2026-10-13 - High School Building Committee
Summary
Built from YouTube auto-captions (no speaker labels; names, dollar figures and numbers are often garbled). The chair and most speakers are not named in the captions.
- Regular meeting of the Shrewsbury High School Building Committee, 2026-10-13, called to order in the afternoon.
- The captions run from 0:23 to about 30:57 with no recess or closed session.
- All votes were by voice and carried; vote counts were not stated.
- The meeting adjourned on a voice vote after the next dates were set.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Shrewsbury High School Expansion | 25 | 81% |
| Minutes, invoices, contract amendment and adjournment | 6 | 19% |
Minutes, invoices, contract amendment and adjournment
0:23-4:12, 5:37-6:08, 29:21-30:57
- Approved the September 8, 2026 minutes.
- Approved three invoices: the project manager (billing time and materials), the architect (billed as if the project were still on the earlier November 2027 vote, reflecting behind-the-scenes work such as consultant coordination, school visits and the start of the existing-conditions evaluation); the third invoice was not described in the captions. The project manager recommended payment as work in place; the architect is revising its cash flow to match the new schedule.
- Approved Amendment No. 1 to the architect's contract, a paperwork item that makes reimbursable costs billable under the town and state school building authority contracts: geotechnical review and engineering, a hazardous-materials site survey, traffic control, and possibly a solar review consultant.
- No correspondence. Meeting dates firmed up: November 10, December 8, January 12, February 9 and March 9, 2027, with the option of adding one in February or March. Each meeting has high-level topics and milestones on a schedule slide.
- A brief screen-sharing problem delayed the presentation; the motion to adjourn was seconded and carried.
Shrewsbury High School Expansion
4:15-5:37, 6:08-29:20
- Where the work stands: the project is in the feasibility study (existing conditions, educational plan and construction options). No project scope is defined; the state authority requires a base repair option, an addition/renovation option and a new construction option to be carried through the next two submissions, though non-preferred options can be dropped along the way. The project team said the new construction option is clearly expensive and that base repair still has to be proven infeasible; the building is about 23 to 24 years old and building and stretch energy codes have changed since.
- Visioning and programming: a visioning plan was reviewed with the district's educational leadership group. Sessions were set for that Thursday (goals and priority mapping), Friday (tours of other high schools) and October 26 (shadowing students through a school day), with five more visioning sessions and a series of staff programming days still to be scheduled. Visioning is now planned through December, and programming through late November and December, so options can be developed in January and February.
- Existing conditions work so far: site survey and topography, traffic counts, an environmental noise survey, and walk-throughs by code, security and engineering consultants. Still to come over the next month: hazardous-materials walk-through and possible testing, food service and theater specialists, and more study of pickup and drop-off traffic. All on-site workers are cleared through the district.
- Proposed schedule shift: move the local funding vote from a 2027 ballot to the November 7, 2028 presidential election ballot. Reasons given: historical turnout in town is 17 to 36 percent for special and midterm ballots versus 66 to 78 percent for presidential ones, lower election costs, one less trip to the polls, and more time for community and district input. The Select Board must approve the ballot question and file it with the state elections division by August 2, 2028, and a special town meeting is recommended before the ballot.
- Key dates in the new plan: preliminary design program approval at the March 9, 2027 committee meeting and submission to the state authority on March 24, 2027; feasibility phase of about 42 weeks; schematic design of about 34 weeks with submission targeted for April 20, 2028; state authority board approval of scope and budget on June 28, 2028; local funding authorization in fall 2028. Construction duration and later phases are still placeholders. The extra November 24 meeting is no longer needed.
- Committee concern: one member worried about seeing material for the first time and voting on it the same night in the February and March meetings. The project manager said January through March would build on each other, with only rough order-of-magnitude costs (square footage based) and an apples-to-apples comparison of options; preliminary options can appear in January, slides can go out on the Friday before each Tuesday meeting, and a meeting could be added before the March 24 submission. Missing the March submission would push the process about two months.
- District views: a high school administrator said staff felt the September 17 kickoff was very fast and the longer runway eased anxiety after school had just started. A district leader added that the longer timeline allows deeper community engagement; more than 50 people applied to join the visioning.
- Vote: the committee voted by voice to move the timeline so the local vote takes place in November 2028. Motion carried. The project team will notify the state authority.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:23Good afternoon and welcome to the uh
00:26October 13, 2026 meeting of the high
00:29school building committee. I'm calling
00:31the meeting to order. Uh the first item
00:34on our agenda is to review and act to
00:36approve the minutes of September 8th,
00:382026.
00:42>> I'm sorry.
00:42>> Oh, as a move approval.
00:44>> Oh.
00:45>> Uh second.
00:47>> Second.
00:48>> All those in favor shall signify by
00:50saying I.
00:51>> I. Motion carries. Uh the next item on
00:54the agenda is to review and act on bill
00:56schedule contract documents. Um we have
00:59three invoices for approval this
01:02afternoon. Um
01:04Mr. Hartley, do you mind walking us
01:06through those?
01:07>> Yes, absolutely. So the uh invoices for
01:10PMA uh represent our uh fee to date. Uh
01:14PMA is billing on a TNM basis. So those
01:18represent our hours. The SMMA bill um
01:21and we're going to go over this uh in a
01:23little bit more detail during the
01:24presentation. and um
01:27uh and allow everyone to provide some
01:30comments and feedback for the group. But
01:32uh the SMMA invoice represents a
01:33percentage build as if the project were
01:36moving forward with that November of
01:382027 vote. We are going to be discussing
01:40adjusting the timeline uh for certain
01:43reasons and we'll go over each of those
01:44in the presentation. Uh but the work in
01:46place uh that SMMA has done is really
01:49behind the scenes right now meeting with
01:50their consultants walking through the
01:52schools, visiting the schools uh uh
01:54beginning their existing uh uh existing
01:58conditions evaluation uh in those
02:00reports starting those reports. Um so
02:02really behind the scenes work uh that is
02:04represented in that invoice. Um SMMA is
02:06working on revised cash flow that will
02:08match up with what we discussed this
02:09evening. Uh but PMA is comfortable
02:11making that recommendation that the
02:13invoice today represents the work in
02:15place from the design team.
02:17>> Great. So can I have a motion on um to
02:20move approval of the three invoices and
02:22then we'll take the contract amendment
02:23separately. Um
02:26I have a motion.
02:27>> So moved.
02:28>> Second.
02:29>> All those in favor shall signify by
02:31saying I.
02:31>> I.
02:32>> Motion carries.
02:34>> Um and then could you speak to the
02:35contract amendment as well?
02:37Um so this would uh this is really a
02:41formality kind of paperwork item. Um but
02:43the in uh amendment number one for SMMA
02:46is representative of the um
02:49reimburseable costs. So costs that are
02:51not carried under a basic services
02:53contract. Some projects don't have them,
02:55some projects do have them. These are
02:56representative of the costs that the
02:58Shrewsbury project uh is likely to have.
03:01Uh these would again be build um with
03:03authorization from the PMA team um for
03:06from uh to SMMA uh after discussion with
03:09the district. Uh but it what it does is
03:11really allows us to uh not have multiple
03:14rounds of amendments for if we have one
03:16for one month, one for another month,
03:18one for another gets these uh billable
03:20in their contract with the town and also
03:22with the MSBA. Um so these are for
03:24geotechnical uh review, geotechnical
03:27engineering, hazmat site survey, traffic
03:29control um and then potentially a solar
03:32PV review uh consultant at both the uh
03:36feasibility so PSR and PDP and also at
03:39the schematic design phase. Uh so really
03:41taking them through uh these were
03:43carried as uh the numbers that were part
03:46of SMMA's original contract although and
03:48they were noted as the other
03:49reimburseables. Um, so really it's just
03:51a paperwork formality for both uh the
03:54MSBA and for the town.
03:56>> Does anyone have any questions?
03:59>> Okay. Can I have a motion then um uh to
04:03approve the contract amendment SMA
04:06amendment number one.
04:07>> So moved.
04:08>> Second.
04:09>> All those in favor shall signify by
04:11saying I.
04:11>> I.
04:12>> Motion carries. Uh the next item on the
04:15agenda is to hear reports, review, and
04:17act on the following matters. Um the
04:19first item is a design update.
04:22>> Pulling up the presentation now.
04:43All right. Uh so as I mentioned uh with
04:46some of the invoices um and with the
04:49amendment um we're currently in that
04:52module 3 feasibility study uh existing
04:54conditions educational plan and
04:56construction options. Um highlighting
04:59that uh you know SMMA has been working
05:03behind the scenes with the district on
05:05the existing conditions educational
05:07visioning and educational program. Um we
05:10are starting to work through space needs
05:12assessment. Um and once we have those
05:15kind of deliverables um you know they
05:18won't be handed out as part of anything
05:20but they'll be part of the PDP. That's
05:23when the development of the preliminary
05:25options and elimination of any
05:27non-preferred options uh would occur. Um
05:30again we're going to talk about the
05:31schedule timeline uh a few slides in and
05:34then kind of as we go through the
05:35process. Uh the well
05:37>> I just want to stop you there. The
05:39>> not showing anything. Yeah.
05:44Let's try one more time. It's showing up
05:47on my screen.
06:06>> Was it showing up at all before I
06:07started?
06:08>> No.
06:08>> Here you go.
06:13All right. Um so what I'd like to do
06:17tonight is just really highlight uh what
06:19that PDP entails. Uh again preliminary
06:22design program um what which starts with
06:24the ed uh existing conditions evaluation
06:26which we mentioned is ongoing and is is
06:29quite extensive uh with it being such a
06:31large building. Um, also in the
06:34background, SMMA is working on that
06:35educational visioning with the district,
06:36which was um, uh, it's going very well
06:39right now. Uh, we're looking to schedule
06:41meetings, and we'll hear about that
06:42tonight. Uh, we're also working on
06:45reviewing what the district provided as
06:47their draft of the educational program,
06:49which is going to be refined through the
06:50PDP process. So, the district did a
06:52great job over the summer of uh, really
06:55prepping that draft for SMMA to hit the
06:57ground running for this fall. Um, so
06:59moving right forward with that. Um
07:02further uh in the PDP we'll be looking
07:04at the space needs. We'll be working uh
07:06with the MSBA space summary template and
07:08that'll be reviewed uh and re uh
07:11iterated upon uh throughout the PDP and
07:14throughout the PSR. Um and then we'll be
07:16developing those preliminary options and
07:18and eliminating any non-preferred
07:20options. Again, the MSBA requires us to
07:22carry base repair uh an addition
07:24renovation option and a new construction
07:26option through the PSR. So through two
07:29submissions with the MSBA um but we can
07:31eliminate some non-preferred options um
07:34as they arise and as they're discussed.
07:36But right now um just for everyone in
07:38the public to know there is no uh
07:41defined scope of the project. We know
07:43that we are looking at a lot of options.
07:45We know that we are looking at um a big
07:48decision for the town whether that's uh
07:50um uh evaluating the new construction
07:53option, evaluating the base repair
07:54option, but really defining what a an
07:57addition renovation project would look
08:00like. So, we are very high level right
08:02now. We're defining that educational
08:03program which is going to lead to what
08:05that design looks like. Um and really
08:08just want to highlight that for the
08:09public. No project set yet. PDP
08:12highlights what options could produce a
08:14result that can deliver that educational
08:17program uh that's built through the
08:19educational visioning and the existing
08:20conditions analysis.
08:23>> Uh with that, I'll turn it over to the
08:24SMMA team to
08:27>> Yep. Good to see everybody again. Um so
08:30jumping into what we have done uh and
08:33where we're at in terms of the visioning
08:35and the programming. Um we are we have
08:38created a a visioning plan with our um
08:42visioning consultant Mike Pillllo. Um so
08:45that has been reviewed with the
08:47educational leadership group. Um so we
08:49have a a plan now for what each of these
08:51sessions um is going to look like and
08:54the topics of discussion at each. Um so
08:56where we're at now is we're in the phase
08:58one where we've scheduled the first
09:00several of these visioning sessions. Um
09:03one actually being on Thursday this
09:05week. Um we'll talk about goals and
09:07priority mapping with this leadership
09:09group. Uh and then we're also going to
09:11be doing some tours of um some high
09:14schools around school tours with that
09:16group as well on Friday this week. Um
09:19and then on the 26th of October, we have
09:22a third session um where we'll actually
09:24be step uh shadowing some students. So
09:27that group will also um be following a
09:31student as they go throughout their
09:32their school day so we can um really get
09:35an understanding of you know what it's
09:37like to be a student. And um so those
09:40three sessions have been um scheduled.
09:43Then we'll also in the meantime work on
09:45scheduling these other visioning
09:47sessions. Um so we have uh right now
09:50five other different sessions that we
09:52need to be scheduled. Some of them can
09:53overlap on the same day. So, we're
09:55hoping to to kind of make it very more
09:57convenient for um for teachers and for
10:00this leadership group. So, that's where
10:02we're at um with the visioning and the
10:04programming. Um for visioning,
10:07programming um is also another set of
10:10meetings that need to be scheduled with
10:11all of the um the educators and staff.
10:14Um so, just so you can see the the
10:17preliminary list that we've created as
10:18to all the different groups that we need
10:21to meet with. Um, so we'll work with the
10:25staff schedule. Um, so that we're we
10:27kind of will hunker down in the school
10:30for a day, probably a series of four or
10:32five days. Um, and then rotate and meet
10:34with each of these these groups around
10:36their schedules. So that will also be
10:39happening. Um, if you want to flip to
10:41the next slide, we can just talk about
10:42the schedule. So, um, if you recall from
10:46last time with the the previous
10:48schedule, we were really trying to get
10:50all of this visioning and programming
10:51done through the end of October. Um, and
10:55there was a lot of I mean, it it would
10:57be a lot to get that all in, especially
10:59just the timing of how the project um,
11:02was approved, you know, at the beginning
11:04of the school year and teachers, staff,
11:07everyone's still trying to to, you know,
11:09focus on getting the school year
11:11started. Um, so by extending out the
11:13visioning and the programming a little
11:15bit, it gives us more time to be able to
11:17ga gather all the information, but also
11:19for everybody to digest the information
11:21and make sure that we're really setting
11:23the groundwork for the project up um
11:26successfully. So this is the new
11:28proposed timeline for the visioning and
11:30the programming. Um the the solid dots
11:34are the one the meetings that we have
11:35scheduled and have held already. Um the
11:38other ones are ones that need to be
11:39scheduled, but you can see in the green
11:41bar the visioning will go um right now
11:44we're planning through December and then
11:46we'll try to get all of the programming
11:49sessions um at the school through the
11:51end of November, December, realizing
11:54that there are holidays in there as
11:56well. So um just making sure we're
11:58allowing enough time there. Um so that's
12:01the preliminary plan. Of course, things
12:03could fluctuate if the if this does
12:06bleed into January. We don't ideally
12:08want to do that, but that's um you know,
12:10we can we can accommodate uh what we
12:13need to um because January, February is
12:15really when we want to start to develop
12:17the options and make sure we have enough
12:19time for that.
12:21So, existing conditions, what we've
12:23completed to date, um, we have and
12:27there's been a lot of activity on site
12:28that you've probably seen people on
12:31site, people in the building. Um,
12:33everyone has been I just want to make
12:34sure everyone's clear. Everyone's been
12:36quarried through the district and
12:37they're all approved before we allow
12:39anyone on site. So, just want to make
12:41that clear. Um but we have done some
12:43site survey work which is surveying the
12:46the site with the topography and um and
12:49all the different site elements. So that
12:51has happened. We've also collected some
12:53traffic data um as well as some
12:56environmental noise survey. So you may
12:58have seen some equipment some stuff on
13:00the road that's just tracking some data
13:03for us. Um we also have had our team and
13:06our consultants, our code consultants,
13:07our um security designers, um engineers
13:12all walking through and doing our
13:13analysis and surveys of the building. Um
13:16and then we do still have some other um
13:19consultant scheduling that's going to
13:20happen over the next month or so um with
13:23our hazmat team. We'll have to walk
13:25through the building that's required and
13:27there may be some testing that has to
13:29happen on some materials. Um, we'll have
13:32our other food service, theater,
13:34specialty consultants that will be part
13:36of the programming that will want to do
13:37their site investigations. Um, and then
13:40a little bit more of a traffic piece
13:42that we want to just really hone in on
13:44what the issues are with pickup and drop
13:46off and make sure we understand that.
13:50>> All right. Um, thank you, Jen. Um so now
13:54as I mentioned we're going to talk about
13:56um the timeline uh and really the
13:58adjusted and and the suggestion and
14:01hopefully uh agreement and discussion
14:02that this committee will have uh on the
14:05timeline and schedule for the project.
14:07Um so when PMA was brought on board we
14:11know that there was a discussion about
14:13uh when the local funding authorization
14:15would happen and really when PMA builds
14:17a schedule we build it back from that
14:19local funding authorization. uh PMA's
14:22goal is to always move as efficiently
14:23through the MSBA's process as possible.
14:26Um the one uh note to that is we need to
14:29make sure that the project is successful
14:31first. Um, so knowing that uh what we've
14:35looked at and knowing that there was
14:36always uh the discussion and
14:38considerations for moving to that
14:40November of 2028 uh ballot vote, um PMA
14:44did some historical research uh for the
14:47the town um found for your special
14:51elections uh anywhere from 17 to 36%
14:55voter turnout on a midterm or state
14:58ballot uh presidential ballot. We're
15:00looking closer to 66 to 78% voter
15:03turnout for the town of Shersbury. A
15:05much better representation of the town.
15:07Um it just so happens that there were
15:09also two successful projects put through
15:11on that timeline. Um really the benefits
15:15you get a higher voter turnout. There's
15:17less election costs um that are incurred
15:19by the town. It's one less trip to the
15:21polls for anyone voting in town. Um and
15:25what this schedule really allows for is
15:27that um a lot more input from community
15:31but also from the the district itself.
15:33Um a couple things to note here. Uh the
15:36select board approval of the ballot
15:38question is required. Uh we did some
15:40digging here. Uh note that uh this would
15:42be required to go to the state elections
15:44division on or before August 2nd of
15:472028. Uh just so everyone knows. I know
15:49that doesn't seem like it's close, but
15:52we want to keep that in mind for select
15:54board meetings and as they're moving
15:55through summer. Obviously, summer is a
15:56slower time. Um, and then the
15:59recommendation that a special town
16:00meeting should occur before that
16:02November 7th ballot, uh, which would be
16:04November 7th of 2028, uh, for the
16:06presidential election. Um, I believe
16:09that's standard practice for the town to
16:12have the special town meeting prior to
16:14the ballot. Uh but again, two-step
16:16process for everyone that's following
16:18along. Um and then below you see the
16:20historical reference points that we
16:22gathered that information from. Um
16:25[clears throat]
16:26excuse me. Uh so moving forward, PMA has
16:28mapped out what the preliminary design
16:31program um in a prima vera uh schedule
16:35would look like. I know that's
16:36incredibly difficult for people to read.
16:39So we also have some other slides that
16:41show uh really what changes on the um
16:46PDP submission. Uh the PDP changes, the
16:48PSR changes and the SD date changes. Um
16:51so for key upcoming dates, we have a
16:53November 10th um select board uh school
16:56building committee meeting. We have a
16:57December 8th school building committee
16:59meeting, January 12th, February 9th, and
17:02then the March 9th, 2027 school building
17:05committee, which which would be the
17:07approval and um submission of the PDP.
17:10So, just focusing on the PDP phase and
17:12the key upcoming dates here and noting
17:14that the 11:24 additional meeting that
17:16we were looking to schedule um would not
17:19be necessary because we'd have a uh a
17:21little bit more breathing room in the
17:23timeline uh for that upcoming.
17:26What that looks like overall is a shift
17:29on the feasibility week uh feasibility
17:32phase out to 42 weeks. Uh we had
17:34mentioned that um we would potentially
17:36look at um continuing the work uh in
17:40between uh feasibility and schematic. We
17:43no longer need to take that risk because
17:46we have built in those uh those breaks
17:48in the timeline um to align with the
17:50MSPA board dates. We'll be looking at a
17:53schematic design phase of about 34
17:55weeks. um targeting an April 20th, 2028
17:59submission. Um that information, these
18:02are all very very um planned out where
18:05the MSBA's board dates are meeting. Um
18:08we'd be looking for an MSBA uh project
18:10scope and budget board meeting approval
18:12um at on 6 uh 28 2028 and then looking
18:17at that local funding authorization in
18:19the fall of 2028.
18:21kind of dialing in what that looks like
18:24on timelines is here for 2027 and 2028.
18:28I just want to note everything for DD
18:31through completion of the project is
18:32italicized right now. We flush that out
18:34as we move through the schematic design.
18:36Once a project uh course is selected uh
18:39and ultim uh preferred solution is
18:41selected. We will flush out whether
18:43that's a two, three, three and a half
18:45year construction timeline, what the
18:48detailed design looks like and what
18:50ultimately closing out a project would
18:51look like during the PSR and the uh SD
18:54phase. Um but PMA has met with um the
18:59district, PMA has met with um SMMA and
19:03all three of us had met together and
19:05reviewed this timeline. Feel very
19:07comfortable that these uh these
19:09timelines can be met. Uh we're very
19:11happy bringing this to you because we
19:13think it allows for a little bit of
19:14breathing room, a little bit of runway
19:16uh for both the design team, the
19:19district, but also the town to ensure
19:21that the town's people are fully
19:22informed of the project to ensure that
19:24they have the right information that
19:26they need to make an informed decision
19:28uh when the time comes. Um we don't want
19:31to rush through the process and we were
19:33starting to feel that we potentially may
19:36be pushing to the pushing to the brink.
19:38We know we could have hit those dates.
19:40Um but um not something we want to do
19:42with a project of this scope and size
19:44being that this is going to be the
19:45largest building undertaken uh in
19:47Shrewsbury uh since the high school was
19:49done. Um so we wanted to open it up for
19:54questions uh give it back to the chair
19:56to discuss anything about the timeline
19:58that anyone has questions about,
20:00concerns about or if anyone feels that
20:02this path is not the recommended path
20:04that we should be looking at. Um and if
20:07uh acceptable that the committee chooses
20:09to move uh and accept the the new
20:12proposed schedule.
20:13>> Great. Thank you.
20:15>> Anyone?
20:17>> Um so [clears throat] I I I do like this
20:20overall timeline that you've laid out um
20:24kind of pushing us back a year. Could
20:26you go back two slides though?
20:27>> Absolutely. Key dates.
20:29>> Key dates. So, um [clears throat]
20:32I know we're way too early to talk about
20:35or speculate on any cost estimates and
20:38figures, but the one thing I'm concerned
20:40about with the schedule was
20:42maybe it's just how you have it up on
20:44the slide, but uh you know, when would
20:46we actually see some of the things
20:48associated with the February 9th and the
20:51March 9th meetings? Um, I guess I'm a
20:54little worried
20:56um about the committee as a group seeing
20:59things for the first time and voting on
21:01them in the same evening. So maybe we
21:03need to have more meetings twice a month
21:05or something, but
21:07>> I would be hesitant, you know, to really
21:09hear from you all the first time in
21:11detail and vote the same.
21:14>> Yeah, absolutely. Um so we based this on
21:19uh past projects that we've looked at
21:21>> um and what the PDP costs
21:24analysis are are rough order of
21:27magnitude costs. So they are not um
21:29level three cost estimated projects.
21:32They are square footages based on the
21:34existing conditions analysis. They are
21:37uh square footages for new construction
21:39or what needs to be renovated based on
21:41that based on the educational program.
21:43So what the January 12th, February 9th
21:46and ultimately the March 9th dates are
21:49to really those three of them to discuss
21:51are what project deliveries. So what
21:55forms of a project could deliver the
21:57educational program based on the
21:59existing conditions analysis and what
22:01we're going to work with the SMMA team
22:04and uh our we will discuss with cost
22:06estimators what we should be looking to
22:08carry for cost per square foot. Um, but
22:11what that's going to be is looking to
22:13compare all of those options on an
22:16applesto apples basis. Not the addition
22:20renovation without this, the new
22:22construction without this. We want to
22:23look what the most cost-effective
22:26solution for the town of Shrewsbury and
22:28the uh school district of Shrewsbury is
22:30going to be. Whether that is an ad rena,
22:32a ren straight renovation, a new
22:34construction option. Um, I think it's
22:36it's pretty clear right now. We know
22:38that um the new construction option is
22:41going to be something that is going to
22:44be very expensive.
22:46>> Uh but what we really need to prove out
22:49is that a base code repair uh is also
22:52going to be something that's really not
22:53feasible right now. We know that the
22:54school is so undersized. Um but you know
22:58that building has been through 23 years,
23:0124 years um since it opened. Um the
23:04building code has changed four four
23:07times, three times.
23:08>> Um the stretch energy code has changed.
23:11So we're going to be looking at whether
23:13or not that building needs new
23:14insulation with a new roof. Um what that
23:16looks like for the mechanical units are
23:18on it. Uh what that looks like for the
23:20windows, what that looks like for the
23:21insulation in the walls, the RV value
23:23that needs to be met uh to meet that
23:25stretch energy code. Um but it's also
23:27going to be looking at a costbenefit
23:29analysis of whether or not uh a new
23:31mechanical system needs to go in. uh and
23:34whether or not that proves out that
23:36that's part of uh the addition
23:37renovation. Um but if that mechanical
23:40system can meet what needs to be met for
23:42the stretch energy code. So there's
23:43going to be a quite a long discussion
23:45about those options. Um but there's not
23:49going to be a um it's a feedback
23:53process. It's not an iterative process
23:55whereas a PSR might be of what has to be
23:59included because anything that we're
24:01discussing is going to be what the
24:03project team based on feedback from the
24:06district those programming meetings the
24:07existing conditions analysis what needs
24:10to be in the project and we're going to
24:11have a very high level view of what
24:13those project cost um uh cost ranges
24:18would be. Jen Brian please feel free to
24:21add in. I know I'm talking a lot, but if
24:22if I'm missing anything on what those
24:24cost, I feel confident that January,
24:27February, and March are going to be
24:28enough for this group to ask questions.
24:31And I think something that might be
24:32beneficial is, you know, we're meeting
24:34on Tuesdays. If we can get this
24:36presentation to you guys on a Friday for
24:38digestion is to allow for some questions
24:40uh in advance of the meeting or so that
24:42you guys can have questions ready for
24:44the group. If you want to shoot them
24:45over, that's fine. Um but I do feel
24:47confident that January, February, March
24:50um can meet those deliverables for this
24:53committee. Um if there's is there
24:56concern about numbers in general or just
24:59decision- making and because we're not
25:01narrowing any options at that point in
25:02time unless the committee feels it's
25:04necessary. We'll still have every option
25:06on the table. Um so just just want to
25:09hear a little bit more about the
25:11concern.
25:12>> My perspective was decision- making.
25:13Yep. I know the numbers are very
25:16preliminary at that time, but as what
25:17you said there at the end, if it's truly
25:21>> option analysis and we're not selling,
25:23>> but if if January, February, and March
25:25build upon each other and it's, you
25:28know, it's iterative between those three
25:30meetings, then that makes me feel more
25:32comfortable versus them being
25:34>> Yeah.
25:35>> segmented and something really new
25:37coming up on March 9th, the night that
25:38we're expected to vote. We don't foresee
25:41something new coming up on March 9th
25:43unless and and unless the existing
25:46conditions analysis will be done, the
25:48programming will be done. So as long as
25:49we hit those timelines in general or
25:52those timelines that we have specified,
25:54we'll be good to build those options for
25:56this time.
25:56>> Yeah. And I think we can pivot. I think
25:58we can start to show some of these
26:00preliminary options in the January
26:02meeting. So that and then we'll build on
26:04top of that like you said. And I think
26:06at this point if if we need to if we
26:09find that in February, you know, between
26:12the February and March meeting, there
26:13does need to be another meeting because
26:14there's a lot of discussion, you know,
26:16where we could
26:17>> add another a meeting in there.
26:19>> Yeah.
26:20>> Right.
26:20>> So if at any point the committee feels
26:22like we want to add a meeting for more
26:24discussion, I think we can absolutely
26:26keep that uh through January and
26:28February in advance of that March date.
26:31Um, can I ask when when is the meeting
26:34with the MSBA after March 9th that we're
26:36we're trying to hit
26:38>> the PDP submission is u March 24th. So
26:41actually even if we wanted to do a
26:44meeting right in advance of before we
26:46submit the PDP then um we could do it
26:49>> the 16th.
26:50>> Yeah.
26:50>> Yeah.
26:51>> So the 24th of March um 2027.
26:56>> Right.
26:57When would be the next meeting if we
26:59didn't weren't able to hit that March
27:00meeting? Would that throw everything
27:02really off?
27:03>> You push two months.
27:04>> Two months.
27:05>> Okay.
27:05>> So, we wouldn't be able to hit the next
27:07round of
27:09that.
27:14>> Anyone else have any comments or
27:16questions regarding the proposed
27:18schedule?
27:19>> Sure. Just for from the high school
27:20perspective and meeting with our staff,
27:21we did originally kickoff on the 17th
27:23September, which was great. I think the
27:25people walked away feeling that was
27:27really accelerated and really fast. Um,
27:29so for us, we had a leadership team
27:31meeting today. Basically, they felt a
27:33little bit more comfortable uh when
27:34we've had a conversation about this
27:36potentially lengthening the runway to
27:39allow for us to do some really uh good
27:41work with you to try and share what we
27:44experience and can share in terms of
27:46just boots on the ground. So, uh, for us
27:48it feels a little bit certainly feels
27:50better. There's a lot of angst after
27:51that first meeting on September. a lot
27:53of questions like this is moving really
27:54fast and we just started school like how
27:56are we going to get this done? So
27:57>> certainly
27:58>> the longer runway feels better for us I
28:00think and has sort of tempered some of
28:02the anxiety around that.
28:03>> Absolutely.
28:05>> Dr.
28:06>> I think in addition um to Mr. Bizillo's
28:09perspective from the high school is also
28:11thinking about engaging our community
28:13deeply or designing the high school for
28:15the future. This is the the building
28:17that we want to stand the testament of
28:19time and it's important that we include
28:21community voices. Um, and I know that we
28:24opened a application to be part of the
28:26visioning and that was really important.
28:28Um, and we've gotten over 50 submissions
28:30to that. So, we we'll have an
28:32opportunity to engage the community at
28:34large um, in a different way by having
28:36this timeline. And so, we appreciate you
28:39listening to feedback and really coming
28:41back to the group to share what what
28:43seems like it could be a a better option
28:45for us.
28:49>> Anyone else?
28:52Do we need to take a motion or to move
28:54the timeline?
28:56>> I think that
28:56>> Yeah, I think that would be very helpful
28:58and we'll let the MSBA know.
29:00>> Okay, great. So, um may I have a motion
29:03to um move the timeline um so that the
29:09um the the vote would take place in
29:12November of 2028.
29:14>> So moved.
29:15>> Second.
29:16>> All those in favor shall signify by
29:17saying I.
29:18>> I. Motion carries. Thank you.
29:21[clears throat]
29:22>> So, that is everything that the PMA and
29:25I believe the SMMA team had. Um, we are
29:29I I know it doesn't seem like a lot's
29:30happening, but a lot's happening in the
29:32background. Um, we're going to be very
29:34busy this week. We have a meeting
29:35tomorrow and and then the day on Friday.
29:37I know the PMA and SMA team are looking
29:39forward to that. So, and the leadership
29:41team, I think, is looking forward to
29:42that. Um, but unless anyone else I'll
29:45turn it back to the chair for any
29:47questions. Anyone [clears throat] have
29:49anything further?
29:51>> I think the next item on our agenda then
29:53is uh correspondence. I don't believe
29:55there was any uh this month. And then uh
29:58the next item on the agenda is setting a
30:01date for our next meeting which I
30:02believe will be November 10th or Yes.
30:05>> Yep. We had we have um just so everyone
30:08can put them in the calendars, the SBC
30:10meetings that are firmed up are November
30:1210th, December 8th, January 12th,
30:16February 9th, and March 9th with the
30:20option for adding one sometime in the
30:23February and March timeline um if if the
30:26committee feels it's it's necessary.
30:29>> Um and then the topics of those meetings
30:32are are carried here. So if anyone wants
30:34to see what's upcoming at the meeting,
30:36we'll obviously have an agenda out. Um
30:38but really these are the highle topics
30:39that we'll be discussing at those
30:40meetings and the milestones that are
30:42part of that and what'll be discussed.
30:44>> Great.
30:47Um if there's no further business, then
30:49I'll take a motion to adjurnn.
30:51>> So moved.
30:53>> Second. All those in favor shall signify
30:55by saying I. I. Thank you and good
30:57night.
