2026-10-13 - High School Building Committee

Summary

Built from YouTube auto-captions (no speaker labels; names, dollar figures and numbers are often garbled). The chair and most speakers are not named in the captions.

  • Regular meeting of the Shrewsbury High School Building Committee, 2026-10-13, called to order in the afternoon.
  • The captions run from 0:23 to about 30:57 with no recess or closed session.
  • All votes were by voice and carried; vote counts were not stated.
  • The meeting adjourned on a voice vote after the next dates were set.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):

Topic Minutes Share
Shrewsbury High School Expansion 25 81%
Minutes, invoices, contract amendment and adjournment 6 19%

Minutes, invoices, contract amendment and adjournment

0:23-4:12, 5:37-6:08, 29:21-30:57

  • Approved the September 8, 2026 minutes.
  • Approved three invoices: the project manager (billing time and materials), the architect (billed as if the project were still on the earlier November 2027 vote, reflecting behind-the-scenes work such as consultant coordination, school visits and the start of the existing-conditions evaluation); the third invoice was not described in the captions. The project manager recommended payment as work in place; the architect is revising its cash flow to match the new schedule.
  • Approved Amendment No. 1 to the architect's contract, a paperwork item that makes reimbursable costs billable under the town and state school building authority contracts: geotechnical review and engineering, a hazardous-materials site survey, traffic control, and possibly a solar review consultant.
  • No correspondence. Meeting dates firmed up: November 10, December 8, January 12, February 9 and March 9, 2027, with the option of adding one in February or March. Each meeting has high-level topics and milestones on a schedule slide.
  • A brief screen-sharing problem delayed the presentation; the motion to adjourn was seconded and carried.

Shrewsbury High School Expansion

4:15-5:37, 6:08-29:20

  • Where the work stands: the project is in the feasibility study (existing conditions, educational plan and construction options). No project scope is defined; the state authority requires a base repair option, an addition/renovation option and a new construction option to be carried through the next two submissions, though non-preferred options can be dropped along the way. The project team said the new construction option is clearly expensive and that base repair still has to be proven infeasible; the building is about 23 to 24 years old and building and stretch energy codes have changed since.
  • Visioning and programming: a visioning plan was reviewed with the district's educational leadership group. Sessions were set for that Thursday (goals and priority mapping), Friday (tours of other high schools) and October 26 (shadowing students through a school day), with five more visioning sessions and a series of staff programming days still to be scheduled. Visioning is now planned through December, and programming through late November and December, so options can be developed in January and February.
  • Existing conditions work so far: site survey and topography, traffic counts, an environmental noise survey, and walk-throughs by code, security and engineering consultants. Still to come over the next month: hazardous-materials walk-through and possible testing, food service and theater specialists, and more study of pickup and drop-off traffic. All on-site workers are cleared through the district.
  • Proposed schedule shift: move the local funding vote from a 2027 ballot to the November 7, 2028 presidential election ballot. Reasons given: historical turnout in town is 17 to 36 percent for special and midterm ballots versus 66 to 78 percent for presidential ones, lower election costs, one less trip to the polls, and more time for community and district input. The Select Board must approve the ballot question and file it with the state elections division by August 2, 2028, and a special town meeting is recommended before the ballot.
  • Key dates in the new plan: preliminary design program approval at the March 9, 2027 committee meeting and submission to the state authority on March 24, 2027; feasibility phase of about 42 weeks; schematic design of about 34 weeks with submission targeted for April 20, 2028; state authority board approval of scope and budget on June 28, 2028; local funding authorization in fall 2028. Construction duration and later phases are still placeholders. The extra November 24 meeting is no longer needed.
  • Committee concern: one member worried about seeing material for the first time and voting on it the same night in the February and March meetings. The project manager said January through March would build on each other, with only rough order-of-magnitude costs (square footage based) and an apples-to-apples comparison of options; preliminary options can appear in January, slides can go out on the Friday before each Tuesday meeting, and a meeting could be added before the March 24 submission. Missing the March submission would push the process about two months.
  • District views: a high school administrator said staff felt the September 17 kickoff was very fast and the longer runway eased anxiety after school had just started. A district leader added that the longer timeline allows deeper community engagement; more than 50 people applied to join the visioning.
  • Vote: the committee voted by voice to move the timeline so the local vote takes place in November 2028. Motion carried. The project team will notify the state authority.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:23Good afternoon and welcome to the uh

00:26October 13, 2026 meeting of the high

00:29school building committee. I'm calling

00:31the meeting to order. Uh the first item

00:34on our agenda is to review and act to

00:36approve the minutes of September 8th,

00:382026.

00:42>> I'm sorry.

00:42>> Oh, as a move approval.

00:44>> Oh.

00:45>> Uh second.

00:47>> Second.

00:48>> All those in favor shall signify by

00:50saying I.

00:51>> I. Motion carries. Uh the next item on

00:54the agenda is to review and act on bill

00:56schedule contract documents. Um we have

00:59three invoices for approval this

01:02afternoon. Um

01:04Mr. Hartley, do you mind walking us

01:06through those?

01:07>> Yes, absolutely. So the uh invoices for

01:10PMA uh represent our uh fee to date. Uh

01:14PMA is billing on a TNM basis. So those

01:18represent our hours. The SMMA bill um

01:21and we're going to go over this uh in a

01:23little bit more detail during the

01:24presentation. and um

01:27uh and allow everyone to provide some

01:30comments and feedback for the group. But

01:32uh the SMMA invoice represents a

01:33percentage build as if the project were

01:36moving forward with that November of

01:382027 vote. We are going to be discussing

01:40adjusting the timeline uh for certain

01:43reasons and we'll go over each of those

01:44in the presentation. Uh but the work in

01:46place uh that SMMA has done is really

01:49behind the scenes right now meeting with

01:50their consultants walking through the

01:52schools, visiting the schools uh uh

01:54beginning their existing uh uh existing

01:58conditions evaluation uh in those

02:00reports starting those reports. Um so

02:02really behind the scenes work uh that is

02:04represented in that invoice. Um SMMA is

02:06working on revised cash flow that will

02:08match up with what we discussed this

02:09evening. Uh but PMA is comfortable

02:11making that recommendation that the

02:13invoice today represents the work in

02:15place from the design team.

02:17>> Great. So can I have a motion on um to

02:20move approval of the three invoices and

02:22then we'll take the contract amendment

02:23separately. Um

02:26I have a motion.

02:27>> So moved.

02:28>> Second.

02:29>> All those in favor shall signify by

02:31saying I.

02:31>> I.

02:32>> Motion carries.

02:34>> Um and then could you speak to the

02:35contract amendment as well?

02:37Um so this would uh this is really a

02:41formality kind of paperwork item. Um but

02:43the in uh amendment number one for SMMA

02:46is representative of the um

02:49reimburseable costs. So costs that are

02:51not carried under a basic services

02:53contract. Some projects don't have them,

02:55some projects do have them. These are

02:56representative of the costs that the

02:58Shrewsbury project uh is likely to have.

03:01Uh these would again be build um with

03:03authorization from the PMA team um for

03:06from uh to SMMA uh after discussion with

03:09the district. Uh but it what it does is

03:11really allows us to uh not have multiple

03:14rounds of amendments for if we have one

03:16for one month, one for another month,

03:18one for another gets these uh billable

03:20in their contract with the town and also

03:22with the MSBA. Um so these are for

03:24geotechnical uh review, geotechnical

03:27engineering, hazmat site survey, traffic

03:29control um and then potentially a solar

03:32PV review uh consultant at both the uh

03:36feasibility so PSR and PDP and also at

03:39the schematic design phase. Uh so really

03:41taking them through uh these were

03:43carried as uh the numbers that were part

03:46of SMMA's original contract although and

03:48they were noted as the other

03:49reimburseables. Um, so really it's just

03:51a paperwork formality for both uh the

03:54MSBA and for the town.

03:56>> Does anyone have any questions?

03:59>> Okay. Can I have a motion then um uh to

04:03approve the contract amendment SMA

04:06amendment number one.

04:07>> So moved.

04:08>> Second.

04:09>> All those in favor shall signify by

04:11saying I.

04:11>> I.

04:12>> Motion carries. Uh the next item on the

04:15agenda is to hear reports, review, and

04:17act on the following matters. Um the

04:19first item is a design update.

04:22>> Pulling up the presentation now.

04:43All right. Uh so as I mentioned uh with

04:46some of the invoices um and with the

04:49amendment um we're currently in that

04:52module 3 feasibility study uh existing

04:54conditions educational plan and

04:56construction options. Um highlighting

04:59that uh you know SMMA has been working

05:03behind the scenes with the district on

05:05the existing conditions educational

05:07visioning and educational program. Um we

05:10are starting to work through space needs

05:12assessment. Um and once we have those

05:15kind of deliverables um you know they

05:18won't be handed out as part of anything

05:20but they'll be part of the PDP. That's

05:23when the development of the preliminary

05:25options and elimination of any

05:27non-preferred options uh would occur. Um

05:30again we're going to talk about the

05:31schedule timeline uh a few slides in and

05:34then kind of as we go through the

05:35process. Uh the well

05:37>> I just want to stop you there. The

05:39>> not showing anything. Yeah.

05:44Let's try one more time. It's showing up

05:47on my screen.

06:06>> Was it showing up at all before I

06:07started?

06:08>> No.

06:08>> Here you go.

06:13All right. Um so what I'd like to do

06:17tonight is just really highlight uh what

06:19that PDP entails. Uh again preliminary

06:22design program um what which starts with

06:24the ed uh existing conditions evaluation

06:26which we mentioned is ongoing and is is

06:29quite extensive uh with it being such a

06:31large building. Um, also in the

06:34background, SMMA is working on that

06:35educational visioning with the district,

06:36which was um, uh, it's going very well

06:39right now. Uh, we're looking to schedule

06:41meetings, and we'll hear about that

06:42tonight. Uh, we're also working on

06:45reviewing what the district provided as

06:47their draft of the educational program,

06:49which is going to be refined through the

06:50PDP process. So, the district did a

06:52great job over the summer of uh, really

06:55prepping that draft for SMMA to hit the

06:57ground running for this fall. Um, so

06:59moving right forward with that. Um

07:02further uh in the PDP we'll be looking

07:04at the space needs. We'll be working uh

07:06with the MSBA space summary template and

07:08that'll be reviewed uh and re uh

07:11iterated upon uh throughout the PDP and

07:14throughout the PSR. Um and then we'll be

07:16developing those preliminary options and

07:18and eliminating any non-preferred

07:20options. Again, the MSBA requires us to

07:22carry base repair uh an addition

07:24renovation option and a new construction

07:26option through the PSR. So through two

07:29submissions with the MSBA um but we can

07:31eliminate some non-preferred options um

07:34as they arise and as they're discussed.

07:36But right now um just for everyone in

07:38the public to know there is no uh

07:41defined scope of the project. We know

07:43that we are looking at a lot of options.

07:45We know that we are looking at um a big

07:48decision for the town whether that's uh

07:50um uh evaluating the new construction

07:53option, evaluating the base repair

07:54option, but really defining what a an

07:57addition renovation project would look

08:00like. So, we are very high level right

08:02now. We're defining that educational

08:03program which is going to lead to what

08:05that design looks like. Um and really

08:08just want to highlight that for the

08:09public. No project set yet. PDP

08:12highlights what options could produce a

08:14result that can deliver that educational

08:17program uh that's built through the

08:19educational visioning and the existing

08:20conditions analysis.

08:23>> Uh with that, I'll turn it over to the

08:24SMMA team to

08:27>> Yep. Good to see everybody again. Um so

08:30jumping into what we have done uh and

08:33where we're at in terms of the visioning

08:35and the programming. Um we are we have

08:38created a a visioning plan with our um

08:42visioning consultant Mike Pillllo. Um so

08:45that has been reviewed with the

08:47educational leadership group. Um so we

08:49have a a plan now for what each of these

08:51sessions um is going to look like and

08:54the topics of discussion at each. Um so

08:56where we're at now is we're in the phase

08:58one where we've scheduled the first

09:00several of these visioning sessions. Um

09:03one actually being on Thursday this

09:05week. Um we'll talk about goals and

09:07priority mapping with this leadership

09:09group. Uh and then we're also going to

09:11be doing some tours of um some high

09:14schools around school tours with that

09:16group as well on Friday this week. Um

09:19and then on the 26th of October, we have

09:22a third session um where we'll actually

09:24be step uh shadowing some students. So

09:27that group will also um be following a

09:31student as they go throughout their

09:32their school day so we can um really get

09:35an understanding of you know what it's

09:37like to be a student. And um so those

09:40three sessions have been um scheduled.

09:43Then we'll also in the meantime work on

09:45scheduling these other visioning

09:47sessions. Um so we have uh right now

09:50five other different sessions that we

09:52need to be scheduled. Some of them can

09:53overlap on the same day. So, we're

09:55hoping to to kind of make it very more

09:57convenient for um for teachers and for

10:00this leadership group. So, that's where

10:02we're at um with the visioning and the

10:04programming. Um for visioning,

10:07programming um is also another set of

10:10meetings that need to be scheduled with

10:11all of the um the educators and staff.

10:14Um so, just so you can see the the

10:17preliminary list that we've created as

10:18to all the different groups that we need

10:21to meet with. Um, so we'll work with the

10:25staff schedule. Um, so that we're we

10:27kind of will hunker down in the school

10:30for a day, probably a series of four or

10:32five days. Um, and then rotate and meet

10:34with each of these these groups around

10:36their schedules. So that will also be

10:39happening. Um, if you want to flip to

10:41the next slide, we can just talk about

10:42the schedule. So, um, if you recall from

10:46last time with the the previous

10:48schedule, we were really trying to get

10:50all of this visioning and programming

10:51done through the end of October. Um, and

10:55there was a lot of I mean, it it would

10:57be a lot to get that all in, especially

10:59just the timing of how the project um,

11:02was approved, you know, at the beginning

11:04of the school year and teachers, staff,

11:07everyone's still trying to to, you know,

11:09focus on getting the school year

11:11started. Um, so by extending out the

11:13visioning and the programming a little

11:15bit, it gives us more time to be able to

11:17ga gather all the information, but also

11:19for everybody to digest the information

11:21and make sure that we're really setting

11:23the groundwork for the project up um

11:26successfully. So this is the new

11:28proposed timeline for the visioning and

11:30the programming. Um the the solid dots

11:34are the one the meetings that we have

11:35scheduled and have held already. Um the

11:38other ones are ones that need to be

11:39scheduled, but you can see in the green

11:41bar the visioning will go um right now

11:44we're planning through December and then

11:46we'll try to get all of the programming

11:49sessions um at the school through the

11:51end of November, December, realizing

11:54that there are holidays in there as

11:56well. So um just making sure we're

11:58allowing enough time there. Um so that's

12:01the preliminary plan. Of course, things

12:03could fluctuate if the if this does

12:06bleed into January. We don't ideally

12:08want to do that, but that's um you know,

12:10we can we can accommodate uh what we

12:13need to um because January, February is

12:15really when we want to start to develop

12:17the options and make sure we have enough

12:19time for that.

12:21So, existing conditions, what we've

12:23completed to date, um, we have and

12:27there's been a lot of activity on site

12:28that you've probably seen people on

12:31site, people in the building. Um,

12:33everyone has been I just want to make

12:34sure everyone's clear. Everyone's been

12:36quarried through the district and

12:37they're all approved before we allow

12:39anyone on site. So, just want to make

12:41that clear. Um but we have done some

12:43site survey work which is surveying the

12:46the site with the topography and um and

12:49all the different site elements. So that

12:51has happened. We've also collected some

12:53traffic data um as well as some

12:56environmental noise survey. So you may

12:58have seen some equipment some stuff on

13:00the road that's just tracking some data

13:03for us. Um we also have had our team and

13:06our consultants, our code consultants,

13:07our um security designers, um engineers

13:12all walking through and doing our

13:13analysis and surveys of the building. Um

13:16and then we do still have some other um

13:19consultant scheduling that's going to

13:20happen over the next month or so um with

13:23our hazmat team. We'll have to walk

13:25through the building that's required and

13:27there may be some testing that has to

13:29happen on some materials. Um, we'll have

13:32our other food service, theater,

13:34specialty consultants that will be part

13:36of the programming that will want to do

13:37their site investigations. Um, and then

13:40a little bit more of a traffic piece

13:42that we want to just really hone in on

13:44what the issues are with pickup and drop

13:46off and make sure we understand that.

13:50>> All right. Um, thank you, Jen. Um so now

13:54as I mentioned we're going to talk about

13:56um the timeline uh and really the

13:58adjusted and and the suggestion and

14:01hopefully uh agreement and discussion

14:02that this committee will have uh on the

14:05timeline and schedule for the project.

14:07Um so when PMA was brought on board we

14:11know that there was a discussion about

14:13uh when the local funding authorization

14:15would happen and really when PMA builds

14:17a schedule we build it back from that

14:19local funding authorization. uh PMA's

14:22goal is to always move as efficiently

14:23through the MSBA's process as possible.

14:26Um the one uh note to that is we need to

14:29make sure that the project is successful

14:31first. Um, so knowing that uh what we've

14:35looked at and knowing that there was

14:36always uh the discussion and

14:38considerations for moving to that

14:40November of 2028 uh ballot vote, um PMA

14:44did some historical research uh for the

14:47the town um found for your special

14:51elections uh anywhere from 17 to 36%

14:55voter turnout on a midterm or state

14:58ballot uh presidential ballot. We're

15:00looking closer to 66 to 78% voter

15:03turnout for the town of Shersbury. A

15:05much better representation of the town.

15:07Um it just so happens that there were

15:09also two successful projects put through

15:11on that timeline. Um really the benefits

15:15you get a higher voter turnout. There's

15:17less election costs um that are incurred

15:19by the town. It's one less trip to the

15:21polls for anyone voting in town. Um and

15:25what this schedule really allows for is

15:27that um a lot more input from community

15:31but also from the the district itself.

15:33Um a couple things to note here. Uh the

15:36select board approval of the ballot

15:38question is required. Uh we did some

15:40digging here. Uh note that uh this would

15:42be required to go to the state elections

15:44division on or before August 2nd of

15:472028. Uh just so everyone knows. I know

15:49that doesn't seem like it's close, but

15:52we want to keep that in mind for select

15:54board meetings and as they're moving

15:55through summer. Obviously, summer is a

15:56slower time. Um, and then the

15:59recommendation that a special town

16:00meeting should occur before that

16:02November 7th ballot, uh, which would be

16:04November 7th of 2028, uh, for the

16:06presidential election. Um, I believe

16:09that's standard practice for the town to

16:12have the special town meeting prior to

16:14the ballot. Uh but again, two-step

16:16process for everyone that's following

16:18along. Um and then below you see the

16:20historical reference points that we

16:22gathered that information from. Um

16:25[clears throat]

16:26excuse me. Uh so moving forward, PMA has

16:28mapped out what the preliminary design

16:31program um in a prima vera uh schedule

16:35would look like. I know that's

16:36incredibly difficult for people to read.

16:39So we also have some other slides that

16:41show uh really what changes on the um

16:46PDP submission. Uh the PDP changes, the

16:48PSR changes and the SD date changes. Um

16:51so for key upcoming dates, we have a

16:53November 10th um select board uh school

16:56building committee meeting. We have a

16:57December 8th school building committee

16:59meeting, January 12th, February 9th, and

17:02then the March 9th, 2027 school building

17:05committee, which which would be the

17:07approval and um submission of the PDP.

17:10So, just focusing on the PDP phase and

17:12the key upcoming dates here and noting

17:14that the 11:24 additional meeting that

17:16we were looking to schedule um would not

17:19be necessary because we'd have a uh a

17:21little bit more breathing room in the

17:23timeline uh for that upcoming.

17:26What that looks like overall is a shift

17:29on the feasibility week uh feasibility

17:32phase out to 42 weeks. Uh we had

17:34mentioned that um we would potentially

17:36look at um continuing the work uh in

17:40between uh feasibility and schematic. We

17:43no longer need to take that risk because

17:46we have built in those uh those breaks

17:48in the timeline um to align with the

17:50MSPA board dates. We'll be looking at a

17:53schematic design phase of about 34

17:55weeks. um targeting an April 20th, 2028

17:59submission. Um that information, these

18:02are all very very um planned out where

18:05the MSBA's board dates are meeting. Um

18:08we'd be looking for an MSBA uh project

18:10scope and budget board meeting approval

18:12um at on 6 uh 28 2028 and then looking

18:17at that local funding authorization in

18:19the fall of 2028.

18:21kind of dialing in what that looks like

18:24on timelines is here for 2027 and 2028.

18:28I just want to note everything for DD

18:31through completion of the project is

18:32italicized right now. We flush that out

18:34as we move through the schematic design.

18:36Once a project uh course is selected uh

18:39and ultim uh preferred solution is

18:41selected. We will flush out whether

18:43that's a two, three, three and a half

18:45year construction timeline, what the

18:48detailed design looks like and what

18:50ultimately closing out a project would

18:51look like during the PSR and the uh SD

18:54phase. Um but PMA has met with um the

18:59district, PMA has met with um SMMA and

19:03all three of us had met together and

19:05reviewed this timeline. Feel very

19:07comfortable that these uh these

19:09timelines can be met. Uh we're very

19:11happy bringing this to you because we

19:13think it allows for a little bit of

19:14breathing room, a little bit of runway

19:16uh for both the design team, the

19:19district, but also the town to ensure

19:21that the town's people are fully

19:22informed of the project to ensure that

19:24they have the right information that

19:26they need to make an informed decision

19:28uh when the time comes. Um we don't want

19:31to rush through the process and we were

19:33starting to feel that we potentially may

19:36be pushing to the pushing to the brink.

19:38We know we could have hit those dates.

19:40Um but um not something we want to do

19:42with a project of this scope and size

19:44being that this is going to be the

19:45largest building undertaken uh in

19:47Shrewsbury uh since the high school was

19:49done. Um so we wanted to open it up for

19:54questions uh give it back to the chair

19:56to discuss anything about the timeline

19:58that anyone has questions about,

20:00concerns about or if anyone feels that

20:02this path is not the recommended path

20:04that we should be looking at. Um and if

20:07uh acceptable that the committee chooses

20:09to move uh and accept the the new

20:12proposed schedule.

20:13>> Great. Thank you.

20:15>> Anyone?

20:17>> Um so [clears throat] I I I do like this

20:20overall timeline that you've laid out um

20:24kind of pushing us back a year. Could

20:26you go back two slides though?

20:27>> Absolutely. Key dates.

20:29>> Key dates. So, um [clears throat]

20:32I know we're way too early to talk about

20:35or speculate on any cost estimates and

20:38figures, but the one thing I'm concerned

20:40about with the schedule was

20:42maybe it's just how you have it up on

20:44the slide, but uh you know, when would

20:46we actually see some of the things

20:48associated with the February 9th and the

20:51March 9th meetings? Um, I guess I'm a

20:54little worried

20:56um about the committee as a group seeing

20:59things for the first time and voting on

21:01them in the same evening. So maybe we

21:03need to have more meetings twice a month

21:05or something, but

21:07>> I would be hesitant, you know, to really

21:09hear from you all the first time in

21:11detail and vote the same.

21:14>> Yeah, absolutely. Um so we based this on

21:19uh past projects that we've looked at

21:21>> um and what the PDP costs

21:24analysis are are rough order of

21:27magnitude costs. So they are not um

21:29level three cost estimated projects.

21:32They are square footages based on the

21:34existing conditions analysis. They are

21:37uh square footages for new construction

21:39or what needs to be renovated based on

21:41that based on the educational program.

21:43So what the January 12th, February 9th

21:46and ultimately the March 9th dates are

21:49to really those three of them to discuss

21:51are what project deliveries. So what

21:55forms of a project could deliver the

21:57educational program based on the

21:59existing conditions analysis and what

22:01we're going to work with the SMMA team

22:04and uh our we will discuss with cost

22:06estimators what we should be looking to

22:08carry for cost per square foot. Um, but

22:11what that's going to be is looking to

22:13compare all of those options on an

22:16applesto apples basis. Not the addition

22:20renovation without this, the new

22:22construction without this. We want to

22:23look what the most cost-effective

22:26solution for the town of Shrewsbury and

22:28the uh school district of Shrewsbury is

22:30going to be. Whether that is an ad rena,

22:32a ren straight renovation, a new

22:34construction option. Um, I think it's

22:36it's pretty clear right now. We know

22:38that um the new construction option is

22:41going to be something that is going to

22:44be very expensive.

22:46>> Uh but what we really need to prove out

22:49is that a base code repair uh is also

22:52going to be something that's really not

22:53feasible right now. We know that the

22:54school is so undersized. Um but you know

22:58that building has been through 23 years,

23:0124 years um since it opened. Um the

23:04building code has changed four four

23:07times, three times.

23:08>> Um the stretch energy code has changed.

23:11So we're going to be looking at whether

23:13or not that building needs new

23:14insulation with a new roof. Um what that

23:16looks like for the mechanical units are

23:18on it. Uh what that looks like for the

23:20windows, what that looks like for the

23:21insulation in the walls, the RV value

23:23that needs to be met uh to meet that

23:25stretch energy code. Um but it's also

23:27going to be looking at a costbenefit

23:29analysis of whether or not uh a new

23:31mechanical system needs to go in. uh and

23:34whether or not that proves out that

23:36that's part of uh the addition

23:37renovation. Um but if that mechanical

23:40system can meet what needs to be met for

23:42the stretch energy code. So there's

23:43going to be a quite a long discussion

23:45about those options. Um but there's not

23:49going to be a um it's a feedback

23:53process. It's not an iterative process

23:55whereas a PSR might be of what has to be

23:59included because anything that we're

24:01discussing is going to be what the

24:03project team based on feedback from the

24:06district those programming meetings the

24:07existing conditions analysis what needs

24:10to be in the project and we're going to

24:11have a very high level view of what

24:13those project cost um uh cost ranges

24:18would be. Jen Brian please feel free to

24:21add in. I know I'm talking a lot, but if

24:22if I'm missing anything on what those

24:24cost, I feel confident that January,

24:27February, and March are going to be

24:28enough for this group to ask questions.

24:31And I think something that might be

24:32beneficial is, you know, we're meeting

24:34on Tuesdays. If we can get this

24:36presentation to you guys on a Friday for

24:38digestion is to allow for some questions

24:40uh in advance of the meeting or so that

24:42you guys can have questions ready for

24:44the group. If you want to shoot them

24:45over, that's fine. Um but I do feel

24:47confident that January, February, March

24:50um can meet those deliverables for this

24:53committee. Um if there's is there

24:56concern about numbers in general or just

24:59decision- making and because we're not

25:01narrowing any options at that point in

25:02time unless the committee feels it's

25:04necessary. We'll still have every option

25:06on the table. Um so just just want to

25:09hear a little bit more about the

25:11concern.

25:12>> My perspective was decision- making.

25:13Yep. I know the numbers are very

25:16preliminary at that time, but as what

25:17you said there at the end, if it's truly

25:21>> option analysis and we're not selling,

25:23>> but if if January, February, and March

25:25build upon each other and it's, you

25:28know, it's iterative between those three

25:30meetings, then that makes me feel more

25:32comfortable versus them being

25:34>> Yeah.

25:35>> segmented and something really new

25:37coming up on March 9th, the night that

25:38we're expected to vote. We don't foresee

25:41something new coming up on March 9th

25:43unless and and unless the existing

25:46conditions analysis will be done, the

25:48programming will be done. So as long as

25:49we hit those timelines in general or

25:52those timelines that we have specified,

25:54we'll be good to build those options for

25:56this time.

25:56>> Yeah. And I think we can pivot. I think

25:58we can start to show some of these

26:00preliminary options in the January

26:02meeting. So that and then we'll build on

26:04top of that like you said. And I think

26:06at this point if if we need to if we

26:09find that in February, you know, between

26:12the February and March meeting, there

26:13does need to be another meeting because

26:14there's a lot of discussion, you know,

26:16where we could

26:17>> add another a meeting in there.

26:19>> Yeah.

26:20>> Right.

26:20>> So if at any point the committee feels

26:22like we want to add a meeting for more

26:24discussion, I think we can absolutely

26:26keep that uh through January and

26:28February in advance of that March date.

26:31Um, can I ask when when is the meeting

26:34with the MSBA after March 9th that we're

26:36we're trying to hit

26:38>> the PDP submission is u March 24th. So

26:41actually even if we wanted to do a

26:44meeting right in advance of before we

26:46submit the PDP then um we could do it

26:49>> the 16th.

26:50>> Yeah.

26:50>> Yeah.

26:51>> So the 24th of March um 2027.

26:56>> Right.

26:57When would be the next meeting if we

26:59didn't weren't able to hit that March

27:00meeting? Would that throw everything

27:02really off?

27:03>> You push two months.

27:04>> Two months.

27:05>> Okay.

27:05>> So, we wouldn't be able to hit the next

27:07round of

27:09that.

27:14>> Anyone else have any comments or

27:16questions regarding the proposed

27:18schedule?

27:19>> Sure. Just for from the high school

27:20perspective and meeting with our staff,

27:21we did originally kickoff on the 17th

27:23September, which was great. I think the

27:25people walked away feeling that was

27:27really accelerated and really fast. Um,

27:29so for us, we had a leadership team

27:31meeting today. Basically, they felt a

27:33little bit more comfortable uh when

27:34we've had a conversation about this

27:36potentially lengthening the runway to

27:39allow for us to do some really uh good

27:41work with you to try and share what we

27:44experience and can share in terms of

27:46just boots on the ground. So, uh, for us

27:48it feels a little bit certainly feels

27:50better. There's a lot of angst after

27:51that first meeting on September. a lot

27:53of questions like this is moving really

27:54fast and we just started school like how

27:56are we going to get this done? So

27:57>> certainly

27:58>> the longer runway feels better for us I

28:00think and has sort of tempered some of

28:02the anxiety around that.

28:03>> Absolutely.

28:05>> Dr.

28:06>> I think in addition um to Mr. Bizillo's

28:09perspective from the high school is also

28:11thinking about engaging our community

28:13deeply or designing the high school for

28:15the future. This is the the building

28:17that we want to stand the testament of

28:19time and it's important that we include

28:21community voices. Um, and I know that we

28:24opened a application to be part of the

28:26visioning and that was really important.

28:28Um, and we've gotten over 50 submissions

28:30to that. So, we we'll have an

28:32opportunity to engage the community at

28:34large um, in a different way by having

28:36this timeline. And so, we appreciate you

28:39listening to feedback and really coming

28:41back to the group to share what what

28:43seems like it could be a a better option

28:45for us.

28:49>> Anyone else?

28:52Do we need to take a motion or to move

28:54the timeline?

28:56>> I think that

28:56>> Yeah, I think that would be very helpful

28:58and we'll let the MSBA know.

29:00>> Okay, great. So, um may I have a motion

29:03to um move the timeline um so that the

29:09um the the vote would take place in

29:12November of 2028.

29:14>> So moved.

29:15>> Second.

29:16>> All those in favor shall signify by

29:17saying I.

29:18>> I. Motion carries. Thank you.

29:21[clears throat]

29:22>> So, that is everything that the PMA and

29:25I believe the SMMA team had. Um, we are

29:29I I know it doesn't seem like a lot's

29:30happening, but a lot's happening in the

29:32background. Um, we're going to be very

29:34busy this week. We have a meeting

29:35tomorrow and and then the day on Friday.

29:37I know the PMA and SMA team are looking

29:39forward to that. So, and the leadership

29:41team, I think, is looking forward to

29:42that. Um, but unless anyone else I'll

29:45turn it back to the chair for any

29:47questions. Anyone [clears throat] have

29:49anything further?

29:51>> I think the next item on our agenda then

29:53is uh correspondence. I don't believe

29:55there was any uh this month. And then uh

29:58the next item on the agenda is setting a

30:01date for our next meeting which I

30:02believe will be November 10th or Yes.

30:05>> Yep. We had we have um just so everyone

30:08can put them in the calendars, the SBC

30:10meetings that are firmed up are November

30:1210th, December 8th, January 12th,

30:16February 9th, and March 9th with the

30:20option for adding one sometime in the

30:23February and March timeline um if if the

30:26committee feels it's it's necessary.

30:29>> Um and then the topics of those meetings

30:32are are carried here. So if anyone wants

30:34to see what's upcoming at the meeting,

30:36we'll obviously have an agenda out. Um

30:38but really these are the highle topics

30:39that we'll be discussing at those

30:40meetings and the milestones that are

30:42part of that and what'll be discussed.

30:44>> Great.

30:47Um if there's no further business, then

30:49I'll take a motion to adjurnn.

30:51>> So moved.

30:53>> Second. All those in favor shall signify

30:55by saying I. I. Thank you and good

30:57night.