2026-09-14 - Select Board

Summary

Built from the official minutes and enriched with details from the auto-generated captions; names and numbers in the captions may be misheard.

  • Public comment: a Whispering Pines resident urged rent control; another resident raised data center zoning, the Flock contract, a long-pending public records request and Article 2 financial questions, and called the proposed data center bylaw too broad; Alan Rafferty praised transparency efforts.
  • Licenses (5-0, Kirrane/Rufli): outdoor entertainment for the Century Sportsman's Club (haunted hay ride and spooky walk, Friday and Saturday nights in October) and the Millbury Lions Foundation (car show September 19, under 200 cars, no alcohol; a two-year license was not granted, annual renewal policy); open air license for the Chamber of Commerce's seventh annual scarecrow contest (October 9 to November 3); fees waived for two events; Motor Vehicle Class I and Auto Repair licenses for TASCA Hyundai Auburn at 735 Southbridge Street, which is being bought from Herb Chambers Automotive Group.
  • Flammable fluids (5-0): Eversource at 12 Westec Drive, a spare transformer facility storing 243,411 gallons of mineral oil dielectric fluid in sealed transformers that are not energized on site; Dileo Gas at 850 Southbridge Street, raising propane storage from 2,000 to 3,000 gallons.
  • National Grid pole petition (5-0): one J pole on South Street, about 1,400 feet south of the Potter Farm intersection; no opposition heard.
  • Rent control in manufactured home parks: public hearing drew both sides. Whispering Pines residents described repeated rent increases, unresponsive management and eviction threats; residents of other parks opposed applying rent control to all parks, and opponents said it would hurt property values. A Town Meeting member noted that the May Town Meeting tabled the article and the Legislature has not acted. The hearing was closed without a vote and the board took the information under advisement.
  • Drainlayer license (5-0): Paul Morris.
  • Tax classification: the board discussed the Economic Development Committee's report; Daniel Carpenter wanted all requested metrics and multi-year budget data ready for the November hearing, and Steve Chambers suggested a one-page chart of likely tax impacts of warrant articles. A working group is to be set up.
  • Fire department: Chief Coleman asked to declare an old forestry and plow truck surplus (frame rot; likely auction; the caption vote tally is garbled). He reported the Central Mass Regional Emergency Communication Center became a legal district July 1, 2026; a facility RFP is due at the end of September and call-taking is expected around summer 2028. A projected $1.2 million annual savings figure dated from last year's numbers, and the dispatch union contract is now executed.
  • Warrant review: CFO Karen Harnois said the FY26 addition to free cash is only about $300,000 (prior free cash about $8.2 million; stabilization over $4 million), the snow and ice deficit is about $450,000, new growth was about $734,727 against a $700,000 estimate, and state aid came in about $230,000 above estimate. Article 2 increases total $941,217, of which $534,680 is bond anticipation note interest on the fire station project, to be debt-excluded. Several members wanted Finance Committee and Planning Board input first; the board asked for a spreadsheet of free cash, stabilization and combined warrant requests.
  • Article 16, 15 Hard Scrabble Road: DPW Director Joanna Paquin explained a no-fee easement so the Casella property can send its stormwater directly to the pond instead of the town system.
  • Article 21, Water Street culvert: $1.4 million for construction, with a small bridge grant application due early in the year; a member pressed for winter bidding because the road has been closed about a year.
  • Other articles: new superintendent R.J. Scaza presented the school articles. The high school all-purpose field is about $550,000 in all ($150,000 from a 2025 set-aside, $150,000 requested, $100,000 from two repurposed amounts, $150,000 from a parking lot project; replacement planned for spring). The accessible activity bus needs $70,000 toward a roughly $140,000 replacement, with a $70,000 state earmark covering the rest. The police phone system article asks $35,000 for building infrastructure because phones failed repeatedly over the summer. The economic development strategic plan asks $75,000; the last plan was 2017. The building condition study asks $80,000 for all town-owned buildings including schools.
  • Warrant reopening: after the Engine 4 fire the chief said the engine is likely repairable, so a placeholder article is not needed; a motion to reopen the warrant failed 1-4-0 (Cavanaugh no, Kirrane yes, Chambers no, Rufli no, Carpenter no).

Issues discussed

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:05Good [music] evening. Welcome to the

00:06September 14th meeting of the Auburn

00:09Selectman. Uh, this open meeting of the

00:12town of Auburn Select Board is being

00:14conducted both in person and remotely

00:17consistent with chapter 107 of the acts

00:20of 2022

00:21which suspends the requirement of the

00:23open meeting law to have all meetings in

00:26a publicly accessible physical location.

00:29Further, all members of public bodies

00:31are allowed to participate remotely as

00:34long as reasonable public access is

00:36afforded so that the public can follow

00:38along with the deliberations of the

00:40meeting. For the public to join the

00:42meeting remotely by telephone, dial

00:46187243212

00:51and use access code 166009269.

00:58or the public can join via computer at

01:01meet.go.comcample

01:06uh Auburn select board room.

01:10Um all supporting materials that have

01:13been provided to members of this body

01:14are available on the town's website. The

01:17public is encouraged to follow along

01:19using the posted agenda. Please note

01:21that this meeting is being recorded by

01:23Auburn Cable Television. Is anyone else

01:26recording tonight's meeting?

01:29No. Okay. [snorts] All right. If you're

01:31able to, please stand for the pledge of

01:33allegiance.

01:38>> I pledge algiance to the flag of the

01:40United States of America and to the

01:43republic for which it stands, one nation

01:46under God, indivisible, with liberty and

01:50justice for all.

01:54>> Okay. So, we have um Paul, could I have

01:57the first public comment list? We have

01:59public comments now. Now, please

02:01remember that public comments are um for

02:04three minutes only. We have a big agenda

02:06tonight. So, we really can't go over

02:08that. Thank you. And when you come up,

02:11please state your name and your address,

02:13but again, three minutes. I even have a

02:15little timer here to make sure that we

02:17stay on schedule. Okay. So, the first

02:19person is Mark Raymond.

02:26right there up to the podium, sir.

02:35>> Mhm. Um, please remember that we can't

02:38reply to comments um because it's not it

02:42would be an item that we would be

02:44discussing and it wouldn't be posted on

02:45the agenda. So, we're not able to do

02:48that, just so you know. Okay. Go ahead,

02:50sir.

02:50>> Yes. I sent out an email this morning to

02:53the board board of selectment. I don't

02:54know if any of you received it yet, but

02:57it's from it's from myself. I'm the lone

02:59plaintiff for Whispering Pine. And uh I

03:02sent that email out, I believe, to Kathy

03:05Johnson, if I got the first name

03:07correct, and I asked her to forward it

03:10that forward that email to you. It's

03:13just four documents which explains rent

03:16control, how it works, how it sets up,

03:18how rents are calculated, rules for the

03:20board. It's a pretty I don't want to say

03:23in depth, but it gives you a pretty good

03:24eye view of of uh what's involved in

03:27rent control. Okay. Uh I am a lone

03:30plaintiff like I said for Pine and we

03:32are in settlement talks, but this case

03:34is a legally dense case. There's a lot

03:37of violations here. uh and a legally

03:41dense case means that's going to be hard

03:43to negotiate and eight months in

03:47settlement talks proves that out. Uh

03:50we're not I can't say we're not making a

03:52lot of progress here, but it's it's

03:55really hard going right now, you know.

03:57So, and even if we do get a settlement,

03:59it's only going to last for 5 years.

04:02This case is our court case is just a

04:05temporary fix. What we really need is

04:08the rent control or else they're going

04:10to empty out their park with their

04:12egregious rent increases. As some of you

04:14may or may not know, their increases

04:16start at $100 per year. It goes up $100.

04:20Right now, they're not doing that cuz

04:22they're involved in litigation. But, you

04:24know, when it starts going up $100 every

04:26year, they're not going to stop. So, you

04:29know, I mean, the handwriting's on the

04:31wall for us. So this this rent control

04:33this is very important to us kind and

04:35American. Thank you.

04:37>> Thank you.

04:39>> All right. Next we have Eric Richards.

04:41Um just be sure to u identify yourself

04:44and your address please.

04:49>> My name is Eric Richards. Ravine Drive

04:51Auburn. I'll keep my remarks to the

04:54point. So first I this is now 60 days.

04:59I'm out waiting for a response on a

05:02public records request from the town

05:03manager's office, from the select board,

05:06from the town council, and should

05:09somebody choose to litigate on the

05:10issue, it's a $10,000 fine plus legal

05:13fees, and you'll pay my legal fees if

05:15it's me. There are several of them

05:17stacked up, I would suggest that

05:20somebody do some addition and

05:21subtraction and think about if they want

05:23to pay those taxpayers costs. Although

05:26as for the taxpayer, I'm paying for it,

05:28too. [gasps]

05:30Second, whoever runs social media here,

05:33they made some comments in reference to

05:36the data center article and fake news.

05:38So, before the planning board, I made

05:40some comments. I submitted a written

05:43recommendation as it relates to the data

05:45center center bylaw that's up for the

05:47articles tonight. And the way they are

05:50written are so broad, capricious and

05:52arbitrary that anybody's nor ordinary

05:55networking at home could be considered a

05:58data center. This building is a data

06:00center and it's left completely open

06:04by commas not ans or's primary or

06:08secondary use to whatever the inspector

06:12of the day decides to do and if they

06:14like the person or not. I think that's

06:17wrong. I would recommend that somebody

06:19revisit the writing of that and consider

06:22scale and combination of uses more

06:26aggregate like the governor's recent

06:28executive order 658

06:31as a point. Second,

06:34there was defects found in the flock

06:37procurement process. That process has

06:40been opaque.

06:41This board and this town paid for town

06:44council. I would ask you to wave

06:46privilege and to disclose and make the

06:49findings and the advice public because

06:51it's not ongoing litigation. Every

06:53taxpayer in this room has paid for that

06:56advice and in the name of transparency,

06:59it makes sense for it to be public.

07:02Finally, tonight's article two, the ban

07:05interest article appears to present a

07:08chapter 44 subsection 20 and subsection

07:1116 issue. The problem is principally

07:15that the way

07:19the math is done for the $69,000

07:22or $600,000 plus is improper.

07:26I would suggest the assistant town

07:28manager, the town manager, the CFO, and

07:30others involved educate themselves on

07:33the subsections of chapter 44. Now,

07:36lucky for us, in case you didn't know,

07:39in the town of Southbridge in 2006, our

07:42CFO was named as a defendant in a

07:44lawsuit in Western Superior Court

07:47directly related to improper transfers

07:51between department.

07:52>> Okay, that'll be that's three minutes.

07:54Thank you, sir.

07:56All right, next on our list, uh Susan

07:58O'Neal, I see you signed up to speak

08:00about rent control. Do you want to wait

08:02until the hearing or do you want to?

08:04Yes, you. Okay, thank you. And um John

08:06Loausan, please come up. Identify

08:09yourself and your address, please.

08:19[snorts]

08:22Good day. Good day. My name is John

08:26Lozan and I live at 10 Main Street.

08:30I've resided there since 1966.

08:34In three minutes, I will attempt to

08:35loosely describe the connection between

08:37our public servants and the citizens of

08:39Auburn from a lifelong resident who is

08:41fortunate enough to recall the past half

08:43century concerning transparency and

08:46accountability in local government. 1976

08:49bysentennial, every school age kid

08:51assembled at the revolutionary war

08:53soldiers cemetery along with teachers,

08:55parents, and parents, we opened a time

08:58capsule. We all We all learned something

09:02profound that day. Never to forget that

09:04we walk on their wounds.

09:11Everybody in town knew Big Tall Mel who

09:14worked on the highway department. He let

09:15the summer help sit up in the back of

09:17the dump truck. We called them turtles.

09:19He let us look at the dogs in a pen that

09:21were caught. He volunteered around town

09:24on his own time.

09:28One winter, me and the other kids from

09:29our neighborhood were sliding down a

09:31huge hill behind the Main Street Reno

09:33Drive border. We had a poor friend. His

09:36his sled was a piece of cardboard. Older

09:38kids made fun of him. Younger kids were

09:40just happy to have sleds. One day

09:44uh a guy came over. He introduced his

09:46name as Paul. He was with his

09:48girlfriend. They talked to the poor kid.

09:50All three walked away. Couple minutes

09:52later, all three stood before us. There

09:54was an enormous colossal six-foot to

09:56bargain with padding as far as the eye

09:58could see. Paul explained that it was

10:00his only. However, uh the other kid, the

10:04poor kid, was in charge of it. He had

10:05permission to borrow the bargain anytime

10:08he wanted from Pulse because it was Paul

10:10sled. Turns out Paul was not only an

10:12Auburn resident, he was an police

10:13officer. Because of these two facts, uh

10:16us residents love Paul.

10:24Paul was a good man, good neighbor.

10:27Paul would roll up his sleeves on his

10:29civies and come to volunteer on several

10:32town events. Paul didn't show up in

10:34uniform for 4 hours and 1 second and

10:36then collect uh uh eight hours of

10:39overtime on the taxpayers's dime. He

10:41showed up in a t-shirt, dungarees, and

10:43sneakers. He was part of the community.

10:45He didn't show up to be viewed by the

10:47public. He showed up to help out help on

10:51his own time

10:53because it was the right thing to do. We

10:56used to call Paul Stretch because there

10:57was a popular toy called Stretch

10:59Armstrong. The joke was on us. I became

11:01his paper boy a few years later. His

11:03mailbox read Paul Armstrong. We We

11:06weren't even close.

11:08I had a backyard. It was big enough to

11:10play any sport. We loved kickball the

11:13most. We would sit on the hill and my

11:16dad would sit on the hill. He would

11:18bring two popsicles but only two. A

11:20neighbor Michael would sit always sit

11:23down and watch us play kickball. The

11:25other popsicle was for him. Michael was

11:27a and could not

11:28>> The three minutes has has arrived. So

11:31that's going to be it. Thank you, sir.

11:33>> Thank you, madam.

11:35>> All right. Next, we have Alan Rafferty.

11:49Good evening, Alan Raffidy, Paul Street.

11:52Uh,

11:54I'd just like to thank Eric Richards who

11:56single-handedly got rid of the flock

11:58contract in the town of Auburn by

12:01discovering that it was illegally

12:04issued. So, thank you very much, Eric

12:07Richards. Um, I always say never let a

12:11good public comment go to waste.

12:14The town of Oxford,

12:17the Sluckman allow no public comment.

12:21No public comment at all.

12:24Recently,

12:28recently

12:30they had a discussion on whether or not

12:32they should make the select men more

12:36genderneutral. So, they want to go to

12:38something like select board, but they

12:40couldn't make that decision on their

12:41own. They were so chicken that they're

12:45putting it to a public vote

12:48in order to determine whether or not you

12:49should make uh the name of the board

12:52genderneutral.

12:55Recently the uh town manager resigned

12:58from the town of Oxford and she's suing

13:00the board of selectmen

13:03probably because not not a very open

13:06form of government in the town of

13:07Oxford. So so I give Auburn credit. You

13:11you have your public comment. You you

13:13have two sessions. Congratulations.

13:16However, recently

13:18the library board

13:21I filed an open meeting complaint

13:23against them and the first thing the

13:26chairman Dorsy

13:28uh did was she cancelled the public

13:31comment for that meeting. The second

13:33meeting she had she canceled the public

13:35comment a second time and then had a

13:37debate whether or not they should get

13:39rid of public comment altogether. Her

13:42reason, she wanted a safe space for her

13:45board.

13:47Now, it's probably because her

13:49background is in education. She's a

13:50principal,

13:52but to much to the credit of Vera

13:55Karine,

13:56she argued against it and and said that

13:59we should keep it. And so, they have

14:01they have kept it. So, congratulations,

14:04Auburn, for trying to be transparent. I

14:07congratulate you. Keep up the good work.

14:11All right. Thank you, sir.

14:13All right. So, that's it for the

14:15comments. Um, our next section is

14:17community organizations. We don't have

14:20anything there, but then we go to

14:22presentations and public hearings.

14:25Uh, Madam Chair, I'd like to make a

14:27motion that we move up items

14:32uh 5D, 5e, and 8 D, which should have

14:38been under uh community organizations.

14:42>> Second.

14:44>> So, we have a motion and a second to

14:45move these three items up to right now.

14:48Um, any discussion? No. All in favor? I

14:52>> I opposed. No. All right. So, the first

14:54thing that we're moving up is the uh

14:56public hearing for uh a board vote on

14:59the outdoor entertainment license for

15:01Century Sportsman's Club at 531 Rodale

15:05Street.

15:06>> I'll make a motion to open the public

15:07hearing.

15:08>> Second. So, we have a motion and a

15:10second to open the public hearing. All

15:12in favor?

15:12>> I opposed. No. Is anyone here from

15:15Century Sportsman's Club? You can come

15:18right to the podium, please, sir.

15:24And can you just tell us about your

15:25event?

15:27>> Uh 12 running a haunted hay ride and

15:30spooky walk for the past 27 years. Uh

15:33their share we're open every Friday and

15:35Saturday night in October.

15:37Um usually from like 7 to 10 is about

15:40the hours we run. At the end of the

15:41month gets a little later. Um that's all

15:45I have.

15:46>> Okay. Um does anyone from the board have

15:49any questions? Does anyone from the

15:51public have any questions on the uh

15:53Century Sportsman's Club hearing? Okay.

15:58>> Make a motion to close the public

15:59hearing.

16:00>> Second. So, we have a motion and a

16:01second to close the public hearing. All

16:03in favor?

16:04>> I

16:04>> opposed. Okay. It is closed. Madam

16:07Chair, I'll make a motion to approve the

16:09outdoor entertainment license for

16:10Century Sportsman Club at 531 Rodale

16:15Street, Auburn, Mass 01501, provided

16:17they comply with all rules and

16:19regulations of the town and orders of

16:21the DCG.

16:22>> Second. Okay, we have a motion and a

16:25second to approve. All in favor?

16:27>> I opposed.

16:29>> You're all set, sir. Thank you.

16:30>> Yes.

16:31>> Thank you. All right, our next public

16:33hearing is a board vote on an outdoor

16:35entertainment license for the Milbury

16:37Lions Foundation at 30 Elm Street. We

16:40have someone here. Come on up,

16:42gentlemen. You can go right to the

16:43podium, please.

16:44>> Madam Chair, I'll make a motion to open

16:46the public hearing.

16:47>> Second. We have a motion and a second to

16:48open the public hearing. All in favor?

16:50>> I opposed.

16:52>> Okay, it's open. Um, can you just tell

16:55us what your um what your event is?

16:58>> Sure. Um my name is William Kaine

17:02Milbury Mass. Um and accompanied with uh

17:05President Kevin Murray. Uh our event is

17:08a a car show. It's uh it's just a

17:12antique and classic cars of all you know

17:14all classes, all all types, all years

17:17are welcome to come. Um we just have a

17:20you know probably about um less than 200

17:23cars. Um there is some music but it's

17:27mostly uh you know like 50s music and a

17:30lot of uh announcements and we judge

17:33cars and award trophies. Um there's food

17:37supplied um by the club. Uh we don't

17:40allow alcohol up into the car show.

17:43There'll be signs for that. We uh put

17:46signs on the highway and for people

17:48coming to the car show to give them

17:50directions to how to get there. Um you

17:52have a map of the location and what

17:53we're doing. So if you have any

17:55questions, be happy to answer them.

17:57>> Okay. Do we have anyone here have any

17:59questions?

18:01>> The hours of the car show.

18:06>> So it's on one day 9 to2 on September

18:0919th.

18:10>> Yeah. And actually that um I think if

18:12you look at the application, it included

18:14next year's dates as well so that we

18:17could wouldn't have to do this again

18:18next year.

18:21>> Okay.

18:24All right. Any other questions?

18:26>> Does anyone from the public have any

18:28questions on this license?

18:31>> No.

18:32>> Madam Chair, I just wanted to clarify.

18:34So, you're seeking a license for this

18:36year and next year,

18:37>> correct? Um, can I ask uh through um

18:41Madam Chair, if the administration had

18:43reviewed the DCG had reviewed this uh

18:46with the understanding that the

18:48recommendation was for two years and not

18:50one year?

18:52um through the chair. No, it was we were

18:55we believe the recommendation was for

18:57one year, not two. Typically, each um

19:01event holder comes back each year for

19:04either an annual um license or a license

19:08for each individual event.

19:11>> Okay. Thank you.

19:12>> Um through the chair, I'm looking at the

19:14DCG memorandum and it does list both

19:17years. Can we move forward with

19:21approving it for both years or do they

19:23need to come back annually?

19:26>> See it?

19:28>> Um I I believe our the policy is just to

19:30do it for one year, gentlemen.

19:32>> Okay.

19:32>> Um Okay.

19:33>> Yeah. So um you'll you can come next

19:36year.

19:37>> Okay. That just that's just what they

19:39explained to if you wanted to do it for

19:41for next year. Put the dates on there.

19:42That's what I was told. That's that's

19:45>> okay.

19:45>> Okay. But we're happy to come back next

19:47year and do it again.

19:48>> Thank you. Thank Well, you've got your

19:50maps and everything all ready to go. So,

19:52there you go. All right. Um,

19:55>> make a motion to close the public

19:56hearing.

19:57>> Second.

20:00>> Um, we have a motion to close the public

20:03hearing. All in favor?

20:05>> I opposed.

20:07>> All right. I'll make a motion to approve

20:09the outdoor entertainment license for

20:10the Milberry Lines Foundation at 30 Elm

20:13Street, Auburn, Mass 01501, provided

20:16they follow all rules and regulations of

20:17the town and any orders of the DCG.

20:20>> Second

20:21>> for Can we put the time because their

20:23application had multiple dates. Can we

20:25just for this year

20:27>> 919?

20:29I don't have it in front of me. One

20:31>> 9:19.

20:32>> I haven't found it yet. for September

20:3419th

20:35>> for se for September 19th, 2026.

20:39>> Second. We have a motion and a second to

20:42approve the license. All in favor?

20:44>> I opposed.

20:45>> You're all set, gentlemen. Thank you.

20:47>> Thank you. We thank the board and thank

20:49thank the town manager for assistance

20:50and helping us.

20:52>> All right. Next, we have um a board vote

20:54in an open air license application from

20:56Auburn Chamber of Commerce for their 7th

20:59annual scarecrow contest event at

21:01Goddard Park at Jury Square. October

21:039th, 2026 to November 3rd, 2026. Do we

21:08have anyone here from the uh chamber?

21:10Hello.

21:17Just go. Yeah, you can sit up here or go

21:19to the podium. Whatever works.

21:22>> All right.

21:24Thank you.

21:29>> So, yeah. Um,

21:30>> do we need to uh No, that's not Yeah.

21:33>> Sorry.

21:33>> Can you tell us about the event?

21:35>> Yeah. So, this is our seventh annual um

21:37Scarecrow Your Business. So, we ask all

21:40businesses, whether they're members of

21:41the Chamber of Commerce or not, to um

21:44have their employees, it's kind of like

21:46a a company um event where they get

21:49together and they do a scarecrow or

21:51scarecrow theme. And it's at uh the

21:54Goddard Park at the fire station um in

21:57uh locations that have already been

21:59picked out. And um we judge judging is

22:03open to the public on our Facebook page

22:05and um it's been quite um attractive

22:08event for the local businesses um over

22:11the years. So like I said this is the

22:13seventh one that we've done.

22:16>> Okay.

22:17>> Do we any questions?

22:19>> How many years have you been doing this

22:21event? The chamber.

22:22>> This is our seventh.

22:23>> Seventh. You said

22:23>> this is our seventh year. Yeah.

22:25>> Thank

22:26>> all right.

22:28Uh, madam chair, I'll make a motion to

22:30issue an open air license to the Auburn

22:31Chamber of Commerce for the 7th annual

22:33Scarecrow contest event at Goddard Park

22:36at Jory Square, 341 to 357 Celebrate

22:39Street, Auburn, Mass 01501 from October

22:429th, 2026 to November 3rd, 2026.

22:46>> Second. So, we have a motion and a

22:48second to um issue the open air license.

22:50All in favor?

22:51>> I opposed.

22:54>> You're all set. Thank you. Thank you

22:55very much,

22:56>> Madam Chair. Can I also make a motion to

22:57wave the fee for the Chamber of Commerce

22:59as well as the Lions Club?

23:02>> A second. So, we have a motion and

23:04second to wave the fees for the uh Lions

23:06Club and for the event and for the um

23:10Chamber of Commerce event. We have a

23:12motion and a second. All in favor?

23:14>> I opposed. Good. Thank you.

23:16>> Thank you very much.

23:17>> Thank you.

23:18>> All right. Going back to our agenda. Um

23:21next we're going to talk about

23:22presentations and public hearings. We

23:24have a public hearing um a board vote on

23:26a motor vehicle class one license and

23:29auto repair license for Taska Hyundai

23:31Auburn at 7:35 South Bridge Street.

23:36>> Madam Chair, I'll make a motion to open

23:37the public hearing.

23:38>> Second. So we have a motion to open the

23:40public hearing. All in favor?

23:42>> I opposed. Yep. All right. Is anyone

23:45here from

23:47Hyundai of Auburn? Hi. Come right to the

23:49podium, sir. There's someone online.

23:51>> How you doing? David Taska, Task

23:53Automotive Group.

23:54>> Okay. Thank you for coming in. And can

23:57you tell us um is this an annual

24:00renewal?

24:01>> Uh we're actually purchasing the

24:02dealership uh in Auburn and uh looking

24:05to close at the end of the month from

24:07Herb Chambers

24:09Automotive Group and uh operate the

24:12business from there. We're a automotive

24:14group originally from Rhode Island, have

24:16a lot of dealerships across the area and

24:18uh looking forward to doing business in

24:20the town.

24:26Okay. Any questions?

24:29>> Does anyone in the public have any uh

24:31questions regarding this um regarding

24:35this license? No.

24:38>> Okay.

24:39>> I'll make a motion to close the public

24:40hearing.

24:41>> I'll second.

24:42>> We have a motion and a second to close

24:43the public hearing. All in favor? I

24:46oppose? No.

24:48I'll make a motion to approve the motor

24:49vehicle class 2 license and auto repair

24:52license for Taska Hyundai Alurn at 735

24:56Selfford Street, Auburn, Mass 01501,

24:58provided they follow rules and

24:59regulations of the town as well as a

25:01DCG.

25:03>> Was that a class one license?

25:04>> The class one I I got is class one or

25:08class two.

25:08>> Class one. Class one.

25:09>> Class one. Okay. I need my readers.

25:11You're going to make all the motions

25:11from now on.

25:13>> I'll second. So, I have a motion and a

25:15second to approve the license. All in

25:18favor? I oppose. No,

25:21>> you're all set. Thank you very much.

25:22Thank you.

25:23>> Um, next we have a public hearing. Um, a

25:25board vote on a storage of flammable

25:28fluids license for Eversource at 12 West

25:32Drive. Do we have someone? Okay, go

25:34ahead.

25:34>> Make a motion to open the public

25:35hearing.

25:36>> A second. We have a motion, a second to

25:38open the public hearing. All in favor?

25:40>> I opposed. No. Oh, and we have someone

25:43who's online. Um, you can you um tell us

25:47who you are, sir?

25:49>> Good evening, Madam Chair, through you

25:50to the members of the board. Uh, my name

25:52is Mike and the last name is Kane, K A N

25:55E with Eversource Energy from West Tech

25:57Drive in Auburn. Uh, I'm joined here

25:59with a project team that has been

26:01working on the project. Uh, Corey

26:04Vandergrift. I'll kick it over to Corey

26:06to give you information. Uh, but I'm

26:08more from the community relations side

26:10organizing the uh the the group of team

26:13that's here. So, we have a bunch of

26:14subject matter experts here to help you.

26:16>> Corey, go ahead.

26:18>> Thank you, Mike. I appreciate it. So, as

26:20Mike said, my name is Corey Vandergrift.

26:21I'm the project manager for the Auburn

26:23spare transformer facility project. Uh,

26:25the purpose of this meeting is that we

26:27are seeking to obtain a land license for

26:28liquid storage at 12 West Drive, Auburn,

26:31Mass. Uh this is a spare transformer

26:34facility where we restore nine

26:36substation transformers used to support

26:38e failure repair and replacement

26:40activities. As spare transformer, these

26:42transformers will not be energized on

26:44site but can be quickly mobilized and

26:46transported where needed. Pertaining to

26:48the liquid storage, we are seeking to

26:49store 243,411

26:52gallons of MODF or mineral oil

26:55dialectric fluid. This is absolutely

26:57critical fluid as it serves two main

26:58purposes. It's the dialectric, excuse

27:00me, dialectric liquid insulation for the

27:03transformer and it also acts as

27:04transformer cooling. The modf will be

27:06stored inside the facility and inside

27:08the transformers themselves. I'd like to

27:10thank you for your time and we're happy

27:12to take any questions that you may have.

27:14>> All right. Thank you. Any questions from

27:16the board?

27:20>> No. Does anyone from the public have any

27:22questions regarding this license? Yeah.

27:26To identify yourself, please.

27:29Danny Lis, 39 Prairie Place. How

27:32flammable is this liquid and what

27:36suppressants will be on scene in case

27:40there is a an incident?

27:47>> Are you able to hear that,

27:49>> Mr. Um Mr. Eversource?

27:52>> Sure. Yeah. Uh Corey, who do you who do

27:55you recommend that's going to go to?

27:56Who's our subject matter expert on that

27:58one?

27:58>> She just hopped up.

28:00>> Yeah. So, good evening uh madame chair

28:03and uh the board. Uh thank you for the

28:06opportunity to speak. So, first of all,

28:08I want to address a concern that is

28:11often related to the word um oil

28:16associated with the electric equipment.

28:18So the insulin oil is used inside the

28:22high voltage uh transformer specifically

28:25the mineral oil is meeting the ITE

28:28standard. This is not the same as the

28:31fuel oil or any motor or petroleum

28:34combustible product that is using for

28:36heating or transportation. In fact, it's

28:39a a high flash point and the high fire

28:42insulated fluid. That being said, uh it

28:46cannot burn without an external and

28:49sustained heat source far hotter than

28:54160° C. If these transformer are in

28:58service, so those transformers or those

29:01equipments we need to keep in mind that

29:04they are stored in this facility as an

29:06inventory. we are putting those

29:08equipment and it will never be energized

29:11at any condition inside the facility. So

29:14in fact we are using this oil inside the

29:17seal tank inside the transformer. So

29:21there is no uh option that this trans

29:25like this oil or this mineral oil is not

29:27a flammable under any normal condition.

29:30It cannot ignite without extreme

29:33temperature far beyond anything that is

29:36uh countered in a non energized

29:39transformer and when the transformer is

29:42out of service the oil present no fire

29:45hazard to the public or to the facility.

29:49Hope that answered the question.

29:52>> Okay. Thank you.

29:55>> Yes. Thank you very much.

29:57>> Yeah, of course. Thank you. Um, does

29:59anyone else have any questions?

30:01>> No.

30:03>> Madam Chair, I'll make a motion to close

30:04the public hearing.

30:05>> Second.

30:06>> All right. So, we have a motion, a

30:07second to close the public hearing. All

30:09in favor?

30:10>> I opposed.

30:13>> All right.

30:14>> I'll make a motion to approve the

30:15storage of flammable fluids license for

30:17Ever Source at 12 West Drive, Auburn,

30:20Mass 01501, provided they follow all

30:23rules and regulations of the town as

30:24well as the DCG.

30:26>> Second. All right. All right. So, we

30:28have a motion and a second um to approve

30:30the storage license. All in favor? I

30:33>> oppose. No. All right. You're all set.

30:36Thank you.

30:37>> Thank you, Madam Chair and members.

30:38>> Thank you. Thank you.

30:40>> Our next public hearing is a board vote

30:42in a storage of flammable fluids license

30:45for DO gas at 850 Southbridge Street. Do

30:48we have someone here from the business?

30:50Come on up. You

30:52>> I'll make a motion to open the public

30:53hearing.

30:54>> I'll second. So, we have a motion and a

30:55second to open the public hearing. All

30:57in favor? I

30:59>> opposed. No. All right. How do you do?

31:02Why don't you tell us about it?

31:03>> Yeah. Good evening. Uh Paul Deo from Dio

31:05Gas. Uh this is a for flammable storage

31:08license at 850 Southwest uh South Bridge

31:10Street [snorts] uh also known as

31:12Westside Plaza. Uh so we currently

31:15already are storing 2,000 gallons of

31:17propane at that site. Uh we're looking

31:19to add an additional,000 gallons uh to

31:21become 3,000 gallons. That's why we need

31:23the flammable storage license. The

31:25reason for the added storage is uh

31:28through this last winter with our with

31:29the cold winter months uh we were having

31:31some propane supply issues which was

31:33putting the restaurant down that was in

31:35the building and a couple of the other

31:37tenants. So by adding the storage, we're

31:39able to get a little bit more uh

31:41pressure into that building to avoid any

31:43um inconveniences or or downages there.

31:46Uh, I did meet the fire department on

31:48site, go over the location of the new

31:50tank, and they are on board on their

31:52end. Uh, but I'm open to answer any

31:54questions that you guys might have in

31:56terms of adding uh the additional

31:58storage at 850 Southwood Street.

32:02>> Does anyone have any questions?

32:05>> So, I'll just ask the same question that

32:06Mr. Laress asked previously. So, what is

32:08on site uh to address any flammable

32:11issues?

32:12>> What is on site for what? I'm sorry. to

32:14address flammable uh issues to regard

32:16against flammable issues.

32:17>> Yeah. So everything is done you know

32:19every there's code requirements by NFBA

32:21which is the national fire code for

32:23setbacks. Um so the tanks are over 25 ft

32:26away from the building. Uh so that's set

32:28per national fire code. Um that's really

32:31that's it. There crash protection to

32:33make sure that vehicles don't hit it. Uh

32:35plow trucks don't hit it. Um, but you

32:37would need a extreme source of uh heat

32:40or a source of ignition for any spark to

32:43happen. And there would also have to be

32:44an active leak uh for something to catch

32:47fire. Um, propane tanks don't explode,

32:49they just burn off. So, um, I guess

32:52that's my answer to your question. Thank

32:54you.

32:55>> Thank you.

32:56>> Okay. Um, does anyone um from the

32:58audience have any questions about this?

33:03>> Okay. And does anyone online have any

33:05questions?

33:07Nope. All right.

33:09>> I'll make a motion to close the public

33:10hearing.

33:11>> I'll second. So, we have a motion and a

33:13second to close the public hearing. All

33:14in favor?

33:15>> I

33:16>> opposed.

33:18And

33:18>> I'll make a motion to approve a storage

33:20of flammable fluids license for Dio gas

33:22at 850 Southbridge Street, Auburn, Mass,

33:2401501, provided they follow all rules

33:26and regulations of the town and any

33:28conditions of the DCG.

33:29>> A second.

33:31>> All right. So, we have a motion and a

33:33second to approve the license. All in

33:35favor?

33:36>> I opposed.

33:38>> You're all said, sir. Thank you.

33:39>> Thank you. I appreciate it.

33:40>> All right. Next, we have

33:44um a a public hearing. We have a board

33:46vote on a pole petition for South Street

33:49National Grid to relocate one J pole on

33:53South Street beginning at a point

33:55approximately uh 1,400 ft south of the

33:58center line of the intersection of

34:00Potter Farm.

34:03I make a motion to open the public

34:05hearing.

34:05>> Second. Um

34:07>> we have a motion and a second to open

34:08the public hearing. All in favor?

34:10>> I opposed. All right. Do we have someone

34:14from National Grid um online?

34:19>> Yes.

34:20>> Oh, good. And can you identify yourself,

34:23sir?

34:25>> Good afternoon, Madam Chair and the

34:26member of the board. My name is Fred

34:27Jolen, working for National.

34:29>> Can you say that? Just say that again a

34:30little louder and slower, please.

34:33>> I'm sorry. My name is Fritz Jolan,

34:36working for National Grid as a design

34:38engineer, 939 South Bridge Street in

34:41Worcester.

34:42>> Okay. So um the purpose of this um

34:45petition is to install a midspan pole in

34:48order to service a customer which has a

34:51u house that's located

34:55um far back

34:57um in his driveway. So there's a reason

35:00why we need to extend primary there in

35:02order to install a transformer.

35:07>> Okay. Okay. Does anyone have any

35:10questions?

35:13When is the work expected to take place?

35:18>> Um [clears throat] I cannot give you a

35:21definite answer on this one because I'm

35:22the design engineer. Usually um

35:24operation and scheduling are taking care

35:26of that. I do not have any idea about

35:30schedule.

35:33>> I'm sorry.

35:36um through the chair. It looks like

35:38there's three polls that are all full

35:40close together. Do does it need to have

35:43three poles?

35:45>> I know you're just adding one, but

35:49>> actually I can answer that question. So,

35:51um the way the the sketch has been

35:54designed is that it's showing two

35:56existing pole and one new pole which is

35:59a jail pole j that we're looking to

36:01install. So, in reality, we're only

36:03looking to install local, but the sketch

36:05is um showing three.

36:07>> I'm sorry, sir. I'm having a really hard

36:09time hearing you. I don't know if it's

36:11the audio on our end.

36:13>> Um, can you hear any better now?

36:18>> Not really.

36:20>> Okay. Oh, okay.

36:23>> What?

36:24>> Can you Is it better right now?

36:26>> That's better. Yes. Thank you so much.

36:28>> Awesome. Awesome. Awesome. So um what I

36:31was what I was trying to say is that the

36:34way that the kit has been designed is

36:36that it's showing three poles but

36:39actually we only installing one pole.

36:42It's showing two poles two existing pole

36:45pole 49 and pole 50 and we're looking to

36:48install a new poll p 49-50.

36:53>> Thank you. So you're consolidating down

36:54to one poll.

36:57>> Thank you. Any

37:03other questions?

37:05Okay. Does anyone in the audience have

37:06any questions about this um this tell

37:10this uh poll for National Grid?

37:13>> No. Okay. No questions.

37:16>> I'll make a motion to close the public

37:17hearing.

37:18>> A second. Um we have a motion and a

37:20second to close the public hearing. All

37:21in favor? I

37:23>> opposed.

37:24>> All right.

37:27I'll make a motion to approve a poll

37:29petition for South Street National Grid

37:31to relocate one J pole on South Street

37:35beginning at a point approximately 1400

37:37ft south of the center line of the

37:39intersection of Potter Farm.

37:41>> A second. We have a motion, a second.

37:44All in favor?

37:45>> Opposed? No. All right. You're all set,

37:48sir. Thank you.

37:50>> Thank you very much.

37:52>> All right. Now we're finally we're at

37:54the um public hearing for a discussion

37:56on rent control in the Auburn

37:58manufactured home parks. So um people

38:02are going to be able to come up and

38:04speak um and no one can speak um for a

38:07second time until everyone has spoken

38:09for first time and it's 3 minutes and

38:12make sure that you just identify

38:14yourself when you go up so we know who's

38:16speaking. Okay? And and I should have

38:18said this earlier, too. If you have your

38:20phones um with you, please put them on

38:23silent. All right.

38:26So, the reason we're having this hearing

38:28is because at the annual town meeting in

38:31May, um we heard um from different

38:35people with some strong opinions about

38:37the rent control. So, we just wanted to

38:39provide an opportunity for residents to

38:42speak um and to tell us what they think

38:44about it. Um, and Dan, did you want to

38:47add anything?

38:48>> Cover it up.

38:49>> All right. Okay. Thank you. All right.

38:52>> Make a motion to open the public

38:53hearing.

38:54>> Second.

38:56>> So, we have a motion, a second to open

38:57the public hearing. All in favor?

38:59>> I I oppose. No. All right. So, who's uh

39:02who's coming up first?

39:05>> Who would like to speak?

39:07>> And there are people on Let's start with

39:09Come on up. Yep.

39:12I should say,

39:16>> can you hear me?

39:17>> Yes.

39:18>> Uh, my name is Susan O'Neal. I live at

39:20131 Washington Street, which is Marra

39:22Vista Mobile Home Park. Um, I've lived

39:25there for 31 years. I've never had any

39:27problems with the landlord, and we've

39:29had at least two landlords during the

39:30time I've lived there. I feel like the

39:33rent control u measure is um unnecessary

39:36for us. It may be in the interest of

39:39other parks that are owned by

39:40corporations to have rent control, but I

39:43don't think the rest of us who are not

39:45in favor should be included in that um

39:49decision. I also don't think the town of

39:51Auburn should have anything to do. I

39:53think it's a private matter between the

39:55residents of those parks and the owners

39:57of those parks and basically I'm opposed

40:00to it. Okay. Okay.

40:02>> Thank you.

40:08All right. Why don't you raise your hand

40:10if you want to speak, please?

40:14Okay. The um will you hold on the woman

40:17in the blue? Yeah. Thank you.

40:36My name is Kathleen Charbano. My husband

40:38and I live in uh Whispering Pines Park,

40:41which is one of the aforementioned parks

40:43that needs the help.

40:46We're retired. We don't make extra

40:50money. We can't work overtime. No side

40:52hustle.

40:54We can't afford to have the rent go up

40:57every month, every month, every month,

40:59every

41:00people our age are leaving the state. We

41:02have no choice. I hate the South. Please

41:05don't make us move.

41:07We need we need we want to stay where we

41:09were. We were planning on retiring

41:11there. We moved into it because it's an

41:13elderly community. Maybe separate the

41:16elder elderly communities from the

41:18people who have good landlords.

41:21That would help both sides.

41:24Um, that's all I have to say. Please

41:27help us. [laughter]

41:28Thank you.

41:29>> Thank you.

41:32>> Okay. Please raise your hand. Um, the

41:35woman in um the front.

41:44>> Good evening. My name is Cheryl Gendro.

41:47I live at 113 Washington Street, which

41:50is a mobile home park. And I can

41:52honestly say I'm proud to say I live in

41:54there because the living is fantastic. I

41:58understand where the other parks are

41:59coming from. But years ago, our park

42:03went through the selling of mobile home

42:05parks. And there's a legal way to go

42:07about it. And I feel for the other parks

42:11that are having the issues, but in my

42:13eyes, we have fantastic landlords.

42:17They do go up on rent, but they show us

42:21the reasons why they've gone up on rent,

42:24and it's because they've invested

42:27some of their money to improve the

42:29parks.

42:31Years ago, as a child, I lived in an

42:34apartment with my parents that had rent

42:36control.

42:38because he could only do so much with

42:41the money that he made off of them rent.

42:43He decided he's not going to improve the

42:46property.

42:47>> So the value of a three tenement

42:52apartment with six room decreased in

42:54value. What happens? The town loses tax

42:58income from the decrease in the value.

43:02So I don't think rent control is in the

43:04best. My other point of contention about

43:07rent control for all the mobile home

43:10parks is

43:12yes, we are a mobile home park, but it

43:14is owned by Justin and his father as a

43:18business.

43:19Now, to me, I relate it to you have all

43:24these plumbing companies that are a

43:26business and you're going to try and

43:28group us all into one and have rent

43:33control for them. It's like we shouldn't

43:37be penalized because

43:40they have issues with their

43:44pack owners. So it's like I said, you

43:48can't group us all in one because the

43:50conditions are different. So, I'm asking

43:54you and the residents of my park that I

43:56am here representing and ask you to

44:00really consider how it's going to affect

44:03us because our rent increase, yes, it

44:05goes up, but it's minimal and there's

44:08explanations as to why it's gone up and

44:12we get a detailed we invested this

44:14amount in this and this and this. So,

44:16you know, comes and they give us a 6

44:18months period basically as to when the

44:21rent is going to increase, if at all.

44:24So, please take it under advisement and

44:26consider everything and do whatever you

44:31can to help the other parks because yes,

44:33the rent increase that they're dealing

44:35with is unjustified because they're an

44:38investment company. They're out to make

44:42a buck, whereas our park owners take

44:44pride in their parks and they care about

44:47their residents. Thank you. Have a good

44:49night.

44:50>> Thank you. [applause]

44:56>> Um, please raise your hands if you

45:01[snorts]

45:06>> Daniel 39 Perry Place. Um, this came in

45:10front of us at town meeting last this

45:13this past spring and

45:16my feelings is the town really shouldn't

45:20be meddling

45:22in private businesses because then

45:24what's going to happen? We going to rent

45:26control the mall or we going to rent

45:28control Mary D and JB? Are we going to

45:31rent control um Catiri?

45:35Um, we don't need to to get into these

45:41people's businesses that, you know, the

45:43the company's businesses. I feel sorry

45:47for them. Um, I really do, but I I don't

45:51think the town needs to get into this.

45:53This is this is something that I think

45:56could come back to bite the town and you

45:58know where. Um, yes, it's it's a shame.

46:02And I don't know if the town can pass a

46:06bylaw where they can only go up so much.

46:11Um,

46:13like the other lady here said that, you

46:16know, the person who owns theirs

46:19shows them why. Is there any way that

46:22the town can force that on to the owners

46:27of the the parks that are having the

46:30issues? Um it's it's price gouging.

46:36It really is. If they're not going to do

46:38you I have an a I rent apartments and I

46:41I can't justify

46:44and going up on somebody like that. You

46:46know, if I make that much money, then I

46:48do an upgrade, whether it's windows or

46:52patio doors or flooring or carpeting or

46:56new appliances or something. It It

46:58sounds like the owner is just price

47:01gouging.

47:02And I don't think it's fair, but I don't

47:04think the town needs to get involved,

47:08you know, as far as saying, okay, this

47:11and this. Yeah, I know. I'm I'm I'm

47:12talking with both hands saying yay on

47:14one and nay on the other, but it's got

47:17to be a happy medium.

47:20Thank you.

47:21>> Thank you.

47:23>> All right. Who Who else would like to

47:26right there? Woman in the white shirt.

47:27Yeah.

47:42Hi. Uh, I'm 86 years old and I live at

47:46Whispering Pines. I also, uh, could be

47:50blind in a few years because I have

47:52severe macular degeneration.

47:55I live by myself. Now, the owner of this

47:58property is a business person. He's not

48:01even in the state of Massachusetts. He

48:03lives in Florida. They supposed to have

48:06a management company. The management

48:08company sends out that they won't even

48:10answer their telephone. We had a problem

48:13with I I live across the street from uh

48:16a surge and the alarm was going off. I

48:19must have called everybody and finally I

48:21called Florida and I said if if I get

48:23poo and pee and I get sick, I said I'll

48:27call Morgan and Morgan. You better

48:29believe it. I also don't understand, and

48:33please forgive me for this, but I don't

48:35understand.

48:37He sent a letter out at one time and

48:39said he was going up on the rent because

48:42of the tax rate. So, he charged us so

48:44much money, the taxes. What am I paying

48:48Auburn's taxes for? I have absolutely no

48:51idea. He also sent us a letter that he

48:54was going up $100 a month for five

48:58years. That means at the end of five

49:00years, uh, we would up to be $1,000 a

49:04month. And if we didn't pay it, he'd get

49:06rid of us. In other words, we'll have to

49:09evict you. I own the property, but he's

49:12going to evict me. I don't quite

49:14understand where this man is coming

49:15from, and we do need help. Now, there

49:18was supposed to be a rent control on the

49:20on the election coming up in November. I

49:22understand it was taken off by uh

49:24Campbell district attorney apparently

49:26because it would affect people who are

49:29uh you know involved in uh charity work.

49:33So it was taken off. There are many ways

49:36to do rent control. You don't have to

49:38force anybody but you can make a

49:40suggestion and get the people involved

49:43who are paying these high these high

49:45things. I'm very happy for you people

49:47who live so comfortably, but the people

49:50at Whispering Pines sit on the edge of

49:52their bed and the edge of their seat

49:54because they don't know what's coming

49:56next from these investors. And these

49:59investors are buying up property. Maybe

50:02they haven't bought up yours yet, but

50:04never know, you have owners. They're

50:07going to get old. Maybe they want to

50:09sell. But I that's getting off the

50:11subject. I really do think that there is

50:14a way. Um, I wish I became I wish I was

50:17a little bit more prepared, but um, you

50:20can you can set a fixed rate or suggest

50:24a fixed rate. I mean, people who live in

50:27the park where I live, we're old. I

50:29mean, really, 86 is not young. Uh, I

50:34don't know what else to say except we do

50:36need help. And Mr. Raymond, Mark Raymond

50:39has been a godsend for our property here

50:42because he's he's worked with the state,

50:45he's worked with the lawyers, he's

50:47worked with consumer.

50:49>> Excuse me, madam. The the three minutes

50:51is up.

50:52>> Thank you.

50:53>> Could I ask you your name, please?

50:54>> Yes. My name is Joanne Mararyian.

50:57>> Thank you.

51:02>> [applause]

51:03[cheering]

51:06>> All right. Uh, who's next?

51:11>> Uh, before we go to Who? How about the

51:15person in black in the blue? In the back

51:17in blue.

51:19Did you already speak?

51:21>> No.

51:21>> No. Okay. You can come up, please. Thank

51:23you.

51:26Yeah.

51:29>> Yes.

51:37My name is June Grammatic and I live in

51:40131 Washington Street and I'm just here

51:44to say how comfortable I am in my home.

51:48My landlord is Justin [clears throat]

51:52Stamus and he and his father own the

51:55park. They are very good to us. anyone

51:59of our complaints,

52:01um, needs, um, just stops by to see how

52:06we're all doing, Justin comes by the

52:09house twice a day to make sure that

52:12everybody is comfortable, to make sure

52:14that if we need anything, he's there. I

52:18feel as though that rank control

52:20wouldn't have the opportunity to do

52:22that. Wouldn't have the opportunity to

52:24control like Justin does. Um

52:30I have 19 units in our um park and when

52:37we all get together we all have the same

52:40thought. We are very comfortable with

52:43our landlord.

52:45Thank you.

52:46>> Thank you.

52:48Um I'm looking we have people um who are

52:51um participating in the meeting online.

52:53Does anyone who's online wish to speak

52:55at this hearing? Could unmute yourself

52:58if that's the case?

53:01>> No. Who she is?

53:02>> Oh, hello.

53:04>> Oh, good. Hi. Um could you identify

53:06yourself, please?

53:08>> Uh yes. My name is Mara Mahoney. I live

53:10in the Whispering Pines estates.

53:14I'm one of the younger residents. I

53:16moved in last year with the intention

53:18that by the time I retire that my

53:23building will be paid off and that I

53:26will just have to pay for my monthly

53:28rent. Um,

53:33I've been here a little over a year and

53:37at the end of last year we all got a

53:38certified letter saying our rents were

53:40going up. They did not go up that much,

53:42but I had only been here less than a

53:45year at that point, and my rent was

53:47already being increased by $20 a month.

53:50Um, I understand that others have

53:53different rent leases than I have. Um,

53:57one of my issues is the way the parakeet

54:01has

54:03fashioned the lease. Um,

54:06coming from my 20s and 30s where I

54:08rented apartments every single month,

54:12um, when you sign a lease with a

54:14landlord, your lease is for a specific

54:16amount of time for a specific dollar

54:18amount.

54:20The parakeet leases are phrased in such

54:22a way that you have a starting rent

54:26that we're paying to them for the use of

54:28the land that our houses are sitting on

54:31and other park facility run things like

54:36trash, water, sewer, um

54:40realy pay payments for the park, snow

54:44removal, etc.

54:46But you have the option at the end to

54:48sign either a one-year lease or a 5-year

54:50lease. And coming from a renters's

54:54position,

54:56if I'm signing a 5-year lease, and that

54:58means I'm locked in for 5 years to my

55:01rent,

55:03as has been other

55:06leases, etc. that I have signed in the

55:08past.

55:09However, on the very top of the next

55:11page, there's a clause stating that they

55:14have the ability to increase their rent

55:17on an annual basis. Um,

55:21seems to me that this isn't quite on the

55:23up and up.

55:25I I also feel I've done a little

55:27research on Parakeet and they own parks

55:30up and down the East Coast

55:33and it seems to me that they're just in

55:35it for the money. Um, if you do the math

55:37just based on what I'm being charged and

55:40you figure it out for, I believe we've

55:42got 55 units in this park for a year,

55:45they're taking in somewhere in the

55:46vicinity of $400,000 to run this park.

55:52um that seems a bit excessive and it

55:56seems to me that they're in it for the

55:58money and that in our case something

56:01needs to be done and if not a city at a

56:05city level

56:07then where

56:11is it supposed to be done?

56:19So, [sighs and gasps]

56:22thank you for listening and I'm hoping

56:26that you take this into consideration.

56:29>> Thank you.

56:31Okay. Does anyone else online wish to

56:33speak?

56:35Just unmute yourself.

56:38>> All right. Does anyone in the audience

56:39who hasn't spoken yet wish to speak?

56:45Yeah. Yes.

56:56Good evening, Eric Richards, 13 Ravine

56:58Drive. I think we need to bring some

57:00clarity to the issue. Even if in this

57:03discussion we stipulate all of the

57:06landlords and all the land owners are

57:08the most amazing people on earth, it

57:11does not take away the fact.

57:13Mr. Rafferty and the board, both of you,

57:16out of your kindness, are looking to

57:18help the most disadvantaged folks and

57:22the folks who do not own a co-op.

57:24And for the folks who have wonderful

57:26landlords today,

57:28but do not know what tomorrow brings or

57:31had a terrible landlord before the

57:34wonderful one arrived. This is a measure

57:37to protect you. The reality is if you

57:40own the land, if you're part of a co-op

57:42or you have a place where you're happy

57:44and your rent is adequately insanely

57:46controlled for increases,

57:48you make it this requires you to take an

57:50extra step to participate. And if all

57:54the residents in all the communities

57:55don't take that step, you don't

57:57participate for but for those residents

57:59who are victims of a predatory system

58:02and you take that step, this will allow

58:05you to have adjudication using a court

58:09formula

58:10set up by the state supreme court that

58:13allows sane increases of not more than

58:1525 or 30% year-over-year. Now VC firms

58:19like Parakeet or others, they are in

58:22fact in business to make money. If

58:24you're shocked, get some tissues.

58:28People are in business to make money.

58:30Real estate works by pooling equity and

58:33value and scaling it in either more

58:35mortgages and loans to increase your

58:38assets or pooling them for sale. That's

58:41reality. This is what happens when you

58:43rent. But this is to protect the

58:46absolute most poorest and vulnerable

58:48folks in our community who need it.

58:50Folks who do not have an extra5 to

58:52$20,000 to move the house that they own

58:55or the trailer they've bought off the

58:58land because they are already in tough

58:59times and their teeth have been kicked

59:01in and they cannot make more pennies and

59:04dollars come from Iraq.

59:07That's what this is about. Nobody has to

59:09participate if they don't want to.

59:12But if they are in a place where they

59:14are being harmed, they have an option to

59:17have a third party put a sane limit on

59:20the increase. And for that reason, I

59:22hope the board will vote to uh enact

59:26this particular measure. It does not

59:28deal with all rent. It only deals with

59:31the mobile home parks who choose to

59:33participate. Thank you.

59:35>> Thank you.

59:37>> All right. It's anyone else. Um, if

59:40there's someone who hasn't spoken yet,

59:41do you want Come on in the back.

59:45She's spoken.

59:56My name is Laurens. I own

1:00:00468 Washington Street.

1:00:04My park is different than most parks

1:00:07because we own the land. We own the

1:00:10mobile homes. And I want my tenants to

1:00:13know that we're not gouging. This has

1:00:16really nothing to do with us because

1:00:19it's not a candidate for rent control.

1:00:23My family also owned American Mobile

1:00:26Home Park. We had a total of 68 tenants.

1:00:31Never had any issues. Treated them like

1:00:34family. We were treated like family. We

1:00:37didn't make a ton of money. We didn't

1:00:40get rich for sure because we're still

1:00:42working. But I think in all fairness,

1:00:47you have to remember that every mobile

1:00:50home park has differences. Justin and

1:00:53John run their parks as their own, which

1:00:56they are. They put their blood and sweat

1:00:59and tears into it just like we do. We're

1:01:02not a major corporation. So I think you

1:01:05need to separate the small business from

1:01:09the major corporations.

1:01:11Thank you.

1:01:12>> Thank you.

1:01:17>> Does anyone else like to speak who

1:01:19hasn't spoken yet?

1:01:22Okay. How about someone who's already

1:01:23spoken wants to come back up? Oh, in the

1:01:26black. You haven't spoken yet, right?

1:01:36Hello,

1:01:38I'm Natalie McGurn. I work for Parakeet

1:01:40Communities. Um, I am the director of

1:01:42operations. So, we are a management

1:01:45company. I hear what everyone is saying.

1:01:48I just wanted to acknowledge that we are

1:01:49here in person. I have a regional

1:01:51manager and the manager of the community

1:01:53that's here. So, if you have questions,

1:01:57happy to answer them for you, but want

1:01:59to make sure that you guys understand

1:02:00that we are we are here. Like, we're

1:02:02here. I'm here to listen. So, that's all

1:02:05I have to say.

1:02:07Thank you. Thank you. [clears throat]

1:02:09Um, anyone else who hasn't spoken for

1:02:11the first time want to speak?

1:02:14Okay. How about the gentleman in the

1:02:16white shirt? Yeah.

1:02:31My name's Mark Raymond. Uh, this is my

1:02:34second time speaking. Uh, the bottom

1:02:36line here is if we can't get parakeet

1:02:39under control,

1:02:41stop them from breaking all the

1:02:43manufactured housing laws, stop them

1:02:45from breaking 93A violations. We're

1:02:49sunk. Okay? And that's all they do is

1:02:51break housing laws in 93 and they don't

1:02:54care. All right, we have to get these

1:02:56rents under control or else you're going

1:02:58to have mass evictions over at

1:03:01Whispering Pines as well as American.

1:03:04Now, their philosophy is they're a

1:03:07corporation and they can do that and

1:03:09they admit that they can raise their

1:03:11rents as high as they want because

1:03:12they're a corporation and they can do

1:03:14that. Uh, I just like to mention a short

1:03:17story here. There's a gentleman up at

1:03:19American and uh he's having trouble ma

1:03:22ma make making his rent payments. So uh

1:03:27parakeet suggested them suggested to him

1:03:29that he go to raft. Raft as you may know

1:03:32is a is a Massachusetts agency that

1:03:35helps people uh with their rent. It's

1:03:38not sustainable but it gets them might

1:03:40get him through a tough time. So the

1:03:43this gentleman went to Raft and he was

1:03:46approved. He submitted the paper to

1:03:49parake and parake rejected it. They s

1:03:52they they told him to go to Raph and

1:03:54then he goes to Raph, gets approved and

1:03:56then they reject it. That's who parake

1:03:59it is. They don't want to tell you who

1:04:01they are, but that's who parake it is.

1:04:03Now, is that legal? Certainly. But it's

1:04:06certainly not that's kind of a cruel

1:04:07thing to do to somebody.

1:04:10So, I get a little worked up when I talk

1:04:12about parakeet, but I've had enough

1:04:13dealings with them. So, thank you very

1:04:15much. Thank you. Would anyone else like

1:04:18to speak? Woman. Yep.

1:04:20>> Hasn't spoken yet.

1:04:21>> Who hasn't? Alan. Okay.

1:04:23>> Yeah, I'll get him next.

1:04:34>> Currently, this is the only forum where

1:04:37I can be heard by Parakeet. And I

1:04:40appreciate you allowing me to speak.

1:04:43Parakeet, they may have a management

1:04:45company, but I'm sorry to say, whoever

1:04:47you are and sitting here, but you never

1:04:50answer your phone, it rings and rings

1:04:52and rings.

1:04:54Management company, they have sent us

1:04:56out contracts that they don't sign.

1:05:01How's that? We need some kind of help.

1:05:04I'm not saying you can give us a legal

1:05:06help, but you can give us some kind of a

1:05:08reference, uh, a moral reference, any

1:05:12kind of a reference, because these

1:05:14people, they talk a lot here, but they

1:05:16never answer their phone for any

1:05:18complaints. And I know cuz I've called.

1:05:22>> Thank you. And what and your name,

1:05:23please? [applause]

1:05:27And my name is And my name is Joanne

1:05:31Mararyian and I'm very proud of telling

1:05:34you that.

1:05:35>> Thank you.

1:05:40>> All right. Who's next? Mr. Rafferty.

1:05:52>> Like you said, Mr. graphity Paul Street.

1:05:55Um,

1:05:57first of all, I'd like to thank Dan

1:05:59Carpenter for suggesting that this

1:06:02hearing be held because there was some

1:06:04concern at a town meeting that um a lot

1:06:08of town meeting members expressed

1:06:11uh a problem with with the subject

1:06:13matter and felt that there had to be

1:06:15more input from the residents and from

1:06:17all the parties involved so that they

1:06:20they would be more clear on the issue.

1:06:22And as a result, what they did is they

1:06:23didn't vote the rent control article

1:06:26down. They tabled it, which in

1:06:29parliamentary procedure is also the

1:06:32polite way of killing something. You

1:06:34table it so that people won't hold it

1:06:37against you. I didn't understand what

1:06:40was going on.

1:06:42Now, let me just explain something to

1:06:43you. First of all, some of the mobile

1:06:46home park owners that have spoken, they

1:06:49are indeed good people and they treat

1:06:51their their people well.

1:06:54Not so with parakeet.

1:06:57That's the problem.

1:06:59And

1:07:01the problem is financialization.

1:07:05Financialization is taking root in our

1:07:07country. people uh investment firms are

1:07:10buying up all sorts of businesses and

1:07:14they become a monopoly

1:07:16and when they do that they can

1:07:19monopolize the market and they can

1:07:20charge whatever they want and they do

1:07:24and they do quite well and so that is

1:07:28what parakeet is. They were investment

1:07:30investment uh people who came together

1:07:32pulled their money and they're buying up

1:07:34properties all over the place. Florida

1:07:37is having a hell of a time because what

1:07:40happens is the properties are being

1:07:41bought up. Now, if you're are a mobile

1:07:44home park and you look pretty good,

1:07:48there's a financial group might come in

1:07:50and buy from your owner and they're

1:07:53going to offer them a quite a nice sum

1:07:55of money and they're going to have to

1:07:57decide, well, am I going to continue to

1:08:00plow snow in New England or I'm going to

1:08:02take that money and retire in Florida?

1:08:05What do you think they're going to do?

1:08:07You really think they're going to give

1:08:08up millions of dollars?

1:08:11So, as it stands, if your landlord is is

1:08:15treating you fine and they're being

1:08:17reasonable, yeah, you're very lucky. But

1:08:21when the financial group comes into town

1:08:23and buys the property, everything is

1:08:26going to change for you. And rent

1:08:29control will will provide some security.

1:08:32Now, let me explain quickly what what

1:08:34rent control does. A rent control board

1:08:36will be formed and appointed by the

1:08:38board of selectmen. And what happens is

1:08:41they will review your expendit

1:08:43expenditures and then uh they have to

1:08:46prove what what their costs were and

1:08:48then they allow for a certain amount of

1:08:49profit reasonable amount of profit. Now

1:08:52depending on who gets appointed to that

1:08:54board they might give you a little bit

1:08:55of profit but they might give you a

1:08:57whole lot of profit.

1:08:58>> Um Mr. Raferty um we've reached three

1:09:00minutes.

1:09:01>> Let me just say one last thing Madam

1:09:03Chairman here's the big problem. We can

1:09:06pass rent control at town meeting and it

1:09:08goes off to the legislature.

1:09:10Unfortunately, the legislature of

1:09:12Massachusetts has been sitting on these

1:09:15rent control um uh articles.

1:09:18>> Thank you. All right. Um yes, Justin.

1:09:23Yep.

1:09:30>> Good evening. Uh Justin Saler of Mobile

1:09:34Communities here.

1:09:35>> Um I wasn't going to get up and speak

1:09:37tonight, but just wanted to get up and

1:09:40reiterate again uh the negative effects

1:09:42that rent control can have on the

1:09:44communities and us as owners as far as

1:09:46tying our hands yearly yearly expenses

1:09:51continue to go up. Sewer, water, real

1:09:53estate taxes, insurance, all that. in

1:09:55tying our hands to a certain amount.

1:09:57It's going to do as Cheryl had said

1:09:59previously is diminish the property

1:10:01values over time for our residents. Um

1:10:04it's going to hurt their home values,

1:10:06hurt the parks. We're going to have to

1:10:07start uh look at different services that

1:10:09we may have to cut and overall it's it's

1:10:13just not going to do anything good for

1:10:14the parks. So, thank you.

1:10:17>> Thank you.

1:10:19[applause]

1:10:21>> Okay, looks like we're coming to the

1:10:23end. Does anyone else want to um speak

1:10:25before we wrap it up?

1:10:29>> Yes, you are in Cheryl, right? Yeah.

1:10:32>> Yes.

1:10:38>> Once again, my name is Cheryl Gendro.

1:10:41And one thing I wanted to tell you, but

1:10:43I had to keep it under three minutes.

1:10:45Years ago, when I first moved into the

1:10:47mobile home park that I'm in, I had a

1:10:49slum of a landlord. He didn't care

1:10:51whatsoever.

1:10:54comes January, we had a water line

1:10:58issue. Couldn't reach him. Couldn't

1:11:00reach him. So, it's like, okay, I

1:11:03reached out to the town of Auburn to see

1:11:06what they could do to help me. And I

1:11:10would assume none of you were on the

1:11:13board back in 2003,

1:11:152004.

1:11:17The response was, "It's a private

1:11:20matter. it's private property. We we

1:11:23can't help you. So, I ended up calling

1:11:26the border health because having no

1:11:28water is a border health issue. That's

1:11:30when the town

1:11:32took action, but you know, it's private

1:11:36property. Does the town of Auburn want

1:11:38to get involved in private business? You

1:11:42know, you guys have enough on your

1:11:43hands. Thank you.

1:11:45>> Thank you.

1:11:49>> All right. Is is there anyone online who

1:11:51would like to speak

1:11:54regarding this?

1:11:57No.

1:11:59What? One more. Oh, yeah. The last

1:12:01speaker. Yeah.

1:12:16>> Um um just identify yourself too. Hi, my

1:12:19name my [cough and clears throat] my

1:12:20name is Kathleen Charbano and I live at

1:12:23Whispering Pines and I wish I had a

1:12:26landlord like Justin.

1:12:29I really do. But we right now are in the

1:12:33same spot she was in. So it hasn't

1:12:36improved. disapproved for her, which is

1:12:39great. But, uh, you know, at the way m

1:12:43Massachusetts is going, like California,

1:12:45like New York, it's going to keep going

1:12:47up and up and up and up. And eventually,

1:12:49I don't know if you're on a fixed income

1:12:50or not, but we we are a lot of us are at

1:12:54the point where we just can't pay that

1:12:56much more in rent anymore.

1:12:59We can't. That's why we're looking for

1:13:01rent control. As far as I'm concerned,

1:13:04you guys can. You don't have to do your

1:13:05rent control. You can do what you're

1:13:07doing right now. We don't care. You guys

1:13:10are having a great time. Enjoy.

1:13:12We We want to live because I don't do

1:13:15well in cardboard boxes.

1:13:18I'm sorry.

1:13:21>> Thank you.

1:13:29>> Yes, sir.

1:13:31We're going to ask any questions the

1:13:33participants?

1:13:34>> No, that's No, we're not. This is

1:13:36information gathering, but no questions

1:13:38tonight.

1:13:41>> Seeing no other person, I'll make a

1:13:42motion to close the public hearing.

1:13:44>> I'll second.

1:13:47>> So, we have two more people. Okay.

1:13:50>> Um, the woman in the black from Parakeet

1:13:52first.

1:13:54>> Just to make it clean, I withdraw my

1:13:56motion.

1:13:56>> Thank you.

1:14:00Hi, Natalie McGurn again. I'm so sorry

1:14:03to take your time. Um, I do want to let

1:14:05everybody know that we are going to be

1:14:06hanging around. So, if you do have

1:14:08questions, I'm happy to address them. We

1:14:10are here to work with you guys. We're

1:14:12not here to work against you guys.

1:14:15There's there's so many things that we

1:14:18can be doing together rather than doing

1:14:20it separately. So, we are going to be

1:14:22able it it didn't take this for me to

1:14:25come. We we have people in the

1:14:27properties. I'm happy to have the

1:14:29conversations. I'm not going to stand

1:14:31I'm not going to stand here to do it,

1:14:33but I wanted to let you guys know that

1:14:35we're here to have the conversations.

1:14:37>> All right. Thank you. Um

1:14:41>> Yep. All right. The last Mark, come on.

1:14:43Last one. Yep.

1:14:56Mark Raymond, uh, I have a question for

1:14:59the board. Is it possible to ask a

1:15:00question to the board? Did you receive

1:15:01my email on rent control? I sent it to

1:15:04Kathy.

1:15:05>> Yes, we did.

1:15:06>> Did Okay. Very good. I That's all I

1:15:08needed to hear. Okay.

1:15:09>> All right. Thank you. All right. This

1:15:11hearing the hearing is over.

1:15:14>> With that, I will make a motion to close

1:15:16the public hearing.

1:15:17>> I'll second. So, you have a motion and a

1:15:19second to close the public hearing. All

1:15:21in favor? I I opposed.

1:15:24>> Um, so

1:15:25>> Madam Chair, can I make a motion for a

1:15:27five minute?

1:15:28>> Before we do that, I just want you to

1:15:29know the board of selectment is taking

1:15:31all this information under advisement at

1:15:33this point. Okay.

1:15:35>> Thank you very much. And sir,

1:15:37>> make a motion for five minute recess.

1:15:40>> I'll second. Sorry.

1:15:41>> A motion to second five minute recess.

1:15:43Thank you. All in favor? I I oppose. No.

1:15:46Good.

1:15:50We don't need a motion quick to open the

1:15:52meeting.

1:15:54>> Y

1:15:59>> All right, we're calling the meeting

1:16:01back to order.

1:16:03Thank you. Um continuing on our agenda,

1:16:09uh we have um departmental items, a

1:16:12board vote and fire department surplus

1:16:14equipment, I think. Um, and then a

1:16:18regional dispatch update. I think Chief

1:16:21Coleman was going to do those.

1:16:25So, we're going to get Chief Coleman.

1:16:28>> Do I hear a motion to take item 8 C?

1:16:32>> Uh, so moved.

1:16:33>> Seconded.

1:16:34>> All right. We have um all in favor.

1:16:36>> I opposed. Okay. So, this is a motion.

1:16:39This is a board vote on a drain layer

1:16:41license for Paul Morris at 50 Salem Road

1:16:45at 50 Peter Salem Road in Lester.

1:16:49Any questions?

1:16:53As a reminder, this has already been

1:16:55vetted by the uh DPW.

1:17:01Hearing no comments, uh I make a motion

1:17:03to approve the drain layer license for

1:17:05Paul Morris located at 50 Peter Salem

1:17:08Road, Lester, Mass. to 01524. Provided

1:17:11that all applicable requirements of the

1:17:12state and town and any of its

1:17:14departments, boards and commissions have

1:17:15been fulfilled, said license is subject

1:17:17to all the conditions stated upon it.

1:17:19Failure to comply with any and all

1:17:20conditions shall invalidate the license

1:17:22and render it null and void.

1:17:24>> Second. So we have a motion and a

1:17:25second. All in favor?

1:17:27>> I opposed. No.

1:17:39Um

1:17:54>> okay. Um moving on in the uh in the

1:17:56warrant

1:17:58um we don't have any gift acceptances.

1:18:00We don't have any proclamations and

1:18:02recommendations. Um, our next item is

1:18:07AF, a discussion of the economic

1:18:10development committee's report on tax

1:18:12classification.

1:18:14We were provided with the um their

1:18:17report.

1:18:25>> Okay.

1:18:27Does anyone have any questions?

1:18:30or what what would we like to um

1:18:33incorporate from their recommendation

1:18:35into the tax classification hearing?

1:18:42>> Dan, I I defer to you. Do you have any

1:18:44um anything you want to bring up first?

1:18:47>> No, I really need additional time to

1:18:51really study it. I know they presented

1:18:54in June. Um, I did review it at one

1:18:58point, but I don't have anything to

1:18:59offer at the moment.

1:19:09>> Mr. Chair,

1:19:11>> go ahead.

1:19:13I didn't have anything specific, but I

1:19:14feel like we should have a working group

1:19:17of this board to review this as well as

1:19:20ask for additional information on the

1:19:23tax classification hearing because I I

1:19:25think a lot of this requires staff to

1:19:27help present some of this information.

1:19:30Certainly the more meaningful the

1:19:32information the less wasted time for

1:19:34staff but also will help provide us with

1:19:36the information we need to make the best

1:19:39not just single-year determination but

1:19:41long-term plan as well.

1:19:45>> I just to build off of what Mr. Chambers

1:19:48said that that was going to be my

1:19:51question to the administration is that

1:19:54um first I want to thank the economic

1:19:55development committee for putting this

1:19:57together. Um once again um this provides

1:20:00a lot of um metrics and data for us to

1:20:06weigh our decisions off of that I think

1:20:08some of us have asked for over the years

1:20:10but um you know we're not able to get

1:20:13provided that information. So some of us

1:20:15did our own research try to come up with

1:20:17uh a framework for how we would approach

1:20:19this. Um but this gives you know solid

1:20:22comparison, solid database, you know,

1:20:25allows us to make database decisions. Um

1:20:28and so my question to the administration

1:20:30is looking at this, have you worked uh

1:20:34with the assessors

1:20:36uh office or has the CFO looked at this

1:20:41um to or perhaps the uh you know

1:20:46assistant town manager uh for economic

1:20:48development looked at this to see what

1:20:51is reasonable or capable of being

1:20:54provided to us um for I believe it's

1:20:56November when we typically do the the

1:20:58tax classification is this information

1:21:00that if we said today we want all of

1:21:03this could you provide all of this in no

1:21:07>> through the chair that's a good question

1:21:08yes we've all looked at it um we were

1:21:11waiting for additional guidance from the

1:21:13board on what areas you wanted to focus

1:21:15on if you wanted us to get information

1:21:18in every one of these areas I'm not sure

1:21:21that's possible but they do set

1:21:24parameters for you to help you make the

1:21:26decision on um the tax classification

1:21:29and your decisions that you have to

1:21:30make. So um any information or guidance

1:21:35you want to give me then we can gather

1:21:37that information for you.

1:21:39>> For for myself and only speaking for

1:21:41myself I want all of this and probably

1:21:44want more but I don't know what that

1:21:46more is yet but I'll settle for all of

1:21:47this.

1:21:48>> Okay.

1:21:52>> Again I know this happens after town

1:21:54meeting. I I feel like we should have

1:21:57more of this information before town

1:21:59meeting so when they're voting on the

1:22:01budget they can see the potential

1:22:03impacts. I'm not sure if that's

1:22:05possible, but again, we're we're voting

1:22:07on a budget which will directly impact

1:22:09what the tax rate is. And I know at town

1:22:12meeting we say, "Oh, this will be what

1:22:15it goes up per thousand or whatever or

1:22:18per resident." And and that's great. I

1:22:21just would like to again have more of

1:22:23that information so when town meeting

1:22:25votes on it they know really the

1:22:28decision of this board is not it's based

1:22:31on what they approve but also how we're

1:22:34splitting that rate and what it how it

1:22:36impacts as we've heard from comments

1:22:38tonight that you know people use taxes

1:22:41as an excuse for going up on things and

1:22:43yes taxes do go up but I think we've

1:22:45been pretty good overall trying to

1:22:48minimize that impact

1:22:53Okay.

1:22:54Um, so I'm hearing that we'd like a

1:22:57working group and that's something that

1:23:00we can set up at our next meeting. We

1:23:02can put on our agenda to um create the

1:23:05working group.

1:23:06>> Yeah. Okay.

1:23:07>> I mean, I definitely have things that I

1:23:09wanted in so in the presentation that we

1:23:13have in November. So certainly things

1:23:16like the unemployment rate, state and

1:23:19federal funding

1:23:21is restricted unrestricted aid trending

1:23:23up or down. Chapter 90 the same school

1:23:27sped transportation same

1:23:30state revenue projections. Our

1:23:32projections on target are projections

1:23:35exceeding expectations and at what

1:23:37percentage?

1:23:38Our new growth. Are we seeing investment

1:23:41in commercial and industrial properties?

1:23:43Are we seeing new businesses opening or

1:23:46expanding and at what percentage rate?

1:23:49Um, similarly, personal property, are we

1:23:51seeing commercial industrial property

1:23:53increases?

1:23:55The budget growth, I I think we need to

1:23:57treat this as part of the budget process

1:24:01because it is. And I think Mr. Chambers

1:24:03and and Mr. Crane have

1:24:07made that kind of clear. And I do think

1:24:09that when we talk about town meeting, I

1:24:12do think that the more information we

1:24:14can provide

1:24:16in a chart, maybe a one-page chart that

1:24:21says when you're talking about voting

1:24:24for items 5 through 10, this is what's

1:24:27going to happen.

1:24:29If you're voting on all 20 and you're

1:24:32not thinking about what how you're going

1:24:34to pay that six months from now where

1:24:36some of your neighbors can't afford to

1:24:37pay it,

1:24:39>> this is what's going to happen. So I I

1:24:41think that's an excellent idea that uh

1:24:44Mr. Chambers recommended. Um I would

1:24:47like to see budget growth. I'd like us

1:24:49to see what the actual percentage is for

1:24:51the last five years, estimated growth

1:24:54over the next three to four years

1:24:57and employee cost over the life of a

1:24:59contract

1:25:00as well as bilar employee contracts over

1:25:03the lifetime of their contracts. Um, at

1:25:06some point I would like to see us post

1:25:08all bargaining agreements and all

1:25:11contracts on our website in a public and

1:25:16notorious place so people understand

1:25:18what our bylaw employees are getting

1:25:20paid and what our collective bargaining

1:25:22obligations are because that drives our

1:25:25budget. I think we've all watched

1:25:27finance and obviously, Madam Chair,

1:25:29you've been on finance for a number of

1:25:30years before you joined our board and

1:25:33you know that 80% of the budget

1:25:36is directly related to payroll. Well,

1:25:39that's not sustainable over the long

1:25:42term depending on personal property

1:25:45taxes. We know this. Um, so we need to

1:25:48start thinking about that and doing

1:25:50things in a multi-year format as opposed

1:25:53to treating this like a one-year deal

1:25:56and next year, well, we'll worry about

1:25:57next year. No, we got to worry about the

1:25:59next 3 to four years because

1:26:02the state is now the most expensive in

1:26:05the country and we're one of the

1:26:06smallest states in the country by

1:26:09population and land size. We should all

1:26:11be very concerned about that. Um, and

1:26:13Auburn has certainly gone up in my time

1:26:16on the board. We've more than doubled

1:26:18the average tax bill and I don't think

1:26:21people's salaries have gone up double um

1:26:24over the course of 12 years. So, those

1:26:27are just ideas that I had thought up. I

1:26:30was not thinking when you mentioned it

1:26:32originally to reflect on that, but I

1:26:35have been thinking about what I'd like

1:26:37to see going forward. Thank you.

1:26:40>> Um, thank you, Dan. Could you do me a

1:26:42favor and could you send those ideas to

1:26:44me?

1:26:44>> Yes,

1:26:44>> I would appreciate that. All right.

1:26:46Thank you. All right. Any other

1:26:48discussion on this right now?

1:26:53>> Okay. So, um I see Chief Coleman here.

1:26:56So, we're going to go back to item uh

1:26:586A. This is going to be a board vote on

1:27:00fire department surplus equipment

1:27:03disposal request.

1:27:07>> Thank you, Madam Chair.

1:27:10Uh as the letter indicates, we're

1:27:12looking to declare uh the old service

1:27:14truck uh forestry unit as surplus

1:27:17property. Um the vehicle has some uh

1:27:21frame rot. It was our primary plow truck

1:27:23and forestry unit uh for many years. So

1:27:26the frame is uh beyond repair. So we're

1:27:28looking to surplus it. Most likely it

1:27:31will be sold to auction.

1:27:36Okay.

1:27:38Any questions on this?

1:27:39>> Uh Madam Chair, if I can just can I just

1:27:42confirm that um this vehicle has been

1:27:45replaced. We have you have an existing

1:27:46for sheet truck or plow truck uh in in

1:27:50use.

1:27:50>> Yes. So, uh one of our existing pickup

1:27:54trucks is going to be playing double

1:27:55duty. Um there is a plan in the CIP on

1:28:00how we're going to be uh handling this

1:28:02with a different kind of setup. uh that

1:28:04will be discussed this budget. But yes,

1:28:05we do have a pickup truck for plow and

1:28:07forestry.

1:28:09>> So that'd be this year's CIP or next

1:28:12fiscal year CIP.

1:28:14>> It's not actually to replace a vehicle.

1:28:16It's a new strategy on how we're looking

1:28:18to deploy some of the resources to

1:28:20reduce the number of fleet vehicles.

1:28:22>> Thank you.

1:28:23>> Okay.

1:28:25Do I hear a motion?

1:28:27>> Make a motion to approve the fire

1:28:28department equipment disposal request as

1:28:30presented.

1:28:31>> I'll second. Um, we have a motion and a

1:28:33second. All in favor? I

1:28:35>> opposed. No.

1:28:37>> All right. And I believe Chief, you're

1:28:39going to give us a uh update on the

1:28:42regional dispatch center.

1:28:47>> Uh, yes. Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh,

1:28:50good evening, members of the board. Um,

1:28:51so officially on July 1st, uh, Central

1:28:54Mass Regional uh, communicate emergency

1:28:56communication center uh, was formed as a

1:28:59district. They officially separated uh

1:29:02from the town of Rutland on June 30th.

1:29:04Uh so the new district has taken on all

1:29:07of their employees and existing debt. Uh

1:29:10the operations board uh they are

1:29:13meeting. They don't have really a whole

1:29:14lot to meet on. The administrative board

1:29:16is is meeting more frequently. Uh

1:29:19there's actually an administrative board

1:29:20this Wednesday. We currently have an RFP

1:29:24out um in search of a uh building. So,

1:29:27we're seeking proposals for the

1:29:29building. Uh, when the state 911 grant

1:29:32was proposed, there was a building in

1:29:34mind, but legally we have to go out for

1:29:37an RFP. So, we used a building um a

1:29:40property for sort of grant purposes uh

1:29:43just so we had a rough budget number.

1:29:45Um, but officially the building has to

1:29:46go out uh for an RFP. So, that RFP is

1:29:49due back at the end of September. Uh so

1:29:51we'll know what we have for possible

1:29:54building locations. Uh at this um admin

1:29:58board on Wednesday, we will be uh voting

1:30:01to put out the RFP to hire an OPM. Uh

1:30:05we're hoping to have the OPM be involved

1:30:07in the building selection and then once

1:30:09the building is selected, we'll do an

1:30:11RFP uh to hire architectural uh

1:30:14services. So um that's where we are. the

1:30:16the district has made a couple um of

1:30:19administration um hires. They've hired

1:30:22uh an executive assistant uh to the

1:30:24director uh and the deputy director. Um

1:30:27again, because they took over officially

1:30:29uh on July 1st. Um so there's there's

1:30:32actually admin staff um that's assisting

1:30:35in a lot of these pro processes. So

1:30:38things are still moving forward. Um, and

1:30:42it's anticipated that we're on the same

1:30:44timeline that uh they'll probably be

1:30:46taking our emergency calls in about two

1:30:48years. So, it's it's that process is

1:30:50still really hasn't moved.

1:30:53>> Okay. Any questions?

1:30:55>> I have a couple. Uh, thank you for the

1:30:56update, Chief. So, they'll be taking our

1:30:58calls two years from what date is that?

1:31:02Two years.

1:31:03>> So, it'd be I think July of 28. I think

1:31:06it would be the summer of 28.

1:31:09Now again, it depends that also depends

1:31:11on what comes in for the RFPs for the

1:31:14building because if it's a building that

1:31:16needs um greater renovation versus

1:31:19something that might be um a little more

1:31:21turnkey that can speed up. So I think

1:31:25you know worst case I think we're

1:31:26looking at the 28 but I think a lot is

1:31:28going to be determined by what building

1:31:29is selected.

1:31:31>> Thank you. Um, so I know that I've joked

1:31:35or half joked sometimes during the

1:31:36budget uh discussion and others that uh

1:31:39the savings that were projected has

1:31:41probably been spent over by each

1:31:43department about 10 times. Um

1:31:46I know that you know when this was

1:31:48presented to us and and got our approval

1:31:51there was a projected savings. Um

1:31:53however there was an unknown at that

1:31:56time um with respect to what were the

1:31:59costs and what was the manpower going to

1:32:01be to replace um the 911 communication

1:32:05staff that currently also staff the

1:32:08front desk um of the police station. And

1:32:12I know there's been discussion sort of

1:32:14off and on um on on what that would look

1:32:17like. When do we think that um that the

1:32:22administration will be able to present

1:32:24to this board exactly what that

1:32:27replacement looks like? Um whether it is

1:32:30sworn staff, administrative staff, etc.

1:32:33Um how many, you know, additional staff

1:32:36members at that point? Um will it take

1:32:39the implications budget-wise from that

1:32:41cost, the the savings that we're

1:32:43realizing? Um we know a portion of that

1:32:46savings is going toward the fire

1:32:47department. once your grant for fully

1:32:49staffing comes off. Um, so I think it's

1:32:53important that we know that data sooner

1:32:56rather than later because just my own

1:32:59preference is I don't want to wait until

1:33:02the July 2028 budget starts to suddenly

1:33:07have to, you know, try to make all of

1:33:10that up and throw it all in that budget

1:33:11year. if there is a way where we could

1:33:13stagger that in um knowing um what's the

1:33:16implications are um it's I think it's

1:33:19going to be a lot easier um and a lot

1:33:21more palatable. So when when do we think

1:33:24that the administration will be able to

1:33:26come back to this board with a solid

1:33:29plan that says with communications

1:33:31shifting, here's what we need, here's

1:33:35the cost, here's where that projected

1:33:38savings is going. Um, and here's

1:33:41hopefully the remaining projected

1:33:43savings that's available uh for other

1:33:45uses.

1:33:45>> Yeah, that's a good question. I'm going

1:33:47to defer to the manager to answer the

1:33:49bulk of that, but I'll just say a year

1:33:51ago the projected savings at the time

1:33:53was um $1.2 million on last year's

1:33:57numbers. And why I mentioned that is we

1:33:59had not um finalized negotiations with

1:34:04um specifically in this case the

1:34:06dispatch union. Um so now that they have

1:34:08an executed collective bargain

1:34:10agreement, we actually know what those

1:34:11expenses are over the next three years.

1:34:13we're going to have a better we're going

1:34:15to have a better handle on being able to

1:34:16project um the savings from this fiscal

1:34:20year, next fiscal year, fiscal 28. So

1:34:23that was also part of an unknown was we

1:34:25didn't have a signed collective

1:34:26bargaining agreement. Um but we will

1:34:28have we'll have a better handle on that.

1:34:29As far as the other timeline, I would

1:34:30defer to the manager

1:34:32>> through the chair. Um, if you can recall

1:34:35back when we were working on this year's

1:34:37fiscal budget, there were conversations

1:34:39about this and about needs within our

1:34:42um, Auburn Police Department. I've been

1:34:45working very closely with the chief on

1:34:47developing a detailed plan. He is

1:34:49working with his key staff um to talk

1:34:52about it operationally, what the

1:34:54dispatchers do now, what um it looks

1:34:57like when they leave, what needs to who

1:35:00needs to be replaced by whom, how many

1:35:02people, and the cost of that. So, I can

1:35:04tell you it's going to be sooner rather

1:35:06than later. We've been working on it for

1:35:08quite a while. We want to um consider

1:35:11also that in fiscal year 28 um our union

1:35:16contracts will be up as well. So there

1:35:18is a lot to consider. Um if we do bring

1:35:22on police officers, if we do bring on

1:35:24clerical union staff um to cover the

1:35:27desk, which is is definitely in our

1:35:29conversation right now, all of that will

1:35:32need to be considered. But I would

1:35:33definitely say sooner rather than later

1:35:35this fiscal year, if not this calendar

1:35:37year.

1:35:39>> Okay. Thank you. I just want to make

1:35:40sure that as we approach the next budget

1:35:42season and the budget season after that

1:35:44um not only this board but more

1:35:46importantly finance committee has a

1:35:48handle on what all of those numbers look

1:35:50like, what all that staffing looks like

1:35:52um and then town meeting as well. So

1:35:54it's good to hear that it's coming

1:35:56hopefully this calendar year.

1:35:58>> Yes. And if I if I may, um the goal is

1:36:00to bring it to the board of selectmen

1:36:02and finance so that they also have one

1:36:06or two meetings where where there's a

1:36:08discussion and conversation. So it will

1:36:11be definitely be both.

1:36:14>> I can make a request that it go to

1:36:15finance before it goes to us.

1:36:18[snorts]

1:36:20>> Okay. Any other questions? Any other

1:36:22questions for uh chief?

1:36:26>> All right. I think you're all set. Thank

1:36:27you, sir.

1:36:28>> Thank you.

1:36:29>> All right. So, now going back to our

1:36:30agenda, checking off a few more items.

1:36:33So, what we still have to do is um uh

1:36:36review the warrant.

1:36:38And we're going to review the warrant at

1:36:40this this meeting and the next one.

1:36:42Correct.

1:36:43>> Well, um through the chair, I wanted to

1:36:46give the board ample opportunity to be

1:36:48able to discuss all of the articles.

1:36:51Yep. Um, you don't need to make a mo uh

1:36:54an opinion tonight, but it will have to

1:36:56be made at the the next meeting. So,

1:36:59it's really up to you how and what you

1:37:01decide to do in regards to the position

1:37:02of the board.

1:37:04>> Um, but I do have key staff here that

1:37:06are able to answer questions that you

1:37:08may have.

1:37:08>> Okay. And I um I believe our chief

1:37:11financial officer is here to give us an

1:37:13update.

1:37:16So this is um we're in item 8F board

1:37:19review discussion and possible vote on

1:37:22position of town meeting warrant

1:37:23articles.

1:37:32>> Good evening.

1:37:33>> Good evening.

1:37:35So, I was just downstairs doing some of

1:37:37my number crunching, looking at the free

1:37:40cash and all of that, and um things are

1:37:42very, very lean from the results from

1:37:45fiscal 26. From what I'm seeing right

1:37:47now, it looks like the addition to the

1:37:50free cash is about in the area of

1:37:53$300,000.

1:37:55And I know that there's a lot of

1:37:57articles in here too that say free cash

1:38:00stabilization

1:38:02um borrowing. So I just kind of wanted

1:38:04to update the board on what to expect on

1:38:06the results of that and that there's

1:38:09also some articles in here that do not

1:38:12have a sum of money right now which is

1:38:14like OPED and the stabilization. So I

1:38:17think as we go through we just have to

1:38:19be very careful on determining our

1:38:21priorities or the board. This is what

1:38:23what I'm suggesting is just to you know

1:38:25just be very careful when determining

1:38:28your priorities. Um because what will

1:38:31happen is you know obviously if you go

1:38:34over over that amount then we're going

1:38:36to be going back into the some of the

1:38:39free cash that we have from last year.

1:38:40The balance left over from last year is

1:38:42about 8.2 million.

1:38:45And generally what's you what's in our

1:38:48policies or what is in our policies is

1:38:50what we use up to half of the free cash

1:38:55or the addition to the free cash. But if

1:38:57we're just talking it could be 300 250

1:38:59300,000 then we would you know we we

1:39:03would be maybe 150,000. So it's a it's a

1:39:06significant decrease from what it has

1:39:09been in prior years. and we seeing that

1:39:11as we're budgeting closer closer to

1:39:13actual and um and our expenditures being

1:39:17close. The other thing we had to keep in

1:39:19mind too is the snow and ice. The

1:39:21deficit is about 450,000.

1:39:24The state is allowing the the cities and

1:39:26towns to amortize that over I believe

1:39:29it's a 3-year period. So, we may we have

1:39:32to keep that in mind, too, because we

1:39:35may want to consider where we're going

1:39:37to get that third that we're going to

1:39:40have to amortize or pay down in fiscal

1:39:4227. So, I wish I had some better news,

1:39:45but um that's kind of where we're at at

1:39:48this point.

1:39:49>> Okay. Um what is the stabilization

1:39:51account balance?

1:39:53>> Stabilization account balance is over $4

1:39:55million.

1:40:00And um what was the new growth number?

1:40:03>> The new growth number was 700 I believe

1:40:07it was 73734,727.

1:40:12So we had estimated it conservatively at

1:40:15700,000. So we did have a little bit

1:40:18higher results on that for fiscal 26.

1:40:21I'm sorry for 27.

1:40:24And when um when the final state budget

1:40:27was set, how much higher was it than how

1:40:30much uh larger was it than what our

1:40:33estimates were that we used in the um

1:40:36preparing the budget?

1:40:37>> Mhm. The state aid um came in at 2

1:40:41almost 230,000 higher than what we

1:40:44estimated and that was a combination.

1:40:46The biggest in part of the increase was

1:40:49in the chapter in chapter 70. There was

1:40:52some in the unrestricted aid and some

1:40:55small gains in some of the um Cherry

1:40:57Street charges.

1:41:03>> Okay, questions.

1:41:06>> So, I do have a question to the town

1:41:10manager. Um you said we needed to have

1:41:14our recommendations by the next meeting.

1:41:16Is that so that we can mail out our

1:41:19recommendations?

1:41:22>> How do we look with the timeline?

1:41:24>> So, it goes to the board of selectman

1:41:26first and then it goes to Fincom. So,

1:41:30it's all um at the next meeting is when

1:41:32FINCOM meets as well. So, they'll have

1:41:35their first meeting that week and if

1:41:36they need a second meeting, it'll be the

1:41:38last week of the month.

1:41:39>> My preference if possible is to flip

1:41:43that next year. Finom should be first so

1:41:47that we have their advice. They know the

1:41:50budget better than we do. And when I

1:41:54went through this, I mean, it looked

1:41:56like a balance sheet to me. If any year

1:42:01we should be relying on finance, it's

1:42:03this year because I don't think I've

1:42:06seen this many requests to take from

1:42:09stabilization or free cash in my

1:42:12lifetime of service as a community

1:42:16member. Um, and that's stretching 30 and

1:42:18a half years. So I think we need as a

1:42:22rule we should go to finance first so

1:42:24that they can review and give us their

1:42:27advice and then we can use that as a

1:42:30basis for our recommendation.

1:42:32>> If I if I may through the chair um not

1:42:35sure um the stabilization and free cash

1:42:38requests we we can discuss because

1:42:41they're individual warrant articles.

1:42:43What you're going to see in article two

1:42:45is a little bit more of a reconciliation

1:42:47of the fiscal year 27 budget. When we

1:42:51came to you, the numbers that we used

1:42:53were through February of the fiscal

1:42:56year. So, it was a six-month number. We

1:42:59are ve we're trying very much to budget

1:43:03appropriately. And because of the

1:43:05additional revenue that we have from the

1:43:08state and from new growth, we're able to

1:43:11actually put um some additional we did

1:43:14an additional analysis especially on our

1:43:16building expenses, gas, electricity, and

1:43:19things that have been fluctuating and

1:43:22putting money in um requesting that

1:43:25money be put from these sources into

1:43:27those line items. And it is an effort to

1:43:30ensure that we're budgeted properly. We

1:43:32do have money in contingency. We're

1:43:35trying not to use it. We're hoping

1:43:36that's what eventually at the end of the

1:43:38year goes rolled into free cash, but in

1:43:41the past it would all these increases

1:43:43and all these changes would all get

1:43:46pulled from contingency. It was never

1:43:48accurately budgeted. So there are a lot

1:43:51of requests here, but they're they're

1:43:53actually to amend the budget based on a

1:43:56new analysis with additional numbers and

1:43:59and um especially when it comes to our

1:44:02building expenses and some of the things

1:44:05that we've had to do in our building the

1:44:06past 6 months. So please know that's why

1:44:09there's a difference um when it comes to

1:44:11article 2. And we're hoping that with

1:44:14these proper line items being budgeted

1:44:17properly that we won't have to go into

1:44:20finance and pull from contingency the

1:44:22way we have in the past. So that that's

1:44:24our goal at this point.

1:44:26>> Yeah. So my comments aren't a criticism.

1:44:29They're simply factual based on my

1:44:32experience. And we have a finance

1:44:34committee that knows this budget and I

1:44:38want to hear from them before I opine on

1:44:41a budget that they know 50 times better

1:44:44than I do. So that's the reason for my

1:44:46comments. It's great that we're trying

1:44:49to budget closer. I think that's

1:44:51wonderful that we're not having uh I

1:44:53don't see any slowdown in the

1:44:55requirements for transfers at the

1:44:57finance committee as of yet. So, I'm

1:44:59hoping to see that happen over the next

1:45:02year so that we, as you say, your

1:45:05strategy will bear fruit. Not

1:45:07criticizing. I'm simply expressing as a

1:45:10member

1:45:12what I would like to see.

1:45:15>> So, Madam Chair, if I may.

1:45:16>> Yeah.

1:45:17>> Um,

1:45:18so can I just get clarification um on

1:45:21what the uh town manager just said? So

1:45:25all of the increases and movements that

1:45:27we're seeing in article 2 are going to

1:45:30come from either an increase in state

1:45:34aid or a a you know increase of revenue

1:45:39that we had underproed etc. None of this

1:45:43is going to hit a tax levy or result in

1:45:45an increase in a tax levy.

1:45:47>> Correct.

1:45:49Um, that was just my clarification

1:45:52question because as you were going over

1:45:54that, um, I'm just going to make a

1:45:57general statement um, on this. I'm not

1:46:00ready personally, just speaking for

1:46:03myself, to vote on any of these tonight.

1:46:06Um, like Mr. Carpenter,

1:46:09I want to hear from who I consider our

1:46:11town experts. Um, a lot of this is

1:46:14budget implicated. So for that, I would

1:46:17prefer uh to make my decision based off

1:46:19of the advice, based off the discussion,

1:46:22and based off of the votes that Fincom

1:46:25presents on those issues. There are

1:46:27zoning issues in here that I'd like to

1:46:30have uh the planning board weigh in

1:46:34before we make a recommendation as well.

1:46:36um and and to have all of that in place

1:46:38before it comes to the select board so

1:46:41that we can then make informed, at least

1:46:43in my opinion, more informed decisions

1:46:46and votes on this. Um knowing that our

1:46:49area experts have all looked at this,

1:46:52dug into their area, made

1:46:53recommendations,

1:46:55just my own personal reference.

1:46:57>> Thank you. um through the chair. We went

1:47:01through this last year, actually this

1:47:04year and last year. The zoning articles

1:47:06did go through planning. We do have

1:47:09opinions for the board so that you're

1:47:11able to make opinions based on that

1:47:13information. Um so that part is um is

1:47:18already done. So those we can discuss

1:47:21tonight in addition to everything else.

1:47:25Do you have those um opinions in writing

1:47:28that can be sent to us or

1:47:30>> No,

1:47:32>> we can get them in writing.

1:47:33>> That would be great. Thank you.

1:47:35>> It's not generally a thing.

1:47:36>> And um

1:47:37>> can I sorry, Madam Chair, when you send

1:47:40those opinions in writing, can you just

1:47:42include the date of the meeting so that

1:47:44those of us who have no life and want to

1:47:47go back and rewatch those meetings are

1:47:49able to do so? Thank you.

1:47:51>> Of course.

1:47:53Um,

1:47:57>> no. I I think this comes back down to

1:47:59the discussion knowing that we are

1:48:01budgeted a lot tighter and there's some

1:48:04additional asks in here. I think people

1:48:06are going to be upset to hear no, but I

1:48:08think we need to have the conversation

1:48:10and I would love for all the other

1:48:12boards to weigh in as well because again

1:48:14this is a community and some things are

1:48:16going to have to be looked at a little

1:48:18bit deeper. It shouldn't just be

1:48:21a yes vote on everything. I think when

1:48:24we're talking that close to budget, we

1:48:26need to have tougher conversations. And

1:48:28if some things are, you know, not

1:48:31approved or don't go forward,

1:48:33I think that means we're working well.

1:48:35We're right, we're budgeting properly,

1:48:38some things are a little bit tighter.

1:48:40Um, I think that means all the boards

1:48:42are doing their job. So, I'd love to see

1:48:44what they say and weigh in on.

1:48:48Okay. Um, a question for our chief

1:48:51financial officer. Can you please

1:48:53provide us with the balances for the

1:48:55accounts, the actual balances for free

1:48:58cash, including the increase from last

1:49:00year, um, the stabilization,

1:49:04um, the state aid projected in actual

1:49:08um, and the, um, deficit, snow ice

1:49:12deficit.

1:49:15>> Yes. Now, I I know that's something that

1:49:17the state allows allows the towns to

1:49:20amvertise the the um amount to split it

1:49:24up and put it on the recap sheet, but

1:49:26we've never done that. We've always been

1:49:28able to um you know, close out the year

1:49:31and find some money in extra accounts.

1:49:34Um do we think that there wasn't enough

1:49:37money um uh budgeted for the snow and

1:49:42ice? Is that something we should be

1:49:43revisiting?

1:49:45because we don't want to do this every

1:49:47year.

1:49:48>> Last year was extreme on the snow. Um

1:49:51all weather forecasts. I don't think

1:49:54anyone budgeted snow correctly.

1:49:56>> All right.

1:49:56>> Um but again, I I mean I I don't plow a

1:50:01whole town and I was half a million

1:50:02dollars over budget. So

1:50:04>> um being that there's 400 and

1:50:07something,000 for the town on overage, I

1:50:10I don't think anyone predicted that

1:50:11amount of snow.

1:50:14Yes. And and through the chair, if I

1:50:16could, with the state allowing us to

1:50:18amvertise it over multiple years, that

1:50:20does mean that most cities and towns are

1:50:22in a deficit. Um, so so they're giving

1:50:25us a chance to make it up over multiple

1:50:28years.

1:50:29>> Um, do you have a just a quick ask, do

1:50:32you have the total amount of the

1:50:34increases for article 2?

1:50:37Yes, the total amount of the increases

1:50:40are 941,217.

1:50:44I just wanted to point out on that of

1:50:46that amount 534,680

1:50:50is for bond anticipation note interest

1:50:53related to the fire station project and

1:50:57that will be dead excluded.

1:50:59>> Okay. Oh, good. Well, yeah. All right.

1:51:03and

1:51:04and am I correct in the um we're able to

1:51:08spend that um none of this money will

1:51:11come from the tax levy because it's

1:51:13coming from the extra state aid and

1:51:15maybe adjustments on our projections for

1:51:17local receipts.

1:51:20That's go well that's correct. So the

1:51:22state aid increase was the about

1:51:24230,000.

1:51:26Y

1:51:26>> the 50,000 for the increase in the

1:51:29contract for the solid waste is coming

1:51:31from the solid waste revenues.

1:51:33>> Okay.

1:51:34>> The um the request from the fire

1:51:37department is coming from the ambulance

1:51:40receipts.

1:51:41>> Yep.

1:51:42>> And then the fire station debt

1:51:43exclusion, the amount of the ban

1:51:46interest is coming from that from that

1:51:47debt exclusion. and then a small amount

1:51:50from the um increase in the new growth.

1:51:53So nothing is going to hit the actual t

1:51:55the tax levy

1:51:57>> in this article.

1:51:58>> And for the town meeting, will you

1:51:59provide a presentation with incre you

1:52:02know adjustments to the numbers etc.

1:52:05>> Sure.

1:52:05>> Okay. like last year.

1:52:07>> Yeah, absolutely.

1:52:08>> Um

1:52:09>> Madam Chair,

1:52:11>> if I can just ask that our CFO um for

1:52:13our next meeting or whenever we we are

1:52:15going to be taking up and voting this,

1:52:18can you prepare just a simple

1:52:20spreadsheet of stabilization and free

1:52:22cash, the beginning balances, and then

1:52:25what it would look like if we approve

1:52:28every single one of these requests. So

1:52:29we can see that um implications spelled

1:52:33out cuz here it's trying to follow

1:52:36along. It's 70 here, 75 there. Um if we

1:52:39can see it all in one spreadsheet.

1:52:41Here's your starting balances and here's

1:52:44everything coming out.

1:52:46>> Sure. Sure.

1:52:48And what I was through the chair if I

1:52:50could. So, I think what if I'm

1:52:52understanding it right, I would probably

1:52:53put the the balances of both the free

1:52:55cash stabilization, maybe add those

1:52:56together and then deduct the the um the

1:52:59articles on there because we're not sure

1:53:01whether they're going to come from free

1:53:02cash or stabilization or

1:53:04>> that's fine.

1:53:04>> Okay.

1:53:05>> I just want to see the implications.

1:53:06>> Yep.

1:53:08>> We have that for finance.

1:53:12>> Sure.

1:53:16>> Okay. Um, may I make a suggestion that

1:53:18we do ask some department heads some

1:53:20questions about their articles, even if

1:53:22we're not going to make a stand or take

1:53:24a position on it today? Does anyone have

1:53:27any question? Any

1:53:28>> I have a question on article 16.

1:53:30>> All right. So, let's what article?

1:53:32>> Article 16.

1:53:35>> All right. So, um, let's go to that and

1:53:37then we'll go back to the beginning

1:53:38because I think it's easier if we start

1:53:40from the beginning. Article 16

1:53:43is about the easement.

1:53:46All right. So, um, can our DPW director

1:53:49come on up and tell us about article 16

1:53:51regarding the easement?

1:53:54Thank you, Karen.

1:53:56Thank you.

1:53:59>> Good evening. Good evening. So, article

1:54:0216 u provides an easement to the

1:54:04property at uh 15 hard scrabble road. Uh

1:54:08currently, um Cassella is on that

1:54:12property and part of their drainage

1:54:14system or their overflow of the drainage

1:54:17system is going into our drainage

1:54:19system. Um that's not something that we

1:54:22typically allow unless there's no other

1:54:25choice. Uh so this easement would allow

1:54:29them to separate their storm water from

1:54:32our storm water and discharge into the

1:54:35pond directly. Um, as part of that

1:54:38easement, there would be some agreements

1:54:41between the property owner and the town.

1:54:43Um, and it's basically to protect the

1:54:46town so that if um if the pipe collapses

1:54:51or if there's this um if there's

1:54:53settlement in the in the roadway, um

1:54:57they have the right to go into the road

1:55:00and we have the right to tell them, you

1:55:03need to fix this. It's not on the the

1:55:05town's dime. It's it's their

1:55:07responsibility to fix the road because

1:55:09of uh their infrastructure in our

1:55:11roadway.

1:55:12>> Okay. Any questions?

1:55:16>> Is there any fee or anything that we're

1:55:19any revenue we're realizing from doing

1:55:23this? No, it's it's just a a separation

1:55:26um trying to improve the the situation

1:55:28so that we're not taking in um storm

1:55:32water and um or taking back some of the

1:55:35capacity in our own system

1:55:38>> through the chair. Is there any

1:55:39environmental risks having their storm

1:55:41water drain directly into the pond? Uh

1:55:44so this would go through concom so um

1:55:48there have already been through some of

1:55:49the peritting process but that would be

1:55:51vetted through um conservation

1:55:53commission and they also have um as part

1:55:56of that they have treatment of that snow

1:55:58water.

1:55:59>> Thank you.

1:56:03Um, while we have you here, can you tell

1:56:05us about article 22, which is the Water

1:56:08Street Culvert Replacement Project?

1:56:11Is it 22?

1:56:13>> Nope. It is

1:56:16>> 21. 21. Thank you.

1:56:20>> So, uh, we had, um, a few weeks ago an

1:56:24update on the Water Street Culver. Uh we

1:56:27did receive a grant uh for further

1:56:31permitting and uh get us to the point to

1:56:35get plans ready for bidding and this

1:56:38would cover the construction of the

1:56:40replacement of the covert.

1:56:42So we're asking for $1.4 million. Um we

1:56:47are still going to be um applying for

1:56:50the um the small bridge grant um that

1:56:54this would allow us to move forward um

1:56:57if we didn't receive the grant or um

1:57:02yeah basically it

1:57:04>> so madam chair if I may ask what is the

1:57:07timing of that grant award? So, the

1:57:12grant I believe is

1:57:15due

1:57:17at the beginning of the year, the uh

1:57:19calendar year.

1:57:20>> That's when the grant application is

1:57:22due.

1:57:22>> Yes.

1:57:23>> What's the award date, the projected

1:57:25award date that they would notify us?

1:57:27>> I think it would be somewhere,

1:57:30and I'd have to go back to my notes. We

1:57:31just had a a a meeting um with the

1:57:35state, but

1:57:37I think it would be over the summer.

1:57:40>> Okay. So

1:57:44while I'm happy that we are pursuing

1:57:47these grants to offset the cost of the

1:57:48taxpayers,

1:57:51this culvert in Water Street as a result

1:57:54has been closed now what a year at this

1:57:58point. Um by the time we come to next

1:58:03spring, it'll be two years.

1:58:05>> Mhm.

1:58:06If we can, if town meeting gives you the

1:58:09approval artic of article 21 at the end

1:58:13of October

1:58:15and you're not going for the grant, do

1:58:18you expect to be able to bid this over

1:58:20the winter when we all know in

1:58:22construction projects you get better

1:58:23prices so that come the first of April

1:58:26we can actually see machines out there

1:58:30and and construction taking place to to

1:58:34um to address this? I don't want us to

1:58:36keep kicking the can down the road. And

1:58:39if so, we're going to wait for the

1:58:40grant. We get the grant, great. We don't

1:58:42get the grant, we're now summertime when

1:58:44you're then putting the bid out. And

1:58:46then we are going to be 3 years before

1:58:48this is constructed.

1:58:50>> So, I don't want to give you false

1:58:51information. So, I let me get back to um

1:58:55I know that I I have a better timeline

1:58:57of when we would expect the permitting

1:59:00process to be finalized.

1:59:03Um, and maybe I can come back next

1:59:06meeting to give you a better idea of of

1:59:08of what we expect for timing for for

1:59:11those permits.

1:59:13>> Okay. Cuz I just want to make sure that

1:59:15this doesn't become the never- ending

1:59:17closure. At this point, it feels like it

1:59:19is.

1:59:23>> Um, and okay, any other questions for

1:59:26her?

1:59:26>> More of a statement. And I don't have

1:59:27the same packet. So I don't have an

1:59:30article 21 on mine. So I don't know.

1:59:33>> No, there isn't. We You This article

1:59:35probably says 22 on your packet.

1:59:37Correct. It

1:59:38>> says 21 on mine.

1:59:39>> It says 21 in a different

1:59:41>> Oh, you have a different packet.

1:59:42>> Yeah. He doesn't have the whole article

1:59:4520.

1:59:47>> He has a shortened version of it.

1:59:48>> You're missing two pages.

1:59:51>> I don't know what I'm missing. I just

1:59:52know it's 22.

1:59:54>> All right. So, um,

2:00:00>> so does your end on page

2:00:03>> what what number does yours?

2:00:05>> I have a 24,

2:00:07>> but I mean hers

2:00:08>> fair. There was there was one um there

2:00:11was one item removed that was my item

2:00:14regarding the data centers. We had two

2:00:18placeholders for the data centers so

2:00:20that we could provide them both to the

2:00:22planning board and they could decide

2:00:24what they thought was best and what we

2:00:26would forward to the board of selectmen.

2:00:28So, one of them was removed. So, the

2:00:30numbers will be off by one most likely.

2:00:33>> Uh, no, mine's very different from hers.

2:00:36So,

2:00:36>> it's very different.

2:00:37>> Can you send us um tomorrow morning send

2:00:40us or have um Amanda send us the current

2:00:44warrant? Okay. Thank you very much.

2:00:47>> All right. Um

2:00:48>> glad you admitted it. [laughter]

2:00:50>> I think that was it for your articles,

2:00:52correct? I

2:00:53>> think so. Zip the Okay. Thank you very

2:00:55much. Um can I ask our our new um school

2:00:59superintendent to come on up and in

2:01:01we're happy to meet you. Please

2:01:02introduce yourself and we just wanted to

2:01:04ask you some questions about your

2:01:06articles.

2:01:07>> Absolutely. Thank you, Madam Chair. RJ

2:01:09Scaza, new superintendent of Auburn

2:01:10Public Schools. Happy to be here tonight

2:01:13here.

2:01:15And when did you start?

2:01:17>> July 1st of this year.

2:01:26>> And I believe you presented um made a

2:01:29presentation at the last school

2:01:30committee meeting with your goals and

2:01:32objectives for um for the school year or

2:01:35moving forward.

2:01:37>> I haven't done that yet. At the

2:01:39September 30th meeting, I'll be

2:01:41presenting my goals to the school

2:01:42committee. Okay, great. Could you send

2:01:44us a copy of those two, please? We

2:01:46appreciate it and we have them. Thank

2:01:47you.

2:01:48>> I'd be happy to.

2:01:49>> All right. So, um I have a question

2:01:52about the um field, the replacement of

2:01:55the allpurpose field. I see that we've

2:01:57got several articles addressing that.

2:02:00Can you tell tell us about the total

2:02:02cost of that?

2:02:04>> Well, it's an approximation at this

2:02:06point. Right now, we are we have a set

2:02:08aside of $550,000

2:02:13given all of the repurposing of

2:02:16previously allocated monies and then a

2:02:18request for $150,000

2:02:21um that you see in the list of article

2:02:24from article one. Um can I guarantee it

2:02:28at this point that the overall project

2:02:30will cost $550,000? I'm not sure. I

2:02:33believe when this was all put into the

2:02:34wheels were put into motion with this

2:02:36there was a estimate that it would fall

2:02:39within that range. It it could be a

2:02:41little higher but you know we're hopeful

2:02:43that with some reallocation of funding

2:02:46additional funding on top of what we we

2:02:48are asking be reallocated that we will

2:02:50be able to cover um the cost of a brand

2:02:53new multi-purpose field at the high

2:02:55school.

2:02:56>> Um I didn't see 550,000

2:03:00reallocated. Is that going to are the

2:03:02regal allocations all in this warrant?

2:03:04>> No. So there's 150,000 that I have been

2:03:08I've learned has been set aside from the

2:03:102025 capital improvement.

2:03:13>> On top of that, uh 150 that's requested

2:03:16in article one making 300

2:03:19>> um repurposing the combination of 60,000

2:03:23and 40,000.

2:03:24>> Yep.

2:03:24>> Um for an additional 100,000. So we've

2:03:27got uh 400,000 there. and then the

2:03:30Binmar um parking lot project

2:03:32repurposing that money toward the turf

2:03:35field for an additional 150.

2:03:37>> Okay.

2:03:38>> And that that is where the sum of 550

2:03:40comes from.

2:03:41>> Okay.

2:03:43All right. Thank you. And when do you um

2:03:46when do you plan to do that replacement?

2:03:48>> Spring of this year if we are granted

2:03:50the opportunity to move forward

2:03:54>> through the chair. Is that going to

2:03:56affect spring sports? I know quite a few

2:03:58teams use that field.

2:04:00>> I have I'll double check with Kevin

2:04:03Bigalow, but my understanding is that it

2:04:04will not affect spring sports and the

2:04:06majority like field hockey um some of

2:04:10the town leagues that use that

2:04:12multi-purpose field use it primarily in

2:04:14the in the fall.

2:04:15>> Okay, great. Thank you.

2:04:16>> Welcome.

2:04:18>> Any questions?

2:04:20>> Um can you tell us about the um

2:04:23>> Mr. Carpenter does have a question?

2:04:25>> Oh, sir. Yeah. Okay,

2:04:28>> question for you. I know some of these

2:04:30fields may be rented out for other

2:04:32athletic associations.

2:04:35Can we tie any of the wear and tear to

2:04:38perhaps overuse from outside of school

2:04:42groups and outside of town groups? Is

2:04:46that contributing to these fields

2:04:49wearing out?

2:04:52Yeah, I Well, let me start by saying I I

2:04:55heard that camping chairs were a

2:04:57significant factor. Um, we're no longer

2:05:00allowing uh and we're trying to our best

2:05:03to police, if you will, the uh use of

2:05:06camping chairs on that multi-purpose

2:05:07field because it digs into the turf is

2:05:09what I understood. As far as the the

2:05:12youth sports or the outside

2:05:13organizations that are um renting out

2:05:15the use of the field, I I think they are

2:05:17all using like standard equipment, their

2:05:20cleats, it gets a lot of use, no doubt,

2:05:23but I don't think there's anything in

2:05:25terms of how they're utilizing the field

2:05:27that is contributing to an increase in

2:05:29wear.

2:05:31>> You're welcome.

2:05:33>> No camping chairs though, please, for

2:05:35the record.

2:05:36>> I I' heard that [clears throat] before,

2:05:38so that makes sense. All right.

2:05:40question. Um, so let me ask you about

2:05:44the um the bus, the multi-function

2:05:46activity bus.

2:05:48>> Now we're you're looking to um for

2:05:50$70,000 to fund a portion of the

2:05:53replacement cost. What is the total

2:05:55replacement?

2:05:56>> We're thinking about 140,000. We have

2:05:58$70,000 additional that was uh granted

2:06:01to us through the fair share earmark um

2:06:03from the governor's office. [sighs]

2:06:06That 70,000 is specific for a capital

2:06:08improvement project for the schools. Um

2:06:10we received 120 total. The the

2:06:13additional 50 is for a program in the

2:06:15school. So we couldn't put that toward

2:06:17the uh wheelchair accessible um bus. But

2:06:22with a contribution from the town of 70

2:06:24and then that fair share earmark

2:06:26additional 70, we think that that will

2:06:28cover the cost of that vehicle, which is

2:06:31it's a pretty expensive vehicle, but I

2:06:33think 140 will do it. And it's a

2:06:35replacement, right?

2:06:36>> It is of Rocket One, I believe, which is

2:06:38relatively old. I have some numbers.

2:06:40There's there was like $15,000

2:06:44done in repairs on Rocket One, uh, and

2:06:4725 and 26 combined. It's an older

2:06:49vehicle.

2:06:50>> Okay. All right.

2:06:52>> Any other questions for

2:06:56>> Okay. I I think that covers it. Thank

2:06:58you very Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank

2:07:00you.

2:07:00>> Thank you.

2:07:03Um

2:07:09um Chief Mills, would you come up and

2:07:12just tell us about article 12 about the

2:07:14phone system?

2:07:18>> Thank you.

2:07:21>> Good evening.

2:07:24the the phone system. Basically, that

2:07:27amount is to bring the building up to

2:07:31the point where it would accept the new

2:07:32phone system that the town is doing. So,

2:07:37we've been experiencing problems with

2:07:39our phone system where we've tried I

2:07:42worked with Mike Marino to try and

2:07:43figure out what the pro problem actually

2:07:46was. and we bought a refurbished unit

2:07:48and then we bought a uh a new unit that

2:07:51because the refurbished one didn't work

2:07:53out and it hasn't solved the problem.

2:07:55So,

2:07:57>> yes, if I may through the chair, um, for

2:08:02several years, the police department um,

2:08:05building did not have the improvements

2:08:09that it needed because there was at one

2:08:12time a plan to relocate the police

2:08:15department. I'm finding um and I think

2:08:18the chief is as well. There are several

2:08:21things that are raising to the top of

2:08:23our importance list. During the summer,

2:08:26the police department telephone system

2:08:29kept going down. I met with Mike Marino.

2:08:32We met with the chief. We can no longer

2:08:35get the parts to fix the system. That is

2:08:39why this is dire. It is something that I

2:08:43did not anticipate that I was not aware

2:08:45of. The chief um is working with me on

2:08:49the whole building right now and just

2:08:51looking to see of anything that was sort

2:08:53of held off over the last few years

2:08:56because they anticipated moving so that

2:08:58we can incorporate that into the capital

2:08:59budget. But that is um the need is is

2:09:03definitely a new phone system, the new

2:09:06um the new software associated with the

2:09:09phone system. And we will also on the

2:09:12town side be upgrading our phone system,

2:09:14but we we have the funds for that. So

2:09:16that's not in this warrant article at

2:09:18this time.

2:09:20>> Madam Chair, if I just may ask um either

2:09:23to the chief or the or the manager um

2:09:26with respect to acting on this. So, I

2:09:30know that you did have the phone

2:09:31problems off and on over the summertime.

2:09:33Um, are you in a position or isn't the

2:09:36town in the position so that again end

2:09:39of October town meeting says we're we're

2:09:42granting you the $35,000.

2:09:45Are you in a position to act on that as

2:09:47soon as possible, upgrade the system or

2:09:49at least get the ball rolling to to make

2:09:52sure that your building doesn't keep

2:09:54having the problems? I just want to make

2:09:55sure this doesn't sort of fall into the

2:09:59normal, you know, process of

2:10:03five months from now, 6 months from now

2:10:04is when this stuff cuz I mean this is a

2:10:06need for your building now and I just

2:10:07want to make sure that that that the IT

2:10:09department and everybody is ready to

2:10:11jump in and act on this cuz you know the

2:10:13phones going to the police are kind of

2:10:15important.

2:10:17>> That's true. I appreciate the question.

2:10:19And it's this is essentially like the

2:10:22manager said, it's just it's upgrades

2:10:25to it's upgrades to the infrastructure

2:10:26to make the the system be able to accept

2:10:28the new phone system. So, excuse

2:10:31[clears throat] me. As soon as if it is

2:10:33approved, like I said, and we're able to

2:10:34go forward, then we'll bid it out as

2:10:36soon as we possibly can.

2:10:38>> Thank you.

2:10:40>> Okay. Any other questions?

2:10:44>> I think we're all set, Chief. Thank you

2:10:46very much. Thank you.

2:10:47>> Thanks, Madam Chair. Can I go back to

2:10:48article 7?

2:10:50>> Yep.

2:10:50>> Can we just have um our economic

2:10:52development director um sort of outline

2:10:54what is the economic development

2:10:56strategic plan, what it will encompass.

2:10:59Um it says funded new or updated. So I

2:11:03just want to understand exactly what we

2:11:06are getting for the $75,000.

2:11:08>> Yes, through the chair. I I'll do my

2:11:10best to answer that question. So, as I

2:11:12think the board might be aware, but if

2:11:14not, I'll remind folks, the last

2:11:15strategic plan was done in 2017. Um,

2:11:19obviously prior to co, prior to a lot of

2:11:21other circumstances that have changed,

2:11:23um, this this grew out of discussions

2:11:25with the economic development committee,

2:11:26uh, wanting to, uh, recalibrate the

2:11:29priorities in that plan. Uh so based on

2:11:32those conversations I took a somewhat

2:11:34informal poll of colleagues from from

2:11:37different communities who have done uh

2:11:39economic plans in the last several

2:11:41years. Um you know doing a bit of a

2:11:45comparison based on community size etc.

2:11:48Uh so there were some that came in uh

2:11:52for smaller communities came in about 50

2:11:54larger communities came in at about 100.

2:11:56So and for several consulting companies

2:12:00who I know their work said for town

2:12:03Auburn size 75 would uh accomplish that

2:12:06goal. So uh we have not hashed out an

2:12:09RFP for that or what the exact criteria

2:12:11would be but it would be essentially an

2:12:13update of the current strategic plan. Uh

2:12:16and so whatever processes involved with

2:12:18that.

2:12:19>> If I can just follow up on that.

2:12:22What does the town what does a town get

2:12:25out of having an updated economic

2:12:27strategic plan?

2:12:28>> Well, there could be a few things with

2:12:29that. First of all, uh it would clearly

2:12:32establish a town's economic priorities.

2:12:34And as we're going for different grants,

2:12:36as we're going for recruitment of

2:12:37businesses, if we can point to a

2:12:39document that outlines our current

2:12:41priorities, it makes sort of the quote

2:12:43unquote sales pitch uh that much easier.

2:12:46Additionally, I hope we can use the

2:12:48process to uh get better dissemin

2:12:51dissemination of information throughout

2:12:53the town to be a robust public process

2:12:54as part of this and also there'd be uh a

2:12:58significant amount of data produced as

2:12:59part of that project as well. So, I'm

2:13:01not going to suggest it's going to

2:13:02answer for example uh the discussion

2:13:04item earlier about the tax

2:13:06classification per se. Uh but there

2:13:08would be some data in there. So uh

2:13:10different boards and certainly economic

2:13:12development committee uh could be basing

2:13:15their uh priorities and uh agenda based

2:13:19on the most current data.

2:13:22>> And I just want to confirm or or make

2:13:25sure that the economic development

2:13:27committee um which I think has

2:13:30personally been a untapped resource in

2:13:32the past um they're probably going to

2:13:34hate because we keep sending stuff their

2:13:35way now to tap that resource. um that

2:13:38they're going to be an integral part of

2:13:39this helping to lead that effort um work

2:13:42with the consultants uh work with

2:13:45professional staff uh to to develop that

2:13:47plan. I just want to make sure that they

2:13:48have a voice and the seat at the table

2:13:50from the beginning

2:13:51>> through the chair. That's exactly the

2:13:53plan. I would anticipate they would help

2:13:55us craft the evaluation criteria in any

2:13:58RFP and then they would be part of any

2:14:01uh working committee or steering

2:14:03committee that grew out of the strategic

2:14:05planning process once a consultant was

2:14:07retained.

2:14:08>> Thank you.

2:14:09>> Thank you. All right. So, um my

2:14:12understanding is we're going to the will

2:14:14of the board is that we're going to look

2:14:15at this next week and make our

2:14:17recommendations and take positions at

2:14:19that time.

2:14:20>> Did have a question. I still have

2:14:22another one as well. Go ahead.

2:14:23>> No, it was fine. Um, threw you to the

2:14:26assistant town manager.

2:14:29>> What other planning documents will this

2:14:32draw from that we have in existence

2:14:34today?

2:14:37>> There could be a few different

2:14:38documents. We do have a master plan that

2:14:40I think dates from 2019. So, it's just

2:14:43after the previous strategic plan was

2:14:45done. There are a number of um uh

2:14:49smaller type plans. There is uh some

2:14:51those analysis at our jury square both

2:14:54uh historically and of course with the

2:14:55recent ULI uh uh exercise. Um there is a

2:15:01sidewalk plan that's in place. There are

2:15:04not necessarily economic development but

2:15:06kind of would be MVP the municipal

2:15:07vulnerability plan. Um there are a

2:15:10number of action items already embedded

2:15:12in those plans. So I think any new

2:15:14strategic plan would look at what's uh

2:15:16what's already existing. That's usually

2:15:18a good first step in any strategic

2:15:20planning process. Look at what action

2:15:21items were addressed in previous plans.

2:15:24What have what have been checked off the

2:15:26list or what have become obsolete and

2:15:29what still need to be followed up on. So

2:15:31any plan we have uh I probably I'm

2:15:34trying to think of off top of my head

2:15:35which other ones might be most relevant,

2:15:37but certainly the master plan um would

2:15:39be the the one that leaps to mind.

2:15:43>> I know the school department has a

2:15:44strategic plan. I would like us

2:15:46>> [clears throat]

2:15:47>> at least look at it. See, we need to

2:15:50bring the schools in one one town, not

2:15:55two different parts of town. I want to

2:15:57see us. We have a new superintendent. We

2:15:59had a great superintendent uh previous

2:16:02actually two before you. So, you have

2:16:05big shoes to fill, but I do want us to,

2:16:07as the chair just asked, do more with

2:16:10communication between us so that we can

2:16:12actually confront some of the challenges

2:16:14that I think we're going to face in a

2:16:16couple of years.

2:16:17>> Yes. Through the chair. I think that's a

2:16:18fantastic idea and I look forward to

2:16:20having the school department be a part

2:16:21of the process.

2:16:25>> Okay.

2:16:26>> Um,

2:16:28sorry, Steve. I think

2:16:29>> Oh, Steve, you wanted to say something.

2:16:30So, um the article relating to um

2:16:34$80,000 for building study and analysis

2:16:38for all town buildings, what what are

2:16:41what is the idea behind that

2:16:45>> through the chair? Um good question. It

2:16:48was one of the goals and objectives that

2:16:50the board of selectmen have provided me

2:16:52to do a full analysis of all town owned

2:16:56buildings from

2:16:59every system in the basement to the

2:17:01roof. What's happened over the last

2:17:04several years that I can see is um not

2:17:08we haven't properly budgeted the cap in

2:17:11capital the repairs that need to be

2:17:13done. an analysis is necessary to do

2:17:17that and it includes the school

2:17:18department and the school department

2:17:20buildings because obviously they're

2:17:22they're part of the capital budget. But

2:17:24that's what this um this money is for.

2:17:27It's a full analysis of all the town

2:17:29buildings.

2:17:30>> The the reason I'm asking is I believe

2:17:33we did a mechanical study with Seaman's

2:17:36engineering on a lot of stuff. That's

2:17:38why I feel like this might be

2:17:41overlapping and I don't know what else

2:17:42is included or what that that report was

2:17:44lacking, but I know that drove a lot of

2:17:47project work and I believe the school

2:17:50department was or school schools were

2:17:52part of that analysis. So I I don't know

2:17:54what was lacking or what else is

2:17:56>> you're correct. I'm very familiar with

2:17:58the HVAC report that was provided by

2:18:01Seammens and that is what we've used to

2:18:03do all of our HVAC upgrades. That is one

2:18:06area that we're actually up to date and

2:18:08we're not running into any issues with

2:18:10this is going to be more in depth. The

2:18:13perfect example is is what's happening

2:18:15with the phones at the police department

2:18:17or the roofs and some of our buildings,

2:18:19even the historical commission. Um

2:18:22there's a lot of things out there that

2:18:24we're we're just not aware of. Um so

2:18:26that's what that's what the

2:18:27recommendation is for

2:18:29>> and that's the clarification I'm looking

2:18:31just building study. It could be

2:18:33general, but I know we did other pieces.

2:18:35So, love to hear more of what is

2:18:38expected outcome of that. What is going

2:18:40to be analyzed?

2:18:42I'm sure all the windows could use

2:18:44replacing. I I don't need to pay $80,000

2:18:46for to say that, but budgeting wise,

2:18:48like there might be more to it. So, that

2:18:51was one of the reasons I asked for it.

2:18:52We need to start understanding what we

2:18:55don't know. We delayed a lot of repairs

2:18:58at the at West Street. We delayed a rod

2:19:01of repairs at

2:19:04>> police station,

2:19:04>> Oxford Street. Um, we have a habit of

2:19:07doing that and and we've got to stop

2:19:09doing that because,

2:19:12you know, I went to school at Randall,

2:19:16which is now where you work and a couple

2:19:18of within the last year we had to close

2:19:21it because of asbestous

2:19:24getting released into the air. So, we

2:19:28definitely need to start looking at some

2:19:30of these older buildings and pretty much

2:19:32all of our buildings with the exception

2:19:34of maybe the two new schools, the middle

2:19:36school and the high school. They're all

2:19:39pretty

2:19:40of an age. So, it would be good to see.

2:19:43I know they were doing asbestous

2:19:45remediation when I was in school at

2:19:47what's now Swiss, but was the junior

2:19:49high. So, I'm sure there's probably

2:19:51still some there. And there's probably

2:19:52some in Well, actually, we got rid of JB

2:19:55and Mary D. So, you're off the hook

2:19:57there. But, uh, I'm sure there's some

2:20:01still lingering around that we want to

2:20:03make sure that we're getting rid of

2:20:06and also getting the budget so we can

2:20:09work on it.

2:20:10>> Can I just confirm that this study will

2:20:11also look at um, ADA compliance in the

2:20:15buildings as well. I know there was a

2:20:18recent concern and issue addressed with

2:20:20the ramp into this building. um that's

2:20:23now been taken care of. But as was

2:20:26pointed out um by some residents

2:20:27recently, you know, this podium is not

2:20:30ADA compliant. Um so there there's those

2:20:34other issues I think in all of our

2:20:35buildings as well that we are probably

2:20:37not in compliance with a 1992 law. Um

2:20:41>> absolutely. And you're you're absolutely

2:20:43right. And it does um it's in all of our

2:20:46buildings that I know we're

2:20:48grandfathered, but we're also a public

2:20:50building to serve the public. and if

2:20:52we're not accessible, um, we're not

2:20:54doing our job. So, that's why we

2:20:57recently redid the van, the ramp, and we

2:20:59do have plans to work with DPW. We've

2:21:02met with them to try to solve the

2:21:05problem here with with the steps um

2:21:08because and those are just two areas and

2:21:10there there's a lot more throughout our

2:21:12buildings.

2:21:14>> All right. Um, moving forward then

2:21:16because we'll we'll pick up the uh

2:21:18warrant at the next meeting in two

2:21:21weeks. Um, let's look at item 8G and

2:21:25this is a board vote to reopen the

2:21:26special town meeting warrant. Um, and

2:21:29could I please ask Chief Coleman to come

2:21:31up to talk about this? I believe you had

2:21:34requested this because there were some

2:21:37unanticipated costs or related to that

2:21:41fire engine that caught fire.

2:21:42>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Um, so,

2:21:45[clears throat] uh, as you know, uh, two

2:21:48weeks ago on the 4th, uh, we suffered a

2:21:51fire in our engine 4. Um, I had spoke to

2:21:56the insurance company that night, made a

2:21:58whole bunch of phone calls that night

2:22:00and one of the emails that I sent that

2:22:01night just to make sure that it wasn't

2:22:04missed, um, was a potential placeholder

2:22:07for a warrant article because at that

2:22:09time at that Friday night at 10:00, um,

2:22:13I did not have a lot of information. Um,

2:22:17I just spoke with, uh, well, today's

2:22:20Monday, so the end of last week. um

2:22:23spoke with the insurance adjuster um had

2:22:26some brief conversations with the shop.

2:22:29Um it does not look like the vehicle is

2:22:31going to be totaled. So that's good

2:22:33news. So we we again we believe that

2:22:36it's going to be repaired. I have more

2:22:38confidence that that's the case. I can't

2:22:40sit here 100%. Uh the third party

2:22:42independent fire investigator was out at

2:22:44the shop uh in Walpole today and condu

2:22:48uh conducted their forensic review. Um,

2:22:51so they just gave the shop permission

2:22:53today to start actually taking the top

2:22:56part of the motor off and start putting

2:22:57a parts list together. Um, but on face

2:23:00value, the shop believes that it's it's

2:23:03going to be repaired. So really the

2:23:05placeholder that I was looking for was,

2:23:07you know, at 10:00 on that Friday night,

2:23:09I'm thinking if this vehicle is totaled,

2:23:11we're going to need an appropriation

2:23:13potentially for me to purchase a used

2:23:16vehicle in order to figure out what the

2:23:19long-term plan is. It does not look like

2:23:21at this point that that's going to be

2:23:23the case. Um, so I I do not need at this

2:23:26time uh that warrant article.

2:23:29>> So Chief, insurance is paying for the uh

2:23:31repair costs. But we don't we don't know

2:23:34that yet. I've the adjuster has looked

2:23:36at it. They sent the forensic folks out

2:23:38there. Um I would anticipate again,

2:23:41right? It's I [snorts] never want to

2:23:44speculate what an insurance company is

2:23:45going to do. Um but in my conversations

2:23:48with the adjuster, um we have the

2:23:50coverage. So I would anticipate that

2:23:53insurance is going to cover if not all

2:23:55at least a a good portion of this. But I

2:23:58do not have that answer.

2:23:59>> Okay.

2:23:59>> We have a deductible.

2:24:01Uh we do we do have a deductible. I

2:24:06think it's a what? Yeah, it's a $1,000

2:24:09deductible.

2:24:10>> And um what's the time frame?

2:24:13>> So again, um not 100% sure. The the shop

2:24:18just got permission today from the

2:24:20insurance company to start actually

2:24:22touching the truck. So even though it

2:24:23was towed there last uh Tuesday, they

2:24:26have not touched the truck because the

2:24:28insurance company didn't authorize it.

2:24:30So, uh, my guess is they will start

2:24:32pulling the top of the motor off

2:24:34tomorrow. Um, so I'm hoping by the end

2:24:36of the week I have a better idea on what

2:24:37the damage um is. The engine block most

2:24:40likely is okay. It's a lot of melted I

2:24:43mean all of the electrical components on

2:24:45the top of the engine are melted. So um

2:24:48my hope, best case scenario is they just

2:24:50put a brand new motor in the truck which

2:24:52has all brand new electrical components

2:24:54versus leaving the existing motor and

2:24:56then trying to strip and trace back

2:24:59wires. and then we're dealing with

2:25:00electrical problems years down the road.

2:25:03Um, so what I'm going to be advocating

2:25:04and pushing for is that the insurance

2:25:06company just replace the motor.

2:25:09>> Okay, questions.

2:25:11>> So, Chief, if this were to happen, say

2:25:14in December, how would you go about

2:25:17getting that repair or getting a

2:25:20replacement vehicle? What What's the

2:25:21process besides going to town meeting?

2:25:26So

2:25:27it if if we were to lose a a vehicle

2:25:30like in your scenario in December and we

2:25:33lost a vehicle completely, we have one

2:25:36spare fire engine in the town.

2:25:37[clears throat] So right now that spare

2:25:39engine is in service on the first day

2:25:43that vehicle was in service, it had a

2:25:44brake issue and then it was out of

2:25:46service the entire day. So we had one

2:25:48fire engine, you know, in the town. So,

2:25:50as I had said to the to the manager

2:25:52before, it really depends on the length

2:25:55of time in which something's going to be

2:25:57out of service. Our mutual aid partners,

2:25:59we all help each other. We have borrowed

2:26:01fire engines from other towns. We have

2:26:03let other towns borrow our fire engines.

2:26:05So, the answer to that question is

2:26:07really depending on how long a vehicle

2:26:09is going to be out of service. But, if

2:26:11it was total that it was out of service

2:26:12completely, um, then most likely I would

2:26:15be asking the board. We would, you know,

2:26:17borrow a truck. we could rent a truck.

2:26:20Um, we might be able to cover that short

2:26:22term within the existing budget. Um, but

2:26:26depending on when it was in the time

2:26:27period of the year, we may have to

2:26:29request a special town meeting in order

2:26:31to get a town meeting appropriation. So,

2:26:33there's a lot of factors that go into

2:26:35that question.

2:26:37So, I mean, I was prepared to come here

2:26:39because I'm not for opening the warrant

2:26:41and it's because we provided all that

2:26:44additional time and I was hopeful, but

2:26:46in an emergency situation, I wanted to

2:26:48make sure you know there are other

2:26:51things and it sounds like if need be

2:26:53opportune inopportune times, we can

2:26:55request that. Not that that's ideal, but

2:26:57>> and again, you understand I made that

2:26:59request with really zero information at

2:27:0110:00 on a Friday night. I said, "Okay,

2:27:03if if if this thing is going to be out

2:27:05of service, we need we need a plan B."

2:27:08Um, but obviously in that week, me

2:27:10chasing the insurance company, getting

2:27:12some answers, I'm at a better comfort

2:27:14level today than I was a week and a half

2:27:16ago.

2:27:17>> And and I'm very comfortable saying no

2:27:19to that. The rest of the board could

2:27:20like I I I don't want to ever say no

2:27:23just to say no. Um, so I want to

2:27:25understand the process, but again, I

2:27:27think this board with the town meeting

2:27:29warrant opening up extra early knowing

2:27:32on the back end that there's always uh

2:27:34staff has limited time to get things

2:27:37together. I want to make sure as a board

2:27:40we try not to open and close the warrant

2:27:42after the dates set so we can make sure

2:27:45there's a good process in place and we

2:27:48can follow that. But knowing if in an

2:27:50emergency we can request an additional

2:27:53town meeting, that could be an option. I

2:27:55never want to put you guys in harm's way

2:27:57trying to save everyone else.

2:27:59>> No, understood.

2:28:01>> Okay. Anything else?

2:28:06>> Okay.

2:28:06>> Thank you.

2:28:07>> Thank you, sir.

2:28:10All right. So, now we're um we have no

2:28:13town manager items, we have no tabled

2:28:15items. Now, it's time for the public

2:28:17comments. the last session of public

2:28:19comments

2:28:21and then we'll look at minutes.

2:28:26>> Do we need to take action on this?

2:28:30G

2:28:32>> um

2:28:34>> I don't think so.

2:28:35>> Well, if we're not reopening it, we

2:28:36don't need to make a motion to go up

2:28:38with it.

2:28:39>> Well, that's not what it says. It says a

2:28:41a board vote to reopen. So, like do we

2:28:44know that for consent? I don't know.

2:28:46Like I feel like we should vote in the

2:28:50negative, right? So you have to read it

2:28:52as this. But

2:28:53>> I I'll make a motion to reopen the

2:28:54special town meeting warrant for Monday,

2:28:56September 14th, 2026 through Wednesday,

2:28:58September 16th, uh 2026 at 400 p.m.

2:29:03>> I'll second. All right. So we have a

2:29:05motion and a second to reopen the

2:29:06warrant. All in favor?

2:29:08>> I.

2:29:11>> A motion to reopen.

2:29:12>> All in favor?

2:29:14>> Yeah. All in favor of reopening it? I

2:29:17>> Okay. All opposed to reopening it.

2:29:20>> I I

2:29:20>> All right. So, the motion does not pass.

2:29:22>> Sorry, that confused me.

2:29:24>> All right, that's okay. Well, we're used

2:29:25to saying yes to everything. All right.

2:29:27Public comments. Eric Richards, it's

2:29:30it's your three minutes, sir. There you

2:29:33go.

2:29:43>> Good evening. Eric Richards, 13 Ravine

2:29:45Drive. Thank you for having me.

2:29:49See if we can end on a strong note.

2:29:51Yeah, had a number of comments. I'll re

2:29:55reserve them until the next meeting. I

2:29:57do have a little bit of cognitive

2:29:58dissonance though. Uh we have a we hired

2:30:03an assistant town manager, Mr.

2:30:06Delquilla, because he's a worldclass

2:30:08economic development guru.

2:30:10We hired a new planner and land use

2:30:13coordinator because they were worldclass

2:30:15economic development, land use, and

2:30:18other staff with minors in economic

2:30:21development.

2:30:22So, if we're paying and we brought

2:30:25talent inhouse

2:30:27for economic development,

2:30:30why do we need consultants?

2:30:34It's curious.

2:30:36Especially a guy with 30 years

2:30:37experience or whatever he's got.

2:30:41I don't know. I like that answer if we

2:30:43can find it. Thank you.

2:30:45>> Thank you, sir. Um, all right. Now, we

2:30:48have received minutes um from August the

2:30:51meeting on August 17, 2026. Does anyone

2:30:54have any questions or concerns about

2:30:56those minutes

2:30:57so we can uh accept them as they have

2:31:01been presented to us? We're meeting

2:31:03again in two weeks. Does anyone have um

2:31:07Well, do I hear a motion?

2:31:09Motion to adjurnn.

2:31:11>> Second.

2:31:11>> So we have a motion and a second to

2:31:13adjurnn. All in favor? I oppose. No.

2:31:16We'rejourned.

2:31:22>> [music]