2026-10-06 - Citizen Review Board
Summary
Built from YouTube auto-generated captions, which cover only the public-comment portion. No agenda or minutes have been read. Names and figures are as captioned and may be misspelled; voice votes carried no recorded counts. Public commenters are not named.
- The captions begin partway through public comment and end at adjournment, so the opening of the meeting (call to order, any reports or case business) is not shown.
- Legal representation: A speaker for a group of citizen advocates asked whether the Board is pursuing its own legal counsel, so that its lawyer is not in the same firm as the City's corporation counsel; the New York Civil Liberties Union had said it does advocacy rather than representation. The Board answered that it anticipates doing so. See Citizen Review Board Independent Legal Counsel.
- Public comment on police priorities: A resident who works as a public defender (speaking in a personal capacity) said low-level enforcement such as trespass, loitering and open-container charges, much of it involving homeless people, takes priority over serious crimes, described an unanswered report of a vehicle theft and a slow police response to a threat, and asked the Board to look into enforcement priorities and how police handle evidence residents provide. Another speaker added that the police keep lists of people most likely to offend but do little outreach, and that people fear contacting police. A third described a faster police response to their own assault than other residents reported.
- Board response: Members said response times and personnel matters fall under the Mayor rather than the Board, but that they meet with the Chief of Police and can raise the concerns there; they asked speakers to put concrete suggestions in writing. A member noted the local law's definition of passive misconduct, which covers a failure to intervene and an untimely response or refusal to take a complaint. The Board said failure to act is one of its most common complaint types and that it could publicize this better, which would likely raise complaint volume.
- The meeting adjourned on a voice vote.
Agenda
Agenda not yet posted.
Sources
- Two YouTube streams carry this meeting's title (see Video).
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yvcIP3Efbg (City of Syracuse YouTube channel)
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLav_y5TJYA (City of Syracuse YouTube channel)
- Public meeting calendar: https://www.syr.gov/Boards-and-Commissions/Public-Meeting-Calendar
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:53for legal representation. And I'm not
00:56sure what stage that is. Our our contact
01:00at New York Civil Liberties Union says
01:01they can't represent people like this
01:04CRB. They don't do representation. they
01:07do advocacy and other kind of work. Um,
01:11so our question is from our group of
01:14citizen advocates,
01:16uh, is the CRB actively pursuing getting
01:19their own legal representation
01:21so that they don't have a lawyer that
01:24has a conflict of interest by being in
01:25the same firm as the city corp council.
01:30>> We're anticipating doing that.
01:33>> Thank you. Appreciate it. Okay. Anyone
01:39else?
01:44>> I just have something short to say. Um,
01:48my name is Megan. I am a local resident
01:51and taxpayer of the city and I'm also a
01:53public defender operating under a legal
01:55practice order. But I want to be
01:57entirely clear that I'm here on my own
02:00strictly personal capacity as a citizen
02:02and my remarks do not reflect those of
02:05my office. Every single day in open
02:08court, we see immense saturation of
02:10public resources, time, and tax dollars
02:13dedicated to aggressive low-level
02:15enforcement like trespass, loitering,
02:18and open container charges. Yet, when it
02:20comes to serious or dangerous actionable
02:23crimes,
02:26there's a total failure of response.
02:28While the community frequently raises
02:30serious and documented complaints
02:33regarding excessive force, police
02:35aggression, those systematic issues are
02:38routinely ignored. I know that the
02:41breakdown I know about this breakdown in
02:43public safety firsthand as a crime
02:45victim myself. On September 7th, my car
02:48was stolen and then crashed directly
02:50into a person's front yard fence,
02:53completely totaling the vehicle. In the
02:55aftermath, the department refused to
02:58even open a case or look at the clear,
03:01actionable building security footage
03:04showing the thieves and their license
03:05plates. I called the police desk,
03:08evidence, compliance, traffic, and every
03:11administrative line day after day for 10
03:14days in a row, followed by sever
03:16followed by several more times in the
03:18week after. And I still have yet to be
03:21able to speak to any officer or
03:23supervisor on the phone. To simply find
03:26out where my vehicle was, I was forced
03:28to independently call each towyard in
03:31the city.
03:33More alarmingly, I know this as a
03:36professional working in the justice
03:38system when an individual threatened to
03:41pull a firearm on one of our attorneys
03:43working in our office last month, an
03:45incident that is a matter of public
03:47record and is and resulted in a court
03:50issued restraining order. It took the
03:53police department many hours to respond
03:56while we stood there making call after
03:58call to respond to that deadly threat.
04:01When an officer finally arrived, they
04:04express explicit reluctance to deal with
04:06the suspect, stating that he was too big
04:09and combative. Instead of securing the
04:12threat, they led us to they left us to
04:14continuously walk past this potentially
04:17armed and dangerous individual on our
04:19way to and from the courthouse. It's
04:22unexpectable for a police department to
04:24aggressively hunt down low-level
04:26offenders and vulnerable populations
04:29like our homeless people.
04:31yet back down completely and abandon
04:33residents in and public servants who
04:36face major active crimes and active
04:39violence. And I urge this citizen review
04:42panel to launch a formal investigation
04:45into the priorities and um the handling
04:50of citizen provided evidence and their
04:52systematic misallocation of enforcement
04:56resources. Thank you.
05:00Thank you. You said your name is Megan.
05:02Um, and giving us that that complaint
05:05based on what you experienced, I'm going
05:07to say this. Welcome to Syracuse and
05:08welcome to the lowle sides of town
05:11because it's something that happen all
05:12the time. What do you think will be a
05:15good uh what do you think should take
05:17place and should happen that would help
05:19us take it to the board? I mean, take it
05:22to the police department. Give us a
05:24suggestion so we can help help you. I
05:28think the thing that is most distressing
05:30to me is having a dozen or more open
05:34containers violations
05:37trespass every morning when I'm
05:39representing folks in court. And it's we
05:42deal with probably half of our clients
05:45are homeless. So, it's very frustrating
05:48to me to see lots of to see that getting
05:51prosecuted so much while serious crimes
05:55are are not being I think it would be um
05:58good to do some sort of accounting of
06:01what um hours are spent doing what how
06:04many loitering charges
06:07are being handed out on a daily basis
06:10versus um what calls are coming in that
06:14are not not getting priority. Okay.
06:16>> So, what do you want us to take to the
06:18police when we go in there? Because you
06:21said a mouthful in regards to lording
06:23and that's a big problem in our city,
06:25right? It
06:25>> is. Yes.
06:25>> And and those crimes you say they don't
06:29see them as seriously. So, let's let's
06:31come up with something that's rational
06:33because you're here each day. We come
06:35here and we listen, but we're going to
06:37take this back to the police and and
06:40Ruffen and whomever it is. And then that
06:42way we if you want answers, give us
06:44something to help you with that you
06:46think would be viable to help the
06:48citizens in regards to case like that.
06:51We know we got a lot of mental issue
06:53issues. We know that. And a lot of that
06:55stuff that you're seeing with the
06:56lottery and those people that are
06:57vagrant, a lot of it has mental issue,
07:00drugs, etc. What could help change the
07:04narrative for your situation?
07:07>> And I know I may be taking they may be
07:11ready to go. I apologize. Um,
07:16>> I think I fundamentally
07:20have a personal difference of opinions
07:22and just the way that the broken windows
07:25policing is kind of getting enforced
07:27downtown specifically. Um, I'll have,
07:30you know, the same repeat clients again
07:32and again and again because they're
07:34homeless. they have nowhere to sleep and
07:36so they're sleeping outside and then
07:38they get picked up and then they come
07:40back out and they're homeless and now
07:42they have a charge and it just goes
07:43around and around and around. There
07:45needs to be systematic intervention for
07:48what can
07:50probably two or three hundred
07:53individuals that make up such a heavy
07:57proportion of our services. I'm not
08:00saying that we're not happy to give them
08:02our services, but it it really does take
08:05up the bulk of what I do in a in a
08:08day-to-day as a lawyer.
08:09>> Okay. So, what you can do that will help
08:12us write the stuff reasoning say we
08:14write it down. Write something concrete
08:17down that you would want us to take.
08:19>> Okay.
08:19>> With
08:21a quick question.
08:22>> Now, when you called in these two
08:24different situations, where did you
08:26call?
08:28Did you call 911?
08:29>> 911?
08:30>> Yes.
08:31>> Okay.
08:32>> Let me make things perfectly clear. The
08:36CRB that that actually falls outside of
08:38the scope of what the CRB is here for.
08:41>> Unfortunately, you know, once a deal
08:43when you're talking about personnel
08:45issues and policemen not showing up,
08:47that falls within the jurisdiction of
08:49the mayor
08:50>> because the mayor handles that
08:52situation. Now, um what the board member
08:55Elise is talking about, we meet with the
08:57chief of police to uh talk about
09:00different issues issues that are coming
09:02up with the police. Uh we certainly can
09:04bring that up at that meeting. Uh but as
09:07far as the CRB, like I said, it falls
09:09outside of the scope of what we are here
09:11for. So, unfortunately, there's not a
09:13whole lot that we can do other than we
09:15can take it to our meeting when we have
09:16with with uh Chief Rustin.
09:19I guess I'm just looking at this section
09:21three of the local law establishing the
09:26citizens board review. Section three um
09:30uh subsection two is talks about passive
09:33misconduct which is a failure to
09:35intervene inappropriately.
09:38A a failure to intervene appropriately,
09:40pardon. um including an untimely
09:42response and refusal to take complaints
09:45which is I think pretty on on board
09:49right it's something that could be
09:51talked about
09:53I'll talk about it for you
09:55>> but yeah if you can send us that uh a
09:57write up on that that way we'll have it
09:59so we'll know exactly what you want to
10:01say to the chief okay thank
10:15Um, Amanda Benhart. Um, I think the
10:19second part of what she was saying is or
10:21trying to focus on is less so about the
10:24situation that I think was happening to
10:27them specifically and more on the
10:30picking and choosing of what situations
10:31the police are choosing to go after or
10:34enforce or focus on or not focus on. and
10:37focusing on things that could be better
10:41intervened with social care or those
10:44kind of programs and not pulling them
10:46through the police system, the judicial
10:48system, spending our tax dollars on that
10:50kind of stuff. Um, I was at a community
10:54meeting over in the southside, uh, TNT,
10:58and they had a police officer there. I
11:01learned a lot. I learned that they keep
11:03lists on people in our city most likely
11:07to commit crimes, domestic violence,
11:11use a gun, could recidivize again people
11:17with mental health issues, people with
11:18homelessness issues, children who get
11:22into problems.
11:24I also learned that they do a lot of
11:27what they call supportive and proactive
11:30things, but they're only supportive and
11:33proactive to the people they're deciding
11:34they can be for. And they're not very
11:38proactive in outreaching with those you.
11:41They multiple times the officer said,
11:44"Follow us on Facebook, reach out to us,
11:47come see us."
11:50But people are scared of the police.
11:53They don't want to go to the police.
11:54They're misreated by the police. Um,
12:01you guys have a connection into CR or
12:03the police system that's a little closer
12:07than citizens might have. stuff might
12:09not always fall in your jurisdiction,
12:12but if we're a system that is helping
12:16folks who are getting abused by the
12:18system, I think it would be helpful for
12:20us to also look and make sure the system
12:22is not being abused against it people.
12:28>> Thank you. [laughter]
12:30Most of the people that we represent are
12:32being abused by the police though and
12:35that's what that's what most of the
12:36representation is is in other words. But
12:39like I said, we can allow them to know
12:42and speak out. But you're in the public
12:44defenders office, so you should have
12:46some type of play down there. You have
12:48any play?
12:52No, I'm talking about being able to talk
12:54to them personally
12:56and downtown at the police department.
12:59And you can't get them on the phone.
13:03>> Well, I can give you a scenario. I got
13:05broken in. My house got broken in and I
13:07called them at 6:00 in the afternoon.
13:09They came at 12:19 in the morning. So,
13:14that's that's some of the stuff here in
13:16Syracuse. Yeah.
13:19Anyone else?
13:26I guess to uh kind of talk about and
13:28build on this discussion of what we're
13:30talking about with the the police and
13:31their sort of disproportionate
13:33enforcement. Um I also had an encounter
13:35with the the Syracuse police as some of
13:38you may know. Uh I was punched in the
13:40face on James and State Street uh by by
13:43a homeless guy. Um I called Syracuse
13:46police. I called Nolita. Um and the
13:49police were there within 45 minutes for
13:51me. They found the guy the next day. So
13:54the police clearly they can do what they
13:58need to do, but I think that at least
14:00with the anecdotal experiences here
14:02today, there's definitely a mismatch in
14:04what might be expected versus the
14:06reality. I think a stolen car in a
14:08shooting incident should receive a
14:09faster response than someone being
14:12punched in the face and not being like
14:15having any medical issues, you know?
14:17Like I was fine. I I was just slightly
14:19bruised in the face and that was it. Um,
14:21and they they found the guy and arrested
14:22him, which is great, but I think that
14:24that should be the experience that
14:25everyone has with the police,
14:27>> right?
14:38>> Kevin, uh, I'm just curious. So um like
14:41with uh me Megan's this kind of passive
14:44complaint so that would rise to the
14:47level where you could submit a complaint
14:50for that and that could become a case of
14:53its own. So I'm wondering is that what
14:56you end up seeing or is it
14:59not? Because it sounds like there'd be a
15:01lot more cases if maybe the public was
15:04more aware that this inaction could also
15:07be considered misconduct. because I
15:09didn't even realize that. So, I'm
15:11wondering if you see that in cases and
15:15if you're presenting that to the public.
15:24>> We have seen that. We have seen that
15:31>> failure to act uh which is what this
15:33kind of action would be called is one of
15:35the most common uh types of complaints
15:37that we do receive. Um, so I think on on
15:39our public end, we could probably do a
15:40little bit better communication about
15:42making that more public, but it is
15:43definitely a very very common complaint
15:45type that we get. And you're probably
15:46right, if we uh advertise that more, we
15:49probably would get a higher volume of
15:50complaints.
15:56Anyone else?
16:02And if you do have something that you
16:04find needs to go and we can speak about
16:07it for you, if you write it down, give
16:10it and I I will I will stand up and try
16:13to represent it once I get there. And if
16:15it's something they can do and I'll come
16:16back with an answer, I'll give it to Don
16:18or and then we'll we'll talk about it or
16:21let you know what's going on and what
16:23they say to us. Okay.
16:26Any
16:30more comments?
16:32If there's no more comments, can we have
16:34a motion to close
16:37>> to adjourn?
16:38Motion to adjurnn.
16:40>> We have a motion on the floor to
16:41adjurnn. Can we get a second?
16:43>> Second.
16:44>> Okay, it's been moved and second. All in
16:46favor?
16:48>> Those opposed?
16:50Motion carried. Meeting adjourned. Thank
16:54you.
```*

