2026-10-06 - Citizen Review Board

Summary

Built from YouTube auto-generated captions, which cover only the public-comment portion. No agenda or minutes have been read. Names and figures are as captioned and may be misspelled; voice votes carried no recorded counts. Public commenters are not named.

  • The captions begin partway through public comment and end at adjournment, so the opening of the meeting (call to order, any reports or case business) is not shown.
  • Legal representation: A speaker for a group of citizen advocates asked whether the Board is pursuing its own legal counsel, so that its lawyer is not in the same firm as the City's corporation counsel; the New York Civil Liberties Union had said it does advocacy rather than representation. The Board answered that it anticipates doing so. See Citizen Review Board Independent Legal Counsel.
  • Public comment on police priorities: A resident who works as a public defender (speaking in a personal capacity) said low-level enforcement such as trespass, loitering and open-container charges, much of it involving homeless people, takes priority over serious crimes, described an unanswered report of a vehicle theft and a slow police response to a threat, and asked the Board to look into enforcement priorities and how police handle evidence residents provide. Another speaker added that the police keep lists of people most likely to offend but do little outreach, and that people fear contacting police. A third described a faster police response to their own assault than other residents reported.
  • Board response: Members said response times and personnel matters fall under the Mayor rather than the Board, but that they meet with the Chief of Police and can raise the concerns there; they asked speakers to put concrete suggestions in writing. A member noted the local law's definition of passive misconduct, which covers a failure to intervene and an untimely response or refusal to take a complaint. The Board said failure to act is one of its most common complaint types and that it could publicize this better, which would likely raise complaint volume.
  • The meeting adjourned on a voice vote.

Agenda

Agenda not yet posted.

Sources

Video

Watch the video
Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:53for legal representation. And I'm not

00:56sure what stage that is. Our our contact

01:00at New York Civil Liberties Union says

01:01they can't represent people like this

01:04CRB. They don't do representation. they

01:07do advocacy and other kind of work. Um,

01:11so our question is from our group of

01:14citizen advocates,

01:16uh, is the CRB actively pursuing getting

01:19their own legal representation

01:21so that they don't have a lawyer that

01:24has a conflict of interest by being in

01:25the same firm as the city corp council.

01:30>> We're anticipating doing that.

01:33>> Thank you. Appreciate it. Okay. Anyone

01:39else?

01:44>> I just have something short to say. Um,

01:48my name is Megan. I am a local resident

01:51and taxpayer of the city and I'm also a

01:53public defender operating under a legal

01:55practice order. But I want to be

01:57entirely clear that I'm here on my own

02:00strictly personal capacity as a citizen

02:02and my remarks do not reflect those of

02:05my office. Every single day in open

02:08court, we see immense saturation of

02:10public resources, time, and tax dollars

02:13dedicated to aggressive low-level

02:15enforcement like trespass, loitering,

02:18and open container charges. Yet, when it

02:20comes to serious or dangerous actionable

02:23crimes,

02:26there's a total failure of response.

02:28While the community frequently raises

02:30serious and documented complaints

02:33regarding excessive force, police

02:35aggression, those systematic issues are

02:38routinely ignored. I know that the

02:41breakdown I know about this breakdown in

02:43public safety firsthand as a crime

02:45victim myself. On September 7th, my car

02:48was stolen and then crashed directly

02:50into a person's front yard fence,

02:53completely totaling the vehicle. In the

02:55aftermath, the department refused to

02:58even open a case or look at the clear,

03:01actionable building security footage

03:04showing the thieves and their license

03:05plates. I called the police desk,

03:08evidence, compliance, traffic, and every

03:11administrative line day after day for 10

03:14days in a row, followed by sever

03:16followed by several more times in the

03:18week after. And I still have yet to be

03:21able to speak to any officer or

03:23supervisor on the phone. To simply find

03:26out where my vehicle was, I was forced

03:28to independently call each towyard in

03:31the city.

03:33More alarmingly, I know this as a

03:36professional working in the justice

03:38system when an individual threatened to

03:41pull a firearm on one of our attorneys

03:43working in our office last month, an

03:45incident that is a matter of public

03:47record and is and resulted in a court

03:50issued restraining order. It took the

03:53police department many hours to respond

03:56while we stood there making call after

03:58call to respond to that deadly threat.

04:01When an officer finally arrived, they

04:04express explicit reluctance to deal with

04:06the suspect, stating that he was too big

04:09and combative. Instead of securing the

04:12threat, they led us to they left us to

04:14continuously walk past this potentially

04:17armed and dangerous individual on our

04:19way to and from the courthouse. It's

04:22unexpectable for a police department to

04:24aggressively hunt down low-level

04:26offenders and vulnerable populations

04:29like our homeless people.

04:31yet back down completely and abandon

04:33residents in and public servants who

04:36face major active crimes and active

04:39violence. And I urge this citizen review

04:42panel to launch a formal investigation

04:45into the priorities and um the handling

04:50of citizen provided evidence and their

04:52systematic misallocation of enforcement

04:56resources. Thank you.

05:00Thank you. You said your name is Megan.

05:02Um, and giving us that that complaint

05:05based on what you experienced, I'm going

05:07to say this. Welcome to Syracuse and

05:08welcome to the lowle sides of town

05:11because it's something that happen all

05:12the time. What do you think will be a

05:15good uh what do you think should take

05:17place and should happen that would help

05:19us take it to the board? I mean, take it

05:22to the police department. Give us a

05:24suggestion so we can help help you. I

05:28think the thing that is most distressing

05:30to me is having a dozen or more open

05:34containers violations

05:37trespass every morning when I'm

05:39representing folks in court. And it's we

05:42deal with probably half of our clients

05:45are homeless. So, it's very frustrating

05:48to me to see lots of to see that getting

05:51prosecuted so much while serious crimes

05:55are are not being I think it would be um

05:58good to do some sort of accounting of

06:01what um hours are spent doing what how

06:04many loitering charges

06:07are being handed out on a daily basis

06:10versus um what calls are coming in that

06:14are not not getting priority. Okay.

06:16>> So, what do you want us to take to the

06:18police when we go in there? Because you

06:21said a mouthful in regards to lording

06:23and that's a big problem in our city,

06:25right? It

06:25>> is. Yes.

06:25>> And and those crimes you say they don't

06:29see them as seriously. So, let's let's

06:31come up with something that's rational

06:33because you're here each day. We come

06:35here and we listen, but we're going to

06:37take this back to the police and and

06:40Ruffen and whomever it is. And then that

06:42way we if you want answers, give us

06:44something to help you with that you

06:46think would be viable to help the

06:48citizens in regards to case like that.

06:51We know we got a lot of mental issue

06:53issues. We know that. And a lot of that

06:55stuff that you're seeing with the

06:56lottery and those people that are

06:57vagrant, a lot of it has mental issue,

07:00drugs, etc. What could help change the

07:04narrative for your situation?

07:07>> And I know I may be taking they may be

07:11ready to go. I apologize. Um,

07:16>> I think I fundamentally

07:20have a personal difference of opinions

07:22and just the way that the broken windows

07:25policing is kind of getting enforced

07:27downtown specifically. Um, I'll have,

07:30you know, the same repeat clients again

07:32and again and again because they're

07:34homeless. they have nowhere to sleep and

07:36so they're sleeping outside and then

07:38they get picked up and then they come

07:40back out and they're homeless and now

07:42they have a charge and it just goes

07:43around and around and around. There

07:45needs to be systematic intervention for

07:48what can

07:50probably two or three hundred

07:53individuals that make up such a heavy

07:57proportion of our services. I'm not

08:00saying that we're not happy to give them

08:02our services, but it it really does take

08:05up the bulk of what I do in a in a

08:08day-to-day as a lawyer.

08:09>> Okay. So, what you can do that will help

08:12us write the stuff reasoning say we

08:14write it down. Write something concrete

08:17down that you would want us to take.

08:19>> Okay.

08:19>> With

08:21a quick question.

08:22>> Now, when you called in these two

08:24different situations, where did you

08:26call?

08:28Did you call 911?

08:29>> 911?

08:30>> Yes.

08:31>> Okay.

08:32>> Let me make things perfectly clear. The

08:36CRB that that actually falls outside of

08:38the scope of what the CRB is here for.

08:41>> Unfortunately, you know, once a deal

08:43when you're talking about personnel

08:45issues and policemen not showing up,

08:47that falls within the jurisdiction of

08:49the mayor

08:50>> because the mayor handles that

08:52situation. Now, um what the board member

08:55Elise is talking about, we meet with the

08:57chief of police to uh talk about

09:00different issues issues that are coming

09:02up with the police. Uh we certainly can

09:04bring that up at that meeting. Uh but as

09:07far as the CRB, like I said, it falls

09:09outside of the scope of what we are here

09:11for. So, unfortunately, there's not a

09:13whole lot that we can do other than we

09:15can take it to our meeting when we have

09:16with with uh Chief Rustin.

09:19I guess I'm just looking at this section

09:21three of the local law establishing the

09:26citizens board review. Section three um

09:30uh subsection two is talks about passive

09:33misconduct which is a failure to

09:35intervene inappropriately.

09:38A a failure to intervene appropriately,

09:40pardon. um including an untimely

09:42response and refusal to take complaints

09:45which is I think pretty on on board

09:49right it's something that could be

09:51talked about

09:53I'll talk about it for you

09:55>> but yeah if you can send us that uh a

09:57write up on that that way we'll have it

09:59so we'll know exactly what you want to

10:01say to the chief okay thank

10:15Um, Amanda Benhart. Um, I think the

10:19second part of what she was saying is or

10:21trying to focus on is less so about the

10:24situation that I think was happening to

10:27them specifically and more on the

10:30picking and choosing of what situations

10:31the police are choosing to go after or

10:34enforce or focus on or not focus on. and

10:37focusing on things that could be better

10:41intervened with social care or those

10:44kind of programs and not pulling them

10:46through the police system, the judicial

10:48system, spending our tax dollars on that

10:50kind of stuff. Um, I was at a community

10:54meeting over in the southside, uh, TNT,

10:58and they had a police officer there. I

11:01learned a lot. I learned that they keep

11:03lists on people in our city most likely

11:07to commit crimes, domestic violence,

11:11use a gun, could recidivize again people

11:17with mental health issues, people with

11:18homelessness issues, children who get

11:22into problems.

11:24I also learned that they do a lot of

11:27what they call supportive and proactive

11:30things, but they're only supportive and

11:33proactive to the people they're deciding

11:34they can be for. And they're not very

11:38proactive in outreaching with those you.

11:41They multiple times the officer said,

11:44"Follow us on Facebook, reach out to us,

11:47come see us."

11:50But people are scared of the police.

11:53They don't want to go to the police.

11:54They're misreated by the police. Um,

12:01you guys have a connection into CR or

12:03the police system that's a little closer

12:07than citizens might have. stuff might

12:09not always fall in your jurisdiction,

12:12but if we're a system that is helping

12:16folks who are getting abused by the

12:18system, I think it would be helpful for

12:20us to also look and make sure the system

12:22is not being abused against it people.

12:28>> Thank you. [laughter]

12:30Most of the people that we represent are

12:32being abused by the police though and

12:35that's what that's what most of the

12:36representation is is in other words. But

12:39like I said, we can allow them to know

12:42and speak out. But you're in the public

12:44defenders office, so you should have

12:46some type of play down there. You have

12:48any play?

12:52No, I'm talking about being able to talk

12:54to them personally

12:56and downtown at the police department.

12:59And you can't get them on the phone.

13:03>> Well, I can give you a scenario. I got

13:05broken in. My house got broken in and I

13:07called them at 6:00 in the afternoon.

13:09They came at 12:19 in the morning. So,

13:14that's that's some of the stuff here in

13:16Syracuse. Yeah.

13:19Anyone else?

13:26I guess to uh kind of talk about and

13:28build on this discussion of what we're

13:30talking about with the the police and

13:31their sort of disproportionate

13:33enforcement. Um I also had an encounter

13:35with the the Syracuse police as some of

13:38you may know. Uh I was punched in the

13:40face on James and State Street uh by by

13:43a homeless guy. Um I called Syracuse

13:46police. I called Nolita. Um and the

13:49police were there within 45 minutes for

13:51me. They found the guy the next day. So

13:54the police clearly they can do what they

13:58need to do, but I think that at least

14:00with the anecdotal experiences here

14:02today, there's definitely a mismatch in

14:04what might be expected versus the

14:06reality. I think a stolen car in a

14:08shooting incident should receive a

14:09faster response than someone being

14:12punched in the face and not being like

14:15having any medical issues, you know?

14:17Like I was fine. I I was just slightly

14:19bruised in the face and that was it. Um,

14:21and they they found the guy and arrested

14:22him, which is great, but I think that

14:24that should be the experience that

14:25everyone has with the police,

14:27>> right?

14:38>> Kevin, uh, I'm just curious. So um like

14:41with uh me Megan's this kind of passive

14:44complaint so that would rise to the

14:47level where you could submit a complaint

14:50for that and that could become a case of

14:53its own. So I'm wondering is that what

14:56you end up seeing or is it

14:59not? Because it sounds like there'd be a

15:01lot more cases if maybe the public was

15:04more aware that this inaction could also

15:07be considered misconduct. because I

15:09didn't even realize that. So, I'm

15:11wondering if you see that in cases and

15:15if you're presenting that to the public.

15:24>> We have seen that. We have seen that

15:31>> failure to act uh which is what this

15:33kind of action would be called is one of

15:35the most common uh types of complaints

15:37that we do receive. Um, so I think on on

15:39our public end, we could probably do a

15:40little bit better communication about

15:42making that more public, but it is

15:43definitely a very very common complaint

15:45type that we get. And you're probably

15:46right, if we uh advertise that more, we

15:49probably would get a higher volume of

15:50complaints.

15:56Anyone else?

16:02And if you do have something that you

16:04find needs to go and we can speak about

16:07it for you, if you write it down, give

16:10it and I I will I will stand up and try

16:13to represent it once I get there. And if

16:15it's something they can do and I'll come

16:16back with an answer, I'll give it to Don

16:18or and then we'll we'll talk about it or

16:21let you know what's going on and what

16:23they say to us. Okay.

16:26Any

16:30more comments?

16:32If there's no more comments, can we have

16:34a motion to close

16:37>> to adjourn?

16:38Motion to adjurnn.

16:40>> We have a motion on the floor to

16:41adjurnn. Can we get a second?

16:43>> Second.

16:44>> Okay, it's been moved and second. All in

16:46favor?

16:48>> Those opposed?

16:50Motion carried. Meeting adjourned. Thank

16:54you.

```*