2026-10-08 - Historic Preservation Commission
Summary
Built from YouTube auto-generated captions of the meeting. No agenda or minutes were read.
- The commission approved the minutes of September 24, 2026 and adopted the findings and decision for 225 Cedar Street from the previous meeting.
- A member disclosed that the applicant, Blackstone Restoration, rents workshop space from them; the commission found it not a conflict and the member recused from seconding.
- 28 West Broadway: certificate of appropriateness for replacing mixed-metal gutters, valleys and downspouts with 20-ounce copper, mahogany carpentry repairs, new slate hips and ridge, snow guards and a rebuilt EPDM roof section at the historic George E. Thompson House. Members praised the plan; no public comment. Findings adopted, certificate granted unanimously. See 28 West Broadway Certificate of Appropriateness.
- Staff noted there will be two vacancies on the commission next year (one regular member and likely the associate seat) and asked members to spread the word; an alternate must apply to become a regular member.
- Adjourned.
Agenda
Agenda not yet posted.
Sources
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RberolK-GNY (City of Bangor YouTube channel, 33:24)
- Agenda Center: https://bangormaine.gov/AgendaCenter
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:16Did you bring a gabble home with you?
00:19>> No, I've got a busted Xbox controller I
00:22can use, I guess. [laughter]
00:24>> Yeah,
00:26>> that'll work. Yeah, they don't hold up
00:28well to toddlers chewing on them. So,
00:38>> okay.
00:39>> They don't hold up well in a
00:40toddler-free household either, just so
00:42you know. [laughter]
00:44>> Okay. Well, it's 7 o'clock. Do we want
00:46to start? Is the applicant there?
00:49>> Yes.
00:50>> Yes.
00:51>> Okay. Um, I can't find the email that
00:55has my me the the uh script. So, if
00:58y'all are okay, we'll dispense with the
01:00script.
01:02>> We're good with it.
01:04>> Okay.
01:05>> Absolutely fine.
01:05>> I guess I shouldn't speak for you guys.
01:06>> Oh, yeah. It's fine. [laughter]
01:09>> Well, welcome to the uh October 8th,
01:132026 meeting of the City of Bangor
01:15Historic Preservation Commission. The
01:18first item on our agenda is old
01:19business, which would be the approval of
01:21the meeting minutes from September 24th,
01:232026.
01:26>> I'd like to move for us to adopt the
01:28meeting minutes from September 24th,
01:302026. They look great.
01:32>> Second the motion.
01:35>> Yes.
01:36>> Yes.
01:37>> And I also vote yes.
01:39Um the second item of old business is
01:41the adoption of findings and decision
01:43for 225 Cedar Street.
01:47I'd like to move first to adopt the
01:49finding decisions for um 225 Cedar
01:53Street from the previous meeting.
01:55>> Second the motion.
01:57>> Yes.
01:58>> Yes.
01:59>> And I will also vote yes. That concludes
02:02the old business on the agenda. So now
02:04we will move on to the new business
02:06which is a certificate of
02:08appropriateness for 28 West Broadway map
02:10lot 2265. The applicant is Blackstone
02:14Restoration and the homeowner is Stephen
02:17and Allison Fes. So, if the applicant
02:20would like to approach the podium, make
02:22sure the microphone lit green and give
02:24your presentation.
02:26>> Uh, Nate, before we do that,
02:28>> yes.
02:28>> Uh, I need to uh put forth a potential
02:31conflict of interest. Um, Blackstone
02:34Restoration rents a workshop space from
02:37me. I do not believe this is a conflict
02:40of interest as I have no financial
02:42holdings in the company or influence.
02:44They are a tenant. If they were not my
02:46tenant, then I would have someone else
02:48rent it. So, I do not think this is a
02:50conflict, but I did want to bring it
02:51forward as a potential for
02:53consideration.
02:55[snorts]
02:56>> Okay,
02:57Katie, any thoughts?
02:59>> I believe we've considered this before
03:01and found it to be not a conflict. Um,
03:03I'd like to move that it's not a
03:05conflict in this instance.
03:08And um I don't believe that Peter can
03:11second that. So um we'll just I'll
03:15second it and um go ahead and we'll vote
03:18I guess.
03:20>> I am voting yes that this is not a
03:22conflict.
03:23>> And I am also voting that this is not a
03:25conflict of interest.
03:28>> Thank you.
03:30>> Thank you, Peter.
03:31>> Thank you.
03:34All
03:38right. Good evening members of the
03:39commission, consultant Poland and staff.
03:42My name is Matthew Whiteamp. I am here
03:44today in a professional capacity to
03:46represent represent Blackstone
03:48restoration Steven and Allison Freeze
03:50for the project proposed project at the
03:52George E. Thompson House at 28 West
03:54Broadway. It's a expansion of a
03:56previously approved project for the
03:58carriage house. for doing much of the
04:00same or proposing to do much of the same
04:03work. Um, a little bit about the
04:06background
04:07um of the house. It was um uh built by
04:13or was built for George E. Thompson. He
04:16was um a
04:19um proate or Ponoska County attorney. It
04:21was constructed um in the early um 20th
04:24century and it was um built by a very
04:27skil or is designed by very skilled
04:29architect Crocker Cra and has this
04:32beautiful
04:34um fenistrated facade with fan lights
04:37and ballistrates. It's an absolutely
04:38lovely house and it's survived very well
04:40over the um century plus that it's been
04:43standing. Um, but there are a couple
04:45problems with this um, structure. And
04:48this is my normal shiel. Um, mixed
04:50metals. When you mix all kinds of
04:53different metals, um, they react with
04:56each other and they corrode each other
04:57and then water gets in the building and
04:59it rots. And that's what's happening
05:02here. Um, it's currently steel and
05:04aluminum and the steel is corroding the
05:07aluminum on the hips. Water's getting
05:09in. It also has lead and that's
05:11corroding the steel and water's getting
05:14in in the gutters and we want to fix
05:17this and the way to do it was with
05:19redoing the metal on the entire building
05:22and we're proposing to use copper. Here
05:25are a couple of the problem areas where
05:27you can see the mixed metals reacting
05:29and the downspout outlet actually
05:32dropped out of this gutter and the water
05:36is pouring into the set. Um, and over
05:40the front facade, there's been attempts
05:43to repair the steel roof with um, EP
05:47dam, which is a rubber material, and
05:48those repairs have failed and water is
05:50getting in there as well. So, our
05:53proposal is to
05:56replace the steel gutters or the um,
05:59wood the wooden gutters that are lined
06:01with steel with copper. And I have an
06:04example for you guys. You want to be in
06:06my box here.
06:11It ends up being something like this. I
06:14can pass it around if anyone wants to
06:16see it.
06:19>> Sharp.
06:26>> We will not be replacing any of the
06:28wooden guns themselves. They appear to
06:30be in serviceable condition. If they do
06:33need to be replaced, they'll be replaced
06:35in kind. These are Douglas fur and
06:37they're made in Oregon and they're a
06:39lovely material to work with.
06:42Um, there are a couple areas of damaged
06:44carpentry.
06:46Where the arrows are on the PowerPoint
06:48presentation, and we're going to replace
06:50in kind with mahogany instead of the
06:53pine. The pine that's currently
06:55available is extremely soft and porous
06:58and doesn't last well in the main
07:00environment. So, we're going to replace
07:01it with sili commonly known as mahogany.
07:05I have two more samples for you guys.
07:08Having fun?
07:23>> You can feel the density and difference
07:25in the materials. It's very evident.
07:28Um, and if we're doing this work, um,
07:32our we just want it to last and it's so
07:36expensive to do that we should do it
07:38once. And for the metal, we're going to
07:41choose 20 oz copper, which has 20 ounces
07:44of weight per square foot. And I have a
07:46sample of that as well.
08:03I have a I have a um this is a lighter
08:06game.
08:13>> Yeah, that is that's 16 ounces per
08:15square foot. I thought I put the it's
08:16probably just buried in here to be
08:18honest.
08:19>> So, moving on. um replace all the copper
08:25uh or the steel gutter liners with
08:27copper and solder all the joints. And if
08:31we're doing that, we can't have steel
08:33valleys cuz they'll react with each
08:36other. So, we're proposing to replace
08:38all of those as well with 20 oz copper.
08:43And then the next logical step is to um
08:47replace some other things with copper.
08:49Um one of the um consultants's question
08:52was about the vent pipe. Um it is
08:56highlighted by the arrow there and this
08:59is what it will look like. It will be
09:01replaced by this instead of a rubber
09:03boot. The rubber deteriorates very
09:06quickly here. And this will last
09:08forever.
09:09I can pass this around if anyone wants
09:11to see it or they can come up later.
09:14All right.
09:20Um and the homeowners, the freezes have
09:23um done some beautiful landscaping to
09:24the property and ice is falling off the
09:28roof onto it and crushing their
09:30beautiful plantings. So they asked if we
09:33could put up um a snow retention system
09:36and they are called snow guards and they
09:40look
09:48this. And there'll be two courses of
09:50them every third slate to hold the snow
09:53onto the roof.
09:55And there's an area that's highlighted
09:57in yellow where there'll be three
09:58courses. They have a generator, backup
10:01generator. And we want to make sure
10:03nothing falls on it because they're very
10:04worried about it.
10:16Yep. You pull three slates out and it
10:18get stacked all back together.
10:22It's a really elegant
10:24way of doing things.
10:27Um,
10:31and then to conclude, um, we're going to
10:34replace the, um, the EPDM roof on the
10:37top, um, which has not been installed
10:40properly. And to, um, be able to conduct
10:44the other repairs, we need to kind of
10:46build up to it. And then it's ringed in
10:49steel as well. So, it'll be a black
10:52rubber roof just like it was. Um,
10:56we'll be adding two down spouts because
10:59the front of this building has sunk over
11:01time and water pools here and there'll
11:04be copper down spouts and all the other
11:06downspouts on the building will be paste
11:07replace.
11:22And those are also made of 20 oz copper.
11:26And that's a 32 oz copper gutter strap.
11:31Um, to do all this, we're going to have
11:33to remove the slate hips on the
11:36building. Um, just to be able to affect
11:40the repairs. Also, um, they were covered
11:45in on the main house with aluminum
11:48recently. And when they were installed,
11:51the contractor screwed through all the
11:53slates to do it, thus ruining them.
11:58So, we'll be removing the hips and ridge
12:02and unfortunately having to scrap most
12:04of that slate, but we will be replacing
12:07it with new slate that was cried in
12:09Quebec and
12:26The slate that is cori um there is in
12:28the same geological um formation from
12:31the Monson slate.
12:35It it is Monson. I have one
12:39right here.
12:50And that's the same slate that is on the
12:52build difference because it's patinaed
12:53over time,
12:56but
13:00that's as close as we can currently get
13:02to what was coron because there's no
13:03active slate quaries in Maine anymore.
13:08Um,
13:11and that concludes my presentation for
13:14the proposed work at 28 West Broadway.
13:16And if possible, I wanted to give you a
13:18little update on the carriage house that
13:21was previously approved by the
13:23commission. Um, the work was completed
13:27um in July of this year and you can see
13:29that the wooden gutters were added and
13:32the profile of the gutters changed
13:34almost none.
13:36um has the same copper down spouts and
13:38snow guards as the main block will have
13:41if approved.
13:57>> Okay, if that's all you've got, then we
14:00can hand it over to the consultant.
14:03>> Yes.
14:05Okay,
14:14>> Nathaniel, you okay?
14:16>> Yeah, I'm I've got uh I've got a
14:182-year-old demanding snacks. Apologize.
14:20>> Oh, that's that's very cute.
14:22>> Done that.
14:23>> Love it. [laughter]
14:25[clears throat]
14:26>> Apologies.
14:28>> No, it's wonderful. So, yeah. Um for for
14:33everybody's uh understanding CPA Crow
14:36was actually the founder of the firm
14:38that is now WBRC today.
14:42So uh Crow Lancaster did a lot of work
14:45in the turn of the century up till the
14:481920s and 30s. But this is a colonial
14:51revival house. Beautiful house as
14:53Matthew described it. And um you can see
14:58a lot of detailing work on this. the
15:00lanterns that are on the that you see on
15:03top of the rails. I don't think those
15:04are there anymore, are they? No. So over
15:07time, fine details maybe get lost, but
15:10the house really has maintained its
15:12integrity incredibly. So I think
15:15Matthew, you probably answered the
15:17questions, but I'll go back through them
15:19one more time. And first question was,
15:21what damaged carpentry will be repaired
15:23with the mahogany? And you pointed that
15:25out pretty clearly. um on the
15:28>> I suspect there will be more damaged
15:32carpentry as we investigate further.
15:34>> Yeah, it looked like excuse me, it
15:36looked like around the perimeter of the
15:38flat EPDM roof up there that there was
15:41actually some kind of a curb, some kind
15:43of a vertical curb. Is that covered in
15:46metal or is that painted [clears throat]
15:47wood or what is that?
15:49>> Um
15:49>> you know where I'm talking.
15:53>> Yeah.
15:55No, no, it was up where the e in this
15:58Yeah, in the tops the top of the roof.
16:02Uh, very Yeah. Okay. There. So, you see
16:06that perimeter? It looks like there's
16:08some kind of a perimeter raised curb
16:11around the outside.
16:13>> Currently, there's um some steel counter
16:16flashing.
16:17>> Is that okay to keep?
16:18>> It's going to be replaced with copper.
16:20We can Okay. because we're proposing to
16:22remove the EPDM roof and
16:25>> if that's removed, it's very simple to
16:27change,
16:27>> right? Okay. So, that'll have a cover of
16:29copper on it. Okay. The next question
16:32was about the vent pipe. Where is it
16:33being replaced? And you pointed that out
16:35pretty clearly. Um there's one up at the
16:38top flat section and it looks like
16:39there's one more back on be on the back
16:42of the house.
16:43>> Just the back one will be replaced with
16:45this styled.
16:46>> Okay.
16:48And the and the one up on the top on the
16:50flat roof won't
16:51>> it's a cast iron pipe and holds a um a
16:55EPDM boot
16:57>> like a boot. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. A boot.
17:01Uh what that is is it's kind of a
17:03witch's cap sort of thing. Um it's
17:06truncated and they usually have a base
17:08to it that you bring your
17:10>> top and is adhered to the
17:14member.
17:14>> Can you point out again where that is?
17:20that piece.
17:20>> Yeah, that
17:24>> I see it. Yeah. Okay.
17:28>> Okay. Thank you. That was and that's a
17:30German the product that you showed was
17:33that German copper vent pipe
17:34>> and that'll be in the slate field at the
17:36on the L of the building.
17:38>> And the other question was just about
17:40ridge slates. I know overlapping slates
17:42as you mentioned. Do you have them on
17:43the hip on the hips and on the ri the
17:46ridges?
17:48>> Uh my only question is is there metal
17:50underneath that
17:52>> step flashed with light?
17:53>> Okay. Yeah, that that was my question.
17:56>> And the reason why you're choosing not
17:58to use copper there. So if there's any
18:00irregularities,
18:01>> right,
18:02>> in the there's like a wood substrate on
18:04the ridge.
18:05>> Yeah.
18:05>> In the hips. If there's irregularity,
18:07the copper doesn't bend as nicely as the
18:09lead does.
18:10>> So it generally lays better. It's lead
18:12or lead coated copper. Okay. Lead
18:15>> sheet lead.
18:16>> Yep. Well, that's good to have it in the
18:18record.
18:20>> Good. That's those were the questions
18:21that I had.
18:28>> Okay. Does anyone on the council have
18:30questions for the applicant?
18:32>> Uh, yes, I do. Um, the steel gutters
18:35you're replacing, were these original to
18:37the house? Um, I believe they were steel
18:42originally. Any houses in Bangor were
18:45originally steel. Um, these appear to
18:47have been redone maybe in the last 30 or
18:5240 years.
18:53>> Okay,
18:53>> that's my best guess.
18:55>> Um, the next question, the EPDM, which
18:58is in that rectangular section on top,
19:00>> um, what would have been the original
19:03material there?
19:04>> It probably was soldered zinc.
19:06>> Okay.
19:07And the EPDM um obviously is a new
19:11material. Uh can you tell us a little
19:13bit about choice of that versus
19:16something else like copper?
19:18>> Well, it's cost cost mostly the
19:22installing the copper pans is very
19:24costly and timeconuming and with the
19:28cold winters and the increasingly hot
19:31main summers the expansion and
19:32contraction on the solder joints is
19:34becoming increasingly problematic. Mhm.
19:37>> want to risk failure. It's already been
19:39installed with EBTM.
19:42>> And you mentioned that the edging on it
19:44is steel. Is that being replaced with
19:46copper?
19:47>> Yes.
19:47>> Okay. And lifetime for the EPDM. I'm
19:50just curious. I mean, I'm not objecting
19:52to the material. I'm curious as to what
19:55projected lifetime would be for that
19:56material. Do we know
19:57>> with maintenance? I think 30 or 40 years
20:01>> and probably easily replaced.
20:05Um, another question I have is you
20:10talking about the corrosion issue and
20:12the the various metals. Um, what is uh
20:16copper's nemesis?
20:18>> Everything.
20:20>> Okay.
20:21>> It's highly reactive.
20:22>> So I guess the the question is the
20:24copper is soldered with lead. I presume
20:26that that is a lasting process and there
20:29is not an electrolytic.
20:30>> They're the most similar of the two.
20:32>> Okay. And the the solder that's used is
20:34a mix of 50% lead and 50% tin.
20:38>> Okay. And and so that is not a reactive
20:41situation. Okay. Um and also similar
20:45question with bronze and copper. Uh
20:48bronze has a significant amount of
20:49copper in it I think. Does it not? Is
20:51that then
20:53>> it doesn't react to bronze and copper? I
20:56think bronze is
20:59correct me if I'm wrong. It's either
21:01bronze, copper and tin or copper and
21:04>> copper and tin. I think
21:06>> I think it's copper and tin. I just
21:08mentioned that the snow guards are
21:10looked at. The guard itself appears to
21:12be bronze and the and the bracket
21:13appears to be copper. So, no issue
21:16there.
21:17>> How um effective are the snow guards? I
21:20mean, putting them up there um
21:24do they I mean what what what is the
21:27tipping point for that? a certain degree
21:29of snow on top that they don't hold or
21:33>> um you know you there's two feet of snow
21:35and it piles up much higher than the
21:38guards the top it it meters it in its
21:40fall
21:41>> I see okay
21:43>> instead of having you know two tons of
21:45snow fall off you have you
21:46>> gota
21:48>> I see the patent date on the uh uh
21:51bronze snow guard is 1923 I think are
21:55snow guards were they they used earlier
21:58And I mean historically iterations like
22:01the Thomas A house has some very early
22:04cast iron versions.
22:06>> Um there actually on the carriage house
22:09there are some existent
22:13they're essentially copper wire
22:15>> and [clears throat] it hooks under the
22:17slate and has a little twist
22:19>> and those are very those have been used
22:21for a very long time. Mhm.
22:24>> But the expansion and contraction under
22:26the slate above it
22:29>> breaks the slate above it generally
22:32>> kind makes a mess or the expansion
22:35contraction works against the edge of
22:37the slate where it's rough.
22:39>> Mhm.
22:39>> And erodess the spiral that's supposed
22:42to hold the snow. M
22:45um Mike mentioned that uh the finials in
22:49that original picture appear to have
22:51been lost on the ballastrade. Um I think
22:55they are a wonderful uh uh ornament u
23:00any any way to convince the homeowners
23:02to replace them.
23:03>> They're fastidious so there is a chance.
23:07>> I too would like to see them back. I
23:09think they're absolutely lovely.
23:10>> I do too. It just adds this extra level
23:12of ornament that this building has. Um,
23:15and I know it's not necessarily on
23:17topic. Um, but there's a beautiful
23:20stained glass window on the back of this
23:22house. If you're ever driving down West
23:24Broadway, turn left. It projects from
23:26the building in this kind of al cove
23:29>> that's stepped under it. It's stunning.
23:32>> We should have taken a picture, put that
23:34in our slide, but I didn't think far
23:36enough ahead.
23:38>> Uh, 20 ounce copper. um choice of that.
23:42Um the copper is going to last a very
23:45long time. 20 ounce is thicker than what
23:48you passed around to the 16. Is there
23:51industry standard for that?
23:53>> Um we just live in an more extreme
23:55environment and the difference in cost
23:58between the 16 and 20 ounces isn't
24:00demonstrable. So
24:02>> I always give the council to go with the
24:04best material you possibly can.
24:07Any estimate of how long all the copper
24:10is going to last?
24:12>> A very long longer than I will.
24:14[laughter]
24:16>> Wonderful. Thank you. I have no other
24:18questions.
24:21>> Um,
24:22silly question. It says steel valleys.
24:26Is that just the dips in between each
24:28connecting part?
24:30>> Light it in the next slide.
24:32>> Hey, very cool. Um my other question is
24:38um we're not going to see any difference
24:39between the mahogany and the pine
24:41because the white trim. Is that correct?
24:43>> It'll be painted to match the building.
24:45>> Fabulous. And then the big difference is
24:47going to be right now it looks like all
24:49the down spouts are painted to match the
24:51house on the trim and the parts and the
24:53so it's going to be copper framing that
24:55front.
24:56>> Yes.
24:56>> Pop out and then uh the sides and the
24:59corners.
24:59>> Correct.
25:01the the kind of beautiful copper color
25:04against the gray of this building. It
25:06would be really lovely.
25:07>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, that's all. Just
25:09wanted to note that that's a big change
25:11and that it's going to look very cool
25:14>> and they will patina over time. They'll
25:17kind of turn brown and then eventually
25:19var degrees.
25:23>> I think that's all my questions.
25:26>> Okay. Um, I don't really have any
25:29questions for Mr. White Camp. So, if no
25:32one else has any questions, we can turn
25:33it over to council discussion or
25:35commission discussion. I mean, excuse
25:36me.
25:40>> Discuss.
25:42[laughter]
25:43>> I mean, I think it's a very
25:44well-considered plan, extremely well
25:47presented. um uh would that we would all
25:51have the uh ability and resources to
25:56restore our historic buildings in this
25:58manner.
25:59Um I I'm pleased to see that there are
26:04homeowners that are doing that. I think
26:06it's a resource we should consider on
26:09the HPC in terms of uh recruiting folks
26:12from
26:14applications like this that have the uh
26:17understanding and passion to do this to
26:19be included somehow in the public uh
26:22move towards restoration and
26:24preservation.
26:31>> Okay.
26:33Anything else before before we go to
26:34public? Anyone in the public?
26:37>> Um, I think my only note is that I think
26:40that
26:42the copper um downspouts is really going
26:46to make it look even more beautifully
26:48symmetrical.
26:50I And I I know that's something that we
26:53talked about as one of the aspects of
26:54this type of house.
26:57>> Yeah. So, that's all that's my only
27:00comment.
27:02Okay.
27:04So, that will wrap up commission
27:06discussion. Do we have anyone in the
27:08public or anyone in the audience?
27:11>> Not here. Is there anybody online?
27:15>> There's no one online either.
27:16>> There's no one online either.
27:18>> Okay.
27:21>> So, with that, I believe we could uh put
27:24this to a motion.
27:29I would like to start the motions
27:30regarding this application and first uh
27:33move that we strike from the document
27:37the yellow uh highlighted sections which
27:40are not applicable to this particular
27:43application.
27:43>> Um before you get to that yeah
27:45procedural background.
27:46>> Oh you want to do that first. Okay. Um
27:49then I would like to move that the
27:51procedural background that the
27:52application being deemed complete
27:55October 8th 2026 and that the propos
27:57proposed project is a certificate of
27:59appropriateness and that the applicant
28:01has paid all the applicable fields fees
28:03is correct and
28:06>> I'd like to second that motion.
28:10>> Yes.
28:10>> Yes.
28:11>> Yes.
28:14And to move ahead then um I I move that
28:18the commission finds it based on
28:19exhibits one to three. Actually one
28:22through three not one two and three.
28:23Well actually it would be all that. Yes.
28:25The application satisfied a historic
28:27preservation code 148-9A
28:30requiring that any alteration of the
28:32historic structure will preserve or
28:34enhance its historical and architectural
28:36character.
28:37>> Seconded.
28:40>> Yes.
28:41>> Yes.
28:42>> Yes.
28:44I would now like to move in part two
28:46that the yellow highlighted areas in the
28:49document be uh stricken as they are not
28:52applicable
28:53>> and for part three.
28:54>> Oh, for part three as well through the
28:56rest of the document that would be parts
28:57two and three.
28:59>> I would like to second that.
29:02>> Yes.
29:03>> Yes.
29:04>> Yes.
29:06And moving forward then I would like to
29:09move under part two number two
29:13that the commission finds it based on
29:14exhibits 1-3 the application satisfies
29:18historic preservation code 148-9B
29:212B requiring that rehabilitation work
29:23does not destroy the distinguishing
29:25qualities nor the character of the
29:27structure and its environment.
29:29>> Seconded.
29:31>> Yes.
29:31>> Yes.
29:32>> Yes.
29:34I would like to move that under part two
29:37number three the commission finds it
29:39based on exhibits 1-3 the application
29:42satisfies historic preservation code
29:44148-2B2C
29:46requiring that while repair is
29:48preferable to replacement in the event
29:50that replacement of a deteriorated uh
29:53architectural features is necessary the
29:55feature being replaced in color design
29:57texture and other visual qualities and
29:59where economically and technically
30:01feasible materials
30:03>> seconded
30:04Yes.
30:05>> Yes.
30:06>> Yes.
30:08>> I'd like to further move in and uh part
30:10two number four uh the commission finds
30:14that based on exhibits 1-3 the
30:15application satisfies historic
30:17preservation code 148-2B2D
30:21requiring that distinctive stylistic
30:23features or examples of skilled
30:25craftsmanship which characterize
30:27historic structures is not damaged or
30:29destroyed when wherever possible.
30:32Seconded and yes.
30:34>> Yes.
30:35>> Yes.
30:37>> Further move under part two number nine.
30:39The commission finds based on exhibits
30:411-3. The application satisfies historic
30:44preservation code 148-2B2I
30:48requiring that whenever possible all
30:50alterations to structures shall be done
30:51in such a manner that if they were to be
30:53removed in the future, the essential
30:55form and integrity of the original
30:57structure would be unimpaired.
30:59>> Seconded. Yes. Yes.
31:02>> Yes. With the note that it's 148-9B
31:062I. I think you said 140 1482B.
31:10>> Oh, excuse me. [clears throat]
31:13And moving forward to uh what is listed
31:18as uh Roman numeral five the decision.
31:23I move that the commission finds that
31:25based on the findings in parts 1-2 of
31:28section four of this document, the
31:30project meets the requirements for a
31:32certificate of appropriateness and
31:33therefore grants a certificate of
31:35appropriateness for the proposed
31:36project.
31:38>> Seconded.
31:39>> Yes.
31:39>> Yes.
31:40>> And I also vote yes.
31:44So, with that, the motion passes,
31:48and I believe that concludes the uh
31:52review of uh 28 West Broadway.
31:56Thank you.
31:58>> Fabulous.
31:58>> Thank you. [snorts]
32:00>> And I believe that concludes everything
32:02on our agenda, unless there was any new
32:05business or other business that anyone
32:08wanted to add.
32:09Um, the only thing I want to add is this
32:12might have been sent when your packets
32:14were sent, but just to share the word
32:16with anyone you know that might be
32:17interested in applying for HBC because
32:19we will have two vacancies. I think one
32:21is the associate member. Could be wrong,
32:24but definitely one regular member
32:25vacancy next year. So,
32:29>> what's the time frame for application?
32:33>> Anytime probably
32:35>> deadline
32:35>> as soon as possible. Um, I don't know if
32:39they have a deadline at this point. Um,
32:43yeah, if you want to, you know, start in
32:45the new year, then it needs to be soon.
32:48>> Just curious, when a new member comes on
32:52and they take an alternate position,
32:54does that can the alternate then be
32:56advanced to a full regular?
32:58>> I think the alternate might have to
33:00apply specifically to be a regular
33:02member.
33:02>> That is correct. That's what I did.
33:05>> Yes.
33:10Okay.
33:12Well, not hearing any other new
33:15business, I move to the meeting.
33:20You can't hear it, but I go with my
33:22computer desk. [laughter]
```*
