2026-10-28 - Joint Committee on Infrastructure and Library Board of Trustees

Summary

Built from the City's posted records and YouTube auto-generated captions. Names and figures are as captioned and may be misspelled.

  • The joint committee of aldermen and Library Board trustees met with a quorum. The Director of Administrative Services reported that the Board of Aldermen had approved the $3 million library bond request for continued design services the night before, keeping the project on schedule: about nine more months of design, a request for construction funds in late spring, and construction possibly starting in summer 2027 subject to Board approval. See Library Renovation Design.
  • Approved the minutes of the August 4, 2026 meeting. No public comment.
  • The owner's project manager reported the project is on track: schematic design is 100 percent complete, the construction manager is finishing its first cost estimate, and design development should begin within the month. Weekly meetings are held with the design team, library staff and the city; the 3D scan, site survey and hazardous material assessment are done, and coordination continues with the courtyard project.
  • The hazardous material testing found some asbestos-containing material and, the project manager believed, mold; the full assessment report is still to come.
  • Approved four invoices on voice votes: two from the project manager for schematic design services ($19,349 and $19,350), the design firm's schematic design invoice ($133,295) and the construction manager's first invoice ($15,451.74). Paula Johnson asked whether itemized invoices were provided (they were in the agenda packet).
  • Questions on relocation: the library must move out during construction because part of the building will be demolished and an addition built; phasing would lengthen the schedule and add cost. A temporary location is being sought, needed by early 2027 at the latest; the former Elm Street Middle School is not considered a good option (partly for lacking working HVAC). Temporary space costs are inside the $45 million project figure, which one alderman objected means bonding rent for 20 years.
  • The trustees will see the schematic design on November 4. The joint committee plans to meet again on November 18 at 6:00 PM, before the Finance Committee, to vote on approving the schematic design so the project can move to design development; drawings will be shared in advance.
  • Adjourned by voice vote.

Agenda

Agenda PDF posted; see Sources.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00in accordance with the requirements of

00:02RSA 91-A

00:04{semicolon} two Roman numeral two.

00:08Will the clerk please take the roll.

00:11>> I will. Alderman Richard Doucette.

00:14>> Present.

00:15>> Alderman Paula Johnson.

00:16>> Present.

00:17>> Alderwoman Benji Flagg Smith.

00:20Um Trustee Linda LeFlamme.

00:24>> Present.

00:25>> Trustee Padma Kollipredi.

00:29Uh Trustee Kristen Cain.

00:31>> Present.

00:33>> Trustee Ernest Jeddy.

00:35>> Here.

00:36>> Uh Trustee Scott Jacquith.

00:38>> Present.

00:39>> Um Trustee Patricia Dresner.

00:42>> Here.

00:43>> Mayor Jim Donchess is I believe not

00:45available. Alderman at Large Lori

00:47Wilshire is not available. Um Alderman

00:49at Large Michael O'Brien.

00:51>> Present.

00:52>> And Alderman at Large Alicia Gregg is

00:54here, so we have eight in attendance.

00:57>> I'm here, too.

00:57>> Oh.

00:58I I'm sorry, what is your name?

00:59>> John Kennedy.

01:00>> John Kennedy. Oh, I just totally skipped

01:02it. I'm sorry. I Padma's name I was

01:04concentrating, so

01:06Okay. So, Trustee John Kennedy, so you

01:08have nine.

01:08>> forget a Kennedy.

01:09>> I know, that's So, also in attendance we

01:12have Kayla Gallo from Left Field, Tim

01:14Cummings, Administrative Service

01:15Director, and Jennifer McCormick, the

01:17Library Director.

01:19So, you have nine.

01:21>> So, we have 10 people, right?

01:24>> [clears throat]

01:24>> Yep.

01:25>> I'll declare a quorum.

01:27>> Tim.

01:30I know I was late, but am I entitled to

01:32a

01:32>> Well, they're up here. They're actually

01:34>> Yeah. I'll make that If anybody didn't

01:37get one of the pass-outs

01:40>> I I gave Ernie mine.

01:41>> Let it be known.

01:44>> Thank you.

01:49>> Okay, we've done the roll call.

01:52Uh

01:54I really don't have much for

01:56introductions, so I'll look to uh

02:00Administrative director Tim Cummings if

02:02he has any introductory comments.

02:04>> I do. Thank you,

02:06um Miss Chairman. For the record, Tim

02:07Cummings, director of administrative

02:08services. Before

02:10we continue on with our regular business

02:13and and receive our official project

02:16status update from our owner's project

02:18manager, Kayla from from Left Field, I

02:22did want to take the opportunity to let

02:25you,

02:26this body, and more importantly, the

02:28general public know that we received

02:30favorable approval last night of the

02:33library bond request to continue with

02:36design-related services for this

02:38project, which is a a wonderful

02:41development that is a $3 million

02:44of of additional monies to bring this

02:47project further along in in its design.

02:50Uh for for everyone's edification

02:54relative to timeline, this keeps us on

02:56track schedule-wise. I would like to

02:58suggest that we will continue with

03:00design over the next 9 or so months, and

03:04that will put us in good stead for late

03:06spring to ask for money for

03:09construction, and ultimately try to

03:11bring this project under construction

03:13subject to approval by the Board of

03:15Aldermen

03:16for

03:17for this summer

03:19time. And that's that's everything that

03:21we've been talking about previously, so

03:24I'm pleased to report that we are still

03:26still on track. And so, I want to thank

03:28the aldermen and and for for you all for

03:30your support and specifically Jen

03:34McCormick for her leadership in in

03:36getting us to where we are today. So,

03:39thank you, Miss Chairman. I'll end my

03:41comments there, and after we get through

03:43some regular business, I assume we'll go

03:45right into a project status update and

03:47hear from our OPM.

03:49>> Yes, we will.

03:50>> [clears throat]

03:51>> All right.

03:53I'll now open up to public comment.

03:55Anybody wishing to speak?

03:59From the public, seeing none.

04:01Approval of minutes. To the clerk.

04:04>> I'd like to make a motion to approve the

04:06minutes of the August 4th, 2026 meeting.

04:10>> Any discussion on the motion?

04:12Seeing none, I'll call for the vote. All

04:15those in favor signify by saying I.

04:17>> I.

04:18>> I.

04:18>> Oppose? Motion carries.

04:22And now, general progress update, which

04:25involves a project status update. I will

04:28now recognize administrative service

04:31director Tim Cummings and Kayla Gallo.

04:35>> Uh thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm just

04:36going to hand it right over to Kayla,

04:38who has a PowerPoint up on the screen,

04:39and she will uh provide the update this

04:42evening.

04:43>> Yes, you can go to the next slide,

04:44please.

04:46I'm Kayla Gallo, project manager with

04:47Left Fields.

04:50Sorry.

04:50>> I don't have it.

04:52>> What?

04:52>> Oh, here it is.

04:53>> Yeah.

04:53>> Thank you.

04:55>> [clears throat]

04:56>> In the back of the drawer.

04:57>> So,

04:58you want to just do it right by the

05:00>> his name, please.

05:01>> Okay.

05:02There we go.

05:06Okay, so I have put together

05:09um

05:10a project timeline and look ahead that

05:13we have been following. As Tim had

05:14mentioned, we are currently on track

05:17um as we had started. So, we're just

05:20about done with the schematic design

05:22phase, and in the next month, we will be

05:26hoping to move into the design

05:27development phase.

05:32So, just a brief project update. We have

05:35been meeting with um the design team,

05:38the library team, and the city weekly.

05:40We've had weekly internal meetings with

05:43um the construction manager, as well as

05:46the design team and the city. We've had

05:48multiple workshops with all city

05:50departments, library staff,

05:52um Nashua City TV, and the Board of

05:54Trustees.

05:56We've completed our 3D scan, site

05:58survey,

06:00um hazardous material assessment, and

06:03we've continued coordination with the

06:04courtyard project team. So currently

06:06where we're at, we're 100% complete with

06:09the schematic design package and the

06:12construction manager is currently

06:14finishing up their first estimate.

06:23>> And Kayla's promised me that the

06:25project's going to come in on budget,

06:26so.

06:27>> Yes.

06:28You can put that in the record.

06:31Um

06:32So today I have approved I mean I have

06:35reviewed and approved on my end and I'm

06:38sending in and asking for approval for

06:41payment on four invoices. There's two

06:45from Left Field. One of them is

06:48schematic design services through July

06:5031st for $19,349.

06:56Um and then the second invoice for Left

06:59Field is

07:00through August 31st for 19

07:04$19,350.

07:08And then

07:09Design Lab, their invoice is for

07:12schematic design services through August

07:1431st

07:16for $133,295.

07:20And then Consigli Construction for their

07:23CM services for through September 30th

07:26for $15,451.74.

07:33>> And just for the record, I am

07:35recommending as well these these

07:37invoices be be paid.

07:41>> Okay.

07:43You have a question?

07:45Paul

07:46Autumn and Johnson, you have a question?

07:48>> Yeah, I've got a couple. Thank you,

07:49please.

07:50Um I'd like to go back to the

07:53previous page.

07:55Um where it says hazardous material

07:58assessment completed.

07:59>> Yep.

08:00>> Were there any hazardous material?

08:03>> Um there So

08:08Did you want to answer question?

08:09>> No, no, go ahead.

08:10>> Okay.

08:10>> So, there was um

08:13There was some ACM that was or asbestos

08:16that was found. They did

08:20They did a They did testing all

08:22throughout um the internal portion of

08:26the building and they did find some.

08:28They haven't sent a full assessment yet,

08:31so we should be getting that soon. We'll

08:32be able to do a thorough report and

08:35review of that

08:36um and then we will be able to assess

08:38from there.

08:40>> May I continue?

08:42>> Yes, you may.

08:43>> Okay. Um

08:45Did you do any mold testing in the

08:47building, too?

08:47>> Yes, so that's exactly what they tested

08:49for.

08:50>> Okay. Was there mold in the building,

08:51also?

08:52>> I believe so, yes.

08:53>> Okay. And my final question, please.

08:56>> Yes.

08:57>> Um are we supposed to get itemized

08:59invoices to show exactly what's

09:02was done?

09:02>> That was Yeah, that would that was sent

09:04in the packet that was sent out with the

09:06agenda. Um It's It's not in this

09:10presentation.

09:11>> Oh, okay. Yep, my apologies.

09:13>> Yep.

09:14>> Okay.

09:15Thank you.

09:16>> You're welcome.

09:18>> Okay, any other further questions?

09:21>> Mr. Chairman, just one Just one thing to

09:23hearken back on is um

09:26the

09:28tentatively we're talking about getting

09:30this group together again on on November

09:3318th.

09:35Um and you know, I want to kind of flag

09:37that because I think that that's going

09:38to be somewhat of a of a of an important

09:40meeting where I think we'll have a a a

09:43conversation about the design and where

09:46we're at and subject to the library

09:48trustees adopting the the design

09:51presented to them, I'd be looking for

09:52this body to

09:54uh approve the schematic design

09:58uh work that has been done to date and

10:00so we can officially move to design

10:03development. And so, wanted to just

10:05tease that out, make make sure you are

10:07all aware of that because I believe you

10:10will be

10:11um

10:11interested in seeing the the hard work

10:14that we've done getting the design to

10:16the point that we're at.

10:19>> Okay, very good.

10:22>> Yes.

10:22>> Alderman Dowd, are you going to be

10:24putting out a um meeting notice on that

10:27or

10:28is it hard and fast now we can put it in

10:30our

10:31schedule?

10:31>> I I I believe it's hard and fast now,

10:33but subject to us confirming that

10:35November 18th works for everyone. But

10:38that is the that is the plan that we're

10:40looking to execute on.

10:42And obviously again that's subject to

10:44the library trustees having a prior

10:47meeting and making an adoption of the

10:49schematic design. So it's in good stead

10:52to be presented uh to to you all.

10:55>> At 6:00?

10:57>> 6:00?

10:58>> Yeah, the 18th yes would be at 6:00.

11:00Technically there'll be a finance

11:01committee meeting at 7:00. So yes, we'll

11:04do it at 6:00.

11:05>> Okay.

11:06>> That's one way to keep the meeting

11:07short.

11:08>> [laughter]

11:11>> Okay.

11:12Uh yes.

11:13>> I just had a quick question. I'm trustee

11:15Jay Wirth. Um

11:16I really appreciate the uh the rough

11:18timeline that you provided. When in the

11:21timeline do we have to secure a

11:23temporary um location for the library?

11:27>> Do you want to answer?

11:28>> Yeah, well

11:29yeah, sure. Go ahead.

11:30>> Okay.

11:32So we are currently in the works of

11:36looking we're looking for a temporary

11:37location now. We should like absolute

11:42latest time that we should have

11:43something is the beginning of 2027. So

11:48roughly wintertime.

11:50>> Thank you.

11:50>> You're welcome.

11:52>> Alderman Johnson.

11:53>> Yes.

11:54Um question about this. Why do we have

11:57to move the library out because we've

11:58done school renovations with the

12:00students in the schools and we didn't

12:02move them out. Why would we have to move

12:04everybody out of library and not keep

12:06them in there as we renovate?

12:07>> So this is a demolition and like a I'm

12:11sorry. Um yeah, a demo addition and

12:14renovation. So, part of the building is

12:16going to be demoed, like demolished. And

12:19there's no way to phase this project

12:22unless it we want the schedule to

12:25>> It would be

12:26It do go ahead.

12:27>> Yeah, it would it would just take too

12:29long. It would end up costing way more

12:30money.

12:31Um, if we if we kept

12:34the building occupied.

12:37>> All set?

12:38>> No.

12:39>> Go go ahead. I want to continue on but

12:41go ahead. I follow you.

12:42>> No, no, you continue and then I'll jump

12:44my question.

12:45>> So so simply put, um,

12:48it's more financially advantageous for

12:52us to move out than elongating the

12:55construction period because we would

12:58have to increase the schedule

13:01to be considerably longer to be able to

13:04accommodate, you know, operations on

13:07site. It would be much more efficient

13:09and it would be a better project in the

13:11long run if we can segregate the

13:13operational uses out from the building

13:16so we can turn it over completely to the

13:19construction manager and not even to get

13:21into some of like the more technical

13:23insurance issues that we would need to

13:24worry about by trying to stay open. So,

13:27for those reasons it was

13:29recommended and suggested that we we

13:32move services off site during

13:34construction. Anecdotally, I'll also

13:37suggest we all know what that building

13:38is made out of. I I would hate to try to

13:41have library services going on and

13:43having someone try to read when there's

13:45a jackhammer actually going on. So,

13:47practically speaking, I think that would

13:49also be very difficult.

13:50>> May I continue?

13:52>> Yes.

13:53>> Okay. So, I guess the question then

13:56becomes, and I know you'll have an

13:57answer, how much square footage are you

13:59looking to move the library into and

14:02what is the cost factor going to be

14:04outside of this bond? So, we're going to

14:07have to rent something or we're going to

14:09find a city building that we're going to

14:10move the library into. I mean, how many

14:13city buildings do we have available that

14:15we can move the library into? Are we

14:17going to use Elm Street?

14:19>> So So, if I may, Mr. Chairman.

14:21>> You may.

14:21>> So, all great questions and we're

14:24working through to get those answers

14:26now.

14:27I think it's fair to say that the Elm

14:29Street Middle School is not the best

14:31option for many reasons. One, it really

14:34doesn't have working HVAC in some of the

14:37building. Um but but secondly,

14:40we certainly

14:43are trying to understand what the market

14:46is available to us to be able to see

14:49what we could be able to one afford and

14:52two what is is is actually there for

14:54square footage for us to be able to to

14:56potentially rent. Once we have that

14:58data, as Kayla said, sometime over the

15:00next 3-4 months, we'll be able to to um

15:04present that and and see if that's an

15:07option in terms of how we want to go.

15:09I'll just conclude my comments by saying

15:11and to be clear is this is all going to

15:13be part of the total building project.

15:17It's not in addition to. So, it has to

15:19be built into that $45 million figure

15:22that we're working with.

15:24>> Okay. Final question, I guess.

15:25>> Okay, we do have other people that want

15:28to speak, but go ahead, Alderman Jones.

15:29>> Okay, I'm just following up. So, on that

15:31$45 million, so whatever we use for

15:34rent, we're going to be bonding that

15:35money too for the rent? It's going to be

15:37part of the bond for 20 years?

15:39>> It would be part of the total project,

15:41yes.

15:41>> So, you're going to be bonding a rent

15:44subsidy for 20 years.

15:47That's basically is That's what you're

15:49saying. So, if it costs you $5 million

15:51for the rent, you're going to be bonding

15:52that $5 million for 20 years at 4%

15:55interest, which is a which is

15:57outrageous. Thank you.

15:59>> Alderman Dowd.

16:01In the school construction projects, we

16:03did the schools in phases and we built

16:05classrooms in the gymnasiums, so we

16:08could take a whole wing of students and

16:10move them into the classrooms in the

16:12gymnasium and shifted students as we

16:14went from one phase to another, so we

16:16could stay within the building.

16:21>> Thank you.

16:22>> All set. Any other questions?

16:25Okay, moving on.

16:28I'll turn to the clerk clerk for

16:31approval of invoices.

16:33>> All righty. I'd like to make a motion to

16:35approve Left Field invoice number 196955

16:39for services through July 31st, 2026 in

16:43the amount of $19,349

16:46and invoice number 199897

16:49for services through August 31st, 2026

16:53in the amount of $19,350.

16:57>> Any discussion on the motion?

17:00Seeing none, call for the vote. All

17:02those in favor signify by saying I.

17:04>> I.

17:05>> Opposed?

17:06>> Nay.

17:10>> Okay.

17:11Motion passes.

17:14Another motion by the clerk.

17:16>> Yes, I'd like to make a motion to

17:17approve Design Lab invoice 26-06.0826

17:23for services through August 31st, 2026

17:26in the amount of $133,295.

17:31>> Any discussion on the motion?

17:34Seeing none, call for the vote. All

17:36those in favor signify by saying I.

17:38>> I.

17:39>> Opposed?

17:40>> Nay.

17:43All right.

17:44So, I can do this.

17:46>> Yeah.

17:48Uh

17:50How about McGregor?

17:51>> I'd like to make a motion to approve

17:53Consigli invoice one for services

17:56through September 23rd, 2026 in the

17:59amount of $15,000

18:01$15,451.74.

18:05>> Any discussion on this motion?

18:07Seeing none, I call for the vote. All

18:09those in favor signify by saying I.

18:11>> I.

18:12>> Opposed?

18:13>> Nay.

18:15>> Okay, motion carries.

18:17Uh now get into all business.

18:21>> None.

18:21>> And yeah, we don't have any.

18:24And we're going to get into adjournment.

18:27Uh so, before Alderman Dowd comes up

18:30with the motion,

18:32uh

18:33going by what uh Director Cummings have

18:36said, we're looking at November 18th.

18:39Uh so, put that on your calendars at

18:436:00 p.m.

18:44And we'll try to see if it this is

18:46available and get it here. And uh

18:49whatever. Okay? And Alderman Dowd.

18:53>> So, we're going to have the uh

18:56drawings to review ahead of time?

18:58>> Yes.

18:59>> Yep.

19:00>> Okay.

19:01Yeah.

19:03And now, these are schematics. There are

19:05a lot of them, right?

19:07>> Yes. So, it's schematic.

19:08>> How about a couple

19:10and just pass it out to certain groups,

19:12you know?

19:13>> Understood.

19:14>> I don't know.

19:16Unless you have one hell of a printing

19:18>> the machine.

19:19>> No.

19:20>> [laughter]

19:22>> Cuz these are big, right?

19:23>> Yeah, they're Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We'll

19:26figure out a way to make sure that

19:28they're large enough for everyone to see

19:29and

19:31we don't have to print out 15 of them.

19:33Yep.

19:35>> Good. Everybody will know where to put

19:36where the pipe is. Everything good.

19:38>> Trustee Jeddy has a question.

19:40>> Uh Alderman Jeddy.

19:42>> Uh Alderman

19:43>> Uh former Alderman Jeddy.

19:45>> Thank you.

19:47Um

19:47So, if I understood Director Cummings,

19:51uh the library trustees are going to

19:53have to approve this design before it

19:57comes before this board.

19:59And when do you anticipate where

20:01trustees are going to be able to do

20:02that?

20:03>> We will

20:04we will be having a presentation by Ben

20:06and his team at the next uh Board of

20:09Trustees meeting.

20:11November 3rd.

20:12>> 4th.

20:12>> 4th.

20:12>> 4th.

20:13>> 4th.

20:14>> 4th. [laughter]

20:14>> November 4th.

20:16>> November 4th.

20:17>> November

20:18>> next week.

20:19>> Yeah, next week.

20:19>> Next week.

20:20>> Okay. So, this these things are all done

20:22and ready to look at, can we look at

20:24[clears throat]

20:24>> Yep.

20:25>> And would we possibly get those prior to

20:27our meeting?

20:29>> Yes.

20:30>> Yep.

20:32>> The the tr-

20:34I would not expect that that

20:35presentation would be shared until

20:39bef- in in advance of the trustee

20:41meeting.

20:43So, Ben will come present, and then

20:46you have access to an electronic copy

20:48after that, similar to the presentations

20:51here.

20:52>> Okay, good.

20:53>> You should

20:54>> Okay, but we're going to be voting on

20:55it.

20:55>> Mhm.

20:56>> A week before

20:57>> That night.

20:57>> That night.

20:59>> Correct. And I think you'll what you'll

21:01see is it is not substantially different

21:04than

21:04other iterations that you've seen.

21:07>> Okay.

21:09>> Alderman Dowd.

21:11Yeah, my question is uh if you

21:14have changes to those drawings,

21:16are you going to approve the changes and

21:18have the changes before it comes here or

21:21>> I I think there would be time built in.

21:23So, so if there's 2 weeks between the

21:26trustees meeting and this meeting, the

21:28expectation would be the trustees

21:30if changes are required, they would have

21:32to meet again to review those.

21:34>> Correct.

21:34>> Yep, that's correct.

21:35>> That's right.

21:36>> Yep.

21:37>> Okay, good. Yeah, I'd like you to

21:40get that done so we can have

21:44a unified meeting here.

21:46>> Yeah.

21:47>> Okay.

21:48Very good. Okay, Alderman Dowd.

21:52>> I'd like to make a motion to adjourn.

21:54>> Motion is to adjourn. All those in favor

21:57signify by saying I.

21:58>> I.

21:59>> Opposed?

22:00You're a good group. Thank you.

22:02>> [laughter]

22:33>> I

```*