2026-10-07 - Water and Sewer Commission Meeting
Summary
Built from ASR auto-captions (names approximate).
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Sewer DEP Compliance | 27 | 60% |
| Water and Sewer Plant Operations Contract Selection | 9 | 20% |
| Other business | 8 | 17% |
| Griffin Road Waterline Extension | 1 | 3% |
- Chaired by Robert Coleman with Emmanuel Asenso, Paul Gagner, Erik Grotton and Thomas Coleman voting.
- Next meeting set for November 4; adjourned by roll call.
Sewer DEP Compliance
4:50-10:40, 18:40-37:36, 38:52-40:40
- Shane (Veolia) presented Veolia's August monthly operating report: three operators on site daily plus a part-time admin, sludge hauling nearly caught up until the receiving incinerator shut for a couple of weeks, E. coli and pH exceedances reportedly resolved, plant loadings still above design, a daily-max flow reporting error to be fixed in the September report, and the phosphorus limit rising to 1.0 mg/L on November 1.
- Engineer Chris McClure presented two proposals, both approved by unanimous roll call: a $5,000 MassDOT-compliant rolling traffic management plan (needed for the roadway access permit to clean, jet and camera the Route 20 sewer line) and a $15,000 proposal to assemble the formal response to MassDEP's enforcement-meeting list (O&M and IPP updates, collection-system mapping/GIS).
- The CWMP (comprehensive wastewater management plan, the gateway to state funding, previously about $600,000 when last done) may need to be outsourced.
- Vincent Masterson reported on 17 faulty meters (three replaced, two new MXUs, the 41 Lakeview broken-wire fix) and hand-delivery of no-flushing notices to the pump-station customers (rest area, Treehouse Brewery, Amazon).
- Jennifer Cournoyer (the new water/sewer administrative coordinator) was introduced; members said what reports they want: a running tally of sewer capacity commitments under the moratorium, notice of new connections, revenue and outstanding-balance information (concern about reliance on the Turnpike Authority invoice, reportedly going out for rebid), delivered as a brief monthly summary in the agenda packet.
Water and Sewer Plant Operations Contract Selection
10:40-18:39, 41:50-42:45
- Shane (Veolia) and a Veolia colleague ("Zach") explained that the CoMag process is impaired because automated wasting/return valves were replaced with manual valves (no SCADA control or "goosing"), one train was cannibalized for parts, and repair pricing is on hold until the board decides on the operations contract.
- Vincent Masterson asked about the second train, and the board asked for current R&M/chemical/sludge cost breakdowns (the one provided ran only through July).
- A member pushed to pick one of the two contractors who pitched to operate the plant earlier that day; the chair declined because it was not on the agenda, with no date set.
Griffin Road Waterline Extension
37:38-38:52
- The extension is stalled: MassDOT permit-portal permissions prevented anyone, including Andrew Golas and Nick Peele, from submitting the Route 20 permit.
Other business
0:07-4:50, 40:41-41:50, 42:45-44:24
- Approved two sets of minutes (the 2025 sets with Emmanuel Asenso abstaining because he was not then on the board) and warrants totaling $108,727.76.
- Lynn Ashley has circulated superintendent applications and Thomas Coleman still needs to schedule interviews.
Sources
Video
Transcript
Transcript
0:07I call this
0:09um
0:10this meeting of the Charlton Water and
0:11Sewer Commission. Oh, wait. No, never
0:13mind. It's
0:18Being over eager.
0:29Oh.
0:30>> Eric signing in now.
1:06>> [snorts]
1:13>> Um before we begin the
1:16the minutes that we got, the dates on
1:18this is July 9th, 2025. Is it Is that
1:21correct, Paul?
1:22>> Yes, there were two sets of minutes um
1:24in 2025. Those were never
1:27approved or signed.
1:29>> Oh, okay.
1:30>> We're bringing them now.
1:31>> Okay, okay. Uh
1:36>> I believe we have a quorum and it is
1:396:30 p.m. I call this meeting of the
1:41Charlton Water and Sewer Commission to
1:44order.
1:48The first item on the agenda is the
1:51public forum.
1:53Is there anyone on this call that wants
1:54to discuss something that is not already
1:56on the agenda.
2:02Hearing none, we'll move on to meetings
2:04and warrants. Mr. Ascenzo, do you have a
2:05motion to approve the meeting minutes?
2:08>> Oh, yes. So, I make the motion to
2:12accept the minute dated on
2:15Um so, there's two of them. The first
2:18one will be September 2nd, 2026.
2:23>> Second.
2:27>> Is there any discussion?
2:31Hearing none, uh call the vote.
2:34>> Mr. Ascenzo?
2:37>> Aye.
2:38>> Mr. Gagner?
2:39>> Aye.
2:40>> Mr. Thomas [clears throat] Coleman?
2:41>> Aye.
2:42>> Mr. Robert Coleman?
2:47>> Unmute.
2:48>> You're muted, Robert.
2:51>> Aye.
2:52>> And Mr. Graton?
2:53>> Aye.
2:58>> And I make a motion to also accept
3:02uh minute dated on July 9th, 2025.
3:07>> Second.
3:11>> Um just so you know, uh Mr. Ascenzo, you
3:13can't
3:15you have to abstain cuz you weren't at
3:16that meeting.
3:18>> Oh, okay.
3:19>> Okay.
3:20All right.
3:20>> I make a motion to accept
3:21[clears throat] the minutes from July
3:2220th,
3:24July 20, 2025.
3:29>> Second.
3:30>> I'll second it.
3:32>> [clears throat]
3:34>> All right. Mr. Ascenzo?
3:36>> Can I vote, though?
3:38>> No, you can just say abstain.
3:40>> Abstain. All right.
3:42>> Mr. Gagner?
3:43>> Aye.
3:43>> Mr. Graton?
3:44>> Aye.
3:45>> Mr. Thomas Coleman?
3:48Oh, sorry. Here I Yeah, Mr. Thomas
3:50Coleman.
3:51>> Aye.
3:52>> Robert Mr. Robert Coleman
3:54>> Hi.
3:56>> Right.
4:00>> And for the uh next order of business,
4:03we have a scheduled appointment uh with
4:06>> I think we have warrants to
4:07>> You're going to do the warrant?
4:08>> Warrants, right.
4:10>> Okay, so I'll make motion to accept uh
4:12warrant total in
4:15uh $108,727
4:19and 76 cents.
4:23>> I'll second it.
4:24>> [clears throat]
4:25>> Is there any discussion?
4:30Hearing none,
4:31uh call for a roll call vote.
4:34>> Mr. Finazzo
4:35>> Hi.
4:36>> Mr. Gagner
4:38>> Hi.
4:38>> Mr. Brotten
4:39>> Hi.
4:40>> Mr. Thomas Coleman
4:42>> Hi.
4:43>> Mr. Robert Coleman
4:44>> Hi.
4:50>> For our next order of business, we have
4:52a scheduled appointment
4:55with the for the Veolia monthly
4:58operating report.
5:03>> Uh good evening.
5:05Um you have my MOR for the month of
5:07August. Um I listed all the operation
5:10and maintenance activities on that
5:12report. As you can see, we've been very
5:15busy um
5:17fixing things and uh getting things back
5:19in order.
5:20You can also see that we've added
5:22another staff member um in the month of
5:25August. So, I just want the board to be
5:27aware that
5:28um we've had three
5:30people on site pretty much every day
5:33barring anybody calling in sick or being
5:35on vacation. Um and then our admin who
5:38works um
5:4020 to 25 hours a week is also on site.
5:42So, just wanted to make sure that you
5:44understand that we're meeting our
5:46obligations, people-wise, and actually
5:49sometimes we even have more people on
5:51site. Um
5:53continue to haul the sludge. We were
5:55actually getting caught up. We were
5:56getting very close um
5:59to being back in compliance, and
6:01unfortunately,
6:03the incinerator that we haul our sludge
6:04to closed down for a couple weeks, which
6:07kind of set us back. Um
6:09the incinerator's back open. We're back
6:11hauling
6:13getting rid of the sludge. Numbers are
6:15coming back down.
6:16Um we're getting close to close to the
6:18compliance. I can tell you the coli
6:20issue has gone away.
6:23I am in constant constant contact with
6:27Mr. Kapasco at the DEP. He is fully
6:29aware of um what's going on with the
6:32plant. I will tell you right now that he
6:34is very interested in the results coming
6:37from the Turnpike Authority and the
6:39brewery. Um
6:41which goes back to the IPP plan. Um
6:45which you are going to have Chris
6:46McCullen write. Um so, he's been um kept
6:50informed all every step of the way.
6:52And I guess with that said, I'll answer
6:55any questions from the board if there
6:56are any.
6:59>> Machine, the the performance report has
7:02flow rates that are
7:04you know, much higher than they've been
7:06in the past.
7:07Is that
7:09a quirk of a flow meter, or is it we
7:12really have
7:13>> I think the meter So, there is an issue
7:14with the daily max. I didn't catch it
7:16until I was working on the DMR.
7:19Um I did have the SCADA guy in the other
7:21day to look to see how that's being um
7:24calculated. It's being calculated right.
7:26Now, I just have to work on how it's
7:28transitioning to this report. Um the
7:30report for September will have the
7:33correct daily max.
7:38>> Yeah, so
7:39like the loading, like the BOD loading,
7:41and TSS loading
7:43are all concentrations times flow
7:47these loadings.
7:49>> Yeah, I mean I don't think the daily max
7:51really plays into that, but the loadings
7:53you're seeing are what is coming into
7:54the plant and what's going out. So, the
7:57BOD pounds per day is
8:00would be off a little bit, but I don't
8:03think that daily maximum plays into
8:05that. So,
8:06I did catch that. I will straighten it
8:09out before I turn in the September
8:11report. But, I can tell you this cuz I
8:13do see the lab data
8:14coming in. Your loadings are still over
8:17the design of the plant. Now, don't get
8:18me wrong. The plant is still performing
8:22pretty well, especially BOD removal is
8:24really good.
8:26Um,
8:27the TSS was coming down. The E. coli
8:29issue's been taken care of. The pH
8:31issue's been taken care of. Couple minor
8:33things here and there.
8:35>> pH is a weird one to
8:37>> It was an issue with
8:38the plant losing flow and some of the
8:41flow pacing. So,
8:43when the plant was starting, we were
8:45having some spikes, which we reported to
8:47DEP.
8:49We believe we've got that corrected now.
8:52We're not seeing those problems more
8:54recently, and I think that'll reflect in
8:57the September report when I write that
8:58for you.
8:59>> Yeah.
9:00Does phosphorus limit go away sometime
9:04soon?
9:06>> I don't think it goes away. I think it
9:07increases to a 1.0. Don't have that
9:10right in front of me. I know there was a
9:12change and usually it's November 1st,
9:14and then I believe it goes up to um
9:17a 1.0 monthly average instead of the
9:20.11. Um, I can look into that for you if
9:23you want and send you an email.
9:25>> It's typical that it goes up to one.
9:27>> Right. They Not
9:29In most places, yes. Like even in
9:30Sturbridge, ours changes on November
9:321st. I'm sure Charlton does the same.
9:35Um,
9:38and then even then, you know, until
9:40with the with the phosphorus, it's
9:42directly related to TSS. The last TSS
9:45before the um
9:48incinerated closed was down to a four,
9:50which I was hoping then the phosphorus
9:52would come back down with it.
9:54Um
9:55But it didn't Like I said, once it
9:57closed, um we didn't get to that. So
10:01So I have the permit in front of me on
10:03November 1st, it does go up to
10:05>> 1 mg per liter.
10:06>> Yeah.
10:07You attribute the
10:09phosphorus
10:11and the nitrogen in the E. coli
10:14to solids inventory more than
10:17>> Definitely the phosphorus. The E. coli
10:19was more um you know, your UV system
10:21just wasn't producing the way it needed
10:23to. With you know, with us getting
10:24permission from MassDEP, having that in
10:27writing, um the E. coli's gone away.
10:30The ammonia issue, um the ABCs are
10:33performing now. We are nitrifying.
10:36We just haven't had enough chance, you
10:38know, once we got caught up on the
10:39hauling, the incinerator closing down
10:42really set us back a couple weeks.
10:44>> But you attribute it more to solids
10:46inventory than CoMag performance?
10:48>> That CoMag system is in need of some
10:51serious work. Um that system's been
10:53altered. It's not running the way It's
10:57not running the way it's designed to
10:58run. Um it's going to need some work.
11:01We've actually priced out um some things
11:03that we'll need to do moving forward.
11:06We just haven't pulled the trigger on
11:08that until we know what the board
11:11respectively decides to do with the
11:12contract.
11:14>> Yeah.
11:15Okay.
11:15>> Cuz some of the parts lead times are
11:17five, six weeks.
11:19We've looked into some other work where
11:21um
11:21pumps have lead times of of months.
11:24And we just didn't want to get into that
11:26until you decide whether you were going
11:28with another company or you were going
11:29to retain Veolia's services.
11:33>> Okay.
11:34And just to to add to a little bit about
11:36what um
11:37Shane had mentioned about the uh the
11:39valving in CoMag,
11:41um
11:42>> [clears throat]
11:42>> the the wasting and return systems on
11:44the CoMag process utilize the same
11:47pumps. So, in order for it to cycle
11:49between return and wasting,
11:53automatic valves actuate um below the
11:56tanks to uh to divert flow to um their
12:00intended location. Those valves at one
12:03point were replaced with manual valves.
12:06Um so, SCADA can't really communicate
12:09with those valves to tell them what
12:11position to be in. So, we're having
12:13challenges with getting um the proper
12:16wasting and return ratios, as well as um
12:20the process utilizes what's referred to
12:22as goosing, where the valves will open
12:26uh more so than normal, um and the pump
12:29speed will ramp up. This scours the
12:31lines, so any buildup of magnetite or
12:33solids in those lines um will actually
12:37clear out. Um again, replacing those
12:39valves with uh manual valves kind of
12:42eliminated that process from working.
12:45So, Shane and I have um Shane and the
12:47team there have looked into uh replacing
12:50those valves and get getting them
12:52automated and functioning as intended.
12:57>> Yep.
13:01That that's a really hard process to
13:04run, just logistically moving
13:06that magnetite around is really
13:08difficult. So, I I get I get that.
13:10>> Yeah, it's a it's it's a
13:13For such a small process, there's a lot
13:14of moving parts, and all those moving
13:17parts are really integral to uh to
13:20proper operation. So, if you lose one of
13:23those parts or one of those chemicals or
13:25one of those mixers,
13:27the process really suffers. So, we think
13:29when we get that all squared away, we
13:31get the the wasting operating as
13:33intended, the return operating as
13:35intended, the performance numbers that
13:38we see coming out of that are just going
13:39to improve that much more.
13:41>> Yeah.
13:58>> Uh
13:59does anyone have any questions?
14:01>> I just have something. Um
14:04I noticed as I Shane, I should have said
14:06something to you.
14:07And I know there's lag time
14:10with your invoicing, but could we get a
14:12current R&M chemical sludge breakdown?
14:14Cuz this looks I mean, I'm just looking
14:16at it quickly now.
14:18Um it looks like it's last month's.
14:21I could be wrong.
14:22>> So, I I gave you the one I gave you was
14:25through um
14:29You're right. It was just through um
14:32July. When I do the September report,
14:34I'll make sure it's up through
14:35September.
14:35>> Yeah. Yeah. And I know
14:36>> And actually, if it helps, I can even um
14:39download it tomorrow and email it to you
14:41if that'll help you.
14:43>> uh yeah, cuz I know uh Trisha, Jen, and
14:45I have been going back and forth with
14:46things, and that's the other thing I
14:48wanted to um make mention. Um
14:51we're not ignoring Trisha. Uh we're
14:53going to do Jen's going to do a deep
14:55dive into those outstanding invoices.
14:58>> Understood. And then I'll I'll um
15:00I don't know how that happened, to be
15:01honest with you. I will I have the
15:03reports on my email. It's just Give me 5
15:06minutes to download them and I'll send
15:07it over to you.
15:09>> Okay, great.
15:09>> I apologize for that.
15:10>> Not a big deal.
15:21>> I I just got a quick question about the
15:23coal mag. I'm a little curious.
15:26Um I know Dennis was working on that
15:28valve. I'm not sure where it left off.
15:30Are both trains in the same situation
15:33currently?
15:38>> The the train that was online was the
15:41one um that we were concentrating on the
15:44most.
15:45We we had some other issues with the
15:47other train. We
15:49um we had stolen parts off off of the
15:52other train to make one um
15:54So, I'd have to dig into that more.
15:57Um
15:58But, you know, with those like like Zach
16:00said, with those actuated valves being
16:02removed and not having the ability to
16:05goose properly, you know, that kind of
16:08and not waste properly, it kind of
16:09screws up the whole system. So,
16:11uh to be honest with you, Vinnie, I can
16:13look at the other unit, which is on our
16:15list of things to do.
16:17Our goal was really to get the the unit
16:20um that we had been
16:22using back up and working cuz that's the
16:24one that seems to perform the best.
16:26>> Okay, I was just curious. I mean
16:29Yeah.
16:30If the other one was 100% ready, I was
16:33thinking maybe it would be an easy
16:34switch, but yeah, you're right.
16:36>> And the actuator is it just hanging
16:38there, you know, so I don't I don't and
16:40honestly, I wasn't there. I don't know
16:41who did what and it doesn't matter cuz
16:43we just want to move forward. I don't
16:44even know if the actuator is the issue
16:46or if it was the valve that was the
16:48issue. So, again, you know,
16:50>> the valve blew out. He showed me it when
16:52he was here.
16:54>> Okay. And then, you know, on just you
16:56know, he should have replaced it with
16:58the proper valve and hooked the actuator
17:00back up, but he didn't. Maybe he had a
17:01reason for that. I can't speak to that.
17:03Um but, we are definitely it's got our
17:05attention and we're working on it. I
17:07will look at the other unit um
17:10tomorrow to see if that's a possibility.
17:12But, when we turned that other unit on,
17:14we weren't having much luck, either.
17:16>> Yeah, that one always kind of had some
17:18quirks to it.
17:19>> Yeah. And then Vinnie, I think what
17:22Shane said with the the head the
17:24actuator still being attached to the
17:26wiring,
17:28um what we can instruct the team there
17:30to do is is to actually manually uh move
17:34that valve position
17:36um through SCADA and see if the see if
17:39the actuator rotates. I mean, it's not
17:42attached to a valve, but it will at
17:43least let us know
17:45if uh the actuator, which is probably
17:47the the substantial part of the the cost
17:50of the valve, is still functioning.
17:53>> Yeah, I know I know we had a blowout on
17:55that valve cuz he showed me the big hole
17:56in it, but
17:58I don't know if the actuator is still
17:59good, so that would be good to find out.
18:01Yeah, I'm just wondering the condition
18:03of the other train, to be honest with
18:04you.
18:05>> Yeah, we can give you an update on that.
18:06And honestly, you know, we have the
18:08similar system in Starboard, and those
18:10valves, the ones that you know, control
18:12the goosing, they're famous for the
18:14magnetites just wearing through the
18:15body. So, I'm not surprised you've had
18:18that issue. We've had it in Starboard.
18:20We actually keep a spare on the shelf
18:21here for that reason.
18:23Um but it is something we're we're going
18:25to address.
18:26>> Yeah.
18:26>> All right.
18:27>> Thank you.
18:28>> Yep.
18:39>> Is there any further discussion on the
18:40topic?
18:43>> This um limit report looks like the same
18:46report from last month, is it?
18:48>> Yeah, that's cool.
18:49>> Yeah, he said he'll uh we'll send it and
18:52update it tomorrow. I can send it out to
18:54you guys.
18:55>> Okay, I missed it. All right, thank you.
18:59>> Is there any further discussion on the
19:01topic?
19:06Hearing none,
19:07uh new business. Uh the department
19:10processes.
19:12>> Okay. Um I don't know if all of you can
19:15see Jen, but Jen is the new water sewer
19:20admin and we are very excited to have
19:23her.
19:23Um she comes with a history of working
19:28for another municipality in the water
19:29sewer department. So, she knows her
19:32stuff.
19:33Um
19:36the way she did meetings is probably
19:38different than way we do it. So, I am
19:42just want to go over a few things with
19:44how things are done. Like, is there
19:47anything you want changed or anything
19:49you want added? For instance, um the
19:51timing of the agenda packet. We usually
19:53send it out the Monday before the
19:55meeting. Are you guys okay with that? Um
19:59when somebody wants to connect a new
20:02house or like a a brand new house
20:05being built or a house looking to
20:08connect, do you guys want to be notified
20:10of that?
20:11Um
20:14I know we need to come before the
20:16commission when
20:18say someone has a large
20:21um privilege fee.
20:24If it's an existing home,
20:27so um with the assessor speaking, the
20:29assessors want all new connections to be
20:31paid in full, all the privilege fees.
20:33But, existing homes, it is okay to be
20:36assessed over time. So, that is normally
20:38brought to the commission for approval.
20:41Um
20:42aging report looking at outstanding
20:44balances, do you want any information on
20:46that? Do you want any information on
20:48meter reads and how they're doing? Any
20:50faulty meters? Any repeat issues? What
20:54do you guys want because Jen's starting
20:56fresh and she's just wants to make sure
21:00you guys get all the information you
21:01want and need.
21:05>> Well, I'll go I'll go first if it's all
21:07right.
21:08>> Sure.
21:09>> I have no issue with the agenda package
21:11timing. I could
21:12pick whatever's convenient and
21:14logistically useful for your end.
21:17>> Okay.
21:17>> Um the new connection notifications
21:19initially when I got on the board
21:22all the single family homes were going
21:24through us. We kind of
21:26authorized um Vinnie to take care of
21:30those, but I did think that we would
21:32receive some kind of a monthly
21:34list at some point. These are the ones
21:36that got tied in.
21:38And
21:39with our moratorium in the
21:42restrictions on the amount of water we
21:44can treat
21:45I do want to and I don't know who does
21:47this, but I do think we should have a
21:49kind of a running tally of our
21:52um
21:53of our commitments.
21:55>> Okay.
21:55>> We've told this guy he can have 15,000.
21:57I've told this guy he can have nine and
22:00and it's growing closer to our limit.
22:02>> Okay.
22:03>> Um
22:05I I think I I think I would like to have
22:08more information on the revenue you
22:10know, we see costs all the time, but we
22:13we see revenue.
22:14>> Yep.
22:14>> So, I think it would be useful for me to
22:17see
22:19you know, each quarter these are the
22:21>> I mean
22:22we can run reports like from our expense
22:25accounts. She can give you balances on
22:27where things stand as well. Like um
22:30all those bills so you guys can get a
22:32current balance of what is in our O&M
22:34account.
22:35So, anything like that just let us know.
22:37>> Yeah.
22:38>> Let me know.
22:39>> I think the risk for that I see is that
22:41for you know, years and years we've been
22:43relying on a large um invoice that went
22:46to the turnpikes.
22:48You know, at some point we've been
22:50warned that that's going to end and and
22:52I'd like to see
22:53>> Um I just heard that's going up for
22:55rebid.
22:58>> Oh, so they're not going to close it
22:59right away. It's
23:00>> Right.
23:00>> years
23:01>> the time. Yeah.
23:02>> But
23:03Yeah, still like
23:05what are we what are we taking in
23:06because we always talk about what we're
23:08what we're spending.
23:09>> Okay. So, those are my
23:11that's my wish list.
23:17Anybody else?
23:24I know when the quarter ends you all
23:26come in to sign the commitment report
23:28which means that's how much money was
23:30billed out including all the surcharges.
23:33I didn't know if you wanted
23:35anything else.
23:39>> Well, it might be a case if we don't
23:40know what we're not getting.
23:42>> True, yeah.
23:43>> Accurate.
23:49>> Well, moving forward we can
23:51absolutely notify you of any and all new
23:54connections
23:55and then
23:57income.
24:00And if you would you like to know what
24:03is outstanding?
24:05Like what bill what the dollar amount is
24:07for outstanding
24:10bills that haven't been paid? Is that of
24:12any interest?
24:16>> I I I think it's of interest.
24:18>> Okay.
24:19>> Yeah.
24:21>> I think I understood from a few meetings
24:24ago that
24:26um
24:27somehow the town runs those people down
24:29and make sure those don't stay
24:31outstanding for too long but I think
24:33it'd be useful to know
24:36>> Sure.
24:36>> what what that looks like.
24:41>> Um
24:42so maybe this is just a thought. Um you
24:45know how Vinnie does his overall monthly
24:48review, maybe Jen can do something
24:50similar like this many connections, this
24:53much came in and this is where we stand
24:55for outstanding invoices. Would
24:57something like that be good?
25:00She could actually just put it in a memo
25:02and just let you guys know or an email
25:04monthly or
25:06it doesn't even have to be part of the
25:07meeting. She can just send it out to
25:08you.
25:12>> I can't see how we wouldn't like it.
25:14>> Okay.
25:14>> It's It's just isn't it unless it's more
25:17work for her that she can't fit in, but
25:19I'm guessing that that it's not.
25:21>> Jen, would you rather it be part of the
25:23meeting or just like a monthly update to
25:26the commission at through email?
25:29>> Whichever they would prefer. I have no
25:31problem. I've done it both ways in the
25:33past with other boards.
25:37I mean, I can put it into the
25:40agenda packet.
25:42>> Now that I'm thinking about it in New
25:43Connections, why don't we do it just
25:45like You can do a summary.
25:48Like a 2-minute summary of what is going
25:51on.
25:52>> Sure.
25:52>> That way they if they have questions
25:54regarding the connections, that would be
25:55the time to talk about it.
25:57>> Absolutely.
25:58>> Does that make sense?
26:04Okay.
26:07So, next Robert, you want to take over?
26:11>> Up next the next order of new business
26:15is the McLeary engineering proposal for
26:17traffic management plan and master DEP
26:20response.
26:25>> That was all part of your packet for you
26:27to review.
26:33>> Is Is Chris on?
26:35>> He is.
26:35>> He
26:36I see his name.
26:38>> Yes, I was able to jump out of my other
26:40meeting. Good Good evening.
26:42>> Hi.
26:43>> Good evening.
26:45So,
26:46yes, so the traffic management plan
26:49proposal
26:50as you probably been aware of we're
26:53trying to get this Route 20 and other
26:55work that's been associated on on Route
26:5720. We have to develop a MassDOT
27:00compliant traffic management plan.
27:04With this proposal
27:06I I am
27:08going to develop something that I'll be
27:10able to use for anytime any work needs
27:12to be done on on the DOT on on the DOT
27:15right-of-way. So, it it'll also, you
27:18know, we have to get this um that line
27:22cleaned
27:23um
27:24jetted and cameraed.
27:26So, this this component is has been
27:28really was what what's holding us up in
27:30order to get out there in addition to
27:32getting, you know,
27:33um quotes from the folks to get that
27:34worked on.
27:35But, this needs to be submitted as part
27:37of that roadway access permit with the
27:40MassDOT um in order for them to approve
27:43uh to approve this work. What we're
27:45proposing is is really a rolling uh
27:47rolling management plan. So, I have to
27:48put in a bunch of develop a bunch of
27:50different pages and and you know, and a
27:53and the attenuators and the rest of
27:54that. So, they So, once we propose doing
27:57work in the road, um they they they will
28:01um they'll they'll approve it.
28:08>> Are you looking for a a motion from the
28:12commission to approve the
28:14>> Y- yes, yes, exactly. Just so you know
28:16that I have a scope of work and a level
28:18of effort that's I'm looking for. But,
28:20that one end up and also this this two
28:22proposals there. The other one is for
28:23that uh MassDEP response. Um I didn't
28:26want to go ahead and start um you know,
28:28expanding um monies towards that um
28:31towards those responses and those and
28:33those uh requirements without without
28:35the board's approval. And so, that's
28:36that's what I'm looking for motion on
28:37both of those uh both those proposals.
28:40>> Yeah, I think they might be in in
28:42backwards order on my
28:45mine. So, the
28:48the $15,000 one is for the DEP response.
28:52>> Yes. Yeah.
28:52>> The traffic management plan are just
28:55okay. That's the $5,000 effort.
28:57>> Yeah. Yeah. And And everything will be
28:59billed as I typically do as a time and
29:01expense so my service items and hours.
29:03Um but I just wanted to give the
29:05commission um budgetary numbers to to
29:07approve to so I can move move the work
29:10forward.
29:10>> Yep. So, the the $5,000 is is your
29:13portion. There are subcontractors that
29:16are going to
29:18be added to that cost to get that work
29:20done.
29:20>> Yes, to do to get the work done. Mine
29:22will have We will have um MassDOT work
29:25access permits in hand. So, when we
29:28identify the subcontractor to do the
29:30actual work, um this has been the This
29:32has been the hurdle that we've had uh
29:35you know, to to to jump through. So, um
29:37I've determined the level of effort I
29:39need to do that and that's and that's
29:40what that is.
29:41>> Yep. And then you'll come back to us and
29:42say, "Hey, we need another X number to
29:45to hire the
29:47detail to
29:48to actually clean the lines and to
29:51dispose of the stuff."
29:52>> Exactly. Yeah.
29:53>> Yeah. Okay. Well, I I move to approve
29:55the
29:56the traffic management plan for $5,000
30:00in accordance with proposal 0543211P.
30:05>> I'll second it.
30:07>> [clears throat]
30:08>> Is there any further discussion on the
30:10matter?
30:14Hearing none, hearing
30:15Let's take for a roll call vote.
30:17>> Mr. Sensale?
30:19>> I.
30:20>> Mr. Uh Mr. Gagner?
30:23>> I.
30:23>> Mr. Graton?
30:24>> I.
30:25>> Mr. Thomas Coleman?
30:27Mr. Robert Coleman?
30:29>> I.
30:34>> Okay, the the next proposal is the um is
30:37for that MassDEP uh response to start
30:40pulling together um
30:42the items that were listed uh
30:45as a result of the uh that the BEP,
30:49we'll call it an enforcement meeting. Um
30:51so I just again putting together uh a
30:54level of effort to start identifying the
30:57requirements for updating the O&M, the
30:59IPP, um and getting into the the C Mom
31:02and that type of I I and and and at
31:04first just respon- putting a formal
31:07response together to uh let them know
31:09that you know the commission's aware of
31:11this and um and your intent is to comply
31:14with all of these uh requirements.
31:18>> Yep.
31:19So
31:21there was an email from Jim Jim Laughlin
31:25um and then a follow-up uh that listed
31:29you know
31:30I don't know, 15 things on it.
31:33Is everything on that list part of this
31:36scope?
31:37>> When we get in So I have seen this been
31:39to a couple of versions of the O&M,
31:41Eric, so depending upon, you know, if
31:44we're talking about this an O&M that
31:45came with the original plant. There was
31:48another O&M that was submitted on behalf
31:50of uh you know, that it that Vinny had
31:52had submitted um
31:54really for updates. Uh it it's it's to
31:57it's to get a get a handle on, you know,
31:59dig through these files and I know most
32:01of them have been started at, you know,
32:03to a point. It's to to let them know and
32:06how deep do we have to get into them?
32:07Let them know that hey, yes again, we're
32:09here. Um there might be some additional
32:11work that comes back, but I I just
32:12wanted to be able to get the
32:14you know, uh roll up my sleeves and and
32:16and dig into these things and and get
32:18the ball rolling. If uh if I come across
32:21additional um requirements that that are
32:24going to take extra costs, I'll come
32:25back to the commission for those.
32:27>> Yeah, right. And and since the work is
32:30like
32:31as you spend time on it, it
32:33>> Yes, exactly. Yeah.
32:34>> But
32:35>> [clears throat]
32:35>> my interest I think is identifying some
32:37tasks that maybe we need to go, you
32:40know, someplace else on to get them
32:41done. And if I could just run some of
32:44these things by you.
32:45>> Yeah.
32:46>> Um the CWMP.
32:48>> Right.
32:49>> Is that in You think that's in this
32:5015,000 or do you think this is something
32:52we should go find?
32:53>> Yeah, we we may need to you know, we may
32:56need to bring outside sources in for
32:58that or you know, it's it's it's just I
33:01know there's again there's been some
33:03framework done there. I just don't know
33:05to what, you know,
33:07degree that the state you know, that
33:09they may want a little more
33:10comprehensive than you know, than we can
33:12than we can do. So, we may want to
33:13outsource that.
33:14>> Yeah. And when you say we should
33:15outsource this, is that is that MacLeod
33:17is that the Water Sewer Commission?
33:20>> I think I think I can get you to the
33:22right you know,
33:23work on
33:25obtaining, you know, getting a quote for
33:27the right resources to accomplish those
33:29so that you're not, you know,
33:31um
33:32you guys don't have to, you know, go out
33:33and try to
33:34I mean, you obviously being in the
33:36business probably have some resources,
33:38but you may be, you know, busy with
33:40other things. So,
33:41>> Well, I mean
33:42>> I can assist in that.
33:43>> In 2002, when I was on the board last,
33:47we needed to get this done and we hired
33:49Tiehm Bond to do it
33:51at a cost of $600,000.
33:53>> Holy smokes. Well, yeah.
33:55>> So, you know, that's a big
33:57>> Yeah.
33:58>> I think now it's it's not the same level
34:01effort. There's
34:02you know, 20-year-old one that they can
34:04update, but I think if that's something
34:06that is going to get kicked back to the
34:07board,
34:08you know, maybe we start that process
34:10sooner rather later because
34:12Dan Dan made it kind of
34:16painfully obvious to us that that the
34:18CWMP is the
34:21is the gateway to get money from the
34:23state.
34:24>> Sure. Okay.
34:25>> So, so some of these other ones in here
34:28is the
34:29uh
34:30collection system mapping.
34:33You think that's something you're going
34:34to tackle?
34:35>> Yes, because we do like again, like I
34:38know that there's some been some GIS
34:40work through previous consultants.
34:43You know, I
34:44I really want to delve into them and see
34:46to what degree they're completed so that
34:49we can, you know, um
34:51determine what what the additional needs
34:52are to get those done, you know. Um this
34:54is you've done a lot of work as you
34:56said, you know, so it's just a matter of
34:58finding the latest revisions and and
35:00getting those updated.
35:02>> And in the IPP?
35:03>> Exactly, yeah.
35:04>> In this, okay.
35:05>> That would be it.
35:07>> Um then I I move to approve the $15,000
35:11proposal 054-3211P
35:15for the assistance with the response
35:17system STEAP.
35:30>> Um I second.
35:35>> Is there any further discussion of the
35:37matter?
35:40Hearing none, I'll call for a roll call
35:42vote.
35:43>> Mr. Sanso.
35:45>> I.
35:45>> Chick Agner.
35:47>> I.
35:48>> Mr. Gratton.
35:49>> I.
35:50>> Mr. Thomas Coleman.
35:52>> I.
35:53>> Mr. Robert Coleman.
35:55>> I.
36:00>> Great, I have I got to run back into
36:02this I'm Melvin Dudley, so I apologize
36:05for the interruption.
36:06>> Thanks, Chris.
36:07>> Have a good night. Thanks, bye-bye.
36:09>> Goodbye.
36:15>> All right, with um
36:17with Chris
36:19um leaving, that
36:22leaves Vinnie.
36:24You're up.
36:25>> All right.
36:26So, this month I worked on those faulty
36:29meters. There were 17 of them on the
36:31list. I visited every house.
36:33Some of them I was just able to reread.
36:35Some of them Veolia staff reread.
36:38Um
36:39There were three of them I installed new
36:41meters in. Two of them got new MXUs.
36:45The
36:4641 Lakeview
36:48He was in last month's meeting.
36:50He looking for an abatement on his bill.
36:54I went out there. I installed a new
36:55meter. It still wouldn't activate. So,
36:58when I started troubleshooting it, I
37:00found a broken wire behind the MXU.
37:03So, that straightened out. His meter is
37:05going to work fine for the next quarter.
37:08Myself, Mr. Robert Coleman, and Thomas
37:11Coleman went out to
37:14the five East rest area, Treehouse
37:16Brewery, and Amazon and hand-delivered
37:18the notices about not flushing things
37:21down the sewer system.
37:24>> Did one Did one go to stores or no?
37:28>> No, because stores isn't on that pump
37:30station.
37:30>> Okay. Okay. Okay, just
37:31>> Yeah, we only went to the people on that
37:33pump station.
37:34>> Okay.
37:35>> And then, the last item is um
37:38the Griffin Road
37:40water extension.
37:42They
37:43>> Oh, yeah.
37:43>> They sent me the shops request.
37:46>> Where does that stand?
37:46>> Last week
37:47>> Yeah.
37:48>> I applied for the permit and it said I
37:51didn't have permission to request that
37:53permit. So, I got Andrew, the town
37:56administrator, and Nick,
37:58the highway department super. I got them
38:01involved. They weren't able to submit it
38:03either.
38:04So, Andrew kicked it up to MassDOT, got
38:07them involved. And as of today, none of
38:10us still have permission to submit
38:11permits.
38:12>> Hm.
38:13>> So, once that's resolved, we'll get that
38:15permit and hopefully they can start
38:17working on that extension.
38:20Do you know who owns it?
38:21>> working on it?
38:22>> Um well, I don't know if they started
38:24working on it, but they shouldn't be
38:26working on it.
38:29I got I mean they could dig the whole
38:31other end of that street without issue,
38:33but the Route 20 side we don't have the
38:35permit for yet.
38:51>> I mean,
38:52is that it?
38:54>> Yeah, that was it. Um
38:55>> Um
38:55>> The meters I went out there probably
38:58six or seven different times to work on
39:00them.
39:01So, even though it doesn't seem like
39:03much
39:04it ate up quite a bit of time.
39:06>> Um
39:08yes, Zach, the other Zach, did meter
39:10reads
39:11and we had issues with the
39:15it getting it to import. So, we had to
39:17have tech support call them come out.
39:20It was just some random rare thing that
39:22happened and he was able to get things
39:24squared away. So, now Jen's going to get
39:25started on
39:27all of that.
39:30>> Is there any chance they did an audit on
39:32how many of the B type meters we have?
39:35>> He got up to over 107 and stopped.
39:40>> Are the B's the
39:42The B's are the new ones, correct?
39:43>> No, C's are the new one.
39:45>> C's are the new ones. Okay.
39:48>> So, he after speaking, he's going to put
39:50together a proposal about changing
39:52everything over,
39:53you know, using an iPad, just making it
39:57more
39:58current and easier.
40:01So, uh
40:01>> The problem that I said before with that
40:03was if we had too many of the older
40:05meters we'd have to change them all.
40:08>> Yeah.
40:08>> But that handheld also getting old.
40:10>> Yeah.
40:11>> So, yeah. We don't give those away for
40:14sure.
40:15>> Yeah, it's like going on 9 years old.
40:18>> Yeah.
40:21I guess we'll see how uh
40:23Do you already have the list of who
40:25didn't read?
40:27>> Um no, we're working on that.
40:29>> All right. When you get it, could you
40:30guys share it with me?
40:31>> Of course.
40:32>> Thank you.
40:37>> Um
40:41The Uh Minnie, did you see the email
40:42about the the new connection?
40:44>> I already sent the reply.
40:46>> Okay.
40:48And lastly, my thing is for Tom and
40:53Robert
40:54at the last meeting Eric had stated he's
40:57going to be busy and out of town and
40:59Tom, you had said you would
41:02like to be involved in the interview
41:03process for the superintendent.
41:06>> Yes.
41:06>> Um I know Lynn sent out applications and
41:09resumes. Were you able to connect with
41:11her about setting up a time?
41:13>> I am not.
41:15>> Okay.
41:17>> All right, we'll do that.
41:23We'll get that uh we'll get that
41:25resolved.
41:31>> I think
41:33that's
41:33all I have. Anybody else? This is
41:36probably the shortest meeting we've had
41:38in a long time.
41:40>> Well, uh
41:43I believe that
41:44we would
41:46There has been a meeting There's been
41:47meeting uh earlier today where we we
41:50have had reviews for
41:53well, pitches from two of the
41:56two contractors seeking to work for us
41:59to operate our plant
42:01and uh
42:03I believe that today would be the best
42:05day to at least discuss uh the
42:08possibility of selecting one, if not
42:10outright selecting one.
42:11>> Well, just letting you know it's not on
42:13the agenda.
42:19>> So, I don't know what the rules are
42:22because I suppose it would be a no-no as
42:24of time of posting whether it today was
42:26the day, but
42:27>> Yeah.
42:28>> No, we're not doing it today, Bob.
42:29>> put to the next month.
42:33>> We're We're definitely not doing it
42:34today.
42:35Um
42:37>> All right.
42:37>> The date will be determined shortly.
42:40>> Okay.
42:42Will it be the next meeting or
42:44an earlier
42:45>> We don't have a definitive date.
42:47>> All right.
42:54Was there any other business to be
42:55discussed?
43:01Uh hearing none,
43:03I introduce a motion. Uh the next
43:05meeting will be on November 4th.
43:08And I introduce
43:10>> Yeah, November 4th.
43:11>> a motion
43:13to uh
43:15end the meeting.
43:19>> I second.
43:21>> Who motioned? I didn't hear that.
43:23>> I did. I introduced a motion to end the
43:25meeting.
43:26>> You You can't motion.
43:28>> Oh, even to end the meeting?
43:30>> Yeah.
43:30>> That was I thought that was an
43:31exception.
43:34>> Motion to adjourn?
43:36>> I second. Uh I make a motion to adjourn
43:39the meeting.
43:41>> Second.
43:42>> I second.
43:43>> I second it.
43:43>> [clears throat]
43:45>> All right, Mr. Senso.
43:47>> I.
43:48>> Mr. Gagner.
43:49>> I.
43:49>> Mr. Grott.
43:50>> I.
43:51>> Mr. Thomas Coleman.
43:53>> I.
43:53>> Mr. Robert Coleman.
43:55>> I.
43:56>> All right, Jen will have a folder for
43:58you. She is located outside of Andrew's
44:01office. Um Robert, if you could just
44:04sign off on bills and then um
44:08I need three sig- or she needs three
44:09signatures for uh the minutes.
44:12>> Okay.
44:13>> Okay?
44:14>> All right. Thank you.
44:15>> Great. You guys have an excellent
44:17evening and a nice long weekend if you
44:20get Monday off.
44:21>> All right. Be well, everybody.
44:22>> You too.
44:23>> Goodbye.
44:24>> Okay.
44:24>> Bye.
