2026-10-07 - Water and Sewer Commission Meeting

Summary

Built from ASR auto-captions (names approximate).

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):

Topic Minutes Share
Sewer DEP Compliance 27 60%
Water and Sewer Plant Operations Contract Selection 9 20%
Other business 8 17%
Griffin Road Waterline Extension 1 3%
  • Chaired by Robert Coleman with Emmanuel Asenso, Paul Gagner, Erik Grotton and Thomas Coleman voting.
  • Next meeting set for November 4; adjourned by roll call.

Sewer DEP Compliance

4:50-10:40, 18:40-37:36, 38:52-40:40

  • Shane (Veolia) presented Veolia's August monthly operating report: three operators on site daily plus a part-time admin, sludge hauling nearly caught up until the receiving incinerator shut for a couple of weeks, E. coli and pH exceedances reportedly resolved, plant loadings still above design, a daily-max flow reporting error to be fixed in the September report, and the phosphorus limit rising to 1.0 mg/L on November 1.
  • Engineer Chris McClure presented two proposals, both approved by unanimous roll call: a $5,000 MassDOT-compliant rolling traffic management plan (needed for the roadway access permit to clean, jet and camera the Route 20 sewer line) and a $15,000 proposal to assemble the formal response to MassDEP's enforcement-meeting list (O&M and IPP updates, collection-system mapping/GIS).
  • The CWMP (comprehensive wastewater management plan, the gateway to state funding, previously about $600,000 when last done) may need to be outsourced.
  • Vincent Masterson reported on 17 faulty meters (three replaced, two new MXUs, the 41 Lakeview broken-wire fix) and hand-delivery of no-flushing notices to the pump-station customers (rest area, Treehouse Brewery, Amazon).
  • Jennifer Cournoyer (the new water/sewer administrative coordinator) was introduced; members said what reports they want: a running tally of sewer capacity commitments under the moratorium, notice of new connections, revenue and outstanding-balance information (concern about reliance on the Turnpike Authority invoice, reportedly going out for rebid), delivered as a brief monthly summary in the agenda packet.

Water and Sewer Plant Operations Contract Selection

10:40-18:39, 41:50-42:45

  • Shane (Veolia) and a Veolia colleague ("Zach") explained that the CoMag process is impaired because automated wasting/return valves were replaced with manual valves (no SCADA control or "goosing"), one train was cannibalized for parts, and repair pricing is on hold until the board decides on the operations contract.
  • Vincent Masterson asked about the second train, and the board asked for current R&M/chemical/sludge cost breakdowns (the one provided ran only through July).
  • A member pushed to pick one of the two contractors who pitched to operate the plant earlier that day; the chair declined because it was not on the agenda, with no date set.

Griffin Road Waterline Extension

37:38-38:52

  • The extension is stalled: MassDOT permit-portal permissions prevented anyone, including Andrew Golas and Nick Peele, from submitting the Route 20 permit.

Other business

0:07-4:50, 40:41-41:50, 42:45-44:24

  • Approved two sets of minutes (the 2025 sets with Emmanuel Asenso abstaining because he was not then on the board) and warrants totaling $108,727.76.
  • Lynn Ashley has circulated superintendent applications and Thomas Coleman still needs to schedule interviews.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

Transcript

0:07I call this

0:09um

0:10this meeting of the Charlton Water and

0:11Sewer Commission. Oh, wait. No, never

0:13mind. It's

0:18Being over eager.

0:29Oh.

0:30>> Eric signing in now.

1:06>> [snorts]

1:13>> Um before we begin the

1:16the minutes that we got, the dates on

1:18this is July 9th, 2025. Is it Is that

1:21correct, Paul?

1:22>> Yes, there were two sets of minutes um

1:24in 2025. Those were never

1:27approved or signed.

1:29>> Oh, okay.

1:30>> We're bringing them now.

1:31>> Okay, okay. Uh

1:36>> I believe we have a quorum and it is

1:396:30 p.m. I call this meeting of the

1:41Charlton Water and Sewer Commission to

1:44order.

1:48The first item on the agenda is the

1:51public forum.

1:53Is there anyone on this call that wants

1:54to discuss something that is not already

1:56on the agenda.

2:02Hearing none, we'll move on to meetings

2:04and warrants. Mr. Ascenzo, do you have a

2:05motion to approve the meeting minutes?

2:08>> Oh, yes. So, I make the motion to

2:12accept the minute dated on

2:15Um so, there's two of them. The first

2:18one will be September 2nd, 2026.

2:23>> Second.

2:27>> Is there any discussion?

2:31Hearing none, uh call the vote.

2:34>> Mr. Ascenzo?

2:37>> Aye.

2:38>> Mr. Gagner?

2:39>> Aye.

2:40>> Mr. Thomas [clears throat] Coleman?

2:41>> Aye.

2:42>> Mr. Robert Coleman?

2:47>> Unmute.

2:48>> You're muted, Robert.

2:51>> Aye.

2:52>> And Mr. Graton?

2:53>> Aye.

2:58>> And I make a motion to also accept

3:02uh minute dated on July 9th, 2025.

3:07>> Second.

3:11>> Um just so you know, uh Mr. Ascenzo, you

3:13can't

3:15you have to abstain cuz you weren't at

3:16that meeting.

3:18>> Oh, okay.

3:19>> Okay.

3:20All right.

3:20>> I make a motion to accept

3:21[clears throat] the minutes from July

3:2220th,

3:24July 20, 2025.

3:29>> Second.

3:30>> I'll second it.

3:32>> [clears throat]

3:34>> All right. Mr. Ascenzo?

3:36>> Can I vote, though?

3:38>> No, you can just say abstain.

3:40>> Abstain. All right.

3:42>> Mr. Gagner?

3:43>> Aye.

3:43>> Mr. Graton?

3:44>> Aye.

3:45>> Mr. Thomas Coleman?

3:48Oh, sorry. Here I Yeah, Mr. Thomas

3:50Coleman.

3:51>> Aye.

3:52>> Robert Mr. Robert Coleman

3:54>> Hi.

3:56>> Right.

4:00>> And for the uh next order of business,

4:03we have a scheduled appointment uh with

4:06>> I think we have warrants to

4:07>> You're going to do the warrant?

4:08>> Warrants, right.

4:10>> Okay, so I'll make motion to accept uh

4:12warrant total in

4:15uh $108,727

4:19and 76 cents.

4:23>> I'll second it.

4:24>> [clears throat]

4:25>> Is there any discussion?

4:30Hearing none,

4:31uh call for a roll call vote.

4:34>> Mr. Finazzo

4:35>> Hi.

4:36>> Mr. Gagner

4:38>> Hi.

4:38>> Mr. Brotten

4:39>> Hi.

4:40>> Mr. Thomas Coleman

4:42>> Hi.

4:43>> Mr. Robert Coleman

4:44>> Hi.

4:50>> For our next order of business, we have

4:52a scheduled appointment

4:55with the for the Veolia monthly

4:58operating report.

5:03>> Uh good evening.

5:05Um you have my MOR for the month of

5:07August. Um I listed all the operation

5:10and maintenance activities on that

5:12report. As you can see, we've been very

5:15busy um

5:17fixing things and uh getting things back

5:19in order.

5:20You can also see that we've added

5:22another staff member um in the month of

5:25August. So, I just want the board to be

5:27aware that

5:28um we've had three

5:30people on site pretty much every day

5:33barring anybody calling in sick or being

5:35on vacation. Um and then our admin who

5:38works um

5:4020 to 25 hours a week is also on site.

5:42So, just wanted to make sure that you

5:44understand that we're meeting our

5:46obligations, people-wise, and actually

5:49sometimes we even have more people on

5:51site. Um

5:53continue to haul the sludge. We were

5:55actually getting caught up. We were

5:56getting very close um

5:59to being back in compliance, and

6:01unfortunately,

6:03the incinerator that we haul our sludge

6:04to closed down for a couple weeks, which

6:07kind of set us back. Um

6:09the incinerator's back open. We're back

6:11hauling

6:13getting rid of the sludge. Numbers are

6:15coming back down.

6:16Um we're getting close to close to the

6:18compliance. I can tell you the coli

6:20issue has gone away.

6:23I am in constant constant contact with

6:27Mr. Kapasco at the DEP. He is fully

6:29aware of um what's going on with the

6:32plant. I will tell you right now that he

6:34is very interested in the results coming

6:37from the Turnpike Authority and the

6:39brewery. Um

6:41which goes back to the IPP plan. Um

6:45which you are going to have Chris

6:46McCullen write. Um so, he's been um kept

6:50informed all every step of the way.

6:52And I guess with that said, I'll answer

6:55any questions from the board if there

6:56are any.

6:59>> Machine, the the performance report has

7:02flow rates that are

7:04you know, much higher than they've been

7:06in the past.

7:07Is that

7:09a quirk of a flow meter, or is it we

7:12really have

7:13>> I think the meter So, there is an issue

7:14with the daily max. I didn't catch it

7:16until I was working on the DMR.

7:19Um I did have the SCADA guy in the other

7:21day to look to see how that's being um

7:24calculated. It's being calculated right.

7:26Now, I just have to work on how it's

7:28transitioning to this report. Um the

7:30report for September will have the

7:33correct daily max.

7:38>> Yeah, so

7:39like the loading, like the BOD loading,

7:41and TSS loading

7:43are all concentrations times flow

7:47these loadings.

7:49>> Yeah, I mean I don't think the daily max

7:51really plays into that, but the loadings

7:53you're seeing are what is coming into

7:54the plant and what's going out. So, the

7:57BOD pounds per day is

8:00would be off a little bit, but I don't

8:03think that daily maximum plays into

8:05that. So,

8:06I did catch that. I will straighten it

8:09out before I turn in the September

8:11report. But, I can tell you this cuz I

8:13do see the lab data

8:14coming in. Your loadings are still over

8:17the design of the plant. Now, don't get

8:18me wrong. The plant is still performing

8:22pretty well, especially BOD removal is

8:24really good.

8:26Um,

8:27the TSS was coming down. The E. coli

8:29issue's been taken care of. The pH

8:31issue's been taken care of. Couple minor

8:33things here and there.

8:35>> pH is a weird one to

8:37>> It was an issue with

8:38the plant losing flow and some of the

8:41flow pacing. So,

8:43when the plant was starting, we were

8:45having some spikes, which we reported to

8:47DEP.

8:49We believe we've got that corrected now.

8:52We're not seeing those problems more

8:54recently, and I think that'll reflect in

8:57the September report when I write that

8:58for you.

8:59>> Yeah.

9:00Does phosphorus limit go away sometime

9:04soon?

9:06>> I don't think it goes away. I think it

9:07increases to a 1.0. Don't have that

9:10right in front of me. I know there was a

9:12change and usually it's November 1st,

9:14and then I believe it goes up to um

9:17a 1.0 monthly average instead of the

9:20.11. Um, I can look into that for you if

9:23you want and send you an email.

9:25>> It's typical that it goes up to one.

9:27>> Right. They Not

9:29In most places, yes. Like even in

9:30Sturbridge, ours changes on November

9:321st. I'm sure Charlton does the same.

9:35Um,

9:38and then even then, you know, until

9:40with the with the phosphorus, it's

9:42directly related to TSS. The last TSS

9:45before the um

9:48incinerated closed was down to a four,

9:50which I was hoping then the phosphorus

9:52would come back down with it.

9:54Um

9:55But it didn't Like I said, once it

9:57closed, um we didn't get to that. So

10:01So I have the permit in front of me on

10:03November 1st, it does go up to

10:05>> 1 mg per liter.

10:06>> Yeah.

10:07You attribute the

10:09phosphorus

10:11and the nitrogen in the E. coli

10:14to solids inventory more than

10:17>> Definitely the phosphorus. The E. coli

10:19was more um you know, your UV system

10:21just wasn't producing the way it needed

10:23to. With you know, with us getting

10:24permission from MassDEP, having that in

10:27writing, um the E. coli's gone away.

10:30The ammonia issue, um the ABCs are

10:33performing now. We are nitrifying.

10:36We just haven't had enough chance, you

10:38know, once we got caught up on the

10:39hauling, the incinerator closing down

10:42really set us back a couple weeks.

10:44>> But you attribute it more to solids

10:46inventory than CoMag performance?

10:48>> That CoMag system is in need of some

10:51serious work. Um that system's been

10:53altered. It's not running the way It's

10:57not running the way it's designed to

10:58run. Um it's going to need some work.

11:01We've actually priced out um some things

11:03that we'll need to do moving forward.

11:06We just haven't pulled the trigger on

11:08that until we know what the board

11:11respectively decides to do with the

11:12contract.

11:14>> Yeah.

11:15Okay.

11:15>> Cuz some of the parts lead times are

11:17five, six weeks.

11:19We've looked into some other work where

11:21um

11:21pumps have lead times of of months.

11:24And we just didn't want to get into that

11:26until you decide whether you were going

11:28with another company or you were going

11:29to retain Veolia's services.

11:33>> Okay.

11:34And just to to add to a little bit about

11:36what um

11:37Shane had mentioned about the uh the

11:39valving in CoMag,

11:41um

11:42>> [clears throat]

11:42>> the the wasting and return systems on

11:44the CoMag process utilize the same

11:47pumps. So, in order for it to cycle

11:49between return and wasting,

11:53automatic valves actuate um below the

11:56tanks to uh to divert flow to um their

12:00intended location. Those valves at one

12:03point were replaced with manual valves.

12:06Um so, SCADA can't really communicate

12:09with those valves to tell them what

12:11position to be in. So, we're having

12:13challenges with getting um the proper

12:16wasting and return ratios, as well as um

12:20the process utilizes what's referred to

12:22as goosing, where the valves will open

12:26uh more so than normal, um and the pump

12:29speed will ramp up. This scours the

12:31lines, so any buildup of magnetite or

12:33solids in those lines um will actually

12:37clear out. Um again, replacing those

12:39valves with uh manual valves kind of

12:42eliminated that process from working.

12:45So, Shane and I have um Shane and the

12:47team there have looked into uh replacing

12:50those valves and get getting them

12:52automated and functioning as intended.

12:57>> Yep.

13:01That that's a really hard process to

13:04run, just logistically moving

13:06that magnetite around is really

13:08difficult. So, I I get I get that.

13:10>> Yeah, it's a it's it's a

13:13For such a small process, there's a lot

13:14of moving parts, and all those moving

13:17parts are really integral to uh to

13:20proper operation. So, if you lose one of

13:23those parts or one of those chemicals or

13:25one of those mixers,

13:27the process really suffers. So, we think

13:29when we get that all squared away, we

13:31get the the wasting operating as

13:33intended, the return operating as

13:35intended, the performance numbers that

13:38we see coming out of that are just going

13:39to improve that much more.

13:41>> Yeah.

13:58>> Uh

13:59does anyone have any questions?

14:01>> I just have something. Um

14:04I noticed as I Shane, I should have said

14:06something to you.

14:07And I know there's lag time

14:10with your invoicing, but could we get a

14:12current R&M chemical sludge breakdown?

14:14Cuz this looks I mean, I'm just looking

14:16at it quickly now.

14:18Um it looks like it's last month's.

14:21I could be wrong.

14:22>> So, I I gave you the one I gave you was

14:25through um

14:29You're right. It was just through um

14:32July. When I do the September report,

14:34I'll make sure it's up through

14:35September.

14:35>> Yeah. Yeah. And I know

14:36>> And actually, if it helps, I can even um

14:39download it tomorrow and email it to you

14:41if that'll help you.

14:43>> uh yeah, cuz I know uh Trisha, Jen, and

14:45I have been going back and forth with

14:46things, and that's the other thing I

14:48wanted to um make mention. Um

14:51we're not ignoring Trisha. Uh we're

14:53going to do Jen's going to do a deep

14:55dive into those outstanding invoices.

14:58>> Understood. And then I'll I'll um

15:00I don't know how that happened, to be

15:01honest with you. I will I have the

15:03reports on my email. It's just Give me 5

15:06minutes to download them and I'll send

15:07it over to you.

15:09>> Okay, great.

15:09>> I apologize for that.

15:10>> Not a big deal.

15:21>> I I just got a quick question about the

15:23coal mag. I'm a little curious.

15:26Um I know Dennis was working on that

15:28valve. I'm not sure where it left off.

15:30Are both trains in the same situation

15:33currently?

15:38>> The the train that was online was the

15:41one um that we were concentrating on the

15:44most.

15:45We we had some other issues with the

15:47other train. We

15:49um we had stolen parts off off of the

15:52other train to make one um

15:54So, I'd have to dig into that more.

15:57Um

15:58But, you know, with those like like Zach

16:00said, with those actuated valves being

16:02removed and not having the ability to

16:05goose properly, you know, that kind of

16:08and not waste properly, it kind of

16:09screws up the whole system. So,

16:11uh to be honest with you, Vinnie, I can

16:13look at the other unit, which is on our

16:15list of things to do.

16:17Our goal was really to get the the unit

16:20um that we had been

16:22using back up and working cuz that's the

16:24one that seems to perform the best.

16:26>> Okay, I was just curious. I mean

16:29Yeah.

16:30If the other one was 100% ready, I was

16:33thinking maybe it would be an easy

16:34switch, but yeah, you're right.

16:36>> And the actuator is it just hanging

16:38there, you know, so I don't I don't and

16:40honestly, I wasn't there. I don't know

16:41who did what and it doesn't matter cuz

16:43we just want to move forward. I don't

16:44even know if the actuator is the issue

16:46or if it was the valve that was the

16:48issue. So, again, you know,

16:50>> the valve blew out. He showed me it when

16:52he was here.

16:54>> Okay. And then, you know, on just you

16:56know, he should have replaced it with

16:58the proper valve and hooked the actuator

17:00back up, but he didn't. Maybe he had a

17:01reason for that. I can't speak to that.

17:03Um but, we are definitely it's got our

17:05attention and we're working on it. I

17:07will look at the other unit um

17:10tomorrow to see if that's a possibility.

17:12But, when we turned that other unit on,

17:14we weren't having much luck, either.

17:16>> Yeah, that one always kind of had some

17:18quirks to it.

17:19>> Yeah. And then Vinnie, I think what

17:22Shane said with the the head the

17:24actuator still being attached to the

17:26wiring,

17:28um what we can instruct the team there

17:30to do is is to actually manually uh move

17:34that valve position

17:36um through SCADA and see if the see if

17:39the actuator rotates. I mean, it's not

17:42attached to a valve, but it will at

17:43least let us know

17:45if uh the actuator, which is probably

17:47the the substantial part of the the cost

17:50of the valve, is still functioning.

17:53>> Yeah, I know I know we had a blowout on

17:55that valve cuz he showed me the big hole

17:56in it, but

17:58I don't know if the actuator is still

17:59good, so that would be good to find out.

18:01Yeah, I'm just wondering the condition

18:03of the other train, to be honest with

18:04you.

18:05>> Yeah, we can give you an update on that.

18:06And honestly, you know, we have the

18:08similar system in Starboard, and those

18:10valves, the ones that you know, control

18:12the goosing, they're famous for the

18:14magnetites just wearing through the

18:15body. So, I'm not surprised you've had

18:18that issue. We've had it in Starboard.

18:20We actually keep a spare on the shelf

18:21here for that reason.

18:23Um but it is something we're we're going

18:25to address.

18:26>> Yeah.

18:26>> All right.

18:27>> Thank you.

18:28>> Yep.

18:39>> Is there any further discussion on the

18:40topic?

18:43>> This um limit report looks like the same

18:46report from last month, is it?

18:48>> Yeah, that's cool.

18:49>> Yeah, he said he'll uh we'll send it and

18:52update it tomorrow. I can send it out to

18:54you guys.

18:55>> Okay, I missed it. All right, thank you.

18:59>> Is there any further discussion on the

19:01topic?

19:06Hearing none,

19:07uh new business. Uh the department

19:10processes.

19:12>> Okay. Um I don't know if all of you can

19:15see Jen, but Jen is the new water sewer

19:20admin and we are very excited to have

19:23her.

19:23Um she comes with a history of working

19:28for another municipality in the water

19:29sewer department. So, she knows her

19:32stuff.

19:33Um

19:36the way she did meetings is probably

19:38different than way we do it. So, I am

19:42just want to go over a few things with

19:44how things are done. Like, is there

19:47anything you want changed or anything

19:49you want added? For instance, um the

19:51timing of the agenda packet. We usually

19:53send it out the Monday before the

19:55meeting. Are you guys okay with that? Um

19:59when somebody wants to connect a new

20:02house or like a a brand new house

20:05being built or a house looking to

20:08connect, do you guys want to be notified

20:10of that?

20:11Um

20:14I know we need to come before the

20:16commission when

20:18say someone has a large

20:21um privilege fee.

20:24If it's an existing home,

20:27so um with the assessor speaking, the

20:29assessors want all new connections to be

20:31paid in full, all the privilege fees.

20:33But, existing homes, it is okay to be

20:36assessed over time. So, that is normally

20:38brought to the commission for approval.

20:41Um

20:42aging report looking at outstanding

20:44balances, do you want any information on

20:46that? Do you want any information on

20:48meter reads and how they're doing? Any

20:50faulty meters? Any repeat issues? What

20:54do you guys want because Jen's starting

20:56fresh and she's just wants to make sure

21:00you guys get all the information you

21:01want and need.

21:05>> Well, I'll go I'll go first if it's all

21:07right.

21:08>> Sure.

21:09>> I have no issue with the agenda package

21:11timing. I could

21:12pick whatever's convenient and

21:14logistically useful for your end.

21:17>> Okay.

21:17>> Um the new connection notifications

21:19initially when I got on the board

21:22all the single family homes were going

21:24through us. We kind of

21:26authorized um Vinnie to take care of

21:30those, but I did think that we would

21:32receive some kind of a monthly

21:34list at some point. These are the ones

21:36that got tied in.

21:38And

21:39with our moratorium in the

21:42restrictions on the amount of water we

21:44can treat

21:45I do want to and I don't know who does

21:47this, but I do think we should have a

21:49kind of a running tally of our

21:52um

21:53of our commitments.

21:55>> Okay.

21:55>> We've told this guy he can have 15,000.

21:57I've told this guy he can have nine and

22:00and it's growing closer to our limit.

22:02>> Okay.

22:03>> Um

22:05I I think I I think I would like to have

22:08more information on the revenue you

22:10know, we see costs all the time, but we

22:13we see revenue.

22:14>> Yep.

22:14>> So, I think it would be useful for me to

22:17see

22:19you know, each quarter these are the

22:21>> I mean

22:22we can run reports like from our expense

22:25accounts. She can give you balances on

22:27where things stand as well. Like um

22:30all those bills so you guys can get a

22:32current balance of what is in our O&M

22:34account.

22:35So, anything like that just let us know.

22:37>> Yeah.

22:38>> Let me know.

22:39>> I think the risk for that I see is that

22:41for you know, years and years we've been

22:43relying on a large um invoice that went

22:46to the turnpikes.

22:48You know, at some point we've been

22:50warned that that's going to end and and

22:52I'd like to see

22:53>> Um I just heard that's going up for

22:55rebid.

22:58>> Oh, so they're not going to close it

22:59right away. It's

23:00>> Right.

23:00>> years

23:01>> the time. Yeah.

23:02>> But

23:03Yeah, still like

23:05what are we what are we taking in

23:06because we always talk about what we're

23:08what we're spending.

23:09>> Okay. So, those are my

23:11that's my wish list.

23:17Anybody else?

23:24I know when the quarter ends you all

23:26come in to sign the commitment report

23:28which means that's how much money was

23:30billed out including all the surcharges.

23:33I didn't know if you wanted

23:35anything else.

23:39>> Well, it might be a case if we don't

23:40know what we're not getting.

23:42>> True, yeah.

23:43>> Accurate.

23:49>> Well, moving forward we can

23:51absolutely notify you of any and all new

23:54connections

23:55and then

23:57income.

24:00And if you would you like to know what

24:03is outstanding?

24:05Like what bill what the dollar amount is

24:07for outstanding

24:10bills that haven't been paid? Is that of

24:12any interest?

24:16>> I I I think it's of interest.

24:18>> Okay.

24:19>> Yeah.

24:21>> I think I understood from a few meetings

24:24ago that

24:26um

24:27somehow the town runs those people down

24:29and make sure those don't stay

24:31outstanding for too long but I think

24:33it'd be useful to know

24:36>> Sure.

24:36>> what what that looks like.

24:41>> Um

24:42so maybe this is just a thought. Um you

24:45know how Vinnie does his overall monthly

24:48review, maybe Jen can do something

24:50similar like this many connections, this

24:53much came in and this is where we stand

24:55for outstanding invoices. Would

24:57something like that be good?

25:00She could actually just put it in a memo

25:02and just let you guys know or an email

25:04monthly or

25:06it doesn't even have to be part of the

25:07meeting. She can just send it out to

25:08you.

25:12>> I can't see how we wouldn't like it.

25:14>> Okay.

25:14>> It's It's just isn't it unless it's more

25:17work for her that she can't fit in, but

25:19I'm guessing that that it's not.

25:21>> Jen, would you rather it be part of the

25:23meeting or just like a monthly update to

25:26the commission at through email?

25:29>> Whichever they would prefer. I have no

25:31problem. I've done it both ways in the

25:33past with other boards.

25:37I mean, I can put it into the

25:40agenda packet.

25:42>> Now that I'm thinking about it in New

25:43Connections, why don't we do it just

25:45like You can do a summary.

25:48Like a 2-minute summary of what is going

25:51on.

25:52>> Sure.

25:52>> That way they if they have questions

25:54regarding the connections, that would be

25:55the time to talk about it.

25:57>> Absolutely.

25:58>> Does that make sense?

26:04Okay.

26:07So, next Robert, you want to take over?

26:11>> Up next the next order of new business

26:15is the McLeary engineering proposal for

26:17traffic management plan and master DEP

26:20response.

26:25>> That was all part of your packet for you

26:27to review.

26:33>> Is Is Chris on?

26:35>> He is.

26:35>> He

26:36I see his name.

26:38>> Yes, I was able to jump out of my other

26:40meeting. Good Good evening.

26:42>> Hi.

26:43>> Good evening.

26:45So,

26:46yes, so the traffic management plan

26:49proposal

26:50as you probably been aware of we're

26:53trying to get this Route 20 and other

26:55work that's been associated on on Route

26:5720. We have to develop a MassDOT

27:00compliant traffic management plan.

27:04With this proposal

27:06I I am

27:08going to develop something that I'll be

27:10able to use for anytime any work needs

27:12to be done on on the DOT on on the DOT

27:15right-of-way. So, it it'll also, you

27:18know, we have to get this um that line

27:22cleaned

27:23um

27:24jetted and cameraed.

27:26So, this this component is has been

27:28really was what what's holding us up in

27:30order to get out there in addition to

27:32getting, you know,

27:33um quotes from the folks to get that

27:34worked on.

27:35But, this needs to be submitted as part

27:37of that roadway access permit with the

27:40MassDOT um in order for them to approve

27:43uh to approve this work. What we're

27:45proposing is is really a rolling uh

27:47rolling management plan. So, I have to

27:48put in a bunch of develop a bunch of

27:50different pages and and you know, and a

27:53and the attenuators and the rest of

27:54that. So, they So, once we propose doing

27:57work in the road, um they they they will

28:01um they'll they'll approve it.

28:08>> Are you looking for a a motion from the

28:12commission to approve the

28:14>> Y- yes, yes, exactly. Just so you know

28:16that I have a scope of work and a level

28:18of effort that's I'm looking for. But,

28:20that one end up and also this this two

28:22proposals there. The other one is for

28:23that uh MassDEP response. Um I didn't

28:26want to go ahead and start um you know,

28:28expanding um monies towards that um

28:31towards those responses and those and

28:33those uh requirements without without

28:35the board's approval. And so, that's

28:36that's what I'm looking for motion on

28:37both of those uh both those proposals.

28:40>> Yeah, I think they might be in in

28:42backwards order on my

28:45mine. So, the

28:48the $15,000 one is for the DEP response.

28:52>> Yes. Yeah.

28:52>> The traffic management plan are just

28:55okay. That's the $5,000 effort.

28:57>> Yeah. Yeah. And And everything will be

28:59billed as I typically do as a time and

29:01expense so my service items and hours.

29:03Um but I just wanted to give the

29:05commission um budgetary numbers to to

29:07approve to so I can move move the work

29:10forward.

29:10>> Yep. So, the the $5,000 is is your

29:13portion. There are subcontractors that

29:16are going to

29:18be added to that cost to get that work

29:20done.

29:20>> Yes, to do to get the work done. Mine

29:22will have We will have um MassDOT work

29:25access permits in hand. So, when we

29:28identify the subcontractor to do the

29:30actual work, um this has been the This

29:32has been the hurdle that we've had uh

29:35you know, to to to jump through. So, um

29:37I've determined the level of effort I

29:39need to do that and that's and that's

29:40what that is.

29:41>> Yep. And then you'll come back to us and

29:42say, "Hey, we need another X number to

29:45to hire the

29:47detail to

29:48to actually clean the lines and to

29:51dispose of the stuff."

29:52>> Exactly. Yeah.

29:53>> Yeah. Okay. Well, I I move to approve

29:55the

29:56the traffic management plan for $5,000

30:00in accordance with proposal 0543211P.

30:05>> I'll second it.

30:07>> [clears throat]

30:08>> Is there any further discussion on the

30:10matter?

30:14Hearing none, hearing

30:15Let's take for a roll call vote.

30:17>> Mr. Sensale?

30:19>> I.

30:20>> Mr. Uh Mr. Gagner?

30:23>> I.

30:23>> Mr. Graton?

30:24>> I.

30:25>> Mr. Thomas Coleman?

30:27Mr. Robert Coleman?

30:29>> I.

30:34>> Okay, the the next proposal is the um is

30:37for that MassDEP uh response to start

30:40pulling together um

30:42the items that were listed uh

30:45as a result of the uh that the BEP,

30:49we'll call it an enforcement meeting. Um

30:51so I just again putting together uh a

30:54level of effort to start identifying the

30:57requirements for updating the O&M, the

30:59IPP, um and getting into the the C Mom

31:02and that type of I I and and and at

31:04first just respon- putting a formal

31:07response together to uh let them know

31:09that you know the commission's aware of

31:11this and um and your intent is to comply

31:14with all of these uh requirements.

31:18>> Yep.

31:19So

31:21there was an email from Jim Jim Laughlin

31:25um and then a follow-up uh that listed

31:29you know

31:30I don't know, 15 things on it.

31:33Is everything on that list part of this

31:36scope?

31:37>> When we get in So I have seen this been

31:39to a couple of versions of the O&M,

31:41Eric, so depending upon, you know, if

31:44we're talking about this an O&M that

31:45came with the original plant. There was

31:48another O&M that was submitted on behalf

31:50of uh you know, that it that Vinny had

31:52had submitted um

31:54really for updates. Uh it it's it's to

31:57it's to get a get a handle on, you know,

31:59dig through these files and I know most

32:01of them have been started at, you know,

32:03to a point. It's to to let them know and

32:06how deep do we have to get into them?

32:07Let them know that hey, yes again, we're

32:09here. Um there might be some additional

32:11work that comes back, but I I just

32:12wanted to be able to get the

32:14you know, uh roll up my sleeves and and

32:16and dig into these things and and get

32:18the ball rolling. If uh if I come across

32:21additional um requirements that that are

32:24going to take extra costs, I'll come

32:25back to the commission for those.

32:27>> Yeah, right. And and since the work is

32:30like

32:31as you spend time on it, it

32:33>> Yes, exactly. Yeah.

32:34>> But

32:35>> [clears throat]

32:35>> my interest I think is identifying some

32:37tasks that maybe we need to go, you

32:40know, someplace else on to get them

32:41done. And if I could just run some of

32:44these things by you.

32:45>> Yeah.

32:46>> Um the CWMP.

32:48>> Right.

32:49>> Is that in You think that's in this

32:5015,000 or do you think this is something

32:52we should go find?

32:53>> Yeah, we we may need to you know, we may

32:56need to bring outside sources in for

32:58that or you know, it's it's it's just I

33:01know there's again there's been some

33:03framework done there. I just don't know

33:05to what, you know,

33:07degree that the state you know, that

33:09they may want a little more

33:10comprehensive than you know, than we can

33:12than we can do. So, we may want to

33:13outsource that.

33:14>> Yeah. And when you say we should

33:15outsource this, is that is that MacLeod

33:17is that the Water Sewer Commission?

33:20>> I think I think I can get you to the

33:22right you know,

33:23work on

33:25obtaining, you know, getting a quote for

33:27the right resources to accomplish those

33:29so that you're not, you know,

33:31um

33:32you guys don't have to, you know, go out

33:33and try to

33:34I mean, you obviously being in the

33:36business probably have some resources,

33:38but you may be, you know, busy with

33:40other things. So,

33:41>> Well, I mean

33:42>> I can assist in that.

33:43>> In 2002, when I was on the board last,

33:47we needed to get this done and we hired

33:49Tiehm Bond to do it

33:51at a cost of $600,000.

33:53>> Holy smokes. Well, yeah.

33:55>> So, you know, that's a big

33:57>> Yeah.

33:58>> I think now it's it's not the same level

34:01effort. There's

34:02you know, 20-year-old one that they can

34:04update, but I think if that's something

34:06that is going to get kicked back to the

34:07board,

34:08you know, maybe we start that process

34:10sooner rather later because

34:12Dan Dan made it kind of

34:16painfully obvious to us that that the

34:18CWMP is the

34:21is the gateway to get money from the

34:23state.

34:24>> Sure. Okay.

34:25>> So, so some of these other ones in here

34:28is the

34:29uh

34:30collection system mapping.

34:33You think that's something you're going

34:34to tackle?

34:35>> Yes, because we do like again, like I

34:38know that there's some been some GIS

34:40work through previous consultants.

34:43You know, I

34:44I really want to delve into them and see

34:46to what degree they're completed so that

34:49we can, you know, um

34:51determine what what the additional needs

34:52are to get those done, you know. Um this

34:54is you've done a lot of work as you

34:56said, you know, so it's just a matter of

34:58finding the latest revisions and and

35:00getting those updated.

35:02>> And in the IPP?

35:03>> Exactly, yeah.

35:04>> In this, okay.

35:05>> That would be it.

35:07>> Um then I I move to approve the $15,000

35:11proposal 054-3211P

35:15for the assistance with the response

35:17system STEAP.

35:30>> Um I second.

35:35>> Is there any further discussion of the

35:37matter?

35:40Hearing none, I'll call for a roll call

35:42vote.

35:43>> Mr. Sanso.

35:45>> I.

35:45>> Chick Agner.

35:47>> I.

35:48>> Mr. Gratton.

35:49>> I.

35:50>> Mr. Thomas Coleman.

35:52>> I.

35:53>> Mr. Robert Coleman.

35:55>> I.

36:00>> Great, I have I got to run back into

36:02this I'm Melvin Dudley, so I apologize

36:05for the interruption.

36:06>> Thanks, Chris.

36:07>> Have a good night. Thanks, bye-bye.

36:09>> Goodbye.

36:15>> All right, with um

36:17with Chris

36:19um leaving, that

36:22leaves Vinnie.

36:24You're up.

36:25>> All right.

36:26So, this month I worked on those faulty

36:29meters. There were 17 of them on the

36:31list. I visited every house.

36:33Some of them I was just able to reread.

36:35Some of them Veolia staff reread.

36:38Um

36:39There were three of them I installed new

36:41meters in. Two of them got new MXUs.

36:45The

36:4641 Lakeview

36:48He was in last month's meeting.

36:50He looking for an abatement on his bill.

36:54I went out there. I installed a new

36:55meter. It still wouldn't activate. So,

36:58when I started troubleshooting it, I

37:00found a broken wire behind the MXU.

37:03So, that straightened out. His meter is

37:05going to work fine for the next quarter.

37:08Myself, Mr. Robert Coleman, and Thomas

37:11Coleman went out to

37:14the five East rest area, Treehouse

37:16Brewery, and Amazon and hand-delivered

37:18the notices about not flushing things

37:21down the sewer system.

37:24>> Did one Did one go to stores or no?

37:28>> No, because stores isn't on that pump

37:30station.

37:30>> Okay. Okay. Okay, just

37:31>> Yeah, we only went to the people on that

37:33pump station.

37:34>> Okay.

37:35>> And then, the last item is um

37:38the Griffin Road

37:40water extension.

37:42They

37:43>> Oh, yeah.

37:43>> They sent me the shops request.

37:46>> Where does that stand?

37:46>> Last week

37:47>> Yeah.

37:48>> I applied for the permit and it said I

37:51didn't have permission to request that

37:53permit. So, I got Andrew, the town

37:56administrator, and Nick,

37:58the highway department super. I got them

38:01involved. They weren't able to submit it

38:03either.

38:04So, Andrew kicked it up to MassDOT, got

38:07them involved. And as of today, none of

38:10us still have permission to submit

38:11permits.

38:12>> Hm.

38:13>> So, once that's resolved, we'll get that

38:15permit and hopefully they can start

38:17working on that extension.

38:20Do you know who owns it?

38:21>> working on it?

38:22>> Um well, I don't know if they started

38:24working on it, but they shouldn't be

38:26working on it.

38:29I got I mean they could dig the whole

38:31other end of that street without issue,

38:33but the Route 20 side we don't have the

38:35permit for yet.

38:51>> I mean,

38:52is that it?

38:54>> Yeah, that was it. Um

38:55>> Um

38:55>> The meters I went out there probably

38:58six or seven different times to work on

39:00them.

39:01So, even though it doesn't seem like

39:03much

39:04it ate up quite a bit of time.

39:06>> Um

39:08yes, Zach, the other Zach, did meter

39:10reads

39:11and we had issues with the

39:15it getting it to import. So, we had to

39:17have tech support call them come out.

39:20It was just some random rare thing that

39:22happened and he was able to get things

39:24squared away. So, now Jen's going to get

39:25started on

39:27all of that.

39:30>> Is there any chance they did an audit on

39:32how many of the B type meters we have?

39:35>> He got up to over 107 and stopped.

39:40>> Are the B's the

39:42The B's are the new ones, correct?

39:43>> No, C's are the new one.

39:45>> C's are the new ones. Okay.

39:48>> So, he after speaking, he's going to put

39:50together a proposal about changing

39:52everything over,

39:53you know, using an iPad, just making it

39:57more

39:58current and easier.

40:01So, uh

40:01>> The problem that I said before with that

40:03was if we had too many of the older

40:05meters we'd have to change them all.

40:08>> Yeah.

40:08>> But that handheld also getting old.

40:10>> Yeah.

40:11>> So, yeah. We don't give those away for

40:14sure.

40:15>> Yeah, it's like going on 9 years old.

40:18>> Yeah.

40:21I guess we'll see how uh

40:23Do you already have the list of who

40:25didn't read?

40:27>> Um no, we're working on that.

40:29>> All right. When you get it, could you

40:30guys share it with me?

40:31>> Of course.

40:32>> Thank you.

40:37>> Um

40:41The Uh Minnie, did you see the email

40:42about the the new connection?

40:44>> I already sent the reply.

40:46>> Okay.

40:48And lastly, my thing is for Tom and

40:53Robert

40:54at the last meeting Eric had stated he's

40:57going to be busy and out of town and

40:59Tom, you had said you would

41:02like to be involved in the interview

41:03process for the superintendent.

41:06>> Yes.

41:06>> Um I know Lynn sent out applications and

41:09resumes. Were you able to connect with

41:11her about setting up a time?

41:13>> I am not.

41:15>> Okay.

41:17>> All right, we'll do that.

41:23We'll get that uh we'll get that

41:25resolved.

41:31>> I think

41:33that's

41:33all I have. Anybody else? This is

41:36probably the shortest meeting we've had

41:38in a long time.

41:40>> Well, uh

41:43I believe that

41:44we would

41:46There has been a meeting There's been

41:47meeting uh earlier today where we we

41:50have had reviews for

41:53well, pitches from two of the

41:56two contractors seeking to work for us

41:59to operate our plant

42:01and uh

42:03I believe that today would be the best

42:05day to at least discuss uh the

42:08possibility of selecting one, if not

42:10outright selecting one.

42:11>> Well, just letting you know it's not on

42:13the agenda.

42:19>> So, I don't know what the rules are

42:22because I suppose it would be a no-no as

42:24of time of posting whether it today was

42:26the day, but

42:27>> Yeah.

42:28>> No, we're not doing it today, Bob.

42:29>> put to the next month.

42:33>> We're We're definitely not doing it

42:34today.

42:35Um

42:37>> All right.

42:37>> The date will be determined shortly.

42:40>> Okay.

42:42Will it be the next meeting or

42:44an earlier

42:45>> We don't have a definitive date.

42:47>> All right.

42:54Was there any other business to be

42:55discussed?

43:01Uh hearing none,

43:03I introduce a motion. Uh the next

43:05meeting will be on November 4th.

43:08And I introduce

43:10>> Yeah, November 4th.

43:11>> a motion

43:13to uh

43:15end the meeting.

43:19>> I second.

43:21>> Who motioned? I didn't hear that.

43:23>> I did. I introduced a motion to end the

43:25meeting.

43:26>> You You can't motion.

43:28>> Oh, even to end the meeting?

43:30>> Yeah.

43:30>> That was I thought that was an

43:31exception.

43:34>> Motion to adjourn?

43:36>> I second. Uh I make a motion to adjourn

43:39the meeting.

43:41>> Second.

43:42>> I second.

43:43>> I second it.

43:43>> [clears throat]

43:45>> All right, Mr. Senso.

43:47>> I.

43:48>> Mr. Gagner.

43:49>> I.

43:49>> Mr. Grott.

43:50>> I.

43:51>> Mr. Thomas Coleman.

43:53>> I.

43:53>> Mr. Robert Coleman.

43:55>> I.

43:56>> All right, Jen will have a folder for

43:58you. She is located outside of Andrew's

44:01office. Um Robert, if you could just

44:04sign off on bills and then um

44:08I need three sig- or she needs three

44:09signatures for uh the minutes.

44:12>> Okay.

44:13>> Okay?

44:14>> All right. Thank you.

44:15>> Great. You guys have an excellent

44:17evening and a nice long weekend if you

44:20get Monday off.

44:21>> All right. Be well, everybody.

44:22>> You too.

44:23>> Goodbye.

44:24>> Okay.

44:24>> Bye.