2026-10-19 - Special Town Meeting
Summary
Built from auto-generated captions; names, numbers and some dollar amounts may be misheard. Vote counts are as announced by the moderator.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Data Center Zoning Moratorium | 37 | 26% |
| Senior Community Center Feasibility | 34 | 24% |
| Special Town Meeting Warrant - October 19, 2026 | 21 | 15% |
| Flock Automated License Plate Readers | 21 | 15% |
| FY27 Capital Plan | 13 | 9% |
| 259 Worcester Road Zoning Change | 8 | 6% |
| Dog License Fee Changes | 4 | 3% |
| Stabilization Fund Transfers | 2 | 1% |
| Sunday Alcohol Sales | 2 | 1% |
| Ashley Road and Amber Road Acceptance | 2 | 1% |
- Monday, October 19, 2026, Charlton Middle School.
- Called to order at 7:18 p.m. (the warrant said 7:00) and adjourned about 9:40 p.m. The recording begins at the call to order (0:08) and ends at adjournment (2:24:05); it does not run past the meeting.
- All 15 articles were taken up; 14 passed and Articles 2 and 3 were passed over.
- Moderator: Kenneth Laferriere (per the town roster; not named in the captions).
- Article 5 was the closest vote (227-144).
Special Town Meeting Warrant - October 19, 2026
0:08-18:35, 1:11:27-1:13:49, 2:23:45-2:24:05
- Opening: the warrant was posted October 1 at the two post offices, Town Hall and Dexter Memorial Hall. The moderator thanked the town clerk Karen LaCroix, the finance director Ashley Obrzut, the Finance Committee, Town Counsel, Town Administrator Andrew Golas, the Select Board, the Planning Board and Mary Devlin, and noted two open Finance Committee seats after Kristen Lemire resigned.
- Ground rules: non-voters seated in marked rows and may speak only if town meeting votes to allow it; three minutes per speaker; amendments in writing; electronic voting devices (green yes, red no, no button for abstain). A practice question ("do you hand out candy on Halloween?") passed 207-146.
- Article 1 (unpaid prior-year bills, paid from FY27 accounts, including a sewer-maintenance bill of $3,725.64 to the plant operator): adopted 336-20. FinCom and Select Board supported; no discussion.
- Article 2 (FY27 budget transfers): passed over indefinitely, 308-36.
- Article 3 (FY27 budget amendments): passed over indefinitely, 315-29.
- Article 8 (delinquent taxpayer list bylaw, adding "may periodically" to the collector's annual list): adopted 265-63, no discussion.
- The moderator moved to adjourn after Article 15 and thanked voters for their patience.
FY27 Capital Plan
18:37-31:25
- Article 4 (miscellaneous capital items) was taken as four separate motions, all with FinCom and Select Board support.
- Motion 1: $50,000 grant match and planning, a hydrologic analysis of South Charlton Reservoir, $50,000 municipal buildings, $80,000 technology, $40,000 library carpeting (all Free Cash). A misprint in the motion as first read was corrected from the floor to $15,000 for the reservoir analysis (the captions are garbled on this figure). Residents asked what the building and IT money covers: HVAC repairs at Town Hall and the health building, and town-wide computers and meeting-room upgrades. Adopted 290-65.
- Motion 2: $275,000 Free Cash for police cruisers (about three, with equipment; the Finance Committee chair said the town replaces about three a year and orders run a year or more ahead). Adopted 261-86.
- Motion 3: $110,000 fire pickup, $100,000 to refurbish Forestry 1 (Free Cash) and $61,000 from ambulance receipts for an EMS car cardiac monitor. Adopted 287-69.
- Motion 4: $140,000 utility bucket-lift pickup, $300,000 excavator with rotary mower, $50,000 wood chipper, $24,000 cemetery road paving, $8,000 tractor accessories (Free Cash) and $25,000 sewer plant office renovations (sewer retained earnings). Adopted 280-70.
Senior Community Center Feasibility
31:27-1:05:07
- Article 5: $500,000 of Free Cash for schematic design and an owner's project manager for a senior community center on Masonic Home Road, with added parking for the Police Department. The moderator noted that lease and land-acquisition wording was removed from the printed statement as out of scope.
- Supporting: feasibility committee chair Pat Stockwell (single-floor building, 23.5 town-owned acres, utilities and fiber nearby, room for parking, trails and a bandshell; funds design only, construction would return to later votes), Bruce Menon (current building has accessibility problems and 13 parking spaces; the new plan has about 100), Select Board member Karen Spiewak speaking as a resident (the idea dates to the 1990s), and Hank Camosse (nearly 30% of residents are over 55).
- Patricia Reddick supported the design but moved to add evaluation of the site for recreational fields and multi-generational use. After consulting counsel the moderator ruled the amendment out of order as outside the scope of the printed article.
- Opposed or cautious: Frank Iacono (after the failed school borrowing vote, invest in youth first), Robert Cronin (take time to design a building that serves more town needs, such as water and sewer offices), and Dan Prouty (a developer, questioned why design costs $500,000 versus $60-70,000 in engineering on his own projects, and suggested another site).
- Questions: Brian Powers on what makes it a "community" center (evenings and weekends use, activity rooms); Shay Matthews and Linda Bellows on how unspent design money is handled. Answers from the town administrator and finance director: $500,000 is an estimate because bids cannot go out without funding; unspent money can be applied to the project or closed out at a later town meeting; the full construction cost would return to town meeting and probably a ballot vote (debt exclusion).
- Annette Mitchell moved the question; ending debate passed 323-42. Article 5 adopted 227-144.
Stabilization Fund Transfers
1:05:09-1:07:25
- Article 6: $100,000 Free Cash to the general stabilization fund, $50,000 Free Cash to the capital stabilization fund, $1,000,000 from sewer retained earnings and $400,000 from water retained earnings for future capital projects. FinCom and Select Board supported; no discussion. Adopted 287-52.
Dog License Fee Changes
1:07:29-1:11:25
- Article 7 (animal control bylaw): a voter noted the booklet text said 70 and older while the fee chart said 60 and older. Staff explained that the 70-and-older exemption (paragraph G) tracks state law, while the fee chart's senior tier is 60 and older, $5 intact and $0 spayed or neutered; David Singer had flagged the difference. No amendment. Adopted 301-41.
259 Worcester Road Zoning Change
1:55:01-2:02:31
- Article 14 (rezone about 15 acres at 269 Worcester Road, previously 293A, from Business Enterprise Park to Community Business): the Planning Board chair moved it and the board recommended it. The owner, Bernard Gauthier, a non-voter, was allowed to speak by a unanimous voice vote; he said the parcel sits behind an auto repair shop near Carroll Hill Road, that the change would allow services such as a small grocery or a restaurant, and that any project would still need Planning Board approval.
- Joe Spiewak asked whether this was spot zoning and what Community Business allows that Business Enterprise Park does not. Dillon Maxfield said residential and restaurant uses are allowed in Community Business, that the two districts are interspersed along Route 20 with Community Business across the street, and that the Planning Board and counsel did not see spot zoning.
- Needed two-thirds. Adopted 260-56.
Sunday Alcohol Sales
1:13:53-1:15:50
- Article 9: accept MGL c.138 s.33B to allow on-premise alcohol sales from 10 a.m. to noon on Sundays and certain holidays. Select Board supported; no discussion. Adopted 258-70.
Ashley Road and Amber Road Acceptance
1:15:56-1:18:16
- Article 10: accept Ashley Road and Amber Road as public ways. Select Board supported; no discussion. Adopted 252-77.
Data Center Zoning Moratorium
1:18:22-1:54:58
- Article 11 (definition of "data center," moved by Planning Board chair Patsy Rydlak): the town had no definition and wanted control over the process. Needed two-thirds. Adopted 256-63.
- Article 12 (data centers not allowed in any district in the use table): Joe Spiewak and Scott Neary warned that blocking larger data centers would turn away employers and tax revenue (a bank data center in Southbridge was cited); Dan Prouty asked whether the large telecom switching facility on Northside Road counts. Dillon Maxfield and Rydlak said it is a temporary moratorium until the 2028 annual town meeting, not a permanent ban, and that data centers as an accessory use (for example in Town Hall) remain allowed. A cloud engineer supported a pause to plan for resource use. Noreen Smith asked whether Articles 12 and 13 depend on each other; staff said 12 points to the section created by 13, and Town Counsel said that if 12 failed and 13 passed, the moratorium would still cover all zones. Moved the question (Bill Borowski), unanimous by voice. Needed two-thirds. Adopted 228-93.
- Article 13 (interim ban, new section 200-5.23): Rydlak moved it as printed. Amendment 1: the planning board realized the definition could capture the existing MCI/Verizon facility on Northside Road, one of the town's larger taxpayers; the ban was narrowed to new data centers, with pre-existing facilities governed by state zoning law and the existing bylaw. Questions from Keith Albright (retrofitting a large building: staff said that would be a change of use and prohibited), Dewey Sasser (power limits, such as 5 MW and up, and a possible large expansion at the existing site; staff said a substantial expansion would exceed pre-existing nonconforming protection) and Scott Neary (protecting one business while saying no to others for two years; the board said it could finish sooner). Bill Fontaine said power, size and noise limits will come in the full rewrite and invited the public to those meetings. Amendment 1 adopted 294-29.
- Amendment 2: if town meeting has not adopted data center regulations or extended the moratorium by the 2028 annual town meeting, the moratorium, definition and use-table row are automatically repealed. Adopted 286-26.
- Article 13 as amended adopted 279-35 (two-thirds met).
Flock Automated License Plate Readers
2:02:36-2:23:42
- Article 15 (non-binding citizens' petition asking the Select Board to deactivate Flock cameras, end contracts, stop expansion, delete Charlton data and hold a public review before any future use): petitioner Michelle Chalmers moved it. She said the cameras have run for two years, that police reported 1,100+ agencies had access to Charlton's data and that the FBI had asked for access, and that more than 40 Massachusetts communities have rejected or dropped such programs. She stressed it is not anti-police.
- In support: Cutter Beck (lives about a mile from a camera; cited security vulnerabilities, misuse cases elsewhere and the risk of future capabilities; credited police for open dialogue), Christopher Merlo, Shay Matthews (wrongful-detention case and search-misuse examples, urged a case number for each search), Peter Cooper, Dewey Sasser (cited published error rates in other cities), Gwendolyn Powell (not anti-police), Liz LaFrance (lives near a camera and was not informed) and Lee Forgione (what stops the platform from becoming a different system without another vote).
- In opposition: a resident argued the system is run by accountable local police, that error rates and oversight are improving, and that problems can be fixed with security and proof requirements instead of ending the program.
- Robert McGrath moved the question; ending debate passed by voice vote. Article 15 adopted 245-56. It is advisory only; the Select Board has a placeholder on October 27 to deliberate on the result.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:08I'll start again. For the record, it is
00:10October 19th, 2026, and it is 7:18 p.m.
00:15I hereby call our town meeting to order.
00:22Per town of Charlton general bylaws,
00:24chapter 15, section 2, the warrant
00:27serving as the official notice of
00:29tonight's meeting was duly posted on
00:31October 1st, 2026 at each of the two
00:35post offices, town hall, and Dexter
00:37Memorial Hall located at the Charlton
00:39Public Library.
00:41Thank you all for coming this evening to
00:43discuss and vote on the articles before
00:45us.
00:47In the event of an emergency, please
00:49exit the auditorium, follow the posting
00:51exit signs both at the front and the
00:54rear of the auditorium.
00:56There are many people who are involved
00:58in making this meeting happen. I'd like
01:00to offer a special thank you. On my
01:03left, town clerk Karen LaCroix.
01:06Oh.
01:09Yes, agreed. Agreed.
01:11Uh let's see. Assistant town clerk Elise
01:13Cunningham checking people in. All
01:14right.
01:15Our finance director and town accountant
01:17Ashley Ober- Oberzut.
01:20And members of the finance committee,
01:21Hank Kaminski, chairperson. Ray Ray
01:24Bellacito.
01:26Alicia Jeek. Brian Finnegan, Jeremy
01:28Foskett, and Jamie Terry who is couldn't
01:31be here this evening.
01:33Also, a thank you to Kristen Lemire who
01:35recently resigned from the finance
01:37committee. We thank Kristen for her
01:38years of service.
01:43>> [applause]
01:45>> Since I have your attention and you
01:47proved that a moment ago,
01:50the finance committee has two open
01:52seats. If you have any interest and any
01:54um experience, financial experience, or
01:57municipal experience, um please uh make
01:59a point to come see me and uh fin fin
02:02finance committee chairperson Hank
02:04Kaminski.
02:07On my right, thank you to Charlton Town
02:09Council Robert Hanegan, town
02:11administrator Andrew Golis, members of
02:13our select board Stephen Karonis,
02:16chairperson,
02:17David Singer, vice chairperson, Michael
02:20Kevorkian, clerk,
02:22Karen Spiwak, member, Barbara
02:25Ziemislawski, member.
02:27And a few people not on stage I'd like
02:29to thank is to the volunteers in the
02:31hallway checking in people, to the
02:33planning board for their work on the
02:34sponsored articles tonight,
02:37to the assistant town administrator Mary
02:39Devlin for her continued support, to
02:41director Jeff Saul and AV expert Drew
02:44Anderson for providing sound and video
02:46for tonight's meeting.
02:49Thank you all for your commitment to the
02:51town of Charlton.
03:00We also welcome non-residents and
03:02residents who are not registered to vote
03:04to observe our town meeting,
03:07whom we ask to please take a seat in the
03:09designated areas which are located in
03:11the front of the auditorium as marked by
03:13reserved signs in the two rows are right
03:15here as I'm pointing out.
03:18These attendees are not allowed to speak
03:20during the meeting unless called upon by
03:22the moderator and voted by a majority of
03:25town meeting voters.
03:28Upon arrival, all voters should have
03:30received
03:32a copy of the warrant as shown
03:36and an electronic voting device.
03:40The voting device must be returned at
03:42the end of the meeting.
03:44If you need to leave the building for
03:45any reason, please return your voting
03:47device to the table at the entrance and
03:49ensure that it is not handed to another
03:52person. We do not want to delay this
03:54meeting if a device is taken or being
03:57improperly used. In a moment, we will
03:59test those devices before we begin.
04:03All registered voters shall remain
04:05seated during the meeting. Please be
04:07respectful and refrain from side
04:09conversations.
04:11Conversations detract from the ability
04:13of other voters to hear the proceedings.
04:16>> [snorts]
04:16>> You may rise to the point of privilege
04:19anytime you are unable to hear by
04:21saying, "Moderator, I rise to a point of
04:24order."
04:26Or it can be as easy as calling out, "I
04:28can't hear."
04:32I I got that one from the prior
04:33moderator, so I can't take credit for
04:35it.
04:38I am advised to inform you concerning
04:41disorderly conduct that under
04:42Massachusetts General Law, chapter 39,
04:45section 17, if you fail to comply with
04:49our established protocols, you will be
04:51warned by me,
04:53then asked to withdraw from the meeting,
04:55and then removed from the meeting if
04:57necessary.
04:59Thank you in advance for following our
05:01town meeting expectations.
05:06At this time, I ask you to rise, remove
05:08your hats, and join me in the Pledge of
05:09Allegiance. Please remain standing after
05:12the pledge for a moment of silence.
05:23>> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
05:26United States of America, and to the
05:29republic for which it stands, one nation
05:32under God, indivisible, with liberty and
05:35justice for all.
05:39>> Please remain standing for a moment of
05:41silence as we reflect and honor the
05:43patriots of 250 years ago who paved the
05:46path of liberty so we may gather here
05:48tonight.
05:56Thank you. Please have a seat.
06:09At this time, I need to review some
06:11general reminders for the benefit of all
06:13and most especially those new to our
06:15town meeting protocols.
06:18Some of you may already be familiar with
06:19our procedures and I ask for your
06:21patience while we ensure that all
06:23present understand the rules and how and
06:26when to participate.
06:28You will also know note I will be
06:30sharing information that is already
06:32printed in your copy of today's warrant.
06:35Please know that I'm doing this for the
06:37benefit of people at home who are
06:38watching this meeting remotely.
06:42Town meeting is the legislative body for
06:44the town of Charlton and per town
06:46bylaws, chapter 15, section 7, we follow
06:49parliamentary procedures found in a book
06:52titled Town Meeting Time
06:55as you can see here,
06:57which is published by the Massachusetts
06:59Moderators Association. It's an
07:01important reference to keep us all on
07:03the same page and it is necessary for
07:05elected moderators to read the book and
07:07learn the protocols.
07:09I will guide the meeting tonight as we
07:11move forward.
07:17Please know, excuse me, please know all
07:19discussion must be directed through the
07:21moderator. When considering an action on
07:23an article, I will call for a motion on
07:25the article and then a second on the
07:28motion.
07:29I may ask for the recommendation of the
07:31Finance Committee, Select Board, or
07:33other board as appropriate.
07:36I will then open the floor for any
07:37discussion on the matter. If you wish to
07:40speak, please approach the microphones
07:42and wait until called upon by the
07:44moderator.
07:46Then state your full name and
07:47residential address in Charlton. You
07:49will need to do this each time you
07:51return to the microphone.
07:54Once I have recognized you, each voter
07:56will have 3 minutes to speak.
07:59Please prepare your thoughts and
08:00questions in advance.
08:02I will use the timer on my iPhone to
08:04ensure all voters have an equal
08:06opportunity to participate.
08:09All comments or questions must be
08:11directed to me and information shared
08:13must be relevant to the issue being
08:15discussed.
08:17All questions and discussion must be
08:19restricted to the matters of business at
08:21hand, specifically the article in the
08:24warrant for which a main motion has been
08:26made.
08:27Discussion of any other issue not
08:30outlined in the warrant will not be
08:32allowed.
08:34If needed, I will call upon town
08:36officials to respond as appropriate.
08:40Please avoid matters of personality.
08:44It is not appropriate to refer to other
08:46voters by name nor call upon others to
08:49speak.
08:51After discussion on the main motion has
08:53begun, if you wish to make a motion to
08:55amend the main motion, it must be
08:57addressed at the microphone and
09:00submitted in writing to me for review.
09:02There are forms up front here on the
09:04table that we ask that you fill out and
09:07have a a prepared if you have a plan to
09:10amend a motion.
09:14If there is a motion to amend and a
09:16second, the amendment will be considered
09:18first and then will require a majority
09:21vote of town meeting.
09:26When I call for a vote, your voting
09:28device will be activated.
09:30Press the green or it says 1A button for
09:34yes.
09:36Press the red or 2B button for no.
09:41Please be aware the remaining buttons
09:43are not used at all.
09:45And please make note that the third
09:47button indicates the letters ABS.
09:50This does not mean absolutely.
09:57I got that feedback the other day.
10:00If you wish to abstain from a vote, then
10:03you don't select any button at all.
10:06Feel free to refer to page two of your
10:09warrant booklet for a photograph and
10:11more detailed instructions.
10:15You may press multiple times.
10:18But the last vote you register will be
10:20the one that's recorded.
10:23Your voting device will show the word
10:25okay when your vote has been received by
10:28the voting system.
10:31We will use a test question to practice
10:33with the devices.
10:35And I'm Our town clerk is going to pull
10:37that up on the screen.
10:40Practice question, do you hand out candy
10:43on Halloween?
10:46Please vote now.
10:59>> [clears throat]
11:04>> 10 seconds remaining.
11:16Please stop voting.
11:18Thank you.
11:20We have recorded 207 in the affirmative
11:23and 146 against.
11:27The motion is adopted.
11:31I was glad it wasn't the other way
11:33around. The kids would be um stricken of
11:35candy in Charlton.
11:38I will now share with you the return of
11:41the warrant.
11:55Warrant for special town meeting,
11:57Monday, October 19th, 2026.
12:00To either of the constables of the town
12:02of Charlton in the county of Worcester,
12:05greetings. In the name of the
12:06Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are
12:08hereby directed to notify the
12:09inhabitants of the town of Charlton
12:11qualified to vote in elections to meet
12:14in the Charlton Middle School, 2 Oxford
12:16Road, Charlton, Mass. On Monday, October
12:1919th, 2026 at 7:00 in the evening for
12:23the purposes of taking action on the
12:25following articles. I'm glad I had it
12:28accurate that time.
12:31Article 1, appropriation of funds for
12:33unpaid bills of a prior fiscal year. To
12:36see if the town will vote to raise by
12:39taxation, transfer, or borrow, and
12:41appropriate a sum or sums of accounts to
12:44be specified at the town meeting for
12:46payment of one or more fiscal years
12:49prior bills, fiscal years bills not paid
12:53due to an insufficiency or of
12:55appropriation or for other reasons, or
12:58take any action relative thereto or
13:00thereon.
13:03May I have a recommendation?
13:05Oh, excuse me.
13:07I I call for a motion.
13:10>> Mr. Moderator.
13:11I move that the town
13:13>> Steve, you got to go a little closer.
13:18>> I move that the following prior bills
13:21prior years bills not previously paid
13:23due to date to the late billing be paid
13:25from the following FY 2027 accounts as
13:28follows.
13:30Green dollars
13:31from the FY 27 municipal offices expense
13:34and equipment account to the Worcester
13:36Elevator Company,
13:38$294
13:39from the FY 27 sewer maintenance
13:41equipment account to Veolia North
13:43America,
13:45$294 from the FY 27 sewer maintenance
13:48equipment account to Veolia North
13:51America, and $3,725.64
13:56from the FY 27 sewer maintenance
13:58equipment account to Veolia North
14:00America.
14:01>> Thank you. Do I have a second from the
14:03floor?
14:04>> Second.
14:05>> Motion's been made and seconded. Do I
14:07have a recommendation of the Finance
14:08Committee?
14:09>> The Finance Committee supports this
14:10motion.
14:12>> Do I have a recommendation of the Select
14:14Board?
14:14>> The Select Board supports this motion.
14:16>> We will require a majority vote.
14:19Is there anything to be said on the
14:21matter?
14:26Seeing none,
14:28as I said, a majority vote will be
14:30required. It's time to vote. Please vote
14:32now.
14:34All those in favor vote by vote signify
14:37by voting yes, and if you're opposed,
14:39vote no.
14:5410 seconds remaining.
15:04Please stop voting.
15:06Thank you.
15:08We have recorded 336 affirmative votes
15:11and 20 votes against. The motion is
15:14adopted.
15:20Article two, inter- inter and intra
15:23departmental transfers and or
15:25appropriations for fiscal year 2027
15:28budget.
15:29To see if the town will vote to raise by
15:31taxation, borrow or transfer and
15:34appropriate from available funds
15:36including so-called free cash and or
15:39funds previously appropriated to other
15:41uses a sum or sums of money to accounts
15:45and for purposes to be specified at the
15:48town meeting or take any action relative
15:50there to or thereon.
15:53Do I have a motion?
15:56>> Mr. Moderator, I move to pass over this
15:58article indefinitely.
15:59>> Do I have a second?
16:01>> Second.
16:03>> What's the recommendation of the Finance
16:05Committee?
16:06>> Finance Committee supports this motion.
16:09>> May I please have a recommendation of
16:11the Select Board?
16:12>> The Select Board supports this motion.
16:14>> Is there anything to be said on the
16:16matter?
16:21Hearing none, a majority vote will be
16:23required here. It's time to vote. All
16:25those in favor please signify by voting
16:27yes. All those opposed please signify by
16:30voting no.
16:31Please vote now.
16:42Taking 10 seconds remaining.
16:52Please stop voting.
16:54We have recorded 308 votes in the
16:57affirmative and 36 votes against. The
17:00motion is adopted.
17:04Article three, amendments to the fiscal
17:07year 2027 budget. To see if the town
17:10will vote to amend the fiscal 2027
17:13budget voted at the May 2026 annual town
17:16meeting or take any action relative
17:19thereto or thereon.
17:21Do we have a motion?
17:23>> Mr. Moderator,
17:24I move that this article be passed over
17:26indefinitely.
17:28>> Do we have a second?
17:30>> Second.
17:31>> Motion's been made and seconded.
17:33May I please have the recommendation of
17:35the Finance Committee?
17:37>> The Finance Committee supports this
17:38motion.
17:39>> May I please have the recommendation of
17:41the Select Board?
17:42>> The Select Board supports this motion.
17:44>> Is there anything to be said on the
17:46matter?
17:51Hearing none,
17:53a majority vote will be required.
17:55All those in favor, please signify by
17:57voting yes. Those opposed, signify by
18:00voting no. Please vote now.
18:1610 seconds remaining.
18:24Please stop voting.
18:26We have recorded 315 votes in the
18:28affirmative
18:30and 29 votes against. The motion is
18:33adopted.
18:37Article 4.
18:40Miscellaneous capital items and related
18:42contracts. To see if the town will vote
18:45to raise by taxation, borrow, or
18:47transfer from available funds, including
18:50so-called free cash, and funds
18:52previously appropriated to other uses,
18:55and appropriate a sum or sums to
18:58purchase capital items
19:00and or for service, repair, improvement,
19:03architectural construction, renovation,
19:06improvement, and or other contracts
19:09relating to town buildings, facilities,
19:11or property, or to municipal services,
19:14and to authorize the select board, chief
19:17procurement officer, or other
19:19appropriate town official, board,
19:22commission, or committee to enter into
19:24such contracts or leases, and to take
19:26such other action as may be necessary or
19:29advisable to effectuate the purposes of
19:32such votes, or take any action relative
19:34thereto or thereon.
19:37Is there a motion?
19:39>> Mr. Moderator.
19:41>> Oh, just pull it forward.
19:45Yeah, yeah, yeah, yes, it'll be right on
19:47it.
19:47>> I move that the town vote to transfer
19:49and appropriate the following amounts to
19:51the following departments respective
19:53accounts for the fiscal year 2027
19:55capital budget to be expended for the
19:57following purposes, each item being
20:00considered a separate appropriation, and
20:02to authorize the select board or chief
20:04procurement officer to enter in such
20:06contracts, including leases, and to take
20:09such other action as may be necessary or
20:11advisable to effectuate the purposes of
20:14the foregoing vote.
20:1650,000 from free cash for grant match
20:19and planning, 250,000 from free cash for
20:22a hydrologic and hydronic analysis of
20:26South Charlton Reservoir,
20:2850,000 from free cash for municipal
20:31building improvements, 80,000 from free
20:34cash for technology replacements and
20:36improvements,
20:38and 40,000 from free cash for
20:40replacement of carpeting at the at the
20:43library.
20:45>> Second.
20:46>> Thank you. We have a motion and a
20:48second.
20:49May I please have the recommendation of
20:51the finance committee?
20:53>> The
20:54The finance committee supports this
20:56motion.
20:57>> May I please have the recommendation of
20:59the select board?
21:00>> The select board supports this motion.
21:02>> Is there anything to be said on the
21:04matter?
21:05>> Mr. Mod
21:06>> Oh,
21:06I'm sorry.
21:07>> May May we
21:08>> Yeah, hold on 1 second. Go ahead.
21:11>> Yeah, there is a typo in our paperwork.
21:13>> This was 15.
21:15>> That's okay. I thought I heard that. So,
21:16I I Yeah, so the booklet is the typo's
21:19on the on the paper you're reading. So,
21:22we want to go back and clarify that.
21:24Conservation
21:2515,000, is that
21:27>> 15,000 for
21:49>> All right. Now, um go ahead.
21:51>> Stephen Sage, 41 Lincoln Point Road.
21:54Can we get a little bit of a
21:56idea of the scope of improvements for
21:57the
21:58municipal building as everything else is
22:00kind of said what it's for.
22:03>> I'll ask um the town administrator to
22:05answer that question.
22:06>> Mr. Moderator, this is primarily to go
22:08toward replacing various small capital
22:10items in our municipal buildings,
22:12primarily HVAC repairs in the town hall
22:14and at Fort River Health.
22:17>> Great. Thank you. Thank you very much.
22:19Is there any other Anything else to be
22:21said on this?
22:25All right.
22:27A majority will vote will be required.
22:29All those in favor, please signify by
22:31voting yes. All those opposed, please
22:33Oh, sorry. Sorry. Go ahead.
22:37>> Hello, Christopher Murillo, 47 Jenny's
22:40>> Oh, if you could I don't know if people
22:42can hear you. Go ahead. There you go.
22:44>> Hello, Christopher Murillo, 47 Jenny's
22:46Road. I was going to ask what is the
22:48exact department for information
22:50technology and what is the exact fiscal
22:53budget for 2027
22:55detailed for the certain technologies it
22:58is directed to for the fiscal year.
23:01>> I'll get an answer for you. Um Mr. Um I
23:03don't know who can answer that best.
23:06Our our town finance director.
23:08>> Off the top of my head, I don't know
23:10what his total budget is for the year,
23:12but the information technology, so that
23:1380,000 is for capital improvements
23:15town-wide. So, it would be replacing
23:18computers,
23:19um
23:20possible [snorts]
23:21like meeting room upgrades at the
23:22selectmen's uh office, but he uses it
23:24for um any IT improvements in town
23:28through any of the town buildings.
23:30>> All right, understood. Thank you.
23:32>> Thank you.
23:33Are there any other
23:36Are there any other
23:37questions on the matter or something to
23:39be said?
23:41All right.
23:42I know people probably already voted,
23:44but we haven't resolved uh finished
23:45that, so please please continue to vote
23:47if you haven't already or
23:50Oh, okay. So, it's sorry. So, it's open
23:52now. Voting now is open. Please signify
23:54by voting yes. All those in favor, and
23:56if you're opposed, signify by voting no.
24:1210 seconds remaining.
24:22Please stop voting.
24:25We have recorded 290 votes in the
24:27affirmative and 65 votes against. The
24:30motion is adopted.
24:33I am looking for motion number two.
24:36>> Mr. Moderator.
24:37>> I move that the town vote to transfer
24:40and appropriate the following amounts to
24:41the following departments' respective
24:43accounts for the fiscal year 2027
24:45capital budget to be expended for the
24:48following purposes, each item being
24:50considered a separate appropriation, and
24:52to authorize the select board or chief
24:55procurement officer to enter into such
24:57contracts including leases and to take
24:59such other action as may be necessary or
25:02advisable to effectuate the purposes of
25:06the foregoing vote.
25:08275,000 from free cash for the
25:11replacement of police cruisers.
25:13>> Is there a second?
25:16>> Second.
25:17>> Second. I hear the second, thank you.
25:19May I please have the recommendation of
25:20the finance committee?
25:21>> The finance committee supports this
25:23motion.
25:25>> And the recommendation of the select
25:26board?
25:27>> The select board supports the motion.
25:30>> Is there anything to be said on this
25:32matter?
25:36Go ahead.
25:37>> Stephen Sage, Lincoln Point Road. How
25:39many cruisers does this represent? Is
25:40this our usual two or is this three?
25:44>> Is that accurate?
25:46Go ahead.
25:47>> I believe it's three, but it also
25:48encompasses the technology that needs to
25:50go into the cruiser.
25:52Also.
25:55>> Thank you. Yes, go ahead.
25:57>> Gwendolyn Powell, uh
25:59235 uh Berlingame Road. Uh may I ask the
26:02urgency of replacing these cruisers and
26:05uh
26:06just in general like how urgent this is?
26:09>> Mr. Hank, do you
26:12So each year, this is not reoccurring,
26:14we get three cruisers, right? That's
26:17about the time that we lose three. And
26:19the reason why we do it on an ongoing
26:21basis, sometimes it can take a year,
26:24year and a half to get these cruisers.
26:25So you got to stay ahead of the game.
26:28>> Thank you.
26:29>> Thank you, Hank.
26:32Is there anything else to be said?
26:39This will require a majority vote.
26:42All those in favor, please signify by
26:43voting yes. All those opposed, please
26:46signify by voting no.
26:48Please vote now.
27:02>> 10 seconds remaining.
27:10Please stop voting.
27:12We have recorded 261 votes in the
27:14affirmative
27:16and 86 votes against with one
27:19abstention, but we're not using that
27:21button, so the motion is adopted.
27:29I'm looking for motion number three.
27:31>> Mr. Moderator,
27:32I move that the town vote to transfer
27:35and appropriate the following amounts to
27:37the following departments account for
27:38the fiscal year 2027 capital budget to
27:41be expended for the following purposes,
27:43each item being considered a separate
27:45appropriation, and to authorize the
27:47select board or chief procurement
27:49officer to enter into such contracts,
27:51including leases, and to take such
27:53action as may be necessary or advisable
27:56to effectuate the purpose of the
27:57foregoing vote. 110,000 from free cash
28:01for F-350 pickup truck support vehicle,
28:04100,000 from free cash to refurbish
28:07forestry one, and 61,000 from ambulance
28:10receipts reserved for appropriation for
28:12an ambulance life pack for the EMS car.
28:16>> Thank you. Is there a second?
28:17>> Second.
28:18>> Motion's been made and seconded. May I
28:21please have the recommendation of the
28:22Finance Committee?
28:23>> The Finance Committee supports this
28:25motion.
28:27>> May I please have the recommendation of
28:28the Select Board?
28:29>> The Select Board supports this motion.
28:32>> Is there anything to be said?
28:38Seeing none, we will require a majority
28:41vote. All those in favor, please signify
28:43by voting yes. All those opposed, please
28:45signify by voting no. Please vote now.
28:5510 seconds remaining.
29:05Please stop voting.
29:07We have recorded 287 affirmative votes
29:11and 69 votes against. The motion is
29:13adopted.
29:16I'm looking for motion number four.
29:18>> Mr. Moderator.
29:21I move the town vote and transfer
29:25Sorry. Vote to transfer and appropriate
29:27the following amounts to the following
29:28departments account for the fiscal year
29:302027 capital budget to be expended for
29:33the following purposes each item being
29:36considered a separate appropriation and
29:38to authorize the select board or chief
29:40procurement officer to enter into such
29:42contracts including leases and to take
29:45such other action as may be necessary or
29:47advisable to effectuate the
29:50the purpose of the foregoing vote.
29:52140,000 from free cash for F350 utility
29:56bucket lift pickup.
29:58300,000 from free cash for an excavator
30:01with rotary mower.
30:0250,000 from free cash for a wood
30:04chipper.
30:0524,000 from free cash for paving of the
30:08cemetery road.
30:098,000 from free cash for a Kubota
30:11tractor accessories.
30:1325,000 from sewer retained earnings for
30:16sewer plant office renovations.
30:20>> Second.
30:21>> Thank you. Motion's been made and
30:22seconded. May have May I please have the
30:25recommendation of the Finance Committee?
30:26>> The Finance Committee supports this
30:28motion.
30:29>> And the recommendation of the Select
30:30Board, please?
30:31>> The Select Board supports this motion.
30:34>> Is there anything to be said on the
30:35matter?
30:42Hearing none, this will require a
30:43majority vote. All those in favor,
30:45please signify by voting yes. All those
30:47opposed, please signify by voting no.
30:50Please vote now.
31:0310 seconds remaining.
31:16Please stop voting.
31:18We have recorded 280 affirmative
31:21affirmative votes
31:22and 70 votes against. The motion is
31:25adopted.
31:27Article 5
31:30New Senior Community Center and Police
31:33Department parking expansion design
31:35phase.
31:36To see if the town will vote to raise
31:38and appropriate funds by borrowing,
31:40taxation, transfer from available funds,
31:44or otherwise, a sum of money to pay
31:46costs of a schematic design services, as
31:49well as retaining of an owner's project
31:52manager for design and construction of
31:55of a new senior community center to be
31:59located on Masonic Home Road and
32:02additional parking for the Police
32:03Department, including payments of costs
32:06incidental and related thereto, or take
32:09any action relative thereto or thereon.
32:13Do I have a motion?
32:15>> Mr. Moderator.
32:17I move that the town vote to transfer
32:19and appropriate the sum of $500,000 from
32:23available free cash to the new Senior
32:26Community Center and Police Department
32:29parking expansion design phase account
32:32number as written for the purpose set
32:35forth in the article, and to authorize
32:37the select board and or the chief
32:39procurement officer to enter into such
32:41contracts and agreements and to take any
32:44other action as they deem necessary or
32:47advisable to effectuate the purpose of
32:49the foregoing vote.
32:51>> Thank you. Before I get the
32:52recommendation, you'll note in your
32:54warrant that the
32:56B was
32:58there was a correction to the state B B
33:00statement and that's because the lease
33:03and acquisition of interest to land was
33:05an error and that's out of scope based
33:07on the article, so that was removed.
33:11>> Second.
33:12>> Motion has been made and seconded. Do I
33:14have a recommendation of the finance
33:15committee?
33:16>> The finance committee supports this
33:18motion.
33:19>> Recommendation of the select board.
33:21>> The select board supports this motion.
33:24>> Is there anything to be said on the
33:25matter?
33:35>> Yes.
33:36>> Right in.
33:37>> That's Stockwell.
33:39>> Oh, yeah.
33:40Thank you.
33:42>> I'm the chair of the senior community
33:44center feasibility committee. We were
33:46charged four years ago by the select
33:48board to find a solution that would
33:49serve the whole community.
33:51After researching several options, we
33:53are here today to ask the community to
33:55approve
33:57Sorry.
33:58Sorry.
33:59After researching several options, we
34:01are here today to ask the community to
34:03approve the next design phase for a
34:05senior community center on Masonic Home
34:07Road next to the police station. We are
34:10recommending a new build as designed by
34:12Liro Hill on this 23 and 1/2 acre
34:15property that is centrally located on
34:17town-owned land and where there were
34:19previously vetted
34:21>> Yeah, we need to
34:22Yeah, we need one second.
34:23>> previously vetted site plans for public
34:26safety building and known topographic
34:28conditions.
34:29>> So, yeah, we're going to we're going to
34:31start over. Can you Can you adjust that,
34:33Drew?
34:34Yeah, so you're going to get right into
34:35the mic. Sorry, I know it's a pain, but
34:39There is feedback. There is feedback,
34:41Drew.
34:43Can you Can you Can you mute the other
34:45mics while we're doing that?
34:48>> How's that?
34:49>> Oh, that's better.
34:50>> Should I start over?
34:52>> Don't you mind, though.
34:53>> Should I start over?
34:54>> Yeah, would you start over, Pat? Thank
34:56you.
34:56>> Pat Stockwell, Sunset Drive. I am the
34:59chair of the Senior Community Center
35:00Feasibility Committee. We were charged 4
35:03years ago by the Select Board to find a
35:04solution that would serve the whole
35:06community. After researching several
35:09options, we are here today to ask the
35:10community to approve the next design
35:13phase for a Senior Community Center on
35:15Masonic Home Road, next to the police
35:17station. We are recommending a new build
35:20as designed by Liro Hill on this 23 and
35:231/2 acre property that is centrally
35:25located on town-owned land, and where
35:27there were previously vetted site plans
35:29for a public safety building and known
35:31topographic conditions.
35:33The financial impact and timeline is
35:35estimated to be the same for this site
35:37as for our other options, but with many
35:39more advantages. So, knowing we won't be
35:41starting from ground zero on this
35:43property is a huge plus.
35:45The site itself has many advantages. It
35:48has sidewalk access to many community
35:50venues both in the town center and in
35:53Shelton City. The building will be
35:54located on a single floor with
35:56same-level accessibility from all
35:58parking areas.
36:00The site has access to tie-ins for town
36:02water and sewer utilities. It has access
36:05to tie into municipal fiber for internet
36:07access.
36:09It is also across the street from the
36:11Overlook Senior Living Facility.
36:13The site has the potential for
36:15much-needed parking space both for the
36:17center itself and for an expanded police
36:19parking lot.
36:20It is a large lot with wetlands, trees,
36:23and open space, which offers a great
36:24opportunity for walking paths and hiking
36:27trails, potentially even tied in with
36:29Overlook's trails.
36:31It has the potential to place the new
36:34bandshell, paid for by Amazon, at this
36:36location for outdoor concerts.
36:39A new senior center, specifically, will
36:41free up much-needed space for municipal
36:43offices in the town hall.
36:46And a new community center will relieve
36:48pressure and complement services offered
36:50by our wonderful library.
36:53And finally, I just want to say this
36:54article is only asking for a transfer of
36:56funds for the design phase. It is not
36:59authorizing construction of a new
37:00center, which will potentially come much
37:02later if approved at additional town
37:05meeting and ballot votes.
37:07Thank you.
37:09>> I now go ahead.
37:13Yeah, I know. I know.
37:15>> My name is Bruce Smanen, five Pine Lane.
37:17I serve with Pat and several other folks
37:20on the signing feasibility committee.
37:22Um I want to talk a little bit about the
37:24current site and why we need an improved
37:26site. Um the current site has two
37:28floors.
37:30It has accessibility compliance
37:32challenges, which is a polite way of
37:34saying if you have a walker in a
37:36wheelchair, you're really challenged to
37:37get to the bathroom.
37:39Um the proposed plan would provide fully
37:41accessible space dedicated for use by
37:44seniors to enhance current programming
37:46and expand services available,
37:48socialization, informational and
37:51educational, cultural, medical and
37:53benefit support, and other activities.
37:55The proposed senior community center
37:57creates new office space designed to
37:59provide privacy for individual meetings,
38:02consultations, and assessments for
38:04seniors that is not available at the
38:06current site. It is significantly
38:08increases storage space for supplies and
38:10durable medical equipment, which are
38:13currently housed in all program spaces.
38:16The expanded space in the new senior
38:18community center allows for concurrent
38:21programs to be run during the day,
38:23something that is limited at the current
38:25site due to the size restrictions.
38:28The expanded size of the proposed senior
38:30community center project offers
38:32additional space to provide a broader
38:33range and scope of classes and programs
38:37to meet the varied needs of seniors in
38:39accordance with their various
38:41capabilities and interests, as well as
38:43allowing programming that meets the
38:44seniors where they are, such as recently
38:47retired, active agers, or those with
38:50more limitations. Current space
38:51limitations make that challenging. It'll
38:54provide upwards of 100 parking spaces.
38:56The current senior center has 13 parking
38:58spaces. Those additional parking spaces
39:01would support a range of other
39:02activities that might be possible for
39:04larger use of the senior community
39:06center and the entire property.
39:08The proposed site design allows for the
39:10senior center to create outdoor
39:12activities for attendees, such as
39:14barbecues, gardening, and landscaping.
39:16Housing the senior center in a dedicated
39:18senior community center building will
39:20enhance opportunities for interaction
39:22between seniors and the greater
39:24community, especially if the town
39:26decides to expand the use of the entire
39:28property to address other possibilities.
39:30Thank you for your time.
39:32>> Thank you very much. Thank you. We'll go
39:34on this side now. Go ahead.
39:36>> Um Patricia Reddick, 58 Daniels Road. Um
39:40be I plan to make a motion. Um before I
39:43do so, I just wanted to briefly explain
39:45why I'm trying what I'm trying to
39:47accomplish. I support moving forward
39:49with the design process for a new senior
39:51center. My concern is that we have an
39:54opportunity while we are um spending all
39:56this money on the design to look at this
39:59property more comprehensively.
40:01Um with approximately 20 acres, um
40:05before we determine where buildings,
40:07parking, utilities, and other
40:08infrastructure will go, I believe we
40:10should evaluate whether the site can
40:13also accommodate recreational or
40:15multi-generational community uses.
40:18Um I'm not asking us tonight to approve
40:21athletic fields or build anything
40:23additional or commit any additional
40:26funding. I'm so simply asking that those
40:29possibilities be considered during the
40:31design phase uh before decisions are
40:33made um that could have unintentionally
40:35eliminate them. Um planning for the
40:38whole property now makes much more sense
40:40than wishing we had um done so later. Um
40:44so uh I would like to move to amend
40:47Article 5 by adding the following
40:49language.
40:51>> I'll I'll take I'll take that.
40:54>> Can I
40:54>> Oh oh oh, sorry. I Yeah, go ahead.
40:58>> Um I after the word um police
41:01department, I want to add including
41:04evaluation in schematic design of the
41:07site for multi-generational community
41:09use including recreational fields and
41:12associated parking.
41:15>> That one said that.
41:16>> Yep, so I'll take that. I need to look
41:17at that.
41:21>> So we emphasizing the community center.
41:27>> Just one moment.
41:48I'm going to consult with our legal
41:50counsel.
42:20>> Thank you for the motion. I'm The motion
42:22is out of order. It's out of scope
42:24because it
42:25based on the town meeting time
42:27regulations,
42:29it is outside of the scope because based
42:31on the reasonableness test because
42:33someone looking at the warrant article
42:36as printed would not jump to assume
42:39recreational fields would be included in
42:41that. So, that is outside of scope and
42:43it's out of order. So, I cannot allow
42:45the motion to continue.
42:47Um so, carry on with the discussion. We
42:48are back to the original motion that was
42:51already on the floor. Thank you.
42:56Go ahead.
42:59>> North Service Road
43:00>> Uh
43:01just a minute. Go ahead. Yeah, try to
43:02talk right into it.
43:03>> Frank Iacono, 66 North Service Road.
43:07Uh a few weeks ago we had a we had a
43:08vote in town here about a large tax
43:12increase cuz we need a lot of borrowing
43:14to do what the town described as basic
43:17maintenance on our schools
43:20because we couldn't afford that.
43:22>> Yeah.
43:23>> And that vote failed.
43:24>> So, sir, that's I
43:25>> Well, that's It's just a point I was
43:26>> But yeah, you cannot make that point
43:27because it's not within the four points
43:29of the article. We're talking
43:30specifically of article five. It has to
43:33be about this.
43:34>> Specifically to article five, to make it
43:37brief and save your time,
43:39we don't have the money. If we can't
43:41afford to support the youngest
43:43generations in this town, we don't have
43:45the money to support the oldest
43:46generations in this town.
43:49Invest in your youth before anything
43:51else.
43:52Don't take from the future to support
43:54the past.
43:55That's all. Thank you.
43:56>> Thank you for your time.
43:59Now, now. No, no, no.
44:01We're not We're not going to do that.
44:04Go ahead.
44:05>> Mr. Moderator, can you hear me?
44:06>> Right in. Yep, there you go.
44:07>> I should know this by now, right? Miss
44:09Moderator, um Karen Spiwak, 187 Sunset
44:12Drive.
44:13>> Yeah, I can't hear her. Uh we need to
44:15I'm remain silent while we talk. Thank
44:17you.
44:18>> Karen Spiwak, 187 Sunset Drive.
44:23I'm asking the voters tonight to please
44:25support by this article by voting yes. A
44:28yes vote will allow the proposed
44:30Charlton Senior Community Center planned
44:32next to the Charlton Police Department
44:34to advance to its next phase.
44:36The plan also includes much-needed
44:38additional parking for the Police
44:39Department, open space, and space for
44:41community events. A yes vote will
44:43authorize, again as we said, the
44:45transfer of funds. This is not a tax
44:47increase. This is the process you go
44:49through when you want a project a
44:51municipal project to move forward.
44:53Charlton's growing senior population has
44:55long since outgrown its current space in
44:57the Town Hall's basement. These
44:59residents are our neighbors, relatives,
45:01and friends that need deserve a modern,
45:03safe, accessible center designed to meet
45:06their needs with hours of independent of
45:09the current Town Hall limitations.
45:11According to the National Council on
45:13Aging, research shows older adults who
45:16participate in senior center programs
45:19can learn to manage and delay the onset
45:21of chronic disease and experience
45:23measurable improvements in their
45:25physical, social, spiritual, emotional,
45:28mental, and economic well-being. Key
45:31factors of senior centers include social
45:33connected connection, health fitness
45:36programs that improve mobility, balance,
45:38and strength while focusing on reducing
45:41fall risk, nutritional support, computer
45:44training, and support services including
45:46health and insurance counseling,
45:48transportation coordination, tax
45:51preparation assistance, and more for a
45:53free or significantly reduced price.
45:57Our seniors have consistently supported
45:59our community from our children's
46:01education to public safety. Now it's our
46:05turn to support a project that will
46:06serve some of our most vulnerable
46:08residents. A yes vote on this is an
46:10investment in our future and in theirs.
46:13And I say, my personal opinion, is we
46:16cannot afford not to do this. Many of us
46:18can afford the health clubs, the the the
46:21tax people to do our taxes, so on and so
46:23forth. There's many seniors out there
46:25this is their lifeline, folks. Think
46:28about how many miles in travel. Think
46:30about as people age and you lose your
46:32partner and now you're sitting there and
46:34maybe you don't know how to do certain
46:36things. You don't have the the means to
46:38do it. This vote tonight is a will
46:41directly impact and reflect our moral
46:44compass as a town. Please support our
46:48seniors. Thank you.
46:50>> THANK YOU.
46:52>> [applause]
46:57>> GO AHEAD.
46:58>> I HENRY KAMINSKI, 10 Ebalou's Road.
47:02And I would ask the meeting tonight to
47:04please
47:05approve this motion.
47:07It takes more We've got a great town
47:09here. We've got a great police
47:10department, fire department. We've got a
47:13tremendous highway department. They keep
47:15our town good. But it takes more than
47:17just those things and a great school
47:18system.
47:20But it takes more than those things to
47:21make a good town a great town.
47:24Almost 30% of our residents are over the
47:26age of 55. And I think by 2030 they're
47:30going to be more like I know 35 or 37.
47:34It's important we take care of all the
47:36residents and we offer all the residents
47:38in town the best we can. So I'd ask you
47:40to approve this motion.
47:48>> Is there any anything else to be said on
47:50the matter?
47:58>> Somebody's coming.
48:04>> Yeah, turn it feel free to put it turn
48:06it up. Yeah. I mean no, I mean turn it
48:08up towards you. Yeah. There you go.
48:11>> Uh Robert
48:12>> Whoop, right into it.
48:13>> Robert
48:15Robert Cronin, 25 Estabrook Drive
48:18Uh
48:20speaking to suggest that uh
48:23people are talking about whether we are
48:25in favor of a senior center or opposed
48:27to a senior center, but I think we
48:29should consider that if we're built
48:31making a big investment in a new
48:32facility, it should be the best facility
48:34possible, not only a senior center, but
48:38uh e-
48:39to provide
48:41more
48:41resources is for the town. Uh
48:45I know the water and sewer commission is
48:46uh looking for uh more office space, for
48:49example, and uh if we uh pump the brakes
48:52and have a building that can do even
48:55more, then it will be a better long-term
48:58investment for our town. Because if we
49:00take the time to get this right, not too
49:01much time. People obviously are uh
49:04have been waiting for a while, but this
49:06building is going to be up uh hopefully
49:08for uh many years to come, and it will
49:10serve the town.
49:12And uh if we vote no, then we can have a
49:15uh better design in the future.
49:17And you know,
49:18it's going to uh spend a lot of money
49:20that uh could have been spent on
49:22something else like a better uh
49:24facility. And uh I say this as somebody
49:26who thinks that yes, a town with a lot
49:28of seniors should have a modern senior
49:30center, but it should have uh so much
49:32more. And uh the most efficient way is
49:35to uh get this one right.
49:37Uh
49:39Thank you.
49:44>> Go ahead.
49:45>> Yeah, Brian Powers, Partridge Hill Road,
49:47Charlton. Uh this is now I know we just
49:50changed the name of this to the senior
49:52and community center. Can we get some
49:54clarification of which aspects are the
49:56community center? Like what what is
49:59added beyond what's currently the senior
50:01center?
50:01>> Yep, let me forget an answer for you on
50:03that. Yep, just a moment. Did um Tom
50:05administrator, should I call the
50:06committee chair?
50:08Yep, so Pat Pat Stockwell is the
50:10committee chair of the
50:12of the senior center renovation, so I'd
50:13ask Pat to answer that question.
50:20>> Okay, the building has been designed so
50:22that it can be used as both a senior
50:24center and a community center. Um
50:27we actually went to Wayland and saw an
50:30example of that during the during the
50:31day Monday through Thursday, it's
50:34dedicated to the seniors and then
50:36evenings and weekends, it can be used by
50:38the community. So there's only a certain
50:40section of it where the administrative
50:41offices are that would be closed off
50:43when a community events were going on.
50:45Plus we have outdoor activities we can
50:47do now which is not possible today.
50:50>> So so
50:51So this design phase will be part of
50:53integrating these other community
50:55elements as well.
50:56>> question.
50:57>> Correct.
50:58>> Based on the the
50:59>> It's it's it's what she said it the
51:02community center as she described it.
51:05>> All right, so they're adding more things
51:06based on the
51:07I know they took a survey and stuff like
51:09that. Some of those things will be added
51:10to it.
51:10>> I'm going to ask Pat to I can't comment
51:12on that the survey
51:14>> Basically yes. I mean most of the
51:16feedback we got was regarding the
51:18seniors, but yes, we did get some
51:19community feedback and I mean there's
51:21activity rooms, there's all kinds of
51:23things that the community would be able
51:25to use in that building.
51:26>> I'm
51:27approving of that.
51:28>> Okay,
51:29thank you. Thank you.
51:32>> Thank you for your time.
51:34>> All right, now
51:38>> Uh
51:38Dan Prouty 134 Partridge Hill Road.
51:41>> Yeah, could you talk you got to talk
51:43>> Okay, I'm sorry. Is that better?
51:44>> Sorry about the technical difficulties
51:46tonight.
51:46>> Okay, Dan Prouty, 134 Partridge Road. Uh
51:49it's just a matter of semantics. This
51:52$500,000, that's the design of the
51:54building. It It reads like it's a design
51:57of the site.
52:00>> So, I can ask our town administrator to
52:02answer that question.
52:03>> It's schematic design of the site.
52:05>> Just the site?
52:06>> Site and building.
52:07>> Okay, excuse me.
52:09I'm before the planning board now
52:12with a site design
52:14for about 600 parking spaces.
52:18And the engineering's run 60 to 70,000
52:21dollars.
52:22And that's wetland mapping, the whole
52:24thing.
52:25So, why does it cost me
52:28as a developer for 50 years 60 to 70,000
52:32dollars
52:33and cost the town 500,000?
52:36>> Yeah, I I hear you called on for your
52:37question and I'm going to ask um I don't
52:39know if Andrew of Finance Committee can
52:41answer that question.
52:45>> Do you want her?
52:46>> No, I got it. Go yeah, so town
52:48administrator is going to answer that.
52:49Go ahead.
52:49>> Uh Mr. Moderator, this is um an estimate
52:52as to where we're at in the in the
52:53process.
52:57Based off of where we're at in the
52:57process and unknown of what the scope of
53:00building or the site is going to be,
53:02um any unused funds will be used to go
53:05toward the entirety of the construction
53:07project.
53:09>> Does that answer your question?
53:11>> No, because I I just can't see the the
53:14difference.
53:15>> Yeah, it's a town meeting. You can talk
53:16into the mic.
53:17>> to talk against the need. I'm just
53:20talking about I don't want to see it go
53:22in a site that's so expensive that when
53:25they come back, it's a million or two
53:27million dollars more than the town can
53:29afford.
53:31I mean I've I've been in the business
53:33for over 50 years.
53:35I've developed industrial parks.
53:37And I And I know numbers and
53:39even as 76 years old, every day I'm
53:42still working with engineers,
53:44wetlands specialists,
53:46and I'm writing checks, okay?
53:50So, I just hate to see the town,
53:54you know,
53:55get missed a big uh
53:57design firm and just run up,
54:00you know, run up a bill, and then it's
54:03so expensive,
54:04the town at that point
54:06says they can't afford it. I want to see
54:08this thing happen.
54:12And you know, and and one other thing is
54:14is maybe before you do this,
54:17included in this, you should look at
54:18another site. I think a marvelous site
54:21for this, if you go down Masonic Hill
54:22Road, and you're coming up from Route
54:2420, there's a site where they have some
54:28parking on grass.
54:30I I can't see if you went to Masonic
54:33Home and said,
54:35"Can we buy that piece of land at a good
54:37price?" Okay.
54:39No, I I I know. I'm just I'm just
54:41telling you my reasoning.
54:43Because I'd like to see this go forward,
54:46but I don't want it to be too expensive.
54:48Thank you.
54:49>> Yeah, so that's your timer there. You're
54:50out of time, but I'm going to get Yeah.
54:56I'm going to get an I want to get
54:58finished the answer there if um our
54:59finance director would like to say a
55:01word.
55:02>> Uh so, Mr. Moderator, uh this is just an
55:04estimate based on uh what it cost us to
55:07design the fire station. Um like Andrew
55:10said, any unused monies can go towards
55:12the cost of the project, but it's to
55:14hire an OPM, an owner's project manager,
55:17which you probably wouldn't have to hire
55:18as a citizen, um but by law we have to,
55:21and also hire an architect to design the
55:23building. And the reason that this site
55:25was chosen is cuz we already own it, so
55:27we didn't have to buy land.
55:30>> Thank you.
55:32Go ahead, sir.
55:33>> Mr. Moderator, uh Shay Matthews, 26
55:35number 10 Schoolhouse Road here in
55:36Charlton on information or
55:38clarification. The motion as written
55:40carries no verbiage about allocating
55:42funds not allocated for estimate
55:46evaluation or contractual agreements to
55:48be directed towards construction. Is
55:50that in effect part of the bylaws or
55:52simply an assumption for the process for
55:54Charlton? I just don't understand how
55:56those funds would be automatically
55:58allocated in this process where the
55:59motion doesn't address that at all.
56:05>> Go ahead, ma'am.
56:05>> So through the moderator, uh Mass
56:07General Law will allow us based on what
56:10the title of the article is to spend
56:11money on. So when the auditor audits us,
56:14as long as we're spending towards the
56:15cost of that project, uh you're allowed
56:17to do So
56:19myself as the accountant would allow
56:21them to spend money on anything towards
56:22the senior center community or police
56:24department expansion design phase that
56:26first and then any unused money for that
56:28would go towards that project. Which so
56:30that would be if we needed more money
56:32towards construction costs or such for
56:35that land.
56:36Or I mean it we could come back to town
56:38meeting and close it and apply it to the
56:40article.
56:43And then if it doesn't if we don't spend
56:44it and the project doesn't move forward,
56:46I would have to come back and close it
56:48at town meeting.
56:49>> Okay. Hold on one just hold your
56:51thought. I know I'm not you're going to
56:52give you more time. You just to be
56:53clear, that's the police department
56:55parking expansion. Correct. I just want
56:57to make sure that was clear cuz I don't
56:58think the word parking was said. Go
57:00ahead.
57:04>> I don't want to belabor this point, but
57:05design phase being automatically
57:07allocated to construction phase seems a
57:09little hard to to reconcile and doesn't
57:11seem clear from the language of the
57:12motion. Thank you for clarifying.
57:14>> Yeah.
57:14Thank you for your time.
57:17And now I'm on this side here. Yep. No,
57:19no. Hold on. I'm on this side. Go ahead.
57:21>> Hi.
57:22Linda Bellows,
57:24Oxford Road.
57:26>> So it's out again.
57:27>> Linda Bellows, 154 Oxford Road. How many
57:31bids did you do receive for this quote
57:33of $500,000
57:35or is it just an estimate?
57:38It's an estimate.
57:40>> It's just an [snorts] estimate. We can't
57:42go out to bid without having physical
57:43money.
57:44No one we can't go out to bid on on
57:47people without money. So once we if the
57:49money is approved tonight then we can go
57:50out to bid and go get quotes following
57:51procurement.
57:52>> So then would it come back to a vote and
57:56we would know how much the bid was and
57:58what you approved and what's left over?
58:02>> Go ahead Ashley.
58:02>> So through the moderator, so
58:05you wouldn't get a say on the quotes cuz
58:08you're allowing the chief procurement
58:09officer to do that with the vote, but if
58:11there was leftover money in the project
58:12if I can we can leave it and close it
58:15instead of applying it to the
58:16construction costs.
58:17>> But would you let us know?
58:20Would you put it out some way and let us
58:22>> like the bid was only a $100,000
58:25and we have $400,000
58:28left over. In a selectman's meeting that
58:30the um
58:32quotes usually get acknowledged during a
58:33selectman's meeting of and then they
58:35they would assign
58:37uh who they're picking at a selectman's
58:38meeting.
58:39>> I'm I'm just a little bit confused. I
58:41was with the child term rec committee
58:43and we did put out bids for different
58:45things and we were able to get bids
58:49beforehand
58:50for sites that we were looking at. I
58:53don't understand why you
58:55or you're just a
58:56I don't know. I don't understand it.
58:58When you get an actual bid why you
59:00couldn't come before the town and say
59:03the actual bid for site prep or
59:06is $100,000 would you prove approve the
59:10$100,000?
59:15>> Do you want to clarify?
59:16>> Yeah, say we're I'm going to ask the
59:17town administrator to continue to
59:19clarify.
59:20>> Say
59:21Mr. Moderator at this point we're at the
59:22pre-design phase.
59:24Mr. Moderator at this point we're at the
59:26pre-design phase where we're still
59:27trying to establish those costs. This is
59:29just a
59:31get some bids out there.
59:37Go ahead.
59:38>> We can't I can't go out to bid without
59:40have an estimate of how much it would
59:41cost. So, I can't go out to bid. When
59:43you go out to bid for an architect or an
59:44owner's project manager, which is what
59:46you need to design a building, I have to
59:48have a cost when you go out to bid, so
59:49they know what they're bidding on.
59:52>> I thought this is just the land, not the
59:55building.
59:55>> We already own the land. So, the land
59:57was already purchased years ago, and
59:59that was the former site of the public
1:00:00safety building right across from
1:00:01Masonic Home Road. That was put out. We
1:00:04didn't build a public safety building on
1:00:06that land, so we're looking to build a
1:00:08senior center community and expand the
1:00:10parking lot for the police station on
1:00:12this land. So, we already own the land.
1:00:15The 500,000 would go towards an
1:00:17architect, hiring an architect to design
1:00:19the building, and an owner's project
1:00:21manager, which will help facilitate the
1:00:23entire project through construction.
1:00:25>> So, it's to decide the site plan and the
1:00:28building.
1:00:29>> Correct.
1:00:29>> The whole thing.
1:00:30>> Correct.
1:00:31>> Right.
1:00:31>> us to construction documents, so we know
1:00:33how much the project will cost. And then
1:00:35that the project cost would come back to
1:00:37town meeting to vote on, and it would
1:00:40probably also go to a ballot vote, cuz
1:00:41you would need a debt exclusion to pay
1:00:43for the total cost. So, that will come
1:00:44back to the public, yes.
1:00:46>> Thank you.
1:00:47>> And yeah, and your 3 minutes is up. So,
1:00:49thank you so much. Thank you.
1:00:52I'm I'm on this side now. Um go ahead.
1:00:54>> Again, Karen Spiwak, 187 Sunset Drive.
1:00:58Um again, I'm talking as a resident, but
1:00:59I did full disclosure, I did serve as
1:01:02the Select Board member who was
1:01:03appointed to serve on the Senior
1:01:04Community Center. Just a few things I
1:01:06wanted to point out. It was always
1:01:08called the Senior Community Center. Um
1:01:10that was always the intent even when the
1:01:12Feasibility Study Committee was formed.
1:01:14The other thing I wanted to point out is
1:01:17many sites were looked at. This
1:01:19committee really did do their due
1:01:20diligence, and this has been literally
1:01:23around since the 1990s. We've been
1:01:25trying to do this since the 1990s. So,
1:01:28if people kind of you hear sighs and
1:01:30stuff, it's because
1:01:31they've We've been trying to get this
1:01:33accomplished. It would this We've never
1:01:34had a separate senior center.
1:01:37Uh and the other thing I just not to
1:01:39overly simplify, but this is simply the
1:01:42transfer of funds so we can get to that
1:01:45next phase and bring it back to the
1:01:46voters and say, "All right, now we have
1:01:48those numbers. You know, what do you
1:01:50want to do?" And
1:01:51your committee will probably go out and
1:01:53look to see, you know, if if there's
1:01:54anything we need to do to bring numbers
1:01:55down. There's all kinds of fundraising
1:01:57that can get done, grants, all kinds of
1:01:59opportunities. But please, let us just
1:02:01let them let us as a town get to that
1:02:03next phase, bring it back, and then we
1:02:06can have more spirited debate as as they
1:02:09would say. Anyway, please again, um vote
1:02:12yes and get us to that next phase.
1:02:16>> Go ahead.
1:02:20>> Can you hear me?
1:02:22Annette Mitchell, three Pikes Pond
1:02:24Circle.
1:02:25Moderator, I'd like to recommend that we
1:02:27move to vote.
1:02:29>> Do we have Do we have a second?
1:02:35At this time, I'd like to just pause for
1:02:37a moment and I'm going to ask the to
1:02:39clerk to put that in here.
1:02:42Well, I'd rather just do that. Yeah.
1:02:47We just need a moment. Thank you for
1:02:48your patience.
1:02:50And the motion is to move the question.
1:02:53We're voting on that first.
1:03:08I'm sorry.
1:03:09>> It's not working.
1:03:10>> It's not Yeah, she hasn't done it yet.
1:03:12We haven't voted yet. Sorry. I'll
1:03:14announce the vote once she's ready.
1:03:15Sorry.
1:03:16Yeah.
1:03:17>> [laughter]
1:03:18>> Yeah, I'll let you know. Don't worry.
1:03:23Okay. Okay. So, at this time we're
1:03:26voting on the move the question.
1:03:28Um all those in favor, you'll signify on
1:03:31your device by voting yes. All those
1:03:32opposed signify by voting no.
1:03:36Please vote now.
1:03:5610 seconds remaining.
1:04:03Please stop voting.
1:04:05We have recorded 323 votes in the
1:04:07affirmative and 42 votes against. The
1:04:10motion is adopted. Now, we're going to
1:04:12go back to Article 5, the original
1:04:15motion, and we're going to be voting on
1:04:17that right now. So, at this time we're
1:04:20going to give the town clerk a minute.
1:04:21You read Yeah, okay. Um at this time we
1:04:24need a majority vote. All those in favor
1:04:27of Article 5, the motion for Article 5,
1:04:29please signify by voting yes. All those
1:04:32opposed, please signify by voting no.
1:04:35Please vote now.
1:04:40>> [snorts]
1:04:50>> 10 seconds remaining.
1:04:55>> [snorts]
1:04:59>> Please stop voting.
1:05:01227 votes in the affirmative and 144 in
1:05:05the against. The motion is adopted.
1:05:09Article six.
1:05:16ARTICLE SIX.
1:05:19TRANSFER to from stabilization funds to
1:05:23see if the town will vote
1:05:25Who am I missing from? Oh, sorry. Sorry.
1:05:27To see if the town will vote to transfer
1:05:29and appropriate a sum of a sum or sums
1:05:32to or from the stabilization funds to
1:05:35take or take any action relative there
1:05:37to thereon. Do I have a motion?
1:05:40>> Mr. Moderator,
1:05:41I move that the town vote to transfer
1:05:43and appropriate the following sums to
1:05:45and from the following accounts and
1:05:47funds. Each such transfer to be
1:05:49considered a separate appropriation.
1:05:52100,000 from free cash to general
1:05:55stabilization fund to fund the
1:05:57stabilization account in accordance with
1:05:59the reserve policy. 50,000 from free
1:06:02cash
1:06:03to the capital stabilization fund to
1:06:05fund the stabilization account in
1:06:06accordance with the reserve policy. 1
1:06:09million from sewer retained earnings to
1:06:11fund future capital projects and 400,000
1:06:15from water retained earnings to fund
1:06:17future capital projects.
1:06:19>> Do I have a second? I do have a second.
1:06:22>> Second.
1:06:23>> May I please have the recommendation of
1:06:25the finance committee?
1:06:26>> Finance committee supports this motion.
1:06:29>> May I have the recommendation of the
1:06:30select board?
1:06:31>> The select board supports this motion.
1:06:35>> Is there anything to be said on this
1:06:36matter?
1:06:42Hearing none, this will require a
1:06:44majority vote. All those in favor,
1:06:45please signify by voting yes. All those
1:06:48opposed, please signify by voting no.
1:06:52>> [snorts]
1:06:59[snorts]
1:07:05>> 10 seconds remaining.
1:07:12>> [snorts]
1:07:18>> Please stop voting.
1:07:20We have recorded 287 votes in the
1:07:22affirmative and 52 votes against. The
1:07:25motion is adopted.
1:07:29Moving along to Article 7,
1:07:32amend general bylaws chapter 110 animal
1:07:35control to see if the town will vote to
1:07:38amend the town of Charlton general
1:07:40bylaws chapter 110 animal control
1:07:44section 110-2
1:07:47the light licenses and tags fees penalty
1:07:51by striking the underlying struck
1:07:53language as shown below
1:07:55additions underlying deletions shown
1:07:58with strike through.
1:08:00And you can the chart is printed in your
1:08:02warrant and I'd ask you to refer to
1:08:04those changes that are listed there.
1:08:08Additionally, G any person 70 years of
1:08:12age or older upon proof of age shall be
1:08:15exempt from the animal fee
1:08:18and you can see the cross out there.
1:08:20The owner of a kennel license age 70
1:08:22years of age or older shall be excluded
1:08:25from this exemption. These exemptions
1:08:27shall take effect upon the town as
1:08:29acceptance of the provision of MGL
1:08:31chapter 140 section 139C reading as
1:08:35follows no fee shall be charged for a
1:08:37license for a dog owned by a person age
1:08:3970 years or over in a city or town that
1:08:42accepts this provision. All other fees
1:08:44and fines and as otherwise provided for
1:08:47for in the animal control bylaws or
1:08:49Massachusetts general laws will apply or
1:08:52take any action relative there to or
1:08:54there on. Do I have a motion?
1:08:56>> Mr. Moderator.
1:08:57>> Point of order.
1:08:58>> Oh.
1:08:58>> The booklet specifies
1:09:01>> Right Dave, just write on your mic
1:09:02there. Sorry.
1:09:03>> booklet specified the booklet specified
1:09:0660 and over. I just want to make sure
1:09:07we're clear
1:09:08>> [music]
1:09:08>> with the people who are here if it's 60
1:09:10or 70.
1:09:11>> Okay, my my What is the booklet? Mine
1:09:13says 70.
1:09:17>> Right, but the chart says 60.
1:09:19>> The chart says 60, yes. So, I'd like
1:09:21clarification from the town
1:09:22administrator.
1:09:25>> Thank you for your question, Joe. Just
1:09:26hold on 1 second. Mr. Singer will get
1:09:28that information.
1:09:29>> Mr. Moderator.
1:09:30>> Go ahead.
1:09:31>> Paragraph G reflects Mass. General Law
1:09:33Chapter 140, Section 139C.
1:09:37The changes reflected that that were
1:09:40pointed out by Mr. Singer are in one
1:09:42110-2E,
1:09:44which reflects a differential between
1:09:46senior center 60 and over,
1:09:49which would be $5 $5 for intact, $0 for
1:09:54Thank you.
1:09:54>> Yes.
1:09:55>> Yeah.
1:09:57Thank you, Mr. Singer. Any
1:10:00I have a I'm looking for a motion.
1:10:05>> Move the town take affirmative action on
1:10:07the motion.
1:10:08>> Do I have a second?
1:10:10>> Second.
1:10:10>> Motion's been made and seconded.
1:10:16Oh, I did did Where You asked after or
1:10:18before?
1:10:19Did I do the recommendations already?
1:10:21>> No.
1:10:21>> No.
1:10:22>> not do it.
1:10:22>> No, we did not. So, that Thank you. No
1:10:24problem.
1:10:25May I have a recommendation of the
1:10:27Finance Committee?
1:10:28>> Finance Committee supports this motion.
1:10:29>> Recommendation of the Select Board.
1:10:31>> The Select Board supports the motion.
1:10:33>> A majority vote is needed. Is there
1:10:35anything to be said on the matter?
1:10:42Seeing none,
1:10:45all those in favor, please signify by
1:10:46voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:10:48signify by voting no.
1:11:05>> [snorts]
1:11:08>> 10 seconds remaining.
1:11:11>> [snorts]
1:11:18>> Please stop voting.
1:11:20We have recorded 301 votes in the
1:11:22affirmative and 41 against. The motion
1:11:25is adopted.
1:11:27Article 8
1:11:29amend general bylaws chapter 155
1:11:32licenses and permits
1:11:34to see if the town will vote to amend
1:11:36the town of Charlton general bylaws
1:11:39chapter 155 licenses and permits
1:11:44section 155
1:11:46dash two, list of delinquent taxpayers,
1:11:50by striking the underlined struck
1:11:51language as shown below.
1:11:54And additions are underlined, deletions
1:11:56are shown with a strike through.
1:11:58List of delinquent taxpayers, the
1:12:00collector shall annually and may
1:12:02periodically, that's that new addition,
1:12:04furnish to each licensing authority a
1:12:07list to all persons who have neglected
1:12:10or refused to pay any local taxes, fees,
1:12:14assessments, betterments, or other
1:12:16municipal charges, removing as you can
1:12:19see the words stricken out.
1:12:22And not
1:12:24and who have not filed in good faith a
1:12:26pending application for an abatement of
1:12:29such tax or pending petition before the
1:12:32appellate tax board or take any action
1:12:35relative thereto or thereon.
1:12:38Do I have a motion?
1:12:41>> Mr. Moderator, I move that the town take
1:12:43affirmative action on Article 8 as
1:12:45printed in the warrant.
1:12:47>> Do I have a second?
1:12:48>> Second.
1:12:49>> I have a motion and a second. May I
1:12:50please have the recommendation of the
1:12:52Finance Committee?
1:12:53>> Mr. Moderator, the Finance Committee
1:12:55supports this motion.
1:12:57>> May I please have a recommendation of
1:12:58the Select Board?
1:12:59>> The Select Board supports this motion.
1:13:01>> Is there anything to be said on the
1:13:03matter?
1:13:07Hearing none, a majority vote will be
1:13:09required.
1:13:10All those in favor, please signify by
1:13:12voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:13:14signify by voting no. Please vote.
1:13:18>> [snorts]
1:13:31>> 10 seconds remaining.
1:13:34>> [snorts]
1:13:42>> Please stop voting.
1:13:43We have recorded 265 affirmative votes
1:13:46and 63 votes against. The motion is
1:13:49adopted.
1:13:53Let's see. Article six.
1:13:56My mistake. I'm in Article nine.
1:14:02>> [clears throat]
1:14:03>> I I you guys are really paying attention
1:14:05and I think that's fantastic. Fantastic.
1:14:09Article nine, accept MGL Chapter 138
1:14:12Section 33B, sales of alcoholic
1:14:15beverages by on-premise licenses on
1:14:18Sundays and certain legal holidays,
1:14:20sales between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon.
1:14:24To see if the town will vote to accept
1:14:26the provisions of Massachusetts General
1:14:28Laws Chapter 138 Section 33B, thereby
1:14:32authorizing the sale of alcoholic
1:14:34beverages by on-premise licensees on
1:14:37Sundays and certain legal holidays
1:14:41between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
1:14:4312:00 noon or take any action relative
1:14:46thereto or thereon.
1:14:48I need Do I have a motion?
1:14:50>> Mr. Moderator, I move that the town take
1:14:52affirmative action on Article 9 as
1:14:54printed in the warrant.
1:14:56>> I need a second. Motion made and
1:14:58seconded.
1:14:59May I please have the recommendation of
1:15:01the select board?
1:15:02>> The select board supports this motion.
1:15:05>> Is there anything to be said on the
1:15:07matter?
1:15:13We will need a majority vote.
1:15:16All those in favor, please signify by
1:15:17voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:15:19signify by voting no.
1:15:21Please vote now.
1:15:35>> [clears throat]
1:15:39>> Uh please stop voting.
1:15:44We have recorded 258 votes in the
1:15:47affirmative and 70 votes against.
1:15:50The motion is adopted.
1:15:56Article 10, acceptance of Ashley Road
1:15:59and Amber Road as public ways.
1:16:01To see if the town will vote to accept
1:16:03as public ways Ashley Road and Amber
1:16:05Road. Said such ways as shown on a plan
1:16:08entitled Road Acceptance Plan, Ashley
1:16:11Road and Amber Road, prepared for and
1:16:14owned by Kenneth Kozlowski by Alpha
1:16:16Omega Engineering Incorporated, civil
1:16:19engineers, land surveyors, environmental
1:16:21consultants, 25 Highland View Drive,
1:16:24Sutton, Massachusetts 01590,
1:16:28to be recorded in the Worcester Registry
1:16:29of Deeds of said plan being on file in
1:16:33the office of the town clerk and
1:16:35planning board together with with and
1:16:38subject to access easements, drainage
1:16:41ways, and other rights as shown on said
1:16:44plan and such easements to accept such
1:16:47deeds of easement or fee for public way
1:16:50purposes and other instruments as the
1:16:52select board shall deem advisable to
1:16:55accomplish such acceptance or take any
1:16:57action relative there to or there on.
1:17:01Do I have a motion?
1:17:02>> Mr. Moderator, I move that the town take
1:17:05affirmative action on Article 10 as
1:17:07printed in the warrant.
1:17:09>> Is there a second?
1:17:11Motion has been made and seconded.
1:17:16What is the recommendation of the select
1:17:17board?
1:17:18>> Mr. Moderator, the select board supports
1:17:20this motion.
1:17:22>> Thank you. Is um is there anything to be
1:17:24said on the matter?
1:17:31Seeing none, this requires a majority
1:17:33vote.
1:17:35All those in favor, please signify by
1:17:36voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:17:39signify by voting no.
1:17:5710 seconds remaining.
1:18:00>> [snorts]
1:18:07>> Please excuse Please stop voting.
1:18:10We have recorded 252 votes in the
1:18:13affirmative and 77 votes against. The
1:18:16motion is adopted.
1:18:22Article 11
1:18:31Amend zoning bylaws, Chapter 200,
1:18:34Section 2, Definitions.
1:18:37Chapter 200-2.1,
1:18:40uses and structures.
1:18:42To see if the town will vote to amend
1:18:44the zoning bylaw, chapter 200, section
1:18:472, definitions, uses and structures by
1:18:50adding the definitions set forth
1:18:52therein, the complete text of which is
1:18:54on file in the offices of the town clerk
1:18:56and the planning board, or take any
1:18:58action relative thereto thereon.
1:19:02I will ask I'm going to ask the chair of
1:19:05the planning board, Patsy, to come
1:19:06forward and just state the motion,
1:19:08please.
1:19:15>> [clears throat]
1:19:15>> I move that the
1:19:17>> Oh,
1:19:18right into it.
1:19:19>> I move that the town take affirmative
1:19:21action on Article 11 as printed in the
1:19:23warrant.
1:19:24>> Is there a second?
1:19:26Second. And Patsy, I'm going to ask I
1:19:28don't Is there anything to be said cuz I
1:19:30don't know Patsy could give a
1:19:31a little overview to cuz I'm not going
1:19:33to read all this. But
1:19:35>> So, we
1:19:36>> Right up to yeah.
1:19:37>> Uh the planning board, we don't have a
1:19:39definition for data center in our zoning
1:19:41bylaws and we added um
1:19:45a generic um description um just so we
1:19:48could have it so we could have some
1:19:49control over the process.
1:19:51>> That's great. Thank you so much. Um
1:19:55At this point um if this Is there
1:19:56anything to be said in the matter?
1:19:58>> Is there a recommendation of the
1:20:00planning board?
1:20:00>> Yeah. Well, yes, thank you.
1:20:03>> Uh the planning board recommends this
1:20:04motion.
1:20:06>> And if there's nothing to be said, we'll
1:20:08move on
1:20:09to vote. All those in favor, please
1:20:11signify by voting yes. All those
1:20:13opposed, please signify by voting no.
1:20:17>> Point of order.
1:20:19>> Yes.
1:20:20>> 2/3.
1:20:20>> Yeah, it does need a 2/3 majority. I
1:20:22apologize. Yes, it's as printed in your
1:20:24warrant. Yep, it does need a 2/3
1:20:26majority to pass.
1:20:29And that's per Massachusetts General
1:20:31Law.
1:20:4510 seconds remaining.
1:20:54Please stop voting.
1:20:58We have recorded 256 votes in the
1:21:00affirmative and 63 votes against. It
1:21:03does reach 2/3 majority. The motion is
1:21:05adopted.
1:21:10Article 12, and again I'll ask our chair
1:21:12of the Planning Board to step forward
1:21:14once I read in a when at your
1:21:15convenience.
1:21:18Article 12 amend zoning bylaws chapter
1:21:20200 section 3 use and intensity
1:21:22regulations section 200-3.2
1:21:26these use regulations schedule to see if
1:21:29the town will vote to amend the zoning
1:21:31bylaw chapter 200 section 3 use and
1:21:34intensity regulations use regulations
1:21:36chapter paragraph B
1:21:39use regulations schedule the complete
1:21:41text of each of which is on file in the
1:21:43offices of the town clerk and the
1:21:45planning board order to take any action
1:21:47relative there to there on and I would
1:21:50ask um
1:21:51Patty to make the motion.
1:21:54>> I move that the town take affirmative
1:21:56action on article 12 as printed in the
1:21:58warrant.
1:21:59>> Second.
1:22:00>> Motion's been made and seconded. What is
1:22:02the recommendation of the Planning
1:22:03Board?
1:22:04>> The plan The Planning Board recommends
1:22:05this motion.
1:22:07>> One great and I don't know if you wanted
1:22:09to say a few words um
1:22:11>> So, this is pretty simple. We're
1:22:13temporarily making um all data centers
1:22:16not allowed in any zoning district in
1:22:18the whole town.
1:22:28>> Thank you for the your help, Patsy, on
1:22:30that.
1:22:31Is there anything to be said on the
1:22:32matter?
1:22:37>> Mr. Moderator, Joe Spiwak, 187 Sunset
1:22:39Drive. What we've just done, if we pass
1:22:42this, is we've told any business that
1:22:43wants to come here and has a data center
1:22:45greater than 2,500 square feet in their
1:22:47home building, they can't come.
1:22:51Be very cautious.
1:22:53There's several banks in Southbridge
1:22:55whose data centers exceed the 2,500
1:22:58square feet. And wouldn't it be nice to
1:22:59be able to woo some of them here? But
1:23:01right now, we're saying, "Sorry,
1:23:04you can't come."
1:23:07Very concerned about that kind of
1:23:09support. And we say it's temporary, but
1:23:12temporary can be a long time.
1:23:14So, I would ask, through you, Mr.
1:23:16Moderator, to the Planning Board,
1:23:18what do we think temporary means?
1:23:19>> Yep, so I could ask the Planning Board
1:23:21to step forward and answer your
1:23:22question.
1:23:24>> [snorts]
1:23:25>> Uh who Yeah, who Thank you. I didn't
1:23:27mean you, Patsy. Anybody. Yeah.
1:23:31>> Can you hear me okay?
1:23:32>> Yep, and if you could identify yourself.
1:23:34>> Fantastic. Dylan Maxfield, uh 8 North
1:23:36Main Street, and I'm the Planning
1:23:38Director here in
1:23:39Uh the idea of this is it's not to be a
1:23:42permanent ban. It is supposed to be a
1:23:45moratorium, and during the moratorium,
1:23:47it prohibits data centers in all zoning
1:23:50districts until the town is actually
1:23:52able to develop a permanent process,
1:23:55which the town could decide at a later
1:23:57date. It may want to ban it, but that's
1:23:58not the intention of this um
1:24:01article before you.
1:24:03And moreover, in this article as well,
1:24:06it still allows for data centers as a
1:24:08subsidiary use. Uh for example, in Town
1:24:10Hall, we have a data center for some of
1:24:13our own um
1:24:15uh internal town processes. It's very
1:24:17common among businesses. It does does
1:24:20ban that use. It simply bans a data
1:24:22center as a primary use temporarily
1:24:25while the time town has time to review
1:24:28its process for permitting.
1:24:31>> All right. Does that answer the
1:24:32question?
1:24:34Now, I'm I'm going to have the gentleman
1:24:35come back if he
1:24:37Go ahead.
1:24:38>> Through you, Mr. Moderator.
1:24:39What happened in the last article is
1:24:41that you allow an ancillary use only
1:24:45only if it's less than 2,500 sq ft.
1:24:51>> And would you like to
1:24:52>> And I'm just telling you right now,
1:24:54having been in this business for 50
1:24:55years,
1:24:56all right, less than 50.
1:24:59Um
1:25:00there's many data centers around right
1:25:01now and and Southbridge is one of them
1:25:04with its 2,500 sq ft is nothing.
1:25:06For a data center, it's a joke. So, if a
1:25:08if a company wants to move in during
1:25:10this moratorium and say, "Hey, I would
1:25:12love to put my place on Route 20. I
1:25:15would love to come to Charlton." You
1:25:17can't permit it and there's no there's
1:25:19no appeal to this.
1:25:21>> Even by the special
1:25:22>> You're blocking You're blocking any
1:25:23development which includes a data
1:25:25center. Just be careful.
1:25:28Now, if you want to go back and look at
1:25:3011 and say, "Maybe we make 2,500 sq
1:25:33I'm I'm sorry, 2,500 sq ft a little bit
1:25:35bigger. Maybe we think about that." But,
1:25:37if you're going to block anything over
1:25:392,500 sq ft,
1:25:41that's a bad idea. I wouldn't support
1:25:42it.
1:25:44>> We had this question for the same voter.
1:25:46>> Is there anything else to be said on the
1:25:48matter?
1:25:49>> Just a point of order.
1:25:51>> If you could identify
1:25:52>> And I'm not sure if this
1:25:53>> If you could identify yourself, please.
1:25:54>> Okay. Dan Prouty, 134 Partridge Hill
1:25:57Road.
1:25:58Um
1:25:59just a question.
1:26:01Uh years ago we had a company come to
1:26:03the town, MCI. When they went broke,
1:26:05Verizon took it over.
1:26:07And that's a that was on my property and
1:26:10I sold them the property
1:26:12behind the industrial park. That's about
1:26:1440,000 sq ft now. Is that considered a
1:26:17data center?
1:26:19>> I would I would need the planning board
1:26:20to answer your question.
1:26:21>> That's what I'm wondering about and and
1:26:23that's the main switch center
1:26:25for air traffic control. They've got a
1:26:28line that comes up the turnpike, a line
1:26:30that up comes and Conrail, then a line
1:26:33that goes down on Northside Road.
1:26:35And um
1:26:37uh
1:26:38I mean, maybe we should take a
1:26:42a little breath back or
1:26:45step back
1:26:46and see if um
1:26:48uh this is even legal to infringe
1:26:53infringe upon a utility company.
1:26:58>> Yep, I'm going to have the planning
1:26:59board chair, Ms. Ridlack, answer.
1:27:02>> Um so, I can answer. Um so, this only
1:27:05gives us until the annual town meeting
1:27:08in the next the next article
1:27:11um if you read the long one, um
1:27:14only gives us till the annual town
1:27:15meeting in 2028 to come up with a better
1:27:18solution, to do the research, to bring
1:27:20in um consultants, lawyers, whatever
1:27:23else we need to make sure that we make
1:27:25the right decision for Chelmsford. We
1:27:26just didn't want something um brought in
1:27:29um that we had no control of. So, this
1:27:31sort of does the same thing sort of like
1:27:33when we do the we did the solar
1:27:34moratorium to um just put on the brakes
1:27:37a little bit so that we we don't rush
1:27:39into this. So, we you know, it very well
1:27:42could
1:27:43fit well in industrial zones. I'm truly
1:27:46not against data centers. Just just said
1:27:49put the brakes on to let us think this
1:27:51through. And again, the next article
1:27:53says that we only have until the annual
1:27:56town meeting 2028 to um come up with uh
1:28:00the
1:28:01what we really want to have permanently
1:28:03in the zoning bylaws.
1:28:06>> Thank you for Thank you for your
1:28:07explanation. Um I I see you. Just give
1:28:10me 1 second.
1:28:22I was just clarifying something for my
1:28:23own knowledge to make sure I had it
1:28:25right. Thank you for your time. Um go
1:28:27ahead and identify yourself.
1:28:28>> Cathy Stanley, 2 Potash Village Road,
1:28:30also town assessor. Want to answer
1:28:32question from Dan regarding
1:28:35um it's actually owned by MCI now. Uh it
1:28:38is
1:28:40we're going to be making some Dylan
1:28:42Planning Board's going to be making some
1:28:43amendments to the next article because I
1:28:45raised this question this morning. It
1:28:47was originally built in 1987. Few people
1:28:50know it's there because you can't see
1:28:51it. It's on Northside Road. It was a
1:28:54fiber optic switching facility.
1:28:56It may be a little bit hybrid now, so we
1:28:59may have you know it's a little bit more
1:29:01probably towards just because technology
1:29:03has advanced.
1:29:05Um and so we want to make sure since MCI
1:29:08is uh one of our top taxpayers in town,
1:29:11that I didn't want anything that we do
1:29:13here tonight to hurt that facility. They
1:29:16did take out a permit a few years ago.
1:29:18We're going to be making some
1:29:19adjustments to the next article to make
1:29:21sure that this preexisting use isn't
1:29:24going to be hurt in the process that
1:29:26we're doing tonight.
1:29:28I hope that answers the question, Dan,
1:29:30that you had.
1:29:31>> Yeah, I I
1:29:32hold on 1 second. Sir sir
1:29:35Mr. Prouty, we can't hear you.
1:29:37>> and building right now. MCI owns
1:29:40>> So
1:29:41yeah, so you've made your comment. Do
1:29:42you have anything further?
1:29:44No, okay. Thank you so much. This Okay.
1:29:48Go ahead.
1:29:51>> 47 James Road
1:29:52>> I'll pick the mic up. Yep.
1:29:55>> 47 James Road, Christopher Merlo. Um if
1:29:59you would like to clarify data centers
1:30:00more besides the given definition you
1:30:03have currently, um
1:30:05could you also specify the current
1:30:07things that are also making up the other
1:30:10things that are making data centers
1:30:12their known given definition that are
1:30:14making the aftermath of what's truly
1:30:18giving their name. Um,
1:30:20the current things like the noise
1:30:23they're emitting, um, just generally
1:30:25anything else besides the current given
1:30:26definition. And also,
1:30:29um, generally in my thought, I think
1:30:312028 is too soon for giving a final
1:30:34credit definition for the goal of this.
1:30:37Um, a lot of this is going too fast, so
1:30:40that is just my suggestion. Um, so if
1:30:42you can come up with a new definition
1:30:44that's more strict and more definitive
1:30:46for what is going on currently, that'd
1:30:47be great. Thank you.
1:30:49>> Okay, so you need a question question
1:30:50answered?
1:30:53Did you have a You wanted the question
1:30:54answered though.
1:30:56Okay.
1:30:59So, go ahead and if you want to answer
1:31:01the first part of his discussion.
1:31:06>> Yeah, the um
1:31:07>> If you could identify yourself again.
1:31:08>> Again, uh, Dylan Maxfield, planning
1:31:10director.
1:31:11Um,
1:31:12again, the the
1:31:14definition for data center was just
1:31:16trying to encap- encapsulate generally
1:31:18what we would consider a data center
1:31:20being,
1:31:21you know, racks of servers, um telecom
1:31:25equipment, that type of use for
1:31:28something like, you know, AI or
1:31:30cryptocurrency, that type of primary use
1:31:32is how we came to the definition of data
1:31:36center. Um My understanding now at this
1:31:40point though, we've already accepted
1:31:41that definition of a data center, so
1:31:43we're just on to the uh
1:31:45>> Yeah, no.
1:31:46>> where it's allowed.
1:31:47>> wanted the clarification, that's all.
1:31:48Thank you. Thank you very much. Um, go
1:31:51ahead, sir. Your turn.
1:31:57>> Do we still have sir? One Applewood
1:31:58Lane. Um I am a cloud engineer
1:32:02and I have worked in co-location
1:32:04facilities. And right now, the issue
1:32:07with data centers is basically hyper
1:32:09scalar scalars who are seeking places to
1:32:12put uh
1:32:14buildings that are going to going to
1:32:15consume massive amounts of resources,
1:32:17more than they have before. Uh so, I
1:32:20think that a temporary pause while we
1:32:24give space to consider how we are going
1:32:26to regulate the
1:32:28resource consumption in our town makes a
1:32:31great deal of sense. I don't think we
1:32:33can fight against it permanently. I
1:32:35don't think we should fight against it
1:32:36permanently, but being able to manage it
1:32:39and decide how we want to deal with it
1:32:40makes a great deal of sense to me uh
1:32:43from the perspective of uh
1:32:45somebody who deals with this every day.
1:32:47>> Thank you. Thank you.
1:32:49Thank you very much, and we'll go on to
1:32:51the next person.
1:32:53Go ahead.
1:32:54>> Scott uh Scott Neary, 12 Yowyn Road. The
1:32:57I like to echo what Mr. Spiwak said. Um
1:33:00I don't think we're worried about
1:33:02stopping the big data centers coming. I
1:33:03think everybody's in this room is
1:33:05probably a majority's for that. The
1:33:07problem is
1:33:08limiting it to scope of 2,500 square
1:33:10feet is going to stop legitimate
1:33:13businesses from coming in here. If that
1:33:14happens,
1:33:16next time this comes to vote for us to
1:33:18fund a school, fund a senior center,
1:33:20something like that, think about the tax
1:33:22money that's not coming in because we
1:33:23did this.
1:33:24>> Yeah, but I understood that was
1:33:25>> said no.
1:33:26>> Thank you. Thank you. And I understood
1:33:27that was the previous article, the
1:33:292,500.
1:33:31Um go ahead.
1:33:32>> Hi, Noreen Smith. I'm at 136 Dresser
1:33:34Hill Road. And I just wanted to clarify
1:33:36we're talking about Article 12, not
1:33:38Article 13 right now.
1:33:40>> Correct.
1:33:40>> Article 13 references an interim
1:33:43prohibition, but Article 12 makes no
1:33:45reference to that. My question is is
1:33:48Article 13 somehow contingent upon the
1:33:50vote on Article 12? Or are they being
1:33:53considered as entirely separate matters
1:33:56where we could vote yes or no, you know,
1:33:59for or against Article 12 and then still
1:34:01have the vote
1:34:03for Article 13?
1:34:04>> That's a great Yeah, go ahead if you
1:34:05want to answer that. Um Patsy or Dylan,
1:34:07whoever.
1:34:14>> I'll do my best to to answer this one
1:34:16because Article 12 does reference what
1:34:19would be Article 13 as section 200-5.23.
1:34:25So, if we were to vote for this section
1:34:27and then vote down Article 13,
1:34:30it would be pointing to a section of the
1:34:32bylaw that wouldn't exist.
1:34:34How that would go over legally, that
1:34:37might be a question for counsel on that
1:34:38one. But, they are separate articles,
1:34:41but they do reference each other. Yes.
1:34:44>> Thank you, and you still have your time.
1:34:46>> And just my final comment then, if we
1:34:49voted down Article 12, we would have the
1:34:51option still to vote for Article 13,
1:34:53allow for an end to a prohibition and
1:34:56give time for the town to consider this
1:34:59further. Is that correct?
1:35:03Do you want legal counsel? Do you want
1:35:05counsel?
1:35:08I'm going to have our town counsel.
1:35:11>> Mr. Moderator,
1:35:12Mr. Moderator, through you, I would
1:35:14agree that if you vote down
1:35:19If you vote down Article 12 and you pass
1:35:23Article 13,
1:35:25there is still a moratorium in
1:35:26existence, and so therefore, the fact
1:35:29that there's a specific provision in 7K
1:35:32that would say
1:35:35a data center is not allowed in any
1:35:37zone, would really not be relevant
1:35:39because there would be a moratorium for
1:35:41all zones.
1:35:45>> Okay.
1:35:46>> Thank you.
1:35:48And that answered your question. Yeah.
1:35:50Very good. Yeah, thank you. And go
1:35:52ahead.
1:35:53>> Good afternoon. Barbara Zaraski, 96 B
1:35:56Baker Pond Road. For the qualification
1:35:58to the planning board, so all the
1:36:00existing businesses
1:36:032,500 square feet and and above, we're
1:36:06going to leave them alone.
1:36:07>> Yeah, so that's the previous article.
1:36:09We're just talking about 12.
1:36:10>> And the part two question is
1:36:13if there is a business coming in say
1:36:15that passes, would you consider the
1:36:18special permitting at all or not?
1:36:22>> Hold on. Yeah, hold on. Yeah, you're
1:36:24welcome. Thank you for the question and
1:36:26planning board or did the planning the
1:36:28town planner want to answer this?
1:36:31Okay, our town planner will answer. Go
1:36:33ahead.
1:36:36>> Yes, correct. If we adopt these articles
1:36:40as they're written, then
1:36:42we would not there would be no special
1:36:44permitting process, no site plan
1:36:46approval process in place to hear a data
1:36:49center
1:36:50while these are all still on the books.
1:36:52So while the moratorium is in effect,
1:36:54just wouldn't be able to accept any
1:36:56application.
1:36:57>> Thank you.
1:36:59>> Thank you for your time. Yes, sir.
1:37:03Hold on.
1:37:04Go No, no, go ahead.
1:37:06>> Bill Borowski, 69 Hackety Road. I'd like
1:37:08to make a motion that we move the
1:37:09question and if you would consider be a
1:37:12voice vote instead.
1:37:16>> Motion's been made and seconded.
1:37:19And I will do a voice vote.
1:37:21All those in favor of moving the
1:37:23question, so again to be clear, we're
1:37:25not voting on Article 12, we're voting
1:37:27to to stop debate and go to 12. So right
1:37:31now the motion is to move the question
1:37:33and it's been seconded. All those in
1:37:34favor signify by saying I.
1:37:39All those opposed signify by saying no.
1:37:43Unanimous.
1:37:46The motion is unanimous.
1:37:49And now we will go back to Article 12,
1:37:52the original motion. Now that's on the
1:37:54table.
1:37:55This will For this to pass, it will
1:37:57require a 2/3 vote needed per Mass.
1:38:01General Law.
1:38:03At this time, you may begin voting. All
1:38:05those in favor, please signify by voting
1:38:07yes. All those opposed, please signify
1:38:10by voting no.
1:38:2310 seconds remaining.
1:38:34Please stop voting.
1:38:36228 in the affirmative and 93 votes
1:38:40against. It does reach 2/3 majority. The
1:38:42motion is adopted.
1:38:46We're moving on to Article 13.
1:38:51And right I'm going to read the article.
1:38:53I know that there's
1:38:55discussion about some amendment, but I
1:38:57want to put this on the floor first.
1:38:59Pardon me.
1:39:02Article 13 amend zoning bylaws chapter
1:39:05200 section 5 special regulations
1:39:10200-5.23
1:39:12data centers to see if the town will
1:39:14vote to amend the zoning bylaw chapter
1:39:17200 section 5 special regulations by
1:39:20adding a new
1:39:23chapter 200 5.23 data centers. The
1:39:26complete text of which is on file in the
1:39:29offices of the town clerk and the
1:39:30planning board or take any action
1:39:33relative thereto or thereon. I'm not
1:39:36going to read everything here. It is
1:39:37printed in your warrant and I'm going to
1:39:40I'll the chair of the planning board to
1:39:41make the motion.
1:39:43>> I move that the town
1:39:45>> Right, right, just a little bit more,
1:39:46Patsy.
1:39:47>> I move that the town takes affirmative
1:39:49action on Article 13
1:39:52as printed in the warrant.
1:39:54>> Second.
1:39:54>> Motion's been made and seconded. What is
1:39:56the recommendation of the planning
1:39:58board?
1:39:59>> The planning board supports this motion.
1:40:01>> Thank you. Is there anything to be said
1:40:03on this matter? Or
1:40:05and right now you're going to start your
1:40:06amendment. Go ahead.
1:40:07>> So,
1:40:08in reviewing the proposed definition of
1:40:10data center, we realize that it may we
1:40:13may have unintentionally captured an
1:40:15existing facility in Charlton, MCI
1:40:18Communications,
1:40:19now associated with Verizon, simply
1:40:22because it it existing operations appear
1:40:25to fall within the broad definitions of
1:40:29a data center.
1:40:30Um this is significant because MCI has
1:40:33historically been one of Charlton's
1:40:35largest taxpayers. The intent of this
1:40:37article is to give the town time to
1:40:40determine how we want to regulate new
1:40:43data centers going forward. I do not
1:40:44believe the intent was to inadvertently
1:40:48um restrict an existing lawful business
1:40:50that has operated in Charlton for many
1:40:52years. Um I want to make an amendment to
1:40:54simply clarify that the temporary
1:40:56prohibition applies to new data centers
1:41:00while any existing facility remains
1:41:02subject to the protections and
1:41:04requirements already provided under
1:41:06Massachusetts zoning law in our existing
1:41:09zoning bylaw.
1:41:12>> Thank you. And to clarify, that's that
1:41:14cross out cuz they don't have this in
1:41:16front of us. Yep, so the under
1:41:19Yeah, you want I have it, but if you
1:41:21want to review the specific area just so
1:41:23we're clear.
1:41:25>> So, under the interim prohibition, we
1:41:28are adding
1:41:29um
1:41:32uh site plan approval or special permit
1:41:35shall be issued for
1:41:37new data center in in um for a new data
1:41:41center in new new data center shall be
1:41:43established. Um we're just taking out um
1:41:47we're just adding the word in new.
1:41:49Um
1:41:50and we're adding at the end of the
1:41:53motion as used in the subsection, a
1:41:55pre-existing data center is one that has
1:41:58lawfully
1:41:59that was lawfully in existence or
1:42:01lawfully begun or for which a building
1:42:04permit or special permit was issued
1:42:07before the first publication of notice
1:42:09of the public hearing on the section.
1:42:12Any other data center is considered a
1:42:14new data is a new data center. Um
1:42:17pre-existing data centers shall be
1:42:19governed by MGL 40A
1:42:21um chapter 6 and 203.4
1:42:25of the zoning bylaw.
1:42:27So, what this does is it just um it
1:42:30excludes um MCI from um
1:42:33be being uh
1:42:35you know,
1:42:37non-conforming.
1:42:39>> Okay. And one one thing, Patsy, just to
1:42:41be clear, you talked about the no new
1:42:43data center shall be established. The
1:42:45words operated or expanded are being
1:42:48removed. Just Correct. Very Okay, just
1:42:51being clear.
1:42:52Um that's the amendment. So, I need a
1:42:54motion to approve the amendment to
1:42:57article 13.
1:42:59>> Make a motion to approve the amendment
1:43:00to article 13.
1:43:02>> Is there a second?
1:43:03>> Second.
1:43:04>> Motion's been made and seconded to
1:43:06approve the amendment. So, we're we're
1:43:08on the amendment right now. Is there
1:43:10anything to be said upon the matter?
1:43:13Yes, go ahead.
1:43:14>> Hi, Keith Albright, 55 Bond Road.
1:43:16Uh question about um so, you're talking
1:43:18about pre-existing versus new
1:43:19construction. Um so, what stops someone
1:43:23from taking a building as large as MCI
1:43:25and retrofitting it to turn it into a
1:43:27data center with all the noise and every
1:43:29all the other issues that can happen?
1:43:31>> I'll get any answer for your question.
1:43:32So, I don't know if town planner or uh
1:43:35town planner will help us assist with
1:43:37that.
1:43:40>> Yes, so that would be Dylan Maxwell,
1:43:42town planner. That would be considered
1:43:44change in use. So, when they would go to
1:43:46apply for any type of building permits,
1:43:48that would be reviewed by the building
1:43:49department that would see it is a change
1:43:51of use, look at the use table, would see
1:43:53that it's in fact a data center, and
1:43:55that is prohibited. So, they wouldn't be
1:43:57able to retrofit that facility. They'd
1:43:59have to be an existing data center, and
1:44:02then they'd be governed by the rules of
1:44:03pre-existing non-conformity.
1:44:05>> Thank you.
1:44:06>> Thank you very much. Thank you, Dylan.
1:44:08Any other Go ahead. Yep. Your Your turn
1:44:10on the right here.
1:44:12>> Dewey Sasser, 1 Applewood Lane, would
1:44:13like to ask the planning
1:44:15board if you had considered a power
1:44:17limitation.
1:44:19Typically
1:44:20>> to go through me.
1:44:21>> Uh sorry. Um
1:44:22typically uh
1:44:25when a new data center is put in that is
1:44:28more than about 5 MW, that can impact
1:44:31local residential power costs.
1:44:34So, I'd like to ask if they had
1:44:35considered that in
1:44:38when they were formulating this article.
1:44:40>> Thank you for the question. I'll ask
1:44:42someone a planning board member.
1:44:46Planning board member, if if you'll just
1:44:47identify yourself.
1:44:48>> Bill Fontaine,
1:44:4919 Pineland Drive, on the planning
1:44:52board.
1:44:53So, these articles in front of town
1:44:56meeting are just to make temporary
1:44:58changes to the bylaws. Uh we will be
1:45:01having extensive meetings,
1:45:03very late meetings to discuss exactly
1:45:06the definitions,
1:45:08power capacity limitations, size
1:45:11limitations, noise limitations, and you
1:45:14are all invited to these meetings when
1:45:16we have them to help us clarify the
1:45:19bylaws that we will rewrite all of
1:45:22these. So, I'm just kind of preempting
1:45:24any of this.
1:45:25We will be rewriting all of these bylaws
1:45:28in the future by the 2028 date.
1:45:32So, before there's a ton of questions
1:45:34about what we will and will not allow
1:45:37for data centers, we understand the
1:45:40concerns. We'd like to hear your
1:45:41concerns also at our planning board
1:45:44meeting. But first, let's just consider
1:45:47the quick amendments to our existing
1:45:50bylaws so that we can get data centers
1:45:53into the record and our bylaws to
1:45:55consider them in a more thoughtful way.
1:45:58Thank Thank you for for all your
1:46:00opinions.
1:46:02>> Thank you. Did Did you Did that answer
1:46:03your question, sir?
1:46:05Cuz you still have time as part of your
1:46:073 minutes.
1:46:08>> Thank you.
1:46:10I was actually thinking more on on
1:46:13the MCI facility that if they chose to
1:46:17increase their facility by say 10 MW,
1:46:20that could impact us and the amendment
1:46:22just passed to this
1:46:25article would allow that. Whereas if
1:46:28they were just doing ordinary
1:46:29improvement of the 1 or 2 MW level, it
1:46:32would not affect us.
1:46:34>> Yeah, and to be clear, where where where
1:46:36the amendment hasn't passed. We're
1:46:37discussing the amendment right now.
1:46:39Yeah, okay. Just to be clear. So, town
1:46:41planner does want wants to say a word.
1:46:43Go ahead.
1:46:48>> So, let me town council correct me on
1:46:50this way I misunderstand pre-existing
1:46:52non-conforming, but um
1:46:55they would be able to make modifications
1:46:56to their facility, but if they were to
1:46:58make you know, very substantial changes,
1:47:01then that would be considered outside of
1:47:03the scope of what pre-existing
1:47:05non-conforming allows, which generally
1:47:07it can't be substantially more
1:47:09detrimental than what the current use
1:47:11allows for. So, if they were say at I
1:47:13don't know, 1 MW or something like that,
1:47:15now they want to go to 10, that would
1:47:17generally be considered substantially
1:47:19more detrimental and wouldn't get that
1:47:21same protection from pre-existing
1:47:23non-conforming use.
1:47:25Uh if that answers the question.
1:47:28>> Yeah, okay. Very good. Thank you. And
1:47:31we're going to go over here. Go ahead,
1:47:32sir.
1:47:32>> Scott Scott Neary again, Yoman Road. I
1:47:34just uh Mr. Moderator, I'd like a
1:47:36clarification. The by all accounts MCI
1:47:38is a great partner of Charlton and what
1:47:41has been mentioned a couple times as one
1:47:43of the biggest taxpayers and we're doing
1:47:44something here to protect them, which I
1:47:46am for. However, I just want to make
1:47:48sure we're I'm clarifying this
1:47:50we're protecting them while saying no to
1:47:53everybody else for 2 years
1:47:56in business. Is that Can you please get
1:47:57that answer? That makes no
1:47:59sense.
1:47:59>> Understand. Yeah, well, get the answer
1:48:00and um town planner or chair of the
1:48:03planning board wants to answer that
1:48:04question, whoever.
1:48:05Go ahead and identify yourself again,
1:48:07please.
1:48:08>> Um Patricia Vidlak, chair of the
1:48:10Charlton Planning Board. Um so, not
1:48:12necessarily 2 years. Um we could go back
1:48:15and work on this for the next 2 months
1:48:16and and be ready for the next town
1:48:18meeting to present our changes. Um most
1:48:21likely we'll form a small um
1:48:24group committee
1:48:25and anybody interested is welcome to
1:48:27apply. So, especially people who have um
1:48:31knowledge and well, we could definitely
1:48:34do it sooner, but um
1:48:36we gave us ourselves enough time to make
1:48:38sure that we made the the right decision
1:48:41for the town.
1:48:43>> Thank you for answering that. Does that
1:48:44answer your question? Yes.
1:48:46Okay, great. Thank you.
1:48:48Go ahead and identify yourself, please.
1:48:50>> Hi, Jessica Wilson, 3610 Schoolhouse
1:48:52Road. Um I just wanted to first say
1:48:54thank you to the Planning Board for
1:48:55taking the time to research this as
1:48:57thoroughly as you're planning to. Um I
1:48:59was wondering two questions if um it
1:49:02would also be um studied about how it
1:49:05could the data centers can impact
1:49:06wildlands and farmland in our town. And
1:49:08then also once the study is completed,
1:49:10if it would be published for the town to
1:49:12also read.
1:49:14Thank you.
1:49:14>> Yeah.
1:49:18See, it's easy when you answer yes. All
1:49:19of
1:49:19>> is considered when we um
1:49:22change any zoning.
1:49:24>> Great. Thank you very much. Is there
1:49:26anything else to be said on the matter?
1:49:28Again, on the amendment.
1:49:31All right, hearing none, we are going to
1:49:33move forward on a vote on the amendment
1:49:35as discussed.
1:49:37We do require a majority vote for the
1:49:40amendment.
1:49:42All those in favor, please signify by
1:49:44voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:49:46signify by voting no.
1:50:0610 seconds remaining.
1:50:15Please stop voting.
1:50:18We have recorded 294
1:50:20votes in the affirmative, 29 in against.
1:50:23The motion is adopted. Now, we're going
1:50:26to return back to um Oh, we have a
1:50:29second amendment. We have a Yes, yes,
1:50:31thank you. So, we have a second
1:50:33amendment before we vote on Article 13.
1:50:37But, it's been amended already from the
1:50:39first motion. So, we're going to go to
1:50:41the second, and I turn to the town
1:50:42planner, Dylan.
1:50:45>> Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Um
1:50:47so, when putting this together,
1:50:49um
1:50:50the idea was to have this expire at 2028
1:50:55annual town meeting. If no action was
1:50:57taken, it's
1:50:58the moratorium. We specify when the
1:51:00planning board needs to have its results
1:51:02by, but one mistake on my part is I
1:51:05didn't make it,
1:51:07you know, crystal clear what happens at
1:51:10that point if no action is taken. So, I
1:51:12wanted to have an amendment here that
1:51:14reflects the point of this moratorium,
1:51:18which would be in section E, um duration
1:51:22and supersession. That would all stay
1:51:25exactly the same. There would just be a
1:51:27line added to the end of that that would
1:51:29read, "If at or before the 2028 annual
1:51:32town meeting, town meeting has not
1:51:33adopted an amendment to the zoning bylaw
1:51:36that regulates data centers or extends
1:51:38the duration of this section, then upon
1:51:40dissolution of the 2028 town annual town
1:51:43meeting, this section 200-5.23,
1:51:47the definition of data center in section
1:51:50200-2.1,
1:51:52and section 200-3.2b,
1:51:56uh 7k shall be repealed and no further
1:51:59forth of of effect without further
1:52:02action of the town meeting." Uh so
1:52:04again, just to kind of summarize that.
1:52:08My understanding is that
1:52:10this is what happens if we don't act,
1:52:13but this really clarifies that, so that
1:52:15way if we come to that town meeting, no
1:52:18action is taken, that there aren't any
1:52:20kind of hanging legal questions. It's
1:52:22very specific what happens, and then it
1:52:24gives us the town, you know, the real
1:52:26incentive to actually uh address these
1:52:29issues in a timely manner.
1:52:32>> Thank you. And I'd ask um um the chair,
1:52:36someone at the planning board to make
1:52:37the
1:52:37>> Motion to accept the amendment as uh
1:52:40stated by our planner.
1:52:41>> Is there a second?
1:52:42>> Second.
1:52:43>> Motion been made and seconded to accept
1:52:45uh to to amend the uh article 13 with
1:52:48the statements that were read. Is there
1:52:51um any um
1:52:54if anything to be said on that, the
1:52:56amendment?
1:53:03Okay. Hearing none,
1:53:05we will move to a vote. Again, we're on
1:53:07an amendment. It's the second amendment
1:53:09to Article 13. This requires a majority
1:53:12vote.
1:53:14All those in favor, please signify by
1:53:16voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:53:18signify by voting no.
1:53:3010 seconds remaining.
1:53:42Please stop voting.
1:53:45We have recorded 286 votes in the
1:53:48affirmative and 26 against. The The
1:53:52motion is adopted.
1:53:54So, now we're going to go back to
1:53:56Article 13 with the two amendments
1:53:59passing. So, the
1:54:01The motion has been updated for Article
1:54:0313. That is on the floor right now. Is
1:54:07there anything further to be said on
1:54:09Article 13 with the amendments?
1:54:15Hearing none.
1:54:16All those in favor, please signify by
1:54:19voting yes. All those opposed, please
1:54:21signify by voting no.
1:54:28>> [snorts]
1:54:38>> 10 seconds remaining.
1:54:46Please stop voting.
1:54:49We have recorded 279 votes in the
1:54:52affirmative, 35 votes against. That does
1:54:55reach 2/3 majority. The motion is
1:54:58adopted.
1:55:01We're going to move to Article 14, text
1:55:03but I think I've asked um
1:55:07a Mr. Bernard Gauthier to step forward
1:55:09to um to make the motion on this
1:55:11particular article.
1:55:16And I
1:55:17remind me you're a Charlton voter.
1:55:20>> No.
1:55:20>> Okay, so then I you we didn't get that
1:55:22clear. So, you'll have to have a seat.
1:55:24>> Okay.
1:55:25>> Sorry.
1:55:25>> That's okay.
1:55:27>> I know when I talked to you on the
1:55:28phone, I had thought that you were. So,
1:55:30that's fine. So, for Article 14, zoning
1:55:33map amendment, change 269 Worcester Road
1:55:37to see if the town will change the
1:55:39zoning designation of the property
1:55:41located at 269, previously 293A
1:55:45Worcester Road, Worcester Road,
1:55:47Charlton, Mass, identified as parcel
1:55:5036-B,
1:55:512.5, consisting of approximately 15 yd,
1:55:55plus or minus, from its current
1:55:59I'm sorry, 15 Do you guys are still
1:56:01paying attention? I love it. 15 acres,
1:56:04plus or minus, from its current zoning
1:56:06district of business enterprise park to
1:56:09community business. The proposed
1:56:11amendment shall be depicted on the
1:56:13zoning map attached hereto and
1:56:15incorporated herein by reference or take
1:56:18any action relative thereto or thereon.
1:56:21And I would ask our chair of the
1:56:22planning board to make the motion.
1:56:25>> I move that the town take affirmative
1:56:27action on Article 14 as printed in the
1:56:29warrant.
1:56:31>> Second.
1:56:32>> Motion's been made Thank you. Motion's
1:56:33been made and seconded.
1:56:37May I have the recommendation of the
1:56:38planning board?
1:56:39>> The planning board supports supports
1:56:41this motion.
1:56:42>> Is there anything to be said on this
1:56:44matter?
1:56:53>> [snorts]
1:56:53>> Go ahead.
1:56:54>> Josh Sabourin
1:56:56Josh Sabourin, 97 Blood Road. Can the
1:56:59owner of the property speak to why he's
1:57:01looking for the change and what he
1:57:02intends to do with the property
1:57:03thereafter?
1:57:04>> I'll second that motion.
1:57:06>> Oh, that's it. You came up for. Perfect.
1:57:08Thank you. And um we need a motion. So,
1:57:11we have a motion and a second to allow
1:57:12the property owner who's a
1:57:13non-registered voter in the town to
1:57:15speak. That requires town meeting
1:57:17approval to do so. So, I need um I'm
1:57:20going to do a voice vote. All those in
1:57:22favor to allow the owner of the property
1:57:24who is a non-registered voter to speak,
1:57:26please signify by saying "I".
1:57:28>> I.
1:57:29>> Those opposed, signify by saying "No".
1:57:32It's unanimous.
1:57:34Mr. Mr. um Gautier, I'd ask you to come
1:57:36forward and and speak a little about the
1:57:38property.
1:57:39>> Uh the property is uh located over
1:57:41behind um ADT, which is an auto mechanic
1:57:45uh facility on the corner of Carol Hill
1:57:47Road.
1:57:49Um this 15 acres
1:57:52uh is in the vicinity where the town
1:57:53itself has converted some land along
1:57:56Route 20 to community business.
1:57:58The reason for doing community business
1:58:00was it allows more opportunities for
1:58:03um
1:58:05uh services for the townspeople
1:58:07and not just an industrial site.
1:58:09So, that's what I was looking to do. Um
1:58:12as far as in exactly what kind of
1:58:15businesses would operate in there
1:58:17would um be determined by the
1:58:19performance study that would be
1:58:20performed
1:58:22once we know that we can do this.
1:58:24And then
1:58:25the planning board has to approve all of
1:58:28this in the in the future. I can't just
1:58:30go build whatever I want. Um but I want
1:58:33to do something that's more for the
1:58:34people.
1:58:35Um what I've been hearing is there's no
1:58:38small grocery stores. There's no
1:58:41um there's no finer restaurants in town.
1:58:44Um those are a couple of the things that
1:58:46we were looking at.
1:58:49>> Thank you. I would remain available.
1:58:51>> Oh, you I
1:58:53>> [laughter]
1:58:55>> Is there Is there to be anything said on
1:58:58this matter?
1:59:00See, I told you.
1:59:01>> Okay.
1:59:03>> Go ahead.
1:59:04>> Just Buick 187 Sunset Drive. So, this is
1:59:07actually
1:59:08nothing, the property owner, but for the
1:59:10the planning board
1:59:12>> Please.
1:59:12>> uh through you, Mr. Moderator. We've
1:59:14spent a lot of years in town not going
1:59:16for spot zoning, right? And trying to
1:59:17make things more contiguous and and and
1:59:20more kind of cohesive. And this looks
1:59:23like we're going back to spot zoning
1:59:24here. So, my simple question would be
1:59:27what is allowed in CB that's not and I
1:59:30guess this might be a very technical and
1:59:31long question. I'm not really looking
1:59:33just for the highlights here, but what's
1:59:35allowed in CB that's not allowed in BEP?
1:59:38>> Yep, and I'll I'll have the planning
1:59:39board members answer it or
1:59:42town our town planner will answer that
1:59:44question. Go ahead.
1:59:49>> Yeah, I know uh I don't have the whole
1:59:51zoning table in front of me, so I won't
1:59:52go through all of the uses, but I know
1:59:54in some preliminary conversations I've
1:59:56had with the property owner, one of the
1:59:58uses that he was considering would be uh
2:00:00residential, which wouldn't be allowed
2:00:03in
2:00:04um the business enterprise park. Um and
2:00:07I think yeah, restaurant as well was
2:00:09another use that was considered that
2:00:11would have been more suited to the
2:00:13community business. So, generally uh
2:00:17kind of the lower scale uh businesses
2:00:20uh lower impact is what would be
2:00:22allowable in community business. Um
2:00:25or generally something like heavy
2:00:26industrial even light industrial is is
2:00:28more suited towards
2:00:30business enterprise park, which is
2:00:31something that the property owner was
2:00:33not looking to do uh in my conversations
2:00:35with them prior to this coming for the
2:00:37planning board.
2:00:39>> Does Does that answer your question?
2:00:41Yes. Oh.
2:00:43>> Sorry, and just also answer the spot
2:00:45zoning question as we reviewed this as
2:00:46well where community business was
2:00:49um across the street and generally as
2:00:51you look along Route 20, you'll see
2:00:55business enterprise and community
2:00:57business kind of interspersed
2:00:59throughout. Um So, as we reviewed this,
2:01:02a change along Route 20 from business
2:01:05enterprise to community business didn't
2:01:08appear to us as spot zoning and I
2:01:09believe our our legal counsel didn't um
2:01:12find this to be spot zoning, either.
2:01:19>> Thank you for answering that and um I
2:01:22There's a diagram in the packet if you
2:01:24people got to the turn the pages about
2:01:27this article just to be clear that it is
2:01:29in the in the uh warrant booklet.
2:01:33Is there anything else to be said on the
2:01:35matter?
2:01:37You may have a seat. Thank you.
2:01:40If nothing to be said,
2:01:44at this um for this article, we need 2/3
2:01:47majority for this to pass per Mass.
2:01:49General Law.
2:01:52All those in favor, please signify by
2:01:54voting yes. All those opposed, please
2:01:56signify by voting no. Please vote now.
2:02:1210 seconds remaining.
2:02:20Please stop voting.
2:02:22We have recorded 260 votes in the
2:02:24affirmative, 56 votes against. It does
2:02:28reach 2/3 majority. The motion is
2:02:31adopted.
2:02:34>> [clears throat]
2:02:36[snorts]
2:02:36>> Article 15.
2:02:38Citizen's petition, automated license
2:02:41plate reader surveillance
2:02:44to see if the town will vote to adopt a
2:02:46non-binding resolution expressing the
2:02:49sense of town meeting that the select
2:02:51board should one suspend and deactivate
2:02:55the town's use of Flock Safety automated
2:02:57license plate reader cameras and
2:03:00and any substantially similar networked
2:03:02automated license plate reader system.
2:03:05Two, terminate or decline to renew
2:03:08associated contracts to the extent
2:03:10legally permissible.
2:03:12Three, authorize no expansion or
2:03:15additional acquisition of such systems
2:03:17and approve no further expenditures for
2:03:19their operation, maintenance, renewal,
2:03:22expansion, or replacement except for
2:03:25costs legally required to wind down
2:03:27existing operations.
2:03:29Four, require after satisfaction of
2:03:31applicable legal preservation
2:03:33requirements, the deletion of Charlton
2:03:35data retained by the vendor.
2:03:38And five, conduct a publicly noticed
2:03:41review before considering any future use
2:03:43of automated license plate reader
2:03:45technology or take any action relative
2:03:49thereto thereon.
2:03:51I'm going to ask the petitioner,
2:03:53Michelle Chalmers, to step forward
2:03:55to make the motion.
2:03:58>> [clears throat]
2:03:59>> And identify yourself, please.
2:04:00>> Michelle Chalmers, 46 Prindle Hill Road.
2:04:04I move that the town take affirmative
2:04:06action on Article 15 in the warrant as
2:04:09printed.
2:04:10>> Is there a second?
2:04:12Motion's been made and seconded.
2:04:15Is there anything to be said on the
2:04:16matter? Oh, and that that the town Did
2:04:18you want to start the first Yep, go
2:04:20ahead. The first Go ahead.
2:04:21>> That would be great. Yep.
2:04:22Uh
2:04:23good evening, everyone. Best for last.
2:04:26I'm speaking tonight about Article 15
2:04:29and why residents brought this citizens
2:04:32petition forward.
2:04:34In In
2:04:36Charlton installed four Flock
2:04:38surveillance cameras.
2:04:40The decisions about the technology, the
2:04:43vendor, and camera placement were made
2:04:46administratively.
2:04:48The selective board or the select board
2:04:50approved the use of town property.
2:04:53But the community never had a meaningful
2:04:55opportunity to understand or weigh in on
2:04:58what this technology actually does.
2:05:01For 2 years, these cameras have been
2:05:03recording license plates, vehicles, and
2:05:06their movements through our town.
2:05:09And what have we learned since?
2:05:11Our police department told us that more
2:05:13than 1,100 municipalities had access to
2:05:16Charlton's camera data.
2:05:19The police also told us that the FBI had
2:05:21requested access.
2:05:23Meanwhile, more than 40 Massachusetts
2:05:25communities, including many of our
2:05:28neighbors, have rejected, suspended, or
2:05:31discontinued Flock programs and other
2:05:34license plate readers.
2:05:36Why are so many communities
2:05:38reconsidering this technology? And what
2:05:41can Charlton learn from them?
2:05:43Because these aren't simply four cameras
2:05:46protecting our town,
2:05:48they're part of a growing interconnected
2:05:50surveillance network across America.
2:05:54And that raises a much larger question.
2:05:57Why are we building the infrastructure
2:05:59to track the movements of Americans who
2:06:02haven't committed a crime?
2:06:04Who controls that information? Who can
2:06:07access it?
2:06:08And who will control it 2, 5, 10 years
2:06:12from now?
2:06:13This isn't about opposing our police.
2:06:17It's about [clears throat] understanding
2:06:18the power of this technology and
2:06:20protecting our constitutional
2:06:23freedoms.
2:06:25We know more today than we did in 2024,
2:06:28and that's why this citizens petition
2:06:31matters.
2:06:32Tonight's vote may be non-binding, but
2:06:35it gives residents a chance to express
2:06:37their informed judgment.
2:06:40I ask the select board to listen
2:06:42carefully to what residents say tonight
2:06:45and take those concerns seriously.
2:06:48We can support public safety without
2:06:51surrendering our privacy, and decisions
2:06:54affecting our freedoms deserve
2:06:56transparency, accountability, and a
2:06:59voice from the people. Thank you.
2:07:10>> Go ahead.
2:07:11>> He's your first.
2:07:13>> I'm having gone I've been alternating.
2:07:14Go ahead.
2:07:15>> Great.
2:07:15>> Uh
2:07:16Good evening. Cutter Beck, 46 Gould
2:07:18Road, where I live approximately 1 mile
2:07:20from the Flock camera on the corner of
2:07:22Northside Road and Stafford Street. For
2:07:25those of you unfamiliar with the area,
2:07:26this street corner is home to a
2:07:28revolutionary era militia training
2:07:30field, and across the street is the
2:07:32historic Rider Tavern. This field was
2:07:34used by the citizens of Charlton to
2:07:36train against oppressive British rule.
2:07:38Now, the start of a very capable
2:07:39surveillance system sits at the same
2:07:41crossroads used by those brave citizens
2:07:43before us.
2:07:44This is only one of four cameras in town
2:07:46with four more possible
2:07:48unless we take this chance to vote on
2:07:50this resolution and open a dialogue on
2:07:52how much surveillance power we want our
2:07:54town to possess. I'm speaking you to you
2:07:56tonight not just as a neighbor, but as
2:07:58someone trained to understand these
2:07:59systems. I hold degrees in computer
2:08:01science, astrophysics, and German
2:08:03studies from WPI. My studies have taken
2:08:05me from the mechanics of AI to the
2:08:07history of how surveillance is used by
2:08:09state powers to extend reach over
2:08:10ordinary citizens. I'm a staunch
2:08:12constitutionalist who values privacy,
2:08:14the will of the people, and the
2:08:16long-term success of our town. I'm
2:08:18worried that the capabilities of the
2:08:20about the capabilities of the ecosystem
2:08:22Flock sells to customers like the
2:08:23Charlton Police Department.
2:08:25To the credit of the Police Department,
2:08:27I appreciate the multiple hours of
2:08:28extensive transparent dialogue I've had
2:08:31about how they currently use these
2:08:32cameras and the benefit it has provided
2:08:34the department. They have, however,
2:08:36expressed that they do not want too much
2:08:37overreach and Big Brother style powers
2:08:39in town that the Flock network can
2:08:41provide. I fear that utilizing even the
2:08:43most basic capabilities of this system
2:08:45opens the door to the future use of the
2:08:47Big Brother powers that the department
2:08:49currently denounces. Leadership in the
2:08:51police department will change at some
2:08:52point and I want to ensure that further
2:08:54surveillance is not brought into play in
2:08:56the future.
2:08:57While our town uses the current camera's
2:08:59still images only for license plate
2:09:01reading, car description searches, and
2:09:02traffic studies, other capabilities
2:09:04Flock sells are able to record video,
2:09:07search for people based on descriptions,
2:09:08detect sounds, and launch drones for
2:09:10investigation before police arrive at a
2:09:12scene. The cameras are not just like a
2:09:14person sitting in the same spot taking
2:09:16pictures of cars that pass by. They form
2:09:18a network around the country aggregating
2:09:20these images and videos for use by
2:09:22departments that share data with each
2:09:23other. Your cell phone images are not
2:09:25combined with over 120,000 other
2:09:27individuals to create an AI searchable
2:09:29network, but the Flock system does.
2:09:32Our department shares and approves
2:09:33searches from over 1,100 other police
2:09:35departments and they have the ability to
2:09:37search thousands of other departments'
2:09:39imagery in connection with crimes and
2:09:40other needs. While our department has
2:09:42expressed good intentions and safeguards
2:09:43thus far, I would be remiss to mention
2:09:45the numerous occurrences of misuse of
2:09:47the system throughout the country
2:09:49leading to the firing of officers due to
2:09:50stalking and following of intimate
2:09:52partners. There are audits in place to
2:09:54detect misuse of the Flock cameras the
2:09:55town has access to, but I would rather
2:09:57that not be even be a possibility in our
2:09:59town.
2:10:00Furthermore, ALPR networks are a massive
2:10:02technical and security risk for the
2:10:04town. Over the last year and a half,
2:10:05countless vulnerabilities in the Flock
2:10:07system have been publicly disclosed.
2:10:09More importantly, in sworn
2:10:11testimony to US Congress on September
2:10:1323rd, security researchers spoke of
2:10:15Flock cameras streaming with
2:10:16unauthorized access on the internet,
2:10:18easy breaches of the physical Flock
2:10:19cameras,
2:10:20>> your sentence, please?
2:10:21>> with granular invasion of privacy with
2:10:23cameras on a person's physical phone
2:10:24screen.
2:10:26>> Thank you.
2:10:26>> Thank you for your TIME THIS EVENING.
2:10:29>> [applause]
2:10:35>> GO AHEAD.
2:10:36IDENTIFY YOURSELF.
2:10:37>> YEP. HELLO, Christopher Merlo, 47 James
2:10:40Road. I was also liking to add on to a
2:10:43statement. Besides automatic license
2:10:45plate readers, there are other things
2:10:47similar in the system. They are also
2:10:50working in the same manner, like he said
2:10:52as well.
2:10:53Um drones and other similar things
2:10:56dedicated that are also directed to our
2:10:58technological devices. What people also
2:11:00don't realize as well that even though
2:11:03Flock is also the main subject of today,
2:11:06people can also, um
2:11:08you know, think for themselves. And
2:11:10also, there's ways to minimalize that
2:11:14vulnerability in your daily life as well
2:11:17without just relying on the playing
2:11:19board. So, there's other ways to do it
2:11:22without just going to the going to, um
2:11:25the town here today. But besides that,
2:11:27that's just another point. So, my point
2:11:29is there's other big things besides
2:11:32Flock, like drones and other things. And
2:11:34Flock is one of the major
2:11:36major other reasons that, um
2:11:40that the system is
2:11:43Yeah. Sorry, I I can't think of
2:11:44anything, but you get my point.
2:11:46>> Thank you for your comments.
2:11:49This side.
2:11:51Go ahead.
2:11:54>> Shay Matthews, 26 number 10 Schoolhouse
2:11:57Road. Sorry, I need a little more
2:11:58height.
2:12:01>> No problem.
2:12:01>> It's, uh, it's perhaps a bit of an
2:12:03overstatement to say it, but it's, uh,
2:12:05seems reasonable on a reflection of the
2:12:07evidence specifically presented before
2:12:08Senate before the Senate
2:12:10by security researcher Ben Jordan and
2:12:13other sheriffs and other testimony that,
2:12:16uh, we have already had and as in
2:12:18citizens arrested for stays for at least
2:12:2113 days as a result of placing a red
2:12:24Ford Bronco at at the position of an
2:12:26accident of a black Ford Bronco. And as
2:12:29a result of a lack of rigor, a lack of
2:12:31inquisitiveness, a lack of caution, a
2:12:33lack of curiosity by the involved law
2:12:35enforcement officials,
2:12:37a citizen, completely innocent, willing
2:12:39to offer testimony, offer evidence,
2:12:40offer receipts, and offer GPS history
2:12:43that it was not her at the accident was
2:12:45nonetheless incarcerated for at least 14
2:12:48days. Further, there is strong evidence
2:12:51that Flock does not work in good faith
2:12:52in participation or in partnership with
2:12:54the communities that it works with.
2:12:56After communities including colleges in
2:12:58Chicago have terminated their contracts
2:13:01with Flock, Flock has declined or
2:13:03has as of now not yet collected the
2:13:07recorders installed that they are now
2:13:10trespassing to collect information.
2:13:12Excuse me. And in addition,
2:13:14in addition to the 30-day retention cap,
2:13:17a logged case number should be included
2:13:19for each search. Already the awesome
2:13:21weight of this degree of surveillance is
2:13:23being shown to be used respons-
2:13:25irresponsibly with search justifications
2:13:28including things like LOL, LMAO, just
2:13:31finding my ex are all documented in
2:13:34evidence with timestamps and with
2:13:36corroboration from the community
2:13:38searched as a result of those efforts.
2:13:40We need to consider carefully whether
2:13:43and how we allow the surveillance state
2:13:45to continue to grow. I would encourage
2:13:47this august body and my fellow citizens
2:13:49to reflect on Lord Blackwell's
2:13:51formulation that it be better that the
2:13:54very bedrock that we inherited in our
2:13:56common law tradition here in the United
2:13:58States as we celebrate our 250 years,
2:14:00that it is better that 10 guilty go free
2:14:02than one innocent suffer.
2:14:04It is incumbent that we allow for
2:14:07innocence to be defended far more than
2:14:09it is important that we punish the
2:14:11guilty, that we know righteously and
2:14:14correctly that we not pursue everyone,
2:14:17but protect those who are innocent in
2:14:19fact and indeed. Thank you for your
2:14:20consideration, my fellow citizens.
2:14:26>> [applause]
2:14:31>> PETER COOPER JR., 194 BERRY Corner Road.
2:14:34Um, it can be
2:14:36a little tough in this era to understand
2:14:38exactly how much what tools, what powers
2:14:41we want to give the police. They're
2:14:42they're an important part of our
2:14:44community. They help keep us safe. It's
2:14:46good that they have some level of tools
2:14:49and ability to do that. And so, trying
2:14:52to figure out where that line is, I'm
2:14:54not really sure. Like, obviously a
2:14:56police officer sitting on a corner
2:14:58looking for a particular car going by,
2:15:00that's their job. That makes sense. You
2:15:03put a camera there, well, then it can
2:15:05look for every car that goes by.
2:15:07Um, but then it's tracking every single
2:15:10car that goes by, every single time, and
2:15:13not just license plates, but which
2:15:15bumper stickers it has, which color it
2:15:17is, all those details
2:15:19get logged and stored. And then you
2:15:20start putting those everywhere in town,
2:15:23and suddenly, as has just been said,
2:15:26you have a surveillance state where
2:15:28every move of everybody is tracked. And
2:15:30so, I don't know where the line is
2:15:32between that and a police officer can
2:15:35stand on a corner look at it, but this
2:15:37is definitely Well, we have now is past
2:15:39that line.
2:15:40And so, because I think that
2:15:44wanting a little privacy is not a crime,
2:15:46I would encourage people to support this
2:15:48measure. Thank you.
2:15:51>> [applause]
2:15:56>> Please go ahead.
2:15:57>> Jerry Sasser, 1 Applewood Lane. Uh,
2:15:59others have spoken to the civil
2:16:00liberties aspects, and I think that's
2:16:02very valuable, but I'm going to offer
2:16:05for additional information.
2:16:06Uh, a um, recent study by the Roseville,
2:16:10California police found a 71% error rate
2:16:14in stolen vehicle reports from Flock
2:16:16cameras.
2:16:17Um, this was uh, misreads on license
2:16:19plates where it would interpret an eight
2:16:21as a nine or something like that.
2:16:23Uh, a similar study, um, on a shorter
2:16:26time frame by the LAPD Inspector General
2:16:29Audit, uh, found approximately a 32%
2:16:32error rate in alerts. These were plates
2:16:34that were correctly read but produced an
2:16:37incorrect stolen vehicle alert as well.
2:16:39Uh, so from my perspective, uh, Flock,
2:16:42um,
2:16:43aside from the civil liberties issue,
2:16:44simply has far too high an error rate to
2:16:47be trusted.
2:16:49Thank you.
2:16:50>> [applause]
2:16:54>> Go ahead.
2:16:55>> Gwen Powell, uh, 235 Brillington Road.
2:16:58Uh, I want to thank everybody who's come
2:17:00with data and such like prepared
2:17:03statements. It's very, very clear that
2:17:05everyone is very passionate about our
2:17:07privacy, but also about the police force
2:17:11and how that power ends up being used. I
2:17:13would say that
2:17:15our expressions, at least in my opinion,
2:17:17this is not an anti-police, uh,
2:17:20sentiment. This is not an anti-authority
2:17:22sentiment. This is a sentiment for our
2:17:24rights, uh, to privacy and, uh, for our
2:17:28constitutional rights.
2:17:29Uh, so thank you, everybody.
2:17:32>> [applause]
2:17:33>> Uh,
2:17:34>> Robert Coleman, 25 West Applewood Drive.
2:17:37I just think another side of the
2:17:39conversation that, uh, seems to be
2:17:40missed it's
2:17:42some people have, uh,
2:17:44conceded that this is being run by local
2:17:46police, not some unaccountable
2:17:48bureaucracy thousands of miles away, and
2:17:50that these are not some crazy people or
2:17:54even people who don't know who we are.
2:17:56We elect the select board that is
2:17:58responsible for appointing these people.
2:18:01This is
2:18:02it's accountable, and other people have
2:18:05suggested that this could be part of
2:18:06some sort of runaway surveillance state,
2:18:09but the trend is in the opposite
2:18:10direction.
2:18:11Error rates are going to go down as the
2:18:13technology gets better. Accountability
2:18:16is going to increase, not only as
2:18:18individual stories highlight the reason
2:18:20for reform, but as Flock itself,
2:18:23certainly not happy about the bad PR,
2:18:25has every incentive to make a system
2:18:27that catches these things early. The
2:18:29reason we know about many of these
2:18:30abuses is because Flock found them.
2:18:33And so, to throw the baby out with the
2:18:35bathwater and
2:18:36stop a system that can catch a car
2:18:38thief, it can
2:18:41keep us at least somewhat safer, seems
2:18:43to be an unreasonable of a reaction. If
2:18:47we want to regulate the systems to make
2:18:49them more secure, we can make
2:18:50requirements that they take security
2:18:53measures, so that they can't be hacked.
2:18:55I certainly don't want them to be
2:18:55hacked. If we want a system that
2:18:58prevents people from being falsely
2:19:00pulled over, I and even detained, which
2:19:04I certainly agree with, we can simply
2:19:06have a higher standard of proof
2:19:08for pulling somebody over.
2:19:10And these are problems that can be
2:19:12solved without giving up the benefits.
2:19:14And uh
2:19:16if the recommendation of this vote were
2:19:19to be implemented, we would be throwing
2:19:21the baby out with the bathwater. And uh
2:19:23I think that a nuanced and effective
2:19:25policy is better than a uh
2:19:29overreaction, even if it's responding to
2:19:32real issues. We can work on them better
2:19:35than this.
2:19:36That's my view.
2:19:38>> Thank you for your um comment.
2:19:41And I'm going to continue here cuz
2:19:43they've been here for us to go ahead.
2:19:48>> Hi.
2:19:49>> [clears throat]
2:19:49>> Liz LaFrance, 13 Stafford Street.
2:19:51>> Thank you.
2:19:52>> Um I'm just saying today that I was
2:19:55never informed these were going to go
2:19:56in, and my house happens to be one that
2:19:58is on camera all day long, 24/7.
2:20:02These license These things capture
2:20:04license plates at approximately six to
2:20:0710
2:20:08um
2:20:09photos per second.
2:20:11That's great, except when you have a
2:20:13constant stream of cars and all the
2:20:15people that live around there being
2:20:16photographed 24/7. You can't go outside.
2:20:19You can't be in your front yard. You
2:20:21can't mow your lawn without being on
2:20:23camera.
2:20:26So, I hear about the Flock, the error
2:20:28rates.
2:20:30Yes, it's possible those error rates are
2:20:31going to go down.
2:20:33Are we finding them because Flock looked
2:20:35for them, or we finding them because we
2:20:36looked for them?
2:20:38Secondly, those will go down, but does
2:20:40our security go up?
2:20:42Anybody get a notification that their
2:20:44credit card was hacked?
2:20:46Hackers are not going to stop, and this
2:20:48data is valuable.
2:20:50Please get rid of the Flock cameras.
2:20:51THANK YOU.
2:20:55>> [applause]
2:20:58>> GO AHEAD.
2:21:00>> LEE, CAN YOU HEAR ME? HELLO. LEE
2:21:02FORGIONE, 20 Knollwood Drive.
2:21:05Um
2:21:06>> Oh, yeah.
2:21:07You turn the mic up if you have to. Like
2:21:09that. Yep, there you go.
2:21:10>> All right.
2:21:11Uh we're simply not voting on a camera.
2:21:13>> could start again though.
2:21:14>> Oh, sorry. Yeah. Lee Forgione, 20
2:21:16Knollwood Drive.
2:21:17Uh we're simply not voting on a camera.
2:21:20We're potentially authorizing a
2:21:22technology platform. Cameras can remain
2:21:24physically identical while the software
2:21:27behind them becomes completely
2:21:28different. Five years from now that
2:21:30platform could potentially have
2:21:31different analytics, different
2:21:33integrations, different retention
2:21:35periods, different sharing relationships
2:21:37and capabilities that haven't been
2:21:38developed yet.
2:21:39So, before anyone votes, I'd like to uh
2:21:41clear it like is there
2:21:43what prevents the system provided
2:21:45tonight from becoming a materially
2:21:46different surveillance system tomorrow
2:21:48without another vote?
2:21:50And if there is currently nothing
2:21:52preventing that, then why should we
2:21:53establish that protection before, not
2:21:55after approval?
2:22:00>> Thank you for your comments.
2:22:03Go ahead, sir.
2:22:04>> Robert McGrath, 83 Bond Road. I move to
2:22:07move the question.
2:22:09>> I have a mo- a motion to
2:22:11I have a motion to move the question and
2:22:13a second has been said.
2:22:15At this time, we're going to vote on the
2:22:17move the question stopping all debate.
2:22:20I would ask um if you are in favor to
2:22:23please signify by voting yes.
2:22:26Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Is there
2:22:28anything to be said on the matter as far
2:22:30as the motion to stop debate?
2:22:33Oh, I apologize. It's been a long night.
2:22:37Please, if all those in favor by moving
2:22:39the question, signify by saying I.
2:22:42>> I.
2:22:43>> Those opposed, signify by saying no.
2:22:46>> No.
2:22:47>> Motion passes. We're going to move
2:22:49directly to voting on Article 15.
2:22:56And there is no requirement for anything
2:22:58other than a majority vote.
2:23:04All those in favor, please signify by
2:23:06voting yes on your device. All those
2:23:08opposed, please signify by voting no.
2:23:2510 seconds.
2:23:31Please stop voting.
2:23:35We have 245 votes in the affirmative, 56
2:23:38votes against. THE MOTION IS ADOPTED.
2:23:41>> [cheering]
2:23:42[applause]
2:23:45>> BEFORE I ASK FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN,
2:23:46thank you for your patience with me.
2:23:48Thank you for your kindness, and I ask
2:23:49for a motion to adjourn.
2:23:51>> Mr. Moderator.
2:23:52>> Yes.
2:23:53>> we adjourn.
2:23:54>> Is there a second? All those in favor.
2:23:57>> [screaming]
2:23:58>> Have a wonderful evening. Thank you so
2:23:59much for your patience and kindness.
2:24:01We'll see you again soon.
2:24:05Most Meeting is adjourned.
