2026-09-22 - Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting
Summary
Built from YouTube ASR auto-captions (no speaker labels; names often garbled).
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 45 Lake View Drive Variance and Special Permit | 42 | 60% |
| ZBA Rules and Regulations Revision | 23 | 33% |
| Reorganization and minutes | 3 | 5% |
| Other business | 1 | 2% |
Reorganization and minutes
0:07-3:22
- Approved the prior minutes and completed the annual reorganization, all by voice vote: Frank Lombardi stays on as chair, a member named Jason (as heard; the previous vice chair, Rob, was replaced) was elected vice chair, and Garrett (as heard) became clerk.
45 Lake View Drive Variance and Special Permit
3:24-45:40
- Petition presented by contractor Raymond Bonville (rendered "Bonavville") for a family camp destroyed by a fallen tree in 2022 and demolished in 2024-25.
- Curtis Meskus gave the building commissioner's timeline: tree strike April 2022, demolition started without a permit in October 2024, stop-work order and hazardous-material cleanup, demo permit February 2025, structure removed about March 2025.
- Because the new house would sit 5 ft from each side line against the 15-ft side setback, the project needs 10-ft side-setback variances plus a special permit for a pre-existing nonconforming lot.
- Abutter Kim Mason of 51 Lake View Drive spoke generally in favor but worried about the new house being wider, taller, and closer than the old camp (about 7 ft off the line before).
- Midway through, the board noticed the plan submitted with the application showed a 12 x 23 ft rear (lakeside) deck that was absent from the plan the board had been given. The board cannot grant relief for something not on the approved plan and wants one complete plan showing the deck, stairs, and exact side-line distances; a possible kickback to the Conservation Commission for roof drains and a retaining wall was also mentioned.
- Continued to October 27, 2026 (after a series of date conflicts), with a possible informal site visit by members in early October.
ZBA Rules and Regulations Revision
45:41-1:08:50
- Resumed the multi-meeting revision of the Rules and Regulations.
- Accepted a new draft application withdrawal form (an extension-request form is still to come).
- Kept the chair-discretion language on supplemental information submitted under 72 hours before a hearing.
- Agreed to replace the "four votes" language with a reference to the statute so it tracks future legislative changes.
- Struck "sitting" and the sentence about a sitting member drafting decisions (staff, Dale, drafts them, and parties sometimes submit proposed findings).
- Flagged the variance-duration and one-time-extension provisions to be updated to the amended Chapter 40A.
- Kept the reconsideration provision, and changed "denied" to "rejected" for incomplete submissions.
- Chapter 40B comprehensive permit authority was discussed in passing (the board has handled one full application and one amendment in 20 years).
- A final vote on the revised rules is expected at a later meeting.
Other business
1:08:50-1:10:11
- Voted to recommend Mary Beth Kazinski (Masonic Home Road, a mental health counselor) to the Select Board as a new alternate member.
- The new town planning director was present in the audience; the meeting adjourned.
Sources
Video
Transcript
Transcript
0:07Okay. So, this is um
0:10Tuesday, September 22nd, 2026. Charlton
0:13Zoning Board of Appeals. Going to call
0:15the meeting to order. And do we have We
0:18don't have Brandy Schiller here yet. All
0:21right. So, we'll get back to Brandy.
0:24So, uh let's first review and approve
0:27the minutes from the last meeting. Do we
0:29have those?
0:31All right. Do I hear anything on the
0:33minutes from the last meeting?
0:36No.
0:37Is there any motions?
0:38Motion to approve the minutes.
0:40There's a
0:41second.
0:41There's a second on the motion to
0:42approve the minutes as as
0:45printed. All in favor say I.
0:47I.
0:48All right. That carries.
0:50All right. ZBA member reorganization. So
0:53once a year we have to set who is going
0:55to be the chair, the vice chair,
0:58secretary.
1:01Um we don't need a treasure.
1:06Uh clerk. There's a clerk. It's chair,
1:08vice chair, and clerk, I think. Right.
1:11All right. So who are we going to do?
1:16Do what is it right now? I'm the chair.
1:18Who's the vice chair?
1:20Rob.
1:21Rob's the vice chair. It's been so long.
1:23So,
1:24and who's the clerk?
1:25Who has been without a clerk since
1:28What does a clerk What do they all do?
1:31No, I mean, the only thing I So, he just
1:34says it's just has a mirror to check to
1:36make sure that I'm still breathing. So,
1:38you know, the chair is dead. The vice
1:40chair, you can step in. Um, other than
1:43that, it's not You You have clerk stuff
1:46that might need to get signed, but
1:47that's about it. There's not really any
1:48kind of major roles for anybody or
1:51whatever.
1:52So,
1:54it's up to you. We want to reach I I
1:56think we should name I would nominate
1:58Rob as the vice chair again. Jason is
2:01the clerk.
2:02Jason,
2:05you want to nominate Jason as the vice
2:07chair? Jason as the vice chair.
2:09Garrett the clerk. You want to do that?
2:10Garrett the clerk.
2:12Is that a nomination?
2:13I like that.
2:13You want me to stay chair? Does someone
2:15else want to be chair?
2:16You can be chair.
2:17Oh, thanks.
2:19You earned it. I've earned it. You can
2:21give it up.
2:24I'll give it up if someone else wants
2:25it. I don't really care. Um, I guess
2:28not. All right. So,
2:29season starting. I can't
2:32be hunting from now till next year.
2:35That's right. That's right. All right.
2:38So, do we have formal nominations? Does
2:41someone want to make the formal
2:42nominations?
2:45Anybody?
2:46So, I'll nominate Jason as vice chair,
2:51Garrett as clerk. Is a second on that?
2:53Second. All in favor say I.
2:55I.
2:55All right. Who wants to nominate the
2:57chair then?
2:58I'll nominate the chair.
2:59All right. So, there's a nomination for
3:01the chair. Is a second on that?
3:03I second it.
3:04All right. All in favor say I.
3:06I. Motion carries. We took care of that.
3:09Um,
3:10this is
3:11Bonavville. I was at that meeting.
3:13Oh, okay.
3:15Wrong room, huh?
3:16He is the petitioner.
3:18Okay. Do we have something from him just
3:20authorizing him to speak?
3:22Yes.
3:22Okay. All right. So, you want to come
3:24over here? Oh, no. He can't. Can he Can
3:26the camera see him from there?
3:28Yes.
3:30They'll see him. You should sit over
3:31here.
3:31Yeah. You sit right there.
3:32Okay.
3:35This is property located at 45 Lake View
3:38Drive.
3:38Okay.
3:39All right.
3:40Can you state your name and for the
3:42record, please?
3:43Yep. Raymond Bonville.
3:44Okay. So, you want to tell us
3:48and you're not the owner of the
3:50property?
3:50No.
3:51Okay. So, you want to What's your
3:53I'm the I'm the uh contractor.
3:56Okay.
3:56And um there was uh a tree that landed
4:00on the house.
4:01Yeah.
4:01And um totally demolished it.
4:04Okay.
4:05It's been uh in the family for like
4:07three generations.
4:09And uh we're putting it into the same
4:11spot that uh it was originally in.
4:14Okay.
4:16So what you're just asking for a special
4:18permit or you asking for?
4:20Yes. Special permit code.
4:24Special permit and the bearings.
4:29The septic and the water is is
4:34it's town
4:36in town water too, isn't it?
4:38No.
4:39want it as well.
4:40Okay.
4:48So, are you changing the dimensions of
4:50the with the exist how long ago did the
4:52structure get the roof fall on it?
4:56About two years ago.
4:57Okay.
4:59We're not past the point where it's
5:01considered abandoned, is it?
5:04Well, when it's my turn, I'll lay out
5:06the chronology.
5:12So this is your plan.
5:21So this is a the house is going to stay
5:23in the exact same spot. Correct.
5:39The well is in the front.
5:41In the back.
5:42Oh, I see it. I said just a cover. Yes.
5:45Um
5:57So it says connect to existing sewer. So
5:59that's
6:01yes connect.
6:04You guys have any questions?
6:07Rob agent Ryan what we the house isn't
6:11there's nothing on the property now
6:12right there permanent variance but what
6:15for
6:16just the what?
6:17Just the seller. Okay.
6:24Previous house has been demolished.
6:26Yeah, it was um um
6:33Okay.
6:36So, you're stating what's existing on
6:38here. Can you just let us know?
6:40Uh right now, there's nothing on there.
6:41You said part of the something. Uh yeah,
6:44just the uh just the cell hole and
6:46there's some more of the the old stone
6:49foundation and that and that's going to
6:51be removed too. Not much of it is left.
6:55Excuse me.
6:58Okay.
7:00You have any other questions? Garrett,
7:01do you have any questions?
7:04No. I'd like to hear Curtis's timeline.
7:06All right. So, we want to call the
7:07building inspector enforcement officer.
7:11Good evening, Kurt Mascus, building
7:13commissioner, zoning enforcement
7:15officer. If you don't mind, I have the
7:16usual set of handouts. One for her, you
7:19get the planning, so you can follow
7:21along. Thank you.
7:23And uh
7:26yeah,
7:31get one out of there. Give it to the
7:33nice lady over here.
7:37this way
7:39and some of these around that way.
7:45You're welcome.
7:48So, the subject property is on Lake View
7:50Drive. It's a 30 by approximately 100
7:53foot lot. It was improved by a camp
7:56style building
7:59uh shown uh in the next page on April of
8:022022 when I was summoned to the site
8:05because a tree had crashed down upon the
8:08building. Um
8:11in October 2024, Mr. Bonavville
8:14undertook demol demolishing the rest of
8:17the building without a building permit
8:20and ran into some issues with hazardous
8:24material on the site. Currently 45 Lake
8:27View Drive, page three is a vacant lot
8:31and we show 51 Lake View Drive to the
8:34right. U that's incorrect because that's
8:39can't be on both sides. That's not 51.
8:41It's
8:4347 or 49, something like that.
8:47And then 51 on the lower part of the
8:50page.
8:5151's the red one
8:53on the top.
8:54On the top.
8:55Yeah.
8:56Oh, it is 51. What's the next one? The
8:58white one would be 57
9:03maybe. I don't know. It's down the
9:05street. So,
9:05you're the you're the little red one.
9:07I am.
9:07Okay.
9:08Yes.
9:08Thank you for helping me with that.
9:11Um,
9:13so anyway, the the lower part of the
9:15page is the next house to the right with
9:17with an incorrect number. Uh, 41 Lake
9:20View to the left and there is a common I
9:23believe it's a piece of town land um
9:26that gives access to the lake. Uh 29
9:30Sunset Drive extensions across the
9:32street and then 42 Lake View also across
9:37the street. And as I started to say in
9:40April of 2022, the house was struck by a
9:44tree. In October of 2024,
9:49um, demo was started without a permit. A
9:51stop work order was issued. Between
9:54November and December, we worked with D,
9:57the applicant to deal with the hazardous
10:00material on the site. In February of
10:032025, the demo permit was issued and
10:07approximately in March of 2025, the home
10:11was removed.
10:13So, we're in a sort of funky state here,
10:16right?
10:17There was still part of a structure in
10:192025, though.
10:20No, there hasn't.
10:23Well, there was a structure in February
10:26of 2025.
10:27Okay.
10:29And in March, it was removed. So in
10:322025, so we're March, so we're less than
10:35two years
10:36into it if there was still portion of it
10:38portion of it there.
10:40Yeah.
10:40Okay. So now we have two issues. The new
10:43the new zoning laws say that um a lot
10:48that's pre-existing non-conforming to
10:50area frontage or both and the
10:53renovations do not offend the setback.
10:57Um I could issue a permit by right.
11:00Right. But they do.
11:02But they do.
11:03Yeah.
11:04And then we have Mr. Bonavville's plan
11:07submitted with the application
11:11which shows a slightly larger house than
11:15what was there. But we have a five foot
11:19setback on one side, a 5ft setback on
11:22the other, which obviously offends
11:24current zoning setback of 15 ft. M
11:27and we have a 30 foot front and rear set
11:30back which you know we don't have a
11:32problem with. So
11:33right just the side set back
11:35so it would require 10 ft.
11:36So we require a 10T variance on each
11:39side
11:39side and a special permit
11:42because it's a pre-existing nonwarming
11:44lot.
11:45The slight increase is that due to
11:47overhang or is it actually just the
11:50layout? That's I mean we're talking you
11:53know a foot or two you know of
11:56additional
11:58is proposing to stay 5t off the property
12:00line at 5t we don't get into issues with
12:04building code and having to rate walls
12:06because we're within 5t of the property
12:08line.
12:09Yeah.
12:10Um so that that isn't an issue for my
12:12other half.
12:13Okay.
12:14And um as he said there is municipal
12:18sewage on the street and and you know
12:20they indicate that it's a well on the
12:22street or on the property
12:23on the property. Okay.
12:25So right now it's six or seven feet off
12:27the line
12:28probably. But I I don't I can only go by
12:32what the plan was because there was no
12:34survey done to my knowledge of the house
12:37location was you know my brothers would
12:40have been is is if we approach this is
12:43and and in 2022 2023 2024
12:48you know oh yeah you want to remove and
12:50replace this building let's go to ZBA
12:52we'll get a straight special permit to
12:54change alter extend under the the other
12:56regulations you know the previous law
12:59Now we're into Okay. It offends the
13:01setbacks. So, we need a special permit
13:04because the lot's on sides.
13:05Yeah.
13:06And need variances on the two sides
13:08because it offends the setbacks.
13:11We got 30 ft of furniture on this, too.
13:13Huh.
13:16Yeah. It's tight.
13:17They're all tight.
13:18Yeah.
13:19So, that's what I have, ladies and
13:21gentlemen.
13:22Yeah.
13:23Foundation. Same foundation or replacing
13:26foundation? We're replacing it with a
13:28stone foundation,
13:34but the new foundation hasn't been put
13:36in yet.
13:37Nothing's been done. Nothing
13:40you're getting all the permits this time
13:42first.
13:42Yes.
13:47Okay. Um, we have some more butters
13:50here.
13:51Yep. Me.
13:52Okay. You want to
13:55I know, right? I did her house, too.
13:57Oh, did you?
13:58If you just so she can speak and get in
14:00the camera, if we could have her sit
14:01there for a moment. Okay.
14:03You want to just come up, state your
14:04name and address for the record.
14:05Yes.
14:06And then just um
14:09if you have any comments on property, so
14:12I have questions.
14:13Okay.
14:14Um Kim Mason, nice to meet you. 51 Lake
14:17View Drive, Charlton. This um is very
14:21important to us. this house. My
14:23greatgrandfather and grandfather built
14:25this little camp that we live in and our
14:28neighbors are wonderful and we want to
14:29do right by them. We just want to make
14:31sure that the house does not become one
14:34of those extra McMansions and encroaches
14:36on our property. Um
14:38the property line is so thin as it is
14:41anyway and we've always gotten along
14:42with those neighbors. They're great.
14:45Um it's ours our house is a camp as
14:47well. It's not a it's not a year round
14:49home. It's a camp.
14:51season.
14:52And so, um, it looks like it's larger,
14:56which is what I was worried about. Um,
14:58and it looks like it's closer, which is
15:00also what I'm worried about because it's
15:02already so tight on both.
15:05So, how much closer do you think it will
15:07be from the old house?
15:09See, you can even if you went down there
15:11now, you would be able to see where the
15:13old property was because the hole is
15:15still there, right?
15:16And we didn't we haven't touched it. We
15:18haven't done anything to it. and we
15:20we're the only ones next to it,
15:21right?
15:22Um and you can see that that there's
15:24more than seven feet there. So going
15:26down to 5T would we would definitely
15:29feel that. I was more concerned about
15:31the height too. Like I'm worried that
15:34there's a there's a limit on the height.
15:36Um Oh, and and I get so I understand
15:39like you can't go out so you're going to
15:41go up
15:42and and that happens. But is the front
15:44are they going to be pushed more in the
15:45front? Is there going to be like an
15:47extensive porch put on the front that
15:50you
15:51I did see that.
15:52Yeah. So, are you considering this the
15:54front or this the front? The road I
15:56would consider as the front.
15:57Oh, I I thought you always talk about
15:58the lake as the front.
16:00When you have a lake house, it's always
16:02the front lake.
16:03No, because
16:05we
16:05Oh, my grandpa was wrong.
16:07Well, I I know what lake people do, but
16:09I'll give you my opinion.
16:10I'll do whatever you want.
16:12No, I believe you. And you're you're
16:14lovely. I just want to make I'm talking
16:17about lake frontage.
16:19I don't care about the road.
16:20I don't look at the road.
16:22I actually hate that road and I will put
16:24that on record that the road is terrible
16:26and that I get a river through my
16:28property which is a whole separate
16:30problem that Ry tried to actually help
16:32me with and we do have a rare running
16:34through my property.
16:35It does not appear that I mean this is
16:37it. It looks like they're going to be 37
16:39feet off of the road and then at least
16:42that off between the back of the house
16:44to the lake.
16:45They were further back than we were. Are
16:47they Are they supposed to be that way?
16:50Yeah. So, this is your exist. This is
16:52your house right here.
16:53Yes.
16:54So, that's the back of their house would
16:55equal the back of their house front.
16:57And what about their porch?
16:59This doesn't have a porch in it. This
17:02is putting one back on.
17:04This plane doesn't have a porch. How are
17:06they going to get down the stairs?
17:08There's going to be a deck in the back,
17:10but not but no porch in the front.
17:14It's um it's a little one, Joan. It's
17:16just to get out and then take a left and
17:19go down the stairs.
17:21How many floors is the house going to
17:22be?
17:23Two.
17:24So, do you mean what it used to have,
17:26which is like the basement seller with
17:28the rock cellar and then one floor, or
17:31do you mean two up?
17:32Uh yeah, it's going to have a basement.
17:34It's going to have the kitchen on the
17:37main floor and the bedrooms upstairs.
17:39So, it is going to be a lot taller.
17:41No, not really because um the the attic
17:43had uh pretty close to 7 ft.
17:47Although although it was a a kind of a
17:50A12 pitch, but um alls we're going to
17:53really do is keep it the same try to
17:56keep it in the same spot, the same size
17:59house, everything. But the only thing
18:01that's going to be different is that
18:02they're going to have a remodeled uh
18:04basement, better basement. Instead of
18:06having a dirt floor and
18:07yeah,
18:08dirt there and everything, it'll be uh 8
18:11foot walls.
18:14So there is a there is a limit in in
18:17town to the height of the building. What
18:19is it? 20 36 feet to the mean roof
18:22height from the mean grade.
18:25I was just studying statistics today in
18:28AP. I was like that means average. I got
18:31you follow that.
18:34That was good. Okay. 36.
18:36So that's the So that's the top of the
18:39roof.
18:40That's the peak.
18:42So that's that's the height that they
18:43could go. They can't go higher than
18:44that.
18:45Okay. Uh in terms of the overall
18:48footprint
18:51from what the the zoning enforcement
18:52officer tells us, it is slightly larger
18:54than what was there before.
18:57I'm I'm only relaying what is shown on
19:00the plans. I have no measure.
19:02It appears slightly larger.
19:04you know, it appears. So, the red line
19:09in the existing house and a little bit
19:11of green around the outside is and at
19:14this scale, which is
19:18telling me that it's uh
19:221 in equals 10 ft, which is about right.
19:26I mean, that's a little more looks like
19:27a little more than a half an inch,
19:30you know. You're talking like you said.
19:31Yes. It looks like it was might have
19:33been seven feet from the property line
19:35before and he's asking specifically to
19:38be
19:395T
19:435T.
19:44Now that's that's the board's decision.
19:48You know that you know that's why we're
19:49talking about a special permit and a
19:51variance.
19:55So the variance is the board's way
19:58decision
19:58decision to Yeah, you just get the
20:01information.
20:02What's this thing?
20:03It' be nice for more detail like an
20:05elevation. There's no depth on it.
20:07767
20:09proposed roof drains. So, we have to
20:11deal with storm water management
20:15conservation.
20:17It's basically something
20:19roofed or something
20:23and then they get a new concrete wall.
20:26That's not
20:29That's conservation.
20:30Well,
20:31I wish that they could continue that
20:33into 51 Lake View.
20:35Well, okay. So, that two two things on a
20:38on a concrete wall at a lake. One, it's
20:41it's working within 100 ft of a well and
20:43you're you're on the lake. where almost
20:45anything you do.
20:46It sure is.
20:48Sure does.
20:48It does. And then um but if it is a
20:51retaining wall at the lake, then it
20:53would need a building permit, but it
20:55would be the building permit would be
20:56reviewed also by conservation because we
20:59work together around these properties.
21:01So if I ever got a cement front, then I
21:04would a cement wall by the lake, I would
21:06have to go through you guys, too.
21:07That's great.
21:10You should do it.
21:10Well, we don't want them to fall over
21:12and hurt people. Oh, I believe I
21:14understand. There's just a lot of steps
21:16and a lot of money.
21:19Okay. I hope it's not too close cuz now
21:22it's going to be taller.
21:26I hope it's not too close. That's all.
21:28But they're very nice and I want them to
21:30have their home back.
21:32Okay.
21:32That's all I have.
21:34So, generally, you're okay with this?
21:35I am generally okay with it. And I'd
21:37like for them to be able to have their
21:38home. And I've worked with Ray in the
21:40past. He is a nice man. He follows
21:43through.
21:43Thank you.
21:44You're welcome.
21:45Sounds like she would prefer it not be 5
21:47ft and stay at seven, but
21:48I would prefer I mean I would prefer
21:50that. I just don't want to screw over my
21:52neighbors, but I don't want to get
21:54screwed either.
21:56I I'm curious, Mr. Von. Is there an
21:58elevation plan?
22:03It's actually on here. You can see the
22:04elevation layout.
22:06No, that I think you're talking about an
22:08elevation of the building.
22:09Of the building. So, let me go look at
22:11my files. It might take me a minute to
22:14to print it out if you want to indulge
22:16me.
22:17I'm going to have Mr. Bonn come back. I
22:19don't mind unless you have anything else
22:21to add.
22:22I don't think you
22:23All right. Thank you. Uh, sir, do you
22:26have any
22:28Oh, no. I uh I'm the the new planning
22:30director here and
22:32Oh, I see. I'm sorry about that.
22:33I was working till 7. Your guys meeting
22:35started at 7:00, so I thought I'd come
22:36join see how you guys uh run your show.
22:38Nice.
22:40There is uh two steps
22:43down in the foundation.
22:45As the land goes on an angle like this,
22:49the foundation is going to sit like
22:50this.
22:54Mhm. Yeah. It'll be a step foundation.
22:55Yeah. So, it's going to be it the whole
22:58house ain't going to be no taller than
22:5924 ft
23:02from the bottom from the bottom of the
23:04ground at the back. You don't know how
23:07tall the old house was, though.
23:09Uh well actually um it it had a dirt
23:15cellar.
23:15Mhm.
23:16And it was sitting on peers.
23:19So in the back it will keep the same
23:22height. In the front you have to keep
23:25the same height because that's how you
23:28walk out. You walk out. You're right on
23:29land
23:31in the front.
23:32This will have a walk out basement.
23:33Yes. Okay.
23:34This will so that's how you access the
23:36backyard.
23:36It is that big. It was already that big
23:39already. You can walk right in.
23:41Okay.
23:43You had mentioned something about a deck
23:45that I don't see on the plans. Is
23:47uh
23:48Is the deck on the side or is it in the
23:50back?
23:50No, it's in the back. Uh in the front
23:54by the lake.
23:54By the lake.
24:00Well, I mean, if as long as if the deck
24:02is within the setback, then I'm not
24:04really too worried about that. It's just
24:06so have 15 feet on either side.
24:09Right.
24:10Right. If we're going to grant them a a
24:12variance on either side anyways,
24:17unless you want to specifically exclude,
24:19you know, a deck or whatever, we're
24:20granting a variance.
24:23No, I I understand that. It's just
24:25without seeing it here to have the plans
24:27approved and then add a deck later on.
24:30Right. But I mean, so if we grant a
24:31variance of 10 ft on either side
24:34and they add a deck and it's within the
24:35rear setback, he's not imposing on that
24:38variance any further than we've already
24:40granted.
24:40So granting the variance to the house
24:43does not grant the variance to the deck
24:45also.
24:47I think if we're going to grant a
24:49variance for the structure, unless we
24:51specifically exclude certain things, I
24:53think it would include the deck. If they
24:55decide afterwards that as long as they
24:57don't offend that variance, I think it's
25:00I think and it's part of that structure,
25:02I think they're okay. I mean,
25:03okay,
25:04but that would be up to Kurt.
25:05I have a question.
25:06Yeah.
25:09Variance is only for both sides, not the
25:11back and front.
25:12You don't need one for the back and the
25:14front, right? So the deck is the deck
25:17would automatically be allowed once the
25:19permates
25:19if his point is is that if you decide to
25:22put a deck on afterwards, right, the
25:25deck is going to offend the setbacks.
25:26But my point is that if we if we grant a
25:29variance and the deck's attached to the
25:31structure, I think it it it kind of
25:33carries with it.
25:35That's what I'm I'm I'm going to have to
25:38disagree with you on that.
25:39You don't think so? No, because we would
25:42have a action
25:45by the board that says according to this
25:48plan
25:50and that plan does not include a deck.
25:53If this was if this was an existing
25:55building,
25:57okay, under the way 4A is written, yeah,
26:00it says I can grant a permit as long as
26:04the work does not offend the setbacks.
26:07So adding a deck the full width of the
26:09house would now offend the setback.
26:12That's what I was wondering.
26:13Yeah, that's if we that's if we say
26:16according to this plan.
26:18Well, I'm I'm trying to the the big
26:20printer is warming up again.
26:22Okay.
26:23And I have a sort of crappy copy of a
26:26plan for this house.
26:30In a moment.
26:30By that logic, they could have a shed
26:32down by the somewhere too.
26:34Oh, please don't do that. That happened
26:35on my other side.
26:36I'm not Not saying they should, but
26:38please don't
26:39you want to say something?
26:40I I did, but I I wanted to get Kurt's
26:43take on it of a of an approach to adding
26:46a deck later that he may disagree with.
26:48Ultimately, he's the zoning enforcement
26:50officer. So, it will ultimately be his
26:52call if it comes back here. But, um,
26:55under pre-existing non-conforming, if a
26:58variance is granted here, um, the
27:01building commissioner does have the
27:03authority to
27:05um
27:07to allow for
27:09some intensification. Um,
27:13but again, it's it's his discretion. So,
27:16I just wanted to see kind of what his
27:18his take on was that and he has a better
27:19understanding of our bylaw of
27:23what degree he can actually do that and
27:24it's hard to say or you don't have a
27:26plan in front of you. Is this beyond
27:28that threshold or not? Uh because it
27:30could be a kickback to the the CDA.
27:33Let me ask you this question. You said
27:35you're just going to build a stairway.
27:36What how what are you what are you
27:38looking at in the
27:40middle the house is this wide? The deck
27:42is this wide and it has to be because we
27:45need to have two means egress. One of
27:49them is off the back deck with emergency
27:51exit.
27:52Oh, so it's a deck and stairs.
27:54Basically a landing out the building
27:56with stairs.
27:57Where is it going to be?
27:58I had thought they exited through the
28:00basement out to the level of the grade.
28:03Oh, no.
28:06Okay. So, this is the plan that was
28:09presented as part of the application
28:11that started this action.
28:13Oh,
28:18that's a much bigger deck.
28:21Yeah,
28:23that's in a That's a deck deck.
28:27House.
28:33All right. We have more to change the
28:36plan.
28:39This is the plan that you submitted as
28:41part of the application bill.
28:43Yep.
28:44Can Can you uh we take a closer look at
28:47that?
28:49So, it's showing a 12 by 30
28:52two deck.
28:55They're showing the building on the
28:57Well, they have a nice ortho of the
28:59building. This would be the lakeside.
29:02They're showing the building is 26 I
29:07think I'm reading this right upside down
29:08268 to the top on the street side
29:13and
29:1533 ft to the top on the lake side
29:20that would be under the you know mean
29:23height and elevation. So under under the
29:26zoning bylaw, it is not exceed the you
29:29know allowed height
29:3212 ft of the deck.
29:35We added that.
29:36What's the back of the house?
29:37Oh god, it I don't think I even need to
29:40It's coming to me.
29:41What's the rear set
29:44on that?
29:45Wow. It says that it's 1 in equals 10
29:49ft. So 10 20 30 40 50 If this is blown
29:55up to scale, well, that's an inch. So,
29:59it's saying that it's 50 feet from the
30:01lake. Add 12 ft, you're still more than
30:0430 feet from the lakefront.
30:06Yeah,
30:08we really don't know the exact
30:10measurements.
30:14Of what, sir?
30:16Of the from from the back of this deck
30:19to the lake.
30:23We don't really know for certain.
30:27There you go.
30:301 in equals 10 ft. 10 20 30 40 50 55 ft.
30:36So that'd still be okay.
30:38So even with a 12 deck that deck that
30:40deck would offend, but still have to go
30:43get a permit for the deck
30:46if he did it after the fact if it's not
30:48in the building permit already.
30:49Sounds like
30:50Well, no, he said that is in the
30:51building. what was submitted is
30:53submitted with the deck.
30:55But you know from this plan right here
30:57is is that that deck is going to offend
30:58one side of the setbacks at least.
31:01Looks like both sides
31:02probably both with the stairs cuz the
31:05stairs are only
31:08does it say how wide the stairs are
31:10here? How wide are the stairs for the
31:123T 3T?
31:15Yeah. So it's still going to offend both
31:17sides. How wide is the building?
31:20How does it affect both sides?
31:22Well, we're giving the sides sep
31:24if we let them build it as it is.
31:27It wouldn't affect the sides any
31:29different. It would just be the rear.
31:31So, we're treating as the deck being a
31:33separate entity for the house.
31:35No.
31:35Well, no. The paper we were originally
31:37given didn't show a deck.
31:38Didn't show a deck.
31:39Oh.
31:40So, you were asking us for if we're
31:42going to grant you a variance according
31:44to the plan and there's no deck, you
31:45don't get a variance for the deck. You
31:47can't build the deck.
31:48Yeah.
31:49Oh.
31:50Well, we need to tackle because that's
31:52not a second egress. So,
31:55the options
31:56you only need a three foot landing and a
31:58set of stairs for the second egress. You
32:01don't need a deck.
32:03No.
32:06Is it silly not to have a deck on the
32:08lakefront property? Probably.
32:10If you're going to have the stairs, you
32:12might as well have the deck. No. Is it
32:14Does it
32:16What is it? Is it the size that's that's
32:19an issue?
32:20So, what's
32:23I was think I was
32:25What's that process?
32:28We can have him do that if you want.
32:30Well, it's not up to me. It's up to him.
32:33No, no. So, but he submitted the this is
32:36the plan that's submitted to the
32:38building department.
32:39This isn't this isn't the same
32:42layout that is to us to us.
32:45So, if
32:48If we grant a variance based on this
32:51right here,
32:52he can't do that.
32:53He can't do that because he didn't get a
32:54variance for all of those things.
32:56So, either he has to change this plan
32:58or he has to change that,
33:00right?
33:00Or he changes that,
33:02right?
33:04So, would he need continuation and
33:07change it? Would he need to withdraw and
33:09reapply?
33:10No, I don't think we need to withdraw
33:12something like that. I think we would
33:13just need a continuence to to amend have
33:16an amended plan.
33:18But do you do you want to go and get
33:21that? Do you want to have all that stuff
33:23on the plan be or and wait or do you
33:27want to just give them
33:29just wing it and give it to them? That's
33:31up to you guys.
33:36Well, we can't use the plan as our
33:39as our variance or our special permit.
33:41We would have to word it.
33:43We'd have to put it in the wording. We
33:46can't say as drawn on the plan, but it's
33:49not on the plan. So, do do you
33:51understand?
33:52Kind of.
33:53Yeah.
33:54It's just because the the deck is a I'm
33:58I'm looking at it as it's a different
34:00entity to the house
34:02because if whatever is granted to the
34:06house
34:08um would be
34:11granted, right?
34:12Because it's a separate entity.
34:15That's what they're saying. It's a tax.
34:17If we approve this as plans are
34:19submitted, this plan doesn't have a
34:20deck, which means you don't have a
34:21variance for the deck when you go to add
34:23that later.
34:24The deck has to be 15 off of the off of
34:27the side.
34:28Yeah, that's on a stairway. That's a
34:29deck.
34:31That's a 12 by 23 deck. That's a
34:34nice size.
34:36And we're not saying we have a problem
34:37with it or not. We're just trying to
34:38make sure that what we decide on is
34:41correct.
34:42Okay?
34:43Because what we were previously deciding
34:44on was this, which didn't show the deck.
34:46Now, this one shows the deck.
34:48Okay. So, I should change this with the
34:50deck on it. So,
34:52if you're going to do that, then I want
34:54I'd like to see better numbers exactly
34:58where the footprint is in relation to
35:01the uh where the proposed is it already
35:03lined out?
35:04Yeah.
35:05You already make Is it So, you don't
35:07know But you don't know exactly where
35:08the property line is, do you?
35:09Oh, yeah. It's been surveyed.
35:11Okay.
35:12Yep.
35:13So, I would suggest maybe the board have
35:16a continuence.
35:19What What day do we have until this?
35:21Um, November 11th.
35:22Okay.
35:24Have Mr. That's Veterans Day.
35:28Have Mr. Bonavville make any amendments
35:31that he would like to the plans
35:35and
35:38have the surveyor stake out the existing
35:44house and the proposed house on the
35:46property and we can go take a look at it
35:48and then the board could do a site visit
35:51so that it's very clear.
35:56Will they even be able to stake out what
35:57the old foundation was?
35:59Oh, it's still there.
36:00He says part of it with the stuff is
36:02still there. Yeah.
36:03Only only a portion is still there,
36:05right?
36:06The hole is still there, right?
36:09What I'm thinking is as they as they
36:11remove the foundation, they probably
36:12expanded the hole bigger than the
36:14foundation. I guess
36:15there wasn't much of a foundation there.
36:17It was just collapsed in, you know, dirt
36:20floor, stone camp foundation
36:23hanging on by a thread.
36:26Is that something you can do?
36:29What is being proposed?
36:32Putting the whole structure in the
36:33foundation.
36:34What Curtis is proposing?
36:36So, what we'd like is we'd like a
36:38revised plan showing the deck and any
36:41other stairs or structures that are
36:44going to be on the house. If we grant a
36:46variance, we want to grant a variance
36:48for the whole thing that you so you're
36:50not coming back to us in three months.
36:51Like, oh, by the way, we want a deck
36:53next spring. and then we have to revisit
36:55the whole thing. So we I don't any
36:57anything else that's going to be built
36:59as part of rebuilding the um
37:02the house that we don't want it all in
37:05one plan. The other thing that we want
37:07is it it seems that it's not
37:13exact on how much of a variance you need
37:16on the side setbacks. So from testimony
37:19from the neighbor and from what it
37:21appears on the plan there is that your
37:24new foundation might be two or three
37:27feet wider than the than the the
37:30previous structure. So we'd want to see
37:33exactly how many feet from the line on
37:36each side are you going to be on the
37:37house including where the deck is. So if
37:41we're going to grant a variance, we're
37:42going to grant a variance for the right
37:43number, not just kind of wing it.
37:46It ain't winging it. It has to be in
37:48that spot.
37:49No, we're not I'm not saying that it
37:50doesn't have to be in that spot, but if
37:53if if the house was What is that? It's
37:5610 ft and you need seven. You're going
38:00to make me I can't do math. Um
38:05I did the new math. I just can't.
38:06So, if it was 72t off of the property
38:08line before, so you're looking at two or
38:10three feet on each side.
38:12Now, if it's five feet, then that's a
38:13three foot difference. You're looking at
38:14you're looking at a little bit wider of
38:16a house than what was existing there
38:18before.
38:19And not saying that we won't approve
38:21that, but we'd want to know.
38:23Okay.
38:24All right.
38:24Yeah.
38:25Sure.
38:26Is that what everyone you good with
38:27that?
38:27Basically, he just wants to see it on
38:29the plan.
38:30When's the next time that everyone can
38:31meet because we don't have to wait till
38:32November 11th.
38:34Exactly.
38:34What's it September?
38:36Just show show the setbacks.
38:37Does all the plants do that on the
38:39foundation? A a lot of a lot of
38:42engineers put them on there for us
38:44for the foundation.
38:45Yeah. They'll put exactly like how many
38:47feet?
38:47I've never seen one. I've I've always
38:49seen them on a plan.
38:50Yeah. They put And if there's an issue
38:52with the rear with the setback by the
38:54lake, then we'd want to see that.
38:55Well, this is So, you're telling me this
38:57is just foundation plan right here?
38:59Yep.
38:59So, basically, if you added the deck to
39:02the foundation plan, you wouldn't do
39:03that anyways. You'd have to do the other
39:05plan with the deck on.
39:09The house has it.
39:11Yeah.
39:11Does the board want to see the proposed
39:15house staked out on the lot
39:19and do
39:19Can you do that?
39:20I I don't I think if the engineer has it
39:24all in the plans and that's the engineer
39:26is the one staking it to begin with for
39:29doing the build. But it's it's up to you
39:31guys.
39:32We did it.
39:33You already staked it out.
39:34Yeah.
39:35All right. And
39:36I have a picture of the hole.
39:37Yeah. We we might do a site visit.
39:40Oh, okay. I didn't know if you wanted to
39:41see just to see if it's worth your time.
39:43Yeah, we'd like to. So, the the board
39:45would be its members um maybe stopping
39:50by and do a site visit. That's not going
39:51to be an issue.
39:52When When will that be? Can you give me
39:55time?
39:55I have no idea.
39:57I'll have the whole after the rains.
40:02That would be next week.
40:03Yeah.
40:03After the storms blow in
40:05like crazy this weekend.
40:09I just want to let you know though, if
40:10there's a tornado, my shed is all set.
40:14Okay.
40:17You guys are going to see me again
40:19because I live on uh 20.
40:22So, it would be 73.
40:24So, it wouldn't be before the this
40:25weekend. So, one day next week if if any
40:29member of the board wants to go, I won't
40:31schedule it because it's it's a vacant
40:33lot. So, it's not like there's somebody
40:34home or anything like that. Right.
40:36You know, if it's staked out, they can
40:37stop by and take a look. And it's not
40:39like they need to go and and they're not
40:41interfering.
40:41Be careful because it it is uh it is it
40:45is in rough shape right now. The stone
40:47wall that was in the front,
40:49we had to knock that down so that we can
40:50get in there and get things out. So, uh
40:53it is kind of a rough terrain.
40:55So, what is it?
40:57Just be careful.
40:57Today's the 21st. 22nd.
41:00May I show you what it was?
41:0129 would be next Tuesday.
41:05You want to do two weeks? Can everyone
41:07do two weeks from tonight?
41:08Oh, so
41:1129. So a week after the next
41:15No, it would be the first week in
41:17October.
41:20We have to dock. You can't h do.
41:22No, I'm just making sure. I'm going to
41:24New York and I'm going to Maine and I
41:26got some trip.
41:27Oh, you're no longer the vice chair and
41:29now that's it.
41:30Listen, trust me. I would have went no
41:32matter what. So, October October 6th
41:38through the chair. Can I show you guys a
41:40picture of what you're looking at?
41:41Sure. I can do October 6th.
41:46That's cool.
41:48Oh, okay.
41:49Yeah. If you could stake out
41:52and if we do if we do uh if any member
41:54of the board wants to do a site visit,
41:56it'll be after this week.
41:58You'll see it very well. You have a pen.
42:00I'm going to stick with
42:02I did
42:03Okay.
42:04From state to state, state to state,
42:06you're going to see exactly what
42:08Okay.
42:08Where the house is going to sit.
42:10Yeah.
42:10And um the the the
42:13setback from the lake
42:15Yeah.
42:15to the foundation.
42:17You're not looking for that.
42:18And you're not looking for a snake that
42:20goes from the snake out front. I'm more
42:23concerned about the sides unless unless
42:26the deck unless you're building a deck
42:28so big
42:29that it's going to offend between the
42:31lake and the house. So if you're going
42:32to be more than 30 if you're going to be
42:34within the 30 ft from the lake to the
42:36house with the deck then you're going to
42:38need to do that. But it's
42:39Oh, we're fine. We're fine.
42:41But if the deck is on the drawing the
42:43next time we meet
42:44Yeah. Any the deck
42:46So I'll have that done.
42:47Right. And and then exactly how many
42:49feet from the line to the side of the
42:50house. We I want to know that if we're
42:52going to grant if we're going to grant a
42:54variance on it, we rather do that. Can
42:56we do that? Can everyone do the six?
43:00I don't have We got one. No,
43:02we got one.
43:05Be good to see the the side lot line too
43:08though next to the house rather than
43:09just
43:09Well, there's a fence on that.
43:11You know, the the lot that the
43:14We can't do the 13.
43:15You can't do the six.
43:16No, I can do the 13.
43:18We cannot do the 13. So
43:21the 13th is I got to pick my wife up
43:23from the airport on the Friday.
43:25Well, it will not be here. So
43:27yeah, we cannot.
43:31The week after that's what the 20th week
43:34um if you want to. We do have an
43:36application on its way
43:39and I would depend if they're able to
43:42get the application in I would be able
43:44to have them as early as October 27th.
43:47So, if you'd like to combine both into
43:50that meeting, we can.
43:53I could do that and two days later.
43:55No, I can do the 27th.
43:57Does that work for you?
43:59Any day, every day works for me.
44:01Yeah, I can make the 27th.
44:02All right, we'll do the 27th and that'll
44:04work.
44:05Well, I just don't I I have some work
44:07function. I don't know what day it is.
44:09Um, this is October 27th.
44:12Today's the 22nd of It's a month.
44:14Okay. September.
44:15Yes. All right.
44:20All right. So, a motion to continue this
44:22till October 27th.
44:25I'll make a motion to continue to
44:26October
44:2722nd. 27th, excuse me.
44:2927th.
44:30Second.
44:30There's a second. All in favor say I.
44:33I.
44:33So, you're going to get us those things.
44:34Submit them to Dale for us.
44:37So, what was your question?
44:38What day is that for?
44:40On Tuesday.
44:41Tuesday. Tuesday.
44:42It's a Tuesday. We always
44:43We always try to meet on Tuesdays.
44:45Yeah.
44:47Okay. So, uh I'm going to get a plan um
44:51with the with the deck on.
44:52Yeah.
44:53And that'll match that.
44:55Yeah. So, whatever you going to put in
44:56the permit, you want to match with what
44:57you're going to do with us.
44:58Okay.
44:59Yeah. Because if we grant you a variance
45:01and it's not on there, then you may not
45:03be able to get it on the permit and
45:04you're back here three months from now.
45:06Yeah. And it has to be on there because
45:08it is it is not required for having two
45:11eresses.
45:12Yeah.
45:13And with the setbacks.
45:14Yeah. So at the deck with the setbacks,
45:19does the egress out of the bottom floor
45:21count?
45:23Excuse me.
45:23Does the egress out of the bottom floor
45:25count? Is there too?
45:26It's on It's on on the main is on the
45:29main floor.
45:30You need two on the main floor.
45:34All right.
45:35Thank you for your time.
45:36Do you want to discuss the um
45:41you print those out again?
45:43Yes. So, first you're on.
45:46Thank you.
45:48You're awesome.
45:48All right. Thanks, guys.
45:50Have a great Have a great evening.
45:51Um, we're provided with a draft
45:54application withdrawal form.
45:57So, um,
46:02didn't we talk about having a draft
46:05extension form?
46:06Yeah, we should have that, too.
46:08One at a time.
46:09We'll do one at a time. We got this.
46:11I'm sorry. I thought when I listened to
46:12the meeting, you guys said withdrawal.
46:14That's fine.
46:15Yeah, that's for sure.
46:17So, you guys want to accept this as our
46:19official uh withdrawal form?
46:22I make a motion to accept.
46:24Okay.
46:26Second.
46:26All in favor say I.
46:28I. Motion carries.
46:30Did you add in the changes already to
46:32this?
46:33I did. Yes.
46:34Okay.
46:34The section that we last talked about
46:37was 3.7.
46:44That was my favorite of all.
46:50I don't remember what I did.
46:53I believe
46:54I I had gave you some additional changes
46:56that I had forgotten before. That's in
46:58there too.
47:05You've taken all this. So, we pretty
47:06much went in agreement everything up to
47:08that point, right?
47:14All right.
47:18Still think we should have our annual
47:20meeting in Barbados.
47:22Sounds wonderful.
47:24We should have enough.
47:25I second that.
47:29I thought that sounds like a motion to
47:31me.
47:34Oh, wait. Now I have to sign for
47:35everything, right?
47:36Yes.
47:49It's okay. I waste the food.
47:52I didn't take the money.
48:04Have you ever once ruled out a bull?
48:07Yeah. Yeah. I've had to tell people to
48:12No g.
48:13That happened a few times and
48:16No. Yeah. Hilka. That happened. That was
48:18Hila was crazy. Um and then the landfill
48:22one
48:24the
48:26they appealed Cassella appealed.
48:30We had to get a special zoning officer
48:33for that. And because Kurt was within
48:36300 feet of the landfill or was close.
48:39And um he couldn't he couldn't make a
48:41determination. So they they got the the
48:44zoning enforcement office from Lexington
48:46came out and made a deter. Were you on
48:48the board for that? No.
48:50You were on the board for that. Weren't
48:51you for
48:52Cassella?
48:53I forget.
48:55And Cassella hired some big
48:57environmental firm law firm in Boston.
48:59And they just they just kept trying to
49:02like we want to question the zoning
49:04enforcement officer directly. And I'm
49:05like no that doesn't doesn't work that
49:07way. You ask you ask and then I can ask
49:10the zoning enforcement officer. That was
49:12a little contentious.
49:16Um
49:21no personal attacks on applicants or the
49:23board.
49:25Just me
49:27jumping across the table.
49:29No, no, they were throwing at me.
49:32So, this right here, supplemental
49:33information section 3.10. The board will
49:36not consider any supplement information
49:38submitted less than 72 hours in advance
49:40of the public hearing unless deemed
49:42appropriate at the discretion of the
49:44chair.
49:46Do you want to have that in there? Do
49:48you want do you want to leave it just to
49:50the chair? Yeah, because we just got
49:52supplemental information.
49:53Yeah, we accept I accept everything, but
49:56I'm not always going to be the chair.
49:58I see
50:01you keep saying that.
50:02Well, it's just a matter of when my wife
50:04hits me with a shovel and buries me in
50:05the backyard, it'll be
50:08And does that include the acting chair
50:09if you're not here?
50:10Yeah, that's the vice chair.
50:12Yeah, it does. I would imagine.
50:14Like, does it need to say it or does it
50:16is it assumed?
50:17No, I think it's assumed.
50:18Okay.
50:20Do you want to leave that in there?
50:22So, I think that that kind of is a
50:23fallback
50:25that if we wanted to if we wanted to not
50:27allow extra documentation, right,
50:30that we could have the option to do
50:31that. Now, personally, I'm not if
50:33there's extra documentation unless
50:36unless the board says to says
50:39we shouldn't accept that, I'm going to
50:41accept every piece of document for the
50:43record that I can. time it's appropriate
50:46to use it or keep it as if there's a
50:48situation where it's like this is
50:49getting out of hand and I'm going to
50:51just nip it in the butt,
50:53right?
50:53You know, that's the only reason why we
50:55should actually keep it.
50:56All right.
50:58Yeah. Because you you can you can accept
51:00it, but if if not, we can just fall back
51:03or whoever the chair is.
51:08Change.
51:10The record just show the vote of you
51:12show the vote of everybody when you do
51:14the thing.
51:14I do. Yes. But you guys um talked about
51:17it maybe a few meetings ago. You were
51:19discussing it, so I just highlighted it
51:21just to bring it up in conversation,
51:27but I do always um show everyone's vote.
51:31Um on the voting part, I think I think
51:35that should be a concurring vote of four
51:38sitting board members should be required
51:40to grant special um
51:46I think there should be a reference to
51:47the statute in that. So I think it's for
51:51us to require four. If they change the
51:53statute then why would we keep four? You
51:56know what I mean?
51:57Okay.
51:59The statute says that we have to have a
52:00four-fifths vote for five members.
52:04So just eliminate the four votes and
52:07just take the current vote pursuant to
52:09Mass General law chapter 48 or something
52:11like that.
52:13That way if the statute chang
52:14change it again, we don't have to change
52:15this.
52:16We don't have to change it.
52:30draft decision of the board.
52:41The text of the decision of the board
52:43shall be considered. So
52:47during the board's a sitting member of
52:49the board will generate a draft.
52:54Isn't that what we typically
52:57doing?
52:59Yeah.
53:07So, it doesn't have to be a a member of
53:10the board or city member. It just has to
53:12be somebody.
53:16Well, no. I was just
53:18I don't think we need to put that in
53:19there. What do you think? And if you
53:20guys recall at our last meeting when we
53:23did 1.3 for the quorum,
53:26yeah,
53:26we took out the verbiage
53:29on sitting board.
53:33So we still have that language
53:36even though we took it out.
53:37Correct.
53:39Consistent.
53:40Yeah, I think you're right.
53:41With the um verbiage that we're going to
53:44use.
53:44I don't think we we should have that
53:46thing in there. I don't think we we've
53:48never done that.
53:50Um what we could do we have something in
53:52here.
53:57So just something for us to note as we
53:59continue to review the document we can
54:02make those edits as well.
54:06So if we took that out we can remove it
54:09completely.
54:09Yeah. The board's written decision state
54:11the specific findings of fact and
54:13reasons for a decision based on the text
54:16of the decision of the board shall be
54:17considered discussed and voted on.
54:19So we're just talking out the first
54:21sentence. We just take out the entire
54:23because we don't need that. We're not
54:24because no sitting member is going to
54:26write the decision. Dale usually writes
54:27the decisions. Mhm.
54:29Um, one of the things that we do do
54:31though is that on bigger and more
54:34complex appeals
54:37and uh petitions in the past
54:41uh we have
54:44um allowed
54:47the parties to draft proposed findings
54:50of fact and we can accept
54:52the lawyers do it
54:53right. So when there's sometimes we have
54:54lawyers on multiple sides and we'll say
54:57draft proposed findings of fact and then
55:00they'll we can just we just take and
55:02accept the ones that we want and discard
55:05the ones that we don't want.
55:07The lawyers look at each others and then
55:09we agree upon it.
55:10Yeah.
55:11Accept it.
55:13So we could put in there something like
55:15the board may
55:19except Do we have to put anything in
55:21there? I don't think we have to. I think
55:23that's
55:23No, you don't think we have to that
55:25ability to just do it.
55:28Well, what was our Didn't we have a
55:31whole section for
55:31Yeah, we pulled a lot of that stuff out.
55:35Yeah.
55:43We have 31 that talks about findings of
55:47fact.
55:50Correct.
55:59Yeah. I mean, so 311 kind of says that
56:01we could do that,
56:03right?
56:03Yeah. I think that's what we went over
56:05last
56:09so we don't have to add it again
56:12on the written part. We should take out
56:14sit in 3.12. We should take out sitting
56:18each board member. Just keep take the
56:19word sitting out.
56:26Same thing with 313.
56:28Yeah, we're going to take that whole
56:29first sentence out because no member we
56:31don't typically draft that. Gale drafts
56:34them. So or we'll get the findings of
56:37fact and incorporate. the on the bigger
56:40ones, I would sometimes
56:43do a proposed decision based on what
56:45agreed findings of fact and then we
56:47would the next meeting we would agree on
56:49the final decision and then submit it.
56:52We've done that once or twice.
56:56Um,
57:23it's 3.17. that changed.
57:30They extended it. They extended the the
57:32the time limit for a variance greater
57:34than one year in the in July, didn't
57:37they?
57:38I'm asking you.
57:40Me?
57:40Yeah.
57:41Oh, when I I started here, I didn't have
57:43ZVA. I'm like, don't need to learn that
57:45one.
57:49Um I think that that's changed.
57:51It's my belief that it has.
57:53You're right. So, we just want to change
57:54it to reflect whatever the statute is.
57:56Perfect.
57:56Yeah.
57:58And the one time extension has changed,
58:00too. I think that that's changed as
58:03well.
58:04Do you sign the decisions?
58:06Yeah.
58:09Know that.
58:09Yeah.
58:11Do you have a special pen?
58:12Yeah, I do.
58:13It's not auto pen.
58:15It's an auto pen. I got a Joe Biden auto
58:17pen right in the middle of me.
58:21Um
58:23it is two years now.
58:24It is two. Yeah.
58:26So right must be exercised
58:42two or three times.
58:45Really?
58:46We might have.
58:46I think so. I'm pretty sure.
58:49That's crazy.
58:59I don't think I have any other changes
59:01on this.
59:04Most of it has to do with Did you have
59:07any other changes?
59:09I submitted a lot last time. Um,
59:12I just I just found one.
59:14Yeah.
59:15Um, yeah. So if we just take out sitting
59:18out of the entire document, we don't
59:19have to go through and find the two
59:21code. No, you can do that. 118.
59:23Yeah.
59:24Um 319 is the next section that we had
59:27to deliberate the findings which is the
59:31reconsideration piece.
59:34If we just want to take another look at
59:35that prior it through
59:38prior to the written decision any
59:40sitting member Yeah. You take any member
59:42may request that the chair call a vote
59:45to reconsider the
59:48I don't have a problem with that. We've
59:50never done that since I've been here.
59:55We don't I don't think we meet
59:57enough often enough that we we would
1:00:01have we would make a decision and then
1:00:05have another meeting before
1:00:09because you file it usually with the
1:00:10town clerk within two days, don't you?
1:00:12Yeah.
1:00:13I have two weeks.
1:00:14You have two weeks. Yeah.
1:00:16Remember going in front of Wister takes
1:00:18two weeks.
1:00:18What if we keep this here and somebody
1:00:21calls for a new vote? We could blow past
1:00:24one of our dates, right?
1:00:26No, we've made the decision. So, I think
1:00:28we may
1:00:29What if it gets reopened
1:00:32after we've made a decision?
1:00:33I don't know the answer to that.
1:00:35Go to the next next meeting that we're
1:00:37in session.
1:00:38That's my point. So if we do that then
1:00:41technically speaking is if we made a
1:00:42vote and made a decision and it hasn't
1:00:45been filed with the town clerk and we
1:00:48could advertise another meeting within
1:00:50the twoe period and vote to reopen it
1:00:55we we could logistically do that. it
1:00:58would be pretty tight,
1:01:00right? Particularly if they're at the
1:01:02end of when the actual
1:01:03if that if they're at the statutory end
1:01:06of their timeline, I I don't know
1:01:09whether or not that impacts that or not
1:01:11because it says you need to make you
1:01:13need to open the hearing and make a
1:01:14decision by a certain date. So, if we
1:01:16were to reconsider the decision, I don't
1:01:18I have no idea whether or not
1:01:21Yeah,
1:01:22it's the first decision that goes to the
1:01:23statute or it's the second one if we
1:01:25would decide to reopen it. It's you've
1:01:28it's never happened.
1:01:29I've never done it. I mean, I'm sure
1:01:30it's
1:01:31there. So, the only reason it would come
1:01:33up is if
1:01:34No one's ever done it while we've been
1:01:36on the while I've been on the board.
1:01:38Yeah.
1:01:39I was putting my worst case scenario cap
1:01:40on and some board member didn't like the
1:01:42decision.
1:01:43Oh, he's worried you're going to retire
1:01:45and it's going to be
1:01:49That's what it is.
1:01:50You see how easily I
1:01:53see I caught that. You can't you could
1:01:56we get through of that.
1:02:00It's okay
1:02:02enough.
1:02:02I don't I don't see
1:02:03I don't see I think we should just leave
1:02:04it in there. I don't say we didn't need
1:02:06to do it in that.
1:02:06No.
1:02:07And then we already we did the
1:02:08withdrawal that can withdraw by notice
1:02:10from the applicant in writing. Any
1:02:12application may be withdrawn without
1:02:14present by notice from the applic.
1:02:16Can I correct that to include the form
1:02:19that you guys approved today?
1:02:21Yes.
1:02:21Thank you. Was it withdrawals that we
1:02:24were getting people assigned or was
1:02:25there extension? I can't remember what
1:02:26we're doing them right.
1:02:28Yeah.
1:02:29Okay. So, we should
1:02:30Yeah.
1:02:30But now we've got a form.
1:02:32And I'll work on the extension.
1:02:37Couldn't tell if I think that's correct.
1:02:40I thought it said withdrawal.
1:02:42So before before publication,
1:02:45they can withdraw themselves. after we
1:02:48publish and the meeting is set then they
1:02:50have to request withdrawal from us and
1:02:52we have to vote
1:02:54and if they're no show then
1:02:56then we can make a decision we can't
1:02:57withdraw them
1:02:58rightision
1:03:00we have to make a decision within the
1:03:02time frame set so some we've we've had
1:03:05that before um
1:03:06I was worried he might not show up
1:03:08I think that was
1:03:10that was five it was uh what's his name
1:03:12on 508 something about the post office
1:03:15parking hot
1:03:17and everyone was like, "We're making a
1:03:19decision on that." I'm like, "Okay."
1:03:20Oh, yeah.
1:03:21Yeah.
1:03:24With
1:03:26it accessories,
1:03:27something like that.
1:03:29Yeah.
1:03:30Yeah.
1:03:32Uh
1:03:3341,
1:03:35the last sentence that says incomplete
1:03:37applications not accompanying by
1:03:39documents as required within the general
1:03:41filing requirements is may be denied by
1:03:45the board.
1:03:47Yeah.
1:03:48So
1:03:50do we have
1:03:52a process for that?
1:03:53Yes. So right now the full application
1:03:57has to be submitted to the town clerk. I
1:04:00think the the town clerk does an initial
1:04:01review, don't they? Or
1:04:02no.
1:04:03So they did the day submitted. If the
1:04:06implic she you'll review it. If the if
1:04:09it's incomplete, then it will get
1:04:11rejected and back out. So uh if it's an
1:04:13incomplete application, and we've had
1:04:15that happen a couple of times before.
1:04:17The reason why I ask is because it
1:04:19states that the denial is by the board
1:04:22and not by the clerk or by day. So if we
1:04:27have to change that particular language
1:04:29because it says the board reaches us and
1:04:31so we are the last here to actually
1:04:34receive.
1:04:34So we should just take the board
1:04:36information. So that's why I brought it
1:04:38up that we will need a revision to that.
1:04:40Yeah. So we just removed by the board
1:04:43just but may be denied.
1:04:47That's a good catch.
1:04:48Yeah, it is.
1:04:51And uh
1:04:52well what so what happened was on that
1:04:55is that the
1:04:58our recording person at the time
1:05:03someone was filing applications and I
1:05:05think they were like you know because
1:05:06they were only here on so before Dale
1:05:09the the person in her place before that
1:05:11was only here on Tuesdays and that was
1:05:13the only day of the week that she was
1:05:15here
1:05:15and the person before that was like that
1:05:17too. So we had someone coming in on like
1:05:20a Wednesday or Thursday. They would like
1:05:22slip it in the thing and say, "Oh, I you
1:05:25know, I dropped it off on Thursday." So
1:05:27now that's the day it starts. And there
1:05:29was this big thing. So now it goes to
1:05:30the town clerk and has to get stamped.
1:05:33So on the on the application, if there's
1:05:37something wrong or something not in it
1:05:39correctly,
1:05:40he gets rejected.
1:05:41It gets rejected. The clock doesn't
1:05:44stop.
1:05:44Yeah. It doesn't get denied.
1:05:47Doesn't get Right.
1:05:49Until it's complete. Yeah.
1:05:50Yeah.
1:05:51Can't make one application without it.
1:05:53It can't be denial.
1:05:54In 20 years, we've had
1:05:56we can deny
1:05:58one 40b application.
1:06:01So, so this board is not only has the
1:06:05authority for
1:06:08um
1:06:08I didn't know
1:06:09we have we have the authority for
1:06:12appeals, special permits, variances and
1:06:15affordable housing under chapter 40B
1:06:17that that goes doesn't go to the
1:06:19planning board comes to us. But we've
1:06:22had one full application in the 20 years
1:06:24we've been here and one amendment. Both
1:06:26of those times this board and worked
1:06:29very closely with the planning board
1:06:31because we don't have the ability to do
1:06:33peer review or anything like that. So,
1:06:34we would probably go to the planning
1:06:36board and ask for their assistance uh
1:06:38for some of those things.
1:06:42Why did we even get in the middle? Why
1:06:43doesn't it go to the planning?
1:06:44It's just the way the statute's written.
1:06:50We they had one that was they were
1:06:52talking about in a previous town
1:06:54administrator said, "Oh, well, we could
1:06:57probably just do it through the Sugman's
1:06:58office as a friendly thing." I was like,
1:07:01I it never came to fruition, so it's
1:07:03never a big deal, but I'm like, "Yeah, I
1:07:05don't have the authority to do that."
1:07:06Friendly.
1:07:07Yeah.
1:07:10Let's go call it.
1:07:11Um,
1:07:15one one thing going back to that one
1:07:18that we were just on.
1:07:19Yeah.
1:07:19If we're pulling by the board
1:07:24requirements may be denied
1:07:27within the front
1:07:32may be denied just period. Yeah.
1:07:36So that's not talking about the whole
1:07:39application itself just the submitt.
1:07:42What do you mean?
1:07:44So basically an application come in. Oh
1:07:46this
1:07:48This isn't filled out, right?
1:07:50Yeah.
1:07:50Okay. You're getting denied.
1:07:53So, off of denial, how long do you have
1:07:56before you can reapply?
1:07:57The next day,
1:07:58you can just go off next day.
1:08:00Well, you want to change it to
1:08:02So, it's not like
1:08:03all the denying.
1:08:04We're not denying the application. We're
1:08:06just denying the the the submission.
1:08:08That's all I That's all I want to
1:08:09clarify.
1:08:10So, should we put the submission be
1:08:12denied?
1:08:12Well, it says applications.
1:08:14So, it's not
1:08:16Okay. Yeah. As long as
1:08:17incomplete application is not
1:08:18accompanied by all documents required in
1:08:20the general filing committees.
1:08:24Should I put rejected?
1:08:26Yeah, put rejected. Change it to
1:08:27rejected.
1:08:28Just so we don't want any confusion in
1:08:31that part. Oh, you were denied on that.
1:08:33You know,
1:08:34are we good otherwise? What do you
1:08:36think?
1:08:37You feel good?
1:08:38Feel good.
1:08:40We can make the changes and I'll bring
1:08:42the
1:08:43and we'll just vote on it next time.
1:08:44Yes. Anything else that we need to do
1:08:46tonight?
1:08:47Yes, you did skip number five.
1:08:49Oh, no. What's
1:08:51Yeah.
1:08:52Oh, recommendations.
1:08:53Yes, we
1:08:54But Mary Beth isn't with us tonight.
1:08:57Kazinski.
1:08:58Uh oh, someone new for the board.
1:09:02Yeah. So, so this is Mary Beth Kazinski.
1:09:05She lives on Masonic Home Road. She's
1:09:07applying to the our board. Do we How
1:09:10many we have? Two.
1:09:11Six. So, we have enough room for one
1:09:13more, which I think um she's a mental
1:09:17health counselor. She's happy to provide
1:09:20her resume and request. She's got a
1:09:21master's degree. I think we should make
1:09:24a minimum requirement at least a PhD by
1:09:27everyone going forward.
1:09:29She have after meeting sessions.
1:09:31Yeah.
1:09:34Um yeah, I'm fine with that. Do you want
1:09:36me to make a vote on this? Does anyone
1:09:38want to
1:09:39recommend them
1:09:39to recommend the seleman nominate Mary
1:09:42Beth Kazinski? Does anyone want to make
1:09:45a make a motion? You're going to make
1:09:46the motion
1:09:47make a motion
1:09:48to uh to nom to recommend Mary Beth
1:09:52Kazinski.
1:09:53Second
1:09:53as an alternate member of the board.
1:09:56There's a second by Rob. All in favor
1:09:57say I.
1:09:58I.
1:09:59Motion carries.
1:10:02All right. Any other things we need? Is
1:10:04there a motion to
1:10:07end the meeting?
1:10:08Motion to adjurnn.
1:10:09Is there second on the motion? All in
1:10:11favor say I. I.
