2026-09-22 - Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting

Summary

Built from YouTube ASR auto-captions (no speaker labels; names often garbled).

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):

Topic Minutes Share
45 Lake View Drive Variance and Special Permit 42 60%
ZBA Rules and Regulations Revision 23 33%
Reorganization and minutes 3 5%
Other business 1 2%

Reorganization and minutes

0:07-3:22

  • Approved the prior minutes and completed the annual reorganization, all by voice vote: Frank Lombardi stays on as chair, a member named Jason (as heard; the previous vice chair, Rob, was replaced) was elected vice chair, and Garrett (as heard) became clerk.

45 Lake View Drive Variance and Special Permit

3:24-45:40

  • Petition presented by contractor Raymond Bonville (rendered "Bonavville") for a family camp destroyed by a fallen tree in 2022 and demolished in 2024-25.
  • Curtis Meskus gave the building commissioner's timeline: tree strike April 2022, demolition started without a permit in October 2024, stop-work order and hazardous-material cleanup, demo permit February 2025, structure removed about March 2025.
  • Because the new house would sit 5 ft from each side line against the 15-ft side setback, the project needs 10-ft side-setback variances plus a special permit for a pre-existing nonconforming lot.
  • Abutter Kim Mason of 51 Lake View Drive spoke generally in favor but worried about the new house being wider, taller, and closer than the old camp (about 7 ft off the line before).
  • Midway through, the board noticed the plan submitted with the application showed a 12 x 23 ft rear (lakeside) deck that was absent from the plan the board had been given. The board cannot grant relief for something not on the approved plan and wants one complete plan showing the deck, stairs, and exact side-line distances; a possible kickback to the Conservation Commission for roof drains and a retaining wall was also mentioned.
  • Continued to October 27, 2026 (after a series of date conflicts), with a possible informal site visit by members in early October.

ZBA Rules and Regulations Revision

45:41-1:08:50

  • Resumed the multi-meeting revision of the Rules and Regulations.
  • Accepted a new draft application withdrawal form (an extension-request form is still to come).
  • Kept the chair-discretion language on supplemental information submitted under 72 hours before a hearing.
  • Agreed to replace the "four votes" language with a reference to the statute so it tracks future legislative changes.
  • Struck "sitting" and the sentence about a sitting member drafting decisions (staff, Dale, drafts them, and parties sometimes submit proposed findings).
  • Flagged the variance-duration and one-time-extension provisions to be updated to the amended Chapter 40A.
  • Kept the reconsideration provision, and changed "denied" to "rejected" for incomplete submissions.
  • Chapter 40B comprehensive permit authority was discussed in passing (the board has handled one full application and one amendment in 20 years).
  • A final vote on the revised rules is expected at a later meeting.

Other business

1:08:50-1:10:11

  • Voted to recommend Mary Beth Kazinski (Masonic Home Road, a mental health counselor) to the Select Board as a new alternate member.
  • The new town planning director was present in the audience; the meeting adjourned.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

Transcript

0:07Okay. So, this is um

0:10Tuesday, September 22nd, 2026. Charlton

0:13Zoning Board of Appeals. Going to call

0:15the meeting to order. And do we have We

0:18don't have Brandy Schiller here yet. All

0:21right. So, we'll get back to Brandy.

0:24So, uh let's first review and approve

0:27the minutes from the last meeting. Do we

0:29have those?

0:31All right. Do I hear anything on the

0:33minutes from the last meeting?

0:36No.

0:37Is there any motions?

0:38Motion to approve the minutes.

0:40There's a

0:41second.

0:41There's a second on the motion to

0:42approve the minutes as as

0:45printed. All in favor say I.

0:47I.

0:48All right. That carries.

0:50All right. ZBA member reorganization. So

0:53once a year we have to set who is going

0:55to be the chair, the vice chair,

0:58secretary.

1:01Um we don't need a treasure.

1:06Uh clerk. There's a clerk. It's chair,

1:08vice chair, and clerk, I think. Right.

1:11All right. So who are we going to do?

1:16Do what is it right now? I'm the chair.

1:18Who's the vice chair?

1:20Rob.

1:21Rob's the vice chair. It's been so long.

1:23So,

1:24and who's the clerk?

1:25Who has been without a clerk since

1:28What does a clerk What do they all do?

1:31No, I mean, the only thing I So, he just

1:34says it's just has a mirror to check to

1:36make sure that I'm still breathing. So,

1:38you know, the chair is dead. The vice

1:40chair, you can step in. Um, other than

1:43that, it's not You You have clerk stuff

1:46that might need to get signed, but

1:47that's about it. There's not really any

1:48kind of major roles for anybody or

1:51whatever.

1:52So,

1:54it's up to you. We want to reach I I

1:56think we should name I would nominate

1:58Rob as the vice chair again. Jason is

2:01the clerk.

2:02Jason,

2:05you want to nominate Jason as the vice

2:07chair? Jason as the vice chair.

2:09Garrett the clerk. You want to do that?

2:10Garrett the clerk.

2:12Is that a nomination?

2:13I like that.

2:13You want me to stay chair? Does someone

2:15else want to be chair?

2:16You can be chair.

2:17Oh, thanks.

2:19You earned it. I've earned it. You can

2:21give it up.

2:24I'll give it up if someone else wants

2:25it. I don't really care. Um, I guess

2:28not. All right. So,

2:29season starting. I can't

2:32be hunting from now till next year.

2:35That's right. That's right. All right.

2:38So, do we have formal nominations? Does

2:41someone want to make the formal

2:42nominations?

2:45Anybody?

2:46So, I'll nominate Jason as vice chair,

2:51Garrett as clerk. Is a second on that?

2:53Second. All in favor say I.

2:55I.

2:55All right. Who wants to nominate the

2:57chair then?

2:58I'll nominate the chair.

2:59All right. So, there's a nomination for

3:01the chair. Is a second on that?

3:03I second it.

3:04All right. All in favor say I.

3:06I. Motion carries. We took care of that.

3:09Um,

3:10this is

3:11Bonavville. I was at that meeting.

3:13Oh, okay.

3:15Wrong room, huh?

3:16He is the petitioner.

3:18Okay. Do we have something from him just

3:20authorizing him to speak?

3:22Yes.

3:22Okay. All right. So, you want to come

3:24over here? Oh, no. He can't. Can he Can

3:26the camera see him from there?

3:28Yes.

3:30They'll see him. You should sit over

3:31here.

3:31Yeah. You sit right there.

3:32Okay.

3:35This is property located at 45 Lake View

3:38Drive.

3:38Okay.

3:39All right.

3:40Can you state your name and for the

3:42record, please?

3:43Yep. Raymond Bonville.

3:44Okay. So, you want to tell us

3:48and you're not the owner of the

3:50property?

3:50No.

3:51Okay. So, you want to What's your

3:53I'm the I'm the uh contractor.

3:56Okay.

3:56And um there was uh a tree that landed

4:00on the house.

4:01Yeah.

4:01And um totally demolished it.

4:04Okay.

4:05It's been uh in the family for like

4:07three generations.

4:09And uh we're putting it into the same

4:11spot that uh it was originally in.

4:14Okay.

4:16So what you're just asking for a special

4:18permit or you asking for?

4:20Yes. Special permit code.

4:24Special permit and the bearings.

4:29The septic and the water is is

4:34it's town

4:36in town water too, isn't it?

4:38No.

4:39want it as well.

4:40Okay.

4:48So, are you changing the dimensions of

4:50the with the exist how long ago did the

4:52structure get the roof fall on it?

4:56About two years ago.

4:57Okay.

4:59We're not past the point where it's

5:01considered abandoned, is it?

5:04Well, when it's my turn, I'll lay out

5:06the chronology.

5:12So this is your plan.

5:21So this is a the house is going to stay

5:23in the exact same spot. Correct.

5:39The well is in the front.

5:41In the back.

5:42Oh, I see it. I said just a cover. Yes.

5:45Um

5:57So it says connect to existing sewer. So

5:59that's

6:01yes connect.

6:04You guys have any questions?

6:07Rob agent Ryan what we the house isn't

6:11there's nothing on the property now

6:12right there permanent variance but what

6:15for

6:16just the what?

6:17Just the seller. Okay.

6:24Previous house has been demolished.

6:26Yeah, it was um um

6:33Okay.

6:36So, you're stating what's existing on

6:38here. Can you just let us know?

6:40Uh right now, there's nothing on there.

6:41You said part of the something. Uh yeah,

6:44just the uh just the cell hole and

6:46there's some more of the the old stone

6:49foundation and that and that's going to

6:51be removed too. Not much of it is left.

6:55Excuse me.

6:58Okay.

7:00You have any other questions? Garrett,

7:01do you have any questions?

7:04No. I'd like to hear Curtis's timeline.

7:06All right. So, we want to call the

7:07building inspector enforcement officer.

7:11Good evening, Kurt Mascus, building

7:13commissioner, zoning enforcement

7:15officer. If you don't mind, I have the

7:16usual set of handouts. One for her, you

7:19get the planning, so you can follow

7:21along. Thank you.

7:23And uh

7:26yeah,

7:31get one out of there. Give it to the

7:33nice lady over here.

7:37this way

7:39and some of these around that way.

7:45You're welcome.

7:48So, the subject property is on Lake View

7:50Drive. It's a 30 by approximately 100

7:53foot lot. It was improved by a camp

7:56style building

7:59uh shown uh in the next page on April of

8:022022 when I was summoned to the site

8:05because a tree had crashed down upon the

8:08building. Um

8:11in October 2024, Mr. Bonavville

8:14undertook demol demolishing the rest of

8:17the building without a building permit

8:20and ran into some issues with hazardous

8:24material on the site. Currently 45 Lake

8:27View Drive, page three is a vacant lot

8:31and we show 51 Lake View Drive to the

8:34right. U that's incorrect because that's

8:39can't be on both sides. That's not 51.

8:41It's

8:4347 or 49, something like that.

8:47And then 51 on the lower part of the

8:50page.

8:5151's the red one

8:53on the top.

8:54On the top.

8:55Yeah.

8:56Oh, it is 51. What's the next one? The

8:58white one would be 57

9:03maybe. I don't know. It's down the

9:05street. So,

9:05you're the you're the little red one.

9:07I am.

9:07Okay.

9:08Yes.

9:08Thank you for helping me with that.

9:11Um,

9:13so anyway, the the lower part of the

9:15page is the next house to the right with

9:17with an incorrect number. Uh, 41 Lake

9:20View to the left and there is a common I

9:23believe it's a piece of town land um

9:26that gives access to the lake. Uh 29

9:30Sunset Drive extensions across the

9:32street and then 42 Lake View also across

9:37the street. And as I started to say in

9:40April of 2022, the house was struck by a

9:44tree. In October of 2024,

9:49um, demo was started without a permit. A

9:51stop work order was issued. Between

9:54November and December, we worked with D,

9:57the applicant to deal with the hazardous

10:00material on the site. In February of

10:032025, the demo permit was issued and

10:07approximately in March of 2025, the home

10:11was removed.

10:13So, we're in a sort of funky state here,

10:16right?

10:17There was still part of a structure in

10:192025, though.

10:20No, there hasn't.

10:23Well, there was a structure in February

10:26of 2025.

10:27Okay.

10:29And in March, it was removed. So in

10:322025, so we're March, so we're less than

10:35two years

10:36into it if there was still portion of it

10:38portion of it there.

10:40Yeah.

10:40Okay. So now we have two issues. The new

10:43the new zoning laws say that um a lot

10:48that's pre-existing non-conforming to

10:50area frontage or both and the

10:53renovations do not offend the setback.

10:57Um I could issue a permit by right.

11:00Right. But they do.

11:02But they do.

11:03Yeah.

11:04And then we have Mr. Bonavville's plan

11:07submitted with the application

11:11which shows a slightly larger house than

11:15what was there. But we have a five foot

11:19setback on one side, a 5ft setback on

11:22the other, which obviously offends

11:24current zoning setback of 15 ft. M

11:27and we have a 30 foot front and rear set

11:30back which you know we don't have a

11:32problem with. So

11:33right just the side set back

11:35so it would require 10 ft.

11:36So we require a 10T variance on each

11:39side

11:39side and a special permit

11:42because it's a pre-existing nonwarming

11:44lot.

11:45The slight increase is that due to

11:47overhang or is it actually just the

11:50layout? That's I mean we're talking you

11:53know a foot or two you know of

11:56additional

11:58is proposing to stay 5t off the property

12:00line at 5t we don't get into issues with

12:04building code and having to rate walls

12:06because we're within 5t of the property

12:08line.

12:09Yeah.

12:10Um so that that isn't an issue for my

12:12other half.

12:13Okay.

12:14And um as he said there is municipal

12:18sewage on the street and and you know

12:20they indicate that it's a well on the

12:22street or on the property

12:23on the property. Okay.

12:25So right now it's six or seven feet off

12:27the line

12:28probably. But I I don't I can only go by

12:32what the plan was because there was no

12:34survey done to my knowledge of the house

12:37location was you know my brothers would

12:40have been is is if we approach this is

12:43and and in 2022 2023 2024

12:48you know oh yeah you want to remove and

12:50replace this building let's go to ZBA

12:52we'll get a straight special permit to

12:54change alter extend under the the other

12:56regulations you know the previous law

12:59Now we're into Okay. It offends the

13:01setbacks. So, we need a special permit

13:04because the lot's on sides.

13:05Yeah.

13:06And need variances on the two sides

13:08because it offends the setbacks.

13:11We got 30 ft of furniture on this, too.

13:13Huh.

13:16Yeah. It's tight.

13:17They're all tight.

13:18Yeah.

13:19So, that's what I have, ladies and

13:21gentlemen.

13:22Yeah.

13:23Foundation. Same foundation or replacing

13:26foundation? We're replacing it with a

13:28stone foundation,

13:34but the new foundation hasn't been put

13:36in yet.

13:37Nothing's been done. Nothing

13:40you're getting all the permits this time

13:42first.

13:42Yes.

13:47Okay. Um, we have some more butters

13:50here.

13:51Yep. Me.

13:52Okay. You want to

13:55I know, right? I did her house, too.

13:57Oh, did you?

13:58If you just so she can speak and get in

14:00the camera, if we could have her sit

14:01there for a moment. Okay.

14:03You want to just come up, state your

14:04name and address for the record.

14:05Yes.

14:06And then just um

14:09if you have any comments on property, so

14:12I have questions.

14:13Okay.

14:14Um Kim Mason, nice to meet you. 51 Lake

14:17View Drive, Charlton. This um is very

14:21important to us. this house. My

14:23greatgrandfather and grandfather built

14:25this little camp that we live in and our

14:28neighbors are wonderful and we want to

14:29do right by them. We just want to make

14:31sure that the house does not become one

14:34of those extra McMansions and encroaches

14:36on our property. Um

14:38the property line is so thin as it is

14:41anyway and we've always gotten along

14:42with those neighbors. They're great.

14:45Um it's ours our house is a camp as

14:47well. It's not a it's not a year round

14:49home. It's a camp.

14:51season.

14:52And so, um, it looks like it's larger,

14:56which is what I was worried about. Um,

14:58and it looks like it's closer, which is

15:00also what I'm worried about because it's

15:02already so tight on both.

15:05So, how much closer do you think it will

15:07be from the old house?

15:09See, you can even if you went down there

15:11now, you would be able to see where the

15:13old property was because the hole is

15:15still there, right?

15:16And we didn't we haven't touched it. We

15:18haven't done anything to it. and we

15:20we're the only ones next to it,

15:21right?

15:22Um and you can see that that there's

15:24more than seven feet there. So going

15:26down to 5T would we would definitely

15:29feel that. I was more concerned about

15:31the height too. Like I'm worried that

15:34there's a there's a limit on the height.

15:36Um Oh, and and I get so I understand

15:39like you can't go out so you're going to

15:41go up

15:42and and that happens. But is the front

15:44are they going to be pushed more in the

15:45front? Is there going to be like an

15:47extensive porch put on the front that

15:50you

15:51I did see that.

15:52Yeah. So, are you considering this the

15:54front or this the front? The road I

15:56would consider as the front.

15:57Oh, I I thought you always talk about

15:58the lake as the front.

16:00When you have a lake house, it's always

16:02the front lake.

16:03No, because

16:05we

16:05Oh, my grandpa was wrong.

16:07Well, I I know what lake people do, but

16:09I'll give you my opinion.

16:10I'll do whatever you want.

16:12No, I believe you. And you're you're

16:14lovely. I just want to make I'm talking

16:17about lake frontage.

16:19I don't care about the road.

16:20I don't look at the road.

16:22I actually hate that road and I will put

16:24that on record that the road is terrible

16:26and that I get a river through my

16:28property which is a whole separate

16:30problem that Ry tried to actually help

16:32me with and we do have a rare running

16:34through my property.

16:35It does not appear that I mean this is

16:37it. It looks like they're going to be 37

16:39feet off of the road and then at least

16:42that off between the back of the house

16:44to the lake.

16:45They were further back than we were. Are

16:47they Are they supposed to be that way?

16:50Yeah. So, this is your exist. This is

16:52your house right here.

16:53Yes.

16:54So, that's the back of their house would

16:55equal the back of their house front.

16:57And what about their porch?

16:59This doesn't have a porch in it. This

17:02is putting one back on.

17:04This plane doesn't have a porch. How are

17:06they going to get down the stairs?

17:08There's going to be a deck in the back,

17:10but not but no porch in the front.

17:14It's um it's a little one, Joan. It's

17:16just to get out and then take a left and

17:19go down the stairs.

17:21How many floors is the house going to

17:22be?

17:23Two.

17:24So, do you mean what it used to have,

17:26which is like the basement seller with

17:28the rock cellar and then one floor, or

17:31do you mean two up?

17:32Uh yeah, it's going to have a basement.

17:34It's going to have the kitchen on the

17:37main floor and the bedrooms upstairs.

17:39So, it is going to be a lot taller.

17:41No, not really because um the the attic

17:43had uh pretty close to 7 ft.

17:47Although although it was a a kind of a

17:50A12 pitch, but um alls we're going to

17:53really do is keep it the same try to

17:56keep it in the same spot, the same size

17:59house, everything. But the only thing

18:01that's going to be different is that

18:02they're going to have a remodeled uh

18:04basement, better basement. Instead of

18:06having a dirt floor and

18:07yeah,

18:08dirt there and everything, it'll be uh 8

18:11foot walls.

18:14So there is a there is a limit in in

18:17town to the height of the building. What

18:19is it? 20 36 feet to the mean roof

18:22height from the mean grade.

18:25I was just studying statistics today in

18:28AP. I was like that means average. I got

18:31you follow that.

18:34That was good. Okay. 36.

18:36So that's the So that's the top of the

18:39roof.

18:40That's the peak.

18:42So that's that's the height that they

18:43could go. They can't go higher than

18:44that.

18:45Okay. Uh in terms of the overall

18:48footprint

18:51from what the the zoning enforcement

18:52officer tells us, it is slightly larger

18:54than what was there before.

18:57I'm I'm only relaying what is shown on

19:00the plans. I have no measure.

19:02It appears slightly larger.

19:04you know, it appears. So, the red line

19:09in the existing house and a little bit

19:11of green around the outside is and at

19:14this scale, which is

19:18telling me that it's uh

19:221 in equals 10 ft, which is about right.

19:26I mean, that's a little more looks like

19:27a little more than a half an inch,

19:30you know. You're talking like you said.

19:31Yes. It looks like it was might have

19:33been seven feet from the property line

19:35before and he's asking specifically to

19:38be

19:395T

19:435T.

19:44Now that's that's the board's decision.

19:48You know that you know that's why we're

19:49talking about a special permit and a

19:51variance.

19:55So the variance is the board's way

19:58decision

19:58decision to Yeah, you just get the

20:01information.

20:02What's this thing?

20:03It' be nice for more detail like an

20:05elevation. There's no depth on it.

20:07767

20:09proposed roof drains. So, we have to

20:11deal with storm water management

20:15conservation.

20:17It's basically something

20:19roofed or something

20:23and then they get a new concrete wall.

20:26That's not

20:29That's conservation.

20:30Well,

20:31I wish that they could continue that

20:33into 51 Lake View.

20:35Well, okay. So, that two two things on a

20:38on a concrete wall at a lake. One, it's

20:41it's working within 100 ft of a well and

20:43you're you're on the lake. where almost

20:45anything you do.

20:46It sure is.

20:48Sure does.

20:48It does. And then um but if it is a

20:51retaining wall at the lake, then it

20:53would need a building permit, but it

20:55would be the building permit would be

20:56reviewed also by conservation because we

20:59work together around these properties.

21:01So if I ever got a cement front, then I

21:04would a cement wall by the lake, I would

21:06have to go through you guys, too.

21:07That's great.

21:10You should do it.

21:10Well, we don't want them to fall over

21:12and hurt people. Oh, I believe I

21:14understand. There's just a lot of steps

21:16and a lot of money.

21:19Okay. I hope it's not too close cuz now

21:22it's going to be taller.

21:26I hope it's not too close. That's all.

21:28But they're very nice and I want them to

21:30have their home back.

21:32Okay.

21:32That's all I have.

21:34So, generally, you're okay with this?

21:35I am generally okay with it. And I'd

21:37like for them to be able to have their

21:38home. And I've worked with Ray in the

21:40past. He is a nice man. He follows

21:43through.

21:43Thank you.

21:44You're welcome.

21:45Sounds like she would prefer it not be 5

21:47ft and stay at seven, but

21:48I would prefer I mean I would prefer

21:50that. I just don't want to screw over my

21:52neighbors, but I don't want to get

21:54screwed either.

21:56I I'm curious, Mr. Von. Is there an

21:58elevation plan?

22:03It's actually on here. You can see the

22:04elevation layout.

22:06No, that I think you're talking about an

22:08elevation of the building.

22:09Of the building. So, let me go look at

22:11my files. It might take me a minute to

22:14to print it out if you want to indulge

22:16me.

22:17I'm going to have Mr. Bonn come back. I

22:19don't mind unless you have anything else

22:21to add.

22:22I don't think you

22:23All right. Thank you. Uh, sir, do you

22:26have any

22:28Oh, no. I uh I'm the the new planning

22:30director here and

22:32Oh, I see. I'm sorry about that.

22:33I was working till 7. Your guys meeting

22:35started at 7:00, so I thought I'd come

22:36join see how you guys uh run your show.

22:38Nice.

22:40There is uh two steps

22:43down in the foundation.

22:45As the land goes on an angle like this,

22:49the foundation is going to sit like

22:50this.

22:54Mhm. Yeah. It'll be a step foundation.

22:55Yeah. So, it's going to be it the whole

22:58house ain't going to be no taller than

22:5924 ft

23:02from the bottom from the bottom of the

23:04ground at the back. You don't know how

23:07tall the old house was, though.

23:09Uh well actually um it it had a dirt

23:15cellar.

23:15Mhm.

23:16And it was sitting on peers.

23:19So in the back it will keep the same

23:22height. In the front you have to keep

23:25the same height because that's how you

23:28walk out. You walk out. You're right on

23:29land

23:31in the front.

23:32This will have a walk out basement.

23:33Yes. Okay.

23:34This will so that's how you access the

23:36backyard.

23:36It is that big. It was already that big

23:39already. You can walk right in.

23:41Okay.

23:43You had mentioned something about a deck

23:45that I don't see on the plans. Is

23:47uh

23:48Is the deck on the side or is it in the

23:50back?

23:50No, it's in the back. Uh in the front

23:54by the lake.

23:54By the lake.

24:00Well, I mean, if as long as if the deck

24:02is within the setback, then I'm not

24:04really too worried about that. It's just

24:06so have 15 feet on either side.

24:09Right.

24:10Right. If we're going to grant them a a

24:12variance on either side anyways,

24:17unless you want to specifically exclude,

24:19you know, a deck or whatever, we're

24:20granting a variance.

24:23No, I I understand that. It's just

24:25without seeing it here to have the plans

24:27approved and then add a deck later on.

24:30Right. But I mean, so if we grant a

24:31variance of 10 ft on either side

24:34and they add a deck and it's within the

24:35rear setback, he's not imposing on that

24:38variance any further than we've already

24:40granted.

24:40So granting the variance to the house

24:43does not grant the variance to the deck

24:45also.

24:47I think if we're going to grant a

24:49variance for the structure, unless we

24:51specifically exclude certain things, I

24:53think it would include the deck. If they

24:55decide afterwards that as long as they

24:57don't offend that variance, I think it's

25:00I think and it's part of that structure,

25:02I think they're okay. I mean,

25:03okay,

25:04but that would be up to Kurt.

25:05I have a question.

25:06Yeah.

25:09Variance is only for both sides, not the

25:11back and front.

25:12You don't need one for the back and the

25:14front, right? So the deck is the deck

25:17would automatically be allowed once the

25:19permates

25:19if his point is is that if you decide to

25:22put a deck on afterwards, right, the

25:25deck is going to offend the setbacks.

25:26But my point is that if we if we grant a

25:29variance and the deck's attached to the

25:31structure, I think it it it kind of

25:33carries with it.

25:35That's what I'm I'm I'm going to have to

25:38disagree with you on that.

25:39You don't think so? No, because we would

25:42have a action

25:45by the board that says according to this

25:48plan

25:50and that plan does not include a deck.

25:53If this was if this was an existing

25:55building,

25:57okay, under the way 4A is written, yeah,

26:00it says I can grant a permit as long as

26:04the work does not offend the setbacks.

26:07So adding a deck the full width of the

26:09house would now offend the setback.

26:12That's what I was wondering.

26:13Yeah, that's if we that's if we say

26:16according to this plan.

26:18Well, I'm I'm trying to the the big

26:20printer is warming up again.

26:22Okay.

26:23And I have a sort of crappy copy of a

26:26plan for this house.

26:30In a moment.

26:30By that logic, they could have a shed

26:32down by the somewhere too.

26:34Oh, please don't do that. That happened

26:35on my other side.

26:36I'm not Not saying they should, but

26:38please don't

26:39you want to say something?

26:40I I did, but I I wanted to get Kurt's

26:43take on it of a of an approach to adding

26:46a deck later that he may disagree with.

26:48Ultimately, he's the zoning enforcement

26:50officer. So, it will ultimately be his

26:52call if it comes back here. But, um,

26:55under pre-existing non-conforming, if a

26:58variance is granted here, um, the

27:01building commissioner does have the

27:03authority to

27:05um

27:07to allow for

27:09some intensification. Um,

27:13but again, it's it's his discretion. So,

27:16I just wanted to see kind of what his

27:18his take on was that and he has a better

27:19understanding of our bylaw of

27:23what degree he can actually do that and

27:24it's hard to say or you don't have a

27:26plan in front of you. Is this beyond

27:28that threshold or not? Uh because it

27:30could be a kickback to the the CDA.

27:33Let me ask you this question. You said

27:35you're just going to build a stairway.

27:36What how what are you what are you

27:38looking at in the

27:40middle the house is this wide? The deck

27:42is this wide and it has to be because we

27:45need to have two means egress. One of

27:49them is off the back deck with emergency

27:51exit.

27:52Oh, so it's a deck and stairs.

27:54Basically a landing out the building

27:56with stairs.

27:57Where is it going to be?

27:58I had thought they exited through the

28:00basement out to the level of the grade.

28:03Oh, no.

28:06Okay. So, this is the plan that was

28:09presented as part of the application

28:11that started this action.

28:13Oh,

28:18that's a much bigger deck.

28:21Yeah,

28:23that's in a That's a deck deck.

28:27House.

28:33All right. We have more to change the

28:36plan.

28:39This is the plan that you submitted as

28:41part of the application bill.

28:43Yep.

28:44Can Can you uh we take a closer look at

28:47that?

28:49So, it's showing a 12 by 30

28:52two deck.

28:55They're showing the building on the

28:57Well, they have a nice ortho of the

28:59building. This would be the lakeside.

29:02They're showing the building is 26 I

29:07think I'm reading this right upside down

29:08268 to the top on the street side

29:13and

29:1533 ft to the top on the lake side

29:20that would be under the you know mean

29:23height and elevation. So under under the

29:26zoning bylaw, it is not exceed the you

29:29know allowed height

29:3212 ft of the deck.

29:35We added that.

29:36What's the back of the house?

29:37Oh god, it I don't think I even need to

29:40It's coming to me.

29:41What's the rear set

29:44on that?

29:45Wow. It says that it's 1 in equals 10

29:49ft. So 10 20 30 40 50 If this is blown

29:55up to scale, well, that's an inch. So,

29:59it's saying that it's 50 feet from the

30:01lake. Add 12 ft, you're still more than

30:0430 feet from the lakefront.

30:06Yeah,

30:08we really don't know the exact

30:10measurements.

30:14Of what, sir?

30:16Of the from from the back of this deck

30:19to the lake.

30:23We don't really know for certain.

30:27There you go.

30:301 in equals 10 ft. 10 20 30 40 50 55 ft.

30:36So that'd still be okay.

30:38So even with a 12 deck that deck that

30:40deck would offend, but still have to go

30:43get a permit for the deck

30:46if he did it after the fact if it's not

30:48in the building permit already.

30:49Sounds like

30:50Well, no, he said that is in the

30:51building. what was submitted is

30:53submitted with the deck.

30:55But you know from this plan right here

30:57is is that that deck is going to offend

30:58one side of the setbacks at least.

31:01Looks like both sides

31:02probably both with the stairs cuz the

31:05stairs are only

31:08does it say how wide the stairs are

31:10here? How wide are the stairs for the

31:123T 3T?

31:15Yeah. So it's still going to offend both

31:17sides. How wide is the building?

31:20How does it affect both sides?

31:22Well, we're giving the sides sep

31:24if we let them build it as it is.

31:27It wouldn't affect the sides any

31:29different. It would just be the rear.

31:31So, we're treating as the deck being a

31:33separate entity for the house.

31:35No.

31:35Well, no. The paper we were originally

31:37given didn't show a deck.

31:38Didn't show a deck.

31:39Oh.

31:40So, you were asking us for if we're

31:42going to grant you a variance according

31:44to the plan and there's no deck, you

31:45don't get a variance for the deck. You

31:47can't build the deck.

31:48Yeah.

31:49Oh.

31:50Well, we need to tackle because that's

31:52not a second egress. So,

31:55the options

31:56you only need a three foot landing and a

31:58set of stairs for the second egress. You

32:01don't need a deck.

32:03No.

32:06Is it silly not to have a deck on the

32:08lakefront property? Probably.

32:10If you're going to have the stairs, you

32:12might as well have the deck. No. Is it

32:14Does it

32:16What is it? Is it the size that's that's

32:19an issue?

32:20So, what's

32:23I was think I was

32:25What's that process?

32:28We can have him do that if you want.

32:30Well, it's not up to me. It's up to him.

32:33No, no. So, but he submitted the this is

32:36the plan that's submitted to the

32:38building department.

32:39This isn't this isn't the same

32:42layout that is to us to us.

32:45So, if

32:48If we grant a variance based on this

32:51right here,

32:52he can't do that.

32:53He can't do that because he didn't get a

32:54variance for all of those things.

32:56So, either he has to change this plan

32:58or he has to change that,

33:00right?

33:00Or he changes that,

33:02right?

33:04So, would he need continuation and

33:07change it? Would he need to withdraw and

33:09reapply?

33:10No, I don't think we need to withdraw

33:12something like that. I think we would

33:13just need a continuence to to amend have

33:16an amended plan.

33:18But do you do you want to go and get

33:21that? Do you want to have all that stuff

33:23on the plan be or and wait or do you

33:27want to just give them

33:29just wing it and give it to them? That's

33:31up to you guys.

33:36Well, we can't use the plan as our

33:39as our variance or our special permit.

33:41We would have to word it.

33:43We'd have to put it in the wording. We

33:46can't say as drawn on the plan, but it's

33:49not on the plan. So, do do you

33:51understand?

33:52Kind of.

33:53Yeah.

33:54It's just because the the deck is a I'm

33:58I'm looking at it as it's a different

34:00entity to the house

34:02because if whatever is granted to the

34:06house

34:08um would be

34:11granted, right?

34:12Because it's a separate entity.

34:15That's what they're saying. It's a tax.

34:17If we approve this as plans are

34:19submitted, this plan doesn't have a

34:20deck, which means you don't have a

34:21variance for the deck when you go to add

34:23that later.

34:24The deck has to be 15 off of the off of

34:27the side.

34:28Yeah, that's on a stairway. That's a

34:29deck.

34:31That's a 12 by 23 deck. That's a

34:34nice size.

34:36And we're not saying we have a problem

34:37with it or not. We're just trying to

34:38make sure that what we decide on is

34:41correct.

34:42Okay?

34:43Because what we were previously deciding

34:44on was this, which didn't show the deck.

34:46Now, this one shows the deck.

34:48Okay. So, I should change this with the

34:50deck on it. So,

34:52if you're going to do that, then I want

34:54I'd like to see better numbers exactly

34:58where the footprint is in relation to

35:01the uh where the proposed is it already

35:03lined out?

35:04Yeah.

35:05You already make Is it So, you don't

35:07know But you don't know exactly where

35:08the property line is, do you?

35:09Oh, yeah. It's been surveyed.

35:11Okay.

35:12Yep.

35:13So, I would suggest maybe the board have

35:16a continuence.

35:19What What day do we have until this?

35:21Um, November 11th.

35:22Okay.

35:24Have Mr. That's Veterans Day.

35:28Have Mr. Bonavville make any amendments

35:31that he would like to the plans

35:35and

35:38have the surveyor stake out the existing

35:44house and the proposed house on the

35:46property and we can go take a look at it

35:48and then the board could do a site visit

35:51so that it's very clear.

35:56Will they even be able to stake out what

35:57the old foundation was?

35:59Oh, it's still there.

36:00He says part of it with the stuff is

36:02still there. Yeah.

36:03Only only a portion is still there,

36:05right?

36:06The hole is still there, right?

36:09What I'm thinking is as they as they

36:11remove the foundation, they probably

36:12expanded the hole bigger than the

36:14foundation. I guess

36:15there wasn't much of a foundation there.

36:17It was just collapsed in, you know, dirt

36:20floor, stone camp foundation

36:23hanging on by a thread.

36:26Is that something you can do?

36:29What is being proposed?

36:32Putting the whole structure in the

36:33foundation.

36:34What Curtis is proposing?

36:36So, what we'd like is we'd like a

36:38revised plan showing the deck and any

36:41other stairs or structures that are

36:44going to be on the house. If we grant a

36:46variance, we want to grant a variance

36:48for the whole thing that you so you're

36:50not coming back to us in three months.

36:51Like, oh, by the way, we want a deck

36:53next spring. and then we have to revisit

36:55the whole thing. So we I don't any

36:57anything else that's going to be built

36:59as part of rebuilding the um

37:02the house that we don't want it all in

37:05one plan. The other thing that we want

37:07is it it seems that it's not

37:13exact on how much of a variance you need

37:16on the side setbacks. So from testimony

37:19from the neighbor and from what it

37:21appears on the plan there is that your

37:24new foundation might be two or three

37:27feet wider than the than the the

37:30previous structure. So we'd want to see

37:33exactly how many feet from the line on

37:36each side are you going to be on the

37:37house including where the deck is. So if

37:41we're going to grant a variance, we're

37:42going to grant a variance for the right

37:43number, not just kind of wing it.

37:46It ain't winging it. It has to be in

37:48that spot.

37:49No, we're not I'm not saying that it

37:50doesn't have to be in that spot, but if

37:53if if the house was What is that? It's

37:5610 ft and you need seven. You're going

38:00to make me I can't do math. Um

38:05I did the new math. I just can't.

38:06So, if it was 72t off of the property

38:08line before, so you're looking at two or

38:10three feet on each side.

38:12Now, if it's five feet, then that's a

38:13three foot difference. You're looking at

38:14you're looking at a little bit wider of

38:16a house than what was existing there

38:18before.

38:19And not saying that we won't approve

38:21that, but we'd want to know.

38:23Okay.

38:24All right.

38:24Yeah.

38:25Sure.

38:26Is that what everyone you good with

38:27that?

38:27Basically, he just wants to see it on

38:29the plan.

38:30When's the next time that everyone can

38:31meet because we don't have to wait till

38:32November 11th.

38:34Exactly.

38:34What's it September?

38:36Just show show the setbacks.

38:37Does all the plants do that on the

38:39foundation? A a lot of a lot of

38:42engineers put them on there for us

38:44for the foundation.

38:45Yeah. They'll put exactly like how many

38:47feet?

38:47I've never seen one. I've I've always

38:49seen them on a plan.

38:50Yeah. They put And if there's an issue

38:52with the rear with the setback by the

38:54lake, then we'd want to see that.

38:55Well, this is So, you're telling me this

38:57is just foundation plan right here?

38:59Yep.

38:59So, basically, if you added the deck to

39:02the foundation plan, you wouldn't do

39:03that anyways. You'd have to do the other

39:05plan with the deck on.

39:09The house has it.

39:11Yeah.

39:11Does the board want to see the proposed

39:15house staked out on the lot

39:19and do

39:19Can you do that?

39:20I I don't I think if the engineer has it

39:24all in the plans and that's the engineer

39:26is the one staking it to begin with for

39:29doing the build. But it's it's up to you

39:31guys.

39:32We did it.

39:33You already staked it out.

39:34Yeah.

39:35All right. And

39:36I have a picture of the hole.

39:37Yeah. We we might do a site visit.

39:40Oh, okay. I didn't know if you wanted to

39:41see just to see if it's worth your time.

39:43Yeah, we'd like to. So, the the board

39:45would be its members um maybe stopping

39:50by and do a site visit. That's not going

39:51to be an issue.

39:52When When will that be? Can you give me

39:55time?

39:55I have no idea.

39:57I'll have the whole after the rains.

40:02That would be next week.

40:03Yeah.

40:03After the storms blow in

40:05like crazy this weekend.

40:09I just want to let you know though, if

40:10there's a tornado, my shed is all set.

40:14Okay.

40:17You guys are going to see me again

40:19because I live on uh 20.

40:22So, it would be 73.

40:24So, it wouldn't be before the this

40:25weekend. So, one day next week if if any

40:29member of the board wants to go, I won't

40:31schedule it because it's it's a vacant

40:33lot. So, it's not like there's somebody

40:34home or anything like that. Right.

40:36You know, if it's staked out, they can

40:37stop by and take a look. And it's not

40:39like they need to go and and they're not

40:41interfering.

40:41Be careful because it it is uh it is it

40:45is in rough shape right now. The stone

40:47wall that was in the front,

40:49we had to knock that down so that we can

40:50get in there and get things out. So, uh

40:53it is kind of a rough terrain.

40:55So, what is it?

40:57Just be careful.

40:57Today's the 21st. 22nd.

41:00May I show you what it was?

41:0129 would be next Tuesday.

41:05You want to do two weeks? Can everyone

41:07do two weeks from tonight?

41:08Oh, so

41:1129. So a week after the next

41:15No, it would be the first week in

41:17October.

41:20We have to dock. You can't h do.

41:22No, I'm just making sure. I'm going to

41:24New York and I'm going to Maine and I

41:26got some trip.

41:27Oh, you're no longer the vice chair and

41:29now that's it.

41:30Listen, trust me. I would have went no

41:32matter what. So, October October 6th

41:38through the chair. Can I show you guys a

41:40picture of what you're looking at?

41:41Sure. I can do October 6th.

41:46That's cool.

41:48Oh, okay.

41:49Yeah. If you could stake out

41:52and if we do if we do uh if any member

41:54of the board wants to do a site visit,

41:56it'll be after this week.

41:58You'll see it very well. You have a pen.

42:00I'm going to stick with

42:02I did

42:03Okay.

42:04From state to state, state to state,

42:06you're going to see exactly what

42:08Okay.

42:08Where the house is going to sit.

42:10Yeah.

42:10And um the the the

42:13setback from the lake

42:15Yeah.

42:15to the foundation.

42:17You're not looking for that.

42:18And you're not looking for a snake that

42:20goes from the snake out front. I'm more

42:23concerned about the sides unless unless

42:26the deck unless you're building a deck

42:28so big

42:29that it's going to offend between the

42:31lake and the house. So if you're going

42:32to be more than 30 if you're going to be

42:34within the 30 ft from the lake to the

42:36house with the deck then you're going to

42:38need to do that. But it's

42:39Oh, we're fine. We're fine.

42:41But if the deck is on the drawing the

42:43next time we meet

42:44Yeah. Any the deck

42:46So I'll have that done.

42:47Right. And and then exactly how many

42:49feet from the line to the side of the

42:50house. We I want to know that if we're

42:52going to grant if we're going to grant a

42:54variance on it, we rather do that. Can

42:56we do that? Can everyone do the six?

43:00I don't have We got one. No,

43:02we got one.

43:05Be good to see the the side lot line too

43:08though next to the house rather than

43:09just

43:09Well, there's a fence on that.

43:11You know, the the lot that the

43:14We can't do the 13.

43:15You can't do the six.

43:16No, I can do the 13.

43:18We cannot do the 13. So

43:21the 13th is I got to pick my wife up

43:23from the airport on the Friday.

43:25Well, it will not be here. So

43:27yeah, we cannot.

43:31The week after that's what the 20th week

43:34um if you want to. We do have an

43:36application on its way

43:39and I would depend if they're able to

43:42get the application in I would be able

43:44to have them as early as October 27th.

43:47So, if you'd like to combine both into

43:50that meeting, we can.

43:53I could do that and two days later.

43:55No, I can do the 27th.

43:57Does that work for you?

43:59Any day, every day works for me.

44:01Yeah, I can make the 27th.

44:02All right, we'll do the 27th and that'll

44:04work.

44:05Well, I just don't I I have some work

44:07function. I don't know what day it is.

44:09Um, this is October 27th.

44:12Today's the 22nd of It's a month.

44:14Okay. September.

44:15Yes. All right.

44:20All right. So, a motion to continue this

44:22till October 27th.

44:25I'll make a motion to continue to

44:26October

44:2722nd. 27th, excuse me.

44:2927th.

44:30Second.

44:30There's a second. All in favor say I.

44:33I.

44:33So, you're going to get us those things.

44:34Submit them to Dale for us.

44:37So, what was your question?

44:38What day is that for?

44:40On Tuesday.

44:41Tuesday. Tuesday.

44:42It's a Tuesday. We always

44:43We always try to meet on Tuesdays.

44:45Yeah.

44:47Okay. So, uh I'm going to get a plan um

44:51with the with the deck on.

44:52Yeah.

44:53And that'll match that.

44:55Yeah. So, whatever you going to put in

44:56the permit, you want to match with what

44:57you're going to do with us.

44:58Okay.

44:59Yeah. Because if we grant you a variance

45:01and it's not on there, then you may not

45:03be able to get it on the permit and

45:04you're back here three months from now.

45:06Yeah. And it has to be on there because

45:08it is it is not required for having two

45:11eresses.

45:12Yeah.

45:13And with the setbacks.

45:14Yeah. So at the deck with the setbacks,

45:19does the egress out of the bottom floor

45:21count?

45:23Excuse me.

45:23Does the egress out of the bottom floor

45:25count? Is there too?

45:26It's on It's on on the main is on the

45:29main floor.

45:30You need two on the main floor.

45:34All right.

45:35Thank you for your time.

45:36Do you want to discuss the um

45:41you print those out again?

45:43Yes. So, first you're on.

45:46Thank you.

45:48You're awesome.

45:48All right. Thanks, guys.

45:50Have a great Have a great evening.

45:51Um, we're provided with a draft

45:54application withdrawal form.

45:57So, um,

46:02didn't we talk about having a draft

46:05extension form?

46:06Yeah, we should have that, too.

46:08One at a time.

46:09We'll do one at a time. We got this.

46:11I'm sorry. I thought when I listened to

46:12the meeting, you guys said withdrawal.

46:14That's fine.

46:15Yeah, that's for sure.

46:17So, you guys want to accept this as our

46:19official uh withdrawal form?

46:22I make a motion to accept.

46:24Okay.

46:26Second.

46:26All in favor say I.

46:28I. Motion carries.

46:30Did you add in the changes already to

46:32this?

46:33I did. Yes.

46:34Okay.

46:34The section that we last talked about

46:37was 3.7.

46:44That was my favorite of all.

46:50I don't remember what I did.

46:53I believe

46:54I I had gave you some additional changes

46:56that I had forgotten before. That's in

46:58there too.

47:05You've taken all this. So, we pretty

47:06much went in agreement everything up to

47:08that point, right?

47:14All right.

47:18Still think we should have our annual

47:20meeting in Barbados.

47:22Sounds wonderful.

47:24We should have enough.

47:25I second that.

47:29I thought that sounds like a motion to

47:31me.

47:34Oh, wait. Now I have to sign for

47:35everything, right?

47:36Yes.

47:49It's okay. I waste the food.

47:52I didn't take the money.

48:04Have you ever once ruled out a bull?

48:07Yeah. Yeah. I've had to tell people to

48:12No g.

48:13That happened a few times and

48:16No. Yeah. Hilka. That happened. That was

48:18Hila was crazy. Um and then the landfill

48:22one

48:24the

48:26they appealed Cassella appealed.

48:30We had to get a special zoning officer

48:33for that. And because Kurt was within

48:36300 feet of the landfill or was close.

48:39And um he couldn't he couldn't make a

48:41determination. So they they got the the

48:44zoning enforcement office from Lexington

48:46came out and made a deter. Were you on

48:48the board for that? No.

48:50You were on the board for that. Weren't

48:51you for

48:52Cassella?

48:53I forget.

48:55And Cassella hired some big

48:57environmental firm law firm in Boston.

48:59And they just they just kept trying to

49:02like we want to question the zoning

49:04enforcement officer directly. And I'm

49:05like no that doesn't doesn't work that

49:07way. You ask you ask and then I can ask

49:10the zoning enforcement officer. That was

49:12a little contentious.

49:16Um

49:21no personal attacks on applicants or the

49:23board.

49:25Just me

49:27jumping across the table.

49:29No, no, they were throwing at me.

49:32So, this right here, supplemental

49:33information section 3.10. The board will

49:36not consider any supplement information

49:38submitted less than 72 hours in advance

49:40of the public hearing unless deemed

49:42appropriate at the discretion of the

49:44chair.

49:46Do you want to have that in there? Do

49:48you want do you want to leave it just to

49:50the chair? Yeah, because we just got

49:52supplemental information.

49:53Yeah, we accept I accept everything, but

49:56I'm not always going to be the chair.

49:58I see

50:01you keep saying that.

50:02Well, it's just a matter of when my wife

50:04hits me with a shovel and buries me in

50:05the backyard, it'll be

50:08And does that include the acting chair

50:09if you're not here?

50:10Yeah, that's the vice chair.

50:12Yeah, it does. I would imagine.

50:14Like, does it need to say it or does it

50:16is it assumed?

50:17No, I think it's assumed.

50:18Okay.

50:20Do you want to leave that in there?

50:22So, I think that that kind of is a

50:23fallback

50:25that if we wanted to if we wanted to not

50:27allow extra documentation, right,

50:30that we could have the option to do

50:31that. Now, personally, I'm not if

50:33there's extra documentation unless

50:36unless the board says to says

50:39we shouldn't accept that, I'm going to

50:41accept every piece of document for the

50:43record that I can. time it's appropriate

50:46to use it or keep it as if there's a

50:48situation where it's like this is

50:49getting out of hand and I'm going to

50:51just nip it in the butt,

50:53right?

50:53You know, that's the only reason why we

50:55should actually keep it.

50:56All right.

50:58Yeah. Because you you can you can accept

51:00it, but if if not, we can just fall back

51:03or whoever the chair is.

51:08Change.

51:10The record just show the vote of you

51:12show the vote of everybody when you do

51:14the thing.

51:14I do. Yes. But you guys um talked about

51:17it maybe a few meetings ago. You were

51:19discussing it, so I just highlighted it

51:21just to bring it up in conversation,

51:27but I do always um show everyone's vote.

51:31Um on the voting part, I think I think

51:35that should be a concurring vote of four

51:38sitting board members should be required

51:40to grant special um

51:46I think there should be a reference to

51:47the statute in that. So I think it's for

51:51us to require four. If they change the

51:53statute then why would we keep four? You

51:56know what I mean?

51:57Okay.

51:59The statute says that we have to have a

52:00four-fifths vote for five members.

52:04So just eliminate the four votes and

52:07just take the current vote pursuant to

52:09Mass General law chapter 48 or something

52:11like that.

52:13That way if the statute chang

52:14change it again, we don't have to change

52:15this.

52:16We don't have to change it.

52:30draft decision of the board.

52:41The text of the decision of the board

52:43shall be considered. So

52:47during the board's a sitting member of

52:49the board will generate a draft.

52:54Isn't that what we typically

52:57doing?

52:59Yeah.

53:07So, it doesn't have to be a a member of

53:10the board or city member. It just has to

53:12be somebody.

53:16Well, no. I was just

53:18I don't think we need to put that in

53:19there. What do you think? And if you

53:20guys recall at our last meeting when we

53:23did 1.3 for the quorum,

53:26yeah,

53:26we took out the verbiage

53:29on sitting board.

53:33So we still have that language

53:36even though we took it out.

53:37Correct.

53:39Consistent.

53:40Yeah, I think you're right.

53:41With the um verbiage that we're going to

53:44use.

53:44I don't think we we should have that

53:46thing in there. I don't think we we've

53:48never done that.

53:50Um what we could do we have something in

53:52here.

53:57So just something for us to note as we

53:59continue to review the document we can

54:02make those edits as well.

54:06So if we took that out we can remove it

54:09completely.

54:09Yeah. The board's written decision state

54:11the specific findings of fact and

54:13reasons for a decision based on the text

54:16of the decision of the board shall be

54:17considered discussed and voted on.

54:19So we're just talking out the first

54:21sentence. We just take out the entire

54:23because we don't need that. We're not

54:24because no sitting member is going to

54:26write the decision. Dale usually writes

54:27the decisions. Mhm.

54:29Um, one of the things that we do do

54:31though is that on bigger and more

54:34complex appeals

54:37and uh petitions in the past

54:41uh we have

54:44um allowed

54:47the parties to draft proposed findings

54:50of fact and we can accept

54:52the lawyers do it

54:53right. So when there's sometimes we have

54:54lawyers on multiple sides and we'll say

54:57draft proposed findings of fact and then

55:00they'll we can just we just take and

55:02accept the ones that we want and discard

55:05the ones that we don't want.

55:07The lawyers look at each others and then

55:09we agree upon it.

55:10Yeah.

55:11Accept it.

55:13So we could put in there something like

55:15the board may

55:19except Do we have to put anything in

55:21there? I don't think we have to. I think

55:23that's

55:23No, you don't think we have to that

55:25ability to just do it.

55:28Well, what was our Didn't we have a

55:31whole section for

55:31Yeah, we pulled a lot of that stuff out.

55:35Yeah.

55:43We have 31 that talks about findings of

55:47fact.

55:50Correct.

55:59Yeah. I mean, so 311 kind of says that

56:01we could do that,

56:03right?

56:03Yeah. I think that's what we went over

56:05last

56:09so we don't have to add it again

56:12on the written part. We should take out

56:14sit in 3.12. We should take out sitting

56:18each board member. Just keep take the

56:19word sitting out.

56:26Same thing with 313.

56:28Yeah, we're going to take that whole

56:29first sentence out because no member we

56:31don't typically draft that. Gale drafts

56:34them. So or we'll get the findings of

56:37fact and incorporate. the on the bigger

56:40ones, I would sometimes

56:43do a proposed decision based on what

56:45agreed findings of fact and then we

56:47would the next meeting we would agree on

56:49the final decision and then submit it.

56:52We've done that once or twice.

56:56Um,

57:23it's 3.17. that changed.

57:30They extended it. They extended the the

57:32the time limit for a variance greater

57:34than one year in the in July, didn't

57:37they?

57:38I'm asking you.

57:40Me?

57:40Yeah.

57:41Oh, when I I started here, I didn't have

57:43ZVA. I'm like, don't need to learn that

57:45one.

57:49Um I think that that's changed.

57:51It's my belief that it has.

57:53You're right. So, we just want to change

57:54it to reflect whatever the statute is.

57:56Perfect.

57:56Yeah.

57:58And the one time extension has changed,

58:00too. I think that that's changed as

58:03well.

58:04Do you sign the decisions?

58:06Yeah.

58:09Know that.

58:09Yeah.

58:11Do you have a special pen?

58:12Yeah, I do.

58:13It's not auto pen.

58:15It's an auto pen. I got a Joe Biden auto

58:17pen right in the middle of me.

58:21Um

58:23it is two years now.

58:24It is two. Yeah.

58:26So right must be exercised

58:42two or three times.

58:45Really?

58:46We might have.

58:46I think so. I'm pretty sure.

58:49That's crazy.

58:59I don't think I have any other changes

59:01on this.

59:04Most of it has to do with Did you have

59:07any other changes?

59:09I submitted a lot last time. Um,

59:12I just I just found one.

59:14Yeah.

59:15Um, yeah. So if we just take out sitting

59:18out of the entire document, we don't

59:19have to go through and find the two

59:21code. No, you can do that. 118.

59:23Yeah.

59:24Um 319 is the next section that we had

59:27to deliberate the findings which is the

59:31reconsideration piece.

59:34If we just want to take another look at

59:35that prior it through

59:38prior to the written decision any

59:40sitting member Yeah. You take any member

59:42may request that the chair call a vote

59:45to reconsider the

59:48I don't have a problem with that. We've

59:50never done that since I've been here.

59:55We don't I don't think we meet

59:57enough often enough that we we would

1:00:01have we would make a decision and then

1:00:05have another meeting before

1:00:09because you file it usually with the

1:00:10town clerk within two days, don't you?

1:00:12Yeah.

1:00:13I have two weeks.

1:00:14You have two weeks. Yeah.

1:00:16Remember going in front of Wister takes

1:00:18two weeks.

1:00:18What if we keep this here and somebody

1:00:21calls for a new vote? We could blow past

1:00:24one of our dates, right?

1:00:26No, we've made the decision. So, I think

1:00:28we may

1:00:29What if it gets reopened

1:00:32after we've made a decision?

1:00:33I don't know the answer to that.

1:00:35Go to the next next meeting that we're

1:00:37in session.

1:00:38That's my point. So if we do that then

1:00:41technically speaking is if we made a

1:00:42vote and made a decision and it hasn't

1:00:45been filed with the town clerk and we

1:00:48could advertise another meeting within

1:00:50the twoe period and vote to reopen it

1:00:55we we could logistically do that. it

1:00:58would be pretty tight,

1:01:00right? Particularly if they're at the

1:01:02end of when the actual

1:01:03if that if they're at the statutory end

1:01:06of their timeline, I I don't know

1:01:09whether or not that impacts that or not

1:01:11because it says you need to make you

1:01:13need to open the hearing and make a

1:01:14decision by a certain date. So, if we

1:01:16were to reconsider the decision, I don't

1:01:18I have no idea whether or not

1:01:21Yeah,

1:01:22it's the first decision that goes to the

1:01:23statute or it's the second one if we

1:01:25would decide to reopen it. It's you've

1:01:28it's never happened.

1:01:29I've never done it. I mean, I'm sure

1:01:30it's

1:01:31there. So, the only reason it would come

1:01:33up is if

1:01:34No one's ever done it while we've been

1:01:36on the while I've been on the board.

1:01:38Yeah.

1:01:39I was putting my worst case scenario cap

1:01:40on and some board member didn't like the

1:01:42decision.

1:01:43Oh, he's worried you're going to retire

1:01:45and it's going to be

1:01:49That's what it is.

1:01:50You see how easily I

1:01:53see I caught that. You can't you could

1:01:56we get through of that.

1:02:00It's okay

1:02:02enough.

1:02:02I don't I don't see

1:02:03I don't see I think we should just leave

1:02:04it in there. I don't say we didn't need

1:02:06to do it in that.

1:02:06No.

1:02:07And then we already we did the

1:02:08withdrawal that can withdraw by notice

1:02:10from the applicant in writing. Any

1:02:12application may be withdrawn without

1:02:14present by notice from the applic.

1:02:16Can I correct that to include the form

1:02:19that you guys approved today?

1:02:21Yes.

1:02:21Thank you. Was it withdrawals that we

1:02:24were getting people assigned or was

1:02:25there extension? I can't remember what

1:02:26we're doing them right.

1:02:28Yeah.

1:02:29Okay. So, we should

1:02:30Yeah.

1:02:30But now we've got a form.

1:02:32And I'll work on the extension.

1:02:37Couldn't tell if I think that's correct.

1:02:40I thought it said withdrawal.

1:02:42So before before publication,

1:02:45they can withdraw themselves. after we

1:02:48publish and the meeting is set then they

1:02:50have to request withdrawal from us and

1:02:52we have to vote

1:02:54and if they're no show then

1:02:56then we can make a decision we can't

1:02:57withdraw them

1:02:58rightision

1:03:00we have to make a decision within the

1:03:02time frame set so some we've we've had

1:03:05that before um

1:03:06I was worried he might not show up

1:03:08I think that was

1:03:10that was five it was uh what's his name

1:03:12on 508 something about the post office

1:03:15parking hot

1:03:17and everyone was like, "We're making a

1:03:19decision on that." I'm like, "Okay."

1:03:20Oh, yeah.

1:03:21Yeah.

1:03:24With

1:03:26it accessories,

1:03:27something like that.

1:03:29Yeah.

1:03:30Yeah.

1:03:32Uh

1:03:3341,

1:03:35the last sentence that says incomplete

1:03:37applications not accompanying by

1:03:39documents as required within the general

1:03:41filing requirements is may be denied by

1:03:45the board.

1:03:47Yeah.

1:03:48So

1:03:50do we have

1:03:52a process for that?

1:03:53Yes. So right now the full application

1:03:57has to be submitted to the town clerk. I

1:04:00think the the town clerk does an initial

1:04:01review, don't they? Or

1:04:02no.

1:04:03So they did the day submitted. If the

1:04:06implic she you'll review it. If the if

1:04:09it's incomplete, then it will get

1:04:11rejected and back out. So uh if it's an

1:04:13incomplete application, and we've had

1:04:15that happen a couple of times before.

1:04:17The reason why I ask is because it

1:04:19states that the denial is by the board

1:04:22and not by the clerk or by day. So if we

1:04:27have to change that particular language

1:04:29because it says the board reaches us and

1:04:31so we are the last here to actually

1:04:34receive.

1:04:34So we should just take the board

1:04:36information. So that's why I brought it

1:04:38up that we will need a revision to that.

1:04:40Yeah. So we just removed by the board

1:04:43just but may be denied.

1:04:47That's a good catch.

1:04:48Yeah, it is.

1:04:51And uh

1:04:52well what so what happened was on that

1:04:55is that the

1:04:58our recording person at the time

1:05:03someone was filing applications and I

1:05:05think they were like you know because

1:05:06they were only here on so before Dale

1:05:09the the person in her place before that

1:05:11was only here on Tuesdays and that was

1:05:13the only day of the week that she was

1:05:15here

1:05:15and the person before that was like that

1:05:17too. So we had someone coming in on like

1:05:20a Wednesday or Thursday. They would like

1:05:22slip it in the thing and say, "Oh, I you

1:05:25know, I dropped it off on Thursday." So

1:05:27now that's the day it starts. And there

1:05:29was this big thing. So now it goes to

1:05:30the town clerk and has to get stamped.

1:05:33So on the on the application, if there's

1:05:37something wrong or something not in it

1:05:39correctly,

1:05:40he gets rejected.

1:05:41It gets rejected. The clock doesn't

1:05:44stop.

1:05:44Yeah. It doesn't get denied.

1:05:47Doesn't get Right.

1:05:49Until it's complete. Yeah.

1:05:50Yeah.

1:05:51Can't make one application without it.

1:05:53It can't be denial.

1:05:54In 20 years, we've had

1:05:56we can deny

1:05:58one 40b application.

1:06:01So, so this board is not only has the

1:06:05authority for

1:06:08um

1:06:08I didn't know

1:06:09we have we have the authority for

1:06:12appeals, special permits, variances and

1:06:15affordable housing under chapter 40B

1:06:17that that goes doesn't go to the

1:06:19planning board comes to us. But we've

1:06:22had one full application in the 20 years

1:06:24we've been here and one amendment. Both

1:06:26of those times this board and worked

1:06:29very closely with the planning board

1:06:31because we don't have the ability to do

1:06:33peer review or anything like that. So,

1:06:34we would probably go to the planning

1:06:36board and ask for their assistance uh

1:06:38for some of those things.

1:06:42Why did we even get in the middle? Why

1:06:43doesn't it go to the planning?

1:06:44It's just the way the statute's written.

1:06:50We they had one that was they were

1:06:52talking about in a previous town

1:06:54administrator said, "Oh, well, we could

1:06:57probably just do it through the Sugman's

1:06:58office as a friendly thing." I was like,

1:07:01I it never came to fruition, so it's

1:07:03never a big deal, but I'm like, "Yeah, I

1:07:05don't have the authority to do that."

1:07:06Friendly.

1:07:07Yeah.

1:07:10Let's go call it.

1:07:11Um,

1:07:15one one thing going back to that one

1:07:18that we were just on.

1:07:19Yeah.

1:07:19If we're pulling by the board

1:07:24requirements may be denied

1:07:27within the front

1:07:32may be denied just period. Yeah.

1:07:36So that's not talking about the whole

1:07:39application itself just the submitt.

1:07:42What do you mean?

1:07:44So basically an application come in. Oh

1:07:46this

1:07:48This isn't filled out, right?

1:07:50Yeah.

1:07:50Okay. You're getting denied.

1:07:53So, off of denial, how long do you have

1:07:56before you can reapply?

1:07:57The next day,

1:07:58you can just go off next day.

1:08:00Well, you want to change it to

1:08:02So, it's not like

1:08:03all the denying.

1:08:04We're not denying the application. We're

1:08:06just denying the the the submission.

1:08:08That's all I That's all I want to

1:08:09clarify.

1:08:10So, should we put the submission be

1:08:12denied?

1:08:12Well, it says applications.

1:08:14So, it's not

1:08:16Okay. Yeah. As long as

1:08:17incomplete application is not

1:08:18accompanied by all documents required in

1:08:20the general filing committees.

1:08:24Should I put rejected?

1:08:26Yeah, put rejected. Change it to

1:08:27rejected.

1:08:28Just so we don't want any confusion in

1:08:31that part. Oh, you were denied on that.

1:08:33You know,

1:08:34are we good otherwise? What do you

1:08:36think?

1:08:37You feel good?

1:08:38Feel good.

1:08:40We can make the changes and I'll bring

1:08:42the

1:08:43and we'll just vote on it next time.

1:08:44Yes. Anything else that we need to do

1:08:46tonight?

1:08:47Yes, you did skip number five.

1:08:49Oh, no. What's

1:08:51Yeah.

1:08:52Oh, recommendations.

1:08:53Yes, we

1:08:54But Mary Beth isn't with us tonight.

1:08:57Kazinski.

1:08:58Uh oh, someone new for the board.

1:09:02Yeah. So, so this is Mary Beth Kazinski.

1:09:05She lives on Masonic Home Road. She's

1:09:07applying to the our board. Do we How

1:09:10many we have? Two.

1:09:11Six. So, we have enough room for one

1:09:13more, which I think um she's a mental

1:09:17health counselor. She's happy to provide

1:09:20her resume and request. She's got a

1:09:21master's degree. I think we should make

1:09:24a minimum requirement at least a PhD by

1:09:27everyone going forward.

1:09:29She have after meeting sessions.

1:09:31Yeah.

1:09:34Um yeah, I'm fine with that. Do you want

1:09:36me to make a vote on this? Does anyone

1:09:38want to

1:09:39recommend them

1:09:39to recommend the seleman nominate Mary

1:09:42Beth Kazinski? Does anyone want to make

1:09:45a make a motion? You're going to make

1:09:46the motion

1:09:47make a motion

1:09:48to uh to nom to recommend Mary Beth

1:09:52Kazinski.

1:09:53Second

1:09:53as an alternate member of the board.

1:09:56There's a second by Rob. All in favor

1:09:57say I.

1:09:58I.

1:09:59Motion carries.

1:10:02All right. Any other things we need? Is

1:10:04there a motion to

1:10:07end the meeting?

1:10:08Motion to adjurnn.

1:10:09Is there second on the motion? All in

1:10:11favor say I. I.