2026-10-08 - Town Council Meeting
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard, speakers are not labeled, and the vote tally was not read aloud in the captions.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk; the closed session is not counted):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Tobacco-Free Public Places Ordinance | 43 | 68% |
| Town Manager Departure and Governance | 3 | 5% |
| Other business | 17 | 27% |
- Regular meeting called to order about 4:16 into the recording by Mayor Harold Weinbrecht.
- Council went into closed session shortly after the ordinance vote (about 1:07) and reconvened at about 2:11:56, then adjourned.
- No public hearings were scheduled.
- This was the evening of the same day as the 2026-10-08 - Town Council Work Session.
Other business: opening, agenda, appointments and manager update
4:16-12:09
- Brittany Richards gave the ceremonial opening, reading a local-history passage about the town's founding in 1871 and earlier inhabitants.
- The agenda was amended to add a council liaison to the newly created transportation and mobility advisory board; the amended agenda was adopted unanimously. The mayor appointed Bella Huang (captioned "Hang"/"Wong") as liaison; no council vote is needed. Staff are still working out logistics, with a first board meeting hoped for in early winter.
- The mayor thanked about fifteen outgoing advisory board members by name (spellings in the captions are unreliable).
- Interim manager Russ Overton recapped the afternoon work session: the downtown multimodal center (Downtown Multimodal Center), fuel prices and the state gas tax suspension (Financial Review and FY2027 Budget), the new state by-right multifamily housing law, which he said would let old shopping centers and office parks become apartments without rezoning or council approval (Growth and Zoning), and changes to the moving-forward dashboard. He said the law applies to only a handful of North Carolina communities (captioned "four").
Public Speaks Out
12:09-29:36
Three-minute limit per speaker; one written comment received and four registered speakers, plus walk-ups. Speakers by theme:
- Tobacco-free spaces (14:06-21:00, counted under the ordinance below): three high school-age speakers, including members of a youth empowerment team, urged a 100% tobacco- and vape-free policy for parks and public spaces, citing youth vaping rates, the normalizing effect of seeing tobacco use, and CDC guidance, and asked that it take effect as soon as possible.
- Accountability and outreach (21:21-24:40, see the governance section below): one resident, saying he works in air-quality research, asked council to schedule a dedicated community town hall before the end of the year, publish an accessible accountability update with corrective actions, and review how a council policy was implemented (captioned "policy 191" and "policy 101"; unclear). He referred to a hostile, packed meeting in the summer and to emails sent privately to council. He was cut off at the time limit. He credited the interim manager's progress on the moving-forward effort.
- Bitcoin ATM scams (24:57-26:53): a just-departed information services advisory board member cited FBI figures on crypto-ATM scam losses (captioned over $400 million, 47% by older adults) and said Cary has about 18 such machines; he asked council to consider local limits such as transaction caps or warning flyers if the state does not act.
- Rail crossing and sidewalks (27:04-29:31): a resident said the state transportation department's plan for the Maynard Road and East Chatham Street rail crossing does not do enough to limit impacts on nearby businesses and asked council to press state partners. He also asked for a status on a February request for sidewalks and crossing signals at a Kildaire Farm Road intersection (captioned "Kilmain") and suggested adding public-comment requests to the town's dashboards. He closed with condolences for a fallen Cary police detective and a Durham firefighter.
Consent agenda
29:38-30:27
Four items, no one pulled, approved unanimously on one motion: adjustments to the adopted meeting schedule; an amendment to the fee schedule; a contract amendment for engineering design and inspection services on a water main replacement project; and the 23-REZ-14 Hatcher property rezoning (zoning case; see Growth and Zoning; no discussion on the recording).
Town Manager Departure and Governance
21:21-24:40
- During Public Speaks Out, one resident asked council to hold a dedicated community town hall before year end, publish an accessible accountability update listing corrective actions, and review how a council policy was implemented (captioned "policy 191" and "policy 101"). He pointed to a hostile, packed summer meeting. No council response on the recording. This is a resident's request, not a finding about the former manager.
Tobacco-Free Public Places Ordinance
14:06-21:00, 30:27-1:06:18
- Assistant town manager Scott Barry presented a council-initiated amendment (taken up in April on a request from Lori Bush and Michelle Craig) to Article 3 of Chapter 14 of the town code. The current rule dates to 2007 and covers only lighted smoking inside town buildings and transit vehicles.
- Proposal: add electronic smoking devices and other emitting products; extend the ban to all town grounds, including parks, playgrounds, event spaces, greenways and trails; and add a ban in privately owned enclosed public places (retail, banks, offices open to the public, gyms, entertainment venues, hotel lobbies). Existing state rules already cover restaurants and bars for cigarettes. State-law exemptions remain (private residences, vehicles, tobacco shops, cigar bars, private clubs, hotel smoking rooms). The manager could designate outdoor smoking areas on town property, for example at the amphitheater.
- Enforcement: education first. A continuing violator could get a $50 infraction (proceeds go to schools by state law); businesses face escalating fines up to $200 for repeats, enforced by the county health director. Town employees could face discipline under personnel rules. Proposed effective date July 1, 2027. Signs would be replaced on the normal schedule and costs absorbed in existing budgets.
- Voting rule: an ordinance change passes on first vote only with five members; if it gets four, it returns for a second vote at a later date.
- Support: members cited consistency with Wake County, Raleigh and neighboring towns, the earlier presentation by a Duke cardiologist and American Heart Association materials, family health stories, and that adults keep other places to smoke. One member asked that staff treat employees supportively (cessation programs rather than discipline).
- Concerns: Sarika Bansal (as best identified; captioned "Bonsel") said she supports adding new products but could not vote yes without local data, a staff pros-and-cons evaluation, complaint or police input, signage cost and enforcement detail, and worried about staff priorities competing with the moving-forward work. Others replied that they had seen vaping at the amphitheater and downtown park and that gathering more data would cost staff time.
- Vote: a member moved adoption with the July 1, 2027 effective date and another seconded. One member said they supported the ordinance but would vote no to try to secure a unanimous vote at a later round. The roll was not read aloud in the captions; from the mayor's remarks ("if it fails, it will come back") the motion appears not to have reached five votes. Staff said it would return at a future meeting needing four votes. Members agreed Ms. Bansal could get her questions answered directly with staff, without a new staff report. Verify the result in the official minutes.
Closed session
1:06:18-2:11:56
Unanimous motion to go into closed session under the state statute for consulting with attorneys (attorney-client privilege) and for personnel matters (qualifications, performance or conditions of employment of public officers or employees). Nothing from the closed session was discussed on the recording. Council reconvened, said the agenda was complete, and adjourned by unanimous voice vote.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
02:59Heat. Heat.
03:46feel happy.
04:16Call to order the October 8th meeting of
04:19the Kerry Town Council. And at this
04:21time, I'll recognize Council Member
04:23Richards for our ceremonial opening.
04:26>> Thank you, Mayor. So, Monday is Columbus
04:30Day or alternatively, Indigenous
04:33People's Day. And so, whether you are
04:35thinking through the lens of the arrival
04:38of Europeans or the many people who were
04:40already living here, it had me thinking
04:43about community and uh a place that we
04:46call home. And Carrie is a place where
04:50so many of us, maybe even most of us,
04:52have moved from elsewhere, my family
04:55included. And I think that's part of
04:57what makes Kerry really special is that
05:00so many of us have the privilege to
05:02intentionally get to choose to call
05:05Kerry our hometown and that there's a
05:07deep appreciation for what makes us a
05:10unique place to live. So if you were
05:12lucky enough to be born here and live
05:15your whole life here and your family
05:16roots and carry run deep, thank you so
05:19much for welcoming the rest of us and
05:22then also acknowledging the people who
05:24were here before any of us. And so if
05:26you will indulge this history major in a
05:30brief reading of a history passage, this
05:33is also a shameless plug for the books
05:37you can purchase at the page walker. So,
05:39if you do not know, our Page Walker Arts
05:42and History Center has a collection of
05:45local history books for purchase. I have
05:48my parents to thank for adding to my own
05:50personal library. So, this is around and
05:53about Kerry by Thomas Bird and I will
05:55read a very brief passage.
05:59The town of Kerry was incorporated in
06:011871, but that was only a milestone in
06:04the history of this area, not the
06:06beginning of it. People of European and
06:09African ancestry had lived here a
06:11hundred years before Kerry began and
06:13Indians were here 10,000 years before
06:15that. The Tuscerora, an Irakcoy speaking
06:18people, were using this part of North
06:20Carolina as a hunting ground when the
06:22first Europeans arrived on the coast.
06:25However, the power of these Native
06:26Americans had been broken in the
06:27Tuscerura War of 1711 to 14 before
06:31settlers reached this far inland. Those
06:34who who survived moved in 1766 to New
06:37York to live with their distant Irakcoy
06:39relatives. The first white settler here
06:42was Francis Jones who received a 640
06:45acre grant on March 25th, 1749.
06:49The land extended along Crabtree Creek
06:51through part of what is now Preston and
06:53what is now District A. So, if that was
06:57a tantalizing introduction and you want
06:59to read the rest of the book for
07:01purchase at the Page Walker History
07:03Center. And with that, let's rise for
07:05the pledge of
07:05>> allegiance.
07:10Algiance to the flag of the United
07:13States of America and to the republic
07:16for which it stands. One nation under
07:19God, indivisible, with liberty and
07:22justice for all.
07:25Thank you, Miss Richards. I have that
07:26book. Now I got to go back and read it
07:28again.
07:30>> All right. I would like to request an
07:33amendment to tonight's agenda to add the
07:36appointment of a council liaison to the
07:38newly created transportation and
07:41mobility advisory board under
07:43recognitions and reports. So is there a
07:47motion to adopt the agenda as amended?
07:50>> So moved.
07:51>> Second.
07:52>> Motion and a second. discussion. All in
07:54favor, please say I.
07:55>> I.
07:56>> Any opposed? Motion carries unanimously.
07:59>> We are now at our first recognition.
08:02Since council amended the agenda to
08:04include the appointment of a council
08:06liaison to the transportation mobility
08:08advisory board, I would like to appoint
08:11council member Bella Hang to serve in
08:13this role. And she is grac graciously
08:16accepted. Thank you so much.
08:18>> Thank you.
08:19>> You look shocked.
08:21Don't look shocked. I thought last time
08:22you just like joked me.
08:24>> Oh, no. No. [laughter]
08:26>> Thank you. I'm so honored. Thank you.
08:28Thank you. I'm so honored.
08:29>> Staff is still working through the
08:31logistics of establishing the advisory
08:34board and appointing a council liaison
08:37at this time. We'll help move that
08:38forward uh as staff prepares to bring
08:41forward recommendations for board member
08:43appointments with the goal of hold with
08:46the goal of holding the first meeting in
08:49early winter of next year. So, thank
08:51you, Miss Wong.
08:52>> Thank you.
08:53>> So, no vote by councils necessary for
08:55this. I'm allowed to make these
08:57appointments. So, the next item on our
08:59agenda is a recognition of outgoing
09:02board members. And I'd like to take a
09:04moment to recognize the volunteers who
09:06have just completed their terms on K's
09:10advisory boards this year. These
09:12residents have generously given their
09:15time, their experience, and unique
09:18perspectives to strengthen our
09:21community. Serving on an advisory board
09:24is a meaningful commitment and takes a
09:26lot of time when we're so grateful for
09:29the many hours they have devoted to this
09:31important service. And so on behalf of
09:34the entire Kerry Town Council and our
09:37community, I want to thank each and
09:39every one of them, each and every one of
09:41the outgoing board members for their
09:43service and for sharing their knowledge
09:46and expertise with us. And I appreciate
09:50all and we appreciate all that you have
09:53done uh contributing during your time on
09:57the boards. So, I'd like to name each
10:00one of these individuals and hopefully
10:03they're joining us via live stream or
10:06here in the audience this evening. So we
10:08have Vince Beast, Lily Chen, Andy Co,
10:12Michael Counter, Victoria Ellis Ford,
10:15and Fitz, Shuchi Gupta, Chris Henden,
10:21John Emanuel, Barry Mitch, Patrick
10:23Murray, Dean Perry, Ness Shortley, Paula
10:27Smith, and Jill Strait. Thank you so
10:29much. A hand for these outgoing board
10:32members, please.
10:36>> [applause]
10:37>> All right. Now, I'm going to turn it
10:39over to our interim town manager, Russ
10:40Overton, for his update. Thanks, Mayor.
10:43I'll give a quick recap of the work
10:45session we had before tonight's meeting.
10:47We covered several topics. First, Kelly
10:49Blazy and Heather Willahan gave us an
10:50update on our future downtown multi
10:52multimodal transit facility that will be
10:55located off of North Harrison Avenue
10:57along the railroad tracks. Kelly gave
10:59well they both gave a great presentation
11:01on where the project's web pa about the
11:03project webpage that can be seen on
11:05kerrync.gov and you can go there if
11:07you'd like to learn more. Uh Jimmy
11:10Simpson also gave us an update on our
11:12continued high fuel prices and how
11:14they're affecting our budget. We talked
11:16about what the general assembly is doing
11:17to to provide some relief including
11:20temporarily temporarily suspending the
11:22state gas tax uh for the public. We also
11:25discussed some new legislation from the
11:27general assembly related to the byite
11:29residential development. This would
11:31allow developers to build apartments on
11:33redeveloping properties that have
11:34existing commercial, industrial, and
11:36business zoning without a resoning or
11:38town council approval. So basically, old
11:41shopping centers, office parks, and
11:42things like that could become apartments
11:44without coming here uh to you all first
11:47and thereby having uh public input.
11:50What's interesting is that the
11:51legislation only applies to four
11:52communities in North Carolina.
11:55And finally, I gave council a preview on
11:57some changes to the moving forward
11:58dashboard. So, we covered a lot of
12:00ground um earlier today on some pretty
12:02important topics and I encourage anyone
12:04who's interested to go back and watch
12:06the recording on our YouTube channel.
12:07That concludes my comments, Mayor.
12:09>> Thank you, Mr. Overton. Now, it's time
12:11for public speaks out. We've included
12:13instructions for speaking at this forum
12:16online and on the printed agenda. There
12:18were three opportunities to participate
12:20in public speaks out through written
12:22comments, by calling in or by attending
12:25here in person tonight. If you are here
12:28in person and would like to speak,
12:30please take a seat in the rows to my
12:31right that are now highlighted.
12:34Public speaks out speakers have three
12:36minutes each for their comments and may
12:38speak on any town related topic as long
12:41as it's not a public hearing. 3minut
12:44time limit will be enforced. Not to be
12:47rude, but to be fair to all of our
12:49speakers. We have a timer on the podium.
12:52It'll start off with a green light, and
12:54when it turns yellow, that means you
12:56have 30 seconds remaining.
12:59When it turns red, that's the point.
13:01I'll interrupt you. Again, not trying to
13:02be rude, but trying to be fair to all of
13:05our speakers.
13:08I would ask that speakers be respectful
13:10in their comments and direct those
13:12comments to the entire council and not
13:14to an individual. And I thank everyone
13:17in the audience for understanding that
13:20this is a business meeting and I ask you
13:22to please respect that. Please do not
13:25applaud, make remarks from your seats,
13:27use props or do anything else that may
13:30distract from the meeting. So now is the
13:33time for public speaks out and first
13:34I'll call on our clerk to share any
13:36written comments and call on any
13:38registered speakers.
13:40>> We've received one written comment.
13:41These have been this comment has been
13:43emailed to council prior to the meeting,
13:45provided to council upon arrival, and
13:47attached to the online agenda. Um, we
13:49have four registered speakers. Our first
13:51one is Mansive.
14:06Good evening. Thank you for having us
14:08tonight, mayor and council members. My
14:10name is Mansive and it's great to be
14:11back before you. I think I can speak for
14:14everyone sitting behind me when I say
14:15that we really appreciate the
14:17opportunity to be here to advocate
14:18specifically for the tobaccof free
14:21public places ordinance. In fact, if you
14:23take a look behind me, you'll see my
14:25fellow advocates here tonight and you
14:27can see how deeply our youth um
14:30community cares about this issue. You've
14:33heard a lot of statistics and policy
14:34arguments from us throughout this
14:35process. So tonight, I just want to
14:37share one final perspective. As a young
14:39person who lives in this community, we
14:42don't experience Carrie in designated
14:44zones. We walk through parks, attend
14:46community events, go to public
14:48facilities, and spend time with our
14:50friends without thinking about where one
14:52smoking zone begins and another ends. We
14:55just notice what's around us. And that
14:57matters because youth people learn what
14:59is normal by what we see around us. More
15:02than one in five high school students in
15:05central North Carolina currently use
15:07ecigarettes. That's not just a statistic
15:09for us. Those are our classmates, our
15:12friends, and the people we see every
15:14day. I've watched vaping become so
15:17common among students that it can feel
15:18like background noise. And that's
15:20exactly what concerns me. When something
15:24becomes normal enough, people stop
15:26questioning it. That's why I don't think
15:28smoking zones are enough. A smoking zone
15:31might separate tobacco use from other
15:33people physically, but it doesn't
15:34separate behavior from the environment.
15:37Young people can still see it, and we
15:39can still absorb the message that
15:41tobacco use belongs in our public
15:43spaces. So tonight, when you vote, I
15:46hope you remember that this ordinance is
15:47about more than where people are allowed
15:49to smoke. It's about what we choose to
15:52make normal for the young people who
15:53live here and to enforce it as soon as
15:56possible to limit the amount of people
15:57affected. Thank you so much for
15:59considering this ordinance, for
16:01listening to us throughout this process
16:03and for giving young people a seat at
16:04this table.
16:06>> Our next register speaker is a followed
16:09by Sudep.
16:26Good evening, mayor and council members.
16:29Thank you for the opportunity to speak
16:31before the council. My name is Aurard
16:34and I have lived in Kerry for the past
16:36eight years. I'm also a member of the
16:39youth empowerment team at the post
16:40center.
16:42Before entering high school, many of us
16:44have had that talk from our parents
16:47about waping, smoking, and the risks
16:49that come with them. And honestly, it's
16:52easy to brush those warnings off and
16:54think they're exaggerating.
16:56But once you get older, you start to
16:58understand why those conversations
17:00matter. When we talk about making car's
17:03public spaces 100% tobaccof free, we're
17:07not only talking about preventing
17:08secondhand exposure. We're also talking
17:11about what young people see as normal.
17:15Parks, greenways, athletic fields, and
17:17other public spaces are places where
17:20kids spend time with their families and
17:22friends. If smoking and vaping are
17:24common in those spaces, then over time
17:27they can start to feel like just another
17:29normal part of everyday life. A 100%
17:32tobaccof free policy sends a clear and
17:35consistent message. Tobacco and vaping
17:38do not have to be a normal part of our
17:40shared spaces and life. This policy is
17:43not about judging people who use tobacco
17:45or nicotine products. It's about
17:47protecting the spaces that belong to
17:49everyone. a child at the park, a family
17:52walking on a greenway, or any Kerry
17:55resident should be able to enjoy those
17:57spaces without unnecessary exposure to
18:00tobacco smoke or vape aerosol. Kerry has
18:04the opportunity to be proactive. We do
18:07not have to wait for a problem to become
18:08worse to start taking action. I want
18:12Carrie to continue being a place where
18:14being healthy is the default, especially
18:16for the next generation growing up here.
18:19Thank you for your time and thank you
18:20for considering this policy.
18:23>> Next speaker is Houd Houd Deep followed
18:27by Hannah Williams.
18:38Good evening, mayor and members of town
18:40council. My name is Sudep Karapa
18:42Pandian. I'm a senior at Green Hope High
18:45School. I'm here tonight to speak on
18:47behalf of our families, our children,
18:48and the well-being of the town of Kerry.
18:51Smoking has created an atmosphere which
18:53is not safe for our loved ones, and the
18:55people we care about. When our parents
18:57or author figures smoke or vape, it
19:00creates a cascade effect that encourages
19:02you to do the same. In my personal
19:05experience, when neighbors in my
19:07neighborhood smoke, members of other
19:09families started doing the same thing.
19:11This is a serious concern when we are
19:13trying to protect our community and
19:15children also learn from parental
19:17behavior which is another reason why it
19:19is important to have tobaccof free
19:21spaces. Having tobaccof free spaces can
19:23provide our community and future
19:25generations with a safe environment to
19:28thrive without having the contagion
19:29effect that tobacco and vapes produce.
19:32In addition to this information, CDC
19:34highlights that establishing a 100%
19:36smoke-free home policy and 100%
19:39smoke-free public spaces reduce youth
19:41experimentation with cigarettes and
19:43other tobacco products. This proves that
19:45tobacco use isn't just an individual
19:48habit, but a ripple effect that directly
19:50shapes the health and safety of our
19:51community. Beyond just my neighborhood,
19:54I witnessed this ripple effect firsthand
19:56across Kerry. I see people vaping in
19:58cars while driving down our roads and in
20:00outdoor concerts and events. This
20:02doesn't just affect youth. It normalizes
20:04nicotine in everyday life and affects
20:06every resident that shares these public
20:08spaces. As a community, we want to take
20:11steps to prevent the younger generations
20:12from developing the habit of tobacco
20:14use. We need to pro we need to promote
20:17well-being by expanding tobaccof free
20:19spaces across all all town parks,
20:22plazas, recreation centers, and public
20:25outdoor spaces throughout our entire
20:27local community.
20:28Extending these smoke-free spaces
20:30throughout Kerry reduces exposure to
20:32secondhand smoke and vape and reinforces
20:34clean, healthy public norms. By creating
20:37100% tobaccof free spaces, Kerry can
20:40break this cycle. It will protect our
20:42air quality, remove triggers for young
20:44people, and provide a clean and safe
20:47environment where families and future
20:48generations can thrive. Thank you for
20:51your time, your leadership, and for
20:52considering this policy to keep Carrie
20:54safe and healthy for everyone.
21:21Good evening, mayor, town council, and
21:24madame clerk. Before I mention uh what I
21:28want to say is that I work in research
21:30science and one of the projects that we
21:32do, we work for the EPA and we test the
21:34air quality in the air. what these
21:37brilliant bright lights are talking
21:38about needs to be deeply considered. Um,
21:41and not only just what they have heard.
21:44Um, I care deeply about this town and my
21:46request tonight is about strengthening
21:49public trust through meaningful dialogue
21:52and measurable accountability.
21:54There's been council members that have
21:57reached out to me the past few weeks.
21:58I've been a little bit under the
22:00weather. I have enough strength to stand
22:01before you tonight before I pass out.
22:04But um I appreciate that. I recognize
22:07and I appreciate the efforts of
22:10uh existing uh engagements that we have
22:13for our residents here in Kerry. The
22:15district meetings and formal
22:17conversations
22:18and public comment all serve valuable
22:20purposes. However, the existence of
22:23those platforms does not by itself
22:26demonstrate that residents concerns have
22:28been meaningfully addressed.
22:31uh this particular uh uh uh this body
22:37has has has have heard from me privately
22:39about this this town hall and I'm going
22:42to say it one time and then I'm going to
22:44say it one more time before we get to
22:46November and there's a reason why I'm
22:48doing that and I've already articulated
22:49that to you clearly inside of emails
22:52that I will conceal to the public as for
22:55right now
22:57uh council's assessment of its outreach
23:00matters Excuse
23:02me.
23:04Um, that does not mean that the
23:07residents feel that their voices have
23:11been heard. With that in mind, I'm
23:13respectfully requesting these three
23:14things. First, schedule a dedicated
23:17community town hall before the end of
23:20this year. I have clearly articulated in
23:23the emails privately to this board why
23:25I'm saying before this year.
23:28I I I want this on the record why I'm
23:30saying this, okay? Because there was a
23:33meeting that we had in the middle of the
23:35summer. It was a packed house. It was
23:38just hostile. And I believe in February,
23:41I mentioned that if we don't get this
23:43thing under control, you're going to
23:44have a hostile meeting with that. So,
23:46there's a reason why I'm saying to do
23:48this before the year.
23:50Um, the second thing would be to publish
23:53an accessible accountability update
23:55identifying corrective actions. And I
23:57know that the interim town manager has
24:00uh done a great job with articulating
24:03the progress moving forward and I
24:05appreciate that. Um these uh requests
24:08that I'm making is not um withstanding
24:11those that work that in which you're
24:13doing and I appreciate that Mr. Overton.
24:16Third is to review the implementation of
24:18policy 191 which I do not like how it
24:21was presented. I think we had another
24:23resident that talked about that. Sorry,
24:25>> I'm going to I'm going to finish my
24:26sentence before we before we finish
24:28that.
24:29>> Thank you.
24:29>> The policy 101. Excuse me. Excuse me,
24:32sir.
24:33>> Excuse me. Your time has expired.
24:35>> Policy 101. I don't like how it was. Do
24:37>> we have any other registered speakers?
24:39>> Okay. Thank you.
24:40>> Policy 101.
24:41>> Anybody else in the audience that would
24:43like to speak, please
24:46come forward.
24:57Good evening, mayor and town council. My
24:59name is Patrick Murray and I just
25:00finished my second term on the
25:02information services advisory board.
25:04Thank you for the recognition earlier.
25:06Serving on that board has been very
25:08rewarding in many, many ways. One thing
25:10that I learned in serving that board is
25:12the appreciation that the town and the
25:14council have for the aging population in
25:16Kerry. trying to make it a welcoming
25:18place that people can can stay and enjoy
25:20and have a great life. Having said that,
25:23the FBI has been tracking Bitcoin
25:26ATMbased scams. They've identified over
25:28400 million
25:31losses. But what's astounding in that if
25:34as if that's not bad enough, 47% of that
25:38has been targeted at elders, losses by
25:41elders. I know the AP has tried to work
25:44with the North Carolina legislature to
25:47come up with bans or other things to
25:49prevent that. They've not been very
25:51successful in getting that on their
25:53agenda. Carrie has about 18 Bitcoin ATMs
25:57according to a Bitcoin ATM map, right,
26:00which is easily found by any potential
26:01scammer.
26:04If Kerry is unable to consider taking
26:07action or are unable to wait for North
26:10Carolina to take action, I would
26:11encourage you to think about what can be
26:13we we done here to reduce the impact to
26:18um the el elderly people living here.
26:20Right? If you cannot ban ATMs,
26:24look at other regulations. Are there
26:26transaction limits? Can there be a
26:28requirement of putting flyers right on
26:31those ATMs, making potential uh uh
26:35victims aware and more and more smart
26:38before they put their cash into that ATM
26:40and send it off to some scanner's
26:41wallet. So, it would be something that I
26:43would like the council to take up to
26:45help protect the elders living in this
26:48community and making Kerry a even safer
26:51place to live for all ages. Thank you.
26:53>> Thank you. Next speaker, please.
27:04Good evening
27:06members of the town council, mayor, Mr.
27:08Overton. My name is Elliot Tardiff,
27:10Kerry resident since 2014, and it's a
27:12privilege to speak with you this
27:13evening. I want to take my time this
27:15evening to talk about progress. Progress
27:18has been in the news here in recent
27:20weeks with the disclosure of the NC DO's
27:23intent to renovate the railroad crossing
27:25at Maynard and East Chattam Streets.
27:28While the state DOT is the responsible
27:30agency and ultimate arbiter of this
27:32project and attendant impacts to
27:34surrounding businesses, I'll nonetheless
27:36state for the record my belief that the
27:38existing proposal does not sufficiently
27:41minimize impact to area businesses. Good
27:44corporate citizens and neighbors, I
27:47argue, are being needlessly sold out in
27:50the name of progress.
27:52Better can be done by them. This should
27:54be a shared belief of everyone on this
27:57day and a belief to inform your
27:59conversation with state partners. I ask
28:02you as our elected leaders to lift up
28:04your voices to demand better progress.
28:08Second, I've noticed that the town is
28:10using dashboards to display progress on
28:13any number of different matters from the
28:15post auditor and WBD action items to
28:19open record requests, permits, and more.
28:22This is a commendable and efficient
28:24means to serve the people and businesses
28:26of this town. Pace of respective
28:28progress notwithstanding, I'd like to
28:30offer an addition. I wanted to touch on
28:33a request that I made before this day in
28:35February asking for the addition of
28:38pedestrian sidewalks and crossing
28:39signals at Kildair Farm Road and Kilmain
28:42Road. While I understand these requests
28:45and proposals must go through different
28:48stages of work
28:50uh before becoming reality, I'd
28:52nonetheless be interested to see where
28:54this is. Has it been discussed? Are
28:56there plans in the works to address it?
28:58You should consider expanding your use
29:00of dashboards to incorporate requests at
29:03venues like public speaks out. You are
29:06our elected leaders. It would for this
29:09resident and others go a long way if I
29:12knew I was being heard and what progress
29:14has been made. Finally, I wanted to
29:17acknowledge the recent tragic passing of
29:20Kerry Detective Alicia Brown and also
29:22the Durham firefighter who died in the
29:24line of duty this morning. Peace be with
29:27the fallen, their loved ones, and their
29:29colleagues. Thank you for your time.
29:31>> Thank you. [clears throat] Anyone else
29:32for public speaks out?
29:36Seeing no one, I'll close. Public speaks
29:38out and we'll move to the consent agenda
29:41portion of tonight's meeting, which is
29:43item four. If you're following along,
29:45I'll take a moment to review the consent
29:47agenda items. Please keep in mind, one
29:50vote approves these items. On the
29:53consent agenda, we have adjustments to
29:55the adopted meeting schedule, amendment
29:58to fee schedule, contract amendment for
30:01engineering design and inspection
30:03services for water main replacement
30:05project and 23 REZ14 Hatcher property
30:10reszoning. Would council members like
30:12any of these items pulled for
30:14discussion? If not, I would entertain a
30:16motion to approve the consent agenda.
30:18>> So moved. Second.
30:20>> There's a motion and a second.
30:21Discussion. All in favor, please say I.
30:24>> I.
30:24>> Any oppose? Motion carries unanimously.
30:27>> We have no public hearings. So, we move
30:29to discussion items
30:32and that is 6.1 which is ordinance
30:36amendment regarding smoking and use of
30:38ecigarettes. Assistant town manager
30:41Scott Barry will present the item and
30:44council may take action.
30:49Good evening, mayor and council. This is
30:51a council initiated item to amend our
30:54code of ordinances that deal with
30:56smoking and the use of electronic
30:58smoking devices.
31:00I'll walk through what our current
31:01ordinance covers, what's changed, and a
31:04proposed update if you choose to move
31:05forward.
31:08Over the past year, Carrie has seen our
31:10neighbors adopt changes to their smoking
31:12regulations, and we've heard from
31:15residents both through written
31:16communication and public speaks out
31:19about desired updates. During the April
31:22council meeting, a council initiated
31:23item was brought forward by council
31:25member Bush and Craig that was discussed
31:27directing staff to advance the proposed
31:29amendment before you this evening.
31:34Our current ordinance dates to 2007. It
31:37prohibits only lighted smoking and only
31:39in town buildings and transit vehicles.
31:42It doesn't address electronic smoking
31:43devices, doesn't cover count town
31:46property outside of buildings, doesn't
31:48cover our park system, and has no rule
31:50for privatelyowned public places.
31:53[snorts]
31:57The amendment before you does three
31:58things. First, it broadens the
32:00prohibition to include products that
32:02emit secondhand emissions, not just
32:04lighted tobacco. Second, it extends
32:07coverage beyond town-owned buildings and
32:09vehicles to all town grounds, the entire
32:12park system, which includes parks,
32:13playgrounds, event spaces, greenways,
32:15and trails. And third, it adds a new
32:18prohibition in privatelyowned enclosed
32:20public places townwide subjects to the
32:22exemptions that the state requires.
32:26Here's what that looks like across our
32:28spaces. Both lighted smoking and
32:30electronic smoking devices would be
32:32prohibited. I will note the asterric
32:34calls out the flexibility of the town
32:36manager to designate outdoor smoking
32:38areas on town property. This would
32:41include areas for employees as well as
32:43designate smoking areas in our venues
32:45like Cocoa Booth.
32:50The inclusion of public places is
32:52probably the most significant update.
32:54Restaurants and bars are already
32:55smoke-free under state laws. What's new
32:58is an equivalent rule for electronic
33:00smoking devices. Beyond those, the
33:02proposed amendment also prohibits
33:04smoking lighted and electronic in retail
33:07stores, offices open to the public,
33:09gyms, entertainment venues, and similar
33:11spaces. The far right column highlighted
33:14in gray shows the space where state law
33:16would still allow use. These include
33:18private residences, vehicles, tobacco
33:20shops, cigar bars, and private clubs.
33:24[snorts] As you can imagine, enforcement
33:26of this would be an education first for
33:28public spaces. If someone is smoking,
33:31the person in charge of the space should
33:32direct them to stop. Continuing to smoke
33:35is an infraction. This could incur a $50
33:37fine issued by a sworn officer. And by
33:39state law, those penalties go to the
33:42school system. For business operators
33:45that would allow smoking, it's also
33:47education first with escalating fines up
33:50to $200 for repeat violations. This
33:52section would be enforced by the county
33:54health director and town employees could
33:57be subject to discipline under our
33:59personnel ordinances.
34:02Staff is proposing that if council
34:04adopts this ordinance, it takes effect
34:05July 1st, 2027.
34:09This implementation date will give staff
34:10time to assess signage, coordinate with
34:12Wake County Public Health, prepare
34:14materials for employees, residents, and
34:16operators, and it also aligns with the
34:17fiscal year.
34:20In [snorts] summary, the proposed
34:21amendment prohibits smoking and
34:23electronic smoking devices across town
34:25buildings, vehicles, properties, and
34:26parks, and enclosed public places with
34:28the manager's ability to designate
34:30outdoor smoking areas on town property.
34:35All right, kind of a new slide, but
34:36because this is an ordinance change, if
34:38this is approved by five members
34:40tonight, um it would pass. If it's
34:43approved by four members, it returns for
34:44a later date and has a second vote.
34:49And with that, council can adopt the
34:51ordinance amending article three of
34:53chapter 14 of the town of Kerry code of
34:55ordinances with an effective date of
34:56July 1st, 2027. And I'm happy to answer
34:59any questions.
35:00>> Thank you, Mr. Barry. I'll open it up to
35:02council members questions, comments.
35:05>> Um, I'll just make a couple of comments.
35:08One of the things that I think is
35:12not necessarily covered in um, Mr. Bar's
35:15report is the complexity that exists um
35:19with our sister um municipalities and
35:23counties. There is this strange and
35:27complex
35:28uh weave of different ordinances and
35:31regulations. And so some of the
35:34challenges that there is is that what
35:36may be allowed in one community is not
35:40allowed in another. So as you're let's
35:42say going from location to location
35:44although the state law is clear um it is
35:48not as clear in the municipal level. So
35:50I wanted to call that out because I
35:53think that Wake County made the changes
35:56um Morrisville Kerry um and I understand
35:59that um Apex is now looking at it as
36:02well. So I think that commonality that
36:05shared commonality is also important.
36:08One other thing I'd just like to call
36:10out because we did receive a couple of
36:12emails from um well, we received one
36:15email from someone that was concerned.
36:17This isn't about telling adults that
36:20they cannot vape. It's about saying that
36:23in places where we have all agreed that
36:26we should we all have agreed that
36:29smoking doesn't belong that vaping
36:32should follow that same clear rule and
36:35guideline. Um, and also it expands it.
36:39It expands it to public spaces in
36:42private locations, including our parks
36:45and greenways. I have had many um many a
36:50family call and say, you know, I took my
36:52my child to the downtown Kerry Park and
36:54there were all these smokers around and
36:56I just didn't feel like they could play
36:58near the playground. So I just wanted to
37:01call that out that you know their
37:02personal their personal choice remains
37:05but shared air I think requires shared
37:08consideration.
37:11>> Other thoughts, comments?
37:15>> I agree and I I was happy to to second
37:19this. Um,
37:22the effects of smoking has had a a huge
37:25effect on my family, though we can't say
37:28definitively. That's how things came to
37:31be, but I've had multiple family members
37:33who have passed due to lung cancer. So,
37:37it was easy for me to say, "Yes, we
37:39should have a public discussion." the
37:41public discussion was much more
37:45difficult and enlightening because
37:47there's a lot of different factors to
37:49consider. It's not just about
37:53health well-being for
37:56it is about health well-being, but it's
37:58also about
38:00finding ways to be sure that we're not
38:06that it's about health and not being
38:07punitive. And so having having things
38:11written in here like the town manager
38:16has the ability to designate specific um
38:19outdoor smoking areas I think is very
38:22important. And also want to point out
38:25that our our ordinances
38:28when we when we pass something it we
38:30don't just set it aside and never look
38:32at it again. that there's always
38:34opportunity as we gather more
38:36information and learn new things to make
38:39changes to that. But I think um as
38:43people are also contacting us and saying
38:46make sure you're not infringing on
38:48personal rights that
38:51the ability to breathe air without
38:54secondhand
38:56spoke is infringing on a personal right
38:59in my opinion. Um, and I think we can I
39:04think we're finding a a reasonable
39:06balance with with this. But I I'm so
39:10sorry. And so I wanted to specifically
39:12name that we have heard um the the Youth
39:16from Post Center that we have
39:20we hear you. We hear what you're saying
39:22and we will continue to listen and that
39:25your your words haven't gone unnoticed
39:27and we appreciate your time. And I think
39:30that's what's helped when there are so
39:32many competing priorities right now for
39:34us to go ahead and make this decision to
39:36move forward.
39:40You
39:40>> know, Council Member Craig and Mayor
39:42Prom Bush, I think you spoke to the
39:44personal liberties argument so well. Uh,
39:47you know, that's a reasonable argument
39:49to make, but I think it's important to
39:51note that this is not preventing adults
39:53from continuing to exercise their free
39:56choices in any number of private and
39:58other public spaces. And I think it's
40:01not dissimilar to if you went to a
40:03friend's house and they said, "Oh, I
40:05don't allow smoking in my house." We
40:07would respect their personal right to
40:09say, "I don't want smoking in this
40:11space." And we're saying that about the
40:13town spaces that belong to all of us.
40:16Uh, I think particularly as a mom of
40:19teenagers and pre-teens, I am
40:22particularly supportive of the public
40:25health aims of a policy like this and
40:27our young people here spoke to that so
40:29well. So, so thank you for surfacing
40:31those concerns. Um, my only concern is
40:37the implications for our town employees.
40:39So, I would just like to ask staff as we
40:43operationalize this and we've given
40:45oursel plenty of time to do that that we
40:48are really mindful that this is
40:51supportive of healthy habits for our
40:53staff um and not punitive. I would
40:56really love instead of uh this resulting
40:59in personnel disciplinary actions that
41:03the consequence would be cessation
41:06programs or other kinds of of supportive
41:08help. So that this isn't uh uh punitive.
41:11This is not meant to punish anyone. This
41:14is meant to endorse healthy habits for
41:17all of our residents and ensure clean
41:19air for all of us.
41:22I would like to say something too. So
41:25this is a first of all I want to thank
41:28the youth for being here. Your advocacy
41:31and your um passion on this really is
41:34very inspiring and I will I will
41:37encourage you to continue to advocate no
41:40matter where we land today on this
41:42discussion because the conversation is
41:46not whether we want this or we don't
41:49want this. It's about you know what is
41:52the ordinance and what is the language.
41:54So I just want you to uh understand that
41:57you know um your advocacy matters and
42:01you know it has definitely brought this
42:04attention to this topic. So I'll just
42:08say something about my and I probably am
42:10sharing too much information here. I
42:12made some notes also so that I don't
42:14forget anything but um I'm highly
42:17allergic to smoke uh to a degree where I
42:20cannot be in a room where there is even
42:23a candle burning. Um I start choking I
42:26can't talk it's getting very severe day
42:29by day. So through my personal health
42:32experience and um through my personal
42:34opinion, I feel
42:37exactly where you are, you know, we
42:39cannot encourage smoking in public areas
42:42for people, you know, who do not want to
42:44share that air. But um I also want to
42:48tell you that I never felt any issue
42:49walking into downtown Kerry Park or Bond
42:52Park. Um I could freely walk. In fact, I
42:56had my daughter's graduation party there
42:58and we never felt anything. So, I just
43:01want to share my personal experience
43:02with you. Although I understand the
43:04advocacy part, but um I also recognize
43:09the health concerns and you know the
43:11problem um the youth is facing. I'm a
43:15daughter of a 18-year-old child that was
43:19um that went to high school and she
43:22would come back and share how the
43:24environment sometimes could be very
43:26triggering and you know it it's very
43:29widespread. Um so I understand where
43:32you're coming from.
43:34Um from an uh ordinance perspective, I
43:37understand what the current ordinance is
43:40and you know I would totally support
43:42this ordinance if we can add um other
43:45new ways of smoking. We can add that but
43:49I cannot support it in its entirety
43:52today and um that is because I have not
43:56seen any data on this. I have not seen
44:00any evaluation from the town staff with
44:03pros and cons. So my decision if I were
44:06to vote on this today would be purely
44:08emotional and um things that you've
44:12mentioned you know we will have to do
44:14from an inform enforcement standpoint. I
44:18think that's very concerning for me
44:19because um I understand we're being
44:22proactive but there are so many issues
44:24right now that our staff needs to spend
44:26time on and the money um that we will be
44:29spending on this um entire enforcement
44:32and the focus I think it will take away
44:35um the focus from very critical items
44:38that are pressing for the town today
44:41like moving forward dashboard coming up
44:44policies you know making those changes
44:47And I feel that's a priority for me.
44:51I I think um in my opinion ordinance
44:55should be developed thoughtfully
44:58considering the public health benefit,
45:00the extent and location of the problem
45:03and forcibility and the resources need
45:06needed to implement them.
45:08[clears throat] I want us to clearly
45:09identify the problem we're addressing
45:12and understand how the proposed
45:13ordinance would help. So, um I would
45:18love to see data. I would love to see um
45:21some metrics that could tell me that
45:23Kerry is moving into that direction
45:25where this has become a nuisance or this
45:27has become a problem and I'd be happy to
45:29support it. But I don't I don't have any
45:32data today to say that and I cannot
45:36support this change just based on
45:38emotions and personal health issues.
45:43>> Any other comments? Uh I would love to
45:46add some comments as well. Uh first of
45:48all thanks to our uh my colleagues have
45:51covered 99 99.9% of all the all the uh
45:56um thoughts and I would love to uh shout
46:00out to our young people as well
46:03especially for the past council meetings
46:05that came out to public speaks out. Uh I
46:08grew up in a second uh uh in a home. My
46:11dad smoke every day and I smoke. I grew
46:14up with the secondhand smoke. Uh thank
46:18God I'm still healthy. [laughter]
46:21But uh I want to share that um
46:23especially to the young people you came
46:25out to express your um opinions and
46:29advocate for this. When I was your age,
46:32I don't know there is option. The
46:35environment showed me my uh my dad and
46:38his friends, everybody is smoking
46:40everywhere and it's very normal to uh
46:45make the uh teenagers to mimic the
46:48adults behavior. But this ordinance I
46:51feel is the benefit for the public good.
46:56So for Carrie, I don't I don't see a lot
46:59of uh people smoking in public, but
47:01still because I'm only one person uh and
47:04I can see from the other public speaks
47:07out and also emails that people are
47:10smoking but this ordinance will help
47:13people to find the right place to to
47:16smoke. And also I would love um Mr.
47:20Barry, could you um u mention about the
47:24businesses uh especially for those
47:27businesses that could be affected? Um
47:30other than that, I will support this
47:33ordinance, but I want to double check
47:35with the businesses.
47:37>> Yeah. So, part of this ordinance applies
47:40to what is called enclosed public
47:43places. So, it's not places that the
47:45town owns, but it's businesses that you
47:46referred to. Uh currently, you know, you
47:49can't smoke cigarettes, lighted
47:50cigarettes or cigars in restaurants or
47:52bars. That's a state rule. This um
47:55amendment would also include then
47:57electronic smoking devices in those
47:59restaurants and bars. It would also um
48:03it would prohibit both cigarettes and
48:05electronic smoking devices, things that
48:07create smoke um in places like retail
48:11stores, banks, these offices, fitness
48:13centers, entertainment venues, and hotel
48:16lobbies. And then the the rule does not
48:19apply to certain places like um that are
48:21businesses like tobacco shops, cigar
48:24bars, if you have a private club, if you
48:26have a country club or if you're in a
48:28smoking room in a hotel.
48:30>> Oh, thank you, Mr. Barry. Um I feel
48:34pretty confident of these um businesses
48:37especially in the public use uh
48:40situation. Uh but for the restaurant and
48:42bars, we don't have any uh power to
48:46control that. It's already under state
48:48law, right?
48:49>> For smoking of cigarettes. Yes.
48:50>> Okay. Thanks.
48:52>> Um
48:54I very much want this to be a unanimous
48:57decision. So I'm going to ask this
48:59question. If a motion comes up and fails
49:02tonight, it comes back at a later date
49:04and only four have to approve that.
49:07>> Let me show your slide again.
49:08>> Yeah. So it takes five votes tonight,
49:12>> correct?
49:13>> And so if you don't get five votes
49:15tonight, then what happens?
49:16>> Then it would come back at a later
49:17meeting and it would only take four
49:19votes.
49:19>> Who determines that meeting? The time
49:21timing,
49:22>> the manager's office.
49:23>> Okay.
49:24>> Putting it back on.
49:25>> I would love Miss Bonsel's questions or
49:28her data to be collected and and I would
49:30love this to be a unanimous decision. I
49:32think that's very important. It's a very
49:35important message to send. Um, if there
49:38is no motion made tonight, what happens?
49:40Still requires five.
49:41>> Yeah. The first time it's voted on, it
49:42would require five to pass.
49:44>> Well, I just want to understand, you
49:46said you wanted it to be unanimous, but
49:49so you you want to postpone it until
49:52Miss Bonsal, Council Member Bonzel has
49:55the data. She may or may not,
49:57>> right? So, if you made a motion and you
50:00don't get five, then it comes back
50:02again, you could take four. But my hope
50:04is that you get seven. I see what you're
50:06saying. Yeah. Well, I I so I appreciate
50:10the questions and I thought Dr. Nishant
50:14Sha who was here at the last meeting who
50:17was phenomenal uh Duke cardiologist gave
50:21us a great deal of data that um from a
50:25cardiology and heart disease perspective
50:28one person in every I think he said 33
50:31seconds um dies of heart disease where
50:35um where there's evidence that smoking
50:36and smokers face a substantial high risk
50:40that one in uh I believe it was 10 kids
50:44um I'd have to look at the post center
50:46kids um is vaping and of those kids 90%
50:50of them are using flavored
50:53um
50:55um flavors to keep them addicted to
50:58nicotine. Um we also know that smoking
51:01and vaping also has a higher degree of
51:04stroke associated with it and we don't
51:06have as much data on vaping because it's
51:08relatively new. But my question to you
51:11would be are you looking specifically
51:13for carry day because we won't have
51:14vaping data but we already know that
51:17smoking and the carcinogens that come
51:20from the vapor from vaping
51:23um is not harmless. I'll say it's I
51:26don't want to say it is harmless. So
51:27what kind of data are you looking for?
51:29because I thought we got quite a bit
51:32from both the kids, the advocates and
51:35the
51:35>> so I think what you're saying is the
51:38data that to show that um smoking is
51:41injurious to help. I think we all agree
51:43on that one thing. Um none of I'm a mom
51:47of a teenager. I know what kids are
51:49doing and it's it's not good. It's sad.
51:52But um I don't think that's my question.
51:56My question is in Kerry, I want to see
51:59and hear from the manager and and the
52:02staff on that this is an issue and um
52:06how many complaints are we getting? Do
52:09we have police chief saying that there
52:12it's a nuisance in the park and people
52:14cannot stand there? So I think some sort
52:17of data backed and the reason why I'm
52:20asking this question is because I
52:23genuinely believe that we need to be a
52:24little bit more intentional and
52:26thoughtful on these ordinances because
52:29of enforcement challenges and um
52:33and we don't want to set a precedent
52:35that we we're trying to put an ordinance
52:39because we believe that this should not
52:42happen here. like is there any factual
52:46evidence that this is happening here and
52:48we need to take care of this by putting
52:50an ordinance is my question. So I'm not
52:52saying
52:53>> well it's not against the law now.
52:55Right. So that's the nobody is I'm I see
53:00what you're saying. You want to know
53:01okay are there people vaping? Right. And
53:03and so we want to expand the I'm sure
53:06they're vaping. I know that you know
53:08from being a teenager's mom that the
53:11kids get together there are parties and
53:13they vape and you know things happen but
53:15is this happening in downtown Kerry
53:17Park? I mean there has to be some sort
53:20of mechan or tool to understand I mean
53:24we we can put these ordinances but if
53:28there is no data supporting those
53:29ordinances how difficult enforcement
53:32will become for the police I mean we I I
53:35would like to understand that what like
53:38um are we going to change all the signs
53:40what is the cost of those signs going to
53:42be do we have the budget for to do those
53:45things or we are going to get that money
53:48from from another bucket to do that. So
53:52I think these are very logical questions
53:54to think about. Nobody is arguing that
53:56um smoking is injurious. I cannot even
53:59breathe when there is smoke around me.
54:02So I just I want some information and I
54:05appreciate what mayor is saying that we
54:08all need to have the right information
54:11before we move forward. But I would
54:13totally understand if you have five
54:14votes today and five and I'm not against
54:17the intention
54:19and um of what you're doing. I just I
54:22feel I'm I don't have enough information
54:24to say this is a problem in Kerry today.
54:28>> My [clears throat]
54:29concern is what because I write so many
54:32notes. Um, when I go back to my notes
54:36and I hear in addition to what you were
54:39saying that it sounds like council
54:41member Bonszel may not support this
54:43tonight without having additional
54:45information, I also heard you say
54:48concerns about the timing of this with
54:50other priorities. And so my question
54:54would be, are we imposing
54:57more difficulties with what we're asking
55:00of staff by collecting data versus what
55:04this says here for the fiscal impact
55:06that signage will be updated
55:08consistently with current maintenance
55:10schedules and
55:13that the cost will be absorb anticipated
55:15to be absorbed within existing operating
55:16budgets. So, I I don't have a specific
55:20number and that might matter to to to
55:23others tonight before taking a vote, but
55:26it might cost the town more of staff's
55:29time to collect the data. Personally, I
55:33on a daily basis, I probably don't even
55:36notice. Um, growing up with smokers as
55:40well, it's normal when I get in the car
55:42with my dad. Um, it's like roll down the
55:44window cuz anyway, that's his personal
55:47business. But I
55:50I I do go to Cocoa Booth Amphitheater
55:55and I there's definitely vaping going on
55:58there within the within the crowd and
56:02there's also I've at I've attended large
56:06events at the downtown Kerry Park. So,
56:08I've personally witnessed it myself and
56:10in in my opinion,
56:14making the policy consistent with
56:17ecigarettes, with what we've already
56:20known for a very long time about
56:23cigarettes, making that consistent
56:25is something that we should just do
56:28based on the data that's been collected.
56:30American Heart Association and and and
56:33the doctor and many other people who
56:34have presented information.
56:37But that's my perspective.
56:40>> It is a good perspective and thank you
56:42for sharing your experience. Um but
56:44these are all personal experience like
56:46what council member Wong said, we are
56:48just one person speaking for this.
56:50There's no
56:52>> re like what you said too, there's no
56:54real data. So, um I'm okay with voting
56:59yes for this, but I just need to know
57:01from police chief how will the
57:03enforcement work or we're just doing
57:05this because we want to feel good
57:06tonight that we are we have made a
57:09difference by putting this ordinance.
57:12Are we really going to enforce this or
57:14how are we going to enforce this? I
57:16think Scott made a great point about
57:17it's um education first
57:21and if you're looking for the police
57:23department to be the first pass at
57:26enforcing vaping laws that's um
57:29probably going to be an impact to the
57:31police department which is why I think
57:32it's best to focus on education
57:35>> like how that part is not clear to me
57:39>> how would you do it you so it's it's
57:40part of a this this is um I think what
57:43council member Bush was alluding to this
57:45then aligns car's regulations with the
57:48types of regulations that our neighbors
57:49have passed. So you have a consistent
57:51message across, you know, Wake County um
57:54area. But ultimately, it's people
57:56learning, it's us putting signs up as we
57:58replace signs. That's our approach for
58:00this.
58:01>> And I'm I'm assuming that similar to the
58:04way um Raleigh did it, there'll be
58:07social media campaign. I'm sure our
58:09partners at the American Heart
58:10Association will be putting out
58:12information. It's it's about education
58:14first, right? And and I do appreciate
58:18the fact and and I'm glad you mentioned
58:20it again. It's it is about aligning the
58:23fact that we when we made our ordinance
58:2520 years ago, vapes didn't exist. And if
58:29the harm from vaping is similar in many
58:34ways to the harm from smoking, and we
58:36already all agree that smoking is
58:38detrimental, then it seems a natural
58:41consequence to also um to prohibit
58:46vaping in these these same spaces.
58:50And uh I would love to share that uh for
58:53the past several council meetings I see
58:56the poll center and American heart
58:58association uh volunteers came up and uh
59:02talk about this uh for the education I
59:04think they will be the very good partner
59:07with us for the education with public um
59:12that will we'll continue this uh
59:14conversation with them
59:15>> and before I see you're leaning in I do
59:17want to give a shout out to the American
59:19Heart Association. They've been really
59:21great at sharing um model language from
59:24the North Carolina Department of um
59:26Health and Human Services, sharing the
59:27Wake County ordinance, sharing the um
59:32Raleigh ordinance and specifically what
59:34was really helpful to me sharing their
59:36feedback um when they started to talk to
59:39businesses, what is the business impact
59:41and actually uh letting us know that
59:44businesses were very supportive of this
59:47expansion. So Scott, I saw you leaning
59:50in.
59:50>> Scott, what I'm um understanding from
59:53today's conversation is there's no cost
59:56right now that uh except the staff time.
59:59So our police is not going to
1:00:02>> we're not adding police officers or
1:00:05anything like that.
1:00:05>> We are not
1:00:06>> correct.
1:00:07>> Okay. So this is more of
1:00:08>> Yeah. Not for this ordinance. Right.
1:00:10>> So what we are doing as part of this
1:00:12ordinance is only going to launch the
1:00:14social media campaign which is only
1:00:16going to be like you know educating
1:00:18people through different mediums that we
1:00:20have but um it's only going to require
1:00:22the staff time and there's no additional
1:00:24funding that will be required to make
1:00:27any changes to existing infrastructure
1:00:30to enforce this. that just there is an
1:00:34an item in the staff report where
1:00:36there's a fiscal impact which is what
1:00:38council member Craig was reading that
1:00:40said that signage will be updated
1:00:42consistently with the current
1:00:43maintenance schedule and this is exactly
1:00:45what um she pointed out. So it the costs
1:00:49that are anticipated are to be absorbed.
1:00:51I just want to make sure that people
1:00:52understand what we're doing because um
1:00:55there's lot of gray area in this
1:00:56discussion and even I don't feel very
1:00:59comfortable like um um at this point
1:01:02that I have 100% of information on what
1:01:06exactly the plan is and how we're going
1:01:08to execute this. I really appreciate
1:01:11council member Benel's questions and
1:01:13this continued discussion just now
1:01:16really helped me to better understand
1:01:18this ordinance and I think the more
1:01:20discussion during this council meeting
1:01:22the better for the public. Appreciate
1:01:24that.
1:01:25>> M
1:01:26>> what what I was going to add was uh this
1:01:29is certainly not the first vote. It
1:01:31definitely won't be the last where we as
1:01:33individuals have reached different
1:01:35conclusions about whether or not we have
1:01:37enough data to make what we feel is an
1:01:40informed decision. Um, and I think that
1:01:42just speaks to differences in individual
1:01:45personalities and the the kind of data
1:01:47that you need to make a decision you
1:01:49feel comfortable with. So, I think if
1:01:51council member Bonsol does not have her
1:01:53questions adequately addressed um and
1:01:56she feels more comfortable with a no,
1:01:58that makes sense. At the same time, I'm
1:02:00hearing that at least four of us have
1:02:03reached a conclusion that we do have
1:02:05enough data. And so, Mayor, I don't know
1:02:09that one council member's reticence
1:02:12warrants asking staff for additional
1:02:16staff time to answer more questions when
1:02:18I am perceiving that the majority of us
1:02:21have had our questions adequately
1:02:24addressed.
1:02:26So, I guess I'll make a motion that we
1:02:28adopt the ordinance amending article 3
1:02:30of chapter 14 of the town of Kerry Code
1:02:33of ordinances with an effective date of
1:02:35July 1st, 2027.
1:02:37>> There's a motion.
1:02:38>> Second,
1:02:39>> and the second, excuse [clears throat]
1:02:40me. Uh, I will support Miss Bonsel
1:02:44because I think it's extremely important
1:02:46that this be unanimous. Um, so if this
1:02:50fails, then it'll come back and by that
1:02:52time I hope we have seven. That's my
1:02:55hope. I totally support the motion, but
1:02:57I'm gonna vote against it because I
1:02:58>> vote against it
1:02:59>> because I want a unanimous vote. That's
1:03:01where
1:03:02>> Well, you should be aware that I don't
1:03:04believe
1:03:05>> I don't believe you will get a unanimous
1:03:07vote.
1:03:07>> Well, we'll see. I want the opportunity
1:03:10to get a unanimous vote. I want it to go
1:03:12down in the books. Is the council
1:03:13unanimously approved?
1:03:16>> So, so that's where I am. I think it's
1:03:18healthy for us to recognize that
1:03:21unanimous votes
1:03:24are not necessarily always healthy.
1:03:27>> I got that.
1:03:27>> But I but I respect But I respect your
1:03:30opinion. Just as I respect that, I would
1:03:33never ask anyone to vote yes on
1:03:36something that they didn't feel
1:03:37comfortable for because I I believe your
1:03:41discomfort is small that you absolutely
1:03:44know that for health reasons that this
1:03:47is a good thing.
1:03:48>> Yeah, I might, you know, I'm open for
1:03:50conversation and discussion. I it's not
1:03:53written in stone, but I need I don't
1:03:55think I have enough information to make
1:03:58this decision because any decision that
1:04:00we make is going to have a big impact.
1:04:02It's
1:04:02>> fair. And um I just don't think I'm
1:04:05there today and I want to be very
1:04:07intentional about my decision- making.
1:04:10And I I appreciate that we all have
1:04:13different levels of information that we
1:04:15need. I I remember the RHA amendment. I
1:04:19didn't have the amount of information I
1:04:20needed to to vote. I I also am cognizant
1:04:24that we've talked about this at the
1:04:26table at the table for at least four
1:04:29times and also very cognizant of the
1:04:32number of times that the American Heart
1:04:34Association and all of these advocates
1:04:37um and the and the youth who have come
1:04:40to I would say at least five meetings to
1:04:43speak ma maybe eight meetings I think to
1:04:46speak and advocate and um I I just want
1:04:50to thank them because I I imagine if
1:04:52this um does not pass, they will be at
1:04:55the next one. And I want to recognize
1:04:57the fact that it takes an enormous
1:04:59amount of enormous amount of time for
1:05:02the public to be engaged consistently
1:05:06and that is a lot of passion. So I
1:05:08really thank them for that.
1:05:10>> Okay, good discussion. All in favor of
1:05:12the motion, please say I.
1:05:13>> I.
1:05:14>> Those opposed
1:05:16two motion requires five votes. If it
1:05:18fails, it will come back to us at an a
1:05:22future meeting. Hopefully the next one,
1:05:24but I don't know how fast.
1:05:27>> Does something change between now and
1:05:30the next meeting other than we have an
1:05:32additional council member?
1:05:34>> Right. Can we ensure that council member
1:05:36Ponal gets whatever information she
1:05:37>> But I think mayor is right there with me
1:05:39too. And I hope that you know we both
1:05:42can get the information. If if you are
1:05:45satisfied and have the information you
1:05:48need, if you reach a point where you
1:05:50said, "I have all the information I
1:05:52need, but I'm not going to vote for it,"
1:05:54then that's acceptable to me, too, that
1:05:56I can now vote for this ordinance. But I
1:05:59would really like this to be unanimous.
1:06:01>> Okay.
1:06:02>> And just to be clear, this is
1:06:03communication that council member Bonsaw
1:06:05can direct with staff and we're not
1:06:07asking staff to bring back to the full
1:06:09body.
1:06:10>> That's right.
1:06:11>> More staff report. Okay.
1:06:14>> And do you need any additional
1:06:15information as well?
1:06:16>> I'm good right now.
1:06:17>> Okay,
1:06:18>> Grace. Thank you'all. Thank you. I need
1:06:21a motion to go into close session. Uh
1:06:23pursuant to GS143 318 11A13 I move that
1:06:28we hold a close session to consult with
1:06:30attorneys employed by Ann or retained by
1:06:32the town in order to preserve the
1:06:34attorney client privilege between the
1:06:36attorneys and the town prevent
1:06:37disclosure of information that's made
1:06:39privileged or confidential
1:06:41pursuant to the laws of the state or not
1:06:44consider a public record within the
1:06:46meaning of chapter 132 of the general
1:06:48statutes and to consider the
1:06:49qualifications competence performance
1:06:52character fitness witness conditions of
1:06:53appointment or conditions of initial
1:06:55employment of one or more individual
1:06:56public officers or employees.
1:06:59>> There's a motion. Is there a second?
1:07:01>> Second.
1:07:02>> Discussion. All in favor, please say I.
1:07:04I.
1:07:05>> Any oppose? Motion carries unanimously
1:07:07and the council will move into close
1:07:09session at 1035.
2:11:56We'll reconvene our council meeting. We
2:11:59uh concluded our agenda. I would
2:12:00entertain a motion to adjurnn.
2:12:03>> So moved.
2:12:04>> Second.
2:12:06>> Any discussion? All in favor, please say
2:12:08I.
2:12:08>> I. Opposed. Motion carries. We are
2:12:10adjourned. Thank you.
2:12:17Oh my goodness.
