2026-10-27 - Athens in Motion
Summary
Built from the YouTube auto-generated captions; names and figures may be misheard. The agenda and minutes were not read.
- Two public comments raised bicycle safety: a right-hook crash risk at South Lumpkin and Cedar streets, and storm-drain hazards on Baxter Street. Staff noted an existing but unfunded striping redesign for Lumpkin/Cedar, and the committee agreed to review those plans and crash data at a future meeting. See Bicycle Crash Data Reporting Gaps.
- Crashes that involve no motor vehicle are filed as injured-person reports and so do not appear in state crash data; staff will work with Athens-Clarke police on reporting accuracy and other data sources.
- The Athens in Motion Plan passed before the Mayor and Commission; members noted the need to build relationships with incoming elected officials.
- Transit staff said the bike light and vest giveaway was popular (a reorder was placed) and that the Better Bus Athens concepts report is due in December. See Better Bus Athens Network Redesign.
- House Bill 328 restricts TSPLOST funds from free or reduced transit fares, speeding up a planned fare analysis; staff will present it and the Better Bus Athens choices to the Mayor and Commission on November 10. See TSPLOST Projects.
- The live crash dashboard, built from Safety Action Plan data, is working again; members asked for better layout on laptops and tablets.
- The Firefly Trail audit draft is out for comment; a member noted national guidance against trail stop signs, and staff said removal needs coordination with Leisure Services. See Firefly Trail Audit.
- August and September crash reports were reviewed; a pedestrian crash on Georgia Avenue will be shared with GDOT to support the benefit-cost case for a pedestrian hybrid beacon there. Monthly versus quarterly or annual reporting will be settled at the December annual meeting.
- The Prince Avenue project (paving, striping, buffers, green infrastructure) has been combined into one construction contract for bidding, with construction expected in spring.
- The November 24 meeting was cancelled; the annual meeting is December 8, and the chair announced they are leaving the commission at year end.
Agenda
- Roll call; approval of minutes and agenda
- Public comments
- Staff updates: Athens in Motion Plan, e-bike safety research group, e-bike policy statement, Bike-Walk-Live summit
- Crash dashboard presentation
- Transit update: bike lights, Better Bus Athens, House Bill 328 fare study
- Firefly Trail audit
- Crash reports (August and September)
- Annual meeting scheduling and chair transition
Sources
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/live/OCdGBvGFZPI (Athens-Clarke County YouTube channel)
- Agenda Center: https://accgov.com/AgendaCenter
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:02live
00:05bronchitis. So,
00:07>> all right, everyone. Thank you for
00:08invitations. Um, this is the October
00:12meeting of the Athens emotion
00:14commission. Share my screen.
00:26Go ahead and do roll call. Lauren, Art
00:29>> here,
00:30>> Teresa,
00:31>> Ry's out sick, Alan
00:33>> here,
00:34>> Ed
00:34>> here,
00:35>> Lane
00:35>> here,
00:36>> Gabriella
00:37>> here,
00:38>> here.
00:40>> And Jason is
00:44here. Katie is here.
00:48Tina is here.
00:52Is here. Molly is here. Welcome.
00:55[clears throat]
00:56And I think Todd is here.
00:59I see him on there.
01:03Okay. Um
01:06before we Oops. I need to update our
01:09SL. That's um before we approve our
01:14agenda public comments.
01:18Daniel.
01:19>> Yes.
01:23>> Okay. You ready?
01:24>> Do no. [laughter] Okay.
01:26>> Uh,
01:29let me I believe I had two.
01:34>> Did you want me to read it?
01:35>> Yes, you can go ahead.
06:15We're not able to hear the audio. Y'all
06:18are talking on business items.
06:21>> Oh, how long have you not heard?
06:23>> I think the whole time.
06:25>> Um, yeah, I sent a message and I didn't
06:27I thought you
06:29>> ready.
06:31>> Okay. Well, let's just restart the
06:33meeting.
06:36>> [laughter]
06:37>> And yeah, and it's showing. Man, this is
06:42all right.
06:43>> What are we starting again?
06:45>> Showing my face
06:50>> there.
06:52>> Okay. So,
06:53>> yeah.
06:55Make sure.
06:57>> All right. So, testing
07:00now. You have Ken Harris?
07:02>> Yes.
07:03>> All right.
07:05Well,
07:06>> all right. Well, I think we'll we'll
07:08proceed.
07:08>> That was our practice.
07:09>> All we we've just um approved the
07:11minutes and approved the agenda.
07:14>> Um so, I think that we will carry on.
07:17>> Great.
07:18>> Yes. And um Daniel had not read the
07:21public comment yet, so we haven't.
07:24What's that?
07:25>> No, you [laughter] I could have
07:27pretended that I was prepared.
07:30>> All right, Daniel. Um yeah, so we have
07:33two public comments. One of them was um
07:35submitted through our website. Um the
07:38other one was just an email to me and
07:42they told me afterwards that they would
07:43like to have it entered as a public
07:45comment. So uh the first do I give name
07:49and email? We don't usually get these so
07:50I don't know how or do I give the name
07:53and address. Um this first comment is
07:56from Aubrey Smith at 365 Morton Avenue.
08:00um Athens.
08:03She said, "I would like to raise a
08:04safety concern about the bicycle
08:05infrastructure at the intersection of
08:07South Lumpin Street and Cedar Street.
08:09About two years ago, I was riding my
08:10ebike in the bike lane on South Lumpin
08:12Street and traveling straight through
08:13the intersection. When the light turned
08:15green, I began moving forward. I quickly
08:17noticed the car beside me was beginning
08:19to turn right across the bike lane
08:21directly into my path. I immediately
08:23stopped. I could not safely continue
08:25forward because that would have put me
08:26further into the bath path of the
08:28turning vehicle and I could not move
08:30backwards because I was on a downhill
08:31slope and my ebike was too heavy to
08:33quickly reverse. As I could all I could
08:35realistically do was break and stay
08:37where I was. The car continued turning
08:39and struck me while I was in the bike
08:40lane. Fortunately, because I stopped
08:42when I did, I was hit by the side of the
08:44vehicle rather than continuing farther
08:47into its path, which I believe could
08:49have resulted in a much more serious
08:50collision. I fell from my bike and
08:52suffered scrapes, bruising, and a neck
08:54strain. I was also especially fortunate
08:56in how I felt. I was wearing a helmet
08:57and I landed largely on my backpack,
08:59which helps helped absorb some of the
09:02impact. My injuries ended up being
09:03relatively minor, but I am very aware
09:05that the outcome could have been
09:06significantly worse if I had not been
09:08wearing a helmet, if I had fallen
09:10differently or if I had landed directly
09:11on the pavement without my backpack
09:13cushioning the fall. I reported the
09:15collision to police and the incident was
09:17captured on video and witnessed by
09:18multiple people. The vehicle left the
09:20scene afterwards. The experience left me
09:23concerned about the design of
09:24intersections where a bicycle lane
09:26continues straight while vehicles
09:27immediately beside the cyclist are
09:29permitted to turn right across that same
09:30space.
09:31>> I do not know whether the driver failed
09:33to see me, saw me too late, or misjudge
09:35where I was. That uncertainty is part of
09:37my concern. A safe intersection should
09:38not depend so heavily on a cyclist and a
09:41turning driver seeing and reacting to
09:44one another correctly within only a few
09:46seconds. I appreciate that Athens and UG
09:48have invested in bicycle infrastructure
09:50and I'm glad that bike lanes exist.
09:52However, I would encourage Athens
09:53emotion commission to examine
09:55intersections like South Lump Street and
09:56Cedar Street and consider designs that
09:58reduce conflicts between cyclists
10:00traveling straight and vehicles turning
10:02right. That could include better
10:04physical separation, protected
10:05intersection designs, improved
10:08visibility, changes to signal timing, or
10:10other measures that make cyclists
10:12clearly visible and keep them either
10:14ahead of, behind, or physically
10:16separated from turning vehicles. I was
10:18lucky. I was wearing a helmet. I I
10:21landed on my backpack, my injuries
10:22healed, and the collision could have
10:24been much worse. I would like my
10:26experience to be considered when future
10:28bicycle infrastructure and intersection
10:29improvements are planned so that another
10:31cyclist does not have to rely in the
10:33same situation.
10:35>> I don't want to spend too many time out.
10:38We're kind of running low on time, but a
10:40question I have for staff is
10:43>> given a couple things that this um
10:46intersection actually has probably the
10:49most
10:52it has the most as far as I know like
10:54bike friendly stuff that we have in
10:57Athens, you know, on the ground like
10:59we've got the green paint and stuff.
11:00what what are the potential next level
11:02things that could be done if you know
11:04what what's the best practices if if
11:07there weren't interest in upgrading this
11:08and that doesn't have to be something
11:10y'all answer today but I'm just curious
11:12what does the next phase upgrade look
11:13like given the experience this person
11:16had and the other thing is I know Cedar
11:18Street is UG owned and then Lumpin is GT
11:23>> ACC
11:24>> ACC okay so ACC okay
11:27um so
11:29But this is such a common problem. This
11:31is this happens all over the place. So
11:34I've had that same accident.
11:35>> That's how I've had that same accident
11:37at different place.
11:38>> It's right down the hill too at the
11:39taste center also.
11:41>> It's the same issue.
11:43>> Yeah. I mean one one solution that we
11:46have seen um is
11:49dedicated uh bike signal. So in that
11:53scenario, you would have a green light
11:55for bikes that would turn on with the
11:57pedestrians. you would still probably
11:59want to give a leading pedestrian
12:01interval. Um it allows the pedestrians
12:03to go first to get into the crosswalk
12:05and then the bikes can go and they can
12:07either turn right or straight. Um the
12:10issue with that is
12:14in the same way that like
12:16like they basically have to have
12:17dedicated signal timing. So when the
12:20light turns green for cars,
12:22[clears throat]
12:23the bike signal needs to be red.
12:27So, they haven't come up with a way that
12:30is like MUTCD compliant. That's the
12:32manual for uniform traffic control
12:34devices. Um, they haven't come up with a
12:36way to like have that be like a like in
12:39my mind as a user, it's like if you let
12:42the bicyclist go with the green, you
12:45have a green signal and everyone else is
12:47stopped, you give a few seconds to let
12:49them get started, to get out of the way,
12:51and then you could turn it to like a
12:52flashing yellow. And then that just kind
12:55of signals to the bicyclist like hey
12:56watch out the cars are also going
12:59>> right
13:00>> but there's a lot that goes into the way
13:03that engineers design these systems and
13:06um you know we don't have any duplicated
13:08bike signals in Athens right now but um
13:12they have been implemented for a while
13:13in some of these larger cities and
13:14they're already like at the conferences
13:16that I went to this past summer there
13:18was a lot of conversation around like
13:20what we could do. Um there are things
13:22you could do like you know and I mean I
13:25guess the question that you're kind of
13:27getting at is also like what can you do
13:29in a cost effective man because
13:32>> like you know
13:35>> the simplest thing are expensive
13:37>> everything to a roundabout right
13:39>> we only have so much real estate here
13:40>> right you know it's like we're not you
13:41know to protect the lanes you would
13:43really have to like widen
13:45>> one thing that I would love to see us
13:47try on one of these corridors is to take
13:50that verge that we have for the sidewalk
13:53and like move it so that it's sidewalk
13:57bike lane right next to each other um
14:00separated with a curb and then you have
14:03that verge separation between the bike
14:06and motor vehicle. Um but yeah, right
14:10now
14:12>> the the signal is like one way that that
14:14would be it. You know, it would be kind
14:16of like or you could become a pedestrian
14:18in that moment and if you have leading
14:20pedestrian interval at that location,
14:22you can walk your bike through.
14:25>> I worry about things like at the base of
14:27the hill because the same thing happens
14:28on College Station going on to research
14:31road. like if I'm coming down that hill
14:34like you know coming to a stop is
14:37challenging enough to also then
14:40>> be cognizant of whether somebody's going
14:42to turn right and I think about them
14:43lumpin as well at the base where
14:46>> so it's like one thing on this where at
14:47least it's flat but what do you do even
14:49with a signal like can you see the
14:51signal from far away enough to like slow
14:53down the bike
14:54>> and the other issue here it's also not
14:57just at intersections it's at driveways
15:01Like I got a [clears throat] when I sent
15:04this out to the end commission listerve
15:07pod wrote me a few days later and said I
15:10literally saw the same scenario happen
15:12just last year on South Lumpin. A
15:14student was on their escooter heading
15:16southbound when another student turned
15:18into the old Holiday in parking lot
15:20driveway for West Ray Street. The
15:22student on the E scooter toppled across
15:24the hood and of the car and slid off and
15:26landed on the pavement. Luckily they
15:27landed on their bottom. I don't think
15:29they got hurt too bad because they got
15:30up and started yelling at the driver.
15:33>> They probably didn't even file police.
15:35>> Yeah. And and I do know that there was a
15:37police report on the initial the one
15:39that he mentioned. Katie pulled up the
15:42police report. We we looked at that. Um
15:44so
15:46>> we know the I mean ultimately this is
15:48like right here motorist responsibility
15:50and I hope they were found and cited
15:52because that's it's hit and run too.
15:55That's serious.
15:55>> Yeah, it was definitely hit and run. Um
15:58I don't know of do we see that on the
16:02reports? Do we get to see if they were
16:04>> um yeah found
16:06>> usually.
16:06>> So [clears throat] the officer will say
16:09whether they tracked him down or whether
16:10they
16:13>> learn they can't do that. Um, okay. So,
16:16basically, oh, it says here that the
16:19officer
16:22um
16:24contacted the victim
16:27to det decide if she wanted to have a
16:29criminal investigation conducted or if
16:31she wanted to pursue any charges. I
16:34again tried contacting
16:36her them multiple times from October 9th
16:40to October 21st and left voicemails. I
16:44still have not heard a response back
16:45from her. Based on the above listed
16:47information, I consider the case to be
16:48inactive due to lack of response from
16:50the victim.
16:51>> So, it's the kind of thing where like
16:53the victim seems to like want to make
16:56charges and I've been super guilty of
16:58like, oh, it's an unknown number. I'm
17:01not going to, you know, answer that
17:03because everything's spam,
17:06>> you know. I don't know um in the context
17:08of like,
17:10>> you know, what happened beyond that, but
17:12um
17:13>> it's too bad. I mean, they took all this
17:14time to write the comment, but not to
17:15follow up with the police.
17:17>> Well, also you have to think about the
17:18energy that probably this person
17:19expended to find who Daniel is and to
17:22write this whole the whole narrative and
17:24so maybe they don't want to to do it
17:26again or they're caught up in other
17:28things. Um that Yeah, it is a little
17:30disappointing, but um I mean they have a
17:33public comment and they made it out of
17:35meeting and it's now on record.
17:37>> Yeah, and I appreciate that comment.
17:38>> What about the sign the signage though?
17:40I've seen some signs from around town
17:42that kind of show a turning vehicle or
17:44you know they watch for bicycle. I think
17:47there's some different colors on this
17:48signs or pops a little bit.
17:50>> Yeah, I was say the same thing on it.
17:52It's not a really great solution but but
17:55solidation going into East Campus
17:57there's one of these yield to bikes
18:00turning traffic yield to bikes and
18:03>> it works maybe half the time.
18:05>> Yeah. understanding I want to litter the
18:06entire road, every driveway and every
18:10>> ultimately know I think having more of
18:13those signs at at intersections would be
18:16helpful. Um I know like years ago TPW
18:22was directed to reduce sign clutter
18:24around Athens and so
18:26>> um
18:26>> campus too,
18:27>> you know, and on campus too. So it it
18:30becomes a really tricky it's like they
18:32want the regulatory signs that are
18:34mandatory. Um
18:36>> not much room there either. It's
18:38>> there isn't tight window.
18:39>> Yeah. It's just it's um and this was in
18:422024 that the crash happened and so you
18:45know this is a couple years ago. Um but
18:50um yeah, it's it there's definitely I
18:53think there's opportunities to improve
18:58and we're going to every year we go to a
19:00new conference, we're going to learn
19:01about some new
19:02>> okay
19:03>> recommendation
19:05and unfortunately it gets into like oh
19:08we we addressed this intersection like
19:10five years ago but like we have other
19:14intersections that are worse but you
19:16know so can we carry step forward into
19:18that. Is there something we can do here
19:20specifically? Sorry, Gabriel.
19:22>> I just did a quick Google search for
19:23solutions for bic bicyclists being hit
19:26by cars not yielding and bike boxes are
19:29something that I guess was suggesting.
19:32>> We have to say it looks like there's one
19:34right there, right?
19:35>> Yeah. Well, and and specifically, well,
19:37this is those are two-stage turn cues,
19:41>> not bike boxes.
19:42>> Okay. Yeah. So, in the case of if we so
19:45like she could have but like the signage
19:48is not clear here. Um she could have
19:50pulled forward into that two-stage turn
19:52queue because that functions as a bike
19:54box.
19:55>> Okay.
19:55>> And then she would have been placed in
19:56front of the driver.
19:59>> Um and this gets into when we install
20:04new infrastructure, new markings that
20:06people are not used to seeing. teach
20:08them.
20:08>> What can we do to educate people?
20:11>> Box
20:13is that green paint
20:16>> painted area. Yeah. If
20:16>> you've ever seen like a bike lane that
20:19like goes to an intersection and then
20:21there's a big box in front of cars.
20:23>> It allows like you're coming up on the
20:26red light and the cars have to stop at
20:29the first stop bar which is the furthest
20:32one away and then that whole green area
20:34can be used by bikes to get in front
20:37>> in front be visible. And I'd seen that I
20:40was unaware of the purpose. Thank you.
20:41>> Yeah.
20:41>> But yeah,
20:43>> I also didn't know until this little
20:44moment that I Googled it.
20:47>> Um
20:48>> question.
20:49>> Okay. Tina has her hand up.
20:50>> Yeah, Tina. What's up?
20:51>> Um but the comment did it say it was
20:53from Cedar turning right onto South Lump
20:57I mean to Lumpin?
20:59>> It was
21:04looking back at it.
21:09Because if that's the case, then they
21:11would have to No,
21:12>> it was Lumpin onto Cedar.
21:14>> Lumpin onto Cedar.
21:15>> Oh, yeah.
21:16>> Well, she was she was she was on South
21:19Lumpin. The car was turning from Lumpkin
21:22onto Cedar.
21:24So,
21:25>> so she's going straight and the car is
21:27turning.
21:27>> Yeah. So, she was going straight in the
21:29bike lane.
21:31Um, and the car was turning right and
21:33the car and basically they both got the
21:35green light at the same time and the car
21:37didn't see her sitting to the right of
21:40them.
21:41>> Mhm.
21:42>> And so, you know, and like again,
21:46I don't like that there's so much
21:48responsibility on the bicyclists in
21:50these types of situations. The most
21:52helpful thing is to like if you're
21:55riding a bike, like make eye contact
21:57with the driver.
21:58>> You're supposed
21:59behind you.
22:02And it's like
22:03>> the driver.
22:05>> I mean, if you're next to them, like it
22:07like try to make yourself visible. Like
22:08you're not supposed to do anything. Like
22:10you're supposed to be able to follow the
22:13rules of the road and trust that other
22:14people will too.
22:16Well, the markings here in this
22:17intersections are a little confusing
22:19because I feel like I usually see the uh
22:21bike box
22:23um behind the stop bar or in front of
22:26the stop bar and but these the bike box
22:29is in well is parallel to the crosswalk.
22:33>> Mhm.
22:34>> So I guess it would be confusing for the
22:36cyclist in this situation to have
22:37understood because the arrow is
22:41>> not
22:43is a little confusing. Yeah, it it it
22:45and it's when I first came into this
22:49role, these were installed within six
22:51months of me starting this position and
22:55we got a lot of feedback and I think we
22:57actually redesigned the striping because
23:00we found that it wasn't designed like it
23:03it it should have been reviewed a little
23:06more. Um,
23:08so we actually redesigned this, but then
23:12there was no money to take that design
23:14and implement it.
23:16>> Oh.
23:16>> So we still have a design for redoing
23:20these
23:22because you're right. I mean, basically,
23:24you're kind of putting yourself in
23:26danger if you actually sit in that
23:28two-stage turn queue because it is in
23:30the path of crossing vehicles.
23:32So
23:33>> exactly. It's it's like it's a rough
23:36intersection and it's also one of our
23:39higher volume for active transportation
23:42because it's on campus. Right. Okay. So,
23:46we're have to move on here. But if you
23:48know whatever ideas, whatever the next
23:51the next phase of this intersection and
23:52others could look like, we're curious
23:54about understanding that we're not
23:56trying to commit to anything. But I am
23:58curious since again this does have
24:01pretty much has the green.
24:04You know,
24:04>> I said that kind of a theoretical
24:06framework. Um well, first you could
24:07check Knackto for protected
24:09intersections,
24:10but theoretically the way to have a good
24:12bike network is you either have um
24:15physical protection throughout the whole
24:17corridor and the intersection. So that's
24:19what you can see on the active there are
24:20little curves at the corners. So for a
24:23car to turn right, they have to go so
24:25that they're almost perpendicular to the
24:27bike lane and they can see them coming.
24:29So that's the full protected
24:30intersection that you need a lot of
24:32rightway for. And the other acceptable
24:35infrastructure is um a street that's
24:38traffic calmed enough so that the cars
24:39and bikes are going about the same
24:40speed.
24:42>> So both of those are very difficult in
24:44this context. But um I find it useful to
24:48have those two ideals in mind.
24:52My last plug, I know we got to move on.
24:54Um would be maybe providing some
24:56defensive bicycling strategies in terms
24:59of like we could put on some kind of
25:02event for maybe at least a little bit
25:06more of a defensive cyclist.
25:09Not that I think it should be our
25:10responsibility, but it is something like
25:12for people to understand how to use
25:14these things and some kind of outreach
25:16to them.
25:19I mean there's like UG has programming
25:23like I think it's part of orientation
25:25right to um how to like exist on campus
25:31walking and driving and
25:33>> it's a general overview safety to 18
25:36year olds coming in
25:38>> to campus that there's a lot going on
25:41>> pedestrian yeah
25:44>> a lot about
25:45>> that people bike and they need to watch
25:47out for bikes
25:48I don't know if it's specifically
25:50>> and there's no interest in not having a
25:53carfree freshman
25:57>> there's a lot
25:59that
26:01>> some folks for some folks
26:03>> there's a lot
26:06>> and and we don't know the age of the
26:08driver who turned into this person could
26:11could be anybody um but yes that's
26:14another thing is you know infrastructure
26:16education
26:17outreach.
26:19Um what what other things can be done?
26:23Um and those you know we as a commission
26:26we can't build infrastructure we can
26:28make recommendations but these are
26:30outreach and education are things we can
26:32help with and we have been part of like
26:34we do watch for dogs like Teresa set us
26:37up with tableabling for that event again
26:39this year. Um, so if there's an interest
26:43in doing more outreach or education and
26:45things like that that we can help with,
26:47um, do that.
26:50>> One one thing I mean,
26:52because I I kind of forgot that we had
26:55plans that never got realized.
26:59>> You tell me. But we could potentially if
27:02y'all wanted to recommend
27:04the installation of those plans or at
27:07least we could discuss them at the next
27:08one. We can look and see what the
27:10differences are. Um I can dig those out
27:13and then if that's something that y'all
27:15would want to recommend for
27:16installation, we could we could seek
27:19that out to see
27:21what it would cost to redo the striping
27:24here. There were definitely improvements
27:27on the entirety of Lumpkin
27:29[clears throat]
27:29that we were like, well, 80% 90% of this
27:35is great and there's these changes that
27:37we would make. I think one of them was
27:39like the bike lane as you approach Rod
27:41Street. Um, it just like wasn't
27:44protected enough. Transit vehicles were
27:45kind of pulling across the bike lane
27:47while the bikes go straight. Um there
27:50was there's a few different things that
27:52we changed and I think even adding in
27:55zippers was one thing we had we expect
27:57for zippers to be added into the
27:58buffered areas. um if that's something
28:02you know basically the public comments
28:03like hey please consider intersections
28:06like this and if we wanted to actually
28:08review those plans at the next meeting
28:11and recommend installation of that then
28:13we can put that forward to mayor and
28:15commission to see if they're willing to
28:17put funds for it
28:19>> I'd like to see the plan
28:21>> I'd like to say I mean if we're talking
28:23about just this intersection or not I'd
28:24like to look at the data specifically
28:26with this intersection I know we have an
28:27accident here and it's bad and I'm
28:29>> but I I want to we have a lot more
28:31infrastructure here than other places.
28:33>> True.
28:33>> So I think I want to let's let's look at
28:35where we should we should look at where
28:38it's most need in terms of actual
28:39accidents collisions.
28:40>> Well, but just I guess I I would prefer
28:43to see what what the ideas are and then
28:46you know we can decide whether that to
28:48to recommend moving forward or not. So
28:50next time not not now.
28:53It would be I'd be just curious and
28:54there are a lot of intersections like
28:56this that presumably it could be
28:57translated to if but not to say that it
29:01would jump the priority but just learn
29:04what it is. Maybe if if y'all want we
29:08can block out more time in the next
29:10agenda to review those to look at the
29:15we can find some sort of we can look at
29:17the intersection crashes
29:20um and we could just discuss it more. I
29:24think in this particular situation it's
29:27like because the plans are made you know
29:29that like we've already spent money on
29:31the plans they exist. it. I'm curious if
29:35there is like some way that we could,
29:37you know, even instead of having to go
29:39through an RFP process, but like get a
29:42state contractor. Um, that's something
29:44we tried with Prince Avenue that soon.
29:48Um, there is one more public comment.
29:50Um, is that So, you'all want to block
29:52out some time next time talk about this
29:54more and we can. Okay.
29:58>> Yeah. Cool.
30:00All right. Yeah. Next comment.
30:03Next comment was
30:10this one led us to an interesting
30:11discussion. All right, so this comment
30:14was um from Kevin Van Vorn. Sorry if I
30:18mispronounced that. Um,
30:22I don't have his address, but uh, he
30:26said, "I wanted to reach out to let you
30:27know that on Thursday, October 8th, my
30:29neighbor Richard Boyd was riding down
30:31Baxter Street on his ebike and had a
30:32serious accident. He suffered a terrible
30:35fall and broke several bones, including
30:36some in his face. He was rushed to Grady
30:39in Atlanta in serious condition. Out of
30:42respect for him and his wife, I haven't
30:44followed up regarding if he is home or
30:46not. The information I've gotten so far
30:47is that we don't know if a car crowded
30:49him on the bike lane and he hit one of
30:51the deep storm drains or if he just
30:53simply fell from debris or just
30:55accidentally hit the storm train. Not
30:57remember the fall at all. I wanted to
30:59pass along I wanted to pass this along
31:02to you as I myself do not travel on
31:04Baxter for this very reason. Our traffic
31:07is incredibly fast and for fear of
31:08hitting
31:10>> and for fear of hitting one of these
31:11storm drains. I fear crashes like this
31:13mostly go unreported to the right
31:15people. So, I want to reach out to you.
31:16Let me know if I should reach out to
31:17anyone else regarding his bike accident.
31:20>> As somebody lived on Baxter for 12
31:22years, rode my bike. Those storm drain
31:24are those recess drains are immense.
31:27>> They're awful.
31:28>> These are as bad as they get on Baxter.
31:31They're horrible.
31:32>> They're awful.
31:32>> And we've done a walk on it along here.
31:34We've had that conversation with staff
31:36about um
31:38>> working together. Um I think that we're
31:40trying to avoid that in the future, but
31:41I don't want to I don't want to spend
31:42too much time on the speculating. Did
31:44has this shown up in a crash report?
31:46>> So,
31:47>> that's interesting. Yeah. Um, we
31:49actually ran into the responding officer
31:51the next day. Um, and it did not show up
31:54on a crash report. It became an injured
31:56person report. So, I actually don't have
31:59access to it through the G dot portal.
32:02So, that we're starting a conversation
32:03about this this um the officer said it
32:07was uh operator error instead of a
32:10roadway issue of a driver issue. So,
32:14I really don't understand why it's not
32:16in the usual crash repository, but um
32:20>> yeah, I mean, basically, if a vehicle is
32:22involved, then it gets a crash report.
32:24And from what we could tell, because I
32:26even was like, what happens if a
32:28bicyclist hits a pedestrian?
32:31And it's I I don't remember exactly what
32:34his answer was and it's probably not
32:36like the official answer, but like that
32:38I think would likely get reported as an
32:40injured person report, which
32:41>> bicycles are vehicles control.
32:44I'm just saying that through the police
32:47department's like process of of dealing
32:50with incidents, like if if there's like
32:54gunfire and someone gets injured from a
32:56gunshot, that is the same form that they
32:58fill out for if you're on a bicycle and
33:00you crash and break some bones.
33:03>> Bet this could be up to discretion.
33:05Well, not discretion, but I bet it's how
33:07it's filed by the police officer. They
33:09may not understand that a bike
33:11>> is a vehicle.
33:12>> Yeah,
33:12>> I bet. I'm just speculating on that, but
33:14>> and it led to some other conversations
33:16where I remember, you know, I was I was
33:18doing the report for the Firefly Trail
33:20Audit and there was a bicyclist that was
33:22hit by a jump truck and I looked in New
33:26Metrics, the the portal for that G do
33:28provides and the crash was not in there
33:30and I went and Katie was able to find it
33:33in Gears and turns out it was considered
33:38private property. Even though it was on
33:40a public trail,
33:42>> it wasn't in the roadways. The officer
33:43reported it as a private property crash.
33:45And the way that G doers,
33:48>> they process all of the crash data for
33:50the whole state. One of the first things
33:52they do is eliminate private property
33:53crashes.
33:54>> Yeah. And also, yeah,
33:56>> it really gets into like how accurate is
33:58the data and like how much effort do we
34:00want to put into,
34:02you know, getting to the accuracy of the
34:04data. Um because I mean ultimately any
34:08anyone can look at the storm trains on
34:10Baxter and know that's an issue, right?
34:12>> But the crash history doesn't support
34:14it. But now we find out that it might
34:16not support it because how many injured
34:18persons reports were filed because a
34:20bicyclist hit it and vehicle wasn't
34:22involved?
34:22>> No.
34:23>> Right. These are great questions to ask.
34:26So y'all are talking with the
34:30um ACCD.
34:32>> Yes. Yes.
34:34you know, there's there's there's always
34:35like ongoing communication there and,
34:37you know, trying to um they show up for
34:39all of our safety audits and um they've
34:41been really responsive. This latest uh
34:44kind of coordination,
34:46um
34:47>> there was there were some staff changes
34:49where the staff person that no longer
34:51works there, uh they were the ones who
34:53were sending us the significant incident
34:54reports. Um and they they don't work
34:58there anymore and no one knew that that
35:00was part of their job. And so we stopped
35:02receiving fatal and serious injury crash
35:05reports through email. So now that's
35:07been kind of set back. It's more
35:09official. It's like written down
35:10somewhere. And um but even then in the
35:14writing they said vehicle involved.
35:17And so I want to make sure um we're
35:20really trying to there's only so much we
35:21can do from the transportation
35:22department, you know, but we do want to
35:25make sure that all the stuff is getting
35:26captured. So the the conversations are
35:29ongoing. Um, you know, even if it means
35:32that we're just going to have to dig
35:33into a different data source, you know,
35:35digging through the incident reports,
35:38uh, injured person report versus crash
35:41reports. Um, we we'll try to figure that
35:43out.
35:45>> Yeah.
35:45>> But yeah.
35:47>> All right. Yeah. Um, glad we're having
35:49this conversation. Thank you.
35:52All right. Um,
35:55moving on.
35:57Um some real quick well let me go
36:00through these really quick um updates
36:03and come back to the dashboard
36:05presentation
36:06um if that's okay with y'all. Just want
36:09to breeze through them. The Athens
36:10emotion plan it passed. Um thank you
36:13everyone who was able to reach out and
36:15talk with commissioners. I think that
36:17that is um the best strategy forward.
36:20there's no shortcuts to building
36:21relationships with our elected
36:23officials. And um so let's keep that in
36:26mind and let's continue to work on those
36:29relationships um before we have
36:32something else to bring before them.
36:36Um so in the coming year that can be
36:38something that we do and we'll talk
36:40about our plans for next year um
36:44shortly.
36:46But thank y'all. It did pass. It was
36:48unanimous for all the commissioners in
36:50attendance and we'll have a new crop of
36:52commissioners
36:53being sworn in and a new mayor. So,
36:55we'll need to work on those
36:57relationships.
36:58>> Um, but thank y'all. Great job.
37:02>> And it it looks great.
37:04>> Yeah.
37:05>> Yeah. Um, Daniel, any updates on the
37:08ordinance
37:10for a Okay. And I just wanted to make a
37:14note that um the UG health promotion and
37:18behavior traffic safety research and
37:19evaluation group has a final report on
37:23um improving ebike safety
37:26and their grant has been extended. Um I
37:28have reached out to see if they would be
37:30interested in giving us a presentation
37:32early next year and they're interested
37:34in coordinating something. Does that
37:36sound good to y'all if we have them come
37:38talk to us? Yeah, I think the short
37:40version is like there's there's issues
37:43that aren't really specific to the
37:45vehicle being ebike. It's like
37:47infrastructure issues abound and they
37:49also affect the ebikes, but we'll get um
37:52some more detailed information from them
37:54and they've been digging through police
37:56reports and also found some shortcomings
37:59and in those and that data so that
38:04um yeah, so I'll work on getting them
38:06out here if that sounds good to y'all.
38:10>> Great. There's also um the APB uh I
38:14joined the policy committee the last
38:16couple months and they have like a
38:19statement that they put out um I think
38:21it's either draft or it's official but
38:23it's regarding ebikes and e-otos and so
38:26really getting into like that kind of
38:29you know nationwide look at you know
38:33establishing what is an ebike versus
38:35what is an emoto
38:37>> and um kind of helping distinguish that
38:39it. So hopefully as more policies and
38:42stuff get developed, they're not just
38:43targeting everything.
38:45>> Yeah.
38:45>> Um so
38:47>> I guess I I've said this once before,
38:49but just for the record, I I think that
38:51it's misplaced to categorize things
38:55[snorts] separately as a as as you know,
38:58this kind of thing, that kind of thing,
38:59different classes of Bike. And I think
39:01that it should really be focused on the
39:03speed that the that it's traveling.
39:06>> That's kind of what their statement
39:07says. It's like the issue is speed. You
39:09know, you can have whatever all of these
39:11things. If your bike is going, you know,
39:1330 or 40 miles an hour, even if it's a
39:16humanpowered bike, you know, fast fast
39:18tour to France down down a hill, that's
39:21dangerous for for the rider and for
39:24pedestrians and other people. But I
39:27think it's just the speed limit they've
39:29got. Well, and that gets tricky though
39:31because then you turn into I mean even
39:34just I was talking to Christine uh this
39:37weekend and uh she's with leisure
39:40services over the trails and she said
39:42last week she saw a moped on the
39:45greenway and
39:46>> well they're there every day.
39:48>> He you know he came up on her and she
39:50happened to be there and she stopped him
39:52and he was like I know I'm not supposed
39:53to be here but it's a cut
39:55>> shortcut
39:56>> I think it's scooter.
39:57>> No no no moped. So then it turns into if
40:01you're going to allow E-Mottos, which
40:03are, you know, no pedal, you know,
40:05throttle engaged, and and it's a speed
40:07limit issue, well then what if it's a
40:10moped? What if it's gas? Who cares? You
40:11know,
40:12>> um what does it matter whether it's
40:14pedaling or not pedaling, whether it's
40:16totally whether it's gasoline powered,
40:19whether they're they're moving their
40:21body or not. If they're going under a
40:24certain speed limit, why can't they just
40:27be on there? Why do we have to say?
40:29Well, we're pedaling, so you have to
40:30pedal.
40:31>> I mean, I don't think we should allow
40:32gas. I don't think we should. Even in
40:34slow, I don't think we should allow gas
40:35power.
40:36>> I agree. The noise.
40:39>> Okay, let's um the may not be there, but
40:42I don't think I want
40:43>> It's It's placing a vehicle in a space
40:45that is supposed to be safe for
40:47>> going 15 miles an hour or less. Our
40:50speed limit. I don't I don't
40:52>> I think um I'd love to have like an
40:54extended discussion about this and maybe
40:56the time for that can be when we have um
41:00the UG folks come in because they've
41:02been collecting a lot of data and have
41:03done a ton of interviews across the
41:06community and I think um having us all
41:09in the same room could be really helpful
41:10along with staff, you know. Um so I'd
41:14like to to do that. Um
41:18but yeah, so I'm going to go ahead and
41:19move us on I can't resist adding one
41:22final comment to that and that is
41:25>> I have I have seen an Athens Clark
41:27County police officer on a
41:28Harley-Davidson Greenway.
41:32>> Now presumably he had very good reasons
41:34for doing
41:34>> let's hope.
41:36>> Presumably.
41:38>> All right. Um some of us attended the go
41:40Georgia bikew walk live summit. Art, you
41:43were there. Um I know Daniel and staff,
41:46y'all were there. I don't think we had
41:47anyone else here beside here for just a
41:49minute.
41:50>> Um, if y'all have any
41:53if you have any quick takeaways or if
41:55you're like I would like to give a
41:57presentation or share something in a
41:59future meeting, please let us know. Um,
42:04but yeah,
42:05>> or what
42:06>> if you have any takeaways or something
42:08like, oh, I saw this great presentation.
42:10I'm interested in it. I want to,
42:12>> you know, my takeaway was just purely I
42:15felt good that there were so many people
42:17around the state that that wanted the
42:19same kind of things as as I did. So, it
42:22felt like community and growing the
42:24community bigger, which was really nice.
42:26>> It's incredibly validating.
42:28>> Yeah.
42:30>> Okay. Um, so where we are in the agenda
42:34is um have a crash dashboard
42:37presentation and then
42:40um we'll have a transit update. Tina,
42:43are you still good because I know we're
42:44a little bit behind schedule.
42:47>> Yeah, I'll probably just have to hop off
42:49afterwards, but good on my end.
42:50>> Okay. All right. Thank you for your
42:52patience. I'm sorry about that.
42:55>> You're good.
42:58>> Okay. Crash dashboard. We call it the
43:00crash board.
43:01>> The crash board.
43:02>> Yeah. I mean I know I'm like [laughter]
43:04>> Yeah.
43:06>> Um would you like to
43:09show it or
43:11>> Sure. Yeah.
43:12>> Did Did anybody talk to you about
43:14showing the fish dashboard?
43:15>> No, I didn't. Okay.
43:17>> I [laughter] can I can do it since
43:19Yeah.
43:22>> back to
43:23>> uh Yeah. Let me Do y'all need a minute?
43:25Should we just go ahead and get Tina to
43:27>> I mean Yeah. go ahead and do those
43:29updates. And it might be my computer's
43:32been running into issues. It may be
43:33easier for us to like have you open the
43:36crash board on your computer and share
43:38the screen.
43:40>> You have to send it to me. Tina, um, are
43:42you ready now?
43:44>> Uh, yes. Let me share my screen.
43:47>> Okay.
43:53>> Make sure you all can see that.
43:56>> Yeah.
43:56>> Yes.
43:57>> Okay. So
43:59um today I'm going to give some updates
44:02regarding bike distribution um better
44:05bus Athens and its timeline um and also
44:08lastly our um uh 50year public
44:12celebration. Can y'all hear me? Okay.
44:15>> Yes.
44:15>> Yes.
44:17>> So
44:17>> that flyer looks great. That is awesome.
44:20>> This is nice.
44:22>> Yeah. Oh yes. This is the flyer on the
44:24right that you see here. um that uh we
44:28work together on um it's on our socials.
44:31We have uh flyers as well that's at um
44:35our information desk and around
44:37[clears throat] multimotal center.
44:40Uh so we do have vest and lights
44:42downstairs at the info desk. There's
44:44still vest available. We already ran out
44:46of lights the first batch. So we worked
44:48with Daniel to reorder them and he
44:50delivered them. Thank you, Daniel. Um so
44:52they're downstairs. I believe the first
44:55batch order was
44:58more than 30 lights. Uh we ran through
45:01that I want to say maybe two or three
45:03weeks. Um and now we got an order of 50
45:06lights. So we'll see. I know on um PPW
45:11side they're creating a spreadsheet to
45:13track how quickly they're um depleting
45:17each order. So we can see I guess how
45:21effective it is. Um hopefully I would
45:25like to know um since this is the
45:28purpose of this collaboration is to
45:31reduce bike ticketing and also increase
45:33safety for cyclists if if there's a way
45:35to track if there are less reported um
45:39ticketing incidences for cyclists. I
45:42don't know if yall know about that. Um
45:44but overall feedback from writers very
45:47good. People are very thankful um to
45:50have access to vest and lights.
45:55>> Love that.
45:56>> This is great. Is there any any
45:58discussion about expanding it to helmets
46:01also?
46:03>> We by Catherine's gives out helmets.
46:06>> I know,
46:07>> but I mean have make it more widely.
46:09>> It's a much larger item to
46:12>> That's right. That's Yeah, I understand.
46:14It's a if it's a budget thing.
46:16>> Well, no. I mean, I think maybe We have
46:18unlimited access. We have unlimited
46:20helmets through the Georgia state. Well,
46:24I don't know. Scott, you could probably
46:25speak to how many helmets are available.
46:30I have I buy about
46:33I don't know almost 200 helmets every
46:36year with our grant. Um we just crossed
46:39into another grant year so I have to buy
46:41more helmets. Daniel is correct. They
46:44are it's physically bigger. So like a
46:46box of helmets that only has 20 takes up
46:49an enormous amount of space. So that's
46:51sort of the the limiting factor there.
46:55>> Yeah.
46:55>> But we can let people know where did you
46:57come get the helmets.
46:59>> Yeah.
47:01>> Great. Okay. Let's let um Tina continue
47:02with her presentation. But yeah, this
47:05looks great, Tina.
47:05>> This is nice.
47:07>> Yeah. Thank you. I It is on Facebook and
47:11Instagram. And I know that our
47:14coordinator
47:15uh
47:19I don't know what's at so tagged I guess
47:22bike as well.
47:24So the next thing um is an update on
47:28better bus Athens. So recap in the
47:30summer we held our first day coder
47:32workshop.
47:34Uh Randy went to Randy yeah thank you
47:37Randy for coming again to that stable
47:39workshop. Then we also had a core design
47:41retreat. So that was made up of staff
47:44and uh UG and some technical experts to
47:48come up with the concepts. Um also after
47:52after we came up with this concepts our
47:54consultants in um worked on a concepts
47:57analysis report of the two concepts.
48:00Those concepts one by uh wrership and
48:03the other being um coverage.
48:06Um and that report is come is in the re
48:11final revision stage and will be
48:13published in December. Um something else
48:16that happened in the summer uh a Georgia
48:20House bill 328 passed. It is a bill that
48:24is supposed to help with education
48:27funding, but there is some hidden
48:30language there regarding usage of uh
48:35transit splast and transportation splass
48:38funds to help fund education. And so
48:41with that um some selective language
48:44there also kind of made it us question
48:49what type of what can we use T-spos for?
48:53Um specifically if I could just this is
48:56the language
48:58if here.
49:01>> Can you see what I just highlighted?
49:04No,
49:05>> it's very small.
49:06>> It's too small.
49:07>> Okay, that's all right. I could just do
49:11this.
49:12Can you see that now?
49:14>> Yeah.
49:15>> Okay. So, House Bill 328, page one, line
49:1916 through n
49:2117 through 19. uh quote to prohibit the
49:26use of special district mass
49:27transportation sales and use taxes for
49:30the provision of free or reduced fairs
49:32for public transit services to provide
49:34or time limits upon their calling of
49:36election for approval of special
49:38districts for transit purpose purposes
49:41sales and use tax. specifically
49:46we uh are doing
49:49well there's some interesting language
49:52here and worked with the attorney office
49:54uh to see what we have to do because
49:56it's a legal thing um uh we were already
50:01going to be cons considering doing a
50:03fair analysis study. It just kind of
50:06moved the timeline up uh because of the
50:09house bill that was passed in the
50:11summer. Um looking at in and considering
50:14what type of funding we have available
50:16if we want to con if we want to fund
50:18fair uh free transit still. Uh and if we
50:22don't what are the other alternatives um
50:25what kind of affairs would be possible
50:27to instill. Uh so it it started a fair
50:30elasticity study as well uh in in tandem
50:35with the better buzz Athens project
50:37which is okay in terms of they're very
50:39intertwined. The type of network we have
50:41and the routes that we have will
50:44determine um or frequency that we want
50:46to set determines the type of
50:49uh capital that we need in terms of
50:53phasing in more service or reducing
50:55service. Um, yeah. So, any questions on
51:00that? It's a lot and is a little
51:02convoluted for everybody still.
51:05>> Yeah. Okay. So, according to this bill,
51:09this I'm seeing the words like time
51:12limits upon the recalling of an
51:14election.
51:16Does this mean that Athens clar county
51:21has to allow for a recall election for
51:24the portion of TE's lost that funds fair
51:27free transit?
51:29We know that
51:34>> I cannot interpret it.
51:37>> Yeah,
51:37>> I don't think I can interpret it and
51:39tell you exactly what it means. Um
51:44I can only I can only uh do what I was
51:50told to do which is conduct this study.
51:56>> Okay. Yeah. So what what you're so what
51:58transit is doing along with better bus
52:01Athens is looking into what does it what
52:05will it take to bring back or to have um
52:08fair free if we're fund if we need to
52:10fund it through some other mechanism
52:12beyond TE's loss.
52:15>> Yes. So, we're al So, we're looking at
52:17fair elasticity as well. Um, how much it
52:19would cost to
52:21uh update or implement our fair
52:27equipment? Uh, what would staffing and
52:29training look like? Uh, what are changes
52:31to operations as well or administration?
52:35Um, or sorry, not administration, admin
52:38internally in our department. Uh, to do
52:42all of that, to implement that. what's
52:45the timeline? Um what would the impact
52:47be on our community? We would also have
52:51to do a a disparity impact analysis um
52:56uh from the FTA. Yeah, there's a lot
53:00going on, but we will have a
53:03presentation to Marission on the 10th uh
53:07regarding our fair and reinstatement
53:11study or fair analysis study. We're
53:13going by two names here, but yes. Uh but
53:16also we are going to be presenting at
53:19the same air commission meeting our
53:20choices report. It'll be the first time
53:23that the commission will um get a look
53:26at our choices report together. So our
53:28consultant will be presenting the
53:31overview of the tradeoffs. Um what does
53:34uh high frequency versus a coverage
53:37model look like? Um what our timeline is
53:39for engagement, all of that. Our social
53:42media campaign will also start uh next
53:46month for awareness. Um we are also
53:50going to be sending out our stakeholder
53:52workshop invitation for our second
53:54workshop next week as well. And then in
53:59December,
54:00uh we'll kick off public engagement. So
54:03that's going to be our surveys,
54:05uh uh tableabling, open forums, virtual
54:09meetings like that. That's the same week
54:12we'll have our stakeholder workshop
54:14meeting and then a potential mayor and
54:16commission meeting to go over our
54:18concepts report. Uh that's going to be
54:21the analysis of what we drew up in the
54:24core design retreat with the propo
54:27concepts of concepts concepts
54:30map concepts of the writership and of
54:34the coverage um maps. And then lastly,
54:39we have the GTA conference that's
54:42happening in um December as well that
54:44we'll be presenting at
54:46>> presumably that's Georgia Transportation
54:48Authority.
54:50>> Georgia Transit Association.
54:52>> Georgia Transit Association. Okay. Thank
54:55you. Um and you had mentioned the 10th.
54:58That's the November 10th.
55:00>> Yes.
55:01>> Okay.
55:03So Tina, with regard to the T-Blast fair
55:07free um portion, is that question just
55:13is that in the attorney's office? Are
55:15they looking at this bill and the
55:17ramifications as you guys are looking
55:19into alternatives?
55:21>> Yes.
55:22>> Yeah.
55:23>> Working with them and um the manager's
55:26office.
55:29Um they're just kind of I mean again
55:33like
55:34that touched on we already had it on our
55:37radar to look at a fair reinstate more
55:39fair analysis study. This house bill
55:41that was passed in the summer just kind
55:42of moved that timeline up. They're just
55:44questions of how do we fund transit? Um
55:47uh can it be fair free? What how how
55:52would our community react to fairs
55:55again? fair elasticity. At what point,
55:58at what cost, um would it make it
56:01difficult for writers to want to ride
56:04transit? Yeah, they're just kind of
56:08answering those questions to start
56:10looking at alterandas, but nothing is
56:12said yet. [snorts]
56:16>> Understood. Understood. So, there's
56:17there's a lot happening right now. Um
56:21>> there is.
56:22>> So, yeah. So let me think of like what
56:25is the the TLDDR or the jargon free
56:29version of this is our buses are fair
56:32free that has been funded since by TLOS
56:342023 and most recently will be funded by
56:37TOS 2026. There is a law that prohibits
56:40the use of TLOS funding to make buses
56:45fair free. So that means that some or
56:47all trips become
56:50we get forced potentially forced to put
56:53the fair boxes back which cost money to
56:56operate. Um and
57:00before before the fair before we went
57:03fair free um
57:07I think uh Athens politics nerd did a
57:09study or did um looked at all the data
57:12and found that 95% of all transit trips
57:15in Athens Clark County were already
57:17without a fair because if you factor in
57:19like UG staff, faculty, students,
57:23um they're already they were already not
57:25paying a fair. So there's just 5% of
57:27trips where people are having to pay a
57:30fair and you think about who are those
57:32people in Athens for county who are
57:34having to pay the bus
57:37>> afford at least.
57:38>> Yeah.
57:38>> Yeah. Right. And then it's also becomes
57:42you know more difficult for agencies if
57:44you're like okay I'm trying to help
57:46somebody. Oh you need to get here by a
57:48bus. Okay I have to buy you bus passes.
57:51You then you need like multiple trips
57:52and so on and so forth. So, I just I
57:54want to paint a picture of like how
57:55things were before we went fair free and
57:59there's um there's certainly a lot of
58:01options and um I'm not not a transit
58:03professional. We have people like Tina
58:05who's working on this with transit, but
58:07I just kind of want to paint a picture
58:10from a nonprofessional layman's
58:13perspective what we're what we're up
58:15against.
58:16>> Yeah. Thank you, Lauren. That's a pretty
58:18good
58:20>> TLDDR. Yeah,
58:25>> that's where
58:25>> let me make it a little bit happier now.
58:27I'll move on to my last slide.
58:29>> Okay, jerk and preach.
58:31>> 50 year anniversary celebration.
58:33>> All right.
58:34>> Hope you like our party bus. You see?
58:38[laughter]
58:38>> Um, so we will be hosting our 50y year
58:42anniversary public celebration on
58:44November 12th at the Multimodal Center.
58:47Uh, from 3 pm to 6 pm. We'll have food,
58:50entertainment, games, and more. And I
58:52will also be doing awareness tableabling
58:54for Better Bus Athens, too. So, uh, if
58:57you're available, come feel free to stop
58:59by, enjoy, and celebrate this really big
59:02milestone.
59:04>> Nice. 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. November
59:0712th.
59:10>> That's awesome news.
59:14Transit celebration. Great.
59:21Okay. Um, Tina, thank you so much for
59:24that update. Thanks for putting together
59:25a presentation and for all the work that
59:28y'all are doing to help get out lights
59:32and vests. Um, we've been handing them
59:33out for a while at tables by Gathn has
59:36them, but I think it this is a very
59:39efficient operation is what it sounds
59:41like. And it sounds like they're getting
59:43to in the hands of people who need them
59:44and that becomes increasingly important
59:46as it gets darker earlier
59:50>> this weekend.
59:51>> Yep.
59:52>> Um, thank you so much.
59:54>> You're very welcome. Um, and please let
59:56me know if there's a way if you all know
59:58um if there's a way to track
1:00:01uh
1:00:03uh I guess cyclist pullovers if there if
1:00:06the trend is going down because of the
1:00:08efforts that we're doing. That would be
1:00:09really interesting.
1:00:11>> Yeah, maybe we can figure that out,
1:00:13Daniel. Like when y'all are talking to
1:00:15AC, maybe they have something anecdotal
1:00:18or they have something y'all they're
1:00:19willing to share with y'all about that.
1:00:22Imagine they have to if they're issued
1:00:24citations, right, in pullovers, they
1:00:26report it. But if they're not issuing
1:00:28citations, maybe even
1:00:30>> Yeah. Or [clears throat] it may not be
1:00:32it may be harder to get into because it
1:00:33may not be a checkbox.
1:00:35Um,
1:00:38so much depends on how something was
1:00:40reported.
1:00:41>> Yeah. What's is there what's the
1:00:44request? No.
1:00:47>> Tina and Transit are wondering if there
1:00:49are less citations being issued for
1:00:52people not having lights.
1:00:55>> Yeah. I don't
1:00:56>> after the Yeah. the giveaways. Yeah.
1:00:58>> I don't know that
1:01:01we will we will find out that data
1:01:03exists. I think generally it's usually a
1:01:05warning, but I could be wrong.
1:01:09Um,
1:01:11>> that is something we've talked about
1:01:12like getting PD to have lights in the
1:01:14patrol cars so that they could just give
1:01:17out lights as they see the need instead
1:01:18of tickets. But I don't even know how
1:01:21many tickets there.
1:01:22>> No. And are warnings recorded or not?
1:01:24>> Yeah.
1:01:27>> And then they wouldn't record whether
1:01:29they were wearing the vest or
1:01:31>> Yeah. So that's Yeah. Yeah. The lights
1:01:35are
1:01:36>> Yeah. You have to have a front light.
1:01:37Mhm.
1:01:38>> Yeah. Okay.
1:01:40>> Um dashboard
1:01:43>> dashboard.
1:01:46Yes. So everyone can live so everyone
1:01:50can explore it.
1:01:52>> Is it posted on the website yet?
1:01:54>> Yes.
1:01:54>> Cool. So if you're online, you can find
1:01:58it on our website.
1:01:59>> You want me to um show it?
1:02:01>> Yeah. Great. Great. Thank you for some
1:02:04of us analog folks here today.
1:02:06>> Yeah, that's good. All
1:02:10right.
1:02:15This is
1:02:16>> Yeah, they said I don't know if it's now
1:02:18live.
1:02:20>> Y it's linked from the BPW website. Um,
1:02:25so these are all the crashes from the
1:02:28five years that we looked at in the
1:02:29safety action plan. And you can use the
1:02:34the column at the left to filter them by
1:02:36lots of different
1:02:39things.
1:02:42Now, uh, whichever crashes that you have
1:02:46filtered are going to populate the
1:02:48trans.
1:02:50It's a little hard to navigate. Um know
1:02:53why this we can't do mouse scrolling but
1:02:55um yeah I'm trying to zoom
1:02:59>> scroll on the um left side of the
1:03:01screen. Okay so that takes you up and
1:03:03down the
1:03:04>> Yeah, I'm trying to zoom in
1:03:05>> and then Well, so scroll down on the
1:03:08website.
1:03:09>> Yeah, actually I think you zoom out on
1:03:11the page then you'll find the zoom
1:03:13buttons on the map in the corner.
1:03:16>> Oh
1:03:17>> yes.
1:03:19Oh, you can get a peek.
1:03:21>> You may have to adjust sizing on your
1:03:24computer. We are working through
1:03:26>> Yes,
1:03:26>> those things.
1:03:29>> It should not right now. I don't think
1:03:32the scrolling on the map should not zoom
1:03:34in and out because you need it to scroll
1:03:37to up and down on the page. But, um,
1:03:42yeah,
1:03:44>> there's uh the charts at the bottom are
1:03:47really helpful.
1:03:49Yeah. And you can click on each crash
1:03:51and get some very basic.
1:04:04>> So we zoomed in really far and also
1:04:07because the scale of the web page is
1:04:09zoomed out, the dots are small.
1:04:13Yeah, there you go. I'm just going in
1:04:16more and then it just goes to normal.
1:04:19>> So, zoom out one
1:04:23>> and then can what happens when you
1:04:24scroll down on this?
1:04:28>> So, that's how you can kind of get down
1:04:30to the plus minus.
1:04:32>> Yeah.
1:04:35>> How does one make that go away?
1:04:39>> There's like an accept
1:04:43button. I just clicked outside of it.
1:04:44>> Oh, just outside of it. Maybe
1:04:46>> outside of that. We can um look outside
1:04:49to make what go away
1:04:50>> the splash screen. I think you had it
1:04:52pop up.
1:04:56>> So yeah, I mean there there are some
1:04:58changes we can make. Uh if y'all have
1:05:01feedback, I don't know what all we
1:05:04basically we you know, our consultant
1:05:07built this for us and then
1:05:09>> yeah,
1:05:10>> all of the links died. Um, and we just
1:05:13hired a new GIS uh
1:05:17administrator. Um,
1:05:20>> I was going to she was she was going to
1:05:21come and um I was going to introduce
1:05:23Shel to her today, but she had uh some
1:05:26she was she had to call out today for
1:05:28health stuff. So, um
1:05:32yeah, her name's Ally and
1:05:35um she we we gave her this task and she
1:05:39had it done within a few hours. So we
1:05:42had struggled with getting it to work
1:05:44for uh you know several months after
1:05:49[cough]
1:05:49acom finished. Um but so it's working
1:05:52now. Uh we're we're looking for ways to
1:05:54make it a little more optimized.
1:05:58>> Yeah.
1:05:59>> Very cool.
1:06:00>> It's really exciting. It's it's um it's
1:06:03difficult to use the map function. I
1:06:05think probably the easiest way to fix
1:06:08that is going to be um I think right now
1:06:11because we have larger screens in our
1:06:14office, it's probably formatted for a
1:06:16larger screen.
1:06:17>> Yeah.
1:06:17>> So, I'll just uh we may it may be
1:06:21helpful to format it for a
1:06:25laptop screen.
1:06:26>> Yeah. Um, and there's there's like
1:06:29generally speaking, I know that with
1:06:31Experience Builder, you can depending on
1:06:34the device you're on, you configure the
1:06:37app differently. So, you can be like,
1:06:39when you're on this type of mobile
1:06:40phone, the app looks like this, and when
1:06:42you're on this type, it looks like this.
1:06:44>> Yeah.
1:06:44>> So, maybe that's something we can work
1:06:46in there.
1:06:48>> Yeah. I think that this is great. It's
1:06:50going to be incredibly powerful. um
1:06:52getting it to fit on smaller screens.
1:06:56It's going to be key to realizing the
1:07:00power of all the data that's in here.
1:07:04>> And a lot of it too, like if you say
1:07:06like the map is important to see
1:07:08spatially where things are, but um the
1:07:12filters are kind of the main thing. So
1:07:15>> if you filter things and then you can't
1:07:17see them or
1:07:19>> if you want to like for turn pedestrian
1:07:21related on.
1:07:27So true. It shows you visually where all
1:07:30the pedestrian crashes are. Um so this
1:07:35is you have a couple filters on. What
1:07:36are on? There's another one that was
1:07:41micro related. Okay. So turn that off.
1:07:44And then so those are all pedestrian
1:07:46crashes. So then scroll to the bottom.
1:07:51Um and this will show you these
1:07:53statistics are kind of like what's
1:07:55helpful to see where you can really
1:07:57start to see like for the pedestrian
1:07:59crashes here's the severity. You know
1:08:01you you got 23
1:08:04um fatal crashes. That's a if you if you
1:08:07switch that to vehicle you'll see that
1:08:10that red line gets much smaller. And so
1:08:12those are some of the things where you
1:08:14know it's like while the map is helpful
1:08:16to see visually where they're at um the
1:08:19the charts you know finding your filter
1:08:22and then doing the charts.
1:08:23>> The charts are absolutely um helpful. I
1:08:26think um
1:08:28when people and I think we're imagining
1:08:30like the public will be using this. I
1:08:32think that they're going to be most
1:08:33concerned with like the areas that are
1:08:34close to them and they are going to
1:08:37really appreciate the map and use that
1:08:40as a gateway and I think that's true for
1:08:43elected officials too.
1:08:45>> That will be probably [clears throat]
1:08:47where everyone
1:08:50starts but I think it's a
1:08:53>> solvable
1:08:56Oh, why can't I zoom up anymore? Why
1:08:58don't you drag it? I was never able to
1:09:01get this flash to go.
1:09:04>> I've tried.
1:09:05>> What device do you have?
1:09:06>> I've got a iPad
1:09:09both Safari and Chrome. We'll see. There
1:09:12may be it may be a configuring
1:09:14configuration thing with that.
1:09:17>> Um but great. Um it's exciting to have
1:09:20this live. Um, again, I know a while
1:09:23back, um, we made some changes to the
1:09:27dot color and everything, and I and I
1:09:29love that the color and the size go
1:09:31together. Um, so that's great if you're
1:09:33visually impaired. Um, two ways to
1:09:36visually see that. That's
1:09:39awesome. I think that this is going to
1:09:40be very powerful and I love that we can
1:09:42put this out there for the public. It's
1:09:45going to be a great um, tool.
1:09:52Okay, [clears throat] I can feel myself
1:09:54wanting to go in and be like, "What
1:09:55about this? Let me find this." And you
1:09:56know, oh yeah, you know, put in an
1:09:58email.
1:09:59>> An old whole road is terrible. It
1:10:01actually works really well with touch
1:10:03screen.
1:10:04>> Okay.
1:10:04>> So, you can like zoom in and zoom out of
1:10:06just the map with my fingers, right?
1:10:10>> Or
1:10:11whatever that is.
1:10:13>> Touch screen working great.
1:10:15>> Yeah.
1:10:19Not your
1:10:19>> It has to be a laptop to screen very
1:10:21quickly.
1:10:22>> Okay. Um I think I'll go ahead and move
1:10:26us on the agenda.
1:10:30>> We don't we do not have Todd here today,
1:10:33do we?
1:10:34>> No.
1:10:35>> Okay.
1:10:37Guess I want to face our questions about
1:10:38the Firefly Trail.
1:10:41[laughter]
1:10:41>> Can I make comment or can we say that?
1:10:43Say that for later.
1:10:46>> You go ahead and make a comment.
1:10:47>> Okay. Um, appreciate you sending out the
1:10:49the Firefly audit. Um, I think it's
1:10:51something I noticed running it and
1:10:52definitely on the audit too and I know
1:10:54it's addressed somewhat on the report
1:10:58about stop signs for Firefly users and I
1:11:03and it's not just my opinion. NACTO. I
1:11:06was looking up the regulations or
1:11:07recommendations regul recommends against
1:11:10stop signs for bike and ped users of
1:11:14trails like this when crossing
1:11:16especially like unsalized
1:11:18intersections. So, I know I've been
1:11:21running on it with my wife and there was
1:11:22confusion from other users. It's up past
1:11:25uh where the audit goes, but where
1:11:27there's a four-way stop sign uh four-way
1:11:30stop where users thought, "Oh, I've got
1:11:33to wait till the intersection. All the
1:11:34cars are gone before I cross." Even
1:11:36though they cars have to stop, too,
1:11:38right? They have stop signs.
1:11:40>> So, it just creates more confusion. And
1:11:42just like a crosswalk, you don't have to
1:11:44stop when crossing a road at unsalized
1:11:48uh uh uh intersection. You know, it's
1:11:50obviously recommended. you want to make
1:11:52sure you're you're safe, but yield signs
1:11:54are one thing, but I'm I'm even NATO
1:11:56recommends against the stop signs.
1:11:59>> It's it's complicated. Um MUTC has
1:12:04some standards for determining the
1:12:07regulatory signage along trails. It's a
1:12:09little different than along sideways
1:12:11sidewalks because
1:12:13>> with [clears throat] the sidewalk, it's
1:12:14only pedestrians. And so, um, the risk
1:12:17with, uh, if you have someone riding,
1:12:20let's say, 15 miles an hour on a bicycle
1:12:24and they're not stopping, the car stops
1:12:26and looks and then they look the other
1:12:28way and then within that time, somebody
1:12:30could come. Um, that being said, one, so
1:12:33there's kind of within the audit report,
1:12:36there's a section at the beginning,
1:12:37which is corridor wide, which is kind of
1:12:39like, let's have a let's have a
1:12:42multi-dep departmental discussion about
1:12:45stop signs on the trail. And
1:12:46>> we saw it.
1:12:47>> Part of this is going to be like
1:12:48convincing, you know, the operators of
1:12:51the trail, leisure services, that uh,
1:12:53you know, that that is a thing that they
1:12:56would want to remove because ultimately
1:12:57we're in charge of the signage that is
1:13:00within the ride ofway for vehicles um,
1:13:04and the crossings and the markings and
1:13:07the the signals there. But uh when it
1:13:10comes to signage along the trail, that
1:13:12is like their responsibility and
1:13:15prerogative. So I know there there's
1:13:18some hesitance um from what I've heard
1:13:20about outright just pulling out stop
1:13:23signs, but it's conversation that we
1:13:26want to have. And then for each
1:13:28location, we do have like specific
1:13:30recommendations.
1:13:32Like it was actually kind of ironic. I
1:13:35went out to take photos uh a couple
1:13:38weeks ago. um just along where we did
1:13:40the audit and
1:13:42you know the uh the fertilizer plant
1:13:45driveway.
1:13:46Never seen any activity there. I pull up
1:13:49to take a picture and there's 10 trucks
1:13:52>> and the gates are open and there's some
1:13:54sort of site like the one day they they
1:13:56were doing something was the day I was
1:13:58taking photos and so I've never seen
1:13:59that there but still I mean um you know
1:14:04it's a fenced off gated parcel that has
1:14:07no traffic.
1:14:08just noticing this back and forth that's
1:14:10happening. Um I'm wondering because you
1:14:13had this great report here. So do you
1:14:16think it's um
1:14:19are we interested in having a
1:14:21presentation version of these audit
1:14:23reports in the future
1:14:26so we can have further discussion
1:14:28because I know a lot of us do go on
1:14:30these. I mean if there's
1:14:31>> well I think so I sent out the draft
1:14:33report. I'm looking for feedback on it
1:14:36for the next two weeks. Um, from there
1:14:38I'll finalize that audit report and also
1:14:41plan the next audit. I'd love to give a
1:14:43presentation. I was kind of waiting for
1:14:45final comments to come in from people.
1:14:47Um, because it has been such a long time
1:14:49since we did the audit, right?
1:14:51>> This next one will not take as long.
1:14:53Basically, I got caught in the Athens in
1:14:56motion plan [clears throat and laughter]
1:14:59the written report editing.
1:15:01Um, but yeah, I'd love to give a
1:15:03presentation on on the audit report once
1:15:05we have those final comments in.
1:15:07>> Should I Is this my comment or do I need
1:15:09to make should I have
1:15:09>> Please send me an email.
1:15:10>> Yeah,
1:15:11>> I I I hear you though. And it'd be
1:15:13helpful. Um
1:15:14>> I think just anything you can provide
1:15:16for for that. It's always helpful to get
1:15:18eyes on it.
1:15:20>> Yeah. Thank you. Yeah. And
1:15:22>> so so maybe in the future like it's it's
1:15:24um we do the ride, you have an initial
1:15:27report and we do a little presentation
1:15:29on it and that can be our comments.
1:15:33>> Um I would prefer written comments from
1:15:36y'all.
1:15:38>> Okay. Yeah. But in the future, let's
1:15:39have a maybe a presentation or
1:15:41something.
1:15:42>> Yeah, I'll do the presentation final.
1:15:45>> I'm talking about in the future the next
1:15:47time. Not necessarily for this one, but
1:15:49like forward as like um a suggested
1:15:52order of operations could be we do the
1:15:54ride
1:15:55>> and then you have this kind of draft
1:15:57report and we get like a presentation on
1:15:59it and provide feedback kind of like the
1:16:01way we do things like with the plan
1:16:03revision and everything.
1:16:05>> Yeah, I hear you on it. Um I think I
1:16:08don't want there to be any confusion.
1:16:10Like for instance with this report,
1:16:13it it includes recommendations that
1:16:15leisure services might contact me with
1:16:17comments and say absolutely not. We're
1:16:20not doing that. And then it'll get
1:16:21deleted from the final and I don't
1:16:23necessarily want to make a presentation
1:16:26saying this is something we're
1:16:27interested in doing. If that's the one
1:16:29thing that a person in public like catch
1:16:32catches is like a presentation of
1:16:33something that's not finalized.
1:16:35>> And who's who's the presentation
1:16:36ultimately for? um
1:16:38>> the final version.
1:16:40>> I mean it it would be for for this
1:16:42commission and the public
1:16:47if if if a presentation is what you guys
1:16:50would like to have then like we can do
1:16:53that. I I can I I can run it up the
1:16:57chain. I just feel like that's going to
1:16:58be the response back is like we don't
1:17:00necessar I mean like it's one thing with
1:17:02the draft Athens emotion plan but even
1:17:04then we didn't like we didn't have like
1:17:06snippets of the plan like we didn't have
1:17:08the plan up on the you know screen
1:17:12um
1:17:13before it was finalized. I think I would
1:17:15just be nervous about like putting stuff
1:17:18out before departments have a chance to
1:17:21give their feedback. So, what I could do
1:17:24is multiple draft rounds where I have
1:17:27draft one goes to staff only and then
1:17:29once they return it back, then I can
1:17:31send that draft out to y'all and
1:17:34>> let's um yeah, we'll we'll talk about
1:17:36this on online. I think um the goal is
1:17:40um there's a lot of great work happening
1:17:43here. I think that the bike audits are
1:17:47awesome and the walk audits and having
1:17:49staff together and seeing y'all talk are
1:17:52great. So, I'm looking for ways to
1:17:54efficiently give feedback, but also to
1:17:57surface some of this work that's
1:18:00happening so, you know, the public knows
1:18:03that these conversations
1:18:05are happening and um that things are
1:18:08going on um and not just kind of bury it
1:18:12in reports for what it's worth because
1:18:15it's because I know it takes a lot of
1:18:17time
1:18:17>> and um I want we want this to amount to
1:18:19something. I think maybe there's also a
1:18:21desire for like accountability
1:18:23and surfacing it and putting it out
1:18:25there.
1:18:25>> Transparency.
1:18:26>> Yeah. And transparency.
1:18:28>> But so we don't have to decide on that
1:18:30today. Um the report it looks great.
1:18:34>> It's awesome to see it with
1:18:35>> with the pictures and everything in
1:18:37there. And there's
1:18:39>> the like what we observed and stuff. I'm
1:18:41loving the format.
1:18:42>> Yeah. It's a lot more detailed than you
1:18:43know expected. This this first one was
1:18:45kind of like working with that outline,
1:18:48the format and and then the next one
1:18:50should be easier because it's more
1:18:51filling in the blanks.
1:18:52>> But yeah, it's a little hard because
1:18:54here we are in a public meeting. I'm
1:18:55talking about this great report that
1:18:58>> no one can see.
1:19:00>> Yeah.
1:19:00>> Yeah. So that that's the thing. So we'll
1:19:03we'll we'll have those conversations. Um
1:19:05>> well and yeah. And so, you know, when I
1:19:07when I send so like in this instance
1:19:09where I sent it out through email, you
1:19:12know, if y'all if y'all can like a twoe
1:19:15turnaround. So, if you can provide
1:19:18comments, I'm I'm happy to listen to
1:19:20questions about it here. Um, but yeah, I
1:19:24think it would make sense to have a
1:19:25presentation about it. I just
1:19:28terms of the order of operations,
1:19:31yeah, it's it's I can have like a
1:19:34overarching presentation. It's just more
1:19:36things to to do. Uh because I out of the
1:19:40the photos that were in there, I took
1:19:43about 200 photos.
1:19:45>> Yeah. Right.
1:19:46>> Of every intersection.
1:19:48Um and so now we have that, you know,
1:19:52set of photos, but
1:19:54>> Yeah. I don't even have this on the
1:19:56agenda.
1:19:57>> Yeah. [laughter]
1:19:58>> Oh, boy. Okay. That's okay. We'll get
1:20:00we'll get we'll get organized.
1:20:01>> It's okay. It came up as part of the
1:20:03leisure services.
1:20:05>> That's
1:20:06>> Yes. Yeah. So, okay.
1:20:08>> So, we'll we'll get it on the agenda and
1:20:10there will be a presentation with it
1:20:11when that happens.
1:20:12>> Okay. Yeah. Not trying to um hide things
1:20:15from the public. In fact, we're trying
1:20:16to service things for the public.
1:20:19>> Okay. We're we're kind of running low on
1:20:21time.
1:20:23Um,
1:20:25I think our biggest priority are the the
1:20:28crash reports, but we also need to talk
1:20:30about our annual meeting and scheduling
1:20:32that.
1:20:34>> Um, I'm going to
1:20:37I'm going to give you all the TLDDR on
1:20:39Prince Avenue and that is it it has to
1:20:41go out to bid for construction for
1:20:44contracting and that's now going to
1:20:47happen construction's expected to happen
1:20:49in spring. That's the short version.
1:20:50This is for the permanent
1:20:52>> barriers. Yeah,
1:20:53>> for lack of a better term. Sorry. What's
1:20:56the technical term?
1:20:58>> Uh,
1:21:00we can call them barriers.
1:21:01>> Okay.
1:21:01>> Yeah.
1:21:02>> I don't know.
1:21:03>> The prince final paving, striping,
1:21:06buffers, and green infrastructure
1:21:08repackaging into a single contract for
1:21:11bidding is the official word from Diana
1:21:14Jackson.
1:21:17Um,
1:21:18it's gonna happen.
1:21:21And then um
1:21:24have two crash reports. Can we get
1:21:26through those in like 10 minutes?
1:21:30>> Yeah.
1:21:33>> Yeah, I tried experimenting with an app
1:21:35to um let you guys kind of explore them
1:21:37on your own. Uh but yeah, actually I did
1:21:41um I updated the PDF so that these are
1:21:43both in there.
1:21:45>> Thanks.
1:21:46[clears throat]
1:21:47Wait.
1:21:55Are you able to share the reports that
1:21:57are
1:21:57>> Yeah, I can um I think I can show this
1:21:59if that would be helpful.
1:22:01>> That's great.
1:22:02>> Yeah. Sorry, I was um trying to get
1:22:04pictures to show up in [laughter]
1:22:07in this app that I built and it's not
1:22:10getting the hang of it.
1:22:12Um,
1:22:13so last month in September, we
1:22:15unfortunately had three fatalities.
1:22:18Those are VR news. Um,
1:22:22kind of different cases. One,
1:22:24uh, they're all drivers, but one person,
1:22:27well, he crashed and got out of his car
1:22:28and then was hit by another car.
1:22:35[clears throat]
1:22:42Yeah. Yeah, you're right. It's Daniel
1:22:44red. Um
1:22:47so um
1:22:50[clears throat]
1:22:54try to this up a little bit. And the
1:22:57other two are actually um senior
1:23:00drivers.
1:23:04One was uh going the wrong way on I
1:23:07think
1:23:09Gosh.
1:23:18>> Yeah, I went to a ninth. It's always a
1:23:23drive.
1:23:23>> Where um which one of which am I looking
1:23:25at?
1:23:26>> This is actually um I was starting with
1:23:28September because it was in front of me,
1:23:29but we
1:23:30>> Okay. Okay. Yeah, we can start in
1:23:31September this one.
1:23:32>> August.
1:23:35Yeah, the driver was 80 and had possible
1:23:37cognitive impairment, was going to
1:23:39breakfast the plane going the opposite
1:23:42way.
1:23:44>> Yeah.
1:23:46[clears throat]
1:23:51The fatality was on Jefferson Road. The
1:23:53driver turned out to the left thinking
1:23:55there was enough time before oncoming
1:23:57traffic.
1:23:58There wasn't.
1:24:00We know because they said so, but then
1:24:02um died later at the hospital
1:24:06also
1:24:08was over 70
1:24:11more vulnerable.
1:24:15>> Right. What are we looking at, Katie?
1:24:17>> Oh, I was I was starting with the
1:24:18fatalities in the um in the table for
1:24:23September.
1:24:24>> Okay.
1:24:25>> So, where's the kill?
1:24:27>> We could go ahead and cut. What page is
1:24:29that?
1:24:30>> Prepared. Uh I think this is still
1:24:32August.
1:24:33>> Okay. So we're we're actually in August.
1:24:34Okay. We are in the land of August.
1:24:38>> Oh, I see. They're both back to back.
1:24:39>> Yes.
1:24:40>> We could start with September. We can
1:24:42start with August.
1:24:43>> Okay. Here's Okay. We're in August.
1:24:44>> There it is.
1:24:45>> Yeah. Let's let's uh we'll do it this
1:24:47way.
1:24:48>> All right.
1:24:52I was trying to think of anything.
1:24:55don't have August in front of me, but
1:24:58>> um
1:24:59>> does anything stand out for you all if
1:25:01you got a chance to look at it already?
1:25:05>> August
1:25:14of August. [clears throat]
1:25:16Our August fatality was the kid who ran
1:25:18out into Lexington Road from Walmart
1:25:21parking lot.
1:25:28>> Yes. So,
1:25:30okay. So, yeah. So, August had one fatal
1:25:33crash and that was the one with the
1:25:35child that ran into traffic on Lexington
1:25:37Road.
1:25:38>> That's right.
1:25:39>> Um,
1:25:41and then is that one serious injury?
1:25:46um
1:25:47>> on Prince Avenue
1:25:50near Ogal Thor
1:25:53>> down there.
1:25:53>> Yeah, August was very late up there too.
1:25:56September.
1:25:58[cough]
1:26:00>> Oh yeah, that was an ebike. Um
1:26:02>> Prince Oak for car left turn of ebike
1:26:07yield yielding.
1:26:10>> Yeah. So basically ebikes going
1:26:12straight. Um that's actually a lot of
1:26:14our motorcycle
1:26:16crashes stop in that way.
1:26:19>> You don't see the the bike coming.
1:26:25>> The car turned left onto Ogulthorp
1:26:28>> from Prince.
1:26:30They weren't using the turn lane.
1:26:33>> Uh
1:26:33>> did they like cut across because the
1:26:36there's a left turn lane there?
1:26:38>> Yeah, the bike was coming
1:26:40into town. Oh, they were okay. I see. I
1:26:43thought it was they were heading the
1:26:44same direction. Okay, now that makes
1:26:46sense.
1:26:46>> I was starting to find sometimes diagram
1:26:48of the report set up trying to attach to
1:26:51the map, but maybe tomorrow.
1:26:53>> Um, it looks like August has the total
1:26:56number like highest total number of
1:26:58crashes this year so far.
1:27:02>> Oh, interesting.
1:27:05>> Oh, yeah. One page up, Lauren.
1:27:08>> Yes. Look at that.
1:27:10>> Look at that. August. Well, yeah, we
1:27:12surpassed it in September 2020, but yes.
1:27:20>> Yeah. I'm trying to think what else was
1:27:23noteworthy.
1:27:26Um, yeah, really similar bike crash on
1:27:30Lumpin.
1:27:36Oh, and the the car that
1:27:39[laughter and clears throat] crashed
1:27:39into a building that was marked as
1:27:41pedestrian, but the two people who were
1:27:43pedestrians were sitting at a booth
1:27:45eating,
1:27:46>> injured,
1:27:51>> wasn't wasn't marked as a severe injury.
1:27:54>> Was that was that at the bottom? What
1:27:56was that?
1:27:57>> 820 hole. Not sure what that is.
1:28:01>> I went to the Oh, I see. Okay.
1:28:03Different. Okay.
1:28:13Zach's piece.
1:28:15>> Zach's piece.
1:28:17>> There's another before. Um,
1:28:22we we need to do something about
1:28:24>> Was that
1:28:26>> Yeah, that was the one we saw, wasn't
1:28:27it, Katie?
1:28:29>> Oh. Oh, I'm not sure in there
1:28:31>> in Normal Town.
1:28:32>> I actually followed up on that. It
1:28:34should have been marked as severe
1:28:35because it was a broken leg.
1:28:36>> Absolutely.
1:28:37>> And it was Yeah, it was very
1:28:39>> It wasing It was right where really
1:28:41Georgia George and Prince.
1:28:43>> It's where we're putting in
1:28:45>> somebody was crossing there and was
1:28:47struck. So Or is it dusk?
1:28:51>> Yeah, it was dusk. Yeah, I should have
1:28:52added that by hand because it um
1:28:55followed up with the officer who didn't
1:28:58put it as severe.
1:29:00>> Wow. Um, but yeah, the the guidelines
1:29:02say broken limbs are supposed to be a
1:29:06>> code.
1:29:07>> It's it's interesting because
1:29:10>> it says issued citation. So that means
1:29:12the pedestrian received a ticket for
1:29:15crossing [clears throat] outside of a
1:29:16crosswalk.
1:29:16>> Oh,
1:29:17>> but also G do has a requirement of
1:29:19certain number of people crossing at
1:29:21that location before they'll put in a
1:29:23safe crossing.
1:29:25So
1:29:26>> it's essentially like with it's it's a
1:29:2920 car or 20 20 people crossing at peak
1:29:32hour like in in a peak hour at any given
1:29:35day you do like a 48 hour study and you
1:29:37have to find that within 20 within like
1:29:39within an hour time period the peak
1:29:42needs to have at least 20 um people
1:29:45crossing. That location
1:29:49is one where as part of the safety
1:29:51audit, they determined that they could
1:29:53put in a pedestrian hybrid beacon, which
1:29:55the uh requirement for that is a minimum
1:29:59of 50 people at peak, which means that
1:30:01they counted at least 50 people at the
1:30:04peak hour crossing at that location. Um,
1:30:08now I think we could get by with a
1:30:09refuge island with RFBS
1:30:12because they actually had RF,
1:30:14you know,
1:30:16recommended for in front of social
1:30:17security office. We're wanting to put in
1:30:20a pedestrian hybrid beacon. Anyways, all
1:30:21that to say, it's tricky because we were
1:30:25going to install that as part of the
1:30:26Avenue Toss project, but if we had
1:30:31installed it, G dot would no longer have
1:30:33the benefit cost ratio to justify
1:30:37their project getting installed. So, it
1:30:40would have removed too many of the
1:30:41safety improvements.
1:30:43So we're kind of stuck in this waiting
1:30:46game of So it actually I mean we should
1:30:49probably send this to GI to let him know
1:30:51hey that spot you now have a serious
1:30:54injury crack that happened at that
1:30:56crossing location which would then
1:30:57increase
1:30:58>> the benefit cost ratio which would then
1:31:00increase the prioritization of the way
1:31:02that G do funds it.
1:31:04>> Yeah. And this is actually was it
1:31:06Georgia not it was closer to Georgia and
1:31:07notore. I know it's reported as but it
1:31:10was
1:31:10>> No. Yeah. Yeah. Georgia. Yeah. That that
1:31:13makes more sense than than part.
1:31:16>> Um because a lot of people cross there.
1:31:19>> I do. All my wives do all the time.
1:31:21>> Yeah.
1:31:21>> So,
1:31:22>> all right. I'm going to move us on to
1:31:24September and then we got to talk about
1:31:27the rest of the year.
1:31:28>> That attestment is actually 2025.
1:31:32>> Oh, oops.
1:31:34Oh, no. That's me. Sorry. I might have
1:31:37done a search for it. I apologize.
1:31:40>> I'm so confused. was looking at the most
1:31:42recent one, but like I only September.
1:31:44>> That's that's me. I was um trying to
1:31:47March.
1:31:48>> Okay.
1:31:49>> Yeah. So, yeah, we are up to this this
1:31:51past month.
1:31:54Oh, wait. Oh, you know what? I I messed
1:31:56it up, too. I forgot to update the
1:31:57cumulative um chart. Anyway, uh
1:32:01>> nothing works. I know. I'll fix it all
1:32:04later.
1:32:04>> This is what happens when we take a
1:32:05month off.
1:32:06>> Oh, god.
1:32:08>> Yeah. So any basically though we had a
1:32:10lot of crashes compared to well we had
1:32:13seven again and 10 pedestrian
1:32:17um but none severely
1:32:21>> what is HIN again entry network.
1:32:24>> Oh yes so yeah that's the tool to
1:32:27prioritize I think it's the 18% of our
1:32:29ACC redways where over 85% of severe and
1:32:33fatal crashes happen. So it's a
1:32:35important priorization pool for the
1:32:37which we need to intervene in
1:32:40um
1:32:41>> to make the biggest impact.
1:32:43>> Yes.
1:32:50>> Well, we can
1:32:52pull up
1:32:53>> I got it.
1:32:54>> Okay. I wasn't sure. We could push it to
1:32:56next month.
1:32:57>> Yeah. But we might have to um Sorry
1:33:00about that y'all. Do that. Yeah.
1:33:02basically got a cluster of the RU on
1:33:05that time.
1:33:08Let me know if you have any questions.
1:33:10>> Yeah, this looks good.
1:33:12>> Did I get the August one right since I
1:33:14got the August one?
1:33:15>> Yeah.
1:33:16Yeah,
1:33:17>> this is um y'all thank your
1:33:22clerk of merit commission and the people
1:33:23who put together packets and everything
1:33:26because it's
1:33:27it's a lot.
1:33:32Yeah. And um should we do I guess we
1:33:35usually do a year and review in January,
1:33:38right?
1:33:38>> Yes.
1:33:39>> For crash reports.
1:33:43Golly, all the bike stuff. Goodness.
1:33:51Right hook.
1:33:55This is the first that I've noticed.
1:33:58Segways
1:34:01back.
1:34:03>> I I need to follow up on that segway.
1:34:06>> Oh,
1:34:08>> what is broke came blocking driveway
1:34:11during football game?
1:34:13Yeah, that was very strange because this
1:34:15was reported by a UG officer.
1:34:17>> This is not talking about a bike change.
1:34:22>> So, this probably shouldn't really be in
1:34:24gears, but I thought
1:34:25>> might be in a parking lot.
1:34:26>> Sure, but still it should be
1:34:29>> Well, I guess this is gears, though.
1:34:30>> What time was it?
1:34:33>> They can be hard to see. I'll say that
1:34:34much. They don't have lighting up. I'm
1:34:37just trying to see. You know, I've heard
1:34:38of other people almost getting
1:34:41>> 117 in a good clip to break a chain.
1:34:44>> Yeah.
1:34:45>> Yeah. And they weren't hurt.
1:34:46>> Maybe it was a plastic chain.
1:34:48>> Yeah.
1:34:49>> I just can't imagine.
1:34:50>> I can't imagine.
1:34:51>> You know, like getting serious injury.
1:34:54>> Yes.
1:34:57>> Right. Turning right up.
1:35:05So if a bicyclist hits a chain, it's a
1:35:07vehicular track.
1:35:09>> Yeah, they hit a pedestrian,
1:35:11>> right? This is some boring.
1:35:13>> Well, so so this is gears. So
1:35:17>> Well, okay. Actually, yeah,
1:35:19>> actually the back crash didn't make it
1:35:21into
1:35:23>> Yeah.
1:35:23>> was a single didn't hit anything. Didn't
1:35:26damage any property other than
1:35:29>> Yeah. And
1:35:32>> yes,
1:35:33>> so we yeah
1:35:34>> essentially if property damage is
1:35:37included then I think EB
1:35:41uses this
1:35:43and I'm not saying that I agree with
1:35:46that.
1:35:48It's an observation.
1:35:51>> Glad to see a driver got excited for not
1:35:54passing with enough clearance. Glad to
1:35:56see that.
1:35:59>> Glad to see that. I'm glad to see that
1:36:01they're being
1:36:01>> cited all jacket for
1:36:11segway and bikeway.
1:36:15>> Yeah, I'm gonna have to follow up on
1:36:16that too because why were they at Were
1:36:19they at fault? Because they were
1:36:20vibrating.
1:36:24No, I think seems like a vehicle.
1:36:27>> I think it's a mobility device, which
1:36:29means you could use it on a sidewalk,
1:36:31but I've also seen like wheelchairs and
1:36:33bike lanes.
1:36:35>> I know of a guy who has a disability
1:36:37ride around a segway. Like can't legally
1:36:39drive, can't physically ride a bike, but
1:36:41get around.
1:36:42>> Yeah,
1:36:45>> interesting. Seems like the bike lane is
1:36:47the place they should be.
1:36:50[clears throat]
1:36:52That's that's unclear because I couldn't
1:36:55tell if it was the guy on the segway or
1:36:57or
1:36:59doing this.
1:37:01>> Oh yeah.
1:37:02>> Yeah. The same point was marked as fault
1:37:04and I I don't understand why. I wasn't
1:37:06explained in the report. So
1:37:08>> try to follow up.
1:37:09>> They are very wide for sidewalk too. So
1:37:16>> if they're like electric scooters, you
1:37:17would think that they should be in the
1:37:19bike lane.
1:37:19>> Yeah. Not on the sidewalk.
1:37:23>> So top speed.
1:37:25>> Segway.
1:37:30Top speed.
1:37:32>> Yeah.
1:37:36>> 10.
1:37:37>> You're like
1:37:38>> 10 to 50 miles hour.
1:37:40>> 50.
1:37:41>> I can't believe it. Depends on which pro
1:37:44version of
1:37:46>> Yes, they can go up to 50 miles an hour.
1:37:50What the hell are they?
1:37:52>> They can do. I sure wouldn't do it
1:37:54anyhow.
1:37:57>> They're only calling that a scooter. So,
1:37:59Segue, I guess, is a brand.
1:38:03[clears throat]
1:38:03>> It says you should ride your Segway on
1:38:05paved bike lanes, multi-use paths,
1:38:08low speed urban or suburban streets.
1:38:12>> All right, I'm going to going to move us
1:38:15on. Um so something to think about is um
1:38:20going forward is like we have these
1:38:22great monthly reports, we now have a
1:38:25dashboard.
1:38:27Um something to talk about with staff is
1:38:32what is the next step for crash reports
1:38:35um for this group? Like what do y'all
1:38:38want to see? Do you you like this
1:38:40format? Is this going good? Um, do you
1:38:43want to do anything differently? Because
1:38:47I think that again, this is another
1:38:49great thing that we're doing is we're
1:38:50surfacing these crashes and before they,
1:38:53you know, sometimes you might get a news
1:38:56story about it, but other than that it,
1:39:00you know,
1:39:02not a lot was happening. So, um, it
1:39:05might be useful to think about how we
1:39:08want to
1:39:10receive this information as a commission
1:39:12going forward, collaborating with staff,
1:39:14understanding that, you know, they have
1:39:16only so much time.
1:39:18Um, because I I think I think it's great
1:39:20to like look at these one by one and
1:39:22talk about them. Um, so what I'm curious
1:39:26to know is do you want because I hate I
1:39:28hate rushing through these at the end of
1:39:30our meeting. think this is one of the
1:39:31most important things [clears throat]
1:39:32that we do and we look at.
1:39:34>> Yeah.
1:39:34>> So, um maybe deciding like okay this is
1:39:38the ma this should be the main chunk of
1:39:39our meeting or this is how much time we
1:39:41want to spend or we don't want to feel
1:39:42rushed or maybe it's you want to receive
1:39:44in a different way. Um maybe you just
1:39:47want to look at the reports before you
1:39:49come in and then talk about specific
1:39:51ones or only look at the killeds or I
1:39:53don't know. I I don't you know I just
1:39:55want to I feel bad that we're rushing
1:39:57through which is so important. I think
1:40:00it's extremely important and maybe we
1:40:02should move it up in the agenda some a
1:40:04lot of times that we make sure we have
1:40:05time we're not rushing through. Um I
1:40:08would also like just with the issues of
1:40:10reporting I don't know if we could have
1:40:12a sit down with um higher up with police
1:40:16to talk about
1:40:18make trying to make under have them
1:40:20understand our concerns about this so
1:40:23that
1:40:25they can educate the officers about how
1:40:27to properly report because there are
1:40:29some there's some issues here
1:40:31>> inconsistent.
1:40:32>> Yeah.
1:40:32>> Yes.
1:40:32>> Needs to be consistent across
1:40:35>> Yeah. What could be helpful is, you
1:40:37know, we've been providing the monthly
1:40:39updates. We will be putting together an
1:40:42annual
1:40:43summary of crashes. If if y'all can get
1:40:48kind of your questions outlined, maybe
1:40:51and I can't make any promises here, but
1:40:52we can request PD come and attend the
1:40:58meeting where we're doing the annual
1:41:00crash report. Um I don't know if that
1:41:03turns into also the annual aim report
1:41:07because I think both of those things
1:41:09overlap a little bit. So maybe
1:41:10>> we usually do um a year review in
1:41:12January.
1:41:13>> Yeah.
1:41:16>> So we sometimes the annual meeting has
1:41:18happened in January for everyone but
1:41:19ideally half.
1:41:21>> Yeah. I think I guess I just I would
1:41:23want to avoid doing the doing both of
1:41:26those time from from a staff capacity
1:41:29standpoint.
1:41:30>> Gotcha. Um but uh Katie, are you do you
1:41:34know
1:41:36because usually we get all of our
1:41:39the monthly crash report for December
1:41:42would be created in January.
1:41:44>> Yeah. So would you think that maybe the
1:41:47annual crash report would be a month
1:41:50after that or do you think you would be
1:41:52able to kind of I mean do you all want a
1:41:55December crash report separate or do you
1:41:58want that to just be the final chapter
1:42:00in the annual
1:42:02>> final chapter in the annual
1:42:03>> because we could I'm thinking probably
1:42:06either February or January or February
1:42:08uh depending on staff capacity. So
1:42:11saving the December crash report for as
1:42:13part of the annual report. Is that what
1:42:15we're saying? Or the annual crash.
1:42:16>> That's my question to you all. Do you
1:42:18like you do you like seeing a monthly
1:42:20and then
1:42:21>> monthly?
1:42:22>> Okay. So what we'll do is January.
1:42:26Well, I mean
1:42:27>> Yeah. Yeah. The uh annual report as soon
1:42:30as possible. Maybe at that meeting also,
1:42:32but if not then February.
1:42:35>> So trying to do the annual crash report
1:42:38in January. writing as well as December.
1:42:42>> Yeah. And that would include December,
1:42:43too, because it's the end of the year,
1:42:44right? Go over that.
1:42:45>> Yeah. I mean, it makes sense that we
1:42:47would have a December crash report.
1:42:49>> Yeah. And then January
1:42:51>> that would get sent out.
1:42:53>> Let's just
1:42:55since it's holidays and stuff, uh, and
1:43:00if we are asking PD to be there, I think
1:43:02safe bet would be February
1:43:04for the annual crash report meeting.
1:43:08and we could see if we can get PD
1:43:11to come talk to us because and we could
1:43:13basically say there's some questions.
1:43:15It'd be helpful if we could provide the
1:43:16questions ahead of time that way they um
1:43:20you know can can make sure that they
1:43:23have the correct answer. You know,
1:43:27>> another model might be like quarterly.
1:43:30We, you know, quarterly we could we
1:43:32could have a major chunk of this meeting
1:43:38and keep up with them more frequently
1:43:42and we could even advertise that to
1:43:48or you know, I don't know.
1:43:51>> I don't know. I like to
1:43:53some of this I like to to review when
1:43:55it's a little fresher in our minds
1:43:57especially if it's been you know a large
1:43:59particularly
1:44:01>> public like don't accident that we've
1:44:02we've
1:44:04>> talked about or it's been in the news so
1:44:06that's just my opinion but I understand
1:44:09other people feel differently
1:44:11>> are you saying to continue with the
1:44:13monthly report but then have every
1:44:15quarter where we go into more
1:44:17>> No I was thinking instead of the the
1:44:19monthly where was commenting on, you
1:44:21know, kind of giving it short short
1:44:23attention. Um, if we if we if we had
1:44:27basically a dedicated meeting four times
1:44:29a year to go through all of this, other
1:44:34m other major agenda items.
1:44:36>> Another alternative to this is the
1:44:40commission has the ability to make
1:44:42committees. We do not currently have any
1:44:45meeting committees. Um there's a
1:44:48projects and policy committee. We
1:44:49haven't met in months. Um mostly because
1:44:51we were waiting on me to get done with
1:44:54some stuff. Communications committee
1:44:56hasn't met. Uh there was a grant data
1:44:58committee that essentially uh the when
1:45:02Mark Abel stepped off, he was the last
1:45:04member of that committee. If there was a
1:45:07desire for committee where we could have
1:45:09more of like a breakout session where
1:45:10those who are passionate about it can
1:45:12come in, we can look at crashes and that
1:45:14could be maybe ahead of a meeting and
1:45:17then they could help with the because I
1:45:19don't want to put too much
1:45:21>> stress on Katie, you know, she's she's
1:45:24organizing both the safe school safety
1:45:26audits as well as the um walk audits uh
1:45:30road safety audits and doing the monthly
1:45:33crash reports. So, um, and there's
1:45:36reports for those things. So, Katie's
1:45:38been in report generating mode for a
1:45:40while, and it's kind of like that's a
1:45:42lot to keep. I mean, you saw it took me
1:45:43eight months just to do one bike a
1:45:45report. So, um, you know, I want to I
1:45:48want to be realistic with our staff
1:45:50availability.
1:45:52>> One possibility. I like the idea of
1:45:54moving the crash report up because I do
1:45:56think it's a a key part of of our world.
1:46:00Um, but you know, maybe we should put a
1:46:03little bit more of the homework on us,
1:46:05less on Katie. And, uh, read crash
1:46:09reports before you show up here on the
1:46:11fourth Tuesday, whatever. And if you
1:46:13have concerns or questions, we bring it
1:46:15up during an early part of the meeting
1:46:18and uh, and as opposed to having to have
1:46:20somebody read it to us on the screen.
1:46:22>> Yeah, you're right.
1:46:24>> I I I I'd prefer to, you know, do it
1:46:27that way because I mean, I find the
1:46:28pressure reports. Thank you very much by
1:46:30the way. Very very interesting and and
1:46:32and very informative about things that
1:46:36are going on in our community. Um but uh
1:46:39we most of us are at least high school
1:46:42graduate
1:46:53how much discussion do we want to have?
1:46:55Um, and I don't know I I think our
1:46:58meetings are a little different than
1:46:59some other meetings.
1:47:01Okay. Can you uh see this is why
1:47:05are you able to do a December 1st or a
1:47:07December 8th meeting?
1:47:10>> Okay. All right. Um,
1:47:12>> me too.
1:47:13>> Okay.
1:47:16Let's um let's go ahead and and move on.
1:47:17That's a good conversation about
1:47:19>> Yeah. Can I just I have one more thing
1:47:21about the crash.
1:47:21>> Yeah. So the the new crash board, are we
1:47:23going to be able to use that to kind of
1:47:27identify
1:47:28patterns and and start looking for
1:47:31>> I areas where are frequently there's
1:47:34accidents or maybe there's frequently
1:47:36pike accidents here for
1:47:39>> I mean just start kind of needle down a
1:47:41little bit with all that data.
1:47:44>> Yeah. It's not our safety action plan,
1:47:46but um yeah, you'll be able to explore
1:47:48it on your own. And ideally, we'll be
1:47:50able to integrate the monthly reports
1:47:52with that dashboard, so it'll all be in
1:47:54the same format. Right now, we only have
1:47:58through 2025 in the dashboard, but
1:48:01hopefully we'll get a workflow with
1:48:03Ali's help where each month I can I can
1:48:06add the crashes.
1:48:07>> We just use that to make recommendations
1:48:09or really show people where we're seeing
1:48:12issues. Yeah, probably already you could
1:48:15filter for, you know, severe bike
1:48:17crashes and see where the busters pop
1:48:19up. Sure. Mostly on campus.
1:48:21>> Thinking for future planning people.
1:48:24>> That's great. It's a great
1:48:28>> Yeah, we're hoping
1:48:29>> like right now. The only thing with that
1:48:30is it's it's like you know 2025 is the
1:48:34latest date and so um until we can get
1:48:38to that point of bringing in crashes
1:48:39because also the crash statuses change
1:48:42throughout
1:48:43>> right
1:48:43>> over time in gear. So once you export it
1:48:45you you don't want to have to like
1:48:47overwrite it can be really tricky if you
1:48:49try to do live
1:48:52>> metrics for a while and it's hard
1:48:54>> 500 a month is a lot of data. Yeah. And
1:49:00there's got to be a way to maybe
1:49:03fix
1:49:05>> going to talk about that. Looking
1:49:06forward to at least expertise on getting
1:49:09workflow going not in the next month but
1:49:12in the next year for sure.
1:49:15>> All right. So going forward and this
1:49:16will probably just be we'll do kind of a
1:49:18quick regular meeting at our annual
1:49:19meeting I think but we'll have um crash
1:49:21report at the beginning and we'll talk
1:49:23about what this looks like going
1:49:25forward. Um, I'm gonna I hate that we
1:49:28don't have any more time for any other
1:49:30staff meetings or staff information. Um,
1:49:33I want to go ahead and move on to the
1:49:34housekeeping. Was there anything
1:49:36critical
1:49:37that y'all needed from us, Daniel, or
1:49:39that you needed to say
1:49:42staff report?
1:49:44>> I don't believe so.
1:49:45>> Yeah. Um, Sam, anything?
1:49:48>> Okay.
1:49:49Yeah. Um, so some housekeeping. Once
1:49:52again, our November meeting falls on um
1:49:54the week of Thanksgiving. Sometimes we
1:49:57keep it. I think most of the time we
1:49:58move it.
1:50:00So, um I would like to suggest or have a
1:50:04conversation about moving our November
1:50:07meeting to December and having it be our
1:50:08annual meeting either the 1st or the
1:50:118th. I think I would actually prefer the
1:50:15ETH. We'll have to get a report together
1:50:18and I don't expect anyone to look at a
1:50:20draft version of this report during the
1:50:22week of Thanksgiving.
1:50:23>> And just to clarify, this would also
1:50:26then take the place of December.
1:50:28>> Yeah.
1:50:29>> Say Jason is off that week, which is not
1:50:32a big deal.
1:50:33>> Yeah.
1:50:33>> The main staff is on. So,
1:50:36>> um but
1:50:38>> So, could everyone do um December 8th?
1:50:42>> Yes.
1:50:43>> All right. And it seems like Alan and Ed
1:50:45going out the door said they could do
1:50:47the 1st or the 8th. So we'll um we won't
1:50:49have that meeting
1:50:52November 24th. That will be moved to
1:50:55December 8th and that will function as
1:50:57our annual meeting. So, we'll have
1:51:00crash report on the agenda
1:51:03and hopefully not too much else because
1:51:05we'll talk about the the year review and
1:51:07um some planning and um
1:51:11>> um
1:51:13>> and please um be on
1:51:17more emails for about that draft
1:51:22um year and review and we'll also need
1:51:24to have a work plan as well. And so the
1:51:27things that go on the work plan are
1:51:29really our policy items and anything
1:51:32that might come before mayor and
1:51:34commission. So I think mainly I'll need
1:51:36to work with staff and see if we're
1:51:37going to bring back up things like the
1:51:38bike lane ordinance.
1:51:40Um
1:51:42yeah, but I'm not sure what else, but it
1:51:45doesn't have to be like everything that
1:51:46we're going to do. Just the stuff that
1:51:48comes before commission.
1:51:51>> Yeah,
1:51:52>> there might that might I think Sam was
1:51:55pointing out that
1:51:57I just want that's a potential December
1:51:598th is a potential date for connect
1:52:02Athens public input um
1:52:05>> okay
1:52:06>> which is the Hawthorne
1:52:08um Avenue Alps road corridor uh the
1:52:11reconnecting communities so I don't know
1:52:15what time that might be uh
1:52:20consider if y'all wanted to be able to
1:52:23go to that
1:52:25>> it would
1:52:26It may overlap but we can also try to
1:52:28work around that and that's for
1:52:30scheduling. I don't know how final those
1:52:33dates are.
1:52:33>> I think that was just a date of December
1:52:358th that was
1:52:38um
1:52:39timing or location.
1:52:44>> I'll have to check on the availability
1:52:45of this room um because it's not our
1:52:47normal uh set Tuesday. So it could be
1:52:51American mission night. Mayor Commission
1:52:54night is um December 1st, I think.
1:52:58>> Well, that's the vote. The work sessions
1:53:00for the 2nd.
1:53:02Um but I just I need to take
1:53:04availability of this room. Also, the
1:53:07only the only staff update I have is
1:53:09that we are moving offices um to Avenue
1:53:14>> is uh probably in November. Um, as part
1:53:17of that, we're going to try to have a
1:53:20conference room that I don't I don't
1:53:23know if we'll have space to host these
1:53:25meetings there, but we could potentially
1:53:28have that as a hosted space. Um,
1:53:30depending on how I don't know if it'll
1:53:32be done in time, but if this once this
1:53:36building gets demolished,
1:53:39we need like we have reserved the next
1:53:41year of this room. I don't know that
1:53:44this room will be here for the next
1:53:45year, but we have reserved it.
1:53:47>> We can bring our popup tent.
1:53:50>> So, um we will search for alternative
1:53:53meeting location, but that could be one
1:53:55where we'll do some live streaming from
1:53:58from that and it would be it's over on
1:54:00Prince Avenue. Anyway, we'll talk more
1:54:02about that. Uh I can either do it
1:54:04through email or next meeting. I guess
1:54:06that is the never mind final meeting.
1:54:09All right, I'm going to go ahead and put
1:54:10us down for um December 8th pending and
1:54:13then availability and scheduling.
1:54:17Yeah. Um the other thing is um I'm
1:54:20rolling off the commission at the end of
1:54:22the year
1:54:24um to focus on school. I just it doesn't
1:54:27allow for my schedule. Um, so yeah, we
1:54:30will need y'all
1:54:33new leadership
1:54:35>> and I think we're um unfortunately sorry
1:54:37to do this y'all. I think that we're
1:54:38between more authority and commission
1:54:41cycles. Um, so it might be a while
1:54:44before you have someone come in. Um, but
1:54:47yeah, I think uh plan being passed and
1:54:51the end of the the GES era, I think it's
1:54:54a good time and we'll talk more about
1:54:58we'll have a nice little recap in our
1:54:59annual meeting. Talk about the the early
1:55:02years of the Athens Emotion Commission.
1:55:04>> Will that be your last meeting?
1:55:06>> The annual meeting.
1:55:07>> Wow.
1:55:09>> Yep.
1:55:11>> I can't do this without you.
1:55:13>> Oh, yeah. [laughter]
1:55:14you staff do all they do all the work.
1:55:16>> When would when would you have normally
1:55:18rolled off anyway? It would have been
1:55:20like within a year, wouldn't it?
1:55:22>> It was 2028.
1:55:24>> 28. Okay. Yeah. So, I'm rolling off next
1:55:27year. So,
1:55:28>> yeah, we've got the we got three coming
1:55:30up next year for
1:55:33Art is eligible for reappoint.
1:55:36believe Teresa
1:55:39>> rolling off and Randy is is he in his
1:55:43first or second? Randy is up as well,
1:55:46but I think he
1:55:48he came on in 2021, so I think that he
1:55:50has another full term he could do.
1:55:54But uh
1:55:55>> it's been um eight years or not seven,
1:55:59six,
1:56:00>> seven, I think. 2019.
1:56:01>> 2019. Yeah, you're right. Yeah, seven
1:56:03years.
1:56:04So
1:56:05>> 8:21 2019 was the first meeting. I have
1:56:08your attendance record. [laughter]
1:56:11>> Thank you.
1:56:13>> You and Teresa are the only ones who go
1:56:14down that far.
1:56:15>> I know we we're the long-term members
1:56:18here.
1:56:19>> Yeah. All right. I know we're we're over
1:56:22and we started late. Technically, we're
1:56:23within two hours if we consider when we
1:56:26started the meeting.
1:56:27>> Um so with that, I will entertain a
1:56:30motion to adjourn our meeting.
1:56:34First by Gabriella.
1:56:36>> Have you had a vote yet today?
1:56:40>> I don't care.
1:56:42>> Second. Yeah. Second.
1:56:45>> All those in favor?
1:56:46>> All right. Thank you.
1:56:48>> Bye.
1:56:49>> Have a good evening.
1:56:51>> Bye.
1:56:52>> Just dropped that bombshell on us.
1:56:55>> Yeah.
1:56:57>> Trying not to have it like the meeting.
1:56:58You know,
```*
