2026-10-19 - Traffic and Transportation Commission
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| South McKinley Avenue No-Parking Request | 24 | 51% |
| North McKinley Avenue and Westchester Drive Always-Stop Request | 9 | 19% |
| School Traffic Circulation Planning | 3 | 6% |
| Other business | 11 | 23% |
- Monday, October 19, 2026.
- Captions run from the call to order at about 3:16 to adjournment at about 50:03, with no gaps; nothing substantive is captioned before 3:16. No closed session.
- Seven members voted (six named at roll call plus the chair); Commissioners Norton and Martinez were absent.
- All votes below were seven in favor unless noted.
North McKinley Avenue and Westchester Drive Always-Stop Request
8:34-17:49
- Neighbors petitioned for an always-stop on the Westchester Drive approaches to North McKinley Avenue (only yield signs there now). A petitioner cited more than 1,000 vehicles a day on McKinley, one recorded speed of 56 mph, a 280-unit apartment complex a block north, no stop sign for about three-quarters of a mile, and many children in the area. A second resident said police lack staff for enforcement.
- Staff: the 85th percentile speed was 30 mph, the one 56 mph reading may have been a motorcycle, and the intersection meets none of the national manual's always-stop warrants, so staff made no recommendation. The petition had 100% support in the required canvass area. Action was at the commission's discretion.
- A commissioner raised the Alternative Speed Abatement Program (speed tables, humps, driver feedback signs), arguing stop signs control traffic rather than slow it; staff said the city splits the cost half and half with neighbors and installs the devices.
- Motion by Commissioner Littlefield (captioned as approving the item "to open some conversation about" the program), seconded by Commissioner Cornett; passed 7-0. The captions leave unclear whether the stop control itself was approved; the chair told the petitioners to work with staff on the program.
South McKinley Avenue No-Parking Request
17:49-41:43
- A resident petitioned for no parking anytime on both sides of South McKinley Avenue from Southwest 84th to Southwest 89th Street, after a church property and field on the east side were sold to a charter school (captioned Santa Fe South). Concerns: a 24 to 26 ft wide street, overflow event parking leaving one lane, access for fire trucks, dump trucks and trash service, nearby senior and nursing facilities, a new playground close to the curb, and sight lines at the two church lot exits. Two neighbors spoke in support.
- Staff: the street is built to the 26 ft residential standard; 91% of respondents in the canvass area supported the request.
- Brandon Roberson (captioned), speaking for the school district, said it did not object, is growing one grade a year to fifth grade (about three years from full size), has moved pickup and drop-off behind the building, is studying parking options along the field, has applied for school zone speed limits, and said fencing awaits a state grant. The problem is mainly large events.
- Commissioners asked why both sides were needed. Commissioner Hale amended his motion to no parking anytime on the west (housing) side only, keeping the east side open; another commissioner noted that full no-parking tends to speed traffic up. Staff agreed to review the church exits for signage, including a 20 ft buffer reminder.
- Modified motion by Commissioner Hale, seconded by Commissioner Littlefield; passed 7-0.
School Traffic Circulation Planning
45:32-48:22
- Prompted by the McKinley item, Commissioner Hale said recently built schools on major roads often lack drop-off and pickup plans and asked the commission to be more proactive.
- Staff said it works with districts on circulation plans (for example new schools on West Memorial Road, with split pickup routes to keep a lane open) but small sites and two-lane roads still spill back onto the street.
- Justin Henry, transportation program planner, said the planning department's revision of parking and access and circulation standards may require schools to show on-site queuing space.
Other business
- 3:16-5:25 Roll call and minutes of the September 21 meeting approved 5-0 with two abstentions (members who missed that meeting).
- 5:27-7:28 Monthly traffic services report: no new signals approved, no new speed cushions or feedback signs, several yield signs installed, and a right-turn-only restriction at Northwest 138th Street and North Rockwell Avenue (captioned "130th/38th"). Staff will send the remaining Alternative Speed Abatement Program balance; funds are available for new applications.
- 7:28-8:34 Consent docket empty. Officers re-elected for 2026-2027, effective next meeting: the current chair (captioned "Kula") and Commissioner Hale as vice chair; 7-0.
- 41:53-45:32 No citizen comments. Commissioner Littlefield asked staff to look at signage for the pedestrian crosswalk and nearby signal at the Classen Triangle shopping area near Northwest 63rd Street, where drivers leaving the lots miss the light, and proposed a future discussion of accessible parking design (such as wheel stops at 90 degree spaces) to feed into the planning department's parking review.
- 48:22-50:03 Staff is preparing a survey on how well driver feedback signs work; a commissioner said the sign near his home on Western Avenue makes most drivers brake. Adjourned.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
01:59Mhm.
03:16>> Welcome to the traffic and
03:18transportation
03:20commission meeting
03:21for October 19th, 2026.
03:25Call the meeting to order. We'll do roll
03:27call.
03:28Go to Commissioner Norton, who's not
03:30available today. Commissioner
03:32Littlefield.
03:33>> Present.
03:34>> Commissioner Kearns.
03:35>> Here.
03:36>> Hale.
03:36>> Here, sir.
03:37>> Commissioner
03:38Martinez is not available. Commissioner
03:41Wynn.
03:41>> Here.
03:42>> Commissioner George.
03:43>> Here.
03:43>> And Commissioner Cornett.
03:46Okay.
03:48Can I have a motion concerning approval
03:50of the traffic and transportation
03:52commission meeting minutes from
03:55September 21st, 2026, please.
04:00>> Motion to approve.
04:01>> Motion by Commissioner Hale. Do we have
04:03a second?
04:04>> Second.
04:05>> Second by Commissioner Wynn. Any
04:08discussion?
04:10Here we have a motion to approve the
04:11minutes by Commissioner Hale, seconded
04:13by Commissioner Wynn. Votes, please.
04:21We're standing by.
04:45Okay.
04:47All right. Go to Commissioner
04:49Littlefield.
04:51Yay. Commissioner Cornes.
04:55Commissioner Cornett.
04:57Abstain.
04:59Commissioner Wynn.
05:00>> Yay.
05:01>> Uh Commissioner Hale.
05:03>> Yes.
05:04>> Commissioner George.
05:05>> Uh I abstain as well. I was out of town
05:08last
05:09>> And
05:10>> Last meeting.
05:10>> I vote yay.
05:13So, what's the count?
05:14That be 1 2
05:18Five yays.
05:20And two abstain.
05:22Okay. So, item passed five yay, two
05:25abstain.
05:27We go now to item three, reports from
05:30the traffic services division in the
05:32councilor's office, sir.
05:34>> All right. You've got our standard
05:35monthly report before you. Uh there have
05:37been no traffic signals that have been
05:39approved recently, so the October report
05:42is just like the one from September. Uh
05:45we have not done any any recent
05:47installations of any speed cushions or
05:50driver speed feedback signs under our
05:53alternative speed abatement program.
05:55And you can see that we had quite a
05:57number of yield signs installed across
05:59the city and we have uh, one turn
06:03restriction that was installed at um, on
06:06Northwest 130th Street 38th Street at
06:09North Rockwell Avenue. And if you've got
06:11any questions about the reports or the
06:13contents, I'd be happy to answer them.
06:16>> Two questions. Um,
06:18on the ASAP, do we have a balance of
06:21what's available with city funds on that
06:22still?
06:24>> As far as um, if we were to get
06:27applicants, are we funded for to be able
06:29to take new applications? Yes.
06:31>> Do you know what the balance is or can
06:33we get that later or next meeting?
06:36>> I can I can probably get the balance for
06:38you prior to the next meeting. I'll just
06:40send it to you.
06:41>> Yeah, and then could could you talk to a
06:43little bit more on the turn restriction
06:45there at 138th and Rockwell? And is it
06:47just from from 138th onto Rockwell?
06:51>> Right. Uh, that particular intersection
06:53is
06:54138th Street has got a structured
06:56entrance, kind of got a bull head in it.
06:59So, it's set up so that it's right turns
07:01in and right turns out and the these
07:03signs are doing nothing more than
07:05reinforcing the geometrics at the
07:07intersection. So,
07:09we don't get uh, drivers making left
07:11turns from a from a lane which is
07:13definitely structured to handle right
07:15turns only.
07:16>> Thanks.
07:20Anybody else have anything for the
07:22staff? Okay, counselor.
07:25>> Nothing from me. Thank you.
07:26>> ma'am.
07:28There are no items on the consent
07:29docket, so we go to item five, 5A, which
07:32is the uh, traffic and transportation
07:35commission, the election of officers for
07:372026 and 2027, which would take effect
07:40at next meeting.
07:42Do we have any motion for the chairman
07:44and the vice chair?
07:46I should have Cornett.
07:49>> I would like to move that we retain
07:52Commissioner Kula as the chair and Mr.
07:55Hale as the vice chair.
07:58>> Okay, do we have a second on that?
07:59>> I'll second that.
08:00>> Second by Commissioner George.
08:04Any talk about it? Any other
08:06nominations? Okay, we have
08:09nomination we have
08:12from Commissioner Cornett second by
08:14Commissioner George. Kula to stay as the
08:16chair and Hale as the vice chair. Can I
08:19have you votes? We still voting
08:22verbally? Okay, no? Oh, there we are.
08:25Okay.
08:29It's up on the screen.
08:31All right, item has passed. All seven in
08:33favor.
08:34We go on now to item 5B, David Hawkins
08:37always stop control north McKinley
08:40Avenue and Westchester Drive.
08:44Do we have anybody here to speak on this
08:45item?
08:46Yes, sir. If I could have your name and
08:48address, you'll have 5 minutes.
08:51>> I'm Carter Still. My address is 1231
08:54Westchester Drive, which is just west of
08:57where the the intersection we're
08:58discussing.
09:03Sure.
09:04Well, thank you guys for your time and
09:06attention while we petitioned to
09:07hopefully make our street safer. Um
09:10it's a simple issue really, although
09:12it's very technically put together with
09:15the traffic measurements and things like
09:17that. So, I want to speak to both.
09:19Um on the the technical side, um the
09:23report indicated that there are over
09:251,000 vehicles traveling north and south
09:28of this intersection on a daily basis.
09:30Um tracked speeds up to 56 mph. Um and
09:34then one thing I want to point out, if
09:35you look at the map,
09:37to the north, there's a apartment
09:38complex, just one block,
09:41which has 280 apartments in it, if I
09:45I correctly researched that.
09:47So, we only have yield signs on the
09:49east-west
09:51for Westchester there. And the point is
09:5356 mph, that that driver is either
09:56slowing down as they're approaching the
09:57apartment complex before they run into
09:59the sign, or they're speeding up to go
10:01south on
10:03McKinley, which is the most common, I
10:06think, way out of the neighborhood for
10:07most people cuz there's no stop signs
10:09for
10:103/4 of a mile.
10:12And then
10:13a couple of other points
10:16from the report,
10:18east-west, again, there's only yield
10:20signs there, and you can see pretty well
10:22as you approach the intersection.
10:25So, cars typically, you know, feel the
10:28need to not even slow down there and
10:29just continue through. But you have such
10:31a short distance of cars entering
10:34McKinley there
10:36that I feel like there's just an
10:37increased likelihood of an incident
10:39there. So,
10:40from the data standpoint, I feel like
10:43the report spit out this is not
10:45approvable.
10:46But from a practical standpoint, knowing
10:49those boundaries and how far the
10:51distances are between stopping points,
10:54I just think that context really helps
10:56the numbers to maybe show a different
10:58story.
10:59And then on [clears throat] some other
11:01points, we have a school, Nichols Hills
11:03Elementary, down 3/4 of a mile south
11:07of the intersection.
11:10Children are often walking to school in
11:11the morning whenever people from the
11:13apartment complex or just the
11:14neighborhood are also using McKinley as
11:16their main way out of the neighborhood.
11:20And probably losing my place here, I
11:22apologize.
11:26On our block and the block to the east,
11:29and just the surrounding neighborhood,
11:30there are over eight families with
11:33approaching 20 children that
11:35lucky for us have all gotten to know
11:36each other are in between houses.
11:39I know this is not a measurable
11:40statistic for you all but on a daily
11:42basis we have a group text saying hey
11:44I'll be outside watching to make sure
11:46so-and-so gets to so-and-so's house
11:48safely.
11:49We feel the need that if they're out
11:50riding their bikes and they're all the
11:52age where that's kind of new for them
11:54that we almost have to be in the middle
11:55of the street to make sure that a
11:57delivery driver you know now that Amazon
12:00can be delivered by any vehicle out
12:02there there's people that are on a tight
12:04deadline to make as many deliveries as
12:05they can and
12:07I just feel like that just incentivizes
12:09them to be speeding and typing in their
12:11GPS and getting where they're going. So
12:14and then
12:16just some [clears throat] other points
12:17there's no sidewalks in our area
12:19to the I know this is not an
12:21intersection in in question but to the
12:23west
12:24is Nichols Road which is also a long
12:26stretch of road north-south which does
12:28not have stop signs in that direction
12:31and the traffic's controlled on a
12:32east-west basis by staggering the
12:34streets.
12:35So
12:36not suggesting or recommending anything
12:38over there at this time but my point is
12:41that there's over half a mile of
12:44distance on Westchester from that point
12:47to your next actual stop sign and so
12:49there's just on east-west basis there's
12:52easy to speed if if you are really
12:54trying to get somewhere fast and just
12:57adds to the danger that we see on a
12:59daily basis.
13:00Um
13:02Let me look through here real quick and
13:03also I want to point out the neighbors
13:05are here.
13:06This is really important to us.
13:08We're not just saying throw some stop
13:10signs for everywhere you can. We
13:12wouldn't be here if if it wasn't
13:14something we truly felt would mitigate
13:17risk of something terrible happening
13:18someday.
13:19Um
13:23And I think those are kind of all the
13:25talking points. David you can kind of
13:27sent some could he as you allowed to
13:29approach as well.
13:31>> So,
13:31one of the issues
13:32>> Hold on. Hold on. Hold on a second, sir.
13:34All right. Uh
13:36So, he's done. So, uh
13:38you'd like to come up and speak. Please
13:39come up and then when you're done, fill
13:41out one of these forms also, please. You
13:44have up to 5 minutes.
13:45>> One of the issues as I understand it is
13:47that
13:49David Hawkins, 1128 Westchester.
13:53And it's my understanding from speaking
13:55with the police department that they
13:56don't have enough personnel
13:58to be able to uh patrol that with a
14:01traffic uh policeman or whatever you
14:03call it. We've had a motorcycle
14:05policeman there maybe three times.
14:08Uh and when I've called to ask for them
14:10to come more because we still have a lot
14:12of speeding, uh they said they don't
14:14have any personnel for that. A lot of
14:16the uh
14:18motorcycle cops have retired or
14:20something like that.
14:22And so, we really don't have any
14:23solution for the speeding. You don't
14:25have enough personnel.
14:27Uh
14:28people are speeding up to 56 mph.
14:31And uh
14:33there are no stop signs, so
14:36that's all I have to say.
14:38>> All right, sir. And I already have a
14:39form for you. So, you're good to go,
14:41sir.
14:41>> you.
14:41>> Okay. Anybody else want to speak on this
14:43item?
14:45No. Okay, very good.
14:47Uh staff, do we have your input, please?
14:50>> Sure. Uh you've got our staff report
14:52before you. Um in this particular case,
14:55if you go through the uh traffic data on
14:56the first page, you'll notice that uh
14:58there is an 85th percentile speed of 30
15:00mph that we recorded on McKinley Avenue.
15:04Uh as as was mentioned during our uh
15:08long-term traffic study, there was one
15:10recorded uh driver that was operating
15:12their vehicle. Could have been a
15:13motorcycle at 56 mph.
15:16Um this particular intersection does not
15:18meet any of the MUTCD always stop
15:21control warrants and therefore
15:24uh
15:25there was not a there is not a
15:26recommendation for the always stop. Uh
15:30the petitioner has provided information
15:32showing that 100% of the residents
15:34within the required petition canvass
15:36area did sign in favor of the request.
15:38So, action on this item will be at the
15:40discretion of the commission.
15:42>> All right, thank you. Do we have a
15:43motion concerning item 5B?
15:46>> I move for approval to open some
15:49conversation about the ASAP program.
15:51>> Okay, we have a motion to approve item
15:535B by Commissioner Littlefield. Do we
15:55have a second?
15:56>> I'll second.
15:57>> Second by Commissioner Cornett. All
15:58right, sir.
16:02>> Has anybody approached you guys with
16:04something called the ASAP program?
16:06Altern- alternative speed abatement
16:08program
16:09in Oklahoma City?
16:11Um
16:13stop signs are not designed
16:15to slow people down. They're designed to
16:18control traffic flow at intersections
16:21where the traffic counts are about equal
16:23to each other. What slows people down is
16:26something in their way.
16:28And in the ASAP program, there are speed
16:29humps and speed tables and driver
16:32feedback devices, you've seen those
16:34where they tell you how fast you're
16:35driving.
16:36Those
16:38are successful at slowing people down
16:40and they're also successful at
16:43um
16:44helping manage cut-through traffic.
16:47So,
16:49I recommend that you all take a look at
16:51that.
16:52I'm I'm perfectly willing to support a
16:55stop sign if that's what you all want to
16:57do, but if you really want to accomplish
16:59something, I think the
17:01speed tables would be your answer.
17:05>> One thing to note on that is that we
17:07just spoke about this, the city actually
17:09has funds to split that cost in half
17:13with you. So, your neighbors would pay
17:15in half and then the city would support
17:17the other half. So, if you did go that
17:19route, it's half as expensive as it
17:21would be if you did it on your own.
17:23And they'll install it for you. You
17:24don't have to do it.
17:26>> Okay.
17:27Do we have any other talk on item 5B?
17:32We have a motion to approve 5B by
17:35Commissioner Littlefield, second by
17:36Commissioner Cornett. Votes, please.
17:45Item has passed with all seven in favor.
17:47And again, just work with the staff
17:49about the ASAP program. Okay, we go on
17:51now to item 5C, Jack Russian.
17:55Uh no parking anytime on the east and
17:56west sides of South McKinley Avenue from
18:00Southwest 84th Street to Southwest 89th
18:03Street. All right, sir. If I could have
18:05your name and address, and you'll have
18:08up to 5 minutes.
18:09>> Good afternoon. Jack Russian,
18:12residing 8520 St. Michael Court.
18:16That's in the St. Croix Villa addition
18:20off of McKinley.
18:23I'd like to thank you for giving the
18:24time to the petition that I sent around
18:27all the neighbors to to sign
18:30uh in an effort to
18:32restrict parking on McKinley.
18:35>> [sighs]
18:35>> Um
18:37in April of this year, the Oak Crest
18:40Church of Christ, located at 1111
18:44Southwest 89th Street, sold its entire
18:47property to the Santa Fe South Charter
18:50School System.
18:52Uh the sale was the church and
18:55approximately a 5-acre field
18:57that extends from 89th Street to about
19:00Southwest 84th Street on McKinley.
19:03And that property is on the east side of
19:06McKinley.
19:08Uh the school is phasing in its student
19:11body.
19:12It has plans to um add students as time
19:15goes on. They're also planning to turn
19:18the 5-acre
19:20uh field into
19:21a soccer field. Probably a couple of of
19:25soccer diamonds are are in its near
19:27future.
19:29We've seen issues with the school
19:30traffic parking on McKinley
19:33on both sides leaving just one lane down
19:35the the middle that allows traffic to
19:38flow.
19:39McKinley is only 24-ft wide and it
19:44can be extremely dangerous. It's only
19:46happened several times since the school
19:48took over, but uh it's the overflow
19:51parking that simply doesn't fit in the
19:53church parking area that will then
19:56find no alternative but to go on to
19:58McKinley under the current conditions.
20:01There is no traffic control as far as we
20:04we have the the school is trying to uh
20:08steer cars from parking on McKinley
20:11because we have met with them and and
20:13shown our concerns, but uh this
20:16problem's only going to get worse
20:18as the school grows as well as as they
20:21add these soccer fields
20:23uh for par- for practices as well as
20:26games.
20:28Um
20:31our concerns are with the number of
20:34vehicles that need to park for special
20:37meetings
20:38um
20:39and for the practice.
20:41McKinley is a vital street to our
20:43community.
20:45We have residents
20:47that have heavy equipment such as dump
20:49trucks that uh
20:51um they have to get in and out of their
20:53driveways in order to use McKinley to
20:55get
20:57back and forth to work.
20:59Um
21:02if the school if the
21:03cars are parked along the curb
21:06uh it's going to restrict uh our trash
21:09service on trash days
21:11uh cuz our kind of uh the the the
21:14residents that live on McKinley have to
21:16put their trash cans out on the street.
21:19The number nine fire station frequently
21:21uses McKinley to not only
21:24um
21:25make calls to our
21:27uh
21:27retirement community at Saint Croix, but
21:30also
21:31the Brookwood
21:33skilled nursing facility that's on 84th
21:36Street has very frequent uh
21:39issues with fire department needing to
21:41make calls, emergency calls, and they
21:44use McKinley to get to that location.
21:48Uh
21:49as I said before, the school has done a
21:50great job in trying to help uh
21:54with
21:55the the traffic,
21:57but I think the day's coming when that's
22:00going to get out of their control.
22:02They have other options. Um
22:05I I'm totally in favor of kids uh
22:09having a good time and having a place to
22:10play,
22:11but um
22:12if they're going to have to resort to
22:16other areas to park
22:18uh cars for meetings, etc.,
22:20maybe that soccer field should be turned
22:22into more of a parking area
22:25to keep their cars off of the street and
22:27keep our community safe.
22:31And again, we appreciate your attention.
22:34Uh
22:36Do you have any questions?
22:38>> All right. Thank you very much, sir.
22:39>> Thank you.
22:40>> Anybody else want to speak on this side?
22:42Yes, sir.
22:43Please come on up.
22:50We'll need your name and address and
22:52then fill out one of these forms when
22:54you're done, please.
22:55>> Yes, sir.
22:56My name's Tommy Wayne McDonald.
22:58I live at 8615 South McKinley. My
23:01property is one of the two-acre pieces
23:04of property there directly across from
23:06the field.
23:07Uh
23:08what initiated my initial concern
23:11is they after they had bought the church
23:16they certainly wanted to show their
23:18constituents
23:20and classes about their new facility.
23:23So, they held their
23:24uh graduation ceremonies
23:27at the church.
23:29I come in about uh 8:30
23:34to make my turn onto McKinley
23:36and they're parked on each side down if
23:40you're looking at the map
23:41it would be
23:43to the first the first piece of property
23:46from the south. They had parked down
23:48there. It was totally both sides.
23:51Now, that wasn't too terribly bad except
23:54we just happened to have a one-ton truck
23:57parked here, a one-ton truck parked
23:59directly across
24:01I'm in my pickup. My mirror's closed in.
24:05Now, I had room
24:07but a fire truck couldn't have never got
24:08through there.
24:10So, that initiated my initial concerns.
24:13Uh
24:13I agree with what Jack said. The school
24:16has been very forthcoming and they've
24:18made every effort. They initially told
24:20us that they would be first
24:22kindergarten, first grade.
24:24And so, they're handling that nicely.
24:26However, they put in second grade. It
24:29will go to fifth, possibly sixth grade.
24:32So, as that builds we'll have additional
24:35traffic there. And as Jack explained our
24:37concerns we're we're an older community,
24:40you know, I'm not a kid anymore as you
24:42can tell.
24:43And so, the necessity for ambulances
24:47fire trucks to get through there is is
24:50very prevalent.
24:52And uh
24:53I just want to
24:54say I support
24:56the petition. I support the idea.
24:59And another thing there, I don't know
25:02if anyone's been out that way, they
25:04built a
25:05playground
25:07that's
25:08Jack, is it 52 ft?
25:10>> 52 ft.
25:11>> From the curb, they have no fencing
25:13around it. And we've observed the
25:16uh
25:17teachers or whomever supposed to observe
25:20them,
25:21they're sitting back under the shade,
25:22you know.
25:24Those kids get out there quite quick
25:26quickly.
25:27That's another concern. That that has
25:29nothing to do with the parking, but
25:31that's a concern. But we would
25:32appreciate your considerations on this,
25:35and I thank you for the time.
25:38>> All right, thank you, sir. Anybody else
25:40want to speak on this item? Yes, ma'am.
25:42Oh, so sorry.
25:45You need to fill out one of the forms,
25:46please. And ma'am, you also fill out a
25:48form when you're done, please.
25:49>> see them pass around?
25:51Thank you.
25:53>> And can I have your name and address,
25:55please? You have up to 5 minutes.
25:56>> Yes, sir. Uh Tonya Childers, 8601
26:028601 South McKinley Avenue. And I'll
26:05just be real brief. I just want to say
26:07uh I have the the other two-acre home
26:10that Wayne had
26:12uh brought up, but uh
26:14I fully support the petition. I fully
26:16support what Jack has said and what
26:19Wayne has said. And um you know, some of
26:21our other neighbors are here. So, we
26:24thank you for your time. I just want to
26:25be brief. I just want to you know, give
26:27a quick statement. Okay.
26:29>> Thank you, ma'am.
26:30>> Mhm.
26:31>> Okay, anybody else wanted to speak on
26:33this item?
26:34Okay, staff, your input, please.
26:36>> You've got our report before you. Um
26:39McKinley is a built to the city's
26:41typical residential standard, which is
26:4326 ft as measured from from face to face
26:46of curb.
26:47Um the applicant has provided a petition
26:49that shows that 91% of respondents
26:51within the required petitionary favor
26:54the no parking requests for both sides
26:56of McKinley from Southwest 84th to
26:58Southwest 89th Street. So, I'm happy to
27:00answer any questions you may have on the
27:01item and action will be at the
27:03discretion of the commission.
27:05>> All right, thank you. Do we have a
27:06motion concerning item 5C?
27:09>> Motion to approve.
27:10>> Motion to approve by Commissioner Hale.
27:12Do we have a second?
27:17>> I'll second.
27:18>> Second by Commissioner Ruth-McKinley. Do
27:20we have any discussion?
27:22>> I have a question.
27:26For the applicant.
27:29>> Who would Who would that be?
27:32>> Sir, if you could come up to the mic, he
27:33has a question for you.
27:35Thank you.
27:37>> Thank you, sir. I just Jack
27:40I want some clarity in my mind if the
27:42issue is
27:44generally on-street parking all
27:46throughout the day or if it's just a
27:48child pick-up
27:50student pick-up zone in the afternoon
27:53that's the problem.
27:55>> Currently, it
27:57Our concern is an all-day
27:59concern. The school has done a good job
28:02of
28:03steering the traffic dropping bringing
28:06kids in and out onto 89th Street and has
28:09and has done their best to try to keep
28:11them off of McKinley.
28:12It's not the the drop-off is the issue.
28:15It's
28:16the
28:17flow of vehicles that come in that will
28:21not fit into this church parking lot
28:23that's going to be falling onto McKinley
28:26if there's not some kind of
28:28restriction.
28:29>> Thank you for that clarity. Appreciate
28:31it.
28:33>> And sir, uh
28:34if you could
28:36My my thought is
28:38why both sides of the street? Why not
28:40just on the school side of the street
28:42and that way
28:44the trash problem wouldn't be a a
28:47because if there's no parking on the
28:49housing side
28:51and you would be able to pull out of
28:53your driveway, be able to see and
28:55everything, but still allow
28:58parking on the school side of the road.
29:01Is that something that might work
29:03instead of just closing it all down?
29:06>> It's it certainly be something we could
29:09try, but uh
29:11I I
29:13I know how
29:14kids and
29:16when those soccer fields get developed
29:19if there's any chance that they can get
29:22away with parking on that street and
29:24it's probably going to be a problem
29:25whether there's park no parking signs
29:27there or not. But I feel quite certain
29:30they're going to be parking on both
29:31sides once that field gets opened up.
29:37>> Okay. All right. Thank you, sir.
29:39That's That's my only input is
29:42try to get a happy medium here
29:45just
29:46not park on the on the housing side.
29:49>> Yeah.
29:50>> And and that would free up 8 10 ft and
29:54that would help with the
29:55>> Mhm.
29:55>> being able to go
29:56>> That that was my thinking as well when I
29:58was looking at this.
30:00Is there anyone from the s-
30:02the school that is
30:04is here? Are they in favor of this or
30:06not in favor of this? Do we know?
30:09>> Well, uh when we sent out our public
30:12notification email, the school
30:14administration was included in that.
30:16>> Mhm.
30:17>> I've not I've not received a response
30:19from them, so I don't know.
30:21>> Got you.
30:21>> I can't I can't tell you why they would
30:23would or would not be here today.
30:25Unless, of course, they're here now.
30:28>> Hi, sir.
30:30>> I need a blue piece of paper, sir.
30:31>> Yeah, you'll you'll have to fill out one
30:33of them and then if I could have your
30:34name and address, please. You'll have up
30:36to 5 minutes.
30:37>> Sure. My name is Brandon Roberson. I'm
30:39at 324 Towry Drive in
30:43Um
30:44I I don't think the school district has
30:45an issue with the parking, the signage.
30:48Obviously, we're in a position now where
30:50we're growing.
30:51Um we're looking at the options for
30:53parking. One of the one of the
30:56one of the focuses we have right now is
30:58to look at what the easement is along
31:00that street, going along the side of the
31:02field, to see if there's parking or if
31:04there if we would be able to park along
31:07there or make parking spaces or parking
31:09available there. I don't have a drawing
31:11for any fields. I don't have any drawing
31:13for anything that we have planned at
31:15this point. Um fencing is and just to
31:18address that because it did come up,
31:20fencing is something we're waiting on a
31:22grant to come through for and the state
31:24and
31:25just in general is a little slow on
31:28grant response right now. So, um
31:31we did have a meeting with the
31:33neighbors. I think everybody knows we
31:35were there, I was there.
31:36Um and we are open to to work however we
31:39can to eliminate any issues related to
31:42parking. I've been there through the
31:43project, I was part of the renovation
31:45project um for the school. We will only
31:48go up to fifth grade, that is the only
31:49plan for us. Um and we will do it. We're
31:52up to second grade now. We basically
31:54have two classrooms of second grade.
31:56We'll expand that, obviously. Um but our
31:59goal is to get to fifth grade and that
32:01will be year by year. So, we'll add
32:03third grade next year, fourth grade the
32:04next, fifth to the end. So, we're about
32:063 years out before we're fully at
32:08capacity.
32:09That should give us some time to
32:11address. We've also adjusted our
32:15traffic pattern in. Uh at first, it was
32:18right off of 89th in and out off the
32:20front of the building. We've since
32:22changed that pattern to around the back
32:23side of the building to add another
32:27probably 30 to 45 cars uh depending on
32:30the time frame. We've changed adjusted
32:32our times for pick up and drop off as
32:33well. I do know that there are issues
32:36when we have events. We're a big school
32:38district, uh a little over 5,000
32:40students, actually about 5116 as of this
32:43morning.
32:44Um
32:45but essentially what happens is we are
32:47family we are a family district. Um
32:50you know, a lot of schools when you have
32:52an event, you have mom and dad there.
32:54You might get a grandparent or two. In
32:56our district, you get everybody.
32:59So, it's not just one car, it's a
33:01couple. And we're aware of that. I
33:03believe the events that we've had we've
33:04had a robing session,
33:07uh two graduations, and a convocation
33:11for the district. We've done actually
33:12done the convocation twice
33:14uh
33:14in 2 years.
33:16It does take up space. I'm not going to
33:18pretend like it doesn't. We have
33:20discussed using the field to park until
33:22we have something more
33:24um
33:25established to do. But again, the
33:28conversation is how do we fix it for the
33:30long term, not just for the short term.
33:32As far as traffic up and down the
33:33street, I can vouch for fire trucks
33:36headed up and down the street. I can
33:37vouch for the neighbors being up and
33:39down the street. And I can vouch for it
33:40being a pain
33:42when it when it is parked on the side.
33:43But right now, I think it is strictly
33:45large events.
33:47There may be something going on I'm not
33:48aware of. Um but we will we will work on
33:51that. Um
33:52we've also submitted for speed zones at
33:55this point or school zones in the front
33:56of the building. So, hopefully that that
33:58will help as well. Um but our goal is to
34:01be a part of the community and to do
34:02what we can to make that happen.
34:05>> So, as far as
34:07the no parking on both sides of the
34:09street, are you guys okay with that?
34:12>> Happy happy for it, yeah. We'll we'll
34:14make adjustments anyway we need to.
34:20>> Okay. All right. Thank you very much.
34:22>> Thank you. Appreciate it.
34:23>> Anybody else
34:25have some comment?
34:30>> Well,
34:32>> Yes, sir.
34:33>> If you would be willing to do just the
34:35east side of McKinley, I mean, I'd be
34:37more than happy to change my
34:40uh
34:41motion.
34:42It's your call, though. Whatever.
34:46>> Yeah, go ahead. Whatever.
34:47>> The west side.
34:48The house inside.
34:49>> Well,
34:51Okay.
34:52On the west side, yeah. As far as the
34:54>> No parking.
34:54>> the parking on the east side, the no
34:56parking on the west. Sorry.
34:58>> Yes.
35:00Sure.
35:01Um
35:01Yeah, it is, you know, we'll negotiate
35:04and and and and go with just the one the
35:07east side of McKinley if that's
35:10what you all are willing to to do at
35:11this time. And then if it
35:14>> Well, it would it would allow parking on
35:16the east side.
35:17No parking would be on the housing side,
35:19which is the west.
35:20>> Okay. Okay.
35:21>> Yes.
35:22>> That way you guys would be able to pull
35:24out. You wouldn't have cars.
35:30>> Uh
35:31>> Okay.
35:32>> I've got no problem.
35:33>> I've got no problem leav- leaving the
35:35motion as is. But it's
35:38it's going to be very restrictive even
35:40if you have family events.
35:43I mean, they're going to have to park in
35:44your driveway or there will be no
35:45parking unless they park in the school's
35:48parking lot. So, uh
35:51as much as it's going to be a
35:52convenience, it's going to be an
35:53inconvenience as well.
35:55I mean, possibly. But it's if you want
35:57it to stand, that's fine.
36:00>> Well, we we need some kind of control
36:02and, you know, if we can't get it on
36:04both sides, then we'll accept whatever
36:06you guys are willing to to allow us to
36:09to do at this time. And
36:11again, we're looking at
36:13being able to get fire trucks through
36:14there, dump trucks,
36:17and trash trucks,
36:19emergency vehicles.
36:21That's our real concern and and uh
36:25and as Wayne indicated,
36:28the school has established a playground
36:31that's
36:3217 yd off of McKinley.
36:36And McKinley, we haven't talked about
36:38speed, but they're
36:39uh it's it's a fast street. We we have a
36:42lot of vehicles that run well above 25
36:45mph.
36:47And 17 yd for a little kid who just lost
36:50a ball is going to come out into
36:52McKinley. And if there's parked cars I
36:56um I actually experienced
36:58uh
36:59during one of these events
37:01uh having all those cars parked on the
37:03east side there's two exits out of the
37:07church parking lot onto McKinley.
37:09And as I was going
37:12south on McKinley
37:14there was a car trying to exit
37:17as there was vehicles pulled out all the
37:19way up to the exit and the car exiting
37:22the parking lot for the church
37:25could not see me going south. I couldn't
37:27see them and we both almost collided
37:30because they were parked so close to
37:32that exit coming out of the the church
37:34parking lot.
37:35And so
37:37this isn't going to fix that problem if
37:38we allow the parking
37:40to continue on the east side unless we
37:43put a red curb there or something to
37:46keep cars
37:47away from that ex either one of those
37:49exits, we're still going to have
37:51problems with traffic
37:54possibly colliding
37:56trying to come out of that church
37:57parking lot.
37:59>> Okay, it sound like you want me to leave
38:00the motion to stand as is and that's
38:03fine.
38:03>> Well, uh
38:04>> I don't think so.
38:04>> You know, parking at an entrance
38:08is limited to 20 ft from the entrance.
38:12So, if we
38:15did
38:16allow parking on the east side, we could
38:20put up some signs to remind people
38:22that 20-ft buffer
38:25to handle that concern.
38:27>> That would help, yeah.
38:28>> Okay, Mr. Mayfield.
38:30>> Yeah, I
38:33One of the things that
38:35happens when we try to solve a problem
38:38like this
38:39is with every action there's like a
38:41reaction. And one of one of the things
38:44that I've observed, and particularly in
38:47Ward 2, is when we do no parking anytime
38:50on residential streets on both sides of
38:52the street, we speed people up.
38:55It gives them a a visual of oh, wow.
39:00You know, off they go. Whereas if there
39:02random cars parked
39:04on the street, it tends to slow people
39:07down. And as uh Commissioner Hale
39:10mentioned, it it restricts the ability
39:13for visitors to park
39:15in front of
39:17on public parking in front of your
39:18house. That's just something to think
39:21about. It In my opinion, I live on a
39:25street that has no parking anytime on
39:28one side of the street, and it's been
39:30there now for I gosh, I don't know,
39:32maybe 20 years, and it's been very
39:34effective in keeping that balance open
39:38for any kind of vehicle.
39:41We had keeping some control and keeping
39:43the traffic at a slower pace than it
39:46would be if it were wide open. It's just
39:49something to think about while you're
39:52deciding today,
39:54and you could always come back at with
39:56an application for no parking anytime
39:59zone
40:00on the residential some someday too if
40:02it didn't accomplish what you're looking
40:04for.
40:05>> Okay.
40:06>> I agree.
40:07>> All right, so you're okay if
40:10we asked to change the motion
40:13>> Mhm.
40:13>> to just one side?
40:14>> Yeah.
40:15>> Okay. All right.
40:17>> Mr. Chair, I'd like to change my motion
40:19to where we have
40:21restricted parking on the west side of
40:23McKinley and open parking on the east
40:25side.
40:26>> Okay. That's a
40:27a modified
40:29motion by Commissioner Hale,
40:30Commissioner Littlefield.
40:31>> I second the motor the modifications.
40:34>> Okay. Counselor, are we okay with this?
40:37>> Yes.
40:38>> All right. Thank you, ma'am.
40:40Okay. Any other talk on this item?
40:43Okay. We have a motion to approve no
40:47parking anytime on the west side of
40:51South McKinley Avenue from Southwest
40:5484th to Southwest 89th Street by
40:57Commissioner Hale, seconded by
40:59Commissioner Littlefield.
41:02Okay. We're standing by to update the
41:04computer.
41:13It says waiting.
41:17Sorry? Oh, am I the only one? Yeah.
41:19Okay. Yay.
41:22>> I'm a yay, also.
41:24>> Okay.
41:25>> Yay.
41:26>> Littlefield, everybody else okay?
41:29>> Yep.
41:29>> Oh, there it is.
41:30>> There it is.
41:31>> Okay.
41:32Item has passed.
41:34Uh it is just the the modified. There's
41:36no east side. Okay?
41:39So, it's Item has passed. All seven in
41:41favor. All right. Thank you very much.
41:43And then, staff, you're going to go out
41:44there and look about those entryways to
41:47see if we can help with some signage.
41:48>> We can do that, yeah.
41:49>> Okay.
41:51All right. Thank you very much.
41:53We go on now to item six, comments from
41:56citizens. Anybody have anything else for
41:59us?
42:01Okay. Item seven, reports from the
42:03traffic commissioners and committees.
42:05Commissioner Littlefield.
42:06>> Couple quick things.
42:07>> Yes, sir.
42:08>> Um
42:09one priority to Let know now is that
42:11pedestrian crosswalk on Grand Boulevard
42:14between um Western Avenue and Grand
42:18Boulevard.
42:19It's between Nick uh Nichols Hills Plaza
42:23>> on 63rd Street?
42:24>> Mhm.
42:25>> Okay.
42:26>> Dude,
42:27we need to take a look at that and see
42:29if there's a way that we can do some
42:31signage
42:33going
42:34uh going eastbound coming out of the
42:37triangle.
42:39Uh
42:40it's it's referred to as the Classen
42:42Triangle Shopping District. There's a
42:44new restaurant being planned in there,
42:46which is going to probably add to
42:49pedestrian traffic. But that light is
42:52within literally feet of where that
42:55crosswalk is, and people come out of
42:57that
42:58that shopping district, and they just
43:00they don't even see the light.
43:02They don't They don't I don't think they
43:03even know it's there.
43:05So it cuz it's just too quick.
43:08And the second point is when you're
43:10exiting Nichols Hills Plaza
43:12going to the south, if you wanted to
43:15turn west
43:17onto Northwest 63rd, it's pretty much
43:19the same scenario. It's a little bit
43:21more feet distance,
43:23but it's still it's still very unsafe.
43:28If there's something we could do there.
43:31Crosswalk in 10 ft. I you know,
43:34something.
43:36Um my my second comment is
43:39you were absent last month, and we
43:41talked a little bit about some
43:44in particular 90° angle parking where
43:49the side walk you know, there's the
43:50parking space, then there's the curb,
43:52then there's the sidewalk, and there's
43:54ADA spaces perhaps on both ends. There
43:56was an application for that.
43:58And many different sizes and types of
44:01vehicles can pull head-on or back in and
44:05block the majority of that sidewalk.
44:07And so we talked with the applicant
44:10about willing to be willing to volunteer
44:12to use park stops.
44:14And and he appeared to be. We weren't
44:17certainly forcing him to.
44:19But we kind of talked around the
44:22horseshoe a little bit about maybe in a
44:24month or two
44:25sitting down and talking about these
44:27kinds of
44:29parking challenges for the physically
44:30disabled
44:32and see if we can come up with something
44:34to present to whoever.
44:36Justin might be aware. Uh I can't
44:39imagine that he wouldn't be. That the
44:42the planning department is re-looking at
44:45all the parking standards for
44:48redevelopments and new developments,
44:50correct?
44:51And it might be a really good
44:52opportunity if we're not too late to
44:55shoot some ideas at them.
44:57So, you know, kind of a
45:02what's the you know, a cooperation might
45:05help the help the city and the citizens
45:07a lot with that. Either the Oh, and the
45:10one final thing. I saw one of the uh the
45:14uh bike lane street sweepers a month or
45:17Oh, I want one.
45:19Oh, they're so cool.
45:22I could go right in the front door and
45:24come right out the back door.
45:26But yeah, it was really cool to see
45:28that.
45:29So, that's it. Thank you.
45:32>> All right, we go to Commissioner Carnes.
45:34>> I'll have everything.
45:35>> Commissioner Hale.
45:38>> Uh Commissioner Littlefield brings up a
45:39really interesting point. So, many uh
45:42the times if we had had some input
45:45prior to the construction or the remodel
45:49uh it might be able to uh
45:51facilitate some better traffic
45:54situations. For example, what we had
45:56today with the school.
45:58Uh so, many of the schools that I see
46:00that have been built recently are on
46:02major thoroughfares and they have no
46:05game plan for dropping or or picking up
46:08kids. I've seen traffic backed up on
46:10Southwestern, on Southwest 139th,
46:13Southwest 119th. And it's it's really a
46:17problem because it basically close
46:19closes one lane of traffic
46:21for these kids. We have become commuter
46:24schools instead of walking to schools.
46:26So, uh it's really
46:29I would like to see us be more proactive
46:31in getting with some of these
46:33developments.
46:37>> Commissioner, I can tell you that um
46:39we do to the to the best of our ability
46:42work with uh school districts when they
46:44make applications for new schools
46:46uh to help them develop traffic
46:48circulation plans. Uh there are some
46:50uh relatively new schools built on West
46:53Memorial Road by the Piedmont school
46:55district and we worked with them because
46:57they had a
46:58they had a pickup plan which brought in
47:00parents for certain grades from the east
47:02and parents for other grades from the
47:04west
47:05just in order to be able to um
47:07be able to maintain at least a lane of
47:09traffic on that road when
47:11and uh to try and minimize the amount of
47:13queuing that spills back out onto the
47:15road. So, we try to get them as much as
47:18possible to queue up and find means of
47:20storing vehicles on the school's
47:22property as opposed to on the public
47:24right-of-way.
47:26There There are certain applications
47:27where you can do it and other ones where
47:28the school property just is not large
47:30enough to accommodate it. And if you're
47:32on like a two-lane section lane road,
47:35that'll be that'll be a problem that
47:36will exist until um
47:38the unless the until the redway gets
47:40widened. You'll still have spillback
47:43onto the street. However, you still have
47:45a free and open travel lane next to it.
47:48But it is a challenge.
47:51>> I was going to make almost the same
47:52point.
47:53>> Well, I think if I we could have your
47:54name and your address and where you
47:56work?
47:57>> Uh Justin Henry, uh 420 Westmain,
47:59Oklahoma City. Uh and
48:02my position is transportation program
48:04planner.
48:05Uh I was just going to make almost the
48:06same point that Stewart made. We One of
48:08the other sections in addition to
48:09parking that we're revising is the
48:10access and circulation. And we're
48:12talking about including a requirement
48:14for schools to submit essentially like
48:16queuing space for onsite as like an
48:18additional section to kind of help
48:19mitigate some of that.
48:21Thanks.
48:22>> Thank you.
48:23All right, we're good.
48:25Go to Commissioner Wynn.
48:26>> Nothing.
48:27>> Commissioner George.
48:28>> No, nothing for me either.
48:29>> Commissioner Courtney.
48:30>> I'm all good. Thank you.
48:31>> [laughter]
48:34[snorts]
48:34>> All right. Captain, do we have anything?
48:36>> No, not today.
48:37>> All right, thank you. Counselor,
48:38anything else?
48:39>> No, nothing.
48:40>> All right. Staff, anything else?
48:42>> I have nothing further to add today.
48:44>> Okay, anybody have anything else for the
48:45Traffic Commission?
48:47Well, then we would I would not hit the
48:51Or or it'll hit you instead of
48:53>> [laughter]
48:54>> I'm still curious about uh
48:56Commissioner's Hale's inquiry a couple
48:57of months ago about any feedback from
49:00the driver feedback devices from the
49:02applicants.
49:03Their their effectiveness. Are we
49:06are we anywhere on that or
49:08>> We're working at putting together
49:10something we can send out to get some
49:11feedback.
49:12>> Thank
49:13Okay, anybody else have anything for the
49:15Traffic Commission?
49:16>> I will just weigh in on because I know I
49:19know I know I know.
49:20Um but
49:22because my house is along one of those
49:24driver feedback signs on on Western um
49:29I will say as soon as people see the
49:31flashing light for the feedback sign,
49:34you see the brake lights immediately.
49:36There are probably three or four that'll
49:38slip through as I'm trying to pull out
49:39that'll just go 60 miles an hour because
49:41they're idiots, but for the most part,
49:43most people see the sign and will
49:45actually throw up their
49:47their brakes. So, I it's been really
49:50effective where we live. Yep.
49:53Thank you.
49:54>> Good to be back.
49:56>> [laughter]
49:57>> All right.
49:59Anybody else now have anything for the
50:01Traffic Commission? All right, we're
50:03adjourned.