2026-10-06 - Policy Committee on Health Safety and Well-being

Summary

Built from the posted agenda (read from a scanned document) and the video captions. No minutes were located. Auto-caption wording may contain errors, especially Hawaiian names and terms.

  • Bill 199 would add a Chapter 14 article establishing a historic place marker program: the Planning Department administers it, Public Works installs and maintains markers, Research and Development supports it with research and outreach, an implementation plan is due within one year and all markers are to be installed within six months after that (Comm. 1095; introduced by Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz and Holeka Goro Inaba).
  • Bill 200 would add a Chapter 14 article establishing a mo'olelo interpretation program that allows interpretive installations on County property (Comm. 1096; introduced by Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz).
  • Both bills are tracked on Historic Place Marker and Moolelo Programs.
  • Committee leadership per the County's current chairs page: chair Dennis Onishi, vice chair Heather L. Kimball. Who attended is not recorded.

Discussion highlights (from the video)

  • Bill 199: the committee voted to forward it to the council with a favorable recommendation, eight ayes and one excused.
  • Bill 200: same result, forwarded with a favorable recommendation, eight ayes and one excused. Staff said it came at the request of Parks and Recreation, which had received many requests for installations on County property.
  • Testimony supported both bills but asked for a cultural and community steering body with a defined decision-making role, community consultation from the start rather than markers simply appearing within 18 months, and attention to boundary discrepancies.
  • The introducing councilmember said amendments would be brought at a later reading on compensation for community knowledge, an appeals process for boundary disputes, and which body has final authority. The Cultural Resource Commission was floated as that body.
  • Department staff acknowledged tight timelines and capacity across Planning, Public Works and Research and Development, and said the mayor has provided funds to help with the work.

Agenda

  1. Call to order, roll call, statements from the public on agenda items.
  2. Bill 199: adds a new article to Chapter 14 establishing a historic place marker program (Comm. 1095). Introduced by Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz and Holeka Goro Inaba. See Historic Place Marker and Moolelo Programs.
  3. Bill 200: adds a new article to Chapter 14 establishing a mo'olelo interpretation program allowing interpretive installations on County property (Comm. 1096). Introduced by Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz. See Historic Place Marker and Moolelo Programs.
  4. Adjournment.

Public testimony: oral testimony via Zoom (register by noon Monday, October 5) or written testimony by the same deadline.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:07Hello

00:08sir.

00:18>> What?

00:20>> Oh, this isn't my committee.

00:23>> Yeah, it's mine.

00:24>> I know.

00:26>> What happened?

00:26>> Deputy, are we ready? Why don't you No,

00:28you

00:30>> I'm just asking about if they're ready.

00:34>> Aaron ready. You guys ready?

00:37>> I think so.

00:54Okay. Good morning.

00:56Today is

00:58October 6 and it's 9:30 a.m. We're at

01:02the Hawaii County Building. This is the

01:04Committee on Health, Safety, and

01:05Well-being. This is 12th session. Uh in

01:09attendance today, to my far left is Miss

01:11Kimble, Miss Kimba, Miss Viegas, Mr.

01:13Keli Kleinfelder, Chair uh Inaba. To my

01:18right is Miss Kagiwana, Mr. Hust, Miss

01:21Kirkowitz, and I'm Chair Onishi.

01:26Mr. Clerk, any testimony?

01:30>> Thank you so much, chair. We have a

01:31couple testifiers here in our Hilo

01:33chamber to start us off this morning.

01:36First of all is Amado Markoff testifying

01:38on both bills 199 and 200 to be followed

01:41by Lami Versure. Amado, when you're

01:44ready to begin, please turn the mic on

01:46by hitting that green button,

01:47introducing yourself, and you'll have

01:48three minutes per agenda item if you can

01:50clearly transition. If not, it will be

01:52three minutes total.

01:55>> [snorts]

01:57>> Uh, aloha everybody. Um, nice to be back

02:00in chambers. Um, I just wanted to speak

02:04briefly on bills 199 and 200. Um, my

02:09name is Amado Marov. I live in Puna and

02:11serve as the executive director of the

02:13Po Lava Zone Museum. I'm speaking today

02:15in strong support of bills 199 and 200.

02:20Through our museum and community

02:21programs, I see how much it matters for

02:23people to understand the place where

02:25they live. Here in or in Kuna, our

02:28landscape continues to change, sometimes

02:30dramatically. Preserving the names and

02:33memories and stories connected to the

02:35landscape helps our community maintain

02:37continuity across generations. Bill 199

02:41would establish a historic place marker

02:43program and help residents and visitors

02:45recognize our traditional MOU in Au Pua.

02:48These places names carry knowledge about

02:50the land history and the relationships

02:52between the people in their environment.

02:54With those when those names become less

02:56visible, opportunities to learn that

02:59knowledge is also diminished. Making

03:01them visible again can encourage people

03:03to ask questions, learn from others, and

03:05develop a deeper sense of responsibility

03:07towards the place they call home or that

03:09they are visiting. I particularly

03:12support the involvement of cultural

03:13practitioners, practitioners, lineal

03:16descendants, historians, and educational

03:18institutions. Their participation should

03:20at should guide the accuracy, language,

03:23and placement of these markers. The

03:25people who hold this knowledge need a

03:27meaningful role to determine how it is

03:28shared. Some places are not supposed to

03:31be talked about and some are. Um, bill

03:34200 creating a Mollo interpretation

03:37program complements the efforts by

03:39providing opportunities to tell the

03:41stories behind the places. A marker can

03:43help us understand where we are. A

03:45thoughtfully developed display, mural,

03:47or interpretive installation can help us

03:49understand why the place matters. At the

03:51Poa Lavazone Museum, we see the value of

03:54bringing people together around local

03:55history and shared experience. These

03:57encounters create opportunities for

03:59education, conversation, and connection.

04:02This bill would give communities a

04:03pathway to bring that kind of learning

04:05into public spaces across our island. I

04:07encourage implementation that welcomes

04:09[clears throat] community proposals,

04:10supports participation from rural

04:13districts, and provides an ongoing care

04:15and maintenance. Cultural knowledge

04:17should be shared with the guidance and

04:19consent of those entrusted with it,

04:21including respect for stories or

04:23information that should remain private.

04:25Together, these bills offer a practical

04:27investment in cultural preservation,

04:29public education, and community

04:30identity. They can help our children

04:32grow up knowing the names and stories of

04:34their home while helping newcomers and

04:36visitors approach Hawaii Island with

04:38greater understanding and respect.

04:42Um,

04:50I just want to say that when I go to a

04:52new place, whether it be on island or

04:54off island, the very first thing I do is

04:57look up what is the name of the place I

04:58am visiting. And I think that that is a

05:01missing ingredient a lot of times. And

05:04for somebody who's deeply entrenched in

05:06the visitor industry and community

05:09programs for our community, I cannot

05:12express how important that Melo around

05:16the areas that we are visiting is. And

05:18so I urge you to pass these bills. Thank

05:21you so much. Nice to see you all.

05:23>> Thank you for your testimony, chair. Our

05:25next testifier is Lami Vers

05:29>> to be followed by Eileen O'Hara. When

05:32you're ready to begin, you can unmute

05:34that mic by hitting the green button,

05:35introducing yourself, and you'll have

05:37three minutes to testify on bill 199.

05:40>> Hi, my name is actually Lahi Lahi

05:42Versure, and I am from uh Call Upon a

05:45Civio Estates, and this is what

05:47originally started me on this process of

05:50introducing this proposal to Ashley last

05:52year because CI View, we're not in

05:55Kalapana. or seven aua away from

05:57Kalapana and I didn't like how the

06:00developer misappropriated that place

06:02name for um economic gains. So let me

06:06just read my testimony because it's

06:08already three minutes. Aloha chair and

06:10members of the council. Mahalo for

06:12introducing bill 199 and for recognizing

06:14the importance of Hawaii Island's

06:16traditional aua. The oh and by the way

06:19I'm I'm speaking on behalf of Kone Kave

06:21and myself. The bill contains many

06:24elements consistent with the community

06:26vision we have been developing. Mapping

06:28traditional land divisions, preserving

06:30place names, documenting oral histories

06:31and cultural information, educating the

06:34public, and creating a coordinated

06:36county program. I support we support

06:38moving this work forward and we

06:40respectfully ask that the bill be

06:41strengthened in several important ways.

06:44First, establish a cultural and

06:45community steering committee or advisory

06:47body with a defined role in

06:49decision-making.

06:51The state's aua marker program

06:53[clears throat] offers a useful model.

06:54There, a community partner develops

06:56proposed marker locations using historic

06:59sources and community knowledge while

07:01the department of transportation

07:02provides the governmental framework,

07:04technical review, safety requirements,

07:06and approval. In other words, the

07:09community brings the cultural knowledge

07:11and proposal. The state provides the

07:14governmental and technical support. This

07:16is what the group in Hamakua did. They

07:19use the Hawaii [clears throat] State

07:21Department um program.

07:24Bill, Bill 199 currently places planning

07:27in the role of administering the program

07:29with cultural practitioners, lineal

07:31descendants, and others consulted as

07:34appropriate.

07:35I believe we can build on or we believe

07:37we can build on the state model by

07:39making the county the governmental and

07:41technical partner while giving a

07:43cultural and community body a defined

07:45role in researching, proposing and

07:47shaping the markers. Equally important,

07:50build meaningful community and youth

07:52engagement into the process from the

07:54beginning. These markers should not

07:56simply appear within 18 months as county

07:59installed signs leaving communities to

08:01ask where did these signs come from? If

08:04that happens, we will have missed an

08:06extraordinary opportunity to create

08:08pelina relationship

08:11with relationship and connection with

08:14these places.

08:15>> 30 seconds, please.

08:17>> The process itself can be an important

08:19part of the project. Communities,

08:20schools, cultural practitioners,

08:22educators, and youth can research their

08:23aua, learn the moleu and place names,

08:25document component knowledge, and help

08:27shape how these places are represented.

08:29that creates understanding and community

08:31ownership that a top- down installation

08:33cannot create.

08:35Um,

08:37and really important to make

08:39implementation phased and partnership

08:41based rather than requiring installation

08:42on an 18-month clock. We have an

08:44immediate opportunity right now, which

08:46is the written testimony I put into your

08:49folder, which is

08:51>> Thank you so much for your testimony.

08:53Okay,

08:54>> chair. Your next testifier is Eileen

08:56O'Hara, testifying on both bill 199 and

08:58200.

09:04>> Eileen, when you're ready to begin,

09:05please introduce yourself and you'll

09:07have three minutes per agenda item if

09:08you can clearly transition. If not,

09:10it'll be three minutes total.

09:16>> Uh, good morning, County Council, and

09:18thank you for accepting testimony. My

09:21name is Eileen O'Hara and I'm here to

09:24testify in support of bills 199 and 200.

09:29Now, um relative to the testimony just

09:33given, there may be some tweaks needed

09:37in the process that is laid out in these

09:39bills in particular for um the boundary

09:43markers as pointed out. Um, but I think

09:47the intention is excellent and I really

09:50um commend you all for considering these

09:53uh two bills.

09:55I know that in my neighborhood we were

09:58fortunate to have a cultural

10:01practitioner who really wanted to see

10:03things changed such that everyone in the

10:07community understood the history of

10:08place.

10:10and the name was changed in our park

10:13plus uh signage was put there to

10:18uh tell the history of the place the

10:21village and why it was named by

10:23Kahakiola.

10:24And while there was some push back from

10:27people who uh weren't really happy to

10:30see more signage, I don't know why,

10:33there were very nicely made signs. Um, I

10:37really appreciated that that was done by

10:40the county and I think everyone is

10:43better informed about place as a result.

10:46And I this is especially important to

10:48our younger generation because the

10:51knowledge that we consider the EK that's

10:54supposed to be passed down from

10:55generation to generation starts to

10:58disappear if we don't talk about it and

11:01show those histories and make it in a

11:04form that anyone can absorb the

11:07information. So thank you so much for

11:09considering these bills. Like I said,

11:10there might be a little tweaking needed

11:12on the process part, but good job. Thank

11:16you so much.

11:19>> Thank you so much for your testimony.

11:22With that, chair, those are all the

11:23testifiers you have at the beginning of

11:25the meeting, noting that we have a

11:26couple testifiers requesting to provide

11:28testimony on specific agenda items.

11:30>> Okay. Thank you very much, Mr. Clark.

11:32Can you read in bill 199?

11:35>> Thank you, Chair. I think um I'm going

11:37to check with Rey to see if the

11:39testifiers want to testify uh before

11:41bill 199. Um, please take those really

11:44and then we'll reach out to the universe

11:46to see if anyone else is interested.

11:48>> Thank you so much, Mr. Clerk. And with

11:50that, our first testifier on bill 199 is

11:54Vai Vichimay to be followed by EJ

11:56Peterson. Vai, when you're ready to

11:59begin, you can unmute your mic and

12:00introduce yourself and you'll have three

12:02minutes.

12:07>> Um, okay. Aloha. My name is Vayima.

12:10coordinator for Moahanoloa Fishing

12:12Association. I'm just trying to check if

12:14I'm coming across clear.

12:17>> Yes, you are.

12:18>> Perfect. I'm testifying in support of

12:20bill 199. Um we're interested in

12:23supporting this bill because it aligns

12:24with a project that I've been working on

12:27um in getting AUA signage along Hilo

12:29Paliku. So, we already have about seven

12:32AU to account for thus far. Uh there was

12:35no process in place when we started our

12:38project and we were kind of just working

12:39alongside DOT um and made it up as we go

12:43pretty much. But I wanted to commend

12:44council member Kirkowitz for introducing

12:47this amendment of the county code and

12:48it's definitely something that our

12:50community has shown interest in um

12:52especially as our signs have gone up and

12:55I would agree that the community might

12:57not have the capacity to get this done

12:59for the AUA um across the island. So, I

13:02appreciate the initiative to do it and

13:04wide. Um, a few things I wanted to bring

13:06up which echo what fellow testifiers

13:08have already said. Um, there definitely

13:10needs to be review of the different

13:12historic maps that determine where

13:14signage is most appropriate. Um, we use

13:16several different databases to review

13:19um, our maps before we install the

13:21signs. And it doesn't they don't always

13:23align. So, there definitely needs to be

13:24care when it comes to deciding what

13:27names go where. Um, I would also

13:29advocate for there to be a community

13:31consultation process before the signs go

13:33up so that there can be community review

13:35and input. Um, at the very least I think

13:37there needs to be a process in place in

13:39case community takes issue with where

13:41the signs are installed. Uh, another

13:44concern that I had was that installing

13:47signs for the entire island seems a

13:49little ambitious within a year. Um, and

13:52maybe considering doing it mouku.

13:55Uh that also seemed to be the consensus

13:57when we were working with DOT, which is

13:58why I bring it up. Um they were they

14:01they thought that it could be difficult

14:04with labor and staffing. I'm not sure

14:07how that works out or if you guys talked

14:08about that already with DOT, but just

14:11wanted to bring that up too. And then I

14:13also was able to take a peek at the

14:15culture resource commission meeting

14:17where it was brought up and I had some

14:19comments that align with said there. Um

14:21the aesthetic appeal of the signs. Um,

14:23Maui and Kauaii do have really beautiful

14:25signage for their Awa signs in

14:28particular, but when we were starting

14:29the process and asked if we could

14:31redesign them, um, DOT did give us some

14:34push back on that, um, because they had

14:37already done signs in on Kona side for

14:40Queen K. Um, but yeah, I just thought I

14:43should bring those things up as

14:44potential issues that could arise and I

14:46appreciate the time that you folks have

14:48given me to testify here today. model.

14:51>> Thank you so much for your testimony.

14:53Chair, your next testifier is EJ

14:55Peterson. EJ, when you're ready to

14:56begin, please introduce yourself and

14:57you'll have three minutes.

15:00>> My name is EJ Patterson. I'm a resident

15:02of County uh Highway 137. I'm president

15:06of the Red Road Resilience Network, a

15:09nonprofit working to build resilience in

15:12our community. I'm testifying in support

15:15of bill 199. Through funding from the

15:18Kilaway recovery grant and in

15:20partnership with Mohaka Pelaka, our

15:23organization will be updating the 2015

15:26corridor management plan. We plan to use

15:29the AOPUA divisions as the basis for

15:33measuring changes and assessing needs in

15:36our area as well as a way to collect

15:40current and historical visual and

15:42databased needs um and information for

15:46our community to work on to make

15:48changes. Um

15:51we are excited that the Yahoo aha

15:55markers came up. that is something that

15:57was in the 2015 quarter management plan

16:01and is still in there. Um we're really

16:03happy to see that. Um but we've been

16:06giving the so we've been giving the Aahu

16:08um markers a lot of thought recently.

16:11One of the things that happened is I

16:13attended the state department of

16:16transportation presentation on their auh

16:19uh uh program and like some of the other

16:22presenters I have some difficulty with

16:24some of them. One of the things was that

16:27they were saying that because they're

16:29using a standard size, a uniform size,

16:33that they only want two to three signs

16:37per road. Well, we have more than 15 on

16:43a 16 miles section of our road. So, what

16:47happens with the others? And who gets to

16:50decide which is more important? Uh we

16:54have been a scenic byway. Um the state

16:58recognized us uh for our uh unique

17:02characteristics and so we are really

17:05concerned about um if their signs are

17:09not seen as appropriate to the

17:12characteristics of our area that they're

17:14going to be defaced or they're going to

17:16be uh destroyed. Um and that's going to

17:19bring up some tensions in our area. Um,

17:22we're also concerned about decision

17:24making. Who does decide what if the

17:27boundaries are in now current uh side

17:31roads or driveway?

17:33>> Seconds, please.

17:34>> Um, that can be a problem and what

17:38information can be carried on those

17:40signs. Um, we have no pullouts, no wide

17:44shoulders for people to look at signs.

17:47Um, so I'm concerned about some of the

17:50parts of this. So, I echo others in

17:52saying that we really need the community

17:54to to be involved in this, especially

17:57the Hawaiian community in our area. I

18:00thank you so much for bringing this up.

18:01I really support it. Uh, and I'm looking

18:04forward to it. Thank you so much.

18:05>> Thank you so much for your testimony.

18:07And with that, chair, those are all the

18:08testifiers you have for this item.

18:13>> Last chance. If we missed anyone, anyone

18:15like to testify in bill 199, please

18:17speak up now.

18:20Hearing and seeing none, Bill 199 amends

18:22chapter 14 of the Hawaii County Code

18:241983 2016 edition as amended by adding a

18:27new article relating to the

18:28establishment of historic place marker

18:30program. Requires the planning

18:32department to administer a historic

18:34place marker program. Requires the

18:35Department of Public Works to install

18:37and maintain historic place markers.

18:39Requires the Department of Research and

18:41Development to support the program

18:42through research and outreach. Requires

18:44the submission of historic place marker

18:47implementation plan within one year. and

18:49requires the installation of all

18:50historic place markers within six months

18:52thereafter introduced by council members

18:54Kirkowitz and Inaba.

18:56>> Mr. Kirkowitz

18:57>> chair motion to forward bill 199 to the

19:00council with a favorable recommendation.

19:02>> Second motion by Miss Kirkowitz, second

19:04by chair. Miss Kirkowitz, go ahead.

19:07>> And I hope my colleague from Puna will

19:09agree that this is a nice number. Um

19:13you know this bill is actually a a real

19:15dream come true. So much of the work um

19:17my office has done on the council has

19:19been about elevating community voice,

19:22community story, and what better way

19:25than to kind of elevate this islandwide

19:28um and showcase the traditional place

19:32names of Aapua and Moku. Um it almost

19:36seems radical in a sense to kind of

19:39rediscover and elevate these names. Um,

19:41and the whole point is to get residents

19:44proud of um and and better educated

19:46about where they're from and to give vis

19:48visitors an opportunity to understand um

19:52where it is that they are visiting. So

19:55this particular ordinance um it creates

19:58a framework for various county

20:00departments to collaborate and as they

20:03say come up with a plan come up with a

20:05plan to work in partnership with

20:07community to evaluate various maps that

20:11have been developed over time um that

20:14showcase the the boundaries for Aua and

20:18Moku um and to decide in partnership

20:20with community with academia with

20:23cultural resource commission

20:24Where is it best appropriate to put

20:26these um to put these signs? We don't

20:29want them to be obstructive. We want

20:31them to be very tasteful and to have

20:34some kind of uniformity to them so that

20:36there is a cohesive look and feel uh to

20:39the signs and that they're recognizable

20:42that when everybody whenever anyone sees

20:44that sign, they immediately think of

20:46this program. Um these signs are not

20:49enough. Um, the dream is for one day for

20:52there to be a historic marker inventory.

20:56So that when you see an Aapua, there is

20:58a map that the county has where every

21:02single place name has been inventoried

21:05and if there are articles or mole or

21:08chance or photos of old Havi um about

21:11that area that we have done a good job

21:13of inventorying it. That's the long-term

21:16goal. We can't get there if we haven't

21:19yet created this map to identify where

21:22the signs could go. Yes, all of that

21:24will be done in partnership with

21:26community. I really want to make sure

21:28that is emphasized here. Um it would

21:31give the county one year to come up with

21:33this plan. Um I do believe that there is

21:37community consultation that will be

21:38happening in every council district

21:41around the island. not a oneanddone

21:42thing but multiple engagements and touch

21:45points because we really want to make

21:46sure that we are getting this right. Um

21:49and then after that has been finalized

21:52bringing it forward to the council so

21:54that it can be presented on record um

21:57and then an appropriation made so that

21:59signs can be installed um islandwide.

22:02Um, I have gotten support from our DOT

22:05director, Ed Sniffen, so that as we are

22:08doing installations islandwide, if

22:10something is on a county or state right

22:12of way, that work, that effort to

22:14install can be coordinated. Um, there's

22:17a lot to unpack there. Happy to answer

22:19any questions, but just really

22:21appreciate the opportunity to bring this

22:22forward on behalf of community. Thank

22:24you, Chair.

22:25>> Okay, members, chair.

22:28>> Thank you. Um, I'd just like to mahalo

22:30council member Kirkwood's office for

22:33taking lead on this and um, it was

22:36interesting to see recently in the news

22:38various

22:40MOU working towards this and then for

22:44this bill to have come together because

22:45in Kona uh, there's a group of us right

22:48now working on something similar. Um so

22:52to have this uniform approach now um

22:55that also ensures that there is some

22:57consultation within each community

23:00because as we know you know two puna

23:03from down the road might disagree on

23:05where where the boundary is right um but

23:08that's why I think when we can have a

23:10uniform approach um from a county

23:13program

23:15we're going to be better off um and as

23:17long as that that consultation does

23:19happen with community. Um, we can

23:22hopefully roll this out in as efficient

23:25and accurate a manner as possible. So,

23:27thank you, Council Member Clitz.

23:31>> Yeah, I just want to echo those

23:32sentiments. Mahalo. Mahalo. Mahalo. Um,

23:35it's

23:39beyond time for this, but uh we're

23:43further along now than we've been in

23:47restoring the uh place names that were

23:51stripped from not only the people but

23:54the places. And uh there is so much

23:58wisdom in every single one of these

24:00names um and what they reflect uh and

24:03the duality of the spaces. So um I'm

24:07really excited to see this moving

24:08forward and the opportunity for uh

24:12myself to continue to learn but also for

24:15my daughters and my grandchildren. Uh

24:18because we we pick things up. I mean,

24:21that's why corporations spend millions

24:23of dollars to put billboards up when we

24:25read signs when we're driving by. That

24:27information goes in and we can carry

24:30that with us and um helps us create that

24:34greater sense of belonging and sense of

24:36place and makes me think of um

24:41oh goodness now I'm forgetting his name.

24:43uh gave us the presentation on um kamu

24:47kamo plunket and his deeper dive into au

24:51puahuaha and all the wisdom and

24:53understanding that resides even within

24:55those systems. So this is a great place

24:57to start in just helping us all

24:59understand that better. I yield

25:02>> Kimble.

25:03>> Yeah, thank you. Um, I really like this

25:07and and where we're going with this. And

25:09I want to just start by uh giving credit

25:12to Vi and Blake from Makahonalo Fishing

25:16Association that really kicked this off

25:17in Hamokua to start identifying those

25:19places along the state highway. Um, and

25:22I I can say that my community really

25:24appreciates those. I get a lot of value

25:26out of it. And um you know when we look

25:29at the recent events that have happened

25:32here um with the storms you know the the

25:36place names they have they're a database

25:38of information and so presenting that in

25:42a meaningful way to the public I think

25:44is is an important first step in all of

25:47this. Um there's a couple things that

25:49I'd like to have the authors consider.

25:52Um, one is I I worry a little bit about

25:55capacity and um, I think both from the

25:59staffing standpoint and the timing

26:00standpoint. So,

26:02one thing I might suggest is

26:06I think it would be appropriate to

26:07potentially establish a funding source

26:11in here because I also think one of the

26:14things that we need to pivot towards is

26:15when we do community consultation,

26:17especially when we're asking for

26:19information that is requires deep

26:21research for like this and deep

26:23knowledge base, we need to acknowledge

26:25that as a meaningful

26:28source that deserves some compensation.

26:31Right. And and one of the things that I

26:33think I'd like to see in here is is

26:35wording that is extends beyond just

26:38consultation with these folks, but

26:40actually almost contracting, but maybe

26:42not contracting exactly, but you you

26:44understand what I'm saying. It's like we

26:46need to provide and and make clear that

26:49this is valuable research being provided

26:52to the county and it should be

26:54acknowledged as such through some sort

26:56of compensation. Um the other thing as

27:00mentioned is you know I know for for my

27:02area there are a ton of aua out there

27:05and there are some discrepancies on

27:08naming discrepancies on boundaries. Um,

27:12so similar to how we have an appeals

27:14process for land use decisions, I think

27:16it would be appropriate to build in some

27:18sort of mechanism if if there are

27:21individuals that want to object to

27:24whatever is proposed for an area that is

27:26constructive. Um, which brings me to the

27:29final point, which is I think there

27:31needs to be some really clear language

27:33about who the final decider is on these

27:36things. um because we do have a lot of

27:39folks weighing into this and um whether

27:43that's the planning department or it

27:46comes before this body which I think

27:48would be not a good idea but just a you

27:50know concept um that there there does

27:53need to be some clear indication of who

27:55is the final authority and therefore the

27:58final authority that could be appealed

28:00to if there were a later disagreement

28:02about the navy. Those are just some of

28:04my suggestions, but I do appreciate um

28:06both of you bringing this forward and

28:08excited about future steps that can

28:10build off of this. So, thank you,

28:15>> Mr. Mr. Kane Kleinfelder. Go ahead,

28:18>> uh yes, I like the number and uh the

28:22idea is good and thank you for bringing

28:24this forward. Both both these bills

28:26actually [clears throat] kind of form a

28:28nice hole for community to be able to

28:30interact with county and do the things

28:32that we we struggle with a lot as far as

28:35signage and where things can go and what

28:37places are named and helping people

28:39appreciate the space they're in and

28:41understand where they are. So wonderful

28:43idea

28:50>> Mr.

28:54Mr. Mitz,

28:56>> thank you, Chair. Um, and thanks for the

28:58really wonderful feedback from my

29:00colleagues. Um, I did want to address

29:01the points that you had brought up,

29:03Council Member Kimell. Um, yes, capacity

29:06was a concern. And so, first off, I I

29:09want to thank the mayor. I I went to the

29:12mayor and I said, "Mayor, we're going to

29:14be shaking the money tree. We're going

29:15to need a little bit of financial

29:16support to get some of these initiatives

29:18off the ground. not asking planning

29:20department to do more necessarily with

29:22their current staff. Um so there is

29:24going to be some money set aside to

29:26contract this work out so that the

29:28county can play the role of being an

29:30active participant and not necessarily

29:33have to manage all the logistics and

29:34facilitate the process. Um so there's

29:37going to be some funding for that. I

29:38would be curious and I I hate to put you

29:40on the spot, Director Medina, but the

29:42idea of compensation for residents

29:45because of their expertise, their

29:47historical knowledge. Um, just as we

29:50would pay an archaeologist or an

29:52engineer for their expertise. I I'm

29:54wondering if there's a way for research

29:57and development to I don't know if it's

29:59a credential council member, but to just

30:01kind of recognize the specialized

30:03knowledge that someone is bringing to

30:05the table for a particular area or time

30:08period. So again, sorry to put you on

30:11the spot, but we're going to be

30:12legislating in real time. I have my fall

30:14interns in the gallery here. They're

30:16going to see how the sausage is made

30:18today.

30:19>> Yeah. Thanks uh for acknowledge I'm uh

30:22Benson Medina. from the director of

30:24research and development for Hawaii

30:26County. Um yeah, and I'm 100% there and

30:30and uh working on some level of

30:32compensation for uh people that

30:35contribute um to this or any other

30:37project um that helps not just our

30:40residents but um also our visitor

30:42industry. And so one of the things that

30:43I really liked about about this and

30:47[clears throat] um you know part of the

30:48values that we're trying to go forward

30:50uh with our visitor industry is one um

30:54uh a superior experience for our

30:57visitors. Uh but the second thing is low

31:00community and environmental impact. And

31:02I think that the more knowledge they can

31:05have about the value of a particular aua

31:08or mouku um then I think the more

31:11respectful they become. So you know part

31:14of our whole program what we did with

31:16the with the pono pledge was um to

31:19really get people to understand um the

31:22value that we post that we put on our

31:26and how they can be uh part of that uh

31:29value system. But, you know, going back

31:31to your original question about

31:32composition,

31:34um, yeah, certainly. And, um, and and

31:36the mayor has provided some funds for us

31:38to to, you know, do things like, um, you

31:41know, special events projects, um, some

31:44that we can put towards our visitor

31:46industry outside of, uh, supporting the

31:49Island of Hawaii Visitors Bureau. So,

31:51uh, we do have [snorts] some leeway uh,

31:54to provide funding for that, but yes, I

31:56would be 100% supportive of that.

32:00That's really fantastic to hear. Thank

32:02you. Um, couple other questions came up.

32:05One was about the signs. I mean, there

32:08are some gorgeous signs that have been

32:10developed for Maui and Kawaii. So

32:12beautiful that Mr. Takaba from public

32:14works pointed out. Don't make it so nice

32:16that someone's going to be tempted to

32:18take it home with them. Yeah. Right. So,

32:20you want it to be beautiful but not

32:21tempting where that it's going to become

32:23a home fixture. Um it's also difficult

32:26to fabricate those kinds of signs with

32:29the multicoloring and the different

32:31kinds of graphics. So um the the brown

32:34and white signs that we currently see on

32:36the highway is what the state department

32:38of transportation currently uses. I

32:40think they're beautiful. Why reinvent

32:42the wheel? We can just utilize a

32:44template that's already been created to

32:46just make it easier on everyone. Mr.

32:48Takavo, was there anything else that you

32:49wanted to add? You were very valuable in

32:51the conversation. So, I just want to

32:52recognize you and Director Sagawa for

32:54being here and so supportive.

32:57Okay.

32:59>> Okay. Go ahead.

33:00>> Thank you, Director Medina.

33:03>> Director Medina, I'm going to be

33:04counting on you to kind of keep moving

33:06this forward with the inventory piece

33:08and making sure we capture and document

33:10all of that wonderful knowledge that

33:12accompanies each of these place names.

33:18>> Hi, Erin.

33:19>> Hi. um Aaron Takaba from the traffic

33:22division. Uh generally I'm in support of

33:25the program uh for its c cultural

33:27significance on Hawaii Island, but I

33:30think you might have already touched on

33:31it. You know, I had some concerns with

33:33um making sure we had adequate funding

33:36and support in order to manage the

33:38program. Um the other issue was about

33:41the sign itself and I think um we're

33:43already in discussions about that. So

33:46that was pretty much my main um

33:48comments. Fantastic. We covered all of

33:50that and as the planning process kind of

33:52proceeds um

33:54>> all of that I think will be fleshed out

33:56in greater detail for the departments

33:57and the community.

33:58>> Okay.

33:59>> Yeah. Thank you.

34:00>> Thank you.

34:00>> And then the last concern was about um

34:03if there is a difference in opinion on

34:06boundaries and where signs should go,

34:08who should be the sort of decision-

34:10making authority? I'm going to suggest

34:12the Cultural Resource Commission. Um

34:15they are a public body. they are

34:16appointed by the mayor, vetted by the

34:18council, and and approved to serve in

34:20that capacity. Um, I would be open to

34:22exploring that body being the deciding

34:24factor. Um, but again, open to folks

34:27suggestions if there are other bodies

34:29that we should be considering. Doesn't

34:31even need to necessarily be within the

34:33county. It could be an academic

34:34institution, but again, um, you ask,

34:37council member, just trying to think in

34:39real time, but if you have other

34:40suggestions, I'm I'm open.

34:42>> Thank you, chair.

34:43>> Okay, Miss Kagi.

34:44>> Thank you. Um, thank you for putting

34:47this forward to both of you. I think

34:49it's it's so um key to who we are on

34:53this island and and for making sure that

34:56we uh share that knowledge amongst

34:59ourselves and and with others. Um I when

35:02you were uh bringing up uh director

35:05Medina, it did touch on something for

35:07me. Um, and so I'm just wondering if you

35:10if there's anywhere in here to put in

35:14the language about compensating

35:17um, our community for their knowledge

35:22and expertise. Um, I'm I'm only saying

35:25that because we tried to do that with

35:28our Hilo Bay wershed community plan

35:31project and it hasn't really um

35:37realized its potential with that. Um, so

35:41I want to just be sure that that you if

35:44this is important to you and to us that

35:47that it it it is actually gets done

35:50because I think it's um not something

35:52that we've really been able to do in the

35:54past. So it it's going to take a a

35:57little bit of a heavy lift to to figure

35:59that piece out. So I would just suggest

36:02that um and uh look forward to

36:05continuing to support this work. Thank

36:06you. I yield.

36:08>> Okay. Okay. Any other members?

36:13>> Mr. Kirk,

36:14>> chair, I just I want to confirm that the

36:16points that were brought up today about

36:17the compensation, the appeals process,

36:19that deciding authority, those will come

36:21in the form of a friendly amendment at

36:23the next reading. Thank you.

36:24>> Thank you. Any other discussions? If

36:27not, I have a couple. Can I have the

36:30directors of public works, R&D, and

36:33planning

36:34can you all come up, please?

36:44>> [clears throat]

36:53>> Can we get one with chair?

37:08Okay, thank you guys. Can you introduce

37:10yourselves?

37:12[clears throat]

37:14Aloha, chair, vice chair Kimble, members

37:17of the Hawaii County Council. Jeff Darl

37:19with the planning department.

37:21>> Aloha council members,

37:24director of public works.

37:28Good morning again. Benson Medina,

37:30director of research and development.

37:32Thank you very much. So, you folks read

37:34over the bill. You folks read over the

37:36bill.

37:38>> Yes.

37:40>> Yeah, I know. I understand. But I'm just

37:42asking them for record. Okay. Cuz when I

37:45read the bill, okay, so planning going

37:47to be the lead, right? Then public works

37:51going to be just like I guess in

37:53installation of the signage, making the

37:55signage, right? And then R&D you're

37:57going to be helping with planning and

38:00coordinating of I guess the wordings and

38:03the research of everything.

38:06>> So right [clears throat] I I understand

38:08our role is uh basically the public

38:11engagement piece

38:12>> but also but but supporting planning

38:14because planning is taking the lead.

38:15>> Yeah.

38:15>> Okay. So I just want to make it clear to

38:17the public how this process going to

38:19work.

38:20>> Also there's a timeline.

38:23So, I'm asking the departments, are you

38:26folks able to meet the timelines

38:31once this pass?

38:32>> Yeah.

38:34>> Cool. On record now. Okay.

38:36>> Yeah. Thank you, chair. Uh it is a tight

38:40timeline. Um as you're aware, we are uh

38:44planning is involved in a lot of project

38:47right now. We have the general plan

38:49amendments. We have the zoning code

38:51update, the subdivision code update, and

38:55more importantly the transient vacation

38:57rental program. All of these are

39:00happening at the same time. Now, um,

39:02this has one year for us to be able to

39:06implement this program or come up with

39:08an implementation

39:10plan and then a period of time to

39:12install the signs working in conjunction

39:16with public works um,

39:18>> and R&D

39:20>> and R&D. Um, the

39:24we will do the best we can. What we

39:26really appreciate is uh council member

39:29Kirkowit's understanding of uh our um

39:34stretch resources right now in regards

39:36to staffing. So this idea of having

39:40monies come for us to be able to um find

39:45another resource to actually do this

39:47work will be uh very extremely helpful

39:51for us to be able to administer this

39:54program. Okay.

39:56>> Public works.

39:58>> Well, I guess uh

40:00public works will be at the

40:02implementation end um

40:04>> creating the signs.

40:05>> Creating the signs. So hopefully

40:08everything gets done beforehand gives us

40:10enough time to solicit for the design

40:14and uh you know all that has to go into

40:17that process

40:19>> because will the signs be done inhouse

40:21or are you guys going to have to

40:23contract it out? I'm pretty sure we're

40:24going to have to go out to design

40:28um and probably uh prepare or make the

40:33signs. Probably need someone to help us

40:36get them out there, post them, uh go

40:39through the regulatory review process,

40:42um maintain them, repair them, replace

40:44them. Um you know, it's at this point in

40:48time, we don't have that capacity. Okay.

40:50But that's what I envision us doing.

40:53>> Okay. Okay. And then R&D, you like Okay.

40:57So, there's going to be money that's

40:59going to be contracted to get

41:01consultants to do most of the work. So,

41:05you going to be working with planning

41:08with the consultants in getting all this

41:11information. Is that correct?

41:12>> That's correct. So, we'll we'll do

41:15whatever we need to support planning's

41:17effort. So we we see our our role here

41:20is uh pretty well spelled out.

41:23>> Okay. And so now within the departments,

41:25are you folks going to have to come up

41:26with any administrative rules on how

41:29this process going to be?

41:32>> Uh well, we're going to have to figure

41:34it out. We don't we don't know yet

41:35because we haven't been through the

41:36process before. But uh but there's

41:39sufficient support for those effort.

41:41>> Okay. So by you saying that

41:44once this bill is passed, okay, and it

41:47takes effect, then you're going to have

41:49to come up with all that information. So

41:51how long would that take?

41:54Because when when does this maybe to the

41:57to the maker, when do you expect this to

42:00take in effect?

42:04>> This takes effect as soon as it is

42:06adopted at second and final reading.

42:08>> Okay. Okay. So you guys heard that. So

42:09now the the clock will start ticking,

42:12right? And so now when you folks got to

42:14meet and get everybody, you know, I

42:17guess your administrative rules or your

42:20how the whole process going to be, how

42:22long do you think that's going to take?

42:29>> I don't know. Well, I mean, we have a

42:31deadline, so we'll be expedition.

42:33>> I know every every time there's a

42:35deadline, but sometimes, you know, it

42:37cannot. So I just you know just for the

42:39public's note because what going to

42:40happen is people going to expect things

42:42to happen right away right and we're

42:46talking about government right and

42:48everybody deals with government right

42:50and there's a process right and then

42:53there like now three different

42:55departments that going have to work

42:56together to get things done and

42:59sometimes working just with one

43:00department is hard right so now we have

43:03three different departments going to be

43:04working together right and so that's

43:06going to be Very interesting. So, I'm

43:08just looking at timeline because I want

43:09to make sure the public understands.

43:11>> Yeah.

43:12>> That this is something new. This might

43:14take a while, right? And just to let

43:17them know upfront so that when this

43:20takes effect and they expect things to

43:22be happening within a year and six

43:24months.

43:25>> Yeah.

43:26>> It might not happen. Right.

43:28>> Yeah. So what I would say is that

43:30probably of the three departments you

43:32here uh we probably have

43:36probably the most available capacity uh

43:39to be to be the driver of the project

43:42not the lead just you know people that

43:44are calling the meetings keeping notes

43:45on it and try to push it along. I think

43:48Councilwoman Kirkowitz alluded to that

43:51earlier said hey I'm depending on you

43:53guys to kind of move this thing along.

43:55So I think that we could we could take

43:57that initial role just to call the

43:59meetings. You know Jeff can drive it. Um

44:02you know

44:04>> the state is the lead of everything. You

44:06folks are just helping subsidies subs

44:09right and so planning is the one that

44:12could have to really organize

44:14everything. Right. And so I just wanted

44:16to make that clear. Right. And hopefully

44:20you have the manpower or

44:23[laughter]

44:24but you know you understand but just to

44:26kind of let the public know. Okay.

44:28>> But thank you and

44:30>> good luck.

44:31>> Okay.

44:33>> Miss Kimble.

44:34>> Thank you.

44:35>> Council member Kirkowitz was first. I'd

44:37like to

44:38>> Okay. Okay. Miss Kirkowitz. Thank you,

44:41chair, and and thank you all so much for

44:43meeting with our offices um to discuss

44:47this bill and and to lend um support.

44:50Thankfully, we're not starting from

44:52scratch. Thankfully, this is not a new

44:54program. um a framework currently exists

44:57within the state and this ordinance was

44:59modeled after the state process but it's

45:02very deliberate in that it is going to

45:04happen islandwide because there are many

45:07communities that don't have the capacity

45:09to do this themselves. Um

45:13uh committee chair, these departments

45:15have been put on notice, so they should

45:17be working actively now to get their

45:20ducks in a row so that once this

45:22ordinance does pass, they are trigger

45:24ready on everything that they need to do

45:26to fulfill the obligations that they are

45:28required to of this ordinance. I have

45:31great faith in our departments to get

45:34the job done.

45:35>> And I'll just leave it at that.

45:37>> Okay.

45:37>> Thank you, M. Kimble.

45:40>> Thank you. Um and sitting over here

45:42contemplating um this question about the

45:45final authority and let let's maybe well

45:48I I don't know if we can have

45:50conversation about this offline but I

45:52think we have a real opportunity here to

45:58decolonize the decision-m process around

46:00this and to do that might include having

46:05the decision-m authority be from

46:07somewhere outside Um,

46:10I have some ideas on what that might

46:11look like. Um,

46:14so what I what I think might be

46:17appropriate between now and the next

46:18meeting, and I don't know what the

46:19capacity might be to do this, would be

46:21to reach out to some of the people that

46:23testified today and other people that

46:24have other people that have supported

46:26this program and just get a pulse on

46:28where they think that decision-making

46:30authority should lead and then maybe we

46:32can kind of go from there. um you know

46:35when we talk about I don't want to do

46:39token elevation of indigenous processes

46:42and protocols but to do genuine

46:46integration right and so part of that

46:48includes where the authority comes from

46:50and I think it's it it's worth kind of

46:52digging into that and spending some time

46:54getting the feedback from the community

46:56where they think that authority should

46:58lie. I mean, it's kind of a tight time

47:00frame to turn that around, but I have I

47:01have faith in you guys to be able to to

47:04do that. Um,

47:07the the other thing to, and I think you

47:11kind of alluded to this, is is you we

47:12are not starting from nothing on this.

47:14There's there are actually several

47:17resources out there with mapping

47:18information around these locations and

47:21the appropriate naming and the histories

47:23and whatnot that I think are available

47:25to us. Um I can recall about a decade

47:28ago I had a student in my JS class

47:31working as part of consortium on

47:33identifying and and recording the aubua

47:36across the county. So I believe there's

47:38already a pretty substantial database of

47:41information that is accessible. So

47:43really it's it's more defining the

47:46process and and than it is the deep

47:49dives into a lot of that initial data.

47:52So I I think I am a little worried about

47:54the timeline, but I think

47:58forcing it a little bit is actually

47:59valuable here. Yeah. Thank you.

48:02>> Okay. Any other members? Hearing see

48:05none. All those in favor of approving

48:07bill 199 and send it to the council with

48:11a positive recommendations, please say

48:13I.

48:14>> Those opposed? We have eight eyes and

48:18one excused. Mr. Connie Clankfelder.

48:22Okay, moving on to bill 200. If anyone

48:25would like to testify in bill 200,

48:27please speak up now.

48:32Hearing and seeing none, bill 200 amends

48:34chapter 14 of the Hawaii County Code

48:361983, 2016 edition as amended by adding

48:39a new article relating to the

48:40establishment of a mole interpretation

48:43program allows interpretive

48:44installations on county property

48:46introduced by council member Kirkowitz.

48:50Chair motion to forward bill 200 to the

48:52council with a favorable recommendation.

48:54>> Second. Okay. Motion by M. Kirkwood,

48:57seconded by Mr. Eustace. Go ahead, Miss

48:59Kirkowitz.

49:00>> Uh, thank you, chair. This is a very

49:02straightforward bill. There are so many

49:03community members and artists that have

49:06approached different county departments

49:07about um installing signs at county

49:10parks or county facilities or doing

49:12murals at um you know, community

49:14centers. This would create a process for

49:17the community to pitch an idea um for it

49:19to be vetted and then approved for

49:22installation at any county facility. Um

49:25this actually came at the request of

49:27parks and recreation because they have

49:28seen a lot of requests. They just don't

49:30have a process to facilitate that. So

49:33through this ordinance we would be

49:34establishing that process. Um and then

49:37the community would have the ability to

49:39pitch either parks and recreation,

49:41public works, fire station, the

49:43administration on the kinds of

49:45interpretive signage or artwork that

49:47they would like installed at a county

49:49facility. Um there is no funding that is

49:52being provided for anybody that puts

49:54forward a proposal. Um that would come

49:56at the discretion either at the

49:58department or be the responsibility of

50:00the individual or organization that is

50:02pitching the idea. But I've been part of

50:05a number of um different art

50:07installations during my time on the

50:09councilman and I can tell you that these

50:11sort of installations um they really do

50:14strengthen connection and pride in place

50:17um and surprise people when they

50:18discover to learn something that they

50:20hadn't known if they hadn't read the

50:22sign. So just looking for everyone's

50:23support. Thank you.

50:25>> Okay. Any other members? Hearing no

50:28seeing none. All those in favor of

50:30approving bill 200 and moving to the

50:34council with a positive recommendation,

50:36please say I.

50:37>> I.

50:38>> Those opposed. We have eight eyes and

50:41one excused. Mr. Connelly [music]

50:43Kleinfelder. And this concludes the

50:46meeting and the time is 10:19. We're

50:50journ.

50:50>> You could have waited like one minute

50:52[laughter]

50:53before taking them both.

```*