2026-11-05 - Policy Committee on Health Safety and Well-being
Summary
Based on YouTube auto-generated captions of the meeting and the posted agenda; names and numbers may be misheard in the captions.
- Quorum: eight members present (Jennifer Kagiwada, James E. Hustace, Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz, Heather L. Kimball, Michelle Galimba, Matt Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder, Holeka Goro Inaba and the chair), with Council Member Rebecca Villegas excused. Dennis Onishi chaired. The meeting began about 11:30 a.m. and adjourned at about 12:33 p.m. The Clerk confirmed there were no testifiers.
- Comm. 1133 (discussion with County administration of the Hurricane Lala after-action review and recovery plan, from Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz, dated October 19, 2026): she moved to close the file at the start, seconded by James E. Hustace, then ran the discussion. The file was closed by voice vote, eight ayes and one excused, after the discussion. See Hurricane Lala Recovery and Relief.
- Kierkiewicz said she asked for the discussion because it has been months since the storm, to learn what worked, where the system struggled and what to change, and to hold space for recovery in the Kaʻu region and other affected communities; she also said her district was hit by the volcanic eruption.
- After-action review: Daryl Oliveira, acting administrator of Hawaii County Civil Defense (attending online), said an after-action review is required under the County Code and that his office's review began in October with a survey of Emergency Operations Center participants. He called it centered on the Emergency Operations Center and not comprehensive, and said he has asked the mayor and managing director to have every County agency and stakeholder do its own internal review so the results can be combined. Examples he wanted captured: lessons from the Kona low flooding, the volume of debris and sediment deposited in flood channels and basins around Naalehu and Pahala, pre-impact messaging, and thresholds for suspending response (for example wind speeds). He also pointed to old wooden police and fire stations (Laupahoehoe was named) that may not be safe to ride out high winds, and to possibly pairing the Honokaa fire and police crews.
- Army Corps of Engineers: Oliveira said the Corps assessed changed water pathways in Kaʻu and will give the County a report on emergency protective measures and mitigation, prioritized by life safety (not a full flood analysis, which would take over a year). It is also to comment on how vulnerable the flooded cemetery is, where burials were displaced, and whether it can stay in place or part should be relocated. Kierkiewicz urged the Corps to hold a public meeting and give historical context on the floods; she also said residents in Ocean View lacked communications, even radio.
- Staffing and third-party review: Oliveira said his last day is the Friday of next week, that the mayor and managing director have been recruiting a permanent administrator, and that he is willing to keep helping. Kierkiewicz asked for a list of his recommendations before he leaves so the next Council can track them, and asked whether an independent third party should run the review; Oliveira supported that, saying a contractor could work without bias and that County staff are too thin, though it would cost money and the County would write the scope of work.
- Universal intake form: Kierkiewicz and Oliveira said applicants were filling out several separate forms (a request for assistance, residential and commercial damage forms) and being interviewed repeatedly, as in the 2018 eruption. Oliveira said the Mayor supports one intake, that data sharing with organizations such as the Red Cross is hard, and that the County is working with the State Department of Human Services, Aloha United Way and FEMA on streamlining case management data.
- State legislators (two State representatives joined by video; names are unclear in the captions and are not given here): they said it took about a week to get access to the right meetings, that they were not allowed in the County's emergency meetings and were only occasionally called, and that elected officials in affected areas should be included. They backed the universal form, said mitigation shortens recovery, and one said that most of the State rainy day fund is tied up awaiting FEMA reimbursement while the State considers options such as grants in aid to nonprofits. A Council member later cautioned about the fine line between elected officials helping and campaigning, and asked that the review address their role.
- Agriculture: Kierkiewicz said ranchers (the captions say Honokaa) needed emergency water for livestock and cited over 850,000 gallons she coordinated and about 100,000 gallons from Public Works in an earlier lava response (the captions say lava; the context is unclear). Oliveira suggested building non-potable water storage for ranchers (a 20,000 gallon tank at roughly $8,000), funded by mitigation grants and philanthropy, which could also serve as fire dip tanks, and said agencies are being brought together to list agricultural recovery resources.
- Recovery officer: Kanani Aton (spelling uncertain), in her first week as recovery officer, said the position is permanent, that she works from the Kilauea recovery office with space in Kaʻu and check-ins at Civil Defense, and that the immediate focus is the FEMA individual assistance appeal.
- FEMA individual assistance appeal: Oliveira said the appeal is due 30 days from notification, which he believed to be November 22 (to be confirmed), and that the County planned to send additional qualitative and quantitative information by close of business the next day. Staff are rechecking the joint preliminary damage assessment, cross-checking request-for-assistance records, contacting families in hotel sheltering, and re-contacting households with destroyed or major damage about insurance, claim denials, household size, income and vulnerability. He said FEMA has no hard threshold number, may do a second joint assessment, and he took this as a sign of a diligent review. Michelle Galimba asked about timeline and State alternatives.
- Other questions: Matt Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder thanked Oliveira and the nonprofit Vibrant Hawaii for relief pop-ups. A member from the north side of the island (name unclear in the captions) asked that nonprofits be assigned tasks matching their specialties, that sound buildings for shelters be identified and hardened (a North Kohala shelter was relocated), and whether standing mutual aid agreements exist with private water purveyors; Oliveira said he would check with the Department of Water Supply and report back, noting informal arrangements with private systems.
- Public Works: a deputy director of Public Works (name uncertain in the captions) attended online; Galimba praised Public Works and State Highways crews. The captions do not show him speaking.
Agenda
Opening: call to order, roll call, statements from the public on agenda items.
Communications: Comm. 1133, discussion with County administration on the Hurricane Lala after-action review and recovery plan. See Hurricane Lala Recovery and Relief.
Adjournment.
Related coverage
- Emergency Proclamation Relating to Tropical Storm Lala - Hawaii County, August 14, 2026: the mayor's local state-of-emergency proclamation ahead of the hurricane warning (supplemental proclamations: first, second).
- Trump approves emergency declaration for Hawaii County after Hurricane Lala - Hawaii News Now, August 26, 2026: federal emergency declaration for the August 14-16 impacts.
- President Donald J. Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Hawaii - FEMA, October 8, 2026: major disaster declaration enabling Public Assistance for Hawaii County.
Sources
- Agenda: https://records.hawaiicounty.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=1138396&dbid=0&repo=ClerkCouncil
- Agenda folder: https://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=0&startid=1091562
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDNK3n0oqwg (Hawaii County Council YouTube channel)
- Agenda hub: https://www.hawaiicounty.gov/our-county/legislative/county-council/meeting-agendas-and-actions
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
01:36That's great. Four weeks for you.
01:39>> My bad.
01:39>> You're our fearless leader.
01:41>> Yeah, right.
01:43Are we ready?
01:44>> Yes, sir.
01:45>> Okay, thank you. Okay, good morning.
01:49Today is Hold on. One fast one.
01:57Is there anything?
01:59Yeah, but I'm looking my
02:01Where's my paper?
02:04No, here. Okay.
02:08November 5th, 2026, we're at the West
02:10Hawaii Civic Center.
02:13It's the 13th session of the Policy
02:15Committee on Health, Safety, and
02:17Wellbeing.
02:19Uh at
02:20in attendance at this meeting, to my far
02:22left is Ms. Kagiwara, Mr. Eustace, Ms.
02:25Kirkowitz. To my far right, it is Ms.
02:28Kimble, Ms. Colimba, Mr. Kanuha Klein
02:31Felder, and Chair Inaba.
02:33And absent or excused is Ms.
02:37Um Vegas, and I'm chairing this meeting.
02:40This is I'm Fresh Onishi.
02:43Mr. Clerk, is there any testimony?
02:46>> Thank you, Committee Chair Onishi. I can
02:48confirm you don't have You do not have
02:49any testifiers for your committee.
02:51>> Okay, thank you very much. Okay, can you
02:54read in Communication 1133?
02:57>> Communication 1133 requested discussion
03:00with County Administration regarding
03:01Hurricane Lala After Action Review and
03:04Recovery Plan from Council member Ashley
03:06Kirkowitz, dated October 19, 2026.
03:10>> Ms. Kirkowitz.
03:11>> Thank you, Chair. Motion to close file
03:12on Communication 1133.
03:14>> Second.
03:14>> Okay, motion by Ms. Kirkowitz, second by
03:16Mr. Eustace. Go ahead, Ms. Kirkowitz.
03:19>> Thank you. Do we have representatives
03:20from the administration present for
03:23today's discussion?
03:35>> Hi, good afternoon. Daryl Oliveira,
03:38acting administrator, Hawaii County
03:39Civil Defense, online.
03:41Along with Kanani Aton, recovery
03:43officer.
03:44>> Great, good morning. Thanks so much for
03:45joining us. Um I requested this
03:48discussion because it's been um a few
03:50months since Hurricane Lala impacted our
03:52Hawaii Island communities, and I think
03:55it's important that we as a council and
03:57the community understand what happened,
03:59what worked, where we struggled, and
04:01what we need to do differently because
04:03we have been seeing a lot of natural
04:05disasters over the last decade and we
04:07can definitely anticipate more in the
04:08future. There was a tremendous amount of
04:11effort um put in by our county and state
04:14and federal personnel, non-profit
04:16organizations, local businesses, and
04:18residents who stepped up to help their
04:20neighbors and I absolutely want to
04:23recognize all of that. But I think it's
04:25important that we also examine the gaps
04:28in our system and the challenges that
04:30our communities um experienced in
04:32accessing assistance.
04:35Um you know, I represent the district
04:36that was inundated by the volcanic
04:38eruption and our community is still in
04:40recovery mode. Um so in addition to
04:43assessing what happened with emergency
04:46response related to lava, I do want us
04:49to at least hold some space to
04:50understand what recovery looks like for
04:53the Kaʻū region and all Hawaiʻi Island
04:55communities that were impacted by the
04:57disaster. Um so with that, um acting
05:00administrator, looking to understand
05:02understand um if an after-action review
05:05um was completed, how those lessons will
05:08translate into concrete improvements at
05:11the county level, and for our recovery
05:14officer, understanding what sort of
05:15efforts are underway so that community
05:18needs can be met and we're doing
05:20everything we can to ensure that nothing
05:22falls through the cracks. Thanks for
05:23being here.
05:25>> And before we start, um just for the
05:27record, uh we have Deputy Director Leo
05:30Asvedo from DPW also
05:33in this meeting discussion. Thank you.
05:35Okay, go ahead, Ms. Kirkwood.
05:37>> Thank you. I'll let the um acting
05:39administrator and recovery officer
05:40proceed with the presentation.
05:42>> Thanks.
05:43>> Uh thank you. Good morning again.
05:45And as uh Council member Kirkwood
05:47pointed out, not only do we want to do
05:50an after-action review at every one of
05:51these events or incidents as an
05:53opportunity to learn from what we
05:55experienced and close the gaps and make
05:57improvements, but it's also a
05:58requirement under the current county
06:00code chapter 7 section 3-6 would again
06:03conducting a a comprehensive
06:04after-action review and it outlines
06:07again the the specific objectives of
06:09that after action review. An after
06:11action review was conducted by our
06:13office back in October starting with a
06:16survey that was put out to all of the
06:17stakeholders that are present here in
06:19the EOC uh when we go through a response
06:22uh and even pre-impact uh operations.
06:26That survey focused a lot on the EOC
06:28operations rather than a more
06:30comprehensive across the entire
06:33I want to say pre-impact activities,
06:36response operations, and then
06:38immediately post-impact recovery
06:40operations.
06:41Uh so what we've done from our office is
06:44I shared this with the mayor and
06:45managing director is requesting that
06:47every one of the county agencies and our
06:49stakeholders conduct an internal after
06:51action review within their own
06:53organization to identify lessons learned
06:56by their organization uh so that we can
06:59include it as a more of a a more
07:00comprehensive after action review for
07:03the administration and then for the
07:04council.
07:05I did provide a copy of the after action
07:07review that was done by our office to
07:09council member Herkes but as I
07:11highlighted for her it's very EOC
07:13centric so it doesn't speak to the two
07:16to totality or the the broad spectrum of
07:19operations that I I'm sure the county
07:21and the community would like to know
07:23what we did, what we learned, what we're
07:26going to do differently the next time.
07:28So as an example what's not captured in
07:30this after action review is lessons
07:33learned with coming out of the Kona low.
07:36Uh so as an again an example
07:38coming out of the Kona low there was
07:39significant debris deposited within the
07:42flood channels and flood basins across
07:45the different areas of the island from
07:47South Kona
07:48through Kau.
07:49And what both state highways and in
07:51particular our Department of Public
07:53Works and if you have questions
07:54specifically on what I'm going to share
07:57I'm grateful that uh Deputy Director
07:59Azavedo's online to maybe address them
08:01but I'll share that what they do again
08:03lessons learned is go out after the
08:05flood event and re-clear all of the
08:08flood basins and channels to ensure with
08:10the next heavy rain event water would
08:12flow.
08:13And I'm sure Neil can share with you
08:15that what was removed in the form of
08:17debris, sediment, and what was collected
08:19in those flood channels, in particular
08:20in the Nallehu and Pahala areas,
08:23was minuscule compared to what was
08:25deposited with Hurricane Lala. Just the
08:28sheer volume of material that was
08:30deposited uh presented with significant
08:33recovery challenges as well as was
08:35evident as to what happened and what
08:37caused a lot of the flooding in areas
08:39that typically don't see flooding. But
08:41that would be an example of what what
08:42I'm asking the departments to capture,
08:44what they did pre-impact as mitigation
08:47strategies and from previous events and
08:50what we learned,
08:51what was effective in those strategies,
08:54and uh what we're going to do the next
08:56time. To kind of segue with that, uh
08:59with that particular incident,
09:01something we've asked, and it's public
09:03knowledge, well known, that we asked the
09:05Corps of Engineers to come in and help
09:07us identify what has changed in the
09:09environment in the Ka'u district with
09:11regards to flood and water movement,
09:14basically water pathways. Because what
09:17was obvious when we did the assessment
09:19is the water was not limited to the
09:21current flood channels. In many areas,
09:24they were either exceeding the capacity
09:26of the streams and creating new flow
09:28paths or exceeding the capacity of the
09:30flood channels regardless of the debris
09:32and the obstructions. It was the volume
09:34of rain that was occurring over a very
09:36short period of time that presented with
09:38some of the new
09:39newly established flood pathways. So the
09:42Corps of Engineers uh has had been
09:44requested. They arrived and did an
09:47assessment and will providing the county
09:49with a formal report on recommendations
09:52from emergency protective measures and
09:54mitigation strategies. It's not going to
09:56be a full comprehensive flood analysis
09:58because that would take, you know, well
10:00over a year. But what we've asked for is
10:02to prioritize it from a basis of life
10:04safety. What has changed in our
10:06community that currently, or with future
10:08flood events, we could see new or
10:12extended threat with life safety. Do we
10:15have residential areas or populated
10:17areas that are at risk going forward?
10:19Secondly is what
10:21infrastructure may also be at risk going
10:24forward
10:25and what mitigation measures can be
10:26taken.
10:28And in included in the infrastructure is
10:30not just the roadways and our
10:33hard facilities structures, but it
10:35includes the cemetery because I know
10:37you're all following that as well. The
10:38flood cemetery was impacted severely
10:41with displacement of burials and we're
10:43asking the core to part of their
10:45analysis
10:46was to comment on how vulnerable the
10:48cemetery is going forward.
10:50What can be some protective measures and
10:52mitigations done to prevent impact or
10:55minimize impact and again even the
10:59future of the cemetery from a more
11:01permanent can it remain in place? Should
11:03we have be having conversations or
11:06discussions as to whether or not the
11:07cemetery needs to be closed and existing
11:09burials at least that section relocated
11:12to different areas within the cemetery
11:14property. But that's an example of what
11:16I'd like to capture in a more
11:17comprehensive after action review
11:20which I will continue to support even
11:23when my term limit is up. I would like
11:26to with if the administration is
11:27comfortable continues to assist and help
11:29facilitate that to compile it and work
11:32with the permanent administrator on
11:34making sure that happens.
11:36Um
11:38Again, that was just an example of one
11:39I'll I'll share another one with regards
11:41to response. So we want to look at the
11:43after action from a pre-impact what was
11:46done. What we do differently and that
11:48would even include our messaging.
11:50So we you're all familiar. We put out
11:51messages pre-impact. We recently
11:54conducted an EOC 101 kind of an
11:56orientation for some of our state
11:58legislators here
11:59and it was interesting to see maybe
12:01different perspectives of or ideas as
12:04when does does Hawaii County's EOC stand
12:06up? Are we waiting for a state
12:08organization HIEMA or even the
12:10governor's office to pull that trigger
12:11and the answer was no. This EOC here on
12:14Hawaii Island stands up the most
12:15frequent of all in the state. We have a
12:17lot of uh experience with what we deal
12:21with and a lot of
12:23I want to say very strong relationships
12:24across our stakeholders.
12:26So, pre-impact, we are conducting
12:28briefings in the EOC where we're
12:30collecting information from our
12:32stakeholders as well as sharing
12:33information with the expected threat and
12:36risk that's coming. So, with a weather
12:38event, well before any impact is even
12:40anticipated, we're getting the latest
12:42updates from a meteorologist here in the
12:45room that's guiding the decision-making
12:48on what strategies we're going to have.
12:50That information is also used with the
12:52development of our communication
12:55packages which goes out to the public in
12:57various forms from our radio messages to
13:00our mass notification with texts and
13:02emails to working with the media on
13:05other processes including social media.
13:08So, we're collecting information early,
13:10sharing information early to help the
13:12agencies and stakeholders get better
13:13prepared and ready as well as to help
13:16our community prepare. But, that's one
13:18element of the pre-impact
13:20ramp up.
13:21As I mentioned, the agencies are also at
13:23that point using the information that
13:25they receive in the EOC from the subject
13:27matter experts on what they need to do
13:29with pre-positioning assets, revisiting
13:32like what Neil does, all of the the
13:34drainages and culverts and making sure
13:35they're all clear. So, his teams are out
13:37there with every weather event prior to
13:39the onset of any impact and ensuring
13:41that those flood channels and openings
13:42are are all sufficient to accommodate
13:45the water that's expected.
13:47It's also making sure all agencies are
13:50mindful of their continuity of
13:51operations. So, fueling of generators,
13:54fueling of vehicles, pre-positioning of
13:56assets, even right down to identifying
13:58the personnel that would be held over
14:00once impact starts.
14:02Um another gap that I'd like to see us
14:04work on together is to identify
14:07thresholds for response as we move into
14:10the response discussion.
14:12Right now, it's it's It's practice on
14:14Hawaii Island where our first responder
14:16agencies
14:18they will use
14:20I want to say more ground truth and
14:23personal perspective from the responding
14:26officers, whether it be police or fire,
14:28and even the public works teams, of
14:30based on their observations when they
14:32will terminate or suspend operations.
14:36It It would be a value to set some
14:38thresholds. So, for example, HECO has a
14:40threshold with putting their crews up
14:43with buckets that if winds exceed 40
14:46mph, buckets don't go up. That is also
14:48an OSHA requirement with crane
14:50operations. So, I think from our
14:52standpoint, from the county, it's how do
14:54we identify some thresholds so that we
14:57can assure the continued operations, the
14:59safety of the personnel, but also manage
15:01expectations from for the public because
15:04if we can communicate that ahead of time
15:06and educate our citizens that once the
15:09onset of some of these hazards begins,
15:12it may be too dangerous to put people on
15:14the road to try to get to you. So, when
15:16we are encouraging taking shelter, going
15:19to a shelter, evacuating areas of risk,
15:22it's really to one ensure their safety,
15:24but also to minimize the risk to
15:26personnel that need to go and assist
15:27them when things go wrong.
15:29Uh so, again, in the response that was
15:32not captured in the current
15:33after-action, but I'd like to see that
15:35captured in the more comprehensive
15:37after-action review. As well as, you
15:39know, some of our facilities. I know all
15:41of you are aware of the facilities in
15:43your district as it And again, I'm
15:45speaking more from a emergency response
15:49uh position where, let's say, police and
15:51fire. But, we have facilities in many
15:53districts across the community
15:56that the facilities would not be the
15:58best to ride out an event. Again, using
16:01as an example our Lapahoehoe police and
16:04fire stations.
16:05They're both old wooden structures that
16:07are not built to current codes that
16:10could be vulnerable to a high wind
16:12event. So, from a county perspective,
16:14it's having those conversations
16:15internally that as if we're expecting or
16:18it's been forecast that we'll see
16:19significant winds in these areas, where
16:22do we relocate the crews so they can
16:24maintain their availability rather than
16:27get trapped or worse by riding it out in
16:30structures that may not survive that
16:32particular threat.
16:34Uh so again as an example with Honoka'a
16:36fire station, conversations we were
16:38having in here is whether or not we
16:40would marry up fire and police. The the
16:42police station in Honoka'a is a much
16:44more hardened facility
16:45or would they rather relocate to the
16:47sports complex in Honoka'a, which is
16:50again a much more strong and resilient
16:51structure to ride out a windy event. But
16:54those are the kinds of conversations
16:55that can easily trans uh transition into
16:58policy or guidelines, operational
17:01guidelines. So for new team members or
17:05you know, the future,
17:07we have better formal formalized
17:09guidance on what we're going to do as
17:11far as operations. Again, I'm just
17:13giving you examples of what I'd like to
17:15see included in a more comprehensive
17:17after-action review
17:19that unfortunately wasn't captured in
17:20the current one,
17:22but I'm I'm committing my
17:24uh or making my commitment to continue
17:26to assist and develop that uh document
17:29both for the council, the
17:31administration, and then for the teams,
17:33but most importantly to communicate to
17:35the public what we learned and what
17:37we're going to do differently.
17:39Um I can continue on. I just didn't want
17:41to take up all the time explaining where
17:43we're at with the current after-action
17:45or where I'd like to go. It might be
17:47more helpful to answer questions at this
17:49point on the after-action process.
17:51Uh so I'll defer to you, uh
17:53council chair, what you prefer. I like I
17:55can share more, I can just entertain
17:57questions.
17:58>> Thank you, acting administrator. Our our
17:59time together is limited, so we
18:01definitely want to save some time for
18:04questions. I'm echoing here.
18:12Um acting administrator, you mentioned
18:14that your time is almost up with the
18:15county. Um when exactly is your last day
18:20in a contracted
18:21and I'm curious if you have any
18:23information around um the mayor's hiring
18:26of a permanent administrator for Civil
18:28Defense.
18:30>> Well, I do know that the mayor and MD
18:31have been working on the the hiring. Uh
18:34the recruitment was open, and I believe
18:36it closed. And I I do believe they do
18:38have applicants.
18:40Uh my last day is actually next week
18:42Friday.
18:43Um
18:44but again,
18:45I'm saying that even though I will not
18:48be on county payroll or a county
18:50employee,
18:51I still feel
18:53I want to say obligated to continue this
18:55process and assist with the new
18:58administrator, especially if it's
18:59someone not from our island and maybe
19:01not familiar with our community. Um
19:05as I shared openly recently again with
19:07our state legislature, I feel we have
19:08the best system. Having been able to
19:11work for a little while in Maui County
19:13and post the fire there,
19:15as well as when I interact with my peers
19:17in the other counties, I feel
19:19we've been fortunate. The system is
19:21built been built on a really good
19:22foundation,
19:24but there's still more work to be done.
19:26Um and again, we also have a very
19:28limited staff in this office. So, for
19:30some of the
19:32I want to say the the desired products
19:34like like an after-action, there may be
19:36better ways to get this accomplished
19:38with the limited staff we have.
19:40Um
19:41and exploring different vehicles or
19:43mechanisms to make that happen, but
19:45again, sorry. To answer your question,
19:47next week Friday is my last day, but I
19:49am planning to stick around and assist
19:51even if I'm not in the official capacity
19:53as long as the administration and the
19:55new administrator would like my
19:56assistance.
19:57>> That's very generous of you considering
19:59you have served as fire chief, Civil
20:01Defense Administrator um here on Hawaii
20:03County, and also supporting Maui after
20:05the Lahaina fires. Um I think this
20:07council would benefit from some kind of
20:09list of recommendations from you before
20:12you depart, just so that we're capturing
20:14lessons learned, um and the next council
20:17can work to ensure that the
20:18recommendations you are provided can be
20:20tracked, and various departments can be
20:22held accountable to ensuring these
20:25things happen.
20:26On the idea of an after action review, I
20:29have a wondering around might it be
20:31appropriate for someone
20:33independent third party not part of the
20:35county to perhaps conduct the after
20:38action review process. Um
20:41obviously our our teams are very
20:44time is very limited
20:45and it might be helpful to have somebody
20:48that wasn't part of the chaos of
20:50response to facilitate those
20:52conversations to get feedback on how
20:56they honestly felt response went and
20:58where there is room for improvement. Is
21:00that something that you could get
21:02behind?
21:04>> Yes, I would definitely support using a
21:06third party facilitating the after
21:08action because they're going to extract
21:10the information from our teams but do it
21:13without bias, do it from
21:16very objective based perspectives,
21:18especially if they're just to reflect on
21:19what's in chapter 736.
21:22There are very specific objectives there
21:25that if you were to do an RFP or or
21:27other solicitation, I think there are
21:30resources in the community
21:32locally as well as there are contract
21:34organizations that do this across the
21:36nation that could come in. I realize
21:38that's at a cost
21:39but I think when you look at if if
21:41you're asking
21:43Holyoke City fans to facilitate that
21:45process given the short staff
21:47we have
21:49and if we're going through multiple
21:50events like we just did, it can
21:53sometimes be put on the back burner as
21:55well as not receive the priority and
21:57commitment that it needs. So by going
22:00through a third party, it it may be more
22:02timely, unbiased, more efficient process
22:05and they'll put a very comprehensive
22:07report together at the end. And again,
22:09we would develop the scope of work for
22:11that contractor to ensure we get the
22:13outcomes we're looking for.
22:15>> Great, thank you. I just have a few more
22:16questions. Um
22:18over the last 10 years this idea of a
22:20universal intake form has come up. This
22:23particular disaster there was the the
22:26Darcy request for assistance case
22:28management. Then there was a form you
22:30needed to fill out if you had
22:31residential damage, and then a separate
22:33form if you had damage to your
22:34commercial facility. Is there any
22:37thought within the county to perhaps try
22:39to merge that so that individuals are
22:42sharing information one time and not
22:45having to be re-traumatized in filling
22:48out multiple applications. This is
22:49something that we saw during Lava, and
22:52unfortunately we also saw it playing out
22:53again with Hurricane Lava.
22:57>> Yes, and
22:58and again I'll say that that concept of
23:00a universal intake for our community was
23:03actually put forth coming out of Izell
23:06because we saw numerous contacts being
23:09made with residents post impact with
23:12regards to damage assessment. So, again,
23:14to give it some some context
23:16we had our CERT teams being deployed to
23:18go into Puna and do damage assessments
23:21followed by Red Cross, followed by our
23:23office of housing. So, these poor
23:25residents were being interviewed, in
23:28some cases many as five times, with
23:30people coming to their homes to collect
23:33almost the same information. And you can
23:35only imagine, like you said,
23:36re-traumatizing them.
23:38I do know specifically residents were
23:40asking, "When is help coming? You keep
23:43asking the same questions." The other
23:45challenge, and why we put forth a
23:47universal intake form then
23:49was to
23:51avoid the challenges with organizations
23:53that may have
23:55uh, restrictions based on their own
23:57internal structure and rules with the
23:59ability to share information.
24:01So, many times we're missing
24:02opportunities. So, again, an example
24:05with the 2018 eruption, at one point we
24:07had well over 400 people in the sports
24:10complex in Pahoa
24:12being managed by Red Cross
24:15yet we could not get information from
24:17Red Cross on the needs of the survivors
24:21from the eruption because their their
24:23system, their charter, their rules don't
24:26allow for them to just hand over
24:27information even if the county is
24:29requesting.
24:30I experienced the same thing on Maui.
24:32There is a process where you can request
24:35a data sharing agreement with Red Cross,
24:37but that doesn't automatically result in
24:39right away you're getting the
24:40information.
24:42So, the universal intake has tremendous
24:44value because we're having touch points
24:46with survivors, damage assessments, when
24:49they go to the resource centers or the
24:51pods, when they go to a shelter. And
24:54each one of those touch points is an
24:55opportunity to collect information about
24:57what did they experience, what needs do
24:59they have.
25:00But as you can imagine, someone having a
25:02tree fall on their home, and they report
25:05that through the request for assistance
25:07portal, and say I need chainsawing, they
25:10may need other things because they they
25:12maybe have been without power because of
25:14the power outage, don't have any food.
25:17They may not have access to
25:18transportation. That tree could have
25:20fell on their catchment, and now they
25:21don't have water. Unless somebody is
25:23doing comprehensive intake and asking
25:26them all the questions, often times
25:28we're missing what are the totality of
25:30their needs that we can work within the
25:32abundance of resources we have on the
25:34ground with various organizations,
25:36government and non-government, to ensure
25:39that we put them in a better place
25:41coming out of the disaster.
25:43We may not get them 100% whole, but we
25:45get them on a path to normalcy and a
25:47back on a path to stability. Uh
25:50especially if it's uncertain if we're
25:52going to get federal assistance.
25:54So, there's huge value to that universal
25:57intake. I know the mayor supports it.
25:59Regarding the platforms you mentioned,
26:01yes, we're looking at how do we get
26:02these digital platforms with I'm not a
26:05techno person, but there these APIs
26:07where you can have agreements between
26:09the proprietary softwares where they can
26:11share information import and export so
26:15that the information is readily
26:16available no matter which platform
26:18you're on. But it will be building that.
26:21We're working with the state coming, you
26:23know, out of LALA with Department of
26:25Human Services, with gems, with um
26:29Aloha United Way,
26:31uh, FEMA on addressing that for our Lala
26:34survivors with, again, how do we
26:36streamline the data collection and how
26:39do we improve the sharing across the
26:41case management realm.
26:44>> Thank you for that. Um, I believe Rep
26:46Capella is on Zoom and I did want to
26:49provide her a very quick opportunity if
26:52she's still on
26:54to perhaps talk about some of the
26:58How do I say this?
27:00Ways in which the administration can
27:03strengthen communications between
27:05elected officials. Um, I don't know if
27:08it I don't know where it is written that
27:10an elected official cannot be in the EOC
27:13during emergency response discussions.
27:17Um, I know that I had legislators
27:18reaching out to me a bit frustrated not
27:20being able to get information, um, as
27:22this
27:24Lala, uh, storm event was progressing.
27:27Um, and so folks are are just having to
27:29do what they can to support community
27:31and that leads to unnecessary
27:33duplication, I think, of efforts and
27:35perhaps frustration. Thank you, Rep um,
27:37Keohokalole
27:38for joining us as well. Ladies, just a
27:40few minutes on ways in which that you
27:41believe uh, communication and
27:43collaboration can be strengthened
27:45between the county and the state.
27:48Particularly because we will likely be
27:50asking you for funding to support
27:52recovery efforts.
27:56>> Aloha, everyone. Um, thank you so much,
27:58Councilmember, for the opportunity uh,
28:00to join you folks today. Um, as um,
28:03Daryl had mentioned, we did have a
28:05chance to talk in the EOC and kind of go
28:07through some of the processes. I think
28:09one of the biggest things is
28:10operationalizing support. Legislators
28:13are often seen as people that community
28:15members can come to, get an answer from,
28:18and with any type of disaster, it's
28:20always the local agency that has to
28:22respond first.
28:24Right, EOC is leading
28:26and then it's state supporting. But at
28:28the same time, we're trying to help our
28:30constituents understand what's happening
28:32and sometimes
28:33we can be the person that community
28:36members will go to because the county is
28:38so overwhelmed. So, I think one of the
28:41things that we need to work on is how do
28:42we operationalize support, being able to
28:45ensure that every single elected
28:47official that is in
28:50that impacted region or area. It doesn't
28:52mean every single elected official on
28:54the island, but if you are someone who
28:55is representing that specific community,
28:58you should be involved from county all
29:00the way up through the state
29:01communications.
29:03It took a couple of
29:04Honestly, it took about a week to be
29:05able to get access to some of the right
29:08conversations and the right people,
29:10um where there are everyday meetings at
29:148:00 or 9:00. The state hosts their own
29:16meeting
29:17held and led by the governor. The county
29:20hosts its own meeting held and led by
29:22the mayor. Um I was not allowed to be in
29:26the county meeting.
29:28Um
29:29It got to a point where mayor did allow
29:30me the opportunity to
29:33um
29:34someone from his team would maybe give
29:36me a call if that was if they remembered
29:39that day. It happened a couple of times,
29:41it wasn't consistent, and that's I I
29:43think a part of the problem. Um so, if
29:45we can find a way to ensure that every
29:47single elected, whether you're county,
29:49state, or federal, you're in that room
29:51so that we are
29:52as you mentioned, funneling the right
29:54resources at the right time, um because
29:56we all have different resources, and at
29:58the end of the day, we want to be able
29:60to at the state level support what the
30:01county is doing and leading, and share a
30:03unified message to community members.
30:07Um and then once one thing that I'll
30:09also echo is the importance of that
30:11universal form. Myself, Rep.
30:13KihuKupuLiloa, that we were helping a
30:15lot of constituents kind of go through
30:18those reports, sharing what we were
30:20hearing with county, um
30:23and then also trying to get them to
30:24direct resources if they needed it. Um
30:28But, there's a lot of overlapping
30:30information that at the end of the day,
30:32I think held us back and held back
30:35support for our community members.
30:38And then I'll just toss to Rep. Kila
30:40Kaapuniella if she wanted to add
30:41anything to that as well.
30:46>> Uh thank you. Thank you um Council
30:48Member Kirkwood for this communication.
30:51And of course to Daryl and Al Kalanithi
30:54uh who will now carry the heavy water
30:56that this takes.
30:58Um
30:59as Rep. Cabella mentioned,
31:02>> [clears throat]
31:02>> I was able to see a lot of the request
31:05for aid forms on the back end, which
31:08then allowed me to communicate
31:12with our office of our state office of
31:15wellness and resiliency,
31:18along with DLIR, which is our
31:20unemployment.
31:22We were recognizing real quickly
31:26that
31:28getting through the event was one part,
31:32but the recovery part, whether it was
31:36food assistance, water assistance, power
31:39assistance, there was going to be this
31:42long-term impact to employment for the
31:45area. And so I, too, um being very vocal
31:50about trying to create this universal
31:53form,
31:54because the sooner we know, the sooner
31:58we as state representative
32:01representatives can start to deploy some
32:03of the other state resources,
32:06so that when they are filling out this
32:09form, they're not getting
32:11re-traumatized. And this one form will
32:15highlight the comprehensive need that
32:18they will have.
32:20Um one thing I've also spoken with the
32:23office of wellness and resiliency is how
32:26to operationalize this trauma-informed
32:30not only response,
32:32but recovery piece.
32:35And then of course, you know, thank you
32:37to Daryl and his team for hosting us in
32:41a training class that I was incredibly
32:44eye-opening
32:46for legislators, but more importantly,
32:50we saw enormous gaps, but we're still
32:52the best across the state. Hawaii Island
32:56is still the best when it comes to an
33:00EOC and its responses.
33:03And then, of course, finally, um
33:05this idea of
33:07Daryl, thank you. If you can stay on, it
33:10would be wonderful.
33:12Uh we have an incredible network and
33:15people at the legislature are trying to
33:18do things better.
33:20Um and
33:22this information around a comprehensive
33:25after-action report helps us map out and
33:30plan the resources, which we know for
33:33this region
33:35of
33:36Kaho'olawe
33:38will be half a generation or more.
33:42And then,
33:43one thing Daryl did teach us during this
33:46process is the more we can mitigate and
33:51put funding and resources to mitigation,
33:55hardening our assets, hardening our
33:57infrastructure,
33:59actually shortens the time of recovery
34:03and the recovery dollars that go with
34:05it. So, thank you, Councilmember
34:08Kirk-O-Witz, for
34:10you know, starting this conversation,
34:12but for everyone to know,
34:15Hawaii Island and all of its
34:17representation, both public and
34:20non-public, are putting our heads
34:22together and and looking for solutions.
34:25Thank you.
34:26>> Thanks, ladies, for being here. I just
34:28have a couple more questions. Um
34:30Administrator, one significant gap
34:32during um the lava response effort was
34:34related to agriculture
34:37um and getting emergency water hauled to
34:40livestock. I don't know how I got roped
34:41into it, but I did. And was able to
34:44coordinate the delivery of over 850,000
34:47gallons of water, and public works also
34:50supported that effort delivering about
34:52100,000 gallons of water.
34:54I know that, you know,
34:56getting water to individuals is
34:58absolutely paramount, but there wasn't
35:02enough attention, in my humble opinion,
35:04paid to ensuring that livestock and
35:07livelihood of these ranches on Enoka'a
35:09was taken care of, particularly when
35:12every year
35:13we have political promises around we
35:15need to be a more food secure,
35:18um, you know, island nation.
35:21Next time, um, what do you anticipate as
35:23far as ensuring that our ag ecosystem is
35:26cared for?
35:29>> I I think it's right now
35:31it's looking at what lessons were
35:33learned. Like, the ranchers,
35:35unfortunately, were heavily dependent
35:37upon the supply chain.
35:39Not so much the source, because it
35:41wasn't like the source was depleted at
35:43the very springs. But I I caveat that
35:46they were going into a dry season next,
35:48so I'm sure we're going to be watching
35:50water levels and available water
35:52resources going forward. But,
35:55we need to
35:57again, from a mitigated mitigation
35:58standpoint,
36:00no longer have just a supply chain as
36:02the only element that ensures they have
36:04water, but it's the storage. So, going
36:07forward, it's identifying opportunities,
36:11maybe through a philanthropic mitigation
36:13funds, combination of different funding
36:16sources. How do we build storage
36:18capacity of non-potable water so it can
36:21be dedicated to ag use,
36:24because that was some of the challenges
36:25as you opened up with is, you know,
36:27first and foremost, available water was
36:29obviously going to go to the human
36:31population,
36:32but yet we still need to support our
36:35agricultural businesses, in particular
36:38the cattle that were highly in need of
36:40the water as both the food
36:43sustainability, but also as an economic
36:46impact on the community. Um again,
36:49far-reaching. So, I'm looking at
36:51opportunities to build more storage
36:53capacity and to piggyback that on other
36:56hazards and risks. So, if you can
36:58imagine, we can get a mitigation grant
37:00or mitigation project where we can
37:01increase storage capacity that's
37:03available for the ranchers,
37:05possibly supplied by a combination of
37:08the available springs, but maybe even
37:11rainwater collection systems,
37:14like our catchments,
37:15but also to be available not just for ag
37:18use, but if we have wildfires in the
37:19area, it's available as dip tanks for
37:22fire suppression.
37:23So, it's how do we find the
37:24multi-benefit solutions that can then
37:27justify federal dollars as well as
37:29receive the support from philanthropic
37:31monies that's cost-effective, relatively
37:34inexpensive. In a sense, when I did some
37:36research after this to
37:38get an idea of what's the barriers to
37:40the ranchers putting in catchment or
37:42storage tanks,
37:45it would appear to be it's within reach.
37:46A 20,000-gallon galvanized storage tank,
37:50and you can get it with food-grade or
37:51non-food-grade liners, is in the
37:53ballpark of $8,000. So, it wouldn't seem
37:56like it's unrealistic or it's ex-
37:59extremely expensive, but it's still an
38:01expense. So, how do we either subsidize
38:04or offset that expense to assist the
38:06ranchers who may be struggling already,
38:09but it would appear that we could
38:11increase storage capacity substantially
38:13for agricultural use uh pretty easily
38:17cuz they're easy to stand up. They're
38:18pretty resilient. Although, I know that
38:20we had significant catchment impacts
38:22with the earthquake, but I think we can
38:24look at the installation in a in a
38:28hardened way and still not be that
38:31expensive or costly to install. So, I
38:34guess like it Actually, I think it's
38:35just continue to work with the ranchers,
38:37work with the nonprofits, work with
38:40philanthropic, and look at looking
38:42forward to possibly mitigation grant
38:44monies, as well as all of our state
38:46partners. One of the things that we're
38:47working on right now is bringing all of
38:49the state and federal agricultural
38:51stakeholders into the room and having
38:53them identify for us what programs do
38:55they have so we have better visibility,
38:58especially for Kanani coming in as a
39:00recovery officer, what are the ag
39:03resources available for recovery?
39:05Um and in some cases, they may even be
39:07there for mitigation before an impact
39:10happens. So, we do have some some work
39:13to do on the ag.
39:15Uh and I think in particular is building
39:17more capacity for the ranchers in Ka'u.
39:19>> Yeah, thank you. I just want to make
39:21sure that in the future ag is not an
39:23afterthought. This is a good segue, I
39:24think, into um Kanani and your role as
39:27the recovery officer. Congratulations. I
39:30think we're all just trying to
39:31understand one, how we can support you,
39:33and then the focus of your work. Is it
39:35just to support um the impacts of
39:37Hurricane Lala, or will you also be
39:39supporting communities impacted by the
39:41Kona lows, and even the eruption, cuz I
39:43know there are some outstanding projects
39:45there. Thank you.
39:47>> Absolutely. Mahalo, everyone. Mahalo,
39:50council. I'm in my first week as
39:52recovery officer, learning from the
39:54people who built and are continuing to
39:56carry this work. Uh our mayor and
39:58managing director are coordinating with
40:00the existing Kilauea recovery office um
40:03and the plan already in motion there to
40:06ensure that we fully expend our federal
40:08funding and not um not let that go at
40:11all. Uh we'll be meeting with the
40:13recovery team soon. Daryl and I will be
40:15going over there. And I'm actually
40:17assigned to work out of that office
40:19full-time with regular check-ins here at
40:22Civil Defense um as well as I'll have a
40:25space out in Ka'u too. Um
40:29at Civil Defense right now, our focus is
40:32the FEMA individual assistance appeal.
40:36And so, we can get help to the families
40:39that need that help. Um it is
40:41time-sensitive, and Daryl can speak more
40:43to that deadline that is being
40:45coordinated with our state officials.
40:48Um so, definitely Kilauea recovery is at
40:51the core foundation of best practices,
40:55best learnings, best ways going forward
40:57with the community voice in the heart
41:00of our community uplifted first and
41:02foremost. And then again, making sure
41:07that we're watchful over that. I'll be
41:09right there learning from the staff
41:10that's there. And then of course now
41:13moving into some of the lava response
41:15and the critical steps that
41:18we have underway
41:20with this individual assistance appeal
41:23to FEMA.
41:25This recovery officer position is
41:27permanent. So, that what we learn from
41:30one disaster carries into the next. From
41:33Kilauea, from episode 41 and the tephra,
41:39the Kona lows, the earthquake, lava, and
41:42come what may. It all starts to compound
41:47and compile into a more deeper, fuller
41:50understanding with community at the
41:52core. Um
41:55And so, it's not meant to limit any
41:58efforts that are happening. It's also
41:59meant not to do it all. But the the
42:02value of what we do here on the Big
42:04Island is collectively, collaboratively
42:07coordinating across many branches of
42:10oversight and assistance and support and
42:13resources
42:16with all of the best practices brought
42:17to the table and continuing to apply
42:20that. So, lots for me to learn. You
42:23know, I'm sitting in a learning
42:24position. I'm seated well
42:27where I need to be,
42:30right where all of the conversations of
42:32recovery are happening. I just today sat
42:35in on the weekly Thursday recovery
42:39meetings that occur for the whole state
42:41that Iima um
42:44facilitates. Learned a lot there,
42:47realizing that there are teams of
42:48recovery officers at the state level and
42:52many efforts that many people that I can
42:55talk story with and learn there learn
42:58how to talk shop with them as well.
43:00So,
43:01in my first week learning from recovery,
43:05supporting the IA appeal
43:08and carrying forward what we learn from
43:10one disaster to the next and making sure
43:12we we come out stronger than
43:15we were before.
43:17>> Thank you for being here, Chair Ige.
43:19>> Okay, any other members?
43:21Ms. Climba.
43:22>> Thank you.
43:24Uh thank you to everyone
43:27um
43:28on Zoom for all your efforts.
43:30Um most especially Mr. Azevedo, who
43:34whose teams have just been so amazing um
43:38as well as the state uh highways, of
43:41course, but
43:42um
43:43just can't say enough for
43:46how public works.
43:49Just
43:50killing it out there. I mean, so just
43:53multi-leveled
43:55problems, so many so much to fix and
43:58clean up.
44:00Um
44:01and your your teams have just been
44:04working nonstop.
44:06Um so, thank you so much for that. Um
44:09you haven't spoken yet, Mr. Azevedo,
44:12Azevedo, so I don't know if you wanted
44:13to jump in and say anything at this
44:15point.
44:18>> I'll go after.
44:19>> Okay. Okay, yeah.
44:21Thank you so much, though.
44:23Um
44:25So, just following up on the
44:28FEMA individual assistance appeal, any
44:33timeline that you have? You mentioned a
44:35deadline.
44:36And so, I imagine there might be a
44:39response after that deadline. It's Do
44:41you have any
44:43um
44:44thoughts on what that general time frame
44:46would be because a lot of folks are
44:47asking in the community.
44:50>> Yeah, the deadline to submit that appeal
44:51is 30 days from the notification, which
44:54I believe that the deadline is now
44:56November 22nd, if I'm not mistaken. Uh
44:59and I confirmed that up for you.
45:01But, our intent I've been in direct
45:03communication with Administrator Lopez,
45:05with Haima, that we will provide our
45:08qualitative, as well as any adjusted
45:11quantitative supportive information by
45:14close of business tomorrow. And
45:15actually, I'm going to be on a call with
45:17him after this this meeting.
45:19The when I say quantitative, that's the
45:21numbers of destroyed and major damage,
45:25which to help reinforce the value of the
45:27universal intake, what we're doing right
45:29now is a team is going back over the
45:31joint preliminary damage assessment
45:33records
45:34to make sure we didn't miss anything in
45:37the numbers,
45:38cross-referencing that with the RFAs
45:40that came in,
45:42as well as we're trying to see how we
45:45can
45:46get communication directly with the what
45:49they call non-congregate sheltered
45:51families that are in the hotels, to make
45:53sure we didn't miss anyone who wasn't in
45:56the field when we conducted damage
45:58assessments. And we're we may miss a
46:01home or two.
46:02We don't think we did, but we want to
46:04make sure we we dotted every I and
46:06crossed every T. So, we're going back
46:07through that. That's the quantitative
46:09piece of the application.
46:12The qualitative speaks to the trauma in
46:14the community.
46:15So, what Kanani and Amir's our office of
46:17housing has been doing is re-contacting
46:21all of those residents that were
46:23identified as either destroyed or major
46:26damage,
46:27confirming whether or not they were
46:28insured, uninsured, underinsured. If
46:31they were insured, did they file a
46:32claim, and what was the response to that
46:34claim? Because we are hearing
46:36anecdotally of residents fighting claims
46:39and having it be denied based on an
46:42interpretation of the claims rep stating
46:44this was not a flood, this is a
46:46landslide.
46:47So, it's things like that that may not
46:49be captured in the initial preliminary
46:53damage assessment that speaks to the
46:54human aspect of this. It's not just
46:57numbers and structures, it's human
46:59lives. The other thing that's not
47:00collected in the damage assessment was
47:02household size, what's household income.
47:05What is the vulnerability of the
47:07household with respect to elderly
47:10as well as medically fragile.
47:12So, we're trying to provide all of that
47:14by re-contacting those homes that
47:15sustained the most significant impacts
47:18and their ability to recover in the
47:21absence of federal support.
47:24Uh so, that's So, we're trying to put
47:25together is the qualitative piece and
47:27have that submitted to FEMA by close of
47:30business tomorrow.
47:32>> Thanks so much for that um work that
47:35you're doing around that. Um so,
47:37if that's the deadline is the 22nd of
47:40November, do you have based on, you
47:43know, previous experience an idea of
47:46when we would hear an answer back from
47:48the appeal, either yay or nay? Would it
47:50be a month or a couple months?
47:53Less more?
47:55>> Yeah, it's it should be pretty quick, uh
47:57but not too hasty that they don't do a a
48:00thorough review of the appeal document.
48:02Uh what was encouraging is, as Kenani
48:04mentioned, we were on the the morning
48:05call this morning in which the governor
48:07asked about the denial of the
48:10application. He asked the same questions
48:12we all asked, what is that number? And
48:14FEMA was on the call and said there is
48:16no hard number,
48:18but it's looking at the ability of the
48:19community to recover with the support of
48:22state and local resources.
48:24So, FEMA also, and I I talked to the
48:27FEMA DCO immediately after the call, who
48:30also indicated that they're doing the
48:32same thing. They're going back through
48:34the numbers. They're considering whether
48:36or not they'll come back and do a
48:37secondary joint preliminary damage
48:39assessment, which means bringing teams
48:41back out to reassess those questionable
48:45claims or questionable reports of damage
48:47to make sure we didn't underestimate the
48:50impact from the quantitative side, and
48:53they're definitely looking forward to
48:54our additional information on the
48:56qualitative side.
48:58Based on that, I feel that it's it's an
49:00indication they're
49:02at least
49:03going to give us a
49:05How should I say it? A a fair and
49:08a diligent review of the appeal, rather
49:11than it's a slam dunk. No, you you don't
49:14meet the numbers and there's no sense
49:15doing an appeal.
49:18>> Thanks. That's especially that that
49:20there may be coming out again.
49:22That's um very
49:25useful to know and even though it takes
49:27longer if they are
49:28doing that assessment again, that is a
49:30sign that they are
49:32would be taking it seriously. Um
49:34you mentioned
49:36state and local resources and I know
49:38when I met with um the
49:42Section 9 administrator with you in the
49:45LA, who he was
49:47talking about how the
49:49um FEMA is meant to
49:52come in when state resources are
49:55overwhelmed or exhausted. So, um
49:58since we do have a state representative
50:00here on Zoom,
50:02um
50:03Representative Lee, I don't know if you
50:04have any thoughts on that. Do we have if
50:06does the state have anything any
50:09resources
50:11um that might come in
50:14um in place of FEMA because there are
50:16folks in the community who are seeing
50:18that FEMA individual assistance is
50:20denied and they're saying it's you know,
50:23is there any other
50:25resources? Are there any other resources
50:27for them
50:28um
50:29because you know, the nonprofits were
50:32great as like coming in and helping
50:35initially, but as they nonprofits
50:38don't really have the resources to cover
50:41the kind of damages that individual
50:43assistance requests are being made for.
50:47Um
50:47so, I don't know if you have any
50:48thoughts on that.
50:51>> Uh couple of things. Um
50:53On the FEMA side, we're having um
50:56robust conversations with our
51:00Hawaii delegation,
51:02uh Senator Schatz and Jill Tokuda,
51:05not only talking about different sources
51:07of funding or maybe recouching some of
51:10the damage, so it is more aligned with
51:13an agricultural need. Uh and then hard
51:17and heavy on FEMA reform as a whole.
51:21Um
51:22on the state side, I know there was a
51:25large number that was out there as far
51:28as how much money we have in our rainy
51:31day fund, but similar to the counties,
51:34so much of that is waiting on the
51:37reimbursement for FEMA. And so, it looks
51:41like $1.6 or 7 billion, but
51:4575 80% of that is still tied up with all
51:50the previous
51:52damages. I mean, we've had one payment
51:56that
51:57that that we got that was from an event
51:59that happened 8 years ago.
52:02Um and then finally this conversation,
52:07um Council member Elefante,
52:10our finance chair is Chris Todd, and so
52:13we have been exploring all types of
52:16options, whether it's realigning our
52:19green fee to help with mitigation
52:23or providing larger grants in aid from
52:27the state to nonprofits and do more
52:31focused and priority funding around
52:34uh recovery.
52:36Uh we just walked out of an election a
52:38few days ago, and so we at the house are
52:42continuing to have that conversation
52:44around leadership and what the goals and
52:46priorities will be. So, I'll be happy to
52:48carry that back for you.
52:50>> Thank you so much.
52:52>> Thank you much so much, Representative
52:53Lee Loy. I really appreciate all you've
52:55done to help out with this, your
52:57leadership in bringing folks together.
53:00Yeah, really appreciate it. Um
53:05I guess
53:06for me
53:08the number one thing that I'm hearing
53:11from the community
53:13is they want information.
53:16They want knowledge, actually even more
53:19than stuff.
53:20They want to know what happened and
53:24what happened to the landscape up above
53:28um Nālani Hū and Wai Hīnaʻu, especially
53:31because that's where it impacted
53:34habitations. Um you know, there was
53:37a lot of damage all over the district,
53:40but most of it is agricultural land.
53:43Um
53:45so that I know um I spoke with you
53:48Administrator Olivera about um
53:52Army Corps of Engineers
53:55um saying that they would do a public a
53:58meeting to provide information
54:01um about what they found. And I can't
54:04underline how important that
54:06is going to be um to really
54:10uh help the community
54:12feel better a little bit. Knowledge is
54:15power, you know, and even if it's bad
54:18news
54:19um just knowing
54:21that
54:24what that bad news is is really really
54:26important to people.
54:28Um
54:30and I think even like going back I don't
54:33know if Army Corps of Engineers can do
54:35that, but
54:36like the context in history
54:39um because
54:41there have been major floods in Kaʻū
54:44before, but none as widespread as this,
54:47like all over the the district. There's
54:50been more localized ones. So I think
54:53putting that context putting this in
54:56context and also understanding why it
54:58was so big. You know, what where exactly
55:03did the rainfall fall up on the mountain
55:06that led to it being so widespread, so
55:09intense, so much debris.
55:12Um
55:14So, I just wanted to underline that. Um
55:16and then one of the other things
55:19that I heard, I think it's very relevant
55:21to civil defense, was that um folks in
55:25Ocean View
55:26did not have communications, not even
55:29radio.
55:30So,
55:31I think that's really important that we
55:33fix that so that that at least they have
55:36some communications to find out what is
55:39happening in their community and larger
55:42area. So, that's my buzzer. That's my 5
55:46minutes, so I'm stopped there and let it
55:48someone anyone else who would like to
55:51um chime in. Thanks.
55:53I yield. Okay.
55:54>> Okay, members, we've got 5 more minutes
55:56before this committee ends. So, Mr.
55:58Kanuha Lee Kleinjelder, can you wrap it
56:00up?
56:01>> Thank you very much, Mr. Onishi. I thank
56:03you, Ms. Kirkwood, for bringing this
56:04forward. Uh Mr. Olivera, thank you for
56:06stepping in. You kind of you walked into
56:08a hornet's nest, you know.
56:10And you went through some of the most
56:13horrendous natural
56:17disasters that we've had, and I
56:19appreciate your expertise in leading the
56:21county through yet another
56:24disaster relief scenario. Uh so, good to
56:26know you're here. I'm sorry that you're
56:27leaving, and I look forward to seeing
56:29who comes in after you.
56:30Uh I have to speak very highly of uh
56:33your wife's organization, too, Vibrant
56:35Hawaii,
56:36in leading the charge in getting out to
56:38community when
56:39government is still
56:41uh figuring out how to and where to
56:43respond.
56:45And I just wanted to
56:47give her a mahalo, as well. I know her
56:48team uh was working very hard. And
56:50there's a number of
56:52different pop-ups in our community
56:55uh that were crucial for our community
56:56to get through the event.
56:58Um just to follow up on something I
57:00heard, I wanted to check in uh
57:02Representative Lee Loy,
57:05uh were you reviewing
57:09the
57:16Sorry, let me get my notes.
57:19Now, the labor the labor notes you were
57:21going through that you were reviewing
57:22post-
57:24hurricane?
57:25>> Yes, so I had through the Darcy system,
57:28I was able to look at the request for
57:30aids and get some information.
57:34But, the ground truth of it all was we
57:38saw Punalu'u Bakery,
57:40right, get inundated and we knew that
57:43there would be community members who
57:46would be without jobs.
57:48And so, myself and Rep Capella,
57:52while she was on the grounds
57:55at her hub, we were communicating
57:58and I was assisting her with
58:00coordinating
58:02uh um unemployment applications or
58:05information
58:06so that individuals who
58:09have lost their jobs, we could start
58:12that process so that they could start
58:15receiving some level of unemployment
58:17checks.
58:18I mean, it was a very chaotic few days
58:23and
58:24the coordination with our state
58:26agencies, uh Kanani knows this, uh with
58:30the cemetery, there's a Department of
58:32Health component that goes with it.
58:36And so, getting that feedback from
58:39people on the ground
58:42to then look at the request for aid
58:45forms and distill
58:48and what we call triage the information
58:52and then
58:54start the lead conversations with our
58:56state agencies was the way that myself
58:59and Rep Capella saw how we could help
59:02and support recovery efforts for the
59:05county.
59:07>> Very very nice. Thank you. Uh Mr.
59:09Oliver, I think my my The comment would
59:11be
59:12in watching this over the years, the
59:15there's a fine line between elected
59:16officials helping
59:19and elected officials campaigning.
59:22And I just something to be aware of and
59:25we're all cognizant of it and we all
59:27want to help and we all want to lend a
59:28hand. But in
59:30in finding that line between
59:32administrative priorities and reaction
59:35to a an event like what we went through,
59:37what we continue to go through
59:40and finding that space for our elected
59:42officials to fit in the picture and be
59:45part of the solution
59:47but not stand in the way of
59:49decision-making or put out wrong
59:51information, but help us get information
59:53for the community to you.
59:55That has definitely been a piece that's
59:57always been
59:59revolving around how do we best serve
1:00:01community in events. And so, I'll look
1:00:04forward to seeing your thoughts on that
1:00:07as part of this after-action report.
1:00:10But thank you to everyone who's involved
1:00:11and thank you again for having the
1:00:12discussion.
1:00:14>> Are you
1:00:14>> Okay, Mr. Hughes, just can you wrap this
1:00:16up, please?
1:00:17>> Okay, thanks, Sheriff. Appreciate your
1:00:18time. [clears throat]
1:00:19First of all, thank you, Councilmember
1:00:20Kirkwood, for bringing this conversation
1:00:21here. Grateful for our state partners to
1:00:24be in this space, as well.
1:00:25Uh Deputy Managing Deputy Director, DPW,
1:00:28uh thank you for all the work you do.
1:00:29Definitely different experiences on the
1:00:31north side of the island, for sure.
1:00:33And um Administrator Olivera, thank you
1:00:35for your leadership during this time.
1:00:36Just a couple of questions.
1:00:39Great to see you know, the
1:00:41the uptick in kind of the engagement
1:00:42with the universal intake form.
1:00:44The the only challenge I I have heard
1:00:47from some of our nonprofit partners uh
1:00:49through through Darcy
1:00:51and kind of the the response and
1:00:53recovery side
1:00:55is not all non nonprofits can do all of
1:00:58the
1:00:59what's asked of them. Some are very
1:01:01specific to their their jobs and their
1:01:03responsibilities.
1:01:04So, if they do vegetation management
1:01:07they cannot help with the health care
1:01:09and respite and those sort of things.
1:01:10So, somehow we need to kind of split
1:01:11that out a little bit more so that the
1:01:13nonprofits that are specialized in
1:01:15certain areas
1:01:16can really undertake that and not are
1:01:18not being stretched into areas they're
1:01:19not familiar and comfortable with.
1:01:22Um
1:01:23the
1:01:25the the question on the administrative
1:01:28value you mentioned on the facility
1:01:29assessment through the after-action
1:01:33You know, we had a situation in North
1:01:34Kohala where we had to relocate an
1:01:38emergency shelter.
1:01:40And that's for a a number of different
1:01:42reasons, you know, from the high winds
1:01:44to the safety of the space and the roads
1:01:47and just the number of trees in that
1:01:49park space.
1:01:50So, I know a lot of facilities
1:01:52vary,
1:01:53but we really need to identify the you
1:01:55know, those critical sound structures in
1:01:57all the different and you know this, but
1:01:59the different sort of situations that we
1:02:01could could we we could see in
1:02:02community. And we really need to have a
1:02:04very
1:02:05to to shift the
1:02:07the emergency shelters is a big
1:02:09challenge and I know you have to do that
1:02:10in other locations as well.
1:02:12But, we really have to kind of come to
1:02:14terms on what are our sound facilities
1:02:16and really moving forward on
1:02:18really hardening those structures that
1:02:19we can in a timely fashion.
1:02:22Uh the last
1:02:23kind of question I had administrator
1:02:25Oliveira is
1:02:26do we have any other standing mutual aid
1:02:29agreements with any of our private water
1:02:31purveyors, telecommunications network? I
1:02:34mean, we have it with our our federal
1:02:36partners,
1:02:37but do we have it with
1:02:39other private water purveyors in in a
1:02:42situation where we need to deliver water
1:02:43in areas we have the capacity to do so
1:02:45with our municipal system, we just have
1:02:47to transport it. But, in the in the case
1:02:49where those systems are down and we need
1:02:52to transport further distances, do we
1:02:54have any standing agreements with other
1:02:56other parties?
1:02:59>> On the water purveyors, I would I
1:03:01probably defer to Department of Water
1:03:03Supply if they have an agreement, but I
1:03:05can say coming from the fire service
1:03:06side, we frequently were we're using
1:03:09water from the private fire surveyors
1:03:11and purveyors in the area. So, include
1:03:13Kohala Ranch, Kohala
1:03:15Puuanani Ranch, those areas. So, I know
1:03:17we've had relationships as well as even
1:03:19in Puna with Hawaiian Shores and
1:03:20Hawaiian Beaches where when we need
1:03:22water for emergency purposes,
1:03:25there are arrangements and agreements.
1:03:28But, I would think, to your question
1:03:30specifically, I'll reach out to
1:03:31Department of Water Supply and get you
1:03:33an answer on
1:03:34these uh maybe agreements and uh
1:03:37relationships with supporting potable
1:03:39water for residents through the private
1:03:41water purveyors. I I have to say there
1:03:43is because as far as I know, uh using
1:03:46one as example that you may know in your
1:03:47district with Ka La Ranch and Kai Lopa
1:03:49with Hawaiian Homelands. The that's
1:03:51again, water that's transcending from
1:03:54one subdivision to another in the
1:03:55subdivision that manages or operates the
1:03:58the water system.
1:04:00But, I'll get you an answer.
1:04:01>> Perfect. And I'm happy to work with you
1:04:02on that and connecting with others in
1:04:04the region, too.
1:04:05Thank you so much. Thanks, Chair.
1:04:08>> Okay.
1:04:09Seeing no other lights. Thank you. Okay,
1:04:12all those in favor of closing and filing
1:04:14Communication 11 33, say aye.
1:04:17>> Aye.
1:04:17>> Those opposed? We have eight ayes, one
1:04:20excused. Ms. Vegas um this meeting is
1:04:24going to be adjourned at
1:04:2712:33 p.m. Thank you.
1:04:32All right, next meeting will be starting
1:04:33up in about 5 minutes.
1:04:36Okay. Thank you.
```*
