2026-11-05 - Policy Committee on Health Safety and Well-being

Summary

Based on YouTube auto-generated captions of the meeting and the posted agenda; names and numbers may be misheard in the captions.

  • Quorum: eight members present (Jennifer Kagiwada, James E. Hustace, Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz, Heather L. Kimball, Michelle Galimba, Matt Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder, Holeka Goro Inaba and the chair), with Council Member Rebecca Villegas excused. Dennis Onishi chaired. The meeting began about 11:30 a.m. and adjourned at about 12:33 p.m. The Clerk confirmed there were no testifiers.
  • Comm. 1133 (discussion with County administration of the Hurricane Lala after-action review and recovery plan, from Ashley Lehualani Kierkiewicz, dated October 19, 2026): she moved to close the file at the start, seconded by James E. Hustace, then ran the discussion. The file was closed by voice vote, eight ayes and one excused, after the discussion. See Hurricane Lala Recovery and Relief.
  • Kierkiewicz said she asked for the discussion because it has been months since the storm, to learn what worked, where the system struggled and what to change, and to hold space for recovery in the Kaʻu region and other affected communities; she also said her district was hit by the volcanic eruption.
  • After-action review: Daryl Oliveira, acting administrator of Hawaii County Civil Defense (attending online), said an after-action review is required under the County Code and that his office's review began in October with a survey of Emergency Operations Center participants. He called it centered on the Emergency Operations Center and not comprehensive, and said he has asked the mayor and managing director to have every County agency and stakeholder do its own internal review so the results can be combined. Examples he wanted captured: lessons from the Kona low flooding, the volume of debris and sediment deposited in flood channels and basins around Naalehu and Pahala, pre-impact messaging, and thresholds for suspending response (for example wind speeds). He also pointed to old wooden police and fire stations (Laupahoehoe was named) that may not be safe to ride out high winds, and to possibly pairing the Honokaa fire and police crews.
  • Army Corps of Engineers: Oliveira said the Corps assessed changed water pathways in Kaʻu and will give the County a report on emergency protective measures and mitigation, prioritized by life safety (not a full flood analysis, which would take over a year). It is also to comment on how vulnerable the flooded cemetery is, where burials were displaced, and whether it can stay in place or part should be relocated. Kierkiewicz urged the Corps to hold a public meeting and give historical context on the floods; she also said residents in Ocean View lacked communications, even radio.
  • Staffing and third-party review: Oliveira said his last day is the Friday of next week, that the mayor and managing director have been recruiting a permanent administrator, and that he is willing to keep helping. Kierkiewicz asked for a list of his recommendations before he leaves so the next Council can track them, and asked whether an independent third party should run the review; Oliveira supported that, saying a contractor could work without bias and that County staff are too thin, though it would cost money and the County would write the scope of work.
  • Universal intake form: Kierkiewicz and Oliveira said applicants were filling out several separate forms (a request for assistance, residential and commercial damage forms) and being interviewed repeatedly, as in the 2018 eruption. Oliveira said the Mayor supports one intake, that data sharing with organizations such as the Red Cross is hard, and that the County is working with the State Department of Human Services, Aloha United Way and FEMA on streamlining case management data.
  • State legislators (two State representatives joined by video; names are unclear in the captions and are not given here): they said it took about a week to get access to the right meetings, that they were not allowed in the County's emergency meetings and were only occasionally called, and that elected officials in affected areas should be included. They backed the universal form, said mitigation shortens recovery, and one said that most of the State rainy day fund is tied up awaiting FEMA reimbursement while the State considers options such as grants in aid to nonprofits. A Council member later cautioned about the fine line between elected officials helping and campaigning, and asked that the review address their role.
  • Agriculture: Kierkiewicz said ranchers (the captions say Honokaa) needed emergency water for livestock and cited over 850,000 gallons she coordinated and about 100,000 gallons from Public Works in an earlier lava response (the captions say lava; the context is unclear). Oliveira suggested building non-potable water storage for ranchers (a 20,000 gallon tank at roughly $8,000), funded by mitigation grants and philanthropy, which could also serve as fire dip tanks, and said agencies are being brought together to list agricultural recovery resources.
  • Recovery officer: Kanani Aton (spelling uncertain), in her first week as recovery officer, said the position is permanent, that she works from the Kilauea recovery office with space in Kaʻu and check-ins at Civil Defense, and that the immediate focus is the FEMA individual assistance appeal.
  • FEMA individual assistance appeal: Oliveira said the appeal is due 30 days from notification, which he believed to be November 22 (to be confirmed), and that the County planned to send additional qualitative and quantitative information by close of business the next day. Staff are rechecking the joint preliminary damage assessment, cross-checking request-for-assistance records, contacting families in hotel sheltering, and re-contacting households with destroyed or major damage about insurance, claim denials, household size, income and vulnerability. He said FEMA has no hard threshold number, may do a second joint assessment, and he took this as a sign of a diligent review. Michelle Galimba asked about timeline and State alternatives.
  • Other questions: Matt Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder thanked Oliveira and the nonprofit Vibrant Hawaii for relief pop-ups. A member from the north side of the island (name unclear in the captions) asked that nonprofits be assigned tasks matching their specialties, that sound buildings for shelters be identified and hardened (a North Kohala shelter was relocated), and whether standing mutual aid agreements exist with private water purveyors; Oliveira said he would check with the Department of Water Supply and report back, noting informal arrangements with private systems.
  • Public Works: a deputy director of Public Works (name uncertain in the captions) attended online; Galimba praised Public Works and State Highways crews. The captions do not show him speaking.

Agenda

Opening: call to order, roll call, statements from the public on agenda items.

Communications: Comm. 1133, discussion with County administration on the Hurricane Lala after-action review and recovery plan. See Hurricane Lala Recovery and Relief.

Adjournment.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

01:36That's great. Four weeks for you.

01:39>> My bad.

01:39>> You're our fearless leader.

01:41>> Yeah, right.

01:43Are we ready?

01:44>> Yes, sir.

01:45>> Okay, thank you. Okay, good morning.

01:49Today is Hold on. One fast one.

01:57Is there anything?

01:59Yeah, but I'm looking my

02:01Where's my paper?

02:04No, here. Okay.

02:08November 5th, 2026, we're at the West

02:10Hawaii Civic Center.

02:13It's the 13th session of the Policy

02:15Committee on Health, Safety, and

02:17Wellbeing.

02:19Uh at

02:20in attendance at this meeting, to my far

02:22left is Ms. Kagiwara, Mr. Eustace, Ms.

02:25Kirkowitz. To my far right, it is Ms.

02:28Kimble, Ms. Colimba, Mr. Kanuha Klein

02:31Felder, and Chair Inaba.

02:33And absent or excused is Ms.

02:37Um Vegas, and I'm chairing this meeting.

02:40This is I'm Fresh Onishi.

02:43Mr. Clerk, is there any testimony?

02:46>> Thank you, Committee Chair Onishi. I can

02:48confirm you don't have You do not have

02:49any testifiers for your committee.

02:51>> Okay, thank you very much. Okay, can you

02:54read in Communication 1133?

02:57>> Communication 1133 requested discussion

03:00with County Administration regarding

03:01Hurricane Lala After Action Review and

03:04Recovery Plan from Council member Ashley

03:06Kirkowitz, dated October 19, 2026.

03:10>> Ms. Kirkowitz.

03:11>> Thank you, Chair. Motion to close file

03:12on Communication 1133.

03:14>> Second.

03:14>> Okay, motion by Ms. Kirkowitz, second by

03:16Mr. Eustace. Go ahead, Ms. Kirkowitz.

03:19>> Thank you. Do we have representatives

03:20from the administration present for

03:23today's discussion?

03:35>> Hi, good afternoon. Daryl Oliveira,

03:38acting administrator, Hawaii County

03:39Civil Defense, online.

03:41Along with Kanani Aton, recovery

03:43officer.

03:44>> Great, good morning. Thanks so much for

03:45joining us. Um I requested this

03:48discussion because it's been um a few

03:50months since Hurricane Lala impacted our

03:52Hawaii Island communities, and I think

03:55it's important that we as a council and

03:57the community understand what happened,

03:59what worked, where we struggled, and

04:01what we need to do differently because

04:03we have been seeing a lot of natural

04:05disasters over the last decade and we

04:07can definitely anticipate more in the

04:08future. There was a tremendous amount of

04:11effort um put in by our county and state

04:14and federal personnel, non-profit

04:16organizations, local businesses, and

04:18residents who stepped up to help their

04:20neighbors and I absolutely want to

04:23recognize all of that. But I think it's

04:25important that we also examine the gaps

04:28in our system and the challenges that

04:30our communities um experienced in

04:32accessing assistance.

04:35Um you know, I represent the district

04:36that was inundated by the volcanic

04:38eruption and our community is still in

04:40recovery mode. Um so in addition to

04:43assessing what happened with emergency

04:46response related to lava, I do want us

04:49to at least hold some space to

04:50understand what recovery looks like for

04:53the Kaʻū region and all Hawaiʻi Island

04:55communities that were impacted by the

04:57disaster. Um so with that, um acting

05:00administrator, looking to understand

05:02understand um if an after-action review

05:05um was completed, how those lessons will

05:08translate into concrete improvements at

05:11the county level, and for our recovery

05:14officer, understanding what sort of

05:15efforts are underway so that community

05:18needs can be met and we're doing

05:20everything we can to ensure that nothing

05:22falls through the cracks. Thanks for

05:23being here.

05:25>> And before we start, um just for the

05:27record, uh we have Deputy Director Leo

05:30Asvedo from DPW also

05:33in this meeting discussion. Thank you.

05:35Okay, go ahead, Ms. Kirkwood.

05:37>> Thank you. I'll let the um acting

05:39administrator and recovery officer

05:40proceed with the presentation.

05:42>> Thanks.

05:43>> Uh thank you. Good morning again.

05:45And as uh Council member Kirkwood

05:47pointed out, not only do we want to do

05:50an after-action review at every one of

05:51these events or incidents as an

05:53opportunity to learn from what we

05:55experienced and close the gaps and make

05:57improvements, but it's also a

05:58requirement under the current county

06:00code chapter 7 section 3-6 would again

06:03conducting a a comprehensive

06:04after-action review and it outlines

06:07again the the specific objectives of

06:09that after action review. An after

06:11action review was conducted by our

06:13office back in October starting with a

06:16survey that was put out to all of the

06:17stakeholders that are present here in

06:19the EOC uh when we go through a response

06:22uh and even pre-impact uh operations.

06:26That survey focused a lot on the EOC

06:28operations rather than a more

06:30comprehensive across the entire

06:33I want to say pre-impact activities,

06:36response operations, and then

06:38immediately post-impact recovery

06:40operations.

06:41Uh so what we've done from our office is

06:44I shared this with the mayor and

06:45managing director is requesting that

06:47every one of the county agencies and our

06:49stakeholders conduct an internal after

06:51action review within their own

06:53organization to identify lessons learned

06:56by their organization uh so that we can

06:59include it as a more of a a more

07:00comprehensive after action review for

07:03the administration and then for the

07:04council.

07:05I did provide a copy of the after action

07:07review that was done by our office to

07:09council member Herkes but as I

07:11highlighted for her it's very EOC

07:13centric so it doesn't speak to the two

07:16to totality or the the broad spectrum of

07:19operations that I I'm sure the county

07:21and the community would like to know

07:23what we did, what we learned, what we're

07:26going to do differently the next time.

07:28So as an example what's not captured in

07:30this after action review is lessons

07:33learned with coming out of the Kona low.

07:36Uh so as an again an example

07:38coming out of the Kona low there was

07:39significant debris deposited within the

07:42flood channels and flood basins across

07:45the different areas of the island from

07:47South Kona

07:48through Kau.

07:49And what both state highways and in

07:51particular our Department of Public

07:53Works and if you have questions

07:54specifically on what I'm going to share

07:57I'm grateful that uh Deputy Director

07:59Azavedo's online to maybe address them

08:01but I'll share that what they do again

08:03lessons learned is go out after the

08:05flood event and re-clear all of the

08:08flood basins and channels to ensure with

08:10the next heavy rain event water would

08:12flow.

08:13And I'm sure Neil can share with you

08:15that what was removed in the form of

08:17debris, sediment, and what was collected

08:19in those flood channels, in particular

08:20in the Nallehu and Pahala areas,

08:23was minuscule compared to what was

08:25deposited with Hurricane Lala. Just the

08:28sheer volume of material that was

08:30deposited uh presented with significant

08:33recovery challenges as well as was

08:35evident as to what happened and what

08:37caused a lot of the flooding in areas

08:39that typically don't see flooding. But

08:41that would be an example of what what

08:42I'm asking the departments to capture,

08:44what they did pre-impact as mitigation

08:47strategies and from previous events and

08:50what we learned,

08:51what was effective in those strategies,

08:54and uh what we're going to do the next

08:56time. To kind of segue with that, uh

08:59with that particular incident,

09:01something we've asked, and it's public

09:03knowledge, well known, that we asked the

09:05Corps of Engineers to come in and help

09:07us identify what has changed in the

09:09environment in the Ka'u district with

09:11regards to flood and water movement,

09:14basically water pathways. Because what

09:17was obvious when we did the assessment

09:19is the water was not limited to the

09:21current flood channels. In many areas,

09:24they were either exceeding the capacity

09:26of the streams and creating new flow

09:28paths or exceeding the capacity of the

09:30flood channels regardless of the debris

09:32and the obstructions. It was the volume

09:34of rain that was occurring over a very

09:36short period of time that presented with

09:38some of the new

09:39newly established flood pathways. So the

09:42Corps of Engineers uh has had been

09:44requested. They arrived and did an

09:47assessment and will providing the county

09:49with a formal report on recommendations

09:52from emergency protective measures and

09:54mitigation strategies. It's not going to

09:56be a full comprehensive flood analysis

09:58because that would take, you know, well

10:00over a year. But what we've asked for is

10:02to prioritize it from a basis of life

10:04safety. What has changed in our

10:06community that currently, or with future

10:08flood events, we could see new or

10:12extended threat with life safety. Do we

10:15have residential areas or populated

10:17areas that are at risk going forward?

10:19Secondly is what

10:21infrastructure may also be at risk going

10:24forward

10:25and what mitigation measures can be

10:26taken.

10:28And in included in the infrastructure is

10:30not just the roadways and our

10:33hard facilities structures, but it

10:35includes the cemetery because I know

10:37you're all following that as well. The

10:38flood cemetery was impacted severely

10:41with displacement of burials and we're

10:43asking the core to part of their

10:45analysis

10:46was to comment on how vulnerable the

10:48cemetery is going forward.

10:50What can be some protective measures and

10:52mitigations done to prevent impact or

10:55minimize impact and again even the

10:59future of the cemetery from a more

11:01permanent can it remain in place? Should

11:03we have be having conversations or

11:06discussions as to whether or not the

11:07cemetery needs to be closed and existing

11:09burials at least that section relocated

11:12to different areas within the cemetery

11:14property. But that's an example of what

11:16I'd like to capture in a more

11:17comprehensive after action review

11:20which I will continue to support even

11:23when my term limit is up. I would like

11:26to with if the administration is

11:27comfortable continues to assist and help

11:29facilitate that to compile it and work

11:32with the permanent administrator on

11:34making sure that happens.

11:36Um

11:38Again, that was just an example of one

11:39I'll I'll share another one with regards

11:41to response. So we want to look at the

11:43after action from a pre-impact what was

11:46done. What we do differently and that

11:48would even include our messaging.

11:50So we you're all familiar. We put out

11:51messages pre-impact. We recently

11:54conducted an EOC 101 kind of an

11:56orientation for some of our state

11:58legislators here

11:59and it was interesting to see maybe

12:01different perspectives of or ideas as

12:04when does does Hawaii County's EOC stand

12:06up? Are we waiting for a state

12:08organization HIEMA or even the

12:10governor's office to pull that trigger

12:11and the answer was no. This EOC here on

12:14Hawaii Island stands up the most

12:15frequent of all in the state. We have a

12:17lot of uh experience with what we deal

12:21with and a lot of

12:23I want to say very strong relationships

12:24across our stakeholders.

12:26So, pre-impact, we are conducting

12:28briefings in the EOC where we're

12:30collecting information from our

12:32stakeholders as well as sharing

12:33information with the expected threat and

12:36risk that's coming. So, with a weather

12:38event, well before any impact is even

12:40anticipated, we're getting the latest

12:42updates from a meteorologist here in the

12:45room that's guiding the decision-making

12:48on what strategies we're going to have.

12:50That information is also used with the

12:52development of our communication

12:55packages which goes out to the public in

12:57various forms from our radio messages to

13:00our mass notification with texts and

13:02emails to working with the media on

13:05other processes including social media.

13:08So, we're collecting information early,

13:10sharing information early to help the

13:12agencies and stakeholders get better

13:13prepared and ready as well as to help

13:16our community prepare. But, that's one

13:18element of the pre-impact

13:20ramp up.

13:21As I mentioned, the agencies are also at

13:23that point using the information that

13:25they receive in the EOC from the subject

13:27matter experts on what they need to do

13:29with pre-positioning assets, revisiting

13:32like what Neil does, all of the the

13:34drainages and culverts and making sure

13:35they're all clear. So, his teams are out

13:37there with every weather event prior to

13:39the onset of any impact and ensuring

13:41that those flood channels and openings

13:42are are all sufficient to accommodate

13:45the water that's expected.

13:47It's also making sure all agencies are

13:50mindful of their continuity of

13:51operations. So, fueling of generators,

13:54fueling of vehicles, pre-positioning of

13:56assets, even right down to identifying

13:58the personnel that would be held over

14:00once impact starts.

14:02Um another gap that I'd like to see us

14:04work on together is to identify

14:07thresholds for response as we move into

14:10the response discussion.

14:12Right now, it's it's It's practice on

14:14Hawaii Island where our first responder

14:16agencies

14:18they will use

14:20I want to say more ground truth and

14:23personal perspective from the responding

14:26officers, whether it be police or fire,

14:28and even the public works teams, of

14:30based on their observations when they

14:32will terminate or suspend operations.

14:36It It would be a value to set some

14:38thresholds. So, for example, HECO has a

14:40threshold with putting their crews up

14:43with buckets that if winds exceed 40

14:46mph, buckets don't go up. That is also

14:48an OSHA requirement with crane

14:50operations. So, I think from our

14:52standpoint, from the county, it's how do

14:54we identify some thresholds so that we

14:57can assure the continued operations, the

14:59safety of the personnel, but also manage

15:01expectations from for the public because

15:04if we can communicate that ahead of time

15:06and educate our citizens that once the

15:09onset of some of these hazards begins,

15:12it may be too dangerous to put people on

15:14the road to try to get to you. So, when

15:16we are encouraging taking shelter, going

15:19to a shelter, evacuating areas of risk,

15:22it's really to one ensure their safety,

15:24but also to minimize the risk to

15:26personnel that need to go and assist

15:27them when things go wrong.

15:29Uh so, again, in the response that was

15:32not captured in the current

15:33after-action, but I'd like to see that

15:35captured in the more comprehensive

15:37after-action review. As well as, you

15:39know, some of our facilities. I know all

15:41of you are aware of the facilities in

15:43your district as it And again, I'm

15:45speaking more from a emergency response

15:49uh position where, let's say, police and

15:51fire. But, we have facilities in many

15:53districts across the community

15:56that the facilities would not be the

15:58best to ride out an event. Again, using

16:01as an example our Lapahoehoe police and

16:04fire stations.

16:05They're both old wooden structures that

16:07are not built to current codes that

16:10could be vulnerable to a high wind

16:12event. So, from a county perspective,

16:14it's having those conversations

16:15internally that as if we're expecting or

16:18it's been forecast that we'll see

16:19significant winds in these areas, where

16:22do we relocate the crews so they can

16:24maintain their availability rather than

16:27get trapped or worse by riding it out in

16:30structures that may not survive that

16:32particular threat.

16:34Uh so again as an example with Honoka'a

16:36fire station, conversations we were

16:38having in here is whether or not we

16:40would marry up fire and police. The the

16:42police station in Honoka'a is a much

16:44more hardened facility

16:45or would they rather relocate to the

16:47sports complex in Honoka'a, which is

16:50again a much more strong and resilient

16:51structure to ride out a windy event. But

16:54those are the kinds of conversations

16:55that can easily trans uh transition into

16:58policy or guidelines, operational

17:01guidelines. So for new team members or

17:05you know, the future,

17:07we have better formal formalized

17:09guidance on what we're going to do as

17:11far as operations. Again, I'm just

17:13giving you examples of what I'd like to

17:15see included in a more comprehensive

17:17after-action review

17:19that unfortunately wasn't captured in

17:20the current one,

17:22but I'm I'm committing my

17:24uh or making my commitment to continue

17:26to assist and develop that uh document

17:29both for the council, the

17:31administration, and then for the teams,

17:33but most importantly to communicate to

17:35the public what we learned and what

17:37we're going to do differently.

17:39Um I can continue on. I just didn't want

17:41to take up all the time explaining where

17:43we're at with the current after-action

17:45or where I'd like to go. It might be

17:47more helpful to answer questions at this

17:49point on the after-action process.

17:51Uh so I'll defer to you, uh

17:53council chair, what you prefer. I like I

17:55can share more, I can just entertain

17:57questions.

17:58>> Thank you, acting administrator. Our our

17:59time together is limited, so we

18:01definitely want to save some time for

18:04questions. I'm echoing here.

18:12Um acting administrator, you mentioned

18:14that your time is almost up with the

18:15county. Um when exactly is your last day

18:20in a contracted

18:21and I'm curious if you have any

18:23information around um the mayor's hiring

18:26of a permanent administrator for Civil

18:28Defense.

18:30>> Well, I do know that the mayor and MD

18:31have been working on the the hiring. Uh

18:34the recruitment was open, and I believe

18:36it closed. And I I do believe they do

18:38have applicants.

18:40Uh my last day is actually next week

18:42Friday.

18:43Um

18:44but again,

18:45I'm saying that even though I will not

18:48be on county payroll or a county

18:50employee,

18:51I still feel

18:53I want to say obligated to continue this

18:55process and assist with the new

18:58administrator, especially if it's

18:59someone not from our island and maybe

19:01not familiar with our community. Um

19:05as I shared openly recently again with

19:07our state legislature, I feel we have

19:08the best system. Having been able to

19:11work for a little while in Maui County

19:13and post the fire there,

19:15as well as when I interact with my peers

19:17in the other counties, I feel

19:19we've been fortunate. The system is

19:21built been built on a really good

19:22foundation,

19:24but there's still more work to be done.

19:26Um and again, we also have a very

19:28limited staff in this office. So, for

19:30some of the

19:32I want to say the the desired products

19:34like like an after-action, there may be

19:36better ways to get this accomplished

19:38with the limited staff we have.

19:40Um

19:41and exploring different vehicles or

19:43mechanisms to make that happen, but

19:45again, sorry. To answer your question,

19:47next week Friday is my last day, but I

19:49am planning to stick around and assist

19:51even if I'm not in the official capacity

19:53as long as the administration and the

19:55new administrator would like my

19:56assistance.

19:57>> That's very generous of you considering

19:59you have served as fire chief, Civil

20:01Defense Administrator um here on Hawaii

20:03County, and also supporting Maui after

20:05the Lahaina fires. Um I think this

20:07council would benefit from some kind of

20:09list of recommendations from you before

20:12you depart, just so that we're capturing

20:14lessons learned, um and the next council

20:17can work to ensure that the

20:18recommendations you are provided can be

20:20tracked, and various departments can be

20:22held accountable to ensuring these

20:25things happen.

20:26On the idea of an after action review, I

20:29have a wondering around might it be

20:31appropriate for someone

20:33independent third party not part of the

20:35county to perhaps conduct the after

20:38action review process. Um

20:41obviously our our teams are very

20:44time is very limited

20:45and it might be helpful to have somebody

20:48that wasn't part of the chaos of

20:50response to facilitate those

20:52conversations to get feedback on how

20:56they honestly felt response went and

20:58where there is room for improvement. Is

21:00that something that you could get

21:02behind?

21:04>> Yes, I would definitely support using a

21:06third party facilitating the after

21:08action because they're going to extract

21:10the information from our teams but do it

21:13without bias, do it from

21:16very objective based perspectives,

21:18especially if they're just to reflect on

21:19what's in chapter 736.

21:22There are very specific objectives there

21:25that if you were to do an RFP or or

21:27other solicitation, I think there are

21:30resources in the community

21:32locally as well as there are contract

21:34organizations that do this across the

21:36nation that could come in. I realize

21:38that's at a cost

21:39but I think when you look at if if

21:41you're asking

21:43Holyoke City fans to facilitate that

21:45process given the short staff

21:47we have

21:49and if we're going through multiple

21:50events like we just did, it can

21:53sometimes be put on the back burner as

21:55well as not receive the priority and

21:57commitment that it needs. So by going

22:00through a third party, it it may be more

22:02timely, unbiased, more efficient process

22:05and they'll put a very comprehensive

22:07report together at the end. And again,

22:09we would develop the scope of work for

22:11that contractor to ensure we get the

22:13outcomes we're looking for.

22:15>> Great, thank you. I just have a few more

22:16questions. Um

22:18over the last 10 years this idea of a

22:20universal intake form has come up. This

22:23particular disaster there was the the

22:26Darcy request for assistance case

22:28management. Then there was a form you

22:30needed to fill out if you had

22:31residential damage, and then a separate

22:33form if you had damage to your

22:34commercial facility. Is there any

22:37thought within the county to perhaps try

22:39to merge that so that individuals are

22:42sharing information one time and not

22:45having to be re-traumatized in filling

22:48out multiple applications. This is

22:49something that we saw during Lava, and

22:52unfortunately we also saw it playing out

22:53again with Hurricane Lava.

22:57>> Yes, and

22:58and again I'll say that that concept of

23:00a universal intake for our community was

23:03actually put forth coming out of Izell

23:06because we saw numerous contacts being

23:09made with residents post impact with

23:12regards to damage assessment. So, again,

23:14to give it some some context

23:16we had our CERT teams being deployed to

23:18go into Puna and do damage assessments

23:21followed by Red Cross, followed by our

23:23office of housing. So, these poor

23:25residents were being interviewed, in

23:28some cases many as five times, with

23:30people coming to their homes to collect

23:33almost the same information. And you can

23:35only imagine, like you said,

23:36re-traumatizing them.

23:38I do know specifically residents were

23:40asking, "When is help coming? You keep

23:43asking the same questions." The other

23:45challenge, and why we put forth a

23:47universal intake form then

23:49was to

23:51avoid the challenges with organizations

23:53that may have

23:55uh, restrictions based on their own

23:57internal structure and rules with the

23:59ability to share information.

24:01So, many times we're missing

24:02opportunities. So, again, an example

24:05with the 2018 eruption, at one point we

24:07had well over 400 people in the sports

24:10complex in Pahoa

24:12being managed by Red Cross

24:15yet we could not get information from

24:17Red Cross on the needs of the survivors

24:21from the eruption because their their

24:23system, their charter, their rules don't

24:26allow for them to just hand over

24:27information even if the county is

24:29requesting.

24:30I experienced the same thing on Maui.

24:32There is a process where you can request

24:35a data sharing agreement with Red Cross,

24:37but that doesn't automatically result in

24:39right away you're getting the

24:40information.

24:42So, the universal intake has tremendous

24:44value because we're having touch points

24:46with survivors, damage assessments, when

24:49they go to the resource centers or the

24:51pods, when they go to a shelter. And

24:54each one of those touch points is an

24:55opportunity to collect information about

24:57what did they experience, what needs do

24:59they have.

25:00But as you can imagine, someone having a

25:02tree fall on their home, and they report

25:05that through the request for assistance

25:07portal, and say I need chainsawing, they

25:10may need other things because they they

25:12maybe have been without power because of

25:14the power outage, don't have any food.

25:17They may not have access to

25:18transportation. That tree could have

25:20fell on their catchment, and now they

25:21don't have water. Unless somebody is

25:23doing comprehensive intake and asking

25:26them all the questions, often times

25:28we're missing what are the totality of

25:30their needs that we can work within the

25:32abundance of resources we have on the

25:34ground with various organizations,

25:36government and non-government, to ensure

25:39that we put them in a better place

25:41coming out of the disaster.

25:43We may not get them 100% whole, but we

25:45get them on a path to normalcy and a

25:47back on a path to stability. Uh

25:50especially if it's uncertain if we're

25:52going to get federal assistance.

25:54So, there's huge value to that universal

25:57intake. I know the mayor supports it.

25:59Regarding the platforms you mentioned,

26:01yes, we're looking at how do we get

26:02these digital platforms with I'm not a

26:05techno person, but there these APIs

26:07where you can have agreements between

26:09the proprietary softwares where they can

26:11share information import and export so

26:15that the information is readily

26:16available no matter which platform

26:18you're on. But it will be building that.

26:21We're working with the state coming, you

26:23know, out of LALA with Department of

26:25Human Services, with gems, with um

26:29Aloha United Way,

26:31uh, FEMA on addressing that for our Lala

26:34survivors with, again, how do we

26:36streamline the data collection and how

26:39do we improve the sharing across the

26:41case management realm.

26:44>> Thank you for that. Um, I believe Rep

26:46Capella is on Zoom and I did want to

26:49provide her a very quick opportunity if

26:52she's still on

26:54to perhaps talk about some of the

26:58How do I say this?

27:00Ways in which the administration can

27:03strengthen communications between

27:05elected officials. Um, I don't know if

27:08it I don't know where it is written that

27:10an elected official cannot be in the EOC

27:13during emergency response discussions.

27:17Um, I know that I had legislators

27:18reaching out to me a bit frustrated not

27:20being able to get information, um, as

27:22this

27:24Lala, uh, storm event was progressing.

27:27Um, and so folks are are just having to

27:29do what they can to support community

27:31and that leads to unnecessary

27:33duplication, I think, of efforts and

27:35perhaps frustration. Thank you, Rep um,

27:37Keohokalole

27:38for joining us as well. Ladies, just a

27:40few minutes on ways in which that you

27:41believe uh, communication and

27:43collaboration can be strengthened

27:45between the county and the state.

27:48Particularly because we will likely be

27:50asking you for funding to support

27:52recovery efforts.

27:56>> Aloha, everyone. Um, thank you so much,

27:58Councilmember, for the opportunity uh,

28:00to join you folks today. Um, as um,

28:03Daryl had mentioned, we did have a

28:05chance to talk in the EOC and kind of go

28:07through some of the processes. I think

28:09one of the biggest things is

28:10operationalizing support. Legislators

28:13are often seen as people that community

28:15members can come to, get an answer from,

28:18and with any type of disaster, it's

28:20always the local agency that has to

28:22respond first.

28:24Right, EOC is leading

28:26and then it's state supporting. But at

28:28the same time, we're trying to help our

28:30constituents understand what's happening

28:32and sometimes

28:33we can be the person that community

28:36members will go to because the county is

28:38so overwhelmed. So, I think one of the

28:41things that we need to work on is how do

28:42we operationalize support, being able to

28:45ensure that every single elected

28:47official that is in

28:50that impacted region or area. It doesn't

28:52mean every single elected official on

28:54the island, but if you are someone who

28:55is representing that specific community,

28:58you should be involved from county all

29:00the way up through the state

29:01communications.

29:03It took a couple of

29:04Honestly, it took about a week to be

29:05able to get access to some of the right

29:08conversations and the right people,

29:10um where there are everyday meetings at

29:148:00 or 9:00. The state hosts their own

29:16meeting

29:17held and led by the governor. The county

29:20hosts its own meeting held and led by

29:22the mayor. Um I was not allowed to be in

29:26the county meeting.

29:28Um

29:29It got to a point where mayor did allow

29:30me the opportunity to

29:33um

29:34someone from his team would maybe give

29:36me a call if that was if they remembered

29:39that day. It happened a couple of times,

29:41it wasn't consistent, and that's I I

29:43think a part of the problem. Um so, if

29:45we can find a way to ensure that every

29:47single elected, whether you're county,

29:49state, or federal, you're in that room

29:51so that we are

29:52as you mentioned, funneling the right

29:54resources at the right time, um because

29:56we all have different resources, and at

29:58the end of the day, we want to be able

29:60to at the state level support what the

30:01county is doing and leading, and share a

30:03unified message to community members.

30:07Um and then once one thing that I'll

30:09also echo is the importance of that

30:11universal form. Myself, Rep.

30:13KihuKupuLiloa, that we were helping a

30:15lot of constituents kind of go through

30:18those reports, sharing what we were

30:20hearing with county, um

30:23and then also trying to get them to

30:24direct resources if they needed it. Um

30:28But, there's a lot of overlapping

30:30information that at the end of the day,

30:32I think held us back and held back

30:35support for our community members.

30:38And then I'll just toss to Rep. Kila

30:40Kaapuniella if she wanted to add

30:41anything to that as well.

30:46>> Uh thank you. Thank you um Council

30:48Member Kirkwood for this communication.

30:51And of course to Daryl and Al Kalanithi

30:54uh who will now carry the heavy water

30:56that this takes.

30:58Um

30:59as Rep. Cabella mentioned,

31:02>> [clears throat]

31:02>> I was able to see a lot of the request

31:05for aid forms on the back end, which

31:08then allowed me to communicate

31:12with our office of our state office of

31:15wellness and resiliency,

31:18along with DLIR, which is our

31:20unemployment.

31:22We were recognizing real quickly

31:26that

31:28getting through the event was one part,

31:32but the recovery part, whether it was

31:36food assistance, water assistance, power

31:39assistance, there was going to be this

31:42long-term impact to employment for the

31:45area. And so I, too, um being very vocal

31:50about trying to create this universal

31:53form,

31:54because the sooner we know, the sooner

31:58we as state representative

32:01representatives can start to deploy some

32:03of the other state resources,

32:06so that when they are filling out this

32:09form, they're not getting

32:11re-traumatized. And this one form will

32:15highlight the comprehensive need that

32:18they will have.

32:20Um one thing I've also spoken with the

32:23office of wellness and resiliency is how

32:26to operationalize this trauma-informed

32:30not only response,

32:32but recovery piece.

32:35And then of course, you know, thank you

32:37to Daryl and his team for hosting us in

32:41a training class that I was incredibly

32:44eye-opening

32:46for legislators, but more importantly,

32:50we saw enormous gaps, but we're still

32:52the best across the state. Hawaii Island

32:56is still the best when it comes to an

33:00EOC and its responses.

33:03And then, of course, finally, um

33:05this idea of

33:07Daryl, thank you. If you can stay on, it

33:10would be wonderful.

33:12Uh we have an incredible network and

33:15people at the legislature are trying to

33:18do things better.

33:20Um and

33:22this information around a comprehensive

33:25after-action report helps us map out and

33:30plan the resources, which we know for

33:33this region

33:35of

33:36Kaho'olawe

33:38will be half a generation or more.

33:42And then,

33:43one thing Daryl did teach us during this

33:46process is the more we can mitigate and

33:51put funding and resources to mitigation,

33:55hardening our assets, hardening our

33:57infrastructure,

33:59actually shortens the time of recovery

34:03and the recovery dollars that go with

34:05it. So, thank you, Councilmember

34:08Kirk-O-Witz, for

34:10you know, starting this conversation,

34:12but for everyone to know,

34:15Hawaii Island and all of its

34:17representation, both public and

34:20non-public, are putting our heads

34:22together and and looking for solutions.

34:25Thank you.

34:26>> Thanks, ladies, for being here. I just

34:28have a couple more questions. Um

34:30Administrator, one significant gap

34:32during um the lava response effort was

34:34related to agriculture

34:37um and getting emergency water hauled to

34:40livestock. I don't know how I got roped

34:41into it, but I did. And was able to

34:44coordinate the delivery of over 850,000

34:47gallons of water, and public works also

34:50supported that effort delivering about

34:52100,000 gallons of water.

34:54I know that, you know,

34:56getting water to individuals is

34:58absolutely paramount, but there wasn't

35:02enough attention, in my humble opinion,

35:04paid to ensuring that livestock and

35:07livelihood of these ranches on Enoka'a

35:09was taken care of, particularly when

35:12every year

35:13we have political promises around we

35:15need to be a more food secure,

35:18um, you know, island nation.

35:21Next time, um, what do you anticipate as

35:23far as ensuring that our ag ecosystem is

35:26cared for?

35:29>> I I think it's right now

35:31it's looking at what lessons were

35:33learned. Like, the ranchers,

35:35unfortunately, were heavily dependent

35:37upon the supply chain.

35:39Not so much the source, because it

35:41wasn't like the source was depleted at

35:43the very springs. But I I caveat that

35:46they were going into a dry season next,

35:48so I'm sure we're going to be watching

35:50water levels and available water

35:52resources going forward. But,

35:55we need to

35:57again, from a mitigated mitigation

35:58standpoint,

36:00no longer have just a supply chain as

36:02the only element that ensures they have

36:04water, but it's the storage. So, going

36:07forward, it's identifying opportunities,

36:11maybe through a philanthropic mitigation

36:13funds, combination of different funding

36:16sources. How do we build storage

36:18capacity of non-potable water so it can

36:21be dedicated to ag use,

36:24because that was some of the challenges

36:25as you opened up with is, you know,

36:27first and foremost, available water was

36:29obviously going to go to the human

36:31population,

36:32but yet we still need to support our

36:35agricultural businesses, in particular

36:38the cattle that were highly in need of

36:40the water as both the food

36:43sustainability, but also as an economic

36:46impact on the community. Um again,

36:49far-reaching. So, I'm looking at

36:51opportunities to build more storage

36:53capacity and to piggyback that on other

36:56hazards and risks. So, if you can

36:58imagine, we can get a mitigation grant

37:00or mitigation project where we can

37:01increase storage capacity that's

37:03available for the ranchers,

37:05possibly supplied by a combination of

37:08the available springs, but maybe even

37:11rainwater collection systems,

37:14like our catchments,

37:15but also to be available not just for ag

37:18use, but if we have wildfires in the

37:19area, it's available as dip tanks for

37:22fire suppression.

37:23So, it's how do we find the

37:24multi-benefit solutions that can then

37:27justify federal dollars as well as

37:29receive the support from philanthropic

37:31monies that's cost-effective, relatively

37:34inexpensive. In a sense, when I did some

37:36research after this to

37:38get an idea of what's the barriers to

37:40the ranchers putting in catchment or

37:42storage tanks,

37:45it would appear to be it's within reach.

37:46A 20,000-gallon galvanized storage tank,

37:50and you can get it with food-grade or

37:51non-food-grade liners, is in the

37:53ballpark of $8,000. So, it wouldn't seem

37:56like it's unrealistic or it's ex-

37:59extremely expensive, but it's still an

38:01expense. So, how do we either subsidize

38:04or offset that expense to assist the

38:06ranchers who may be struggling already,

38:09but it would appear that we could

38:11increase storage capacity substantially

38:13for agricultural use uh pretty easily

38:17cuz they're easy to stand up. They're

38:18pretty resilient. Although, I know that

38:20we had significant catchment impacts

38:22with the earthquake, but I think we can

38:24look at the installation in a in a

38:28hardened way and still not be that

38:31expensive or costly to install. So, I

38:34guess like it Actually, I think it's

38:35just continue to work with the ranchers,

38:37work with the nonprofits, work with

38:40philanthropic, and look at looking

38:42forward to possibly mitigation grant

38:44monies, as well as all of our state

38:46partners. One of the things that we're

38:47working on right now is bringing all of

38:49the state and federal agricultural

38:51stakeholders into the room and having

38:53them identify for us what programs do

38:55they have so we have better visibility,

38:58especially for Kanani coming in as a

39:00recovery officer, what are the ag

39:03resources available for recovery?

39:05Um and in some cases, they may even be

39:07there for mitigation before an impact

39:10happens. So, we do have some some work

39:13to do on the ag.

39:15Uh and I think in particular is building

39:17more capacity for the ranchers in Ka'u.

39:19>> Yeah, thank you. I just want to make

39:21sure that in the future ag is not an

39:23afterthought. This is a good segue, I

39:24think, into um Kanani and your role as

39:27the recovery officer. Congratulations. I

39:30think we're all just trying to

39:31understand one, how we can support you,

39:33and then the focus of your work. Is it

39:35just to support um the impacts of

39:37Hurricane Lala, or will you also be

39:39supporting communities impacted by the

39:41Kona lows, and even the eruption, cuz I

39:43know there are some outstanding projects

39:45there. Thank you.

39:47>> Absolutely. Mahalo, everyone. Mahalo,

39:50council. I'm in my first week as

39:52recovery officer, learning from the

39:54people who built and are continuing to

39:56carry this work. Uh our mayor and

39:58managing director are coordinating with

40:00the existing Kilauea recovery office um

40:03and the plan already in motion there to

40:06ensure that we fully expend our federal

40:08funding and not um not let that go at

40:11all. Uh we'll be meeting with the

40:13recovery team soon. Daryl and I will be

40:15going over there. And I'm actually

40:17assigned to work out of that office

40:19full-time with regular check-ins here at

40:22Civil Defense um as well as I'll have a

40:25space out in Ka'u too. Um

40:29at Civil Defense right now, our focus is

40:32the FEMA individual assistance appeal.

40:36And so, we can get help to the families

40:39that need that help. Um it is

40:41time-sensitive, and Daryl can speak more

40:43to that deadline that is being

40:45coordinated with our state officials.

40:48Um so, definitely Kilauea recovery is at

40:51the core foundation of best practices,

40:55best learnings, best ways going forward

40:57with the community voice in the heart

41:00of our community uplifted first and

41:02foremost. And then again, making sure

41:07that we're watchful over that. I'll be

41:09right there learning from the staff

41:10that's there. And then of course now

41:13moving into some of the lava response

41:15and the critical steps that

41:18we have underway

41:20with this individual assistance appeal

41:23to FEMA.

41:25This recovery officer position is

41:27permanent. So, that what we learn from

41:30one disaster carries into the next. From

41:33Kilauea, from episode 41 and the tephra,

41:39the Kona lows, the earthquake, lava, and

41:42come what may. It all starts to compound

41:47and compile into a more deeper, fuller

41:50understanding with community at the

41:52core. Um

41:55And so, it's not meant to limit any

41:58efforts that are happening. It's also

41:59meant not to do it all. But the the

42:02value of what we do here on the Big

42:04Island is collectively, collaboratively

42:07coordinating across many branches of

42:10oversight and assistance and support and

42:13resources

42:16with all of the best practices brought

42:17to the table and continuing to apply

42:20that. So, lots for me to learn. You

42:23know, I'm sitting in a learning

42:24position. I'm seated well

42:27where I need to be,

42:30right where all of the conversations of

42:32recovery are happening. I just today sat

42:35in on the weekly Thursday recovery

42:39meetings that occur for the whole state

42:41that Iima um

42:44facilitates. Learned a lot there,

42:47realizing that there are teams of

42:48recovery officers at the state level and

42:52many efforts that many people that I can

42:55talk story with and learn there learn

42:58how to talk shop with them as well.

43:00So,

43:01in my first week learning from recovery,

43:05supporting the IA appeal

43:08and carrying forward what we learn from

43:10one disaster to the next and making sure

43:12we we come out stronger than

43:15we were before.

43:17>> Thank you for being here, Chair Ige.

43:19>> Okay, any other members?

43:21Ms. Climba.

43:22>> Thank you.

43:24Uh thank you to everyone

43:27um

43:28on Zoom for all your efforts.

43:30Um most especially Mr. Azevedo, who

43:34whose teams have just been so amazing um

43:38as well as the state uh highways, of

43:41course, but

43:42um

43:43just can't say enough for

43:46how public works.

43:49Just

43:50killing it out there. I mean, so just

43:53multi-leveled

43:55problems, so many so much to fix and

43:58clean up.

44:00Um

44:01and your your teams have just been

44:04working nonstop.

44:06Um so, thank you so much for that. Um

44:09you haven't spoken yet, Mr. Azevedo,

44:12Azevedo, so I don't know if you wanted

44:13to jump in and say anything at this

44:15point.

44:18>> I'll go after.

44:19>> Okay. Okay, yeah.

44:21Thank you so much, though.

44:23Um

44:25So, just following up on the

44:28FEMA individual assistance appeal, any

44:33timeline that you have? You mentioned a

44:35deadline.

44:36And so, I imagine there might be a

44:39response after that deadline. It's Do

44:41you have any

44:43um

44:44thoughts on what that general time frame

44:46would be because a lot of folks are

44:47asking in the community.

44:50>> Yeah, the deadline to submit that appeal

44:51is 30 days from the notification, which

44:54I believe that the deadline is now

44:56November 22nd, if I'm not mistaken. Uh

44:59and I confirmed that up for you.

45:01But, our intent I've been in direct

45:03communication with Administrator Lopez,

45:05with Haima, that we will provide our

45:08qualitative, as well as any adjusted

45:11quantitative supportive information by

45:14close of business tomorrow. And

45:15actually, I'm going to be on a call with

45:17him after this this meeting.

45:19The when I say quantitative, that's the

45:21numbers of destroyed and major damage,

45:25which to help reinforce the value of the

45:27universal intake, what we're doing right

45:29now is a team is going back over the

45:31joint preliminary damage assessment

45:33records

45:34to make sure we didn't miss anything in

45:37the numbers,

45:38cross-referencing that with the RFAs

45:40that came in,

45:42as well as we're trying to see how we

45:45can

45:46get communication directly with the what

45:49they call non-congregate sheltered

45:51families that are in the hotels, to make

45:53sure we didn't miss anyone who wasn't in

45:56the field when we conducted damage

45:58assessments. And we're we may miss a

46:01home or two.

46:02We don't think we did, but we want to

46:04make sure we we dotted every I and

46:06crossed every T. So, we're going back

46:07through that. That's the quantitative

46:09piece of the application.

46:12The qualitative speaks to the trauma in

46:14the community.

46:15So, what Kanani and Amir's our office of

46:17housing has been doing is re-contacting

46:21all of those residents that were

46:23identified as either destroyed or major

46:26damage,

46:27confirming whether or not they were

46:28insured, uninsured, underinsured. If

46:31they were insured, did they file a

46:32claim, and what was the response to that

46:34claim? Because we are hearing

46:36anecdotally of residents fighting claims

46:39and having it be denied based on an

46:42interpretation of the claims rep stating

46:44this was not a flood, this is a

46:46landslide.

46:47So, it's things like that that may not

46:49be captured in the initial preliminary

46:53damage assessment that speaks to the

46:54human aspect of this. It's not just

46:57numbers and structures, it's human

46:59lives. The other thing that's not

47:00collected in the damage assessment was

47:02household size, what's household income.

47:05What is the vulnerability of the

47:07household with respect to elderly

47:10as well as medically fragile.

47:12So, we're trying to provide all of that

47:14by re-contacting those homes that

47:15sustained the most significant impacts

47:18and their ability to recover in the

47:21absence of federal support.

47:24Uh so, that's So, we're trying to put

47:25together is the qualitative piece and

47:27have that submitted to FEMA by close of

47:30business tomorrow.

47:32>> Thanks so much for that um work that

47:35you're doing around that. Um so,

47:37if that's the deadline is the 22nd of

47:40November, do you have based on, you

47:43know, previous experience an idea of

47:46when we would hear an answer back from

47:48the appeal, either yay or nay? Would it

47:50be a month or a couple months?

47:53Less more?

47:55>> Yeah, it's it should be pretty quick, uh

47:57but not too hasty that they don't do a a

48:00thorough review of the appeal document.

48:02Uh what was encouraging is, as Kenani

48:04mentioned, we were on the the morning

48:05call this morning in which the governor

48:07asked about the denial of the

48:10application. He asked the same questions

48:12we all asked, what is that number? And

48:14FEMA was on the call and said there is

48:16no hard number,

48:18but it's looking at the ability of the

48:19community to recover with the support of

48:22state and local resources.

48:24So, FEMA also, and I I talked to the

48:27FEMA DCO immediately after the call, who

48:30also indicated that they're doing the

48:32same thing. They're going back through

48:34the numbers. They're considering whether

48:36or not they'll come back and do a

48:37secondary joint preliminary damage

48:39assessment, which means bringing teams

48:41back out to reassess those questionable

48:45claims or questionable reports of damage

48:47to make sure we didn't underestimate the

48:50impact from the quantitative side, and

48:53they're definitely looking forward to

48:54our additional information on the

48:56qualitative side.

48:58Based on that, I feel that it's it's an

49:00indication they're

49:02at least

49:03going to give us a

49:05How should I say it? A a fair and

49:08a diligent review of the appeal, rather

49:11than it's a slam dunk. No, you you don't

49:14meet the numbers and there's no sense

49:15doing an appeal.

49:18>> Thanks. That's especially that that

49:20there may be coming out again.

49:22That's um very

49:25useful to know and even though it takes

49:27longer if they are

49:28doing that assessment again, that is a

49:30sign that they are

49:32would be taking it seriously. Um

49:34you mentioned

49:36state and local resources and I know

49:38when I met with um the

49:42Section 9 administrator with you in the

49:45LA, who he was

49:47talking about how the

49:49um FEMA is meant to

49:52come in when state resources are

49:55overwhelmed or exhausted. So, um

49:58since we do have a state representative

50:00here on Zoom,

50:02um

50:03Representative Lee, I don't know if you

50:04have any thoughts on that. Do we have if

50:06does the state have anything any

50:09resources

50:11um that might come in

50:14um in place of FEMA because there are

50:16folks in the community who are seeing

50:18that FEMA individual assistance is

50:20denied and they're saying it's you know,

50:23is there any other

50:25resources? Are there any other resources

50:27for them

50:28um

50:29because you know, the nonprofits were

50:32great as like coming in and helping

50:35initially, but as they nonprofits

50:38don't really have the resources to cover

50:41the kind of damages that individual

50:43assistance requests are being made for.

50:47Um

50:47so, I don't know if you have any

50:48thoughts on that.

50:51>> Uh couple of things. Um

50:53On the FEMA side, we're having um

50:56robust conversations with our

51:00Hawaii delegation,

51:02uh Senator Schatz and Jill Tokuda,

51:05not only talking about different sources

51:07of funding or maybe recouching some of

51:10the damage, so it is more aligned with

51:13an agricultural need. Uh and then hard

51:17and heavy on FEMA reform as a whole.

51:21Um

51:22on the state side, I know there was a

51:25large number that was out there as far

51:28as how much money we have in our rainy

51:31day fund, but similar to the counties,

51:34so much of that is waiting on the

51:37reimbursement for FEMA. And so, it looks

51:41like $1.6 or 7 billion, but

51:4575 80% of that is still tied up with all

51:50the previous

51:52damages. I mean, we've had one payment

51:56that

51:57that that we got that was from an event

51:59that happened 8 years ago.

52:02Um and then finally this conversation,

52:07um Council member Elefante,

52:10our finance chair is Chris Todd, and so

52:13we have been exploring all types of

52:16options, whether it's realigning our

52:19green fee to help with mitigation

52:23or providing larger grants in aid from

52:27the state to nonprofits and do more

52:31focused and priority funding around

52:34uh recovery.

52:36Uh we just walked out of an election a

52:38few days ago, and so we at the house are

52:42continuing to have that conversation

52:44around leadership and what the goals and

52:46priorities will be. So, I'll be happy to

52:48carry that back for you.

52:50>> Thank you so much.

52:52>> Thank you much so much, Representative

52:53Lee Loy. I really appreciate all you've

52:55done to help out with this, your

52:57leadership in bringing folks together.

53:00Yeah, really appreciate it. Um

53:05I guess

53:06for me

53:08the number one thing that I'm hearing

53:11from the community

53:13is they want information.

53:16They want knowledge, actually even more

53:19than stuff.

53:20They want to know what happened and

53:24what happened to the landscape up above

53:28um Nālani Hū and Wai Hīnaʻu, especially

53:31because that's where it impacted

53:34habitations. Um you know, there was

53:37a lot of damage all over the district,

53:40but most of it is agricultural land.

53:43Um

53:45so that I know um I spoke with you

53:48Administrator Olivera about um

53:52Army Corps of Engineers

53:55um saying that they would do a public a

53:58meeting to provide information

54:01um about what they found. And I can't

54:04underline how important that

54:06is going to be um to really

54:10uh help the community

54:12feel better a little bit. Knowledge is

54:15power, you know, and even if it's bad

54:18news

54:19um just knowing

54:21that

54:24what that bad news is is really really

54:26important to people.

54:28Um

54:30and I think even like going back I don't

54:33know if Army Corps of Engineers can do

54:35that, but

54:36like the context in history

54:39um because

54:41there have been major floods in Kaʻū

54:44before, but none as widespread as this,

54:47like all over the the district. There's

54:50been more localized ones. So I think

54:53putting that context putting this in

54:56context and also understanding why it

54:58was so big. You know, what where exactly

55:03did the rainfall fall up on the mountain

55:06that led to it being so widespread, so

55:09intense, so much debris.

55:12Um

55:14So, I just wanted to underline that. Um

55:16and then one of the other things

55:19that I heard, I think it's very relevant

55:21to civil defense, was that um folks in

55:25Ocean View

55:26did not have communications, not even

55:29radio.

55:30So,

55:31I think that's really important that we

55:33fix that so that that at least they have

55:36some communications to find out what is

55:39happening in their community and larger

55:42area. So, that's my buzzer. That's my 5

55:46minutes, so I'm stopped there and let it

55:48someone anyone else who would like to

55:51um chime in. Thanks.

55:53I yield. Okay.

55:54>> Okay, members, we've got 5 more minutes

55:56before this committee ends. So, Mr.

55:58Kanuha Lee Kleinjelder, can you wrap it

56:00up?

56:01>> Thank you very much, Mr. Onishi. I thank

56:03you, Ms. Kirkwood, for bringing this

56:04forward. Uh Mr. Olivera, thank you for

56:06stepping in. You kind of you walked into

56:08a hornet's nest, you know.

56:10And you went through some of the most

56:13horrendous natural

56:17disasters that we've had, and I

56:19appreciate your expertise in leading the

56:21county through yet another

56:24disaster relief scenario. Uh so, good to

56:26know you're here. I'm sorry that you're

56:27leaving, and I look forward to seeing

56:29who comes in after you.

56:30Uh I have to speak very highly of uh

56:33your wife's organization, too, Vibrant

56:35Hawaii,

56:36in leading the charge in getting out to

56:38community when

56:39government is still

56:41uh figuring out how to and where to

56:43respond.

56:45And I just wanted to

56:47give her a mahalo, as well. I know her

56:48team uh was working very hard. And

56:50there's a number of

56:52different pop-ups in our community

56:55uh that were crucial for our community

56:56to get through the event.

56:58Um just to follow up on something I

57:00heard, I wanted to check in uh

57:02Representative Lee Loy,

57:05uh were you reviewing

57:09the

57:16Sorry, let me get my notes.

57:19Now, the labor the labor notes you were

57:21going through that you were reviewing

57:22post-

57:24hurricane?

57:25>> Yes, so I had through the Darcy system,

57:28I was able to look at the request for

57:30aids and get some information.

57:34But, the ground truth of it all was we

57:38saw Punalu'u Bakery,

57:40right, get inundated and we knew that

57:43there would be community members who

57:46would be without jobs.

57:48And so, myself and Rep Capella,

57:52while she was on the grounds

57:55at her hub, we were communicating

57:58and I was assisting her with

58:00coordinating

58:02uh um unemployment applications or

58:05information

58:06so that individuals who

58:09have lost their jobs, we could start

58:12that process so that they could start

58:15receiving some level of unemployment

58:17checks.

58:18I mean, it was a very chaotic few days

58:23and

58:24the coordination with our state

58:26agencies, uh Kanani knows this, uh with

58:30the cemetery, there's a Department of

58:32Health component that goes with it.

58:36And so, getting that feedback from

58:39people on the ground

58:42to then look at the request for aid

58:45forms and distill

58:48and what we call triage the information

58:52and then

58:54start the lead conversations with our

58:56state agencies was the way that myself

58:59and Rep Capella saw how we could help

59:02and support recovery efforts for the

59:05county.

59:07>> Very very nice. Thank you. Uh Mr.

59:09Oliver, I think my my The comment would

59:11be

59:12in watching this over the years, the

59:15there's a fine line between elected

59:16officials helping

59:19and elected officials campaigning.

59:22And I just something to be aware of and

59:25we're all cognizant of it and we all

59:27want to help and we all want to lend a

59:28hand. But in

59:30in finding that line between

59:32administrative priorities and reaction

59:35to a an event like what we went through,

59:37what we continue to go through

59:40and finding that space for our elected

59:42officials to fit in the picture and be

59:45part of the solution

59:47but not stand in the way of

59:49decision-making or put out wrong

59:51information, but help us get information

59:53for the community to you.

59:55That has definitely been a piece that's

59:57always been

59:59revolving around how do we best serve

1:00:01community in events. And so, I'll look

1:00:04forward to seeing your thoughts on that

1:00:07as part of this after-action report.

1:00:10But thank you to everyone who's involved

1:00:11and thank you again for having the

1:00:12discussion.

1:00:14>> Are you

1:00:14>> Okay, Mr. Hughes, just can you wrap this

1:00:16up, please?

1:00:17>> Okay, thanks, Sheriff. Appreciate your

1:00:18time. [clears throat]

1:00:19First of all, thank you, Councilmember

1:00:20Kirkwood, for bringing this conversation

1:00:21here. Grateful for our state partners to

1:00:24be in this space, as well.

1:00:25Uh Deputy Managing Deputy Director, DPW,

1:00:28uh thank you for all the work you do.

1:00:29Definitely different experiences on the

1:00:31north side of the island, for sure.

1:00:33And um Administrator Olivera, thank you

1:00:35for your leadership during this time.

1:00:36Just a couple of questions.

1:00:39Great to see you know, the

1:00:41the uptick in kind of the engagement

1:00:42with the universal intake form.

1:00:44The the only challenge I I have heard

1:00:47from some of our nonprofit partners uh

1:00:49through through Darcy

1:00:51and kind of the the response and

1:00:53recovery side

1:00:55is not all non nonprofits can do all of

1:00:58the

1:00:59what's asked of them. Some are very

1:01:01specific to their their jobs and their

1:01:03responsibilities.

1:01:04So, if they do vegetation management

1:01:07they cannot help with the health care

1:01:09and respite and those sort of things.

1:01:10So, somehow we need to kind of split

1:01:11that out a little bit more so that the

1:01:13nonprofits that are specialized in

1:01:15certain areas

1:01:16can really undertake that and not are

1:01:18not being stretched into areas they're

1:01:19not familiar and comfortable with.

1:01:22Um

1:01:23the

1:01:25the the question on the administrative

1:01:28value you mentioned on the facility

1:01:29assessment through the after-action

1:01:33You know, we had a situation in North

1:01:34Kohala where we had to relocate an

1:01:38emergency shelter.

1:01:40And that's for a a number of different

1:01:42reasons, you know, from the high winds

1:01:44to the safety of the space and the roads

1:01:47and just the number of trees in that

1:01:49park space.

1:01:50So, I know a lot of facilities

1:01:52vary,

1:01:53but we really need to identify the you

1:01:55know, those critical sound structures in

1:01:57all the different and you know this, but

1:01:59the different sort of situations that we

1:02:01could could we we could see in

1:02:02community. And we really need to have a

1:02:04very

1:02:05to to shift the

1:02:07the emergency shelters is a big

1:02:09challenge and I know you have to do that

1:02:10in other locations as well.

1:02:12But, we really have to kind of come to

1:02:14terms on what are our sound facilities

1:02:16and really moving forward on

1:02:18really hardening those structures that

1:02:19we can in a timely fashion.

1:02:22Uh the last

1:02:23kind of question I had administrator

1:02:25Oliveira is

1:02:26do we have any other standing mutual aid

1:02:29agreements with any of our private water

1:02:31purveyors, telecommunications network? I

1:02:34mean, we have it with our our federal

1:02:36partners,

1:02:37but do we have it with

1:02:39other private water purveyors in in a

1:02:42situation where we need to deliver water

1:02:43in areas we have the capacity to do so

1:02:45with our municipal system, we just have

1:02:47to transport it. But, in the in the case

1:02:49where those systems are down and we need

1:02:52to transport further distances, do we

1:02:54have any standing agreements with other

1:02:56other parties?

1:02:59>> On the water purveyors, I would I

1:03:01probably defer to Department of Water

1:03:03Supply if they have an agreement, but I

1:03:05can say coming from the fire service

1:03:06side, we frequently were we're using

1:03:09water from the private fire surveyors

1:03:11and purveyors in the area. So, include

1:03:13Kohala Ranch, Kohala

1:03:15Puuanani Ranch, those areas. So, I know

1:03:17we've had relationships as well as even

1:03:19in Puna with Hawaiian Shores and

1:03:20Hawaiian Beaches where when we need

1:03:22water for emergency purposes,

1:03:25there are arrangements and agreements.

1:03:28But, I would think, to your question

1:03:30specifically, I'll reach out to

1:03:31Department of Water Supply and get you

1:03:33an answer on

1:03:34these uh maybe agreements and uh

1:03:37relationships with supporting potable

1:03:39water for residents through the private

1:03:41water purveyors. I I have to say there

1:03:43is because as far as I know, uh using

1:03:46one as example that you may know in your

1:03:47district with Ka La Ranch and Kai Lopa

1:03:49with Hawaiian Homelands. The that's

1:03:51again, water that's transcending from

1:03:54one subdivision to another in the

1:03:55subdivision that manages or operates the

1:03:58the water system.

1:04:00But, I'll get you an answer.

1:04:01>> Perfect. And I'm happy to work with you

1:04:02on that and connecting with others in

1:04:04the region, too.

1:04:05Thank you so much. Thanks, Chair.

1:04:08>> Okay.

1:04:09Seeing no other lights. Thank you. Okay,

1:04:12all those in favor of closing and filing

1:04:14Communication 11 33, say aye.

1:04:17>> Aye.

1:04:17>> Those opposed? We have eight ayes, one

1:04:20excused. Ms. Vegas um this meeting is

1:04:24going to be adjourned at

1:04:2712:33 p.m. Thank you.

1:04:32All right, next meeting will be starting

1:04:33up in about 5 minutes.

1:04:36Okay. Thank you.

```*