Redevelopment Outreach to Property Owners

At a glance

Based on auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

  • What: a discussion on who at the city is responsible for reaching out to owners of vacant or declining commercial sites about redevelopment and the incentives available (GO bond funds, TIF).
  • Where it stands: raised by Councilmember Cooper on 2026-10-13 (consent docket item 9BA). No vote; staff said it is a shared effort limited by resources.
  • Next: Cooper asked for an accountability and reporting process, and later asked staff for a report on a Strong Towns article about retail tax and property tax.

The discussion

  • Cooper cited research favoring mixed-use development and said he had identified 6 to 12 sites in Ward 2. He found owners hard to reach (layered LLCs) and asked whose job outreach is and who reports back to council.
  • Craig Freeman said planning and the economic development staff work with developers who bring concepts, and private owners decide how to develop their land.
  • Kenny Sudel said the Alliance for Economic Development is the "tip of the spear" but is a 13-person office managing about 130 active projects, so proactivity is a resource issue. He listed priorities: TIF districts, GO bond projects, the urban renewal authority, industrial and employment sites near Tinker, and support for MAPS projects.
  • Councilmember Stonecipher backed being more proactive and asked for a budget proposal for outreach.
  • Other councilmembers raised permit streamlining and community engagement as no-cost levers.

Sources

Discussion time

About 25 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).

Meeting Minutes
2026-10-13 - City Council 25

Log

  • 2026-10-13 - City Council - Item 9BA: Cooper pressed staff on who does outreach to property owners; Kenny Sudel cited limited staff; Stonecipher asked for an outreach budget. No vote.