2026-10-19 - Commission on Women
Summary
Built from YouTube auto-generated captions; the agenda and minutes were not read. Names and figures are as captioned and may be misspelled.
- First meeting of the revamped commission: The chair, who is also the District 12 Council member, introduced members from organizations including a hospital, the League of Women Voters, the Housing Authority, the YWCA, a national mothers' advocacy group, a women's rights network and the College of Charleston, along with city HR and Clerk of Council staff.
- New format: The commission has existed four or five years and helped spur the city's original paid family leave policy. It now meets four times a year, tied to the budget cycle. The fourth-quarter meeting picks the next year's topic, the first brings in outside experts, the second workshops a proposal with city staff, and the third presents it to the mayor and Council. Recommendations must be things the city can actually act on.
- Current paid leave: City HR said employees get 4 weeks of paid maternity leave for the birth parent plus 2 weeks of other-parent leave, usable within 12 months of a birth, adoption or foster placement, so a birth parent can stack six weeks. The state gives birth parents 6 weeks in one block and, since October 1, 4 weeks for the non-birthing parent. The city has about 2,000 employees. FMLA covers unpaid time beyond the paid weeks, up to 12 weeks.
- Pending changes: HR is considering raising the non-birth parent to 4 weeks, restating the leave as a flat 6 weeks, and adding stillbirth language as the state did. The Council HR committee started on this and paused it until the chair returned. The Clerk of Council said any cost would need budget review. See City Paid Family Leave Policy.
- Chair's position: The chair called four weeks unacceptable, argued for a tiered path to 12 weeks over a couple of years, and said the city should lead the state rather than follow it. Members cited North Carolina state employees at 12 weeks and Virginia's statewide program.
- Child care: Members discussed costs of roughly $385 to $400 a week per child, long waitlists, aftercare gaps, zoning changes to allow more daycares (Dorchester County was cited as an example), tri-share cost-sharing between parent, state and employer, and calls for universal child care. One member said only 23 percent of South Carolina families can afford care. The chair noted the city's zoning code rewrite is under way. See Affordable Child Care Study.
- Vote: The commission voted unanimously to choose affordable child care as its 2027 topic and to support bringing city paid family leave up to the state standard and pursuing a tiered increase. The chair will carry this to the HR committee, whose next meeting is November 19, and will check whether it can move faster to affect next year's budget.
- Next steps: Members asked to be told when paid leave goes before Council so advocates can speak. Before the January 11 meeting, the chair and members will line up local and national presenters on child care, and HR will provide a comparison with other Southeastern metro areas.
Related: City Paid Family Leave Policy, Affordable Child Care Study
Agenda
Agenda PDF posted; see Sources. Items not yet read.
Sources
- Agenda Center listing for this date: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10192026-11281
- Documents: Commission on Women Agenda
- Agenda Center: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/AgendaCenter
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKnfEsKOjRo (City of Charleston YouTube channel)
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:18Let me know when we're set, Jennifer.
00:21>> All right.
00:23>> All right. Well, let's go ahead and kick
00:26this off. Welcome everybody to our first
00:30meeting of the revamped Commission on
00:32women. We are very excited to have you.
00:35I'm Leslie Skardon. I'm your chair and
00:38also represent District 12 on City
00:41Council, which is essentially the second
00:43half of James Island from Camp Road to
00:46Folly Beach minus all of the donut holes
00:49for the town and unincorporated county.
00:52And I'm the only woman on City Council.
00:54So, seems appropriate.
00:56>> [laughter]
00:57>> Um I also served on the committee with
01:00Jennifer Brown and Hilda Gadsden the
01:02past few years and so excited to kind of
01:06take the the next iteration of this
01:08going forward. Um so, what I thought we
01:10could do is I'll call on you. Just a
01:12couple of you could introduce yourself.
01:14Um say your name and what organization
01:16you're with. And then we'll go through
01:18the ordinance. We'll hear from the
01:21city's HR team on some of the work that
01:23they currently do. And then we'll get
01:25into discussion
01:28of what we want to tackle next year in
01:31terms of our our topic. So,
01:33um
01:34Dr. Cheek, do you want to go first?
01:41And you're on mute.
01:46Uh Dr. Cheek, you're on mute.
01:54>> I'm Deanna Ellington Cheek. I'm from
01:57Charleston originally. I'm affiliated
02:00with
02:01Roper Hospital. I'm semi-retired and I
02:05just take care of dialysis patients and
02:08I was at MUSC from 1988 to 2005.
02:14>> Great. Thank you.
02:17Cara.
02:19>> I'm Cara Erickson. I'm the co-president
02:22of the League of Women Voters in
02:23Charleston
02:25and also oversee communications for the
02:27league. I'm
02:29a downtown Charleston resident. Have
02:32been in Charleston for probably about 10
02:35years. Came originally from New York,
02:37worked in publishing and media
02:40for most of my career.
02:42>> Great.
02:43Jennifer Strickland.
02:47>> Good afternoon. I'm Jennifer Strickland.
02:48I work for the city of Charleston
02:51in the HR department. And I've been with
02:55the city for about
02:573 years. I grew up in Summerville, South
03:00Carolina. So really just a native here
03:03in Charleston.
03:05And excited. I'm
03:06a new newly appointed person on the on
03:10the commission. Thank you.
03:12>> Great.
03:13And Jennifer Brown.
03:17>> Good afternoon everybody. I'm Jennifer
03:20Brown. I love to say I am a come here.
03:23I'm not from here.
03:26But my son loves Charleston enough for
03:29everybody
03:30who is a native. I currently work with
03:32Charleston County Housing Authority
03:35running their family self-sufficiency
03:37program. And just love the opportunity
03:40to continue to serve on the commission
03:43and very excited to see us go into this
03:45next chapter. Thank you.
03:48>> Great. Janet.
03:53>> Hey all, my name is Janet Bates. I'm My
03:55day job is working at Terracon, which is
03:57an engineering firm here in town, but
03:59I'm here representing the Chamber of
04:00Mothers, which is a national nonprofit
04:03nonpartisan advocacy organization
04:05working for child care, paid leave, and
04:08affordable
04:09maternal health care.
04:14>> Great. Lavonda?
04:20>> Hi. Can you all hear me okay?
04:22>> Yes.
04:24>> Okay, great. I'm Lavonda Brown. I'm with
04:26the YWCA Greater Charleston. I'm a newly
04:30appointed to this commission. I'm really
04:32excited.
04:35Been in Charleston about 10 years. I am
04:37from the city by the sea known as
04:40Savannah, Georgia.
04:45>> Great. Hilda?
04:57Hilda, we can't hear you.
05:07Want to try one more time?
05:15Okay, I can introduce Hilda. How about
05:16that? So, Hilda Gadson previously served
05:20on the commission and is just an
05:22all-star.
05:23We'll get those audio issues sorted out,
05:25but Hilda, we're glad you're here.
05:28Amalia?
05:32>> Hi. Hi, everyone. I'm so sorry to to be
05:34late. I was having issues signing up
05:36with Zoom. Amalia Loxsado, I use she/her
05:39pronouns. I am your CEO at the Women's
05:42Rights and Empowerment Network. Very
05:44happy to be here, and I don't know if
05:45there was anything else I needed to
05:47answer at this point.
05:49>> Nope, that's great.
05:51Um and then Professor Alyssa Jones is
05:54our College of Charleston um gender
05:57studies representative. She's actually
05:59going through her tenure review right
06:00now, so she um sends her apologies, but
06:03um had an unavoidable conflict for this
06:06meeting, which we knew about for a long
06:07time. Um but she said um to send you all
06:10her regards. And then I know we have a
06:12couple of our wonderful wonderful city
06:14staff on here. Jennifer Cook, do you
06:16just want to say hello?
06:18>> Hi, I'm Jennifer Cook. I'm the clerk of
06:21council and I've worked for the city
06:23about 15 years.
06:25And it's a pleasure to be here.
06:28>> April.
06:30>> Hi, my name is April Slinkard. I am the
06:33benefits and wellness manager for the
06:34city of Charleston. I've worked for the
06:37city um this go around for 3 years. I
06:40started out of college working for the
06:42city, went back, got my nursing degree,
06:44did all the things, and then came back
06:46to the city. Um I love it. I've lived
06:48here for about 35 years.
06:50>> Awesome. Tammy.
06:53>> Hi, Tammy O'Berry, HR director for the
06:56city of Charleston, and been here about
06:57a year and a half, and very happy to be
06:59here. Thank you.
07:00>> Great. And Maylee.
07:04>> Hi. Um I work with the clerk of
07:07council's office, and I've been here for
07:09about 3 years, and also very happy to be
07:12here.
07:13>> Awesome. All right, did I miss anybody?
07:17Okay. Well, thank you all for doing
07:19that. Since it's our first meeting, just
07:20wanted um people to get familiar with
07:22who's on the call. Um our next agenda
07:25item is to review the ordinance, so um
07:28I'm going to go ahead and share my
07:30screen.
07:32And uh
07:34right. Okay, can you guys see this?
07:38Is it too small?
07:41Let me get a little bigger.
07:45All right, how's that?
07:47>> That's great.
07:48>> Awesome. So, the Commission on Women has
07:51been around for at least four or five
07:53years now, and believe four years ago
07:56was really part of what spearheaded the
07:59city's original paid family leave
08:01policy. And then I had the pleasure of
08:03serving on the commission the past few
08:06years, and I really wanted to kind of
08:09reinvigorate the commission and what
08:11we're able to do and line it up with the
08:14city's budget cycle. And specifically
08:17with key city staff and the mayor's
08:19office and council to ensure that the
08:22work that the committee does is getting
08:24attention and can create actionable and
08:28concrete recommendations going forward.
08:31So,
08:32we've reshaped the commission a bit. You
08:34know, the goal is to enhance life for
08:36women in Charleston, and we want to make
08:39sure that we're talking about topics
08:41that are germane to the city, right? So,
08:43we don't want to be taking on a federal
08:46policy that the city can't do anything
08:48about because we want our
08:49recommendations to be concrete and
08:52actionable each year. So, we've also
08:54shortened the the calendar. We used to
08:57meet monthly, and so I believe we can do
09:00our our work in four very intentional
09:03meetings throughout the year.
09:05So, today is our kickoff meeting, and
09:07then you all should have received the
09:09calendar invites for our upcoming
09:11meetings. And
09:13what this does is that it allows us to
09:16set our schedule. So, the process here
09:18is that in the Q4 meeting, which is
09:20today,
09:22we'll vote on the topic that we want to
09:24tackle next year. And so, this could be
09:27anything from paid family leave,
09:30affordable child care, pay equity, human
09:32trafficking, domestic abuse,
09:35elderly women and health care. And so,
09:37we know what the topic is at the end of
09:39the year so that for this Q1 meeting in
09:41January, we can line up um a slate of
09:45different experts who can come and share
09:47best practices with us. So, for example,
09:50if we decided to move forward on paid
09:53family leave, what we would do is we
09:54would ask um for national experts from
09:57organizations like Bloomberg or the
09:59Council of Mayors or other
10:01municipalities to come and report out
10:04best practices and what they've seen
10:06work and and different ideas.
10:09Once we gather that information and look
10:12at the landscape of what we can do, um
10:14we'll workshop a proposal with the
10:16corresponding staff within the city to
10:19help address this issue. So, bringing in
10:22the folks who are working on this every
10:23day at the city, um going through ideas
10:26and suggestions to have that proposal.
10:28That Q3 meeting then is designed to
10:31present the recommendation to the mayor
10:34and his staff and get it city council
10:37agenda so we can vote for it. Um and
10:40then it's purposely done in this order
10:42because right now the city's in the
10:44budget process and so we want to make
10:45sure if there's a budget implication
10:47associated with the change, we don't
10:49have to wait a whole year to then come
10:52back and see action on it. It's already
10:54done. And then that Q4 meeting,
10:57um the the next topic is selected. You
11:01all were chosen um very strategically.
11:03We followed the uh reordering of the
11:06Commission on Arts by selecting
11:08organizations
11:10that have a lot of expertise on this
11:12issue. So, we wanted the organizations
11:15um to have the seat to bring in that
11:18knowledge um to to share it with the
11:20commission and make really informed
11:22decisions going forward. So, again,
11:25today's meeting, we're going to um pick
11:27the topic for next year. And then
11:29between now and January 11th, um I will
11:32bring together or I'll reach out to
11:34different experts and get them lined up,
11:35get them on our calendar. I'll reach out
11:38to you guys for any
11:39experts that we should, organizations
11:41that we should have. You guys will
11:43probably present to you on that topic.
11:46And then in April we'll be able to
11:47workshop our proposal and go forward.
11:50So with that, I'm going to stop sharing.
11:53Are there any questions about kind of
11:55the process that we're following and
11:56what we're hoping to achieve?
12:01Okay, awesome.
12:03So what we we had held a pre-call and I
12:07think that the two topics I would really
12:09like for us to consider next year are
12:12paid family leave and affordable child
12:15care. I think those would give us the
12:16most one of those would give us a very
12:18kind of concrete win that we can then
12:21build upon going forward. And so to and
12:24of course we can we can discuss others
12:26if you want but I know there's a lot of
12:27work being done in those two areas now
12:30especially in in affordable child care.
12:32And so I believe there are a lot of
12:34different examples of proposals that we
12:36could workshop and hear about and move
12:38forward. So we would have a really solid
12:40win to kick us off on.
12:42We've asked the city's HR team here
12:45today to present on what the city is
12:48already doing with paid family leave. I
12:50believe that there are a couple of
12:53updates to the the paid family leave
12:55policy. So I thought it would be helpful
12:57to have the city HR team kind of just
12:59give us an overview of what paid family
13:02leave is is in the city right now, where
13:05it's going and then we can have a larger
13:08discussion to see if that's something
13:10that we would want to work on increasing
13:12for next year or if we would want to
13:13look at something like child care
13:15solutions
13:17to to focus on next year. Does that
13:19sound good?
13:21Okay, so I will turn it over to Tammy.
13:24Are you giving the presentation?
13:27>> I am not. April's going to give the
13:29presentation.
13:29>> April, okay.
13:31The floor is yours, April.
13:34>> Okay.
13:35I am going to
13:37share
13:39>> [clears throat]
13:40>> Can everybody see the screen?
13:43>> Yes.
13:44>> Okay.
13:45So, currently, uh and I'm just going to
13:48kind of start with what we are doing
13:51now, what we have in place.
13:53Um we currently have a paid maternity
13:56leave, um which is available to the
13:58biological mother, that's 4 weeks paid
14:00leave.
14:02Um
14:03that is uh used at the birth of the
14:05child.
14:06We also then have a paid paternity
14:09leave, um which is available also to the
14:11biological mother, um or adopting
14:14parent, foster parent, or co-parent, and
14:17that's 2 weeks of paid leave. So, for
14:20example, the biological mother can stack
14:23those, and they can they would have 6
14:26weeks.
14:27The 4 weeks, like I said, um is used at
14:30the birth of the child, the 2 weeks um
14:32would be used within the 12 months of
14:35birth or placement of the child.
14:37Uh and those that paternity leave is um
14:41applicable for births, adoptions, foster
14:44care placement.
14:46So, that's what we currently have in
14:48place um for our employees. We have been
14:52looking at options, um so this is very
14:55timely. Um we've been looking at
14:57different options and and what we think
15:00um may be improvements um to the policy.
15:08>> And April, were some of those options to
15:11go up to 6 weeks, or um are those
15:13options that could be shared here, or
15:15would would you be looking to the
15:17commission to potentially make
15:18recommendations next year?
15:21>> So, we had started the process of
15:23looking at um what the state of South
15:26Carolina offers for state employees.
15:29Currently
15:31they offer Sorry, I'm going to my next
15:34slide. There we go. They offer the birth
15:36parents 6 weeks paid, which ultimately
15:39is in alignment with ours.
15:42But as of October 1st, they
15:45started a 4-week paid
15:48leave for the non-birthing parent, which
15:51is an increase from 2 weeks.
15:53So our kind of our thought process was
15:56that might be a good transition
16:00to the next step of what we might be
16:02able to offer.
16:05We also
16:08have been asked by
16:10department since we are heavily focused
16:12on public safety
16:14to just kind of be
16:16aware
16:17of like need of filling
16:21filling jobs while people are out
16:23long-term. So we just need to balance
16:25the needs of all the departments, but
16:27make sure that we're giving
16:29as much
16:30leave
16:32and and resources to mothers and
16:34families as we can.
16:37>> Got it. And [clears throat] just to be
16:39clear, so the the state employees, the
16:42birth parent gets 2 more weeks than city
16:45and the non-birthing parent gets 2 more
16:46weeks.
16:47>> The birth parent Ultimately, the 6 weeks
16:50is the same for the city of Charleston
16:52and for the state. It's just structured
16:54a little differently. In the state
16:59it is 6 weeks as a chunk, as one block.
17:03For us, it's 4 weeks plus the 2 weeks
17:06can be taken within the first 12 months.
17:08So there's some extra flexibility in
17:10ours. I believe than in the state. So
17:13those 2 weeks um, for our employees can
17:17be used at any time within that 12
17:19months. It doesn't have to be used um,
17:22right at the birth.
17:23>> Oh, I see. I see. Okay. Got it.
17:28>> Madam
17:29Madam Chair, um, Commissioner Bates has
17:32her hand up.
17:34>> Yes, thank you.
17:35>> Hi, thank you. Just a point of
17:37clarification. That additional two
17:39weeks, if the
17:41if the partner took the two weeks,
17:44is the birthing parent still eligible
17:46for the additional two weeks?
17:51>> If
17:52I'm sorry, say that
17:53>> So the the way that I read it, it shows
17:55currently the the plan is that the birth
17:58the birth mother gets four weeks and
18:01then the birth mother or the foster
18:04parent or the co-parent or the partner
18:06gets two weeks. So if the birth parent
18:09uses the full six weeks, does the father
18:12say in this situation get two weeks?
18:15>> Yes.
18:16>> Okay, so it's both. So it is it Okay,
18:19thank
18:19>> If both work for the city, yes. Yes,
18:21that's correct.
18:21>> Okay.
18:27>> Thank you. Good question. April, oh, go
18:29ahead, Cara.
18:32You're on mute.
18:36Hey, Cara, you're on mute.
18:38>> Sorry. Okay, just a point of
18:40information. How many employees in the
18:41city of Charleston are impacted by this
18:45rule? I I just don't know the scope of
18:48of the the employee base.
18:52>> Uh, I would I would have to get that
18:54information. I can forward it back to
18:57you.
18:57>> Okay. I was just curious, roughly. Okay.
19:00>> have we have about
19:02uh, 2,000 employees, but um, to break it
19:04down by the impact, who would be
19:07impacted, I would get I can get that
19:08information for you. Not a problem.
19:10>> 2,000 is is is good. Thanks.
19:14>> Good question.
19:17April, did you have any other slides to
19:18share or was this it?
19:20>> Nope, that was it.
19:22>> Okay. Thank you, April.
19:23>> You're welcome.
19:24>> Um and then one question cuz I know that
19:26these have been presented to our HR
19:28committee that's made up of council
19:30members.
19:32Can the HR committee move on this
19:34separately outside of the Commission on
19:36Women this year to vote to increase
19:40what the city does to the state level?
19:45>> Um I'll take that one, Leslie.
19:48This is Tammy.
19:51We we are not council experts, so I'm
19:55going to leave that to Jennifer Cook,
19:57but what I do know is that at our last
19:59committee meeting, we started to talk
20:02about this and the committee asked us to
20:04pause it and talk about it when you came
20:06back next time.
20:08>> Okay.
20:08>> So it was moving forward in the
20:10committee
20:11with this proposal, but we were asked to
20:14pause. So Jennifer Cook may be able to
20:17tell us more about what we can or can't
20:20do from that perspective.
20:28>> Jennifer, do you mind following up on
20:30that and then we'll go to Janet?
20:32>> Um
20:33so I'm not sure that I am the best
20:36person to speak to that, but I imagine
20:39you know, any considerations like this
20:42would need to be a part of the budget.
20:45Um so I I think maybe there would need
20:47to be discussions with
20:50BFRC about that just to ensure that um
20:56that's reserved in the budget.
20:59But I don't know if that would be for
21:012027
21:02or if this is something that would be
21:04for 2028.
21:07And it would depend It would depend on
21:09what action that HR committee took at
21:12that time.
21:14>> Okay. Janet?
21:16>> Um
21:17a question just so that I understand the
21:20current plan and and the conversations
21:21y'all have had to date.
21:23Has there been any discussion or is
21:24there anything in the plan that um
21:26ensures the leave can be utilized for uh
21:30birthing parents who experience
21:32stillbirth?
21:36>> I know that um that is one of the im-
21:40changes that uh the state made was they
21:42included that as part of their language.
21:45Um that would be something that we would
21:47want to look at adding um to be more
21:49specific in our policy.
21:52>> Thank you.
21:53>> Good question.
21:56Does anyone else in the commission have
21:58questions about the city's current paid
22:00family leave policy?
22:06Okay.
22:07Oh, go ahead, Cara.
22:08>> I just wanted to ask um is there also a
22:11policy that would say you can take a
22:13certain amount of time unpaid and during
22:16that additional time would would would
22:19people be getting, you know, some sort
22:21of state disability payments? I don't
22:23know how it works in the state.
22:27>> Um well, I know um for us,
22:30they would be covered under FMLA
22:33um and be able to use any of their
22:36accrued leave um any of that after the 6
22:40weeks um to make the 12 weeks whole for
22:44FMLA.
22:45>> Okay.
22:46>> Um so, they have that ability in
22:49addition to the 6 weeks.
22:53>> And just to clarify, FMLA would
22:55typically be unpaid?
22:57Okay, so that's just guaranteed time off
22:59of work once the paid time is used. Um
23:04and doctors would need to write you out
23:08of work to be eligible for more time
23:11beyond that what the normal 6 to 8 weeks
23:14that a doctor would write you out for.
23:16So, April, stop me if I say anything
23:18wrong here, but let's say somebody's out
23:20for a regular maternity leave and
23:21they're written out for 6 weeks, it
23:23would be paid and they would come back.
23:26I believe a lot of times if you have a
23:28C-section, they can write you out for up
23:29to 8 weeks.
23:31You would have 6 weeks
23:33weeks of pay and if you're depending on
23:35your situation, you may or may not get
23:37disability
23:39after that depending on whether or not
23:41you are disabled according to the
23:43disability rules, but then any time
23:45remaining after that would be unpaid.
23:48>> Mhm.
23:53Question.
23:55Any other questions from the commission?
24:02Okay.
24:03Um well, thank you, HR team, for that.
24:07Um
24:08I'm going to share something that I
24:10probably said not so eloquently on our
24:12last HR committee. Um and please know
24:15this is in no way, shape, or form a
24:16criticism of our fantastic HR team and
24:19their staff, but to me 4 weeks is
24:21absolutely unacceptable. Um
24:24and just based on personal experience, I
24:27had an emergency C-section. I was in the
24:29hospital for 10 days. Um my boys were in
24:32the NICU for 2 weeks. Like to have to
24:35take them home and then go back to work
24:362 weeks after, I just couldn't imagine
24:38what that was and I had an employer who
24:40gave me 16 weeks. Um so, I I do feel
24:43very passionately about this topic and
24:48what I would like to see the the city do
24:50is is have a tiered plan to get to 12
24:53weeks over the course of a couple of
24:54years for all um
24:57the the biological mother and the
24:59partner,
25:00I think that is the minimum requirement
25:02now that we see and actually have a lot
25:05of people who I know get 6 months off
25:07now including 2 weeks before their due
25:09date and then after as well. So, I think
25:12there are excellent standards out there
25:14and I I don't think this is one of them.
25:16And again, I say that with with no
25:20no malice towards our HR staff. They're
25:21incredible. We have an incredible
25:23benefits team, but I think this is an
25:25area of improvement and one of the
25:26reasons why I care so deeply about this
25:28commission is because I want to see us
25:31do great work in this area.
25:33And so, I do think this could be a
25:35really great focus place for us for the
25:39coming year.
25:40At the same time, I know that affordable
25:43child care has become a topic that is
25:46widely embraced by a lot of different
25:49stakeholders including our business
25:50community.
25:52And I've actually been approached with
25:54some really great ideas around how the
25:56city could actually change its zoning
25:57code to allow for more daycares in the
26:01city for example to help cut some red
26:03tape. And so, for your all's background,
26:05the city's also going through our zoning
26:07code rewrite. So, there's a nice
26:10parallel there happening.
26:13And so, I know that there's a lot we
26:14could study on the the child care side
26:17and understanding what options are
26:19available to municipalities to help
26:21create more child care options. And
26:24that's not something I know a lot about.
26:25I know Janet probably has a lot of ideas
26:27and a lot of you on this commission do.
26:30So, I think that could be a really rich
26:31area
26:33for study as well.
26:35Um
26:35And we also do have this other path
26:39through the HR committee.
26:41So, I
26:42one option to propose and I'll open it
26:44up for discussion is that you know, if
26:46this committee were to focus on
26:48affordable child care next year, I I
26:50continue to work with our HR committee
26:52chair,
26:53and our incredible staff. Sorry, this is
26:55not the You guys are amazing. I just
26:57don't like the policy. I love all you
26:59though.
27:00And and try to push those increases
27:03through the HR committee as well, at
27:06least for next year to try to get on the
27:08same level as the state to start.
27:10So, I do kind of see two parallel paths
27:13there.
27:14But, I am one voice, so want to open the
27:17floor to you all.
27:26Jennifer Brown.
27:28>> Yes. Um
27:30is it possible
27:32cuz I like to dream big.
27:34Is it possible for this commission to
27:38work on both? When I say work on both, I
27:42I support your tier approach to 12.
27:46Who's to say maybe 16, but maybe that's
27:48pushing it. But, 12 and also to study
27:53the child care
27:55issue.
27:57Me personally,
27:59I didn't think that there was a problem
28:01that there were not enough daycares in
28:03Charleston. I thought that the
28:05affordability was the issue.
28:07Um but, my question or suggestion is can
28:11we do both?
28:15>> It's a good question. Let's have Dr.
28:17Cheek next.
28:21>> Let me unmute. I don't have an idea any
28:24idea of what child care costs. I'm
28:28probably the most senior person on this
28:31commission. So,
28:34I do have a grandchild who is now in
28:39in school. It's rather pricey, but you
28:43know,
28:45my daughter and son-in-law have good
28:48jobs and we help with that. But what
28:51what exactly
28:53is the cost of child care these days?
28:59>> Janet, you want to take that one?
29:01>> [laughter]
29:05>> Oh, and I can't hear you.
29:08>> Sorry.
29:09Um it depends on a lot of factors. So,
29:11it's going to depend on your geography.
29:13Um if you're living in a more rural area
29:15versus uh a more uh urban area. Also,
29:18the number of daycares does affect it
29:20because if there's only one in a
29:21population versus five, their prices
29:23tend to be higher. Um supply and demand
29:26takes uh takes into account there. And
29:28it also depends on the number of kids
29:30that you have within the facility. But
29:32you can be looking at upwards of $385 to
29:34$400 a week per child. Um
29:38uh as an example, I mean, I think in in
29:40some I've heard some other people throw
29:41around numbers are like, "Oh, in other
29:43cities we pay $30,000 a year for child
29:45care." Like, cool, you do here in
29:46Charleston, too. Um and so, when we're
29:49looking at the the cost of living and
29:52when we say that housing and
29:53transportation should cost 30% or less
29:56of someone's paycheck, what we're not
29:58taking into account is the additional
29:59infrastructure that is necessary for
30:01that person to go to work to make that
30:04paycheck. And that's the cost of of
30:06child care. The national number that's
30:08been agreed on is that it should only
30:09cost 7%. Um
30:12I have spent 6 years on on the child
30:14care front in Charleston and this is an
30:17issue that I'm incredibly passionate
30:18about. So, I was going to raise my hand
30:20and say, "I would really love for us to
30:21tackle this one." I'm also equally like
30:23quite frankly equally as passionate
30:25about the paid leave for many of the
30:26similar reasons that Leslie is.
30:28Um
30:29there are some pretty valuable resources
30:32that I'd be happy to bring to the
30:33commission related to
30:35um zoning laws. Uh Dorchester County has
30:37done some some recent work in the last
30:39year on changing their zoning laws to
30:40allow for daycares to come in with less
30:42red tape. There's also examples from out
30:44of state I'd be happy to bring to bear.
30:46Um there are a decent number of
30:48resources and um that I could share with
30:51you all in terms of um some reading on
30:53different municipalities in child care
30:55and some solutions that have been done
30:56and there's also a gentleman um who
30:58works for a company called Tutris um and
31:01he has been a passionate advocate for uh
31:03tri-share programs. Um tri-share
31:06programs are when the um parent, the um
31:10state, and the employers share the cost
31:12of the child care together and I think
31:14that that's a very interesting thing for
31:16us to consider um moving forward. So I
31:20either direction we go, I would also
31:21like to tackle both. Whoever said that,
31:23I'm I'm all about that. Um but it is uh
31:26I was at a recent meeting with the uh
31:28Chamber of Commerce here in Charleston
31:30and we're talking about what would make
31:32it more valuable for people to live in
31:34Charleston and to continue the economic
31:36growth that we're seeing here and the
31:37two top issues were housing and child
31:39care. So I worry if we wait that we're
31:42going to miss the opportunity to strike
31:43while the iron is hot on this one.
31:46Sorry, that was more information than
31:47you asked for.
31:48>> [laughter]
31:48>> No, that that that was great and I I
31:52would be interested in tackling both
31:54myself.
31:55>> [laughter]
31:57>> Tammy.
31:58>> Tammy.
32:04>> Sorry, trying to unmute myself there. Um
32:07I did want to clarify just for point of
32:10clarification that the city currently
32:13does have 6 weeks of paid maternity
32:15leave for
32:17the birth parent.
32:18I know we said 4 weeks earlier, but it's
32:204 + 2.
32:22If we structure ours like the state,
32:24it'll be more clearly six, but there is
32:276 weeks paid now for the birth parent
32:29and two for the other parent, the
32:33non-birth parent. Um what we're looking
32:35at doing right now is upping the
32:37non-birth parent to four and possibly
32:40converting our four plus two to a
32:42generic six.
32:44>> Thank you for that clarification.
32:46>> a point of clarification, okay.
32:47>> Thank you, yeah. Sorry, I'm
32:50um that's helpful and then with those um
32:52updates, Tammy, would it be
32:54incorporating the state language like
32:57including stillbirths?
32:59Yes, ma'am. Okay.
33:01Okay.
33:02So, that's helpful. So, just to clarify,
33:03those changes are on the table right now
33:07being evaluated by the HR committee.
33:09Okay. Um Amalia.
33:11>> they they paused
33:13They Sorry, they paused it, but they're
33:16They they're ready to evaluate it.
33:18>> Yes. Okay.
33:19>> Okay.
33:20>> Uh Amalia.
33:23>> Hi, thank you. Um I I am also on board
33:26with with tackling both.
33:29Um I I have a question. Is
33:33is the idea for the city of Charleston
33:35to continuously keep up with the state?
33:39I ask that because
33:41you know, part of part of our
33:43legislative agendas and as an
33:45organization, not as Amalia, but as an
33:47organization, is to increase the weeks
33:51off for both the birthing and the
33:52non-birthing parents and so
33:55I'm just curious as to how we're going
33:57to tackle that as a commission here and
33:58what the plan is for the city. Like if
34:00the if the city is going to continuously
34:03catch up with the state, then why not
34:05start working on that tiered approach
34:07now on paid leave?
34:10Um so, that's that question and then I
34:13also wanted to offer um in in my
34:16previous life
34:18we launched a a program in a different
34:21state um that gives single parents
34:24universal child care and I also worked
34:27with the um
34:29with the folks that did the blueprint on
34:31universal child care in New Mexico and I
34:34personally speaking think that universal
34:36child care for South Carolina is the way
34:38to go and anything else is a band-aid.
34:39So, um to the extent that I can be
34:42helpful in in that space, I'm I'm happy
34:46to give all the information and as
34:47someone who has now
34:49this is the first year I am not paying
34:51for child care. Um
34:54it's kind of it's kind of wild, but only
34:5623% of our families in South Carolina
34:59can actually afford child care.
35:02>> Yeah.
35:02>> So, the numbers are bleak.
35:05>> They are. Thank you for that. And to
35:06answer your first question, I mean, in
35:09my mind, like no, we should be ahead of
35:11the state. Um I think what's under what
35:14will be under consideration for the HR
35:16committee is a temporary
35:19uh level setting and adjustment to meet
35:22the lowest standards set by the state,
35:24but I would like to see us be a model
35:26for that and I do think there's an
35:28economic reason to do that in terms of
35:30staff recruitment and retention. Um and
35:32there's an economic benefit to having um
35:35extended paid family leave, if that's
35:37helpful.
35:40Um
35:41Jennifer Strickland.
35:44>> I just wanted to say that I kind of it
35:46sounds like we're all kind of on the
35:47same page. I do struggle with um both of
35:50these topics, which one do we tackle
35:53first? Um if we do kind of look at the
35:56parental um maternal leave as a tiered
35:59approach, I think that makes sense where
36:01we could kind of phase into that and
36:03then also work on the child care
36:05component. Um I personally have a
36:093-year-old.
36:10Um
36:11I think it's a combination of both, if I
36:13were to speak on what my um situation
36:16was in finding child care. The waitlists
36:19were 2 years long. So, I think there was
36:23a shortage on top of okay, well, I'm
36:26also paying a whole another mortgage on
36:28top of paying what I currently pay to
36:30live.
36:32Um so, I think it is affordability
36:34matched with okay, those wait lists and
36:36trying to get into, you know, the good
36:39schools or, you know, good education
36:41even on that that level because I mean,
36:44that's so important in the very
36:46beginning as well.
36:47Um as far as the uh maternity leave, I
36:51came from an organization when I did
36:53have my daughter where I had her and had
36:56to be back after 2 weeks and being a
36:58mother who is well into her 40s and had
37:01a child and I had some some things come
37:04up. Now, I didn't have a C-section, but
37:06I really did struggle just being a
37:08little bit older. It was really hard to
37:11leave a child that young and and go back
37:15to work. So, um I can speak on that and
37:18I think both of them are just as
37:19important and they kind of go hand in
37:20hand, too. So,
37:22thank you.
37:24>> Thank you for sharing that. Appreciate
37:26it.
37:29Okay. So, I have a thought for us
37:32because
37:34I too would love to this commission to
37:36tackle both at once and I also know that
37:38that would be we we need to double our
37:40meetings. Um
37:42so,
37:44I would propose that we make affordable
37:47child care the commission's
37:50topic of study for 2027
37:53and also then give a an endorsement or a
37:59um
38:00a resolution or um
38:03a vote that basically says, "Leslie, on
38:06the HR committee, go after this tiered
38:08approach with all of your might. You
38:10have our support
38:12um and I'll provide you all with updates
38:15on all of our calls about that."
38:18Um so, that way I I that would be kind
38:20of the best way to to two track it and
38:23see where we get. Uh And then, you know,
38:26next year if we haven't gotten anywhere,
38:27then we we double down.
38:30What do people think about that?
38:35Thoughts?
38:37>> Um I'll I'll jump in, Leslie. I I love
38:39that idea. One thing that I would ask is
38:41if there's an opportunity if the if the
38:43paid leave is coming up in front of
38:45council and there's an opportunity for
38:46public comment that this commission
38:48knows about it so we can either, you
38:50know, bring in some experts if that
38:52would be helpful.
38:53You know, I know both Wren and the
38:55Chamber of Mothers were involved with
38:58getting the state's paid leave to
39:00include stillbirth and we have some
39:02individuals
39:03who are in Charleston County who could
39:04certainly be a part of that discussion
39:06and and speak to the council about their
39:08own personal experience. So, I would
39:10love for this commission to be aware of
39:12when that's happening so that we can
39:13assist.
39:15>> That's a great idea and I think we could
39:16also probably we can ask the HR chair to
39:19if we could do public comment before one
39:21of those meetings as well.
39:23Tammy, do you have the next HR committee
39:27meeting handy? Sorry to put you on the
39:28spot.
39:29>> [laughter]
39:31>> I can look.
39:36>> And then just so you all know, I told
39:39Professor Jones that I would share that
39:41her preference was also for child care
39:44affordability. She had talked to some of
39:46the gender studies professors and that
39:48was their their focus.
39:50And while Tammy looks for that, I think
39:54one question I have for you all is the
39:56scope of child care that we want to look
39:58at. Um
40:00More personal stories here. This is why
40:01I love this commission.
40:03You know, our boys just transitioned
40:05from daycare to
40:08pre-K at our local neighborhood
40:10elementary school.
40:12The aftercare is an incredibly difficult
40:15issue, too.
40:17And so, you know, these kids start
40:19school at 7:00 a.m. and they get out at
40:212:25 p.m. Um, which makes it absolutely,
40:25incredibly hard to have two working
40:28parents. Um, and then, you don't have a
40:31ton of options and nannies are
40:33incredibly expensive and there aren't a
40:36lot of them to go around and and we were
40:38very fortunate to get into Kaleidoscope
40:40very last minute, but there just aren't
40:42that many aftercare programs that are
40:44also free and and Kaleidoscope still has
40:46a cost, too. So, you know, when I think
40:48of child care, I'm also the aftercare
40:51part comes to mind for me, too.
40:53Um, because that's a really big deal for
40:55working families, as well.
40:59Just put that out there.
41:02All right. So, um, Jennifer Cook, do we
41:05need to make an official motion, second,
41:08and and vote on our
41:10proposal to move forward?
41:12>> Yes.
41:13>> Okay. Can I make a motion as a chair?
41:17>> Yes.
41:18>> Okay.
41:19Um, well, then I would like to make a
41:21motion that the Commission on Women
41:24select affordable child care as our
41:272027,
41:29um, topic of of focus and discussion.
41:33And at the same time, that the
41:35Commission lends its support, um,
41:39to pursue
41:41I one, bringing the city of Charleston's
41:46paid family leave up to the state
41:48standards. And then, two, um, pursuing a
41:51tiered approach to increase the city's
41:55paid family leave policy moving forward.
42:01That's my motion.
42:03>> I second that ground.
42:07>> All right. Second from Janet, so we'll
42:08open it up to discussion. Jennifer
42:10Brown.
42:11>> I I just have one question. I thought
42:13the young lady from HR said city of
42:17Charleston does have 6 weeks just like
42:19the state. So, aren't we already
42:23on the state level and we just want to
42:25move to tier?
42:27>> It would also be adding an additional 2
42:29weeks for the non-biological parent and
42:32updating some of the language to include
42:35stillbirth leave for example.
42:37>> Oh, that is I forgot about the
42:39stillbirth. Thank you so much. Okay,
42:41thank you.
42:41>> Great question.
42:42>> Question.
42:44>> Any other discussion?
42:47Tammy.
42:49>> I do not have that meeting on my
42:51calendar. I believe it should probably
42:53be December. Jennifer Cook, do you have
42:56I mean
42:56>> I have it.
42:57>> Jennifer?
42:58>> I have it. It's November 19th.
43:01>> November 19th. Okay.
43:05All right, I will I'll work with
43:08I'll talk to the chief of staff and the
43:10mayor if we would need to move more
43:12quickly than that to have it included in
43:15the budget for next year. So, I'll do
43:17some pre-work ahead of that meeting
43:20to see if that's possible.
43:24Okay.
43:25Dr. Cheek.
43:31I think you're still muted.
43:36>> Is the state of South Carolina
43:39and I guess the city of Charleston
43:42doesn't seem to be in line with the
43:45state at this point, but is the state in
43:48line other states in the Southeast?
43:52I I don't I don't want to go beyond the
43:54Southeast because
43:57you know, because when we start looking
44:01at northern states salaries
44:04and salaries are higher, but um just to
44:09compare, I'd like to know, you know, if
44:13we're comparable
44:15to other Southeastern states.
44:18>> So So, we've done
44:20I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt.
44:22>> No.
44:23>> Go ahead.
44:24>> Okay.
44:24>> No, go right ahead.
44:26>> We have done We have done an analysis of
44:29um local government and state government
44:32here in South Carolina. It would be
44:34fairly easy to grab a couple other
44:35states, um and we could provide that
44:39information to you guys.
44:42>> Yeah, and that that's a great question,
44:44and I also Well, I think this is where
44:46we can focus it on Charleston as a city
44:48instead of the state as a whole and and
44:50looking at other metro areas with a
44:52similar cost of living um and a similar
44:55salary range to us
44:57um throughout the Southeast because it
44:59is, you know, I think Charleston is a
45:01more expensive place than a lot of the
45:02rest of the state. Um so, that could be
45:04interesting to compare it kind of from
45:06an apples-to-apples perspective. Like,
45:07if we're looking at Durham, Raleigh, um
45:11Savannah, Charlotte, Richmond, um I
45:15would be interested in in those city
45:17comparisons. Amalia?
45:21>> So, North Carolina has paid leave for
45:23their state employees for 12 weeks.
45:27Um and Virginia has a comprehensive paid
45:32family um
45:34paid family and medical leave program
45:36for for everybody across the state. I
45:38just don't remember how long it is, but
45:40I'll look into that.
45:41>> Thank you.
45:43Yeah.
45:44Good to know.
45:46Okay.
45:48Um All right, any more discussion before
45:50we vote on the motion?
45:56Okay, all in favor.
46:00I.
46:03Okay, any opposed?
46:12Cara, Dr. Cheek, and Jennifer Brown, are
46:14you opposed or do you just need to take
46:16your hands down?
46:21>> In favor.
46:23>> Okay, great. Okay, so passes
46:25unanimously. Um my next question is as
46:28we prepare for our January meeting, um
46:31what I'd like to do is have a series of
46:33presentations um to look at what other
46:36municipalities are doing and what our
46:37options are. Um so my question to you
46:40all, Janet, I'm assuming the Chamber of
46:43Mothers has resources here. Amalia, I'm
46:45assuming Wren has resources here.
46:48Um Lavonda, I don't know if the the Y
46:50has any resources here on child care. Um
46:54but if you have examples that you would
46:58like to present to the committee, I'd
46:59love to start with this committee's
47:01knowledge um and then augment that with
47:03some some national folks too. And if you
47:05have recommendations
47:07on any national organizations that would
47:09be helpful to bring into the
47:10conversation,
47:12um please let me know and we can reach
47:15out to those folks to get the right
47:16point of contacts on the agenda as well.
47:21Okay.
47:24All right, awesome.
47:26Anything else for the good of the order?
47:32All right. Um well guys, thank you so
47:34much. Our ladies, thank you so much. Um
47:36really grateful for your time. Um I love
47:39to run an efficient meeting, so
47:40hopefully you feel like this was 48
47:42minutes um well spent. I think we have a
47:45great path going forward. Um I'm really
47:48excited to work with you all and uh
47:50produce some tangible results.
```*
