2026-10-19 - Commission on Women

Summary

Built from YouTube auto-generated captions; the agenda and minutes were not read. Names and figures are as captioned and may be misspelled.

  • First meeting of the revamped commission: The chair, who is also the District 12 Council member, introduced members from organizations including a hospital, the League of Women Voters, the Housing Authority, the YWCA, a national mothers' advocacy group, a women's rights network and the College of Charleston, along with city HR and Clerk of Council staff.
  • New format: The commission has existed four or five years and helped spur the city's original paid family leave policy. It now meets four times a year, tied to the budget cycle. The fourth-quarter meeting picks the next year's topic, the first brings in outside experts, the second workshops a proposal with city staff, and the third presents it to the mayor and Council. Recommendations must be things the city can actually act on.
  • Current paid leave: City HR said employees get 4 weeks of paid maternity leave for the birth parent plus 2 weeks of other-parent leave, usable within 12 months of a birth, adoption or foster placement, so a birth parent can stack six weeks. The state gives birth parents 6 weeks in one block and, since October 1, 4 weeks for the non-birthing parent. The city has about 2,000 employees. FMLA covers unpaid time beyond the paid weeks, up to 12 weeks.
  • Pending changes: HR is considering raising the non-birth parent to 4 weeks, restating the leave as a flat 6 weeks, and adding stillbirth language as the state did. The Council HR committee started on this and paused it until the chair returned. The Clerk of Council said any cost would need budget review. See City Paid Family Leave Policy.
  • Chair's position: The chair called four weeks unacceptable, argued for a tiered path to 12 weeks over a couple of years, and said the city should lead the state rather than follow it. Members cited North Carolina state employees at 12 weeks and Virginia's statewide program.
  • Child care: Members discussed costs of roughly $385 to $400 a week per child, long waitlists, aftercare gaps, zoning changes to allow more daycares (Dorchester County was cited as an example), tri-share cost-sharing between parent, state and employer, and calls for universal child care. One member said only 23 percent of South Carolina families can afford care. The chair noted the city's zoning code rewrite is under way. See Affordable Child Care Study.
  • Vote: The commission voted unanimously to choose affordable child care as its 2027 topic and to support bringing city paid family leave up to the state standard and pursuing a tiered increase. The chair will carry this to the HR committee, whose next meeting is November 19, and will check whether it can move faster to affect next year's budget.
  • Next steps: Members asked to be told when paid leave goes before Council so advocates can speak. Before the January 11 meeting, the chair and members will line up local and national presenters on child care, and HR will provide a comparison with other Southeastern metro areas.

Related: City Paid Family Leave Policy, Affordable Child Care Study

Agenda

Agenda PDF posted; see Sources. Items not yet read.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:18Let me know when we're set, Jennifer.

00:21>> All right.

00:23>> All right. Well, let's go ahead and kick

00:26this off. Welcome everybody to our first

00:30meeting of the revamped Commission on

00:32women. We are very excited to have you.

00:35I'm Leslie Skardon. I'm your chair and

00:38also represent District 12 on City

00:41Council, which is essentially the second

00:43half of James Island from Camp Road to

00:46Folly Beach minus all of the donut holes

00:49for the town and unincorporated county.

00:52And I'm the only woman on City Council.

00:54So, seems appropriate.

00:56>> [laughter]

00:57>> Um I also served on the committee with

01:00Jennifer Brown and Hilda Gadsden the

01:02past few years and so excited to kind of

01:06take the the next iteration of this

01:08going forward. Um so, what I thought we

01:10could do is I'll call on you. Just a

01:12couple of you could introduce yourself.

01:14Um say your name and what organization

01:16you're with. And then we'll go through

01:18the ordinance. We'll hear from the

01:21city's HR team on some of the work that

01:23they currently do. And then we'll get

01:25into discussion

01:28of what we want to tackle next year in

01:31terms of our our topic. So,

01:33um

01:34Dr. Cheek, do you want to go first?

01:41And you're on mute.

01:46Uh Dr. Cheek, you're on mute.

01:54>> I'm Deanna Ellington Cheek. I'm from

01:57Charleston originally. I'm affiliated

02:00with

02:01Roper Hospital. I'm semi-retired and I

02:05just take care of dialysis patients and

02:08I was at MUSC from 1988 to 2005.

02:14>> Great. Thank you.

02:17Cara.

02:19>> I'm Cara Erickson. I'm the co-president

02:22of the League of Women Voters in

02:23Charleston

02:25and also oversee communications for the

02:27league. I'm

02:29a downtown Charleston resident. Have

02:32been in Charleston for probably about 10

02:35years. Came originally from New York,

02:37worked in publishing and media

02:40for most of my career.

02:42>> Great.

02:43Jennifer Strickland.

02:47>> Good afternoon. I'm Jennifer Strickland.

02:48I work for the city of Charleston

02:51in the HR department. And I've been with

02:55the city for about

02:573 years. I grew up in Summerville, South

03:00Carolina. So really just a native here

03:03in Charleston.

03:05And excited. I'm

03:06a new newly appointed person on the on

03:10the commission. Thank you.

03:12>> Great.

03:13And Jennifer Brown.

03:17>> Good afternoon everybody. I'm Jennifer

03:20Brown. I love to say I am a come here.

03:23I'm not from here.

03:26But my son loves Charleston enough for

03:29everybody

03:30who is a native. I currently work with

03:32Charleston County Housing Authority

03:35running their family self-sufficiency

03:37program. And just love the opportunity

03:40to continue to serve on the commission

03:43and very excited to see us go into this

03:45next chapter. Thank you.

03:48>> Great. Janet.

03:53>> Hey all, my name is Janet Bates. I'm My

03:55day job is working at Terracon, which is

03:57an engineering firm here in town, but

03:59I'm here representing the Chamber of

04:00Mothers, which is a national nonprofit

04:03nonpartisan advocacy organization

04:05working for child care, paid leave, and

04:08affordable

04:09maternal health care.

04:14>> Great. Lavonda?

04:20>> Hi. Can you all hear me okay?

04:22>> Yes.

04:24>> Okay, great. I'm Lavonda Brown. I'm with

04:26the YWCA Greater Charleston. I'm a newly

04:30appointed to this commission. I'm really

04:32excited.

04:35Been in Charleston about 10 years. I am

04:37from the city by the sea known as

04:40Savannah, Georgia.

04:45>> Great. Hilda?

04:57Hilda, we can't hear you.

05:07Want to try one more time?

05:15Okay, I can introduce Hilda. How about

05:16that? So, Hilda Gadson previously served

05:20on the commission and is just an

05:22all-star.

05:23We'll get those audio issues sorted out,

05:25but Hilda, we're glad you're here.

05:28Amalia?

05:32>> Hi. Hi, everyone. I'm so sorry to to be

05:34late. I was having issues signing up

05:36with Zoom. Amalia Loxsado, I use she/her

05:39pronouns. I am your CEO at the Women's

05:42Rights and Empowerment Network. Very

05:44happy to be here, and I don't know if

05:45there was anything else I needed to

05:47answer at this point.

05:49>> Nope, that's great.

05:51Um and then Professor Alyssa Jones is

05:54our College of Charleston um gender

05:57studies representative. She's actually

05:59going through her tenure review right

06:00now, so she um sends her apologies, but

06:03um had an unavoidable conflict for this

06:06meeting, which we knew about for a long

06:07time. Um but she said um to send you all

06:10her regards. And then I know we have a

06:12couple of our wonderful wonderful city

06:14staff on here. Jennifer Cook, do you

06:16just want to say hello?

06:18>> Hi, I'm Jennifer Cook. I'm the clerk of

06:21council and I've worked for the city

06:23about 15 years.

06:25And it's a pleasure to be here.

06:28>> April.

06:30>> Hi, my name is April Slinkard. I am the

06:33benefits and wellness manager for the

06:34city of Charleston. I've worked for the

06:37city um this go around for 3 years. I

06:40started out of college working for the

06:42city, went back, got my nursing degree,

06:44did all the things, and then came back

06:46to the city. Um I love it. I've lived

06:48here for about 35 years.

06:50>> Awesome. Tammy.

06:53>> Hi, Tammy O'Berry, HR director for the

06:56city of Charleston, and been here about

06:57a year and a half, and very happy to be

06:59here. Thank you.

07:00>> Great. And Maylee.

07:04>> Hi. Um I work with the clerk of

07:07council's office, and I've been here for

07:09about 3 years, and also very happy to be

07:12here.

07:13>> Awesome. All right, did I miss anybody?

07:17Okay. Well, thank you all for doing

07:19that. Since it's our first meeting, just

07:20wanted um people to get familiar with

07:22who's on the call. Um our next agenda

07:25item is to review the ordinance, so um

07:28I'm going to go ahead and share my

07:30screen.

07:32And uh

07:34right. Okay, can you guys see this?

07:38Is it too small?

07:41Let me get a little bigger.

07:45All right, how's that?

07:47>> That's great.

07:48>> Awesome. So, the Commission on Women has

07:51been around for at least four or five

07:53years now, and believe four years ago

07:56was really part of what spearheaded the

07:59city's original paid family leave

08:01policy. And then I had the pleasure of

08:03serving on the commission the past few

08:06years, and I really wanted to kind of

08:09reinvigorate the commission and what

08:11we're able to do and line it up with the

08:14city's budget cycle. And specifically

08:17with key city staff and the mayor's

08:19office and council to ensure that the

08:22work that the committee does is getting

08:24attention and can create actionable and

08:28concrete recommendations going forward.

08:31So,

08:32we've reshaped the commission a bit. You

08:34know, the goal is to enhance life for

08:36women in Charleston, and we want to make

08:39sure that we're talking about topics

08:41that are germane to the city, right? So,

08:43we don't want to be taking on a federal

08:46policy that the city can't do anything

08:48about because we want our

08:49recommendations to be concrete and

08:52actionable each year. So, we've also

08:54shortened the the calendar. We used to

08:57meet monthly, and so I believe we can do

09:00our our work in four very intentional

09:03meetings throughout the year.

09:05So, today is our kickoff meeting, and

09:07then you all should have received the

09:09calendar invites for our upcoming

09:11meetings. And

09:13what this does is that it allows us to

09:16set our schedule. So, the process here

09:18is that in the Q4 meeting, which is

09:20today,

09:22we'll vote on the topic that we want to

09:24tackle next year. And so, this could be

09:27anything from paid family leave,

09:30affordable child care, pay equity, human

09:32trafficking, domestic abuse,

09:35elderly women and health care. And so,

09:37we know what the topic is at the end of

09:39the year so that for this Q1 meeting in

09:41January, we can line up um a slate of

09:45different experts who can come and share

09:47best practices with us. So, for example,

09:50if we decided to move forward on paid

09:53family leave, what we would do is we

09:54would ask um for national experts from

09:57organizations like Bloomberg or the

09:59Council of Mayors or other

10:01municipalities to come and report out

10:04best practices and what they've seen

10:06work and and different ideas.

10:09Once we gather that information and look

10:12at the landscape of what we can do, um

10:14we'll workshop a proposal with the

10:16corresponding staff within the city to

10:19help address this issue. So, bringing in

10:22the folks who are working on this every

10:23day at the city, um going through ideas

10:26and suggestions to have that proposal.

10:28That Q3 meeting then is designed to

10:31present the recommendation to the mayor

10:34and his staff and get it city council

10:37agenda so we can vote for it. Um and

10:40then it's purposely done in this order

10:42because right now the city's in the

10:44budget process and so we want to make

10:45sure if there's a budget implication

10:47associated with the change, we don't

10:49have to wait a whole year to then come

10:52back and see action on it. It's already

10:54done. And then that Q4 meeting,

10:57um the the next topic is selected. You

11:01all were chosen um very strategically.

11:03We followed the uh reordering of the

11:06Commission on Arts by selecting

11:08organizations

11:10that have a lot of expertise on this

11:12issue. So, we wanted the organizations

11:15um to have the seat to bring in that

11:18knowledge um to to share it with the

11:20commission and make really informed

11:22decisions going forward. So, again,

11:25today's meeting, we're going to um pick

11:27the topic for next year. And then

11:29between now and January 11th, um I will

11:32bring together or I'll reach out to

11:34different experts and get them lined up,

11:35get them on our calendar. I'll reach out

11:38to you guys for any

11:39experts that we should, organizations

11:41that we should have. You guys will

11:43probably present to you on that topic.

11:46And then in April we'll be able to

11:47workshop our proposal and go forward.

11:50So with that, I'm going to stop sharing.

11:53Are there any questions about kind of

11:55the process that we're following and

11:56what we're hoping to achieve?

12:01Okay, awesome.

12:03So what we we had held a pre-call and I

12:07think that the two topics I would really

12:09like for us to consider next year are

12:12paid family leave and affordable child

12:15care. I think those would give us the

12:16most one of those would give us a very

12:18kind of concrete win that we can then

12:21build upon going forward. And so to and

12:24of course we can we can discuss others

12:26if you want but I know there's a lot of

12:27work being done in those two areas now

12:30especially in in affordable child care.

12:32And so I believe there are a lot of

12:34different examples of proposals that we

12:36could workshop and hear about and move

12:38forward. So we would have a really solid

12:40win to kick us off on.

12:42We've asked the city's HR team here

12:45today to present on what the city is

12:48already doing with paid family leave. I

12:50believe that there are a couple of

12:53updates to the the paid family leave

12:55policy. So I thought it would be helpful

12:57to have the city HR team kind of just

12:59give us an overview of what paid family

13:02leave is is in the city right now, where

13:05it's going and then we can have a larger

13:08discussion to see if that's something

13:10that we would want to work on increasing

13:12for next year or if we would want to

13:13look at something like child care

13:15solutions

13:17to to focus on next year. Does that

13:19sound good?

13:21Okay, so I will turn it over to Tammy.

13:24Are you giving the presentation?

13:27>> I am not. April's going to give the

13:29presentation.

13:29>> April, okay.

13:31The floor is yours, April.

13:34>> Okay.

13:35I am going to

13:37share

13:39>> [clears throat]

13:40>> Can everybody see the screen?

13:43>> Yes.

13:44>> Okay.

13:45So, currently, uh and I'm just going to

13:48kind of start with what we are doing

13:51now, what we have in place.

13:53Um we currently have a paid maternity

13:56leave, um which is available to the

13:58biological mother, that's 4 weeks paid

14:00leave.

14:02Um

14:03that is uh used at the birth of the

14:05child.

14:06We also then have a paid paternity

14:09leave, um which is available also to the

14:11biological mother, um or adopting

14:14parent, foster parent, or co-parent, and

14:17that's 2 weeks of paid leave. So, for

14:20example, the biological mother can stack

14:23those, and they can they would have 6

14:26weeks.

14:27The 4 weeks, like I said, um is used at

14:30the birth of the child, the 2 weeks um

14:32would be used within the 12 months of

14:35birth or placement of the child.

14:37Uh and those that paternity leave is um

14:41applicable for births, adoptions, foster

14:44care placement.

14:46So, that's what we currently have in

14:48place um for our employees. We have been

14:52looking at options, um so this is very

14:55timely. Um we've been looking at

14:57different options and and what we think

15:00um may be improvements um to the policy.

15:08>> And April, were some of those options to

15:11go up to 6 weeks, or um are those

15:13options that could be shared here, or

15:15would would you be looking to the

15:17commission to potentially make

15:18recommendations next year?

15:21>> So, we had started the process of

15:23looking at um what the state of South

15:26Carolina offers for state employees.

15:29Currently

15:31they offer Sorry, I'm going to my next

15:34slide. There we go. They offer the birth

15:36parents 6 weeks paid, which ultimately

15:39is in alignment with ours.

15:42But as of October 1st, they

15:45started a 4-week paid

15:48leave for the non-birthing parent, which

15:51is an increase from 2 weeks.

15:53So our kind of our thought process was

15:56that might be a good transition

16:00to the next step of what we might be

16:02able to offer.

16:05We also

16:08have been asked by

16:10department since we are heavily focused

16:12on public safety

16:14to just kind of be

16:16aware

16:17of like need of filling

16:21filling jobs while people are out

16:23long-term. So we just need to balance

16:25the needs of all the departments, but

16:27make sure that we're giving

16:29as much

16:30leave

16:32and and resources to mothers and

16:34families as we can.

16:37>> Got it. And [clears throat] just to be

16:39clear, so the the state employees, the

16:42birth parent gets 2 more weeks than city

16:45and the non-birthing parent gets 2 more

16:46weeks.

16:47>> The birth parent Ultimately, the 6 weeks

16:50is the same for the city of Charleston

16:52and for the state. It's just structured

16:54a little differently. In the state

16:59it is 6 weeks as a chunk, as one block.

17:03For us, it's 4 weeks plus the 2 weeks

17:06can be taken within the first 12 months.

17:08So there's some extra flexibility in

17:10ours. I believe than in the state. So

17:13those 2 weeks um, for our employees can

17:17be used at any time within that 12

17:19months. It doesn't have to be used um,

17:22right at the birth.

17:23>> Oh, I see. I see. Okay. Got it.

17:28>> Madam

17:29Madam Chair, um, Commissioner Bates has

17:32her hand up.

17:34>> Yes, thank you.

17:35>> Hi, thank you. Just a point of

17:37clarification. That additional two

17:39weeks, if the

17:41if the partner took the two weeks,

17:44is the birthing parent still eligible

17:46for the additional two weeks?

17:51>> If

17:52I'm sorry, say that

17:53>> So the the way that I read it, it shows

17:55currently the the plan is that the birth

17:58the birth mother gets four weeks and

18:01then the birth mother or the foster

18:04parent or the co-parent or the partner

18:06gets two weeks. So if the birth parent

18:09uses the full six weeks, does the father

18:12say in this situation get two weeks?

18:15>> Yes.

18:16>> Okay, so it's both. So it is it Okay,

18:19thank

18:19>> If both work for the city, yes. Yes,

18:21that's correct.

18:21>> Okay.

18:27>> Thank you. Good question. April, oh, go

18:29ahead, Cara.

18:32You're on mute.

18:36Hey, Cara, you're on mute.

18:38>> Sorry. Okay, just a point of

18:40information. How many employees in the

18:41city of Charleston are impacted by this

18:45rule? I I just don't know the scope of

18:48of the the employee base.

18:52>> Uh, I would I would have to get that

18:54information. I can forward it back to

18:57you.

18:57>> Okay. I was just curious, roughly. Okay.

19:00>> have we have about

19:02uh, 2,000 employees, but um, to break it

19:04down by the impact, who would be

19:07impacted, I would get I can get that

19:08information for you. Not a problem.

19:10>> 2,000 is is is good. Thanks.

19:14>> Good question.

19:17April, did you have any other slides to

19:18share or was this it?

19:20>> Nope, that was it.

19:22>> Okay. Thank you, April.

19:23>> You're welcome.

19:24>> Um and then one question cuz I know that

19:26these have been presented to our HR

19:28committee that's made up of council

19:30members.

19:32Can the HR committee move on this

19:34separately outside of the Commission on

19:36Women this year to vote to increase

19:40what the city does to the state level?

19:45>> Um I'll take that one, Leslie.

19:48This is Tammy.

19:51We we are not council experts, so I'm

19:55going to leave that to Jennifer Cook,

19:57but what I do know is that at our last

19:59committee meeting, we started to talk

20:02about this and the committee asked us to

20:04pause it and talk about it when you came

20:06back next time.

20:08>> Okay.

20:08>> So it was moving forward in the

20:10committee

20:11with this proposal, but we were asked to

20:14pause. So Jennifer Cook may be able to

20:17tell us more about what we can or can't

20:20do from that perspective.

20:28>> Jennifer, do you mind following up on

20:30that and then we'll go to Janet?

20:32>> Um

20:33so I'm not sure that I am the best

20:36person to speak to that, but I imagine

20:39you know, any considerations like this

20:42would need to be a part of the budget.

20:45Um so I I think maybe there would need

20:47to be discussions with

20:50BFRC about that just to ensure that um

20:56that's reserved in the budget.

20:59But I don't know if that would be for

21:012027

21:02or if this is something that would be

21:04for 2028.

21:07And it would depend It would depend on

21:09what action that HR committee took at

21:12that time.

21:14>> Okay. Janet?

21:16>> Um

21:17a question just so that I understand the

21:20current plan and and the conversations

21:21y'all have had to date.

21:23Has there been any discussion or is

21:24there anything in the plan that um

21:26ensures the leave can be utilized for uh

21:30birthing parents who experience

21:32stillbirth?

21:36>> I know that um that is one of the im-

21:40changes that uh the state made was they

21:42included that as part of their language.

21:45Um that would be something that we would

21:47want to look at adding um to be more

21:49specific in our policy.

21:52>> Thank you.

21:53>> Good question.

21:56Does anyone else in the commission have

21:58questions about the city's current paid

22:00family leave policy?

22:06Okay.

22:07Oh, go ahead, Cara.

22:08>> I just wanted to ask um is there also a

22:11policy that would say you can take a

22:13certain amount of time unpaid and during

22:16that additional time would would would

22:19people be getting, you know, some sort

22:21of state disability payments? I don't

22:23know how it works in the state.

22:27>> Um well, I know um for us,

22:30they would be covered under FMLA

22:33um and be able to use any of their

22:36accrued leave um any of that after the 6

22:40weeks um to make the 12 weeks whole for

22:44FMLA.

22:45>> Okay.

22:46>> Um so, they have that ability in

22:49addition to the 6 weeks.

22:53>> And just to clarify, FMLA would

22:55typically be unpaid?

22:57Okay, so that's just guaranteed time off

22:59of work once the paid time is used. Um

23:04and doctors would need to write you out

23:08of work to be eligible for more time

23:11beyond that what the normal 6 to 8 weeks

23:14that a doctor would write you out for.

23:16So, April, stop me if I say anything

23:18wrong here, but let's say somebody's out

23:20for a regular maternity leave and

23:21they're written out for 6 weeks, it

23:23would be paid and they would come back.

23:26I believe a lot of times if you have a

23:28C-section, they can write you out for up

23:29to 8 weeks.

23:31You would have 6 weeks

23:33weeks of pay and if you're depending on

23:35your situation, you may or may not get

23:37disability

23:39after that depending on whether or not

23:41you are disabled according to the

23:43disability rules, but then any time

23:45remaining after that would be unpaid.

23:48>> Mhm.

23:53Question.

23:55Any other questions from the commission?

24:02Okay.

24:03Um well, thank you, HR team, for that.

24:07Um

24:08I'm going to share something that I

24:10probably said not so eloquently on our

24:12last HR committee. Um and please know

24:15this is in no way, shape, or form a

24:16criticism of our fantastic HR team and

24:19their staff, but to me 4 weeks is

24:21absolutely unacceptable. Um

24:24and just based on personal experience, I

24:27had an emergency C-section. I was in the

24:29hospital for 10 days. Um my boys were in

24:32the NICU for 2 weeks. Like to have to

24:35take them home and then go back to work

24:362 weeks after, I just couldn't imagine

24:38what that was and I had an employer who

24:40gave me 16 weeks. Um so, I I do feel

24:43very passionately about this topic and

24:48what I would like to see the the city do

24:50is is have a tiered plan to get to 12

24:53weeks over the course of a couple of

24:54years for all um

24:57the the biological mother and the

24:59partner,

25:00I think that is the minimum requirement

25:02now that we see and actually have a lot

25:05of people who I know get 6 months off

25:07now including 2 weeks before their due

25:09date and then after as well. So, I think

25:12there are excellent standards out there

25:14and I I don't think this is one of them.

25:16And again, I say that with with no

25:20no malice towards our HR staff. They're

25:21incredible. We have an incredible

25:23benefits team, but I think this is an

25:25area of improvement and one of the

25:26reasons why I care so deeply about this

25:28commission is because I want to see us

25:31do great work in this area.

25:33And so, I do think this could be a

25:35really great focus place for us for the

25:39coming year.

25:40At the same time, I know that affordable

25:43child care has become a topic that is

25:46widely embraced by a lot of different

25:49stakeholders including our business

25:50community.

25:52And I've actually been approached with

25:54some really great ideas around how the

25:56city could actually change its zoning

25:57code to allow for more daycares in the

26:01city for example to help cut some red

26:03tape. And so, for your all's background,

26:05the city's also going through our zoning

26:07code rewrite. So, there's a nice

26:10parallel there happening.

26:13And so, I know that there's a lot we

26:14could study on the the child care side

26:17and understanding what options are

26:19available to municipalities to help

26:21create more child care options. And

26:24that's not something I know a lot about.

26:25I know Janet probably has a lot of ideas

26:27and a lot of you on this commission do.

26:30So, I think that could be a really rich

26:31area

26:33for study as well.

26:35Um

26:35And we also do have this other path

26:39through the HR committee.

26:41So, I

26:42one option to propose and I'll open it

26:44up for discussion is that you know, if

26:46this committee were to focus on

26:48affordable child care next year, I I

26:50continue to work with our HR committee

26:52chair,

26:53and our incredible staff. Sorry, this is

26:55not the You guys are amazing. I just

26:57don't like the policy. I love all you

26:59though.

27:00And and try to push those increases

27:03through the HR committee as well, at

27:06least for next year to try to get on the

27:08same level as the state to start.

27:10So, I do kind of see two parallel paths

27:13there.

27:14But, I am one voice, so want to open the

27:17floor to you all.

27:26Jennifer Brown.

27:28>> Yes. Um

27:30is it possible

27:32cuz I like to dream big.

27:34Is it possible for this commission to

27:38work on both? When I say work on both, I

27:42I support your tier approach to 12.

27:46Who's to say maybe 16, but maybe that's

27:48pushing it. But, 12 and also to study

27:53the child care

27:55issue.

27:57Me personally,

27:59I didn't think that there was a problem

28:01that there were not enough daycares in

28:03Charleston. I thought that the

28:05affordability was the issue.

28:07Um but, my question or suggestion is can

28:11we do both?

28:15>> It's a good question. Let's have Dr.

28:17Cheek next.

28:21>> Let me unmute. I don't have an idea any

28:24idea of what child care costs. I'm

28:28probably the most senior person on this

28:31commission. So,

28:34I do have a grandchild who is now in

28:39in school. It's rather pricey, but you

28:43know,

28:45my daughter and son-in-law have good

28:48jobs and we help with that. But what

28:51what exactly

28:53is the cost of child care these days?

28:59>> Janet, you want to take that one?

29:01>> [laughter]

29:05>> Oh, and I can't hear you.

29:08>> Sorry.

29:09Um it depends on a lot of factors. So,

29:11it's going to depend on your geography.

29:13Um if you're living in a more rural area

29:15versus uh a more uh urban area. Also,

29:18the number of daycares does affect it

29:20because if there's only one in a

29:21population versus five, their prices

29:23tend to be higher. Um supply and demand

29:26takes uh takes into account there. And

29:28it also depends on the number of kids

29:30that you have within the facility. But

29:32you can be looking at upwards of $385 to

29:34$400 a week per child. Um

29:38uh as an example, I mean, I think in in

29:40some I've heard some other people throw

29:41around numbers are like, "Oh, in other

29:43cities we pay $30,000 a year for child

29:45care." Like, cool, you do here in

29:46Charleston, too. Um and so, when we're

29:49looking at the the cost of living and

29:52when we say that housing and

29:53transportation should cost 30% or less

29:56of someone's paycheck, what we're not

29:58taking into account is the additional

29:59infrastructure that is necessary for

30:01that person to go to work to make that

30:04paycheck. And that's the cost of of

30:06child care. The national number that's

30:08been agreed on is that it should only

30:09cost 7%. Um

30:12I have spent 6 years on on the child

30:14care front in Charleston and this is an

30:17issue that I'm incredibly passionate

30:18about. So, I was going to raise my hand

30:20and say, "I would really love for us to

30:21tackle this one." I'm also equally like

30:23quite frankly equally as passionate

30:25about the paid leave for many of the

30:26similar reasons that Leslie is.

30:28Um

30:29there are some pretty valuable resources

30:32that I'd be happy to bring to the

30:33commission related to

30:35um zoning laws. Uh Dorchester County has

30:37done some some recent work in the last

30:39year on changing their zoning laws to

30:40allow for daycares to come in with less

30:42red tape. There's also examples from out

30:44of state I'd be happy to bring to bear.

30:46Um there are a decent number of

30:48resources and um that I could share with

30:51you all in terms of um some reading on

30:53different municipalities in child care

30:55and some solutions that have been done

30:56and there's also a gentleman um who

30:58works for a company called Tutris um and

31:01he has been a passionate advocate for uh

31:03tri-share programs. Um tri-share

31:06programs are when the um parent, the um

31:10state, and the employers share the cost

31:12of the child care together and I think

31:14that that's a very interesting thing for

31:16us to consider um moving forward. So I

31:20either direction we go, I would also

31:21like to tackle both. Whoever said that,

31:23I'm I'm all about that. Um but it is uh

31:26I was at a recent meeting with the uh

31:28Chamber of Commerce here in Charleston

31:30and we're talking about what would make

31:32it more valuable for people to live in

31:34Charleston and to continue the economic

31:36growth that we're seeing here and the

31:37two top issues were housing and child

31:39care. So I worry if we wait that we're

31:42going to miss the opportunity to strike

31:43while the iron is hot on this one.

31:46Sorry, that was more information than

31:47you asked for.

31:48>> [laughter]

31:48>> No, that that that was great and I I

31:52would be interested in tackling both

31:54myself.

31:55>> [laughter]

31:57>> Tammy.

31:58>> Tammy.

32:04>> Sorry, trying to unmute myself there. Um

32:07I did want to clarify just for point of

32:10clarification that the city currently

32:13does have 6 weeks of paid maternity

32:15leave for

32:17the birth parent.

32:18I know we said 4 weeks earlier, but it's

32:204 + 2.

32:22If we structure ours like the state,

32:24it'll be more clearly six, but there is

32:276 weeks paid now for the birth parent

32:29and two for the other parent, the

32:33non-birth parent. Um what we're looking

32:35at doing right now is upping the

32:37non-birth parent to four and possibly

32:40converting our four plus two to a

32:42generic six.

32:44>> Thank you for that clarification.

32:46>> a point of clarification, okay.

32:47>> Thank you, yeah. Sorry, I'm

32:50um that's helpful and then with those um

32:52updates, Tammy, would it be

32:54incorporating the state language like

32:57including stillbirths?

32:59Yes, ma'am. Okay.

33:01Okay.

33:02So, that's helpful. So, just to clarify,

33:03those changes are on the table right now

33:07being evaluated by the HR committee.

33:09Okay. Um Amalia.

33:11>> they they paused

33:13They Sorry, they paused it, but they're

33:16They they're ready to evaluate it.

33:18>> Yes. Okay.

33:19>> Okay.

33:20>> Uh Amalia.

33:23>> Hi, thank you. Um I I am also on board

33:26with with tackling both.

33:29Um I I have a question. Is

33:33is the idea for the city of Charleston

33:35to continuously keep up with the state?

33:39I ask that because

33:41you know, part of part of our

33:43legislative agendas and as an

33:45organization, not as Amalia, but as an

33:47organization, is to increase the weeks

33:51off for both the birthing and the

33:52non-birthing parents and so

33:55I'm just curious as to how we're going

33:57to tackle that as a commission here and

33:58what the plan is for the city. Like if

34:00the if the city is going to continuously

34:03catch up with the state, then why not

34:05start working on that tiered approach

34:07now on paid leave?

34:10Um so, that's that question and then I

34:13also wanted to offer um in in my

34:16previous life

34:18we launched a a program in a different

34:21state um that gives single parents

34:24universal child care and I also worked

34:27with the um

34:29with the folks that did the blueprint on

34:31universal child care in New Mexico and I

34:34personally speaking think that universal

34:36child care for South Carolina is the way

34:38to go and anything else is a band-aid.

34:39So, um to the extent that I can be

34:42helpful in in that space, I'm I'm happy

34:46to give all the information and as

34:47someone who has now

34:49this is the first year I am not paying

34:51for child care. Um

34:54it's kind of it's kind of wild, but only

34:5623% of our families in South Carolina

34:59can actually afford child care.

35:02>> Yeah.

35:02>> So, the numbers are bleak.

35:05>> They are. Thank you for that. And to

35:06answer your first question, I mean, in

35:09my mind, like no, we should be ahead of

35:11the state. Um I think what's under what

35:14will be under consideration for the HR

35:16committee is a temporary

35:19uh level setting and adjustment to meet

35:22the lowest standards set by the state,

35:24but I would like to see us be a model

35:26for that and I do think there's an

35:28economic reason to do that in terms of

35:30staff recruitment and retention. Um and

35:32there's an economic benefit to having um

35:35extended paid family leave, if that's

35:37helpful.

35:40Um

35:41Jennifer Strickland.

35:44>> I just wanted to say that I kind of it

35:46sounds like we're all kind of on the

35:47same page. I do struggle with um both of

35:50these topics, which one do we tackle

35:53first? Um if we do kind of look at the

35:56parental um maternal leave as a tiered

35:59approach, I think that makes sense where

36:01we could kind of phase into that and

36:03then also work on the child care

36:05component. Um I personally have a

36:093-year-old.

36:10Um

36:11I think it's a combination of both, if I

36:13were to speak on what my um situation

36:16was in finding child care. The waitlists

36:19were 2 years long. So, I think there was

36:23a shortage on top of okay, well, I'm

36:26also paying a whole another mortgage on

36:28top of paying what I currently pay to

36:30live.

36:32Um so, I think it is affordability

36:34matched with okay, those wait lists and

36:36trying to get into, you know, the good

36:39schools or, you know, good education

36:41even on that that level because I mean,

36:44that's so important in the very

36:46beginning as well.

36:47Um as far as the uh maternity leave, I

36:51came from an organization when I did

36:53have my daughter where I had her and had

36:56to be back after 2 weeks and being a

36:58mother who is well into her 40s and had

37:01a child and I had some some things come

37:04up. Now, I didn't have a C-section, but

37:06I really did struggle just being a

37:08little bit older. It was really hard to

37:11leave a child that young and and go back

37:15to work. So, um I can speak on that and

37:18I think both of them are just as

37:19important and they kind of go hand in

37:20hand, too. So,

37:22thank you.

37:24>> Thank you for sharing that. Appreciate

37:26it.

37:29Okay. So, I have a thought for us

37:32because

37:34I too would love to this commission to

37:36tackle both at once and I also know that

37:38that would be we we need to double our

37:40meetings. Um

37:42so,

37:44I would propose that we make affordable

37:47child care the commission's

37:50topic of study for 2027

37:53and also then give a an endorsement or a

37:59um

38:00a resolution or um

38:03a vote that basically says, "Leslie, on

38:06the HR committee, go after this tiered

38:08approach with all of your might. You

38:10have our support

38:12um and I'll provide you all with updates

38:15on all of our calls about that."

38:18Um so, that way I I that would be kind

38:20of the best way to to two track it and

38:23see where we get. Uh And then, you know,

38:26next year if we haven't gotten anywhere,

38:27then we we double down.

38:30What do people think about that?

38:35Thoughts?

38:37>> Um I'll I'll jump in, Leslie. I I love

38:39that idea. One thing that I would ask is

38:41if there's an opportunity if the if the

38:43paid leave is coming up in front of

38:45council and there's an opportunity for

38:46public comment that this commission

38:48knows about it so we can either, you

38:50know, bring in some experts if that

38:52would be helpful.

38:53You know, I know both Wren and the

38:55Chamber of Mothers were involved with

38:58getting the state's paid leave to

39:00include stillbirth and we have some

39:02individuals

39:03who are in Charleston County who could

39:04certainly be a part of that discussion

39:06and and speak to the council about their

39:08own personal experience. So, I would

39:10love for this commission to be aware of

39:12when that's happening so that we can

39:13assist.

39:15>> That's a great idea and I think we could

39:16also probably we can ask the HR chair to

39:19if we could do public comment before one

39:21of those meetings as well.

39:23Tammy, do you have the next HR committee

39:27meeting handy? Sorry to put you on the

39:28spot.

39:29>> [laughter]

39:31>> I can look.

39:36>> And then just so you all know, I told

39:39Professor Jones that I would share that

39:41her preference was also for child care

39:44affordability. She had talked to some of

39:46the gender studies professors and that

39:48was their their focus.

39:50And while Tammy looks for that, I think

39:54one question I have for you all is the

39:56scope of child care that we want to look

39:58at. Um

40:00More personal stories here. This is why

40:01I love this commission.

40:03You know, our boys just transitioned

40:05from daycare to

40:08pre-K at our local neighborhood

40:10elementary school.

40:12The aftercare is an incredibly difficult

40:15issue, too.

40:17And so, you know, these kids start

40:19school at 7:00 a.m. and they get out at

40:212:25 p.m. Um, which makes it absolutely,

40:25incredibly hard to have two working

40:28parents. Um, and then, you don't have a

40:31ton of options and nannies are

40:33incredibly expensive and there aren't a

40:36lot of them to go around and and we were

40:38very fortunate to get into Kaleidoscope

40:40very last minute, but there just aren't

40:42that many aftercare programs that are

40:44also free and and Kaleidoscope still has

40:46a cost, too. So, you know, when I think

40:48of child care, I'm also the aftercare

40:51part comes to mind for me, too.

40:53Um, because that's a really big deal for

40:55working families, as well.

40:59Just put that out there.

41:02All right. So, um, Jennifer Cook, do we

41:05need to make an official motion, second,

41:08and and vote on our

41:10proposal to move forward?

41:12>> Yes.

41:13>> Okay. Can I make a motion as a chair?

41:17>> Yes.

41:18>> Okay.

41:19Um, well, then I would like to make a

41:21motion that the Commission on Women

41:24select affordable child care as our

41:272027,

41:29um, topic of of focus and discussion.

41:33And at the same time, that the

41:35Commission lends its support, um,

41:39to pursue

41:41I one, bringing the city of Charleston's

41:46paid family leave up to the state

41:48standards. And then, two, um, pursuing a

41:51tiered approach to increase the city's

41:55paid family leave policy moving forward.

42:01That's my motion.

42:03>> I second that ground.

42:07>> All right. Second from Janet, so we'll

42:08open it up to discussion. Jennifer

42:10Brown.

42:11>> I I just have one question. I thought

42:13the young lady from HR said city of

42:17Charleston does have 6 weeks just like

42:19the state. So, aren't we already

42:23on the state level and we just want to

42:25move to tier?

42:27>> It would also be adding an additional 2

42:29weeks for the non-biological parent and

42:32updating some of the language to include

42:35stillbirth leave for example.

42:37>> Oh, that is I forgot about the

42:39stillbirth. Thank you so much. Okay,

42:41thank you.

42:41>> Great question.

42:42>> Question.

42:44>> Any other discussion?

42:47Tammy.

42:49>> I do not have that meeting on my

42:51calendar. I believe it should probably

42:53be December. Jennifer Cook, do you have

42:56I mean

42:56>> I have it.

42:57>> Jennifer?

42:58>> I have it. It's November 19th.

43:01>> November 19th. Okay.

43:05All right, I will I'll work with

43:08I'll talk to the chief of staff and the

43:10mayor if we would need to move more

43:12quickly than that to have it included in

43:15the budget for next year. So, I'll do

43:17some pre-work ahead of that meeting

43:20to see if that's possible.

43:24Okay.

43:25Dr. Cheek.

43:31I think you're still muted.

43:36>> Is the state of South Carolina

43:39and I guess the city of Charleston

43:42doesn't seem to be in line with the

43:45state at this point, but is the state in

43:48line other states in the Southeast?

43:52I I don't I don't want to go beyond the

43:54Southeast because

43:57you know, because when we start looking

44:01at northern states salaries

44:04and salaries are higher, but um just to

44:09compare, I'd like to know, you know, if

44:13we're comparable

44:15to other Southeastern states.

44:18>> So So, we've done

44:20I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt.

44:22>> No.

44:23>> Go ahead.

44:24>> Okay.

44:24>> No, go right ahead.

44:26>> We have done We have done an analysis of

44:29um local government and state government

44:32here in South Carolina. It would be

44:34fairly easy to grab a couple other

44:35states, um and we could provide that

44:39information to you guys.

44:42>> Yeah, and that that's a great question,

44:44and I also Well, I think this is where

44:46we can focus it on Charleston as a city

44:48instead of the state as a whole and and

44:50looking at other metro areas with a

44:52similar cost of living um and a similar

44:55salary range to us

44:57um throughout the Southeast because it

44:59is, you know, I think Charleston is a

45:01more expensive place than a lot of the

45:02rest of the state. Um so, that could be

45:04interesting to compare it kind of from

45:06an apples-to-apples perspective. Like,

45:07if we're looking at Durham, Raleigh, um

45:11Savannah, Charlotte, Richmond, um I

45:15would be interested in in those city

45:17comparisons. Amalia?

45:21>> So, North Carolina has paid leave for

45:23their state employees for 12 weeks.

45:27Um and Virginia has a comprehensive paid

45:32family um

45:34paid family and medical leave program

45:36for for everybody across the state. I

45:38just don't remember how long it is, but

45:40I'll look into that.

45:41>> Thank you.

45:43Yeah.

45:44Good to know.

45:46Okay.

45:48Um All right, any more discussion before

45:50we vote on the motion?

45:56Okay, all in favor.

46:00I.

46:03Okay, any opposed?

46:12Cara, Dr. Cheek, and Jennifer Brown, are

46:14you opposed or do you just need to take

46:16your hands down?

46:21>> In favor.

46:23>> Okay, great. Okay, so passes

46:25unanimously. Um my next question is as

46:28we prepare for our January meeting, um

46:31what I'd like to do is have a series of

46:33presentations um to look at what other

46:36municipalities are doing and what our

46:37options are. Um so my question to you

46:40all, Janet, I'm assuming the Chamber of

46:43Mothers has resources here. Amalia, I'm

46:45assuming Wren has resources here.

46:48Um Lavonda, I don't know if the the Y

46:50has any resources here on child care. Um

46:54but if you have examples that you would

46:58like to present to the committee, I'd

46:59love to start with this committee's

47:01knowledge um and then augment that with

47:03some some national folks too. And if you

47:05have recommendations

47:07on any national organizations that would

47:09be helpful to bring into the

47:10conversation,

47:12um please let me know and we can reach

47:15out to those folks to get the right

47:16point of contacts on the agenda as well.

47:21Okay.

47:24All right, awesome.

47:26Anything else for the good of the order?

47:32All right. Um well guys, thank you so

47:34much. Our ladies, thank you so much. Um

47:36really grateful for your time. Um I love

47:39to run an efficient meeting, so

47:40hopefully you feel like this was 48

47:42minutes um well spent. I think we have a

47:45great path going forward. Um I'm really

47:48excited to work with you all and uh

47:50produce some tangible results.

```*