2026-09-17 - Committee on Recreation
Summary
Built from the posted agenda and the auto-generated captions; names and numbers in captions may be misheard. Minutes were not yet posted.
- The August 20, 2026 minutes were approved by voice vote. There was no public participation and no old business.
- 2023 recreation bond review: staff said a draft status document is nearly finished, covering each listed bond project and its funding plan, plus related work funded outside the bond (for example a public-private playground project). It is to be complete by the next committee meeting, and members may see a draft beforehand. See 2023 Recreation Bond Projects.
- October discussion preview (rugby, lacrosse and other field users): the chair said the topic is broader than rugby versus lacrosse, because demand from colleges, high schools, youth leagues and clubs far exceeds available fields. See Recreation Field Permits and Unpermitted Use.
- Members and staff said the city cannot lock in exclusive agreements with one group, citing a past trial memorandum of understanding that did not work and the precedent it would set for other parks. They stressed that fields are primarily for city residents and are over-booked, and that no permit requests from the rugby group have been denied.
- Staff noted limits at the Stanley Coach Chisum field: no water or irrigation, temporary restrooms, limited parking, and lights that need staff to switch on and off. A recently lost field is pushing programs onto another park's fields.
- Possible long-range fixes mentioned: artificial turf and lighting at more fields, along with water, sewer and parking improvements.
- The chair plans a visual summary of all field demands and constraints for October. The committee adjourned.
Agenda
- Invocation
- Minutes: August 20, 2026
- Public participation
- Old business (none listed)
- New business
a. Review of 2023 recreation bond referendum list and status of projects - 2023 Recreation Bond Projects
b. Announcement of October discussion on rugby and lacrosse practice/events and city recreation programming - Recreation Field Permits and Unpermitted Use - Adjourn
Sources
- Agenda Center listing for this date: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_09172026-11215
- Documents: Recreation Committee Agenda
- Agenda Center: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/AgendaCenter
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42mm6jnHcco (City of Charleston YouTube channel)
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:11We're good.
00:25>> Good afternoon everybody. This is uh
00:27city councilman Jim McBride, the chair
00:29in the recreation committee meeting on
00:32uh se was it September? September 17th.
00:36Um we have
00:38the mayor uh Councilman Sheileely,
00:42myself, Councilwoman Scardarden uh is
00:45online and councilman Ben Dellesander is
00:47online as well.
00:50So let's take a moment for um Barry Hes
00:53in silence.
01:03Okay. Amen. Um, can I make a motion uh
01:06to approve the minutes from last
01:07meeting?
01:09>> Second.
01:12>> All right. Any uh
01:15we'll go and vote. Um, if in favor say
01:18I.
01:19>> I. I.
01:22>> Okay, it passes. Um,
01:25no public participation today. We're
01:27going to Any uh old business? Any
01:30comments from anybody of the committee
01:32members about old business from last
01:33meeting?
01:34>> Is there public participation?
01:37There's none. Okay.
01:39We put this on the agenda.
01:41>> No, no, no. Just maybe next month we
01:43might do it.
01:44>> Okay.
01:45>> Okay.
01:47>> Fair.
01:49Any comments for old business? If not,
01:52we will move to new business. Um, so
01:56item A,
01:58uh, requested by Councilwoman Scarden,
01:59review of the 2023 recreation bond
02:01referendum list and status of projects.
02:05>> I can take that one, Mr. Chairman. Um,
02:08we are pretty close. We have a draft
02:14u that is not quite finished that
02:18outlines
02:20um the status of every listed project on
02:22the 23 bond, what the funding um plan is
02:27for each one of them. And also we've
02:31included in this uh all the other work
02:34that has been done on projects outside
02:37the bond that is relevant for every
02:40every council member because it affects
02:41every one of their districts. So, uh,
02:44for example, if if, [snorts]
02:46um, Hazel Park or playground downtown
02:49was not specifically listed on the park
02:53wreck bond, but we through a public
02:56private partnership, uh, are doing
02:58pretty significant work there. Um, but
03:01the funding is not coming from the bond,
03:03it's coming from other sources. So,
03:05we're outlining the parks and wreck bond
03:08and where that money is going. And then
03:11we're uh highlighting all the other
03:14projects that have either been done or
03:16are being done or soon to start, if you
03:19will, uh related. And we'll have that
03:22package completed by the next WCK uh
03:26meeting. So, if any of the council
03:28members would like to see a draft of
03:30that beforehand, happy to provide it.
03:33Um, Hampton Logan is running point on
03:35it. Uh, and would love your input before
03:39it is finalized and and uh made public
03:43to the to the general population.
03:48>> Councilman Scott, any question,
03:50follow-up questions or comments?
03:52>> No, that's great. Thank you. I remember
03:54um you had shared that during council,
03:55so I was excited to see where that was
03:58going because I know there are a couple
04:00of James Island projects on there. So
04:02yes, if um you all are willing to share
04:04a copy before the next meeting, would
04:06love to take a peek and help in any way
04:08I can.
04:10>> Very good.
04:14Okay. So the next item, any last
04:17comments on item A?
04:19If not, the next item is
04:23my attempt to frame this discussion. Um
04:27so when we we and I'll just read it real
04:30quick. Sorry. the announcement um
04:32regarding
04:34discussion at the next month's the
04:36October recreation committee meeting
04:39related to regional and local rugby and
04:41lacrosse and other uh organizations
04:44practice and events and balancing with
04:47city recreation programming. Um so since
04:51I've been on the committee this short
04:52time uh I've been reached out to by Mr.
04:54Maloney of associated with the
04:57Charleston Rugby uh association
05:00several times and I know he had
05:02submitted um a proposal a year or so ago
05:05or maybe even further. Um so me being
05:08new it's taken a lot to just get my feet
05:10underneath me and understand kind of the
05:11history with this this uh proposal and
05:13and Coach Dan Chism Park usage and
05:17lacrosse etc etc etc. There's a lot to
05:20unwind there and when we've brought it
05:22up in previous recreation committee
05:23meetings, Lori Yarboro gave a great
05:26summary of all the the pros and cons and
05:28all the things that recreation committee
05:30has to deal with on a regular basis and
05:32then you have as well uh since then. And
05:35I'll be flatout honest, it is so much
05:37information and they do so much with so
05:40much programming in so many fields
05:41around the city of Charleston. It's
05:42impossible for I think anyone just to
05:45hear it to fully understand and digest
05:48what you all are dealing with on a
05:49regular basis to to me to to try to
05:52deconlict all the interests and manage
05:53all the interests. Um so I want to give
05:56due diligence to um Mr. Mr. Maloney as
06:01well as any other organizations and and
06:04the recreation committee to be able to
06:05explain next month to give time to
06:07prepare for next month having a very
06:09in-depth discussion um to be able to
06:11address uh all of Mr. Maloney's points,
06:14all of the lacrosse interest points and
06:16and everyone else. But I'll just go
06:18through a list here of kind of a a
06:20framework that I'm hoping to achieve
06:22between now and next month's um
06:26recreation committee meeting. uh
06:28understanding that there's a lot of
06:30competing interests that again I'm still
06:32trying to wrap my head around uh all the
06:34needs uh you know I think we we know
06:37there's a general we all wish there was
06:38more fields there was more recreation
06:40facilities you know there's making we're
06:41making some progress on that but the
06:43demand far exceeds what we have in the
06:46city right now so that's very
06:47challenging for the recreation um
06:50department to manage all that um so th
06:55this issue is as I've learned um talking
06:58to Robin is much more than just rugby
07:00versus lacrosse. It's it's balancing all
07:02the broader interests um with the
07:05Stanley uh coach Stanley Chism Park as
07:07well as all the other all the other
07:08fields
07:10um such as the College of Charleston,
07:12the Citadel um three different high
07:15schools, Wando, Lucy Beckham and
07:17Oceanside Collegiate,
07:19West Ashley, anticipated fall 2026
07:22usage, uh Charleston Youth Rugby, uh
07:26Blockade.
07:28So there's a lot that you're all trying
07:29to balance and I I fully rec recognize
07:31that and I'm trying to uh make sure that
07:33on October we can fully articulate all
07:35that you're trying to manage. So it
07:37doesn't appear to Mr. Maloney or any
07:39other interest that we're not giving
07:42them due diligence and fully, you know,
07:45um
07:46processing their their their uh
07:49requests. So that makes sense. Um
07:53there was a uh cusabo, is that right?
07:56That's how you say it. do um as a
07:58precedent um that no longer is in place
08:01and I'll allow you if you want to to
08:03talk about that now or next month, but
08:06there's some lessons learned from that
08:07experience. So just because the city had
08:10an MOU with another organization in the
08:11past doesn't mean that that's now a new
08:13precedent and in fact it may not have
08:15gone as as well as as was advertised
08:17when thatou was put in place.
08:21Um yes sir, go ahead.
08:23>> Yeah. Um it it did not go well. It was
08:26an experiment, a trial and didn't work.
08:30And I think it's important to note that
08:33this is not just an issue with Stanley
08:36Chisum, which is a very popular field,
08:38but probably one of the least used
08:41fields that we have. We have a lot of
08:44recreational fields. We have a ton of
08:49people, organizations very reputable,
08:52very compelling in their arguments,
08:55um, very passionate about their product
09:00that are always asking us to use our
09:05facilities and we want to let them, but
09:08we cannot lock in with any one group. I
09:13mean, it is proven to be an extreme
09:16problem. It sets a very dangerous
09:18precedent. Even one park, well, then
09:21you're going to have these seven people
09:23over here that want to use the park on
09:25John's Island saying, "Well, you did it
09:27there. Why won't you do it here?" And
09:30they're different circumstances for
09:32every field. Um, but bottom line is what
09:35is very consistent across all of it is
09:39that they're over booked.
09:42And so we sympathize and we understand
09:45the frustrations of these groups that
09:48come back time and time again and and
09:50don't want to hear that we cannot
09:52accommodate them. Um but the reality of
09:56it is we we have to be judicious. We
09:59have to be equitable. We cannot pick
10:01favorites one over the other. Not
10:04everybody's going to get it exactly the
10:06way they want it. And um I I I do give
10:12real accolades to staff for doing the
10:16best that they can. And it's not just
10:19scheduling. I want to be clear on this
10:20too. We have Beth and the Capital
10:23Projects team here as well. It's a huge
10:26amount of wear and tear on our fields.
10:29And I assure you, we do not get the
10:32money back in the fees that we charge.
10:36It costs us. And again, that's what
10:38they're there for. I get it. We want to
10:40use them as much as possible. And
10:42there's never a right balance on use
10:45versus wear and tear versus um getting
10:49everybody uh on the schedule that that
10:51wants to be on the schedule. But um you
10:55know I think we need to be very careful
10:58when we start zeroing in on one park or
11:02another park and a specific effort here
11:04and a specific effort there because
11:07it'll take that
11:09um already delicate balance and potent
11:12potentially just put it upside down in a
11:15ditch. So
11:19>> yeah, thank you chairman and I agree
11:21with the mayor. Um few years ago when I
11:24was chairing this, we had a similar
11:26situation except it was club soccer that
11:29was really coming at us hard saying you
11:31you need to give us some facilities. You
11:33need to give us some facilities. These
11:34are kids that live and in the city of
11:37Charleston, they just choose to play at
11:38a different level and we don't have the
11:40fields to accommodate them and so we
11:42need the city to help. So it it is more
11:45than more than rugby and lacrosse.
11:47There's other outside groups as as well
11:50um that that are asking for this and
11:52have asked in the past.
11:56>> Yeah. And one uh was sat next to Robin
11:59Cooper last week when you you all came
12:01down to uh John's Allen to talk about
12:03the recreation center. We had some time
12:05to talk afterwards and she gave a
12:07perspective that I hadn't thought of is
12:09that you know these city fields and
12:11facilities are for city residents
12:13primarily. That's obviously that's what
12:15it should be for. Allowing a group to
12:18come in and play teams from other areas
12:20and that kind of thing is cool. I think
12:22it's cool. It's having a rugby
12:23tournament in in Charleston would be
12:25awesome, but that's not the primary use
12:27of our fields. And I so I understand
12:29that perspective. I'm speaking for you
12:31here. You can correct me if I'm wrong,
12:33but uh so I'm not I'm not preloading a
12:36decision on this. I just want to kind of
12:37get it out there in the ether as to what
12:40a a bigger perspective on what the
12:41considerations are. And I think and
12:43hopefully in October we'll be able to
12:44kind of show with lists of all the
12:48community demands and interests and then
12:49all the fields related to this topic so
12:52the public has a better understanding of
12:54how challenging it is for you all to
12:55manage all the unbelievable demand on
12:58these fields and if there's any way to
13:00compromise that is beneficial to the
13:02city of Charleston then we'll talk about
13:03it but I don't want to steer either way.
13:06Go ahead.
13:06>> I think just one f last point Mr.
13:08chairman, if you will, is that I I do
13:10think it's also will be good to again
13:14highlight all of the nuances, all of the
13:17details, all of the logistics that staff
13:19deals with so that when you have those
13:22frustrated teams and players and
13:24parents,
13:25um these folks often take the brunt of
13:29it like and and and we owe it to our
13:34staff to I guess educate people and to
13:39make sure that they know that, you know,
13:42the staff would love to h let you have
13:45your game there, but you know, they're
13:48not going to pick and choose winners and
13:50losers here, and that's not their job,
13:53and and we cannot put them in an unfair
13:55position. So, u I think it's going to be
14:00important for let let people know. Um,
14:02and then, you know, I think we may want
14:05to look at looking at, you know, just
14:08making it very clear to the public writ
14:10large that this is not an option. I
14:13mean, if that's what we determine. Um,
14:16so, uh, I I'll I look forward to next
14:20next next month. Thank you, Mr.
14:23>> One quick comment and I'll turn on Mr.
14:25Sheileely. Um and to with all that
14:28demand and all those competing
14:30interests, my understanding is you guys
14:33have not denied Mr. Maloney
14:34>> correct
14:36>> any of the permit any of the requests
14:37that they've asked for. They they've
14:39done it. I think one of his desires is
14:42to have more of kind of long-term locked
14:44in agreement and I and I get that and
14:46we'll talk about that next next month.
14:48But to be fair, more than fair to you
14:50all because you've earned it is that you
14:51it's not that you've denied anything.
14:53It's so I I get that. Mr. Go ahead.
14:56>> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I mean, a
14:57couple of things that we had discussed a
14:59few years ago when these things were
15:01coming up were as we try to improve
15:04fields, we take a look at artificial
15:06turf so that there's you you don't have
15:10the the maintenance that um that you
15:12have on the natural turf. Um and I used
15:14to be against artificial turf, but
15:16they've come a long way with with
15:17artificial turf and what they can do.
15:19you see Mount Pleasant and other
15:21municipalities now putting in artificial
15:23turf so that they can get more use out
15:25of those fields. Um, and the other thing
15:27that we've discussed in this committee
15:29is lights as well, you know, on on those
15:31fields. So, I mean, that's a couple of
15:33things that are long range that can
15:35really help this problem down the road.
15:40>> I want to turn over to this to the staff
15:42if you guys have any comments on on this
15:44going into this.
15:48I would just note that the issue isn't
15:50just the field itself, but it's the
15:52other improvements that go along with
15:53the field. Uh lack of sewer, lack of
15:56water that's to the field. So
15:58improvements need to be made if the
16:00route is to program this heavier than
16:03what we're doing right now. So we have
16:05temporary uh restrooms out there. We
16:07have portallettes that we pay for. We
16:10being the city, not capital projects. Uh
16:12we would have to do improved parking and
16:14other things. So in addition to the
16:16lights, the field itself, there'd be
16:17other structural improvements that would
16:19need to be made
16:20>> and pick up the garbage more freely.
16:22Like again, the more these things are
16:24there's just other
16:27consequences that are very relevant for
16:30the operation. But again, I want to be
16:31on record of saying we want them used as
16:34much as possible, but we have to balance
16:38it between all these other competing
16:40interests and uh and our capacity to to
16:44service them.
16:47>> Yeah. And I think everybody's hit on all
16:50the points and you know, we we do the
16:52best we can to give everybody something.
16:54I have for the most part been able to
16:56give everybody something of what they
16:59need. If somebody, you know, baseball
17:00team comes in and says, "I want four
17:01nights a week, 6:00." I'm not going to
17:03be able to give somebody four nights a
17:04week at 6:00. I can give you two nights
17:06a week at 5:00 and then somebody can
17:07come in at 7. Um, you know, depending
17:10again, as Mr. Sheileley said, the light
17:12situation, we just don't have enough
17:14fields with lights in a week or two.
17:16We're dead in the water. Um, you know,
17:18and we lost just lost another field um
17:21with McMahon. So now everything I've got
17:23programmed at McMahon now has to land on
17:25Harmon. So, I've got youth flag
17:28football, youth soccer, adult flag
17:30football, adult soccer, tackle football,
17:34um ultimate frisbee, and adult flag
17:36football all on really two fields, but
17:41we make them four. So, I mean, I've got
17:44a soccer field on top of a flag football
17:46field next to a flag football field next
17:48to a flag football field. Um, you know,
17:50parking becomes an issue as well. You
17:53know, we're Thank goodness Burke's right
17:54there because we can use Burke. So, it's
17:56parking, it's staffing, it's opening,
17:58it's closing, it's turning lights on,
17:59turning lights off. Lights at Chisel are
18:02going to be great. But if I have to now
18:03send a staff person down to turn lights
18:05on and turn lights off, then I'm having
18:07to charge that customer for that because
18:09we're not, you know, that's probably not
18:11a place that we will put a permanent
18:12staff person. Um, you know, John's
18:15Island's great. I got three fields. All
18:17three are being rented. Two of them I
18:19can do on a phone app. The third one, I
18:21have to send somebody out there to turn
18:22lights off and then send somebody out
18:24there to turn lights on. Mr. McBride
18:26lives on John's Island. Might give you a
18:28part-time job. [laughter]
18:29>> Yeah.
18:31>> Um, you know, so those are all things
18:33that staffing and that rest. We we give
18:35our fields no rest. No rest. And you
18:39know, Chisum is a little bit different.
18:40That's not our greatest turf field.
18:42We're not putting the money into it in
18:44the past just because of the nature of
18:46the field. There is no water. There is
18:48no irrigation. where we can't put
18:49fertilizer down because they can't water
18:50it in. So, um, you know, there's
18:53different levels. So, we have those
18:54satellite fields and Chisum is great
18:57that we're able to give, you know,
18:59Rugby, we've got, I think, eight permits
19:01scheduled. You know, Mr. Maloney has
19:03four and I think there's three or four
19:04other permits already scheduled out for
19:06for a hall for the fall. Um, you know,
19:09but again, in next week, two weeks from
19:11now, that feels no good. Come five
19:13o'clock in the afternoon. It's only good
19:15on Saturdays and Sundays.
19:17I just want to again say too that
19:20this is not a knock on any of the
19:21organizations, but M. Maloney, I think
19:24they take care of it. They they are good
19:26stewards of the of the field. I'm not,
19:29you know, in any way trying to suggest
19:30when I mention trash or anything like
19:32that that any of these folks um don't
19:35care about the fields or aren't good
19:36stewards. But, you know, just the
19:38reality of it is to to Robin's point,
19:40there's just a lot more that goes into
19:42it than uh the scheduling alone.
19:47Yeah, definitely. There's 25 people that
19:49I can just probably name right off the
19:51top that would get in line and say,
19:53"Okay, I want mine, too."
19:56>> So, a lot was said. My again, my goal in
19:58October is to is to be able to show this
20:00so it's it's crystal clear to everybody
20:01what all the things you're trying to
20:02balance, and we're not trying to be
20:03prejuditial against or for anybody.
20:05We're trying to be as fair as as can be.
20:07And just again in my limited experience,
20:10there's so much information that you all
20:11have, it's impossible to, you know, even
20:13if you just listed off a whole bunch of
20:14organizations that I'll forget 10
20:16minutes after I walk out of here. So, I
20:17think having it visually to kind of make
20:19it clear for everybody will help help
20:21the public a lot.
20:25>> Any comments from anyone else on the
20:26committee?
20:33>> All right. Uh hearing none. Everyone
20:35okay to return? We'll go and adjourn.
20:38Thanks everybody. Thank you.
```*
