2026-09-17 - Committee on Recreation

Summary

Built from the posted agenda and the auto-generated captions; names and numbers in captions may be misheard. Minutes were not yet posted.

  • The August 20, 2026 minutes were approved by voice vote. There was no public participation and no old business.
  • 2023 recreation bond review: staff said a draft status document is nearly finished, covering each listed bond project and its funding plan, plus related work funded outside the bond (for example a public-private playground project). It is to be complete by the next committee meeting, and members may see a draft beforehand. See 2023 Recreation Bond Projects.
  • October discussion preview (rugby, lacrosse and other field users): the chair said the topic is broader than rugby versus lacrosse, because demand from colleges, high schools, youth leagues and clubs far exceeds available fields. See Recreation Field Permits and Unpermitted Use.
  • Members and staff said the city cannot lock in exclusive agreements with one group, citing a past trial memorandum of understanding that did not work and the precedent it would set for other parks. They stressed that fields are primarily for city residents and are over-booked, and that no permit requests from the rugby group have been denied.
  • Staff noted limits at the Stanley Coach Chisum field: no water or irrigation, temporary restrooms, limited parking, and lights that need staff to switch on and off. A recently lost field is pushing programs onto another park's fields.
  • Possible long-range fixes mentioned: artificial turf and lighting at more fields, along with water, sewer and parking improvements.
  • The chair plans a visual summary of all field demands and constraints for October. The committee adjourned.

Agenda

  1. Invocation
  2. Minutes: August 20, 2026
  3. Public participation
  4. Old business (none listed)
  5. New business
    a. Review of 2023 recreation bond referendum list and status of projects - 2023 Recreation Bond Projects
    b. Announcement of October discussion on rugby and lacrosse practice/events and city recreation programming - Recreation Field Permits and Unpermitted Use
  6. Adjourn

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:11We're good.

00:25>> Good afternoon everybody. This is uh

00:27city councilman Jim McBride, the chair

00:29in the recreation committee meeting on

00:32uh se was it September? September 17th.

00:36Um we have

00:38the mayor uh Councilman Sheileely,

00:42myself, Councilwoman Scardarden uh is

00:45online and councilman Ben Dellesander is

00:47online as well.

00:50So let's take a moment for um Barry Hes

00:53in silence.

01:03Okay. Amen. Um, can I make a motion uh

01:06to approve the minutes from last

01:07meeting?

01:09>> Second.

01:12>> All right. Any uh

01:15we'll go and vote. Um, if in favor say

01:18I.

01:19>> I. I.

01:22>> Okay, it passes. Um,

01:25no public participation today. We're

01:27going to Any uh old business? Any

01:30comments from anybody of the committee

01:32members about old business from last

01:33meeting?

01:34>> Is there public participation?

01:37There's none. Okay.

01:39We put this on the agenda.

01:41>> No, no, no. Just maybe next month we

01:43might do it.

01:44>> Okay.

01:45>> Okay.

01:47>> Fair.

01:49Any comments for old business? If not,

01:52we will move to new business. Um, so

01:56item A,

01:58uh, requested by Councilwoman Scarden,

01:59review of the 2023 recreation bond

02:01referendum list and status of projects.

02:05>> I can take that one, Mr. Chairman. Um,

02:08we are pretty close. We have a draft

02:14u that is not quite finished that

02:18outlines

02:20um the status of every listed project on

02:22the 23 bond, what the funding um plan is

02:27for each one of them. And also we've

02:31included in this uh all the other work

02:34that has been done on projects outside

02:37the bond that is relevant for every

02:40every council member because it affects

02:41every one of their districts. So, uh,

02:44for example, if if, [snorts]

02:46um, Hazel Park or playground downtown

02:49was not specifically listed on the park

02:53wreck bond, but we through a public

02:56private partnership, uh, are doing

02:58pretty significant work there. Um, but

03:01the funding is not coming from the bond,

03:03it's coming from other sources. So,

03:05we're outlining the parks and wreck bond

03:08and where that money is going. And then

03:11we're uh highlighting all the other

03:14projects that have either been done or

03:16are being done or soon to start, if you

03:19will, uh related. And we'll have that

03:22package completed by the next WCK uh

03:26meeting. So, if any of the council

03:28members would like to see a draft of

03:30that beforehand, happy to provide it.

03:33Um, Hampton Logan is running point on

03:35it. Uh, and would love your input before

03:39it is finalized and and uh made public

03:43to the to the general population.

03:48>> Councilman Scott, any question,

03:50follow-up questions or comments?

03:52>> No, that's great. Thank you. I remember

03:54um you had shared that during council,

03:55so I was excited to see where that was

03:58going because I know there are a couple

04:00of James Island projects on there. So

04:02yes, if um you all are willing to share

04:04a copy before the next meeting, would

04:06love to take a peek and help in any way

04:08I can.

04:10>> Very good.

04:14Okay. So the next item, any last

04:17comments on item A?

04:19If not, the next item is

04:23my attempt to frame this discussion. Um

04:27so when we we and I'll just read it real

04:30quick. Sorry. the announcement um

04:32regarding

04:34discussion at the next month's the

04:36October recreation committee meeting

04:39related to regional and local rugby and

04:41lacrosse and other uh organizations

04:44practice and events and balancing with

04:47city recreation programming. Um so since

04:51I've been on the committee this short

04:52time uh I've been reached out to by Mr.

04:54Maloney of associated with the

04:57Charleston Rugby uh association

05:00several times and I know he had

05:02submitted um a proposal a year or so ago

05:05or maybe even further. Um so me being

05:08new it's taken a lot to just get my feet

05:10underneath me and understand kind of the

05:11history with this this uh proposal and

05:13and Coach Dan Chism Park usage and

05:17lacrosse etc etc etc. There's a lot to

05:20unwind there and when we've brought it

05:22up in previous recreation committee

05:23meetings, Lori Yarboro gave a great

05:26summary of all the the pros and cons and

05:28all the things that recreation committee

05:30has to deal with on a regular basis and

05:32then you have as well uh since then. And

05:35I'll be flatout honest, it is so much

05:37information and they do so much with so

05:40much programming in so many fields

05:41around the city of Charleston. It's

05:42impossible for I think anyone just to

05:45hear it to fully understand and digest

05:48what you all are dealing with on a

05:49regular basis to to me to to try to

05:52deconlict all the interests and manage

05:53all the interests. Um so I want to give

05:56due diligence to um Mr. Mr. Maloney as

06:01well as any other organizations and and

06:04the recreation committee to be able to

06:05explain next month to give time to

06:07prepare for next month having a very

06:09in-depth discussion um to be able to

06:11address uh all of Mr. Maloney's points,

06:14all of the lacrosse interest points and

06:16and everyone else. But I'll just go

06:18through a list here of kind of a a

06:20framework that I'm hoping to achieve

06:22between now and next month's um

06:26recreation committee meeting. uh

06:28understanding that there's a lot of

06:30competing interests that again I'm still

06:32trying to wrap my head around uh all the

06:34needs uh you know I think we we know

06:37there's a general we all wish there was

06:38more fields there was more recreation

06:40facilities you know there's making we're

06:41making some progress on that but the

06:43demand far exceeds what we have in the

06:46city right now so that's very

06:47challenging for the recreation um

06:50department to manage all that um so th

06:55this issue is as I've learned um talking

06:58to Robin is much more than just rugby

07:00versus lacrosse. It's it's balancing all

07:02the broader interests um with the

07:05Stanley uh coach Stanley Chism Park as

07:07well as all the other all the other

07:08fields

07:10um such as the College of Charleston,

07:12the Citadel um three different high

07:15schools, Wando, Lucy Beckham and

07:17Oceanside Collegiate,

07:19West Ashley, anticipated fall 2026

07:22usage, uh Charleston Youth Rugby, uh

07:26Blockade.

07:28So there's a lot that you're all trying

07:29to balance and I I fully rec recognize

07:31that and I'm trying to uh make sure that

07:33on October we can fully articulate all

07:35that you're trying to manage. So it

07:37doesn't appear to Mr. Maloney or any

07:39other interest that we're not giving

07:42them due diligence and fully, you know,

07:45um

07:46processing their their their uh

07:49requests. So that makes sense. Um

07:53there was a uh cusabo, is that right?

07:56That's how you say it. do um as a

07:58precedent um that no longer is in place

08:01and I'll allow you if you want to to

08:03talk about that now or next month, but

08:06there's some lessons learned from that

08:07experience. So just because the city had

08:10an MOU with another organization in the

08:11past doesn't mean that that's now a new

08:13precedent and in fact it may not have

08:15gone as as well as as was advertised

08:17when thatou was put in place.

08:21Um yes sir, go ahead.

08:23>> Yeah. Um it it did not go well. It was

08:26an experiment, a trial and didn't work.

08:30And I think it's important to note that

08:33this is not just an issue with Stanley

08:36Chisum, which is a very popular field,

08:38but probably one of the least used

08:41fields that we have. We have a lot of

08:44recreational fields. We have a ton of

08:49people, organizations very reputable,

08:52very compelling in their arguments,

08:55um, very passionate about their product

09:00that are always asking us to use our

09:05facilities and we want to let them, but

09:08we cannot lock in with any one group. I

09:13mean, it is proven to be an extreme

09:16problem. It sets a very dangerous

09:18precedent. Even one park, well, then

09:21you're going to have these seven people

09:23over here that want to use the park on

09:25John's Island saying, "Well, you did it

09:27there. Why won't you do it here?" And

09:30they're different circumstances for

09:32every field. Um, but bottom line is what

09:35is very consistent across all of it is

09:39that they're over booked.

09:42And so we sympathize and we understand

09:45the frustrations of these groups that

09:48come back time and time again and and

09:50don't want to hear that we cannot

09:52accommodate them. Um but the reality of

09:56it is we we have to be judicious. We

09:59have to be equitable. We cannot pick

10:01favorites one over the other. Not

10:04everybody's going to get it exactly the

10:06way they want it. And um I I I do give

10:12real accolades to staff for doing the

10:16best that they can. And it's not just

10:19scheduling. I want to be clear on this

10:20too. We have Beth and the Capital

10:23Projects team here as well. It's a huge

10:26amount of wear and tear on our fields.

10:29And I assure you, we do not get the

10:32money back in the fees that we charge.

10:36It costs us. And again, that's what

10:38they're there for. I get it. We want to

10:40use them as much as possible. And

10:42there's never a right balance on use

10:45versus wear and tear versus um getting

10:49everybody uh on the schedule that that

10:51wants to be on the schedule. But um you

10:55know I think we need to be very careful

10:58when we start zeroing in on one park or

11:02another park and a specific effort here

11:04and a specific effort there because

11:07it'll take that

11:09um already delicate balance and potent

11:12potentially just put it upside down in a

11:15ditch. So

11:19>> yeah, thank you chairman and I agree

11:21with the mayor. Um few years ago when I

11:24was chairing this, we had a similar

11:26situation except it was club soccer that

11:29was really coming at us hard saying you

11:31you need to give us some facilities. You

11:33need to give us some facilities. These

11:34are kids that live and in the city of

11:37Charleston, they just choose to play at

11:38a different level and we don't have the

11:40fields to accommodate them and so we

11:42need the city to help. So it it is more

11:45than more than rugby and lacrosse.

11:47There's other outside groups as as well

11:50um that that are asking for this and

11:52have asked in the past.

11:56>> Yeah. And one uh was sat next to Robin

11:59Cooper last week when you you all came

12:01down to uh John's Allen to talk about

12:03the recreation center. We had some time

12:05to talk afterwards and she gave a

12:07perspective that I hadn't thought of is

12:09that you know these city fields and

12:11facilities are for city residents

12:13primarily. That's obviously that's what

12:15it should be for. Allowing a group to

12:18come in and play teams from other areas

12:20and that kind of thing is cool. I think

12:22it's cool. It's having a rugby

12:23tournament in in Charleston would be

12:25awesome, but that's not the primary use

12:27of our fields. And I so I understand

12:29that perspective. I'm speaking for you

12:31here. You can correct me if I'm wrong,

12:33but uh so I'm not I'm not preloading a

12:36decision on this. I just want to kind of

12:37get it out there in the ether as to what

12:40a a bigger perspective on what the

12:41considerations are. And I think and

12:43hopefully in October we'll be able to

12:44kind of show with lists of all the

12:48community demands and interests and then

12:49all the fields related to this topic so

12:52the public has a better understanding of

12:54how challenging it is for you all to

12:55manage all the unbelievable demand on

12:58these fields and if there's any way to

13:00compromise that is beneficial to the

13:02city of Charleston then we'll talk about

13:03it but I don't want to steer either way.

13:06Go ahead.

13:06>> I think just one f last point Mr.

13:08chairman, if you will, is that I I do

13:10think it's also will be good to again

13:14highlight all of the nuances, all of the

13:17details, all of the logistics that staff

13:19deals with so that when you have those

13:22frustrated teams and players and

13:24parents,

13:25um these folks often take the brunt of

13:29it like and and and we owe it to our

13:34staff to I guess educate people and to

13:39make sure that they know that, you know,

13:42the staff would love to h let you have

13:45your game there, but you know, they're

13:48not going to pick and choose winners and

13:50losers here, and that's not their job,

13:53and and we cannot put them in an unfair

13:55position. So, u I think it's going to be

14:00important for let let people know. Um,

14:02and then, you know, I think we may want

14:05to look at looking at, you know, just

14:08making it very clear to the public writ

14:10large that this is not an option. I

14:13mean, if that's what we determine. Um,

14:16so, uh, I I'll I look forward to next

14:20next next month. Thank you, Mr.

14:23>> One quick comment and I'll turn on Mr.

14:25Sheileely. Um and to with all that

14:28demand and all those competing

14:30interests, my understanding is you guys

14:33have not denied Mr. Maloney

14:34>> correct

14:36>> any of the permit any of the requests

14:37that they've asked for. They they've

14:39done it. I think one of his desires is

14:42to have more of kind of long-term locked

14:44in agreement and I and I get that and

14:46we'll talk about that next next month.

14:48But to be fair, more than fair to you

14:50all because you've earned it is that you

14:51it's not that you've denied anything.

14:53It's so I I get that. Mr. Go ahead.

14:56>> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I mean, a

14:57couple of things that we had discussed a

14:59few years ago when these things were

15:01coming up were as we try to improve

15:04fields, we take a look at artificial

15:06turf so that there's you you don't have

15:10the the maintenance that um that you

15:12have on the natural turf. Um and I used

15:14to be against artificial turf, but

15:16they've come a long way with with

15:17artificial turf and what they can do.

15:19you see Mount Pleasant and other

15:21municipalities now putting in artificial

15:23turf so that they can get more use out

15:25of those fields. Um, and the other thing

15:27that we've discussed in this committee

15:29is lights as well, you know, on on those

15:31fields. So, I mean, that's a couple of

15:33things that are long range that can

15:35really help this problem down the road.

15:40>> I want to turn over to this to the staff

15:42if you guys have any comments on on this

15:44going into this.

15:48I would just note that the issue isn't

15:50just the field itself, but it's the

15:52other improvements that go along with

15:53the field. Uh lack of sewer, lack of

15:56water that's to the field. So

15:58improvements need to be made if the

16:00route is to program this heavier than

16:03what we're doing right now. So we have

16:05temporary uh restrooms out there. We

16:07have portallettes that we pay for. We

16:10being the city, not capital projects. Uh

16:12we would have to do improved parking and

16:14other things. So in addition to the

16:16lights, the field itself, there'd be

16:17other structural improvements that would

16:19need to be made

16:20>> and pick up the garbage more freely.

16:22Like again, the more these things are

16:24there's just other

16:27consequences that are very relevant for

16:30the operation. But again, I want to be

16:31on record of saying we want them used as

16:34much as possible, but we have to balance

16:38it between all these other competing

16:40interests and uh and our capacity to to

16:44service them.

16:47>> Yeah. And I think everybody's hit on all

16:50the points and you know, we we do the

16:52best we can to give everybody something.

16:54I have for the most part been able to

16:56give everybody something of what they

16:59need. If somebody, you know, baseball

17:00team comes in and says, "I want four

17:01nights a week, 6:00." I'm not going to

17:03be able to give somebody four nights a

17:04week at 6:00. I can give you two nights

17:06a week at 5:00 and then somebody can

17:07come in at 7. Um, you know, depending

17:10again, as Mr. Sheileley said, the light

17:12situation, we just don't have enough

17:14fields with lights in a week or two.

17:16We're dead in the water. Um, you know,

17:18and we lost just lost another field um

17:21with McMahon. So now everything I've got

17:23programmed at McMahon now has to land on

17:25Harmon. So, I've got youth flag

17:28football, youth soccer, adult flag

17:30football, adult soccer, tackle football,

17:34um ultimate frisbee, and adult flag

17:36football all on really two fields, but

17:41we make them four. So, I mean, I've got

17:44a soccer field on top of a flag football

17:46field next to a flag football field next

17:48to a flag football field. Um, you know,

17:50parking becomes an issue as well. You

17:53know, we're Thank goodness Burke's right

17:54there because we can use Burke. So, it's

17:56parking, it's staffing, it's opening,

17:58it's closing, it's turning lights on,

17:59turning lights off. Lights at Chisel are

18:02going to be great. But if I have to now

18:03send a staff person down to turn lights

18:05on and turn lights off, then I'm having

18:07to charge that customer for that because

18:09we're not, you know, that's probably not

18:11a place that we will put a permanent

18:12staff person. Um, you know, John's

18:15Island's great. I got three fields. All

18:17three are being rented. Two of them I

18:19can do on a phone app. The third one, I

18:21have to send somebody out there to turn

18:22lights off and then send somebody out

18:24there to turn lights on. Mr. McBride

18:26lives on John's Island. Might give you a

18:28part-time job. [laughter]

18:29>> Yeah.

18:31>> Um, you know, so those are all things

18:33that staffing and that rest. We we give

18:35our fields no rest. No rest. And you

18:39know, Chisum is a little bit different.

18:40That's not our greatest turf field.

18:42We're not putting the money into it in

18:44the past just because of the nature of

18:46the field. There is no water. There is

18:48no irrigation. where we can't put

18:49fertilizer down because they can't water

18:50it in. So, um, you know, there's

18:53different levels. So, we have those

18:54satellite fields and Chisum is great

18:57that we're able to give, you know,

18:59Rugby, we've got, I think, eight permits

19:01scheduled. You know, Mr. Maloney has

19:03four and I think there's three or four

19:04other permits already scheduled out for

19:06for a hall for the fall. Um, you know,

19:09but again, in next week, two weeks from

19:11now, that feels no good. Come five

19:13o'clock in the afternoon. It's only good

19:15on Saturdays and Sundays.

19:17I just want to again say too that

19:20this is not a knock on any of the

19:21organizations, but M. Maloney, I think

19:24they take care of it. They they are good

19:26stewards of the of the field. I'm not,

19:29you know, in any way trying to suggest

19:30when I mention trash or anything like

19:32that that any of these folks um don't

19:35care about the fields or aren't good

19:36stewards. But, you know, just the

19:38reality of it is to to Robin's point,

19:40there's just a lot more that goes into

19:42it than uh the scheduling alone.

19:47Yeah, definitely. There's 25 people that

19:49I can just probably name right off the

19:51top that would get in line and say,

19:53"Okay, I want mine, too."

19:56>> So, a lot was said. My again, my goal in

19:58October is to is to be able to show this

20:00so it's it's crystal clear to everybody

20:01what all the things you're trying to

20:02balance, and we're not trying to be

20:03prejuditial against or for anybody.

20:05We're trying to be as fair as as can be.

20:07And just again in my limited experience,

20:10there's so much information that you all

20:11have, it's impossible to, you know, even

20:13if you just listed off a whole bunch of

20:14organizations that I'll forget 10

20:16minutes after I walk out of here. So, I

20:17think having it visually to kind of make

20:19it clear for everybody will help help

20:21the public a lot.

20:25>> Any comments from anyone else on the

20:26committee?

20:33>> All right. Uh hearing none. Everyone

20:35okay to return? We'll go and adjourn.

20:38Thanks everybody. Thank you.

```*