2026-09-02 - Ad Hoc Budget Advisory Committee
Summary
Built from the video's auto-generated captions (about 55 minutes) and the posted agenda. Figures may be misheard.
- Mayor William S. Cogswell, Jr chairs; the meeting was presentations and status only, with no formal votes heard.
- Development Services requested several positions and items, including a $40,000 inspector vehicle, a $160,000 infrastructure program manager split between stormwater and the general fund, a $145,000 senior building inspector, a $106,000 development services coordinator, and a $50,000 annual floodplain buyout contingency.
- Development Services also proposed fee revisions starting early next year, projected to bring in about $1.8 million more for the general fund. Staff said building fees are below the cost of service; members asked how break-even is measured. See 2027 Building and Permit Fee Changes.
- Stormwater Management asked for a green infrastructure site manager, a $500,000 increase in the small-project allocation to $2 million, and more pump station operating money.
- Community Services requested a Love Your Block manager to replace an expiring grant, code enforcement support, nighttime tourism enforcement officers, $30,000 to update a tour guide manual last published in 2011, and several recreation staffing and program changes.
- The July monthly report showed overages in liability insurance and some parks and vehicle costs; property taxes, business licenses and permit fees were over target, while some rents and franchise fees were under. Stormwater and tourism tax revenue were over target, and fuel was projected about $500,000 over budget.
- Timeline: more department presentations through September, a draft budget to council by November 17, first reading December 1, and later readings December 15. See 2027 Development Services Stormwater and Community Services Budget Requests.
Agenda
- Moment of silence
- Review of budget requests: a. Development Services; b. Stormwater Management; c. Community Services Section
- July monthly reports
- 2027 budget timeline
- Other business
- Adjournment
Sources
- Agenda Center listing for this date: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_09022026-11184
- Documents: Ad Hoc Budget Committee Agenda
- Agenda Center: https://www.charleston-sc.gov/AgendaCenter
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpPwHVznc0w (City of Charleston YouTube channel)
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:02All right, I think we're good to go.
00:07>> All right, I I guess I'll just get us
00:09started. So, if we want to start with a
00:10moment of silence.
00:23Okay, then we can start um
00:26with a review of budget requests and
00:28then we'll quickly just go over the July
00:30monthly reports and the budget timeline.
00:33But, we will start with development
00:34services and Ron, I believe you do have
00:37a PowerPoint to share, yes?
00:40>> I do. Yeah, good afternoon everyone.
00:44>> Stop sharing. Sorry, Jennifer. I did
00:46that all too fast.
00:50I'm a mess.
00:52>> Let me share my screen with you all.
00:55Um
01:00Okay, you're all seeing my presentation
01:02now?
01:06>> Yes.
01:06>> We are.
01:07>> Okay, great.
01:09So, this is the new program request for
01:11development services and I'll jump right
01:13into it.
01:14Um
01:18So, um I'd listed these in the order of
01:21the requests that we have that you would
01:24see in the uh sheet that's provided by
01:26BFRC.
01:28Um but, our first request is for a uh
01:30vehicle request for a bid inspector
01:32position. Um we are currently actually
01:34one vehicle short of our vehicle to
01:36inspector ratio. Um we have an open
01:39position, but that person technically
01:41does not have a vehicle assigned, so we
01:43are
01:44they are required to obviously have
01:46vehicles to perform their everyday job
01:47duties. So, this one's pretty
01:48straightforward. Um the goal is to
01:50ensure that all the employees can
01:52perform all of the all of their job
01:54duties and have the equipment necessary.
01:57Um and we estimated a cost of $40,000 to
02:01provide that vehicle for a building
02:03inspector inspector.
02:05Excuse me.
02:10So one thing you'll notice is what a lot
02:12of our requests are focused on asset
02:14management and building up our asset
02:16management here at the city. Um we think
02:19that's something that we can greatly
02:20improve upon to determine how many
02:23assets we have, what are the conditions
02:25of these assets for both stormwater and
02:28engineering, roadways, sidewalks,
02:30curbing gutter, bridges, other
02:32infrastructure such as that. So this
02:34first new position request is called an
02:37infrastructure program manager. So it's
02:38a request for an additional asset
02:40management position to help preserve and
02:42manage the infrastructure at the city.
02:45Um we currently only have one asset
02:47manager and their primary focus is just
02:50stormwater infrastructure. So we want to
02:52build upon that. Obviously, we can even
02:54use more stormwater asset managers, but
02:56um
02:57other assets that I mentioned
02:58previously. And this position would have
03:01a focus mainly on
03:04uh ensuring that we are compliant with
03:06the state requirements of the MS4
03:08program. That's kind of our stormwater
03:10permitting that we need to keep up with.
03:13Uh things along the lines of
03:16public outreach, good housekeeping on
03:18our own facilities, doing post
03:20construction monitoring of stormwater
03:23practices throughout the city. Uh we
03:25have to do that on a yearly basis and
03:27submit reports to SC DES. So that would
03:30be their main focus. However, they also
03:32would assist in just your general asset
03:35management of stormwater and
03:37right-of-way infrastructure.
03:39So the goal is to expand upon the city's
03:41current asset management program to
03:43include additional infrastructure.
03:45Again, we only look at stormwater assets
03:47currently, but we want to include
03:49sidewalks, curbing gutter, non-standard
03:51materials, roadway conditions, bridges,
03:53retaining walls, anything that's within
03:55the right-of-way or maintained by the
03:57city. And uh the unique aspect of this
03:59one, it's $160,000, but it would be
04:01split 50/50 between the stormwater and
04:04general fund.
04:09Another asset management request would
04:11be a senior asset manager position. Um
04:14it would be an additional asset managers
04:16preserve and manage the city's
04:17infrastructure. You know, when you
04:19compare us to Charleston County, they
04:20currently have eight employees within
04:22their asset management program. Again,
04:24we only have one, and then the person
04:27who manages that division. So, we have a
04:30request for two more to start um
04:33building up this team.
04:35So, this position's primary focus would
04:37just be on stormwater and right-of-way
04:40infrastructure and create a vertical
04:42growth within the division. Um the other
04:45one having that additional services of
04:48helping with the program, the MS4
04:51program,
04:52um
04:53is is the main difference between the
04:54two. And the goal and the cost estimate
04:57are exactly the same as the other
04:58position.
05:03The next position we're looking to
05:04request is a senior building inspection
05:07division inspector.
05:08Um
05:09it's for an additional senior inspector
05:11to assist in performing building
05:12inspections throughout the city. This
05:14actually was requested in the 2025
05:16budget, but we only got approved for one
05:18position then. Um we think the senior
05:21inspector is a great opportunity to
05:22build even more vertical growth. Right
05:25now, everyone's on that inspector level.
05:28Um so, to have senior inspector allows
05:31them to grow in their position to help
05:32with retention. Um
05:35and the goal of this position is to
05:37ensure that inspections are being
05:39completed in timely manner to support
05:40the development community and general
05:42public who are building within the city.
05:44You know, we aim to complete as many
05:46inspections as we can within 24 hours
05:49and in order to do that it'd be great to
05:50have more senior positions who can help
05:52grow the the new staff and have a little
05:55more experience um and the cost estimate
05:57for this is $145,000
06:00and would be purely a general fund.
06:05So this one's a little bit of a unique
06:06request. So it's a funding request for
06:08flood plain buyout contingency funds.
06:11Um the request is for funds to be
06:13utilized for potential buyouts of
06:14repetitive loss properties with a
06:16history of flood flooding.
06:18Um the funding would be utilized
06:20alongside grant funding or when grant
06:22funding is not available. A lot of the
06:24grants that we deal with have a match of
06:26either 50% 25%
06:29so we need to have some funding set
06:30aside to match those grants that we're
06:34receiving. Um of course we're always
06:36going to go after grants and if they're
06:37100% grant funded that's great but we
06:40don't want to have a situation where we
06:42can't go after a grant because we don't
06:44have funding to support that match. Um
06:47we also look at this as a great
06:48opportunity to use with other city
06:50departments as as they have projects
06:52that they need to do buyouts for. If
06:54there is a repetitive loss component to
06:56it we can contribute this money to that
06:59buyout in any aspect of it. Um and the
07:03goal would be to build up a larger sum
07:06of money year after year if we don't
07:08utilize it. Any unused funding would be
07:10rolled over to the following year to be
07:12utilized for future buyouts. Um it's
07:14worth mentioning that
07:16uh Charlotte, North Carolina have a has
07:18a very robust program to utilize their
07:21own dollars. Um they've done over 450
07:24flood plain buyouts for oop excuse me if
07:26I think I went to the wrong slide. Uh
07:29they've done over 450 buyouts of
07:31properties for repetitive loss and
07:34obviously someone like New Jersey they
07:36set this up after Hurricane Sandy and
07:38have a very robust program where they're
07:40not just using grants. They have money
07:42set aside. It's almost like rainy day
07:44funding.
07:45Um the goal would be to reduce the
07:46number of flooded properties within the
07:48city
07:50and work towards creating a more
07:51resilient community. We're requesting
07:53$50,000 understanding that if we want to
07:55do more significant, we probably need
07:57more, but again, we would roll over.
07:59And And just buying out these properties
08:02would be step one. You can then
08:03revitalize them and do things like storm
08:06water improvements, parks, retrofits,
08:08things like that with open space area.
08:14And this is our last position request.
08:15It's a development services coordinator.
08:17So, this request is for an
08:19administrative position to act as the
08:21permit center representate
08:22representative and assist in answering
08:24any questions related to the department.
08:27Um having a a stronger presence in the
08:29permit center and
08:30to improve upon our customer service and
08:33they would also just generally support
08:34the admin work within the department as
08:37a whole. So, the goal would be focused
08:39on customer service and to better
08:41communicate our processes and
08:43requirements to the public and the
08:44applicants who may come to the permit
08:46center.
08:47And it's $106,000 of um general fund.
08:53Actually, this one and I'm sorry, I
08:54might not put in there. I think this one
08:56is split as well, 50/50.
08:59>> Ron, I think Council Member Waring has a
09:01question.
09:02>> Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, go ahead.
09:04>> The the thing is that a dual question, I
09:06guess, for you and Ms. Waring.
09:09Uh these grant matching
09:12allocations that you're requesting, how
09:13how we've done that in the past. So,
09:15when we got a grant and I don't know, it
09:18was, you know, 2/3 federal government
09:20and we had to come up with a third.
09:22Um
09:23Ms. Waring, how do we do that in the
09:26Where do we get the money from?
09:28How do we budget for that, you know, 2 3
09:30years?
09:30>> Typically, we know the grants that are
09:32that we're applying applying for and
09:35kind of the
09:37whether we would be successful in
09:38getting that. So, we would budget for
09:40that match, Councilmember Waring.
09:42>> Okay.
09:43>> And and we and we still try and do that,
09:45Councilmember. Um the situation we run
09:47into a lot of the FEMA grants, the
09:49timelines are very hard to predict. Um
09:52we've had some grants submitted for in
09:55the early 2020s that we still haven't,
09:57you know, even heard back from or we
09:59heard back from this year.
10:01So, um
10:03it it's kind of would be nice to set
10:05some money aside in case, you know, one
10:07pops up
10:08>> No, we're bringing it with you, I mean.
10:10So, how is this different from what we
10:12were doing in the past?
10:15>> Well, in the past it would be based on a
10:17on a specific grant, where in this
10:19situation we are looking to have it, you
10:21know, budgeted for every year. We would
10:23get 50,000 on a yearly basis. And if we
10:26didn't use that money because a grant
10:29wasn't available, we could set it aside
10:31and build up a larger sum for a larger
10:33grant or just buying out a property on
10:36our own without a grant if possible.
10:39>> All right, got it. Thank you.
10:40>> Yeah, of course.
10:41>> Councilmember Waring, a lot of the times
10:42the grants we try to go for are the
10:4490/10 as well because those are better.
10:47And then the grant recent grants that
10:49we've done, please correct me, Ron, if
10:51I'm wrong, the match was actually paid
10:53by the homeowner.
10:55So, it wasn't a city It wasn't a city
10:57funded match.
10:58>> Yeah, in the most recent ones, yep,
11:00that's correct.
11:03>> Got it.
11:07>> Thank you for that.
11:09Okay, so now um the last aspect I wanted
11:11to dive into is fee revisions. Um
11:14so, we are looking at some additional
11:16fee revisions. A lot of these fees that
11:18I'm going to be talking about have not
11:19been revised since prior to 2020. Um up,
11:23Hampton, see you got your hand.
11:25Never mind.
11:27Um prior to
11:29>> Oh, okay.
11:30Fair enough. Uh prior to 2020. Um, so we
11:33think it's appropriate to to look into
11:35these and obviously all of these fees
11:37were coordinated with BFRC and legal to
11:40make sure that we're not taking in more
11:42money than the amount of time and effort
11:44that we are putting in.
11:46Um, we plan to put these into effect the
11:49beginning of the new year and we
11:50projected 1.8 million of additional
11:53general funds. That's what our
11:54department projected based on what we've
11:56taken in the past and the goal is to
11:58better account for the city's costs when
12:00it comes to permitting, review, and
12:01inspections of various city processes.
12:03So,
12:04got some summary tables for you.
12:07So, one of and I'll break it down to the
12:09first three,
12:10actually the first five are all focused
12:12on the plat review committee. So, it's
12:14the review of plats. Um, we have some
12:17in- significant increases in those cuz
12:19it's been been a long time and most of
12:22them are the first three are just a flat
12:24fee, the first four actually, excuse me.
12:27Um, where it's a you know, you pay the
12:29fee. If you have edits, you will pay it
12:31again. But, the last one where it's if
12:34lots are of five or more are paid per
12:37lot, this is pretty standard with the
12:39how a lot of the other municipalities do
12:40it and I'll have a summary table with
12:43against other municipalities to see.
12:46Um, the encroachment permit fees are
12:47going up slightly as well as the
12:49engineering permit fees for work within
12:50our right-of-way from 25 to 100.
12:53Building permit fees are a little more
12:54complicated, so I'll do that in a
12:55separate slide.
12:57And then the application fee. So, this
12:59is for the effort of the permit center
13:01to perform intake, form assigning those
13:03reviews. We've doubled that from 40 to
13:0580.
13:06Um, we do have some new fees that we
13:09also wanted to implement. Um, the Lomar
13:12F, which is a uh, flood plain related
13:15fee. We don't get too many of these, but
13:17it is an effort that is a little
13:19non-standard that we wanted to start
13:21tracking our effort on. Um, it's for
13:23bringing in fill to remove a property
13:25from the flood plain. So, we charge 200
13:29for that review.
13:31And then there's issuance of a
13:33certificate of occupancy which requires
13:35fire building a heavy lift on the permit
13:38center. Every time someone comes in for
13:40a CEO we would require a $350.
13:44This last one is an administrative fee
13:46which I talked about in the past.
13:48Basically for if we have a contract for
13:51third-party services whether it be
13:53review inspections, we would add a 20%
13:56administrative fee on all the invoices
13:59we process for our time to do invoice
14:01intake get the fees in the system, the
14:04project management aspect of managing
14:06the third-party.
14:08So, we we will apply that to the
14:10invoices.
14:14And for the more complicated one, the
14:16building inspection fees.
14:18So,
14:20it's a lot of information here, but
14:22essentially it is a 50% increase of the
14:26valuation of how much construction cost
14:29and a 50% increase on what the fee being
14:31implemented. You will see on the next
14:33slide. So, this
14:35valuation is directly in line with the
14:38International Building Code the ICC
14:42Building Valuation Data and this is what
14:45basically a standard for almost all
14:47municipalities to use. We were using
14:49something from 2017. We are just
14:51bringing it up to 2026.
14:54Um
14:55and that's what is recommended by the
14:57the code.
14:59And that's you'll see here we we brought
15:02this up by 50%. We are actually under
15:04the code recommendation for what the fee
15:07is per the amount of construction we are
15:09doing. And with that I think it's better
15:11to just show you some of the summary
15:13tables
15:14which kind of spells it out.
15:16So, I have three columns here that are
15:18highlighted. So, this is our 2027
15:21fee in the first yellow column from the
15:24left. Then you have Charleston County
15:26who did a fee revision in 2026.
15:29And then you have Mount Pleasant. And
15:32you could see the one thing I would say
15:33Mount Pleasant directly uses the
15:36recommendation from the International
15:38Residential Code, but they add $30 on
15:41top of all these values for an
15:43application.
15:44Um
15:46we are generally in line with all of
15:48them. Mount Pleasant immediately once
15:50you get to around 50,000
15:53greatly exceeds what our fees are. So,
15:55anything above 50,000 with construction
15:58greatly exceeds. But when it comes to
16:00Charleston County, we are pretty in line
16:03within $100 of what their fees are are.
16:06Slightly more in some situations.
16:08Slightly less as you get higher and
16:10higher. So, it wouldn't be anything that
16:13this town community is not already
16:14paying for other municipalities.
16:17And again, all in line with the building
16:19valuation data and the recommendation
16:22from the International Residential Code.
16:25We are less than what they are
16:26recommending. And
16:28I should point out that these fees are
16:29actually less than the effort that we
16:32put in, but we felt like it was an
16:33appropriate jump based on everyone else
16:36in the market.
16:39And then this is a quick comparison
16:41table for uh the plat review committee.
16:43Berkeley County was the most recent to
16:45update their fees. I did talk to
16:47Charleston County and they are actually
16:48going through some fee updates as well.
16:50So, they're interested in what we're
16:52doing. They also know what Berkeley
16:53County has done. So, I would expect them
16:55to come in line.
16:56But for those everyday uh citizens who
16:59are coming in for boundary surveys,
17:01property line adjustments, things like
17:02that, Berkeley County actually charges
17:04more than us. Um and then as you get
17:08more and more lots for a plat review, we
17:11do get a little higher in our fees than
17:13Berkeley County. So, that kind kind
17:15kicks in at about 25 lots or more.
17:18The other change I just wanted to point
17:19out to you all is that Berkeley County
17:21charges half the initial fee for every
17:23resubmittal, where our current plan is
17:27to charge the same amount of fee for
17:29every submittal based on the effort that
17:31it takes and the intake
17:34and and everything involved in the
17:35process. So, that's the main difference
17:37between us and Berkeley County.
17:42And that's all I have. And I will open
17:44it up for any additional questions. And
17:47sorry sorry if I was a little long, a
17:49lot of information.
18:00>> You were not long, Ron, at all. So.
18:02>> Uh
18:04I appreciate that, Amy.
18:09>> Everybody's good? No questions?
18:13Okay. Thank you, Ron.
18:15>> Thank you very much. Appreciate it.
18:17I'm going to stop sharing.
18:19>> All right, Matt Fatman. I'm sorry you
18:21have a
18:23PowerPoint as well you want to share?
18:26>> Yes. Yeah, thank you, Amy.
18:46All right, looks like it's sharing okay.
18:49Um
18:50Again, Stormwater Department 2027 budget
18:53request. I think most of you are
18:55pretty familiar with the
18:57Stormwater Department, but split into
18:59three functional groups at the moment.
19:00Project management, the large projects,
19:01small projects, pump stations, and um
19:04some engagement work, outreach
19:05engagement.
19:06Our utility program, which is the
19:08account management that's transitioned
19:09over from CWS to the city.
19:12Um billing coordination with the county
19:13tax offices, uh determination of those
19:16fees, and then uh the credit process
19:17that we're just finalizing at council.
19:20Then the field operations group, um
19:21which are maintenance, rehab, uh the
19:23construction work we do for much of our
19:25in-house construction, and then support.
19:28Um departmental mission, reducing the
19:31impact of flooding on the city. Uh we do
19:33that in project management through
19:36managing our funded capital and small
19:38projects to mitigate those existing
19:40flood impacts. Um we
19:43identify and prioritize new potential
19:44projects,
19:46and then of course maintain the
19:47functionality of our existing
19:48construction projects, and you'll see
19:51most of our budget requests are related
19:52to the third bullet there this year. Um
19:55from the utility perspective, managing
19:56about 60,000 billing accounts,
19:59calculating updated billing amounts each
20:01year, um coordinating with the counties
20:02for billing of all of those uh
20:05service accounts, and collecting that
20:06revenue, um and then manage the credit
20:08and bill process.
20:10But that is actually a slight decrease
20:12in budget, um as we continue to
20:15reduce our um consultant need for
20:17consultant support as we shift over. Uh
20:19we have we have been
20:21pretty cost-effective from the beginning
20:22on that, but doing more and more work
20:24in-house um as we continue to build out
20:26that program.
20:28And then from an operations perspective,
20:29of course, we've been rehabilitating
20:31existing infrastructure. The front yard
20:33roadside ditch systems are almost all uh
20:36rehabilitated at this point. Most of our
20:38rear yard systems are rehabilitated. Our
20:40canals are mostly rehabilitated. Uh we
20:43are starting to focus in on the
20:45underground pipe system, which is
20:46probably our biggest remaining need for
20:49rehabilitation.
20:50Uh shifted over in those other
20:52considerations to proactive system
20:53maintenance, where we're actively going
20:55out and um scheduling maintenance rather
20:57than going and fixing problems, as as
20:59you all are well aware of.
21:01And then doing quite a bit of small
21:02project construction work, really built
21:04out built out that small project
21:06construction crew and outfall cleaning
21:08work within the last couple of years um
21:10through a lot of support from council.
21:12That's been incredibly successful in
21:14reducing our costs and letting us build
21:17even more small projects um all while
21:21keeping our total budget numbers very
21:23similar um despite some very significant
21:25increases in the construction and
21:27engineering sector over the last 5
21:28years.
21:30So um here is a slide that is I'm sure a
21:33joy to read since it is all heavy text.
21:36Um but basically breaks down some of how
21:38the budget works for our our department.
21:40A lot of a lot of support in field
21:42operations staff. Um
21:44some staff costs with our utility and
21:46project management team.
21:48Uh equipment vehicles. Uh that's about a
21:50million dollars per year generally for
21:53lease purchase of buying um very large
21:56equipment dump trucks, excavators,
21:58backhoes to replace existing equipment
22:00as it ages out
22:02in our our fleet replacement plan. Um
22:04and generally on the order of 50 to
22:06100,000 dollars for pickup trucks and
22:09um smaller vehicles, passenger vehicles
22:11that are for
22:12uh replacing again existing vehicles for
22:14our um maintenance crews primarily but
22:16also our project managers.
22:18Uh the small projects in-house IDC
22:20budget. This is um indefinite delivery
22:22contracts, small project work that we
22:24fund and then in-house materials we
22:27purchase for our field ops crews for
22:28small construction work. Um that
22:31includes uh in the prior year 1.5
22:35million dollars of the small project
22:37allocation. This year proposing to shift
22:39that small project allocation to 2
22:41million dollars. That's the 500,000
22:43dollar increase that you're seeing on
22:44the slide there to continue um the great
22:47work we're doing with the small project
22:49team.
22:51Um emergency repairs and pumping. Um
22:54that's again emergency actions we take.
22:56We do budget for that so that when there
22:57is a problem, we have funding available
22:59um to be able to fix it. A lot of um
23:01sinkhole repairs, um some emergency
23:04pumping actions, hurricane response that
23:05is not
23:07uh declared event where we get
23:08reimbursement, that type of work.
23:10Um pump station O&M, this is another big
23:12area for cost increase this year.
23:15Um two new pump stations coming online,
23:18um one coming out of upfit construction,
23:21bringing that back into our O&M
23:23responsibilities, and one hopefully
23:24going into
23:26um construction for upfit, which will
23:28take it back out of our
23:29responsibilities, um but those two new
23:31stations coming online, um large
23:33increase, it's about a hundred million
23:35dollars of
23:36asset that we are maintaining, so we're
23:38still at less than 1% a year in
23:41maintenance costs, um but that's
23:42something we're continuing to build out
23:44the long-term
23:45capital O&M plan. Um this is primarily
23:49uh the initial preventative maintenance
23:51work, um but trying to maximize that to
23:54minimize need for large-scale capital
23:57replacement and upfit work.
23:59Um new expenses are our main new program
24:01[clears throat] ask is the green
24:02infrastructure site manager. Um this
24:06would be an ongoing cost, a loaded
24:07salary cost, about a hundred and five
24:09thousand dollars a year, that's salary
24:10plus all the benefits, um different
24:13taxes and everything else.
24:15Uh in addition to a one-time cost for a
24:17a vehicle, for a pickup truck for the
24:18position, for forty thousand dollars, um
24:21a little bit more detail on those. The
24:23green infrastructure
24:25management position, we now have the Del
24:27Moresi Ecological Park over Berbarry
24:28Woods, the Howell Avenue Ecological Park
24:30in James Island off Howell Avenue, the
24:32Bridgepoint Ecological Park, um and
24:34Shadow Moss and Church Creek,
24:36the Mallard and Walk Natural Flood
24:38Storage sites, also in Shadow Moss and
24:40the Church Creek,
24:41um the Robert Mitchell Pump Station, the
24:43rain gardens that are going in as part
24:44of that project over on Huger Street, um
24:47four buyout property retrofit sites,
24:49three in West Ashley, one in James
24:51Island, um and then some additional work
24:53that we're looking at um in the coming
24:55year or two between
24:58um South Peace Ferry
25:00wetland storage around Crosstown Church
25:01area,
25:03uh Newmarket Creek potentially, which is
25:04in the design phase rather than
25:06construction phase at this point, and
25:07some other um very small projects. So,
25:09this is basically trying to shift these
25:11away from any kind of con- um major
25:14contracted maintenance, um hiring an
25:16internal position to
25:18manage our field operations crews with
25:20some specialty knowledge to doing the
25:22vegetative landscape maintenance and
25:24flood storage maintenance on those
25:25sites, bring our costs down by doing it
25:27in-house, and being available
25:30similar to what we do with pump
25:31stations, um when we do need to contract
25:33work, having an in-house expert rather
25:35than having to hire a outside landscape
25:37architecture firm or something, which
25:38drives up costs very significantly.
25:41Um pump station management, we mentioned
25:42that cost increase, um again talked
25:44about we now have
25:46um four or will have four pump stations
25:48for next fiscal year. Uh the MUSC
25:51station is planning for the upfit with
25:53the Army Corps of Engineer project work,
25:55which would take it back out of our
25:56maintenance roles primarily while the
25:58contractor's working on it, but the
25:59other three will roll into our
26:02um maintenance program for that increase
26:04that you were seeing.
26:05Then the small project allocation,
26:07um think again you're mostly familiar
26:09with this, but projects typically
26:11between 20,000 and 500,000. These are
26:13normally street scale rather than
26:15neighborhood or region scale projects.
26:18Uh we've built more than 40 projects in
26:20the last five um five or six years.
26:23Got at least 10 ongoing projects. Um
26:26we've had an increase in how many
26:27outfalls we're cleaning, that's been
26:29really successful, brought the
26:30permitting for that fully in-house.
26:33Um do all that work in-house at this
26:34point, which lets us clean many more
26:36outfalls. We still have a mix for the
26:38outfall cleaning itself between
26:40contractor cleaning and in-house
26:42cleaning depending on the length of the
26:43outfall and the complexity of the site.
26:46Um but we have also increased our
26:47in-house permitting, design,
26:48construction. It's really let us stretch
26:51the same dollar amounts to do just as
26:54much work even as we've had construction
26:56engineering cost increases in the in the
26:58outside contractor community.
27:00Um but we would like to keep expanding
27:01that out doing more work. It's a great
27:03example where
27:05um the department's able to coordinate
27:07the efforts between our field operations
27:08and project management groups to kind of
27:10leverage the resources in both entities
27:12to do more work more efficiently for the
27:14city and get it done a lot quicker than
27:16when we have to go um out through the
27:18contract process.
27:20General focus, and you've probably all
27:21seen this slide before, but
27:23um
27:24you know, really focusing again and
27:26putting bold on the pump station program
27:28for the upcoming year, the green
27:29infrastructure program for the upcoming
27:31year. Most important thing we can do is
27:33maintain
27:34the infrastructure we have to be as
27:36effective as possible. Um we do need to
27:38still build new projects. Current large
27:40capital projects are on there always are
27:41important to be cost effective in those.
27:44Um but very important to maintain what
27:46you have. Small projects incredibly
27:48important as well.
27:49Um our outfall maintenance has been a
27:51real success story that we're continuing
27:53to push to get things to drain out more
27:55effectively at low and moderate tides.
27:58Um our open channel drainage maintenance
28:00has been already very successful for us
28:02so it's sliding down that priority
28:04scale. Um but doing it is certainly
28:05something we need to stay on top of.
28:08Um similar with the check valve program.
28:09Had great success getting those
28:10installed, maintaining those. Now it's
28:12more of a maintenance rather than a
28:14fresh installation.
28:16Um
28:17In terms of things we might need in the
28:19future, again talking about that pipe
28:20system rehab, we got to continue to
28:22figure out ways to improve that. We've
28:23looked at it with the small project
28:25allocation. We have a pilot project
28:26going on right now in Wagner Terrace to
28:28start trying to um
28:30modernize some of the older vitrified
28:32clay pipes and some other challenges
28:34around the city.
28:35Um future large capital projects for
28:37neighborhoods that still need those.
28:39Um and then of course future small
28:41projects as we continue to ask for that
28:43additional funding to be able to build
28:44more of those projects.
28:46Um an asset inventory, I think Mr. Rucci
28:48touched on that in his presentation of
28:50it is very helpful to know where the
28:52assets are. It does make our um field
28:54operations work much more efficient. It
28:56isn't as critical as being able to do
28:58the field operations work, but it is
29:00helpful for efficiency purposes.
29:02And that's all I have. Happy to answer
29:04any questions.
29:22>> Okay.
29:24Thank you, Matt.
29:25>> Thank
29:27>> And next would be community services
29:29section with Dan Rucci.
29:34>> Thank you very much. Do you have that to
29:36pull up, Amy, or
29:37>> I'm just I'm just going to pull it up.
29:39>> Thanks.
29:42Okay, so um I don't have a fancy power
29:44point you guys, but keep it uh
29:47as simple as possible. Um
29:51under livability and tourism, we're
29:53currently requesting three new programs.
29:56Uh it will be the love your block, and
29:58you can skip to the next page,
30:00and I'll elaborate.
30:03The uh we're requesting uh two nighttime
30:07tourism enforcement officers, and we
30:10want to update the tour guide manual for
30:13our tourism department. Next page,
30:15please.
30:25You got too fast. Go to the main
30:28summary.
30:30Okay.
30:36>> Hey, Dan. You just want the tourism and
30:38livability? I just have the summary
30:39pages for tourism and livability.
30:41Do you want me to have the details
30:43pulled I can pull the details up for you
30:44if that's what you want.
30:45>> That's what I was going to I thought
30:47that would be more helpful for
30:48understanding.
30:49>> 2 seconds. Give me 2 seconds.
30:54All right, here's the detail, Dan.
30:55>> Thank you very much.
30:57>> You're welcome.
30:57>> first is your your love your love your
30:59love program. This initially was a uh
31:03grant funded through the Bloomberg uh
31:05Center for Public Innovation. There was
31:08originally a $20,000 grant to support uh
31:11the program
31:13uh which uh really is dedicated to
31:16serving uh
31:18communities and neighborhoods throughout
31:20the city. It is a resident-led,
31:23neighborhood-focused initiative.
31:25Uh our goal is to uh replace the grant
31:30program which ends
31:32uh actually in October
31:34and replace it with a full-time Love
31:37Your Block manager who is actually
31:39currently on staff now uh under the uh
31:42original grant
31:43and uh
31:45make this a a full-time program.
31:47Uh first part is obviously the
31:50um
31:51uh
31:53creating that position for the Love Love
31:54Your Block manager.
31:56And uh if you go to the next page,
31:58please.
32:00The second part of the program will be
32:02focused on uh a $20,000 uh request for
32:07our code enforcement budget to support
32:10this program. Now, looking through our
32:13um
32:14our current positions, uh as a
32:17cost-saving effort, I noticed that there
32:20was a part-time position that was
32:22underutilized. Uh we're willing to uh
32:25use that
32:26uh existing program uh to offset those
32:29costs to support this um
32:32this uh initiative.
32:34And honestly, will be uh cost savings
32:37along
32:39uh
32:39all those lines.
32:41Uh next page, please.
32:44Any questions on the Livable Block or
32:46I'll just keep going.
32:49Next is uh
32:50nighttime tourism enforcement. What
32:52we're doing is uh
32:54currently
32:56most of you may know
32:57uh the mayor's primary initiative or one
32:59of his initiatives this year is to
33:02update the tourism management plan. And
33:04the mayor's identified some guiding
33:06principles including uh residents first.
33:09Um so our goal and hearing from the
33:12residents is that there's a uh lack of
33:15enforcement uh during nighttime hours
33:18and there will be a need for two
33:21additional officers uh for our tourism
33:24staff to um
33:26be able to
33:28commit to this process and that's our
33:30request for two additional officers.
33:33Uh the money's are down there. The item
33:35line items are down there and uh these
33:38officers will be required to work at
33:41night and supplement it by day
33:44uh personnel if needed. And
33:46um
33:48that's it for this. Go ahead to the next
33:51one.
33:52Our third request for Livability and
33:54Tourism is to update our tourism uh
33:58manual, the tour guide manual. It is
34:00outdated and with the last um
34:02uh published in 2011. Uh
34:05over the past several years we've had
34:07some feedback some from the tour guide
34:10uh uh
34:11members of their community and wanting
34:15to
34:16uh update the manual which is a cost.
34:19We're asking for $30,000
34:21to commit to this process. Our uh we
34:26want to stay in line with the uh mayor's
34:28initiative with tourism management. We
34:31we'd like this to roll out at the same
34:32time as the plan rolls out
34:36to kind of invest our resources and
34:40commitment to the industries as well as
34:42our residents.
34:44And our goal is to also
34:47request funding from other partners as
34:50the CBB to offset additional costs that
34:54may occur.
34:56That's it for livability and tourism
34:58next.
34:59Is our recreation department.
35:05So we're basically asking for three
35:07items of
35:08or three positions maintenance worker
35:10full-time position.
35:12This position would be
35:15dedicated to the main Maybank Tennis
35:17Center courts and satellite courts.
35:20The clay courts require daily watering
35:22and maintenance.
35:24The Maybank hard courts and satellite
35:25courts require each week
35:28for these
35:30courts to be gained.
35:32It is a minimal position costs. We
35:35currently have a contract worker helping
35:37to maintain the courts. But the new
35:40maintenance position could take away
35:43some of the need for a contract worker
35:45which would give us some saving costs.
35:48In the long run.
35:50Also with the increase of pickleball
35:53play on various satellite courts, our
35:55maintenance worker has added
35:57responsibilities maintaining these
35:59tennis and pickleball equipment etc.
36:04Next please.
36:06We're in in uh
36:09preparation for our Johns Island
36:10Recreation Center that obviously is not
36:12built yet. We want to hire request to
36:17hire
36:18a recreation specialist. We want to make
36:21sure there's enough time to train this
36:24individual prior to opening the Johns
36:27Island recreation facility.
36:29Um, this staff person will be
36:31responsible for building uh, recreation
36:34presence on the island by having after
36:36school events, outdoor athletic
36:38programs, and uh, more uh, throughout
36:41the year. This staff person will also
36:44implement outdoor programs at Johns
36:47Island Park to create uh, relationships
36:49with the community to garner their
36:51support and interest in the new facility
36:53programming.
36:55So, this will allow for an easy
36:56transition of programming into that new
36:58facility once it is built.
37:02Um, next, please.
37:08Uh,
37:09request for uh, recreation again for AU
37:12fees uh, increasing the fees uh, from 50
37:15to 30 uh,
37:16hours. Yeah, $30 per person. What this
37:20is is a uh,
37:22it's for our All-Star programs when the
37:25when the kids uh, teams uh, go to the
37:27All-Stars, each each child is
37:30uh,
37:31responsible for contributing $15 per
37:33person, uh, but we're asking for
37:37um,
37:37uh, additional uh,
37:39monies to offset the costs
37:41and um,
37:43be able to support these
37:45uh,
37:46the events or the equipment and uniforms
37:48for these kids.
37:50Uh, next, please.
37:53Uh, we're asking for a tennis instructor
37:55full-time.
37:57Uh, instructor for the Maybank Tennis
37:58Center.
37:59This would use uh, one part-time
38:02instructor
38:03be use of the one part-time instructor
38:05to make a full-time instructor for that
38:08location.
38:09Uh, this will be more closely with the
38:12head work more closely with the head
38:14tennis professional uh, to add some
38:17programming and some more involvement in
38:19day-to-day activities.
38:22And finally,
38:24uh we're asking for uh Daniel Island Rec
38:27Center wrestling program.
38:29What this will do is
38:31uh increase our youth sports on Daniel
38:33Island with the wrestling. This program
38:36is already done city-wide, so we want to
38:38expand it to the Daniel Island
38:41uh area as well. It's a pretty minimal
38:43costs
38:44uh for that.
38:46Uh are there any questions for
38:49the ability and tourism and recreation?
39:11>> Okay. Everybody's good?
39:23>> Uh good to me.
39:25>> Sorry, I'm just trying to share my
39:26screen again. Can you see my screen,
39:28okay?
39:29>> Yeah, I can.
39:31I'm [clears throat] going to have to
39:32skip out and pick up on phone cuz I got
39:35a 4:00 downtown.
39:37>> Okay. This will I'll be fast.
39:39>> Okay.
39:41>> We'll just quickly go over July monthly
39:43report. Sorry, I'm not on camera, am I?
39:48Not that it matters necessarily. Um
39:50total operating expenditures,
39:53you can see the only person that's
39:54having a problem is me.
39:57>> Oh, yeah.
39:59>> I know.
40:01>> Well, how does that happen?
40:03>> Everybody else is tracking under target.
40:06Um
40:07property, auto, and marine, and port
40:09liability insurance has been much more
40:11expensive than we had anticipated. I
40:14think I talked about this last month as
40:16well, or the last time we met anyway.
40:19We're trying to do a deep dive into that
40:21and
40:22see if it's better for us to
40:24find a different
40:26carrier. So, we are looking at that for
40:28next year.
40:29Fire is just over a little in capital
40:31due to timing of purchases. Parks is
40:34mostly due to utility costs, mostly
40:36street lights.
40:37And repair maintenance costs and
40:39supplies.
40:40Leases over on operating due to vehicle
40:42repairs, which is um will be covered by
40:45insurance proceeds, or at least mostly
40:47covered by and then the timing of the
40:49body camera purchases and taser payment
40:52was off, makes it a little off target.
40:54Public services over on operating due to
40:56vehicle repairs and capital purchases,
40:59which also will be covered by asset
41:01sales revenue.
41:03Any questions on any of that?
41:09Okay.
41:10And that's just a graphic
41:12of where we are.
41:16And then revenues
41:18are looking pretty good.
41:20Interest, um we're still looking at the
41:22allocation. I think that will improve.
41:26And rents as well are a little under
41:28target.
41:37So, property taxes are doing well. It's
41:39mostly motor vehicle, um delinquent real
41:41property taxes, and personal property
41:43and watercraft.
41:44And mostly due to Charleston County
41:46motor vehicle taxes.
41:48>> [clears throat]
41:49>> Business licenses is over, it's all
41:50business licenses. Permits and fees are
41:53over target, we've talked about this, um
41:55permit fees mostly.
41:57Development services, fire marshal, and
41:59planning and preservation fees. And
42:01livability and tourism fees, the
42:03carriage medallion fees are under target
42:05still.
42:08Any questions on any of that?
42:11>> Well, not that, but um maybe I should
42:14ask this of Mr. Butchy, but the fees
42:16that we collect and for example,
42:18building inspections, does it does it
42:21come close to breaking even to to pay
42:23for that department?
42:26>> That's a great question.
42:28>> Is it revenue producing?
42:30>> It's under
42:31>> Yeah, go ahead, Ron. Sorry.
42:33>> I was going to say based on our adjusted
42:36residential fees, which was what we were
42:38looking for, we are still under what it
42:41costs to actually do the work associated
42:44with those inspections and reviews.
42:46>> Wow.
42:48>> And we can never make money, Councilman
42:50>> Correct.
42:50>> So, we always have to at least make it
42:52break even. So, we're you know, pretty
42:53conservative in our in the way we look
42:55at it because the state law prevents us
42:57from making money on our fees.
43:01>> Right. Most of our other fees are closer
43:03to the breaking even number, but the the
43:06building ones when we broke it out was
43:08was under.
43:09>> I mean, like 10% 20%? I mean, you know,
43:12>> I'd have to I'd have to take another
43:14look at the spreadsheets. We created
43:15spreadsheets to to kind of come up with
43:17those.
43:18>> to you send an email out with that.
43:20>> Yeah, we can look at it and send it to
43:22you.
43:22>> Thank you.
43:24>> And then in our governmental state and
43:26local, it's mostly local option sales
43:28tax. We have that through May. Those are
43:32lagging local option sales tax.
43:34Charleston County is 3% over. Berkeley
43:36County is 10% over.
43:39Franchise fees are target
43:42Sorry, target mostly due to Dominion.
43:46Cable and franchise fees continue to
43:48decline and are under target, which
43:51we'll see every year, I think.
43:55And then sales and user charges over
43:57target mostly due to recreation facility
44:00fees and instructional lessons. Doing
44:02really well in recreation.
44:06Any questions there?
44:09Um rents are under target primarily due
44:11to target calculations for the utility
44:13>> Amy
44:14>> Yes, sorry.
44:14>> I I got a question. I I'm just
44:17about the franchise fees with cable and
44:19TV. You say it's declining, is that is
44:22that just people cutting the cord?
44:26I mean it does does that include
44:28internet as well or
44:30>> Yes.
44:31>> Okay.
44:32>> Mhm.
44:34>> Thanks.
44:35>> You're welcome.
44:38Um we talked about this before the
44:39utility reimbursements and the annual
44:42rent collections were just a little
44:44their target calculations are off and
44:46boat slip rent is under target because
44:47the diesel line was was down at the
44:49Maritime Center.
44:51Some and then we have some contractual
44:53rents that are under target that we're
44:54working on as well.
44:57Contributions and donations we have CWS
44:59and UMA that both came in over target.
45:05>> Let me let me ask a question back to
45:07I have to take care of this on the other
45:08side. If the city
45:10rents a I don't know private property at
45:13on a triple net lease.
45:15>> Mhm.
45:16>> Um
45:17we
45:18city have to pay the property tax
45:20portion?
45:21>> It depends on how that it's it's written
45:24but yes.
45:25Many cases we do, yes.
45:27>> Oh, okay. All right, [clears throat]
45:28thanks.
45:31>> I'm sorry, was that this? Did anybody
45:33have any questions?
45:35Any other questions? Okay. Enterprise
45:38funds are looking good. Everybody is
45:40there um
45:43expected profit or loss is better than
45:45expected in at at each of our
45:48facilities.
45:57Angel Loaf is revenue at target and
45:59expenses are under target so loss today
46:01is less than we we anticipated.
46:03City Market
46:05also the same. Um the ballpark though
46:09a loss today is less than expected. And
46:11then the mini golf course is doing well.
46:14as well. Revenues are slightly over and
46:16expenses are on our target.
46:24Any questions?
46:27All right. Um also Lake Murray, revenues
46:29are slightly over target, expenses are
46:31under, profit today is slightly higher
46:33than expected, and then parking
46:35violations are significantly over
46:37target, which is good. You know, the
46:39last couple of years we struggled with
46:40that a little bit. Meters are under
46:42target. I'm sorry, that's not right.
46:45Violations are over target. Meters are
46:47what we struggled with or under target,
46:49but they're higher than previous years,
46:50so we are doing better.
46:52Um the budget that we we might have been
46:54a little bit aggressive in the budget
46:56for for meter revenue.
46:58Permits and fees are over target, and
46:59garages and lots are at target.
47:05Any questions on those?
47:10And then stormwater revenues are
47:12tracking over target and have exceeded
47:14budget.
47:16And that does not include any late
47:17payments from CWS accounts, Councilwoman
47:19Waring, just so you know.
47:26And then um
47:28expenses are under target as well in
47:30both development services and stormwater
47:32management.
47:38Any questions on that?
47:41All right. Tourism funds are looking
47:43good. Mini A tax state A is um over
47:46target by about 800. State A tax is over
47:50about almost 300,000, and hospitality
47:54we are actually a a bit over target,
47:55which is which is good news since you
47:57know that that was flatlining. So,
48:00our our budgeted number was
48:03pretty good. So, feeling a little bit
48:05better about hospitality fees.
48:10Any questions about any of those?
48:14All right.
48:17Um just municipality tax, there's a
48:192-month lag that we talked about, so
48:22it's just through May. State
48:24accommodations is just through the
48:25second quarter cuz we receive those
48:27payments every quarter. And then
48:29hospitality, we do receive on a monthly
48:31basis.
48:32But it's still a 1-month lag.
48:38And then fuel,
48:42we budgeted 330 per gallon for the year,
48:45and these are the average price per
48:47gallon for each month so far and through
48:49August 15th.
48:53So, we went real high in April and May,
48:55we came down a little bit in June, and
48:57then we went back up a little bit in
48:58July and August.
49:05So, what we're projecting is probably
49:07about a $500,000
49:09over budget number by the end of the
49:11year.
49:14Hopefully, prices will come down a
49:15little bit, but that is about That's
49:17where we're we're predicting right now.
49:20Obviously, it's fluid as you all know.
49:22So, we'll just continue to monitor the
49:24prices, and we're encouraging
49:26departments to conserve fuel, especially
49:28now that hopefully the weather will get
49:30a little cooler.
49:32That might help that a little bit as
49:33well.
49:36Any questions on that?
49:39Okay. And this is just kind of the
49:40rolling 7-day average fuel costs for
49:44unleaded and diesel. You see, diesel
49:46doesn't even fit on the chart. So.
49:54And then this is quantities purchased
49:56over the last 4 years. We're pretty much
49:58right at the same level as we were in
50:0025.
50:04So consumption is saying at least a
50:06little steady till last year.
50:15And then
50:16any questions on fuel?
50:202027 budget timeline just where we are.
50:22Um next week we will have public service
50:25and traffic and transportation report
50:27out to you all. On the 16th will be
50:29planning and preservation, parks, and
50:32fire.
50:33And then police, HR, and information
50:35technology will go on the 23rd. And the
50:3730th we'll have um
50:40BFRC and executive.
50:42So that'll be the schedule for this
50:43month.
50:48Do you have something else you're
50:49worrying about?
50:50>> Yeah, I do. As we, you know, obviously
50:52we're in budget season. Do you see any
50:56um
50:56big items of areas on the horizon that
51:01you know will be problematic?
51:03>> Healthcare.
51:06And insurance, just our our property
51:08insurance will be
51:11and then will be a little bit more
51:13significant than we would have liked.
51:16And then also, you know, the
51:17compensation study, whatever we do with
51:19the compensation study will be another.
51:24>> The compensation study has been so long
51:26by the time we get it it might be
51:28obsolete.
51:29>> No, they did a lot of work this year to
51:31make it more current. So I feel
51:33comfortable that we'll have good more
51:34current data.
51:36>> That's great.
51:37>> For implementation, yes.
51:40>> That's great.
51:42Okay.
51:43>> All right. And so then October we'll
51:45finalize our revenue projections and
51:48make final recommendations. We have the
51:50public hearing I'm sorry Council member
51:51Seeking.
51:53You have something?
51:54>> Oh, I just
51:55I just had a real quick question a
51:56little bit behind the slides that you
51:58could put out there. When it comes to
52:00making money off of fee schedule, who is
52:03the arbiter of that and against what
52:06baseline is that measured? Do we do that
52:08internally? Do we get audited? How does
52:10anybody know the the the quotient there?
52:15>> So,
52:17we do it internally and we just look at
52:19the total cost of what the services
52:22we're providing around those fees is at
52:24the time and just
52:27look at revenues that way, increases in
52:29fees that way to ensure we're not going
52:31over
52:32the overhead basically.
52:36Is that what you're asking?
52:37>> Yeah, I'm just trying to sort of see if
52:39there's a formula or I mean you actually
52:41can do it to a some certain. It seems to
52:43me that it's not exactly any It's not an
52:45exact science.
52:48>> It's not exact exact, but
52:51it's pretty close.
52:53>> Okay. All right, thanks.
52:54>> Sure.
52:56Um cuz you know, there's probably
52:59we could always probably find some more
53:00expenses, right? But
53:03we have
53:04um we do the best we can. I think with
53:06Workday too and the way that we have um
53:09things recorded, it will be a little bit
53:11easier moving forward and then we're
53:12actually looking at
53:14some software and implementing things
53:16that's going to make that even easier to
53:18do Council member Seeking. So, hopefully
53:20as we evolve, um those exercises will be
53:24more fruitful.
53:27>> Thank you.
53:27>> Mhm.
53:29And then the public hearing we'll have
53:31in October.
53:32>> Yeah, just real quick Amy, sorry. Uh
53:35>> I'm sorry, I can't always see if you
53:36guys are raising your hands, so please
53:38just speak out.
53:39>> well, I'm I'm turning my my on and off,
53:40so um
53:42I guess just to follow up on Council
53:45member Seeking's question, and this may
53:46be more of a legal question, but um
53:49you know, with user fees
53:51do is the is the same rule applicable to
53:55to what we're doing in our enterprise
53:58funds and
53:59>> No.
54:00>> I mean, those those are not Okay. Those
54:02are not user fees.
54:04>> Right. Those are right, and it's those
54:06operate like a true business
54:09enterprise funds.
54:10>> Okay.
54:12Thank you.
54:13>> You're welcome.
54:15We have our deadline
54:17to have the budget advertisement to the
54:19Boston Courier is November 10th, and
54:21then we have to have the draft budget to
54:24all on November or by November 17th.
54:27First reading the budget is December
54:291st, second and third is December 15th.
54:36And that is all I have unless anybody
54:38has any other questions.
54:45All right.
54:47We will see you all next week. It's a
54:49fun every week ad hoc meeting month.
54:55>> Thank you all.
54:56>> Sure. Let us know if you need anything
54:59or have any other questions, okay?
```*
