2026-09-02 - Ad Hoc Budget Advisory Committee

Summary

Built from the video's auto-generated captions (about 55 minutes) and the posted agenda. Figures may be misheard.

  • Mayor William S. Cogswell, Jr chairs; the meeting was presentations and status only, with no formal votes heard.
  • Development Services requested several positions and items, including a $40,000 inspector vehicle, a $160,000 infrastructure program manager split between stormwater and the general fund, a $145,000 senior building inspector, a $106,000 development services coordinator, and a $50,000 annual floodplain buyout contingency.
  • Development Services also proposed fee revisions starting early next year, projected to bring in about $1.8 million more for the general fund. Staff said building fees are below the cost of service; members asked how break-even is measured. See 2027 Building and Permit Fee Changes.
  • Stormwater Management asked for a green infrastructure site manager, a $500,000 increase in the small-project allocation to $2 million, and more pump station operating money.
  • Community Services requested a Love Your Block manager to replace an expiring grant, code enforcement support, nighttime tourism enforcement officers, $30,000 to update a tour guide manual last published in 2011, and several recreation staffing and program changes.
  • The July monthly report showed overages in liability insurance and some parks and vehicle costs; property taxes, business licenses and permit fees were over target, while some rents and franchise fees were under. Stormwater and tourism tax revenue were over target, and fuel was projected about $500,000 over budget.
  • Timeline: more department presentations through September, a draft budget to council by November 17, first reading December 1, and later readings December 15. See 2027 Development Services Stormwater and Community Services Budget Requests.

Agenda

  1. Moment of silence
  2. Review of budget requests: a. Development Services; b. Stormwater Management; c. Community Services Section
  3. July monthly reports
  4. 2027 budget timeline
  5. Other business
  6. Adjournment

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:02All right, I think we're good to go.

00:07>> All right, I I guess I'll just get us

00:09started. So, if we want to start with a

00:10moment of silence.

00:23Okay, then we can start um

00:26with a review of budget requests and

00:28then we'll quickly just go over the July

00:30monthly reports and the budget timeline.

00:33But, we will start with development

00:34services and Ron, I believe you do have

00:37a PowerPoint to share, yes?

00:40>> I do. Yeah, good afternoon everyone.

00:44>> Stop sharing. Sorry, Jennifer. I did

00:46that all too fast.

00:50I'm a mess.

00:52>> Let me share my screen with you all.

00:55Um

01:00Okay, you're all seeing my presentation

01:02now?

01:06>> Yes.

01:06>> We are.

01:07>> Okay, great.

01:09So, this is the new program request for

01:11development services and I'll jump right

01:13into it.

01:14Um

01:18So, um I'd listed these in the order of

01:21the requests that we have that you would

01:24see in the uh sheet that's provided by

01:26BFRC.

01:28Um but, our first request is for a uh

01:30vehicle request for a bid inspector

01:32position. Um we are currently actually

01:34one vehicle short of our vehicle to

01:36inspector ratio. Um we have an open

01:39position, but that person technically

01:41does not have a vehicle assigned, so we

01:43are

01:44they are required to obviously have

01:46vehicles to perform their everyday job

01:47duties. So, this one's pretty

01:48straightforward. Um the goal is to

01:50ensure that all the employees can

01:52perform all of the all of their job

01:54duties and have the equipment necessary.

01:57Um and we estimated a cost of $40,000 to

02:01provide that vehicle for a building

02:03inspector inspector.

02:05Excuse me.

02:10So one thing you'll notice is what a lot

02:12of our requests are focused on asset

02:14management and building up our asset

02:16management here at the city. Um we think

02:19that's something that we can greatly

02:20improve upon to determine how many

02:23assets we have, what are the conditions

02:25of these assets for both stormwater and

02:28engineering, roadways, sidewalks,

02:30curbing gutter, bridges, other

02:32infrastructure such as that. So this

02:34first new position request is called an

02:37infrastructure program manager. So it's

02:38a request for an additional asset

02:40management position to help preserve and

02:42manage the infrastructure at the city.

02:45Um we currently only have one asset

02:47manager and their primary focus is just

02:50stormwater infrastructure. So we want to

02:52build upon that. Obviously, we can even

02:54use more stormwater asset managers, but

02:56um

02:57other assets that I mentioned

02:58previously. And this position would have

03:01a focus mainly on

03:04uh ensuring that we are compliant with

03:06the state requirements of the MS4

03:08program. That's kind of our stormwater

03:10permitting that we need to keep up with.

03:13Uh things along the lines of

03:16public outreach, good housekeeping on

03:18our own facilities, doing post

03:20construction monitoring of stormwater

03:23practices throughout the city. Uh we

03:25have to do that on a yearly basis and

03:27submit reports to SC DES. So that would

03:30be their main focus. However, they also

03:32would assist in just your general asset

03:35management of stormwater and

03:37right-of-way infrastructure.

03:39So the goal is to expand upon the city's

03:41current asset management program to

03:43include additional infrastructure.

03:45Again, we only look at stormwater assets

03:47currently, but we want to include

03:49sidewalks, curbing gutter, non-standard

03:51materials, roadway conditions, bridges,

03:53retaining walls, anything that's within

03:55the right-of-way or maintained by the

03:57city. And uh the unique aspect of this

03:59one, it's $160,000, but it would be

04:01split 50/50 between the stormwater and

04:04general fund.

04:09Another asset management request would

04:11be a senior asset manager position. Um

04:14it would be an additional asset managers

04:16preserve and manage the city's

04:17infrastructure. You know, when you

04:19compare us to Charleston County, they

04:20currently have eight employees within

04:22their asset management program. Again,

04:24we only have one, and then the person

04:27who manages that division. So, we have a

04:30request for two more to start um

04:33building up this team.

04:35So, this position's primary focus would

04:37just be on stormwater and right-of-way

04:40infrastructure and create a vertical

04:42growth within the division. Um the other

04:45one having that additional services of

04:48helping with the program, the MS4

04:51program,

04:52um

04:53is is the main difference between the

04:54two. And the goal and the cost estimate

04:57are exactly the same as the other

04:58position.

05:03The next position we're looking to

05:04request is a senior building inspection

05:07division inspector.

05:08Um

05:09it's for an additional senior inspector

05:11to assist in performing building

05:12inspections throughout the city. This

05:14actually was requested in the 2025

05:16budget, but we only got approved for one

05:18position then. Um we think the senior

05:21inspector is a great opportunity to

05:22build even more vertical growth. Right

05:25now, everyone's on that inspector level.

05:28Um so, to have senior inspector allows

05:31them to grow in their position to help

05:32with retention. Um

05:35and the goal of this position is to

05:37ensure that inspections are being

05:39completed in timely manner to support

05:40the development community and general

05:42public who are building within the city.

05:44You know, we aim to complete as many

05:46inspections as we can within 24 hours

05:49and in order to do that it'd be great to

05:50have more senior positions who can help

05:52grow the the new staff and have a little

05:55more experience um and the cost estimate

05:57for this is $145,000

06:00and would be purely a general fund.

06:05So this one's a little bit of a unique

06:06request. So it's a funding request for

06:08flood plain buyout contingency funds.

06:11Um the request is for funds to be

06:13utilized for potential buyouts of

06:14repetitive loss properties with a

06:16history of flood flooding.

06:18Um the funding would be utilized

06:20alongside grant funding or when grant

06:22funding is not available. A lot of the

06:24grants that we deal with have a match of

06:26either 50% 25%

06:29so we need to have some funding set

06:30aside to match those grants that we're

06:34receiving. Um of course we're always

06:36going to go after grants and if they're

06:37100% grant funded that's great but we

06:40don't want to have a situation where we

06:42can't go after a grant because we don't

06:44have funding to support that match. Um

06:47we also look at this as a great

06:48opportunity to use with other city

06:50departments as as they have projects

06:52that they need to do buyouts for. If

06:54there is a repetitive loss component to

06:56it we can contribute this money to that

06:59buyout in any aspect of it. Um and the

07:03goal would be to build up a larger sum

07:06of money year after year if we don't

07:08utilize it. Any unused funding would be

07:10rolled over to the following year to be

07:12utilized for future buyouts. Um it's

07:14worth mentioning that

07:16uh Charlotte, North Carolina have a has

07:18a very robust program to utilize their

07:21own dollars. Um they've done over 450

07:24flood plain buyouts for oop excuse me if

07:26I think I went to the wrong slide. Uh

07:29they've done over 450 buyouts of

07:31properties for repetitive loss and

07:34obviously someone like New Jersey they

07:36set this up after Hurricane Sandy and

07:38have a very robust program where they're

07:40not just using grants. They have money

07:42set aside. It's almost like rainy day

07:44funding.

07:45Um the goal would be to reduce the

07:46number of flooded properties within the

07:48city

07:50and work towards creating a more

07:51resilient community. We're requesting

07:53$50,000 understanding that if we want to

07:55do more significant, we probably need

07:57more, but again, we would roll over.

07:59And And just buying out these properties

08:02would be step one. You can then

08:03revitalize them and do things like storm

08:06water improvements, parks, retrofits,

08:08things like that with open space area.

08:14And this is our last position request.

08:15It's a development services coordinator.

08:17So, this request is for an

08:19administrative position to act as the

08:21permit center representate

08:22representative and assist in answering

08:24any questions related to the department.

08:27Um having a a stronger presence in the

08:29permit center and

08:30to improve upon our customer service and

08:33they would also just generally support

08:34the admin work within the department as

08:37a whole. So, the goal would be focused

08:39on customer service and to better

08:41communicate our processes and

08:43requirements to the public and the

08:44applicants who may come to the permit

08:46center.

08:47And it's $106,000 of um general fund.

08:53Actually, this one and I'm sorry, I

08:54might not put in there. I think this one

08:56is split as well, 50/50.

08:59>> Ron, I think Council Member Waring has a

09:01question.

09:02>> Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, go ahead.

09:04>> The the thing is that a dual question, I

09:06guess, for you and Ms. Waring.

09:09Uh these grant matching

09:12allocations that you're requesting, how

09:13how we've done that in the past. So,

09:15when we got a grant and I don't know, it

09:18was, you know, 2/3 federal government

09:20and we had to come up with a third.

09:22Um

09:23Ms. Waring, how do we do that in the

09:26Where do we get the money from?

09:28How do we budget for that, you know, 2 3

09:30years?

09:30>> Typically, we know the grants that are

09:32that we're applying applying for and

09:35kind of the

09:37whether we would be successful in

09:38getting that. So, we would budget for

09:40that match, Councilmember Waring.

09:42>> Okay.

09:43>> And and we and we still try and do that,

09:45Councilmember. Um the situation we run

09:47into a lot of the FEMA grants, the

09:49timelines are very hard to predict. Um

09:52we've had some grants submitted for in

09:55the early 2020s that we still haven't,

09:57you know, even heard back from or we

09:59heard back from this year.

10:01So, um

10:03it it's kind of would be nice to set

10:05some money aside in case, you know, one

10:07pops up

10:08>> No, we're bringing it with you, I mean.

10:10So, how is this different from what we

10:12were doing in the past?

10:15>> Well, in the past it would be based on a

10:17on a specific grant, where in this

10:19situation we are looking to have it, you

10:21know, budgeted for every year. We would

10:23get 50,000 on a yearly basis. And if we

10:26didn't use that money because a grant

10:29wasn't available, we could set it aside

10:31and build up a larger sum for a larger

10:33grant or just buying out a property on

10:36our own without a grant if possible.

10:39>> All right, got it. Thank you.

10:40>> Yeah, of course.

10:41>> Councilmember Waring, a lot of the times

10:42the grants we try to go for are the

10:4490/10 as well because those are better.

10:47And then the grant recent grants that

10:49we've done, please correct me, Ron, if

10:51I'm wrong, the match was actually paid

10:53by the homeowner.

10:55So, it wasn't a city It wasn't a city

10:57funded match.

10:58>> Yeah, in the most recent ones, yep,

11:00that's correct.

11:03>> Got it.

11:07>> Thank you for that.

11:09Okay, so now um the last aspect I wanted

11:11to dive into is fee revisions. Um

11:14so, we are looking at some additional

11:16fee revisions. A lot of these fees that

11:18I'm going to be talking about have not

11:19been revised since prior to 2020. Um up,

11:23Hampton, see you got your hand.

11:25Never mind.

11:27Um prior to

11:29>> Oh, okay.

11:30Fair enough. Uh prior to 2020. Um, so we

11:33think it's appropriate to to look into

11:35these and obviously all of these fees

11:37were coordinated with BFRC and legal to

11:40make sure that we're not taking in more

11:42money than the amount of time and effort

11:44that we are putting in.

11:46Um, we plan to put these into effect the

11:49beginning of the new year and we

11:50projected 1.8 million of additional

11:53general funds. That's what our

11:54department projected based on what we've

11:56taken in the past and the goal is to

11:58better account for the city's costs when

12:00it comes to permitting, review, and

12:01inspections of various city processes.

12:03So,

12:04got some summary tables for you.

12:07So, one of and I'll break it down to the

12:09first three,

12:10actually the first five are all focused

12:12on the plat review committee. So, it's

12:14the review of plats. Um, we have some

12:17in- significant increases in those cuz

12:19it's been been a long time and most of

12:22them are the first three are just a flat

12:24fee, the first four actually, excuse me.

12:27Um, where it's a you know, you pay the

12:29fee. If you have edits, you will pay it

12:31again. But, the last one where it's if

12:34lots are of five or more are paid per

12:37lot, this is pretty standard with the

12:39how a lot of the other municipalities do

12:40it and I'll have a summary table with

12:43against other municipalities to see.

12:46Um, the encroachment permit fees are

12:47going up slightly as well as the

12:49engineering permit fees for work within

12:50our right-of-way from 25 to 100.

12:53Building permit fees are a little more

12:54complicated, so I'll do that in a

12:55separate slide.

12:57And then the application fee. So, this

12:59is for the effort of the permit center

13:01to perform intake, form assigning those

13:03reviews. We've doubled that from 40 to

13:0580.

13:06Um, we do have some new fees that we

13:09also wanted to implement. Um, the Lomar

13:12F, which is a uh, flood plain related

13:15fee. We don't get too many of these, but

13:17it is an effort that is a little

13:19non-standard that we wanted to start

13:21tracking our effort on. Um, it's for

13:23bringing in fill to remove a property

13:25from the flood plain. So, we charge 200

13:29for that review.

13:31And then there's issuance of a

13:33certificate of occupancy which requires

13:35fire building a heavy lift on the permit

13:38center. Every time someone comes in for

13:40a CEO we would require a $350.

13:44This last one is an administrative fee

13:46which I talked about in the past.

13:48Basically for if we have a contract for

13:51third-party services whether it be

13:53review inspections, we would add a 20%

13:56administrative fee on all the invoices

13:59we process for our time to do invoice

14:01intake get the fees in the system, the

14:04project management aspect of managing

14:06the third-party.

14:08So, we we will apply that to the

14:10invoices.

14:14And for the more complicated one, the

14:16building inspection fees.

14:18So,

14:20it's a lot of information here, but

14:22essentially it is a 50% increase of the

14:26valuation of how much construction cost

14:29and a 50% increase on what the fee being

14:31implemented. You will see on the next

14:33slide. So, this

14:35valuation is directly in line with the

14:38International Building Code the ICC

14:42Building Valuation Data and this is what

14:45basically a standard for almost all

14:47municipalities to use. We were using

14:49something from 2017. We are just

14:51bringing it up to 2026.

14:54Um

14:55and that's what is recommended by the

14:57the code.

14:59And that's you'll see here we we brought

15:02this up by 50%. We are actually under

15:04the code recommendation for what the fee

15:07is per the amount of construction we are

15:09doing. And with that I think it's better

15:11to just show you some of the summary

15:13tables

15:14which kind of spells it out.

15:16So, I have three columns here that are

15:18highlighted. So, this is our 2027

15:21fee in the first yellow column from the

15:24left. Then you have Charleston County

15:26who did a fee revision in 2026.

15:29And then you have Mount Pleasant. And

15:32you could see the one thing I would say

15:33Mount Pleasant directly uses the

15:36recommendation from the International

15:38Residential Code, but they add $30 on

15:41top of all these values for an

15:43application.

15:44Um

15:46we are generally in line with all of

15:48them. Mount Pleasant immediately once

15:50you get to around 50,000

15:53greatly exceeds what our fees are. So,

15:55anything above 50,000 with construction

15:58greatly exceeds. But when it comes to

16:00Charleston County, we are pretty in line

16:03within $100 of what their fees are are.

16:06Slightly more in some situations.

16:08Slightly less as you get higher and

16:10higher. So, it wouldn't be anything that

16:13this town community is not already

16:14paying for other municipalities.

16:17And again, all in line with the building

16:19valuation data and the recommendation

16:22from the International Residential Code.

16:25We are less than what they are

16:26recommending. And

16:28I should point out that these fees are

16:29actually less than the effort that we

16:32put in, but we felt like it was an

16:33appropriate jump based on everyone else

16:36in the market.

16:39And then this is a quick comparison

16:41table for uh the plat review committee.

16:43Berkeley County was the most recent to

16:45update their fees. I did talk to

16:47Charleston County and they are actually

16:48going through some fee updates as well.

16:50So, they're interested in what we're

16:52doing. They also know what Berkeley

16:53County has done. So, I would expect them

16:55to come in line.

16:56But for those everyday uh citizens who

16:59are coming in for boundary surveys,

17:01property line adjustments, things like

17:02that, Berkeley County actually charges

17:04more than us. Um and then as you get

17:08more and more lots for a plat review, we

17:11do get a little higher in our fees than

17:13Berkeley County. So, that kind kind

17:15kicks in at about 25 lots or more.

17:18The other change I just wanted to point

17:19out to you all is that Berkeley County

17:21charges half the initial fee for every

17:23resubmittal, where our current plan is

17:27to charge the same amount of fee for

17:29every submittal based on the effort that

17:31it takes and the intake

17:34and and everything involved in the

17:35process. So, that's the main difference

17:37between us and Berkeley County.

17:42And that's all I have. And I will open

17:44it up for any additional questions. And

17:47sorry sorry if I was a little long, a

17:49lot of information.

18:00>> You were not long, Ron, at all. So.

18:02>> Uh

18:04I appreciate that, Amy.

18:09>> Everybody's good? No questions?

18:13Okay. Thank you, Ron.

18:15>> Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

18:17I'm going to stop sharing.

18:19>> All right, Matt Fatman. I'm sorry you

18:21have a

18:23PowerPoint as well you want to share?

18:26>> Yes. Yeah, thank you, Amy.

18:46All right, looks like it's sharing okay.

18:49Um

18:50Again, Stormwater Department 2027 budget

18:53request. I think most of you are

18:55pretty familiar with the

18:57Stormwater Department, but split into

18:59three functional groups at the moment.

19:00Project management, the large projects,

19:01small projects, pump stations, and um

19:04some engagement work, outreach

19:05engagement.

19:06Our utility program, which is the

19:08account management that's transitioned

19:09over from CWS to the city.

19:12Um billing coordination with the county

19:13tax offices, uh determination of those

19:16fees, and then uh the credit process

19:17that we're just finalizing at council.

19:20Then the field operations group, um

19:21which are maintenance, rehab, uh the

19:23construction work we do for much of our

19:25in-house construction, and then support.

19:28Um departmental mission, reducing the

19:31impact of flooding on the city. Uh we do

19:33that in project management through

19:36managing our funded capital and small

19:38projects to mitigate those existing

19:40flood impacts. Um we

19:43identify and prioritize new potential

19:44projects,

19:46and then of course maintain the

19:47functionality of our existing

19:48construction projects, and you'll see

19:51most of our budget requests are related

19:52to the third bullet there this year. Um

19:55from the utility perspective, managing

19:56about 60,000 billing accounts,

19:59calculating updated billing amounts each

20:01year, um coordinating with the counties

20:02for billing of all of those uh

20:05service accounts, and collecting that

20:06revenue, um and then manage the credit

20:08and bill process.

20:10But that is actually a slight decrease

20:12in budget, um as we continue to

20:15reduce our um consultant need for

20:17consultant support as we shift over. Uh

20:19we have we have been

20:21pretty cost-effective from the beginning

20:22on that, but doing more and more work

20:24in-house um as we continue to build out

20:26that program.

20:28And then from an operations perspective,

20:29of course, we've been rehabilitating

20:31existing infrastructure. The front yard

20:33roadside ditch systems are almost all uh

20:36rehabilitated at this point. Most of our

20:38rear yard systems are rehabilitated. Our

20:40canals are mostly rehabilitated. Uh we

20:43are starting to focus in on the

20:45underground pipe system, which is

20:46probably our biggest remaining need for

20:49rehabilitation.

20:50Uh shifted over in those other

20:52considerations to proactive system

20:53maintenance, where we're actively going

20:55out and um scheduling maintenance rather

20:57than going and fixing problems, as as

20:59you all are well aware of.

21:01And then doing quite a bit of small

21:02project construction work, really built

21:04out built out that small project

21:06construction crew and outfall cleaning

21:08work within the last couple of years um

21:10through a lot of support from council.

21:12That's been incredibly successful in

21:14reducing our costs and letting us build

21:17even more small projects um all while

21:21keeping our total budget numbers very

21:23similar um despite some very significant

21:25increases in the construction and

21:27engineering sector over the last 5

21:28years.

21:30So um here is a slide that is I'm sure a

21:33joy to read since it is all heavy text.

21:36Um but basically breaks down some of how

21:38the budget works for our our department.

21:40A lot of a lot of support in field

21:42operations staff. Um

21:44some staff costs with our utility and

21:46project management team.

21:48Uh equipment vehicles. Uh that's about a

21:50million dollars per year generally for

21:53lease purchase of buying um very large

21:56equipment dump trucks, excavators,

21:58backhoes to replace existing equipment

22:00as it ages out

22:02in our our fleet replacement plan. Um

22:04and generally on the order of 50 to

22:06100,000 dollars for pickup trucks and

22:09um smaller vehicles, passenger vehicles

22:11that are for

22:12uh replacing again existing vehicles for

22:14our um maintenance crews primarily but

22:16also our project managers.

22:18Uh the small projects in-house IDC

22:20budget. This is um indefinite delivery

22:22contracts, small project work that we

22:24fund and then in-house materials we

22:27purchase for our field ops crews for

22:28small construction work. Um that

22:31includes uh in the prior year 1.5

22:35million dollars of the small project

22:37allocation. This year proposing to shift

22:39that small project allocation to 2

22:41million dollars. That's the 500,000

22:43dollar increase that you're seeing on

22:44the slide there to continue um the great

22:47work we're doing with the small project

22:49team.

22:51Um emergency repairs and pumping. Um

22:54that's again emergency actions we take.

22:56We do budget for that so that when there

22:57is a problem, we have funding available

22:59um to be able to fix it. A lot of um

23:01sinkhole repairs, um some emergency

23:04pumping actions, hurricane response that

23:05is not

23:07uh declared event where we get

23:08reimbursement, that type of work.

23:10Um pump station O&M, this is another big

23:12area for cost increase this year.

23:15Um two new pump stations coming online,

23:18um one coming out of upfit construction,

23:21bringing that back into our O&M

23:23responsibilities, and one hopefully

23:24going into

23:26um construction for upfit, which will

23:28take it back out of our

23:29responsibilities, um but those two new

23:31stations coming online, um large

23:33increase, it's about a hundred million

23:35dollars of

23:36asset that we are maintaining, so we're

23:38still at less than 1% a year in

23:41maintenance costs, um but that's

23:42something we're continuing to build out

23:44the long-term

23:45capital O&M plan. Um this is primarily

23:49uh the initial preventative maintenance

23:51work, um but trying to maximize that to

23:54minimize need for large-scale capital

23:57replacement and upfit work.

23:59Um new expenses are our main new program

24:01[clears throat] ask is the green

24:02infrastructure site manager. Um this

24:06would be an ongoing cost, a loaded

24:07salary cost, about a hundred and five

24:09thousand dollars a year, that's salary

24:10plus all the benefits, um different

24:13taxes and everything else.

24:15Uh in addition to a one-time cost for a

24:17a vehicle, for a pickup truck for the

24:18position, for forty thousand dollars, um

24:21a little bit more detail on those. The

24:23green infrastructure

24:25management position, we now have the Del

24:27Moresi Ecological Park over Berbarry

24:28Woods, the Howell Avenue Ecological Park

24:30in James Island off Howell Avenue, the

24:32Bridgepoint Ecological Park, um and

24:34Shadow Moss and Church Creek,

24:36the Mallard and Walk Natural Flood

24:38Storage sites, also in Shadow Moss and

24:40the Church Creek,

24:41um the Robert Mitchell Pump Station, the

24:43rain gardens that are going in as part

24:44of that project over on Huger Street, um

24:47four buyout property retrofit sites,

24:49three in West Ashley, one in James

24:51Island, um and then some additional work

24:53that we're looking at um in the coming

24:55year or two between

24:58um South Peace Ferry

25:00wetland storage around Crosstown Church

25:01area,

25:03uh Newmarket Creek potentially, which is

25:04in the design phase rather than

25:06construction phase at this point, and

25:07some other um very small projects. So,

25:09this is basically trying to shift these

25:11away from any kind of con- um major

25:14contracted maintenance, um hiring an

25:16internal position to

25:18manage our field operations crews with

25:20some specialty knowledge to doing the

25:22vegetative landscape maintenance and

25:24flood storage maintenance on those

25:25sites, bring our costs down by doing it

25:27in-house, and being available

25:30similar to what we do with pump

25:31stations, um when we do need to contract

25:33work, having an in-house expert rather

25:35than having to hire a outside landscape

25:37architecture firm or something, which

25:38drives up costs very significantly.

25:41Um pump station management, we mentioned

25:42that cost increase, um again talked

25:44about we now have

25:46um four or will have four pump stations

25:48for next fiscal year. Uh the MUSC

25:51station is planning for the upfit with

25:53the Army Corps of Engineer project work,

25:55which would take it back out of our

25:56maintenance roles primarily while the

25:58contractor's working on it, but the

25:59other three will roll into our

26:02um maintenance program for that increase

26:04that you were seeing.

26:05Then the small project allocation,

26:07um think again you're mostly familiar

26:09with this, but projects typically

26:11between 20,000 and 500,000. These are

26:13normally street scale rather than

26:15neighborhood or region scale projects.

26:18Uh we've built more than 40 projects in

26:20the last five um five or six years.

26:23Got at least 10 ongoing projects. Um

26:26we've had an increase in how many

26:27outfalls we're cleaning, that's been

26:29really successful, brought the

26:30permitting for that fully in-house.

26:33Um do all that work in-house at this

26:34point, which lets us clean many more

26:36outfalls. We still have a mix for the

26:38outfall cleaning itself between

26:40contractor cleaning and in-house

26:42cleaning depending on the length of the

26:43outfall and the complexity of the site.

26:46Um but we have also increased our

26:47in-house permitting, design,

26:48construction. It's really let us stretch

26:51the same dollar amounts to do just as

26:54much work even as we've had construction

26:56engineering cost increases in the in the

26:58outside contractor community.

27:00Um but we would like to keep expanding

27:01that out doing more work. It's a great

27:03example where

27:05um the department's able to coordinate

27:07the efforts between our field operations

27:08and project management groups to kind of

27:10leverage the resources in both entities

27:12to do more work more efficiently for the

27:14city and get it done a lot quicker than

27:16when we have to go um out through the

27:18contract process.

27:20General focus, and you've probably all

27:21seen this slide before, but

27:23um

27:24you know, really focusing again and

27:26putting bold on the pump station program

27:28for the upcoming year, the green

27:29infrastructure program for the upcoming

27:31year. Most important thing we can do is

27:33maintain

27:34the infrastructure we have to be as

27:36effective as possible. Um we do need to

27:38still build new projects. Current large

27:40capital projects are on there always are

27:41important to be cost effective in those.

27:44Um but very important to maintain what

27:46you have. Small projects incredibly

27:48important as well.

27:49Um our outfall maintenance has been a

27:51real success story that we're continuing

27:53to push to get things to drain out more

27:55effectively at low and moderate tides.

27:58Um our open channel drainage maintenance

28:00has been already very successful for us

28:02so it's sliding down that priority

28:04scale. Um but doing it is certainly

28:05something we need to stay on top of.

28:08Um similar with the check valve program.

28:09Had great success getting those

28:10installed, maintaining those. Now it's

28:12more of a maintenance rather than a

28:14fresh installation.

28:16Um

28:17In terms of things we might need in the

28:19future, again talking about that pipe

28:20system rehab, we got to continue to

28:22figure out ways to improve that. We've

28:23looked at it with the small project

28:25allocation. We have a pilot project

28:26going on right now in Wagner Terrace to

28:28start trying to um

28:30modernize some of the older vitrified

28:32clay pipes and some other challenges

28:34around the city.

28:35Um future large capital projects for

28:37neighborhoods that still need those.

28:39Um and then of course future small

28:41projects as we continue to ask for that

28:43additional funding to be able to build

28:44more of those projects.

28:46Um an asset inventory, I think Mr. Rucci

28:48touched on that in his presentation of

28:50it is very helpful to know where the

28:52assets are. It does make our um field

28:54operations work much more efficient. It

28:56isn't as critical as being able to do

28:58the field operations work, but it is

29:00helpful for efficiency purposes.

29:02And that's all I have. Happy to answer

29:04any questions.

29:22>> Okay.

29:24Thank you, Matt.

29:25>> Thank

29:27>> And next would be community services

29:29section with Dan Rucci.

29:34>> Thank you very much. Do you have that to

29:36pull up, Amy, or

29:37>> I'm just I'm just going to pull it up.

29:39>> Thanks.

29:42Okay, so um I don't have a fancy power

29:44point you guys, but keep it uh

29:47as simple as possible. Um

29:51under livability and tourism, we're

29:53currently requesting three new programs.

29:56Uh it will be the love your block, and

29:58you can skip to the next page,

30:00and I'll elaborate.

30:03The uh we're requesting uh two nighttime

30:07tourism enforcement officers, and we

30:10want to update the tour guide manual for

30:13our tourism department. Next page,

30:15please.

30:25You got too fast. Go to the main

30:28summary.

30:30Okay.

30:36>> Hey, Dan. You just want the tourism and

30:38livability? I just have the summary

30:39pages for tourism and livability.

30:41Do you want me to have the details

30:43pulled I can pull the details up for you

30:44if that's what you want.

30:45>> That's what I was going to I thought

30:47that would be more helpful for

30:48understanding.

30:49>> 2 seconds. Give me 2 seconds.

30:54All right, here's the detail, Dan.

30:55>> Thank you very much.

30:57>> You're welcome.

30:57>> first is your your love your love your

30:59love program. This initially was a uh

31:03grant funded through the Bloomberg uh

31:05Center for Public Innovation. There was

31:08originally a $20,000 grant to support uh

31:11the program

31:13uh which uh really is dedicated to

31:16serving uh

31:18communities and neighborhoods throughout

31:20the city. It is a resident-led,

31:23neighborhood-focused initiative.

31:25Uh our goal is to uh replace the grant

31:30program which ends

31:32uh actually in October

31:34and replace it with a full-time Love

31:37Your Block manager who is actually

31:39currently on staff now uh under the uh

31:42original grant

31:43and uh

31:45make this a a full-time program.

31:47Uh first part is obviously the

31:50um

31:51uh

31:53creating that position for the Love Love

31:54Your Block manager.

31:56And uh if you go to the next page,

31:58please.

32:00The second part of the program will be

32:02focused on uh a $20,000 uh request for

32:07our code enforcement budget to support

32:10this program. Now, looking through our

32:13um

32:14our current positions, uh as a

32:17cost-saving effort, I noticed that there

32:20was a part-time position that was

32:22underutilized. Uh we're willing to uh

32:25use that

32:26uh existing program uh to offset those

32:29costs to support this um

32:32this uh initiative.

32:34And honestly, will be uh cost savings

32:37along

32:39uh

32:39all those lines.

32:41Uh next page, please.

32:44Any questions on the Livable Block or

32:46I'll just keep going.

32:49Next is uh

32:50nighttime tourism enforcement. What

32:52we're doing is uh

32:54currently

32:56most of you may know

32:57uh the mayor's primary initiative or one

32:59of his initiatives this year is to

33:02update the tourism management plan. And

33:04the mayor's identified some guiding

33:06principles including uh residents first.

33:09Um so our goal and hearing from the

33:12residents is that there's a uh lack of

33:15enforcement uh during nighttime hours

33:18and there will be a need for two

33:21additional officers uh for our tourism

33:24staff to um

33:26be able to

33:28commit to this process and that's our

33:30request for two additional officers.

33:33Uh the money's are down there. The item

33:35line items are down there and uh these

33:38officers will be required to work at

33:41night and supplement it by day

33:44uh personnel if needed. And

33:46um

33:48that's it for this. Go ahead to the next

33:51one.

33:52Our third request for Livability and

33:54Tourism is to update our tourism uh

33:58manual, the tour guide manual. It is

34:00outdated and with the last um

34:02uh published in 2011. Uh

34:05over the past several years we've had

34:07some feedback some from the tour guide

34:10uh uh

34:11members of their community and wanting

34:15to

34:16uh update the manual which is a cost.

34:19We're asking for $30,000

34:21to commit to this process. Our uh we

34:26want to stay in line with the uh mayor's

34:28initiative with tourism management. We

34:31we'd like this to roll out at the same

34:32time as the plan rolls out

34:36to kind of invest our resources and

34:40commitment to the industries as well as

34:42our residents.

34:44And our goal is to also

34:47request funding from other partners as

34:50the CBB to offset additional costs that

34:54may occur.

34:56That's it for livability and tourism

34:58next.

34:59Is our recreation department.

35:05So we're basically asking for three

35:07items of

35:08or three positions maintenance worker

35:10full-time position.

35:12This position would be

35:15dedicated to the main Maybank Tennis

35:17Center courts and satellite courts.

35:20The clay courts require daily watering

35:22and maintenance.

35:24The Maybank hard courts and satellite

35:25courts require each week

35:28for these

35:30courts to be gained.

35:32It is a minimal position costs. We

35:35currently have a contract worker helping

35:37to maintain the courts. But the new

35:40maintenance position could take away

35:43some of the need for a contract worker

35:45which would give us some saving costs.

35:48In the long run.

35:50Also with the increase of pickleball

35:53play on various satellite courts, our

35:55maintenance worker has added

35:57responsibilities maintaining these

35:59tennis and pickleball equipment etc.

36:04Next please.

36:06We're in in uh

36:09preparation for our Johns Island

36:10Recreation Center that obviously is not

36:12built yet. We want to hire request to

36:17hire

36:18a recreation specialist. We want to make

36:21sure there's enough time to train this

36:24individual prior to opening the Johns

36:27Island recreation facility.

36:29Um, this staff person will be

36:31responsible for building uh, recreation

36:34presence on the island by having after

36:36school events, outdoor athletic

36:38programs, and uh, more uh, throughout

36:41the year. This staff person will also

36:44implement outdoor programs at Johns

36:47Island Park to create uh, relationships

36:49with the community to garner their

36:51support and interest in the new facility

36:53programming.

36:55So, this will allow for an easy

36:56transition of programming into that new

36:58facility once it is built.

37:02Um, next, please.

37:08Uh,

37:09request for uh, recreation again for AU

37:12fees uh, increasing the fees uh, from 50

37:15to 30 uh,

37:16hours. Yeah, $30 per person. What this

37:20is is a uh,

37:22it's for our All-Star programs when the

37:25when the kids uh, teams uh, go to the

37:27All-Stars, each each child is

37:30uh,

37:31responsible for contributing $15 per

37:33person, uh, but we're asking for

37:37um,

37:37uh, additional uh,

37:39monies to offset the costs

37:41and um,

37:43be able to support these

37:45uh,

37:46the events or the equipment and uniforms

37:48for these kids.

37:50Uh, next, please.

37:53Uh, we're asking for a tennis instructor

37:55full-time.

37:57Uh, instructor for the Maybank Tennis

37:58Center.

37:59This would use uh, one part-time

38:02instructor

38:03be use of the one part-time instructor

38:05to make a full-time instructor for that

38:08location.

38:09Uh, this will be more closely with the

38:12head work more closely with the head

38:14tennis professional uh, to add some

38:17programming and some more involvement in

38:19day-to-day activities.

38:22And finally,

38:24uh we're asking for uh Daniel Island Rec

38:27Center wrestling program.

38:29What this will do is

38:31uh increase our youth sports on Daniel

38:33Island with the wrestling. This program

38:36is already done city-wide, so we want to

38:38expand it to the Daniel Island

38:41uh area as well. It's a pretty minimal

38:43costs

38:44uh for that.

38:46Uh are there any questions for

38:49the ability and tourism and recreation?

39:11>> Okay. Everybody's good?

39:23>> Uh good to me.

39:25>> Sorry, I'm just trying to share my

39:26screen again. Can you see my screen,

39:28okay?

39:29>> Yeah, I can.

39:31I'm [clears throat] going to have to

39:32skip out and pick up on phone cuz I got

39:35a 4:00 downtown.

39:37>> Okay. This will I'll be fast.

39:39>> Okay.

39:41>> We'll just quickly go over July monthly

39:43report. Sorry, I'm not on camera, am I?

39:48Not that it matters necessarily. Um

39:50total operating expenditures,

39:53you can see the only person that's

39:54having a problem is me.

39:57>> Oh, yeah.

39:59>> I know.

40:01>> Well, how does that happen?

40:03>> Everybody else is tracking under target.

40:06Um

40:07property, auto, and marine, and port

40:09liability insurance has been much more

40:11expensive than we had anticipated. I

40:14think I talked about this last month as

40:16well, or the last time we met anyway.

40:19We're trying to do a deep dive into that

40:21and

40:22see if it's better for us to

40:24find a different

40:26carrier. So, we are looking at that for

40:28next year.

40:29Fire is just over a little in capital

40:31due to timing of purchases. Parks is

40:34mostly due to utility costs, mostly

40:36street lights.

40:37And repair maintenance costs and

40:39supplies.

40:40Leases over on operating due to vehicle

40:42repairs, which is um will be covered by

40:45insurance proceeds, or at least mostly

40:47covered by and then the timing of the

40:49body camera purchases and taser payment

40:52was off, makes it a little off target.

40:54Public services over on operating due to

40:56vehicle repairs and capital purchases,

40:59which also will be covered by asset

41:01sales revenue.

41:03Any questions on any of that?

41:09Okay.

41:10And that's just a graphic

41:12of where we are.

41:16And then revenues

41:18are looking pretty good.

41:20Interest, um we're still looking at the

41:22allocation. I think that will improve.

41:26And rents as well are a little under

41:28target.

41:37So, property taxes are doing well. It's

41:39mostly motor vehicle, um delinquent real

41:41property taxes, and personal property

41:43and watercraft.

41:44And mostly due to Charleston County

41:46motor vehicle taxes.

41:48>> [clears throat]

41:49>> Business licenses is over, it's all

41:50business licenses. Permits and fees are

41:53over target, we've talked about this, um

41:55permit fees mostly.

41:57Development services, fire marshal, and

41:59planning and preservation fees. And

42:01livability and tourism fees, the

42:03carriage medallion fees are under target

42:05still.

42:08Any questions on any of that?

42:11>> Well, not that, but um maybe I should

42:14ask this of Mr. Butchy, but the fees

42:16that we collect and for example,

42:18building inspections, does it does it

42:21come close to breaking even to to pay

42:23for that department?

42:26>> That's a great question.

42:28>> Is it revenue producing?

42:30>> It's under

42:31>> Yeah, go ahead, Ron. Sorry.

42:33>> I was going to say based on our adjusted

42:36residential fees, which was what we were

42:38looking for, we are still under what it

42:41costs to actually do the work associated

42:44with those inspections and reviews.

42:46>> Wow.

42:48>> And we can never make money, Councilman

42:50>> Correct.

42:50>> So, we always have to at least make it

42:52break even. So, we're you know, pretty

42:53conservative in our in the way we look

42:55at it because the state law prevents us

42:57from making money on our fees.

43:01>> Right. Most of our other fees are closer

43:03to the breaking even number, but the the

43:06building ones when we broke it out was

43:08was under.

43:09>> I mean, like 10% 20%? I mean, you know,

43:12>> I'd have to I'd have to take another

43:14look at the spreadsheets. We created

43:15spreadsheets to to kind of come up with

43:17those.

43:18>> to you send an email out with that.

43:20>> Yeah, we can look at it and send it to

43:22you.

43:22>> Thank you.

43:24>> And then in our governmental state and

43:26local, it's mostly local option sales

43:28tax. We have that through May. Those are

43:32lagging local option sales tax.

43:34Charleston County is 3% over. Berkeley

43:36County is 10% over.

43:39Franchise fees are target

43:42Sorry, target mostly due to Dominion.

43:46Cable and franchise fees continue to

43:48decline and are under target, which

43:51we'll see every year, I think.

43:55And then sales and user charges over

43:57target mostly due to recreation facility

44:00fees and instructional lessons. Doing

44:02really well in recreation.

44:06Any questions there?

44:09Um rents are under target primarily due

44:11to target calculations for the utility

44:13>> Amy

44:14>> Yes, sorry.

44:14>> I I got a question. I I'm just

44:17about the franchise fees with cable and

44:19TV. You say it's declining, is that is

44:22that just people cutting the cord?

44:26I mean it does does that include

44:28internet as well or

44:30>> Yes.

44:31>> Okay.

44:32>> Mhm.

44:34>> Thanks.

44:35>> You're welcome.

44:38Um we talked about this before the

44:39utility reimbursements and the annual

44:42rent collections were just a little

44:44their target calculations are off and

44:46boat slip rent is under target because

44:47the diesel line was was down at the

44:49Maritime Center.

44:51Some and then we have some contractual

44:53rents that are under target that we're

44:54working on as well.

44:57Contributions and donations we have CWS

44:59and UMA that both came in over target.

45:05>> Let me let me ask a question back to

45:07I have to take care of this on the other

45:08side. If the city

45:10rents a I don't know private property at

45:13on a triple net lease.

45:15>> Mhm.

45:16>> Um

45:17we

45:18city have to pay the property tax

45:20portion?

45:21>> It depends on how that it's it's written

45:24but yes.

45:25Many cases we do, yes.

45:27>> Oh, okay. All right, [clears throat]

45:28thanks.

45:31>> I'm sorry, was that this? Did anybody

45:33have any questions?

45:35Any other questions? Okay. Enterprise

45:38funds are looking good. Everybody is

45:40there um

45:43expected profit or loss is better than

45:45expected in at at each of our

45:48facilities.

45:57Angel Loaf is revenue at target and

45:59expenses are under target so loss today

46:01is less than we we anticipated.

46:03City Market

46:05also the same. Um the ballpark though

46:09a loss today is less than expected. And

46:11then the mini golf course is doing well.

46:14as well. Revenues are slightly over and

46:16expenses are on our target.

46:24Any questions?

46:27All right. Um also Lake Murray, revenues

46:29are slightly over target, expenses are

46:31under, profit today is slightly higher

46:33than expected, and then parking

46:35violations are significantly over

46:37target, which is good. You know, the

46:39last couple of years we struggled with

46:40that a little bit. Meters are under

46:42target. I'm sorry, that's not right.

46:45Violations are over target. Meters are

46:47what we struggled with or under target,

46:49but they're higher than previous years,

46:50so we are doing better.

46:52Um the budget that we we might have been

46:54a little bit aggressive in the budget

46:56for for meter revenue.

46:58Permits and fees are over target, and

46:59garages and lots are at target.

47:05Any questions on those?

47:10And then stormwater revenues are

47:12tracking over target and have exceeded

47:14budget.

47:16And that does not include any late

47:17payments from CWS accounts, Councilwoman

47:19Waring, just so you know.

47:26And then um

47:28expenses are under target as well in

47:30both development services and stormwater

47:32management.

47:38Any questions on that?

47:41All right. Tourism funds are looking

47:43good. Mini A tax state A is um over

47:46target by about 800. State A tax is over

47:50about almost 300,000, and hospitality

47:54we are actually a a bit over target,

47:55which is which is good news since you

47:57know that that was flatlining. So,

48:00our our budgeted number was

48:03pretty good. So, feeling a little bit

48:05better about hospitality fees.

48:10Any questions about any of those?

48:14All right.

48:17Um just municipality tax, there's a

48:192-month lag that we talked about, so

48:22it's just through May. State

48:24accommodations is just through the

48:25second quarter cuz we receive those

48:27payments every quarter. And then

48:29hospitality, we do receive on a monthly

48:31basis.

48:32But it's still a 1-month lag.

48:38And then fuel,

48:42we budgeted 330 per gallon for the year,

48:45and these are the average price per

48:47gallon for each month so far and through

48:49August 15th.

48:53So, we went real high in April and May,

48:55we came down a little bit in June, and

48:57then we went back up a little bit in

48:58July and August.

49:05So, what we're projecting is probably

49:07about a $500,000

49:09over budget number by the end of the

49:11year.

49:14Hopefully, prices will come down a

49:15little bit, but that is about That's

49:17where we're we're predicting right now.

49:20Obviously, it's fluid as you all know.

49:22So, we'll just continue to monitor the

49:24prices, and we're encouraging

49:26departments to conserve fuel, especially

49:28now that hopefully the weather will get

49:30a little cooler.

49:32That might help that a little bit as

49:33well.

49:36Any questions on that?

49:39Okay. And this is just kind of the

49:40rolling 7-day average fuel costs for

49:44unleaded and diesel. You see, diesel

49:46doesn't even fit on the chart. So.

49:54And then this is quantities purchased

49:56over the last 4 years. We're pretty much

49:58right at the same level as we were in

50:0025.

50:04So consumption is saying at least a

50:06little steady till last year.

50:15And then

50:16any questions on fuel?

50:202027 budget timeline just where we are.

50:22Um next week we will have public service

50:25and traffic and transportation report

50:27out to you all. On the 16th will be

50:29planning and preservation, parks, and

50:32fire.

50:33And then police, HR, and information

50:35technology will go on the 23rd. And the

50:3730th we'll have um

50:40BFRC and executive.

50:42So that'll be the schedule for this

50:43month.

50:48Do you have something else you're

50:49worrying about?

50:50>> Yeah, I do. As we, you know, obviously

50:52we're in budget season. Do you see any

50:56um

50:56big items of areas on the horizon that

51:01you know will be problematic?

51:03>> Healthcare.

51:06And insurance, just our our property

51:08insurance will be

51:11and then will be a little bit more

51:13significant than we would have liked.

51:16And then also, you know, the

51:17compensation study, whatever we do with

51:19the compensation study will be another.

51:24>> The compensation study has been so long

51:26by the time we get it it might be

51:28obsolete.

51:29>> No, they did a lot of work this year to

51:31make it more current. So I feel

51:33comfortable that we'll have good more

51:34current data.

51:36>> That's great.

51:37>> For implementation, yes.

51:40>> That's great.

51:42Okay.

51:43>> All right. And so then October we'll

51:45finalize our revenue projections and

51:48make final recommendations. We have the

51:50public hearing I'm sorry Council member

51:51Seeking.

51:53You have something?

51:54>> Oh, I just

51:55I just had a real quick question a

51:56little bit behind the slides that you

51:58could put out there. When it comes to

52:00making money off of fee schedule, who is

52:03the arbiter of that and against what

52:06baseline is that measured? Do we do that

52:08internally? Do we get audited? How does

52:10anybody know the the the quotient there?

52:15>> So,

52:17we do it internally and we just look at

52:19the total cost of what the services

52:22we're providing around those fees is at

52:24the time and just

52:27look at revenues that way, increases in

52:29fees that way to ensure we're not going

52:31over

52:32the overhead basically.

52:36Is that what you're asking?

52:37>> Yeah, I'm just trying to sort of see if

52:39there's a formula or I mean you actually

52:41can do it to a some certain. It seems to

52:43me that it's not exactly any It's not an

52:45exact science.

52:48>> It's not exact exact, but

52:51it's pretty close.

52:53>> Okay. All right, thanks.

52:54>> Sure.

52:56Um cuz you know, there's probably

52:59we could always probably find some more

53:00expenses, right? But

53:03we have

53:04um we do the best we can. I think with

53:06Workday too and the way that we have um

53:09things recorded, it will be a little bit

53:11easier moving forward and then we're

53:12actually looking at

53:14some software and implementing things

53:16that's going to make that even easier to

53:18do Council member Seeking. So, hopefully

53:20as we evolve, um those exercises will be

53:24more fruitful.

53:27>> Thank you.

53:27>> Mhm.

53:29And then the public hearing we'll have

53:31in October.

53:32>> Yeah, just real quick Amy, sorry. Uh

53:35>> I'm sorry, I can't always see if you

53:36guys are raising your hands, so please

53:38just speak out.

53:39>> well, I'm I'm turning my my on and off,

53:40so um

53:42I guess just to follow up on Council

53:45member Seeking's question, and this may

53:46be more of a legal question, but um

53:49you know, with user fees

53:51do is the is the same rule applicable to

53:55to what we're doing in our enterprise

53:58funds and

53:59>> No.

54:00>> I mean, those those are not Okay. Those

54:02are not user fees.

54:04>> Right. Those are right, and it's those

54:06operate like a true business

54:09enterprise funds.

54:10>> Okay.

54:12Thank you.

54:13>> You're welcome.

54:15We have our deadline

54:17to have the budget advertisement to the

54:19Boston Courier is November 10th, and

54:21then we have to have the draft budget to

54:24all on November or by November 17th.

54:27First reading the budget is December

54:291st, second and third is December 15th.

54:36And that is all I have unless anybody

54:38has any other questions.

54:45All right.

54:47We will see you all next week. It's a

54:49fun every week ad hoc meeting month.

54:55>> Thank you all.

54:56>> Sure. Let us know if you need anything

54:59or have any other questions, okay?

```*