2026-08-27 - Board of Investment Commissioners
Summary
Written from the auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
- A short (about 10-minute) meeting with four members present and three absent; a quorum was confirmed.
- The consultant reviewed July results for the Employees' Retirement System: markets were negative in July as the conflict in Iran pushed energy prices and inflation expectations up, and the aggregate bond index fell about 1 percent for the month. Stocks were still up about 10 percent year to date for the S&P 500, and the consultant said markets had been mostly favorable through the first weeks of August.
- The portfolio held up better than its index in July, helped by growth equity managers and the hedge fund portfolios. Equities were about 70.7 percent of assets, above target but below the maximum threshold, so no rebalancing was needed; the fixed income allocation was also within range.
- The financial reconciliation showed the plan's value falling slightly over the month, mainly from the monthly pension payroll, partly offset by about a million dollars of appreciation. No rebalancing was recommended.
- For the trust funds, July returns were about minus 1.1 percent, roughly in line with their benchmarks; long-term returns were said to far exceed what a typical trust needs.
- The commissioners approved the retirement system report and the trust report by voice vote, continued the rebalancing item to the next month's agenda, accepted a cash-flow handout into the record, and adjourned.
Issues discussed
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:02First, take a roll call.
00:04>> Chairman and Mayor Salinger
00:05>> Present.
00:06>> Vice Chairwoman Hillary
00:08>> Present.
00:09>> City [snorts] Treasurer Hammond
00:10>> Present.
00:11>> Councilwoman Ryan
00:12>> Present.
00:12>> Mr. Costello is absent. Mr. Hirsch is
00:15absent. Mr. Wiseman is absent. Four are
00:18present, three absent. We have a quorum.
00:21>> Perfect. Thanks for joining us. I think
00:23this will be
00:24pretty efficient meeting today.
00:26Um we want to ask our friends from
00:27Segal, Julian and Peter to uh start
00:30guiding one place investment performance
00:31analysis.
00:33Great.
00:33Uh good afternoon, everyone.
00:35>> I am going to review just a part of the
00:38exhibits, uh in particular 2023 exhibits
00:41in the report titled
00:43City Provident Fund Retirement System
00:45for the period ended June 31st, 2026.
00:48Just a quick update on the market on
00:50page through one. Page through 10.
00:53During the month of July, uh as the
00:56board mission is the Provident Fund,
00:58July was uh obviously negative month for
01:01the markets.
01:02Uh we had
01:04the assumption of the conflict in Iran
01:07uh push energy prices up. And when
01:10energy prices get pushed up, inflation
01:11expectations get pushed up, bond yields
01:13go up, bond prices go down. So, bonds
01:16were negative during the month. That
01:17shows up in the uh Bloomberg US
01:20Aggregate Index having a negative 1.03%
01:23return for the for the month and
01:25negative 7/10 of a percent for the month
01:28of for the year to date through July.
01:30Stock index returns were also negative
01:32as well, but it's worth pointing out
01:35that still through July, we end up with
01:38good year-to-date returns, uh 10%
01:41positive for the S&P 500, better returns
01:43for small cap stocks and international
01:45stocks. And that's really the point of
01:47the performance of these diversification
01:49those markets would have paid off. Um I
01:52will say this to you, we're not asking
01:54for the August 21st, 2026 report, but
01:57again, the the market since then has
01:59been surprisingly in August. Primarily
02:02with large US corporations that reported
02:04earnings in the second quarter of 2026
02:06were actually came in ahead of
02:09expectations. That's what they thought
02:10it was.
02:11So, the market environment,
02:12notwithstanding challenges with
02:14inflation, challenges in the bond
02:16market, which is significant, uh the
02:18market has been mostly favorable through
02:20the first two weeks of August. So, you
02:21go to page three.
02:23Through this period of time, well, the
02:26well, the pension system's portfolio
02:28index was negative, -6.7%.
02:31Among North Carolina Retirement System,
02:34uh the actual portfolio protected better
02:36on the downside and minus and positive
02:38return. The reason for that the return
02:41was 3/10 of a percent was uh
02:44because of some outperformance of growth
02:47equity managers, Brandes, but
02:51also the hedge fund portfolios uh did
02:54better than the index. That helped the
02:56pension system, the retirement system
02:58portfolio, as shown in the upper
03:00left-hand side of page three, ended the
03:02period with 636.6
03:04million. I'm rounding down. You can see
03:06year-to-date return is 4.4%.
03:09Uh that's 6.0 in the last uh 1 3 5 year
03:12returns 14.5, 13.3,
03:16and 8% uh respectively. Asset allocation
03:19from asset allocation standpoint is
03:21shown as second.
03:22Well, from top, second column from the
03:25left, your equity allocation is 70.7%
03:28at the end of the period. So, no need to
03:30rebalance. Above the target, but uh well
03:32below the maximum threshold. And then
03:34going to the uh I'm going to I'm going
03:36to skip over page
03:38five for the real estate,
03:40which um page six.
03:43Uh page four is what I thought it was.
03:45Uh the domestic in
03:47the fixed income portfolio held 31% of
03:50the assets versus a 22% target. So
03:53again, within the range, not an
03:55actionable variance. And the
03:57year-to-date return for the bond
03:58portfolio basically flat, -1/10 of a
04:02percent. You had one bond manager
04:04outperforming. They outperformed pretty
04:06significantly since you hired them last
04:08year.
04:09But it's been a tough market for bonds
04:10and really a lot of this has been
04:12because of the inflation narrative. Good
04:14news is your active portfolios worked
04:16well. And hedge funds also, as reported
04:18in the last page, but if you go to page
04:20four, page five,
04:22you can see that I'll just stick with
04:23the year-to-date numbers.
04:25Uh
04:26the hedge fund profit minus capital
04:28return year-to-date for the first seven
04:30months of the calendar year, we had 4.6%
04:33respectively. With that, I'll actually
04:35turn over to Peter and just have him run
04:38through the financial reconciliation. If
04:40that is okay with you, Peter.
04:42All right.
04:44>> Uh so on page six of the same document,
04:47we're looking at the financial wrap
04:48report uh for the month ending July
04:5031st.
04:52And I'm giving group the committee uh
04:55uh just an update on the cash drawers uh
04:58looking at the funds in a slightly
05:00different way. Um so uh if you look at
05:03the top line total plan, uh the market
05:06value of the employee retirement system
05:09began the month at $652 million. It
05:12reduced by $653 million. Uh there was
05:15the uh typical pension payroll and two
05:19plus two distributions of
05:21roughly $8 million.
05:22Uh and also um
05:25I had capital appreciation
05:27on that slight positive return that kind
05:29of driven by the reasons that Julian
05:32highlighted earlier, just about a
05:34million dollars. So the the net result
05:36uh is a portfolio that's uh
05:38uh just shy of $612
05:42million,
05:42uh July 31st, 2006.
05:46Um we did not rebalance the portfolio
05:48last quarter, which
05:50um
05:51ended up being completely resilient. Uh
05:53and so that we
05:54the action in the month uh reflects
05:57that. Um
05:58next month uh
06:00in August we'll be talking about
06:03contributions of companies to the
06:05pension plan
06:07uh that already occurred uh in the
06:09fourth quarter next month.
06:10Uh any questions on the financial or
06:12consolidation
06:13portion?
06:15No.
06:17>> No.
06:18>> Uh I usually talk about rebalancing in
06:20June and so on and so forth. This period
06:23we're not recommending any uh
06:25this period and we won't do it again.
06:28All right, so I'll stop there and
06:29mention
06:30three.
06:31>> Are there any questions or comments on
06:33item one?
06:35>> No, Mr. Chair.
06:35>> Seeing none, I'll take a motion to
06:37approve item one.
06:38>> So moved.
06:39>> All right, motion by Mr. Ryan, seconded
06:40by Mr. Husband.
06:42>> Yep.
06:42>> All those in favor say aye.
06:43>> Aye.
06:45>> Uh any opposed or any abstentions? You
06:46guys have it. Item two, discussion
06:49related to the various trusts.
06:51>> Peter?
06:52>> Yes.
06:52>> Yes, sir. Thank you very much.
06:54>> I'm on page three of the trust document
06:57um
06:58and we are looking at
07:02the top line performance for the various
07:05trusts.
07:07Uh you'll note that the returns
07:09for the month of July, which is our
07:11focus
07:12uh today, were negative
07:141.1%.
07:16Um
07:17really relatively in line with the
07:20indices um
07:22trust of our total return debt
07:24benchmarks. Uh kind of the drivers of
07:26that is we we didn't get a a
07:27contribution from uh the global equity
07:31uh in the month of July. The returns
07:33between the equity uh and the fixed
07:35income are comparable.
07:37Uh the returns are quite close
07:40um
07:41uh to the benchmark uh, and so we we did
07:44get uh, the
07:46performance and from an asset allocation
07:49standpoint got the uh, exposure to US
07:53international multi-market equity right.
07:56Uh, we also had big contributions from
08:00our uh, active managers generally with
08:03equity uh,
08:05uh, and uh, the impact of the active
08:08manager
08:09uh, was uh, slightly negative on the
08:12quarter. Really nothing to report uh,
08:14here in terms of the strength of our
08:16portfolios constructed constructed. I
08:18also can tell you uh, if we look at our
08:211 3 5 7 10-year numbers from across the
08:26board long-term these returns uh,
08:29far exceed
08:31uh, the needs of a of a typical trust
08:33which is
08:34uh, generally 2% to 7% per year. So, we
08:37are doing quite well. Uh, nothing to uh,
08:40the two-year report uh, regarding the
08:41trust but then um,
08:43at least we did perform well on those
08:45long-term periods too.
08:49>> Um, I'll move on to this the financial
08:51reconciliation on the following page.
08:54Um, we did not have uh, any cash
08:56advances uh, identified uh, in the
08:59trust. So, as I said you'll see various
09:02flashing on the fees and expenses.
09:05Um, but the uh, the trust in total as of
09:09July uh, at roughly uh, $39 million.
09:15>> Thank you, Peter.
09:17Any questions or comments on item two of
09:19the trust funds?
09:20>> No, Mr. Chairman.
09:21>> I'll take a motion to approve.
09:23>> So moved.
09:23>> Motion moved by Zachary and
09:26Sarah children.
09:28All those in favor say aye.
09:30Any opposed? The ayes have it.
09:32Item three as has been mentioned uh,
09:35there's no recommendation for
09:36rebalancing.
09:37Make a motion to continue letting freeze
09:39the previous months agenda to the
09:41following months agenda.
09:43Um
09:44>> So moved.
09:45>> Councilor Ryan seconded by Treasurer
09:47Husband. All those in favor say aye.
09:49Opposed? Any abstentions? And then
09:51finally, uh you have a handout from
09:55Sarah with cash flows,
09:58um which we'll take a motion to enter in
10:01as considered one or eight.
10:04>> Either one.
10:04>> I'm moving you for both. One is fine.
10:06>> I'll do both of them.
10:07>> One's fine.
10:08>> Who will second that? Council Ryan
10:09seconded by Ms. Sarah Silvaria. All
10:11those in favor say aye. Aye. Any
10:13opposed? The ayes have it. Any other
10:15business or discussion?
10:18Seeing none.
10:19Councilor Workman is not here to make a
10:21motion to adjourn.
10:22Uh
10:23>> Motion to adjourn.
10:24>> By the councilwoman and seconded by the
10:26Treasurer. All those in favor say aye.
10:28Aye.
10:29Any opposed? Vote 14.
