2026-10-01 - Board of County Commissioners

Summary

Built from YouTube auto-captions (no speaker labels; names and figures are often garbled).

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes ceremony and side talk; public comment is split by subject):

Topic Minutes Share
Zero Williams Road Surplus Property Sale 10 19%
Countywide Data Center Moratorium 5 10%
Trae Co Investments Peters Creek Parkway Rezoning (F-1673) 6 12%
Unified development ordinance miscellaneous text amendments 6 12%
Domestic Violence Awareness Month resolution and Bridges to Hope 10 19%
Winstonet 25th anniversary proclamation 4 8%
Idols Road development (public comment) 3 6%
Horizons Residential Care Center Septic Easement 1 2%
Opening, minutes, refunds, reports, adjournment 7 13%
  • Regular meeting of Thursday, October 1, 2026, about 52 minutes of recorded time (captions begin at 10:54).
  • Chair Gloria D. Whisenhunt presided.
  • Malishai Woodbury joined by Zoom at about 32:30 and had left before the adjournment vote ("unanimous almost").
  • Motions were made by Dan Besse, Richard V. Linville, G. Gray Wilson and a commissioner captioned "Parker", who is not on the roster and is probably Don Martin (unconfirmed).
  • Everything passed unanimously except the property surplus item (4-3).

Opening and invocation

10:54-13:13

  • Public comment rules (30 minutes total, 3 minutes per speaker; speaker cards or phone). Invocation by Father David McCannless of Wake Forest Catholic Campus Ministry (spelling approximate); pledge led by Tonya D. McDaniel.

Unified development ordinance text amendments

13:15-19:44

  • Public hearing on a staff-proposed bundle of 16 minor amendments to chapters 3 through 9, presented by Chris Murphy: three clarifications (building facade offsets for indoor retail, parking reductions for trees, commercial and industrial subdivisions not limited to three lots on a private easement); three changes to remove conflicts (townhomes and multifamily of four units or less exempted from design standards under a recent state law change, child day care indoor and outdoor space aligned with state rules, and removal of the three-year renewal for land clearing and inert debris (LCID) landfill permits, which has never been used in 31 years); and ten corrections of numbering and wording.
  • The Planning Board heard it in May with no opposition and recommended approval; the Winston-Salem City Council adopted it Sept 21.
  • Dan Besse asked about LCID complaints; Mr. Murphy said the only one he knew of was a fire at the Watkins Ford site (burying inert debris can smolder) and that a Salem Chapel LCID request was denied about a month earlier. No speakers for or against. Approved unanimously.

Domestic Violence Awareness Month and Bridges to Hope

19:44-29:47

  • Resolution recognizing October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month and the Bridges to Hope Family Justice Center. It cited local figures for the past fiscal year (for example 3,172 Winston-Salem police domestic violence incidents and 796 emergency protection orders; numbers as captioned). Approved unanimously. Dana Hamlin (spelling approximate) accepted and urged housing, counseling and transportation for survivors, followed by photos.

Winstonet 25th anniversary

30:00-33:59

  • G. Gray Wilson read a proclamation honoring Winstonet's 25 years of digital inclusion work (more than 22,000 residents served a year, 25 technology labs, 5,800 devices distributed). Approved unanimously, with Commissioner Woodbury voting by Zoom. Lakesha Jordan, executive director, accepted; this was Digital Inclusion and Equity Week.

Minutes

34:05-34:28

  • Minutes of the Sept 17, 2026 regular meeting approved unanimously.

Public comment: Idols Road development

34:46-38:18

  • Alan Daniel (spelling approximate) of Clemmons spoke against a rezoning to RS15 for about 350 houses on roughly 175 acres on Idols Road, citing stormwater runoff (mitigation required only for the first inch of rain; three July storms over an inch; Salem Glen flooding), and traffic from this and a nearby 500-house approval. He asked the board to keep the land as part of Tanglewood Park. No board response. Not tracked as a separate Issue yet.

Countywide Data Center Moratorium

38:24-41:58, 42:36-42:56, 44:35-45:26

  • Debra Demske (captioned "Dinsky"/"Demsky") thanked the board for denying the hyperscale data center rezoning (Project Iron Spur Data Center Rezoning (F-1669)) and said that at Monday's briefing (Sept 28) the board briefly discussed and rejected a moratorium, with County Attorney Gordon Watkins advising against. She said she delivered a petition for a text amendment to the planning department on Monday that was refused, and asked the board to accept the petition so it can go through the ordinance process, to get a second opinion from outside land use counsel (such as the UNC School of Government), and to let residents work with staff on a workable version.
  • Marsie West, a candidate in District B, said the moratorium discussion was dismissed despite much left to learn, that exemptions for vested rights were written in, and that zoning relies on outdated industry classification codes (SIC, last updated 1997) instead of NAICS. No board vote or response at this meeting.

Zero Williams Road Surplus Property Sale

42:57-44:33, 46:48-54:25, 1:01:32-1:02:26

  • Public comment: Marsie West called an earlier offer for county land very low versus a similar $899,000 listing, and urged listing county land on a public site, putting sale proceeds into a new emergency fund, and building an inventory of county property and leases.
  • Agenda item 7: resolution declaring surplus the county's property at Zero Williams Road along the Yadkin River (deeded to the county in 1988) and advertising an offer of $328,450 from adjoining owner James Perkins for 10 days of upset bids; the offer exceeds tax value and the board can reject all bids at any time.
  • Richard V. Linville moved not to surplus the property; Dan Besse seconded. On a hand vote it failed 3-4 (one commissioner heard to confirm the opposed were Wilson, "Parker", Woodbury and the chair). The original item was then moved and seconded and passed 4-3.
  • Malishai Woodbury said some citizens did not know the property was for sale and she wanted better public notice; the chair said it would be advertised and open to upset bids. Chelsea Swain, deputy general services director, said the land came in a land exchange (tied to the old Sciworks site), that a former conservation easement was moved to CG Hill Park, and that she knew of no legal restrictions. Required advertising is the local newspaper; the county has also used its website. One commissioner (captioned as the final speaker) voted no because the riverfront land is mostly floodplain and effectively conservation property.
  • The county manager later told the board staff is preparing a presentation for the Nov 9 morning session on all county-owned vacant property and will ask for direction on surplus, sale or more active marketing; she predicted the list would surprise the board.

Horizons Residential Care Center Septic Easement

45:32-46:45

  • County manager Shontell Robinson presented a resolution approving a septic system agreement and an easement to Horizon's residential care center across county land, because new parking lot work required a new septic repair area to meet state environmental health rules. Approved unanimously.

Tax refunds and reports

54:26-55:30

  • Two tax refund resolutions (captioned $1,2876 and $16,22169; amounts unclear), the August contribution-based benefit cap report and the August financial report approved unanimously.

Trae Co Investments Peters Creek Parkway Rezoning (F-1673)

55:39-1:01:30

  • Briefing by Chris Murphy for the Oct 15 meeting: rezoning a 1-acre former church on Peters Creek Parkway at the Davidson County line from highway business limited use to highway business special use for an indoor dog kennel ("Camp Halliday", as captioned) with a fenced outdoor run. Consistent with the South Suburban Area Plan Update and Forward 2045; Planning Board recommended approval unanimously Aug 13 with no opposition.
  • A commissioner asked how many kennels sit on major roads and worried about a dog getting loose; staff said outdoor areas must be fenced.

Adjournment

1:02:26-1:02:45

  • Adjourned on a motion by Dan Besse, second by G. Gray Wilson; Commissioner Woodbury had left.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

10:54Good afternoon and welcome to our

10:57regular meeting of the forail county

10:59board of commissioners. Uh persons who

11:02wish to speak concerning items on this

11:05agenda or about a matter relating to

11:08county government have two options to

11:11voice their opinion. In person attendees

11:14should complete a speaker card and

11:16deliver it to the clerk before the

11:19meeting begins.

11:21Comments are also accepted by calling

11:243364221200.

11:28You will be placed on hold and

11:30recognized to speak in the order your

11:33call was received. The public comment

11:36period will be limited to 30 minutes in

11:39its entirety.

11:42Uh the maximum time allotted to each

11:45speaker is three minutes.

11:49Um,

11:51we will begin our meeting with the

11:53invocation from Father David McCannless,

11:57Wake Forest Catholic Campus Ministry,

12:00followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led

12:03by Commissioner McDaniel.

12:06>> Thank you for having me. And

12:08>> please stand if you're able.

12:13Heavenly Father, send down your blessing

12:16on Foresight County and on these public

12:19servants who have been elected to lead

12:21us. Watch over them and their families

12:23as they serve our county, keeping them

12:26safe under your divine protection.

12:29Assist them with your spirit of counsel

12:31and fortitude, of prudence and right

12:34judgment. May they always seek justice

12:37for the people they serve and fill them

12:40with the peace that comes from serving

12:42you and the common good. We ask this

12:45through our Lord Jesus Christ who lives

12:47and reigns with you forever and ever.

12:49Amen.

12:50>> Amen.

12:53>> To the flag of the United States of

12:56America and to the republic for which it

12:59stands. One nation under God,

13:02indivisible, with liberty and justice

13:05for all.

13:10>> This chair is terrible.

13:13Yeah.

13:15The first item on the agenda is a public

13:17hearing on an ordinance amendment

13:20proposed by planning and development

13:22services staff to modify sections of

13:26chapter 3 through nine of the unified

13:29development ordinance to provide minor

13:31non-substance changes, corrections, and

13:34clarification. Chris Murphy, planning

13:37and development service director, will

13:39give us a brief overview of the request.

13:42Mr. America.

13:54>> Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of

13:56the board of county commissioners. Yes,

13:58this is a staff proposed text amendment

14:00to uh address 16 miscellaneous

14:03amendments to the UDO that are prepared

14:05periodically to keep the UDO up to date

14:07through various minor non-s substantive

14:09changes, clarifications, and

14:11corrections.

14:17Uh the changes can be divided into three

14:19separate categories. There are three

14:21amendments that provide clarification to

14:23ordinance requirements and those include

14:25uh for the use store services uh retail

14:27indoor. Um if you have a length of a

14:30building over a certain uh size, you

14:33have to have some building offsets. And

14:35there were some uh it wasn't as clear

14:37what we meant by that. So, we provided a

14:39minimum distance for that offset that

14:41depth to provide some articulation and

14:44break up that facade. Uh, as I alluded

14:47to on Monday, even though we will

14:48eventually be removing parking

14:50requirements from the UDO because of the

14:52state statute, this was already in the

14:54works. Uh, so we had a clarification

14:57related to how many u parking spaces can

15:00be reduced for uh tree. And then we also

15:04had a clarification related to uh

15:06commercial industrial subdivisions not

15:09being limited to three lots served by

15:11private easement.

15:13Um we had three amendments uh that

15:15removed conflicts with uh other state,

15:17county or local regulations or with

15:19long-standing practice.

15:21uh the general assembly uh changed the

15:25um statutes within the last 6 months to

15:29uh include uh town homes and multif

15:32family units being four units or less.

15:35They moved it from the commercial code

15:36to the residential code and there's a

15:39specific prohibition against being able

15:41to do design regulations for things in

15:44the residential code. So we had to

15:46remove we had to change the MLKO

15:49district to um basically exempt those.

15:52Uh similarly uh child daycare center our

15:56regulations have always been a little

15:58more stringent than the state dealing

16:00with indoor space and outdoor play area

16:03and you know it's been identified need

16:05that we need to do all we can to get

16:07more child care. So we wanted to have

16:09our regulations in line with the state

16:10requirements. So that's one of those

16:12other changes. And then finally, uh,

16:14under the last removal of conflict or

16:18change to reflect policy, there's a

16:21provision that's been in the ordinance

16:23since its adoption in '95 for LCIDs to

16:25have a three re three-year renewal

16:27period, but there's never been an

16:29instance where those have been brought

16:30back for a renewal. So, we're 31 years

16:33down the road. Um it's our belief that

16:36if you met the requirements for an LCID

16:39special use permit to be issued

16:40initially that there wouldn't be

16:41anything that would change because again

16:43you're trying to find findings of fact

16:45related to the particular project and if

16:48there is an enforcement issue we have

16:50other mechanisms to address that. So we

16:52are just proposing removing that

16:53three-year renewal period. Uh the other

16:5610 amendments uh dealt with correcting

16:58errors in section numbering or

17:00lettering, misspellings, grammar uh

17:03without any changes to actual content.

17:07Uh this was heard by the planning board

17:08back in May. Uh there were no speakers

17:10in opposition and it did recommend

17:11approval of this to both the city

17:13council and the board of county

17:14commissioners. The city council did

17:16adopt this on the 21st of September. And

17:19with that, I stand ready to answer any

17:21questions.

17:23>> Commissioner Bessie. Thank you, ma'am.

17:25Just one question. The LCID landfills.

17:29Um, so what this change would do would

17:32be to eliminate

17:34um an automatic review. Is that correct

17:38of after three years for

17:40>> correct?

17:40>> Okay. Um,

17:42>> a review that hasn't happened to date.

17:44>> Yeah. Um,

17:48have there been

17:50any LCID landfills operating in the

17:53county during this period that have uh

17:56been um the subject of complaints about

18:00um violations?

18:02>> No, the only I mean the last two LCIDs

18:05that you have heard have been as far as

18:07I'm aware there was one that was several

18:09years ago uh that was heard and there

18:11was some minor opposition but it had not

18:14been established. Um, the one that you

18:16that was denied about a month ago on

18:19Salem Chapel had obviously I think the

18:22most consternation. The one that we

18:24heard on Watkins Ford has been in

18:26operation since the mid20s.

18:30And um there was an there were concerns

18:34related to that one about a fire, which

18:36is not unusual for an LCD whenever you

18:39are burying inert debris and those

18:42things inevitably get hot. But there

18:45haven't been just any run-of-the-mill

18:46complaints from LCIDs over the course of

18:49time.

18:49>> All right. And the only one that there

18:51were complaints about was the fire in

18:53the one. Okay. Thank you.

18:54>> Correct.

18:56>> This is a public hearing and uh speakers

18:59will have up to 15 minutes total to

19:02speak in favor of this request and up to

19:0515 minutes total to speak in opposition.

19:08Is there anyone wishing to speak in

19:10favor?

19:15Okay. Is there anyone wishing to speak

19:18in opposition to this petition?

19:23I declare the public hearing closed. Is

19:26there a motion?

19:29>> So moved.

19:30>> Motion to approve by Commissioner

19:32Parker.

19:34>> Second by com Vice Chair uh Wilson. Is

19:37there discussion?

19:39[clears throat]

19:40All in favor, please say I. I.

19:44>> Opposed. That's unanimous. The next item

19:47on the agenda is a resolution

19:49recognizing October as domestic violence

19:53awareness month and in recognizing the

19:55efforts of the Bridges to Hope Family

19:58Justice Center of Foride County. Dana

20:01Hamlin is here to receive the resolution

20:05and please come forward and all your

20:07guests and I will as I read the

20:09resolution.

20:12What? Whoops. That's not it.

20:19resolution recognizing October as

20:22domestic violence awareness month and in

20:24recognition the efforts of the Bridges

20:27to Hope Family Justice Center of Forcy

20:29County. Whereas October is National

20:32Domestic Violence Awareness Month and

20:35domestic violence affects all people

20:37regardless of age, sex, gender, race,

20:41ethnicity, ability, religion, and socio

20:45socioeconomic background in Forside

20:48County communities. Whereas domestic

20:50violence, a form of interpersonal

20:53violence, may include physical,

20:55emotional, psychological, sexual, or

20:58financial abuse and isolation from

21:01family, friends, and support systems

21:04affecting children, and adults

21:06throughout the lifespan. Whereas the

21:10North Carolina Coalition Against

21:11Domestic Violence identifies 69 domestic

21:15violence related homicides of adult and

21:18children statewide this year, including

21:2222 murder suicides through August.

21:26Whereas from July 1st, 2025 till June

21:2930th, 2026, the Winston Salem Police

21:33Department reports 3,172

21:37domestic violence related incidents.

21:40Kernersville Police Department reports

21:43269

21:45domestic violence related reports. the

21:48Forers County Sheriff's Office, 2,242

21:54uh domestic violence reports and the

21:56Forside County District Attorney's

21:58Office deposed of 2,33

22:02domestic violent cases and the Office of

22:05the Force County Clerk of Courts reports

22:07that 796

22:10emergency domestic violence protection

22:12orders were granted. Whereas Bridges to

22:16Hope Family Justice Center advocates for

22:19an institutional and systematic change

22:22to decrease domestic violence,

22:24homicides, increase victim safety and

22:28offenders accountability, and provide

22:31easier access to services and resources

22:34through co- lower location services.

22:38Whereas no one agency can solve the

22:41complex challenges of domestic violence

22:44alone, Forside County recognizes the

22:47following organizations in in

22:50collaboration and partnership with the

22:52center that provide critical on-site and

22:56off-site services. Adrien Wake Forest

22:59Baptist Hospital Violence Intervention

23:02and Prevention Program, Children's Law

23:04Center of Central North Carolina,

23:07Experience in Self-Reliance, Family

23:10Services Incorporated, the Office of the

23:12Forside County Clerk of Court, Forside

23:15County District Attorney's Office,

23:18Forside County District Court Judicial,

23:21Forside County's Madresses Office,

23:23Forside County Sheriff's Office,

23:25Kernersville Police Department, Legal

23:28Aid of North Carolina, NextStep

23:30Ministries, North Carolina Department of

23:33Adult Corrections, the Partnering Path,

23:37Winston Salem Police Department, and the

23:39Forside County Health and Human Services

23:42Department, including Behavioral Health

23:44Service, Public Health, Social Services,

23:48and other community organizations. Now

23:51therefore be a resolve that the Versail

23:53County Board of Commissioners recognize

23:55October as domestic violence awareness

23:58month and the bridges to hope in

24:01creating a safe haven for survivors.

24:05This is be adopted the first day of

24:07October 2026.

24:10Is there a motion?

24:12>> Motion to approve by Commissioner

24:14Bessie.

24:15>> Second.

24:16>> Second by Commissioner Parker. All in

24:19favor, please say I.

24:21>> I. That's unanimous. I'll join you.

24:29[applause]

24:45>> Response. Yes, ma'am. Thank you.

24:49Thank you to the county manager's

24:51office, the Bridges to Hope staff team,

24:54and all elected officials.

24:57Clearly, our community is safer as a

25:01result of the collaboration

25:03and partnership of our partner agencies

25:06and collaborators and those evolving

25:08relationships that are here today.

25:12These agencies work hard every day to

25:14help clients plan for safety.

25:17While numbers and data can support any

25:19narrative, numbers don't always paint a

25:22perfect picture.

25:25There are still far too many incidences

25:27of domestic violence that happen behind

25:30closed doors because survivors are

25:32reluctant to come forward because of

25:34fear, shame, or embarrassment. Often

25:38when they do come forward, many of our

25:40partner agencies and services are

25:42stretched and strained and are at their

25:45capacity to serve, but they show up

25:48every day and do it all over again.

25:51Survivors need practical solutions for

25:54affordable, transitional, and permanent

25:56housing. Survivors need counseling

25:59options available for themselves and

26:02their children without being on waiting

26:04lists for months.

26:06Survivors need kind-hearted, hope-

26:08centered approaches in institutions and

26:11systems where they often feel invisible,

26:14dismissed, and unheard.

26:17Survivors need options that work with

26:19their emergency situations that don't

26:22require a precious day away from their

26:25jobs, schools, or caregiving duties.

26:28Survivors need transportation to and

26:31from services across Force County to get

26:33to the resources that are available to

26:35them.

26:37Survivors need us to put our words,

26:40promises, and plans into action and show

26:43up for them so they can show up for

26:46themselves and heal. Survivors need us

26:50not only just in October, but 11

26:53additional months of the year. To

26:56service providers, family members,

26:59friends, employers, decision makers, and

27:02community leaders.

27:04We are the difference in the lives of

27:06adults and children who have been

27:08victimized. And we stand in the gap

27:11often between life and death, hurt and

27:15healing, and between a past of harm and

27:19a future of hope. Not just in October,

27:23but every day of the year. Thank you.

27:28And thank you all for being here and

27:31supporting survivors during the month of

27:33October.

27:36[applause]

27:42Everybody turn around.

28:05Right back there.

28:31me now.

29:01I didn't think I'd see anything.

29:13>> So phenomenal.

29:17How you doing? How you doing?

29:47Wait just a minute.

30:00The next item on the agenda is a

30:02proclamation recognizing the 25th

30:05anniversary of Winstonet.

30:09Lakesha Jordan, EU uh executive director

30:12of Winstonet is here to receive the

30:15resolution. Please come forward as vice

30:18chair Wilson reads the pro pl

30:21proclamation.

30:22Welcome.

30:24>> I'll read the proclamation and then come

30:26around.

30:29Whereas Winston Net is a 501c3 nonprofit

30:32organization dedicated to closing the

30:34digital divide and ensuring that

30:36residents have the technology, skills,

30:39connectivity, and support needed to

30:40fully participate in today's economy.

30:43Whereas Winston Net has served as a

30:45community technology partner across

30:47Winston Salem and for Scythe County,

30:49building infrastructure and programs

30:50that connect residents to education,

30:53employment, health care, government

30:55services, and economic opportunity.

30:57Whereas Winstonet operates a network of

31:00community technology centers to provide

31:02residents with computers, affordable

31:04high-speed internet, technology

31:06assistance, and distributes and

31:08refurbishes computers and other

31:10technology for those who cannot afford

31:12them. Whereas Winston Net provides

31:14hands-on digital literacy workforce, AI,

31:18cyber security, and technology training

31:20in multiple languages to reach residents

31:22who face language barriers and helps

31:24residents move from basic technology

31:27with skills toward employment and career

31:28opportunities. Whereas, Winstonet uses

31:31corporate technology donations to

31:33refurbish equipment in house to

31:35redistribute items locally and serves as

31:37a community implementation partner

31:40capable of translating public investment

31:42into direct resident impact. And whereas

31:45Winstonet serves over 22,000 unique

31:47residents annually, maintains 25

31:50community technology labs, and has

31:52distributed 5,800 devices. Now

31:55therefore, be it resolved that the Force

31:58County Board of Commissioners hereby

31:59recognizes the 25th anniversary Winston

32:02Net and celebrates its work to turn

32:04digital access into economic

32:06opportunity. Adopted the first day of

32:09October, 2026.

32:13>> Do we have a motion?

32:16>> So moved.

32:17>> Motion to approve by Commissioner

32:19Parker.

32:21>> Second. Second by Commissioner Bessie

32:24and Commissioner Limulle. Uh we ha we

32:28all I'm going to ask if there's

32:30discussion

32:32and there is uh Commissioner Woodbury

32:35has joined us by uh by Zoom. So all in

32:41favor please say I. I

32:43>> I.

32:44>> Commissioner Woodbury.

32:47>> I Okay, that is unanimous.

33:19Thank you. I came small in numbers, but

33:22we are definitely big in support and we

33:24appreciate you all support. Um, on

33:26behalf of Winstonet and the board, our

33:28staff, our partners, I am honored to

33:30accept this proclamation from Forsythe

33:33County recognizing 25 years of work here

33:37in Forsthe County, building the digital

33:39divide. So, bridging, not building,

33:43bridging the digital divide. I also want

33:45to let you all know that this week is

33:48digital inclusion and equity week and so

33:51we are so excited to be able to accept

33:53this on this week. So thank you for your

33:54support. We appreciate it and we will

33:57continue to do the great work here in

33:58Force County.

33:59>> Thank you. [applause]

34:05The next item on the agenda is approval

34:08of minutes for the regular meeting on

34:10September 17th, 2026. Do I have a

34:14motion?

34:15>> Approve.

34:15>> Move approval by Commissioner Bessie.

34:19>> Second.

34:19>> Second by Commissioner Parker. All in

34:22favor, please say I.

34:23>> I.

34:25>> Commissioner Woodbury.

34:27>> I.

34:28>> That's unanimous. Thank you.

34:31The next item on the agenda is a public

34:34session. Madame Clerk, do we have cards

34:37or calls?

34:40Chair Wizen Hunt, we don't have any

34:41calls, but we have three speaker cards.

34:43>> Okay, please call them forward.

34:46>> The first speaker is Alan Daniel. Please

34:49come forward. State your name and

34:50address for the record.

34:57>> Good afternoon, commissioners. Alan

34:59Daniel, 100 Fernworth Court in Clemens,

35:03North Carolina.

35:05I come before you today to address an

35:07issue that you've heard me address

35:10before. Um it is the property on Idol's

35:14Road which has been approved by the

35:17zoning board I believe to be reszoned

35:20RS15 for the development of 350 houses

35:24on about 175 acres.

35:28I've spoke to you all first about this

35:30back when that property was being

35:32considered for a business park

35:35and the runoff for 175 acres for 1 in of

35:41rain would fill six Olympic size

35:44swimming pools. During the month of July

35:48this year, our area

35:51had three rain events that exceeded an

35:55inch of rain in 24 hours. And those

35:59there is mitigation devices anytime you

36:02develop a property like this that

36:05mitigates the runoff, but it is only

36:08required to mitigate the runoff for the

36:10first inch of rain. And I left my prop

36:14at the at my chair, but I brought a

36:16funnel to try to illustrate exactly what

36:19that does. That device funnels all the

36:23runoff from that 165 acres into that

36:26device. But when the amount of rain

36:30exceeds that device, all that water is

36:32concentrated into one place and it runs.

36:37The three events we had in July were one

36:42a little over an inch of rain in 24

36:44hours, a little over an inch and a half

36:46of rain in 24 hours, and then in two

36:49consecutive days, 4 in and 2 in.

36:55So if you multiply

36:586 * 4 is 24 + 6 + 6 + 6, we're talking

37:06about 30 or more Olympic size swimming

37:11pools full of water being dumped off of

37:14that property. The road that goes down

37:17below that is Doc Davis Road which

37:20separates that property from Salem

37:22Glenn. that road becomes impassible

37:24currently with that wa that that

37:26property being all wooded in a heavy

37:29rain event. I have seen Salem Glenn

37:32under 3 ft of water.

37:35That property also is right across the

37:38road from a piece of property that has

37:40been approved for 500 houses.

37:44The two of those properties together, if

37:47they are developed as projected,

37:50would put one car every 5 to 7 seconds

37:55going by our neighborhood in Southwest

37:58Clemens.

38:00One car every 5 to 7 seconds for 3 hours

38:04from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and again

38:07for 3 hours from 6 3:00 p.m. to 6:00

38:10p.m.

38:11>> Your time's expired, sir.

38:13>> Okay. I would like for you all if you

38:15would please to hold that property as

38:18part of Tanglewood Park. Thank you.

38:24>> The next speaker is Deborah Dinsky.

38:26Please come forward. State your name and

38:28address for the record.

38:36[clears throat]

38:36>> Good afternoon. I'm Deborah Demsky, 1722

38:40Princeton Street, Winston Salem. First,

38:42I want to thank you all very much for

38:45your considerations of the reasonzoning

38:47for the Hyperscale Data Center. I very

38:50much appreciate um you listening to the

38:54constituents and making a sound decision

38:58and I also appreciate the ones that

39:01voted for the resoning. I I really

39:03appreciate your attention and um

39:08I thank you very much for uh the

39:11entertaining discussion about a

39:13discussion for the moratorum. Thank you

39:15all very much. Uh on Monday I delivered

39:19a petition for uh a text amendment

39:24uh for the UDO to the planning

39:27department. Uh, oh, and also I want to

39:29say thank you to uh staff uh for Scythe

39:32County staff has been absolutely

39:34outstanding through the whole process of

39:37of everything that I've worked with the

39:41county on. Um, at any rate, I delivered

39:43the petition on Monday. Um, it was in

39:47Monday's briefing that you guys uh

39:49briefly discussed and then rejected

39:52further discussion of a moratorum.

39:56Uh some of you said that you would

39:58decide on hypers scale data center

40:01reszoning requests independently. The

40:05only problem with that is we don't have

40:08any structures in place to make good

40:11decisions about hyperscale data centers

40:14where they really belong because there

40:17are places in Foresight County where

40:18they're going to belong and we want them

40:20here. But before we let another

40:24petition, before we have to constantly

40:27decide these because they're going to

40:29eat up all of our time and our resources

40:31just going back and forward about this.

40:34And it would be so much better if we had

40:37a good set of rules and regulations

40:41around where they need to be and the

40:44rules that they're going to live by. I

40:46mean, it's the same for everything else,

40:48right?

40:49And so at any rate, um

40:54the residents our our petition was

40:57refused and um both the text amendment

41:00requests and the moratorum discussion

41:03were rejected on the advice of county

41:05attorney Mr. Watkins and um with all due

41:09respect to the board to Mr. Watkins, it

41:13would be difficult to make decisions

41:16uh based on the regulations because like

41:19I said, they don't exist.

41:21Um

41:23democracy works best

41:26when residents have a say in the

41:29governance that happens.

41:32And so

41:34about our petition, we are asking three

41:36things. We would like for you to accept

41:39the petition so it can go through the

41:41process in the UDO of um a hearing and

41:46making a decision. Get a second legal

41:49opinion from outside land use council

41:53school of government

41:54>> and third let us work with staff on a

41:56version that works. Thank you very much

41:58for your time.

42:03>> The last speaker is Marcy West. Please

42:05come forward. State your name and

42:06address for the record.

42:08>> I'd appreciate it if you'd start before

42:10when I get here. I

42:11>> always do, Marcy.

42:12>> So, I just heard

42:13>> we never cut you short.

42:14>> All right. So, thank you commissioners.

42:16My name is Marcy West. I'm running for

42:18county commission in district B and I'm

42:20at live at 331 Carolina Circle.

42:24Recently, commissioner meetings have

42:25been a bit disappointing, I've got to

42:27say. And I'm here to talk about good

42:29stewardship because I think that county

42:31commissioners need to be good stewards

42:33of our property and of our assets. So

42:36the data center moratorum discussion

42:40just a discussion was summarily

42:42dismissed to pite the fact that we have

42:44many things that we need to learn about.

42:46Actually texted today with a woman who

42:48lives in Lowden County. She knows what

42:49it's like. She's experiencing that

42:51pollution and traffic and the issues

42:53with that. Um, so first of all though

42:57the I wanted to talk about the land. We

42:59had a piece of property that was you're

43:02you're considering for surplusing. That

43:04land was supposed to be a park coming

43:06from it was it was off. It was an offer

43:09that was made that was incredibly low. I

43:11did a simple Google search. I found a

43:13property that's similar frontage,

43:15similar size, $899,000.

43:18So we have a new offer now. It's $300

43:21and something,000 for this surplus

43:23property. I'm sure you're going to wind

43:25up going ahead and selling it. But I

43:27would urge two things. Number one, list

43:29it on a public site where people who

43:31might be interested in that land can see

43:33it. And number two, I want you to make

43:36sure that that land, that money that we

43:38get from that land. Let's start an

43:40emergency fund because we don't have an

43:42emergency fund yet. It's tiny amount.

43:44It's a drop in the bucket, but we need

43:46to have one and we're going to be coming

43:47into emergency times. So, let's prepare

43:50for that. Okay. Number two, I was um

43:53upset about uh a property discussion

43:56that happened here that had to do with

43:57an easement and things. It's not on the

43:59list here. I'll talk about that later.

44:02So, I I also wanted to move on to the um

44:05fact that we um we're not really keeping

44:09good track of the property we have,

44:11right? We're not we don't know what

44:12property we have. We don't know who's

44:14leased it. We don't know what parts of

44:16that land belongs to the lease versus

44:17us. Let's get together an inventory of

44:20that information so that we have a way

44:22to track that and we know maybe there's

44:24some property that can be put up for

44:25sale that we can get some income funds

44:27from and use for future emergencies. Let

44:30let's do that. That just makes makes

44:32sense to me. And I also just want to

44:35talk a little bit more about the

44:37moratorium, the data center moratorum.

44:39This was just a discussion about a pause

44:42on discussing it, right? It's a

44:44temporary or moratorum.

44:46Commissioner Bessie wrote in there that

44:48people who had the rested vested rights

44:51were going to be exempted. So it wasn't

44:52going to stop all of them. And when you

44:55look at our zoning information, it's

44:58based on SIC industry codes. Those were

45:01out they've been outdated since 1989.

45:05Okay? They were last done in 1989, last

45:08updated in 1997. They're no longer in

45:10use. Now, there's something new called

45:12the NICS that gets updated on a regular

45:15basis and that's what we should be using

45:17in our zoning. You can't tell me that we

45:19have no control over this and we can't

45:21challenge this.

45:23>> It's clearly not a services a property.

45:26Thank you.

45:29>> Madame County Manager, could you please

45:31continue the agenda?

45:32>> Thank you, Madam Chair, and good

45:33afternoon, commissioners, staff, and

45:35guests. The agenda items before you have

45:36been briefed and hopefully questions

45:38answered. Agenda item number six is a

45:40resolution approving the septic system

45:42agreement and authorizing the grant and

45:44execution of an easement to Horizon's

45:46residential care center across a portion

45:48of Force County owned real property.

45:50Included in the lease agreement are

45:52terms by which Horizon Residential is

45:54responsible for maintaining the septic

45:56system it installed years ago which is

45:58located outside the current lease

46:00boundary. Um, due to the recent

46:02construction of parking lot improvements

46:04serving Horizon's Park, a new septic

46:06repair area must be identified for

46:08Horizons to meet certain requirements of

46:10the North Carolina Department of Health

46:11and Human Services, Division of

46:13Environmental Health. A septic system

46:15agreement must be executed with

46:17easements granted to Horizons to satisfy

46:19the requirements of DHS in establishing

46:22the new septic repair area.

46:26>> Move approval. Motion to approve by

46:29Commissioner Parker.

46:33Second,

46:33>> second by Commissioner Limville or

46:36discussion.

46:38All those in favor say I.

46:40>> I.

46:41>> Commissioner Woodbury.

46:44>> I.

46:45>> That's unanimous. Agenda item number

46:48seven is a resolution declaring certain

46:50real property as surplus and authorizing

46:52publication of an offer to purchase

46:54county-owned real property by negotiated

46:56offer, advertisement, and upset bids

46:58procedure. In 1988, Forcy County was

47:01deed property at Zero Williams Road

47:03along the Yaken River. There are no

47:05current county operations or uses for

47:07this property. And recently, the county

47:09received an offer to purchase the

47:10property from James Perkins in the

47:12amount of $328,450

47:15who owns adjoining property. The offer

47:17amount exceeds the tax value. This item

47:20approves advertising the received offer

47:22for upset bids. Once the upset bids

47:25process is complete, the commissioners

47:27may at any time reject any and all

47:29offers.

47:31>> There a motion.

47:32>> I have a motion. Madam Chair, I move

47:35that we not surplus this property that's

47:38in question.

47:39>> Second.

47:41>> There's a motion by Commissioner

47:42Limville and a second by Commissioner

47:45Bessie. All those in favor say I.

47:48>> I.

47:50>> Opposed.

47:56Okay.

47:58Uh, Commissioner Woodbury.

48:02Um, no.

48:04>> No to the to the motion.

48:08>> Correct.

48:10>> Okay.

48:11>> Can I repeat the motion?

48:13>> Well, if you think it needs repeated,

48:16[laughter]

48:17>> Madam Chair, do we have a have a total?

48:19I I heard one no. I I heard at least

48:22three yeses.

48:25Well, I I know of three four who were

48:30who are opposed to the motion.

48:33>> Commissioner Wilson, Commissioner

48:35Parker, Commissioner Woodbury, and

48:38myself. [clears throat]

48:38>> Thank you. I needed to clarify.

48:40Commissioner Woodbury.

48:42>> Is that what you count?

48:45[clears throat]

48:45>> Chair Wes Hunt, do you mind doing a vote

48:47by hand? Okay. I think that'd be easier.

48:50>> Okay. All in favor of the motion, please

48:52raise your hand.

48:55You change your mind.

48:58>> The the original motion.

49:00>> Yeah.

49:01>> Yeah. That's the only motion we have.

49:03>> It's easy to get

49:06through the count. Raise the hands.

49:08>> All in favor of of Commissioner

49:10Lynville's motion, raise your hand.

49:14>> One, two, three. Commissioner Woodbury.

49:21>> No.

49:21>> Okay. All opposed. One, two, three,

49:25four. The motion fails.

49:28Is there a motion to approve the item?

49:36>> Now, we're talking about the item on the

49:37agenda.

49:39>> Yes.

49:39>> So, moved.

49:41>> Second.

49:42>> Motion to approve by Commissioner Parker

49:45and second by Commissioner Wilson. All

49:49in favor? Madam Chair, may I uh

49:51>> Oh, I I do have Oh, go ahead.

49:54>> Okay, we'll have discussion in just a

49:56minute, Miss Woodbury.

49:57>> I was going to ask for discussion. Thank

50:00>> Okay, do we have discussion?

50:02Go ahead, Commissioner Woodbury.

50:06>> Um, thank you, Sher Wizen Hunt. So, I am

50:09interested in um the concern that one of

50:13the citizens raised around

50:16uh people being able to identify when we

50:19have um property for sale. And I would

50:23be um I could lean into, you know, maybe

50:29readvertising because some citizens felt

50:31like they didn't know that this property

50:34was being sold. I know we've discussed

50:36this before. I don't really know what

50:38else um you know we could do and I'm

50:41interested in what the county managers

50:43say to make sure people know when we

50:45have um key property for sale. But that

50:49is I think have been at least a

50:52challenge for us as a county to make

50:53sure that all of our citizens are very

50:56aware when we have um property for sale

51:00in lie of

51:02there may be you know adjacent or

51:04similar property that is selling for

51:11I do think that we need to take into

51:13consideration that we still may be able

51:16to um one get more of our citizens aware

51:20of this property being sold and possibly

51:24um being able to get you know more for

51:26it. Thank you,

51:28>> Commissioner Woodbury. By this uh

51:31approval, it will be advertised and

51:34there'll be an upset bid if someone

51:36wants to bid higher. So, this is what

51:39this is what we're voting on it that we

51:42did vote on and approved is to put it

51:45out on the market, advertise it, and um

51:49it will be advertised for 10 days.

51:53Commissioner Bessie,

51:54>> thank you. Um [clears throat] had a

51:56question for staff. Uh do we have

51:58details of the original gift of this

52:01property and under what uh what terms it

52:04was uh it was donated?

52:06I'm going to ask um Chelsea Swain, our

52:09deputy general services director, to

52:11come up.

52:22>> Good afternoon. From everything that I

52:24can read and gather, it was an exchange

52:27of property for some property up at the

52:30um north end of town where the old

52:32Syworks Science Center was.

52:34>> Okay. Um, so is there a conservation

52:38easement on this property currently?

52:40>> Not currently. There was at one time,

52:42but that was converted and relocated to

52:45the CG Hill Park property.

52:47>> All right. So, there are no legal

52:50restrictions on our sale of the

52:52property.

52:54>> Not that I am aware of. No, sir. Not

52:55that I've been able to find anywhere.

52:57>> Right. Thank you.

52:59>> Other discussion.

53:00>> A question on advertisement. I believe

53:04that you said I asked that you said that

53:07um the I I'm not sure whether it's the

53:11only thing it's required or not but one

53:15is the uh classified in the local

53:17newspaper the only thing it's required

53:21>> yes publication in the locally

53:23distributed newspaper yes sir and I

53:26think we have in the past also put it on

53:28our county website.

53:32>> Madam just chair, just in terms of a

53:34brief discussion, the reason that I will

53:36vote against this motion is because I

53:39believe this is an unusual piece of

53:40property and that it's a a riverfront

53:43property. Most of it is unbuildable

53:45because it's u in the flood plane. It's

53:48currently essentially conservation

53:50property. uh and I believe that that is

53:53a uh a better use for the county

53:56citizens than uh to simply sell it on a

53:59hard fire sale basis.

54:04>> Okay, we have a motion

54:07um and and a second. All in favor,

54:10please say I.

54:12>> I.

54:14>> Commissioner Woodbury,

54:17>> I

54:18>> Okay. All opposed?

54:20>> No. Okay, that passes 43 in favor of the

54:25motion.

54:26>> Agenda item number eight and nine are

54:28resolutions approving refunds by the tax

54:30assessor collector. Eight is in the

54:32amount of $1,2876

54:35and nine is the amount of $16,22169.

54:42>> Is there a motion?

54:44>> Move approval.

54:45>> Motion to approve by Commissioner

54:47Parker.

54:50Second.

54:51>> Second by Vice Chair Wilson. All in

54:53favor, please say I.

54:55>> I.

54:56>> Commissioner Woodbury.

54:59>> I.

55:01>> That's approved unanimously.

55:03>> Agenda items 10 and 11 are our reports.

55:0510 is the August contribution based

55:07benefit cap report and 11 is the August

55:09financial report.

55:11>> Move to approve.

55:12>> Motion to approve by Commissioner

55:14Limville.

55:15>> Second. Second by Commissioner Parker.

55:18Discussion.

55:20All in favor, please say I.

55:23>> I.

55:24>> Commissioner Woodbury.

55:27>> I.

55:27>> Okay, that's unanimous.

55:31>> I may have missed something. Did we take

55:32items eight and nine together?

55:35>> I thought so.

55:39>> And we have one discussion item, Madam

55:42Chair. It is our planning item from our

55:44planning director, Chris Murphy. It's in

55:46regards to F-1673.

56:17Good afternoon again. This is case

56:19F1673. This is a briefing that will be

56:22for your October uh 15th meeting. Uh the

56:26petitioner is TCO Investments. This is a

56:281acre property on the east side of

56:29Peters Creek Parkway south of Hartman

56:31Plaza Drive. This is one or two parcels

56:33just north of the Davidson County line.

56:36The request is to reszone this piece of

56:38property from special use limited uh

56:40zoning, highway business limited to

56:42highway business special use. Uh so

56:44they're going from a limited use to a

56:46site plan. Uh this was approved as a

56:48limited use back in 2012. Now they're in

56:51for this 2026 um

56:55change. Uh this is a subject property

56:57shown on the forward 2045 growth

57:00management area plan map. It is located

57:01within the GMA3 suburban neighborhoods

57:04growth management area. Again, you see

57:05the dot there right on the county line

57:07with Davidson County.

57:09Uh I apologize. It is the last property

57:13in the county or the first depending on

57:15how you look at it. Uh this is the

57:17location map. You do see the subject

57:18property there highlighted in yellow.

57:20The Davidson County line just to the

57:21south. You see a number of highway

57:23business properties in that vicinity

57:24along with a general business property.

57:26And again, this is uh zoned highway

57:28business limited use.

57:32subject property shown on the aerials.

57:34There's a manufactured home park across

57:36the street. There's a

57:38uh convenience store. There is an

57:40outdoor display retail uh property here.

57:44This was reszoned several years ago for

57:48a

57:49um outdoor display retail. This is part

57:51of a larger commercial development. This

57:53is actually a daycare center and this is

57:55multifamily zoning. Again, all this is

57:57in Davidson County. So it is along this

57:59commercial corridor

58:02subject property um shown on the south

58:05suburban area plan update. Uh this

58:07subject property is recommended for

58:09commercial development.

58:11It actually used to be a church. Um but

58:13it's been a um it's been a number of

58:16uses over the course of time, but this

58:18is looking east into the subject

58:19property. Uh this uh the area that was

58:22probably at one point a uh fellowship

58:25hall is not actually part of this

58:27request. They're two separate parcels.

58:28That's actually in Davidson County. The

58:30church itself is uh has been used for a

58:33number of things, but this is for a use

58:35called Camp Halliday. It's for a indoor

58:37kennel use. Uh and they do have an

58:40outdoor run area as part of that. Not

58:42that they will be out there all day

58:43long. This is just where they would go

58:45out and exercise, go to the bathroom,

58:46etc. They would be out there with the uh

58:49with the workers that work at the

58:51facility. Uh this is looking across

58:53Peters Creek Parkway towards the west.

58:56There's the manufactured home park, the

58:58existing um convenience store uh there

59:01in that image. Uh this is looking south

59:03along Peters Creek Parkway towards the

59:05Davidson County line. That driveway in

59:08the foreground there is the driveway to

59:10the subject property.

59:12And this is looking north. You see the

59:13zoning sign. This is looking north along

59:16Peters Creek Parkway.

59:18Uh this is the site plan. It's proposing

59:20to uh utilize the existing uh church

59:23facility. probably better formalize the

59:26parking. And then the outdoor area for

59:29the for the dog run area where they

59:32would be uh out there with the employees

59:35of the kennel indoor use would be in

59:38this location.

59:40Again, this is the existing daycare

59:43center with their outdoor play area. So,

59:44I guess the kids and the dogs can talk

59:46to each other when they're out there.

59:48Um,

59:51this request is consistent with the

59:52parcel specific commercial land use

59:55recommendation of the south suburban

59:56area plan update. Uh, the request is

59:58also consistent with the recommendation

1:00:00of uh, forward 2045 to prioritize denser

1:00:03higher intensity development along

1:00:04growth corridors and with an activity

1:00:06centers. It's also adaptively reusing an

1:00:08existing underutilized building along a

1:00:11major thoroughare.

1:00:13This was heard by the planning board at

1:00:15August 13, 2026 public hearing. There

1:00:17were no speakers in opposition and

1:00:19following the public hearing, the

1:00:20planning board did vote unanimously to

1:00:22recommend approval to the board of

1:00:23county commissioners. And with that, I

1:00:26can answer any questions that you might

1:00:27have.

1:00:27>> Questions?

1:00:29>> How many K9 kennels in this county are

1:00:32adjacent to a major thorough affair?

1:00:35>> Uh, I don't have an exact number. I

1:00:38thought you were going to ask me how

1:00:39many have we approved in the last 10

1:00:40years because it's been a lot. Um, but I

1:00:45I don't know how many along Thorough

1:00:46affairs, but again, it would kind of

1:00:48make sense because a lot of folks do

1:00:49take their pets to an indoor kennel

1:00:52facility, like a donkey daycare, for

1:00:54lack of a better term, while they're

1:00:56going to work and they pick them up on

1:00:58the way home. So, it would kind of make

1:00:59sense for them to be along a major

1:01:00thorough affair.

1:01:02>> Well, yeah, but the the dogs have to go

1:01:04outside the kennel building, correct? To

1:01:07>> They do.

1:01:09>> Okay. to

1:01:12answer the call of nature and if one of

1:01:14them gets loose, you know exactly what

1:01:15will happen.

1:01:16>> Well, luckily they are within an

1:01:18infenced in area. Now, I don't know. I

1:01:21mean, again, I'm not doing their

1:01:23business model, but it is it does have

1:01:24to be fenced.

1:01:27>> Okay.

1:01:30Other questions?

1:01:32>> Thank you, Chris.

1:01:35>> Thank you. And Madam Chair, I do just

1:01:37want as a followup to some of the

1:01:38conversations on the surplus property um

1:01:41just to let the board make sure the

1:01:42board's aware that staff is working on a

1:01:44presentation for the November 9th

1:01:46morning session regarding all of our

1:01:49county owned vacant property. We do want

1:01:50to make sure the board has a

1:01:52comprehensive understanding of all the

1:01:53properties that we own that are vacant

1:01:56or not actively being used and then get

1:01:58your direction on how you would like us

1:02:00to proceed with them, whether they're

1:02:01property you want us to consider for a

1:02:03surplus or sale or not, whether you want

1:02:05us to take a more aggressive approach on

1:02:07marketing the properties just to make

1:02:09sure we have a good understanding and

1:02:11being intentional about these assets.

1:02:12Um, so we'll be seeking your direction

1:02:15on that, but I think just in um some

1:02:17previous meetings, I think we need to

1:02:19show you a list and I actually think

1:02:20you're going to be surprised by some of

1:02:21the property that we own. So, um, we'll

1:02:24be prepared to discuss that on November

1:02:259th.

1:02:26>> Thank you. Is there a motion to adjourn?

1:02:29>> So move.

1:02:30>> So moved by Commissioner Bessie.

1:02:31>> Second.

1:02:32>> Second by Commissioner Wilson. All in

1:02:35favor say I.

1:02:36>> I. Commissioner Woodbury,

1:02:42I think she's left the building. Um,

1:02:45that's unanimous almost.