2026-10-14 - Council ARPA Review Committee

00:00.15] It's 10:01. We'll call the meeting to order. Roll call, please.

00:04.74] Carroll?

00:06.48] Jensen?

00:07.08] Here.

00:08.01] Wharton?

00:08.73] Here.

00:09.24] Hardinger?

00:09.81] Here.

00:12.00] Next is the consideration of August 19, 2026, meeting minutes.

00:16.41] Have we had an opportunity to look those over?

00:19.02] Yes. Motion to approve.

00:20.49] We have a motion to approve. Do we have a second?

00:22.05] Second.

00:24.54] Jensen?

00:25.11] Aye.

00:25.71] Wharton?

00:26.52] Aye.

00:27.06] Carroll?

00:28.23] Hardinger?

00:28.98] Aye.

00:30.42] All right. Next is an update on the ARPA projects and expenditures. Colin Pickwick.

00:35.28] So last time we met, looking at the minutes, obviously, we've got-- We're winding

00:40.08] down on everything. Just a few projects that are still outstanding.

00:43.89] And so Finance reached out to those entities on those contracts based on the

00:48.63] feedback from the committee. And so I'll have Jodi walk through that.

00:52.32] We've got a couple of decisions to make from the committee and see where we go from

00:56.01] there, so maybe your last meeting.

00:58.35] We'll see if you need to meet again, but we're getting near the end. So Jodi?

01:02.40] All right. I know our time's limited, so we'll dive right into our decision points.

01:08.85] We have one internal and three external projects that are still in progress.

01:14.31] The internal project has less than $10,000 left. It will be spent before December.

01:19.92] There's no concerns with that Renewed Jordan Creek project.

01:24.39] On the three external projects,

01:28.44] we

01:31.80] need some direction from you on how strict we want to be with the contract language

01:38.04] that govern these three. For Ozark Greenways, they will have

01:44.67] at a minimum $3,700 left unspent that will come back to the city

01:50.70] to be reallocated to the historic city hall.

01:54.54] For CPO and Restore SDF, they have spent the remaining

02:00.21] monies by their contract deadline, but we're still waiting on the final

02:04.56] reimbursement request information.

02:07.23] And both contracts did state that those were due by 9/30 and

02:12.87] 9/15. So technically, they have missed the deadline as far as getting the final

02:18.06] reimbursement request in, but they have spent the money.

02:21.57] So our ask of you is if you want us to enforce that

02:27.60] reimbursement request date in the contract or give them more time to get their

02:33.00] final documentation to us for their final reimbursement request.

02:37.68] You can see here the difference, there's about $51,000 that has

02:43.53] been spent, but we have not received all of the documentation to reimburse it yet.

02:47.73] Okay. Have any of them provided an explanation why they haven't provided this

02:52.08] information by the deadline? Or have they asked for an extension?

02:56.28] So, with Restores DF, they did submit a request

03:01.83] originally on September 10th. We reviewed it, requested some

03:07.68] revisions,

03:09.81] and they submitted a revised request on 9/22, but

03:16.44] they didn't make the changes we requested.

03:18.33] They made different changes, so it had to be re-reviewed.

03:21.63] We've reached out to them again and

03:25.50] are still waiting on documentation for the new expenses they submitted on their

03:30.39] revised request. So that one has been going back and forth for a while.

03:35.79] The deadline in the contract was September 15th.

03:39.21] Okay.

03:40.38] For community partnership-

03:42.36] Sorry, if I may.

03:43.32] Yes.

03:44.01] What was the nature of the changes we requested, and what did they change

03:50.01] instead?

03:51.72] So we had requested-- They had originally requested more than was

03:57.39] remaining on their contract, and they had missed a payment that we had made

04:03.39] as far as getting it recorded on their side.

04:06.30] So we were mainly requesting that they just reduce the request to the amount

04:11.49] remaining on the contract, and I think there was one charge that didn't have

04:16.20] sufficient documentation. We'll just take that one off, replace it, and we even

04:20.97] sent them the form. All they really had to do at that point was sign the revised

04:25.71] form, and we were good to go. But they chose to swap out some expenditures

04:32.01] on their side and resubmit, and so then that had to start the process over again of

04:38.67] making sure we had all of the correct documentation for the new expenditures they

04:42.84] submitted.

04:43.80] And those new expenditures were eligible under the grant?

04:48.75] We're still waiting for some documentation to complete that

04:54.69] review process, but they seem to be on first glance, yes.

05:00.06] Thank you.

05:02.28] And then for Community Partnership of the Ozarks,

05:07.83] they had one pending request. They were waiting on clear checks for

05:13.89] two of their final expenses. They wrote the checks prior to September 30th or on

05:19.23] September 30th,

05:21.54] but they didn't have the clear checks showing that the payment had actually been

05:25.50] processed by the vendor. So they got one of those to us yesterday, and they are

05:31.38] waiting on the final one for a little over $3,000 that still had not cleared as

05:37.38] of yesterday.

05:38.43] Okay.

05:41.55] Well, I think

05:43.98] all the entities here have been notified many times of the deadlines and

05:49.83] when they needed to have things submitted by.

05:54.12] It looks like

05:57.33] for Restores DF, they sent their initial

06:01.41] request in before the deadline. I'm curious what the holdup is.

06:06.24] It seems like it's been a few weeks since they've responded to your request.

06:13.11] Yes. There have been multiple. We've had two of our staff people look at it and

06:19.02] reach out to them separately to get this final documentation so we can wrap this

06:23.91] up, and there are some lags in communication on their side there.

06:29.13] Okay.

06:32.52] Do we have to go with what they've submitted, or could we

06:38.70] provide reimbursement for what was included and determined eligible in

06:44.64] that submission that was on time?

06:47.37] So-

06:48.15] Can we do a partial, I guess is what I'm asking.

06:51.30] We could do that. My only concern with taking that approach is if they've used

06:56.64] those expenses they originally submitted to us for another grant

07:02.70] or program ask. And so we want to be sure we're not double-dipping there.

07:08.46] Yeah.

07:09.00] Or they're not double-dipping those covered.

07:12.15] I don't really have a good understanding as to why they changed up the expenses

07:16.11] they had originally submitted

07:19.38] there.

07:20.37] Okay.

07:22.14] Well, I think based on our conversation at the last meeting, if they hadn't turned

07:27.24] in the reimbursement receipts by the contract date, we would reallocate those

07:31.02] funds. So it seems like due diligence on the city's side has been done to

07:37.83] try to help get them the reimbursement as quickly as possible, but they haven't met

07:41.22] the deadline. So I'm curious what the will of this committee is on the issue.

07:47.19] What are you thinking?

07:50.04] Listen, I know these organizations, they're good organizations, but

07:55.08] we have deadlines for a reason because this money has to be spent by a certain

07:58.65] date, and

08:01.17] anybody who received funds has known this since they

08:05.28] submitted their first application for the projects to be funded.

08:08.28] So if they haven't asked for an extension or if they haven't said, "Hey, we're

08:12.84] working on this, we'll have it to you by this day," I think the fund should be

08:16.44] reallocated. They've had sufficient time to get all their ducks in a row, and it

08:21.36] just seems like

08:23.31] due to communication issues, we can't wait forever.

08:27.39] Are you speaking on both Restore SDF and CPO projects?

08:30.87] Yeah.

08:32.31] Okay.

08:32.49] Because the CPO one-

08:35.01] They submitted after

08:36.06] ... they submitted 15 days late.

08:40.02] So, I

08:43.11] don't see any reason to not reallocate the funds unless there's additional

08:47.28] information to be shared about this.

08:48.99] I guess I might ask staff, do you know, so our decision at the previous meeting to

08:54.48] not allow property acquisition as a reimbursement under the

09:00.18] grant, did that create any issues for them on being able to spend

09:05.94] funds by September 30th?

09:08.97] They The funds were technically spent.

09:12.43] With CPO, like I mentioned, it's they just don't have the clear checks, which

09:18.37] is part of what's required for the reimbursement request.

09:21.70] But

09:23.26] two days after

09:25.75] the meeting and after I had informed CPO of the decision of the committee,

09:31.48] their

09:33.70] offer for the lien was rejected anyway, so that became a moot point.

09:37.12] But they did have the other projects

09:41.05] kind of already bid out and ready to go.

09:45.49] So I don't know that it caused any delay on their part.

09:48.91] Okay. But so the issue is that

09:52.36] they paid and had the money expended, the issue is just the vendor hasn't cashed

09:57.64] the check yet?

09:59.05] Yes. There were two vendors that had not

10:03.64] cashed the check. One, they were able to get the documentation yesterday.

10:10.00] The other one, for the $3,100, was still outstanding as of

10:16.00] yesterday.

10:16.75] Do we know the date that the money was spent?

10:20.80] I believe that the check was written on the 30th.

10:25.15] Okay, so then-

10:27.25] But they knew that the contract close was the 30th, so they would've had to turn in

10:32.23] their receipt on the 30th.

10:36.28] Yeah.

10:37.54] And I feel like if they needed an extension, they could've asked, for one.

10:43.12] If it's like, "Hey, we're waiting for this check to clear.

10:45.61] Can you give us a couple more weeks?" Or

10:49.00] I would consider a request to extend, but it looks like none of these organizations

10:53.47] have requested an extension.

10:54.85] At our last meeting, they had a request for us to extend it, and we said no.

11:00.97] They wanted to extend it to-

11:02.62] The contract, yeah.

11:03.73] Yeah.

11:04.06] Yeah. But that was for a different purpose.

11:06.91] That was because they were acquiring property, and they didn't do that.

11:10.33] Yeah.

11:10.39] So they spent the money by the 30th.

11:14.74] They could have submitted the request on the same day and maybe said, "Hey."

11:19.54] Yeah.

11:20.86] So what are your thoughts on it?

11:22.15] Just procedurally going to ask, so it sounds like they're really down to 3,100 in

11:26.98] terms of

11:29.77] funds that haven't already been documented, that have been cashed, basically.

11:34.99] Because if we pull away the 27,150,

11:40.66] what happens with... They've already cashed the check.

11:43.12] It's already been written and cashed.

11:45.13] That's really on them to absorb that, I guess, in their whatever funding sources

11:49.09] they have, essentially, if we pull it.

11:51.67] Yeah. I don't want to do that, but again,

11:56.35] we do have these contract terms for a reason.

12:00.13] So I want to be respectful of these organizations and

12:05.80] their budgets,

12:08.23] but this pool of money does have restrictions.

12:11.08] So we have to make sure we have enough time to do our due diligence to pull

12:14.02] everything together to make our reports.

12:18.43] I guess I would be inclined, if

12:23.52] interested in your all's thoughts, I think Holland's comment is a good one.

12:28.63] I'd be inclined to reallocate 3130, 190 from the CPO

12:34.03] project,

12:36.28] reimbursing the 24,000 that was spent on time, and we do have documentation to

12:41.26] substantiate.

12:43.66] Reallocating the 3719.93 that's left over from Ozark

12:49.18] Greenways, and then reallocating the full balance of

12:54.67] 23,785.08 from Restore SGS since we don't have verified documentation for

13:00.73] those.

13:01.60] Yeah. The request was made before the deadline, but again, closing was on the

13:07.42] 15th for that.

13:08.53] But my thing is changing costs that you want reimbursed after that,

13:14.92] I'm not sure we should get into that.

13:17.17] Yeah. Well, if they haven't reached out within the last couple of weeks,

13:21.58] if all they have to do is make a simple change and sign, I don't understand why

13:25.90] that's not happened so.

13:27.28] So would you guys have any concerns with that approach that I laid out?

13:31.93] What was the amount for Restore that was still?

13:35.29] I believe it's the full 23-

13:37.18] 23

13:37.30] ...785 that we don't have verified documentation submitted.

13:41.08] Yes.

13:41.98] Yeah. So the 3130, 90 from CPO,

13:48.07] the full

13:50.11] remaining amount of Ozark Greenways, and the full remaining amount of Restore SGS.

13:57.07] Do we know who the vendor is

14:01.18] that hasn't cleared the checks for 3131? Do we know who that vendor is?

14:07.96] I do not know off the top of my head without looking.

14:10.75] We did ask,

14:14.02] at some point last week, that CPO reach out to the vendors that had not

14:19.99] deposited the checks to get those

14:23.59] through the process and finalized.

14:26.41] But as of late yesterday, that one was still outstanding.

14:31.54] I can look and see who the vendor is, but I don't recall.

14:35.08] Were

14:37.45] CPO Ozark Greenways or SGS asked to be here? Do they know about this meeting?

14:44.20] They knew there was a meeting today, but they did not-

14:47.71] To discuss reallocating their funding.

14:50.53] To discuss the update. We've been in contact with them the

14:56.38] last couple of weeks, multiple times, back and forth, trying to get these tied up,

15:01.57] but we did not specifically ask them to be here.

15:07.09] But they were aware that if they didn't spend the money by the contract date and

15:11.02] turn in their reimbursement

15:13.57] documentation, that the funding could be reallocated or would be reallocated after

15:18.07] that time.

15:19.21] Yes, and that was stated in each of the contracts.

15:22.42] And in our contacts with them,

15:27.01] they understood the spending deadline.

15:30.19] And no one asked for an extension because they know it was available.

15:33.34] CPO was hit last time, but they wanted that till the end of October, was it?

15:38.41] Yes. CPO had asked for an extension, and they were in our conversations, each of

15:44.11] them.

15:47.44] The conversations were more focused on the spend date as opposed to the

15:51.97] reimbursement request date. But they do go hand in hand,

15:57.91] and the contract language is clear on that.

16:03.13] Yeah. Could you maybe help us understand your...

16:05.98] It sounds like you've got some concerns.

16:07.87] I do, in the sense of, I just would hate for this to be a he said, she said

16:12.73] situation where we didn't know. Because I would expect that these individuals would

16:17.20] be here to communicate to us

16:21.40] at this meeting because this is the final meeting, and I'm just trying to verify

16:26.14] that they knew to be here to discuss these funds.

16:30.64] Well, I don't know that that's-

16:33.58] They have representatives to be able to be present.

16:38.20] Based on what Jodie's saying, they knew we were meeting.

16:40.36] We didn't ask them to be here, though, and so we didn't say, "Explain yourselves."

16:44.20] I think the only time we heard from the organizations was before we decided on any

16:49.54] allocation of funding, so when people were kind of pitching their projects to the

16:53.26] committee.

16:54.13] Because I just have a feeling that after we make these decisions, we're going to

16:58.27] get some emails that someone didn't know, that some communication fell through the

17:02.86] cracks. And I don't know if we need to postpone until they know that we're getting

17:08.62] ready to allocate these funds if you are not properly communicating with this

17:13.39] committee.

17:13.75] Well, it sounds like they have communicated with them that

17:18.43] you're at risk of losing the funds if you don't get your expenditures in by these

17:22.81] dates. I also know that-

17:24.76] If you're willing to stick on it, then I'm willing to stick on it, too.

17:26.80] Well-

17:27.04] But I'm prepared for someone to say that communication fell through the cracks.

17:31.63] I'm prepared for that as well.

17:34.90] Well, let me-

17:35.38] What is clear, though, is that the contract was not...

17:40.18] The contract's the contract, so the details of that are very clear.

17:43.57] So if there's a communication piece about whether or not they had all the paperwork

17:48.49] submitted back on time-

17:50.83] Or whether or not they had the option to extend.

17:55.21] So the question you initially-

17:56.20] I think they had the option to extend, but we-

17:58.30] But that's not in the contract. I guess what I'm saying is your initial question to

18:04.42] our staff here was, did any of them send an explanation

18:10.39] or ask for an extension? That is not in the contract.

18:13.63] That is just simply correspondence that would happen before you get to this

18:17.65] meeting, and I'm not sure that we can verify that those entities

18:23.44] knew that

18:26.08] an extension was even an option. And so I just got a feeling that once we stick

18:31.99] to our guns on this, someone's going to come back and say they didn't know.

18:34.93] Well, the contract time has come and gone.

18:36.31] I get it.

18:36.58] The one on the 15th. And if- You haven't responded for something that

18:42.56] happened

18:44.24] a month ago,

18:46.40] and the deadline was a month... I don't know.

18:48.26] It just seems like you're missing the boat, and I think if

18:52.16] we choose to extend this again,

18:57.50] we're running out of time.

18:58.64] We are. Okay.

18:58.97] I also want to add too that

19:01.79] when there have been other

19:05.90] dollars potentially up for grabs, there were other organizations that were here

19:11.45] essentially advocating on behalf of us at reallocating those funds to them if we

19:15.47] had leftover funds. So people have been knowing about these deadlines for years.

19:21.11] And it seems like in recent days and weeks, they've also been communicated via

19:25.97] phone individually that they have a deadline, and they need to turn in the

19:29.90] reimbursements by a certain date to get the money back.

19:32.99] So if I had heard some sort of a plea like, "Hey,

19:37.88] please give us a couple of extra days, we're working on X, Y, and Z," that could be

19:41.66] something we would consider.

19:44.24] But it sounds like we haven't had any of that from these organizations on the

19:49.40] deadline.

19:50.48] I'll note, I had to make some calls like this whenever I would bring in the CDBG

19:55.67] program for the state, and

20:01.97] ultimately,

20:04.46] you can communicate as much or as little, but

20:10.67] a contract exists for both parties to be able to fall back on.

20:15.02] So to your point, I'm curious, does the contract have any language about how to

20:20.39] request an extension?

20:24.53] I do not know offhand. I'd have to review it again.

20:28.79] I did include just the snippets that talked about the reimbursement request

20:33.47] deadline, but I don't know if there was any language in there about requesting an

20:39.23] extension for the reimbursements.

20:42.86] I could offer maybe a suggestion. We could tell

20:48.71] these

20:50.78] two entities, CPO and Restore SDF, "This is how much you have left.

20:56.63] The contract deadline has come and gone for spending and reimbursement request, but

21:02.51] if you get this request to us in full by this date, we will

21:08.39] consider it. If not, the committee will pull the funds back per the contract

21:14.12] terms."

21:15.20] Yep.

21:16.58] I lean towards the contract. I lean towards the contract too.

21:20.81] I would just say, let's just prepare for someone to say that communication failed

21:25.49] to impress.

21:26.33] But even if there's no language in there about an extension, this

21:32.24] has already been extended.

21:35.27] This is not the first extension for any of these organizations for this funding.

21:40.10] So...

21:41.09] Well, we're prepared to make the motion, but I make the motion-

21:45.53] As much as I'd hate to-

21:46.31] ... with the understanding that someone's going to say that it wasn't clear,

21:49.73] someone's going to say that, "I thought this," and, "I thought that." And so I just

21:54.95] want to go on record that we're expecting that because I am pretty sure that these

21:59.93] folks right here would've communicated something if they knew that certain options

22:04.85] were available to them outside of their contract.

22:06.89] We did talk about all of this in the last meeting, and these organizations

22:10.13] specifically, and the meeting before, and the meeting before.

22:13.22] I know how humans are.

22:16.61] And I understand that, but all year we've been talking about get your money spent,

22:21.44] get your reimbursements in. All the other organizations did that by the contract

22:24.95] deadline.

22:25.73] Know your contract.

22:26.81] So

22:28.55] we're getting down to the wire, and I want to make sure staff have time to prepare

22:32.18] their final reports. Plus, we also have-

22:35.63] Is it 10:25?

22:36.92] We'll talk about that in a minute. But what do we want to do?

22:39.17] So I'll make a motion that we accept the reimbursement request for CPO

22:45.14] in the amount of $24,118.12 and reallocate

22:51.05] $3,131.90 to the Historic City Hall renovation.

22:57.17] Do we need to do these separately per project, or can we do it all at once?

23:02.36] Procedurally.

23:04.31] We can do it all at once, I think, right?

23:05.99] I'll keep going then. So that's part one.

23:07.61] Part two is reallocate the remaining balance of Ozark Greenways to the Historic

23:12.20] City Hall renovation project, and part three is restoring the full remaining

23:16.88] balance of the Restore SDF project to the Historic City Hall renovation project.

23:23.18] Do we have a second?

23:24.17] Second.

23:28.73] Jensen?

23:29.45] Aye.

23:30.17] Carol?

23:31.94] Borton?

23:32.66] Aye. Hardinger?

23:34.01] Aye.

23:35.27] All right, and now we have the final report to discuss.

23:38.99] If you have to go, feel free, but-

23:40.97] You won't have a quorum.

23:41.99] No.

23:42.80] Do we need to vote on it?

23:45.23] Well, we don't-

23:45.74] It's informational

23:46.34] ... even have a quorum.

23:47.39] Oh, to continue the meeting?

23:49.25] Okay.

23:50.09] You can just do reports. You just can't take the action.

23:53.06] Action.

23:53.66] Yeah. That's really all we have, right?

23:55.49] It's just a-

23:56.24] Just a report?

23:57.05] Yeah.

23:57.29] All right.

23:57.86] Okay.

23:58.28] Thank you.

23:58.88] See you then.

24:05.42] Okay. Final report?

24:06.95] Yeah.

24:08.69] So we're working on a final report,

24:12.50] which will be published, which will be a nice presentation material for the public

24:18.11] to see what council and the community spent on the ARPA funds

24:24.14] over the past however many years it's been now, and looking at kind of the end of

24:29.06] the calendar year timeframe. I don't know, Cora or Melissa?

24:32.63] Yeah. Publish date will be December 31st to

24:37.25] associate with the federal deadline for expenditure of the funds.

24:41.18] And Heather, as the committee chair and the

24:46.76] only council member who has served on this committee from the beginning

24:52.40] throughout, has written a really good introductory letter.

24:56.66] We also did a video interview yesterday at our studio that we'll have a QR code

25:01.79] pointing to. We'll have QR codes throughout the report to provide video on each of

25:07.40] the projects. And the report is coming together nicely, should have something for

25:12.26] you to see in about three to four weeks. So we're excited about it.

25:16.37] Melissa's done a good job of storytelling on this, and I can't wait to read it, so.

25:20.30] So the question I have, which we can't make a decision apparently because we don't

25:23.78] have...

25:26.24] Just going to get some ideas generally. We'll have that ready to go.

25:32.00] Will we want to bring this back and get a final check-off on this?

25:36.80] Yeah.

25:36.83] Maybe need some vague, maybe.

25:38.66] I think so. Maybe a little-

25:40.01] Before we say we're good with it? That's the question.

25:43.13] Oh, sure.

25:43.46] This is a question for staff, I guess, since you guys can't give us direction at

25:46.64] this point.

25:47.42] I don't know that we need to approve the report.

25:49.64] Trust.

25:51.11] But if you would like to send it to us before it's published, we'd love to read it.

25:55.04] Yeah, absolutely.

25:55.94] And then, I think it would be nice if we have a little ceremony,

26:01.40] inviting the organizations that have been honored and with the funds from the

26:05.30] federal government, and kind of celebrating the progress we've made because some of

26:09.26] the things that I talked about the letter and in our interview yesterday was just

26:13.13] the impact that these dollars have had in our community.

26:18.20] And I also think that the intent of

26:21.89] the process and how we went about selecting these different projects, we wanted to

26:26.81] see some long-term legacy. We wanted to see some movement made in some of the key

26:32.42] areas that our citizens have told us are important to them.

26:35.33] So this isn't just a success for the city of Springfield.

26:39.26] I think this is a success for every citizen who participated in that communications

26:43.67] process, and those who will benefit from these projects for years

26:49.67] to come. So I think it's a really cool, unique opportunity to celebrate.

26:58.22] We're excited about it.

26:59.15] Yeah.

27:01.67] We don't need to vote on a date for-

27:04.31] Well, you can't vote.

27:05.90] No.

27:06.20] But

27:07.94] I don't know that-

27:09.14] For this event.

27:10.76] Well, I don't know that we need to.

27:12.62] Yeah.

27:13.97] You can just let us know when that is.

27:15.32] We'll make plans and we'll send some things out, make sure we coordinate with

27:18.05] everybody's schedules, what kind of timeframe that looks like.

27:21.44] Maybe like a 3:30 in an afternoon, and maybe do it here.

27:26.36] It'd be cool if we could do it at a transformational project site to

27:31.82] highlight one of the successes.

27:33.44] The day center or somewhere.

27:35.06] Yeah, that's a good idea.

27:36.11] The teen center is also-

27:37.46] That was great.

27:37.94] Yes.

27:38.48] The teen center.

27:39.44] They have a lot of room, a lot of space.

27:41.63] Yeah.

27:43.37] All right.

27:43.79] Take lead on that if you like.

27:45.35] Yeah.

27:46.97] So can't make any decisions regarding future meeting schedule, but I think the

27:51.68] intent the last time we voted was that this would be our final meeting of the ARPA

27:55.19] committee. So we'll just stick with that. And do we have a motion?

27:59.00] Well, I guess we don't need a motion.

28:01.97] The meeting ended when-

28:03.20] Yeah, the meeting has been concluded and is now concluded.

28:07.85] And now we can go back to our regular programming.

28:10.13] Yeah. Thank you everyone for attending.