2026-09-21 - City Council Workshop

Summary

Built from the agenda posted on the CivicClerk portal and the City's video auto-generated captions (about 55 minutes); names and numbers may be misspelled. No votes were taken; the agenda packet and minutes were not read.

  • The City Manager presented the portfolio approach, a framework for how staff turn many council, committee and community requests into focused priorities. It rests on a mission of improving lives through exceptional public service and a vision of being Missouri's most trusted city, with a Trust Edge framework the Council funded. See Portfolio Approach to Delivering Results.
  • Core problem named: the City manages money tightly but treats staff time as flexible, which overloads staff and stalls priorities. The proposed rhythm is to formalize initiatives with a purpose, outcome and owner, review them monthly, communicate before items reach Council, and decide what to drop when new priorities are added.
  • Public safety priorities: code enforcement, downtown safety, loud motorcycle enforcement, drones as first responders, body-worn cameras, a review of why citations stall in prosecution, expansion of street outreach, and a new Quality of Place Care Team. A council member noted that 40% of fires are in vacant structures.
  • Economic vitality: modernizing development incentive policies, a long-term annexation strategy, the Kearney redevelopment plan, a recently approved sewer extension to the west of about $8.2 million, Jordan Creek activation, and finding the next industrial park site as the current one is down to its last half lot.
  • Housing: the first missing-middle pilot lost money even with donated land, and staff said two potential projects dropped out because they could not comply with current rules; a development process analysis is planned.
  • Communications: information should reach Council and the community 30 to 60 days ahead, with a focus on a few major stories; the first $5 million of Neighborhood Works projects was cited as well received.
  • Council members urged both penalties and incentives for vacant properties, a refresh of Forward SGF as it nears five years, and attention to financial sustainability, which the manager agreed to add. The manager said the committee structure helps protect staff capacity and asked Council to route more review items through committees.

Agenda

  • Presentation: Portfolio Approach to Delivering Results.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

No transcript: the recording is hosted on CityView, not YouTube, and no captions are available.

Transcript

These are Vimeo auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00.69] This meeting is called to order.

00:03.48] Thank you.

00:10.83] Call the roll?

00:12.15] No roll.

00:13.41] All right. Today's meeting is a presentation by the city manager on a

00:19.29] portfolio approach to delivering results. Mr. Cameron?

00:23.79] Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Good morning, members of council. Thank you for being here.

00:30.00] I know that we've had a lot of conversations just in the community, and people have

00:34.29] asked me for what it looks like in the first year, and what all have I learned, and

00:38.40] the things that I want to process or put together and pull together.

00:41.70] But also just working with the council as part of my overall annual review and

00:45.90] talking about the things that focusing on and working on moving forward.

00:50.52] But this is something that I think a little bit elementary, but at the same time,

00:54.03] it's a framework that I do not believe the city itself has had from an overall

00:58.23] perspective of getting projects and accomplishing tasks and things of that nature.

01:02.28] So I'm looking forward today to talking about a new phrase called Lead with

01:05.91] Clarity, Serve with Purpose. If you've been around or listened to anything I've

01:09.63] shared before, one of the key words that you all-- that I like to float around is

01:15.00] the word clarity, and having vision and a direction for where you're going to go

01:18.48] and how to accomplish projects and tasks.

01:20.97] And this council was very generous to offer to provide the funding to do the Trust

01:25.77] Edge framework. For those that were there, one of the three things that I told

01:29.37] staff that I wanted to walk away from was the two pillars I wanted to work on the

01:33.03] most was clarity and connection

01:37.83] with the community itself. And why that is necessary is because it's important to

01:42.06] know what we're trying to achieve, having the framework.

01:45.39] It's not about the fact that you have a staff that are not committed and dedicated

01:50.04] to do the work. It's about whether we have the capacity to get those things done

01:54.09] and deliver them. So basically, I want to walk through kind of some of the

01:57.90] observations, but talk about where we're going in 2027.

02:01.47] Basically, not 2027, where we've actually started, but just having the clarity of

02:05.64] what we're working on, what interferes with us achieving those objectives, the

02:09.69] framework that we have created that we're continuously going to continue to evolve.

02:13.47] But actually, just to share that with the community as well, because it's not just

02:16.29] about clarity for the staff, it's clarity with council, but it's clarity to the

02:20.46] community. Because in my listening sessions with the community, it was more about

02:24.21] where's the story? Where are these projects?

02:27.63] And I think it's very important that we come out and start talking about what the

02:30.72] manager's priorities and what the council's priorities and how we're going to

02:33.75] deliver on those results. So the first thing we started with was establishing the

02:39.21] Springfield Standard. With the Trust Edge work, was one of the objectives I had in

02:44.34] the operational excellence was to redefine the mission, vision, and values of the

02:47.79] city. It's not just something we're going to be putting on a wall.

02:50.70] It's not just something we're talking about, but how do we actually deliver those

02:53.70] results? In the Trust Edge, and you've heard me quote this before, people trust the

02:57.57] clear and distrust the ambiguous or overly complex.

03:02.31] So when it's not clear to staff, when it's not clear to the council, when it's not

03:05.64] clear to the community, there's a lack of trust.

03:08.40] And I think one thing I've learned in having these conversations, even internally

03:12.15] and externally, is the trust in what we're delivering and how we're communicating

03:16.95] those things. So we address our mission around improving lives through

03:22.53] exceptional public service. I think that is what every city employee wants to do,

03:26.25] is to improve the lives for our community through just exceptional public service

03:30.78] to the community. But the vision is to be Missouri's most trusted city.

03:35.34] And the difficulty of that is you got work to do.

03:37.89] We have work to do to achieve that. So we built it around these five principles,

03:42.30] six principles around people, service, collaboration, accountability, solutions,

03:47.25] and courage. So sometimes clarity does not necessarily mean that we're going to all

03:51.36] agree on what that looks like or that we don't need to make adjustments or changes

03:55.71] to what that is. My favorite one in this one probably is about the people, but it's

04:00.39] also about creating solutions. We will solve problems, but we'll need to do that

04:04.44] with courage to do that. Being clear about what matters and purposeful about how we

04:10.05] serve. What I will say about this staff and the city employees, they're extremely

04:14.37] dedicated to delivering, almost to a fault at certain times, watching them work

04:19.20] through extended hours, weekends, and nights to get things prepared, even from last

04:24.00] night from all the communication team to prepare slide decks for today.

04:28.50] And I kind of want to show you how

04:31.05] the challenge of what it is when you're dealing with a city working and living at

04:35.52] the city of Springfield. One thing about it is we have a budget, right? Money.

04:40.98] So we're limited by how much money we can spend to do those projects.

04:44.01] But one thing that I found in the city is we're not limiting our time or our

04:48.03] capacity. So we view time and capacity as something that's negotiable.

04:53.10] We're on the money. We can't overspend our budget, but we're overspending our time

04:56.31] and capacity, and what I believe in that's happening in the city and has happened

05:00.12] in the city that stalls priorities for the city and the council.

05:03.90] Why does it take so long to get this done?

05:05.58] Why are development processes more difficult?

05:08.31] It's not that staff has created or tried to make it difficult for the development

05:12.12] community or that it's-- Whatever it may be, it's really limited by the amount of

05:17.73] time they have to actually focus on specific tasks at hand.

05:21.84] We want everything, but time and funding create the boundaries.

05:25.68] So when you're limited with funding,

05:28.71] that's all the projects you can do.

05:30.09] But with time, we're adding more and more scope and more and more projects into the

05:33.96] staff's list and how do we create a framework and a system for staff to work with

05:39.09] that actually delivers outputs. This is just kind of the reality of city work.

05:43.71] And so I love this graphic because you have all these departments, you have all

05:47.13] these inputs that come into our daily lives and what we're working to do.

05:52.80] What's outlined in there is you'll see that it says citizens, but that's part of

05:56.19] the CRC, the NAC, really what comes through council.

06:00.18] But all the different things that come into the city on a daily basis that we'll be

06:04.20] competing against the priorities.

06:06.45] And it's not that we do not need to deal with those aspects, but creating a

06:11.85] framework for how we achieve outputs for the staff to understand, for council to

06:17.55] understand, and the community to understand has been one of the biggest tasks and

06:21.36] projects that I've worked on in the manager's office with Virginia and the rest of

06:25.23] the staff. I can't speak for them. I won't speak for them in the room.

06:28.35] But creating this framework for our employees has been well-received because they

06:32.22] would call it each one, what is it going to be the flavor of the month?

06:35.25] What's going to be the project we're working on this month that's not one of the

06:38.82] priorities that was added last month?

06:40.92] So this is kind of the way they all kind of get combined together.

06:44.73] But this is the slide deck, the slide that I really want to draw attention to

06:49.53] because you have tangled inputs coming into all these different departments, and

06:52.95] this is just an observation. Staff has provided their feedback, their input, and

06:57.21] what they're excited about this framework is it leads to a focused output.

07:01.83] So when you have all those inputs coming in, all those different questions or

07:05.70] tasks, we still have to address the day-to-day of the city, right?

07:08.82] So you get questions, you all ask us questions, but then you have different

07:13.14] agencies or places saying, "When are you going to get to working on this project or

07:17.01] that project?" And so what we're doing with this framework is going through what I

07:21.87] call tangled inputs, and I would say that the city management staff there is that

07:27.06] middle piece that's actually creating a framework that will actually showcase and

07:31.56] move this into focused outputs. Is there any questions or any idea or concepts or

07:35.70] thoughts that have you seen this yourselves when you're trying to get something

07:39.54] done? But this is what I'm seeing that's affecting our ability to deliver specific

07:45.21] outputs on a routine basis.

07:47.49] What would you say is the number one thing, if you go back one slide?

07:54.99] What's the number one thing you need to achieve focused outputs in your opinion?

08:02.01] You have to be clear about what you're asking for and understanding that we only

08:06.63] have so much time. So if you keep adding more things into the inputs,

08:13.08] staff are going to work their tail off. I've seen this so much.

08:15.93] I've seen people

08:18.21] that are working. They're putting in the work, but the actual outputs

08:24.06] are limited because there's so many different inputs they're trying to deliver on.

08:27.93] So if we can get clear up on what those are, but I can tell you that you can go

08:31.71] into a council meeting and walk out with three different new inputs to deliver, but

08:35.97] they may interfere with other inputs that we're trying to achieve.

08:39.36] Does that answer your question?

08:40.47] Yeah.

08:42.63] So here's the operating rhythm. I'm not going to try to tell you how to build the

08:46.56] clock, but it's very important that this is what the new framework does for the

08:49.92] staff and what it does for us. Because one of the things we have is this thing

08:53.28] called ClearPoint, and whether people can review that ClearPoint or will go in

08:58.44] there is like, what are we actually achieving?

09:00.93] So the simply monthly cycle that turns an idea into a managed work is this.

09:05.13] We formalize it, you define an initiative So the purpose, the outcome, and who the

09:10.08] owner of that initiative is. And I'm going to talk about an example of one coming

09:14.19] up. But the review is monthly momentum review.

09:16.83] So basically, when we all get together, it's important that the council, the mayor,

09:22.56] staff get together and it's like, "Are we on target for what we're trying to

09:25.95] achieve?" So Kenosha Middle Pilot Project is one of those great examples, like,

09:29.85] where are we at with that? If it's competing for other housing dynamics or Chapter

09:34.20] 36 changes as we go, it's very important that we review, are we on

09:40.23] momentum? But then we communicate.

09:42.57] This is the one place that I feel like the community and even council's left out on

09:46.74] the storytelling piece. It's not because staff doesn't want to provide it, it's

09:51.03] just there's so many different things that there's a story to.

09:54.06] And by the time we get to it, it usually turns into a press release versus, hey,

09:57.66] what was the initial story on the front end? So how are we communicating it?

10:01.68] Are we being transparent with it? Way before it turns into a council topic, it's

10:06.06] been talked about or it's been presented to you.

10:09.18] But also then we adjust portfolio and capacity decisions, resources, and

10:13.41] trade-offs. So we formalize the initiative, we review it on a monthly basis,

10:19.38] but if we have to adjust, which is four, means a new input's been added at a

10:24.33] council meeting, whatever that may be.

10:26.01] And this is not a complaint, this is just how much capacity do you have.

10:29.43] If a new input is added,

10:32.25] be it how to fund a certain project, then it means you're going to push something

10:36.84] else away a little bit to provide the capacity to do that.

10:41.49] Clarity up front reduces rework and mission creep later.

10:44.37] So mission creep means this is different projects we have.

10:48.00] These are the five priorities council's identified.

10:50.46] Now we've got mission creep because we're adding four new initiatives that we want

10:54.45] to review or want staff to bring back.

10:56.76] So somewhere you have to reduce the mission somewhere else to avoid the creep

11:02.67] that's come in. It's just like a

11:05.61] construction project, when all of a sudden the scope begins to creep and gets

11:08.64] larger and you don't have the money for it,

11:12.15] it becomes a challenge. And so creating an operating rhythm, lead with clarity,

11:17.31] serve with purpose is incredibly paramount for the City of Springfield and our

11:21.90] organization of having this as we move forward.

11:24.72] And I just want to walk through some of the,

11:28.29] what I call the right size management.

11:29.91] These are all three dimensions of how we function as a city.

11:33.45] So you've got the council, the strategic priorities, and you've got citywide

11:37.68] enterprise, and you've got departmental or operational.

11:40.56] That bottom one is basically what we do on a day-to-day basis.

11:44.61] But situations like merit rules would be on the bottom line.

11:48.51] But the council's strategic priorities would be around public safety or the

11:53.34] downtown, which I'll talk about that in a little bit.

11:56.49] But then there's also the citywide and the enterprise piece that basically is a

12:00.78] focus of one specific department that they're working on that may not necessarily

12:04.68] line up with this. It lines up with the council priority, but it also doesn't just

12:08.73] go to a strategic priority at the top.

12:12.06] And one thing I wanted to be really clear about is it's literally, there's probably

12:16.53] in thirds that the staff are focusing on the day-to-day function, but also how to

12:21.12] deliver the outputs for the council on a daily basis.

12:24.39] So we developed a system that keeps bandwidth in mind and delivers results.

12:28.59] And Virginia, if I'm missing any part of that that would help, let me know.

12:33.69] So this is just a little bit of the framework.

12:35.52] So I just want to give you, just this is an example.

12:37.56] This is not something that basically

12:40.35] that I would signal as the top priority, but it is definitely what we listened to

12:44.19] in the community was public safety is a priority.

12:48.15] It is without a doubt, and this council's identified it as one of its top five.

12:52.29] I would say it has risen even more so to the top of anything that I've discussed in

12:58.17] the listening sessions with the community, but also how do we align those resources

13:02.97] to achieve the objectives that the citizens expect, but also at the same time, what

13:07.92] our law enforcement expects. They work very hard.

13:10.59] They're working very diligently to address the needs.

13:13.38] But this is what we saw, is crime, faster accountability, safer environments,

13:17.97] trespassing camps, where we're not enforcing the trespassing, or where we want more

13:23.34] enforcement on trespassing. Noise was a big one.

13:26.82] I want to show a slide deck that's just some information about what our efforts

13:31.50] have been on the noise reduction piece.

13:33.87] But also, I think what is a key element here is the reporting of the

13:39.81] how we're reporting quality of life issues versus just overall crime statistics in

13:44.19] the city. I think that is one of the big elements that we're going to continue to

13:47.46] evolve, is how we're reporting, how we're addressing crime in the community.

13:53.22] Speeding, streets feeling unsafe, and loose dogs, again, while it's limited in

13:57.18] certain areas, this is a big piece in the conversations I've had with neighborhood

14:01.14] associations as Chapter 18 amendments.

14:04.11] But these are just kind of the listening to the community, the five signals, the

14:07.29] things that we're looking for. But I know it seems, again, it seems elementary, but

14:11.58] you cannot dismiss. I feel like that's what's happened in the listening sessions is

14:16.20] you're talking about all these bigger things, but you dismiss these little things

14:19.35] like noise, dogs, things of that nature.

14:22.14] And so I believe the framework allows us to incorporate that as well as the

14:27.42] bigger topics.

14:30.27] So this is just delivery and action. This is just an example.

14:33.57] I believe this was for the month of May.

14:35.94] I don't believe it's the most recent, but the problem was residents signaled that

14:40.05] loud motorcycles were a challenge.

14:42.21] So we actually did a centralized or focused effort on those things.

14:45.81] Stops made, citations issued. And again, we're not in it for just the citation

14:49.98] side, but this goes back to if we have laws on the books that we're not enforcing,

14:55.35] I think that is an element that this council has identified. Enforce what you have.

14:59.61] And I think this is what we're starting to see.

15:03.33] And I know while some may like it and not like it, the deployment of drones as

15:07.20] first responders or being able to evaluate and utilize that as help with a

15:11.10] motorcycle task just in general, because it's hard to outfly a drone if someone's

15:16.41] speeding away from an officer as we have a non-pursuit policy.

15:21.72] So now I want to talk about where we're going specifically based upon what the

15:26.16] council priorities have been. These are the things that we're going to focus on

15:30.24] over the next

15:32.04] several months. And as I stated, going back a slide, right here, adjust or the

15:37.89] portfolio piece is every 30 days, we're evaluating these things.

15:41.61] So I want to be very clear to you and the community, this is not something that's

15:45.63] just a-- this is not an exhaustive list today.

15:48.30] I'm just walking through the very top high points of where we need to be focused as

15:53.61] a community, where my office is focused as your city manager in bringing our staff

15:57.72] around these topics. Again, so talking about public safety, the

16:02.79] downtown by far is one of those elements. Oh, I'm sorry. Go ahead.

16:07.83] Yeah. I just had a question. Would someone be available after this meeting?

16:12.78] I brought my laptop. I wanted to get into ClearPoint to be able to

16:19.77] bridge what you're talking about and how we can follow along.

16:23.49] Yes. Thank you. That's a great point.

16:26.19] So someone will be available?

16:27.99] We'll make sure somebody's available.

16:29.34] Okay.

16:30.42] Samantha's-

16:31.08] Appreciate that.

16:32.16] Is Samantha here?

16:33.06] She's here.

16:33.66] Okay. Because ClearPoint, I appreciate the comment.

16:37.53] ClearPoint will be a way, but what we're finding is not everyone is going to

16:42.03] ClearPoint. So how do we elevate? How are we going to elevate in our

16:47.37] storytelling and communicating with the council?

16:49.98] More updates just like this specifically, so we can update that place, but you can

16:55.47] go look at it as well, because not everyone's going to go looking at ClearPoint

16:59.01] from the community's perspective, and how do we actually have updates that are

17:02.76] actually meaningful. So talking about downtown

17:07.44] safety. You got a question, Bruce?

17:09.63] No, I was just going to say I wrote down the same thing.

17:11.25] Okay. So downtown safety, order, and community vitality.

17:15.24] So the issue is how do we address the downtown? Just that's one specific area.

17:20.85] So that is a pub-- It crosses over multiple departments.

17:24.06] So you have health, you have legal, public works, PIO, et cetera.

17:28.14] One thing that's very important about the downtown is it is kind of like that

17:32.79] catalyst at the center of the city, but there is a lot of feedback from our

17:36.75] downtown businesses, if I've heard anything about this, is feeling safe in the

17:40.77] downtown in those capacities. So this is going to be reviewing not just the public

17:46.11] safety element of it, but our permitting, what we are allowing in those areas, but

17:50.16] also enforcing, again, the health codes and the permitting requirements that we

17:54.39] have in that area because I think that is one of the largest feedback that we're

17:58.98] receiving. But is how are we going to make it better partnering with the DSA to do

18:04.65] that? So you will see a much more robust effort. You're already seeing it.

18:08.52] One thing I'll say is we're going to, we've already started these efforts.

18:14.19] Vacant buildings, encourage redevelopment with creative solutions.

18:18.75] This is

18:20.91] We can't just keep having vacant buildings and not have some sort of creative way

18:24.93] to address those areas. So this is one of those places.

18:27.18] Deploy technology-enabled policing and public safety.

18:30.48] So basically, with the new body cameras that you all have adopted, this may not

18:34.56] seem like much, but it's tremendous because when you have

18:39.15] officer shortages or they're working on different things, the new body-worn cameras

18:44.01] actually do a lot of the reporting for the staff so they're not going back spending

18:47.73] a lot of time writing reports. It's actually deployed in the actual equipment that

18:52.14] we're purchasing for them. But also utilizing the drone system on-- We're talking

18:56.61] about traffic enforcement, that basically you can utilize that particular piece

19:01.62] because you can capture the actual violation

19:05.67] while it's happening. So instead of having an officer sitting at an intersection,

19:08.82] you can actually utilize drone policing, which is what we've done with the

19:12.24] motorcycles to help. Again, that's not facial recognition.

19:16.23] That's not doing anything other than capturing the plate, the situation, and it

19:20.52] actually taking place for actual video evidence.

19:23.16] Proactive and accountable enforcement, so it's basically increased traffic

19:27.00] operations. Again, all the things that we've been talking about before.

19:32.55] But the other element, the last one, we were talking about on public safety side,

19:35.67] but the other one is the prosecutor's office review.

19:38.19] It's really important basically just to make sure that we're actually able to

19:41.37] prosecute and move those projects through the prosecutor's office, and that doesn't

19:45.63] mean the prosecutor's not doing a good job.

19:47.40] It just means when we write more tickets than are tickets that are going to be

19:50.79] issued in those capacities, that basically, and that's not basically, I want to

19:54.39] clarify that statement. That is not something that's talking about a quota because

19:58.62] we're not allowed to do that, but it's basically how we are increasing because our

20:02.10] traffic tickets have declined. But also, is that a question of whether they're

20:07.74] moving through the prosecutor's office or not? So evaluating that process.

20:11.31] And Jordan and his team have done a very good job of working with other attorneys

20:15.12] just to work and navigate through the legal system here of how to improve those

20:19.26] processes. But also when it comes down to permitting in the downtown, again, it's

20:24.66] important to know that if someone is violating that process and a ticket is issued

20:28.32] by the law enforcement, that it will be prosecuted accordingly because I believe

20:32.61] that is a gap that has not taken place as much as it should have.

20:37.23] Public safety, so evaluation of ROI.

20:40.38] So the city contributes a lot of money or provides money to different services.

20:44.43] So one of the things is to evaluate where those are being invested.

20:48.27] Are we receiving the ROI or return on those programs?

20:52.11] The street outreach team, expansion consideration, with funding that we do have

20:56.97] because that street outreach team is actually taking resources into the community.

21:01.11] This was, by the way, for those that will be watching online or just for the

21:05.13] councils for memory, this was actually created

21:10.86] based upon the North Glenstone CID.

21:14.01] Starting that process was how we create and deploy a outreach team.

21:19.59] Then we got the Quality of Place Care Team, which is a new initiative that Tim is

21:23.55] working on, and Anita's been working on this as well,

21:27.21] which talks about the unhoused in the community, and obviously we got Chapter 18.

21:32.37] So what I'm stating is these are going to be the elements that we're working on in

21:36.12] these next 30, 60, 90 days. This is not all-inclusive of everything that's going

21:41.37] on. So if you're wanting to know where the art museum is or other departments or

21:45.54] what's the airport's plans as well, I'm only hitting the highlights of what we've

21:49.86] heard specifically to work on as part of my overall discussion between myself and

21:54.99] council on what my priorities are as the city manager moving forward.

21:59.64] Economic vitality. Yes.

22:01.08] Back up. I'm sorry. What do you see as the greatest public safety need?

22:06.27] To enforce the codes we have

22:09.18] by far and to report because quality of life issues, I believe when you look at

22:14.28] even traffic enforcement, I think those elements are--

22:19.65] A lot of times you can find, and I believe we find this a lot whenever there are

22:23.07] traffic pull or when you're pulling somebody over, even if you increase that, it's

22:29.07] probably where you're most likely to also find

22:32.94] bad actors through just that.

22:35.64] Just to add to your own comment. Every survey I've ever seen shows public safety is

22:41.43] the citizens' top. Some aspect of public safety is the top concern.

22:47.76] Yeah. I think it's enforcing what we have, but it's also at the same time it's

22:51.84] actually having a strategy of what we're addressing because I think it's the same

22:54.72] thing about time and capacity. What do you have the capacity to address?

22:58.38] If you're dealing with one thing, you've got to put a lot of your focus and efforts

23:02.61] on those. And so I think it's very important about what is the actual

23:08.91] focus of any department for that matter.

23:13.98] So, yes.

23:16.17] Going back also to public safety.

23:20.01] Couple of slides you had vacant buildings.

23:22.80] I'm not sure did you want to keep that under public safety or more so

23:29.01] a different priority? Because the four actionable

23:35.28] part of the portfolio that you're presenting is not really touching on vacant

23:39.63] buildings, and so I'm wondering if it's going to be covered up under another

23:44.88] priority here because that right there is such a key.

23:49.59] Vacant buildings, dilapidated vacant homes, and that's what been getting those up

23:55.47] to their highest and best use and allowing for sight sound

24:01.02] supervision of the community to keep an eye out on those areas that are

24:06.45] improving it with activity, quality of life issues, outdoor recreation,

24:11.82] amenities that are surrounding those particular buildings.

24:15.66] And so I don't know if you wanted to keep vacant buildings under public safety.

24:21.24] It certainly needs to be under quality of place, development processes,

24:27.12] and certainly economic vitality.

24:29.16] Sure. Absolutely. Yes.

24:31.11] I'm just going to add to that. I think it's imperative that you keep it under

24:34.11] public safety because you often talk to the fire service, 40% of our fires are in

24:39.84] vacant structures.

24:42.12] We've talked with criminal conduct.

24:43.74] A lot of our criminal conduct happens in vacant properties.

24:47.01] And so I'm not disagreeing it should be maybe in economy development, maybe in

24:51.60] something else as well. But I think it's imperative that there's a lot of cross--

24:57.51] It's a vacant building, but it's also a hub for criminal conduct.

25:02.58] And I think if you don't keep them both in there, I think you're missing an

25:05.94] opportunity to link up some of these problems.

25:07.92] So it's both great points. What I would say about the slide deck in and of itself

25:13.92] is what I say about the council's priorities, there's a number of things that all

25:17.82] cross over into one another. What I want to demonstrate today is that we are

25:21.75] actually going to focus on vacant buildings, regardless if it's in one specific

25:26.49] category. But literally, this framework is about where is the manager's office,

25:31.98] where is the staff knowing it's being directed in these next 30, 60, 90 days

25:36.48] because it's not something-- One thing I've learned about because of that tangled

25:41.61] piece, it takes a lot longer to push things out, and it shouldn't take a year.

25:46.44] It should be something that we can be focused on, that we can deliver on those

25:49.47] elements. So talking about the vacant buildings, be it public safety, economic

25:54.24] vitality, what are we going to do because there's certain elements on the

25:57.09] enforcement side, and that's more back to the prosecutor's office and what Jordan

26:01.02] and his team are doing. I think that the city attorney's office has done a great

26:05.70] job of identifying, "Hey, we're ready to go and kind of do the work," and then

26:10.56] bring legislative policies back to council that actually address these things that

26:14.58] maybe we're a little bit weak on that need legislative approval.

26:18.66] And where does the council-- Because that's the one thing I appreciate this

26:21.93] council, what they do, they'll say, "How can we help you?" How can we help me, the

26:27.03] manager's office? It's literally we need to bring legislation to you that actually

26:31.59] helps address the very thing that we're talking about.

26:33.48] So the vacant buildings may take additional work on legislative sides. Yes.

26:38.97] Also,

26:41.40] I think the absentee owners don't realize that it's a public safety risk to keep

26:45.90] their buildings vacant. That is what attracts the problems is that the absentee

26:51.81] owner or the owner who doesn't get that building back up, they're

26:57.78] disincentivized to keep it vacant, and that's downstream

27:03.75] looking at what happens on the property.

27:06.00] Upstream is you have to address the property owner, and so

27:11.97] that is the thing that we should be looking at with vacant properties because we're

27:16.95] going downstream looking at who's starting fires.

27:22.08] That is downstream. If we could really address the absentee owners and the owners

27:27.30] of these properties that keep those properties vacant for years and years and years

27:32.64] and years, that is what is going to be transformational about vacant properties up

27:38.40] under public safety.

27:39.97] Council Member Hosmer. I agree with that 100%, but I think we talked about doing

27:45.61] some incentive programs to encourage people to redevelop, but we also should be

27:50.17] doing a disincentive. There's a cost you're going to have if you're going to hold a

27:55.15] vacant building in the City of Springfield for...

27:57.70] Again, a building on the square that's been empty for 30 years, that can't be good

28:02.95] for the developer, it can't be good for the owner.

28:05.02] And if we don't disincentivize that, they're not going to ever put it back in the

28:09.01] market. They just wait. And so I think it's

28:12.82] imperative that we have

28:15.82] carrots and sticks.

28:17.23] Yes.

28:18.40] And just to incentivize some people, you're not going to get everybody.

28:21.70] I think there needs to be a penalty for people to sit on property for years and

28:27.70] years and years.

28:28.63] So we'll add that to this slide because this is the next slide I'm transitioning

28:32.08] to, talking about modernizing the development incentive policy, that it's not just

28:36.61] about for large-scale development, it also needs to be for incentivizing or

28:40.42] de-incentivizing those that are, just as you just stated.

28:44.59] So how do we incentivize that? It needs to be revised, it needs to be modified

28:50.26] with today's standards and things that we're actually-- Because we're in a

28:52.60] competitive market, but at the same time, making sure that we're competitive with

28:56.23] them, but we're not also giving away

28:59.59] everything. So it needs to be evaluated what's in the best interest of the

29:02.41] community, but also what's the opportunity cost for us if we do not deliver.

29:06.19] So finding those incentive policies, redevelopment incentives.

29:09.85] So it's not just about taking property outside the city, and just to be clear, or

29:15.49] annexing, it's got to be how do we redevelop and incentivize to redevelop in the

29:20.20] middle of town. So there's a lot of opportunities.

29:22.75] I know Council Member Radziwonlis and I have talked about this at length about how

29:27.01] do we have those places where we incentivize and make it where it's more

29:30.46] profitable. Because if we've already seen in the missing middle conversation,

29:34.27] off-site improvements create a lot more of the cost, and does not allow us

29:40.06] to achieve that objective. So then the annexation conversation, the consent to

29:45.31] annex is one of those elements that we as a city need to address, is we have

29:50.05] properties that are immediately adjacent to our property or to our places that

29:54.73] we've already signed these consent to annex.

29:56.59] So that is one of those disconnects of understanding that if somebody is compact or

30:00.43] contiguous, they've signed their document, what is holding us back to executing

30:04.78] those consents? But also, where are we looking not just at the

30:10.51] current properties, but where are we growing outside the doughnut hole of the City

30:14.59] of Springfield? And so looking for areas that we can deploy and expand our

30:18.49] infrastructure to help grow the housing stock, but also commercial retail and some

30:24.04] industrial. But the whole idea, I know there's a lot of conversation, a lot of

30:27.52] words out there floating around, especially with the data center discussion, that

30:30.79] annexation and data centers are all synonymous.

30:33.25] That is not anywhere what I'm talking about in this conversation.

30:36.94] I'm talking about just how does the city plan to grow its footprint over not

30:42.40] just 5 years, 10, 15, 20, but where are we going to be looking for those areas?

30:46.81] That's going to be a focal point. Kearney redevelopment plan, I said just drive

30:51.64] down Kearney, you'll understand.

30:53.43] This is one of those areas where this is a funding need, where I believe at some

30:57.79] point we have the conversation, when you establish a goal, where's the revenue?

31:00.88] Where's the sources to come together to pull this together?

31:04.78] Because a lot of these redevelopment plans, could be a lot easier.

31:08.44] When people talk about Trader Joe's or projects, I'm not saying it's coming, but

31:11.65] what I'm saying is, if we could go assemble property in these redevelopment areas

31:15.58] that the city does, and then incentivize that around those property acquisitions.

31:20.26] So a lot of the work that needs to be done is going to take some capital for us to

31:24.10] do that. So, yes, Council Member Horton.

31:27.49] Thank you. So I was curious. I see at least two of the three where

31:34.93] it could possibly tie into this new position that you were able to secure funding

31:39.85] for-

31:40.18] Yes

31:40.66] ... which was the engineering liaison.

31:43.39] Would that individual have a role to play in those three?

31:47.56] Is that

31:49.15] role even listed? Have you secured that role?

31:52.63] And would they even have a role in these two or three areas

31:58.57] here?

31:58.96] Absolutely.

32:00.28] That's still ambiguous to me.

32:02.71] I appreciate that. I think to that point is that what's important, because I think

32:08.74] you bring up a valid point, we were talking about it.

32:10.69] Where is the funding to achieve the priorities of economic vitality?

32:14.83] Where is that in the budget? And objectively, at some point, one of the

32:18.28] conversations that we'll continue to have is when we establish these goals, where

32:22.03] is the budget to execute that? And so that's very important, the discussion.

32:26.83] But to your point from the ambiguous piece is why it's not been deployed or out

32:30.49] there is it's literally getting around the clarity of what are we trying to

32:34.06] achieve. Because if we're not all on the same page of what that looks like, and

32:38.29] that's why this conversation, just both with council, with staff, and getting

32:42.79] clarity on what we're trying to achieve is do we want to have incentives?

32:45.76] Do we want to work with the redevelopment side?

32:48.25] That could be all over the map in that conversation.

32:51.13] So,

32:55.66] did I answer your question?

32:57.76] No. Maybe.

32:59.14] We can keep going.

33:00.04] Yeah. Okay. But I

33:03.52] 100% agree on that one particular piece is what does that position need to achieve?

33:08.29] But I think modernizing our incentive program, where we're going to consent to

33:12.52] annex, where we're going to deploy utilities, because a lot of this stuff is going

33:16.09] to be public-private partnerships.

33:17.62] It will not just be the days of the city coming up with the funding for everything.

33:22.30] It's kind of over. The best way to work on those things is public-private

33:26.05] partnerships, and that's what I envision for that position as a liaison is how to

33:30.01] achieve win-win-win success on growing and redevelopment, but also how to

33:35.95] expand our territory as well. Okay, so infrastructure, economic vitality

33:41.83] continues. This is utility deployment in strategic areas.

33:44.74] This is the one thing that I think the city in and of itself, we are doing right

33:49.60] now. We just approved about $8.2 million worth of sewer to the west.

33:53.92] We need to continue to be looking at those areas of opportunity where we put our

33:57.28] utilities to work that actually help us achieve both housing, help us also achieve

34:02.38] retail,

34:04.23] commercial, and industrial in our growth.

34:06.76] But also, how do we deploy it in areas that if we revitalize existing areas, say in

34:11.86] downtown, where maybe the infrastructure doesn't support it, or places that if we

34:15.49] would increase the capacity of what we have on the books.

34:18.37] This is a big piece for both the city, city utilities, and working with our

34:22.42] partners, is we have to be very strategic in deploying our utilities.

34:28.72] Because that will lead for additional economic opportunities.

34:31.93] I cannot stress this point enough, but we are starting to execute this.

34:35.23] This is the work where

34:38.38] Aaron Kemper and his team have worked with the county, city utilities, and are

34:41.92] pulling together this joint regional conversation.

34:45.01] That's the one thing that's probably been lacking, and it's not because it's just

34:49.09] someone that needed to say, "Hey." Aaron's wanted to deploy this for quite some

34:52.03] time. So basically deploying this and getting all the regional partners together so

34:56.86] that we're not duplicating our efforts and we're not putting infrastructure into

35:00.10] places that someone else is also hitting as well.

35:02.68] The right of way management, utility coordination, modernization, critical capital

35:08.65] collaboration. And this is one of the things, working with city utilities, working

35:12.64] with ourself, is where we're deploying our resources collectively, not just the

35:17.11] city doing one thing, city utilities doing something, and we're just basically

35:20.62] making sure we have that collaboration. That's a big piece.

35:23.26] And then the regional coordination, which I already talked about, that Aaron is

35:25.90] working on, on infrastructure and community growth.

35:29.20] Because one thing about it is, is that Springfield cannot house all the growth,

35:32.95] that the other surrounding cities are helping in those pieces, but where are we

35:35.89] putting our infrastructure collectively to do that? The Renewed Jordan Creek.

35:40.99] This is a big one, too, because this is a point that I've had a lot of feedback on,

35:45.31] is what's going to happen and how are we going to deploy and utilize it?

35:48.25] How do we activate it? How do we create economic opportunities around it?

35:52.00] And making sure that it's well-utilized, it's well-programmed, but this is a

35:58.21] big piece of economic vitality. Then the industrial park conversation is this is a

36:03.28] high priority. But one of the nice things about it, if you saw the Earling Group

36:07.30] announcement last week with the opening of the improvements that we made on

36:12.58] LeCompte Road, and basically opening up a large portion of their property that

36:18.64] actually adds for an industrial park.

36:20.95] But also at the same time, I think we're down to the last half lot in Pick West

36:26.87] And so being down to that last one, how it arrived at that location or at that

36:31.52] state, we're to the point now that

36:35.03] really finding additional land or property that go to the next industrial site is a

36:40.52] high priority that we need to have a conversation about.

36:43.97] And it may be like it was in Pick East and Pick West, or it may be a public-private

36:48.74] partnership with a private owner.

36:50.45] It just depends on what is the highest and best use that we can utilize.

36:54.68] I know that we've had conversations about how to build, I guess it's called Pick

36:58.07] Next or

37:00.02] whatever we want to call it. But anyway, that's a high priority in those

37:02.57] conversations, and I've been talking with both the chamber and city utilities and

37:07.58] other stakeholders about where and how that would come about. Housing.

37:14.54] This is probably one of those elements that when I think about the homeless,

37:20.12] unhoused, and projects, where we're going to have workforce, how do we deploy this?

37:26.06] And moving forward, this topic comes to the forefront the most.

37:31.19] So when we saw the missing middle pilot 1.0, which we're working on, the math

37:36.86] shows you there was a loss, even with the city giving away the land and doing that.

37:41.39] So making sure how do we address the missing middle pilot, but it's also evaluating

37:46.73] how we actually have come up with the funding that actually work on the offsite

37:50.87] improvements or different things that actually help us move the needle.

37:53.75] I can tell you there's been two things.

37:55.31] I go down to Chapter 36, ongoing amendments.

37:59.06] I've seen two projects so far, I believe that at some point were in conceptual

38:03.38] design, go away from what would've been great missing middle projects because

38:09.29] it would not comply with the new Chapter 36.

38:13.22] And so I think it's very important that we continue to have conversations about

38:18.53] those new changes and making sure that it's not something that's pushing away from

38:22.61] the housing priority,

38:24.86] and making it more difficult. Because if I've had any one comment in relationship

38:29.45] to our building codes and the Chapter 36, is right now it's

38:35.21] encouraging people to say, "What can I do to build something in the county not to

38:39.50] have to comply and/or to meet that new requirement?" So I think those amendments

38:43.82] need to make sure that we're not moving away from our housing priority completely.

38:48.38] It's creating a negative versus a positive.

38:52.01] Then I put in there the review and amend all BDS-related city codes.

38:55.10] Thank you, Martin, for being here because this is Martin's. This is his work.

38:59.72] What he's recommending,

39:03.26] in his work, is to review how we do development processes, how we work on those

39:08.06] elements, to make building processes easier, but also at the same time, have

39:12.38] accountability for moving the housing forward.

39:16.82] Public works development process analysis and adjustments.

39:21.08] Basically, it's just what do we need to do from a process analysis and where do we

39:25.37] deploy resources or infrastructure to help meet a housing need?

39:30.08] Because sometimes a lot of it, again, comes down to offsite improvements that need

39:33.26] to be made, especially on the redevelopment areas, and public works need to be a

39:37.01] part of it, and there needs to be a budget associated with it each year.

39:43.19] Strategic communications. This is probably that place that

39:47.93] both council, the feedback I've received, the listening sessions, is how are we

39:52.79] communicating with the public more on a strategic side, talking about

39:58.10] integrated strategic communications plan, but this is both internal and external.

40:03.65] So it's important that we're communicating with our staff what we're working on,

40:06.29] but it's also important to communicate with the community in advance.

40:10.25] I think a lot of times what's happening,

40:13.10] not by intention, but a lot of times the information is getting to the community,

40:17.69] even sometimes to the council, at the council meeting.

40:21.98] So basically, having that information out there 30 days in advance, 60 days in

40:25.64] advance, you all are talking about this conversation, it helps with transparency.

40:29.84] People can say, "Hey, I'd like to know more about that." But also just telling the

40:33.74] story. I think I don't have the video for it to roll out, but there's a video roll

40:37.97] out that we're going to do on Renew Jordan Creek, but I think you're going to see

40:41.00] it with Neighborhood Works program.

40:43.37] The communication staff, y'all done a fantastic job of actually evolving and

40:49.13] making these changes to go to more of a storytelling aspect so the citizens are

40:53.33] more a part of it from the beginning versus towards the end of it.

40:56.90] And Abe, I think you brought it up many times as like, hey, there ought to be some

41:01.58] sort of story that we're sharing, that we're working on.

41:04.73] Because there's a lot of good going on inside the city of Springfield, but at the

41:08.39] same time, it's how do we get focused around what that story is and why the

41:12.53] framework matters so much for us to do that, is if we've got 27 projects going on

41:17.12] at one time and we're like, "We really need to focus on four or five to tell a

41:21.80] really good story," that's something that is very, very important as we move

41:24.74] forward as an organization. That's why the framework matters so much to what we're

41:29.45] working on, is that we have to stay focused on what we're trying to achieve.

41:38.72] So basically, I really want to just to roll out, this is what we're going to work

41:42.62] on, specifically over the next 30, 60, 90 days.

41:47.06] And what I would still say again to the staff, to the council, and to the community

41:52.73] is this is not exhaustive. This is basically just the start of where we stay clear.

41:58.70] If I can go back to one

42:02.39] space that if I had my perfect world, is that we would get out of what

42:08.42] I call spaghetti junction and get into focused outputs that we can deliver on a

42:13.76] routine basis that we can report to the community, "Hey, we've reduced this

42:19.70] by this many

42:22.70] crime reductions, this many foot patrols, this many contacts.

42:25.91] We've reduced our timeframe for development from here to there," and report those

42:29.51] stories out, but also at the same time to celebrate, like Neighborhood Works Plus.

42:33.47] Some of the best feedback we've received to date is just the fact that we've rolled

42:36.89] out the first $5 million

42:39.77] towards those Neighborhood Works programs.

42:41.69] And so, if I could come back to one slide, that really is

42:47.90] what my role is and what I want to provide to our staff is clarity for how they

42:52.46] function, but also how we deliver those outputs.

42:55.13] But what interferes with that is when there's so many different external inputs

42:58.88] being added before we can even deliver the first few, it really does make it much

43:03.44] more difficult. So what I'm going to ask, what can we do to help is how do we

43:06.50] reduce the total number of inputs and stay to a focused output?

43:14.33] Comments, questions from members of council? Council Member Horton.

43:18.65] I just had a question about when you're meeting with your team, how much

43:23.39] conversation is being had about the clarity around FOR SF?

43:29.63] Oh, great question. So

43:35.39] that is going to be basically the catalyst of this conversation because when you

43:38.96] look at FOR SF,

43:41.54] and I don't have necessarily the specific data, Maurice may be able to add to it,

43:45.38] but I know that we've actually deployed and asked how much does staff actually

43:49.58] understand at FOR SF and how do they know why they're pursuing FOR SF?

43:55.97] That is one of those pieces where

43:58.76] there's not a lot of clarity around it because not everyone even understands it

44:02.00] completely from a staff level.

44:04.49] That's interesting that you would say that, because the community, 10,000 touch

44:10.19] points in terms of telling us as the city what they wanted to see, and

44:16.31] maybe it's more of a how-

44:18.26] Yeah

44:18.32] ... than a what. Because I think that some clarity around what is essentially our

44:23.99] North Star is a starting point-

44:26.87] Yes

44:27.11] ... as well that

44:30.08] the staff as well as even the council could benefit from just that refresher.

44:36.08] I think you and I, we've talked about

44:39.98] we're coming up on five or six years since adopting the FOR SF.

44:46.79] And we've talked about Springfield Regional Arts Council, how they've done some

44:52.19] community engagement around their strategic planning.

44:55.37] But maybe it's a good time to kind of do some refresher and do some clarity around

45:01.58] FOR SF so that we can get anchored again in FOR SF, because

45:06.50] that is our plan. And so to the extent that we can

45:12.38] integrate and weave this all into what's being done here, again, I've mentioned

45:19.64] perhaps we've codified quality of place in Chapter 36 and other

45:25.64] areas, but just in terms of the language and the storytelling around FOR

45:31.28] SF. And I know with specific projects such as Renew Jordan Creek, Renew Jordan

45:35.81] Creek is a visible example of how we're trying to improve quality of place

45:42.14] But to the extent that we can get back, you talked about Mission Creek.

45:46.13] Forward SGF is our North Star, and to the extent that we can get back to really

45:51.95] verbalizing and communicating and coalescing and really rallying around

45:57.98] what our community told us that they wanted over the next 20, 30, 40 years, and

46:03.68] being able to communicate that, that is the thing that also inspires top-level

46:08.51] vision and inspires folks to want to be a part of it, that attractability

46:14.48] piece, but also the desirability and the civic pride

46:20.93] that folks really want to aspire to in our community as well.

46:25.70] So to the extent, and I didn't see it mentioned anywhere in your presentation, but

46:30.20] to the extent that we can start to get back to, and really start to

46:35.99] paint that picture around Forward SGF and quality of place, that is the thing that

46:41.61] really, really inspires people as well.

46:43.86] Yes. Great point. And I appreciate the comment again.

46:48.83] The

46:50.51] Forward SGF, definitely in the conversations we've had, I've shared it with the

46:54.86] mayor, Forward SGF from the overall what is the why, what's the objective, does the

46:59.57] staff understand it, was it clear when it was deployed?

47:02.36] I'll still go back to this, is when you have all those inputs coming in, Forward

47:07.16] SGF, I think it gets lost because it's like, "Hey, I want to work on this topic,

47:12.44] this topic."

47:14.93] It's like my dad always taught me, "Quit shooting at the cunning, pick out a

47:17.96] quail." We start doing a lot of different things, and a lot of things just get

47:22.22] lost. And I agree 100% because I think that's the one area that I'd like to get

47:25.61] around with Forward SGF is where are we at? Do they meet it?

47:30.78] So just because it's not in the deck does not mean...

47:33.36] Like I said, I think it's probably how I keep it short and concise, but at the same

47:37.88] time, that is definitely one of those pieces that at the five-year review, I

47:41.39] believe it's due every five years to review it, is that we're at that space as

47:45.44] like, does everyone still understand why?

47:48.05] Do we have the funding to execute some of the work that's outlined in it?

47:51.14] Because that's another element is I think that we're limited on money, but we try

47:56.03] to make up for it with actually adding additional things or projects to it, and I

47:59.42] think there's scope creep to your point,

48:02.15] definitely in Forward SGF, and then some people like, where's their time to

48:05.96] actually work on Forward SGF versus all the other competing pieces.

48:11.30] Random Yesti.

48:12.32] Yes, sir.

48:13.58] Thank you, Councilman Horton, because you just led into the conversation I'm going

48:18.92] to pick up, which is it is a big, complex document, and a lot of work went

48:24.65] into it, Forward SGF, that is. And I see Tim in the room here.

48:29.78] He would preach to us as architects sometimes, we had a very complicated contract

48:35.24] that we would always work with every project that we worked on called the American

48:38.99] Institute of Architects A201 document.

48:41.72] And I think, Tim, you mentioned at some point, maybe that's something you ought to

48:44.90] read every year. At least read through it once to refresh yourself on all the

48:48.89] pieces of it. And I think there's a value in reconnecting and maybe refreshing it

48:53.36] with everybody. But what I want to get to is I really believe this is a great

48:58.58] visual. It is complicated on this end and needs to come clear on that end.

49:04.67] I appreciate your recognition that it's not all about within our city limits.

49:10.40] There's a regional aspect to the growth of our city, and that

49:16.55] there's a couple of pieces of that that I think are really important.

49:20.28] And that is quality of place, which is a central theme of Forward SGF.

49:27.41] We are a core city, and we generate sales tax, property tax within our city to

49:33.03] support our expenses every year and hopefully move them forward.

49:36.44] This is also a fiscal discussion, not just a feel-good discussion, right?

49:41.36] I think our core city element has to continue to grow its economics using quality

49:46.67] of place as the way to retain, attract

49:52.22] residents, but also to stay one step--

49:57.44] Our surrounding communities are actually doing really well,

50:01.34] our bedroom communities. But we've got to stay one step ahead of that so that they

50:05.78] continue to come to Springfield to do some things that they want to do.

50:08.66] And I think the quality of place initiative is central to that idea of keeping

50:14.63] Springfield a core destination, not just for people outside our city, not just for

50:19.11] students and retention, but also for our bedroom communities to see us as a place

50:23.15] to continue to come to.

50:25.53] Mayor McDonald.

50:26.42] Oh, thank you, Mayor. Thank you for your presentation.

50:29.03] It was very enlightening and refreshing to see.

50:33.56] One of the things I wanted to visit with you about is you talked a little bit about

50:38.72] time and capacity.

50:41.78] And one of the things we have been moving as a council body is trying to

50:46.97] direct our personnel resources through what I funnel and

50:52.97] appreciate is through the committee structure.

50:55.76] I think that lends itself to a much more organized way of

51:01.49] addressing issues from the policy standpoint, for the personnel standpoint,

51:07.79] as opposed to what we used to have, every council member pinging-

51:12.80] Yes

51:12.95] ... you and everything. Can you talk a little bit about how that

51:17.57] maybe

51:20.12] has helped in terms of clarity and helped in terms of mission

51:26.60] success?

51:27.89] Yeah. I think that anything that we can do that would move to committee

51:35.18] would be much-- I believe it's helped tremendously.

51:38.28] I think it could be utilized even more.

51:40.53] And it's like, I know you all are busy and have things that are going on, and we're

51:43.41] adding to those agendas, but literally anything that could have those conversations

51:47.54] that the committee could work on or committees can work on.

51:50.99] Because no matter what, if it goes and it's pinging, I still see it that back to

51:56.99] that one slide is we're getting pinged all the time, and it's still happening.

52:01.73] So basically, whenever we're talking about legislation or reviews, it would be

52:05.54] helpful to go to committee because then it puts the department head or the

52:10.97] leadership in kind of in conflict.

52:13.70] We don't want to let the council down, but we still want to be able to deliver the

52:18.44] priority or Forward SGF.

52:22.13] And somewhere there's only so much time and capacity you have.

52:24.78] And if all of a sudden you're working on a specific topic or agenda, it's going to

52:30.66] take away from potentially what staff would be working on.

52:34.01] And I'm going to say this to you. I appreciate the comment and the question.

52:38.30] Staff are very much in favor of having a tier or some sort of system that basically

52:42.41] says, what are we specifically supposed to work on, and understanding what that is

52:47.21] because you get hit from different questions or requests.

52:50.82] How do we stay focused on that? I think anything that's legislative in nature or

52:53.88] requires review or additional pieces, if it would go through committee, would make

52:57.29] it a lot more practical. And I know that there's been changes to do that.

53:01.49] I think it's just very important that that continue and grow.

53:07.64] Other comments?

53:09.92] Mr. Mayor, one more-

53:11.03] Yeah, please

53:11.36] ... one more point because it was brought up, and I know that

53:15.23] Councilman Horton and myself and others, financial sustainability is also not

53:19.49] mentioned in this slide deck. And you just brought it up, Bruce.

53:22.73] So I want to be very clear that, again, I just kind of hit the high points of just

53:27.59] the framework, but also what we're focused on.

53:29.48] But that's not the only thing the manager's office is focused on.

53:32.39] So staff has provided what public safety will work on, but at the same time, what

53:37.43] am I working on specifically is the financial sustainability piece is actually

53:42.03] deploying and actually doing a review, and bringing partners of the community

53:46.55] together, be it a committee, whatever that may be. But we have got to evaluate.

53:51.23] We need to evaluate financial sustainability.

53:53.84] Stormwater was a big topic that's brought up.

53:55.82] Parks is a big topic that's brought up.

53:58.01] So making sure that we're talking about what are the needs to operate the city, to

54:01.82] have the funding to achieve these priorities.

54:04.43] Make no mistake about it, one thing about it is that eventually what I look forward

54:08.30] to is basically, I've said it and I'll say it again, is having priorities that are

54:13.43] funded. But if their funding is not there to do that, we need to have those

54:16.82] discussions as well. I think that's important to evaluate.

54:20.00] Do we have the resources to execute missing middle pilots?

54:23.99] Do we have the resources to actually execute all that's in Forward SGF?

54:28.22] I think they're great ideas, but without funding it's going to be difficult.

54:31.91] And not everything can go right back to the CAB asking for it.

54:35.33] So those projects and those dollars were basically designated in specific projects,

54:39.14] and so seen a lot of that.

54:42.14] Mr. Mayor, other comment?

54:43.70] No. Are there other questions or comments?

54:47.72] We have done a fabulous job of ending in an hour.

54:50.66] Yeah.

54:50.82] Look at that.

54:54.38] All right. Well, then we are adjourned.

54:56.48] Agenda today?

54:57.59] Pardon me?

54:57.95] Is there anything else on the agenda today?

54:59.03] There's nothing else on the agenda today.

55:02.12] Thank you.

55:02.78] Goodbye.