2026-10-20 - Housing Homelessness & Parks

Summary

Park Gift Acceptance Resolutions

3:33-6:12

  • Tupola took three Parks and Recreation gift resolutions together: benches with bronze plaques from two donor families and 12 tennis nets for Central Oahu Regional Park.
  • Laura Thielen thanked the donors. No questions or testimony; each was reported out for adoption.

Bill 57 (2026) CD1 Outdoor court maintenance

6:14-13:12

  • Thielen still objected to the bill after amendments, explaining a three-year gap in outdoor court reconstruction caused by a contract that covered only resealing, and the department's reorganization to prevent a repeat.
  • She asked not to write one recreational use into ordinance and proposed a broader maintenance-cycle provision building on the 2016 Charter amendment.
  • Dylan Armstrong urged collaboration with agencies. The bill was amended to the CD1 and reported out for second reading and public hearing.

Bill 11 (2026) CD1 Affordable housing incentive reporting

13:12-25:19

  • Kevin Auger (Land Management) asked the committee not to advance the bill, calling it costly and not very useful, and pointing to modeling tools already under development.
  • Armstrong asked about cost and data access; Angela Melody Young suggested reusing information developers already file.
  • Tupola said the bill covers only city-provided incentives. It was amended to the CD1 and reported out for third reading.

Bill 18 (2026) CD2 Chapter 32 affordable housing

25:19-48:13

  • Takeuchi Apuna (Planning and Permitting) thanked the chair but raised three remaining concerns: Punchbowl height exception, transitional height setbacks, and fire-safety standards for 60 to 75 foot buildings.
  • Tupola presented the CD2 changes: B1 and B2 districts in transit areas, 75-foot height in the primary urban area and transit areas, floor area ratio from 4 to 5, a new unit-count formula, and property management requirements.
  • Gina Thielen, Martin Win and Abe Parker supported it (Win asked for one change; Parker asked for no amendments). Armstrong supported the higher ratio but opposed transitional setbacks and parking requirements.
  • Amended to the CD2 and reported out for third reading as is; Nishimoto was recorded as a no vote and Tulba had reservations.

Other business

0:25-3:33, 48:13-50:45

  • Opening procedures and testimony rules (Tupola chairing; Nishimoto, Tulba and Dos Santos-Tam present).
  • After a recess the chair said there were not enough members to take votes and postponed action on the last bill of the day (the captions do not name it). Adjourned at about 50:45.

Captions for this video are human-uploaded (all caps) and may contain errors. They run from 00:25 to 50:45, covering the whole meeting, but numbers and names are sometimes garbled.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):

Topic Minutes Share
Bill 18 (2026) CD2 Chapter 32 affordable housing 23 46%
Bill 11 (2026) CD1 Affordable housing incentive reporting 12 24%
Bill 57 (2026) CD1 Outdoor court maintenance 7 14%
Park Gift Acceptance Resolutions 3 5%
Other business 6 11%

Agenda

Bill 11 (2026) CD1 on affordable housing incentives and Parks and Recreation gift acceptance resolutions.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

Human-uploaded captions (all caps); may contain errors. They run from 00:25 to 50:45.

Transcript

00:25♪

00:26♪

00:56>>Chair Tupola: ALOHA GOOD

00:59AFTERNOON.

01:00IT IS 2:32 P.M.

01:02TUESDAY OCTOBER 20, 2026 CALL

01:04MEET EON HOUSING HOMELESSNESS

01:06AND PARKS TO ORDER.

01:07I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME

01:08COUNCILMEMBERS NISHIMOTO,

01:09COUNCILMEMBER IT TULBA, AND

01:11COUNCILMEMBER TYLER DOS-SANTOS

01:12TAM.

01:15KIA'AINA, WATERS, OKIMOTO

01:18EXCUSED.

01:19CORD AIRED WEYER EXECUTED.

01:22TAHITAHITI IMMEDIATE REMOTE

01:25MEETING BY INTERACTIVE

01:25CONFERENCE TECHNOLOGY, WITH

01:26THE FOLLOWING PROCEED NURSE

01:27EFFECTED FOR THE MEETING.

01:29MEMBERS PUBLIC ALLOWED TO

01:30PROVIDE ORAL TESTIMONY ALL I'M

01:31ONLINE AGENDA IN PERSON IN THE

01:35COUNCIL CHAMBER REMOTELY WHEN

01:36EACH AGENDA IS TAKEN UP AND

01:37BOTH AS BOTH ENGLISH AND

01:38HAWAIIAN ARE OFFICIAL

01:39LANGUAGES OF THE STATE OF

01:39HAWAII, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 15

01:40SECTION 4 OF THE HAWAII STATE

01:42CONSTITUTION, SECTION 1-13 OF

01:43THE HAWAII REVISED STATUTES,

01:45MEMBERS PUBLIC MAY TESTIFY IN

01:46EITHER LANGUAGE.

01:47FOR ORAL TESTIMONIES OFFERED

01:48IN OLELO HAWAII, ADDITIONAL

01:50TIME AS MAY BE NECESSARY AL

01:52ALLOWED FOR THE TESTIFIER TO

01:52PROVIDE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF

01:54THEIR TESTIMONY.

01:56BEFORE TESTIFYING EACH PERSON

01:56SHALL STATE THEIR NAME SPEAKER

01:58MAY NOT/ANYONE ELSE READ THEIR

02:00STATEMENT AND LIMITED TO A ONE

02:02MINUTE PRESENTATION ON EACH

02:03ITEM.

02:04ALL PERSONS GIVE REGISTERED

02:06TESTIMONY IN PERSON CALLED

02:07FIRST.

02:07WHEN THE TIMER GOES OFF,

02:08PLEASE CONCLUDE YOUR REM REMARK

02:10PROMPTLY PERSON IS NOT

02:11REGISTERED WILL BE GIVEN

02:12OPPORTUNITY TO TESTIFY FOL

02:13FOLLOWING RENTAL STERTD

02:15TESTIFIERS.

02:16REGISTERED TESTIFIERS.

02:16IN-PERSON TESTIMONY CONCLUDE

02:17PROCEED TO REMOTE TESTIMONY.

02:18ALL PERSONS REGISTER IT

02:20TESTIFY RE REMOTELY BY VIDEO

02:21CONFERENCE OR TELEPHONE CALLED

02:23UPON.

02:25WITH YOUR NAME IS CALLED

02:25MONITOR YOUR SCREEN ACTIVATE

02:27AUDIOFEED WHEN PROMPTED.

02:28TESTIFYING BY TELEPHONE ONLY,

02:30IDENTIFY LAST THREE DIGIT OF

02:32YOUR PHONE NUMBER.

02:33NUMBER CALLED LISTEN FOR THE

02:34PROMPT TO UNMUTE PRESS ST STAR

02:37ANYONE ELSE STANDING BY REM

02:38REMOTELY UTILIZE ZOOM RAISED

02:40HAND BUTTON INDICATE YOUR

02:42DESIRE TO SPEAK.

02:43JOINING US BY TELEPHONE ONLY

02:44PLEASE STAR 9 TO INDICATE YOUR

02:45DISIESH TO SPEAK.

02:47FRIENDLY REMINDERS AND TIPS,

02:48VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM A QUIET

02:49LOCATION IF YOU'RE WATCHING

02:50OLELO, MY YOU THE YOUR

02:51TELEVISION.

02:52WHEN THE TIMER ON THE SCREEN

02:53REACHES ZERO CONCLUDE YOUR

02:54REMARKS PROMPTLY HRS 92-3.7 R

02:57REYEARS ALL VOTES REMOTE

02:59MEETINGS CONDUCTED BY ROLL

03:00CALL UNLESS UNANIMOUS.

03:02I WILL FIRST CALL FOR

03:03OBJECTIONS AND IF THERE ARE

03:04ANY, I WILL CALL FOR ROLL CALL

03:06SRO WRITTEN TESTIMONIES

03:08INCLUDING TESTIFIER'S ADDRESS,

03:09EMAIL ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER

03:11WILL BE AVAILABLE IT PUBLIC AS

03:13DESCRIBED ON THE POSTED AGE

03:15AGENDA. AS COURTESY PLEASE

03:16TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES FOR

03:17THE DURATION OF THIS MEETING.

03:18COUNCILMEMBERS TAKING ITEM

03:18NUMBER 1, 2 AND 3 AND THEN 6

03:21ALL DPR RELATED.

03:22AND THEN WHEELE WHIELENS HANDLE

03:26HOUSING BILLS.

03:27WE'LL HANDLE TWO HOUSE BILLS.

03:28MAKE SURE DPR GETTING TAKEN

03:30CARE OF MOVE ON TO HOUSING.

03:33INDULGENCE, START WITH ITEM

03:35NUMBER 1 RESOLUTION 26-219,

03:38TAKE THEM ALL TOGETHER.

03:41RESOLUTION SEPTEMBER US GIFT

03:42TWO HIGH BACK TRADITIONAL

03:43BENCHES PREPARATION TWO GRO

03:45GROUNDS BRONZE PLAQUES DONATED

03:47BY THE OHANA OF CLARA KWAN AND

03:50DONATED OHANA OF CHAIR KAWANO

03:54TO BE PLATED AT AINA MOANA

03:56PARK IN ALA MOANA REGIONAL

03:58PARK.

03:592 RESOLUTION 26-2 IT 3 ACCEPTS

04:00GIFTS TO THE CITY OF ONE HIGH

04:04BACK TRADITIONAL BENCH,

04:05PREPARATION OF GROUNDS AND ONE

04:06BRONZE PLAQUE WITH INSCRIPTION

04:08TO READ DONATED BY THE FAMILY

04:10OF SERM CHONGCHUA VALUED AT

04:152,718.74 FROM VICTOR CHONGCHUA

04:16PLACEMENT INTEEMP PARK.

04:18NUMBER 3, RESOLUTION 26-2224

04:20ACCEPTS GIFT TO THE CITY

04:23FURNISH AND INSTALL 12 TENNIS

04:24MNETS VALUED 3,769.63 FROM U.H.

04:30S.

04:31IT A I WOULD PACIFIC INK FOR

04:31PATSY T MIMPLEG CENTRAL OAHU

04:32REELING O&M PARK.

04:33WITH US, WE HAVE DIRECTOR

04:34LAURA THIELEN.

04:36PATSY TPATSY PATSY MINK.

04:40>>Testifier: ALOHA COUNCIL

04:41CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE CAN

04:42COMMITTEE.

04:43LAURA THIELEN ON BEHALF OF

04:44PARKS AND RECREATION.

04:46WANT TO GIVE OUR THANKS TO

04:47FAMILIES OF LITTLE I LILLY AND

04:51AND SERM CHONGCHUA.

04:52APPRECIATE THE DONATIONS OF

04:53THE BENCH AND ALSO TO THE U.S.

04:57TA FOR THE DONATIONS OF THE

04:58TENNIS NETS AT CENTRAL OAHU

05:00REGIONAL PARK AND BE HAPPY TO

05:01ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF THERE

05:03ARE ANY.

05:03>>Chair Tupola:

05:04COUNCILMEMBERS ANY QUESTIONS

05:04FOR THE DIRECTOR?

05:05ER SEEING NONE.

05:07GO TO REGISTERED TESTIFIERS.

05:09ANY REGISTERED IN PERSON OR

05:11REMOTE TESTIFIERS?

05:12>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

05:13WE HAVE FOR ITEM NUMBER 4.

05:18ITEM NUMBER 4.

05:20BILL 11.

05:21>>Chair Tupola: OKAY.

05:22>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

05:23SORRY.

05:23ITEM NUMBER 6, TAKE 6 TOGETHER

05:25WITH THIS ONE TOO.

05:27>>Chair Tupola: JUST GO GOING

05:28TO DO ONE, TWO, THREE.

05:30>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

05:30NONE FOR ONE, TWO, THROUGH

05:32THREE.

05:32>>Chair Tupola: PERSONS

05:33WANTING TO TESTIFY ITEMS 1, 2

05:37OR 3?

05:37SEEING NONE.

05:39WE RECOMMEND THAT RESOLUTION

05:4326-219, BE REPORTED OUT FOR

05:45ADOPTION.

05:45ANY DISCUSSION?

05:47ANY OBJE OBJECTIONS ANY

05:48RESERVATIONS?

05:48HEARING NONE SO ORDERED.

05:50RECOMMENDATION FOR ITEM NUMBER

05:522, RESOLUTION 26-2323, CHAIR

05:54RECOMMENDS THAT REPORTED OUT

05:55FOR ADOPTION.

05:56A ANY DISCUSSION?

05:57OBJECTIONS OR RESERVATIONS?

05:59HEARING NONE SO ORDERED.

06:0026-233.

06:01RECOMMENDATION ITEM NUMBER 3,

06:03RESOLUTION 26-2224 BE REPORTED

06:05OUT FOR, 224 REPORTED OUT FOR

06:08ADOPTION.

06:08ANY DISCUSSION?

06:09OBJECTIONS OR RESERVATIONS?

06:10SEEING NONE.

06:10SO ORDERED.

06:12THANK YOU.

06:14GGO FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6.

06:18O BILL AFTER REYEARS

06:19PREPARATION OF CERTAIN

06:20INFORMATION REQUIRES

06:22PREPARATION OF CERTAIN

06:22INFORMATION RELATING TO

06:23OUTDOOR PLAY CLAY COURTS.

06:29CD1.

06:29AMENDMENTS ARE LISTED ON THE

06:30AGENDA.

06:41>>Testifier: LAURA THIELEN.

06:42APPRECIATE INITIATOR OF THE

06:43BILL WHO DID THE AMENDMENTS TO

06:45IT.

06:45HOWEVER, WE STILL DO OBJECT TO

06:47IT.

06:49I WOULD LIKE TO STRESS SOME OF

06:51THE CHANGES THAT WE HAVE MADE

06:52TO ADDRESS THE SITUATION ABOUT

06:53WHY THIS AROSE AND HOW WE ARE

06:56GOING TO BE MOVING FORWARD.

06:57SO FIRST OF ALL, WE HAD A

07:00OUTDOOR COURT CONTRACT THAT WE

07:01WERE USING FOR LITTLE OVER TEN

07:04YEARS.

07:05TO RECONSTRUCT AND RESEAL

07:07OUTDOOR COURTS AND WE DID NE

07:08NEARLY 700 OUTDOOR CAN COURT

07:11RECONSTRUCTION OR RESEALING

07:13OVER A PROBABLY ABOUT A 12

07:14YEAR PERIOD.

07:16ABOUT 3 YEARS AGO, WE WERE

07:17TOLD THAT THAT CONTRACT DID

07:19NOT COVER RECONSTRUCTION.

07:21ONLY RESEALING.

07:22BASICALLY PUTTING THE GOO

07:24SURFACE TO SMOOTH OUT THE

07:25COURT AND REPAINTING IT.

07:27SO WE HAD TO STOP THE

07:28RECONSTRUCTION WHICH WHERE YOU

07:30CLAW THE TOP OFF OF THE COURT.

07:33YOU CAN TAKE OFF MAYBE QUARTER

07:35INCH THE AS FAULT CONCRETE AND

07:37RELAY IT OR YOU CAN GO DOWN TO

07:39THE BASE COURSE, RECOMPACT THE

07:42BASE COURSE, LEVEL IT OUT AND

07:44THEN RECORE THE ENTIRE CORD.

07:44THAT WAS THE WORK THAT WE HAD

07:45TO STOP.

07:45ASPHALT CONCRETE YRN CONTINUE W

07:49THE REDE SEALING CREATE NEW

07:53CONTRACT COURT.

07:53TAKEN 3 YEARS TO GET TO THIS

07:54POINT PURCHASING HAS PUT IT

07:56OUT FOR BID.

07:57NOTIFIED ABOUT TEN DIFFERENT

07:58VENDORS THAT THEY CAN PUT

08:00THEIR NAME ON IT AND THOSE

08:01VENDORS ARE GOING TO HAVE TO

08:02GO THROUGH THE QUALIFICATIONS

08:03WITH PURCHASING, ONCE THAT IS

08:05COMPLETED, WE WILL BE ABLE TO

08:07REUSE THAT CONTRACT.

08:09I TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR IT

08:11TAKING US 3 YEARS TO GET TO

08:12THIS POINT.

08:13WE HAVE MADE SOME CHANGES

08:15WITHIN OUR DEPARTMENT SO THAT

08:16THAT IS NOT REPEAT. WE'VE

08:18MOVER THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE

08:20CONTRACTS OUT OF THE PARKS

08:22MAINTENANCE AND RECREATION

08:23DIVISION.

08:25WE HAVE SET UP MAINTENANCE

08:26SUPPORT SERVICE TO BE ITS OWN

08:27DIVISION AND WE COMPLETED IS

08:28THAT REORGANIZATION.

08:31THEY ARE NOW MANAGING THE

08:33WRITING TO GET THE SCOPE OF

08:35THOSE TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION

08:36CONTRACTS.

08:37SIMILARLY, PURCHASING HAS

08:39MOVED US TO SECTION THAT IS

08:41USED TO HANDLING CONSTRUCTION

08:43CONTRACTS.

08:44SO WE ARE NOW WITH THE SECTION

08:45THAT ALSO DOES THE CIVIL

08:48DIVISION FOR THE FACILITIES

08:49DIVISION AND WE'RE ALREADY S

08:50SEEING A CHANGE IN THOSE TYPES

08:53OF CONTRACTS SO WE DON'T THINK

08:56THAT'S GOING TO BE REPEATED.

08:57QUESTION ARE ASKING THAT YOU

08:58NOT PUT INTO ORDINANCE

09:00REQUIREMENTS ABOUT A SINGLE

09:02TYPE OF RENGO RESERVATION AJ

09:03OPERATION, R RE RECREATIONAL

09:06OPERATION GOING TO SEND A

09:07WRONG MESSAGE PRIMACY OF

09:09IMPORTANCE TO THAT TYPE OF

09:10RECREATIONAL USE, AND WE GIVEN

09:12LISTING IN OUR TESTIMONY, OF

09:15THE SEVERAL DOZEN OTHER TYPES

09:15OF REC RIGS AJ REC RIGSAL FACIL

09:19RESPONSIBLE FOR MAIN BEING TAN

09:23MAINTAINING A REPAIR.

09:24TOOK A ATHLETIC SECTION OF THE

09:24ORDINANCE.

09:26I DO THINK THAT THERE IS A

09:27COMPROMISE WHICH WE COULD WORK

09:29WITH THE COMMITTEE ON DEV

09:31DEVELOPING.

09:31THERE WAS A CHARTER AMENDMENT

09:33IN 2016, WHICH AUTH AUTHORIZE

09:36DDMENT PARKS AND RECREATION TO

09:39DO MINOR, REPAIR MAINTENANCE

09:40AND CAPITOL IMPRO IMPROVEMENTS.

09:42BECAUSE UP UNTIL THEN E WE

09:44WERE RELY LIGHTEN DEPARTMENT

09:46OF DESIGN ANDEN CONSTRUCTION

09:47DO EVERY TIME OF DEPA TYPE OF

09:51DEPARTMENT INCLUDING THIS TYPE

09:53OF CONSTRUCTION.

09:53TAKEN REINSES STARTED TO DO

09:54MORE OF THIS TYPE OF MASTER

09:56CONTRACTS A MINOR CIP AND

09:57LARGE SCALE REMAY PAIR AND

09:59MAINTSZ, IN THE REPAIR AND

10:00MAIFNTS.

10:01LAST 3 AND HALF YEARS, REDONE

10:0540 ROOFS INCLUDING GARBAGE R

10:07LARGE GYMNASIUM AND POOL

10:09COMPLEXES.

10:10MAINTENANCE.

10:11REDONE PARKING LOTS.

10:12WE LO REDO COURTS OF THE

10:15MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PLAY

10:15GROWVES PUTTING IN THREE NEW

10:18PLAYGROUNDS ONE IN THE

10:19INTRODUCER'S NEIGHBORHOOD

10:21GOING TO BE OPENED IN THIS

10:22NEXT WEEK AND LOVELY.

10:23GOING TO HAVE ONE IN YOUR

10:24DISTRICT, CHAIR AND THEN ONE

10:28IN COUNCILMEMBER NISHIMOTO

10:29DISTRICT SOON.

10:29MASTER AGREEMENTS HAVE REALLY

10:31CHANGED OUR ABILITY AND PUT

10:33FORWARD PROBABLY ABOUT

10:36$20 MILLION WORTH OF CONSTRUCT

10:39IMPROVEMENTS THAT FALL INTO

10:40THIS CATEGORY OF MINOR CIP.

10:41ITY WE COULD COME FE FORWARD WI

10:45A PROPOSAL FOR A AMENDING THIS

10:46SECTION, WHICH WOULD GIVE

10:48FURTHER DEFINITION IT THAT

10:49CHARTER PROVISION AND THEN PUT

10:51THE, DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBLE

10:54FOR MOUNTAINING A CYCLE

10:57MAINTAINING CYCLE OF THESE

10:59TYPE OF MINOR CAPITOL

11:00IMPROVEMENTS LARGE SCALE

11:01REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE TO

11:03REACTION AMENITIES ACROSS THE

11:05BOARD INCLUDING BUT NOT LI

11:07LIMITED TO PROVIDE LISTING OF

11:08IMPROVEMENTS WHICH WOULD

11:09INCLUDE OUTDOOR COURTS.

11:11>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

11:11SO MUCH.

11:12I APPRECIATE IT.

11:13I WILL SAY THATTER ARE, THE

11:14DIFFERENCE THAT YOU MADE IN

11:16TRTRYING TO INTERPRET AND

11:18TAKEAWAY BEAURACACY UNNEEDED

11:22NOTICED.

11:22NOT MAYBE NOT BY EVERYONE,

11:24NOTICED BY ME.

11:25NOTICED IN MY DISTRICT THAT

11:26SOME OF THE CHANGES, YOU GUYS

11:28ARE DOING WITHIN MSS, MINOR

11:31CIP IS SO IMPORTANT STR GO TO

11:34DO.

11:35DC FOR ALL OF THESE PROJECTS.

11:36THANK YOU FOR DELINEATING

11:38THAT. AND DEFINITELY LOOKING

11:39FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU ON

11:41YOUR PROPOSED EDITS THANK YOU

11:44DIRECTOR.

11:44ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED

11:45TESTIFIERS?

11:47>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

11:47CHAIR YES, WE HAVE DILLON

11:48ARMSTRONG.

11:50>>Chair Tupola: MR

11:51MR. ARMSTRONG.

11:51PLEASE PROCEED.

11:53REAC>>Testifier: ALOHA.

11:56MEMBERS COMMIT EEVMENT DILLON

11:57ARMSTRONG INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY.

11:59I DIDN'T A E LAB Y ELABORATE MU

12:03THIS BILL.

12:05DON'TDON'T NEIL THE NEED TO AT

12:06TIME.

12:07I WOULD ONLY NOTE THAT I

12:08ALWAYS ENCOURAGE COLLABORATION

12:09WITH THE IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES

12:11AS YOU, FURTHER REFINE YOUR

12:14LEGISLATION.

12:14AND I HOPE THAT EVERYONE COMES

12:15TO AMENABLE FINAL DRAFT.

12:18AND WITH THAT, THANK YOU.

12:20>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

12:21MR. ARMSTRONG.

12:22NO QUESTIONS ANY OTHER PERSONS

12:23WISHING TO TESTIFY ON THIS

12:25MEASURE?

12:25BILL 657.

12:26SEEING NONE, 57.

12:29LOOK FORWARD TO WHEREBY

12:29WONDERINGING WITH DIRECTOR

12:30THIELEN I THINK SO FAR, GREAT

12:32FRIENDSHIP.

12:33WORKING WITH DIRECTOR THIELEN.

12:34EVERYTHING WE'RE DOING HELP

12:35YOU GUYS TO BE ABLE TO SERVICE

12:36OUR PARKS BETTER.

12:38SO EXCITED FOR SOME OF

12:39UPCOMING IMPROVEMENTS.

12:40SO WE'RE GOING TO WORK FORGOT.

12:41AND THEN WHEN IT COMES BACK

12:43SECOND READING MAKE SURE THESE

12:44THEDDIES WITH FOR THE NEXT VOTE.

12:47WORK TOGETHER.

12:47CHAIR RECOMMENDS BILL 57 BE

12:48AMENDED TO THE POSTED CD1 AS

12:50IDENTIFIED O.

12:51CS2026, 0613 AND ANY

12:54DISCUSSION?

12:54OBJECTIONS OR RESERVATIONS?

12:56THIS BILL HAS BEEN AMEN TO DO

12:57A CD1.

12:58AMEND.

12:59CLEM REMAINEDS THAT BILL 57,

13:022026 RECOMMENDS.

13:03ROT OUT PASSAGE SECOND READING

13:06SAND PUBLIC HEARING.

13:08ANY DISCUSSION, ANY OBJECTIONS

13:10OR RESERVATIONS?

13:11HEARING NONE.

13:11SO ORDERED.

13:12THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

13:12GO TO ITEM NUMBER 4.

13:18BILL 11 REQUIRES REPORTING

13:20AFFORDABLE HOUSING INSIN

13:21TESTIFIES TO CITY COUNCIL

13:21INCENTIVE.

13:23PROPOSED, POSTS CD1 THAT I

13:25SUBMIT THE FOR YOUR

13:26INFORMATION.

13:26THE EAS AMENDMENTS LIST ON AGEN

13:28WITH US.

13:29WE HAVE DIRECTOR KEVIN AUGER.

13:39U DIRECTOR USING LAND

13:40MANAGEMENT.

13:41APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO

13:41TESTIFY ON BILL 11.

13:43PROPOSED CD1.

13:46STATING DCH DEPARTMENT AND

13:48ADMINISTRATION SHARE COUNCIL'S

13:49VIEW THAT'S PUBLIC DISEEBS TO

13:52KNOW WHETHER THE CITY GETTING

13:52A GOOD VALUE FROM THE HOUSING

13:53INCENTIVE -- -S HOUSE COUCH A

13:58PRO*FIES.

13:58CHIEF CONCERN WON'T PROVIDE

13:59MUCH THAT IS TRULY USEFUL AND

14:01DO SO GREAT EXPENSE.

14:04STATED PURPOSE OF BILL 11 IS

14:05TO REQUIRE REPORTING OF

14:07AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES

14:07TO CITY COUNCIL.

14:10BUT THE BREATH OF THE BILL IS

14:12PROBLEMATIC.

14:12SCANSIVE DEFINITION OF

14:14AFFORDABLE HOUSING, EXPANSIVE.

14:16OFFERED FOR, SALE OR FOR RENT,

14:19TO HOUSEHOLDS EARNING 140% OR

14:21BELOW THE AMI, AREA MEDIAN

14:23INCOME.

14:24WOULD COVER HOMES LIVED IN BY

14:26CLOSED 3 QUARTERS OF OAHU A HE

14:29IS POPULATION.

14:30INCLUDING FOR EXAMPLE, FAMILY

14:31OF FOUR ERRING UP TO $215,000.

14:34A YEAR.

14:35ERPING UP TO, DEFINITION OF,

14:37INCENTIVES EARNING UP TO) FOR

14:39EXAMPLE INCLUDE VARIANCE GRANT

14:40THE BECAUSE OF A LOT IS

14:44UNUSUALLY SHAPED OR STEEP.

14:45THE BILL WOULD REQUIRE

14:45DETERMINATION OF THE VALUE OF

14:46THAT SPECIFIC VARIANCE.

14:48AND IT WITH ALSO REQUIRE

14:49THOUSANDS OF SIMILAR VALU

14:51VALUATIONS ON SO-CALLED

14:52INCENTIVES SIMPLE FEE WAIVER

14:56EXPEDITED PERMITTING, TO

14:58PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

14:59AGREEMENTS.

15:00IT WOULD HE REQUIRE NOT JUST

15:02TO ASSEMBLE CURRENT

15:03INFORMATION BUT ALL PAST

15:05INFORMATION FOR EACH PROJECT.

15:07IN ENDS BILL WOULD REQUIRE

15:09DHHL TO PRODUCE SEMION WAIL

15:11BASIS A LARGE LEDGER OF EVERY

15:13SINGLE HOUSING PROJECT.

15:15SEMI-ANNUAL JRNLINGS JRNLINGS

15:15BUILT IN THE CITY WITH UNITS

15:17OFFERED TO HOUSEHOLDS AT OR

15:18BELOW 140% OF THE AMI THEN

15:22ATTEMPT TO VALUE EACH AND

15:23EVERY INCENTIVE EACH PROJECT

15:25RECEIVES.

15:27THIS WOULD YOU ESTIMATED

15:28DOLLAR VALUES NONMONITARY SIN

15:31EINISIININCENTIVE MEG TO REACH,

15:37VALUE CITY AND DEVELOPER.

15:39REQUIRING DEPARTMENT TO GO

15:41BACK IN TIME TO DETERMINE

15:41THOSE VALUES, AND TEMPT THAT

15:44KIND OF ANALYSIS PROJECT BY

15:46PROJECT BASIS BETTER BUSINESS

15:47BUREAU HIBTDIVELY EXPENSIVE.

15:50PROHIBITIVELY.

15:51ENDLESSER R AND END TO WHAT END.

15:55IF THE ACTUAL INTENT OF BILL

15:56IS TO ASSESS WHETHER CITY GETS

16:00A GOOD BANNING FOR THE BUCK

16:01WHEN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT INIS

16:01EPIC TESTIFIES, IT WENT

16:02REQUIRE R EN INCENTIVESSER

16:08ACQUIRING PRECIOUS RESOURCES.

16:10CENTRAL QUESTION ATTEMPT 20G

16:11ANSWER FOR ANY INCENTIVE

16:13PROVIDED, WHETHER IT'S MADE A

16:16DIFFERENCE OR WHETHER IT

16:17CHANGED OUTCOMES.

16:19WHETHER THE PROJECT OR

16:20AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS WOULD

16:21HAVE BEEN BUILT ANY WAY.

16:24BLOLEDGER CANDIDATE ANSWER THAT

16:24QUESTION.

16:25ANSWER REQUIRES NOTHING WHAT

16:27THE DEVELOPER COULD HAVE BUILT

16:29UNDER ORDINARY RULES WHAT

16:31TIMELINE AND WITH WHAT FIN

16:32FINANCING.

16:32ALL OF WHICH VARY BY

16:33NEIGHBORHOOD, PROJECT TYPE AND

16:35MARKET CYCLE.

16:37LEDGER CAN'T ANSWER THAT

16:38QUESTION.

16:38INSTEAD WE BELIEVE IT'S MORE

16:39FEASIBLE TO DETERMINE PROGRAM

16:40LEVEL.

16:41BY MODELING PROJECTSING ON

16:44CONSISTENT ASSUMPTIONS COM

16:45COMPARING OUTCOMES, WITH AND

16:47WITHOUT INCENTIVE, AND EXA

16:49EXAMINING RESULTS BEFORE AND

16:50AFTER POLICY CHANGES.

16:52THIS WORK IS ALREADY UNDERWAY.

16:55REQUEST T SUPPORT OF DHLM UHERO

16:58DEVELOPED PROTOTYPE PARCEL

16:59LEVEL FINANCIAL MODEL TESTS

17:01WHETHER HOUSING IS FEASIBLE,

17:02WITH AND WITHOUT GIVEN

17:04INCENTIVE.

17:05IN THE BILL 7 CHAPTER 32

17:07CONTEXT, UHERO APPLIED MODEL

17:11TO 62 SAMUEL SMALL URBAN

17:14PARCELLS.

17:14MOST WITH INFEASIBLE UNDER

17:16STANDARD ZONING BUT MANY

17:18BECAME FEASIBLE WITH CHAPTER

17:1932 INCENTIVES.

17:21RAISING EXPECTED PROD PRODUCTIO

17:22FROM ROUGHLY 100 UNITS TO NE

17:25NEARLY 1700.

17:26CURRENT PROTOTYPE MODEL HAS

17:27ITS LIMITS.

17:28IT CAN'T ASSESS EVERY TIME OF

17:29INCENTIVE.

17:30AND IT'S RESULTS DEPEND ON A

17:32SUNLTSES ABOUT RENT IT'S, CO

17:34COSTS AND INTEREST RAYS.

17:35ASSUMASSUMRATES BUT STRONG FOUN

17:39BUILDING ON THIS MODEL SIMILAR

17:40TOOLS WOULD SERVE PUBLIC FAR

17:42BETTER THAN INSISTING NEW

17:44TIME-CONSUMING REPORTING

17:45REQUIREMENT THAT IS NOT

17:46DESIGNED TO REVEAL WHETHER THE

17:47CITY HOSE HOUSING INACCEPT

17:50TESTIFIERS -- INCENTIVES ARE

17:51TRULY WORK.

17:5130 YEARS AGO OFFICE OF COUNCIL

17:53SERVICE, PUBLISHED ISSUE BRIEF

17:56ON REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, OF

17:58CITY AGENCY.

17:58FOUND THAT AS OF JANUARY 1995,

18:0173 REPORTS REQUIRED.

18:04THERE ARE NOW THROWS KHRO*

18:04ESSER TO 80.

18:06BILL 11 WOULD ADD ANOTHER.

18:08CLOSER TO 11.

18:08CONCERNED COUNCIL TO FOUR

18:10QUESTIONS PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF

18:12NEW REPORTS.

18:15NUMBER 1, TO THE BENEFIT O

18:17OUTWEIGH PRO APPROPRIATION COST.

18:18NUMBER 2, HOW FREQUENTLY

18:20SHOULD REPORTS BE PRO PREPARED?

18:22NUMBER 3, SHOULD THE REPORTING

18:23REQUIRES CODIFIED IN ORDI

18:26ORDINANCE?

18:27NUMBER 4, HOW WILL COUNCIL USE

18:29REPORTS IN ENSURE REQUIREMENTS

18:31CONTINUE TO BE WORTHWHILE?

18:33I THINK IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO

18:35ASK THOSE QUESTIONS HERE.

18:36BILL 11 WAS INTRODUCED WITHOUT

18:37INPUT OR DISCUSSION WITH DHLM

18:41AND NOT BEEN REVISED TO

18:42PROVIDE FOR ANY OF OUR COM

18:44COMMENTS CONCERNS OR FEEDBACK

18:46SINCE INTRODUCTION.

18:47BASED ON FOREGOING, RES

18:49RESPECTFULLY ASK THE COMMITTEE

18:51NOT TO ADVANCE BILL 11 AND

18:54CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE

18:54DEPARTMENT TO FURTHER REFINE

18:55THE TOOLS, WE ARE ALREADY

18:56DEVELOPING TO DETERMINE

18:58WHETHER OR NOT CITY AND ITS

19:00TAXPAYORS ARE GETTING GOOD

19:01VALUE FROM HOUSING INCENTIVES

19:04THAT COUNCIL APPROVES.

19:05WWE ARE OPEN FOR FOCUSING ON

19:08SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ABOUT

19:09SPECIFIC PROGRAMS OR INCE

19:11INCENTIVES.

19:12ESTABLISHING PERMITTED

19:13INTERACTION GROUP OR INFORMAL

19:15CONVERSATION TO GET A GOOD

19:16UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOST

19:17IMPACTFUL PLACES TO

19:19CONCENTRATE OUR EFFORTS.

19:20AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE

19:21INFORMATION NEEDED TO ASSESS

19:24PARTICULAR EXISTS.

19:28BILL 11 PRIME EXAMPLE OF U

19:30UNNEED BUREAUCRACY.

19:32REVREAR-VIEW MIRRORRER

19:34REQUIREMENT COP ASSUME

19:36PRESSURES DEPARTMENT CAPACITY

19:37KNEEING LIVE I IMPACT

19:37STRATEGIC PLAN FEE NEGATIVELY

19:40IMPACT STRATEGIC PLAN TO

19:42DELIVER MORE AFFORDABLE

19:42HOUSING.

19:43FORWARD LOOKING IN EFFORTS TO

19:44ENSURE THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING

19:46INCENTIVE THAT IS COUNCIL

19:48LIKES TO APPROVE CAN ACHIEVE

19:49THEIR DESEARED RESULT.

19:50MAHALO FOR YOUREL

19:51CONSIDERATION.

19:53DESIRED RESULTS.

19:53>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

19:54SO MUCH.

19:54FEW FOLLOW-UP IT QUESTIONS THE

19:55APP THEN IF THE COUNCIL HAS A

19:58DID DO THINK YOU MIGHT BE

19:58READING FROM THIS SEPTEMBER

19:59LETTER THAT WAS SENT TO THE

20:01COMMITTEE BUT IN OWL ALL OF

20:02THE LETTERS THAT YOU GUYS

20:03CENTS FROM MARCH AND SEPT

20:04SEPTEMBER, THERE WERE NO

20:06AMENDMENTS SUGGESTED.

20:07YOU KIND OF ALLUDED TO SOME

20:08WHEN YOU SPEAKING.

20:09DO YOU GUYS HAVE A LIST OF

20:10SUGGESTED AMEN AMENDMENTS FOR T

20:13PARTICULAR BILL?

20:14>>Testifier: HAPPY TO FOLLOW

20:14UP WITH THE CHAIR.

20:16TO PROVIDE THOSE TO YOU.

20:18>>Chair Tupola: OKAY.

20:23YEAH?

20:24OKAY.

20:25>>Testifier: WE DON'T LIKE

20:26THE BILL AT ALL FUNDAMENTALLY.

20:28>>Chair Tupola: I DON'T

20:29THINK APPROPRIATE APPROACH.

20:29>>Chair Tupola: I HEARD

20:30YOUR COMMENTS.

20:31I DID SEND TO THE BILL TO

20:33DOCTOR BOND HO'OMAU AT UHERO

20:34ASKING IF INTERACT TIF MAP

20:36WOULD RESOLVE OR ANSWER SOME

20:37OF THESE QUESTIONS.

20:39AT UHERO.

20:39LOOKED AT THE INTERACTIVE MAP.

20:41MIGHT DO IT FOR US.

20:42>>Testifier: NUMBER TOOLS

20:43THAT WE'VE BEEN DEVELOPING

20:44OVER THE LAST YEAR.

20:46THAT WE'RE ABOUT TO ROLLING

20:47OUT I THINK MANY OF THEM WILL

20:48HELP TO SIRI SO TO SOLVE MAN TH.

20:53BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD WITH

20:54BILL 11 APPRECIATE OPPORTUNITY

20:57TO SHARE THOSE WITH YOU AND

20:59SSEE IF TOOLS MIGHT ALREADY

21:00EXIST.

21:00>>Chair Tupola: OKAY.

21:00THANK VERY MUCHMENT

21:01COUNCILMEMBER ANY QUESTIONS?

21:02SEEING NONE THANK YOU SO MUCH.

21:05, ANY REGISTERED TESTIFIERS?

21:08>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

21:08YES, WE DO SNOOSM OKAY.

21:10LET'S PROCEED.

21:11>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

21:12WE DO.

21:13>>Chair Tupola: PROCEED

21:13WITH MR. ARMSTRONG.

21:17>>Testifier: MAHALO NUI LOW

21:18A DILLON ARMSTRONG COMMENTING

21:20INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY.

21:22I DO VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THE

21:23INTENT OF BILL 11.

21:26TWO SETS OF QUESTIONS LEALVES

21:27TO T RELATES CURRENT DISCUSSION

21:30AND TESTIMONY WRITTEN WHICH I

21:31ALREADY REVIEWED FIRST IS,

21:34HAWAII IN THE SUBMITTED VERY

21:35SUBSTANTIVE TESTIMONY RAISED

21:38THE ABSOLUTELY RELEVANT

21:41PROBLEM THAT'S UNCLEAR HOW

21:43MUCH WOULD BE NEEDED IN TERMS

21:44OF RESOURCES FOR THE

21:45DEPARTMENT TO BE ABLE TO

21:47IMPLEMENT THIS LEGISLATION AND

21:49DOGS THE DIRECTOR WHO IS WITH

21:52US AT THE TIME, IN THIS HE

21:53HEARING, DOES HE AND

21:55INDICATION WHAT KIND OF STAFF

21:56HOUR AND ADDITIONAL EXPENSES

21:57SUCH AS LICENSES FOR SOFTWARE,

22:02IN KIND EXPENSES, T ET ET ALL

22:06WOULD BE ROUGHER ESTIMATE OF

22:06THE COST OF IMPLEMENT A THIS

22:08BILL?

22:08SECOND QUESTION HAS TO DO WITH

22:11ACTUAL ORAL TESTIMONY JUST

22:14PROVIDED.

22:14NOW, IF THIS IS SOME SORT OF

22:16INTERACTIVE MAP THROUGH GOO HE

22:18OWE GRAPHIC INFORMATION SYS

22:21SYSTEM, I WOULD RACES THE

22:21QUESTION -- GEOGRAPH.

22:22>>Testifier: HOLLIS DATA SET

22:23THAT COULD BE PROVIDED FOR

22:24FREE TO THE PUBLIC?

22:26IF IT WAS ACCEL BASED,

22:28ANALYSIS, MODEL, FEMA HAS A

22:30BENEFIT IT COST ESTIMATOR THAT

22:33CAN BE DOWNLOADED BY ANYONE IN

22:36THE PUBLIC AND USED IN THAT

22:39MANNER.

22:39I'M ALL FOR INCREASING DATA

22:40TRANSPARENCY.

22:40WITHOUT INCREASING BUREA

22:43BUREAUCRACY.

22:43>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

22:44SO MUCH.

22:45ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO TESTIFY

22:49IN THIS MATTER?

22:50ALREADY.

22:50GO AHEAD.

22:50MISS H MILLION DID I YOUNG.

22:51>>Testifier: ANGELA MELODY

22:52YOUNG.

22:52CARES.

22:54MISS MELODY YOUNG.

22:55COMMENTING.

22:56NEITHER IN SUPPORT OR IN

22:57OPPOSITION.

22:58ONE THING I WAS THINKING ABOUT

23:00TOO WAS FOR THE COUNCIL AND

23:04THE LAND MANAGEMENT OFFICE, TO

23:05CONSIDER WHETHER THESE REP

23:07REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WOULD

23:08CREATE ADDITIONAL

23:08ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN.

23:11BECAUSE I THINK THAT TO MAKE

23:11IT WORK, THEORETICALLY YOU

23:13COULD SIMPLIFY THE PROCESS BY

23:14HAVING DEVELOPERS PROVIDE

23:16INSIGHT ON DATA, TO PROVIDE

23:18INFORMATION THEY ALREADY

23:19PREPARE FOR EXISTING CITY

23:20APPLICATIONS.

23:21FINANCING, TAX INCENTIVES

23:23AFFORDABLE HOUSING, COMPL

23:24COMPLIANCE, FORMS, RATHER THAN

23:26REQUIRING THE LAND MANAGEMENT

23:29OFFICE TO CREATE ENTIRELY NEW

23:30REPORTING SYSTEM.

23:33SO AND THIS WILL MAKE IT

23:34EASIER TO S SYNCHRONIZE AND

23:35INTEGRATE THE DATA.

23:36BUT ALSO HAVE TO INTEGRATE THE

23:38DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION

23:40TECHNOLOGY TO CREATE ALGORITHM

23:42TO PRODUCE THE DATA NEEDED TO

23:45READ THE METRICS OF WHAT

23:45INCENTIVES ARE TIED TO PRO

23:46PRODUCING THE MOST LIVABLE

23:48HOUSING PROJECTS WITH THE MOST

23:49MASK PLUM BEN BIT FIT TO THE

23:52STATE AND COUNTY.

23:52AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE BILL

23:54CLARIFIES.

23:55MAX BENEFIT.

23:56SEEKING CLARIFICATION.

23:58DOES IT NEED STATE'S

23:59DEPARTMENT.

24:00HHFDC ALSO AWARDS AND FUNDS

24:02PROJECTS.

24:03SO IN THEORY, TO MAKE IT WORK,

24:05YOU WOULD IDEA EYE HAVE TO ALL

24:09THESE DEPARTMENTS OFFICES WO

24:10WORKING TOGETHER COOPERATIVE

24:11WILL I DO DEVELOP A PROGRAM,

24:14TO INTEGRATE THESE DATA POI

24:17POINTS, AND ALSO, I THINK IT

24:23IS HARDER TO.

24:23>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU.

24:25>>Testifier: -- DATA.

24:26WE HAVE ELECTRONIC FORMS IN

24:27THIS SUNSCREEN RAG, MAKE IT

24:29YEARS.

24:30IN THIS GENERATION MAKES IT

24:31EASIER THAT THANK YOU.

24:33ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO TESTIFY

24:36ON THIS IT ITEM?

24:38NOT REGISTERED.

24:38SEEING NONE.

24:38WE'LL CLOSE DISCUSSION.

24:40COUNCILMEMBERS ANY DISCUSSION?

24:41I DO THINK WANT TO CLARIFY,

24:43SOMETHING THAT YOU BROUGHT UP.

24:45WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CITY FU

24:47FUNDS FOR CITY GRANTS, BONDS

24:49AN FUNDING.

24:50NOT TRYING TO COLLECT YOU WILL

24:52A INCENTIVES THROUGHOUT THE

24:54UNIVERSE.

24:54JUST THE ONES IN THE CITY THAT

24:56WE ARE GIVING OUT.

24:58HOW WE CAN REPORT BACK TO OUR

24:58CONSTITUENTS, HOW WE'RE TRYING

25:00TO INCENTIVIZE AFFORDABLE

25:01HOUSING.

25:02WITH THAT BEING SAID, CHAIR

25:02RECOMMEND THAT IS BILL 11 BE

25:03AMEND TO POSTED CD1.

25:05IDENTIFIED OCS2026,-0393, ANY

25:08DISCUSSIONS?

25:09OBJECTIONS?

25:09RESERVATIONS?

25:10MARE THIS BILL P BEEN AMENDED

25:11TO CD1.

25:12CHAIR THEN RECOMMEND THAT IS

25:13BILL 11, CD1 BE REPORTED OUT

25:15PASSAGE THIRD READING.

25:16ANY DISCUSSION?

25:17ANY OBJECTIONS?

25:18RESERVATIONS?

25:19HEARING NONE.

25:19SO ORDERED.

25:29AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

25:29KAGAWA 25, COMMITTEE PROVES

25:32CD1 VERSION OF THE BILL.

25:33POSTPONED.

25:36DIESES ANTIBODIED PROPOSED

25:38HANDCARRIED--DISTRIBUTED HO

25:43PROPOSED HANDCARRIED VERSION.

25:46OCS2026-0613/10/14/2026 MAKES

25:54AMENAMENAMENDMENTS LISTED ON AG.

25:58DAWN TAKEUCHI APUNA.

25:59>>Testifier: ALOHA CHAIR.

26:06MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE DAWN

26:07TAKEUCHI APUNA DPP, FIRST I

26:09ALIKE TO RECOGNIZE CHAIR THANK

26:10YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HARD WORK

26:13ON THIS BILL.

26:14I KNOW TALK A LOT OF EFFORT TO

26:16SPEAK TO ALL THE DIFFERENT

26:19STAKEHOLDERS AND TRYING TO

26:19FIND BALANCE.

26:20SO I HAVE SOME COMMENTS ON THE

26:22CURRENT VERSION.

26:24DPP SHARES YOUR GOAL OF

26:25INCREASING AFFORDABLE HOUSING

26:26PRODUCTION, AND RISES

26:28IMPORTANCE OF ENSURING THAT

26:29DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DO NOT

26:31UNNECESSARILY IMPEDE VIABLE

26:33PROJECTS.

26:33WE ALSO APPRECIATE THE

26:34AMENDMENTS IN THE CD2 THAT

26:37ADDRESSES SEVERAL OF OUR

26:38EARLIER CONCERNS.

26:39HOWEVER, THREE ISSUES REMAIN.

26:41WE BELIEVE WARRANT FURTHER

26:42CONSIDERATION.

26:44NUMBER 1, PUNCHBOWL SPECIAL

26:46DISTRICT HEIGHT PROTECTIONS.

26:48WE APPRECIATE THAT CD2

26:49GENERALLY PRESERVES UNDERLYING

26:51ZONING HEIGHT LIMITS IN

26:54SPECIAL DISTRICTS INCLUDING

26:55DIAMOND HEAD.

26:55HOWEVER WE REMAIN CONCERNED

26:57ABOUT THE EXCEPTION FOR PUB

26:59PUBLIC.

27:00RECOPUNCHBOWL.

27:02EXISTING HEIGHT PRECINCTS VARY

27:05CONSIDERABLY AND MAY LIMIT

27:07DEVELOPMENT COMM OPPORTUNITIES

27:08CERTAIN PROPERTIES.

27:09HEIGHT LIMITS ARE NOT

27:10ARBITRARY, BUT REFLECT

27:12LONGSTANDING PLANNING DECI

27:14DECISIONS INTENDED TO PROTECT

27:16VIEWS OF PUNCHBOWL AND THE

27:18SURROUNDING COMMUNITY.

27:19PROTECTION OF THESE

27:20COMMUNITIES DEFINING FEATURES

27:22REMAINS OBJECTIVE OF THE CI

27:23CITY'S ADOPTED PLANS AND

27:24POLICIES.

27:26OUR CONCERN IS NOT

27:27HYPOTHETICAL.

27:28EXISTING CHAPTER 32

27:29DEVELOPMENTS HAVE ALREADY

27:31DEMONSTRATED VISUAL IMPACT

27:33ALLOWING BUILDING TO EXCEED

27:35UNDERLYING HEIGHT LIMITS.

27:36ADDITIONAL PROJECTS ATHLETIC A

27:38LONG PROSPECT STREET PROSPECT

27:41STREET AND WITHIN VIEWSHED

27:43BETWEEN PUNCHBOWL AND DIAMOND

27:44HEAD COULD FURTHER AFFECT

27:46THESE IMPORTANT VIEWS. DPP

27:48SUPPORTED INCREASING ALLOWABLE

27:49HEIGHT TO 75 FEET.

27:51OUTSIDE SPES DISTRIBUTES

27:53COMPROMISE PROVIDED UNDERLYING

27:57HEIGHT PROTECTIONS WITHIN

27:57SPECIAL DISTRICTS WERE

27:58MAINTAINED.

28:00WE THEREFORE CONTINUE TO

28:00REQUEST DELETION OF PUNCHBOWL

28:03EXCEPTIONS SO THAT CHAPTER 32

28:04PERJP32 PROJECTS W W WITHIN THE

28:10SUBDIVISION SUBJECTS TO

28:11UNDERLYING ZONING.

28:12TRANSITIONAL HEIGHT SETBACKS.

28:13WE UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS

28:14THAT TRANSITIONAL HEIGHT

28:16SETBACKS COULD REDUCE

28:17DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY

28:18PARTICULARLY ON SMALLER

28:20PROPERTIES.

28:21HOWEVER, THESE SETBACKS SERVE

28:23IMPORTANT PURPOSE IN

28:24MITIGATING THE IMPACTS OF

28:25ATOLLER BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT

28:28RESIDENTIAL INTO THES. TAL

28:29TALLERMENT IMPACT E'O IMPACTS

28:30TO LIGHT, AIR VIEW AND

28:32NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER.

28:35CD2 ESTABLISHES SETBACKS ONLY

28:36FOR BUILDING EXCEEDING 75 F

28:38FTEs FIGHT.

28:41UP TO 75 FEET -- 75 FEET.

28:43COULD BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT

28:44THOSE ADDITIONAL HEIGHT

28:45SETBACKS, EVEN WHEN ADJOINING

28:47LOWER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

28:51PROPERTIES.

28:53GIVEN THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN

28:54ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT,

28:57ELIMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM

28:58BUILDING COVERAGE RESTRICTION

28:59AND INCREASE IN F.A.R. WITHIN

29:01THE PRIMARY URBAN CENTER, THE

29:03KUMABE HAD A TIF IMPACTS ON

29:05ADJACENT PROPERTIES CUMULATIVE

29:07WARRANT CONSIDERATION.

29:09WE CONTINUE TO RECOMMEND

29:10RETAINING REASONABLE

29:11TRANSITIONAL HEIGHT SETBACKS A

29:14JASON DON'T RESIDENTIAL ZONING

29:17DISTRICTS AND APPLYING THE

29:17PROPOSED CHAPTER 32 HEIGHT

29:19SETBACKS BEGINNING 60 FEET

29:21RATHER THAN 75 FEET.

29:22-- ADJACENT TO) NUMBER 3,

29:24BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

29:25STANDARDS AND LIFE SAFETY, WE

29:27APPRECIATE THAT CD2 REMOVES

29:29CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE BUYER

29:30PROTECTION PROVISIONS AND

29:32CLARIFIES APPLICABILITY OF

29:33REMAINING CONSTRUCTION

29:34STANDARDS.

29:35HOWEVER, WE CONTINUE TO HAVE

29:36CONCERNS ABOUT EXTENDING THE

29:39ALTERNATIVE FIRE RESISTANCE

29:40RATED CONSTRUCTION.

29:42AND FIRE ESCAPE STAIR

29:44STANDARDS IN ROH SECTION 32,

29:483.2A2 AND C, FROM 60 FEET TO

29:5175 FEET.

29:52THESE ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

29:53HAVE NOT BEEN SUFFICIENTLY

29:55DEMONSTRATE TO PROVIDE

29:56EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF LIFE

29:58SAFETY AT THE EXISTING 60 FEET

30:00THRESHOLD.

30:01EXTENDING THEIR APPLICATION TO

30:02TOLETALLER BUILDINGS WITHOUT A

30:06SUPPORTING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

30:07RAISES ADDITIONAL CONCERNS FOR

30:09OCCOCCUPANCY EMERGENCY RESPONSE

30:12AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITY.

30:15WE RECOGNIZE THAT 70-FOOT

30:16THRESHOLD IS ASSOCIATED WITH

30:18HIGHRISE PROVISIONS OF THE

30:20BUILDING CODE.

30:21HOWEVER, THE HIGHRISE

30:22CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON THE

30:23HEIGHT OF THE HIGHEST OCCUPIED

30:27FLOOR OF A LOWEST LEVEL OF

30:29FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ACC

30:30ACCESS.

30:30WHICH IS NOT NECESSARILY THE

30:31SAME AS OVERALL BIDDING HEI

30:33HEIGHT.

30:33MORE IMPORTANTLY, BUILDING

30:34HEIGHT.

30:35REMAINING BELOW HIGHRISE

30:36THRESHOLD DOES NOT BY ITSELF

30:38ESTABLISH THAT ALTERNATIVE

30:39CONSTRUCTION AND EGRESS

30:41STANDARDS PROVIDED IN

30:42EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTE

30:43PROTECTION.

30:44DID.

30:45P.

30:45P CONTINUES TO RECOMMEND

30:46RETAINING THE 60-FOOT

30:47LIMITATION, IN SECTIONS 32,

30:513.2A2 AND C, UNLESS TECHNICAL

30:54LIFE SAFETY ANALYSIS

30:55DEMONSTRATES THAT EXTENDING

30:57THESE ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS TO

31:0075 FEET WILL IN THE COMPROMISE

31:02OCCUPANT OR EMERGENCY RES

31:04RESPONDERS SAFETY.

31:05OR OUR INTENT IS NOT PROHIBIT

31:0775-FOOT AFFORDABLE HOUSING

31:07PROJECTS.

31:08BUT TO ENSURE THAT TOLE TALLER

31:10BUILDINGS COMPLY WITH

31:11APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION.

31:12AND LIFE SAFETY STANDARDS.

31:15THAT THOSE ARE MY COMMENT AND

31:16WE'RE HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

31:17THANK YOU.

31:18>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

31:18DIRECTOR.

31:20THANK FOR READING MY LETTER.

31:20I CAN TELL YOU DID.

31:22JUST REAL QUICK, I WANT TO SAY

31:25WE MIGHT HAVE TO TOUCH BASE

31:26BECAUSE THE TRANSITIONAL

31:27HEIGHT SETBACK IS STILL THERE.

31:28BUT MAYBE THERE IS SOMETHING

31:30DIFFERENT BUT I DID LEAVE

31:32TRADITIONAL HEIGHT SETBACK

31:33WHERE ZONING LOTS ADJOIN ZO

31:35ZONING LOT RESIDENTIAL ZONING

31:37DISTRICT.

31:43OKAY.

31:44THAT IS THE ONLY ONE.

31:45THE OTHER ONES THAT YOU READ,

31:46I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BUT

31:47I FEEL LIKE THAT ONE, I JUST

31:49HAD A LITTLE BIT OF THOUGHT.

31:50MAYBE WE CAN TALK OFFLINE

31:52ABOUT THAT.

31:53WE'RE GETTING REALLY NERDIE

31:54AND TECHNICAL ABOUT THIS.

31:56IS THAT OKAY?

31:56>>Testifier: YES.

31:58>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU.

31:58THTHANK YOU DIRECTOR.

32:00COUNCILMEMBER QUESTIONS FOR

32:01DIRECTOR?

32:03SEEING NONE.

32:04BEFORE WE TAKE TESTIMONY,

32:05WE'RE GOING TO REVIEW THE

32:07POWERPOINT.

32:08JUST GOES OVER WHAT WE'RE

32:09DOING WITH THE CD2.

32:11THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE

32:12DISCUSSING TODAY.

32:13THANK YOU COMMITTEE MEMBERS

32:14FOR YOUR PATIENCE.

32:15THANK YOU TO MY OF IS IT A AND

32:16THANK YOU FOR DPP FOR THE

32:18MULTIPLE MEETINGS ON THIS.

32:19MY STAFF AND FOR EVERYONE ELSE

32:21ON THE MEETINGS.

32:22SO THIS IS THE CURRENT VERSION

32:24THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING.

32:24NEXT SLIDE.

32:40FIRST SLIDE.

33:20THANK YOU.

33:22SO QUICKLY, WE HAVE 224 UNITS

33:24THAT ARE CURRENTLY BUILT.

33:25WITH A POTENTIAL OF MAYBE 18

33:281800.

33:28THERE ARE OPEN 6 CERTIFICATES

33:31OF OCCUPANCY SILL.

33:32THREE WHAT ARE COMING AND 22

33:34BUILDING PERMIT THAT IS HAVE

33:35BEEN ISSUED.

33:36OCCUPANCY STILL.

33:37NEXT, OKAY, SO FAR, I'VE TAKEN

33:4226 MEETINGS ON THIS BILL.

33:44WITH VARYING PEOPLE WITH

33:45NEIGHBORHOODS, TO NEIGHBORHOOD

33:46BOARD MEMBERS, GOVERNMENT

33:48AGENCIES, DEVELOPERS UHERO

33:49INCLUDED.

33:50DHLM, DPP AS H AS WELL AS MAYOR

33:53ADMINISTRATION.

33:55NEXT.

33:58OUR GOAL IS IT TRYING TO BUILD

33:59HOUSING BUILD IT RIGHT, BUILD

34:03COMMUNITY, BEEN VERY, VERY

34:03DIFFICULT TO STRIKE A BALANCE

34:04WITH ALL OF THAT.

34:04NEXT.

34:07SO IF WE CAN, BUILD MORE

34:09HOUSING.

34:11HOUSING PROCONSTRUCTION BUT

34:14PROCOMMUNITY ENTIT AT THE SAME

34:18EDITION OF B1, B2 BUSINESS

34:21DISCOING SUGGESTED BY

34:22COMMITTEE MEMBER DEFINITELY

34:23FEW OF US IN COMMITTEE THAT WE

34:25DO NOT HAVE ANY OF THESE

34:28PROJECTS AWAY WOULD LIKE THAT.

34:28SO ADDING B1, B2 IN THE T.O.D.

34:30AREAS AS WELL AS ADDING T.O.D.

34:33DEVELOPMENT PLANNED AREAS, NOT

34:34JUST T.O.D. DEVELOPMENT AREAS.

34:37FLENEXT.

34:38FOR EVERYTHING OUTSIDE THE

34:39PRIMARY URBAN A AREA, IT IS 60

34:46ZONING AN WHATEVER IS SHORTER

34:47FOR THE PRIMARY URBAN AREA, AS

34:49WELL AS TRANSIT-ORIENTED

34:51DEVELOPMENT AREAS, THE 75 FEET

34:52UNDERLYING ZONING WIND FARM IS

34:57GREATER.

34:57AND THAT INCLUDES PUNCHBOWL

34:58AND WAIKIKI SPECIAL DISTRICT

34:59AREAS IN PRIMARY URBAN AREA.

35:02WHICHEVER IS GREATER.

35:04FLOOR AREA RATIO IN THESE,

35:06PRIMARY URBAN AREA IS INCR

35:08INCREASED TO 5.

35:09HIGHEST FLOOR AREA RATIO WITH

35:11HAVE ANYWHERE IN DOWNTOWN

35:12HONOLULU IS 7.5.

35:14SO IT'S ONE F.A.R. MORE THAN

35:16THE CURRENT F.A.R. OF FOUR.

35:20UNIT COUNT HAS A NEW FORMULA.

35:22THAT IS DETERMINED BY WHETHER

35:25OR NOT IT'S CLOSE TO A BUS

35:26STOP OR FAR FROM A BUS STOP.

35:28WITH THE ELIGIBILITY OR THE

35:30NUMBER OF UNITS BEING LOT AREA

35:33DIVIDED BY 120 OR 130.

35:34THAT IS THE BREAKDOWN OF HOW

35:35THE UNITS WOULD BE DECIDED IN

35:37THE EXAMPLE OF 10,000 SQUARE

35:40FOOT ALOHA LOT.

35:41NEXT.

35:43EFFICIENCY DWELL DWELLING UNIT

35:45WAS A MEETING WITH THE DEV

35:48DEVELOPERS AND THE

35:48ADMINISTRATION, IN REGARDS TO

35:49THE LACK OF DEFINITION OF TH

35:50THIS.

35:50AND SO THE DEFINITION IS BEING

35:51DEFINED IN THIS BILL OF WHAT

35:54EFFICIENCY UNIT IS WHICH IS

35:55THE 170 CURRENTLY, EXISTING

35:58CODE REFERENCES 220 FEET FOR

36:00EFFICIENCY, BUT THEY'RE ALSO

36:02WAS NOR PART OF THE CODE THAT

36:03ALLOWS FOR 190 SQUARE FEET OF

36:06HABITABLE SPACE WHICH WOULD BE

36:08THE BEDROOM AT 70 AND LI LIVING

36:12ROOM AT 120.

36:12SO THIS IS JUST CLARIFYING.

36:13NEXT.

36:14HEIGHT SETBACKS THEY'RE LISTED

36:17HERE.

36:19APPLIES TO ANY BUILDINGS THAT

36:20OVER 75 FEET.

36:20MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS

36:21SETBACK SIMILAR TO WHAT WE

36:22HAVE FOR OTHER BUILDINGS THAT

36:24HAVE THE ADDITIONAL HEIGHT.

36:27EFFECTIVE DATE.

36:28VERBIAGE WAS GIVEN TO US DPP

36:31HOW TO SMOOTHLY TRANSITION.

36:32SO ANYBODY THAT USES THE LAW

36:36IF PASSED CANNOT USE A

36:38COMBINATION OF BOTH LAWS.

36:39THEY HAVE EITHER GO WITH THE

36:41PREVIOUS CHAPTER 32 OR THE

36:43MOVING FORWARD CHAPTER 32.

36:45NEXT.

36:48TRYING TO BUILD IT RIGHT.

36:49NEXT.

36:51ENCOURAGING PARKING WITHOUT

36:53IMPOSING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

36:55DEFINITELY WE'RE TRYING TO I

36:56AM ENCOURAGE ALL DEVELOPERS OF

36:57THIS TO BE MINDFUL OF THE FACT

37:00THAT THE BOTTOM FLOOR BEING

37:03UTILIZED FOR PACKING A WE

37:04ELEVATOR SHAFT WOULD BE

37:05ENCOURAGED.

37:06AS WE AS FOR THOSE AREAS WHERE

37:08THE CITY HAS ABILITY TO DO

37:11ON-STREET PARKING.

37:11I HAVE MET WITH DTS ABOUT TH

37:12THIS.

37:13AS WELL AS EMPTY LOTS WHERE WE

37:14COULD DO SURFACE STREET

37:17PARKING TO ASSIST BECAUSE

37:18THESE SMALL PROJECTS,

37:20DEFINITELY THE CITY COULD HELP

37:21WITH INFRASTRUCTURE WHERE WE

37:24CAN.

37:24SAFETY STANDARDS, WE REMOVED

37:28CONSTRUCTION TYPES PIPING

37:29MATERIAL, FIRE PREPROTECTION

37:31SYSTEMS HANDFUL OF FIRE

37:32EXEMPTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN

37:33REMOVED AND MANY OF THE

37:35DEVELOPERS SAID THIS THEY

37:36ALREADY FOLLOWED THAT CLA

37:38CLARIFIES THE FIRE ESCAPE

37:40STAIR REQUIREMENTS, AND

37:41MAINTAINS ANYTHING RELATING TO

37:43EGRESS, EXAMP EXTERIOR GRASS AN

37:47SMOKE ALARMS.

37:49EXTERIOR GLASS.

37:50MET WITH A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE

37:52THAT LAS VEGAS WOLFPACK THESE

37:53BUILDS TO ASK MAY HE THIS

37:54THOUGHT THAT LIVE WITHIN THESE

37:55BUILDINGS ASK THAT THEY

37:58THOUGHT ABOUT THEIR EXPER

37:59EXPERIENCE.

37:59INCREASING LOT SIZE, WAS

38:00DEFINITELY INTENDED FOR US TO

38:01BE ABLE TO HAVE MORE PARKING

38:03FOR THESE STRUCTURES.

38:05I WILL SAY THAT THE PEOPLE

38:05HAWAII MET WITH LIKE THE

38:07PARKING WHO I MET WITH LIKE

38:09THE PARK AND WANT THE PARK.

38:11ENCOURAGING ALL DEVELOPERS TO,

38:12TAKE IN THEIR FEEDBACK BECAUSE

38:15DEFINITELY WE WANT TO CREATE

38:16HABITABLE COMMUNITIES SPACES.

38:18PROPERTY MANAGEMENT.

38:20EVEN THOUGH DPP CANNOT ENFORCE

38:21THIS, I WROTE IT INTO THE BI

38:23BILL.

38:24AND ALL DEVELOPERS CURRENTLY

38:24MOVING BILL 7 PROJECTS HAVE

38:26AGREED.

38:26THAT HAVING A PROFESSIONAL

38:27PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

38:2924-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT, AND

38:32HAVING IT PUBLICLY POSTED IS

38:35SOMETHING THAT EVERYONE CAN D

38:35DO.

38:36THE AREAS WHERE WE HAVE HAD

38:37ISSUES HAS BEEN HANDC HARD TIME

38:39THE COMMUNITY TO CONTACT THE

38:40DEVELOPERS SO THIS IS THE BEST

38:42WAY FORWARD.

38:44REFUSE LOADING AN CORNER LOTS.

38:46WAS CLARIFIED IN THIS BILL.

38:48AND THIS WAS I BELIEVE

38:50DISCUSSION THAT THE DEVELOPERS

38:51HAD WITH DPP.

38:53ON CLARIFYING THIS STANDARD.

38:55AND THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT

38:57HAVE NOT CHANGED.

38:58AND STILL REMAIN IN CHAPTER 3

38:5932.

39:00WE DID NOT TOUCH ANY OF THE

39:01GRANDS SEX DID IS.

39:03DID NOT CHANGE -- GRANTS

39:04SUBSUBSIDIES.

39:06DO NOT CHANGE SUNSET DATE OR

39:08PARK REQUIREMENT OR ELEVATOR

39:09REQUIREMENT ALREADY REQUIRED

39:10FOR THE REGULAR BUILDING COAT

39:12CODE THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT

39:14WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY.

39:16VERY SMALL EDDIES MAYBE T.O.D.

39:18AND THE EDITS MAYBE T.O.D. AND

39:22B1, B2 NEW HE IS ONES SOME OF

39:24THE STUFF THAT DIRECTOR

39:24BROUGHT UP THAT WE CAN, TALK

39:25ON AFTER OFFLINE.

39:27SO CLERK DO WE/ANYONE HERE IN

39:29PERSON WISHING TO TESTIFY?

39:30>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

39:31YES, WE DO.

39:32>>Chair Tupola: OKAY.

39:32START OFF WITH GINA THIELEN.

39:36PLEASE.

39:40>>Testifier: ALOHA CHAIR.

39:42MEMBERS COMMITTEE.

39:42GINA THIELEN.

39:44I AM HERE TO TESTIFY ONE

39:47EQUIVOCAL SUPPORT FOR BILL 18.

39:51A LITTLE BIT DISTANT O INTS

39:52E'O APPOINTING TO HERE SOME OF

39:53THE-A DISAPPOINTING TO HEAR

39:56MANY SOME OBJECTIONS COMING

39:57FROM DPP.

39:57GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT

39:58HAS BEEN INVESTED.

39:59BY CHAIR AND ALL VARIOUS

40:01STOCKHOLDERS TO ARRIVE AT AN

40:03TRUE COMPROMISE WHICH WHAT

40:05THIS BILL IS.

40:06WHILE THERE MAYBE THINGS

40:07INDIVIDUALLY IN HERE THAT I

40:07MIGHT OBJECT TO, I BELIEVE

40:09THAT THIS BILL IS COMPROMISED

40:12LEGISLATION TAKES INTO ACCOUNT

40:14ALL OF THE BROADEST CONCERNS

40:17OF THE MANY STAKES HOLDERS

40:18INVOLVED.

40:18DUI WANT TO TAKE A MINUTE TO

40:20ADDRESS CHAPTER P 2 AND

40:21AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

40:2232.

40:23BECAUSE, IT HAS GROWN INCR

40:25INCRYINGLY FRUSTRATING FOR ME

40:26SOMEONE TASKED -- INCREASE

40:29CREEINGLY L WITH THE

40:29RESPONSIBILITY TO SEE THESE

40:31PROJECTS MOVE FORWARD.

40:32INCREASINGLY SEEING HEAD WINDS

40:34IN TERMS OF, LAMB COSTS

40:37CONSTRUCTION COSTS FINANCING

40:37COSTS, WITH INTEREST RATES

40:39CONTINUING TO RISE, THIS

40:41PROGRAM IS OUTSTANDING PRO

40:43PROGRAM.

40:43PROVIDES MUCH NEEDED

40:45AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE

40:46PEOPLE OF OAHU.

40:47AND IT DOES SO ALMOST NO COST

40:49TO THE CITY & COUNTY OF

40:50HONOLULU.

40:52SO I WOULD REALLY STRONGLY

40:54URGE THE REMAINING MEMBERS OF

40:56THE COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THIS

40:59LEGISLATION.

40:59AND MOVE IT FORWARD.

41:01THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

41:02>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

41:02MISS THIELEN.

41:03NEXT UP WE HAVE MR. MARTIN W

41:05WIN.

41:14>>Testifier: ALOHA CHAIR.

41:15MEMBER COMMITTEE. PRINCIPAL

41:18URBAN REAL ESTATE HE WILL HA

41:19HAVED, DEVELOPING TWO PROJECTS

41:23UNDER CHAPTER 32.

41:25IN WAIKIKI.

41:25GENERALLY STAND ON MY WRITTEN

41:27TESTIMONY.

41:28BUT I DO WANT TO MENTION THAT

41:30SPECIFICALLY, FOR ANY SPECIAL

41:32DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMITS I WOULD

41:34STRONGLY RECOMMEND REMOVING

41:37ANY LESSER OR LESSER OF

41:40LANGUAGE AND IMPOSING CAP ON

41:43TOP OF THE EXISTING SPECIAL

41:44DISTRICT.

41:45DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

41:46SPECIAL DISTRICTS AS DIRECTOR

41:48APUNA MENTIONED, GOES THROUGH

41:50CAREFUL CONSIDERATION FOR

41:53BUILT ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT

41:55STANDARD.

41:56SO RATHER THAN IMPOSING

41:57ADDITIONAL CEILING ON THE

41:58DEVELOPMENT STANDARD, WITHIN

42:00SPECIAL DISTRICTS, PROBABLY

42:02THE BEST WHAT IS TO KEEP IT AS

42:05WHAT SPECIAL DISTRICTS STATE.

42:09OTHERWISE, OVERALL, I WANT TO

42:10SAY, HOW EXC EXCITED I AM ABOUT

42:11CHAPTER 32.

42:12AND EVOLUTION OF THE PROGRAM.

42:14OBVIOUSLY SEEING A LOT OF NEW

42:17PROJECTS BEING BUILT AND ALL

42:18SORT OF COLORS ALL DIFFERENT

42:20FLAVORS AND JUST REALLY WANTED

42:22TO THANK THE COUNCIL AND

42:24DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, REST OF

42:25THE COMMUNITY, AND

42:27PARTICULARLY THE

42:28ADMINISTRATION, STAFF FOR

42:28EVERYTHING WE'VE DONE TO GET

42:29TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY.

42:30MAHALO.

42:31>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

42:31SO MUCH.

42:33I WAS ABLE TO VISIT HIS

42:34PROJECT ON 1615 ALA WAI.

42:35DIDN'T KNOW, GRAFFITID ABANDON

42:38BUILDING AN NOW, IT IS

42:41DEMOLISHED AND HOPEFULLY GOING

42:42TO BE BILL 7 PROJECT.

42:44CRCROSSING OUR FINGER.

42:45NEXT WE HAVE MR. SAM KIM.

42:49OBJECTING.

42:50NEXT WE HAVE MR. DILLON

42:51ARMSTRONG.

42:54>>Testifier: MAHALO CHAIR.

42:55TUPOLA.

42:56I WANT TO SAY IN MY INDIVIDUAL

42:57CAPACITY, WHILE I AM COM

43:00COMMENTING THIS BILL DEATH

43:00RATELY APPRECIATE THE EFF

43:01EFFORT -- THIS BILL GREATLY

43:03APPRECIATE THE EFFORT YOU PUT

43:04INTO THE LEG WORK, COMMUNITY

43:05MEETINGS THOUGHTFULNESS OF THE

43:06CHANGES I AM OLD, WITH THE

43:09RESTRICTION OF MY TIME, GOING

43:10TO FOCUS ON THINGS THAT I FEEL

43:12HAVE NOT YET BEEN ADDRESSED IN

43:15COMMENT TEAR YOU.

43:17ABSOLUTELY SUPPORT INCREASING

43:17F.A.R. FROM 4 TO 5.

43:18I WOULD POTENTIALLY SUPPORT

43:19GREATGREAT OF INCREASE.

43:23DO NOT ECHO THE DPP DIRECTOR'S

43:25COMMENTS AS IT RELATES TO THE

43:29TRANSITIONAL HEIGHT SETBACK.

43:30I THINK THAT IS UNNECESSARY

43:30RESTRICTION ON DEVELOPERS. I

43:31DO HAVE A VISION FOR

43:34NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION.

43:34THERE ARE WAYS OF ACCOM

43:35ACCOMPLISHING THAT IN AREAS

43:36WHERE THAT IS SENSITIVE ISSUE.

43:38I WOULD ALSO ADD THAT I DO

43:39STRONGLY OPPOSE OFF-STREET

43:42PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR

43:42AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

43:44I THINK THIS IS NOT ONLY DR

43:45DRIVING UP OUR DEVELOPMENT

43:46COSTS, IT'S ABSOLUTELY

43:47CONTRARY TO YOUR DESPERATE

43:49NEED TO INCREASE REVENUE FORCE

43:50THE BUS.

43:53AND FOR RAIL.

43:53AND I'M NOT ANTI-PARKING NOT

43:54AUNTY CAR.

43:55WHEN WE IMPROVE TRANSIT

43:57UTIOUT ALOH

43:59ALOHA THE UTI UTILIZATION WE

44:01IMPROVE EVERY DRIVER'S COM

44:02COMMUTE.

44:02I COULD ELABORATE.

44:04>>Chair Tupola: NO PARKING

44:05REQUIREMENT BUT I DO, INTENDED

44:09TO JUST ENSURE THAT THERE IS

44:10PARKING AVAILABLE WHERE WE CAN

44:11DO IT ON THE CITY'S STREETS.

44:14THTHANK YOU.

44:14ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO TESTIFY

44:15WWHO IS UNREGISTERED?

44:20COME UP TO PODIUM AND INTREE

44:21YUINTRODUCE YOURSELF.

44:27>>Testifier: ALOHA CHAIR

44:29TUPOLA.

44:30COMMITTEE MEMBERS.

44:32ABE PARKER WITH WUFAT AND

44:36MOUMAUNA KEA MARKETPLACE

44:37AFFORDABLE RENTAL.

44:40SUPPORT PROPOSED CD IT AND

44:41BILL 18.

44:42URGE COUNCIL TO PASS WITHOUT

44:44AMENDMENTS.

44:44OAHU DOES NOT HAVE SHORTAGE OF

44:48IDEA OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

44:51WE HAVE A SHORTAGE OF PROJECTS

44:52THAT CAN BE BUILT.

44:55WE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IS TOO

44:57HIGH.

44:58AND ECONOMY DOES NOT WORK.

44:59PROJECTS STALLS. AND PROBABLY

45:03CONTINUE TO AGE, DESPERATELY

45:07WE NEEDED HOUSING, NEVER

45:08DELIVERED.

45:10SIT CD2 ADDRESS THE PROBLEM

45:12WITH THREE KEYS.

45:13FIRST KEY, IS 75-FOOT BILLING

45:16HEIGHT.

45:17STAYING WITHIN THE HEIGHT,

45:18HELPS AVOID SUBSTANTIAL

45:20ADDITIONAL COSTS ASSOCIATED

45:22WITH HIGHRISE CONSTRUCTION.

45:25SECOND, F.A.R. 5.0.

45:28BOY.

45:29IT'S GREAT.

45:30SO I REMEMBER FIRST ONE HELP

45:33WRITE THE BILL 7.

45:354.0, 5.0.

45:36YOU GUYS GOT IT.

45:37THIRD, INCREASING THE DENSITY

45:40UNIT DESTINAT DESTI DENSITIES.

45:45THE THIS IS YOU ARE JENSEN.

45:48WI-URGENT.

45:50-- REPORTED MORE ON THAT 50%

45:51OF THE OAHU RENTERS ARE RENT

45:54BURDENED.

45:56WHILE SLIGHTLY MORE THAN 200

46:00MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPERS WERE

46:01PERMIT THE ISLAND.

46:03WIDE OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS.

46:05MOST IMPORTANTLY, C CD2 CAN

46:10CHANGE WHAT HAPPENED ON THE

46:11GROUND.

46:13WE CANNOT BUILD AFFORDABLE

46:14HOUSING WITH RULE THAT IS MA

46:16MAKES PROJECTS IMPOSSIBLE TO

46:18FINANCE.

46:19WE NEEDED PRACTICAL POLICIES

46:21THAT MAKES HOUSING POSSIBLE.

46:23AND C CD2 DOES THAT.

46:25THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

46:25>>Chair Tupola: THANK YOU

46:26FOR YOUR FACE MASK.

46:27ANYONE HE WISHING TO TESTIFY

46:28THANK YOU FOR YOUR TESTIMONY.

46:29ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO TESTIFY

46:30NOT REGISTERED?

46:34CLERK ANYONE ONLINE WISHING TO

46:34TESTIFY?

46:36>>Council Clerk: CHAIR,

46:36THERE ARE NONE.

46:37>>Chair Tupola: OSHA OKAY

46:37THANK YOU SO MUCH. COMMITTEE,

46:38ANY DISCUSSION?

46:43SEEING NONE.

46:44DISCUSS OR AMEND THE BILL.

46:46SO I DO BELIEVE I ALREADY

46:47RECAPPED WHERE WE ARE.

46:49CHAIR RECOMMENDS THAT BILL 18

46:50CD1 BE AMENDED TO THE

46:51HANDCARRIED CD1.

46:52AS IDENTIFIED OCS2026-0647.

46:58>> ANY DISCUSSION?

46:59ANY OBJECTIONS?

47:01NO VOTE FOR COUNCILMEMBER

47:03NISHIMOTO.

47:04ANY RESERVATIONS?

47:05THIS RESERVATIONS FOR

47:08COUNCILMEMBER TULBA.

47:09AMENDED TO CD2.

47:10CHAIR RECOMMEND AS BILL 18 CD2

47:14BE REPORTED OUT PASSAGE THIRD

47:15READING.

47:15ANY DISCUSSION?

47:16ANY OBJECTIONS?

47:21NO FOR COUNCILMEMBER NISH

47:24NISHIMOTO.

47:42OKAY.

47:44SO BASICALLY, WE WE'RE GOING P

47:45OUT BILL 18, 026 AS IS.

47:48AND CHAIR SAMUEL LEMMO THAT

47:49BILL 18, 2026D CHAIR RECO

47:53RECOMMENDS CURRENT R CURRENT

47:53CRERGS CD2 PASSAGE THIRD

47:55READING.

47:55ANY DISCUSSION?

47:56ANY OBJECTIONS?

47:57ANY RESTS REZ.

47:58>> NO VOTE NO ANY RESERV

48:00RESERVATIONS.

48:00NO VOTE FOR COUNCILMEMBER

48:01NISHIMOTO.

48:02RESERVATIONS FROM

48:03COUNCILMEMBER TULBA.

48:04OKAY, WITH THAT BEING SAID,

48:05BILL 18 IS NOW REPORTED OUT

48:09PASSAGE THIRD READING A AS IS.

48:13FIN

48:37SORRY.

48:39WE NEED TO TAKE A RECESS.

48:39RECESS.

48:40(RECESS).

49:23MAPLO

49:48♪

50:19>>Chair Tupola: ON OKAY CHAIR

50:28CALLS COMMITTEE BACK TO ORDER.

50:30OKAY, WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH

50:31COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO TAKE VO

50:32VOTES TODAY.

50:33AND DEFINITELY FLAT

50:34FLAT -- PROJECTED IS NO ONE

50:35LEFT IN THIS BUILDING.

50:36NO ONE ELSE. POSTPONE ACTION

50:38ON LAST BILL OF THE DAY.

50:39AND SEEING THAT WE HAVE NO

50:41OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION

50:42DISCUSSION THIS MEETING IS NOW

50:43ADJOURNED.

50:45>>(ADJOURNED).

50:45♪