2026-09-16 - Development Review Board

00:13Welcome everybody. We're going to get

00:16started. Uh welcome to the September

00:1816th meeting of the Waterberry

00:20Development Review Board. My name is

00:22Alex Toltoy. I'm the vice chair, but

00:24I'll be chairing this meeting tonight.

00:26Um, we are a seven member board. Um, we

00:30only have, as of right now, we have

00:32four. We will probably have five present

00:35in a in a minute. Um, any approval

00:37requires four votes in the affirmative.

00:40If at any point the applicant wishes to

00:42continue the hearing to a future date

00:43when more members may be present, they

00:46may request a continuence at any time

00:47before closing the public hearing. Um,

00:51at this point, I'll ask board members to

00:53introduce themselves.

00:56David, start with uh Dave Rogers, DRB

00:58member.

00:59>> Wilson, DRB member.

01:01>> Brooks Fortune.

01:05>> Want to let everyone know that this

01:06meeting is recorded and the recording

01:08becomes part of the public record. Um,

01:11for each application, I'll announce the

01:13applicant from part of the agenda, have

01:15the applicant and consultants introduce

01:17themselves, ask if there are any members

01:19uh of the public that wish to be heard,

01:22and then uh any staff, and we'll ask

01:26questions. Then I'll ask for the current

01:29applicant to come on up for tonight's

01:31meeting. We only have one meeting or one

01:34application.

01:39right here.

01:41>> Yes, please.

01:42>> You introduce yourself, please.

01:43>> France Shetman.

01:46>> Thank you. Uh,

01:48>> ladies in the back, do you wish to speak

01:50tonight?

01:51>> Um, well, I'm

01:53>> No, sorry. Behind you.

01:56>> Not necessarily.

01:58[laughter]

01:59>> Well, if you want, I'll just ask you to

02:00raise your right hand. Um,

02:02>> we have one uh one person attending on

02:04Zoom as well. Uh, if anybody on Zoom

02:07wishes to speak tonight, um, I'll ask

02:09you to raise your right hand so we can

02:11swear you in. Do you swear that the

02:13evidence you shall give to this board

02:14shall be the truth, the whole truth, and

02:16nothing but the truth?

02:17>> Yes.

02:18>> Okay.

02:20Um, I saw that the butter notices were

02:23received. Um,

02:26so at this point, I'll ask Francine to

02:28present your application.

02:31So when we originally came before the

02:33board um we were we were able to secure

02:38a variance to build a single family

02:40residence at 35 um Sunset Drive. Uh

02:44there was in the variance a condition

02:47that required us to come back to the

02:50design review board to have me take a

02:53look at what our plans are for

02:55utilities.

02:56And um that's what I'm here to do. Um,

02:59basically I don't know what you need to

03:02know about the property or anything, but

03:05currently the guarantee [clears throat]

03:06is going to be here.

03:09We're we're like to secure this final

03:12permit is really why I'm here. We had a

03:16few people who were interested in

03:17purchasing and building on this lot. And

03:19I thought

03:22I'm I'm very new at this. I thought we

03:23actually have done everything with the

03:25variance but didn't realize this was one

03:27possible piece that we're doing here.

03:30>> Gotcha. Can you tell us a little bit

03:32about the utilities that you're planning

03:33on bringing in?

03:35>> Pardon me.

03:35>> Which utilities? I saw water.

03:38>> Sorry. So it's a we currently the we

03:40have a designed um engineer designed

03:42inland septic. So that's not coming in.

03:45We have water we would like to connect

03:48to the town water which we have access

03:50to and we also have utilities which

03:53would be electricity

03:55maybe padium I don't anymore

03:58>> sure works out there and basically

04:01that's what we're looking at those would

04:03be underground

04:07>> um you have anything you want to add

04:10>> um just note that the permit for the

04:13single family residents uh has expired.

04:15So any future um builder on the site

04:19would need to go through that permit

04:20process again for the dwelling

04:22>> for

04:24date

04:26um

04:27on the utility

04:31construction.

04:33I'm assuming that's going to go where

04:35the green dots are.

04:39>> That's my understanding. This is what um

04:42I think our engineers told us would be

04:44the best one.

04:45>> Okay.

04:46>> There's another view

04:49here

04:52with the green dots.

04:55>> Cheryl, [clears throat] can you go back

04:55to the moon?

04:56>> Yeah, absolutely.

04:57>> Thank you.

05:00>> Um so I know you had the rightway there

05:03to get to the lot.

05:06Um, I guess they went in a straight line

05:09to run the water line out there of the

05:12second set of green dots on the left.

05:15Um,

05:20how much

05:22off the road is that going to be where

05:26it's above the the rightway going in?

05:30>> Um,

05:31>> see where the green dot kind of goes

05:33>> straight across the road. My

05:35understanding quite honest what I

05:37understand is a 12 perk right away that

05:39we currently have sunset drive a bus to

05:43that land that right away it actually

05:45[clears throat] is right on the sunset.

05:48So what you have there

05:51uh going across is basically tail land.

05:54We come across the right of way goes

05:57across 100 to the

06:00>> okay

06:01>> to behind um where you see it crossing

06:04one of our boundaries. Um

06:08they're my understanding is the

06:10engineers

06:13have explained to me how they need to

06:15separate all the wires. I can go either

06:17straight down or across depending on my

06:20distances

06:22required. So I'm assuming

06:24um that that green dot may be

06:27approximate. I think once I get in there

06:29I don't know what you're doing as far as

06:31distance.

06:33>> Okay.

06:34>> But the entire piece would be within

06:36that 12t but it would be under the right

06:40is here. I think I

06:43>> Yeah, I think I remember this and I

06:46think it does run like alongside sunset.

06:48>> Yeah,

06:49>> basically about sunset run,

06:52>> but they're going to come across that if

06:53we have our line of sight coming or it

06:56goes out into the development area.

07:01Um I don't want any more questions at

07:04this point or

07:08>> but

07:09yeah remember this from before and you

07:14know a big concern was this 12T right

07:17away which is very unusual. Usually

07:21there's,

07:23you know, 20 to 50 ft and you have fair

07:27amount of buffer clearance to the

07:29utilities that are in the rightway.

07:32[clears throat] In this case, it's

07:34really nothing. Once you're done putting

07:35road in and you're ditching to the side

07:39of the runoff, you don't have much left.

07:43And I guess one of my big concerns is uh

07:47the drawing looks really schematic. I

07:49mean, there's no there's no real

07:53dimensioning or anything. And u I'm very

07:57concerned about uh Ramy and Deie

08:01Martin's house there and how close it

08:03may be. I mean, I'm not so sure this

08:06right away is actually shown where it

08:08is. If anything, I think it should be

08:11state in the area of that house so

08:15people can see. And I think we need to

08:17know if there needs to be some more

08:19screening implemented.

08:21You know, one of the things with uh

08:23[clears throat]

08:24figure rightways is so you can clear

08:27along the edges any kind of trees that

08:29are in danger of falling over and

08:31everything else. In this case, you'd

08:33have to go in someone else's property

08:34and get permission. And

08:37I don't know. I know this has been

08:39existing for years since it was cow

08:41path, but uh

08:44I mean

08:46I'm really concerned that uh the owner

08:50is talking about an engineer and this

08:53obviously isn't an engineer drawing. So

08:55I wonder where this came from. I mean

08:57it's really schematic at this point and

09:00uh I guess I'd like to see something a

09:03little more detailed.

09:05And uh we're talking about a crown in

09:08the middle of the rightway. Well, that's

09:10fine, but that means there's going to be

09:13water going to each side of the

09:15driveway. Where is it going? How's it

09:18handled? I know there's a wetland area

09:20down here on the lower section. Uh how's

09:23that handled? I mean, [clears throat]

09:26we need some more details personally.

09:31>> Can I respond?

09:32>> Yeah, of course. So this this was was

09:34not just a handdrawn. This was an

09:36engineer surveyor Todd Hill. He did all

09:39this work. Um it's a blow up of this

09:42session which was part that we are

09:45talking about

09:47um for for this variance. Um I I need to

09:51remind you that we do have a variance

09:53for this single family

09:57and I did not come here today to reargue

10:00that. I'm not prepared to.

10:02>> Well, we're not arguing about your

10:04house.

10:05>> So, what I'm saying is that it was done

10:06by an engineer

10:08>> who knows what they're doing.

10:10>> Well, it would have been nice if Peter

10:11put his name on the drawing.

10:13>> It's a blow up of what he gave us.

10:15>> Well, then give us the whole draw, you

10:18know. I mean, you look at this and I

10:20anybody could have done this. I don't

10:23know how accurate it is. So, I mean,

10:26that's my concern.

10:28And you know that that boundary line

10:30might be closer to the existing house

10:33[clears throat]

10:34than this is showing. I don't know. I

10:36know it's really tight. I've been up

10:38there to look.

10:41So, uh, that's all I have.

10:45>> I believe we sent

10:48miniaturaturized version of the plan.

10:51It's probably somewhere.

10:55>> Not to me for the dish. No. So unless

10:58it's in the previous files that you have

11:02with me.

11:03>> I didn't bring any

11:08[clears throat]

11:08>> I don't remember it in the previous

11:10submitt.

11:18>> I don't I have not reviewed it. So I

11:20should not

11:26Yeah.

11:27And fortunately, Miss Chimman, we have

11:29some

11:31rules that we have to account for here.

11:34Um, we have to account for the adequacy

11:37of surfacing and the provisions for

11:39runoff and discharge of storm water. We

11:42have to account for the adequacy of

11:44landscaping and screening.

11:47um including adequacy with regard for

11:50achieving maximum compatibility with and

11:53protection for adjacent properties and

11:56publications

11:58and I don't see detail in the drawings

12:00whether we call them engineer drawings

12:03or not

12:05as to those itemiz

12:12and without more

12:17I I don't know how we can make

12:21a decision on this.

12:23>> I mean, I can understand what you're

12:24saying. There is actually a road there.

12:26It's not a compound. Um it's a gravel

12:29road. It's being grown over been going

12:33back and forth for years. We've owned

12:34the property for quite a while.

12:37Um so

12:40there's an existing access that we use.

12:43Um it is a large piece of land um and

12:50probably the last lot available in this

12:53in this development. It was created long

12:55ago as we said earlier. Um

13:00and if this isn't um you need more

13:03information as far as landscaping and

13:06what have you. I personally don't see a

13:08lot of there is by the way there are um

13:11stakes that are showing the rainy

13:13property boundary they've been there

13:15quite last couple years really for those

13:18are there they exist

13:20um

13:22and

13:23I mean because it's fairly tight there

13:25might not be a whole lot of changes that

13:28there is a substantial drop off the left

13:31hand side of Islam the weapons

13:36So there's not a whole lot of what can

13:38happen there for my honest.

13:43So as far as screening, you know, I I

13:47just don't foresee it being an easy

13:49thing to do quite honestly. But if it's

13:53but it's primarily used to access

14:06I think what we're trying to prevent is

14:09I I've seen the road. I know it's tight

14:12and I know that the neighbors are right

14:14there. Um and I remember from last night

14:16that there was concern about how close

14:17it all was. I think what we're trying to

14:19prevent is that this project goes ahead

14:23and there's a discrepancy or there's

14:26some sort of people are are confused

14:27about what's supposed to happen and what

14:29it's supposed to look like and oh well

14:32you know they're excavating all this

14:33land all that dirt ends up on the

14:34neighbor's land. Was that supposed to

14:35happen or they kind of clean it up? I

14:38think

14:40>> I'm sorry I didn't interrupt you. Um I

14:42think

14:44a more detailed drawing of what exactly

14:48is going to happen, where things are

14:50going to be. Um the distances between

14:54the water line and the property line,

14:55the distance between the the water line

14:57and the electrical, [clears throat] you

14:59know, all these different things should

15:00really be clearly marked. So when the

15:03project starts and if an issue were to

15:05come up or somebody were to ask

15:06questions, it's really clear in the

15:09drawing of well this is exactly what the

15:12engineer said was going to happen, this

15:14is exactly where it's supposed to be and

15:16this is where it is, right? It's to kind

15:19of cover everybody's bases so that

15:21nobody kind of has any issues with

15:24what's going on or to try to limit I

15:26should say.

15:28>> Okay. Again, I wasn't coming back here

15:31today to rearview our variance, but

15:33obviously I just wanted to move this

15:36project. Well, it's not even a project.

15:38Why not?

15:39>> I mean, it's it's pretty substantial.

15:41>> No, but at this point in time, we really

15:43it's it's

15:46the final I guess what I'm what am I

15:48trying to say? So

15:52the final permit was to try to do this,

15:55but I when we first saw the condition on

15:59our variance, personally, I assume that

16:02whoever might purchase a property would

16:04probably do all of that

16:06>> and get that last piece of permit

16:09>> and that would be maybe a condition on a

16:12sale. that that was what but I was told

16:14by a few people that we should probably

16:16do this before we actually put it on the

16:18mark and so that's where I am so that's

16:21why I'm here tonight trying to do cross

16:24my tees and dot my eyes

16:26>> I think that makes complete sense but I

16:28think I'm hoping you can kind of see our

16:31obligation to the neighborhood uh that

16:35everything is kind of spelled out in

16:36detail

16:37>> I can I would want to know if I it were

16:41me I would want to Now, I'm not saying

16:43it's the wrong thing to do either,

16:46>> but I'm also, you know, it's not we

16:49originally purchased this maybe our

16:51daughter would build on it quite

16:52honestly and she moved to back to water.

16:57So, as a point of obviously

17:01chunk of

17:04>> I think I'll speak for myself. I think

17:06this project makes a lot of sense. I I

17:08think it's well within your realm to do

17:11this type of work. I think we as a board

17:14just need a little bit more detail

17:16exactly what's going to happen. Um like

17:19my I also have a question about the

17:21electrical pad. I'm so sorry. Um about

17:25the electrical pad and does that need to

17:27be in the setback or is that within the

17:30existing setback?

17:31>> Right.

17:31>> Um it's on the land. I mean,

17:34>> yeah, I know it's on the land, but is it

17:35within the, you know, are you going to

17:36put it within the setback for that

17:39>> area, right?

17:40>> I'm sure

17:42>> we don't know that.

17:44>> Mountain power.

17:46>> Well, it just says,

17:46>> well, it needs to be on like a final

17:48design, a final plat on here so we can

17:50actually see.

17:52>> Can you go to the next side?

17:53>> Yeah, absolutely.

17:55>> Yeah, I think I I think I found whatever

17:56surveys are available, but they don't um

17:59from the previous applications. So add

18:02on a transformer

18:05>> is that within the setback?

18:07>> Um I think it's pretty far in quite

18:10honestly because there's a lot of land

18:11back there.

18:12>> We would just we need to know exactly

18:14where it's actually going to be, right?

18:15So that if you then go ahead and put it

18:18somewhere and somebody says, "Hey, is

18:20this within the setback?" You can

18:22clearly show on the map it's exactly

18:24where it's supposed to be. It's not

18:26within setback. Everything is

18:31up front and all.

18:32>> Okay. I mean, I I get, you know, maybe

18:34what I guess

18:37never been before you guys before. I'm

18:39spirit trying to figure out what you

18:40need. We appreciate

18:42>> and

18:44if um

18:46[clears throat]

18:47perhaps I can have a little more

18:48guidance from Miss Ford as to exactly

18:51what you want and then we can go

18:53forward. I guess again I'm not familiar.

18:56Yeah,

18:56>> when we had this done enough about two

18:58years ago, most of this work was done

19:01and but then zoning administrator left

19:04and I thought I didn't know about it and

19:06so kind of sat by a long time before I

19:09figured out oh so that's why there's a

19:12bit of a delay right now. Um a lot of

19:15this was done two years ago.

19:20So um when we had big mountain power

19:23what they would do with their power we

19:25talked to you know walk you know how do

19:28you do something like this with water

19:31electric stuff was

19:35>> I don't remember quite honestly

19:36>> yeah I think reaching out maybe to the

19:38same engineer to a different engineer

19:40and just saying you know we need

19:42scalable topographic maps

19:44>> a survey

19:46>> um yeah you probably do have them on

19:48file from the We don't have anything in

19:50>> No, there's nothing here.

19:53>> Nothing like that. There's something

19:54from Little River. Look at Todd Hill. I

19:58guess what you need to do really is go

19:59to the film drags and uh look at the

20:04section 301 site plan review, which is

20:08basically why you're here,

20:09>> right?

20:10>> And just look at uh section A, B, and C.

20:14That's the kind of information we're

20:16looking for. I think

20:17>> I mean it is summarized on the site plan

20:19review information form that was

20:21submitted with your application. Okay.

20:23Okay.

20:24>> I mean in all fairness putting up to

20:26your review I noticed the same thing

20:28would be part of anybody.

20:29>> No I'm not I'm not feeling that at all.

20:32I'm just trying to understand what I

20:34what more I need to do

20:36>> and that's basically it.

20:40>> Yeah. No. So that to me makes sense. I'm

20:44not I'm not um you know it's just

20:47something that we we at this point in

20:49time we don't we won't use a lot

20:51ourselves

20:53that happens. So I

20:54>> think the fact that it's just a 12 foot

20:56right away which is really unusual. I

20:59don't think I've ever come across

21:00anything like that. But you're really

21:03limited. And so I think it has to be

21:05bought out as to how you're going to

21:09plow it, how the drainage is going to

21:11work, how you going to protect the

21:13wetlands, how you going to protect your

21:14neighbors from, you know, working.

21:18They're all It's all permitted road

21:20peritted. No,

21:21>> that road is permitted the way it is

21:23now.

21:24>> Yes. Yes. That that 12 foot um Yes. the

21:27curb cut, the um the 12 foot right ofway

21:31access as a driveway. Um those were all

21:35previous permits. Um and the single

21:40family residents, again, although that

21:42permit has expired, all of the necessary

21:44paperwork uh to allow for the

21:47development of that law, including

21:49wetlands considerations, were uh were

21:51reviewed and considered to.

21:53>> So there's a groundwater permit. Yes,

21:56>> that was for

21:58>> Yep.

21:59>> for the road. The rightway the roads

22:02come

22:03>> for the dwelling.

22:04>> Just for the

22:06>> Yeah.

22:06>> I mean, basically the whole road up the

22:10wetland area

22:12would be

22:16>> I think reaching out maybe to the

22:17original engineer that started this.

22:19>> Yeah.

22:20>> Just a little bit more detail.

22:24have them do have them uh do a drawing

22:26that people can point to. Maybe um just

22:29flush out the drawing that's there. Um

22:32that would be

22:34>> No, I mean Okay. And what I might have

22:37then I guess this might withdraw the

22:40application or do I? I don't even know.

22:43>> Yes, we can continue it.

22:46>> Yeah. I don't know how quickly we'll do

22:48this. I don't see the winter coming

22:50soon. It might not be much of anything

22:52this time.

22:55>> Well, that's up to you. I mean,

22:56>> yeah.

22:57>> No, but I'm I'm just lining people up

22:59and seeing how busy they are.

23:02Very quickly or you might consider that,

23:04you know, people are going to go in the

23:06hydro you do if you do it over the

23:09winter ready.

23:10>> Yeah. And that's true. And maybe Todd

23:14may have just enough information and I I

23:16part of me think more data but they're

23:20really big class shrink down your

23:24computers.

23:26>> The engineers are generally able to

23:29provide digital copies that are

23:31reasonable resolution. Um and then also

23:34what we can take the large the large

23:37plat um on paper and just for the the

23:40DRB's u information reminder for those

23:44of you who are there at the time um when

23:46the variance

23:48um was approved.

23:51The conditions were there shall be no

23:53further subdivision of the property.

23:56Property development is limited to

23:58single family, excuse [clears throat]

23:59me, single family residential uses. All

24:03utilities shall be underground due to

24:04the narrowness of the right of way and

24:08development within the right of way

24:09shall be reviewed by the DRB under site

24:12planning.

24:15>> Um, be mind reaches out to you about a

24:19continu, you know, maybe reach out to an

24:21engineer, see what their time frame is,

24:23talk to, you know, who whomever else.

24:25Um, and if you want to see about a

24:28continuence or whatever makes sense for

24:31you.

24:31>> Okay.

24:32>> That engineer might have a lot of

24:34>> I think he's already got it. And again,

24:37I apologize, but it was

24:42>> I just it can be confusing.

24:43>> It is confusing and I appreciate your

24:45time. I feel like I might have wasted

24:47your time, but um,

24:49>> you furthered your process.

24:51>> So, that's fun. I have stuff that I have

24:53to do anyway. So glad you do. Um no, so

24:57I will um take this all in consideration

25:01and um with my husband who probably

25:05tonight.

25:06>> Thank you so much.

25:07>> Thank you. Thank you.

25:09>> Is there anybody from the public that

25:11wishes to speak tonight?

25:15I will retain your word and that I do

25:18think I'm a neighbor not an adjoining

25:20neighbor but I'm given and I do think

25:22that it's important to maintain

25:24integrity

25:26that project is so small

25:30and there's no place in my opinion for

25:32screens or any planting degrees

25:36property and um be a little more

25:39technical

25:41run that I do that one should be in

25:46front of any other.

25:53Anybody online?

25:56No. Okay.

25:59>> Oh, sorry. I didn't see. Maybe come up

26:01just so we can all [clears throat] hear

26:03you. Sorry. I meant to say that to the

26:05and just state your name.

26:07>> Microphones.

26:08>> My name is Bindy Bon. actually heard me.

26:12Um I'm concerned about the rightway and

26:16the cresting of the road that land

26:18underneath this web. Um

26:22he's already had a wall and a half

26:27collapse because of the weather.

26:30So where the snow is going to go,

26:34I just I don't know where all this is

26:37going to happen in that span, you know?

26:40I mean, it's like 10 ft away from the

26:43hill.

26:44>> Yeah.

26:44>> So, it's really

26:46>> Well, and it's not a gravel road.

26:49>> Yeah. I, you know, I think that's where

26:50an engineer putting some thought into it

26:52and, you know, redoing the road would

26:55very well may help that. So, but we

26:59appreciate. Thank you.

27:02>> Okay. Thank you.

27:04>> Thank you. And hopefully I'll see you

27:07all again.

27:07>> Okay.

27:08>> Thank you.

27:09>> All right.

27:17>> Thank you.

27:18>> Take care.

27:27Thank you.

27:28>> Thank you.

27:32There's certainly plenty of examples

27:34that are on file of how that's been done

27:37and what should be on a drawing.

27:40That was very inadequate with

27:42information

27:43>> that that might

27:45have set up properly.

27:47>> I it

27:48might not that I feel bad that she's

27:51really put back on. Um,

27:55>> and I don't know what technical like

27:58technically I don't have the background

28:01to know how adequate that was for what

28:03we were considering.

28:04>> Sure.

28:05>> Well, I mean, as Brooks brought up, it's

28:07kind of in black and white. You follow

28:09the

28:10>> Yeah.

28:10>> Sorry.

28:12>> Still Yeah.

28:13>> Yep.

28:13>> Yep.

28:16>> All right. So, we have two decisions.

28:18Yeah. You're not free yet.

28:20>> No. No. We have two decisions to approve

28:26from the last time I can get those

28:27permits issued. Normally, you know, I

28:29like to move faster on that, but um

28:32yeah, gang busters lately.

28:36Um

28:39so, but y'all are being very patient on

28:42the applicant end.

28:58muted but I wasn't here last

29:19Harry calling

29:21I'm glad we got that.

29:27>> We are recording.

29:29>> Oh, I'm sorry.

29:45I feel like I'm getting a point for JR

29:47where

29:49the same properties coming back. I feel

29:52like I've run through all the

29:53properties.

29:54>> Yeah. [clears throat]

29:58But probably been through like six times

30:00at this point.

30:02>> Yeah. What scares me is when we look at

30:03those overlays, you know, how off those

30:06boundaries are and it certainly looks

30:09like the rightway is a lot further from

30:12that house on that overview than it

30:15shows everywhere else. That's 15. Yeah.

30:23>> Did we note that we um about the water

30:26heater?

30:27>> Yeah.

30:27>> In the garage.

30:28>> Yes.

30:41>> Maybe come on comment on the unapproved

30:44general minutes from August 5th. as at

30:47that moment those look correct.

30:52>> Wasn't there wasn't there something

30:53about water that we wanted to include in

30:56that um mentioned

30:58>> in the in the one3 decision

31:01>> in the drink water.

31:03>> Yeah, it's in the conditions.

31:04>> Yeah. Yeah.

31:05>> It had to be stuck above

31:10>> and all the all the electric,

31:15right? Yeah.

31:16>> Yeah, it's in there.

31:17>> No, I'm I'm just not finding it. I'm so

31:20>> It's just I'm just I'm just rehashing in

31:23my brain.

31:26>> There's not

31:29[clears throat] garage though.

31:31>> It's not a conditioned garage.

31:34>> It's okay to have a hot water heater.

31:37>> Well, we don't know that. I mean, they

31:39may have conditioned it. It's not. Maybe

31:43they plan to. I mean, we weren't the

31:45ones that asked to move the water heater

31:47out there.

31:49>> Oh, no. We just said if you put it out

31:51there, this is hard. Okay.

33:45Yeah,

33:45>> I'm assuming that Rudy signed up on this

33:48water connection

33:52>> or we just

33:54>> uh Yeah, it's all

33:56>> Is it?

33:57>> Yeah, I'll double check.

33:58>> I just didn't see that. I

34:01I'll double check.

34:02>> Is it I I didn't see it. I didn't notice

34:05it.

34:12I'll get these four ready to go.

34:21No, I don't want to go home.

34:25I don't for

34:32like I could just go bar girl.

34:37That was my plan.

34:39>> I have something.

34:57So, in the September minutes, I'm just

34:59um there are some errors to names either

35:01spellings or just incorrect.

35:05Um, [clears throat]

35:12I'm just cleaning up.

35:26>> Um, can I ask a question about maybe

35:29Hill the barn? Mhm.

35:33>> Didn't that go from

35:36a 19 ft to 29 ft high?

35:42>> They are going to have to They're

35:43They're going to have to reapply.

35:45>> They're going to have to reapply.

35:46>> Got it. Got it. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, that's

35:49>> So, yeah. Their dimensions are changing.

35:52>> We're just All we're doing is approving

35:54what happened.

35:55>> Yeah. Sure.

35:58The August 5th August 5th.

36:03Sorry.

36:04>> No, no, no, no. I just I hadn't gotten a

36:07chance to I usually review these for

36:10names, attendance, etc.

36:12>> I uh almost said,

36:17>> okay, you were there.

36:21>> Thank you.

36:23Now that's all you know.

36:31>> Good one everybody.

36:35>> How's am I?

36:42>> We do all several.

36:46I I would do the decisions and the

36:49minutes as as each

36:54>> anybody

36:57make a motion.

36:58>> I'll make a motion to move the minutes

37:01by September 2nd

37:08>> August 5th

37:09>> as amended.

37:12>> Second.

37:14>> I'll second.

37:19All in favor

37:25>> just to confirm that um the only

37:27amendment to the August minutes are

37:30adding your name to the agend

37:32Copy. Thank you.

37:35>> Motion to approve the decision.

37:43>> Anybody?

37:45>> I make a motion to approve the decisions

37:49of Barney and Jill drinkwater and real

37:53Victoria Comr.

37:57>> As amended.

37:58>> As amended.

38:00We here say

38:07all in favor.

38:11>> Right. So that's okay. So date

38:13abstained. So four to zero one. Um and

38:18again just the only amendments were the

38:21bellington names

38:23on the September second.

38:29Great. Close the meeting at

38:33710.

38:35>> Hello.

38:40>> Sorry.

38:41>> Uh, no. That's okay. Um,

38:44>> recording stopped.

38:46>> Dana Allen came in.

38:49>> Yes. Who wanted our viewers the town

38:54plan? I think you guys have to v that

38:57off the board in the next week or so.

39:00You're done soliciting kinds

39:03of public.

39:04>> Yeah, on the 30th.

39:06>> This question is better as you

39:10>> No, it's not. Do you recall what we owe

39:12him or what he wanted from us? Has

39:14anyone followed up on that? I basically

39:17went online, they voted off, they

39:20commented on, you know, the first days,

39:23>> gave some suggestions and then

39:27>> but the board hasn'ticed.

39:32>> No, I don't I all he was asking and

39:35Cheryl basically said if we have

39:38something we want to have input on and

39:40to go online, we got to do it. So, it's

39:44pretty easy. I don't I don't think you

39:46have to I don't think

39:49that

39:50>> it actually when you get online and you

39:51start looking at it

39:54>> it's clear it's more focused on

39:57responses

39:57>> right

40:00>> so we're officially adjourned then

40:02>> yes Okay.

40:16>> [music]

```*