2026-10-13 - Finance Committee

Summary

Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard and outcomes incomplete.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):

Topic Minutes Share
Cannabis Stabilization Fund 14 70%
Targeted Tax Relief Program 6 30%
  • Tuesday, October 13, 2026.
  • A single-topic Finance Committee meeting, about 20 minutes of continuous captioned discussion (captions run from 0:05 to 20:24, with no recesses or gaps) that ended in adjournment.
  • The chair (addressed as "Madam Chair"; apparently Councilor Govan, unconfirmed) called it because constituents ask why they do not see tax relief from cannabis revenue.
  • A city finance official (captioned "Kathy"; surname not captioned) answered. No votes were taken.

Cannabis Stabilization Fund

0:14-5:17, 8:24-17:27, 20:09-20:24

  • Staff said the city's 3% local cannabis tax brings in roughly $1.2 million a year to the general fund, which offsets about $1 million in the budget; one third goes into a stabilization fund set up by the Council with the mayor. Deposits were about $543,000 in fiscal 2025 and $609,000 in fiscal 2026.
  • The fund now holds about $1.7 million after the city paid back about $1.4 million to two cannabis businesses over host community agreement fees (an extra 3%) that the state ruled not allowed. Nothing has been spent; the money was described as no longer tied up.
  • Allowed uses (set by the Council): neighborhoods within 1.5 miles of a cannabis establishment; education and recreation programming for youth and adults, neighborhood business incentives, infrastructure, recreation and community sites, and other needed initiatives.
  • Process: the Council would settle on an eligible use, work with the mayor, and the mayor would bring a financial order to transfer the money; a different use would need a change to the Council order or ordinance, drafted with the Law Department.
  • Councilor Click-Bruce (captioned "Click Bruce", "King Bruce") said some wards with dispensaries bear traffic and other effects, and asked that the money go back to those neighborhoods. The chair agreed.
  • A councilor arriving late (captioned "Whitfield"; identity unconfirmed) asked whether any funds had been used; staff said no and that the Council has not yet put together a plan. Staff did not know the number of cannabis stores (a councilor guessed 12 or 13).
  • The chair said the Council would start conversations on a plan; no vote.

Targeted Tax Relief Program

5:17-8:24, 17:31-20:05

  • A councilor (captioned "Council Blount" at one point; identity unconfirmed) asked whether part of the cannabis fund could seed Mayor Sarno's targeted tax relief program, which is funded by voluntary contributions. Staff said that would take a change to the Council order and a draft worked out with the mayor and Law Department, and called it a good idea if the parameters (annual, fixed amount, other uses) were set.
  • The councilor said general relief is about $15 per million dollars of levy reduction, which property growth erodes, while targeted relief reaches groups such as veterans and blind residents more directly.
  • Later the chair suggested the assessor's office mail residents an invitation to donate (for example a box to check each quarter), since escrowed taxpayers never see the tax bill; staff said residents can also send a check to the city marked for targeted tax relief. The chair said the broader tax relief discussion would resume at the next meeting (October 20).

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:05[music]

00:14>> Good afternoon.

00:16Welcome to this finance committee

00:18meeting and today we're going to have

00:19the discussion about um cannabis tax

00:23money. Hopefully Kathy can help us out

00:26with some answers.

00:28Um and I think we talked a little bit

00:30about it the last time we met at

00:33in the North End. So, the reason that I

00:35wanted to meet is because a lot of our

00:37constituents have been saying that you

00:40know, they thought that when we approved

00:43to have cannabis um dispensaries and the

00:46stores that we were going to be able to

00:49um

00:50benefit from

00:52I guess the taxes that they're going to

00:54be paying. So, I guess I just wanted

00:56some information on that. Do you know

00:59how much is getting collected? I should

01:01have asked the assessor's office to be

01:02here to be able to um

01:04>> uh we we use a million dollars and I I

01:06believe when we do the uh presentation,

01:08a million dollars is in the budget for

01:10the uh in the general fund budget. So,

01:12it does help. It helps offset the

01:14million dollars.

01:15>> About a million dollars.

01:18>> All right. Well, um and again, you know,

01:21constituents want a a tax relief. Um so,

01:25they're not seeing that and they said

01:27that um they say all the time that they

01:30were under the impression that we would

01:32be able to you know, benefit from. So, I

01:34guess

01:34>> benefited by a million dollars. If not,

01:36we would have to cut a million dollars

01:37out of the budget. So, there is a

01:38benefit.

01:39>> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Well, I will be um

01:42passing that information along. Do you

01:44have any questions on Council Blount?

01:46>> I do. Thank you. Um Madam Chair, uh good

01:48to see you, Kathy.

01:49Um good to see you get to see you as

01:51well.

01:52Uh

01:54so,

01:55let me

01:56help me get my my head straight here.

01:58So, we passed a canna- the cannabis pass

02:01a couple of years ago in the community

02:02reform,

02:03right? And we collect 1/3

02:07of the tax that goes into the city.

02:10I do believe there was a lawsuit that

02:12got settled a while back.

02:14Can you tell me before

02:16Can you tell me a little bit about that

02:18lawsuit and what happened to it? Because

02:19I think that lawsuit was resolved.

02:21>> There was a lawsuit um and in the HCA

02:24they were uh charging additional 3%.

02:27>> Okay.

02:27>> Um it was then uh deemed unallowable by

02:30the state, so we had to pay back the two

02:33we the law department negotiated and we

02:34paid back money to the two um Insight

02:37and another one.

02:38Uh we paid back money. We took it out of

02:41that um stabilization fund that was set

02:43up that the council set up with the

02:45mayor.

02:46Uh so, there is a current balance in

02:48that.

02:49>> And how much did we pay out?

02:51>> We paid out 1.4 million.

02:54>> It was a lawsuit?

02:55>> Yes.

02:55>> To Insight and

02:57>> And I can't remember the other one, I'm

02:58sorry.

02:59>> And that also went a couple of years.

03:01>> Yes.

03:02>> So, we were charging 6% tax total. Three

03:05for the state, three for us, and now

03:07we're only charging 3%.

03:09Now, out of the

03:12the money, so we can give you a quick

03:14refresher. What can the money be used

03:17for?

03:17>> The city council set up a state with the

03:2033% of that money goes into a

03:22stabilization that the city council set

03:24up with the mayor

03:25and it can be used uh for neighborhoods

03:28within 1.5 miles of a marijuana

03:31establishment and is used for

03:33educational recreation programming for

03:35youth and adults, neighborhood business

03:37incentives, improvements on

03:39infrastructure, recreation, and

03:41community sites, and other needed

03:43initiatives.

03:45>> Okay.

03:46And so, I think you said roughly we have

03:481.something.

03:49>> 1.7 million.

03:51>> That comes in every year?

03:53>> No. No. No. That's a total what you have

03:55in there now.

03:56In in 25 it took it we took in 543,000

04:01in 26 we took in 609,000.

04:07So the total you have available in that

04:09stabilization fund is 1.7 million

04:12dollars.

04:14>> And that if I may Councilwoman that loss

04:18was because of the host community

04:20agreement, right?

04:22Okay. I'm going to acknowledge

04:23Councilman Click Bruce.

04:25Okay.

04:26>> Okay. Thank you. Thank you for me.

04:28Kathy

04:29um

04:31Okay.

04:36So it's very it's very targeted to use

04:39that can be used for within that 1.5

04:41million mile radius.

04:42>> council had it. Yes.

04:44>> Okay.

04:44>> You you guys put together the um

04:46agreement.

04:47>> So whenever there's a a cannabis store

04:50that 5-mile radius

04:52>> That 1.5. Yeah.

04:54>> 5

04:551.5 miles?

04:56>> Yes.

04:59>> So so Kathy um

05:02So with regards to the uses and I'm just

05:04brainstorming here

05:06and thinking aloud

05:08um

05:09I'm sure there's a lot of uh

05:10things that we can put that money into

05:12work.

05:14What can we in terms of because as you

05:17know I'm about to I want to talk to you

05:19about the next time we meet. Mhm. And

05:21we're going to have that discussion

05:22starting

05:23>> October 20th.

05:25>> So and there's just just to put an idea

05:28on the table. Can we use a portion of

05:31that money to to put it into the mayor's

05:34new targeted tax relief program

05:36uh which we approve and I think the

05:38mayor 2 weeks ago put it out already. So

05:42and and

05:44it's a good thing. I supported it. I

05:45supported it. But that needs to be

05:47funded right so right now that has to be

05:50on a monthly basis people would donate

05:52into that program mostly like a good

05:54energy fund back then

05:57uh

05:57but can that money be used can we

06:00support some of that money to sort of

06:01start kickstart this program?

06:04>> In my opinion counselor you would have

06:06to change

06:08um

06:09council order.

06:10>> Excuse me.

06:11>> Which you can you can I mean the you'd

06:13have to have the mayor

06:16the mayor would have to then you'd have

06:17to work with the mayor and you could

06:19draft something outline something and

06:20send it to the law department a draft of

06:22the specifics and then they could put

06:24something together and then you'd have

06:25to present it to

06:26>> How do you feel about it counselor?

06:28>> I

06:28I I think that would be a good use it's

06:30what you have to do is actually make

06:31sure you know what parameters. Do you

06:33want it to be available every year? Do

06:35you want to put a certain amount in it?

06:37Are you going to have other uses? I I

06:39mean I think it's a great idea.

06:40>> Thank you I thank you because I I one of

06:42the things but then chair

06:44is that I do think that the the property

06:46tax relief

06:48um

06:49we've been talking about this now since

06:51I've been in the council now six years

06:53since

06:54and every year it's the same discussion

06:57the same discussion it needs to be

06:59sustained you know how does that get

07:01sustained? Everybody has different

07:03ideas.

07:05I saw it coming back.

07:06uh

07:07but I still believe that with the target

07:09of the tax relief Kathy and please

07:10correct me if I'm mistaken

07:12that another one deviates too much from

07:15the original subject but then chair

07:17that

07:19the the way we're doing this now

07:22with the target of the tax with the tax

07:24relief

07:25for every million dollars in that we're

07:27putting into it is a $15 savings.

07:31So I think traditionally we put in like

07:33five or eight million dollars so that

07:35comes out to be about what anywhere

07:37between 45 to 90 dollars.

07:39But then with the property value

07:41increase that gets lost in translation.

07:44Uh the target of the and that goes to

07:46everybody including the businesses. But

07:47the target of the target

07:48>> everybody.

07:49>> is more specific. It's targeted to those

07:53categories such as veterans, such as

07:57blind.

07:59So people will have a more direct higher

08:01increase.

08:03Is that correct? Okay. Uh

08:05thank you, Beth. So Madam Chair, I think

08:07a later one that's part of this

08:08conversation with the canal cuz I think

08:10that's something we should explore.

08:12Uh if that the council ordinance to

08:14change, I think that's is worthy of

08:16pursuing because we are you know this

08:18canal money

08:20can be finally put to

08:22be good to straight good use.

08:24>> So right now, uh thank you Fred coming

08:27up for the chair. Uh so right now that's

08:30stabilization fund. How do people access

08:33that money?

08:35>> Stabilization, you can't access it.

08:36Right now the city council has it. The

08:381.7 million dollars.

08:40>> Okay. So so how do we access it? So we

08:45say

08:45>> to decide what you want to use it for in

08:47the program.

08:48>> You like the CPA fund.

08:49>> You have to decide what you want to use

08:50it for and vote on the council floor, if

08:52I'm correct.

08:53>> Lindsay, I think that's

08:53>> The mayor The mayor has to bring forth a

08:54financial order just like anything else.

08:57So if the council came up with, you

08:59know, an eligible use for the funds,

09:01coordinated with the mayor, it would

09:03just be a financial order, which would

09:05be a transfer out of that account into a

09:07separate fund for whatever specific

09:09>> still would have to be within that 1.55

09:13mile radius.

09:14>> Yeah, whatever the parameters are set up

09:16per the per this this ordinance. If you

09:18want to change this ordinance, you would

09:20have to change change it. You would you

09:22would yeah, draft it, submit it to the

09:24mayor, and ask him to support the new

09:26ordinance. And then you'd have to vote

09:27on on the floor.

09:29>> So I just see it from what that list

09:31that you mentioned, you know,

09:33big recreational use, right? I think a

09:37lot of neighborhoods

09:39benefit from that because there's a lot

09:41of neighborhoods that don't have those

09:43things. And do you want to give an

09:44example?

09:45Uh

09:46so, I'm I'm wondering if there's a way

09:48that we can move forward with that

09:51because I know when we have our

09:54tax rate conversation

09:56the tax relief

09:58question and comments will be there.

10:01Once we look at how to figure that out.

10:04And I know the meeting that we had um

10:07you know

10:08cutting cutting things out of the budget

10:11is not the answer, right? Um

10:14finding I think finding ways to be more

10:16efficient and more effective with what

10:19we have um so that we don't have to keep

10:23increasing the budget every year. I

10:25think it's a better way of doing things.

10:28That's like as as a family, that's what

10:30we have to do, right? We can't we're not

10:32going to get extra money because the

10:34light bill went up, the gas bill went

10:36up, groceries went up. Um so, finding

10:39ways to

10:40I guess live within our means

10:43is is a way to do it, but that's outside

10:45of the cannabis conversation, so. Um

10:48okay, any other comments or questions

10:50about the cannabis um

10:54call it cannabis stabilization fund?

10:58>> Yeah, um Madam Chair, I have a question.

11:03That's okay.

11:04>> Go ahead.

11:06>> Um so, I missed the first part of it.

11:08So, did is there

11:10um

11:11is there a process where we can access

11:13the money now? I know last

11:16I heard about it it was kind of tied up

11:18at the state level, so has that been

11:20rectified?

11:22>> Yes, that has been rectified.

11:23>> Yes, that was rectified. They paid out

11:251.4 They paid back 1.4 million to the

11:28two um businesses. So, right now after

11:31we pay that there's 1.7 million left in

11:34the fund.

11:35>> Okay.

11:36All right. I just want to

11:38I I I heard Counselor Davis' comments

11:41earlier, which wholeheartedly I think

11:43the whole city

11:45should benefit

11:46from some type of relief. If we can come

11:49up with a a process for that, great.

11:52But, I also want to hone in on the fact

11:53that

11:55some areas are more affected than

11:58than others, obviously, with some of the

12:01dispensaries located. I'm going to give

12:03one example, which is right in the ward

12:05my ward, Ember.

12:07Where we have tons of traffic and tons

12:09of issues going on. So, I just want to

12:11be, you know,

12:13prepared for the the pushback we may

12:15receive with some of the residents that

12:18actually have to deal with

12:20that traffic and all concerns in their

12:22particular area. So, I'm I'm all for

12:25supporting,

12:26you know, something we come up with a

12:28comprehensive plan to do that, but I

12:30also want also us to to recognize that

12:34there are some real issues that are

12:35happening in neighborhoods, and how can

12:37we use this money to

12:39give back to those that actually have

12:42the dispensaries in the area. So,

12:45just want to put that on the record.

12:47>> Yeah, and and I agree with that,

12:49Counselor King Bruce.

12:50You know, these funds, that's what they

12:52were made for, and that's the reason

12:55that I'm asking about them is because I

12:58know for a long time they were tied up,

13:00and we weren't able to have access to

13:02them. So, finding a way to be able to

13:04use them the way that they were

13:06intended, you know, and of course I'm

13:08always for tax relief for the residents.

13:12And this targeted tax relief fund that

13:15the mayor

13:16initiated a couple of years ago, I think

13:19he funded a million dollars. There's a

13:20million dollars in there right now.

13:22So, finding a way to, you know, continue

13:25to fund those kind of things.

13:27The The thing with the targeted tax

13:29relief is that it's targeted to people

13:33who

13:34um

13:35you know, of course they need the funds.

13:38I like it veterans, I like seniors, you

13:40know, people with disabilities.

13:43Um and then we also have people in our

13:45city who are struggling, you know,

13:48there's seniors of course and they're

13:50still struggling. They don't probably

13:51fit into those categories, but they

13:54still need um the help. So that's a

13:56whole That's conversation again for next

13:58week. I don't want to talk about that

13:59now, but for the stabilization fund with

14:02the cannabis um tax money created I

14:05would like for us I agree with Council

14:07uh Cliff Bruce that we should find a way

14:10to put that money into those

14:12neighborhoods that are affected by that,

14:14you know, and um

14:16the the impact that it's having it might

14:19not be, you know, immediately seen, but

14:22I think, you know, because the money is

14:24there and because a lot of those

14:25neighborhoods don't have those

14:27resources, it would you know, behoove us

14:30to to continue along those lines when we

14:33first start those conversations.

14:35Um I acknowledge our Council Council

14:38President Oh Whitfield, you have your

14:40hand up, ma'am?

14:41>> Yeah, sorry I'm late Council um Madam

14:44Chair.

14:45Um grateful Turk Festival first I wanted

14:48to say it was great. I had a good time.

14:50>> Thanks for coming out.

14:51>> Got the food that I wanted. Um I know

14:54that I missed the first part of the

14:55meeting, but I just wanted to circle

14:58back and see if any of those funds have

15:00been

15:01used or distributed and what's in the

15:03accounts.

15:05>> Uh no, we just paid back that one the

15:08lawsuit um the 1.4 million. So what's

15:12left in the account is 1.7 million.

15:14Nothing's been used. It has to go The

15:16council has to put an order in front of

15:18the mayor. The mayor then has to at

15:19request the mayor and then the mayor

15:21would have to put a financial order in

15:22front of you, but um the city council,

15:25it's in a stabilization fund set up for

15:27the city council. So, you haven't um

15:29put together a plan yet.

15:32>> So, I think Madam President that that's

15:34something that we can start talking

15:36about.

15:37>> Yeah.

15:38>> And I'm making, you know, figuring out

15:40what we want. I like categories that are

15:44in the um the fund um and use it in that

15:48way to benefit the residents.

15:51>> Okay. That that is an option a

15:53opportunity.

15:55>> Mhm.

15:56>> Mhm.

15:57Thank you.

15:58>> Thank you, Madam President. All right.

16:00Anything else on on that? So, we're

16:03getting three We're collecting 3%,

16:05right? Of that 3% that we collect

16:09all of it doesn't go into this fund. 33%

16:12>> 33% Okay.

16:13>> And the other And the other one goes to

16:15the general fund.

16:16>> The other thing goes to the general

16:17right to general fund revenue.

16:22>> So, that means that we're really

16:23collecting

16:24over a million dollars, like

16:261.something.

16:27>> And um at 1.26, we collected 1.2 million

16:32went to the general fund, and um 609,000

16:36went into your fund.

16:41>> Great.

16:42>> So, I think that's over uh how many how

16:44many cannabis stores is there that we

16:46have here?

16:46>> I I don't know the number of stores off

16:48the top of my head, Council.

16:49>> No, we don't.

16:49>> I don't either, no.

16:51>> I I want to say maybe like 12 or 13, but

16:54I'm not sure. I don't know them.

16:58>> Uh Madam Chair.

17:00>> Yes, sir.

17:02>> Uh what was the categories again?

17:05>> Could you please say them again?

17:06>> Yeah, and these categories were set up

17:07by the city council.

17:09>> Yeah, I understand.

17:09>> Um education and recreational program

17:12programming for youth and adults,

17:14neighborhood business incentives,

17:15improvements to infrastructure,

17:17recreational community sites, and other

17:19needed initiatives.

17:21>> Okay. Thank you.

17:27>> Thank you.

17:31All right. So, we'll start having those

17:32conversations, I think,

17:34because

17:35regarding the targeted tax relief

17:39that's supposed to be Again, this is

17:41off-topic. Uh but, I know that I think

17:44that in the tax bills, people have an

17:46opportunity to check a box.

17:49Um

17:50Unfortunately, I'm going to say, like

17:53like for example, myself, when I get my

17:55tax bill,

17:57I just put it away, because it comes out

17:59of my thing, so I don't have to check

18:00the box. So, I think I'm wondering if

18:02there's a way for us to um

18:06maybe And um this is the assessor's

18:08office uh send something out

18:11specifically asking, "Hey, are you Do

18:13you want to participate in the targeted

18:14tax relief?" And I'm sure a lot of

18:16people would um if they knew about it.

18:20And it's probably not a lot. You could

18:22say $5, you know, of the quarter. If

18:25everybody did that, we'd have some money

18:27in here. So, yeah, maybe we'll have a

18:30conversation with the assessor's office

18:31regarding sending something out like

18:33that.

18:34So, I like that um

18:36funding idea.

18:37>> You're talking about people without

18:38escrows.

18:39>> Yeah. See, like my my bill, I get it,

18:42and it just gets paid in my mortgage.

18:45>> mortgage

18:45>> Um so, I don't need I don't even have to

18:47look at it or send it back because it

18:51gets paid. But, um I know some people do

18:54get it, and they have to look at it, and

18:56maybe they could check the box, but I

18:58think most people nowadays, if they have

19:00a mortgage, and they have um escrow in

19:03their mortgage, it just goes

19:04automatically.

19:06So,

19:07>> If If I may interrupt. Uh Kathy, in

19:09those cases like uh Councilwoman is

19:11talking about,

19:13uh,

19:13can the person send a check instead?

19:16>> Oh, yeah.

19:16>> On their own?

19:17>> Yep.

19:18>> And it will have to be, this have to be

19:19spelled out to be used dollars.

19:22>> I mean, yeah, if you don't want to just

19:23send a check, a random check to

19:25assessors, but I'd rather send it to the

19:26city and just say for targeted tax.

19:29>> So, anybody out there, any resident who

19:30feels generous could say, "I'm going to

19:32write a check for whatever, 25, 50

19:34bucks."

19:35>> But, I think a offer should be made.

19:37Like,

19:39I'd like to get a something in the mail

19:40saying, "Hey, do you want to

19:42give to the targeted tax relief?" You

19:44know, and and

19:46check that box, say, "Okay, every

19:48quarter I'll give $5 or something like

19:50that." And then people if people want to

19:52send a check, the offer needs to be made

19:55cuz I think a lot of people might not

19:56know about it. Um, and having, you know,

20:00having it brought up to the forefront, I

20:02think would be helpful. Just my thought

20:04on that.

20:05But, I guess we were off topic.

20:09All right. Any other, um, comments or

20:12questions about the cannabis,

20:15um,

20:16stabilization fund, I'm going to call

20:17it.

20:19No? All right. All right, well, this

20:22meeting is going to be adjourned.

20:24Thank you all.