2026-10-13 - Finance Committee
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard and outcomes incomplete.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Cannabis Stabilization Fund | 14 | 70% |
| Targeted Tax Relief Program | 6 | 30% |
- Tuesday, October 13, 2026.
- A single-topic Finance Committee meeting, about 20 minutes of continuous captioned discussion (captions run from 0:05 to 20:24, with no recesses or gaps) that ended in adjournment.
- The chair (addressed as "Madam Chair"; apparently Councilor Govan, unconfirmed) called it because constituents ask why they do not see tax relief from cannabis revenue.
- A city finance official (captioned "Kathy"; surname not captioned) answered. No votes were taken.
Cannabis Stabilization Fund
0:14-5:17, 8:24-17:27, 20:09-20:24
- Staff said the city's 3% local cannabis tax brings in roughly $1.2 million a year to the general fund, which offsets about $1 million in the budget; one third goes into a stabilization fund set up by the Council with the mayor. Deposits were about $543,000 in fiscal 2025 and $609,000 in fiscal 2026.
- The fund now holds about $1.7 million after the city paid back about $1.4 million to two cannabis businesses over host community agreement fees (an extra 3%) that the state ruled not allowed. Nothing has been spent; the money was described as no longer tied up.
- Allowed uses (set by the Council): neighborhoods within 1.5 miles of a cannabis establishment; education and recreation programming for youth and adults, neighborhood business incentives, infrastructure, recreation and community sites, and other needed initiatives.
- Process: the Council would settle on an eligible use, work with the mayor, and the mayor would bring a financial order to transfer the money; a different use would need a change to the Council order or ordinance, drafted with the Law Department.
- Councilor Click-Bruce (captioned "Click Bruce", "King Bruce") said some wards with dispensaries bear traffic and other effects, and asked that the money go back to those neighborhoods. The chair agreed.
- A councilor arriving late (captioned "Whitfield"; identity unconfirmed) asked whether any funds had been used; staff said no and that the Council has not yet put together a plan. Staff did not know the number of cannabis stores (a councilor guessed 12 or 13).
- The chair said the Council would start conversations on a plan; no vote.
Targeted Tax Relief Program
5:17-8:24, 17:31-20:05
- A councilor (captioned "Council Blount" at one point; identity unconfirmed) asked whether part of the cannabis fund could seed Mayor Sarno's targeted tax relief program, which is funded by voluntary contributions. Staff said that would take a change to the Council order and a draft worked out with the mayor and Law Department, and called it a good idea if the parameters (annual, fixed amount, other uses) were set.
- The councilor said general relief is about $15 per million dollars of levy reduction, which property growth erodes, while targeted relief reaches groups such as veterans and blind residents more directly.
- Later the chair suggested the assessor's office mail residents an invitation to donate (for example a box to check each quarter), since escrowed taxpayers never see the tax bill; staff said residents can also send a check to the city marked for targeted tax relief. The chair said the broader tax relief discussion would resume at the next meeting (October 20).
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:05[music]
00:14>> Good afternoon.
00:16Welcome to this finance committee
00:18meeting and today we're going to have
00:19the discussion about um cannabis tax
00:23money. Hopefully Kathy can help us out
00:26with some answers.
00:28Um and I think we talked a little bit
00:30about it the last time we met at
00:33in the North End. So, the reason that I
00:35wanted to meet is because a lot of our
00:37constituents have been saying that you
00:40know, they thought that when we approved
00:43to have cannabis um dispensaries and the
00:46stores that we were going to be able to
00:49um
00:50benefit from
00:52I guess the taxes that they're going to
00:54be paying. So, I guess I just wanted
00:56some information on that. Do you know
00:59how much is getting collected? I should
01:01have asked the assessor's office to be
01:02here to be able to um
01:04>> uh we we use a million dollars and I I
01:06believe when we do the uh presentation,
01:08a million dollars is in the budget for
01:10the uh in the general fund budget. So,
01:12it does help. It helps offset the
01:14million dollars.
01:15>> About a million dollars.
01:18>> All right. Well, um and again, you know,
01:21constituents want a a tax relief. Um so,
01:25they're not seeing that and they said
01:27that um they say all the time that they
01:30were under the impression that we would
01:32be able to you know, benefit from. So, I
01:34guess
01:34>> benefited by a million dollars. If not,
01:36we would have to cut a million dollars
01:37out of the budget. So, there is a
01:38benefit.
01:39>> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Well, I will be um
01:42passing that information along. Do you
01:44have any questions on Council Blount?
01:46>> I do. Thank you. Um Madam Chair, uh good
01:48to see you, Kathy.
01:49Um good to see you get to see you as
01:51well.
01:52Uh
01:54so,
01:55let me
01:56help me get my my head straight here.
01:58So, we passed a canna- the cannabis pass
02:01a couple of years ago in the community
02:02reform,
02:03right? And we collect 1/3
02:07of the tax that goes into the city.
02:10I do believe there was a lawsuit that
02:12got settled a while back.
02:14Can you tell me before
02:16Can you tell me a little bit about that
02:18lawsuit and what happened to it? Because
02:19I think that lawsuit was resolved.
02:21>> There was a lawsuit um and in the HCA
02:24they were uh charging additional 3%.
02:27>> Okay.
02:27>> Um it was then uh deemed unallowable by
02:30the state, so we had to pay back the two
02:33we the law department negotiated and we
02:34paid back money to the two um Insight
02:37and another one.
02:38Uh we paid back money. We took it out of
02:41that um stabilization fund that was set
02:43up that the council set up with the
02:45mayor.
02:46Uh so, there is a current balance in
02:48that.
02:49>> And how much did we pay out?
02:51>> We paid out 1.4 million.
02:54>> It was a lawsuit?
02:55>> Yes.
02:55>> To Insight and
02:57>> And I can't remember the other one, I'm
02:58sorry.
02:59>> And that also went a couple of years.
03:01>> Yes.
03:02>> So, we were charging 6% tax total. Three
03:05for the state, three for us, and now
03:07we're only charging 3%.
03:09Now, out of the
03:12the money, so we can give you a quick
03:14refresher. What can the money be used
03:17for?
03:17>> The city council set up a state with the
03:2033% of that money goes into a
03:22stabilization that the city council set
03:24up with the mayor
03:25and it can be used uh for neighborhoods
03:28within 1.5 miles of a marijuana
03:31establishment and is used for
03:33educational recreation programming for
03:35youth and adults, neighborhood business
03:37incentives, improvements on
03:39infrastructure, recreation, and
03:41community sites, and other needed
03:43initiatives.
03:45>> Okay.
03:46And so, I think you said roughly we have
03:481.something.
03:49>> 1.7 million.
03:51>> That comes in every year?
03:53>> No. No. No. That's a total what you have
03:55in there now.
03:56In in 25 it took it we took in 543,000
04:01in 26 we took in 609,000.
04:07So the total you have available in that
04:09stabilization fund is 1.7 million
04:12dollars.
04:14>> And that if I may Councilwoman that loss
04:18was because of the host community
04:20agreement, right?
04:22Okay. I'm going to acknowledge
04:23Councilman Click Bruce.
04:25Okay.
04:26>> Okay. Thank you. Thank you for me.
04:28Kathy
04:29um
04:31Okay.
04:36So it's very it's very targeted to use
04:39that can be used for within that 1.5
04:41million mile radius.
04:42>> council had it. Yes.
04:44>> Okay.
04:44>> You you guys put together the um
04:46agreement.
04:47>> So whenever there's a a cannabis store
04:50that 5-mile radius
04:52>> That 1.5. Yeah.
04:54>> 5
04:551.5 miles?
04:56>> Yes.
04:59>> So so Kathy um
05:02So with regards to the uses and I'm just
05:04brainstorming here
05:06and thinking aloud
05:08um
05:09I'm sure there's a lot of uh
05:10things that we can put that money into
05:12work.
05:14What can we in terms of because as you
05:17know I'm about to I want to talk to you
05:19about the next time we meet. Mhm. And
05:21we're going to have that discussion
05:22starting
05:23>> October 20th.
05:25>> So and there's just just to put an idea
05:28on the table. Can we use a portion of
05:31that money to to put it into the mayor's
05:34new targeted tax relief program
05:36uh which we approve and I think the
05:38mayor 2 weeks ago put it out already. So
05:42and and
05:44it's a good thing. I supported it. I
05:45supported it. But that needs to be
05:47funded right so right now that has to be
05:50on a monthly basis people would donate
05:52into that program mostly like a good
05:54energy fund back then
05:57uh
05:57but can that money be used can we
06:00support some of that money to sort of
06:01start kickstart this program?
06:04>> In my opinion counselor you would have
06:06to change
06:08um
06:09council order.
06:10>> Excuse me.
06:11>> Which you can you can I mean the you'd
06:13have to have the mayor
06:16the mayor would have to then you'd have
06:17to work with the mayor and you could
06:19draft something outline something and
06:20send it to the law department a draft of
06:22the specifics and then they could put
06:24something together and then you'd have
06:25to present it to
06:26>> How do you feel about it counselor?
06:28>> I
06:28I I think that would be a good use it's
06:30what you have to do is actually make
06:31sure you know what parameters. Do you
06:33want it to be available every year? Do
06:35you want to put a certain amount in it?
06:37Are you going to have other uses? I I
06:39mean I think it's a great idea.
06:40>> Thank you I thank you because I I one of
06:42the things but then chair
06:44is that I do think that the the property
06:46tax relief
06:48um
06:49we've been talking about this now since
06:51I've been in the council now six years
06:53since
06:54and every year it's the same discussion
06:57the same discussion it needs to be
06:59sustained you know how does that get
07:01sustained? Everybody has different
07:03ideas.
07:05I saw it coming back.
07:06uh
07:07but I still believe that with the target
07:09of the tax relief Kathy and please
07:10correct me if I'm mistaken
07:12that another one deviates too much from
07:15the original subject but then chair
07:17that
07:19the the way we're doing this now
07:22with the target of the tax with the tax
07:24relief
07:25for every million dollars in that we're
07:27putting into it is a $15 savings.
07:31So I think traditionally we put in like
07:33five or eight million dollars so that
07:35comes out to be about what anywhere
07:37between 45 to 90 dollars.
07:39But then with the property value
07:41increase that gets lost in translation.
07:44Uh the target of the and that goes to
07:46everybody including the businesses. But
07:47the target of the target
07:48>> everybody.
07:49>> is more specific. It's targeted to those
07:53categories such as veterans, such as
07:57blind.
07:59So people will have a more direct higher
08:01increase.
08:03Is that correct? Okay. Uh
08:05thank you, Beth. So Madam Chair, I think
08:07a later one that's part of this
08:08conversation with the canal cuz I think
08:10that's something we should explore.
08:12Uh if that the council ordinance to
08:14change, I think that's is worthy of
08:16pursuing because we are you know this
08:18canal money
08:20can be finally put to
08:22be good to straight good use.
08:24>> So right now, uh thank you Fred coming
08:27up for the chair. Uh so right now that's
08:30stabilization fund. How do people access
08:33that money?
08:35>> Stabilization, you can't access it.
08:36Right now the city council has it. The
08:381.7 million dollars.
08:40>> Okay. So so how do we access it? So we
08:45say
08:45>> to decide what you want to use it for in
08:47the program.
08:48>> You like the CPA fund.
08:49>> You have to decide what you want to use
08:50it for and vote on the council floor, if
08:52I'm correct.
08:53>> Lindsay, I think that's
08:53>> The mayor The mayor has to bring forth a
08:54financial order just like anything else.
08:57So if the council came up with, you
08:59know, an eligible use for the funds,
09:01coordinated with the mayor, it would
09:03just be a financial order, which would
09:05be a transfer out of that account into a
09:07separate fund for whatever specific
09:09>> still would have to be within that 1.55
09:13mile radius.
09:14>> Yeah, whatever the parameters are set up
09:16per the per this this ordinance. If you
09:18want to change this ordinance, you would
09:20have to change change it. You would you
09:22would yeah, draft it, submit it to the
09:24mayor, and ask him to support the new
09:26ordinance. And then you'd have to vote
09:27on on the floor.
09:29>> So I just see it from what that list
09:31that you mentioned, you know,
09:33big recreational use, right? I think a
09:37lot of neighborhoods
09:39benefit from that because there's a lot
09:41of neighborhoods that don't have those
09:43things. And do you want to give an
09:44example?
09:45Uh
09:46so, I'm I'm wondering if there's a way
09:48that we can move forward with that
09:51because I know when we have our
09:54tax rate conversation
09:56the tax relief
09:58question and comments will be there.
10:01Once we look at how to figure that out.
10:04And I know the meeting that we had um
10:07you know
10:08cutting cutting things out of the budget
10:11is not the answer, right? Um
10:14finding I think finding ways to be more
10:16efficient and more effective with what
10:19we have um so that we don't have to keep
10:23increasing the budget every year. I
10:25think it's a better way of doing things.
10:28That's like as as a family, that's what
10:30we have to do, right? We can't we're not
10:32going to get extra money because the
10:34light bill went up, the gas bill went
10:36up, groceries went up. Um so, finding
10:39ways to
10:40I guess live within our means
10:43is is a way to do it, but that's outside
10:45of the cannabis conversation, so. Um
10:48okay, any other comments or questions
10:50about the cannabis um
10:54call it cannabis stabilization fund?
10:58>> Yeah, um Madam Chair, I have a question.
11:03That's okay.
11:04>> Go ahead.
11:06>> Um so, I missed the first part of it.
11:08So, did is there
11:10um
11:11is there a process where we can access
11:13the money now? I know last
11:16I heard about it it was kind of tied up
11:18at the state level, so has that been
11:20rectified?
11:22>> Yes, that has been rectified.
11:23>> Yes, that was rectified. They paid out
11:251.4 They paid back 1.4 million to the
11:28two um businesses. So, right now after
11:31we pay that there's 1.7 million left in
11:34the fund.
11:35>> Okay.
11:36All right. I just want to
11:38I I I heard Counselor Davis' comments
11:41earlier, which wholeheartedly I think
11:43the whole city
11:45should benefit
11:46from some type of relief. If we can come
11:49up with a a process for that, great.
11:52But, I also want to hone in on the fact
11:53that
11:55some areas are more affected than
11:58than others, obviously, with some of the
12:01dispensaries located. I'm going to give
12:03one example, which is right in the ward
12:05my ward, Ember.
12:07Where we have tons of traffic and tons
12:09of issues going on. So, I just want to
12:11be, you know,
12:13prepared for the the pushback we may
12:15receive with some of the residents that
12:18actually have to deal with
12:20that traffic and all concerns in their
12:22particular area. So, I'm I'm all for
12:25supporting,
12:26you know, something we come up with a
12:28comprehensive plan to do that, but I
12:30also want also us to to recognize that
12:34there are some real issues that are
12:35happening in neighborhoods, and how can
12:37we use this money to
12:39give back to those that actually have
12:42the dispensaries in the area. So,
12:45just want to put that on the record.
12:47>> Yeah, and and I agree with that,
12:49Counselor King Bruce.
12:50You know, these funds, that's what they
12:52were made for, and that's the reason
12:55that I'm asking about them is because I
12:58know for a long time they were tied up,
13:00and we weren't able to have access to
13:02them. So, finding a way to be able to
13:04use them the way that they were
13:06intended, you know, and of course I'm
13:08always for tax relief for the residents.
13:12And this targeted tax relief fund that
13:15the mayor
13:16initiated a couple of years ago, I think
13:19he funded a million dollars. There's a
13:20million dollars in there right now.
13:22So, finding a way to, you know, continue
13:25to fund those kind of things.
13:27The The thing with the targeted tax
13:29relief is that it's targeted to people
13:33who
13:34um
13:35you know, of course they need the funds.
13:38I like it veterans, I like seniors, you
13:40know, people with disabilities.
13:43Um and then we also have people in our
13:45city who are struggling, you know,
13:48there's seniors of course and they're
13:50still struggling. They don't probably
13:51fit into those categories, but they
13:54still need um the help. So that's a
13:56whole That's conversation again for next
13:58week. I don't want to talk about that
13:59now, but for the stabilization fund with
14:02the cannabis um tax money created I
14:05would like for us I agree with Council
14:07uh Cliff Bruce that we should find a way
14:10to put that money into those
14:12neighborhoods that are affected by that,
14:14you know, and um
14:16the the impact that it's having it might
14:19not be, you know, immediately seen, but
14:22I think, you know, because the money is
14:24there and because a lot of those
14:25neighborhoods don't have those
14:27resources, it would you know, behoove us
14:30to to continue along those lines when we
14:33first start those conversations.
14:35Um I acknowledge our Council Council
14:38President Oh Whitfield, you have your
14:40hand up, ma'am?
14:41>> Yeah, sorry I'm late Council um Madam
14:44Chair.
14:45Um grateful Turk Festival first I wanted
14:48to say it was great. I had a good time.
14:50>> Thanks for coming out.
14:51>> Got the food that I wanted. Um I know
14:54that I missed the first part of the
14:55meeting, but I just wanted to circle
14:58back and see if any of those funds have
15:00been
15:01used or distributed and what's in the
15:03accounts.
15:05>> Uh no, we just paid back that one the
15:08lawsuit um the 1.4 million. So what's
15:12left in the account is 1.7 million.
15:14Nothing's been used. It has to go The
15:16council has to put an order in front of
15:18the mayor. The mayor then has to at
15:19request the mayor and then the mayor
15:21would have to put a financial order in
15:22front of you, but um the city council,
15:25it's in a stabilization fund set up for
15:27the city council. So, you haven't um
15:29put together a plan yet.
15:32>> So, I think Madam President that that's
15:34something that we can start talking
15:36about.
15:37>> Yeah.
15:38>> And I'm making, you know, figuring out
15:40what we want. I like categories that are
15:44in the um the fund um and use it in that
15:48way to benefit the residents.
15:51>> Okay. That that is an option a
15:53opportunity.
15:55>> Mhm.
15:56>> Mhm.
15:57Thank you.
15:58>> Thank you, Madam President. All right.
16:00Anything else on on that? So, we're
16:03getting three We're collecting 3%,
16:05right? Of that 3% that we collect
16:09all of it doesn't go into this fund. 33%
16:12>> 33% Okay.
16:13>> And the other And the other one goes to
16:15the general fund.
16:16>> The other thing goes to the general
16:17right to general fund revenue.
16:22>> So, that means that we're really
16:23collecting
16:24over a million dollars, like
16:261.something.
16:27>> And um at 1.26, we collected 1.2 million
16:32went to the general fund, and um 609,000
16:36went into your fund.
16:41>> Great.
16:42>> So, I think that's over uh how many how
16:44many cannabis stores is there that we
16:46have here?
16:46>> I I don't know the number of stores off
16:48the top of my head, Council.
16:49>> No, we don't.
16:49>> I don't either, no.
16:51>> I I want to say maybe like 12 or 13, but
16:54I'm not sure. I don't know them.
16:58>> Uh Madam Chair.
17:00>> Yes, sir.
17:02>> Uh what was the categories again?
17:05>> Could you please say them again?
17:06>> Yeah, and these categories were set up
17:07by the city council.
17:09>> Yeah, I understand.
17:09>> Um education and recreational program
17:12programming for youth and adults,
17:14neighborhood business incentives,
17:15improvements to infrastructure,
17:17recreational community sites, and other
17:19needed initiatives.
17:21>> Okay. Thank you.
17:27>> Thank you.
17:31All right. So, we'll start having those
17:32conversations, I think,
17:34because
17:35regarding the targeted tax relief
17:39that's supposed to be Again, this is
17:41off-topic. Uh but, I know that I think
17:44that in the tax bills, people have an
17:46opportunity to check a box.
17:49Um
17:50Unfortunately, I'm going to say, like
17:53like for example, myself, when I get my
17:55tax bill,
17:57I just put it away, because it comes out
17:59of my thing, so I don't have to check
18:00the box. So, I think I'm wondering if
18:02there's a way for us to um
18:06maybe And um this is the assessor's
18:08office uh send something out
18:11specifically asking, "Hey, are you Do
18:13you want to participate in the targeted
18:14tax relief?" And I'm sure a lot of
18:16people would um if they knew about it.
18:20And it's probably not a lot. You could
18:22say $5, you know, of the quarter. If
18:25everybody did that, we'd have some money
18:27in here. So, yeah, maybe we'll have a
18:30conversation with the assessor's office
18:31regarding sending something out like
18:33that.
18:34So, I like that um
18:36funding idea.
18:37>> You're talking about people without
18:38escrows.
18:39>> Yeah. See, like my my bill, I get it,
18:42and it just gets paid in my mortgage.
18:45>> mortgage
18:45>> Um so, I don't need I don't even have to
18:47look at it or send it back because it
18:51gets paid. But, um I know some people do
18:54get it, and they have to look at it, and
18:56maybe they could check the box, but I
18:58think most people nowadays, if they have
19:00a mortgage, and they have um escrow in
19:03their mortgage, it just goes
19:04automatically.
19:06So,
19:07>> If If I may interrupt. Uh Kathy, in
19:09those cases like uh Councilwoman is
19:11talking about,
19:13uh,
19:13can the person send a check instead?
19:16>> Oh, yeah.
19:16>> On their own?
19:17>> Yep.
19:18>> And it will have to be, this have to be
19:19spelled out to be used dollars.
19:22>> I mean, yeah, if you don't want to just
19:23send a check, a random check to
19:25assessors, but I'd rather send it to the
19:26city and just say for targeted tax.
19:29>> So, anybody out there, any resident who
19:30feels generous could say, "I'm going to
19:32write a check for whatever, 25, 50
19:34bucks."
19:35>> But, I think a offer should be made.
19:37Like,
19:39I'd like to get a something in the mail
19:40saying, "Hey, do you want to
19:42give to the targeted tax relief?" You
19:44know, and and
19:46check that box, say, "Okay, every
19:48quarter I'll give $5 or something like
19:50that." And then people if people want to
19:52send a check, the offer needs to be made
19:55cuz I think a lot of people might not
19:56know about it. Um, and having, you know,
20:00having it brought up to the forefront, I
20:02think would be helpful. Just my thought
20:04on that.
20:05But, I guess we were off topic.
20:09All right. Any other, um, comments or
20:12questions about the cannabis,
20:15um,
20:16stabilization fund, I'm going to call
20:17it.
20:19No? All right. All right, well, this
20:22meeting is going to be adjourned.
20:24Thank you all.