2026-09-24 - CSO Control Plan Public Hearing 2

Summary

Based on auto-generated captions; names and figures may be misheard.

  • Format: the second of three public hearings on the draft updated Combined Sewer Overflow Control Plan, run as a Zoom session by facilitators from the Consensus Building Institute. It was a comment-only hearing, with no presentation or question period, and each speaker got two minutes. About 55 people joined at the start.
  • Background from the MWRA chief engineer: the plan was developed by the MWRA and the cities of Cambridge and Somerville, aims to substantially reduce or eliminate combined sewer overflows to the Alewife Brook, Mystic River and Charles River under state water-quality variances, and has been in development since 2022. The draft was released April 30, 2026, and written comments are due October 30, 2026. The final plan is expected in May 2027 after state and federal review.
  • Ways to comment: the online portal, email, mail to the MWRA, or verbal comment at hearings. The third hearing is October 28 from 6 to 8 p.m., in person at Somerville City Hall and online. The last of the project office hours is October 6.
  • Speakers from Arlington (including a state representative, a Town Meeting member and residents near Alewife Brook), Newton, Medford and Woburn mostly urged full sewer separation and virtual elimination of overflows. Speakers alleged the draft plan would leave Alewife Brook receiving about 50 percent more overflow volume in a future five-year storm than today, and said sewage floods onto the Alewife path and into homes along the brook.
  • A Charles River Watershed Association organizer said the roughly $1.3 billion draft plan would still allow discharges in heavy storms and noted 285 written comments had been submitted as of September 16, most calling for an end to overflows.
  • A Medford resident praised the plan overall but asked that it be designed for wetter-than-typical years, for example one to three standard deviations above average rainfall, rather than a typical year.
  • Cost concerns from MWRA member communities: a Melrose official said the plan would raise Melrose's sewer assessment by about $1 million a year (roughly $120 per household) and supported the draft as balanced, warning that stronger plans would triple the cost. A Norwood selectman cited about $36 million more in rates over the debt period for Norwood under the draft and $109 million under the stronger plan, and said neighboring towns would see about $150 million combined; they asked for relief for communities with separated systems.
  • A resident asked that the project website show the comment deadline clearly (October 30, with a time) and said the plan's map omits six active outfalls on the brook. A wastewater advisory committee member asked whether adopting a lower-level plan now would rule out later improvements; staff said the team could not answer questions at the hearing and pointed to office hours.
  • The hearing closed when no one else asked to speak.

Issues discussed

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:02Hi everyone, welcome.

00:06We are going to give another minute or

00:08two for people to join us here on this

00:11sunny Thursday afternoon. Thanks for

00:14logging on to the the second public

00:16hearing on the draft updated combined

00:19sewer overflow control plan. Again,

00:22we'll just give a minute or two here as

00:24people as people join.

00:55Hello to those just joining us. We're

00:57just waiting a moment longer for others

01:01to to enter this Zoom space. Thanks for

01:03being here. start sharing my screen in

01:06the meantime.

01:25All right, I'm seeing our numbers

01:28plateau a bit, so I think we're okay to

01:30go ahead and get started. So, hello

01:32everyone. Welcome to the second of three

01:35public hearings on the draft updated

01:37combined sewer overflow control plan. Um

01:40it's great to be with you in this Zoom

01:43world. Um my name is Abby Fulham. I am a

01:46facilitator at the Consensus Building

01:47Institute. I'll be facilitating the

01:50public hearing this afternoon. Um I'm

01:52joined by my colleagues Ona Ferguson and

01:54Micah Seagull. We're based here in

01:56Porter Square.

01:59So how we will approach this public

02:02hearing? Um so first the objective of

02:05this session is for people who are

02:08interested to share verbal comment on

02:10this draft plan that will be entered

02:13into the public record. Um so we're

02:16going to start this afternoon with a

02:17little bit of information just where we

02:19are in the process. If you're interested

02:21in learning more about the draft plan,

02:23how to do that and then how to comment

02:25on it. This is one, this public hearing

02:27is one of many ways to comment on the

02:29draft plan. And so we want you to um

02:31know the other options. Then we'll give

02:33a little bit of instruction um for

02:35today, how to get how to get in the

02:37queue, etc. And then we'll open for

02:39public comment. Um we will adjourn the

02:43meeting once everyone who wants to share

02:46has had two minutes to speak.

02:49Um so there's not a formal end time for

02:52this public hearing. We will end once

02:53everyone who wants has had the

02:55opportunity. We will not be taking

02:57formal breaks. So if you ever need to,

02:59you know, stretch, go to the restroom,

03:01get some food, please do that. This is

03:02being recorded. Um it will be posted on

03:05the project website if you want to watch

03:07any of the public comments that you

03:09missed. Um, and then from there the

03:12recording will be transcribed and then

03:14again those comments will be entered

03:16into the public record on this draft

03:19plan and then they'll be considered by

03:21the project team as they develop the

03:23final version of the plan.

03:26Um, I'll say just briefly here, this is

03:29clearly not an information sharing

03:31meeting. If you want to learn more,

03:33we're about to hear different ways, but

03:34there are a lot of resources on the

03:36website. So encourage you to to check

03:38them out.

03:39All right, I'm going to turn now to

03:41Brian Kubaska from MWR who's the chief

03:44engineer. Brian, over to you.

03:48>> Welcome everyone. Thank you for joining

03:51us today. Um, [clears throat] this uh

03:54draft updated Cso control plan uh was

03:58developed by the project partners uh the

04:01MWR, the city of Cambridge, and the city

04:04of Somerville.

04:05The partners were supported by several

04:07consultant teams in the draft plans

04:09development. Um representing uh the MWRA

04:15um Cambridge and Somerville. Um people

04:18here today include Jeremy Hall. He's

04:22he's joining me from the MWRA. Jeremy is

04:24the MW Cso program manager.

04:28uh Luchica Hiller uh cso program manager

04:33with Cambridge and Katherine Woodbury

04:36the uh city consultant uh also from

04:40Cambridge. And we also have Rich Re the

04:44director of infrastructure and asset

04:46management from the city of Somerville

04:48as well as Gina Cortez,

04:51deputy director of engineering

04:54uh at the city of Somerville as well. U

04:57members of the project team uh the

05:01you can jump to the next slide.

05:05The updated Cso control plan has been

05:08developed

05:11since has been underdeveloped since uh

05:132022.

05:15Uh its purpose is to identify projects

05:18and strategies sub to substantially

05:20reduce or eliminate combined sewer

05:23overflow in the Alway

05:26Mystic and the Charles River in

05:28accordance with Mass D's

05:31issued variances for these water bodies.

05:34The plan has included extensive

05:36technical work and public engagement

05:38including multiple public meetings. I

05:41believe we had seven to date. Uh the

05:44draft plan

05:46uh was released on April 30th, 2026

05:53um [clears throat] by the partners and

05:56uh we are currently in the sixmonth

05:58public comment period. Written comments

06:02uh are due by the end of October,

06:04October 30th, 2026.

06:07So following the public comment period,

06:10the comments will re be reviewed by the

06:13project partners with additional review

06:15by mass D and EPA. Uh the final updated

06:19CSO control plan is anticipated in May

06:22of 2027

06:24following further state review.

06:28Next slide.

06:31We encourage members of the public to

06:34review the draft plan and the

06:36information from previous public

06:38meetings as they develop their comments.

06:42You can find this information on our

06:44project website. Next slide.

06:49So there are four ways to submit public

06:52comments uh through the online public

06:56comment portal. Uh that's shown by the

06:59uh the section in the upper right of

07:01this this slide. You have a URL there as

07:04well as as a web link. um by email. Uh

07:10there's also a URL the next one down for

07:12that and as well as by mail written

07:16comments to the MWR at two Griffin Way

07:20in Chelsea and and lastly by providing

07:24verbal comments during this public

07:26meeting today.

07:28Um so you know this is our second of

07:32three hearings.

07:35Uh

07:37the third and final public hearing will

07:40be held on Octo October 28th uh from

07:446:00 to 8.

07:46That will be a uh inperson at Somerville

07:50City Hall as well as virtual. Next

07:52slide.

07:57And lastly, uh, questions or requests

08:00for information outside of the formal

08:03public comments can be directed to our

08:06project team by email. Uh, we appreciate

08:10everyone taking the time to participate

08:12and provide input today. Uh, your

08:14comments will be documented and will be

08:17considered as the Enter Cambridge and

08:19Somerville moves towards completion of

08:22our updated Cso control plan.

08:25Uh believe Abby will now explain uh how

08:29the public comment process will work at

08:31today's hearings.

08:33>> Yeah, thanks Brian. Uh so hi everyone

08:36and for those that are just tuning in,

08:38my name is Abby Fulham. I'm a

08:40facilitator from the Consensus Building

08:41Institute joined here by my colleagues

08:43Ona Ferguson and Micah Seagull and we'll

08:45be facilitating uh this afternoon. So

08:48first of all, thank you for being here.

08:50We have about let's see about 55 people

08:54on Zoom at this hearing. Um which is

08:56fantastic and we hope to see you at a um

08:59potentially the in-person one as well.

09:02Um the point of today's session again is

09:04a public hearing, an opportunity to

09:06share verbal comment that will be

09:08transcribed and then entered into the

09:11public record um and then considered by

09:13the project partners and regulators as

09:15they put together the final plan. Um,

09:18and it is not a we're not presenting

09:20anything this e this afternoon, nor is

09:22this like a question and answer

09:24opportunity. And if you if you are

09:26interested in learning more about what's

09:28in the plan, again, please look at the

09:29project website. Maybe Ona, would you

09:31mind putting that in the chat for

09:33people? Um, and then also there is the

09:37the final of eight office hours will be

09:40on October 6th. So if you have questions

09:42about the plan, we encourage you to

09:44attend the office hours and you can ask

09:47those questions of the project team. The

09:49information on that is also on the

09:51project website.

09:53Um so how we're going to run this

09:56session is everyone who wants to speak

09:59will have up to two minutes to share. Um

10:03we'll have a big timer on the screen. We

10:05ask that you please be respectful of

10:06this. We're going to be pretty firm. We

10:08want to be fair across commenters and

10:10across public hearings. So, we're going

10:12to be pretty tight with that twominut

10:14deadline. Um, as we said at the top,

10:17there's no there's not a fixed end time.

10:19We will adjourn rather when everyone

10:21who's interested has had an opportunity

10:24to comment and we imagine that you have

10:26a lot to say about this plan. It's very

10:28long. It's very detailed. Um, and so if

10:30you have more than two minutes of

10:31comments to share, please please do

10:33submit them in writing. Um, and Brian

10:36articulated the different ways to do

10:38that. Okay. So, how this is going to

10:41work, um, if you want to join the queue,

10:44please raise your hand in Zoom. Keep

10:47that hand up throughout the entire

10:49afternoon session until you speak.

10:51Otherwise, you'll lose your place in

10:52line. We're just going to go

10:53chronologically there. Um, once Ona will

10:57do the first batch, she's going to call

10:58on people. And once you're you'll get a

11:01we'll promote you to panelist. You'll

11:03have to click on a little window that

11:05says move into panelist role or

11:08something like that. And then you'll be

11:09able to unmute yourself and turn on your

11:12camera and then share your public

11:14comment. Um right now though we can't

11:16see or hear you.

11:19Um on Zoom there should be a raise hand

11:21button at the bottom of your of your

11:24screen. If it's not right there,

11:25sometimes it lives in a reactions um

11:28button. So, just click there if you

11:30can't find it. If you're calling in on

11:32the phone, um you can hit star 9, which

11:36will raise your hand. And then if you

11:38change your mind and you want to lower

11:39your hand, you can hit star 9 again. Um

11:42and then once you're promoted, you'll

11:43hit star six to unmute yourself. We can

11:46remind you of that. Um but star 9 is

11:48going to be how you get in the in the

11:50queue. For everyone, if you change your

11:52mind about speaking tonight, just lower

11:53your hand so we know not to call on you.

11:56Um, and maybe public speaking is not for

11:59you, but you really want to comment.

12:01Again, you do not have to share public

12:03comment verbally. You can do it in

12:05writing. Uh, this QR code will take you

12:07directly to the comment page or you can

12:10go through the the project team website.

12:14Okay. So, just lastly before we move

12:16here into public comment, again, 2

12:18minutes. We're going to be firm. What

12:20would that limit? You will see a timer.

12:22Please be mindful of it. Please be

12:24respectful. Um, and then importantly, we

12:26ask that you share your name, your town,

12:29and your affiliation if it's relevant,

12:31and that will get entered into the

12:33public record along with your comment.

12:36Okay, I'm going to stop sharing.

12:40>> Thank you, Abby.

12:41>> Turn it to Ona. Thanks. Great. Um, one

12:44other thing as we get into hearing from

12:47all of you is when you start seeing um,

12:52the people who are sharing comments,

12:54there will be a timer and there will be

12:56their window and each of you can adjust

13:00how big and how small you want those.

13:02Sadly, we couldn't preset it. So, at the

13:05beginning, you might see the clock

13:06really big. If you're on a computer,

13:08there's a little slider. You can just

13:10slide that window over so it gets little

13:12and the person gets big, which you

13:13should do to see everyone's faces. And

13:17yeah, you'll see it now. I know it's

13:19very big on where I am. Um, and then if

13:22you're on a phone, you similarly will

13:24see the clock as like the primary

13:26window, but if you tap on the speaker's

13:29face, they will become the big window

13:32you see. So you can see people instead

13:34of um just the timer. So with that we

13:38are going to get started. Again please

13:40raise your virtual hand if you would

13:42like to share comments. We will start um

13:45with Dave Rogers and then go to Beth

13:48Malofchek.

13:49So Dave, please go ahead. We are going

13:51to promote you um and you'll have to

13:54accept that promotion and then unmute

13:56yourself and turn on your camera.

14:03Representative Rogers should be in

14:06process of being promoted.

14:10>> Go ahead and try it. Representative

14:14>> I did. Um,

14:17>> yep.

14:19>> There you are. Perfect.

14:20>> Working. Okay.

14:22>> Yes. Please go ahead.

14:23>> Okay. Well, first, thank you very much

14:26for this opportunity to comment on the

14:28draft updated combined sewer overflow

14:30control plan. I genuinely appreciate the

14:33great deal of time, effort, and

14:35commitment uh it has taken for the MWR,

14:39the city of Cambridge, and the city of

14:40Somerville to present such a detailed,

14:42comprehensive plan. Uh no doubt many

14:45contributed, and we appreciate it. I

14:47represent the people of Arlington,

14:49Belmont, and Cambridge as I have for a

14:51fair number of years now. And many of

14:53them are deeply concerned about the

14:54health of the ale wife, the Charles, and

14:56the Mystic Rivers. They themselves have

14:58been deeply committed to advocating for

15:01improvements to the local ecosystem. And

15:03for many years in my role as a

15:05representative, I have done that to help

15:07protect the natural world around the

15:09Charles, the Elwife, the mystic. I

15:12myself live just a couple blocks from uh

15:14the Elwife Brook. In the original

15:16presentation of the plan, uh uh the mass

15:19D expressed concerns about the direction

15:22of the plan. So a state agency uh said

15:25that they identified uh alternatives

15:28identified may be insufficient to

15:30address cso discharges and associated

15:33impacts and appear to be inconsistent

15:36with the clean water act and the mass

15:38surface water quality standards. After

15:40being granted this extension, the final

15:42draft control plans only make relatively

15:46modest improvements. Uh, and the plans

15:49for the alwife remain largely the same.

15:52The main point I want to convey is while

15:54there's a lot of different strategies to

15:56control and to mitigate environmental

15:58contamin contaminants, the ultimate gold

16:02standard is sewer separation. and um uh

16:06all other measures while uh helpful do

16:09not have that same impact. So I want to

16:12encourage additional sewer separation

16:14particularly in the alewife area. Uh I

16:17also want to uh [clears throat]

16:18>> have seconds

16:19>> stress that um u I appreciate the time

16:24and um

16:27um I'll I'll honor the the time limit

16:29here but I think I've made my point and

16:32and thank you. Thank you. Um, Beth

16:35Molofchic, you are next. We'll promote

16:37you and let you unmute and turn on your

16:41camera. And then Ariana Puya will be

16:44next.

16:57>> Beth Malof check. My affiliation. I

17:01belong to voters who know the draft plan

17:04is crap. Governor Healey's plan to

17:07continue sewage dumping to continue the

17:09status quo using East Arlington as the

17:11raw sewage overflow basin for Somerville

17:14and Cambridge is not a vote getter.

17:17Governor Healey suspended the gas tax.

17:19She needs to end sewage in the alew wife

17:21Charles and Mystic. Tannery Rose Cso and

17:24CAM 401A have got to go. We want sewer

17:28separation.

17:31The draft plan leaves ale wife receiving

17:33nearly 50% more cso volume in a common

17:36future 5-year storm than it receives

17:39today. This defies common sense as well

17:43as I think several legal things you're

17:45supposed to be adhering to um namely

17:49ending csos. So, I'm here again to say

17:54that uh Governor Healey's draft plan is

17:58not a solution. It is the illusion of a

18:01solution. It is a multiplier

18:05specifically in East Arlington. East

18:08Arlington should not be used as the open

18:12sewer of convenience for the wealthier

18:15communities of Cambridge and Somerville.

18:18This defies

18:20basic precepts of humanity and decency.

18:25So get back to the drawing board. Start

18:28over. You have not done enough work.

18:31Your work product fails miserably.

18:35Please. We want a solution, not the

18:37illusion of a solution. We do not want

18:40Governor Healey's multiplier.

18:42We want a workable plan with

18:44comprehensive sewer separation. We want

18:47a fishable and swimmable ale wife brook

18:51ASAP. Thank you very much.

18:53>> Thank you, Beth. Are you an Arlington

18:55resident?

18:56>> I'm an Arlington resident.

18:58>> Thank you.

18:58>> Voters against crap in our rivers.

19:01>> Thank you, Beth. Um, next up is Ariana

19:05Pa. And as we are promoting Ariana, um,

19:09that is the only other hand that is up.

19:11So, if you are one of the 47 attendees

19:15here today and you think you might want

19:17to say something, you should put up your

19:20hand so we can hear from you or you

19:22should think about it some and come to

19:24our next hearing and or write your

19:27comments in. But we will end the hearing

19:29when we have no more people to call on.

19:32So, Ariana um please go ahead.

19:36>> Thank you. My name is Ariana Puya. I

19:39live in Newton and I'm speaking today as

19:41the senior community organizer for the

19:43Charles River Wershed Association.

19:45Ending combined sewer overflows in the

19:47Charles River um is a top priority for

19:50CRWA. Our detailed comments on the plan

19:52and the analysis will be submitted in

19:54written form, but I am here today simply

19:56to ask that the parties recommend

19:58virtual elimination of CSOS in the final

20:02plan. The current draft plan does not

20:04eliminate CSOS. Instead, it ensures that

20:07they will continue during heavy or high

20:09intensity

20:10rainfall events. Storms like the one

20:13predicted for this weekend would still

20:15discharge raw sewage into the river even

20:18after implementing the this $ 1.3

20:20billion plan. Severe weather events like

20:23this are already happening and will only

20:26become more frequent due to climate

20:27change. Raw or untreated raw or

20:30untreated sewage will flow into the

20:32Charles and contaminate it for at least

20:34the following two days. This is one of

20:36the busiest times of the years on the

20:38river as people are training for the

20:40head of the Charles regata. Rorers with

20:42chronic health issues or who are immuno

20:44compromised will have to make the

20:46difficult decision about whether to

20:48pause their training or potentially get

20:50sick. We can and must end this problem.

20:53But it's not just about those who

20:54recreate on the river. A study on the

20:56Marramac River demonstrated a connection

20:58between increased emergency room visits

21:00from gas gastrointestinal issues and cso

21:04of discharge events. The disease-causing

21:06agents and sewage are likely getting

21:08into the air and making those who enjoy

21:10the beautiful Charles River parks and

21:12pathways or even just who live nearby

21:15causing them to be sick. We can and must

21:17end this problem. Um, in my role at

21:20CRWA, I have the chance to speak to a

21:23lot of people about the river. People

21:24feel deeply connected to the Charles

21:26River. When they learn that the in 2026

21:29that there is still raw sewage going

21:30into the river, they are outraged. They

21:33are making their voices heard. And as of

21:35September 16th, we see 285 comments have

21:38been submitted on this draft plan. The

21:40vast majority calling like we are for an

21:42end to CSOS. We can and must end this

21:45problem. And thank you for your time.

21:47>> Thank you. Um and thanks to those of you

21:50who got inspired to raise your hands. We

21:52now have um some more hands in the

21:54queue. Next up are Chris Styver and then

21:58John Dort Tortelli. Chris, he will be

22:01promoted now.

22:09Hey there. Thanks for the promotion.

22:11>> Perfect.

22:12>> Ready to go.

22:13>> Yep.

22:15>> Uh screen's moving around. There we go.

22:19All right. Well, first off, thanks for

22:20the time to speak here. My name is Chris

22:21Styver. I live in Medford. Um about a

22:235-minute walk to the Mystic River. Uh

22:25we've got two small kids and we're

22:27active family. So we spend a lot of time

22:28outdoors enjoying uh many of the

22:30beautiful resources of this area. And

22:32that includes the Mystic River and the

22:33Mystic Lakes. So we take our kids to

22:36Shannon Beach to go swimming. Uh that is

22:38when there isn't uh a CSO event. Um we

22:42go canoeing in the Mystic Pond and

22:44Shell. Uh and I'm a runner, so we we're

22:46always running and along the shores of

22:48the Mystic River Lakes. Uh we really

22:50love the natural beauty of our region

22:52and I in particular want to preserve it

22:54for our kids to enjoy as they grow. Um

22:56so first off thanks for all the hard

22:58work. Clearly there's a lot of time and

22:59effort that went into this plan. Um it's

23:01really well thought out. Um and overall

23:03I think it puts us in the right

23:04direction of trying to reduce CSOS. Um

23:06however I'm concerned that the control

23:08measures and activities um are not

23:10designed around the right scenarios. the

23:13the sort of typical year analysis um is

23:16really designing for it's not quite an

23:19average rainfall. It's a little above

23:21that but um and I do appreciate that

23:23there is some um allowance for increased

23:26rainfall that is certainly going to

23:28happen with with climate change. Um but

23:30it still means that non-typical years uh

23:33years where there's excessive rainfall

23:36um we're going to continue to allow

23:37CISOs into our our wersheds. Uh and so I

23:40urge the uh the group here to uh

23:43reconsider um a different definition of

23:45how we plan for and design um the

23:48structures and facilities. For example,

23:51uh some standard deviation above the

23:54mean, two standard deviation, two

23:56standard deviations, three standard

23:57deviations above the mean, I think would

23:58be a more appropriate way to help

24:00prevent uh CSOS in non-typical or higher

24:04failures.

24:06Thank you.

24:07>> Thank you.

24:10John Tortelli, you are next. And then it

24:13will be Caroline Meeks.

24:16John, you should be promoted.

24:20>> John, you declined. I'm going to try

24:22that again.

24:23>> You need to sort of accept the panelist

24:26promotion.

24:30>> Yep, there we go. Joining.

24:35>> Great. So, John, you can unmute and turn

24:37on your camera when you're ready.

24:41>> I think we're there.

24:42>> There you are.

24:44>> I live on Sunnyside Avenue, Arlington

24:46along the Wife Brook, and it's time for

24:51separation of sewage and the storm water

24:55overflow. It distresses me that in 2026,

25:00we're still talking about raw sewage

25:02discharges into the Elwife. I have

25:05personal experience with the sewage

25:08overflow onto my property and it's not a

25:12nice thing. There are economic time and

25:15health costs to this. I hate it also

25:19when friends and family members,

25:21grandchildren come over and I have to

25:24tell them stay away from the water.

25:26Nobody can believe it when I tell them

25:29there's raw sewage out back here. Uh,

25:32waterways should be clean and they

25:34should be clear and be able to use by

25:38all. It's basically, as Beth summed it

25:42up, time to cut the crap and it's time

25:44to eliminate CSOS. Thank you.

25:50>> Thank you.

25:52Next up is Caroline Meeks and then after

25:56Caroline will be Lori Rogers Stokes.

26:00Caroline [clears throat]

26:10unmute. Let me start over. And I guess

26:14my video is on. I can turn that on.

26:16There we go. Perfect. Um, thank you for

26:20this opportunity to comment. I My name

26:23is Caroline Meeks. I am an East

26:25Arlington resident. I um am went to

26:29Somerville High. I have an elder who

26:33lives in Somerville. She used to live in

26:35the VNA, which is right across the

26:36street um from the Mystic River um very

26:41close to the ill wife. And I want to

26:44reiterate that I think it's very

26:45important, the time has come to separate

26:48our sewage from our waterways. Our

26:52waterways are so important uh especially

26:55as we go into this period of climate

26:58change.

27:00Not only are we going to get storms like

27:02we're getting this weekend repeatedly

27:04and we just can't assume, oh, it's only

27:07going to happen occasionally with the

27:09system can handle it. We're going to

27:10have more more storms causing more of an

27:13impact. We're also having more warm

27:15weather and our waterways are very

27:18important for people in the heat. We see

27:22that at Shannon Beach and we could be

27:24using the Elwife could be a beautiful

27:27kayakable

27:29fishable um stream. Uh we have such an

27:33amazing resource here with all of these

27:36waterways. It's just not right that the

27:40sewage from Cambridge and Somerville

27:42should be polluting these waterways

27:44which are a regional asset.

27:47Thank you.

27:48>> Thank you.

27:50Next up is Kristen Anderson and then

27:53Rajes Moan.

27:55>> Oh no, I think you skipped

27:57>> Lori. Sorry there. Please Lori. Sorry,

28:00it' be Lori and then Kristen.

28:04>> Hello. I've put my video on. I don't

28:07know if you see me. Oh, you do see me.

28:09Oh, great.

28:10>> Um, I think that everybody on both sides

28:13of this issue knows that there shouldn't

28:14be raw sewage flowing into any waterway.

28:18It is, as someone pointed out, 2026. So,

28:22it just becomes this war of attrition.

28:24the timeline shown earlier like since

28:262023. It's just a constant battle by

28:30people who know that it's not right but

28:32just are driven by other motivations to

28:34see how much they can just wear people

28:36down and drag it out until people forget

28:39about it or give up. And I'm glad to see

28:41so many people here not giving up. It's

28:44irrational to even have an argument

28:46about whether there should be raw sewage

28:49flooded into a river or a stream or any

28:53body of water. And the money that is

28:55spent for other things that are not as

28:58important is just a sign that this is an

29:03issue where people know what the right

29:04thing to do is, but there are other

29:05reasons why they don't want to do it for

29:08profit or who knows what. But I just

29:10want to add my voice to those people

29:11making the rational argument that it's

29:14not our burden to prove that it's a bad

29:16thing. It's not our burden to sort

29:18through constant uh reiterations of the

29:22same plan and say no no no over and over

29:24again. But for as long as being made our

29:26burden, I'm here to help carry part of

29:29that. Thank you.

29:31>> Can you also Lori say where you live?

29:32>> Oh yes. I'm from Arlington. I'm in

29:34Arlington Heights.

29:35>> Thank you. Um okay. I think I thought I

29:40had next Kristen. I seem to have got

29:43tangled between these three. Kristen,

29:44why don't you go Kristen Anderson and

29:46then we'll go to Rajes Moan.

29:56>> Working. Kristen, you should be able to

29:57unmute and turn on your camera.

29:59>> Thank you. Uh,

30:02I think I got it. Thank you.

30:06Um, and you can hear me now. Um, so, um,

30:11uh, my name is Kristen Anderson. I'm

30:12from Saveale Wifebrook. I'm an Arlington

30:14Town meeting member, and I, um,

30:17testified for two minutes, um, last

30:20week, and I just wanted to, um,

30:23uh, fix something. I I misspoke, um, and

30:27I just wanted to fix what I said last

30:29week. Um, so I'm involved in this

30:32because I've had um the cso flood water

30:35in my house and I've gotten sick from

30:36the sewage and my neighbors got sick

30:38from the sewage and I don't want it to

30:39happen to anybody else. Um, and um what

30:44I had said last week is that the draft

30:46plan is designed to allow sewage

30:49discharge volumes that are 50% worse in

30:53um future 5-year storm events than they

30:56are in today's 5-year storm events. So

30:58conditions in the future will be much

31:00worse than they are today because the

31:01draft plan was not engineered uh to keep

31:05up with climate change impacts. Um the

31:09draft plan is designed to discharge more

31:11sewage

31:13um in the exact frequency of storms that

31:17are most likely to result in ill wife

31:20flooding. And last week I had said that

31:22it was the exact same size um storm, but

31:25what I meant to say is it's the same

31:27frequency of storm because in the future

31:30uh these storms are going to be um much

31:32larger um uh more common. Um and Elwife

31:38Brook floods um over its bank um and it

31:42sends sewage discharge into

31:46um the ill wife path. We've seen um

31:49parents pushing baby strollers through

31:52the raw sewage there. And we've seen um

31:55older folks um walking through it. Uh

31:58children riding bikes through it. It's

32:00absolutely horrifying. Um in 2023, the

32:04ill wife flooded over its bank five

32:06times. Um and so we really need

32:08[clears throat and music]

32:10>> Okay. Thank you.

32:11>> Thank you, Chris.

32:13>> You can say your sent you want to say

32:14the second half of the sentence. Oh no.

32:16Okay. Let's go to Rajes. And I would

32:20like to say we have no more hands in the

32:22queue after Rajes. So if you are here

32:26thinking you would like to make verbal

32:28public comment, now is your chance to

32:30raise your Zoom hand and let us know um

32:34because we will close when the last

32:36comment has been given um today knowing

32:39we have another uh hearing in a month.

32:42Um so okay, I see a couple more hands

32:44going up. Thank you, Rajes, please. you.

32:46>> Yeah. Can you see me or hear me?

32:48>> Yes. Yep.

32:49>> Okay. [laughter] I cannot. So, anyway,

32:52um I'm my name is Rajes. I'm I I live in

32:55Wuburn and I have kayaked and enjoyed

32:58the water in various places in Charles

33:01River. And I also made a film last year

33:05uh on the alewife run basically the

33:08elwife migration and how important it is

33:11for both um the wildlife and the natural

33:14resources not only in in in the river

33:16waters but also the ocean. uh so I find

33:20it very disturbing to see that sewage

33:23will be dumped and you know it impacts

33:26um the people people's health and the

33:29wildlife local wildlife all these are

33:32precious and it's very important for us

33:34to conserve and I myself come from um

33:38working at Harvard uh to know that there

33:40is absolutely brilliant minds and

33:43brilliant institutions in this area uh

33:46we cannot have a solution for this uh to

33:49me is um difficult to digest. So I want

33:52to go on record saying uh we should not

33:55be dumping cso into these rivers and

33:58these rivers are precious both in

34:00short-term and long-term uh health of

34:03the community as well as the wildlife.

34:05Thank you.

34:07>> Thank you.

34:09Next up um Elena Proacus Ellis and then

34:12Rachel Ducas.

34:15So Elena, you'll be promoted.

34:22There. You should be able to unmute and

34:24turn on your camera.

34:33There you are.

34:37Sorry, I was just having some trouble

34:38unmuting. Um, just have to get my

34:40comments up here. I was taking some time

34:43to try to consolidate to less than two

34:44minutes, but I'm just going to have to

34:46read really fast.

34:48Can you hear me? Okay.

34:49>> Yes. Yep.

34:50>> Okay.

34:51>> Um, the city of Melrose is a fully

34:53served MWR water and sewer community.

34:56Melrose staff, including myself and the

34:58DPW director, have been leaders in

35:00sustainability and environmental

35:01initiatives. It is through this lens

35:03that we provide comments on this plan.

35:05The MW's proposed CSO plan is projected

35:07to increase Melrose's sewer assessment

35:09by approximately $1 million per year

35:11once the full debt service repayment is

35:13in effect as compared to our current

35:15assessment for all of our MW sewer

35:17services of 6.8 million per year. This

35:20will add approximately $100 $120 per

35:23year to each household in Melrose.

35:25Melrose does not have combined sewers,

35:26but we recognize the importance of

35:28furthering efforts to minimize CSO

35:30discharges to our region's rivers. Much

35:32like the cleanup of Boston Harbor, we

35:34recognize the regional benefit and the

35:35need for this contribution from all rate

35:37paying communities.

35:39Um the currently proposed CSO plan

35:42reduces discharges in a typical year to

35:44zero by 2050 and retains substantial

35:47storage and treatment of wet weather

35:49flow while selectively using sewer

35:51separation, allowing large volumes of

35:52storm water to continue to flow to the

35:54Deer Island treatment plant from

35:56combined sewers except in extreme

35:58weather events. This provides a balanced

36:00approach to ensuring significant volumes

36:02of polluted storm water are not diverted

36:04to local waterways rather than their

36:06current destination of the Deer Island

36:08treatment plant, which could backslide

36:10environmental protection rather than

36:11enhancing it. Through the current plan,

36:13the first flush of storm water

36:15pollutants from areas proposed to keep

36:16combined sewers will continue to be

36:18diverted away from the Charles River,

36:20Mystic River, and Awife Brook and will

36:22receive full treatment before being

36:23discharged to Boston Harbor. This

36:25appears to be a prudent and balanced

36:27approach. Um, furthermore, the the

36:31higher control plans that have been

36:33suggested will uh triple the cost to

36:36Melrose rateayers, again with no direct

36:38benefit to Melrose other than uh a

36:41regional benefit. Um, I don't believe

36:44that sewer separation is the answer. I

36:47think it will result in more

36:49environmental uh detriment

36:52and we urge the Environmental Protection

36:54Agency and D to uh consider and pass uh

36:58MWR's proposed plan.

37:00>> Thank you, Elena. Rachel Ducas, you are

37:04up next and then we have no other hands.

37:06So again, if you want to speak today um

37:10and have not yet done so, please raise

37:13your Zoom hand.

37:15Rachel,

37:16>> hi. Um,

37:20the ongoing planned releases of raw

37:22sewage into the alewife brook um ensure

37:25that the waterway

37:27um is not uh conducive to the support of

37:31highquality nature creatures, habitat,

37:34any of that which includes humans that

37:36live nearby.

37:38uh the increase in certainty in weather

37:41and patterns moving forward and all of

37:43the modeling that's done with the

37:45engineering calculations that were

37:46presented in the various uh cso uh

37:50releases that are part of many of the

37:53current plans that don't include sewer

37:55separation. Um, I'm very skeptical about

37:58a lot of that simply because of this

38:01massive increase in uncertainty over

38:04time related to climate change and all

38:06the other good stuff that we've reviewed

38:09together. Uh, I just mistrust a lot of

38:12that. Um, how likely it is to truly

38:16happen that way.

38:18Um, and there's also the aspect that

38:20there's a lot of concerns about the

38:22stability of long-term governance and

38:24the way decisions are made and things

38:26like that. So, I think the time to act

38:28on this is now because otherwise it will

38:30be once again pushing this issue into

38:32the future um by not working on

38:35separating um the sewer systems. So I

38:38support any plans that includes full

38:41sewer separation, the renaturalization

38:44of particularly AWife Brook area which

38:46is next to my house, but any any spaces

38:50that um CSOS exists that are releasing

38:53sewage into the waterways and impacting

38:55the wildlife, I think we should do full

38:58sewer separation for those.

39:01>> Thank you, Rachel. Um, next up, Gwen

39:04Spie.

39:14There you are, Gwen. You should be able

39:16to turn on your camera and unmute now.

39:24>> Can you see me?

39:25>> We can. There you go.

39:27>> And you can hear me. Okay. I cannot see

39:29myself. Um

39:33but you can see me I see your face

39:37right. Um

39:39so um just a few quick comments. I

39:42wasn't planning to speak but um just uh

39:46this is a practical thing for the next

39:48meeting um and any other public

39:52um sessions you uh

39:55people keep in the doing the

39:56presentation keep saying that the

39:58comments are due by the end of October

40:00and then correcting themselves and

40:02saying October 30th. It would be great

40:03if you would put up a big red banner on

40:05the Cso page saying comments due and at

40:10what time if it's midnight or 5:00 p.m.

40:12on October 30th, not not end of October.

40:16Those are two different things. Um the

40:18map advocates have been asking for years

40:21that the map that you show I know this

40:24is not a presentation, it's a public

40:26comment, but you're still presenting

40:28information and it's very misleading.

40:30The map shows you cannot see uh six

40:35yellow dots which would signify six um

40:39cso outfalls

40:42um dumping millions of gallons of

40:45untreated completely untreated human

40:47waste and industrial waste into the tiny

40:50little awife brook because you are

40:52continuing to use the orange dots with

40:55the closed cso outfalls which are

40:58completely irrelevant to the new and

40:59updated plan. Um, it's important to

41:02actually represent the information for

41:04people when they're giving public

41:05comment. Uh, I have a question. Uh, this

41:08is I'm not expecting to be answers

41:10answered, but uh, whether Melrose and

41:13other towns will be weighing in for the

41:14EPA have any guarantees that their rates

41:17won't go up. This system is um, our

41:20system entire system is outdated. El

41:23Wifebrook is used as hydraulic relief

41:26for a system that does that is not

41:28adequate to the amount of of wastewater

41:31that is in the entire regional system

41:33and needs to be repaired for the entire

41:38[music]

41:39Thank you.

41:41>> Thank you, Gwen. Next up, Bob Donnelly.

41:47Bob, we will promote you.

42:01See, Bob Donnelly, you should be getting

42:02an invitation. Oh, good.

42:10So, you want to unmute and turn on your

42:12camera so we can see you.

42:24Oh, thank you.

42:25>> There you are.

42:26>> Hear me? All right. Thanks. Um, I'm

42:28speaking from a perspective of a

42:31community of Norwood, an MWA rate paying

42:33community and, uh, we are just now

42:37fielding some, I'm on the board of

42:39selectman. We are now fielding some

42:41inquiries and some questions from our

42:43own community. I think the information

42:45being put forward for the draft plan um

42:48is the one that if if it's the one

42:50that's uh on the table, I think we

42:52prefer that. Uh we're looking at in

42:54Norwood, we're looking at over that debt

42:57service period some $36 million more in

43:00rates from Norwood rateayers uh for this

43:03project and it moves to 109 million for

43:06the extreme uh weather plan. And those

43:09are very big numbers for a town that uh

43:12is financially struggling itself uh that

43:15has its own needs in storm water. We

43:18have separated our water uh waste water

43:20from our storm water. Um and we feel

43:22that the um cost of the particularly the

43:26um higher placed plan is just untenable.

43:30uh we in ran uh our neighboring towns in

43:32Randolph, Westwood, Canton, Denim,

43:35Walpole, and Norwood, we would all see

43:36about $150 million increase over that

43:39debt period in our rates. And that's

43:41going to put a real damper on our

43:42ability to address our own utility

43:45problems, our own storm water issues,

43:46and our own water issues. So, um I

43:49believe the rate the drought plan as

43:51presented is the one that I hope the D

43:53and EA do approve. And I also hope that

43:57there is a consideration given for the

43:59communities outside and south of this of

44:01the system who do um already separate

44:05water wastewater from their um um storm

44:08water that we are given a more of a

44:10break so that $36 million uh payment

44:12that we'll be paying for this debt can

44:15be reduced. So um I think that's been

44:18the consensus among community members

44:19I've spoken to and I will end there and

44:22I will thank you very much for taking my

44:24comment.

44:26Thank you so much.

44:31With that, we have reached the end of

44:34Oh, one more person who hasn't commented

44:37yet just raised your hand. Nick of time.

44:39Um, Andrea DS,

44:42please go ahead. And again, anybody who

44:44wants to speak today, it's easiest if

44:46you put your hand up early. You can take

44:48it down if you change your mind. But we

44:51keep almost being out of people.

44:54Hi, thanks. Yeah, and I know this is uh

44:56I thought give people a little more time

44:58to think about what they might want to

45:00say. Um, I have a question um that may

45:04not be that easy to answer, but for the

45:07um uh partnered folks, um

45:11we're on um you know, we're we're bound

45:15in this region and across the country by

45:18the Clean Water Act, which I thought

45:21required that, you know, we continually

45:24work to remove

45:26um combined sewer from the rivers and

45:29the brooks where where it's happening

45:31now. If we went with a lower

45:35um level plan uh for this round of

45:41long-term control um would that preclude

45:45future improvements?

45:47Thanks. I'll leave it right there.

45:50>> Thanks, Andrea. don't think the plan the

45:52team is prepared to answer questions

45:54here but there is an office hours

45:57session coming up where you can talk to

46:00some of the team members directly and I

46:02wanted to mention that anyway um to

46:04everybody

46:05>> just one more noa for the for the record

46:08can you share your town andor

46:10affiliation

46:11>> oh sorry

46:14>> sorry my town is um you know I live in

46:18Newton but I'm with the wastewater

46:19advisory committee

46:22Thank you. Um,

46:24office hours October 6th from 6:00 to

46:278:00 p.m. It's the 9th of 9 2-hour

46:30office hours that the project team has

46:33offered. That is at the Somerville

46:35Public Library on Highland Avenue. I

46:38will say I know there's another hand,

46:40but it's by someone who has spoken

46:41already. And at these sessions, we're

46:43just giving people two minutes, one

46:45two-minute period. So, everyone is

46:47welcome to come back for our third and

46:50final hearing if you would like to speak

46:52more in the record verbally. That is

46:54October 28th at 6 p.m. at Somerville

46:58City Hall. Um, and of course submit as

47:03much detail um in writing as you would

47:06like all the different ways that we

47:07shared at the beginning of this hour.

47:12So, with that, want to thank everyone

47:15for being here, for all of your

47:18thoughtful input, and for caring and

47:21tracking all of this work. We will see

47:26many of you back at the upcoming

47:28hearing, and hope everyone has a really

47:30nice rest of your day. Thank you all.