2026-09-24 - CSO Control Plan Public Hearing 2
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions; names and figures may be misheard.
- Format: the second of three public hearings on the draft updated Combined Sewer Overflow Control Plan, run as a Zoom session by facilitators from the Consensus Building Institute. It was a comment-only hearing, with no presentation or question period, and each speaker got two minutes. About 55 people joined at the start.
- Background from the MWRA chief engineer: the plan was developed by the MWRA and the cities of Cambridge and Somerville, aims to substantially reduce or eliminate combined sewer overflows to the Alewife Brook, Mystic River and Charles River under state water-quality variances, and has been in development since 2022. The draft was released April 30, 2026, and written comments are due October 30, 2026. The final plan is expected in May 2027 after state and federal review.
- Ways to comment: the online portal, email, mail to the MWRA, or verbal comment at hearings. The third hearing is October 28 from 6 to 8 p.m., in person at Somerville City Hall and online. The last of the project office hours is October 6.
- Speakers from Arlington (including a state representative, a Town Meeting member and residents near Alewife Brook), Newton, Medford and Woburn mostly urged full sewer separation and virtual elimination of overflows. Speakers alleged the draft plan would leave Alewife Brook receiving about 50 percent more overflow volume in a future five-year storm than today, and said sewage floods onto the Alewife path and into homes along the brook.
- A Charles River Watershed Association organizer said the roughly $1.3 billion draft plan would still allow discharges in heavy storms and noted 285 written comments had been submitted as of September 16, most calling for an end to overflows.
- A Medford resident praised the plan overall but asked that it be designed for wetter-than-typical years, for example one to three standard deviations above average rainfall, rather than a typical year.
- Cost concerns from MWRA member communities: a Melrose official said the plan would raise Melrose's sewer assessment by about $1 million a year (roughly $120 per household) and supported the draft as balanced, warning that stronger plans would triple the cost. A Norwood selectman cited about $36 million more in rates over the debt period for Norwood under the draft and $109 million under the stronger plan, and said neighboring towns would see about $150 million combined; they asked for relief for communities with separated systems.
- A resident asked that the project website show the comment deadline clearly (October 30, with a time) and said the plan's map omits six active outfalls on the brook. A wastewater advisory committee member asked whether adopting a lower-level plan now would rule out later improvements; staff said the team could not answer questions at the hearing and pointed to office hours.
- The hearing closed when no one else asked to speak.
Issues discussed
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:02Hi everyone, welcome.
00:06We are going to give another minute or
00:08two for people to join us here on this
00:11sunny Thursday afternoon. Thanks for
00:14logging on to the the second public
00:16hearing on the draft updated combined
00:19sewer overflow control plan. Again,
00:22we'll just give a minute or two here as
00:24people as people join.
00:55Hello to those just joining us. We're
00:57just waiting a moment longer for others
01:01to to enter this Zoom space. Thanks for
01:03being here. start sharing my screen in
01:06the meantime.
01:25All right, I'm seeing our numbers
01:28plateau a bit, so I think we're okay to
01:30go ahead and get started. So, hello
01:32everyone. Welcome to the second of three
01:35public hearings on the draft updated
01:37combined sewer overflow control plan. Um
01:40it's great to be with you in this Zoom
01:43world. Um my name is Abby Fulham. I am a
01:46facilitator at the Consensus Building
01:47Institute. I'll be facilitating the
01:50public hearing this afternoon. Um I'm
01:52joined by my colleagues Ona Ferguson and
01:54Micah Seagull. We're based here in
01:56Porter Square.
01:59So how we will approach this public
02:02hearing? Um so first the objective of
02:05this session is for people who are
02:08interested to share verbal comment on
02:10this draft plan that will be entered
02:13into the public record. Um so we're
02:16going to start this afternoon with a
02:17little bit of information just where we
02:19are in the process. If you're interested
02:21in learning more about the draft plan,
02:23how to do that and then how to comment
02:25on it. This is one, this public hearing
02:27is one of many ways to comment on the
02:29draft plan. And so we want you to um
02:31know the other options. Then we'll give
02:33a little bit of instruction um for
02:35today, how to get how to get in the
02:37queue, etc. And then we'll open for
02:39public comment. Um we will adjourn the
02:43meeting once everyone who wants to share
02:46has had two minutes to speak.
02:49Um so there's not a formal end time for
02:52this public hearing. We will end once
02:53everyone who wants has had the
02:55opportunity. We will not be taking
02:57formal breaks. So if you ever need to,
02:59you know, stretch, go to the restroom,
03:01get some food, please do that. This is
03:02being recorded. Um it will be posted on
03:05the project website if you want to watch
03:07any of the public comments that you
03:09missed. Um, and then from there the
03:12recording will be transcribed and then
03:14again those comments will be entered
03:16into the public record on this draft
03:19plan and then they'll be considered by
03:21the project team as they develop the
03:23final version of the plan.
03:26Um, I'll say just briefly here, this is
03:29clearly not an information sharing
03:31meeting. If you want to learn more,
03:33we're about to hear different ways, but
03:34there are a lot of resources on the
03:36website. So encourage you to to check
03:38them out.
03:39All right, I'm going to turn now to
03:41Brian Kubaska from MWR who's the chief
03:44engineer. Brian, over to you.
03:48>> Welcome everyone. Thank you for joining
03:51us today. Um, [clears throat] this uh
03:54draft updated Cso control plan uh was
03:58developed by the project partners uh the
04:01MWR, the city of Cambridge, and the city
04:04of Somerville.
04:05The partners were supported by several
04:07consultant teams in the draft plans
04:09development. Um representing uh the MWRA
04:15um Cambridge and Somerville. Um people
04:18here today include Jeremy Hall. He's
04:22he's joining me from the MWRA. Jeremy is
04:24the MW Cso program manager.
04:28uh Luchica Hiller uh cso program manager
04:33with Cambridge and Katherine Woodbury
04:36the uh city consultant uh also from
04:40Cambridge. And we also have Rich Re the
04:44director of infrastructure and asset
04:46management from the city of Somerville
04:48as well as Gina Cortez,
04:51deputy director of engineering
04:54uh at the city of Somerville as well. U
04:57members of the project team uh the
05:01you can jump to the next slide.
05:05The updated Cso control plan has been
05:08developed
05:11since has been underdeveloped since uh
05:132022.
05:15Uh its purpose is to identify projects
05:18and strategies sub to substantially
05:20reduce or eliminate combined sewer
05:23overflow in the Alway
05:26Mystic and the Charles River in
05:28accordance with Mass D's
05:31issued variances for these water bodies.
05:34The plan has included extensive
05:36technical work and public engagement
05:38including multiple public meetings. I
05:41believe we had seven to date. Uh the
05:44draft plan
05:46uh was released on April 30th, 2026
05:53um [clears throat] by the partners and
05:56uh we are currently in the sixmonth
05:58public comment period. Written comments
06:02uh are due by the end of October,
06:04October 30th, 2026.
06:07So following the public comment period,
06:10the comments will re be reviewed by the
06:13project partners with additional review
06:15by mass D and EPA. Uh the final updated
06:19CSO control plan is anticipated in May
06:22of 2027
06:24following further state review.
06:28Next slide.
06:31We encourage members of the public to
06:34review the draft plan and the
06:36information from previous public
06:38meetings as they develop their comments.
06:42You can find this information on our
06:44project website. Next slide.
06:49So there are four ways to submit public
06:52comments uh through the online public
06:56comment portal. Uh that's shown by the
06:59uh the section in the upper right of
07:01this this slide. You have a URL there as
07:04well as as a web link. um by email. Uh
07:10there's also a URL the next one down for
07:12that and as well as by mail written
07:16comments to the MWR at two Griffin Way
07:20in Chelsea and and lastly by providing
07:24verbal comments during this public
07:26meeting today.
07:28Um so you know this is our second of
07:32three hearings.
07:35Uh
07:37the third and final public hearing will
07:40be held on Octo October 28th uh from
07:446:00 to 8.
07:46That will be a uh inperson at Somerville
07:50City Hall as well as virtual. Next
07:52slide.
07:57And lastly, uh, questions or requests
08:00for information outside of the formal
08:03public comments can be directed to our
08:06project team by email. Uh, we appreciate
08:10everyone taking the time to participate
08:12and provide input today. Uh, your
08:14comments will be documented and will be
08:17considered as the Enter Cambridge and
08:19Somerville moves towards completion of
08:22our updated Cso control plan.
08:25Uh believe Abby will now explain uh how
08:29the public comment process will work at
08:31today's hearings.
08:33>> Yeah, thanks Brian. Uh so hi everyone
08:36and for those that are just tuning in,
08:38my name is Abby Fulham. I'm a
08:40facilitator from the Consensus Building
08:41Institute joined here by my colleagues
08:43Ona Ferguson and Micah Seagull and we'll
08:45be facilitating uh this afternoon. So
08:48first of all, thank you for being here.
08:50We have about let's see about 55 people
08:54on Zoom at this hearing. Um which is
08:56fantastic and we hope to see you at a um
08:59potentially the in-person one as well.
09:02Um the point of today's session again is
09:04a public hearing, an opportunity to
09:06share verbal comment that will be
09:08transcribed and then entered into the
09:11public record um and then considered by
09:13the project partners and regulators as
09:15they put together the final plan. Um,
09:18and it is not a we're not presenting
09:20anything this e this afternoon, nor is
09:22this like a question and answer
09:24opportunity. And if you if you are
09:26interested in learning more about what's
09:28in the plan, again, please look at the
09:29project website. Maybe Ona, would you
09:31mind putting that in the chat for
09:33people? Um, and then also there is the
09:37the final of eight office hours will be
09:40on October 6th. So if you have questions
09:42about the plan, we encourage you to
09:44attend the office hours and you can ask
09:47those questions of the project team. The
09:49information on that is also on the
09:51project website.
09:53Um so how we're going to run this
09:56session is everyone who wants to speak
09:59will have up to two minutes to share. Um
10:03we'll have a big timer on the screen. We
10:05ask that you please be respectful of
10:06this. We're going to be pretty firm. We
10:08want to be fair across commenters and
10:10across public hearings. So, we're going
10:12to be pretty tight with that twominut
10:14deadline. Um, as we said at the top,
10:17there's no there's not a fixed end time.
10:19We will adjourn rather when everyone
10:21who's interested has had an opportunity
10:24to comment and we imagine that you have
10:26a lot to say about this plan. It's very
10:28long. It's very detailed. Um, and so if
10:30you have more than two minutes of
10:31comments to share, please please do
10:33submit them in writing. Um, and Brian
10:36articulated the different ways to do
10:38that. Okay. So, how this is going to
10:41work, um, if you want to join the queue,
10:44please raise your hand in Zoom. Keep
10:47that hand up throughout the entire
10:49afternoon session until you speak.
10:51Otherwise, you'll lose your place in
10:52line. We're just going to go
10:53chronologically there. Um, once Ona will
10:57do the first batch, she's going to call
10:58on people. And once you're you'll get a
11:01we'll promote you to panelist. You'll
11:03have to click on a little window that
11:05says move into panelist role or
11:08something like that. And then you'll be
11:09able to unmute yourself and turn on your
11:12camera and then share your public
11:14comment. Um right now though we can't
11:16see or hear you.
11:19Um on Zoom there should be a raise hand
11:21button at the bottom of your of your
11:24screen. If it's not right there,
11:25sometimes it lives in a reactions um
11:28button. So, just click there if you
11:30can't find it. If you're calling in on
11:32the phone, um you can hit star 9, which
11:36will raise your hand. And then if you
11:38change your mind and you want to lower
11:39your hand, you can hit star 9 again. Um
11:42and then once you're promoted, you'll
11:43hit star six to unmute yourself. We can
11:46remind you of that. Um but star 9 is
11:48going to be how you get in the in the
11:50queue. For everyone, if you change your
11:52mind about speaking tonight, just lower
11:53your hand so we know not to call on you.
11:56Um, and maybe public speaking is not for
11:59you, but you really want to comment.
12:01Again, you do not have to share public
12:03comment verbally. You can do it in
12:05writing. Uh, this QR code will take you
12:07directly to the comment page or you can
12:10go through the the project team website.
12:14Okay. So, just lastly before we move
12:16here into public comment, again, 2
12:18minutes. We're going to be firm. What
12:20would that limit? You will see a timer.
12:22Please be mindful of it. Please be
12:24respectful. Um, and then importantly, we
12:26ask that you share your name, your town,
12:29and your affiliation if it's relevant,
12:31and that will get entered into the
12:33public record along with your comment.
12:36Okay, I'm going to stop sharing.
12:40>> Thank you, Abby.
12:41>> Turn it to Ona. Thanks. Great. Um, one
12:44other thing as we get into hearing from
12:47all of you is when you start seeing um,
12:52the people who are sharing comments,
12:54there will be a timer and there will be
12:56their window and each of you can adjust
13:00how big and how small you want those.
13:02Sadly, we couldn't preset it. So, at the
13:05beginning, you might see the clock
13:06really big. If you're on a computer,
13:08there's a little slider. You can just
13:10slide that window over so it gets little
13:12and the person gets big, which you
13:13should do to see everyone's faces. And
13:17yeah, you'll see it now. I know it's
13:19very big on where I am. Um, and then if
13:22you're on a phone, you similarly will
13:24see the clock as like the primary
13:26window, but if you tap on the speaker's
13:29face, they will become the big window
13:32you see. So you can see people instead
13:34of um just the timer. So with that we
13:38are going to get started. Again please
13:40raise your virtual hand if you would
13:42like to share comments. We will start um
13:45with Dave Rogers and then go to Beth
13:48Malofchek.
13:49So Dave, please go ahead. We are going
13:51to promote you um and you'll have to
13:54accept that promotion and then unmute
13:56yourself and turn on your camera.
14:03Representative Rogers should be in
14:06process of being promoted.
14:10>> Go ahead and try it. Representative
14:14>> I did. Um,
14:17>> yep.
14:19>> There you are. Perfect.
14:20>> Working. Okay.
14:22>> Yes. Please go ahead.
14:23>> Okay. Well, first, thank you very much
14:26for this opportunity to comment on the
14:28draft updated combined sewer overflow
14:30control plan. I genuinely appreciate the
14:33great deal of time, effort, and
14:35commitment uh it has taken for the MWR,
14:39the city of Cambridge, and the city of
14:40Somerville to present such a detailed,
14:42comprehensive plan. Uh no doubt many
14:45contributed, and we appreciate it. I
14:47represent the people of Arlington,
14:49Belmont, and Cambridge as I have for a
14:51fair number of years now. And many of
14:53them are deeply concerned about the
14:54health of the ale wife, the Charles, and
14:56the Mystic Rivers. They themselves have
14:58been deeply committed to advocating for
15:01improvements to the local ecosystem. And
15:03for many years in my role as a
15:05representative, I have done that to help
15:07protect the natural world around the
15:09Charles, the Elwife, the mystic. I
15:12myself live just a couple blocks from uh
15:14the Elwife Brook. In the original
15:16presentation of the plan, uh uh the mass
15:19D expressed concerns about the direction
15:22of the plan. So a state agency uh said
15:25that they identified uh alternatives
15:28identified may be insufficient to
15:30address cso discharges and associated
15:33impacts and appear to be inconsistent
15:36with the clean water act and the mass
15:38surface water quality standards. After
15:40being granted this extension, the final
15:42draft control plans only make relatively
15:46modest improvements. Uh, and the plans
15:49for the alwife remain largely the same.
15:52The main point I want to convey is while
15:54there's a lot of different strategies to
15:56control and to mitigate environmental
15:58contamin contaminants, the ultimate gold
16:02standard is sewer separation. and um uh
16:06all other measures while uh helpful do
16:09not have that same impact. So I want to
16:12encourage additional sewer separation
16:14particularly in the alewife area. Uh I
16:17also want to uh [clears throat]
16:18>> have seconds
16:19>> stress that um u I appreciate the time
16:24and um
16:27um I'll I'll honor the the time limit
16:29here but I think I've made my point and
16:32and thank you. Thank you. Um, Beth
16:35Molofchic, you are next. We'll promote
16:37you and let you unmute and turn on your
16:41camera. And then Ariana Puya will be
16:44next.
16:57>> Beth Malof check. My affiliation. I
17:01belong to voters who know the draft plan
17:04is crap. Governor Healey's plan to
17:07continue sewage dumping to continue the
17:09status quo using East Arlington as the
17:11raw sewage overflow basin for Somerville
17:14and Cambridge is not a vote getter.
17:17Governor Healey suspended the gas tax.
17:19She needs to end sewage in the alew wife
17:21Charles and Mystic. Tannery Rose Cso and
17:24CAM 401A have got to go. We want sewer
17:28separation.
17:31The draft plan leaves ale wife receiving
17:33nearly 50% more cso volume in a common
17:36future 5-year storm than it receives
17:39today. This defies common sense as well
17:43as I think several legal things you're
17:45supposed to be adhering to um namely
17:49ending csos. So, I'm here again to say
17:54that uh Governor Healey's draft plan is
17:58not a solution. It is the illusion of a
18:01solution. It is a multiplier
18:05specifically in East Arlington. East
18:08Arlington should not be used as the open
18:12sewer of convenience for the wealthier
18:15communities of Cambridge and Somerville.
18:18This defies
18:20basic precepts of humanity and decency.
18:25So get back to the drawing board. Start
18:28over. You have not done enough work.
18:31Your work product fails miserably.
18:35Please. We want a solution, not the
18:37illusion of a solution. We do not want
18:40Governor Healey's multiplier.
18:42We want a workable plan with
18:44comprehensive sewer separation. We want
18:47a fishable and swimmable ale wife brook
18:51ASAP. Thank you very much.
18:53>> Thank you, Beth. Are you an Arlington
18:55resident?
18:56>> I'm an Arlington resident.
18:58>> Thank you.
18:58>> Voters against crap in our rivers.
19:01>> Thank you, Beth. Um, next up is Ariana
19:05Pa. And as we are promoting Ariana, um,
19:09that is the only other hand that is up.
19:11So, if you are one of the 47 attendees
19:15here today and you think you might want
19:17to say something, you should put up your
19:20hand so we can hear from you or you
19:22should think about it some and come to
19:24our next hearing and or write your
19:27comments in. But we will end the hearing
19:29when we have no more people to call on.
19:32So, Ariana um please go ahead.
19:36>> Thank you. My name is Ariana Puya. I
19:39live in Newton and I'm speaking today as
19:41the senior community organizer for the
19:43Charles River Wershed Association.
19:45Ending combined sewer overflows in the
19:47Charles River um is a top priority for
19:50CRWA. Our detailed comments on the plan
19:52and the analysis will be submitted in
19:54written form, but I am here today simply
19:56to ask that the parties recommend
19:58virtual elimination of CSOS in the final
20:02plan. The current draft plan does not
20:04eliminate CSOS. Instead, it ensures that
20:07they will continue during heavy or high
20:09intensity
20:10rainfall events. Storms like the one
20:13predicted for this weekend would still
20:15discharge raw sewage into the river even
20:18after implementing the this $ 1.3
20:20billion plan. Severe weather events like
20:23this are already happening and will only
20:26become more frequent due to climate
20:27change. Raw or untreated raw or
20:30untreated sewage will flow into the
20:32Charles and contaminate it for at least
20:34the following two days. This is one of
20:36the busiest times of the years on the
20:38river as people are training for the
20:40head of the Charles regata. Rorers with
20:42chronic health issues or who are immuno
20:44compromised will have to make the
20:46difficult decision about whether to
20:48pause their training or potentially get
20:50sick. We can and must end this problem.
20:53But it's not just about those who
20:54recreate on the river. A study on the
20:56Marramac River demonstrated a connection
20:58between increased emergency room visits
21:00from gas gastrointestinal issues and cso
21:04of discharge events. The disease-causing
21:06agents and sewage are likely getting
21:08into the air and making those who enjoy
21:10the beautiful Charles River parks and
21:12pathways or even just who live nearby
21:15causing them to be sick. We can and must
21:17end this problem. Um, in my role at
21:20CRWA, I have the chance to speak to a
21:23lot of people about the river. People
21:24feel deeply connected to the Charles
21:26River. When they learn that the in 2026
21:29that there is still raw sewage going
21:30into the river, they are outraged. They
21:33are making their voices heard. And as of
21:35September 16th, we see 285 comments have
21:38been submitted on this draft plan. The
21:40vast majority calling like we are for an
21:42end to CSOS. We can and must end this
21:45problem. And thank you for your time.
21:47>> Thank you. Um and thanks to those of you
21:50who got inspired to raise your hands. We
21:52now have um some more hands in the
21:54queue. Next up are Chris Styver and then
21:58John Dort Tortelli. Chris, he will be
22:01promoted now.
22:09Hey there. Thanks for the promotion.
22:11>> Perfect.
22:12>> Ready to go.
22:13>> Yep.
22:15>> Uh screen's moving around. There we go.
22:19All right. Well, first off, thanks for
22:20the time to speak here. My name is Chris
22:21Styver. I live in Medford. Um about a
22:235-minute walk to the Mystic River. Uh
22:25we've got two small kids and we're
22:27active family. So we spend a lot of time
22:28outdoors enjoying uh many of the
22:30beautiful resources of this area. And
22:32that includes the Mystic River and the
22:33Mystic Lakes. So we take our kids to
22:36Shannon Beach to go swimming. Uh that is
22:38when there isn't uh a CSO event. Um we
22:42go canoeing in the Mystic Pond and
22:44Shell. Uh and I'm a runner, so we we're
22:46always running and along the shores of
22:48the Mystic River Lakes. Uh we really
22:50love the natural beauty of our region
22:52and I in particular want to preserve it
22:54for our kids to enjoy as they grow. Um
22:56so first off thanks for all the hard
22:58work. Clearly there's a lot of time and
22:59effort that went into this plan. Um it's
23:01really well thought out. Um and overall
23:03I think it puts us in the right
23:04direction of trying to reduce CSOS. Um
23:06however I'm concerned that the control
23:08measures and activities um are not
23:10designed around the right scenarios. the
23:13the sort of typical year analysis um is
23:16really designing for it's not quite an
23:19average rainfall. It's a little above
23:21that but um and I do appreciate that
23:23there is some um allowance for increased
23:26rainfall that is certainly going to
23:28happen with with climate change. Um but
23:30it still means that non-typical years uh
23:33years where there's excessive rainfall
23:36um we're going to continue to allow
23:37CISOs into our our wersheds. Uh and so I
23:40urge the uh the group here to uh
23:43reconsider um a different definition of
23:45how we plan for and design um the
23:48structures and facilities. For example,
23:51uh some standard deviation above the
23:54mean, two standard deviation, two
23:56standard deviations, three standard
23:57deviations above the mean, I think would
23:58be a more appropriate way to help
24:00prevent uh CSOS in non-typical or higher
24:04failures.
24:06Thank you.
24:07>> Thank you.
24:10John Tortelli, you are next. And then it
24:13will be Caroline Meeks.
24:16John, you should be promoted.
24:20>> John, you declined. I'm going to try
24:22that again.
24:23>> You need to sort of accept the panelist
24:26promotion.
24:30>> Yep, there we go. Joining.
24:35>> Great. So, John, you can unmute and turn
24:37on your camera when you're ready.
24:41>> I think we're there.
24:42>> There you are.
24:44>> I live on Sunnyside Avenue, Arlington
24:46along the Wife Brook, and it's time for
24:51separation of sewage and the storm water
24:55overflow. It distresses me that in 2026,
25:00we're still talking about raw sewage
25:02discharges into the Elwife. I have
25:05personal experience with the sewage
25:08overflow onto my property and it's not a
25:12nice thing. There are economic time and
25:15health costs to this. I hate it also
25:19when friends and family members,
25:21grandchildren come over and I have to
25:24tell them stay away from the water.
25:26Nobody can believe it when I tell them
25:29there's raw sewage out back here. Uh,
25:32waterways should be clean and they
25:34should be clear and be able to use by
25:38all. It's basically, as Beth summed it
25:42up, time to cut the crap and it's time
25:44to eliminate CSOS. Thank you.
25:50>> Thank you.
25:52Next up is Caroline Meeks and then after
25:56Caroline will be Lori Rogers Stokes.
26:00Caroline [clears throat]
26:10unmute. Let me start over. And I guess
26:14my video is on. I can turn that on.
26:16There we go. Perfect. Um, thank you for
26:20this opportunity to comment. I My name
26:23is Caroline Meeks. I am an East
26:25Arlington resident. I um am went to
26:29Somerville High. I have an elder who
26:33lives in Somerville. She used to live in
26:35the VNA, which is right across the
26:36street um from the Mystic River um very
26:41close to the ill wife. And I want to
26:44reiterate that I think it's very
26:45important, the time has come to separate
26:48our sewage from our waterways. Our
26:52waterways are so important uh especially
26:55as we go into this period of climate
26:58change.
27:00Not only are we going to get storms like
27:02we're getting this weekend repeatedly
27:04and we just can't assume, oh, it's only
27:07going to happen occasionally with the
27:09system can handle it. We're going to
27:10have more more storms causing more of an
27:13impact. We're also having more warm
27:15weather and our waterways are very
27:18important for people in the heat. We see
27:22that at Shannon Beach and we could be
27:24using the Elwife could be a beautiful
27:27kayakable
27:29fishable um stream. Uh we have such an
27:33amazing resource here with all of these
27:36waterways. It's just not right that the
27:40sewage from Cambridge and Somerville
27:42should be polluting these waterways
27:44which are a regional asset.
27:47Thank you.
27:48>> Thank you.
27:50Next up is Kristen Anderson and then
27:53Rajes Moan.
27:55>> Oh no, I think you skipped
27:57>> Lori. Sorry there. Please Lori. Sorry,
28:00it' be Lori and then Kristen.
28:04>> Hello. I've put my video on. I don't
28:07know if you see me. Oh, you do see me.
28:09Oh, great.
28:10>> Um, I think that everybody on both sides
28:13of this issue knows that there shouldn't
28:14be raw sewage flowing into any waterway.
28:18It is, as someone pointed out, 2026. So,
28:22it just becomes this war of attrition.
28:24the timeline shown earlier like since
28:262023. It's just a constant battle by
28:30people who know that it's not right but
28:32just are driven by other motivations to
28:34see how much they can just wear people
28:36down and drag it out until people forget
28:39about it or give up. And I'm glad to see
28:41so many people here not giving up. It's
28:44irrational to even have an argument
28:46about whether there should be raw sewage
28:49flooded into a river or a stream or any
28:53body of water. And the money that is
28:55spent for other things that are not as
28:58important is just a sign that this is an
29:03issue where people know what the right
29:04thing to do is, but there are other
29:05reasons why they don't want to do it for
29:08profit or who knows what. But I just
29:10want to add my voice to those people
29:11making the rational argument that it's
29:14not our burden to prove that it's a bad
29:16thing. It's not our burden to sort
29:18through constant uh reiterations of the
29:22same plan and say no no no over and over
29:24again. But for as long as being made our
29:26burden, I'm here to help carry part of
29:29that. Thank you.
29:31>> Can you also Lori say where you live?
29:32>> Oh yes. I'm from Arlington. I'm in
29:34Arlington Heights.
29:35>> Thank you. Um okay. I think I thought I
29:40had next Kristen. I seem to have got
29:43tangled between these three. Kristen,
29:44why don't you go Kristen Anderson and
29:46then we'll go to Rajes Moan.
29:56>> Working. Kristen, you should be able to
29:57unmute and turn on your camera.
29:59>> Thank you. Uh,
30:02I think I got it. Thank you.
30:06Um, and you can hear me now. Um, so, um,
30:11uh, my name is Kristen Anderson. I'm
30:12from Saveale Wifebrook. I'm an Arlington
30:14Town meeting member, and I, um,
30:17testified for two minutes, um, last
30:20week, and I just wanted to, um,
30:23uh, fix something. I I misspoke, um, and
30:27I just wanted to fix what I said last
30:29week. Um, so I'm involved in this
30:32because I've had um the cso flood water
30:35in my house and I've gotten sick from
30:36the sewage and my neighbors got sick
30:38from the sewage and I don't want it to
30:39happen to anybody else. Um, and um what
30:44I had said last week is that the draft
30:46plan is designed to allow sewage
30:49discharge volumes that are 50% worse in
30:53um future 5-year storm events than they
30:56are in today's 5-year storm events. So
30:58conditions in the future will be much
31:00worse than they are today because the
31:01draft plan was not engineered uh to keep
31:05up with climate change impacts. Um the
31:09draft plan is designed to discharge more
31:11sewage
31:13um in the exact frequency of storms that
31:17are most likely to result in ill wife
31:20flooding. And last week I had said that
31:22it was the exact same size um storm, but
31:25what I meant to say is it's the same
31:27frequency of storm because in the future
31:30uh these storms are going to be um much
31:32larger um uh more common. Um and Elwife
31:38Brook floods um over its bank um and it
31:42sends sewage discharge into
31:46um the ill wife path. We've seen um
31:49parents pushing baby strollers through
31:52the raw sewage there. And we've seen um
31:55older folks um walking through it. Uh
31:58children riding bikes through it. It's
32:00absolutely horrifying. Um in 2023, the
32:04ill wife flooded over its bank five
32:06times. Um and so we really need
32:08[clears throat and music]
32:10>> Okay. Thank you.
32:11>> Thank you, Chris.
32:13>> You can say your sent you want to say
32:14the second half of the sentence. Oh no.
32:16Okay. Let's go to Rajes. And I would
32:20like to say we have no more hands in the
32:22queue after Rajes. So if you are here
32:26thinking you would like to make verbal
32:28public comment, now is your chance to
32:30raise your Zoom hand and let us know um
32:34because we will close when the last
32:36comment has been given um today knowing
32:39we have another uh hearing in a month.
32:42Um so okay, I see a couple more hands
32:44going up. Thank you, Rajes, please. you.
32:46>> Yeah. Can you see me or hear me?
32:48>> Yes. Yep.
32:49>> Okay. [laughter] I cannot. So, anyway,
32:52um I'm my name is Rajes. I'm I I live in
32:55Wuburn and I have kayaked and enjoyed
32:58the water in various places in Charles
33:01River. And I also made a film last year
33:05uh on the alewife run basically the
33:08elwife migration and how important it is
33:11for both um the wildlife and the natural
33:14resources not only in in in the river
33:16waters but also the ocean. uh so I find
33:20it very disturbing to see that sewage
33:23will be dumped and you know it impacts
33:26um the people people's health and the
33:29wildlife local wildlife all these are
33:32precious and it's very important for us
33:34to conserve and I myself come from um
33:38working at Harvard uh to know that there
33:40is absolutely brilliant minds and
33:43brilliant institutions in this area uh
33:46we cannot have a solution for this uh to
33:49me is um difficult to digest. So I want
33:52to go on record saying uh we should not
33:55be dumping cso into these rivers and
33:58these rivers are precious both in
34:00short-term and long-term uh health of
34:03the community as well as the wildlife.
34:05Thank you.
34:07>> Thank you.
34:09Next up um Elena Proacus Ellis and then
34:12Rachel Ducas.
34:15So Elena, you'll be promoted.
34:22There. You should be able to unmute and
34:24turn on your camera.
34:33There you are.
34:37Sorry, I was just having some trouble
34:38unmuting. Um, just have to get my
34:40comments up here. I was taking some time
34:43to try to consolidate to less than two
34:44minutes, but I'm just going to have to
34:46read really fast.
34:48Can you hear me? Okay.
34:49>> Yes. Yep.
34:50>> Okay.
34:51>> Um, the city of Melrose is a fully
34:53served MWR water and sewer community.
34:56Melrose staff, including myself and the
34:58DPW director, have been leaders in
35:00sustainability and environmental
35:01initiatives. It is through this lens
35:03that we provide comments on this plan.
35:05The MW's proposed CSO plan is projected
35:07to increase Melrose's sewer assessment
35:09by approximately $1 million per year
35:11once the full debt service repayment is
35:13in effect as compared to our current
35:15assessment for all of our MW sewer
35:17services of 6.8 million per year. This
35:20will add approximately $100 $120 per
35:23year to each household in Melrose.
35:25Melrose does not have combined sewers,
35:26but we recognize the importance of
35:28furthering efforts to minimize CSO
35:30discharges to our region's rivers. Much
35:32like the cleanup of Boston Harbor, we
35:34recognize the regional benefit and the
35:35need for this contribution from all rate
35:37paying communities.
35:39Um the currently proposed CSO plan
35:42reduces discharges in a typical year to
35:44zero by 2050 and retains substantial
35:47storage and treatment of wet weather
35:49flow while selectively using sewer
35:51separation, allowing large volumes of
35:52storm water to continue to flow to the
35:54Deer Island treatment plant from
35:56combined sewers except in extreme
35:58weather events. This provides a balanced
36:00approach to ensuring significant volumes
36:02of polluted storm water are not diverted
36:04to local waterways rather than their
36:06current destination of the Deer Island
36:08treatment plant, which could backslide
36:10environmental protection rather than
36:11enhancing it. Through the current plan,
36:13the first flush of storm water
36:15pollutants from areas proposed to keep
36:16combined sewers will continue to be
36:18diverted away from the Charles River,
36:20Mystic River, and Awife Brook and will
36:22receive full treatment before being
36:23discharged to Boston Harbor. This
36:25appears to be a prudent and balanced
36:27approach. Um, furthermore, the the
36:31higher control plans that have been
36:33suggested will uh triple the cost to
36:36Melrose rateayers, again with no direct
36:38benefit to Melrose other than uh a
36:41regional benefit. Um, I don't believe
36:44that sewer separation is the answer. I
36:47think it will result in more
36:49environmental uh detriment
36:52and we urge the Environmental Protection
36:54Agency and D to uh consider and pass uh
36:58MWR's proposed plan.
37:00>> Thank you, Elena. Rachel Ducas, you are
37:04up next and then we have no other hands.
37:06So again, if you want to speak today um
37:10and have not yet done so, please raise
37:13your Zoom hand.
37:15Rachel,
37:16>> hi. Um,
37:20the ongoing planned releases of raw
37:22sewage into the alewife brook um ensure
37:25that the waterway
37:27um is not uh conducive to the support of
37:31highquality nature creatures, habitat,
37:34any of that which includes humans that
37:36live nearby.
37:38uh the increase in certainty in weather
37:41and patterns moving forward and all of
37:43the modeling that's done with the
37:45engineering calculations that were
37:46presented in the various uh cso uh
37:50releases that are part of many of the
37:53current plans that don't include sewer
37:55separation. Um, I'm very skeptical about
37:58a lot of that simply because of this
38:01massive increase in uncertainty over
38:04time related to climate change and all
38:06the other good stuff that we've reviewed
38:09together. Uh, I just mistrust a lot of
38:12that. Um, how likely it is to truly
38:16happen that way.
38:18Um, and there's also the aspect that
38:20there's a lot of concerns about the
38:22stability of long-term governance and
38:24the way decisions are made and things
38:26like that. So, I think the time to act
38:28on this is now because otherwise it will
38:30be once again pushing this issue into
38:32the future um by not working on
38:35separating um the sewer systems. So I
38:38support any plans that includes full
38:41sewer separation, the renaturalization
38:44of particularly AWife Brook area which
38:46is next to my house, but any any spaces
38:50that um CSOS exists that are releasing
38:53sewage into the waterways and impacting
38:55the wildlife, I think we should do full
38:58sewer separation for those.
39:01>> Thank you, Rachel. Um, next up, Gwen
39:04Spie.
39:14There you are, Gwen. You should be able
39:16to turn on your camera and unmute now.
39:24>> Can you see me?
39:25>> We can. There you go.
39:27>> And you can hear me. Okay. I cannot see
39:29myself. Um
39:33but you can see me I see your face
39:37right. Um
39:39so um just a few quick comments. I
39:42wasn't planning to speak but um just uh
39:46this is a practical thing for the next
39:48meeting um and any other public
39:52um sessions you uh
39:55people keep in the doing the
39:56presentation keep saying that the
39:58comments are due by the end of October
40:00and then correcting themselves and
40:02saying October 30th. It would be great
40:03if you would put up a big red banner on
40:05the Cso page saying comments due and at
40:10what time if it's midnight or 5:00 p.m.
40:12on October 30th, not not end of October.
40:16Those are two different things. Um the
40:18map advocates have been asking for years
40:21that the map that you show I know this
40:24is not a presentation, it's a public
40:26comment, but you're still presenting
40:28information and it's very misleading.
40:30The map shows you cannot see uh six
40:35yellow dots which would signify six um
40:39cso outfalls
40:42um dumping millions of gallons of
40:45untreated completely untreated human
40:47waste and industrial waste into the tiny
40:50little awife brook because you are
40:52continuing to use the orange dots with
40:55the closed cso outfalls which are
40:58completely irrelevant to the new and
40:59updated plan. Um, it's important to
41:02actually represent the information for
41:04people when they're giving public
41:05comment. Uh, I have a question. Uh, this
41:08is I'm not expecting to be answers
41:10answered, but uh, whether Melrose and
41:13other towns will be weighing in for the
41:14EPA have any guarantees that their rates
41:17won't go up. This system is um, our
41:20system entire system is outdated. El
41:23Wifebrook is used as hydraulic relief
41:26for a system that does that is not
41:28adequate to the amount of of wastewater
41:31that is in the entire regional system
41:33and needs to be repaired for the entire
41:38[music]
41:39Thank you.
41:41>> Thank you, Gwen. Next up, Bob Donnelly.
41:47Bob, we will promote you.
42:01See, Bob Donnelly, you should be getting
42:02an invitation. Oh, good.
42:10So, you want to unmute and turn on your
42:12camera so we can see you.
42:24Oh, thank you.
42:25>> There you are.
42:26>> Hear me? All right. Thanks. Um, I'm
42:28speaking from a perspective of a
42:31community of Norwood, an MWA rate paying
42:33community and, uh, we are just now
42:37fielding some, I'm on the board of
42:39selectman. We are now fielding some
42:41inquiries and some questions from our
42:43own community. I think the information
42:45being put forward for the draft plan um
42:48is the one that if if it's the one
42:50that's uh on the table, I think we
42:52prefer that. Uh we're looking at in
42:54Norwood, we're looking at over that debt
42:57service period some $36 million more in
43:00rates from Norwood rateayers uh for this
43:03project and it moves to 109 million for
43:06the extreme uh weather plan. And those
43:09are very big numbers for a town that uh
43:12is financially struggling itself uh that
43:15has its own needs in storm water. We
43:18have separated our water uh waste water
43:20from our storm water. Um and we feel
43:22that the um cost of the particularly the
43:26um higher placed plan is just untenable.
43:30uh we in ran uh our neighboring towns in
43:32Randolph, Westwood, Canton, Denim,
43:35Walpole, and Norwood, we would all see
43:36about $150 million increase over that
43:39debt period in our rates. And that's
43:41going to put a real damper on our
43:42ability to address our own utility
43:45problems, our own storm water issues,
43:46and our own water issues. So, um I
43:49believe the rate the drought plan as
43:51presented is the one that I hope the D
43:53and EA do approve. And I also hope that
43:57there is a consideration given for the
43:59communities outside and south of this of
44:01the system who do um already separate
44:05water wastewater from their um um storm
44:08water that we are given a more of a
44:10break so that $36 million uh payment
44:12that we'll be paying for this debt can
44:15be reduced. So um I think that's been
44:18the consensus among community members
44:19I've spoken to and I will end there and
44:22I will thank you very much for taking my
44:24comment.
44:26Thank you so much.
44:31With that, we have reached the end of
44:34Oh, one more person who hasn't commented
44:37yet just raised your hand. Nick of time.
44:39Um, Andrea DS,
44:42please go ahead. And again, anybody who
44:44wants to speak today, it's easiest if
44:46you put your hand up early. You can take
44:48it down if you change your mind. But we
44:51keep almost being out of people.
44:54Hi, thanks. Yeah, and I know this is uh
44:56I thought give people a little more time
44:58to think about what they might want to
45:00say. Um, I have a question um that may
45:04not be that easy to answer, but for the
45:07um uh partnered folks, um
45:11we're on um you know, we're we're bound
45:15in this region and across the country by
45:18the Clean Water Act, which I thought
45:21required that, you know, we continually
45:24work to remove
45:26um combined sewer from the rivers and
45:29the brooks where where it's happening
45:31now. If we went with a lower
45:35um level plan uh for this round of
45:41long-term control um would that preclude
45:45future improvements?
45:47Thanks. I'll leave it right there.
45:50>> Thanks, Andrea. don't think the plan the
45:52team is prepared to answer questions
45:54here but there is an office hours
45:57session coming up where you can talk to
46:00some of the team members directly and I
46:02wanted to mention that anyway um to
46:04everybody
46:05>> just one more noa for the for the record
46:08can you share your town andor
46:10affiliation
46:11>> oh sorry
46:14>> sorry my town is um you know I live in
46:18Newton but I'm with the wastewater
46:19advisory committee
46:22Thank you. Um,
46:24office hours October 6th from 6:00 to
46:278:00 p.m. It's the 9th of 9 2-hour
46:30office hours that the project team has
46:33offered. That is at the Somerville
46:35Public Library on Highland Avenue. I
46:38will say I know there's another hand,
46:40but it's by someone who has spoken
46:41already. And at these sessions, we're
46:43just giving people two minutes, one
46:45two-minute period. So, everyone is
46:47welcome to come back for our third and
46:50final hearing if you would like to speak
46:52more in the record verbally. That is
46:54October 28th at 6 p.m. at Somerville
46:58City Hall. Um, and of course submit as
47:03much detail um in writing as you would
47:06like all the different ways that we
47:07shared at the beginning of this hour.
47:12So, with that, want to thank everyone
47:15for being here, for all of your
47:18thoughtful input, and for caring and
47:21tracking all of this work. We will see
47:26many of you back at the upcoming
47:28hearing, and hope everyone has a really
47:30nice rest of your day. Thank you all.
