Whistler Road Mansky Site Plan
At a glance
- What: site plan application for a commercial building at Whistler Road / 123 (Lammansky/Mansky property), engineered by Kevin Quinn.
- Where it stands: as of September 16, 2026 the Planning Board approved the continued public hearing, resolving stormwater and lighting-plan conditions and debating whether a driveway-spacing variance was needed.
Review focus
- Reviewed across multiple Planning Board meetings, with recurring focus on stormwater management (an unconventional recharge design using clean unpaved-surface runoff), driveway spacing waivers, and lighting-plan conditions.
Naming note
- The "123 [Route]" hearing on September 2 and the "Whistler Road/123 (Lammansky)" hearing on September 16 refer to the same project as the August 12 Whistler Road/Mansky hearing (all Kevin Quinn Engineering).
Discussion time
About 70 minutes across 3 meetings (from transcript timestamps; approximate).
| Meeting | Minutes |
|---|---|
| 2026-09-16 - Planning Board Meeting | 24 |
| 2026-09-02 - Planning Board Meeting | 23 |
| 2026-08-12 - Planning Board Meeting | 23 |
Log
2026-08-12 — 2026-08-12 - Planning Board Meeting
Site plan hearing for the Whistler Road/Mansky property, engineer Kevin Quinn. Discussion covered stormwater and driveway waiver questions.
2026-09-02 — 2026-09-02 - Planning Board Meeting
Continued site plan hearing for the commercial building at 123 [Route]. Kevin Quinn Engineering proposed an unconventional stormwater recharge design using clean, unpaved-surface runoff instead of standard treated recharge; the board leaned toward endorsing the concept in spirit pending the town engineer's (Graves/Mike's) sign-off on final calculations. Board granted a driveway-separation accommodation (29 ft vs. the 50 ft standard) based on a pre-existing non-conforming driveway. Hearing continued to September 16.
2026-09-16 — 2026-09-16 - Planning Board Meeting
Approved the continued public hearing for the Whistler Road/123 (Lammansky) project, resolving stormwater and lighting-plan conditions and debating whether a driveway-spacing variance was needed.