2026-10-14 - Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement Committee

Summary

Auto-generated captions: names, numbers and some words are misheard (the chair's name is rendered "Co Pepper", Councilor Louijeune as "Lu Jong" or "Luis", and the Blue Hill Avenue project name is often garbled). Private residents who testified are not named. Spans are approximate.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk; call-ups between speakers are left out):

Topic Minutes Share
Civil rights and rapid transit equity in Boston 75 47%
Blue Hill Avenue Transportation Action Plan 63 39%
Orange Line extension along Blue Hill Avenue 18 11%
Procedural and other business 4 3%
  • Wednesday, October 14, 2026.
  • Field hearing of the Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement Committee, chaired by Councilor Culpepper, held at a community hall in Dorchester and called to order at 6:17 p.m. The video runs about 2 hours 48 minutes and was captioned from the start; the hearing wound up at roughly 9 p.m. There was no recess or closed session.
  • The agenda was Docket No. 1340 (a hearing on the civil rights implications of rapid transit inequities in Boston) and Docket No. 1341 (a resolution supporting an evaluation of an Orange Line extension along Blue Hill Avenue), sponsored by Culpepper and Councilor Worrell and referred on July 8, 2026.
  • Present in order of arrival: Murphy, Mejia (vice chair), Flynn, Louijeune and Worrell, with Santana and Pepén joining later.
  • Murphy left early and Mejia and Louijeune said they could not stay for the whole hearing. No vote was taken.

Civil rights and rapid transit equity in Boston

10:06-19:32, 25:48-27:49, 34:50-52:40, 1:07:02-1:10:44, 1:22:58-1:26:33, 1:36:13-1:38:50, 1:42:52-1:45:29, 1:53:11-1:56:11, 1:58:50-2:04:07, 2:09:44-2:22:34, 2:23:12-2:28:48, 2:42:12-2:48:28

  • Framing: Culpepper said the hearing is in this committee, not a transportation committee, because the lack of rail on Blue Hill Avenue is a civil rights issue. Murphy, Mejia, Flynn, Louijeune and Worrell gave two-minute openings; they stressed that residents are not listened to as other neighborhoods are, displacement of businesses and residents during and after construction, and the racial wealth gap. Mejia rejected the choice presented as "take this or have nothing". Louijeune and Santana later called for the community process itself to change.
  • Panel: a retired planner and a longtime civil rights leader and former emergency-management official (Ann McKinnon and Lewis Alisa, name spelling uncertain) argued the neighborhood has been denied investment given to other parts of the region, that rapid transit was removed from the corridor decades ago, and that the city has not engaged residents on the core question of which mode to build. They told Flynn the Council must press the city to treat this as a civil rights matter, and told Louijeune that businesses need construction planning and a block-by-block survey; the panel called the mayor's anti-displacement plan unproven.
  • Testimony: speakers described a long-promised replacement for the elevated Orange Line, asthma and diesel bus exposure, Title VI civil rights review demands, a call to sue the city, and a list of eight written demands to be answered by agencies within 30 days. Former state senator Diane Wilkerson said seven councilors had indicated they see a civil rights issue and urged them to sign a letter to the mayor drafted by Culpepper and Worrell asking the administration to address the concerns raised before moving further, and said she would report back on who did not. She also accused the mayor of misstating the level of opposition; those were her statements.
  • Closing: Flynn said he stands with Culpepper and Worrell against the plan and for an alternative from residents, and that many councilors still see it as a transportation matter. Santana urged changing how community process works and said jobs from any construction should go to neighborhood residents (noting a Boston Residents Jobs Policy hearing the next day, see Boston Residents Jobs Policy compliance). Worrell said residents want safety improvements, ADA crossings, lighting, trees and better bus stops now without the center-running bus lane.
  • Next steps: Culpepper said the dockets stay open, that the MBTA general manager (who declined to attend) will be subpoenaed for a later hearing, and that a subpoena for the city's Chief of Streets, who also did not attend, will be discussed. He said this night was the last for the mayor and MBTA to take comments for their federal grant application and that the hearing's comments will be added to that submission.

Blue Hill Avenue Transportation Action Plan

3:00-10:06, 27:49-34:47, 52:44-1:06:06, 1:10:52-1:18:40, 1:30:10-1:35:58, 1:39:29-1:42:30, 1:45:40-1:52:30, 1:56:24-1:58:40, 2:07:34-2:09:16, 2:28:49-2:32:19, 2:35:29-2:39:20, 2:40:28-2:41:27

  • Chair's statement: Culpepper said residents have opposed a center-running bus lane every time it was proposed, that the safety and beautification work has been tied to it by a memorandum of understanding between the city and the MBTA, that about $18 million is committed to the bus lane in that memorandum, and that, after he and Worrell met federal transit officials, the construction money has not yet been obligated and so cannot be "sent back". He said the city's Columbus Avenue project is cited as a model in the application.
  • Planner's critique: McKinnon said the travel-time savings are overstated (about five of the 10 to 15 minutes come from removing a U-turn in Milton, not the bus lane), that the project does nothing north of Grove Hall, and that planning should compare alternatives equally as federal environmental law requires. Santana and Worrell asked how to fix the process and how earlier studies (back to 1978, plus a 2017 transit needs study and a corridor coalition) should have been used; the panel said to restart with a true alternatives analysis, enforce traffic law and manage buses.
  • Public testimony: many speakers opposed the center-running lane, citing fewer bus stops (19 to 10 was stated), harder crossings for older residents, loss of parking and business access like on Columbus Avenue, construction disruption, traffic pushed to side streets near Grove Hall, diesel air pollution, and gaps in outreach (especially Spanish speakers and neighborhood associations). One speaker quoted an engineer who thought savings would be nearer five minutes. Others suggested solar-powered pods or other options. A smaller number supported the project: one speaker said a majority of riders are people of color and the grant is for buses, another asked for data on whether the money could fund rail and said engagement had occurred in 2021 to 2023, and a third supported it as a step toward light rail. Pepén, speaking under the Orange Line item, said he supports the project and sees it as compatible with later rail.
  • Other: a Grove Hall resident asked that someone be appointed to monitor that people of color are represented on construction crews.

Orange Line extension along Blue Hill Avenue

19:43-25:45, 1:19:00-1:22:36, 1:26:47-1:29:56, 2:04:13-2:07:22, 2:32:59-2:35:12

  • Docket No. 1341: Worrell said nobody is asking for a train tomorrow but rail deserves a modern evaluation next to side-running and center-running bus options. He cited the MBTA's own planning framework that names Blue Hill Avenue as an inner-core area lacking rapid transit, ridership of roughly 20,000 daily bus riders, and new state revenue from the fair share amendment, so the federal grant should not be treated as the only opportunity.
  • Testimony: speakers called for an alternatives analysis including an Orange Line extension (one speaker said the 2012 state study and an unused tunnel under Washington Street are starting points), a presenter shared a station concept for the corridor, and a former MBTA employee said the nearby Mattapan line upgrade is already building a power substation and vehicle facility, the costly parts of light rail. Another speaker warned a bus lane would have to be torn up if a subway were later chosen.
  • Pepén described the 2012 state study as recommending an extension from the Tufts area to Nubian Square and under Blue Hill Avenue and said that is worth looking into.

Other business

0:28-3:00, 2:39:20-2:40:28, 2:41:28-2:42:12

  • Call to order, public testimony rules (two minutes each, called five at a time; written comments to the committee email), reading of the dockets, attendance, and thanks to Council central staff and councilors' staff. Culpepper reminded the audience that Council rules apply, so no cheering or applause for or against speakers.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00All

00:28right. See you.

00:31My name is Minyard Co Pepper,

00:34District 7 city councelor,

00:37and I am the chair of the Boston City

00:40Council Committee on Civil Rights,

00:42Racial Equity, and Immigrant

00:45Advancement.

00:47Today is October 14th,

00:512026 and the exact time is 6:17

00:56p.m.

00:57We are at the Prince Hall Grand Lodge,

01:0124 Washington Street,

01:04Dorchester, Mass. Uh, this hearing is

01:07being recorded. Written comments may be

01:09sent to the committee email at

01:12ccccc.ivil

01:13[email protected].

01:16and will be made part of the record and

01:18available to all counselors. Public

01:22testimony will be taken in three groups

01:24during this hearing. Individuals will be

01:27called in the order in which they signed

01:29up and will have two minutes to testify.

01:33If you're interested in testifying in

01:35person, please add your name to the

01:39signin sheet near the entrance.

01:41And if you brought written

01:43documentation, please give 15 copies to

01:46our central staff leazison Megan

01:49Kavanaaugh.

01:51Today's hearing is on docket number

01:531340,

01:55order for a hearing to examine the civil

01:57rights implications of rapid transit

02:00equities in the city of Boston. and

02:02docket number 1341,

02:05the resolution in support of evaluating

02:08an orange line extension along Bluehill

02:12Avenue. These matters were sponsored by

02:15councilors Minyard Co Pepper and

02:18councilors Brian Werewell and were

02:20referred to the committee on July 8th,

02:242026.

02:25Today I am joined by my colleagues in

02:28order of arrival. Councelor Murphy,

02:32Councelor Mahia, Councelor Flynn,

02:35Councelor Lu Jong, and councelor Warel.

02:41Good evening everyone. I want to thank

02:43my council colleagues and panelists,

02:47community organizations, and most of all

02:50the residents who came out tonight.

02:53I made this a field hearing on purpose.

02:56When I filed these dockets, I felt a

02:59real sense of urgency to bring the

03:01council

03:03directly to the community,

03:06the community that will be impacted by

03:08this project the most.

03:11Certainly tonight, I'm disappointed that

03:14the MBTA general manager, Phil Ing, uh

03:20has decided not to

03:23come and testify,

03:26but he will uh be subpoenaed

03:32>> for our next hearing.

03:34Uh, I think Phil Ling is one of the most

03:37critical witnesses

03:40in this

03:42hearing with regard to the MBTA

03:45and funding that has been invested

03:49in and around the city of Boston.

03:53Chief of Streets Chris Ozgood

03:56also not here tonight.

03:58Uh, we anticipated he would come. We

04:02hadn't discussed a subpoena, but we will

04:04be discussing a subpoena with regard to

04:07Chris Ozgood. And I know most of you

04:10know me when I practice law, a subpoena

04:12was one of the first things that I would

04:14do. Whenever you want someone to come

04:16and testify before you, you just

04:19subpoena them.

04:21And so

04:23as a city councelor,

04:27I'm happy that we have the subpoena

04:29powers available to us when witnesses

04:32have decided not to appear.

04:38When I think about where we are tonight,

04:41this hearing was scheduled so that

04:43residents could hear not just from us,

04:47not just from the counselors, but also

04:49to get answers that you've been hearing

04:53different

04:55facts in the public in the community in

05:00those hearings. And tonight we want to

05:03try and correct a lot of the things that

05:05you have heard that just aren't

05:07accurate. Every [clears throat] time a

05:09center running bus lane has been

05:11proposed to Blue Hill Avenue, this

05:14community has opposed it. Let me say

05:18that again. Every time a center running

05:20bus lane has been proposed for Blue Hill

05:23Avenue, this community has vehemently

05:28opposed it clearly and loudly. In 2009

05:32when the state proposed a city running

05:35bus lane from Madapan to Roxberry and

05:37again in recent year through petitions

05:40pack community meetings and testimony

05:42the residents of Roxbury, Dorchester and

05:44Matipan including Nubian Square, Grove

05:47Hall, Franklin, Madapan Square and all

05:50the neighborhoods along the Bluehole

05:52Avenue corridor

05:55have said we deserve better than a

05:57center running bus lane. When you look

06:00at the MBTA's rail map, most of the city

06:03has convenient access to rapid rail

06:06transit.

06:07Our neighborhoods do not. Blue Hill

06:11Avenue is the busiest corridor in the

06:13MBTA system, accounting for 11% of the

06:16total wrership. Yet, the people who rely

06:20on the MBTA have no rail.

06:25That's a transport. We We live in a

06:27transportation desert.

06:29And it's a result of decisions that have

06:32been made not to invest in the

06:34community. Not because of geography.

06:37This community

06:41is not only having a center running bus

06:43lane that no one asked for to be forced

06:46on. It has been handed a false choice.

06:50Accept the bus lane or lose the safety

06:54and beautifification improvements that

06:56are part of the same project. These are

06:58improvements the community deserves and

07:01has been asking for for decades.

07:04Why should they be contingent on design

07:08on the design that the community

07:10continues to reject? And here's what's

07:12interesting. Anou signed by the city and

07:15the MBTA and sent to the Federal Transit

07:18Administration is the reason why these

07:21improvements cannot be separated from

07:24the project.

07:25It's not that the FDA required they be

07:28part of the project. theou there's a

07:32memorandum of understanding between the

07:34MBTA and the city signed by the mayor

07:38that

07:43stated in no uncertain terms that that

07:47$18 million that we've been saying we

07:50wanted to be used right now

07:54is committed to the center running bus

07:56lane in theouou. We haven't been told

07:59that. The mayor told us that if they use

08:02that $1 million, then they would have to

08:04come back and do it over again. So, it's

08:07best not to use it right now when theou

08:11requires that money be used for the

08:14center running bus lane signed by the

08:16mayor and general manager in thatou

08:21tells us something else about Columbus

08:23Avenue. the April 2024th letter that's

08:27sent toou to the Federal Transportation

08:30Administration,

08:33Federal Transportation Administration

08:35that Brian and War and I met with last

08:38week and found out a lot of information

08:40that we had not been told the truth.

08:44when they talk about the money being

08:47sent back to Washington and we were

08:49being criticized by folks who said stop

08:52opposing it because the money is going

08:55to go back. Well, the money can't go

08:58back because the money has not been

09:01given to the state or the city. The

09:04money hasn't been obligated yet. There's

09:07still so early in the process. They had

09:11us believing that they had the money.

09:13That's why you can't believe all that

09:15fake news.

09:17The money is not obligated,

09:20>> so it can't go back cuz you can't give

09:23back something you don't have.

09:25But they led us to believe that they had

09:27the money already.

09:31And when you think about thatou that the

09:33mayor and the general manager signed, it

09:35points to Columbus Avenue as a model for

09:37the project, calling it as similar to

09:39what we envisioned for Blue Hill Avenue.

09:42That's the Columbus Avenue project they

09:44just pulled down that they called in

09:47theou similar to Blue Hill Avenue. You

09:50heard Chris Oddsgood last week trying to

09:53distance it from Blue Hill Avenue saying

09:55Columbus Avenue is different from Blue

09:57Hill Avenue, but in theou

10:00and so let me just close there. I could

10:03talk about what's going on, but I want

10:06to give my colleagues an opportunity.

10:09But tonight's hearing is really a civil

10:11rights hearing. That's what we're

10:13focused on tonight. That's the bill that

10:16I filed. It's a civil rights hearing.

10:19And that's why I filed docket 1340 in

10:22order for a hearing on the history of

10:24transit equity in Boston and its civil

10:27rights implication. Cuz I believe when

10:29you invest in all the communities around

10:31Boston and you don't invest in this

10:33community,

10:35that's what they call a civil rights

10:36issue.

10:37>> That's right. And so we're here tonight

10:41with my colleagues and I thank my

10:43colleagues for coming

10:46and I'm going to give each of them an

10:49opening state an opportunity to give

10:51their opening statements. I've got

10:53plenty more to say but we'll talk about

10:55later but I want to hear from them now.

10:57I'm going to give each of them two

10:59minutes and we're going to start with

11:00them by arrival. We're going to start

11:02with councelor Murphy. Councelor Murphy

11:05you have the floor.

11:06>> Thank you. Um, thank you councel Kalper

11:10and Council Warel for all of your work

11:13and advocacy up to this point. I know

11:16that you and your staff I want to thank

11:18your offices also because you've been

11:20doing a lot of work and what you're

11:22advocating for. Unfortunately, it seems

11:25like we have this same conversation time

11:29and time again that when we or the

11:33administration allows and listens to the

11:36community, they do the opposite of what

11:39the community asks for or they make you

11:41think that they're listening to you, but

11:43then you find out that they're not

11:45taking, you know, lived experiences. You

11:48live in this neighborhood. You know best

11:51what your neighborhood wants. And when

11:53it's completely ignored, to me that is

11:55unacceptable. So as an atlarge city

11:58councelor, it is a privilege to

12:00represent all of the neighborhoods. I

12:02also get to see that

12:05not every neighborhood is listened to

12:07the same. Right. It is true. It's not

12:09just people complaining. It's not just

12:11saying poor us. It's it is true that not

12:14every neighborhood. So if we have that

12:16political will, it is disrespectful that

12:19the administration is not here. They

12:22always get plenty of time to show up.

12:25And I think that falls on us as a body.

12:27I think if all 13 of us, not just some

12:30of us, said the subpoena, they often say

12:33that our subpoena power, but what what

12:35teeth does it have? What can you really

12:37do with it? Well, we can stop council

12:39meetings. We can stop the business of

12:41the city if we all stand together. So,

12:44I'm here to listen to the community, but

12:46also support my colleagues who have been

12:49working hard in making sure that this

12:51community doesn't have another thing

12:52pushed on to them that that your voices

12:55are heard and respected. So, thank you

12:57for having this meeting and just glad to

12:59be here.

13:00>> Thank you, Council Murphy. Councelor

13:01Mahia, you have two minutes.

13:04>> Uh, thank you, Chair. Um, and thank you

13:06everyone for showing up because showing

13:09up is half the battle, right? And I'm

13:12sure that half of you, if not all of

13:14you, are tired of doing just that,

13:16showing up and not feeling like whatever

13:18you have to say is being heard and um

13:21and honored. So, I'll just say a few uh

13:25things. First of all, um Blue Hill Lab

13:29is at the heart of the black and brown

13:31community. It is one of the last

13:32corridors that are still left standing

13:35in terms of gentrification. And whatever

13:37we do and however we decide to move, we

13:40have to make sure that we're moving with

13:42intentionality and making sure that the

13:44people who are living in and around that

13:46neighborhood have not only a seat at the

13:48table, but are dictating what happens in

13:51that neighborhood. And I think that's

13:53going to be one of the things that I'm

13:54going to be paying most attention to

13:56because how we do this matters, right?

14:00Um, the other the other piece of it is I

14:02I reject the false hope narrative that

14:06we either take this or we have nothing.

14:08The same thing happened with White

14:10Stadium. Either we're going to renovate

14:11it or you don't get anything. We can't

14:13continue to have this and or we should

14:17and we and I believe we deserve it all.

14:19And that's what we should be fighting

14:21for is having it all. Um, and it

14:24shouldn't be pitting people against each

14:26other. this whole dynamic where you have

14:27transit people against folks who who are

14:30fighting for parking. That is how they

14:33win. What I'd like to see is all of us

14:36coming together, working in

14:38collaboration with each other and

14:40designing what we want as a unit instead

14:44of pitting each other against one

14:45another. That's played out. And then

14:47lastly, I'll say this that in January of

14:502022, I was the city councelor that

14:53hosted the first town hall at Morning

14:56Star. And then I asked the

14:58administration for real meaningful

15:01community engagement. That was in 2022.

15:04And then most recently, I was the first

15:06city councelor to host an off-site

15:08hearing on this particular topic right

15:11on Blue Hill A last year in 2025. So,

15:14I'm not new to this, but what I will say

15:17is that what we need to start doing is

15:19organizing differently because pitting

15:22people against each other when no one's

15:24going to win under those dynamics. So,

15:26I'm really encouraging you all to

15:28understand what's at stake and start

15:30learning how to be with each other

15:32instead of in conflict with one another.

15:34And I'll end with this that I'm going to

15:35leave at 7:30 and I don't want nobody

15:36talking smack about me leaving because I

15:38got to go take care of my kid. And

15:40that's it. 7:30.

15:42>> Thank you, Councilman here. Uh,

15:44Councelor Flynn, you have two minutes.

15:47>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to

15:48Councelor Co Pepper, Council Well, for

15:51bringing this forward. Honored to be

15:53here. I'm probably the only city

15:55councelor at the at the table here that

15:58doesn't necessarily represent this area,

16:01the impacted area. But I came here for

16:04two reasons.

16:06one to support my council colleagues

16:08councelor Cole Peppa council who I have

16:11a tre tremendous amount of respect for

16:13and two to listen to residents because I

16:16have respect for the residents here as

16:18well I'll be here for the three hours

16:20listening to every comment and concern

16:22you have um councelor co pepper

16:26mentioned it there's a reason this is

16:28being held in the committee on civil

16:30rights not transportation or or planning

16:34and the reason as council co pepper said

16:36is this is a racial justice issue. This

16:39is a civil rights issue.

16:42And that's what the lens of this meeting

16:45should be about and would be about is

16:47listening to residents about the impact

16:51city decisions are having on civil

16:53rights for residents in and around the

16:55impacted neighborhood. Um I I agree. I

16:58believe it is a civil rights issue. Um

17:01and I think it's a critical civil rights

17:03issue. I don't think the best decisions

17:05are made at city hall. I think the best

17:08decisions are made in the neighborhoods

17:11and the best decisions are are us

17:14listening to you and your elected

17:16officials, especially councelor Co

17:18Pepper and council elected by you to do

17:22their job. And that's exactly what

17:24they're doing, advocating for you,

17:27ensuring that you're being treated with

17:30respect, but which you're not. in my job

17:33is to support council co pepper and

17:35council war and I'll do everything I

17:37possibly can to stand with them

17:41especially on the alternative plan that

17:43council co council co pepper but I agree

17:46it's about civil rights it's about

17:48racial justice thank you

17:50>> thank you councelor Flynn

17:53councelor Louis you have two minutes

17:56>> thank you um good evening everyone sorry

17:58I'm a little raspy I'm a little bit

17:59under the weather um But I just want to

18:02thank everyone for coming out here

18:04tonight. I want to thank central staff

18:05for being here. Um, and I want to thank

18:07my colleagues for putting this together.

18:08And I want to thank all the residents

18:10who are taking time out of their evening

18:11to be here to really talk about and

18:13shape what our community looks like,

18:16what Blue Hill Avenue looks like. I know

18:17that there have been many, many hearings

18:20and meetings on this topic. And I want

18:21to thank my colleagues for their work

18:24here. Um, I'm really concerned and I

18:27know that folks in here are really

18:29concerned about issues involving

18:31displacement both during construction

18:34and after. Whether we're talking about

18:35business displacement, whether we're

18:37talking about resident displacement, um,

18:40and and on top of that, we have a a

18:42pernitious and a very real racial wealth

18:45gap that we don't want to see furthered.

18:48And so, we have to be very careful. So,

18:49I have a lot of concerns regarding that.

18:52And at the same time, Bluehole Avenue is

18:54worthy of investment. It's worthy of

18:56making sure that all of our residents

18:58feel safe. Um, and so I'm going to be

19:00here to listen. I'm probably not going

19:03to be able to last the entire hearing,

19:04but I do want to know want to mention

19:06that back when there were meetings at

19:08K's Oasis before K's Oasis closed about

19:11this project. I know some of y'all were

19:13there because I was there listening and

19:15talking to community members about what

19:17their vision is for Blue Hill A. Whether

19:19you are older, whether you are younger,

19:21I do so much on a little loud. My salons

19:23are there, so many. So, I hear about

19:25this all of the time and I think it's

19:26really important to hear from all of

19:27you. So, I look forward to doing that

19:28for as long as I can last this evening.

19:30Thank you. [snorts]

19:32Thank you, councelor Luis Yung. The next

19:35uh next councelor to present to you his

19:40opening is councelor Brian Warell.

19:43Councelor Warell.

19:45>> Thank you, councelor Copeper. Um, thank

19:48you all for being here tonight.

19:51And tonight is about the people who live

19:53here. So, I want to start with a simple

19:56question. What level of transportation

19:58investment does our community actually

20:01deserve? The MBTA spent more than a

20:05billion dollars extending rail service

20:08to New Bedford. After a year, that line

20:11is carrying roughly 2,500

20:14riders a day. Here on Bluehav, we're

20:18talking about close to 20,000 bus riders

20:22every day. That is a huge difference.

20:26Yet, this community is being told that

20:28an investment that is a fraction of that

20:31amount is somehow our once in a

20:34generation opportunity

20:37and that we better take it because we

20:39may never get another one. I don't buy

20:42that.

20:43You can get on a train in Providence and

20:46get to South Station in about an hour.

20:49But if you're taking public

20:51transportation from Madapin inside of

20:54the city of Boston, it could take you

20:56longer than that to get downtown.

21:00That should bother all of us because

21:02this is just not about shaving a few

21:05minutes off of a bus trip. This is about

21:08whether this community, our community,

21:10is finally going to receive the kind of

21:12transportation investment that

21:14[clears throat] matches the need. So the

21:17question is not whether Blue Hill Lab

21:19needs investment. Of course it does. The

21:22real question is whether a centerrunning

21:24bus lane is the best long-term answer

21:27for our community. And before we answer

21:30that question, we ought to know what the

21:33alternative actually look like. Now let

21:36me be clear. Nobody is saying build a

21:39train tomorrow. What we are saying is

21:42that before we lock oursel into this

21:45corridor into one solution for the next

21:47generation, rail deserves a real modern

21:50evaluation. And so does alternatives

21:53included side running bus lanes. And

21:56rail is not some wild idea. Rail was up

22:00and down blue lab before. This community

22:03has been talking about better rapid

22:05transit for decades.

22:07So for me, this is not about So for me,

22:10this is also about restoration.

22:13It's about looking at a community that's

22:15waited a long time and asking whether we

22:17can finally make the kind of investment

22:19that matches our need. And here's where

22:22the MBTA's own planning framework

22:25becomes important. The MBTA already has

22:28a framework for the kinds of places

22:30where highquality transit and rail

22:33should be considered. They talk about

22:35dense inner city communities that lack

22:39rail and rapid transit. They talk about

22:41places that rely heavily on buses. They

22:45talk about communities where people face

22:47longer trips to jobs and opportunity.

22:51And they did and they did not just

22:53describe our community. They

22:55specifically named Bluehill Lav in the

22:59MBTA's own focus 40 plan. Bluehill A was

23:03identified as an inner core community

23:05lacking rapid transit. That is not my

23:08phrase. That is the MBTA's phrase. So

23:11we're not asking the MBTA to create some

23:13special standard [clears throat] for

23:14Blue Hill Lav. We're asking them to

23:16apply the standard they already created.

23:20If Bluehill Lab checks the boxes they

23:23say matter, then put the rail and the

23:25BRT side by side. Show us the ridership.

23:29Show us the travel times. Show us the

23:31cost. Show us the impact on businesses

23:34and development. And show us the

23:36long-term benefits for our community.

23:38Then let the facts tell us what makes

23:40the most sense. And there's another

23:42piece of this conversation we cannot

23:44ignore.

23:46Massachusetts now has a new source of

23:48transportation revenue that did not

23:50exist a few years ago. The fair share

23:53amendment is bringing hundreds of

23:55millions of dollars into transportation,

23:57including investments in the MBTA and

24:00additional capacity to fund major

24:02transportation projects. So, when people

24:05say this $80 million federal grant is

24:08our one opportunity, that conversation

24:10is missing something. We now have new

24:12state transportation revenue coming in

24:15through the fair share. So the question

24:17should not just be how do we hold on to

24:19this one federal grant at all cost. The

24:22question should be what is the right

24:23long-term investment for Blue Hill Lab

24:26and how do we put federal state fair

24:29share and other resources to pay for it?

24:32Because if this quarter truly needs a

24:34generational investment, then we should

24:36be looking at every available tool to

24:38make that general investment happen.

24:43And that is where accountability comes

24:44in. We keep being told to trust our

24:47experts and expertise it does matter.

24:50But expertise also comes with

24:52responsibility to follow the evidence

24:54and apply standards consistently.

24:57Residents deserve to see the analysis.

25:00They deserve to see comparisons and real

25:03engagement means people have some say in

25:05the biggest question. What kind of

25:08transportation system do we want serving

25:10this community for the next 50 or 100

25:12years? If people keep showing up, keep

25:15raising the same concerns and keep

25:17asking for alternative, government has a

25:20responsibility to do more than just hear

25:22them. We have a respond and show them

25:26those analysis and those alternatives.

25:28So tonight is about listening. It's

25:30about giving residents the space they've

25:32been asking for. And before anybody

25:35makes a generational decision about Blue

25:37Hill Lab, the people along Blue Lab

25:40deserve a say. Thank you.

25:45[applause]

25:48>> In addition to what Brian said, there's

25:51an obvious disconnect between what

25:54disinvested and what underserved

25:56communities ask for. and what government

25:59gives them. Agencies claim to be

26:02helping, but they too often divide us.

26:04When other communities ask for

26:06transportation improvements, they get

26:08them regardless of cost or technical

26:11challenges. Cambridge and Somerville got

26:14the red line extension to Alwife built

26:17in the 1980s for $574 million.

26:21Somerville and Medford got the Green

26:23Line extension, which they went through

26:25major cost overruns and redesigned

26:28before the state found more money, 2.3

26:32billion in all. On the South Boston

26:35waterfront, the Silver Line got 624

26:38million for the tunnel. Today the green

26:40line, let me just say this again. Today,

26:43this day, 10:1426,

26:46the green line is slated for $2.9

26:50billion investments and we are given a

26:53bus lane. Those communities did not have

26:56to fight the way we have to fight to

27:00keep a center running bus lane from

27:02coming. They got rail investments they

27:04asked for. All we want is what they got.

27:09Rosendelle is now undergoing a

27:11feasibility study for rail line from

27:15Rosendale to the orange line. All we

27:18want is what Rosendelle is getting a

27:21feasibility study. And when you think

27:23about what we have to fight for in order

27:27to get what we asked for,

27:30we realize that it's a civil rights

27:33issue. That's right.

27:35>> One that we have to fight for. And we

27:37know that we've been fighting for a long

27:39time. Whatever we get, we fight for it.

27:43And when we fight,

27:44>> we win.

27:45>> Not like that. When we fight,

27:48>> we win.

27:49>> Let me uh move on to uh our first panel.

27:53I'm going to rearrange this a little bit

27:55because tonight is really for the

27:57community. So, I'm going to have our

27:59first panelist come up tonight and after

28:02Ann McKinnon comes and talks, a senior

28:04planner, and after Lewis Alisa comes,

28:07our first panelist, then the rest of the

28:09night will be for community testimony.

28:13That's what tonight was geared for. I

28:15remember I was at those hearings when

28:17they cut them off. 20 people didn't get

28:19to speak at one, more than 20 didn't get

28:22to speak at the other. This is your

28:24night. So, Ann, why don't you come on

28:26up? Uh, Dr. Lewis Alisa, come on up.

28:39>> And we'll give each of you seven

28:42minutes.

28:42>> Okay. More or less.

28:47>> I'll see some of you.

28:55>> Hello. Um I'm an McKinnon. I live in

28:57Jamaica plane. I um worked for um about

29:0235 years as a planner and a number of my

29:05clients were most of my clients were

29:08public agencies uh including the MBTA

29:11and other transit properties around the

29:13country and um city of Boston and other

29:16municipalities and the state. So I um I

29:20know a little bit about um how the the

29:23planning process is supposed to work and

29:26it's clearly failed here but failed by

29:29design um

29:32>> in in terms of of transit service here.

29:36You only need to look at a map and see

29:38that this neighborhood is not served by

29:41transit and it's an outlier in the city

29:43of Boston. The carter is served only by

29:46buses, which is the uh slowest and least

29:49efficient form of transportation that

29:52exists. Um the MBTA actually at at the

29:57hearings said that the ridership on in

30:00this corridor is uh kind of similar to

30:03the blue line um that goes to East

30:06Boston and River. and we don't hear

30:09anybody talking about um the blue line

30:12would be well served by a bus. Um and

30:16the facts are pretty clear.

30:19The the mode that has been chosen for

30:22Blue Hill Avenue because it's quick and

30:25relatively easy to build is buses. Buses

30:28are the lowest capacity

30:30transportation mode that exists. They

30:33have the least the lowest ability to

30:37impact land use and development

30:40decisions.

30:42Um the travel time sta savings are

30:45overstated. Um they say it'll save the

30:48bus way will save 10 to 15 minutes. Um

30:53first of all that's not enough to get

30:54people to sell their car and say gee

30:56I'll save 10 minutes and jump on the

30:58bus. Um, but a lot of that travel time

31:00savings is unrelated to the busway. It's

31:04it comes from five minutes comes from

31:06eliminating the U-turn in Milton.

31:09So, they don't tell you that. You have

31:11to read the thousandpage document to to

31:14get that. The project will do nothing to

31:17speed traffic beyond north of Grove

31:20Hall. And that's about 50% of the of the

31:24um of the trip from Matapan to Nubian

31:27Square. So a lot of the trip is uh is

31:32still stuck in traffic.

31:35And for all of this investment, the MBTA

31:38says that um it might be able to add

31:42maybe 10 additional buses, round trips,

31:4610 additional round trips over an

31:4818-hour day on the 28 bus, which is

31:52hardly a noticeable increase in service.

31:56So, it really the the benefits are

31:59really oversold by the MBTA.

32:02So, why does this neighborhood get

32:03crumbs when other neighborhoods get

32:06serious improvements? And that's because

32:09they fight for them and they're listened

32:10to. And that's why we're talking about

32:13this as a civil rights issue. Um,

32:16transit equity cannot be achieved

32:18without talking to people, without

32:21developing alternatives and analyzing

32:24them and um selecting the alternative

32:28that meets most of the goals.

32:33Transit equity requires

32:36um really thoughtful and serious

32:39planning

32:41and bold action and neither of which has

32:44happened here. The decision to pursue

32:47the pot of money at the feds uh at the

32:50at the federal government level um was

32:55probably done because it was seen as

32:57easy to get. And you know, it's

32:59unfortunate that some some areas of the

33:03city and the state um are allowed to

33:06think big, think bold, and go for the

33:10money that's needed to make a meaningful

33:12improvement in this corer. For whatever

33:15reason, they went for the uh for the

33:18bunt instead of the home run.

33:22Um,

33:24as the counselor said, this money for

33:27construction has not been approved.

33:30Basically, the city has been misleading

33:32people by saying that they have the

33:35money. And

33:37>> that is a that is a lie. Um, and and and

33:41why why else the money's relatively easy

33:44to get, they thought. They also didn't

33:46care that there were other the past

33:48studies that said this corer should be

33:52studied for a higher quality transit

33:55service. Those studies go back to 1978.

33:59Nobody cared or they ignored them.

34:03I mean, in addition, you know, the city,

34:05in addition to the city, the a number of

34:08transit advocacy groups um have said

34:10that this is a great project and they

34:13basically are saying they they speak for

34:15the community. Well, clearly they don't.

34:18Um and and I think they need to be

34:20checked. Um and finally, you know, bold

34:24action and um you know, big vision

34:28uh seems to be allowed in other

34:31neighborhoods but not here. And I think

34:34the uh the strength of the community

34:36that's come out to oppose this uh is

34:38making people pay attention that they

34:41need to think a little bolder than a bus

34:43on Blue Hill A.

34:47>> Thank you, Ann

34:50[applause] Lewis.

34:53>> Seven minutes.

34:55>> That's a lot That's a lot

34:56[clears throat] more than I get when I

34:57go downtown. I'm glad to be home. Um

35:01first um Reverend Dr. uh Co Pepper let

35:04me thank you for bringing this um

35:06hearing where it belongs into the

35:08community. Most of our meetings should

35:10be held in the communities that are

35:12being impacted. That's the only thing

35:13that makes sense. I want to thank the

35:15other members u of the city council who

35:16did not think it robbery. to take time

35:19and come out and hear what the community

35:20had to say is the real challenge of this

35:2320th century that people do not who

35:26govern do not hear often from the people

35:28that they govern. They are in positions

35:31that they get elected to and forget that

35:32the people who voted them in should be

35:34heard. So I appreciate each of you being

35:37here today, but I thank you very much

35:39Dr. Co, Dr. CO Pepper for bringing this

35:42home because you tried to move this in

35:44this issue situation around

35:46transportation into your committee from

35:47the beginning because like you said this

35:49is a civil rights issue. The right to be

35:51able to go to work, go to school, move

35:55safely and comfortably about your

35:57community. The right not to have your

36:00businesses undermined or destroyed. The

36:02right to be able to get from one place

36:04to another as everybody else in this

36:06Commonwealth. It's yours because you pay

36:09the same taxes as everyone else. You

36:12need to know that we are suffering from

36:14the most ardent racist political process

36:18that I've ever been a part of. That the

36:20city of Boston has deliberately with

36:23malice of forethought undermined the

36:25development of Roxbury, Dorchester,

36:27Madapan, lower Roxbury for the past 50

36:30years that I've been a resident of this

36:32city that they deliberately went out of

36:34their way to undermine the resources.

36:36They deliberately took rapid transit out

36:39of the community affecting over 45,000

36:41homes and families in Roxbury and moved

36:44it a mile away from where the people

36:46lived in Roxberry in Dorchester. Moving

36:49that orange line was a different issue

36:51to minimize the ability of folks to get

36:53from their home to a place of

36:55employment. Giving a a free 28 or 22 bus

36:59does not get you to where you need to

37:01be. When you get to the end of the line,

37:03you still have to pay to go where the

37:04jobs are. They have no direct connection

37:07to downtown or to the industrial zones

37:09or to any place else. It was a

37:11deliberate decision. I've served five

37:13governors, two presidents, and two

37:15mayors. And throughout my tenure in

37:18time, we have been arguing. We have been

37:20fighting, discussing the civil rights of

37:22the residents of Roxbury, which was

37:24denied, denied, denied. You ask any

37:27councelor up here, they'll look at their

37:29sheet and they'll tell you what they've

37:30given to other cities and other

37:32communities. $43 million to build a

37:34swimming pool in in in Charles Town. And

37:37then you ask, "What do we have on Geneva

37:40A or what do we have in Franklin Park?"

37:41They didn't spend $43 million in

37:43Franklin Park over the last 50 years.

37:45Now they want to take the park and put

37:47$335 million for somebody else to

37:50control it. They took $135 million from

37:54the children at Madison Park High

37:55School, told them they'll have to wait

37:57eight years before they have a school

37:58that makes the only difference in this

38:00community to keep up with technology.

38:02Wait seven years while we get a soccer

38:05league to come in and make a difference

38:06in Roxbury. You won't be able to play.

38:09Our children won't be able to play. And

38:11they're encroaching on the playstead

38:13that has been neglected for 50 years.

38:15That the money that they spend in

38:17Franklin Park is onetenth of what they

38:19spend on the common. and for the last 50

38:20years and now they're saying they're

38:22concerned. We should be happy that

38:23they're concerned and so they come and

38:25ask us do we want protection? They had

38:28the tarity ass we want protection. Do we

38:31want blue from 1983 when Dukakus

38:34returned as governor Senator Wilkerson

38:37Sister Virginia? They all sat on

38:40commissions. We've had three commissions

38:41on Blue Hill Avenue. We laid out what

38:43they had to be done to make the

38:45economics of Blue Hill Avenue work. We

38:47laid out clearly what we needed, wanted

38:49to see. They've ignored everything for

38:51the last 50 years and now they're saying

38:54because there's money available that's

38:56going to the construction industry, we

38:58need to make a choice of whether or not

38:59we want to see our businesses destroyed

39:01and our homes destroyed. We're building

39:03more. There are more cars coming through

39:05Roxbury and Dorchester Matteran emanate

39:09and in in in uh towns and cities that

39:13are not related to us. This is not

39:15improvement for Roxbury. When you start

39:17doing construction, ask anyone who lives

39:19at the low end of Blue Hill Avenue what

39:21happened for the three years they tore

39:23up the whole streets and what happened

39:24to the businesses down there that end

39:25near Dudley. Let's be clear, this is not

39:29about development for our community.

39:30This is about construction dollars that

39:32goes back in the terms of campaign

39:34funds. This is not economic development

39:37because economic development would say

39:38we fix the sidewalks, we put in the

39:40streets, we fix the storefronts, we deal

39:42with the nine, 10 large scale

39:44developments that are going up on Blue

39:45Avenue and we don't take away from the

39:48economy and the ability of things

39:49getting done. There has been no economic

39:53impact study. None. There has been no

39:56environmental impact study. None. The

39:58economics of this is that if they spend

40:00$22 billion to fix up the South Boston

40:03waterfront and M brother Flynn, I'm

40:05going to tell you, yeah, you have

40:06interest here because that's money that

40:08fix the city of Boston and your

40:09residents. Also, when they take 22

40:12billion and do the South Boston

40:13waterfront, they can't account for a

40:15billion dollars over the last 50 years

40:17in Grove Hall. They can't account for

40:19the money that they spent just recently

40:22in Finway. all the money that they spend

40:24in the ink block in terms of housing and

40:26street development in growth wall in

40:28Roxbury. So the question that we've been

40:29asking, Garrison Trot has been asking,

40:32Bluehole Avenue Commission has been

40:34asking the people in the community, when

40:36it gets from Matapan Square to growth

40:39hall, where does it go? For seven years,

40:42we've asked that question. They've had

40:44four studies, spend a million dollars

40:45over a great scale from Harvard, came

40:47here in 24 and 25, and we met with them

40:50overund6 times and each time the people

40:53in this community says we don't need it.

40:56We need the community to work. We need

40:59transportation that'll work. We need

41:01Blue Avenue that's safe for our kids. We

41:03need environmental impact study to tell

41:05you what slowing down those cars from

41:07Milton and Randolph and and and Brockton

41:10is going to mean to the lives of an area

41:12that has the highest asthma rate in the

41:14country. None of that has happened yet.

41:16We're saying the the justice the

41:19injustice of this process has an

41:21economic effect. that when you slow down

41:24the growth, when you minimize and

41:26complicate the ability of people to be

41:28able to use their neighborhoods and use

41:30their homes and use their businesses for

41:32economic growth, it's a civil rights

41:35issue. Thank you for taking this on. I

41:38need people to keep in mind this issue

41:40should not go away. You should not go

41:42from here and be comfortable. Tell your

41:44friend, tell your neighbors that your

41:46community is in jeopardy, your homes are

41:49in jeopardy, your lives are in jeopardy.

41:51And if we don't stand up now, we won't

41:53be here later.

41:59[applause]

42:01>> Want to move to the counselors now.

42:07Counselors, you have two minutes

42:11for questions if you choose to ask any.

42:14And we'll start with councelor Murphy.

42:16You have two questions. is gone.

42:20>> Councelor Murphy left.

42:22>> He's gone.

42:22>> Councelor

42:24Mahia.

42:25>> Yes.

42:26>> You have

42:27>> two minutes for questions.

42:28>> I'll take Murphy's, too. [laughter] Um,

42:33nah. Uh, so first of all, thank you,

42:35Council Co Pepper. Um, and I was in the

42:38chamber that day when we were trying to

42:40debate where this hearing was going to

42:42go, and I fought for it to be in civil

42:43rights because this is where it belongs.

42:46Um, and so I just want to thank you for

42:47your fierce advocacy. Um, and also for

42:51the panelists and Lewis and I go way

42:53back. We've been fighting against every

42:55single thing that is happening in

42:56Dorchester, Roxbury, and Matapan.

42:59and we're still fighting.

43:01And at some point, we're

43:04we're tired. And what we're not talking

43:07about and something that I, you know,

43:10John, I'm gonna just call you out

43:11because we've been you, we've been

43:13talking about this offline, is the

43:15displacement that is going to happen to

43:18communities, gentrification that's going

43:20to happen because whenever we get

43:22anything shiny, what happens?

43:28Right? And there's this threat and this

43:32fear that we have as people of color

43:35that things are always being done to us

43:38without us. And so I would love to hear

43:42from Lewis um and an what would a

43:48a restorative justice practice

43:51to repair the harm that has been caused

43:54question

43:55>> as it relates to the uh the community

43:58engagement that has not really happened

44:01in George Roxbury and Matapan as it

44:03relates to this like how can the city

44:06turn it around? What if anything needs

44:08to happen for the city to turn this

44:10around?

44:13>> Well, I I think um part of the problem

44:16or the biggest problem is recently is

44:18that um they're not asking for input on

44:23the fundamental question about the the

44:26mode, what what is going to be um what

44:29mode is used on Blue Hill. They're

44:31asking for um you know what color the

44:34bus stop should be and and what kind of

44:37tree should be installed. The problem

44:39with the city of Boston is they don't do

44:42planning. You can't even find a planning

44:45um division on the BTD the Boston

44:48transportation department website. So,

44:51as has been said and I think councelor

44:53Wel said it really well is um you know

44:57you got to step back and do a real

44:59planning study with alternatives. You

45:01start by looking at what's the problem

45:03and you develop alternatives. Side

45:05running bus lane, rail, center running

45:07bus lane, um peak hour bus lane, roller

45:12skate lane, whatever it is. you you

45:13develop your alternatives and you get

45:16you walk people through the process

45:19slowly analyzing each one. The city came

45:23and said, "Here, you know, we we got a

45:26bus lane project. What do you think

45:27about it?" And that's fundamentally not

45:29how you do it.

45:30>> Yeah. Thank you for that. And I know my

45:32time is up. I heard the the beeper, but

45:35before Lewis says something real quick,

45:37I just want to acknowledge uh two

45:40things. One is that I am the chair of

45:42education and I'm also going to be u

45:45speaking at the school committee in a

45:47little while. So I'll be stepping out

45:48and coming back. And then the other

45:50thing that I'd like to just put on the

45:53record is that there has been historical

45:56harm caused to our communities. I grew

45:59up here in the city of Boston. I know

46:00what it's like. Um, and I think that we

46:03have an opportunity to write the wrongs

46:07that have happened here in this process.

46:10And having watched this over the last

46:12seven years, because it was 20 2022,

46:16Lewis, that we hosted the first hearing,

46:18the first town hall at Morning Star, and

46:21then five or six years later, the people

46:23who showed up to speak at Morning Star

46:25weren't even able to be heard. So that

46:28is a problem. And that is something that

46:31I think Lewis, you can talk to in terms

46:34of what we're hearing and what we're

46:35doing with what we hear. Where's the

46:38disconnect as it relates to community

46:40engagement?

46:41>> The disconnect is the respect. We get no

46:44respect for our leadership and no

46:45respect for the knowledge that we have.

46:47Before I go on, I want to thank pas the

46:49Grandmaster Colin Herel for the use of

46:51the space. And I also want to thank

46:53sister Virginia for the time she put in

46:55because there's some people that have

46:56stayed here and made made this work. You

46:59know, the the nation had made growth

47:01hall work. This building here, this

47:04grand lodge has been here for years to

47:07make this community work. We provided if

47:10they talk to us, they would talk to the

47:12people who make a difference, who make

47:14the change in our community, we'd have a

47:16totally different environment here. It's

47:18been deliberate. There is no accident.

47:20Talk to our counselors. Ask them what

47:22they've asked for. Ask them to what when

47:24we ask for equity, why we can't get it.

47:26If they spent 10% of what they spent in

47:29ink block and Grove Hall, it'd be a

47:31totally different environment. So, you

47:33know, what they have to do is push city

47:36councils because you have the power is

47:39to get them to listen to what we're

47:40saying, get them to follow. Clearly,

47:42they talk to no planners, no city

47:44planners, no transportation planners for

47:46the designs that they've created. This

47:48last project that they've given us, we

47:50start in 2017 at the Lee School saying

47:53no, this doesn't work. not no we don't

47:55want development no we don't want

47:57improvements we're saying the design

47:58that you're pushing doesn't work and

48:00we've given them alternatives they said

48:02no to our alternatives but they keep

48:04bringing on things that work for them

48:06when they start closing Harvard Street

48:08and they close ESON and Charlotte Street

48:10and they close access to move people

48:12around to minimize the amount of time

48:14that you spend taking in carbon monoxide

48:16they're not listening to us we've got to

48:18bring this to a head and the head has to

48:20be that we charge them with the racism

48:22that's controlling their decisionmaking

48:24that takes away from what our counselors

48:26and representatives are saying.

48:28>> Thank you. Thank you, Louis. And I'll

48:30just know for the record that, you know,

48:31I've spoken to many of the business

48:33owners up and down the corridor and some

48:36of them didn't even know that that was

48:38happening. So, I find it very hard to

48:39believe that at this moment in time,

48:41there's still people who don't even know

48:43that the city is planning to do

48:45something like this that's going to

48:46impact their businesses. And that says a

48:49lot in terms of still the work that

48:50needs to be done in terms of community

48:51engagement. And I know my time was up.

48:54Councelor Co Pepper, thank you for

48:55allowing me to speak.

48:56>> Thank you, Council Mahia. Uh I do want

48:58to acknowledge recognize uh Senator

49:01Wilkerson

49:03for being here with us tonight. Uh and

49:06uh Oh, you are going to testify. Did you

49:08sign up?

49:10Are there any other elected officials or

49:12former elected officials?

49:17>> Council,

49:17>> I do want to acknowledge Councelor

49:19Santana. Uh thank you, Council Santana.

49:23And uh after

49:26I've been given the counselors two

49:29minutes for an intro and two minutes for

49:31questions, let me go to councelor Flynn

49:34uh and then councelor Bujon. And then uh

49:38we'll come to you councelor Santana.

49:41>> Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair. And I

49:44also want to recognize sister Virginia

49:47and Senator Wilkerson and and so many

49:50others that are that are here, community

49:52leaders, and my my good friend as well,

49:54Louis Lewis. Lisia Louisa, um I was

49:58going to ask Lewis a question, and I've

50:00known Lewis a long period of time, and

50:03it's not it's not a trick question, but

50:06Lewis, I I opened up my statement saying

50:09this. I believe this is a civil rights

50:11issue. Um, I I I voted to to ensure that

50:16this docket went into the civil rights

50:18committee. Um,

50:21but the city thinks of this issue as a

50:23transportation and planning

50:26issue. I don't necessarily think they

50:30classify this as a civil rights issue

50:32like like the residents do, like we do,

50:36like like you do. My my question is

50:40knowing that how do how do we shift the

50:42focus to have civil rights be part of

50:46the discussion

50:48from city officials

50:51because we know the community knows it's

50:53a civil rights issue but city officials

50:56are not supporting that narrative. Um

50:59that's my question. laws.

51:01>> The question falls back on you and the

51:03council to um get the city to admit they

51:06don't respect the concept of civil

51:08rights. That's the bottom line is the

51:11former head of the Boston branch in

51:12NACP. Unfortunately, we had to sue to

51:15get people to recognize that the right

51:17to have housing and the right to have

51:19transportation and the right to have

51:20good schools and the right to have clean

51:22air and the right to be able to move

51:24safely is a civil it's a right for

51:26civilians. It's also a human right. And

51:29so transportation that gives you

51:31education and gives you access to

51:32housing and gives you access to jobs and

51:35everything else. It's a right for you as

51:37a human being to be able to survive in a

51:39city of this nature. We don't have an

51:42effective transportation program. So

51:44therefore, we must have we must have

51:48focus on the civil rights of everyone

51:50who's trying to make a living, go to

51:52school, get good health care, and

51:54participate in their society.

51:57>> Thank Thank you, Lewis. I think part of

51:59the strategy and discussion too, I think

52:02the city council has a responsibility to

52:05speak firmly that this is a civil rights

52:08issue. I don't think we can be

52:09wishy-washy and some of us say it is a

52:12civil rights issue. Some say it's a

52:14transportation issue. Some say it's a

52:16construction issue. It is a civil rights

52:18issue. If if we united on that one theme

52:21and that one goal, I think the

52:23administration will hear us as a

52:26collective body that this is a civil

52:28rights issue, I think there's some

52:29responsibility on my colleagues to

52:32firmly state that this is a civil rights

52:34issue and to ask the administration to

52:37treat it such um Thank you, Mr. Chair.

52:40>> Thank you. Thank you, Council Flor.

52:44You have two minutes.

52:45>> Thank you, uh, Mr. Chair. Um, and thank

52:48you to the panelists for your testimony

52:50and for being here today. Um, I have a

52:53question regarding like what I care

52:55deeply about the issue of displacement

52:59is one of the reasons why we fought so

53:00hard for rent stabilization. It's one of

53:02the reasons why we fought so hard for to

53:04get more money from the state house to

53:06do the work of affordable housing. When

53:08I'm thinking about businesses and

53:10potential businesses being displaced,

53:12especially black and brown ones during

53:14construction, we can look at the other

53:16end of Blue Hill Avenue to see what it's

53:18like for businesses to suffer through

53:20construction. U and whether we're

53:22talking about a center running bus lane,

53:24whether you're talking about Middle

53:25Lane, whether you're talking about a

53:26rail, construction happens. And so I'm

53:29thinking whether you're talking about

53:31the other side of Blue Lab or in High

53:33Park or when the bridge was down, there

53:35were businesses that suffered. What does

53:37a model look like to support businesses

53:41um like to support businesses during

53:44construction?

53:47>> Well, for me, the first thing that has

53:48to happen is good planning, which hasn't

53:50taken place. That's the most important

53:52thing. Planning for the time that

53:54businesses are going to be down,

53:55planning routes that are used as

53:57alternatives for people to get to school

53:58and to get to work and things of that

54:00nature. Best example,

54:01>> Louis, I'm I'm talking about

54:02specifically for the businesses, right?

54:04Like, how do we help the businesses? You

54:06help the businesses by planning. You

54:08have to plan ahead to say what's going

54:10to happen during construction period. As

54:13a former FEMA regional director for

54:14places that have been completely

54:16destroyed, I know that the first thing

54:18you have to do is talk about how

54:20businesses are able to survive during

54:22the construction or reconstruction of

54:23any area. If they don't plan for it,

54:25they don't take consider if they haven't

54:27done a survey to even understand what

54:29the businesses are and what their needs

54:30are, they can't move ahead productively.

54:35Ann, do you have a

54:38[clears throat]

54:39>> Well, I think you know it goes back to

54:41talking to people. You have to

54:43understand the the um quirks of each

54:46business when they get their deliveries,

54:49how long the deliveries take. Um and it

54:52it really it's planning to avoid not mop

54:58up but avoid making problems um by

55:02tailoring your your construction to how

55:06businesses actually operate. And you

55:07know the MBTA h has done a decent job

55:11with this in the past and they need to

55:13have their feet held to the fire but you

55:16really need block by block to understand

55:18what each business's needs are.

55:22The same work they did for South Boston,

55:24the same work we did in New Bedford, the

55:26same approach we've done on any highway

55:27and roadway construction prior to this

55:30event other than environmental impact

55:32statement for economics and

55:33environmental impact for health. They

55:35meet with all the businesses in the

55:37community. They meet with the business

55:39network and they find out how businesses

55:41run so they can plan on behalf of them.

55:44That was the most important thing in

55:46building the third harbor tunnel that we

55:48got the traffic off of Dorchester

55:49Avenue, created a bypass road and made

55:52it available for residents of Dorchester

55:54and South Boston and to be able to

55:55survive.

55:58>> Thank you. I mean I think my time is up.

56:00I would love to hear what you thought

56:01your thoughts around residential

56:02displacement as well, but I believe

56:03that's my time. I don't know if Council

56:05Co Pepper

56:06>> Council She can answer the question.

56:08>> Yeah. Around like I asked about

56:09businesses, but what about residential

56:11displacement? How do you plan for

56:13prevention of that

56:14>> when construction is happening?

56:16>> That's a that's a hard problem, but you

56:19know, the mayor claims she has an indie

56:20displacement plan, but um remains to be

56:25seen.

56:26I think it's a paper document that is on

56:29a shelf now. I I I that's a that's a um

56:34that's a bigger topic.

56:40>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Those are my

56:41questions.

56:42>> Thank you,

56:42>> Sh. Can I just say displacement and

56:44disruption are two different things, but

56:45they have the same effect because

56:47residents lives will be so disrupted.

56:50Business will be so disrupted, it'll

56:51make it almost untenable when they're

56:53doing two sides of the street coming

56:56down a major thorfare artery like Blue

56:59Avenue. There is no plan in place. It's

57:01sort of like the so-called

57:03transportation plan they have for White

57:04Stadium. It's a myth.

57:08>> Thank you, counselor. U want to move now

57:12to councelor Santana. Uh councelor I

57:15gave each of the counselors two minutes

57:18to make an opening statement and I gave

57:21them two minutes for questions and so

57:25I'll give you four minutes if you need

57:27them all.

57:28>> Thank you chair co pepper and good

57:30evening everyone. It's good to be here

57:32and great to see everyone. Um

57:35I want to thank the panelists um for

57:38being here as well and for taking the

57:39time um to answer our questions. I think

57:43you know I think

57:45>> right now I mean you hear from my

57:47colleagues obviously I'm hearing from a

57:48lot of you all about what's going on in

57:50our neighborhoods here. Um and you know

57:53a a big thing about that is the lack of

57:56communication and transparency um that

57:59many residents feel um and know right

58:02that um that they're lacking right now.

58:03So my question for the panelists is more

58:05about right now obviously our current

58:08process or the current process of the

58:10administration [clears throat] um of how

58:13they do business and how they get

58:15feedback from residents um is not

58:17currently working. There's a lot of

58:18meetings, right? We I know a lot of you

58:21show up to a lot of meetings um and and

58:23testify. I know we're going to hear

58:24testimony today, right? But it's about

58:27not checking a box about how do we

58:29actually take that feedback and actually

58:30incorporate it into the plannings that

58:32we're doing. So my question is, and I

58:34don't know if you know I'm sorry for

58:36coming in late, so I I I will apologize

58:38if this question has been asked and

58:40answered. Um but my question to the

58:43panelists is more of like the current

58:45process is not working right now. So

58:48what what what about the process? The

58:50whole process has to change, right? So

58:52my question to you both is um what are

58:54some starting steps that we can take as

58:56a council um to change that process um

58:59from the ground up?

59:03Well, I I think the the problem is that

59:07they hold a meeting to talk about a

59:09project that was never embraced

59:14>> instead of and the solution is you start

59:16over with a true alternative study that

59:21I that studies each alternative to the

59:25same degree. This is what the federal

59:27government requires. If this if this

59:30were subject to um a very indepth

59:34environmental review, the requirement is

59:38that you study each alternative to the

59:40same degree. And the reason that the

59:43that the National Environmental Policy

59:46Act requires this is to prevent people

59:49from lurching toward the solution. They

59:52think we all have biases. So, you have a

59:55a highway engineer or transit

59:58professional who says, "This is what I

1:00:00think we ought to do." And the the

1:00:02environmental review and any planning

1:00:04review mandates that you step back and

1:00:08evaluate alternatives that you a have

1:00:11alternatives, b you evaluate them to the

1:00:14same degree.

1:00:17And this project did not do that. They

1:00:22cannot prod produce any document saying

1:00:24that they truly analyzed

1:00:27and tried to make work other

1:00:30alternatives.

1:00:32It's not just saying, "Oh yeah, we

1:00:33looked at, you know, a side bus lane, it

1:00:37didn't work." No, you have to analyze

1:00:39it. So, so the solution is step back and

1:00:43look at alternatives and evaluate them

1:00:46as if they did not have a preferred

1:00:49solution. And so that requires really,

1:00:52you know, making a commitment to a true

1:00:55planning process.

1:00:56>> And can I just do a follow-up question

1:00:57on that in more spec I mean, is there a

1:01:00specific project that have you seen um

1:01:02in the past where maybe it was

1:01:04introduced, it was not um embraced by

1:01:07the community as you mentioned, right?

1:01:08And then that what you just h what you

1:01:10just explained actually occurred. Is

1:01:12there a specific project that

1:01:15I'm hearing from community? I'm hearing

1:01:17>> are you you're talking about nationally

1:01:18or in Boston cuz here in Boston. No,

1:01:20here in Boston.

1:01:20>> We can take you to the seapport where

1:01:22they said they didn't want it to happen.

1:01:23We can take you to a number of places

1:01:25where they said, you know, the the bike

1:01:27lanes and some of the things that

1:01:28they're proposing, the bus lanes does

1:01:30not work for the businesses there. We've

1:01:32got examples of everybody other parts of

1:01:34this city being respected in a very

1:01:36different way.

1:01:37>> We've got real we've got real, you know,

1:01:40examples. And so the question is though,

1:01:42is not just in the city council, but in

1:01:44the state and at the federal level

1:01:45because most of this decisions made at

1:01:47the highest level of department of

1:01:48transportation. And that's why we're

1:01:50appealing to them is because they didn't

1:01:52do their due diligence. When you're

1:01:54involving this many people, this many

1:01:56thousands of people, MEEP is supposed to

1:01:58kick in automatically. There's supposed

1:02:00to be an automatic environmental impact

1:02:02assessment as well as economic

1:02:04assessment. We've done it for bridges

1:02:05and tunnels all over the city. Trust me,

1:02:08as head of the Seapport Advisory

1:02:10Council, I did it from Gloucester to

1:02:11Seapport Secon and also in New Bedford.

1:02:14did nothing moving forward without

1:02:16talking to the community and getting

1:02:18analysis of what the impacts would be.

1:02:20>> Thank you, Councelor Santana.

1:02:22>> Thank you um Chair and I just want to um

1:02:25I just want to give a few shoutouts. I

1:02:27obviously um Senator Rickerson Sister

1:02:30Virginia. I see um Steven Wilson, the

1:02:32great um here in the building. I also,

1:02:34you know, one thing I'm big focused on

1:02:36and I think many of you know is how we

1:02:38incorporate our young people into these

1:02:40conversations. And you know, I just want

1:02:42to give a shout out to some of the young

1:02:44people here that I know um who are here

1:02:46on a on a Thursday. Is it Thursday?

1:02:49Wednesday. Wednesday night. Um really

1:02:51appreciate y'all being here and being

1:02:53engaged. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

1:02:54>> Thank you, councelor. Councelor Warel,

1:02:56you've got uh two minutes.

1:02:59>> Uh thank you, chair. Um my question is

1:03:01around past planning um proposals that

1:03:06the community has created. Uh Lewis, you

1:03:08spoke to uh initiatives or um planning

1:03:11processes that dated back to 2017. Uh

1:03:14whether that was the Roxberry,

1:03:15Dorchester, Madapan transit needs study.

1:03:17Uh there was a Washington Street

1:03:19corridor coalition um and few other um

1:03:23uh times communities came together to

1:03:25discuss transportation needs and

1:03:27planning around Bluehav. Uh my question

1:03:30to both you and Ann is how how should

1:03:32have those past planning process been

1:03:35factored into this conversation and when

1:03:38if they should have been introduced uh

1:03:41to the community about here here are

1:03:44past pin and processes that talked about

1:03:47different uh initiatives and strategies

1:03:49to make the bus more efficient on Blue

1:03:51Lab.

1:03:53Well, any planner who's serious about um

1:03:58getting to yes on an agreeable solution

1:04:02starts by looking at what was studied in

1:04:04the past. You go back to 1978. You go

1:04:07back to all of the um previous efforts

1:04:10and you bring all those alternatives

1:04:11forward and you say, you know, this was

1:04:13looked at. We're going to update the

1:04:15data and look at it. they just jumped to

1:04:18what they thought they could get funding

1:04:21for and what was going to be easy to

1:04:25implement. And that's a lazy um arrogant

1:04:28way to um approach a project of this

1:04:31magnitude.

1:04:32>> That's right.

1:04:34>> Sister Sister Virginia and Senator

1:04:36Wilkersonson and others who've been at

1:04:38it for about 40 years now can tell you

1:04:40that there's at least three studies out

1:04:42there. is a blue lab avenue commission

1:04:44that came up during Dukakus in the

1:04:45second Dukakus came up you know even

1:04:48with King and others they all they have

1:04:50to do is do the research the

1:04:52alternatives have been presented for the

1:04:5410 years that I've been working on this

1:04:55project specifically we've had five

1:04:58groups come together and grayscale they

1:04:59paid a million dollars to from Harvard

1:05:01we sat with them throughout 24 and 25

1:05:04and we met with over 106 meetings and

1:05:07each meeting people said resoundingly

1:05:09the center line process doesn't work

1:05:11Here are two alternatives. The first

1:05:13alternative is to enforce chapter 90,

1:05:16the transportation code. Four major

1:05:19public safety agencies in the area and

1:05:22they still don't enforce the law. The

1:05:24second is to manage the traffic and

1:05:26improve transit service, which means

1:05:30starting at the the the head where the

1:05:32buses come from, send them out on a

1:05:34regular basis. In the winter time, move

1:05:36the snow in in the summertime and force

1:05:39the parking in. You can pick up 10

1:05:42minutes, not five minutes. If you

1:05:43enforce

1:05:44>> Yep.

1:05:45>> If you enforce the traffic regulations

1:05:47in the area, this community needs

1:05:48improvement. We've wanted to improve.

1:05:50This is not a group of membies. We're

1:05:52not saying no. We're saying we don't

1:05:54want our lives destroyed and our health

1:05:56taken away in order for construction

1:05:57people to make a lot of money and then

1:06:00our community lose our businesses. We

1:06:01suffered that through COVID and we know

1:06:04exactly what will happen if we don't get

1:06:05it right.

1:06:06>> Thank you. Thank you, Councelor Warwell.

1:06:10And that will end the uh panel

1:06:12discussion. We'll now move into the

1:06:17testimony from the public.

1:06:21Each speaker will get two minutes. I'll

1:06:24call the panelists

1:06:27uh five at a time. You come up to this

1:06:30mic here. Uh

1:06:34and as one panelist speak, I I'd ask the

1:06:37other four to stand behind them so we

1:06:40can uh

1:06:43give them a few minuteses

1:06:45to stand. We don't want that long line

1:06:48down there where you have to wait an

1:06:49hour. So, we're just going to call five

1:06:51at a time. Uh and I'll call the first

1:06:54five. You'll come to the mic and you'll

1:06:56have two minutes. The timer is right

1:06:58here. Uh, Westward,

1:07:02Jeffrey Sams,

1:07:04Maxon

1:07:06Medcrier,

1:07:08uh, Judith Vanam,

1:07:11and Demarcus White

1:07:18West,

1:07:20peace and blessings, sir.

1:07:22>> Uh,

1:07:25Wes's mic is not on. Uh

1:07:31hello, hello, hello.

1:07:33>> I think it's on now. Great.

1:07:37>> Peace and blessings to my brothers and

1:07:39sisters of Boston, to the Commonwealth.

1:07:42>> Thank you. How you doing? How you doing,

1:07:43sister? My name is Wes Wood. I represent

1:07:46the people. Um I'm the chair of the

1:07:49Matipan Coalition and I'm leading the

1:07:51corridor coalition as well.

1:07:54Before I begin, I want to Who's in the

1:07:56room? Can everyone put their hands up if

1:07:58you're from Roxberry, Madapan, and

1:08:00Dorchester?

1:08:03>> Almost everybody.

1:08:05>> Wonderful.

1:08:07>> I'm born and raised in Boston. My family

1:08:10has been in this city for over a hundred

1:08:12years. And when I see my people being

1:08:14torn away from their homes, when I see

1:08:17them being torn away from their friends

1:08:18and family and having to look elsewhere

1:08:20to live, this tells me that this is a

1:08:23human rights issue, not a political one.

1:08:26We assembled in this historical hall

1:08:28tonight to demand payment on a long

1:08:31overdue

1:08:32on a long overdue promisary note from

1:08:35the city.

1:08:37Decades ago, when the transit

1:08:39infrastructure was dismantled through

1:08:41this corridor, the city made a vow to

1:08:44the people of this corridor, to the

1:08:46working men and women of Roxberry,

1:08:48Dorchester, and Matipan

1:08:50that equitable connection and dignity

1:08:53and rapid transit would follow. But

1:08:55instead, this community was handed a

1:08:57checkmarked insufficient funds. Billions

1:09:00of dollars inflowing everywhere else

1:09:02into the city, and we was given red

1:09:04paint on the streets.

1:09:10What is on trial here tonight is not

1:09:12about a bus schedule, but what is on

1:09:15trial is the moral architecture of this

1:09:17city. When you bring blueprints, traffic

1:09:20models, periodic dockets into this room,

1:09:25not one of you can look at the

1:09:26businesses, the barbers, the salons, the

1:09:29the people who actually keep this

1:09:30corridor alive and thriving with

1:09:32culture. You can't look at them in the

1:09:33eyes and say, "In five years, your

1:09:35business will still be here." And if you

1:09:37can't say that to them honestly,

1:09:42you promised this corridor rapid transit

1:09:44decades ago. You gave white

1:09:45neighborhoods subways, trains, and you

1:09:48come to our neighborhood and you're

1:09:50giving us diesel exhaustion. And you're

1:09:52asking us to be thankful.

1:09:55We want transit sovereignty. We want our

1:09:58merchants to be protected. And if you

1:10:00can't deliver rapid transit equity and

1:10:03economic security to the people whose

1:10:04tax dollars built this city, then you

1:10:07have no business running this city.

1:10:10Boston still owes this corridor rapid

1:10:12transit and it was promised. What are

1:10:14you going to do to promise that? Can I

1:10:16have your hands up? Every counselor

1:10:18who's actually going to say yes and push

1:10:20for this forward.

1:10:25>> For both dockets.

1:10:31>> Okay. Thank you.

1:10:44Jeffrey

1:10:46>> Jeffrey

1:10:48Sams Jeffrey

1:10:52Jeffrey is not here. Uh Max Sense,

1:10:57is he here?

1:10:59>> Come on, Max. Come on. You got two

1:11:01minutes.

1:11:02>> I thought I had a couple more people to

1:11:04go. Good evening, everyone.

1:11:06Thank you counselors for holding this

1:11:08meeting again. Council Mahia, thank you.

1:11:11I I went to the the one on Blue Hill

1:11:13Avenue. Um so I just jotted some notes

1:11:16down because I grew up here. My name is

1:11:18again Max Sans Mateer. I grew up in uh

1:11:21Roxbury

1:11:23Matapan and Hyde Park. And I've been

1:11:25here most of my life. I have three

1:11:27children and we all commute in some way.

1:11:30I walk, I take the bus, take the train,

1:11:33I drive. So, I feel it all. I see it

1:11:36all. And not one time in my commuting,

1:11:39at least on public transportation, that

1:11:41I don't see someone, a child, an elderly

1:11:44person dragging a cart behind them,

1:11:46someone with a small child and a baby in

1:11:49a carriage that is either rushing for

1:11:51the bus, which is very easy when you're

1:11:54coming from the curb. Now, imagine those

1:11:56individuals having to cross the street

1:11:58to get to the center, still have traffic

1:12:01coming at them. Maybe the child drops a

1:12:03toy in the middle of the street. Now you

1:12:05have to stop, pick it up, maybe wait,

1:12:08right? Because everyone's always in a

1:12:10hurry. This is a major throughway. A

1:12:13major throughway for everyone who wants

1:12:15to divert off the highway, come up Route

1:12:17128, 138, off 93 just to get to and from

1:12:21work. At night, when there's no one else

1:12:24commuting to work, it's quiet. The

1:12:28streets are calm. The buses run freely.

1:12:33I challenge everyone to try to find out

1:12:36how late are the number 28 buses. How

1:12:39late are they? 28 30 uh excuse me, 23.

1:12:43They're not on the top five list. They

1:12:46[clears throat] get us there. Why do we

1:12:48need something in the center that now

1:12:51that now challenges us to cross the

1:12:53street? Many elderly. This is a multif

1:12:55family community, business community,

1:12:58homeowned neighborhood. This is not a

1:13:01street full of buildings of renters

1:13:04turning over. We have people who have

1:13:06lived here a long time. They grow old

1:13:09here. They start young here and they

1:13:11need to commute safely, efficiently.

1:13:14They need to get to the curb under

1:13:17perhaps a canopy. Why can't we have

1:13:19covered bus stops like Washington Street

1:13:22down the south end? My bus goes through

1:13:25there as well. I've seen it restored.

1:13:28I've seen new bricks. I've seen repaved

1:13:32at least three times. And we have to

1:13:34continue to deal with what is going on

1:13:37on Blue Hill Avenue. We have to continue

1:13:40to accept substandard

1:13:43conditions. Our bus drivers are great.

1:13:46And you ask them, they too see people

1:13:48running for the bus. They're not

1:13:50necessarily for it. When I attended the

1:13:53last meeting, I said, "Well, gee, are

1:13:55our buses really that late? Is it a an

1:13:59attendance issue?"

1:14:01One of the city reps paused on that one.

1:14:04I saw her write it down. Not the

1:14:07counselors, Mayor Woo's office. Okay.

1:14:11So, I don't think it's even that because

1:14:14we get two buses at a time. So, what is

1:14:17it really for and who is it really for?

1:14:20It's not really helping us. It actually

1:14:22will impact our lives more negatively,

1:14:25more negatively than what we have now.

1:14:27It's not telling us that we are being

1:14:29supported and what we want and don't

1:14:31want is being heard. It's about

1:14:34disrespect, disenfranchisement,

1:14:36continuous disenfranchisement.

1:14:38And we continually say the same thing.

1:14:42Where are these supporters of this

1:14:43project? They're not here. If they are,

1:14:46they're not saying anything. Someone

1:14:48told me on the street, we just stuck up

1:14:50a conversation that he heard there are

1:14:513,000 supporters. Really?

1:14:54>> Where are they? Where are they? Where

1:14:57are they? Oh, you're there. Oh, really?

1:14:59You support this project?

1:15:01>> You must not have grown up here. You

1:15:04must not have really fully embraced

1:15:06fully embraced all of the diversity.

1:15:13>> Okay, beautiful. I'm happy you

1:15:15supported. I'm happy you supported.

1:15:17Thank you for your time. I appreciate

1:15:19it. Um, you know, every time no one

1:15:22supports this.

1:15:22>> Thank you, Max.

1:15:23>> Thank you so much.

1:15:28>> We follow and we are we are obligated to

1:15:32follow the rules as if we're down at

1:15:35city hall. So, we have to follow the

1:15:37council rules, which means that there's

1:15:39no expression of support one way or

1:15:42another. And so if you would just

1:15:44refrain from uh showing your support one

1:15:48way or another, as if we're down the

1:15:51council.

1:15:52>> Yes. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

1:15:54We're following Nope. Tonight we're

1:15:57following the rules as if we're down the

1:16:00council. And so I came here knowing that

1:16:03y'all are going to follow the rules as

1:16:06if we're down the council.

1:16:09You can speak for two minutes, but what

1:16:12you can't do is show support one way or

1:16:14another. Thank you.

1:16:20>> No. And we tell you down the council to

1:16:23stop clapping.

1:16:25>> Mac, [laughter]

1:16:28let let's get back so folks can testify.

1:16:32>> Let's not get distracted. Uh, who's

1:16:34next? Judith Vanham.

1:16:45You've got two minutes.

1:16:53>> I would like you to note that there is a

1:16:55better way of doing transit on Blue Hill

1:16:59Avenue

1:17:00and it's nothing that anybody's talked

1:17:03about so far that I've heard. It's solar

1:17:05mobility.

1:17:07uh transit. And if you c I I'll describe

1:17:11it so you know what I'm talking about.

1:17:14If you can imagine small pods that carry

1:17:18typically one to four people. They're

1:17:20private. You get in there with whom you

1:17:22want to travel with and they move fast.

1:17:27Um

1:17:29and they're solar powered. So all of

1:17:32Blue Hill A would have a panel of solar

1:17:36solar panels. So, you know, that's a

1:17:38protection also for people who are

1:17:40walking. Um, what what this does is that

1:17:48it it just provides faster, cleaner

1:17:51transportation, less expensive, and it

1:17:54you puts you up in leading the head of

1:17:57all the all the transit in the world.

1:18:01This system will then because it works

1:18:04so well and is so is affordable both to

1:18:07build and to use will connect with all

1:18:09of Boston and way beyond Boston. Um it's

1:18:14something that you before you make a

1:18:17decision what direction you want to go

1:18:19in, it's very important to look at it.

1:18:22Any

1:18:28questions that I could quickly answer?

1:18:30>> Judith,

1:18:31>> we're not answering questions from the

1:18:33panelists.

1:18:34>> Public

1:18:35>> just using two minutes for your

1:18:37statement.

1:18:39>> Thank you.

1:18:40>> Thank you.

1:18:42>> If you want to look it up, here's the

1:18:44company that I I've been following since

1:18:47I tried to get it to use in Hull, which

1:18:50I'm still working on. The company is

1:18:52JPods. It's jpo

1:18:55ds.com.

1:18:59Okay, check it out.

1:19:00>> Thank you, Judith Demarcus White.

1:19:13>> Good evening, everyone.

1:19:16>> My name is Demarcus White. I was born

1:19:18and raised in Roxberry

1:19:20and I've um people be telling me,

1:19:23Demarcus, you have a vision of Boston.

1:19:27Why do I have a vision?

1:19:28>> That's good. Um, before I get to the

1:19:31plan,

1:19:32>> oh,

1:19:33>> before I get to the plan, um, take down

1:19:35my email address because I'm going to

1:19:36send you the Orange Line project plan

1:19:39that I presented to Coun, uh, council,

1:19:42uh, to the to the counselor, demarcus

1:19:45w35gmail.com.

1:19:48That's demarcus dm a r cus w35gmail.com.

1:19:56All the plan has been put in place for

1:19:59the Orange Line extension from Rugles to

1:20:02Madapan.

1:20:03It's going to be great for our

1:20:05community. Not not this this uh center

1:20:09lane that the city is proposing.

1:20:13>> Now about my vision, everybody knows mo

1:20:16mostly everyone knows that I've drawn

1:20:18drawn the orange line. I've been drawn

1:20:20for 40 years. drawn the orange line from

1:20:23Forest Hills to to do drew drew the

1:20:26green line from North Station to Leech

1:20:29and that's where my vision comes in. So

1:20:31I've created a plan. I created stations

1:20:33within this Orange Line plan. It's not

1:20:36just going to be about the stations

1:20:39itself underneath. Let's say the tunnel

1:20:44will be 125 ft deep if we plan to build

1:20:48the orange line in between.

1:20:51In between the stations and the street

1:20:54level, we will have businesses for our

1:20:58communities. We're talking about retail

1:21:00stores. We're talking about

1:21:03um businesses that where people own them

1:21:07who looks like us.

1:21:09>> And we're talking about well imagine

1:21:12this Martin Luther King Boulevard is

1:21:15which is the station that he wants. Can

1:21:18you imagine having a king center, a

1:21:21local king center within the station?

1:21:24That's what we need where Bernard when

1:21:26Reverend when when we can bring Reverend

1:21:28Bernice King up there and do the grand

1:21:31opening with the station named after her

1:21:34father.

1:21:37I um once you get the um project, you'll

1:21:41see it and we need to have a meeting

1:21:43together to talk about it. We're talking

1:21:46again businesses

1:21:48underneath the station

1:21:51because I've been to New York. I've been

1:21:53to Penn Station. They have major

1:21:55businesses under the station. We need to

1:21:57have that here in Roxberry, Dorchester,

1:21:59and Madapan where people don't have to

1:22:01go to South Bay uh to to Staples. we can

1:22:04have our own BPS supply store where we

1:22:07can where we can buy our own school

1:22:10books and all that and everything within

1:22:12our community where we don't have to go

1:22:13to South Bay or Somerville.

1:22:15>> Demarcus, can you wrap it up now?

1:22:17>> Yes. So, um so uh um

1:22:22so uh again, my email address is

1:22:24demarcus35gmail.com.

1:22:27I'll send you I'll send you that package

1:22:29and um let's let's have a meeting about

1:22:31this and continue.

1:22:34Thank you.

1:22:36Want to call up the next five.

1:22:39Uh Reggie Stewart,

1:22:41Terresa Rochelle,

1:22:44Jeffrey Ferris,

1:22:47Michael Kosu,

1:22:49and John Smith.

1:22:58>> Uh good evening. Can y'all hear me?

1:23:04How about now?

1:23:06Is that better? All right. Uh good

1:23:08evening everybody. Uh good evening uh

1:23:11Chair Co Pepper. Uh Vice Chair uh Mahia

1:23:15who's with us in spirit. Uh thank you

1:23:17counselors for coming. Uh as I think

1:23:20about this issue, I think about some of

1:23:22the questions that we should ask

1:23:24ourselves. And it's not just a question

1:23:27that I would pose to the counselors or

1:23:30just to the mayor, but also to our state

1:23:32partners as multiple levels of

1:23:34government are involved uh in this

1:23:37project. Uh, you know, I I want us as

1:23:40officials, community leaders, activists,

1:23:44residents, uh, that we as a city really

1:23:46look in the mirror and be honest, uh,

1:23:49when we ask ourselves the question, do

1:23:52black communities deserve the same scale

1:23:54[clears throat] of investment and the

1:23:56same determination to solve

1:23:57transportation problems as other

1:24:00communities? Now, on the surface, we

1:24:02should say yes, but if that's the case,

1:24:06we're not acting like it. Uh, in 1987,

1:24:09when the elevated orange line was

1:24:11removed, uh, and not replaced, it

1:24:14essentially cut off black Boston from

1:24:17the rest of the city. And here we are

1:24:20four decades out, still waiting for that

1:24:23promise to be fulfilled. Uh, in the

1:24:25meantime, uh, Massachusetts has spent

1:24:28billions of dollars. we uh uh was

1:24:32referenced 2.3 billion uh for the Green

1:24:35Line extension into Somerville and

1:24:36Medford. And I agree with everyone when

1:24:39you we say it's a civil rights issue

1:24:41because it can't be lost on us that the

1:24:44communities of Somerville and Medford

1:24:47are 70%

1:24:49white residents.

1:24:51And that project, it faced soaring cost,

1:24:54threats of cancellation, but the state

1:24:57did redesign. They found the money and

1:25:00they built it and figure it out. Uh so

1:25:02why do some communities uh receive a

1:25:05conversation uh while we're offered

1:25:07crumbs and crumbs that we did not ask

1:25:11for and that we're told to be grateful

1:25:13for. And when we propose rail, cost and

1:25:17feasibility concerns are used to shut

1:25:19down the conversation as opposed to a

1:25:23doorway for government to find a

1:25:26solution. And that's why so many of us

1:25:28rightly see that racism underpins this

1:25:32entire conversation. It's not racism

1:25:35through explic explicit prejuditial

1:25:38statements or attitudes, but it's

1:25:41through decades of decisions about which

1:25:43communities get transformative

1:25:45investment and which ones do not. Uh so

1:25:49I echo uh the call for feasibility

1:25:52studies uh serious alternative analyses

1:25:56designs to address costs feasibility

1:25:59concerns around displacement and ensure

1:26:01authentic intentional community

1:26:05engagement. Again I'll say it authentic

1:26:08intentional community engagement which

1:26:10has been missing from this process as

1:26:12well as many others uh throughout our

1:26:15neighborhoods. And I just want to close

1:26:17with just the ask. Do not tell black

1:26:21Bostononians what's feasible or what's

1:26:24possible when you haven't even done the

1:26:26work to find out in the first place.

1:26:30Thank you.

1:26:33[applause]

1:26:34Theresa

1:26:38Terresa Rochelle,

1:26:41Jeff Ferris.

1:26:47Thank you, counselors. Uh, yes, Jeffrey

1:26:50Ferris. Uh, some many of you may know me

1:26:52as the former longtime owner of Ferris

1:26:55Wheels bike shop in Jamaica Plane. Yes,

1:26:57I'm in Jamaica Plane. I am not in this

1:26:58neighborhood.

1:27:00>> Did just go through a process has some

1:27:02similarities. the the loss of the

1:27:04overpass at Forest Hills, I was on the

1:27:07losing side. The city and the state did

1:27:09not want to replace that bridge, no

1:27:10matter how much we [clears throat] in

1:27:12the community fought for it. But anyway,

1:27:16for tonight, um I'm mostly addressing

1:27:18the second docket, which is about the

1:27:20need for a study of

1:27:24the Orange Line Down Blue Hill Avenue.

1:27:27So,

1:27:29>> you know that

1:27:29>> orange line down Blue Hill Avenue?

1:27:32Why should this sound crazy? Is it

1:27:34because it's just a lot of black folks

1:27:36and other people of color? The city and

1:27:39the tea never did a complete and open

1:27:42alternatives analysis of the Blue Hill

1:27:44Avenue corridor. You've heard this a

1:27:46number of times tonight already. They

1:27:48come up with their own idea of a center

1:27:50bus proposal and told the community that

1:27:53this was the best thing for them. They

1:27:55still haven't learned that the community

1:27:56is tired of being told what's good for

1:27:58them.

1:28:00>> Now, I could not find a comprehensive

1:28:02list of project goals for this for the

1:28:04transit improvements, but in this era of

1:28:06climate change and global warming, it

1:28:08needs to include getting as many people

1:28:11as possible out of gas guzzling cars.

1:28:15It is well known that an underground

1:28:17heavy rail subway like the Orange Line

1:28:19to downtown along this or any corridor

1:28:22would attract the most riders.

1:28:24This includes people from this community

1:28:27currently on the buses along with new

1:28:29local riders and commuters as have been

1:28:31mentioned from other communities south

1:28:33of here currently driving up Blue Hill

1:28:35Avenue. A one seat ride to downtown

1:28:38along with many destinations in between

1:28:40is a wonderful goal. Why is this

1:28:44community being denied this future

1:28:47opportunity?

1:28:49Now the detail if after

1:28:53what was that

1:28:55>> that's your time Mr. But go on and wrap

1:28:57up.

1:28:58>> Thank you.

1:28:58>> You can wrap up.

1:28:59>> If after a proper analysis, it was

1:29:01determined that the underground subway

1:29:02was the right approach, but they'd

1:29:05already put in a center bus lane, what

1:29:08would have to happen? They'd have to

1:29:09tear up the whole center bus lane to

1:29:11build the subway under the street. That

1:29:14would be a sad result following the huge

1:29:16cost and disruption the center bus lane

1:29:19would have caused.

1:29:21>> Obviously, the orange line extension

1:29:23here is a long range desire. Choosing

1:29:25this does not preclude the need for

1:29:27immediate transportation improvements.

1:29:29There are many ways these can be done,

1:29:30but don't choose so-called improvements

1:29:32that preclude the Orange Line

1:29:34construction down the road. The current

1:29:37center bus lane planning should stop

1:29:39immediately until an open public

1:29:42thorough alternatives analysis is done,

1:29:44including the Orange Line extension.

1:29:46Look at the pros and cons of each. any

1:29:49community would deserve this, but

1:29:51especially here with the decades of

1:29:53broken promises to the people of color.

1:29:56>> Thank you.

1:29:57>> Thank you. Want to just make sure that

1:30:01Teresa Teresa Roshelle, you are you

1:30:03going to testify? Teresa,

1:30:07Michael, why don't you testify and we'll

1:30:10let Teresa follow you?

1:30:16My my name is uh Michael Kosu,

1:30:19co-director of project right. Why this

1:30:22issue is a civil rights issue is that

1:30:24this whole process has been flawed from

1:30:26the start and the neighborhood that's

1:30:28most impacted negatively by this pro uh

1:30:30plan has the least input into the plan.

1:30:34When the meeting was at Growalt Library,

1:30:37they had big poster boards of the

1:30:38intersections south of of Franklin Park.

1:30:42The intersections from Franklin Park

1:30:44into Warren Street was very small. It

1:30:46was this this wide. You cannot see the

1:30:49impact of that plan. And there was a

1:30:51reason why for that when they first

1:30:54tried to nest scheduled the meeting,

1:30:56they had it at the Holland BCY facility

1:31:00on by boat in Geneva. We told them

1:31:02that's not Grove Hall. So then they

1:31:03moved it to the Holland Techch or Burke.

1:31:06And as much as I love the Hall and Tech

1:31:07Burke, because I spent a lot of time

1:31:09there, we told them that that's not

1:31:11accessible community-wise for seniors,

1:31:13those in walkers, those in wheelchairs,

1:31:16and so forth. And the side path that

1:31:18they had you take was to go right by the

1:31:20dumpsters where there's a lot of needles

1:31:22we find, and a lot of rats. So that's

1:31:24not very accessible. They said, "Oh, we

1:31:26were going to try to use the Grove Hall

1:31:27Community Center." But they did not tell

1:31:28anyone. So a lot of people who I knew

1:31:31who knew the Hall and Tech Burke did not

1:31:34come because they knew that it was

1:31:35totally inaccessible.

1:31:37The other part on this is that we've

1:31:39always said before you present a plan on

1:31:42Blue Avenue and you're using the flawed

1:31:44design of the Columbus A process. Let's

1:31:48evaluate what happened on Columbus A.

1:31:50It's not safer. We've had two elders,

1:31:52very respective elders, killed trying to

1:31:55cross the street along Columbus A. You

1:31:57have apartment buildings no longer have

1:31:59parking in front. So, uh, seniors and

1:32:03families have to go around the corner

1:32:05several blocks just so they can get to

1:32:07their their building. So, why are we

1:32:08repeating that same mistake? Businesses

1:32:10have lost u customers. We've lost our

1:32:13fish market that everyone like to go to,

1:32:16right? So, why are we repeating that?

1:32:19And they're going to try to tell you

1:32:20that it's better and it's faster. Not

1:32:23for us. It's it's for growall. So you

1:32:25can look at the plan, but if you're

1:32:27riding the bus, you you have instead of

1:32:30two bus stops between Columbia Road and

1:32:32War Street, you only have one. You can't

1:32:34drive across uh Blue Avenue. If you're

1:32:37leaving your house, you're going to have

1:32:39to go one way. You only have one way,

1:32:40and you usually have to go into traffic

1:32:43um into dead of traffic. In front of

1:32:45Harbor Street Health Center, you're

1:32:47you're going to have part-time parking.

1:32:49So during rush hour, you cannot load and

1:32:51unload to a health center. And we have a

1:32:53lot more. I think Anton's going to talk.

1:32:55We have copies of our of our statement.

1:32:59>> Thank you.

1:33:01[applause]

1:33:02Teresa Roser

1:33:04and John

1:33:07Smith, you're next.

1:33:08>> Good afternoon, everyone. My name is

1:33:09Teresa Rochelle. I'm a longtime resident

1:33:12of Rox Ferry. I am here to express my

1:33:15concerns about the um blue the Grove

1:33:18Hall bus one bus going up um from Brock

1:33:22Prevy to Madapan.

1:33:24I'm really um concerned more or less

1:33:28that a lot of the statistics and the

1:33:30data weren't given at a number of the

1:33:31meetings. I've attended all of the

1:33:34meetings for Roxberry, Dorchester,

1:33:37Madapan, and Jamaica plane. And there

1:33:40was a stark difference in Roxberry in

1:33:42Dorchester and Matapan. When I went to

1:33:45JP, it was more accessible when there

1:33:48were more people there and they were

1:33:50more uh their neighborhood association

1:33:53was more involved. During the meetings,

1:33:55one of the questions that was asked is

1:33:57how come the neighborhoods do not know

1:34:00about the meetings that are being held.

1:34:02If I went home and I asked people in my

1:34:04neighborhood and many of the people in

1:34:06my neighborhood had no idea about this

1:34:09meeting or the Blue Hill AB bus meetings

1:34:12in certain neighborhoods. So, how are

1:34:14the neighborhood associations being

1:34:16contacted is what I'd like to know.

1:34:18Another thing is that the Orange Line I

1:34:22grew up when we had the Orange Line. It

1:34:24was a high It was a a a train track that

1:34:27was up high, probably about 20 feet up

1:34:30in the air.

1:34:32>> Yes. And so the it it leaned a little

1:34:35bit, but they promised another transit

1:34:38system and we never got another transit

1:34:40system. We all we have is the buses.

1:34:43Now, the problem I have with the buses

1:34:45is that there's not enough information

1:34:48that was put out during the meetings.

1:34:50They didn't give us an environmental

1:34:52study. They gave us all the pros and

1:34:54none of the cons. When you give a

1:34:56audience the information, you're

1:34:58supposed to produce both so you can have

1:35:00an objective informed view. That did not

1:35:03happen from my perspective. I asked

1:35:06about the studies and I did not see

1:35:08them. The number one concern that I have

1:35:11is that you want a bunch of diesel buses

1:35:13going up and down in Roxbury

1:35:15neighborhood. You're not giving into

1:35:17consideration other projects that are

1:35:18already in the making. Not only that,

1:35:21you're not considering the fact that

1:35:22Roxberry is one of the high toxic

1:35:25neighborhoods in the whole state. There

1:35:28are many studies that tell you about the

1:35:29environmental problems and the high

1:35:31toxicity rate here. And none of that was

1:35:34mentioned at any of the meeting or how

1:35:35they were going to address it. When we

1:35:37asked about when are we going to get um

1:35:40electrical buses, the answers are

1:35:42[clears throat] in three years. So you

1:35:43mean you just going to put a system in

1:35:45and wait for three years for more

1:35:47pollution? I just think that we need

1:35:50alternative not one one one shoe size

1:35:54does not fit everyone. So we should have

1:35:56had an alternative plan. That's all.

1:35:58>> Thank you John Smith.

1:36:02[applause]

1:36:13>> How's everybody doing?

1:36:16My name is John Smith Saintier and I've

1:36:18spent all of my life between Roxberry

1:36:21and Madapan.

1:36:22And so I found a quote by Malcolm X. I

1:36:25really think um sums up my feelings

1:36:27about with this whole situation. So he

1:36:30says, "If you stick a knife in my back 9

1:36:32in and pull it out six inches, there's

1:36:35no progress.

1:36:36If you pull it out all the way, there's

1:36:39no progress. Progress is healing the

1:36:42wound that the blow made. And as we all

1:36:45know, for generations, our community has

1:36:48experienced sustained disinvestment by

1:36:50both the city and state. Transportation

1:36:54is one of the clearest examples. We have

1:36:56been left heavily dependent on bus

1:36:58service, and that inequity limits access

1:37:00to employment, health care, civic

1:37:03participation, and much more. Do you

1:37:06know how many people I speak to in my

1:37:08neighborhood that have never even been

1:37:10to city hall? When I ask them why, some

1:37:13tell me plainly that that they do not

1:37:16have a reliable way to get there. That

1:37:19matters because civil rights are not

1:37:22only about formal exclusion.

1:37:25Civil rights are also about whether

1:37:27public systems create structural

1:37:29barriers that limit meaningful

1:37:32participation.

1:37:34So if residents cannot reliably reach

1:37:36city hall and access government,

1:37:39transportation, transportation inequity

1:37:42becomes a barrier to civic participation

1:37:44itself.

1:37:46And none of these barriers exist in

1:37:48isolation.

1:37:50Structural inequities have contributed

1:37:52to premature death and shorter lives.

1:37:54Transportation is part of that larger

1:37:56system. It shapes where people can go,

1:37:59what opportunities they can reach, and

1:38:01how much time and access they lose

1:38:04simply trying to move through the city.

1:38:08That is why the civil rights question

1:38:10cannot simply be how much money is being

1:38:12spent on Blue Hill. A government can

1:38:15spend hundreds of million dollars in our

1:38:17community and still leave the underlying

1:38:20inequity intact.

1:38:22Mayor Michelle Woo's approach to racial

1:38:24justice too often appears to be making

1:38:27historically inequitable systems operate

1:38:31more efficiently. But making an

1:38:33inequitable system work better is not

1:38:36the same as correcting the inequity

1:38:38itself. So I ask for like the millionth

1:38:42time, when are we going to stop managing

1:38:45inequity more efficiently and become

1:38:47willing to correct the inequity itself?

1:38:50Thank you.

1:38:52Thank you.

1:38:54Want to call up the next five. Uh Marcus

1:38:59Ny,

1:39:01Paul Simmons,

1:39:03M Hudson,

1:39:06Robert Hector, and Alan Tanner.

1:39:15>> Marcus,

1:39:17>> are you here? Marcus.

1:39:20>> Sir, what's your name?

1:39:22>> I'm Robert.

1:39:23>> Did you sign up?

1:39:27>> Robert Hector.

1:39:29>> Why don't you come on, Robert Hector?

1:39:32>> Come on. I'm going to talk to you about

1:39:35solar power invitation transportation.

1:39:39But first of all,

1:39:4330 over 30 years ago, this neighborhood,

1:39:46they tore down the elevated train

1:39:50and they moved it out of the

1:39:51neighborhood. And this is the only

1:39:54neighborhood without any rail service at

1:39:56all.

1:39:59Years later,

1:40:02along comes Deval Patrick. goes down to

1:40:05Dudley station and says he has better

1:40:09transportation for this neighborhood.

1:40:11What he gave you was a civil line.

1:40:15[clears throat] That's what he brought.

1:40:17What I have here

1:40:20is solar powered ramp transportation.

1:40:23Doesn't cost you 4 cents to put it in.

1:40:27That's about it. There's no fossil

1:40:29fuels. It operates by itself. you uh

1:40:33punch in where you're going to go and

1:40:35you go.

1:40:37I propose that one side of it'll be it

1:40:41can be put it together in a solid train

1:40:44all the way down from Matapan to Dudley

1:40:47or you can use it as parts and you can

1:40:49use your notebook to punch in where you

1:40:52want to go and it's run by

1:40:56the sun. And it's called solar powered

1:41:00energy.

1:41:02The way it works, it will start on one

1:41:05side of Blue Hill Avenue, not two sides

1:41:07is the way they want or down the middle.

1:41:10At each bus stop will be a station

1:41:13and you get on it and you just punch in

1:41:16where you want to go. It doesn't cost a

1:41:18lot of money to install it. We're asking

1:41:21the city to listen. We already had two

1:41:24bills with the state and they wanted to

1:41:26put it in South Boston. We want it here

1:41:28in this neighborhood.

1:41:30This is where we need the the

1:41:32transportation.

1:41:34And if anyone wants to see it right now,

1:41:38I can give it to you on your cell phone

1:41:42right now. Your [clears throat]

1:41:44telephone number if you want. that this

1:41:46this so power industry doesn't cost

1:41:49anything to put except for an investment

1:41:52in the community and putting

1:41:55uh all the cars and things that were on

1:41:58one side of the street down the middle

1:42:00will be gone. You put one side where

1:42:04cars can go up and down. You'll have the

1:42:06trees and them still will still be there

1:42:08and you still have your bicycles riding

1:42:10and everything. It'll it'll can come

1:42:12from Matapan

1:42:15>> all the way down Blue Hill Avenue. We

1:42:16can run it over to downtown Boston or

1:42:19over to the Orange Line.

1:42:22And uh the use in it is for us in this

1:42:27neighborhood. So I'm asking the city to

1:42:29take a look at it.

1:42:30>> Thank you, Mr. Hector.

1:42:33[applause]

1:42:35Is Marcus here? Is there a Marcus here?

1:42:39No.

1:42:41There's a Mac here.

1:42:46Mac is Mac Hudson.

1:42:52>> Thank you. Um, first, good evening to

1:42:55all the city councilors, chairman, and

1:42:59to everybody that came out. My name is

1:43:01M. Hudson. Uh, I am one of the main

1:43:04facilitators of the Black Agenda

1:43:05Coalition and I keep showing up for

1:43:08these meetings because I think for the

1:43:12first time I'm hearing at least framed

1:43:15of the proper way as a civil rights

1:43:17violation. And I think there is no

1:43:20fundamental constitutional right than

1:43:22the right to be heard. And when I've

1:43:25showed up at all these hearings, the one

1:43:27thing that I've realized is that we're

1:43:29not being heard. We're being talked to,

1:43:33spat at,

1:43:35not being heard.

1:43:36>> Bamboozled.

1:43:37>> And then the the other fundamental is

1:43:39the right to redress.

1:43:41At [clears throat] these meetings, there

1:43:43should be a redress if you're not

1:43:45hearing what you should be hearing,

1:43:48right? All of which our community has

1:43:51been deprived of and and constantly

1:43:53being deprived of. So I I want to urge

1:43:58this body and the rest of us to stop

1:44:01thinking now we cannot depend on what

1:44:05the city's going to do because I'm

1:44:07hearing now the the plot thickens.

1:44:10They're lying about the what what the

1:44:12agreement was. We we just heard this

1:44:15about the theus,

1:44:17right? I mean what they're coming before

1:44:20us. They don't even have the decency to

1:44:22tell us the truth.

1:44:24To me, that is the most greatest

1:44:26disrespect that you can do to a

1:44:28community, but it's being done to our

1:44:31community because we're black and

1:44:34because we're not respected. Now, if

1:44:37that makes city hall a racist, then I

1:44:40would be the first one to say that's

1:44:42exactly what I'm feeling, that they are

1:44:44racist. And there's no way to understand

1:44:47this because when I look at every other

1:44:49community, it's not a fact that they

1:44:51just coming out to vote, but they're

1:44:53showing up in those spaces saying what

1:44:55they do and what they don't. And no

1:44:57matter how many times we show up in

1:44:59these same spaces and say we don't want

1:45:01it, we're being s we're being told so

1:45:04what. That's a fundamental wrong. And so

1:45:09I concede and I know my two minutes is

1:45:11up and I urge all of us to stop

1:45:13contemplating. We need to stop filing an

1:45:16action. We need to bring this to a

1:45:19court. We need to sue the city. We need

1:45:22to start suing them on every single bit

1:45:25and fight them to the end. Peace.

1:45:29Thank you, Paul Simmons.

1:45:40>> Uh, do you hear me?

1:45:44Hello.

1:45:47>> Am I coming through now?

1:45:48>> Yes.

1:45:49>> Okay. My name is Paul Simmons.

1:45:50[clears throat] Um, prior to the last

1:45:52meeting, I asked an engineer who had

1:45:55worked for the MBTA with the MIT degree

1:45:58what his professional opinion was of the

1:46:00city's proposal. If you'll bear with me,

1:46:03I'll quote from the email he sent me to

1:46:05so there's no misrepresentation.

1:46:09In my opinion, there are numerous

1:46:10problems with the proposed center

1:46:12running bus lane project. The tea is

1:46:14promising that the project will result

1:46:16in a 10 to 15 minutes shorter bus ride

1:46:18along Bluehill Avenue. I think the time

1:46:21savings will be marketkedly less,

1:46:23perhaps closer to 5 minutes or less. So

1:46:25why build the project in the first place

1:46:27and settle small businesses with several

1:46:29years of significant construction

1:46:31impacts? We can instead focus on

1:46:34implementing roadway safety improvements

1:46:36in the near term. And while true

1:46:38alternative alternatives analysis and

1:46:40feasibility study performed that analyze

1:46:43a range of possible public transit

1:46:45improvements along the corridors,

1:46:47including all rail options. The 10 to 15

1:46:51minute time savings is indeed

1:46:53questionable given the following. We

1:46:56believe that the higher end of the

1:46:58bracket is applicable to a southbound

1:47:00trip from Grove Hall to Madapan Square

1:47:03since the proposed roadway upgrades will

1:47:05allow a bus to turn left directly on the

1:47:07Madapan station rather than having to

1:47:09proceed further southbound over the

1:47:11river then make a U-turn as is the case

1:47:13today. As part of a near-term standalone

1:47:17safety improvement project, if so

1:47:19desired, we can reconfigure the

1:47:21intersection to facilitate a left turn

1:47:22for buses and realize a fiveminute time

1:47:25savings. It follows we should focus on

1:47:28purported 10-minute time savings and

1:47:30dispute this metric. The proposed

1:47:33project will reduce the number of bus

1:47:35stops by approximately 50%. Accordingly,

1:47:38many riders will have to travel

1:47:40significant further significantly

1:47:42further to a bus stop, thereby

1:47:44increasing their nonb their nonbus

1:47:46travel times, even though the actual

1:47:48trip times on the bus may be shorter.

1:47:52The 10-minute time savings is only

1:47:54realizable for a full length trip from

1:47:56Matapan Square to Grove Hall or full

1:47:59length trip in the opposite direction.

1:48:01Many passengers board buses. Is that am

1:48:04I running out of time? Paul, going to

1:48:06wrap up. You can wrap up.

1:48:08>> Okay. Well, well, briefly, there were

1:48:10all kinds of flaws in the city's

1:48:12presentation. My other concern, which I

1:48:15wasn't able to get to, was increased

1:48:16congestion. The problem you have, and

1:48:19it's been mentioned before,

1:48:20>> I was speaking the mic into the mic.

1:48:22>> Okay. Other people have mentioned the

1:48:24issues of air quality. You have extra

1:48:26congestion. You have you have more

1:48:29particular pollution. Thanks to the

1:48:31senator, I now know that there will be

1:48:33350 buses coming in to shuttle people

1:48:36into White Stadium. That is also

1:48:39expected to increase congestion. So,

1:48:40what you're going to see given the

1:48:43existing sensors for particular

1:48:45pollution, it's increased air quality

1:48:49degradation, more asthma triggers, and

1:48:52inevitably more deaths. So anybody that

1:48:55calls himself to be in favor of

1:48:56environmental justice cannot in any way

1:49:00in conscience support this project

1:49:02because people will be hurt. Thank you.

1:49:06>> Thank you

1:49:08Alan Tanner.

1:49:22Good evening members of this Boston City

1:49:25Council and to everybody present. My

1:49:27name is Alan Tanner. I testify today as

1:49:32a leader with Prophetic Resistance

1:49:34Boston and as well as a resident of

1:49:36Roxbury.

1:49:39My first point is that this process was

1:49:43not based in listening to the people.

1:49:46Listening to the people is what we see

1:49:48today where we have the city coming to

1:49:51the people, listening to the needs of

1:49:53the people and then moving upon what the

1:49:56people have said.

1:49:58>> That is not what we have seen in this

1:50:01process of the center running bus lane.

1:50:04>> Um my next point

1:50:06>> is that there has been a

1:50:07disproportionate impact in black

1:50:10communities. you know, constantly as has

1:50:12been mentioned already, if

1:50:14[clears throat] we have other

1:50:15communities, if I go to Back Bay, if I

1:50:17go to JP and we have people that are

1:50:20saying, "No, this is not something that

1:50:23we want," then guess what? That's

1:50:25actually considered. But now, if we go

1:50:28to Roxbury, Doorchester, Matapan, we are

1:50:31constantly told, "Oh, don't don't worry

1:50:33about it. This is it's the money's

1:50:35there. It's going to happen. It's going

1:50:36to happen." That is not okay.

1:50:41My next point, rail has been here

1:50:43before. This is not the first time we

1:50:46are looking at the possibility of rail.

1:50:50And so we we should not shut down all

1:50:54other options. We we should not shut

1:50:56down, you know, options and say, "Oh,

1:50:59well, no, we just don't have the money

1:51:01for rail." But as has been mentioned, we

1:51:03have the fair share amendment. You know,

1:51:05we have invested money in other things.

1:51:08So, let us think about investing and not

1:51:11divesting from our communities. Um, my

1:51:15other point, other center bus lanes such

1:51:18as the one on Columbus Avenue, that has

1:51:21been atrocious. It's created traffic.

1:51:23It's created bottlenecks, and it has

1:51:26been consistently known that that is not

1:51:30what we want.

1:51:33Safety issues. I'm actually particularly

1:51:35worried. I've looked at the plan. um for

1:51:38the segment of Blue Hill Avenue that's

1:51:40in front of my church. Um and they plan

1:51:44to put a a bike lane also kind of like

1:51:47on the sidewalk in front of my church.

1:51:50So I'm like, "Oh, so now not only are we

1:51:52asking our seniors and our young people

1:51:54to cross two lanes of traffic, but we're

1:51:57also asking them to cross a bike lane,

1:52:00too. So now we're adding another

1:52:02hazard." Well, that does not work for

1:52:05me.

1:52:06Um, and in my closing two points,

1:52:10I want to focus on

1:52:14the the fact that to consistently say we

1:52:17are going to go ahead and we're going to

1:52:19do this, that is an egregious abuse of

1:52:22authority.

1:52:24And lastly, I call for an alternative

1:52:28analysis. Thank you for your time.

1:52:30>> Thank Thank you. [applause]

1:52:34The next five is uh Maha Alim.

1:52:41Maha Ashlin.

1:52:47Drew Carpenter,

1:52:54Asia Jackson,

1:52:57Antoine

1:52:59Joe Care,

1:53:03Anthony Bayz, and Diane Wilkerson.

1:53:09Yes.

1:53:11>> Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.

1:53:13>> Good evening.

1:53:13>> My name is Drew Carpenter.

1:53:16Um, Out of all the speakers that came up

1:53:18here, I think I'm one of the ones who

1:53:22actually just lived like two minutes

1:53:24from here. I moved at 484 Blue Hill Lav

1:53:27in 1972.

1:53:30>> I moved 484 Blue Hill Lav 1972 right

1:53:33next to M Dixon. I watch Blue Hill Laugh

1:53:36shrink.

1:53:38>> I watch him shrink and I'm like, you

1:53:41know what is their fixation on Blue Hill

1:53:44Laugh?

1:53:46You know what is their fixation on blue

1:53:48your lab? Like I grew up in this

1:53:50neighborhood and we did good, you know,

1:53:53as we did as we do. Well, whatever we

1:53:56do, whatever we did, we did do good. I

1:53:58don't know if that makes sense. I'm a

1:53:59little nervous. I ain't going to lie.

1:54:01But what I do know is that that bus lane

1:54:04thing triggered me. That bus name

1:54:07triggered me. I understand the history

1:54:09of Boston. See, I was bus from there to

1:54:12South Boston and had to get under the

1:54:14bus, get under the seats because rocks,

1:54:16bricks, sticks, and racist slurs was

1:54:18coming through the window. You know what

1:54:20I mean? I didn't want to leave my

1:54:22neighborhood and go somewhere else. What

1:54:24I what we did want was them to give us

1:54:27what they gave them. And that's what we

1:54:29don't get. We never get what they get.

1:54:32>> We get less because that's how they view

1:54:35us, less.

1:54:37This community, someone's talked about

1:54:39gentrification. I'm going go I'm going

1:54:41to go a different route and this is no

1:54:42charge to the Hispanic community. This

1:54:44community is like 75% Hispanic. I can

1:54:48count the Hispanic people on my hands in

1:54:50this room. Is the word getting to them?

1:54:53Is anybody talking to them,

1:54:55communicating with them or the rest of

1:54:57them?

1:54:58>> But they don't care because they wanted

1:55:00this to go quiet as possible. I was at

1:55:03the Burke meeting when they I was told,

1:55:05"Oh yeah, construction is going to

1:55:07happen regardless in 2028. Everything

1:55:09was paid for." I was lied right to my

1:55:11face.

1:55:13That's disrespectful.

1:55:16That's straight disrespectful. I And I'm

1:55:18triggered by all this. I'm pro black all

1:55:21day. I love my people. I love my

1:55:23community.

1:55:25>> I want y'all to love us, too, the way we

1:55:27are. To me, I've been taking that those

1:55:30buses since they was 10 cent up and down

1:55:33Blue Hill A. I'm okay with waiting the

1:55:35extra five minutes because the extra

1:55:37five minutes gave me an opportunity to

1:55:39meet someone in my neighborhood that I

1:55:41never met before. Community

1:55:45togetherness. We don't need y'all to

1:55:46come over here and dictate how we move

1:55:49about in our community.

1:55:51>> We don't need that. What you What we

1:55:54need is y'all to hear the people in the

1:55:55community. Talk with them. meet with us.

1:55:58But y'all don't want that. That ain't

1:56:01what y'all want. That ain't what y'all

1:56:02ever wanted, you know. So, leave us

1:56:06alone.

1:56:11[cheering]

1:56:13>> Anton.

1:56:14>> Anton.

1:56:21>> Anton, can you just stay where you live?

1:56:23Sure.

1:56:24>> So, I'm Anson Joano. I work for Project

1:56:26Wright. Um I've worked in Grof fall

1:56:28since 19 2000 something like that but um

1:56:32basically I just wanted to talk about

1:56:34the plan that they have proposed

1:56:35[clears throat] and how it affects

1:56:36growall itself because I understand

1:56:38whether we don't want it or not but what

1:56:40they've actually proposed like what what

1:56:42is it that we have so um part of the

1:56:46issue is that a lot some of the project

1:56:48is not even what directly happens at

1:56:49Blue Hill but it's what's going to be

1:56:51pushed into the neighborhood streets

1:56:52around it that we need to also be

1:56:54concerned about. So between Sver and

1:56:57Wayne, the current design reduces

1:56:59northbound traffic to one lane,

1:57:01restricts several left turns, makes

1:57:03nazing a one-way eastbound, redirects

1:57:06traffic towards Sver and Elmhill. Right

1:57:08between Wayne and Washington, there's

1:57:10only one general traffic lane in each

1:57:12direction along with a pickup and drop

1:57:14off from the Carolina Academy. Right.

1:57:17And at Castlegate, drivers would be

1:57:19limited to a right turn with other

1:57:21movements redirected through Washington,

1:57:22Normandy, or Elm Hill. And each of these

1:57:25changes is small by itself, but together

1:57:28they raise one major question, which is

1:57:30how much traffic is being moved off

1:57:32Blueh Hill and onto the streets where

1:57:34Groveall residents actually live.

1:57:36>> Right. So this is information the

1:57:38community should see. We need the we

1:57:41need the projected before and after

1:57:43traffic volumes for Elm Hill, Sver,

1:57:46Washington, Normandy, Nas, Pasadena,

1:57:48[clears throat] Wayne, Supple, all of

1:57:50these streets

1:57:52before we can actually make even an

1:57:54informed decision and we haven't been

1:57:56presented with any of these. Um, we also

1:57:59need to know what happens in the

1:58:01one-lane sections during the real

1:58:02neighborhood conditions. School pickups,

1:58:04deliveries, double parking, crashes,

1:58:07disabled vehicles. Their transit

1:58:09concerns, too. Existing bus stops at

1:58:11Sver Street are being replaced by

1:58:13stations farther along the corridor,

1:58:15which could mean longer walks for some

1:58:17riders. Um, the current plan shows no

1:58:20bike lanes from Sver through Warren

1:58:22Street. So, the idea about bike

1:58:25transportation being better, we don't

1:58:27get that. So, that's another question to

1:58:29bring up there. Uh, just wrap up. So if

1:58:33Gro Falls is asked to accept these

1:58:34tradeoffs, then we need the numbers that

1:58:36are specific to Gro Hall and not just

1:58:38the corridor wide averages.

1:58:40>> So thank you.

1:58:42>> Thank you. Thank you, Asia Jackson.

1:58:50>> Asia, could you just state where you

1:58:52live?

1:58:53>> I live in Roxberry.

1:58:56Roxberry.

1:58:58Oh, my time started, y'all. Okay. So,

1:59:01good evening everyone. My name is Asia

1:59:02Jackson. I'm from Roxberry. I'm a

1:59:05stakeholder here. I'm speaking for

1:59:07myself, but I'm a part of several

1:59:09organizations that are in this room.

1:59:12Five generations, five

1:59:15lived on this soil, fought for this

1:59:18rail. My grandmother, my greatg

1:59:20grandmother fought for this rail. Fast

1:59:22forward to tonight. My son spend 95

1:59:26minutes from Matapan station all the way

1:59:29to Rugos twice daily.

1:59:34Think about that. That is not a delay.

1:59:37That is not inconvenience. That is a

1:59:39human life, human potential and economic

1:59:43opportunity systemically

1:59:46>> stolen from our children by a broken

1:59:50transit grid. Let's be honest. Darkest

1:59:53number 1340 and 1341

1:59:56for the rapid transit that was stripped

1:59:59from us in 1987

2:00:02was never replaced when billions flow

2:00:06seamlessly

2:00:07to white communities. $2.3 million

2:00:12billion

2:00:14for the green line extension. 1.58

2:00:17billion for the red and orange line on

2:00:20the other side extension,

2:00:221 billion for South Coast Rail, but our

2:00:27neighbors neighborhoods are given measly

2:00:31little pennies. We get $164 million

2:00:35diesel bus lane. What is that?

2:00:39>> That is not an accident.

2:00:42That is modernday infrastructure

2:00:44redlinining.

2:00:46>> This is separate and unequal layout

2:00:49inflicts structural economic harm. It

2:00:53sentences our families to profound

2:00:56health equity crisis. I'm going to be

2:00:58one more minute longer because I got

2:01:00some demands and they need to be

2:01:02answered in 30 days. So blockading

2:01:06direct access to Boston Medical Center,

2:01:09New England, Longwood Medical Area, our

2:01:13children, are they not worth more?

2:01:17Is our time worth less? Are we not

2:01:21supposed to have jobs in our

2:01:23commonwealth

2:01:24that help us our livelihood?

2:01:2895 minutes

2:01:31to Ruggles, not even downtown. Before

2:01:34this body commits a single dollar to a

2:01:37painted bus lane, I demand a formal

2:01:40title six civil rights review. Number

2:01:44one, I am placing eight action

2:01:47actionable mandates directly onto the

2:01:51official record. Number one, price a

2:01:55green line connection. There's a rail

2:01:59underneath Tmont Street that is not

2:02:01being used. We need to look into that.

2:02:06There's a formal mass dot form that even

2:02:08gives the information about how much it

2:02:12will cost for that rail to go to Newbian

2:02:15Square and then extend to Madapan

2:02:18station. We deserve that.

2:02:21Number two, study a direct heavyline

2:02:24rail connection from Matapan to Forest

2:02:27Hills or South Station, which would be

2:02:30better.

2:02:31Three, force a 30-year operational cost

2:02:34audit. Number four, formally review my

2:02:37Gold Line 28 Express for immediate

2:02:40interim relief while we work on our rail

2:02:45system. Number five, stop using fake

2:02:48riding times claims from true doortodoor

2:02:53trips, taking away stops that our

2:02:56elderly residents cannot get to these

2:02:58stops, which will in fact create longer

2:03:02travel times by 20 plus minutes for

2:03:05elderly and disabled residents traveling

2:03:09on this middle bus bus disaster. So um

2:03:15we need number six a published verified

2:03:18fatality construction impact and canopy

2:03:21removal data block by block. Number

2:03:25seven we need funds for home ownership

2:03:29stability and binding reperative growth

2:03:33especially for the leftover American

2:03:36free men that are here along Blue Hill A

2:03:39and in Roxbury. Establish number eight,

2:03:42my last establish absolute

2:03:45accountability. I demand that every

2:03:47single agency involved answer each of

2:03:50these eight demands

2:03:52in writing point by point within 30

2:03:56days. We will not wait another 40 years.

2:04:00Our community deserves equality,

2:04:04economic mobility, health equity, and

2:04:07rail now. Thank you.

2:04:13I'd like to acknowledge

2:04:17uh and

2:04:20give my uh councelor colleague uh

2:04:24councelor Pepin. I didn't see you down

2:04:26there. Uh so I just want to acknowledge

2:04:29councelor Pepin. Uh we're in public

2:04:32testimony, but let me just give him two

2:04:35minutes to make his opening statement.

2:04:38Since we don't have a panel up anymore,

2:04:41uh you won't need those two minutes, but

2:04:43councelor Pepin, uh go on and make your

2:04:45two-minute opening statement.

2:04:48>> I appre Thank you, Councelor Pepper. I

2:04:51co pepper, thank you so much, council

2:04:53war. Thank you so much for for just

2:04:56holding this this council hearing

2:04:57tonight. Uh for me this is a very

2:04:59important topic. Uh public

2:05:01transportation

2:05:03for me advocacy has been gone a long way

2:05:05before I was a city councelor. Used to

2:05:07work for an organization called

2:05:08transportation for Massachusetts where

2:05:11we studied a lot the implications of

2:05:13public transportation. And I actually

2:05:15got the opportunity to do a lot of the

2:05:16studying of the lack of public

2:05:19transportation investments in these

2:05:21neighborhoods. And to their credit and

2:05:24to the credit of a lot of residents that

2:05:25I've heard tonight, the hurt is real.

2:05:28And I know that the BTA and the state

2:05:30and even the city has for a long time

2:05:32promised a lot of projects that were

2:05:34supposed to be here. Um they moved the

2:05:37orange line away from Washington Street

2:05:39and Square many years ago. They moved

2:05:41away the light rail, the trolley that

2:05:43used to run down Blueho Avenue. A lot of

2:05:46things have been taken away from these

2:05:47communities. And I know many of you know

2:05:50that I do support this project.

2:05:52But it's not because of any

2:05:53relationships or any new ideas for me.

2:05:56It's it's because of I truly believe in

2:05:58the usage of public transportation. Um I

2:06:02do believe in the fact that if we allow

2:06:05this type of infrastructure to come, it

2:06:07does give the opportunity to build a

2:06:10light rail down Blueho Avenue like many

2:06:12of you are asking for. But I also have I

2:06:16I believe it was a previous speaker that

2:06:18mentioned the tunnel that's underneath

2:06:20Washington Street that used to that used

2:06:23to connect um the old previous orange

2:06:25line. There's a lot of infrastructure

2:06:26underneath our grounds that are being

2:06:29they're not used and um I know that

2:06:32there was a proposed extension by some

2:06:34of my colleagues, but I think there's

2:06:35even a better proposal out there that ex

2:06:38extends out of Tus Medical Center down

2:06:41street to Nubian Square and then an

2:06:43extension down to under Blueho Avenue.

2:06:46Um that type of infrastructure that is

2:06:48worth looking into. I believe that study

2:06:50that that was referenced by the

2:06:51residents is the 2012 Mass DOT study

2:06:54with in partnership with the Roxberry

2:06:56Doorchester Matapan Coalition that did

2:06:58that study and actually recommended

2:07:00that. And I say that because it is

2:07:03important to recognize what what the

2:07:05work has been done and what hasn't been

2:07:06done. But ultimately I say all that just

2:07:08to say I am a pro public transportation

2:07:10advocate. That is essentially why I

2:07:12really do support this. But I do hear

2:07:14why people don't support this. And I

2:07:16just wanted to make sure that I was here

2:07:18to hear more comments from the

2:07:19residents. And thank you, councelor Cole

2:07:20Pepper.

2:07:22>> Thank you, Council Pepin. Let us move

2:07:24back to our public testimony. Anthony

2:07:26Bayz and then Diane Wilkerson.

2:07:34>> Hello, my name is Tony Bias.

2:07:35>> Tony Bayas, where's you from?

2:07:37>> Peacel. And someone asked where the

2:07:40Hispanics are. Here we are. So, first,

2:07:43could I get a show of hands from our

2:07:44electives who've actually rode the bus

2:07:46to get here?

2:07:48Well, I did, and it was slowed by

2:07:50traffic. Now, imagine you rely on the

2:07:52bus to get to work or to go to school.

2:07:55The plan to install center running bus

2:07:56lanes is sensible in light of the facts

2:07:59and despite the lies. I will now go over

2:08:01what is true in this debate. We know

2:08:04that 40,000 people a day ride the bus on

2:08:07this corridor. We know that the majority

2:08:09of traffic on this corridor is made up

2:08:12of bus riders. We know that over 75% of

2:08:15bus riders on Blue Hill A are people of

2:08:18color. We know that this plan would save

2:08:21up to 15 minutes for each rider. We know

2:08:24that the grant is specifically allocated

2:08:26for buses and not for any other project.

2:08:28We know that if not used, this money

2:08:31would not be returned and invested in

2:08:33this community. Now, let's go over what

2:08:35is not true. In other words, lies. The

2:08:39plan can be changed for other purposes.

2:08:42Center running bus lane platforms are

2:08:44unsafe to board. Have you ridden the

2:08:46green line? The plan is removing

2:08:48parking. Not happening. The plan will

2:08:50preclude future plans for rail projects.

2:08:53There hasn't been thousands of hours of

2:08:55community outreach. All of these

2:08:57statements are not founded in truth.

2:09:00Let's also dispel the notion that this

2:09:02hearing was of importance to the civil

2:09:04rights committee. This was orchestrated

2:09:06in order to have a biased hearing.

2:09:08Lastly, I want to address the people

2:09:10that think that if this is built, these

2:09:13bus lanes would gentrify the

2:09:14neighborhood. What do you think is going

2:09:16to happen if they build a subway?

2:09:25[clears throat]

2:09:38Senator Wilkinson.

2:09:44>> Good evening.

2:09:48>> For the record, my name is Diane

2:09:50Wilkerson.

2:09:51too many organizations in history to

2:09:54recount, but I live about 60 seconds

2:09:57from Blue Hill Avenue off Harvard Street

2:09:59and Harvard Common

2:10:08to me the question to thank you for

2:10:12being here. The these counselors I

2:10:15suspect all started already had a day at

2:10:17city hall hearing. So I think Lewis said

2:10:20I'm thank you for considering it not you

2:10:23know not robbery for you to give up your

2:10:24evening to be here. We appreciate you.

2:10:29The question for me is how is this not a

2:10:33civil rights issue.

2:10:36I want to share with the counselors

2:10:40um just a brief history

2:10:43related to you related to the council.

2:10:46In 1989,

2:10:48the city of Boston's city council held

2:10:50its first ever out of city hall

2:10:55community hearing.

2:10:58Do you know why? Because the federal

2:11:01court ordered the city of Boston

2:11:05to to create a home rule petition to

2:11:08give the Fair Housing Commission some

2:11:10teeth. They called our Fair Housing

2:11:12Commission a paper tiger.

2:11:16the then chair of the housing committee

2:11:19for the Boston City Council. Some of you

2:11:22may know the name, attorney Jim Burn. He

2:11:24was the partner for somebody named Tom

2:11:27Fineran. That name sound familiar? Well,

2:11:31Councelor Burn said after we did all of

2:11:35the hearings, the city council hearings,

2:11:37the place was packed in support of the

2:11:41home rule petition.

2:11:44Councelor Burns announced that he was

2:11:46certain, despite the fact that they had

2:11:48not heard any at the council hearing,

2:11:50there must be some opposition out there

2:11:52and we're going to go find it. So, the

2:11:55first of the hearings

2:11:58was at St. Angel Church in South Boston.

2:12:04I'm amazed that they always feel like

2:12:05they need to tell us how to behave. When

2:12:08did we ever have a city council hearing

2:12:10that? Anyway, y'all get the picture.

2:12:15It was the ugliest,

2:12:18most intense

2:12:20environment I have ever experienced in

2:12:22this city. I was the attorney, the

2:12:26council for the Boston branch at the

2:12:29time that was led by Lewis Alisa

2:12:32and I was there. I went to the hearing

2:12:34with my co-consel

2:12:36Naen Cohen who was attorney at the

2:12:38lawyers committee and councelor

2:12:42Co Pepper very familiar.

2:12:45I was the only black face in that room

2:12:47about 400 very angry white people

2:12:52and we ended up having to get police

2:12:55escort to get me out of the building

2:13:01in 1993

2:13:04and my first year in the state senate.

2:13:08I was one of the signitories on the

2:13:10letter that was signed that was

2:13:12organized 94 because Mayor Manino signed

2:13:16that letter.

2:13:18Almost all of the city councilors signed

2:13:20the letter. All of the state rep, state

2:13:23representative Fox, state representative

2:13:25Rushing signed the letter committing to

2:13:29the commitment

2:13:31for comparable replacement to the orange

2:13:34line when it came down.

2:13:37My signature is on that letter.

2:13:43In 2004,

2:13:46after negotiating with the MBTA with the

2:13:50help of the former Congressman Capalano,

2:13:54I ended up leading the cavalcade

2:13:58of buses from the MBTA out of Cabbat

2:14:02Yard on Washington Street in Egleston.

2:14:06finally

2:14:08after I don't know how many years. Why?

2:14:10Because it was a toxic toxic deadly

2:14:16site. The most deadly

2:14:20because the buses idled all the time. We

2:14:24we literally had a cat a cavalcade that

2:14:26left Cabat Yard down Washington Street

2:14:30into the Arborway to get those buses out

2:14:33of Roxberry. We have the largest number

2:14:36of school age children in that fivemile

2:14:39radius that we call Roxberry,

2:14:41Doorchester, and Matipan. The highest

2:14:44rates of asthma in the state

2:14:49because of the toxic fumes spewed by the

2:14:51diesel buses.

2:14:54How you could say counselor

2:14:58that you heard all the con concerns but

2:15:01you still support public transit is

2:15:03completely beyond me. People died

2:15:07because of the experiment at com at

2:15:10Columbus Avenue. The day after the

2:15:13Holland school hearing the city

2:15:15announced they were scrapping the plan

2:15:17for the extension on Columbus A. And I

2:15:21would submit is because they don't ever

2:15:23want people to see

2:15:26the number of incidents, accidents,

2:15:28fatalities

2:15:30that occurred in that site.

2:15:33You've never seen it and you never will.

2:15:40This morning,

2:15:42the mayor was on Java with Jimmy talking

2:15:46about Blue Hill Avenue.

2:15:49He said, "I I I I know that you've had

2:15:53all these meetings. There's a lot of

2:15:54opposition." She said, "No, there

2:15:56isn't."

2:15:58She said, "No, there isn't." Did you

2:16:00watch the hearing at Matipan

2:16:03at Morning Star Baptist Church?

2:16:08Almost half of the people there

2:16:09testified in support. That's what she

2:16:11said this morning.

2:16:15So when you ask the questions, why has

2:16:18it been so difficult?

2:16:20Is because she lies.

2:16:25>> And more important than that,

2:16:28for the first time in all the almost 50

2:16:30years that I've been here, as we sit

2:16:32here this evening, the city of Boston is

2:16:36marshalling its assets against us.

2:16:40They have a rapid response team of

2:16:43employees that we pay for every day who

2:16:47were on your Facebook post 10 minutes

2:16:49after you post them.

2:16:52Try it.

2:16:54I've seen them respond to you. I've seen

2:16:57them respond to you. Oh, they always

2:17:00respond to me until I chase them off.

2:17:03But we chase them with facts. The day

2:17:05after the Morning Star meeting,

2:17:09someone posted, "Why would they say

2:17:12we're going to have increased service?

2:17:13We're going to lose bus stops."

2:17:16That's a fact.

2:17:19We're going from 19 to 10. What that

2:17:23means is those people you see pushing

2:17:24the baby carriages, toting their carts

2:17:28on the walkers are going to have to walk

2:17:30three times further to get on this bus

2:17:33in the middle of the street.

2:17:36Can you see the traffic from Canton and

2:17:39Milton and Stoton tearing down Blue Hill

2:17:42Avenue blowing their horn to get Grandma

2:17:44to hurry up and get across the street

2:17:47cuz that's what we're going to see. So

2:17:53she said it this morning, folks. Oh, no.

2:17:57Most of supporting 3500 signatures on a

2:18:01petition to date. When did 3,500 of us

2:18:04sign anything?

2:18:07No, there will not be any electric buses

2:18:11in three years. The MBTA already

2:18:14announced that they are pulling pushing

2:18:16it back. They're at least five years

2:18:19away. Can you just get toxic spewed in

2:18:22your face every day for five more years?

2:18:25It's going to kill us,

2:18:27>> Senator.

2:18:28>> Period. So, I'm I'm gonna wrap with

2:18:30this. I think it was West who asked the

2:18:33counselors to raise their hands if they

2:18:35supported the I the con the notion that

2:18:38this was a civil rights issue.

2:18:45Six actually everybody who was here

2:18:48raised their hand. I think there was six

2:18:50and I we already know that councelor

2:18:52Murphy who had left she already said she

2:18:54was in that's seven

2:18:57even without counselor from district

2:18:59five seven is a majority on the council

2:19:03last I checked

2:19:06the idea that somebody could be bold

2:19:09enough to walk in here and say I live on

2:19:11Beacon Hill.

2:19:16Oh, no. I was not going to let that one

2:19:18go.

2:19:21Can you imagine the audacity?

2:19:27And he didn't tell you he works for

2:19:30Council Durkin.

2:19:33>> Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. You order.

2:19:36Y'all order.

2:19:37>> He didn't tell you that he's taken out

2:19:40papers OCPF to run citywide for city

2:19:44council. He ain't saying I'm That's a

2:19:46lie, is he? Cuz it is. He's taking out

2:19:49his papers to run. So I guess he's

2:19:51practicing on us. How dare you?

2:19:55>> You took the bus.

2:19:57>> It's the other direction, you fool. It's

2:19:59not Matipan.

2:20:05>> So let let me just let me just say let

2:20:07me just say this. This is my ask. This

2:20:10is my ask of you.

2:20:12This is my ask for the counselors. Seven

2:20:15counselors said they believed that this

2:20:17was a civil rights issue.

2:20:20One one word of advice. I used to remind

2:20:24my my c my colleagues in the Senate, the

2:20:27other 39 senators. I have 180,000

2:20:32bosses. We call them constituents and

2:20:35not one of them is in this room. I don't

2:20:37work for you. You don't work for the

2:20:40mayor. You don't work for the governor.

2:20:43I didn't work for the governor. You work

2:20:45for this. This is these are your bosses.

2:20:48>> Order. So, if you are comfortable enough

2:20:50to come in here and say that you believe

2:20:53that this is a civil rights issue, I

2:20:56want you to be comfortable enough to

2:20:59sign a letter

2:21:03>> authored by councelor Warwell and Co

2:21:06Pepper to the mayor that said, "You

2:21:08heard enough and raise concerns and you

2:21:10think that we need to follow up on some

2:21:12of these before we move any further."

2:21:14That to me is minimum. If you believe

2:21:17what you just said, seven of you said

2:21:19yes.

2:21:21Seven of you.

2:21:23Co Pepper, Warell, Murphy, Flynn,

2:21:27Santana, Lugenne, and Mahia. Seven of

2:21:31you said yes. If you don't do that,

2:21:35it'll be reported at our next meeting on

2:21:38accountability. Because see, this is

2:21:40like when people go to black churches

2:21:42and talk about racism. Go talk to the

2:21:44white people.

2:21:46Don't come in here and tell us you

2:21:47believe it's a civil rights issue. Tell

2:21:49the folks who are making the decision.

2:21:51All we're saying is if you believe we

2:21:54should pursue it, we should at least

2:21:56look at this.

2:21:59Support the two counselors that this

2:22:01gentleman was so disrespectful to go to

2:22:03Morning Star Baptist Church and scream

2:22:05at them and talk about he's ashamed. Who

2:22:08cares?

2:22:09Who cares?

2:22:11For real. For real. This is serious,

2:22:15folks, because this is going to kill us

2:22:17all if we don't if we don't push back on

2:22:20this. Brand new

2:22:23shiny buses are still going to be

2:22:26spewing diesel.

2:22:31We can do better than this and we have

2:22:32an obligation to do better than this.

2:22:34Thank you, Senator.

2:22:36I want to call up the the next five

2:22:40and we the next five and we promised

2:22:42we'd be out by nine. Uh Mea Bush,

2:22:47H. Joseph,

2:22:51Jay McManis,

2:22:54and Ms. Grace,

2:22:57Mela Bush, H. Joseph J Mcmanis

2:23:04and Miss Grace

2:23:11>> Mela.

2:23:12>> Good evening. My name is Mela Bush.

2:23:15Thank you for holding this hearing here.

2:23:17It's very hard for people to go to city

2:23:19hall and to hold it in the evening in

2:23:21our community for an issue that um

2:23:23actually is so important to us is

2:23:28amazing. Thank you so much. Um

2:23:32I just want to speak to the um one

2:23:36thing. The life expectancy of people in

2:23:39our zip codes here in the community. I'm

2:23:42in 0 to 119

2:23:45>> is uh about 28 to 30 years less than

2:23:49those in Beacon Hill. is already true.

2:23:52>> So that is a fact and there are reasons

2:23:55why that were um laid out here around

2:23:59asthma rates, diesel pollution.

2:24:03I I just wanted to say that the second

2:24:05thing that I wanted to say is about the

2:24:08um the civil rights. I worked for over

2:24:1120 plus years on working to get the the

2:24:14Fairmont line up and running and leading

2:24:15the community process to do that. That

2:24:17was a civil rights battle. A right to a

2:24:20ride, a right to get on the train and to

2:24:22ride the rails that uh trains were going

2:24:25through our communities and they were

2:24:27polluting our lungs, but there were no

2:24:30stops and we weren't able to get on

2:24:32those trains. We now have four stations.

2:24:34One in Bluehill a Cumins and Matipan

2:24:37Square, one on Morton Street, Talbert A,

2:24:41Uppam's Corner, Four Corners, South Bay

2:24:44going straight to South Station.

2:24:47That's a rail line that we fought for

2:24:49and we won. We protested. We did all of

2:24:52that. And now we're here and we're

2:24:55talking about the civil rights and the

2:24:58equity and the the right to um adequate

2:25:01public transportation. I want to lift up

2:25:04a name that some of you know here uh who

2:25:07fought for replacement rail on

2:25:10Washington Street with the Washington

2:25:13Street Corridor Coalition. and we know

2:25:15he's no longer here with us. His name

2:25:17was Bob Terrell. He was a transit

2:25:20historian and he worked and ran the Fair

2:25:22Housing Commission in city hall. He

2:25:24didn't live to see the day that that uh

2:25:27replacement came to other communities in

2:25:30Roxbury after the Orange Line was taken

2:25:32down. I'm not speaking necessarily on

2:25:35behalf of an Orange Line replacement.

2:25:37Um, we're talking about comparable,

2:25:40equitable transportation that is

2:25:42non-polluting,

2:25:45that is not going to exacerbate our

2:25:48children's asthma and impact our health.

2:25:52My family lost uh two young people under

2:25:55the age of uh 35 to respiratory issues.

2:26:01That one lived to be 24 years old and

2:26:04she passed away because of asthma. It's

2:26:06the reason why I do this work. My son

2:26:10was in the hospital over 40 times for

2:26:13asthma. Why? Because we lived in

2:26:15Roxberry, grew up in Roxberry, we lived

2:26:18in uh Dorchester, Matipan, and the the

2:26:21old housing stalk. And then we lived in

2:26:24Jamaica Plane, and we we were in the

2:26:26area where the buses deadheaded all the

2:26:29way up to Forest Hill Station. Back in

2:26:32the 2000s, we fought to stop those buses

2:26:35early 2000, late 90s to stop those

2:26:38diesel pollutant buses from going to uh

2:26:42Forest Hills, shut down the Bartlett

2:26:45yard, stop the dead heading of those

2:26:48diesel powered buses. And today we they

2:26:51came back. We we were able to get

2:26:53compressed natural gas buses to go

2:26:56through our community that were a little

2:26:57less polluting to try and save our

2:27:00lungs. And then I watched during COVID

2:27:04when the buses that were um banned from

2:27:06coming into what was then Dudley

2:27:09Station, Ashmont, Forest Hills, they

2:27:11weren't allowed to let diesel buses run

2:27:13over here because we fought and stopped

2:27:16those buses from running through our

2:27:18communities. They slipped them back in.

2:27:21And I watched that black diesel soot

2:27:23spewing out of buses on Transit Equity

2:27:25Day in Nubian Station a few years ago

2:27:28during COVID in 2020. And I said, "Oh my

2:27:31god, they're back."

2:27:33>> And what are we fighting about right

2:27:35now?

2:27:36>> Put in more diesel buses. And I mean

2:27:40more diesel buses with shuttles that

2:27:42they will not divulge to go to White

2:27:44Stadium

2:27:46to transport people.

2:27:49So many hundreds of buses that are going

2:27:51to be coming in and they're saying, "Oh,

2:27:53we'll put electric buses three years

2:27:55after the start of the first game. Why

2:27:58aren't they saying they'll do it now?

2:28:00So, we need you to continue to fight for

2:28:03our civil rights, our right to arrive,

2:28:05our right to breathe clean air, and our

2:28:08right to have our lifespan extended to

2:28:1190 years plus and not have this

2:28:14situation. He ran out of here, the

2:28:16Beacon Hill guy. Um, he's not here

2:28:19anymore

2:28:21because that's a fact. We have a right

2:28:23to breathe here. We still can't breathe.

2:28:26And we need to have this thing addressed

2:28:31and address the our rights to clean air,

2:28:34quality public transportation that is

2:28:37going to get us to where we need to go

2:28:39and to look at viable options and to

2:28:42look at how we can um actually live a

2:28:45few minutes longer. Thank you for

2:28:48allowing me to speak.

2:28:49>> Thank you, Mea. The uh H. Joseph,

2:28:54H. Joseph, J McManis, Miss Grace. If if

2:28:59there's someone who hasn't signed up yet

2:29:02and you want to speak, please go to the

2:29:05back and sign the signup sheet. There's

2:29:08someone that wants to talk and you

2:29:10haven't. We don't want anyone to leave

2:29:13here

2:29:15who hasn't talked but wanted to talk.

2:29:18Okay.

2:29:19>> Hi, good evening. My name is Helena

2:29:21Joseph. I do live in Dorchester. I also

2:29:23work in Dorchester. And I want to thank

2:29:25you guys for um holding this meeting. I

2:29:28also want to thank the community folks

2:29:30to come out and represent yourselves. Um

2:29:33a lot of times we hear about these um

2:29:36meetings are taking place and a lot of

2:29:39the community people do not know that

2:29:41these meetings are happening. I think we

2:29:43need to do a better job to inform the

2:29:46residents and the people in the

2:29:47community when those meetings are taking

2:29:50place because people do care about where

2:29:52they work and where they leave. Um I'm

2:29:55tired of speaking. I am tired of

2:29:57talking. I feel like we are talking and

2:29:59we are talking. What are you guys going

2:30:01to do to help us? I mean are we talking

2:30:03today? What is going to what is the

2:30:05result of all this talking today? What's

2:30:08going to happen? what action is going to

2:30:10actually happen for people in this

2:30:12community. Um my brother and his wife

2:30:16built a dental practice for 25 years on

2:30:18Bluehab. I'm actually working with them

2:30:21right now. We have three um construction

2:30:24buildings happening right around um the

2:30:27practice and I I can tell you it has

2:30:30been really challenging for us and for

2:30:34the patients. Parking is a problem now.

2:30:38What is going to happen when we have all

2:30:41these things that is supposedly already

2:30:44um going to happen? We are talking about

2:30:46it, but it sounds like this is something

2:30:48that's already going to happen whether

2:30:50we talk no matter how many times we say

2:30:52we don't want it. It's something that it

2:30:54seems like it's already things are in

2:30:57motion. You have these three

2:30:59construction buildings um happening and

2:31:02they have all these huge vehicles. We've

2:31:04spoken to the city. they have come in

2:31:06and they have um tried to help. It will

2:31:09work one week and then the following

2:31:11week challenges for patients to parking.

2:31:14Patients has to go streets upon streets

2:31:16to find parking. Sometimes we have

2:31:18patients cancelling appointments and I'm

2:31:20just saying who are talking to the

2:31:22people the businesses that are serving

2:31:25the community who are representing them.

2:31:28How are you are you guys going into

2:31:30these businesses and talking to people

2:31:32and talking about the challenges? I

2:31:33think we can talk all we want, but until

2:31:36we don't see the action, it just seem

2:31:38like we we just talking just for talking

2:31:41sake. And I hope that we do something

2:31:44about the people that are being

2:31:46affected. Not only the businesses, we

2:31:48also have the all of these construction

2:31:51things that are happening. You have the

2:31:52side parking on the streets. You have

2:31:54the double parking. It's a mess. And I

2:31:57just hope that we take the consideration

2:32:00of what people are saying, the what

2:32:01people are feeling and make people feel

2:32:03like what they're saying is being taken

2:32:06into consideration and people feel like

2:32:08their concerns are being met. We need to

2:32:11respect the people in the community. We

2:32:13need to take the their concerns and we

2:32:16need action. All this talking, I hope it

2:32:19means something. Thank you.

2:32:21>> Thank you. What business was that?

2:32:24>> What?

2:32:26Okay, thank you.

2:32:30Jim McGanis,

2:32:35>> are you H Joseph?

2:32:38>> That's David. David. That's David.

2:32:40>> That's David.

2:32:41>> You didn't sign up yet, did you?

2:32:43>> You thought you did?

2:32:53We don't sit on the list, but

2:32:56>> go on. David, two minutes.

2:32:59>> Thank you, sir.

2:33:00>> Thank you, sir. Um, thank you all for uh

2:33:04listening. Um,

2:33:07my name is David Seawward. Um, my name

2:33:11is David Seawward and I want to tell you

2:33:13a bunch of things that I learned when I

2:33:15worked for the MBTA that have not been

2:33:18said, which is crazy to me because rail

2:33:22is so possible is so possible and I

2:33:26agree with everything that's been said

2:33:28here, so I'm not going to repeat it. Um,

2:33:32councelor WHL talked about restoring the

2:33:35rail on Blue Hill Avenue. That's how we

2:33:38know it's possible because the streets

2:33:40here were designed for the rail to be

2:33:44there. That's why their bus project is

2:33:47easy and cheap because it's already been

2:33:51you have the geometry perfect. You

2:33:53almost never have this possibility.

2:33:56Now, do you know that right next to us,

2:33:59right next to us, they are funding and

2:34:02building the upgrade of the Matipan line

2:34:05to be light rail,

2:34:07>> they're building a traction power uh

2:34:11substation that's what powers the

2:34:13overhead uh catenary wires u right

2:34:17there. That is that and they're building

2:34:20a vehicle maintenance facility.

2:34:24Those are the biggest costs that made

2:34:26that green line extension project so

2:34:28hard and so costly. We already have them

2:34:31at Madapan Square. So, we're going to

2:34:33get that. We're going to get light rail

2:34:36from Milton,

2:34:3870% white. And how are we not going to

2:34:41get it here? Like, you don't have to be

2:34:44from here to feel that this is just

2:34:46nuts, right? Um, and so all like at a

2:34:51minimum like at a minimum

2:34:55what you for you could have rail light

2:34:58rail transit

2:35:00going up uh Blue Hill Avenue in their

2:35:04center

2:35:06and Columbus

2:35:077-year construction project make it to

2:35:10Jackson Square. Thank you so much.

2:35:12>> Thank you. [applause]

2:35:17H Joseph

2:35:22J. Mcmanis

2:35:27ma'am, what's your name?

2:35:29>> Pardon me. Oh, Miss Grace. Okay, Miss

2:35:32Grace. I think Miss Grace is our last

2:35:34speaker for the night.

2:35:36>> Oh, good evening.

2:35:38>> Give our counselor. I just like to say

2:35:40that we've had a hundred years of white

2:35:44male mayors and you're probably not used

2:35:47to a nonwhite mayor, but give Mayor Woo

2:35:52the respect that she deserves. That's

2:35:54all I'm going to say. Um, people have a

2:35:57problem with everything she does. Um,

2:36:02everything she does. Oh, non-white

2:36:04people. We don't know how to build. We

2:36:05don't know how to run the city. Mothers

2:36:08can't be mayors. Oh, I think they can.

2:36:11So, I I just don't like the the the

2:36:14disrespect. If I mayor, they would have

2:36:17never disrespected Mighty Wells and

2:36:20certainly not Mayor Manino. Um, I may

2:36:23have my differences with them with

2:36:25issues and whatever, but I never

2:36:28disrespect them like she is being

2:36:30disrespected today everywhere she goes.

2:36:33um the racism attacks against her.

2:36:36>> Would you direct your comments to the

2:36:37dockets?

2:36:38>> So, I'm going Well, that's one of them.

2:36:40Um the other thing I want to say is yes,

2:36:43I do support uh the the the bus center,

2:36:48bus lanes coming down Blue Lab. I

2:36:50support the money that's coming in our

2:36:53community. I have not um the city

2:36:57council, this is a meeting. You said it

2:36:59was a city council meeting. So, you

2:37:01should have brought the data. Okay. Can

2:37:05we actually have rail? How long is that

2:37:09going to take? Can we use this $163

2:37:13million for rail? If it takes, like you

2:37:16said, uh 5 years to do something else,

2:37:21how many how long is it going to take us

2:37:25to get rail? And can this money be used?

2:37:30So this money was allotted for this

2:37:32center bus lane. Can it be used? And it

2:37:36needs to be clear for rail. Now the

2:37:40other thing it is a lie that when you're

2:37:44saying that there was no community

2:37:45engagement. I participated in 2021 to

2:37:502023 in a community engagement process.

2:37:55the city of Boston hire at Gayscale.

2:37:58Gayscale subcontracted

2:38:01with a black woman's community

2:38:03engagement firm out of Matapan.

2:38:07Okay. Um, if you goo if you Google

2:38:10grayscale community engagement, you can

2:38:13see they taped all the conversations,

2:38:17recorded everything, and I went and I

2:38:20and I must say that I also participate

2:38:24in my neighborhood um, association

2:38:27meetings, not just mine, probably about

2:38:30four of them. So ask not what your city

2:38:34can do for you. What are you doing for

2:38:36your community? Uh the neighborhood

2:38:39associations are putting out information

2:38:41and you need to contact them, get on

2:38:44these mailing lists and and know about

2:38:46them.

2:38:46>> Thank you, Miss Grace.

2:38:47>> Uh that that's one thing.

2:38:49>> Thank you, Mrs. Grace. Thank you, Mrs.

2:38:51Grace.

2:38:51>> But um

2:38:53>> Thank you, Mrs. Grace.

2:38:54>> I support I support the

2:38:57that money.

2:38:59this we this the city of Boston has

2:39:03failed to do any major investments in

2:39:06our community for 80 years and now we

2:39:09want to start White Stadium. We want to

2:39:13stop the we want to stop this money into

2:39:16our community. What other community is

2:39:19stopping money going into their

2:39:20community?

2:39:21>> Thank you, Miss Grace.

2:39:22>> Thank you so much. Uh, Elna Elnara

2:39:27Miles is the last speaker of the

2:39:31evening.

2:39:33We'll give the counselors one minute to

2:39:34give a closing statement. I do want to

2:39:37thank everyone that came out.

2:39:40Thank everyone that stayed here the

2:39:42entire time. Thank everyone that

2:39:44participated.

2:39:46Thank all the counselors. And I want to

2:39:49make sure that we recognize the city

2:39:52council central staff that really

2:39:55conducted and operated me. Stand up.

2:39:57Come on. Let's have all of the city

2:39:59council central staff stand up. Come on.

2:40:02All you know. Come on. Stand up. Just

2:40:05stand up. Just stand up. [applause]

2:40:10[cheering]

2:40:13We thank them for coming out tonight and

2:40:18spending the time to make sure that this

2:40:21council hearing uh went in good order.

2:40:25Uh Miss Miles, you have two minutes.

2:40:28>> Well, I don't need that long, but

2:40:29>> Okay. Okay.

2:40:30>> Thank you everyone. My concern is

2:40:34whatever project they're going to bring

2:40:36to this community. I'm not seeing any

2:40:39people of color working on the streets.

2:40:44They've dug up Blue Hill A. I'm a Grove

2:40:48Hall member and we live right on the

2:40:51corner Devon Blue Hill and I'm also the

2:40:55insurance agent in the community Empire

2:40:59Insurance.

2:41:01But we don't see any people of color

2:41:04working here and all the construction

2:41:07that's going on. There used to be a guy

2:41:10that would monitor

2:41:12>> who

2:41:14>> and I want to make sure somebody

2:41:18is appointed to that job to make sure

2:41:21people of color are represented with the

2:41:24construction that's coming to the

2:41:26community.

2:41:27>> Thank you, Miss Miles.

2:41:28>> Thank you.

2:41:28>> I also want to recognize

2:41:31all of the staff for the different

2:41:33counselors that are here tonight. Uh

2:41:36there's my chief of staff, Taric Meyers.

2:41:40There's uh council war, staff, Yousef

2:41:44Matthew. Uh there's

2:41:49Bailey.

2:41:51[applause] There's Kristen. Uh

2:41:55>> what other staff is here?

2:41:59>> What's it?

2:42:00>> Bradford. Where's Bradford?

2:42:01>> Angela.

2:42:02>> Angela. Where's Angela? Give all the

2:42:05staff a round Give all the staff a round

2:42:07of applause. Thank you, Angela.

2:42:10[applause]

2:42:12I'm going to give each counselor a

2:42:14minute to close out. Uh I just thank all

2:42:17of you for coming tonight. Uh thank you

2:42:20for being part of this hearing. Uh we'll

2:42:23take all that we have. Tonight is the

2:42:27final night that the mayor and the MBTA

2:42:30will be taking comments to submit uh

2:42:33with their application. Uh we're going

2:42:35to make sure all of these comments a

2:42:37part of that submission so that uh your

2:42:41voice will be heard. This is not the

2:42:44last of these councils here. We're not

2:42:46closing out this council docket because

2:42:48we're going to work uh to make sure that

2:42:52you get a chance to hear from the MBTA

2:42:55general manager and the questions that

2:42:57folks have and concern. Just want to

2:43:00thank all you for a great night. Thank

2:43:02you for participating and uh we will

2:43:06have other meetings uh and we'll make

2:43:08sure everyone knows about them. Let me

2:43:10start with uh Councelor Flynn uh for a

2:43:14minute closing.

2:43:17>> Thank you, Councelor Co Pepper. Thank

2:43:18you, Council War. Thank you to the

2:43:21residents for being here. I stand with

2:43:24my two colleagues, Council War and

2:43:27Council Co Pepper

2:43:30in against this plan and for an

2:43:33alternative plan. And that alternative

2:43:36plan has to come from the residents. The

2:43:39alternative plan

2:43:41>> is about respecting the residents. It's

2:43:45about listening to residents

2:43:47and understanding that the best ideas

2:43:50don't come from city hall. The best

2:43:53ideas come from the residents. I do

2:43:56think as I mentioned at the very

2:43:58beginning, this is a civil rights issue.

2:44:02I think that has to be the main focus

2:44:06and we have to ensure that this

2:44:08community is respected and heard

2:44:12and I just don't think that it is heard

2:44:16at city hall and including on the Boston

2:44:19City Council. I don't necessarily

2:44:21believe my city council colleagues um

2:44:24think of this as a as a civil rights

2:44:27issue. I think they think of this as a

2:44:30transportation issue and we we still

2:44:33have a lot of work to do to

2:44:37educate city councilors about the impact

2:44:40this has on civil rights. Thank you very

2:44:43much. Honored to be here.

2:44:48>> Councelor

2:44:51is councelor Pepin

2:44:53>> councelor Santana.

2:44:55>> Um thank you Mr. Chair. I just want to

2:44:57thank you and um councelor Warel for um

2:45:00you know putting this um hearing

2:45:02together and for being the main filers.

2:45:04I want to thank the community who came

2:45:05out um showed out and testified. Um and

2:45:09you know I think we've learned a lot. I

2:45:10think there's a lot of work that had to

2:45:12do. Um as I mentioned in my questioning

2:45:14and my opening remarks um I think we

2:45:16need to completely change how we do our

2:45:18community process. um it's not it's

2:45:20currently not working and there's been

2:45:22one too many projects um where I've

2:45:24definitely been in community and and and

2:45:26hear the opposition um and things don't

2:45:29necessarily change. So um I think that

2:45:31needs to change but really appreciate

2:45:32the opportunity and the organizing. I

2:45:34also want to thank central staff um for

2:45:36all the work that you do and I'm looking

2:45:38forward to the work ahead. Thank you

2:45:41>> council war. Um I want to thank the

2:45:44chair. I want to thank um our staffs. I

2:45:46want to thank central staff. Um, but

2:45:48especially I want to thank everyone that

2:45:50has continued uh to show up. If this is

2:45:53your first year fighting against the

2:45:54center running bus, if you've been

2:45:56fighting for it um over years and years,

2:45:59just want to thank you for showing up in

2:46:01a real way for your community. Um, I

2:46:04take my job as an elected official, uh,

2:46:07very seriously [clears throat]

2:46:08knowing that I was elected by you, the

2:46:11residents, to work in partnership with

2:46:13you to bring the solutions that we can

2:46:16work together to make our neighborhoods

2:46:18better. Um, as Councelor Flynn has said,

2:46:21a lot of the good ideas, a lot of the

2:46:24great ideas, a lot of the best ideas

2:46:27come from neighbors, come from the

2:46:29residents. So that is why we need to

2:46:31work in partnership to make sure that we

2:46:34are bringing uh not only the best but

2:46:37the same level of service that is being

2:46:40uh given to other neighborhoods to our

2:46:42neighborhood and that's what you can

2:46:43expect from me every day as your elected

2:46:45official in city hall. So thank you uh

2:46:48for showing up. This fight is nowhere

2:46:50near over. So please stay engaged and

2:46:53stay tuned. Um there is a meeting

2:46:55tomorrow uh city council hearing on the

2:46:58Boston residents job policy at 2 pm

2:47:01which talks about the u requirements or

2:47:04the at the goals that we have as a city

2:47:06for every construction site. So please

2:47:09join in on that conversation but we also

2:47:11have to make sure that during this

2:47:13conversation when construction is going

2:47:16to happen for rail or a side running bus

2:47:18lane I'm going to claim it now that

2:47:20those jobs also go to our neighborhood.

2:47:23So, thank you again. Um, let's continue

2:47:24to fight.

2:47:25>> Thank you to everyone who stayed with us

2:47:27tonight, the residents who took time

2:47:29away from the family and work, the

2:47:31panelists, the community organizations,

2:47:34and my colleagues on the council. We

2:47:36came to Blue Hill Avenue because this is

2:47:39where the decisions will land. You want

2:47:42safety improvements. You want crossings

2:47:46that are ADA compliant. You want new

2:47:49lighting. You want trees. You want

2:47:51better bus stops. and you want them now.

2:47:54You do not want a center running bus

2:47:56lane that no one here has asked for. And

2:47:59you should not have to accept what they

2:48:02have told us we're getting in order to

2:48:05get what you deserve. This is a question

2:48:07of transportation equity. This is a

2:48:10civil rights question and it will not go

2:48:13away because this hearing ends and

2:48:16neither will we. Thank you for showing

2:48:19up tonight and for showing out and may

2:48:21God bless you.

2:48:28>> The meeting is now ending.

2:48:30[clears throat]

2:48:31>> Docket number 1340 and 1341.

2:48:35Thank you for all that you've done.