2026-10-26 - Assembly Finance Committee
Summary
Built from the video captions and the agenda text on the county's event page. No minutes were located. Auto-caption wording may contain errors.
- The committee's single item was a discussion of a possible transfer of funds from the general fund undesignated fund balance to the county's stabilization funds under Resolution 26-08. Roll call confirmed a quorum, with an alternate delegate sitting in.
- The County Administrator urged protecting the unreserved fund balance by moving a good share into stabilization once the auditors finish the FY26 books. The county has five stabilization funds (general, capital, emergency, revenue contingency and PFAS). The Administrator favored adding to general and capital stabilization, and not to emergency stabilization, which holds a little over $1.5 million.
- The Administrator noted the county has almost $80 million of deferred capital needs and about $15 million in revenue contingency stabilization. The PFAS liability is unknown, so that fund's eventual need cannot be estimated.
- Cash flow: early in the fiscal year the county pays roughly $11.5 million (retirement and health assessments, taken at a discount for early payment) before most revenue arrives, so some unreserved balance must stay available to avoid short-term borrowing.
- The Deputy Speaker said the September 15 date and 15 percent threshold in the resolution should be revisited, since the cash-flow squeeze lasts into winter. The Administrator said the audit is typically done around February or March, and the committee agreed that waiting for the auditors' certification is the sensible trigger.
- Several delegates and the Clerk said the overlap among the general, emergency and revenue stabilization funds is unclear. The Clerk searched the Assembly journal and found no definitive reason for having both general and emergency funds. Delegates wanted the purpose and permitted uses of each fund written down, and possibly the number of funds reduced (three or four rather than five).
- Next steps: the Administrator will draft a policy on stabilization fund use, purpose and the timing and percentage of transfers, and aim to bring it back to the committee within about 30 days. No vote was taken, and the meeting adjourned.
- Committee Chair is John Ohman; Vice Chair is James Killion. See FY2028 Budget Guidelines Resolution for the agenda item listed on the event page.
Agenda
The agenda link is on the county's document site and requires a login; only the agenda text on the county's event page (if any) was read, as summarized above.
Sources
- Event page: https://www.capecod.gov/event/assembly-of-delegates-standing-committee-on-finance-meeting-54/
- Agenda or business calendar (login required): https://barnstablecounty.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/Public/IQA2m26n4xLjT6_lIOJsi88-AVpBhjcHwk4jpv4EOZf8afU?e=CfLd4n
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfHtf5FWI5M (Barnstable County YouTube channel, live-stream entry)
- County meeting center: https://www.capecod.gov/county-government/meeting-center/
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
01:59Mhm.
03:54Mhm.
04:02ADA Nondiscrimination Coordinator at
04:10or visit www.capecod.gov. Members of the public
04:15Microsoft Teams. You can join on your computer
04:22that the Standing Committee on Finance may
04:26including votes on recommendations for action by
04:30public may participate at the discretion of the
04:37Yes, Mr. Clerk. Please proceed with the roll call.
04:48Delegate Gallagher? Here. I do know that Do Do
04:54Delegate O'Malley? Here. Uh Chair O'Malley? Uh
05:01Chair Killian? Here. And I do see Delegate King as
05:08you've got a quorum. Thank you, Mr. Clerk.
05:13a discussion regarding the potential transfer of
05:18to stabilization fund under resolution 26-08. And
05:29I don't see anyone else. So, uh Mr. Administrator,
05:38I would be happy to. So, I appreciate it. Um
05:47not being able to make the meeting. She's well,
05:54I am here. I do appreciate this discussion because
06:01I'm really adamant that the county protect its
06:09unreserved fund balance is placing that into
06:20we have [clears throat] currently we have 1 2 3 4
06:30five. Sorry, five stabilization funds. I could
06:39I don't think that's the I don't think that's the
06:47when we as soon as we get the auditors essentially
06:58then I think we want to make sure that we're
07:04balance to stabilization. One of the things that
07:11is um [clears throat] making sure that we we
07:19So, our revenues come in unlike towns on a very
07:27mostly quarterly basis for most towns.
07:32Our expenditures continue relatively stable for
07:39fiscal year. So, in the first part of the fiscal
07:46mostly to cover, um, our retirement
07:53uh, various things that that we get a discount,
08:01we spend those funds early in the fiscal year to
08:06dollars, give or take. Um, we don't see that
08:15January time frame. So, I know, uh, in order for
08:24because why would we? Why would we expend the
08:30borrowing, uh, we want to make sure we've got
08:36to be able to cover some of those significant
08:42um, so, aside from that, you know, as I
08:48uh, their work on for this FY26, uh, complete
08:57um, I, I will be, uh, certainly
09:02allocate money into, into stabilization.
09:10anyway, general stabilization, capital
09:14fund referred to as emergency stabilization,
09:20stabilization, and we've got PFAS, uh, a PFAS
09:28the law changed in Massachusetts a number
09:33specific stabilization funds for very specific
09:41revenue stabilization um all make a lot of sense
09:49the difference between general stabilization
09:56you know, when when I worked on a town level,
10:04tap a fund in the event of a an what an emergency,
10:12your local receipts, or a dramatic decrease in
10:19so that was the purpose of general stabilization.
10:25stabilization was created uh back in 2020, that
10:31history of that. That may have been a result of
10:38of exactly what the purpose was of emergency
10:47I don't know right now the balance hovers around
10:54I probably would not recommend putting more money
11:02just sort of my my outlook on things. Um but I
11:10a good uh destination for a chunk of funds. I
11:1880 million dollars worth of deferred capital. We
11:24those deferred capital needs um without uh again,
11:32state reimbursement for some of those. Um,
11:38capital stabilization. Uh, I think you've got
11:46pushing almost 15 million. And uh, and PFAS
11:56Mayor Ben Paul or or uh, Paul Rosala or
12:02one of the last meetings that we don't really
12:08obligation will be. But right now it's it's a
12:17Um, there there is no way to essentially
12:24the contamination PFAS contamination. Um, so we've
12:33analysis, you know, research uh, when it comes
12:41such a moving dynamic I think at this point that
12:49or or even approximately what uh, our our total
12:56So, so I guess that's my long way of saying um,
13:05uh, you're on the right track. I'm on the right
13:10uh, allocate some of these unreserved fund
13:15Um, and you know, those are basically my
13:22capital stabilization I think are are going to
13:30So, um I I don't see anyone with a with a
13:36you you know, you mentioned about um sort of end
13:41quarter as um a time when we do disperse funds
13:48and you want to be able to use the funds in
13:54correct? Is that that what you No, that's
14:00Once you put that money into stabilization, we
14:05best way to think about it. But you want to make
14:10sure that for that period of the year where we've
14:15beginning of our fiscal year we want to make
14:21um in, unres-left in unreserved fund balance,
14:26once that Once we bridge that and we get into
14:33know, then it's a different story. Then then we're
14:38for the cash flow. If that makes sense. It it
14:44of of stabilization funds we have. Do you see a
14:50remember we've had discussions about the creation
14:54I think it was done as a way to sort of track
14:59you know, specific things were coming out of a
15:04stabilization, and it made it a little
15:08to provide the funds that we were anticipating
15:15would you pare that down in some way to
15:21Uh Uh, that's a That's a great
15:26I think setting up a stabilization fund for
15:32cities and towns have cried out for that for,
15:39uh, legislation state legislation back in the
15:46for cities and towns to do that. And, and so we,
15:51thing. Um, I only question, you know, that what's
15:58between general stabilization and emergency
16:03in my book should not ever be touched uh, unless
16:10could be an economic downturn severe enough to to
16:18again, you have to define that. You know, that
16:24a stabilization fund is defining how you're
16:31seems to me to be sort of duplicating what gen
16:37I think as you mentioned I think that
16:41in the Delaware Valley can probably remember it
16:45COVID that that we that we created that fund and
16:51Anyway, I will stop talking and I will unleash the
17:00I don't know if I like the
17:05phrasing here uh but let me I've got a few things.
17:13state the different stabilization funds but I
17:19for me, um without going in more depth about this,
17:28an overlap of the general fund, the emergency,
17:34so, I mean, revenue stabilization is there in
17:38that can happen in general, too, all right?
17:44at another meeting, but I think all of us are
17:49let's deal with the transfer of funds to because
17:56uh not too long ago. And um there seems to be
18:05Mr. Dutton, we got your input on that.
18:09about how we deal with this, and we had
18:14not again, it wasn't an automatic. It was the time
18:21We can't set up something automatic. So, that
18:26and we said when it exceeds 15%, and we got
18:32the administration put in its budget book, which
18:38all right? So, we didn't pull these
18:42Now, if we're going to look at this, though, we
18:47hearing from you, it sounds as if you're saying
18:54uh problem until somewhere January, February. So,
19:01good date to try to make this transfer or to even
19:06that now that we're looking at it again. But, the
19:13to that, you you mentioned we shouldn't perhaps
19:18are we talking about waiting until the auditors
19:25before we think about the transfer? Because
19:30Um I don't I don't think we're going to have an
19:38or rather the FY 26 fiscal year,
19:44the audit shouldn't take until uh should not take
19:50you know, to get the auditors in here to have
19:55have a discussion with the commissioners.
20:00for the most part, completed or much earlier than
20:05that that that audit is important to us is that we
20:12every city and in town, the Department of Revenue
20:18with counties. So, so we rely on the auditors' uh
20:26uh to make sure that we we have done everything
20:31everything right in terms of, you know, the
20:38uh I don't want anybody relying on what I say to
20:44balance and transfer that into stabilization. Um
20:50uh opine on that and make sure that that, you
20:56certified, which is a municipal term, but for lack
21:02auditors have certified uh what we have so that
21:08where we're putting it. Um so that that's, you
21:15go back and look. I know uh that September 15th
21:23there was some definition confusion about the 15%.
21:32municipal in the municipal world is the 15%10 to
21:39is kind of a target. Um and auditors will tell you
21:45Um it making sure that that stabilization fund
21:56fund budget in the municipal world is kind of
22:01and look, but I I do apologize if there was some
22:0715th date came from came from us, I you know, we
22:15um, I think the important part is that, you
22:20making sure that once once we "quote unquote
22:26once we certify our free cash (to put
22:30um that, that that money is spread spread
22:37that we all think are the the appropriate ones to
22:45I think the 15th date did come from you,
22:50what where it came from, etc. I'm here to talk
22:56to me, we do need certain things out to do
23:00whenever anyone turns around and thinks about
23:05All right, that's not right. So, we need to have
23:12So, you're suggesting one of them is we wait till
23:18I'm a familiar with municipal financing as well.
23:24Revenue certifying is our auditors. But, I I'm
23:32you're telling me it's sooner than that that
23:37financials. Is it March? Do you have an idea when
23:44it's in the February-March time frame and I I
23:50policy and I I don't think that this is referenced
23:54I would not object. In fact, I could bring, you
24:00but I certainly wouldn't object to uh developing,
24:05you know, based upon exactly when the
24:10um, and when, when the, the commissioners
24:15on a transfer into stabilization. I, I think
24:21Yeah, and and I think so, too. All right, um
24:28thinking about? Is it Does it make sense to say I
24:34of 15%of the operating budget. So, we're
24:42undesignated general fund balance as a cushion on
24:48Maybe there's a better metric and um for us to use
24:56All right, a target for what the amount
25:03ought to be the at least target starting point
25:11stabilization fund buckets. And I think before we
25:18what those buckets are. All right? And then we can
25:24is there something you you could come back to us
25:29sit down and and have a revise our resolution
25:36assembly can work can live with. And we're all
25:42Absolutely. I think I think um in fact, I
25:51well, we are working on general update
25:56make sure that this is one of them. Um but
26:01sort of readdress that uh that
26:07I can come back to you with some policy
26:15Uh Delegate Mally, you had your hand up but
26:19to have some comments, questions? I did. I think I
26:25it but I uh in listening to Administrator Guttman,
26:32clearly uh under what circumstances each of these
26:40aware here that there's you know, the emergency
26:45emergency fund if uh our general revenues from
26:51general that's the revenue reserve [clears throat]
26:56get really clear about what are the margins of
27:01That would because otherwise we're going to
27:05a transfer. And it would be quite [clears throat]
27:10from that bucket. That's all. And I think Delegate
27:17Uh Clerk Fletcher, your hand is up.
27:21Um I'll try to be brief. I believe it or not
27:29Administrator Dutton, when this got passed
27:34and I couldn't remember why there were two. And I
27:39day that the Assembly passed it for a previous
27:44I could see our vice chair saying, "I prefer
27:49more than one." I still couldn't
27:54that um ratings agencies like to see these
27:59which is why we have a PFOS one and a capital one.
28:04emergency and that. I I do remember at the time we
28:10other things that were going on. I think the sense
28:16a true emergency before you would you would raid
28:22would use the general stabilization fund to
28:27there was an idea that well, if we have to have
28:33that that's the fund for that and the rest
28:39if you were hoping that as a clerk the archive
28:45Just just just thought I'd throw that in
28:50Well, look Fletcher, I mean I again I think going
28:57was a matter of putting limited funds in these
29:02"Oh, we've got all this money in this account.
29:07capped. So it will be used for a specific
29:16pre-COVID, I mean it was a million dollars, I
29:24And if you can remember this
29:29when the county had built up a significant
29:34increases in valuation real estate. So Um you've
29:39O'Malley has as well to remember when the idea of
29:45funds would have been ludicrous because we
29:50I didn't want to intervene in the debate. I
29:54on it faster than I thought and didn't find what
29:59that I that I couldn't find a a definitive
30:05Deputy Speaker, your hand is up again. Yeah. Yeah,
30:10makes me more in favor of what Delegate O'Malley
30:17and and we need to put down a very easy history
30:24question what what why what were we thinking then?
30:30and in this budget cycle we've got to do
30:35from undesignated into stabilization funds, this
30:41think it's what it needs. It needs to be tightened
30:47Um and perhaps um as I said before, uh too many
30:54overlap of some of this. So, let's let's get it
30:5910 years from now, people sitting in our seats can
31:05record as to what that was for." Um rather than
31:11I went back and I couldn't really tell. Um that's
31:18So, given that your your suggestion being uh you
31:23looking back. But ultimately, the goal is to just
31:31to understand. Yeah, if we don't Yeah, we don't we
31:36make it and I don't think we can get lower than
31:42but I mean, three or four, but it's certainly
31:50questions? I don't see anybody with a hand
31:55Uh Delegate King, do you have
31:59an alternate on this, but you're
32:05Uh no, I I I I really don't have
32:09I I'm just wanting to listen in and and and and
32:15Okay. Well, well, you can, but it seems like
32:21Um Administrator Dutton, do you have anything
32:28would like us to discuss in the future? Where What
32:32as? Um I think I think given uh the invitation uh
32:39uh or I would propose drafting some some policy
32:47and purpose. And as I think uh uh Delegate
32:54right metrics or developing the right metrics
33:02And I think in the in the meantime, we'll
33:08at least when they were created back in
33:132020. We'll try to figure out, you know, what
33:19any history on that. 2020 unfortunately
33:25so it's challenging to try to find some history to
33:31you and the commissioners with some policy around
33:38it will be), well, we can adopt that and be a
33:44how we're going to save the money and then
33:49So that's what I I will do. And if I might
33:55I think that the timing issue on the undesignated
34:01Uh since you we want I'm sorry. Because you
34:08when these allocations are going to be made
34:14as you know, what percentage of of our
34:20for each of the stabilization funds. And and
34:26decision to override policy, but you know,
34:34So administrator Dalton, what sort of time frame
34:39you know, coming up to the end of the
34:42want to going to want to try and
34:47I would say the short answer is yes. I would
34:52a consensus within the next 30 days and we have as
34:59to the financial policies already. So I don't
35:05internally. So So I don't why don't I make that
35:11resolved and back to the finance committee
35:18Any other comments, questions regarding timeline
35:27And I see absolutely none. If there's nothing
35:33Excellent. Thank you everybody. Very
```*
