2026-10-15 - Planning and Zoning Commission
Summary
Built from the town's posted agenda and the unapproved (draft) minutes, which were read, and from the video's YouTube auto-generated captions. Names and figures may be misheard; voice votes are not tallied.
- Public hearing on the 2026-2036 Plan of Conservation and Development, organized around the themes Protect, Develop and Enjoy. Town Planner John Guszkowski presented the process and draft; the current plan was adopted in 2015 and the update folds in the town's earlier open space and conservation plan. See Plan of Conservation and Development 2026-2036.
- Demographic points: population has grown from about 3,000 in the 1960s to about 8,000 and is projected flat; the town is older than the state average; about 85 percent of housing is single-family; about 540 residents both live and work in town.
- The goals and actions are summarized in an implementation table naming lead boards, costs, priorities and timelines; members agreed to sort it by lead entity and send each board its own extract.
- A resident with fire-service experience asked for a paragraph recognizing the town's three fire departments and emergency management. William Rewinski supported noting volunteer staffing, funding and insurance concerns. Guszkowski offered to add a volunteerism section acknowledging fire companies; no objection.
- Joseph Adiletta challenged a draft housing-gap figure (945 ownership and 465 rental units, attributed to a 2022 affordable housing plan), saying his own review found only a 49-unit deficit for extremely-low-income households. Guszkowski tentatively agreed to remove it unless it can be confirmed.
- The hearing was kept open and continued to the regular meeting on 2026-11-19 (carried).
- Minutes of 2026-10-01 approved; Dwight Ryniewicz abstained.
- Zoning enforcement report: new accessory buildings and garages and one accessory dwelling unit; one erosion and sedimentation bond released; the Scranton Village owners delivered stormwater bonds and were expected to file a special permit application within the week (see Scranton Shops Change of Use).
- A public hearing for the Jeffco Fibres storage and warehouse addition at the former Crabtree & Evelyn property was announced for November (see Jeffco Fibres Warehouse Addition).
- The Planner reported that the town meeting approved a citation ordinance allowing direct fines for land-use, scenic-road and historic-preservation violations (see September 2026 Special Town Meeting Ordinances).
- Discussion of the regional housing growth plan: a letter from the regional council of governments to First Selectman Chandler L. Paquette was read; the state is to set target housing numbers around the turn of the year and the regional body will allocate them, and the town will have to decide how to take part. The Planner suggested preparing through existing plans, a zoning review, a developable land inventory and infrastructure capacity. The process was described as incentive-based.
- The budget report was routine. The meeting adjourned.
Agenda
Agenda PDF posted; see Sources.
Sources
- Agenda: https://www.woodstockct.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10152026-569
- Draft minutes: https://www.woodstockct.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_10152026-569
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnEZfGfZ3lU (Town of Woodstock YouTube channel, 1:03:51)
- Agenda Center: https://www.woodstockct.gov/agendacenter
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:00Um
00:03We will uh first do our roll call.
00:06Um
00:07Jared Alaleta
00:08>> Joseph Alaleta
00:09>> David Morris
00:10>> Amy Ronan again
00:11>> Aaron Farbo
00:13>> John Day
00:15>> Online folks
00:17>> Doug Porter
00:19>> Mark Blackmer
00:21>> Dwight Rowanowitz
00:25>> We'll designate Dwight, um John and Amy
00:27as
00:29the alternates today.
00:31And we'll go on to the pledge of
00:32allegiance if you please.
00:38>> I pledge allegiance
00:39>> to the flag
00:40>> of the United States of America.
00:43>> And to the republic for which it stands,
00:45>> one nation under God, indivisible, with
00:49liberty and justice for all.
00:58>> Hey,
00:59um
01:00I would just like to thank all the hard
01:02work that the POCD committee did and
01:06will come in putting this draft
01:07together. Um
01:10I think we really worked hard to make it
01:12actually a
01:13document that we can work with and work
01:16>> [clears throat]
01:18>> work through. Um use it for a more of a
01:20guideline than we have in the past.
01:22That's our That was our goal. So, thank
01:23you very much for all those people that
01:25did that.
01:26Um
01:28Do we have any citizens' comments not on
01:31the agenda tonight and what's on the
01:32agenda tonight?
01:35Hearing none, we'll move on to um
01:38meeting minutes. Um we approved the
01:40meeting minutes from September 17th last
01:43um meeting. So, we only need to approve
01:46the meeting minutes from October 1st.
01:49Um we can have a motion.
01:51>> So moved.
01:52>> Second.
01:53>> Second.
01:54>> Um any uh any discussion?
02:00Hearing none, uh, all in favor?
02:02>> Aye.
02:03>> Aye.
02:05>> Any opposed?
02:07Any abstentions?
02:08>> I'll abstain from the, uh, vote.
02:12>> Thank you. That was Dwight.
02:13Thank you.
02:15Okay, now we're going to open, uh,
02:17public hearing on the plan of
02:19conservation and development.
02:21Um,
02:24I'm sure [clears throat] that, um,
02:25everybody has looked through it and
02:27we're just going to
02:29First, we'll ask for any comments from
02:31the commissioners.
02:33>> Well, one I'd like to echo your comment,
02:36Dave, about, uh, a lot of the work that
02:38went into it. I think,
02:39particularly Amy, was in charge of doing
02:41a lot of, uh, work with different
02:43groups. It's, uh, very helpful in
02:45pulling people together.
02:47A lot of commissions and boards in town
02:49helped put all these comments together.
02:51So, uh,
02:53make it
02:53reflects well on what the community
02:56wants, uh, wants to see in the next, uh,
02:5810 years or so.
03:00I'll save other comments, through the
03:02draft, as we get into into the draft.
03:04But, that's it.
03:06>> Any other comments from the
03:07commissioners?
03:08John, did you want to, um,
03:11kind of guide us through this or did you
03:13>> Sure. Yeah, no, I have I have a little
03:15presentation prepared that if you'll
03:17bear with me,
03:18um,
03:20I've gotten it down to about an hour and
03:2145 minutes. So, uh,
03:24we should we should be
03:26>> You you'll be talking to an empty room.
03:30>> Uh, okay. Can I this this hopefully
03:32won't won't take very long, but I did
03:33want to give give a little bit of
03:35background for folks online or folks,
03:37um, in the room
03:38what we've gone through, um, in
03:39preparing this plan. Can you see the
03:41screen?
03:43>> Yes.
03:44>> Oh, the so it looks like a PowerPoint
03:45presentation?
03:47>> Yes.
03:47>> Okay, great.
03:49Um,
03:50so, just to begin, uh, I wanted to give
03:52a little bit of background exactly what
03:53is a plan of conservation and
03:54development and why the town is doing
03:58this at this point and why it's come to
03:59the planning and zoning commission. So,
04:02per state law, state statutes,
04:04specifically Connecticut General Statute
04:06Section 8-23, requires that every
04:08municipality in the state prepare and
04:10update this master plan every 10 years.
04:14The plan is an advisory document that is
04:17that is
04:18the responsibility of the planning
04:19commission. In the case of Woodstock and
04:21many other towns, we have a joint
04:23planning and zoning commission. But it
04:25is the responsibility of that commission
04:26to prepare and update it. The statute
04:30has a great number of
04:32considerations that it must include,
04:36including things like the future land
04:37use. Again, it's a 10-year plan, so what
04:39will the town look like in terms of its
04:41use of land over the next 10 years.
04:43Housing, particularly affordable
04:44housing, drinking water supplies,
04:46cluster development, soil preservation,
04:49transportation infrastructure, we must
04:51we must consider how we're growing, our
04:53economic trends, our our population
04:55trends.
04:56And then there are a number of things
04:58that that also must be considered,
05:00including community needs for energy,
05:03protection of resources, particularly
05:04agricultural resources, and then other
05:07things like sea level rise concerns and
05:09and technology needs. So, all of these
05:12things need to be considered in the plan
05:14of conservation and development
05:16as it is prepared by the by the town.
05:19How a plan is used.
05:22First, it is meant to coordinate and
05:25communicate with the state and regional
05:28plans of conservation and development.
05:29The state, as you can see on the screen,
05:31develops its plan every 5 years and is
05:34responsible for guiding the investments
05:37and and broad policies of the state of
05:39Connecticut.
05:40And these plans are meant to coordinate
05:42with each other.
05:44Currently, that region, Capital Region,
05:46I'm sorry, the uh Northeast Connecticut
05:49Council of Governments does not have an
05:50active plan of conservation and
05:52development. They are actually beginning
05:53that process right now.
05:56Um and so we're we're getting our plan
05:58in ahead of theirs, so that can actually
06:00serve to inform their plan in terms of
06:02priorities for um this portion of the
06:04the region.
06:05Um any um municipal investments that a
06:09town makes, if it's going to be um
06:10buying land, selling land, making uh
06:13significant um investments in municipal
06:15facilities, extension of infrastructure,
06:17new roads, new bridges, new water lines,
06:21all of those things must be compared to
06:24and um
06:25found in harmony with the plan of
06:27conservation and development, which is
06:28why we have to consider so many of these
06:30uh sort of future-looking things.
06:33Um as well as if this commission, as
06:35it's in its zoning role, is going to be
06:38adopting new zoning regulations in the
06:40way we treat different types of land
06:42use, different development patterns um
06:44over the next 10 years, those also have
06:46to be found largely in harmony with the
06:49plan of conservation and development. So
06:50in short, this plan is to establish
06:52goals that then the town, through its
06:54investments, through its regulations,
06:56then implements over the next decade.
06:59When we seek uh grant money, if we're
07:01going to buy open space, if we want to,
07:03you know, do economic development
07:05grants, um infrastructure extension
07:07grants, things like that, it very much
07:10behooves the town to have those
07:12investments reflected as priorities in
07:14the plan of conservation and
07:15development, and it will greatly assist
07:17our efforts if we can point to
07:18something, say, "Look, this is a
07:20priority for the town. Can you, state
07:22government, federal government, private
07:23foundation, help us to reach this goal
07:26through your funding?" Those sorts of
07:28things uh are very important. And then,
07:30of course, to demonstrate our statutory
07:31compliance in saying that we are in fact
07:34providing for affordable housing
07:36opportunities, that we are providing for
07:38energy um resilience in our community,
07:40that we are planning for future growth.
07:44Again, the state the state plan um
07:47MECOG doesn't have a plan currently. The
07:49state plan um which was adopted last
07:51year does have um areas we're looking at
07:55what's called the um locational guide
07:57map of Woodstock and it it flags areas.
08:00Again, it's a plan of conservation and
08:02development. So, the broadly speaking,
08:03the green areas on a plan like this are
08:06are intended broadly for preservation,
08:08conservation, lower impact development,
08:11or you know, protection of some type.
08:13And then the yellow and pink and orange
08:14areas on this are meant for a
08:16development or increased activity. And
08:18and on the Woodstock map, obviously,
08:21it's it's generally a rural forested
08:23agricultural area. The state sees it as
08:26such. Uh and then a couple of activity
08:29areas. Basically, you know, South
08:30Woodstock and Woodstock Hill and then
08:32East Woodstock
08:34are seen as sort of community centers
08:36that are suitable for some level of
08:38growth.
08:41Um
08:43despite the fact that the state um
08:44identifies a whole lot of things that a
08:46town must consider as part of its plan
08:48of conservation and development, there
08:49actually is very little in the way of
08:51guidance for how a municipality should
08:53prepare a plan. Um and so,
08:55municipalities are really sort of on
08:57their own and can kind of chart their
08:59own course for how to to go about this.
09:01The plan um in in Woodstock um has been
09:04a couple of years coming.
09:06Um I sort of stepped in in the middle uh
09:09of the process working with you guys for
09:10the last year plus.
09:12Um the current plan was adopted in 2015.
09:15So, we're a little bit behind um the the
09:17deadline.
09:19Um however, the state has given us uh
09:21that that extension to to finish this.
09:24Um there was a POCD committee
09:26established and and as the chair pointed
09:28out, um Amy Monahan has chaired that
09:31group um for the last 2 years or so
09:33working initially with um MECOG and
09:35Julia Fay who was your consulting
09:37planner prior to my um, work with you.
09:40Um, there was a a lot of conversation,
09:42community conversation. There were
09:43targeted stakeholder surveys, you know,
09:45the agricultural community, economic
09:46development, seniors. Um,
09:50all, you know, were were had had
09:52specific um, surveys and questionnaires.
09:55And then, um, again, about a little
09:57under a year and a half ago, we were
09:58brought in, Take It Planning Policy
10:00Group, to help um, sort of take over
10:02from Nikog and Delia and uh, to help
10:05bring this process to conclusion. We,
10:07um, essentially at that time kind of
10:10started a little bit from scratch and
10:12established essentially a vision. Um,
10:15which a a an approach starting with a a
10:18broad vision for what we would like to
10:20see in Woodstock and then a thematic
10:22approach. Um, and particularly what
10:24we'll get into sort of the three
10:25categories of those of those themes. Um,
10:29and uh, the the other major thing that
10:31we did
10:33was that the state the town had for many
10:35years, um, a separate document called
10:37the plan of open space and conservation,
10:40which was developed by the conservation
10:41commission back I around 2003 or so.
10:45Um,
10:46maybe a little bit earlier than that.
10:48Um, which was in need of update and so
10:50it was decided, um, in this process that
10:52we would update those two plans together
10:55and incorporate them. So, essentially
10:57the plan of open space and conservation
10:59became largely the the first half of the
11:02the plan of conservation and development
11:03update.
11:05And then the subcommittee, uh, again,
11:07chaired by by Amy, um, sort of went
11:10through chapter by chapter, section by
11:11section, drafting this, reviewing this.
11:14Um, seeking input, uh, and then as the
11:17the draft came together, it was brought
11:19back to the Planning and Zoning
11:20Commission, which has the ultimate
11:21responsibility for reviewing and
11:22adopting. Um, and and we scheduled this
11:25public hearing a couple of months ago.
11:26So, that broadly speaking, that was the
11:28process.
11:29Um, I can stop right here. Amy, do you
11:31want to add anything about about the the
11:33process?
11:35>> Uh no, not at this time.
11:37>> Okay.
11:38Uh didn't mean to put you on the spot,
11:40but um so
11:42first um just a little bit of
11:44background. So, you know, one of the
11:46things that we're we are asked to
11:47consider in developing a plan of
11:48conservation and development is sort of
11:50who we are and where we are
11:52demographically, economically,
11:53population-wise. What are there are
11:56there important trends? Where do we fit
11:58in terms of the state, in terms of the
11:59market? Um so, we do have a little bit
12:01of initial analysis. None of nothing
12:04here will surprise members of the
12:05commission, probably members of the
12:07public either. We know who we are in
12:09Woodstock. Um but, you know, the town
12:11has grown from a very small rural
12:13community in the '60s
12:15uh when we only had about 3,000 people
12:17and we're now up over um 8,000.
12:20However, population over the last 15
12:23years or so has been relatively flat. Um
12:27and current projections are that that
12:29population will continue to remain to be
12:31about flat. Our growth rates are slowing
12:33down. Our our you know, our population
12:35is aging somewhat. We're not having as
12:37many kids and our school is not growing.
12:39So, we're projected to stay right around
12:418,000 people for the next 15 years or
12:43so. This is again, that's a projection.
12:45It's not you know, it's it's not locked
12:48in stone. We can certainly change
12:50direction. We could grow, we could
12:51shrink, but that the current projection
12:53has us being about flat.
12:56Um our age distribution, as you can see
12:59on the in the chart in the upper right,
13:00we are a little bit older than the state
13:03in general. We have more of our uh
13:05percent by percentage, we have more
13:07people in the 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and um
13:1270 to 79 population in Woodstock than in
13:15the state overall, which has a few more
13:17very older you know, significantly older
13:19people and and the the youth population
13:22is a little bit um larger in the state,
13:24particularly young adults, 20 to 40. Um
13:28Woodstock is significantly smaller than
13:30the state numbers.
13:32Uh and we are a little bit less diverse
13:34in terms of our ethnic
13:36our racial makeup than the state or even
13:38Northeast Connecticut. We're
13:39predominantly white Caucasian about 86%
13:43with another 12% Hispanic or Latino
13:46which is you know certainly lower than
13:47the state's numbers of 64 and 17 for
13:51instance. Again,
13:52sort of who we are. We we recognize
13:54this.
13:55Um household sizes have declined over
13:58the last 20 years or so.
14:00We were up over two and a half people
14:02per household and now we are under two
14:04and a half people per household. Um the
14:06this is sort of echoed in trends across
14:09the state although
14:11more precipitous in Northeast
14:12Connecticut and Woodstock than in the
14:14state overall which stayed right around
14:16two and a half the whole way. And and
14:18what that means is that even though our
14:21population is relatively flat, our
14:23number of households could grow because
14:27households are smaller and that still
14:28reflects a potential demand for new
14:31housing.
14:32Um
14:34in terms of our housing stock, we are
14:36largely a
14:37a owner
14:39occupied particularly we are very
14:40heavily single family 85% of our housing
14:43stock is single family residence which
14:45is then all owner occupied. Our
14:47multi-family tends to be 79%
14:50renter occupied. And both of those
14:52levels are higher than the cog or the
14:54state in general.
14:57In terms of our economics, Woodstock I'm
15:00going to avoid calling Woodstock a
15:02bedroom community. However, Woodstock
15:04does tend to export more people in terms
15:08of jobs than it imports.
15:10Only about 500 residents 540 residents
15:14both live and work in Woodstock. Another
15:171100 come to Woodstock from elsewhere
15:20but more than 3500 people who live in
15:23Woodstock go elsewhere for employment
15:26for employment. So we are we tend to be
15:29a community that is more residential
15:31than business focused in terms of our in
15:33terms of our makeup.
15:36In relatively good shape financially in
15:38terms of our municipal expenditures, our
15:40grand list, our total indebtedness. And
15:42some of the the key employers that again
15:45would surprise no one line master,
15:47Rogers Corp, Northeast placement. These
15:48are all relatively large employment
15:51employers in Woodstock.
15:54Then getting into the actual vision and
15:56again a lot of the work that was done in
15:592024 and 2025
16:02before I sort of took over the effort
16:05was in developing a lot of that data and
16:07developing a lot of that input. And so
16:09we took that data and input and
16:11basically sculpted a vision statement.
16:14That identified what Woodstock wanted to
16:17be and how it saw itself over the next
16:19decade. And so I'm going to take a
16:21moment and just read the whole statement
16:23if you don't mind. And you know, feel
16:26free to close your eyes and and and
16:27think of Woodstock as we read this.
16:30The town of Woodstock planning and
16:31zoning commission. In developing this
16:34update to the 2015 plan of conservation
16:36and development is led by a strong
16:38commitment to preserving and enhancing
16:41the historic scenic rural and
16:44agricultural landscape of Woodstock.
16:46It is also led by its intent to promote
16:49actions and policies that will encourage
16:52a community with wider and more
16:53diversified opportunities for homes.
16:56Agriculture.
16:58And appropriate industry. The town will
17:00seek to balance its stewardship efforts
17:03with the need of the community to grow
17:05and allow its current and future
17:07residents to live, work, learn, and
17:09thrive here in a way that fundamentally
17:12respects Woodstock heritage.
17:14We envision a Woodstock.
17:16That protects the natural, cultural, and
17:18historic resources that make Woodstock a
17:20treasured place,
17:22develops its land and its economy in a
17:24way that expands opportunity in
17:26Woodstock in a sustainable way without
17:28sacrificing our history or our future,
17:32enjoys the abundance of resources and
17:34opportunities, and strengthens the
17:36common ties that draw the community
17:38together.
17:39Over the coming decade, Woodstock will
17:41continue to welcome the thoughtful
17:43welcome thoughtful development in town
17:45balanced with a continued conservation
17:47of natural and cultural resources that
17:50are essential to the realization of this
17:51vision.
17:56And that's an important statement that
17:58very much um formed the basis of
18:01everything that is to come uh in this
18:03plan.
18:06And so you'll note that we highlighted
18:09three key themes and in that vision
18:11statement. And those are protect,
18:14develop, and enjoy.
18:17Um and because of those things, so we we
18:20looked at the what do we want to do in
18:21Woodstock? We want to protect. And the
18:23the the key elements that went into that
18:25portion, that theme, is elements of
18:28soil, water, air, wildlife, open space,
18:31agricultural resources, and our history.
18:34Those are things we want to protect.
18:36When we look at the the theme of
18:37develop, we want to look at again
18:40agricultural development, housing,
18:42infrastructure, our schools, our
18:44resilience in the way that we grow.
18:46And in the theme of enjoy, we looked at
18:49things like our town resources, our
18:50recreation, our community organizations,
18:53and our multiple boards and commissions
18:55and people who are dedicated to making
18:56Woodstock a great place.
18:58And so those three themes formed the
19:01basically the skeleton, the the the the
19:03um infrastructure of how the rest of the
19:06plan was structured.
19:09So we we basically broke the rest of the
19:11plan down into those three three key
19:12topics. So, under protect we again we
19:16looked at conservation. We incorporated
19:18the plan of open space and conservation
19:20and updated that. I'm sorry, that was it
19:22in 2001. So, it was a little earlier
19:24than I thought.
19:26Um and looking at all sorts of things,
19:28our water resources, our soils, our key
19:30watersheds, our drinking water supplies,
19:32our natural resources, our uninterrupted
19:35forest blocks. Uh and particularly our
19:37our key agricultural resources. Since we
19:39examined all of these elements and
19:41identified the things that are necessary
19:44to protect and the methods in which to
19:46protect them. So, we looked at our
19:47water, our soils, our climate
19:49resilience, looking at things like doing
19:51better and and having better access to
19:53mapping. Looking at things like green
19:56infrastructure and um
19:58uh low-impact development. So,
20:00stormwater management. Um and certainly
20:03the elements of water conservation,
20:05energy conservation, uh riparian
20:07buffers, and things like that. All of
20:09those elements were considered and
20:11prioritized in the protect area.
20:14We also certainly looked at our key
20:17um land covers, our farmlands, our
20:19forests, our open spaces. Um looking at
20:22the the protection that we've done in
20:24terms of agricultural preservation,
20:26forest land preservation, uh our PA 490.
20:30Um and then we made some recommendations
20:32on prioritizing acquisitions. What types
20:35of land should we be investing in
20:37protecting over the long term? Uh where
20:39are they located? What characteristics
20:40do they have? Um how do we support our
20:43working farms, our working forests, as
20:45well as our wildlife corridors? So,
20:47those things were prioritized and
20:49identified in that portion of the
20:50chapter.
20:52And then some of the more human scale
20:54things, our historic character, um our
20:57historic district on on Woodstock Hill
20:59and our historic um properties,
21:01resources, vistas, our stone walls, our
21:04scenic roads. Um and and not is this
21:08about protecting those things through,
21:10you know, easements, through open space
21:12acquisition, but it's also about
21:13stewarding those things to make sure
21:15that a farm, once protected, doesn't
21:18just grow up to become a a forest, that
21:20it be retains its active agricultural
21:23uses, and that the farms the farmers
21:25that that farm those lands
21:27can thrive.
21:29Um, and so those were the elements that
21:31were included in protect.
21:36Then in the in the develop theme,
21:38um, we talked a lot about housing, um,
21:41which is, again, housing is sort of the
21:44major human interface with the town of
21:46Woodstock.
21:47Um, we recognize that Woodstock is
21:49extremely um,
21:52uh,
21:53dependent on its single-family
21:54residences. Um,
21:56you know, we don't have a particularly
21:58uh, high-density uh, development, so
22:00we're we're generally dependent on our
22:02on our automobiles to get from place to
22:04place.
22:05Um, and we don't have a lot of uh,
22:08higher-density multi-family mixed-use
22:10opportunities that would allow people to
22:13um, not have not be in their cars uh,
22:16getting from place to place.
22:17And so we looked at the opportunities
22:20for new residents, for lower-income
22:22residents, for aging residents, people
22:24who are looking to downsize, um, and and
22:26trying to find opportunities for um,
22:29new housing uh, choices in Woodstock.
22:34Also, we and obviously we we talk about
22:36agriculture as a conservation priority,
22:39but agriculture is one of the major
22:41business uh, sectors in Woodstock, and
22:43so the development of agriculture
22:46as a a business entity, as an economic
22:48driver, re- remains incredibly
22:50important. So, you know, farmland sort
22:52of spans the conservation and the
22:54development end of things.
22:56Uh, and that includes, you know, making
22:58sure that our regulations are in place
22:59to allow farmers to expand the the
23:02potential uses on their property and
23:04looking at
23:05agritourism opportunities
23:07and agribusiness opportunities both on
23:09farm and in our community in general.
23:12And then leveraging those resources, the
23:13Woodstock Fair, the
23:15you know, farm to farm to table, farm
23:18stands. Um
23:20and coordinating our small business
23:22promotion that that is also very rural
23:24and and agricultural based.
23:29And then finally looking at those
23:30infrastructural systems that maintain
23:33our ability to
23:35to function and to be interconnected. So
23:37our road and transportation systems
23:40making sure that our um our roads and
23:43infrastructures are resilient and are of
23:46high quality and are safe. That also
23:48looking at things like bicycle and
23:51pedestrian access and bicycle and
23:52pedestrian safety. Um
23:55telecommunications towers and and other
23:58kind of communications infrastructure,
24:00broadband internet. All of these
24:02elements
24:03are critical to to Woodstock working
24:05together and and being able to grow and
24:07thrive as well as our current
24:09infrastructure, our public water lines
24:11and our public sewer lines which for the
24:14for the time being and for the
24:15projectable future are you know, limited
24:17to that area of of Harrisville and South
24:19Woodstock, a little bit on Woodstock
24:21Hill to serve the academy.
24:23And so we you know, analyzed our ability
24:26to expand that and on our you know,
24:28relative lack of interest in expanding
24:30and basically looking to preserve and
24:32maintain that infrastructure as it is.
24:38Then we get into the third of the three
24:40themes which is enjoy which is I think
24:42kind of a novel approach to looking at
24:44some of these things that make Woodstock
24:46special.
24:47Um and so we want to look at our in in
24:49this section we looked at the the
24:51elements of Woodstock that make it a a
24:54special place to live in, to visit and
24:57to interact. and so our parks our trails
25:00our recreation programs and outdoor
25:01experiences the preserved farms the
25:04forests that you know the
25:07open space trails
25:09making sure that we had our core
25:10amenities were well taken care well
25:12taken care of town parks
25:14the Woodstock Academy you know
25:16recreation facilities Roseland parks and
25:18making sure all of these things are well
25:20taken care of well maintained and are
25:22responsive to the needs of a changing
25:25demographic to make sure that the
25:26programming
25:28meets our needs.
25:31Then we looked at our traditions and our
25:34common um
25:36the things that sort of bring us
25:37together as Woodstock our fairs our
25:39festivals things from the Woodstock fair
25:41to the 4th of July Jamboree and in in
25:43East Woodstock our our community
25:46libraries our scenic roads
25:48and and the
25:50um
25:51traditions that are established and um
25:54fostered by our small businesses by our
25:56nonprofit groups by our community
25:58development organizations to kind of
26:00keep things happening in Woodstock keep
26:02Woodstock promotion
26:04growing
26:06and fostering our connections and so we
26:08we identified those and looking to
26:10foster and support support those.
26:12And then this is perhaps one of the most
26:14important things is recognizing that
26:16Woodstock is a small town that has
26:18embraced
26:20basically small government and and
26:21government by
26:23um volunteers government by its citizens
26:26and we have such an extensive list of
26:29community organizations town boards and
26:31commissions volunteer led groups
26:35you know our committees our commissions
26:37our boards
26:38um
26:39that you know work tirelessly year round
26:42for no pay
26:44just for the love of Woodstock for the
26:45love of community and so we want to make
26:47sure that we um
26:49inventory these groups make sure that
26:50they are supported that they have
26:52resources, that they are interconnected,
26:54um and that they are able to continue
26:57their good work
26:58through sort of sensible capital
27:00planning and coordination.
27:03So, those were the primary areas of
27:04focus.
27:05And then each of those themes we we
27:08broke down those topics. So, for in in
27:10in develop we talked about
27:11transportation and roads and bridges and
27:14that sort of thing.
27:15And each of those
27:16areas had specific goals and specific
27:20actions. And so then we gathered all of
27:23those recommendations for specific goals
27:25and specific actions into a a large
27:28implementation table. And this is at the
27:30end of the draft of the plan of
27:32conservation and development and it
27:33essentially represents a detailed to-do
27:36list. So, we set these goals, we have
27:38this broad vision for what we want
27:40Woodstock to be over the next 10 years.
27:42How are we going to get from here to
27:44there?
27:46This is where implementation comes in.
27:48So, for each of those action steps, what
27:51we have done in the implementation table
27:53is we break down the action item. So,
27:55for instance, in the protect category,
27:58continue to use farmland soil data as a
28:01tool for prioritizing agricultural soil
28:03conservation. That's a very specific
28:05goal.
28:06That's fine, but whose job is it and how
28:08important is it and how much is it going
28:10to cost? And so each of those tasks are
28:14assigned a lead entity. So, in that
28:16case, the goal is the lead entity is the
28:18open space and agricultural preservation
28:20commission.
28:22There are support entities, certainly
28:23town staff, and the board of selectmen
28:26through through providing resources to
28:28them.
28:29This is an ongoing project, but it's a
28:31relatively low-level project cuz using
28:33soil data is not a major capital
28:35investment. We're not buying anything.
28:37We're using available data. And so it's
28:39a relatively low-cost thing. And so in
28:41this
28:42implementation table we break down all
28:44of those tasks in a way that everyone
28:46understands whose job is it,
28:48how much it's likely to cost, what the
28:50priority is, how long it's going to
28:52take, and when they should get started
28:54on it.
28:55Um and so that is the full breakdown of
28:59um
29:00all of our tasks to help us achieve our
29:03goals in the plan of conservation and
29:05development.
29:07So that's the structure of the plan.
29:09Uh moving forward from here, again,
29:11we're having a public hearing right now.
29:13The public hearing
29:14um can continue if the the commission
29:16feels it's important. We could broaden
29:18outreach, but again, there's been
29:20extensive outreach through this process
29:22through a a great number of public
29:23meetings, through surveys and input and
29:26a solicitation of all the different
29:27boards and commissions. Um so it can be,
29:31you know, modified from here.
29:33Um once it is adopted,
29:35the plan as we see it today is in its
29:38basically um
29:40draft form. Um
29:43there will be it will be cleaned up. It
29:44will be, you know, any typos are going
29:45to be corrected. We're going to add a
29:47lot a lot of great pictures um and and
29:49basically clean it up so it is a
29:51showpiece document. Um and so over the
29:54next month or two, once it's adopted, we
29:56will clean it up and have a final uh
29:58layout that will be available on the
29:59town website that will be will be
30:00available in hard copy for boards and
30:02commissions to use.
30:04And this will become our 10-year plan.
30:05In many ways, it will be for the
30:07planning and zoning commission. Uh
30:09there's a lot of regulatory changes
30:10recommended here
30:12um for open space commission, for the
30:14board of selectmen, for the board of
30:15finance, for economic development. These
30:17are our marching orders for the next 10
30:19years.
30:21Um we are going to, following this, um
30:24the COG is going to be working on the
30:26regional housing growth plan and their
30:28regional plan of conservation and
30:29development. So this document will be
30:31used extensively in guiding the
30:33formation of those plans, which are our
30:35next um
30:37uh our next tasks. And then we basically
30:40take those goals and they and and the
30:42specific recommendations and we take
30:44action. The Planning and Zoning
30:45Commission will have a full agenda of of
30:48regulation changes
30:50and recommendations to move forward over
30:53the next 10 years when it's not dealing
30:54with, you know, applications and that
30:56sort of thing. So, those are the
30:57proposed next steps.
31:00Um, and I will stop there and be happy
31:02to um answer any questions that the
31:04commission may have about the process
31:07um
31:08or the document itself. And and I can
31:10bring the actual document itself up on
31:12the screen if people want to ask about
31:15specific sections of the plan.
31:17And I'll turn it back over to you, Mr.
31:19Chair.
31:20>> Thank you, John. Thank you for all your
31:22work. Um
31:24>> [clears throat]
31:24>> Let's get any commission comments yet?
31:27Or do we want to open it to people who
31:29can open
31:30>> Well, so the last meeting where we
31:31discussed this, we talked about
31:34scorecards, etc. And I guess adjacent to
31:38that
31:39is my question of how we get or how are
31:42we going to
31:43uh
31:45inform the people who have been
31:47designated as the lead person or
31:50commission
31:52that they are now charged with carrying
31:54these things out.
31:56And how is that process going to happen?
31:57Are we going to call them up or are we
31:59going to send them a memo?
32:00>> that they're going to get handed
32:02the finished copy and say, "This is our
32:04guideline." I mean, all the commissions
32:05have had input and know what's going on.
32:09>> But you have to read through the entire
32:11thing in order to see if you are
32:14uh designated as the person to carry it
32:16out for all of them.
32:18>> Well
32:19Yeah.
32:19>> I mean, I we would hope that people
32:20would do that. However,
32:22you know, it's a big document and and I
32:24I worry that
32:26there are going to be things that people
32:28will be say that uh
32:31you know, open space is charged with
32:33doing this and this and this
32:35and it'll just go by the wayside. I
32:38guess I worry about that.
32:39>> I think the implementation table is um
32:42if you leave the first 112 pages out and
32:46just look at that table,
32:48then you get a very clear um
32:51plan of who is in charge of what by
32:53item. So I think we can shrink like the
32:56the mass of looking for where you're
32:58involved to that, you know, 20-page
33:01table. And then they can go back into
33:03the document to find um background about
33:06what was said about those topics.
33:09I do agree with your concern though
33:11because in the past these documents have
33:13been created and then kind of shelved.
33:15We discussed that when we started this
33:18whole update how we wanted to create a
33:19document that was user-friendly and
33:22encouraged people to actually do what
33:24was in the document. And I think that um
33:28the layout that John created with all of
33:30our input um and the three
33:33different, you know, themes will help
33:36with that. But I do think that we
33:39we or someone has to be tasked with
33:42annually, maybe we call the Board of
33:45Selectmen to send out an annual letter
33:46that says, you know, to every
33:48commission, have you done any of your
33:51POCD goals and report back and kind of
33:54do an annual. I think that would be
33:56logical.
33:58>> Does it make sense to go through the
34:00list of implementation
34:02guideline or the the long list that's in
34:05the back.
34:06And
34:07call out
34:09the different commissions and people
34:12who're responsible for different things
34:13and put under each commission a list of
34:17things they're responsible for.
34:19And up front
34:21send them that list and say, you know,
34:23over the next 10 years
34:25we're hoping you will be able to
34:28accomplish some goal.
34:30>> I don't think that falls on us.
34:31>> That doesn't fall us.
34:33>> We We have this document. We produced
34:34it. We handed it to the commissioner to
34:36say,
34:37this is
34:38to the chair or to to different
34:40commissions and say,
34:42you know, this this is the document that
34:44we produced with your input and these
34:48this is your guideline.
34:50>> Yeah. I I will note also uh
34:53the very last the very last
34:55implementation item on the list, the
34:57very last thing on page whatever it is,
34:59114,
35:01is a task for planning and zoning, which
35:04is to undertake an annual review of the
35:06progress of the POCD,
35:08including a survey of implementation
35:10partners led by the planning and zoning
35:12commission at their January or February
35:13meetings. So, this you know,
35:16amongst the many things that planning
35:17and zoning has charged themselves with,
35:20um ongoing monitoring and communication
35:22with the other boards and commissions is
35:24a key element. So, we will, you know, we
35:27I and certainly what we we will do is we
35:30can um do a little bit of a little bit
35:33of outreach and we can, you know,
35:35um email and I can can coordinate with
35:37with chairman of the various commissions
35:39to say, you know, here's the plan. Um
35:42you know, here's the implementation
35:43table. There's a bunch of stuff for your
35:45commission. We'd encourage you to review
35:47this at your next meeting with your
35:48commission to talk about the different
35:50goals.
35:51Um and and you know, we'll be checking
35:54in with you. Um we meaning the planning
35:56and zoning commission on an annual basis
35:58over the next decade just to to see how
36:00it's going and see if there are
36:02resources that you need, if there there
36:03are obstacles,
36:05or if priorities have evolved. But but
36:08we did assign to ourselves
36:10um
36:11doing some coordination uh and and
36:13follow-up.
36:16>> Joseph,
36:16>> uh John, that implementation table, the
36:20uh 25 pages, uh is that uh like a
36:23Excel spreadsheet that you put together?
36:25>> Um
36:26>> Um I I put it together in Word. Uh
36:29I could convert it to a spreadsheet, but
36:31it's it's a Word table right now.
36:33>> Because I was going to kind of follow up
36:35on John's suggestion and under the lead
36:37entity, if the table could be sorted
36:40just by each commission. So,
36:44when this is finally approved and we can
36:46have maybe three or four pages that
36:50offer to each board commission chair
36:53board or commission chair uh just uh
36:56sorted based on
36:58their lead entity responsibility. Uh it
37:01might
37:01>> Yeah, I mean it wouldn't be it wouldn't
37:02be too difficult to convert a a Word
37:04table to an Excel spreadsheet and sort
37:06it. That's that's very doable.
37:08>> Okay.
37:09>> That that that's exactly the kind of
37:11thing I had in mind.
37:12>> Okay.
37:13>> Something that would just make it easier
37:14for people to just look at quickly what
37:17are what are my responsibilities here.
37:19Right.
37:20And and not have to worry about somebody
37:21else's.
37:22>> Yep.
37:23>> Cuz otherwise it you know, it's it's
37:25sort of daunting cuz like
37:27stuff can get lost like
37:28>> Yep.
37:29>> Makes sense.
37:31>> Do Any other commissioners have
37:33um comments? I mean, we'll get a chance
37:35later. I just wanted to before we open
37:37it up to the public comment.
37:39>> Okay, we're going to go to public
37:40comment. Um Please if you have a
37:42comment, just um state your name for the
37:45um for the record and
37:48we are ready to hear from you.
37:56Yes, Don.
37:58>> Don Aleta, chair of Open Space and
38:00Parkland Preservation Committee.
38:02Um
38:03uh
38:04Your point is well taken. But most of
38:06the committees already know what their
38:08jobs are. It's in our job description
38:11when people volunteer to sit on these
38:12various commissions, boards, and
38:14committees. And we are charged with
38:17creating an annual report already that
38:19talks about needing the votes. So, I
38:21know my plan for that is simply to send
38:24P&Z a copy of what I already sent to the
38:26Board of Selectmen and at Board of
38:27Finance.
38:28>> Okay.
38:30Thanks.
38:34>> Yes, did.
38:36Derek May just recently moved back into
38:39town. I had a chance to review this.
38:42I like the document. A lot of work a ton
38:43of work obviously went into it.
38:46Seems very comprehensive. The only thing
38:47I noticed um
38:49as a potential omission is I've got
38:52background in fire department in in
38:54another town.
38:56There's very little
38:58mention of
38:59the three Woodstock fire departments.
39:02Um
39:04as far as I
39:06I think they um
39:09deserve a paragraph. I guess is what it
39:11is what it comes to. If we're talking
39:13about
39:14the points that John brought up
39:16we're talking about a sense of village.
39:18Talking about um
39:20municipal development cuz
39:23there is still entities anything can
39:25change and probably
39:28the nature of things we're talking
39:29about.
39:30People who don't work in town including
39:33myself.
39:34Um who are staffing that so you can see
39:37there's opportunity for change there.
39:39We're talking about um
39:41water supply issues, roads, everything.
39:44So,
39:45introducing a
39:47at least a paragraph acknowledging that
39:49along with the other good uh boards and
39:51commissions and entities within town I
39:53think would be good. And that may at
39:56some point
39:57this document may benefit that
40:00discipline when they're going for grants
40:02and looking for solutions.
40:04Um to be able to point back to document
40:06like this and say, "See, we are part of
40:08of this." So, there's still opportunity
40:11to do that.
40:12>> [clears throat]
40:12>> Um
40:13I'll submit that for your consideration.
40:15Thank you.
40:16>> Thank you, Derek.
40:19>> See.
40:20To add on to to Derek's point, we have a
40:24relatively new emergency response
40:27um
40:29director, I guess he is, um but a new
40:31emergency response kind of entity in
40:33town that coordinate and they do a lot
40:36um
40:37for emergency planning and that also
40:40would be beneficial to have in there
40:42because we are under more threats of all
40:44different types, whether you know,
40:46people
40:48and I know that they go out for grants,
40:50so I don't know if I would like to see
40:51that added. If first topic gets added
40:53in.
40:56Thank you for that.
41:00>> Great. Thank you, Derek. Anybody else?
41:03>> No.
41:05>> Yes.
41:05>> I will speak. It's just
41:07I'm chairman of Wetlands, just
41:09go follow up with his
41:11go up with his comment is
41:14there's a probably volunteerism in
41:17the fire departments and
41:19you know, it might be a good idea to try
41:21to recognize that if that's going to
41:23change
41:24at some point how we look at
41:26our services, whether we do some
41:29amount of fire companies or
41:32uh offering more funding for fire
41:34companies, so
41:36um
41:36that could be a major
41:38thing for us and
41:40probably going to your insurance and
41:42house insurance
41:44is somewhat based on how far you are
41:45from the fire station.
41:48So.
41:49And even now, as far as I know, when
41:51they have any alarm, and when stop,
41:53all three fire departments respond right
41:55away.
41:57They're at least
41:58uh alerted and standby.
42:03>> Thank you.
42:06Um anybody else?
42:14Um
42:18Thank you guys, everybody, for showing
42:19up. You My concern is that I
42:24we did our best to get
42:26this out so people could see it and show
42:27up if they wanted to.
42:29Um put it on the website and then we put
42:31it on Woodstock Proud.
42:34Um
42:39Is our we set with our public input or
42:41should we extend this and try to get
42:42more people on more input? I don't know
42:44if it's going to
42:46I don't I'm just I'm just throwing it
42:47out there to see what people think.
42:51>> I I'd have one comment if I could
42:54address it with with John
42:57and maybe the rest of the commission on
42:58the housing
43:00on page 58.
43:02You know,
43:03paper copy, not sure if that aligns with
43:05the
43:06online
43:07>> table at the top? Yeah.
43:09Let me I'll bring it up just so we're on
43:11the same literally on the same page.
43:14>> Okay. And it's not so much a table if
43:16you can go down it's in that second
43:18paragraph.
43:20I don't know if you can blow it up. It's
43:22pretty hard for
43:24anybody to read it. Maybe we can zoom.
43:27I was just concerned
43:29about four lines down the the last
43:33sentence in that second paragraph. The
43:352022 Woodstock Affordable Housing Plan
43:38starting with that.
43:41Uh calculated the housing gap of
43:43approximately 945 ownership housing
43:46units and 465 rental.
43:51I don't know where that number came
43:53from.
43:54And I think we may want to just
43:57strike that whole sentence.
44:00The numbers really aren't adding up.
44:03And when I looked at that affordable
44:05housing report for a gap analysis
44:08uh there were two tables
44:11one that um
44:12housing gap analysis for a family of
44:14four households
44:17and that actually showed just a deficit
44:19of 49
44:22opportunity housing opportunities
44:25uh in the extremely low-income range.
44:29The other
44:31housing gap analysis for renters
44:34actually showed a surplus of available
44:37housing units. Uh the table is made up
44:40of a supply and demand uh numbers and
44:43that's that's where I'm saying I'm
44:45getting my numbers from.
44:47But anyway, uh
44:48that number of 945
44:52needed
44:53housing units and 465
44:57additional housing units
45:00don't know where those numbers came
45:01from.
45:03>> Are they are they are they not or this
45:05was this was pulled from the plan that
45:06was already adopted? Is it that are
45:08those not reflected in that plan?
45:10>> I was looking for that but that same
45:12statement or similar and I really
45:14couldn't find it, John.
45:16Doesn't mean it's not in there but I
45:17didn't see it under uh either that
45:20housing gap analysis section or
45:22>> I yeah cuz I I wasn't involved in the in
45:24the drafting or adoption of that plan.
45:25This was just uh pulled from there but I
45:27can I I I can tentatively
45:31have that have that taken out unless it
45:33can be verified. That's that's fair.
45:35>> Okay.
45:43Uh that was the only comment that I
45:45wanted to make, John, I think on on the
45:47report. Otherwise, uh
45:49the work through the different meetings
45:50and reviews have seemed to capture a lot
45:54of what everybody was talking about
45:55looked at.
45:56>> So
45:57That's Thank you, Joe. Um Mr. Chair, I
46:01would I would No, I mean that's that's a
46:02that's a change that can be made. I to
46:04to um
46:05Derek May's uh note and and Bill
46:08Ruinsky's comment on that, I I would I
46:10think that's an outstanding
46:12um
46:14thought and and that's something that we
46:15hadn't uh noted enough of.
46:18I would propose that we would add a um a
46:21small section under
46:24town volunteerism to specifically call
46:26out um the fire companies as well as our
46:29emergency management um force
46:32uh reflecting their value to the
46:34community um and per Bill's note noting
46:37that it is a very difficult demanding
46:40volunteer job um
46:42that not only keeps people um engaged in
46:45the community but also keeps
46:47budgets down um for the town and and and
46:49maintains that level of of uh
46:51volunteerism connectivity. Um I'm happy
46:54to do that if you would like to
46:57um
46:59you know, I I would say I wouldn't want
47:00you to to adopt this this evening but
47:03you know, it's it's really up to you if
47:05you'd like to close the hearing or not,
47:07you know, with with the note that this
47:08that section will also be added.
47:12>> Do we have any input from um anybody
47:14online?
47:19>> Uh there was a Mark
47:20>> Great presentation and uh thank you,
47:23Amy, and thank you to everybody that
47:25worked so hard on this.
47:32>> Okay. Is there
47:35There's no member of members of the
47:36public online
47:38that I can see.
47:39>> so, no.
47:40>> Okay.
47:42>> I would recommend maybe keeping the
47:44hearing open uh for one more meeting
47:47just so the finalized version is
47:50available online and people can read it.
47:53I think it's very close to being
47:54approved uh but
47:56um just to give everybody a chance to
47:58look at the real final final version.
48:02I don't think it hurts to hold it open
48:04for one more meeting.
48:06It may
48:07keep it open and it may close pretty
48:09quickly.
48:09>> Yeah. If we continue it to our next
48:12regular monthly meeting.
48:13>> Yeah.
48:15>> I agree, Joseph.
48:17>> Doug Porter, I agree with Joseph. I
48:19think leaving it open for another
48:20meeting, another month or another till
48:22another meeting, I think it's good.
48:24Gives some people an opportunity to
48:25digest whatever was spoken about tonight
48:28and it's
48:30there's no rush for us to do anything
48:32until maybe it's the next meeting and go
48:34from there.
48:36>> So yes, John. I would make that a
48:37motion.
48:38>> I'll second it.
48:40>> Okay. All in favor?
48:42>> Aye.
48:42>> Aye.
48:43>> Aye.
48:43>> Aye.
48:44>> Any opposed? Any abstentions? So moved.
48:49Um
48:52>> Do that.
48:53>> November what? 19th meeting?
48:56>> Yeah, to the next next regular monthly
48:57meeting.
48:58>> Yeah.
49:00>> I think we have another public hearing
49:01then, but it shouldn't
49:03I'm not sure if that's going to happen
49:04or not. So
49:07Well, great. That gets us through that.
49:10And that
49:11um
49:15eliminates the Okay, is there any new
49:17business?
49:18>> I have no new business.
49:20>> Can I just make one request?
49:21>> Sure.
49:21>> For the people who came into this public
49:23hearing, now we have a whole month to
49:26talk up
49:28this plan. If there's a lot in here,
49:30there's a lot to learn from it and try
49:32to get new people to come next month. So
49:34I appeal to you to invite others to come
49:37next time.
49:41>> Okay.
49:42Old business
49:43that was negated because we
49:46kept the public hearing open.
49:48Um
49:50that brings us to number eight.
49:52Home occupations, John.
49:54>> Uh no new home occupation applications
49:56this month.
49:58>> Okay.
50:00Do we have any more citizen comments?
50:03Hearing none, we're going to
50:05communications to get our ZEO report.
50:09>> Uh I posted the ZEO report uh this
50:11afternoon. Um nothing too out of the
50:14ordinary. A couple of
50:16um
50:17accessory buildings, uh garages, a new
50:19ADU, um
50:21which is good to see.
50:23Uh a couple of bonds, uh one released
50:26for erosion sedimentation, and the folks
50:28for Scranton Village, the owners of
50:29Scranton Village, stopped in the office
50:31this after this morning and dropped off
50:33their uh stormwater bonds. Um so they
50:36are moving along. We anticipate they're
50:39going to have their their um special
50:41permit filed in the next week or so, and
50:44they can actually start their
50:45construction work.
50:47Um we do have a public hearing scheduled
50:49for uh November for Jeffco Fibers with
50:52the the former Crabtree and Evelyn
50:54property,
50:55um looking to add uh storage and
50:57warehouse building. So that that special
50:59permit hearing will open in November.
51:01Um I'll note that we also uh approved,
51:04uh we, meaning you, the town meeting,
51:07uh would stock approve the new citation
51:09ordinance that will allow
51:11um land use violations as well as scenic
51:13road violations and historic
51:14preservation violations to be addressed
51:17um a little bit more directly with
51:19fines.
51:20Um and then we are um
51:24in the loop now finally about the cog uh
51:27starting to undertake their regional
51:29plans of conservation and development
51:30and housing uh growth. So what they're
51:33looking for volunteerism and
51:35participation in both of those.
51:38>> Uh
51:38>> John,
51:40would you be able to comment a little
51:41bit more on NECOG's uh
51:44function and participation in creating
51:46that regional housing plan uh
51:49to
51:50address the state's requirement that
51:53every municipality have something or
51:55each municipality
51:57coordinate with a cog in their area.
52:01>> Yeah, um that's well I mean that's a
52:02pretty good summary, Mitchell. I don't
52:04know how much you want me to elaborate
52:05on that, but yeah, so the basic process
52:08is um the state uh you know the the
52:12state law public act 25-1 created the
52:15responsibility for every municipality to
52:17come up with a housing growth plan. And
52:20that housing growth plan um which will
52:23be um
52:26required to be submitted for for the
52:28Northeast Connecticut towns by June of
52:312028. So, we have just under 2 years um
52:35to develop this.
52:36The process by which this happens is
52:39sort of slowly rolling out um and and
52:43the the function of the the basic
52:45timeline is this.
52:46The state um has the first
52:49responsibility, the Office of Policy and
52:50Management, specifically the Office of
52:52Responsible Growth,
52:54um is charged with coming up by the end
52:57of this calendar year, so in the next 2
52:58months,
53:00the big um housing growth
53:03targets for the next 10 years. So, the
53:0610-year target of total housing growth
53:09um
53:10that is that is projected to be
53:12necessary in the entire state.
53:14Um they take that big number
53:17and then divide it up amongst their uh
53:20nine councils of government. So,
53:22Northeast Let's say the number is
53:25you know, for ease of you know, ease of
53:27numbering, let's say the number is
53:2890,000. And let's say equal
53:30distribution,
53:31each cog would be then responsible for
53:3310,000 of these numbers. That's that's
53:35not going to be the distribution because
53:37obviously the capital region is much
53:38much bigger and more populous than than
53:40Northeast Connecticut.
53:41But, the state will divide up that big
53:44housing number amongst its nine COGs.
53:48That process is going to happen um in
53:51again the next 2 months. That's the
53:52gross number. And so at at beginning of
53:562027, Northeast COG will receive um the
54:01big number. And that is not only a a
54:03gross number for the entire COG. They
54:06must then take that gross number and
54:09divide it up amongst its member
54:11municipalities.
54:13And further divide it into um its net
54:17number of affordable units and
54:19affordable of different types.
54:21Um multi-family ownership, senior
54:23housing, you know, um you know, mobile
54:26manufactured what whatever the category
54:28of affordable. So, that that the COGs
54:30have to take the gross state number and
54:32turn it into a net affordable municipal
54:36number.
54:38Amongst amongst its member
54:39municipalities. And Northeast COG is uh
54:41what like 11 11 communities, 13
54:43communities, something like that.
54:45Um
54:46that number is going to be developed
54:49with the input ideally with the input
54:51and participation of all of the member
54:52municipalities in the COG over the next
54:556 months. Basically between December and
54:57June.
54:58Um
55:00the the the COG will be working with our
55:02member municipalities to come up with
55:04each town's target number.
55:06And the big number from the state is a
55:0810-year target.
55:10Um the COG will be coming up with a
55:125-year
55:14goal
55:15uh for each municipality. And so then
55:17over that period, the municipality must
55:20decide
55:21if it
55:23wants to participate in this regional
55:24process
55:25and work with the COG and the leadership
55:27of the COG to come up with a regional
55:30housing development plan, housing growth
55:32plan with municipal targets and
55:34municipal actions to try to get to our
55:37municipal number that's been
55:39um targeted with us and and assigned to
55:41us by the cog.
55:44Or a municipality can choose to go it
55:46alone. If we disagree with the cog's
55:48approach, if we disagree with the cog's
55:50number, if we believe that we can do
55:52more, if we think, you know, we're
55:54restricted because of infrastructure,
55:56because of soils, because of whatever
55:57reason, because of market, that that's
55:59an unrealistic number, we can submit and
56:01develop or we can develop and submit an
56:03alternative number to the cog and to the
56:06state and come up with our own municipal
56:09housing plan similar to what we did with
56:11the affordable housing plan back, you
56:13know, 4 years ago or so.
56:15The framework of this plan is going to
56:17be a little bit different because there
56:18are actual numbers um assigned to it and
56:21actual types of housing um assigned to
56:24it brought rather than just sort of
56:25broad goals, like, oh, let's loosen
56:27let's loosen our, you know, multi our
56:28our
56:29ADU regulations or something like that.
56:31It needs to be a little bit more
56:32specific than that.
56:34Um but that is a decision that that
56:36Woodstock and all the other communities
56:38of Northeast Connecticut will have to
56:40will have to um that's a decision we'll
56:42have to make basically no later than
56:45July of 2027. So, in about 8 months, we
56:49have to decide whether we're going to
56:50participate in the cog process or go it
56:52alone and come up with our own plan. And
56:54then we'll basically spend the next year
56:57working with cog or working on our own
56:59to come up with um
57:01our housing growth plan.
57:03And so that's that's broadly the time
57:04frame.
57:06>> Have you heard of any punitive measures
57:08the state is thinking of either
57:10not punishment but maybe reducing
57:12funding for road care or schools if
57:16towns don't meet their
57:18assigned target of housing growth? Any
57:21of that commentary?
57:23>> As of right now, the the the language of
57:25the statute is very, very clear that it
57:29is it operates on incentives, not
57:31penalties. That they you know, the the
57:33the reason
57:35the the part of the reason that it was
57:37not adopted that the public act was took
57:40until November to be adopted
57:42um was to make sure that all of the
57:46sticks were removed and and only carrots
57:49remained. Um obviously it's a big
57:50responsibility to come up with this
57:51plan, but if a town um
57:55you know, submits an acceptable plan
57:58and makes good faith efforts towards
58:01towards the
58:02uh achievement of the goals as
58:04established in the plan, it unlocks a
58:06variety of of grant housing grant and
58:09housing opportunities through the
58:11housing growth fund, um through priority
58:13funding, you know, through through OPM
58:15and other grant programs. So, you could
58:17say
58:19you know, that maybe the backhanded
58:21stick is if the town, you know, chooses
58:24to opt out of the system entirely or you
58:26know,
58:28um half-heartedly adopt something and
58:30you know, does not make good faith
58:32efforts towards implementation of those
58:34goals,
58:36you know, it's possible that the town
58:38may lose out on
58:40funding opportunities. You know, that
58:42that are that are discretionary, but
58:44nothing that is currently available to
58:47municipalities is slated to be taken
58:49away if we do not participate.
58:52It is it is only a failure to unlock
58:56incentive funding.
58:58>> Great. Thank you.
59:01Amy.
59:03>> Don, I have a question. Are there any
59:06topics that we should be focusing on in
59:09preparation? Cuz I'm hearing that we
59:11have 8 months or a maximum of 16
59:13meetings
59:14before we actually have to start making
59:16decisions about this housing. So, are
59:19there like do you have documents you can
59:22give us or you know, do we have to plan
59:25the topic like cover certain topics in
59:27that 8-month period to be prepared for
59:29this work.
59:31>> Um yeah, I would So, I would and and
59:34I'll I'll I'll note and you know, I've
59:36I've said this at a couple of earlier
59:37meetings that I've been a little bit
59:39chagrined that NICOG has been late to
59:41the late to the party on some of these
59:43things
59:44that other other COGs are
59:466 months ahead in terms of their
59:47planning.
59:48>> And do you like send us sort of
59:50documents you know, kind of goes along
59:53in that process between now and then so
59:55that we're better prepared?
59:56>> Yeah, we could. Um
59:59yeah, um and but I will I will also, you
1:00:01know, there's also a certain level of
1:00:03difference because I mean, first of all,
1:00:05we don't even know what the state
1:00:06numbers are going to be yet, you know,
1:00:08and and so a lot will depend on that. Um
1:00:12but I would note and I don't mean to to
1:00:14jump the um
1:00:15the agenda, uh Mr. Chair, but I'll I'm
1:00:19going to put on the screen um the the
1:00:21piece of correspondence that's in
1:00:23correspondence
1:00:24um which addresses just specifically
1:00:26this. This is a letter from NICOG to
1:00:29First Selectman Paquette
1:00:31um
1:00:32that was sent at the uh last week um
1:00:35beginning of October um about the
1:00:37housing growth plan.
1:00:39Um it talks a little bit about what the
1:00:40housing growth plan is and it goes into
1:00:43some of the specifics that um I think to
1:00:46to Amy's question, what we should be
1:00:48thinking about um which is, you know,
1:00:51consistency with our regional plan with
1:00:53our municipal plan and our WPCA goals.
1:00:56Um looking at, you know, zones um or
1:00:59properties that might be suitable for uh
1:01:03you know, additional housing
1:01:04development. Uh different strategies and
1:01:06I think this is something that we can
1:01:07look at our existing affordable housing
1:01:09plan
1:01:10um for, you know, promoting different
1:01:12housing types, looking at an inventory
1:01:15of our developable land in town.
1:01:17Um looking at our zoning regulations, uh
1:01:20Uh, infrastructure needs, our current
1:01:21capacity, what kind of flows we send to
1:01:24Putnam, what kind of water um system
1:01:26capacity we have.
1:01:28Um
1:01:29as well as, you know, some of our our
1:01:31demographics and our housing profile.
1:01:33Um, so there there is some of those
1:01:35things to consider. The state has
1:01:38um done
1:01:41They they've come up with some
1:01:42preliminary recommendations on how to
1:01:44conduct an inventory of developable
1:01:47land. Um, so that work is being done in
1:01:49the background and is going to be
1:01:51available to COGs and and ultimately to
1:01:53municipalities as well
1:01:55um to assist in those efforts.
1:01:57But, yeah, I mean, it you know, broadly
1:02:00speaking, we're looking at housing
1:02:01growth opportunities, particularly
1:02:03affordable housing.
1:02:04And so we're, you know, we should be
1:02:05looking at those standard things. What,
1:02:07you know, our zoning regulations, our
1:02:09developable land our infrastructure, you
1:02:12know, um
1:02:13those kind of key things that that would
1:02:16impact our ability and uh to develop
1:02:19certain types of housing in certain
1:02:20locations.
1:02:23And yes, and and insofar as um guidance
1:02:27from other COGs
1:02:29is useful, I'm happy to share it. Again,
1:02:31I I I want to be a little bit sensitive
1:02:33to not stepping on the toes of of our
1:02:35COG, which is charged specifically with
1:02:38leading this process and frankly funded
1:02:41to lead this process. Like,
1:02:42municipalities are given zero dollars to
1:02:44do this planning. COGs are given several
1:02:46hundred thousands of dollars every year
1:02:48to do this planning. So,
1:02:50I would encourage us to take their lead.
1:02:52Um, but but, you know, not wait around
1:02:54too long.
1:02:59>> Thank you, John.
1:03:01Um
1:03:03brings us to budget report.
1:03:05Um
1:03:07We seem to be staying within our bounds
1:03:10on that.
1:03:12>> Yeah, there's there's nothing
1:03:14particularly of note there, I would say.
1:03:16>> Um, any additional correspondence other
1:03:19than I mean that we covered that.
1:03:21>> other than the knee thing, that's
1:03:22it.
1:03:23>> Okay.
1:03:26And then
1:03:26>> Mark still on?
1:03:27>> Mark still on?
1:03:30Brings us to a number 12, adjournment.
1:03:32>> [laughter]
1:03:34>> Bye Mark.
1:03:35>> Is there a motion?
1:03:36>> Move to adjourn.
1:03:38>> There you go.
1:03:39>> [laughter]
1:03:39>> We have a second?
1:03:41>> Second.
1:03:42>> All in favor?
1:03:43>> Aye.
1:03:44>> Aye.
1:03:44>> Aye.
1:03:46>> So moved.
1:03:47>> Thank you everybody.
1:03:49>> Can I
```*
