2026-10-15 - Planning and Zoning Commission

Summary

Built from the town's posted agenda and the unapproved (draft) minutes, which were read, and from the video's YouTube auto-generated captions. Names and figures may be misheard; voice votes are not tallied.

  • Public hearing on the 2026-2036 Plan of Conservation and Development, organized around the themes Protect, Develop and Enjoy. Town Planner John Guszkowski presented the process and draft; the current plan was adopted in 2015 and the update folds in the town's earlier open space and conservation plan. See Plan of Conservation and Development 2026-2036.
    • Demographic points: population has grown from about 3,000 in the 1960s to about 8,000 and is projected flat; the town is older than the state average; about 85 percent of housing is single-family; about 540 residents both live and work in town.
    • The goals and actions are summarized in an implementation table naming lead boards, costs, priorities and timelines; members agreed to sort it by lead entity and send each board its own extract.
    • A resident with fire-service experience asked for a paragraph recognizing the town's three fire departments and emergency management. William Rewinski supported noting volunteer staffing, funding and insurance concerns. Guszkowski offered to add a volunteerism section acknowledging fire companies; no objection.
    • Joseph Adiletta challenged a draft housing-gap figure (945 ownership and 465 rental units, attributed to a 2022 affordable housing plan), saying his own review found only a 49-unit deficit for extremely-low-income households. Guszkowski tentatively agreed to remove it unless it can be confirmed.
    • The hearing was kept open and continued to the regular meeting on 2026-11-19 (carried).
  • Minutes of 2026-10-01 approved; Dwight Ryniewicz abstained.
  • Zoning enforcement report: new accessory buildings and garages and one accessory dwelling unit; one erosion and sedimentation bond released; the Scranton Village owners delivered stormwater bonds and were expected to file a special permit application within the week (see Scranton Shops Change of Use).
  • A public hearing for the Jeffco Fibres storage and warehouse addition at the former Crabtree & Evelyn property was announced for November (see Jeffco Fibres Warehouse Addition).
  • The Planner reported that the town meeting approved a citation ordinance allowing direct fines for land-use, scenic-road and historic-preservation violations (see September 2026 Special Town Meeting Ordinances).
  • Discussion of the regional housing growth plan: a letter from the regional council of governments to First Selectman Chandler L. Paquette was read; the state is to set target housing numbers around the turn of the year and the regional body will allocate them, and the town will have to decide how to take part. The Planner suggested preparing through existing plans, a zoning review, a developable land inventory and infrastructure capacity. The process was described as incentive-based.
  • The budget report was routine. The meeting adjourned.

Agenda

Agenda PDF posted; see Sources.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00Um

00:03We will uh first do our roll call.

00:06Um

00:07Jared Alaleta

00:08>> Joseph Alaleta

00:09>> David Morris

00:10>> Amy Ronan again

00:11>> Aaron Farbo

00:13>> John Day

00:15>> Online folks

00:17>> Doug Porter

00:19>> Mark Blackmer

00:21>> Dwight Rowanowitz

00:25>> We'll designate Dwight, um John and Amy

00:27as

00:29the alternates today.

00:31And we'll go on to the pledge of

00:32allegiance if you please.

00:38>> I pledge allegiance

00:39>> to the flag

00:40>> of the United States of America.

00:43>> And to the republic for which it stands,

00:45>> one nation under God, indivisible, with

00:49liberty and justice for all.

00:58>> Hey,

00:59um

01:00I would just like to thank all the hard

01:02work that the POCD committee did and

01:06will come in putting this draft

01:07together. Um

01:10I think we really worked hard to make it

01:12actually a

01:13document that we can work with and work

01:16>> [clears throat]

01:18>> work through. Um use it for a more of a

01:20guideline than we have in the past.

01:22That's our That was our goal. So, thank

01:23you very much for all those people that

01:25did that.

01:26Um

01:28Do we have any citizens' comments not on

01:31the agenda tonight and what's on the

01:32agenda tonight?

01:35Hearing none, we'll move on to um

01:38meeting minutes. Um we approved the

01:40meeting minutes from September 17th last

01:43um meeting. So, we only need to approve

01:46the meeting minutes from October 1st.

01:49Um we can have a motion.

01:51>> So moved.

01:52>> Second.

01:53>> Second.

01:54>> Um any uh any discussion?

02:00Hearing none, uh, all in favor?

02:02>> Aye.

02:03>> Aye.

02:05>> Any opposed?

02:07Any abstentions?

02:08>> I'll abstain from the, uh, vote.

02:12>> Thank you. That was Dwight.

02:13Thank you.

02:15Okay, now we're going to open, uh,

02:17public hearing on the plan of

02:19conservation and development.

02:21Um,

02:24I'm sure [clears throat] that, um,

02:25everybody has looked through it and

02:27we're just going to

02:29First, we'll ask for any comments from

02:31the commissioners.

02:33>> Well, one I'd like to echo your comment,

02:36Dave, about, uh, a lot of the work that

02:38went into it. I think,

02:39particularly Amy, was in charge of doing

02:41a lot of, uh, work with different

02:43groups. It's, uh, very helpful in

02:45pulling people together.

02:47A lot of commissions and boards in town

02:49helped put all these comments together.

02:51So, uh,

02:53make it

02:53reflects well on what the community

02:56wants, uh, wants to see in the next, uh,

02:5810 years or so.

03:00I'll save other comments, through the

03:02draft, as we get into into the draft.

03:04But, that's it.

03:06>> Any other comments from the

03:07commissioners?

03:08John, did you want to, um,

03:11kind of guide us through this or did you

03:13>> Sure. Yeah, no, I have I have a little

03:15presentation prepared that if you'll

03:17bear with me,

03:18um,

03:20I've gotten it down to about an hour and

03:2145 minutes. So, uh,

03:24we should we should be

03:26>> You you'll be talking to an empty room.

03:30>> Uh, okay. Can I this this hopefully

03:32won't won't take very long, but I did

03:33want to give give a little bit of

03:35background for folks online or folks,

03:37um, in the room

03:38what we've gone through, um, in

03:39preparing this plan. Can you see the

03:41screen?

03:43>> Yes.

03:44>> Oh, the so it looks like a PowerPoint

03:45presentation?

03:47>> Yes.

03:47>> Okay, great.

03:49Um,

03:50so, just to begin, uh, I wanted to give

03:52a little bit of background exactly what

03:53is a plan of conservation and

03:54development and why the town is doing

03:58this at this point and why it's come to

03:59the planning and zoning commission. So,

04:02per state law, state statutes,

04:04specifically Connecticut General Statute

04:06Section 8-23, requires that every

04:08municipality in the state prepare and

04:10update this master plan every 10 years.

04:14The plan is an advisory document that is

04:17that is

04:18the responsibility of the planning

04:19commission. In the case of Woodstock and

04:21many other towns, we have a joint

04:23planning and zoning commission. But it

04:25is the responsibility of that commission

04:26to prepare and update it. The statute

04:30has a great number of

04:32considerations that it must include,

04:36including things like the future land

04:37use. Again, it's a 10-year plan, so what

04:39will the town look like in terms of its

04:41use of land over the next 10 years.

04:43Housing, particularly affordable

04:44housing, drinking water supplies,

04:46cluster development, soil preservation,

04:49transportation infrastructure, we must

04:51we must consider how we're growing, our

04:53economic trends, our our population

04:55trends.

04:56And then there are a number of things

04:58that that also must be considered,

05:00including community needs for energy,

05:03protection of resources, particularly

05:04agricultural resources, and then other

05:07things like sea level rise concerns and

05:09and technology needs. So, all of these

05:12things need to be considered in the plan

05:14of conservation and development

05:16as it is prepared by the by the town.

05:19How a plan is used.

05:22First, it is meant to coordinate and

05:25communicate with the state and regional

05:28plans of conservation and development.

05:29The state, as you can see on the screen,

05:31develops its plan every 5 years and is

05:34responsible for guiding the investments

05:37and and broad policies of the state of

05:39Connecticut.

05:40And these plans are meant to coordinate

05:42with each other.

05:44Currently, that region, Capital Region,

05:46I'm sorry, the uh Northeast Connecticut

05:49Council of Governments does not have an

05:50active plan of conservation and

05:52development. They are actually beginning

05:53that process right now.

05:56Um and so we're we're getting our plan

05:58in ahead of theirs, so that can actually

06:00serve to inform their plan in terms of

06:02priorities for um this portion of the

06:04the region.

06:05Um any um municipal investments that a

06:09town makes, if it's going to be um

06:10buying land, selling land, making uh

06:13significant um investments in municipal

06:15facilities, extension of infrastructure,

06:17new roads, new bridges, new water lines,

06:21all of those things must be compared to

06:24and um

06:25found in harmony with the plan of

06:27conservation and development, which is

06:28why we have to consider so many of these

06:30uh sort of future-looking things.

06:33Um as well as if this commission, as

06:35it's in its zoning role, is going to be

06:38adopting new zoning regulations in the

06:40way we treat different types of land

06:42use, different development patterns um

06:44over the next 10 years, those also have

06:46to be found largely in harmony with the

06:49plan of conservation and development. So

06:50in short, this plan is to establish

06:52goals that then the town, through its

06:54investments, through its regulations,

06:56then implements over the next decade.

06:59When we seek uh grant money, if we're

07:01going to buy open space, if we want to,

07:03you know, do economic development

07:05grants, um infrastructure extension

07:07grants, things like that, it very much

07:10behooves the town to have those

07:12investments reflected as priorities in

07:14the plan of conservation and

07:15development, and it will greatly assist

07:17our efforts if we can point to

07:18something, say, "Look, this is a

07:20priority for the town. Can you, state

07:22government, federal government, private

07:23foundation, help us to reach this goal

07:26through your funding?" Those sorts of

07:28things uh are very important. And then,

07:30of course, to demonstrate our statutory

07:31compliance in saying that we are in fact

07:34providing for affordable housing

07:36opportunities, that we are providing for

07:38energy um resilience in our community,

07:40that we are planning for future growth.

07:44Again, the state the state plan um

07:47MECOG doesn't have a plan currently. The

07:49state plan um which was adopted last

07:51year does have um areas we're looking at

07:55what's called the um locational guide

07:57map of Woodstock and it it flags areas.

08:00Again, it's a plan of conservation and

08:02development. So, the broadly speaking,

08:03the green areas on a plan like this are

08:06are intended broadly for preservation,

08:08conservation, lower impact development,

08:11or you know, protection of some type.

08:13And then the yellow and pink and orange

08:14areas on this are meant for a

08:16development or increased activity. And

08:18and on the Woodstock map, obviously,

08:21it's it's generally a rural forested

08:23agricultural area. The state sees it as

08:26such. Uh and then a couple of activity

08:29areas. Basically, you know, South

08:30Woodstock and Woodstock Hill and then

08:32East Woodstock

08:34are seen as sort of community centers

08:36that are suitable for some level of

08:38growth.

08:41Um

08:43despite the fact that the state um

08:44identifies a whole lot of things that a

08:46town must consider as part of its plan

08:48of conservation and development, there

08:49actually is very little in the way of

08:51guidance for how a municipality should

08:53prepare a plan. Um and so,

08:55municipalities are really sort of on

08:57their own and can kind of chart their

08:59own course for how to to go about this.

09:01The plan um in in Woodstock um has been

09:04a couple of years coming.

09:06Um I sort of stepped in in the middle uh

09:09of the process working with you guys for

09:10the last year plus.

09:12Um the current plan was adopted in 2015.

09:15So, we're a little bit behind um the the

09:17deadline.

09:19Um however, the state has given us uh

09:21that that extension to to finish this.

09:24Um there was a POCD committee

09:26established and and as the chair pointed

09:28out, um Amy Monahan has chaired that

09:31group um for the last 2 years or so

09:33working initially with um MECOG and

09:35Julia Fay who was your consulting

09:37planner prior to my um, work with you.

09:40Um, there was a a lot of conversation,

09:42community conversation. There were

09:43targeted stakeholder surveys, you know,

09:45the agricultural community, economic

09:46development, seniors. Um,

09:50all, you know, were were had had

09:52specific um, surveys and questionnaires.

09:55And then, um, again, about a little

09:57under a year and a half ago, we were

09:58brought in, Take It Planning Policy

10:00Group, to help um, sort of take over

10:02from Nikog and Delia and uh, to help

10:05bring this process to conclusion. We,

10:07um, essentially at that time kind of

10:10started a little bit from scratch and

10:12established essentially a vision. Um,

10:15which a a an approach starting with a a

10:18broad vision for what we would like to

10:20see in Woodstock and then a thematic

10:22approach. Um, and particularly what

10:24we'll get into sort of the three

10:25categories of those of those themes. Um,

10:29and uh, the the other major thing that

10:31we did

10:33was that the state the town had for many

10:35years, um, a separate document called

10:37the plan of open space and conservation,

10:40which was developed by the conservation

10:41commission back I around 2003 or so.

10:45Um,

10:46maybe a little bit earlier than that.

10:48Um, which was in need of update and so

10:50it was decided, um, in this process that

10:52we would update those two plans together

10:55and incorporate them. So, essentially

10:57the plan of open space and conservation

10:59became largely the the first half of the

11:02the plan of conservation and development

11:03update.

11:05And then the subcommittee, uh, again,

11:07chaired by by Amy, um, sort of went

11:10through chapter by chapter, section by

11:11section, drafting this, reviewing this.

11:14Um, seeking input, uh, and then as the

11:17the draft came together, it was brought

11:19back to the Planning and Zoning

11:20Commission, which has the ultimate

11:21responsibility for reviewing and

11:22adopting. Um, and and we scheduled this

11:25public hearing a couple of months ago.

11:26So, that broadly speaking, that was the

11:28process.

11:29Um, I can stop right here. Amy, do you

11:31want to add anything about about the the

11:33process?

11:35>> Uh no, not at this time.

11:37>> Okay.

11:38Uh didn't mean to put you on the spot,

11:40but um so

11:42first um just a little bit of

11:44background. So, you know, one of the

11:46things that we're we are asked to

11:47consider in developing a plan of

11:48conservation and development is sort of

11:50who we are and where we are

11:52demographically, economically,

11:53population-wise. What are there are

11:56there important trends? Where do we fit

11:58in terms of the state, in terms of the

11:59market? Um so, we do have a little bit

12:01of initial analysis. None of nothing

12:04here will surprise members of the

12:05commission, probably members of the

12:07public either. We know who we are in

12:09Woodstock. Um but, you know, the town

12:11has grown from a very small rural

12:13community in the '60s

12:15uh when we only had about 3,000 people

12:17and we're now up over um 8,000.

12:20However, population over the last 15

12:23years or so has been relatively flat. Um

12:27and current projections are that that

12:29population will continue to remain to be

12:31about flat. Our growth rates are slowing

12:33down. Our our you know, our population

12:35is aging somewhat. We're not having as

12:37many kids and our school is not growing.

12:39So, we're projected to stay right around

12:418,000 people for the next 15 years or

12:43so. This is again, that's a projection.

12:45It's not you know, it's it's not locked

12:48in stone. We can certainly change

12:50direction. We could grow, we could

12:51shrink, but that the current projection

12:53has us being about flat.

12:56Um our age distribution, as you can see

12:59on the in the chart in the upper right,

13:00we are a little bit older than the state

13:03in general. We have more of our uh

13:05percent by percentage, we have more

13:07people in the 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and um

13:1270 to 79 population in Woodstock than in

13:15the state overall, which has a few more

13:17very older you know, significantly older

13:19people and and the the youth population

13:22is a little bit um larger in the state,

13:24particularly young adults, 20 to 40. Um

13:28Woodstock is significantly smaller than

13:30the state numbers.

13:32Uh and we are a little bit less diverse

13:34in terms of our ethnic

13:36our racial makeup than the state or even

13:38Northeast Connecticut. We're

13:39predominantly white Caucasian about 86%

13:43with another 12% Hispanic or Latino

13:46which is you know certainly lower than

13:47the state's numbers of 64 and 17 for

13:51instance. Again,

13:52sort of who we are. We we recognize

13:54this.

13:55Um household sizes have declined over

13:58the last 20 years or so.

14:00We were up over two and a half people

14:02per household and now we are under two

14:04and a half people per household. Um the

14:06this is sort of echoed in trends across

14:09the state although

14:11more precipitous in Northeast

14:12Connecticut and Woodstock than in the

14:14state overall which stayed right around

14:16two and a half the whole way. And and

14:18what that means is that even though our

14:21population is relatively flat, our

14:23number of households could grow because

14:27households are smaller and that still

14:28reflects a potential demand for new

14:31housing.

14:32Um

14:34in terms of our housing stock, we are

14:36largely a

14:37a owner

14:39occupied particularly we are very

14:40heavily single family 85% of our housing

14:43stock is single family residence which

14:45is then all owner occupied. Our

14:47multi-family tends to be 79%

14:50renter occupied. And both of those

14:52levels are higher than the cog or the

14:54state in general.

14:57In terms of our economics, Woodstock I'm

15:00going to avoid calling Woodstock a

15:02bedroom community. However, Woodstock

15:04does tend to export more people in terms

15:08of jobs than it imports.

15:10Only about 500 residents 540 residents

15:14both live and work in Woodstock. Another

15:171100 come to Woodstock from elsewhere

15:20but more than 3500 people who live in

15:23Woodstock go elsewhere for employment

15:26for employment. So we are we tend to be

15:29a community that is more residential

15:31than business focused in terms of our in

15:33terms of our makeup.

15:36In relatively good shape financially in

15:38terms of our municipal expenditures, our

15:40grand list, our total indebtedness. And

15:42some of the the key employers that again

15:45would surprise no one line master,

15:47Rogers Corp, Northeast placement. These

15:48are all relatively large employment

15:51employers in Woodstock.

15:54Then getting into the actual vision and

15:56again a lot of the work that was done in

15:592024 and 2025

16:02before I sort of took over the effort

16:05was in developing a lot of that data and

16:07developing a lot of that input. And so

16:09we took that data and input and

16:11basically sculpted a vision statement.

16:14That identified what Woodstock wanted to

16:17be and how it saw itself over the next

16:19decade. And so I'm going to take a

16:21moment and just read the whole statement

16:23if you don't mind. And you know, feel

16:26free to close your eyes and and and

16:27think of Woodstock as we read this.

16:30The town of Woodstock planning and

16:31zoning commission. In developing this

16:34update to the 2015 plan of conservation

16:36and development is led by a strong

16:38commitment to preserving and enhancing

16:41the historic scenic rural and

16:44agricultural landscape of Woodstock.

16:46It is also led by its intent to promote

16:49actions and policies that will encourage

16:52a community with wider and more

16:53diversified opportunities for homes.

16:56Agriculture.

16:58And appropriate industry. The town will

17:00seek to balance its stewardship efforts

17:03with the need of the community to grow

17:05and allow its current and future

17:07residents to live, work, learn, and

17:09thrive here in a way that fundamentally

17:12respects Woodstock heritage.

17:14We envision a Woodstock.

17:16That protects the natural, cultural, and

17:18historic resources that make Woodstock a

17:20treasured place,

17:22develops its land and its economy in a

17:24way that expands opportunity in

17:26Woodstock in a sustainable way without

17:28sacrificing our history or our future,

17:32enjoys the abundance of resources and

17:34opportunities, and strengthens the

17:36common ties that draw the community

17:38together.

17:39Over the coming decade, Woodstock will

17:41continue to welcome the thoughtful

17:43welcome thoughtful development in town

17:45balanced with a continued conservation

17:47of natural and cultural resources that

17:50are essential to the realization of this

17:51vision.

17:56And that's an important statement that

17:58very much um formed the basis of

18:01everything that is to come uh in this

18:03plan.

18:06And so you'll note that we highlighted

18:09three key themes and in that vision

18:11statement. And those are protect,

18:14develop, and enjoy.

18:17Um and because of those things, so we we

18:20looked at the what do we want to do in

18:21Woodstock? We want to protect. And the

18:23the the key elements that went into that

18:25portion, that theme, is elements of

18:28soil, water, air, wildlife, open space,

18:31agricultural resources, and our history.

18:34Those are things we want to protect.

18:36When we look at the the theme of

18:37develop, we want to look at again

18:40agricultural development, housing,

18:42infrastructure, our schools, our

18:44resilience in the way that we grow.

18:46And in the theme of enjoy, we looked at

18:49things like our town resources, our

18:50recreation, our community organizations,

18:53and our multiple boards and commissions

18:55and people who are dedicated to making

18:56Woodstock a great place.

18:58And so those three themes formed the

19:01basically the skeleton, the the the the

19:03um infrastructure of how the rest of the

19:06plan was structured.

19:09So we we basically broke the rest of the

19:11plan down into those three three key

19:12topics. So, under protect we again we

19:16looked at conservation. We incorporated

19:18the plan of open space and conservation

19:20and updated that. I'm sorry, that was it

19:22in 2001. So, it was a little earlier

19:24than I thought.

19:26Um and looking at all sorts of things,

19:28our water resources, our soils, our key

19:30watersheds, our drinking water supplies,

19:32our natural resources, our uninterrupted

19:35forest blocks. Uh and particularly our

19:37our key agricultural resources. Since we

19:39examined all of these elements and

19:41identified the things that are necessary

19:44to protect and the methods in which to

19:46protect them. So, we looked at our

19:47water, our soils, our climate

19:49resilience, looking at things like doing

19:51better and and having better access to

19:53mapping. Looking at things like green

19:56infrastructure and um

19:58uh low-impact development. So,

20:00stormwater management. Um and certainly

20:03the elements of water conservation,

20:05energy conservation, uh riparian

20:07buffers, and things like that. All of

20:09those elements were considered and

20:11prioritized in the protect area.

20:14We also certainly looked at our key

20:17um land covers, our farmlands, our

20:19forests, our open spaces. Um looking at

20:22the the protection that we've done in

20:24terms of agricultural preservation,

20:26forest land preservation, uh our PA 490.

20:30Um and then we made some recommendations

20:32on prioritizing acquisitions. What types

20:35of land should we be investing in

20:37protecting over the long term? Uh where

20:39are they located? What characteristics

20:40do they have? Um how do we support our

20:43working farms, our working forests, as

20:45well as our wildlife corridors? So,

20:47those things were prioritized and

20:49identified in that portion of the

20:50chapter.

20:52And then some of the more human scale

20:54things, our historic character, um our

20:57historic district on on Woodstock Hill

20:59and our historic um properties,

21:01resources, vistas, our stone walls, our

21:04scenic roads. Um and and not is this

21:08about protecting those things through,

21:10you know, easements, through open space

21:12acquisition, but it's also about

21:13stewarding those things to make sure

21:15that a farm, once protected, doesn't

21:18just grow up to become a a forest, that

21:20it be retains its active agricultural

21:23uses, and that the farms the farmers

21:25that that farm those lands

21:27can thrive.

21:29Um, and so those were the elements that

21:31were included in protect.

21:36Then in the in the develop theme,

21:38um, we talked a lot about housing, um,

21:41which is, again, housing is sort of the

21:44major human interface with the town of

21:46Woodstock.

21:47Um, we recognize that Woodstock is

21:49extremely um,

21:52uh,

21:53dependent on its single-family

21:54residences. Um,

21:56you know, we don't have a particularly

21:58uh, high-density uh, development, so

22:00we're we're generally dependent on our

22:02on our automobiles to get from place to

22:04place.

22:05Um, and we don't have a lot of uh,

22:08higher-density multi-family mixed-use

22:10opportunities that would allow people to

22:13um, not have not be in their cars uh,

22:16getting from place to place.

22:17And so we looked at the opportunities

22:20for new residents, for lower-income

22:22residents, for aging residents, people

22:24who are looking to downsize, um, and and

22:26trying to find opportunities for um,

22:29new housing uh, choices in Woodstock.

22:34Also, we and obviously we we talk about

22:36agriculture as a conservation priority,

22:39but agriculture is one of the major

22:41business uh, sectors in Woodstock, and

22:43so the development of agriculture

22:46as a a business entity, as an economic

22:48driver, re- remains incredibly

22:50important. So, you know, farmland sort

22:52of spans the conservation and the

22:54development end of things.

22:56Uh, and that includes, you know, making

22:58sure that our regulations are in place

22:59to allow farmers to expand the the

23:02potential uses on their property and

23:04looking at

23:05agritourism opportunities

23:07and agribusiness opportunities both on

23:09farm and in our community in general.

23:12And then leveraging those resources, the

23:13Woodstock Fair, the

23:15you know, farm to farm to table, farm

23:18stands. Um

23:20and coordinating our small business

23:22promotion that that is also very rural

23:24and and agricultural based.

23:29And then finally looking at those

23:30infrastructural systems that maintain

23:33our ability to

23:35to function and to be interconnected. So

23:37our road and transportation systems

23:40making sure that our um our roads and

23:43infrastructures are resilient and are of

23:46high quality and are safe. That also

23:48looking at things like bicycle and

23:51pedestrian access and bicycle and

23:52pedestrian safety. Um

23:55telecommunications towers and and other

23:58kind of communications infrastructure,

24:00broadband internet. All of these

24:02elements

24:03are critical to to Woodstock working

24:05together and and being able to grow and

24:07thrive as well as our current

24:09infrastructure, our public water lines

24:11and our public sewer lines which for the

24:14for the time being and for the

24:15projectable future are you know, limited

24:17to that area of of Harrisville and South

24:19Woodstock, a little bit on Woodstock

24:21Hill to serve the academy.

24:23And so we you know, analyzed our ability

24:26to expand that and on our you know,

24:28relative lack of interest in expanding

24:30and basically looking to preserve and

24:32maintain that infrastructure as it is.

24:38Then we get into the third of the three

24:40themes which is enjoy which is I think

24:42kind of a novel approach to looking at

24:44some of these things that make Woodstock

24:46special.

24:47Um and so we want to look at our in in

24:49this section we looked at the the

24:51elements of Woodstock that make it a a

24:54special place to live in, to visit and

24:57to interact. and so our parks our trails

25:00our recreation programs and outdoor

25:01experiences the preserved farms the

25:04forests that you know the

25:07open space trails

25:09making sure that we had our core

25:10amenities were well taken care well

25:12taken care of town parks

25:14the Woodstock Academy you know

25:16recreation facilities Roseland parks and

25:18making sure all of these things are well

25:20taken care of well maintained and are

25:22responsive to the needs of a changing

25:25demographic to make sure that the

25:26programming

25:28meets our needs.

25:31Then we looked at our traditions and our

25:34common um

25:36the things that sort of bring us

25:37together as Woodstock our fairs our

25:39festivals things from the Woodstock fair

25:41to the 4th of July Jamboree and in in

25:43East Woodstock our our community

25:46libraries our scenic roads

25:48and and the

25:50um

25:51traditions that are established and um

25:54fostered by our small businesses by our

25:56nonprofit groups by our community

25:58development organizations to kind of

26:00keep things happening in Woodstock keep

26:02Woodstock promotion

26:04growing

26:06and fostering our connections and so we

26:08we identified those and looking to

26:10foster and support support those.

26:12And then this is perhaps one of the most

26:14important things is recognizing that

26:16Woodstock is a small town that has

26:18embraced

26:20basically small government and and

26:21government by

26:23um volunteers government by its citizens

26:26and we have such an extensive list of

26:29community organizations town boards and

26:31commissions volunteer led groups

26:35you know our committees our commissions

26:37our boards

26:38um

26:39that you know work tirelessly year round

26:42for no pay

26:44just for the love of Woodstock for the

26:45love of community and so we want to make

26:47sure that we um

26:49inventory these groups make sure that

26:50they are supported that they have

26:52resources, that they are interconnected,

26:54um and that they are able to continue

26:57their good work

26:58through sort of sensible capital

27:00planning and coordination.

27:03So, those were the primary areas of

27:04focus.

27:05And then each of those themes we we

27:08broke down those topics. So, for in in

27:10in develop we talked about

27:11transportation and roads and bridges and

27:14that sort of thing.

27:15And each of those

27:16areas had specific goals and specific

27:20actions. And so then we gathered all of

27:23those recommendations for specific goals

27:25and specific actions into a a large

27:28implementation table. And this is at the

27:30end of the draft of the plan of

27:32conservation and development and it

27:33essentially represents a detailed to-do

27:36list. So, we set these goals, we have

27:38this broad vision for what we want

27:40Woodstock to be over the next 10 years.

27:42How are we going to get from here to

27:44there?

27:46This is where implementation comes in.

27:48So, for each of those action steps, what

27:51we have done in the implementation table

27:53is we break down the action item. So,

27:55for instance, in the protect category,

27:58continue to use farmland soil data as a

28:01tool for prioritizing agricultural soil

28:03conservation. That's a very specific

28:05goal.

28:06That's fine, but whose job is it and how

28:08important is it and how much is it going

28:10to cost? And so each of those tasks are

28:14assigned a lead entity. So, in that

28:16case, the goal is the lead entity is the

28:18open space and agricultural preservation

28:20commission.

28:22There are support entities, certainly

28:23town staff, and the board of selectmen

28:26through through providing resources to

28:28them.

28:29This is an ongoing project, but it's a

28:31relatively low-level project cuz using

28:33soil data is not a major capital

28:35investment. We're not buying anything.

28:37We're using available data. And so it's

28:39a relatively low-cost thing. And so in

28:41this

28:42implementation table we break down all

28:44of those tasks in a way that everyone

28:46understands whose job is it,

28:48how much it's likely to cost, what the

28:50priority is, how long it's going to

28:52take, and when they should get started

28:54on it.

28:55Um and so that is the full breakdown of

28:59um

29:00all of our tasks to help us achieve our

29:03goals in the plan of conservation and

29:05development.

29:07So that's the structure of the plan.

29:09Uh moving forward from here, again,

29:11we're having a public hearing right now.

29:13The public hearing

29:14um can continue if the the commission

29:16feels it's important. We could broaden

29:18outreach, but again, there's been

29:20extensive outreach through this process

29:22through a a great number of public

29:23meetings, through surveys and input and

29:26a solicitation of all the different

29:27boards and commissions. Um so it can be,

29:31you know, modified from here.

29:33Um once it is adopted,

29:35the plan as we see it today is in its

29:38basically um

29:40draft form. Um

29:43there will be it will be cleaned up. It

29:44will be, you know, any typos are going

29:45to be corrected. We're going to add a

29:47lot a lot of great pictures um and and

29:49basically clean it up so it is a

29:51showpiece document. Um and so over the

29:54next month or two, once it's adopted, we

29:56will clean it up and have a final uh

29:58layout that will be available on the

29:59town website that will be will be

30:00available in hard copy for boards and

30:02commissions to use.

30:04And this will become our 10-year plan.

30:05In many ways, it will be for the

30:07planning and zoning commission. Uh

30:09there's a lot of regulatory changes

30:10recommended here

30:12um for open space commission, for the

30:14board of selectmen, for the board of

30:15finance, for economic development. These

30:17are our marching orders for the next 10

30:19years.

30:21Um we are going to, following this, um

30:24the COG is going to be working on the

30:26regional housing growth plan and their

30:28regional plan of conservation and

30:29development. So this document will be

30:31used extensively in guiding the

30:33formation of those plans, which are our

30:35next um

30:37uh our next tasks. And then we basically

30:40take those goals and they and and the

30:42specific recommendations and we take

30:44action. The Planning and Zoning

30:45Commission will have a full agenda of of

30:48regulation changes

30:50and recommendations to move forward over

30:53the next 10 years when it's not dealing

30:54with, you know, applications and that

30:56sort of thing. So, those are the

30:57proposed next steps.

31:00Um, and I will stop there and be happy

31:02to um answer any questions that the

31:04commission may have about the process

31:07um

31:08or the document itself. And and I can

31:10bring the actual document itself up on

31:12the screen if people want to ask about

31:15specific sections of the plan.

31:17And I'll turn it back over to you, Mr.

31:19Chair.

31:20>> Thank you, John. Thank you for all your

31:22work. Um

31:24>> [clears throat]

31:24>> Let's get any commission comments yet?

31:27Or do we want to open it to people who

31:29can open

31:30>> Well, so the last meeting where we

31:31discussed this, we talked about

31:34scorecards, etc. And I guess adjacent to

31:38that

31:39is my question of how we get or how are

31:42we going to

31:43uh

31:45inform the people who have been

31:47designated as the lead person or

31:50commission

31:52that they are now charged with carrying

31:54these things out.

31:56And how is that process going to happen?

31:57Are we going to call them up or are we

31:59going to send them a memo?

32:00>> that they're going to get handed

32:02the finished copy and say, "This is our

32:04guideline." I mean, all the commissions

32:05have had input and know what's going on.

32:09>> But you have to read through the entire

32:11thing in order to see if you are

32:14uh designated as the person to carry it

32:16out for all of them.

32:18>> Well

32:19Yeah.

32:19>> I mean, I we would hope that people

32:20would do that. However,

32:22you know, it's a big document and and I

32:24I worry that

32:26there are going to be things that people

32:28will be say that uh

32:31you know, open space is charged with

32:33doing this and this and this

32:35and it'll just go by the wayside. I

32:38guess I worry about that.

32:39>> I think the implementation table is um

32:42if you leave the first 112 pages out and

32:46just look at that table,

32:48then you get a very clear um

32:51plan of who is in charge of what by

32:53item. So I think we can shrink like the

32:56the mass of looking for where you're

32:58involved to that, you know, 20-page

33:01table. And then they can go back into

33:03the document to find um background about

33:06what was said about those topics.

33:09I do agree with your concern though

33:11because in the past these documents have

33:13been created and then kind of shelved.

33:15We discussed that when we started this

33:18whole update how we wanted to create a

33:19document that was user-friendly and

33:22encouraged people to actually do what

33:24was in the document. And I think that um

33:28the layout that John created with all of

33:30our input um and the three

33:33different, you know, themes will help

33:36with that. But I do think that we

33:39we or someone has to be tasked with

33:42annually, maybe we call the Board of

33:45Selectmen to send out an annual letter

33:46that says, you know, to every

33:48commission, have you done any of your

33:51POCD goals and report back and kind of

33:54do an annual. I think that would be

33:56logical.

33:58>> Does it make sense to go through the

34:00list of implementation

34:02guideline or the the long list that's in

34:05the back.

34:06And

34:07call out

34:09the different commissions and people

34:12who're responsible for different things

34:13and put under each commission a list of

34:17things they're responsible for.

34:19And up front

34:21send them that list and say, you know,

34:23over the next 10 years

34:25we're hoping you will be able to

34:28accomplish some goal.

34:30>> I don't think that falls on us.

34:31>> That doesn't fall us.

34:33>> We We have this document. We produced

34:34it. We handed it to the commissioner to

34:36say,

34:37this is

34:38to the chair or to to different

34:40commissions and say,

34:42you know, this this is the document that

34:44we produced with your input and these

34:48this is your guideline.

34:50>> Yeah. I I will note also uh

34:53the very last the very last

34:55implementation item on the list, the

34:57very last thing on page whatever it is,

34:59114,

35:01is a task for planning and zoning, which

35:04is to undertake an annual review of the

35:06progress of the POCD,

35:08including a survey of implementation

35:10partners led by the planning and zoning

35:12commission at their January or February

35:13meetings. So, this you know,

35:16amongst the many things that planning

35:17and zoning has charged themselves with,

35:20um ongoing monitoring and communication

35:22with the other boards and commissions is

35:24a key element. So, we will, you know, we

35:27I and certainly what we we will do is we

35:30can um do a little bit of a little bit

35:33of outreach and we can, you know,

35:35um email and I can can coordinate with

35:37with chairman of the various commissions

35:39to say, you know, here's the plan. Um

35:42you know, here's the implementation

35:43table. There's a bunch of stuff for your

35:45commission. We'd encourage you to review

35:47this at your next meeting with your

35:48commission to talk about the different

35:50goals.

35:51Um and and you know, we'll be checking

35:54in with you. Um we meaning the planning

35:56and zoning commission on an annual basis

35:58over the next decade just to to see how

36:00it's going and see if there are

36:02resources that you need, if there there

36:03are obstacles,

36:05or if priorities have evolved. But but

36:08we did assign to ourselves

36:10um

36:11doing some coordination uh and and

36:13follow-up.

36:16>> Joseph,

36:16>> uh John, that implementation table, the

36:20uh 25 pages, uh is that uh like a

36:23Excel spreadsheet that you put together?

36:25>> Um

36:26>> Um I I put it together in Word. Uh

36:29I could convert it to a spreadsheet, but

36:31it's it's a Word table right now.

36:33>> Because I was going to kind of follow up

36:35on John's suggestion and under the lead

36:37entity, if the table could be sorted

36:40just by each commission. So,

36:44when this is finally approved and we can

36:46have maybe three or four pages that

36:50offer to each board commission chair

36:53board or commission chair uh just uh

36:56sorted based on

36:58their lead entity responsibility. Uh it

37:01might

37:01>> Yeah, I mean it wouldn't be it wouldn't

37:02be too difficult to convert a a Word

37:04table to an Excel spreadsheet and sort

37:06it. That's that's very doable.

37:08>> Okay.

37:09>> That that that's exactly the kind of

37:11thing I had in mind.

37:12>> Okay.

37:13>> Something that would just make it easier

37:14for people to just look at quickly what

37:17are what are my responsibilities here.

37:19Right.

37:20And and not have to worry about somebody

37:21else's.

37:22>> Yep.

37:23>> Cuz otherwise it you know, it's it's

37:25sort of daunting cuz like

37:27stuff can get lost like

37:28>> Yep.

37:29>> Makes sense.

37:31>> Do Any other commissioners have

37:33um comments? I mean, we'll get a chance

37:35later. I just wanted to before we open

37:37it up to the public comment.

37:39>> Okay, we're going to go to public

37:40comment. Um Please if you have a

37:42comment, just um state your name for the

37:45um for the record and

37:48we are ready to hear from you.

37:56Yes, Don.

37:58>> Don Aleta, chair of Open Space and

38:00Parkland Preservation Committee.

38:02Um

38:03uh

38:04Your point is well taken. But most of

38:06the committees already know what their

38:08jobs are. It's in our job description

38:11when people volunteer to sit on these

38:12various commissions, boards, and

38:14committees. And we are charged with

38:17creating an annual report already that

38:19talks about needing the votes. So, I

38:21know my plan for that is simply to send

38:24P&Z a copy of what I already sent to the

38:26Board of Selectmen and at Board of

38:27Finance.

38:28>> Okay.

38:30Thanks.

38:34>> Yes, did.

38:36I

38:36Derek May just recently moved back into

38:39town. I had a chance to review this.

38:42I like the document. A lot of work a ton

38:43of work obviously went into it.

38:46Seems very comprehensive. The only thing

38:47I noticed um

38:49as a potential omission is I've got

38:52background in fire department in in

38:54another town.

38:56There's very little

38:58mention of

38:59the three Woodstock fire departments.

39:02Um

39:04as far as I

39:06I think they um

39:09deserve a paragraph. I guess is what it

39:11is what it comes to. If we're talking

39:13about

39:14the points that John brought up

39:16we're talking about a sense of village.

39:18Talking about um

39:20municipal development cuz

39:23there is still entities anything can

39:25change and probably

39:28the nature of things we're talking

39:29about.

39:30People who don't work in town including

39:33myself.

39:34Um who are staffing that so you can see

39:37there's opportunity for change there.

39:39We're talking about um

39:41water supply issues, roads, everything.

39:44So,

39:45introducing a

39:47at least a paragraph acknowledging that

39:49along with the other good uh boards and

39:51commissions and entities within town I

39:53think would be good. And that may at

39:56some point

39:57this document may benefit that

40:00discipline when they're going for grants

40:02and looking for solutions.

40:04Um to be able to point back to document

40:06like this and say, "See, we are part of

40:08of this." So, there's still opportunity

40:11to do that.

40:12>> [clears throat]

40:12>> Um

40:13I'll submit that for your consideration.

40:15Thank you.

40:16>> Thank you, Derek.

40:19>> See.

40:20To add on to to Derek's point, we have a

40:24relatively new emergency response

40:27um

40:29director, I guess he is, um but a new

40:31emergency response kind of entity in

40:33town that coordinate and they do a lot

40:36um

40:37for emergency planning and that also

40:40would be beneficial to have in there

40:42because we are under more threats of all

40:44different types, whether you know,

40:46people

40:48and I know that they go out for grants,

40:50so I don't know if I would like to see

40:51that added. If first topic gets added

40:53in.

40:56Thank you for that.

41:00>> Great. Thank you, Derek. Anybody else?

41:03>> No.

41:05>> Yes.

41:05>> I will speak. It's just

41:07I'm chairman of Wetlands, just

41:09go follow up with his

41:11go up with his comment is

41:14there's a probably volunteerism in

41:17the fire departments and

41:19you know, it might be a good idea to try

41:21to recognize that if that's going to

41:23change

41:24at some point how we look at

41:26our services, whether we do some

41:29amount of fire companies or

41:32uh offering more funding for fire

41:34companies, so

41:36um

41:36that could be a major

41:38thing for us and

41:40probably going to your insurance and

41:42house insurance

41:44is somewhat based on how far you are

41:45from the fire station.

41:48So.

41:49And even now, as far as I know, when

41:51they have any alarm, and when stop,

41:53all three fire departments respond right

41:55away.

41:57They're at least

41:58uh alerted and standby.

42:03>> Thank you.

42:06Um anybody else?

42:14Um

42:18Thank you guys, everybody, for showing

42:19up. You My concern is that I

42:24we did our best to get

42:26this out so people could see it and show

42:27up if they wanted to.

42:29Um put it on the website and then we put

42:31it on Woodstock Proud.

42:34Um

42:39Is our we set with our public input or

42:41should we extend this and try to get

42:42more people on more input? I don't know

42:44if it's going to

42:46I don't I'm just I'm just throwing it

42:47out there to see what people think.

42:51>> I I'd have one comment if I could

42:54address it with with John

42:57and maybe the rest of the commission on

42:58the housing

43:00on page 58.

43:02You know,

43:03paper copy, not sure if that aligns with

43:05the

43:06online

43:07>> table at the top? Yeah.

43:09Let me I'll bring it up just so we're on

43:11the same literally on the same page.

43:14>> Okay. And it's not so much a table if

43:16you can go down it's in that second

43:18paragraph.

43:20I don't know if you can blow it up. It's

43:22pretty hard for

43:24anybody to read it. Maybe we can zoom.

43:27I was just concerned

43:29about four lines down the the last

43:33sentence in that second paragraph. The

43:352022 Woodstock Affordable Housing Plan

43:38starting with that.

43:41Uh calculated the housing gap of

43:43approximately 945 ownership housing

43:46units and 465 rental.

43:51I don't know where that number came

43:53from.

43:54And I think we may want to just

43:57strike that whole sentence.

44:00The numbers really aren't adding up.

44:03And when I looked at that affordable

44:05housing report for a gap analysis

44:08uh there were two tables

44:11one that um

44:12housing gap analysis for a family of

44:14four households

44:17and that actually showed just a deficit

44:19of 49

44:22opportunity housing opportunities

44:25uh in the extremely low-income range.

44:29The other

44:31housing gap analysis for renters

44:34actually showed a surplus of available

44:37housing units. Uh the table is made up

44:40of a supply and demand uh numbers and

44:43that's that's where I'm saying I'm

44:45getting my numbers from.

44:47But anyway, uh

44:48that number of 945

44:52needed

44:53housing units and 465

44:57additional housing units

45:00don't know where those numbers came

45:01from.

45:03>> Are they are they are they not or this

45:05was this was pulled from the plan that

45:06was already adopted? Is it that are

45:08those not reflected in that plan?

45:10>> I was looking for that but that same

45:12statement or similar and I really

45:14couldn't find it, John.

45:16Doesn't mean it's not in there but I

45:17didn't see it under uh either that

45:20housing gap analysis section or

45:22>> I yeah cuz I I wasn't involved in the in

45:24the drafting or adoption of that plan.

45:25This was just uh pulled from there but I

45:27can I I I can tentatively

45:31have that have that taken out unless it

45:33can be verified. That's that's fair.

45:35>> Okay.

45:43Uh that was the only comment that I

45:45wanted to make, John, I think on on the

45:47report. Otherwise, uh

45:49the work through the different meetings

45:50and reviews have seemed to capture a lot

45:54of what everybody was talking about

45:55looked at.

45:56>> So

45:57That's Thank you, Joe. Um Mr. Chair, I

46:01would I would No, I mean that's that's a

46:02that's a change that can be made. I to

46:04to um

46:05Derek May's uh note and and Bill

46:08Ruinsky's comment on that, I I would I

46:10think that's an outstanding

46:12um

46:14thought and and that's something that we

46:15hadn't uh noted enough of.

46:18I would propose that we would add a um a

46:21small section under

46:24town volunteerism to specifically call

46:26out um the fire companies as well as our

46:29emergency management um force

46:32uh reflecting their value to the

46:34community um and per Bill's note noting

46:37that it is a very difficult demanding

46:40volunteer job um

46:42that not only keeps people um engaged in

46:45the community but also keeps

46:47budgets down um for the town and and and

46:49maintains that level of of uh

46:51volunteerism connectivity. Um I'm happy

46:54to do that if you would like to

46:57um

46:59you know, I I would say I wouldn't want

47:00you to to adopt this this evening but

47:03you know, it's it's really up to you if

47:05you'd like to close the hearing or not,

47:07you know, with with the note that this

47:08that section will also be added.

47:12>> Do we have any input from um anybody

47:14online?

47:19>> Uh there was a Mark

47:20>> Great presentation and uh thank you,

47:23Amy, and thank you to everybody that

47:25worked so hard on this.

47:32>> Okay. Is there

47:35There's no member of members of the

47:36public online

47:38that I can see.

47:39>> so, no.

47:40>> Okay.

47:42>> I would recommend maybe keeping the

47:44hearing open uh for one more meeting

47:47just so the finalized version is

47:50available online and people can read it.

47:53I think it's very close to being

47:54approved uh but

47:56um just to give everybody a chance to

47:58look at the real final final version.

48:02I don't think it hurts to hold it open

48:04for one more meeting.

48:06It may

48:07keep it open and it may close pretty

48:09quickly.

48:09>> Yeah. If we continue it to our next

48:12regular monthly meeting.

48:13>> Yeah.

48:15>> I agree, Joseph.

48:17>> Doug Porter, I agree with Joseph. I

48:19think leaving it open for another

48:20meeting, another month or another till

48:22another meeting, I think it's good.

48:24Gives some people an opportunity to

48:25digest whatever was spoken about tonight

48:28and it's

48:30there's no rush for us to do anything

48:32until maybe it's the next meeting and go

48:34from there.

48:36>> So yes, John. I would make that a

48:37motion.

48:38>> I'll second it.

48:40>> Okay. All in favor?

48:42>> Aye.

48:42>> Aye.

48:43>> Aye.

48:43>> Aye.

48:44>> Any opposed? Any abstentions? So moved.

48:49Um

48:52>> Do that.

48:53>> November what? 19th meeting?

48:56>> Yeah, to the next next regular monthly

48:57meeting.

48:58>> Yeah.

49:00>> I think we have another public hearing

49:01then, but it shouldn't

49:03I'm not sure if that's going to happen

49:04or not. So

49:07Well, great. That gets us through that.

49:10And that

49:11um

49:15eliminates the Okay, is there any new

49:17business?

49:18>> I have no new business.

49:20>> Can I just make one request?

49:21>> Sure.

49:21>> For the people who came into this public

49:23hearing, now we have a whole month to

49:26talk up

49:28this plan. If there's a lot in here,

49:30there's a lot to learn from it and try

49:32to get new people to come next month. So

49:34I appeal to you to invite others to come

49:37next time.

49:41>> Okay.

49:42Old business

49:43that was negated because we

49:46kept the public hearing open.

49:48Um

49:50that brings us to number eight.

49:52Home occupations, John.

49:54>> Uh no new home occupation applications

49:56this month.

49:58>> Okay.

50:00Do we have any more citizen comments?

50:03Hearing none, we're going to

50:05communications to get our ZEO report.

50:09>> Uh I posted the ZEO report uh this

50:11afternoon. Um nothing too out of the

50:14ordinary. A couple of

50:16um

50:17accessory buildings, uh garages, a new

50:19ADU, um

50:21which is good to see.

50:23Uh a couple of bonds, uh one released

50:26for erosion sedimentation, and the folks

50:28for Scranton Village, the owners of

50:29Scranton Village, stopped in the office

50:31this after this morning and dropped off

50:33their uh stormwater bonds. Um so they

50:36are moving along. We anticipate they're

50:39going to have their their um special

50:41permit filed in the next week or so, and

50:44they can actually start their

50:45construction work.

50:47Um we do have a public hearing scheduled

50:49for uh November for Jeffco Fibers with

50:52the the former Crabtree and Evelyn

50:54property,

50:55um looking to add uh storage and

50:57warehouse building. So that that special

50:59permit hearing will open in November.

51:01Um I'll note that we also uh approved,

51:04uh we, meaning you, the town meeting,

51:07uh would stock approve the new citation

51:09ordinance that will allow

51:11um land use violations as well as scenic

51:13road violations and historic

51:14preservation violations to be addressed

51:17um a little bit more directly with

51:19fines.

51:20Um and then we are um

51:24in the loop now finally about the cog uh

51:27starting to undertake their regional

51:29plans of conservation and development

51:30and housing uh growth. So what they're

51:33looking for volunteerism and

51:35participation in both of those.

51:38>> Uh

51:38>> John,

51:40would you be able to comment a little

51:41bit more on NECOG's uh

51:44function and participation in creating

51:46that regional housing plan uh

51:49to

51:50address the state's requirement that

51:53every municipality have something or

51:55each municipality

51:57coordinate with a cog in their area.

52:01>> Yeah, um that's well I mean that's a

52:02pretty good summary, Mitchell. I don't

52:04know how much you want me to elaborate

52:05on that, but yeah, so the basic process

52:08is um the state uh you know the the

52:12state law public act 25-1 created the

52:15responsibility for every municipality to

52:17come up with a housing growth plan. And

52:20that housing growth plan um which will

52:23be um

52:26required to be submitted for for the

52:28Northeast Connecticut towns by June of

52:312028. So, we have just under 2 years um

52:35to develop this.

52:36The process by which this happens is

52:39sort of slowly rolling out um and and

52:43the the function of the the basic

52:45timeline is this.

52:46The state um has the first

52:49responsibility, the Office of Policy and

52:50Management, specifically the Office of

52:52Responsible Growth,

52:54um is charged with coming up by the end

52:57of this calendar year, so in the next 2

52:58months,

53:00the big um housing growth

53:03targets for the next 10 years. So, the

53:0610-year target of total housing growth

53:09um

53:10that is that is projected to be

53:12necessary in the entire state.

53:14Um they take that big number

53:17and then divide it up amongst their uh

53:20nine councils of government. So,

53:22Northeast Let's say the number is

53:25you know, for ease of you know, ease of

53:27numbering, let's say the number is

53:2890,000. And let's say equal

53:30distribution,

53:31each cog would be then responsible for

53:3310,000 of these numbers. That's that's

53:35not going to be the distribution because

53:37obviously the capital region is much

53:38much bigger and more populous than than

53:40Northeast Connecticut.

53:41But, the state will divide up that big

53:44housing number amongst its nine COGs.

53:48That process is going to happen um in

53:51again the next 2 months. That's the

53:52gross number. And so at at beginning of

53:562027, Northeast COG will receive um the

54:01big number. And that is not only a a

54:03gross number for the entire COG. They

54:06must then take that gross number and

54:09divide it up amongst its member

54:11municipalities.

54:13And further divide it into um its net

54:17number of affordable units and

54:19affordable of different types.

54:21Um multi-family ownership, senior

54:23housing, you know, um you know, mobile

54:26manufactured what whatever the category

54:28of affordable. So, that that the COGs

54:30have to take the gross state number and

54:32turn it into a net affordable municipal

54:36number.

54:38Amongst amongst its member

54:39municipalities. And Northeast COG is uh

54:41what like 11 11 communities, 13

54:43communities, something like that.

54:45Um

54:46that number is going to be developed

54:49with the input ideally with the input

54:51and participation of all of the member

54:52municipalities in the COG over the next

54:556 months. Basically between December and

54:57June.

54:58Um

55:00the the the COG will be working with our

55:02member municipalities to come up with

55:04each town's target number.

55:06And the big number from the state is a

55:0810-year target.

55:10Um the COG will be coming up with a

55:125-year

55:14goal

55:15uh for each municipality. And so then

55:17over that period, the municipality must

55:20decide

55:21if it

55:23wants to participate in this regional

55:24process

55:25and work with the COG and the leadership

55:27of the COG to come up with a regional

55:30housing development plan, housing growth

55:32plan with municipal targets and

55:34municipal actions to try to get to our

55:37municipal number that's been

55:39um targeted with us and and assigned to

55:41us by the cog.

55:44Or a municipality can choose to go it

55:46alone. If we disagree with the cog's

55:48approach, if we disagree with the cog's

55:50number, if we believe that we can do

55:52more, if we think, you know, we're

55:54restricted because of infrastructure,

55:56because of soils, because of whatever

55:57reason, because of market, that that's

55:59an unrealistic number, we can submit and

56:01develop or we can develop and submit an

56:03alternative number to the cog and to the

56:06state and come up with our own municipal

56:09housing plan similar to what we did with

56:11the affordable housing plan back, you

56:13know, 4 years ago or so.

56:15The framework of this plan is going to

56:17be a little bit different because there

56:18are actual numbers um assigned to it and

56:21actual types of housing um assigned to

56:24it brought rather than just sort of

56:25broad goals, like, oh, let's loosen

56:27let's loosen our, you know, multi our

56:28our

56:29ADU regulations or something like that.

56:31It needs to be a little bit more

56:32specific than that.

56:34Um but that is a decision that that

56:36Woodstock and all the other communities

56:38of Northeast Connecticut will have to

56:40will have to um that's a decision we'll

56:42have to make basically no later than

56:45July of 2027. So, in about 8 months, we

56:49have to decide whether we're going to

56:50participate in the cog process or go it

56:52alone and come up with our own plan. And

56:54then we'll basically spend the next year

56:57working with cog or working on our own

56:59to come up with um

57:01our housing growth plan.

57:03And so that's that's broadly the time

57:04frame.

57:06>> Have you heard of any punitive measures

57:08the state is thinking of either

57:10not punishment but maybe reducing

57:12funding for road care or schools if

57:16towns don't meet their

57:18assigned target of housing growth? Any

57:21of that commentary?

57:23>> As of right now, the the the language of

57:25the statute is very, very clear that it

57:29is it operates on incentives, not

57:31penalties. That they you know, the the

57:33the reason

57:35the the part of the reason that it was

57:37not adopted that the public act was took

57:40until November to be adopted

57:42um was to make sure that all of the

57:46sticks were removed and and only carrots

57:49remained. Um obviously it's a big

57:50responsibility to come up with this

57:51plan, but if a town um

57:55you know, submits an acceptable plan

57:58and makes good faith efforts towards

58:01towards the

58:02uh achievement of the goals as

58:04established in the plan, it unlocks a

58:06variety of of grant housing grant and

58:09housing opportunities through the

58:11housing growth fund, um through priority

58:13funding, you know, through through OPM

58:15and other grant programs. So, you could

58:17say

58:19you know, that maybe the backhanded

58:21stick is if the town, you know, chooses

58:24to opt out of the system entirely or you

58:26know,

58:28um half-heartedly adopt something and

58:30you know, does not make good faith

58:32efforts towards implementation of those

58:34goals,

58:36you know, it's possible that the town

58:38may lose out on

58:40funding opportunities. You know, that

58:42that are that are discretionary, but

58:44nothing that is currently available to

58:47municipalities is slated to be taken

58:49away if we do not participate.

58:52It is it is only a failure to unlock

58:56incentive funding.

58:58>> Great. Thank you.

59:01Amy.

59:03>> Don, I have a question. Are there any

59:06topics that we should be focusing on in

59:09preparation? Cuz I'm hearing that we

59:11have 8 months or a maximum of 16

59:13meetings

59:14before we actually have to start making

59:16decisions about this housing. So, are

59:19there like do you have documents you can

59:22give us or you know, do we have to plan

59:25the topic like cover certain topics in

59:27that 8-month period to be prepared for

59:29this work.

59:31>> Um yeah, I would So, I would and and

59:34I'll I'll I'll note and you know, I've

59:36I've said this at a couple of earlier

59:37meetings that I've been a little bit

59:39chagrined that NICOG has been late to

59:41the late to the party on some of these

59:43things

59:44that other other COGs are

59:466 months ahead in terms of their

59:47planning.

59:48>> And do you like send us sort of

59:50documents you know, kind of goes along

59:53in that process between now and then so

59:55that we're better prepared?

59:56>> Yeah, we could. Um

59:59yeah, um and but I will I will also, you

1:00:01know, there's also a certain level of

1:00:03difference because I mean, first of all,

1:00:05we don't even know what the state

1:00:06numbers are going to be yet, you know,

1:00:08and and so a lot will depend on that. Um

1:00:12but I would note and I don't mean to to

1:00:14jump the um

1:00:15the agenda, uh Mr. Chair, but I'll I'm

1:00:19going to put on the screen um the the

1:00:21piece of correspondence that's in

1:00:23correspondence

1:00:24um which addresses just specifically

1:00:26this. This is a letter from NICOG to

1:00:29First Selectman Paquette

1:00:31um

1:00:32that was sent at the uh last week um

1:00:35beginning of October um about the

1:00:37housing growth plan.

1:00:39Um it talks a little bit about what the

1:00:40housing growth plan is and it goes into

1:00:43some of the specifics that um I think to

1:00:46to Amy's question, what we should be

1:00:48thinking about um which is, you know,

1:00:51consistency with our regional plan with

1:00:53our municipal plan and our WPCA goals.

1:00:56Um looking at, you know, zones um or

1:00:59properties that might be suitable for uh

1:01:03you know, additional housing

1:01:04development. Uh different strategies and

1:01:06I think this is something that we can

1:01:07look at our existing affordable housing

1:01:09plan

1:01:10um for, you know, promoting different

1:01:12housing types, looking at an inventory

1:01:15of our developable land in town.

1:01:17Um looking at our zoning regulations, uh

1:01:20Uh, infrastructure needs, our current

1:01:21capacity, what kind of flows we send to

1:01:24Putnam, what kind of water um system

1:01:26capacity we have.

1:01:28Um

1:01:29as well as, you know, some of our our

1:01:31demographics and our housing profile.

1:01:33Um, so there there is some of those

1:01:35things to consider. The state has

1:01:38um done

1:01:41They they've come up with some

1:01:42preliminary recommendations on how to

1:01:44conduct an inventory of developable

1:01:47land. Um, so that work is being done in

1:01:49the background and is going to be

1:01:51available to COGs and and ultimately to

1:01:53municipalities as well

1:01:55um to assist in those efforts.

1:01:57But, yeah, I mean, it you know, broadly

1:02:00speaking, we're looking at housing

1:02:01growth opportunities, particularly

1:02:03affordable housing.

1:02:04And so we're, you know, we should be

1:02:05looking at those standard things. What,

1:02:07you know, our zoning regulations, our

1:02:09developable land our infrastructure, you

1:02:12know, um

1:02:13those kind of key things that that would

1:02:16impact our ability and uh to develop

1:02:19certain types of housing in certain

1:02:20locations.

1:02:23And yes, and and insofar as um guidance

1:02:27from other COGs

1:02:29is useful, I'm happy to share it. Again,

1:02:31I I I want to be a little bit sensitive

1:02:33to not stepping on the toes of of our

1:02:35COG, which is charged specifically with

1:02:38leading this process and frankly funded

1:02:41to lead this process. Like,

1:02:42municipalities are given zero dollars to

1:02:44do this planning. COGs are given several

1:02:46hundred thousands of dollars every year

1:02:48to do this planning. So,

1:02:50I would encourage us to take their lead.

1:02:52Um, but but, you know, not wait around

1:02:54too long.

1:02:59>> Thank you, John.

1:03:01Um

1:03:03brings us to budget report.

1:03:05Um

1:03:07We seem to be staying within our bounds

1:03:10on that.

1:03:12>> Yeah, there's there's nothing

1:03:14particularly of note there, I would say.

1:03:16>> Um, any additional correspondence other

1:03:19than I mean that we covered that.

1:03:21>> other than the knee thing, that's

1:03:22it.

1:03:23>> Okay.

1:03:26And then

1:03:26>> Mark still on?

1:03:27>> Mark still on?

1:03:30Brings us to a number 12, adjournment.

1:03:32>> [laughter]

1:03:34>> Bye Mark.

1:03:35>> Is there a motion?

1:03:36>> Move to adjourn.

1:03:38>> There you go.

1:03:39>> [laughter]

1:03:39>> We have a second?

1:03:41>> Second.

1:03:42>> All in favor?

1:03:43>> Aye.

1:03:44>> Aye.

1:03:44>> Aye.

1:03:46>> So moved.

1:03:47>> Thank you everybody.

1:03:49>> Can I

```*