2026-10-29 - Planning & Zoning- Data Center Legislation Discussion Meeting

Summary

Built from the city's event listing and auto-generated captions; names and figures may be misheard. Minutes are not posted. The video runs about 1 hour 55 minutes.

  • Hearing 4 of 5 in the Data center legislation hearing series, on community benefits and economic growth. A TVA representative (Jamie Bach, data center business development; captions also render "James") spoke first because TVA could not attend earlier hearings, and described a centralized intake process for data center requests covering size, timing, system impact studies and full cost recovery.
  • Doug McGowan (MLGW) said loads over 5 MW trigger a TVA system impact study; data centers pay the distribution costs of serving them, can be curtailed first, and face penalties and then disconnection if they do not curtail, all written into service agreements. See Data center electric service and ratepayer protections.
  • MLGW can serve roughly 800 to 850 MW; above that TVA serves the customer directly (the two figures were both stated). He said the xAI Colossus 1 site draws 150 MW from MLGW and generates another 150 MW behind the meter, with that shift expected around December or January. See MLGW System Capacity and Substation Planning.
  • Recycled water plant: he described xAI building a $250 to $300 million plant that reduces demand on the aquifer. Councilmembers pressed on the fact that there is no contract requiring it; the answer was that it is offered as a gift, with a city land contract that lets the city claw back the land if it is not built. See xAI clean water recycling plant and Memphis aquifer protection and groundwater monitoring.
  • Community benefits: the chair said 25 percent of the taxes xAI pays to the city is required to go to communities near the sites, and councilmembers asked for the administration's breakdown of how it is spent. Jeff Warren floated an independent community benefits agency (modeled on an authority, which would need state legislation) and asked the Chamber of Commerce to research a 2025 state bill, 1074, said to preempt community benefits agreements. See Data center community benefit agency ordinance and Data center community benefits fund allocation.
  • A Chamber of Commerce representative said the Chamber is business-funded, defended confidentiality agreements as necessary for recruiting, and offered help with state lobbying.
  • Pearl Walker and Yolanda Cooper-Sutton asked for a public list of company community investments; a member cautioned that some may be covered by nondisclosure agreements. Cooper-Sutton also asked for air quality monitors in affected communities and for the EDGE board to attend future hearings. See Air quality monitoring and permits near data centers.
  • Chris Winton outlined the mayor's 90-day plan, including a repository of past presentations, community outreach in Boxtown and Whitehaven, and truck rerouting near one school.
  • Residential net metering (not permitted in Tennessee without a law change) and virtual power plants were also raised; MLGW has begun a residential battery pilot for medically vulnerable customers.
  • Next hearing: November 9, with hearings continuing about every two weeks after that. No formal votes were taken.

Agenda

Community Benefits & Economic Growth, outstanding questions (no formal agenda document posted).

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00hearings, and um, I think they've gone

00:02well. But, uh, here's a focus item for

00:04today's meeting. We're going to, um,

00:07continue reviewing proposed data center

00:09legislation including community benefits

00:11proposals and address outstanding

00:13questions from council members and

00:14community members,

00:16discuss community priorities, potential

00:18benefits, and the information needed to

00:19advance the legislative review.

00:23Um,

00:25I've got a list of attendees that I'm

00:27going to read for us for the record.

00:29We've got the COO here with the city of

00:31Memphis, Chris Winton. We've got DPD in

00:34the audience. I saw I see some Greater

00:36Memphis Chamber

00:37uh, members and executives. I see, uh,

00:40President McGowen

00:42and, uh, VP Ursula Madden with Memphis

00:44Light, Gas, and Water.

00:46And then, um, I've saved our friend from

00:48the Tennessee Valley Authority. We're

00:50going to time travel and actually allow

00:52Mr. Bach to speak first.

00:55Um, they were unable to make the second

00:57and third meeting just due to scheduling

00:58conflicts. So, Mr. James Bach will

01:01actually go first today from TVA.

01:04Um,

01:05and excited to be here and get this, uh,

01:08committee hearing going. So, Mr. Bach,

01:10are you there?

01:16>> Good afternoon. Can you hear me?

01:18>> Good afternoon. We spoke briefly

01:19yesterday.

01:21I still have yet to see your face. There

01:22you are. All right. Nice to Nice to see

01:25you. If you

01:26>> on.

01:27>> Yeah, so if you don't mind, uh,

01:28introduce yourself and, um, tell us a

01:31little bit

01:32about your job there and then I've got a

01:33couple of questions.

01:37>> Okay. Um, did we want to review any

01:40content today or just start with some

01:42Q&A and go from there?

01:44>> Well, I wanted to get just a little

01:46human side from you real quick. Uh,

01:48yeah, if you don't mind.

01:49>> Yeah. Sounds Sounds great. Well, good

01:52good afternoon, everybody. Thank you

01:54for, um,

01:56yeah, thank you for the opportunity to

01:57to update the the council, uh, today. My

02:00name is Jamie Bach.

02:02I lead our newly formed data center

02:05structuring and business development

02:07group and I sit within

02:09our commercial energy function at TVA.

02:14You know, I I

02:15I was reflecting a little bit. I have

02:16been at TVA for over 17 years now, which

02:20has seemingly gone by pretty quickly. Um

02:23but I've had the opportunity to work in

02:25a number of of different spaces. So uh

02:28most of that is kind of on the

02:30commercial energy and customer program

02:32space, but I've also uh spent time in in

02:36parts of our financial services

02:37organization

02:39and and working on uh broader strategy

02:42uh as well.

02:44And and for today and we we we we can

02:46get into it um with some some of the

02:48questions and some of the content, but

02:50my team is really responsible for um

02:54kind of delivering a a standard

02:57commercial framework for data centers

02:59that that our board really helped

03:01establish in our August board meeting.

03:04And and it's it's really rooted in the

03:07mission of TVA uh how we kind of

03:10implement this commercial framework to

03:12to protect ratepayers

03:14um both financially and from a

03:16reliability standpoint. And and the way

03:19we're kind of

03:20executing on this framework is we've

03:23stood up a kind of a centralized

03:26end-to-end process that we are are

03:29working all data data center projects in

03:31the valley through. So

03:33um that's been the focus of my team over

03:36the last three or four months and uh

03:38it's certainly been um

03:40an exciting time to work in the space.

03:42>> All right. Well, thank you for that

03:44introduction. And then uh Doug and

03:46Ursula, if you all don't mind, would you

03:48mind

03:49approaching the desk or whatever if you

03:52will cuz I feel like at some point

03:53during this um

03:56you all may want to want to chime in,

03:57but I'll I'll just start off with the

03:59question for you. And And thank you for

04:00being here.

04:02Um I know you all tried to make it to

04:03the last two meetings.

04:05Um

04:08You know, one of the questions, or I

04:09guess the first question that I asked

04:11Ursula, um

04:13and Doug, you were traveling on that

04:14day,

04:16was, will you explain to us the intake

04:18process

04:20for, you know, everybody talks about

04:22Space XAI, but like any data center or

04:24anything

04:26like that.

04:26>> Sure.

04:29Absolutely happy happy to do that. So,

04:32as I mentioned, kind of coming out of

04:34our August board meeting, we've uh we've

04:36really stood up this

04:38end-to-end

04:40uh

04:40process. So, I'll go a little bit beyond

04:42um just the intake, but just to give a

04:44high-level overview,

04:46um

04:47the process does begin with kind of a

04:49centralized intake function. So, that

04:52that is now my team. We can kind of

04:54serve as as one team, one central point

04:57of contact. Um and and on that very

05:00front end uh part of the process, we're

05:03really gathering information on a

05:06project size, the timing, kind of the

05:09operational characteristics or

05:11expectation,

05:12and that front-end information gathering

05:15really can help feed other parts of the

05:18process. So, again, my team is is kind

05:21of the central hub, if you will, for for

05:23intake. From there, we we work a a

05:27project through kind of a progressive uh

05:31technical evaluation. This is mostly in

05:34our transmission space. So, from system

05:37impact studies to detailed engineering

05:40studies,

05:41what is required um

05:45from an infrastructure need, a timing,

05:48and what costs will this, you know,

05:50prospective data center need to cover

05:52for interconnect.

05:54Uh from there, we overlay a standard

05:57commercial framework, um and then having

06:01again that one team, that one process

06:03really helps

06:04align any

06:06coordinated execution of agreements or

06:08communications

06:10on the back end. So,

06:12I think just having this this consistent

06:15evaluation process has really been

06:17beneficial. [clears throat]

06:18>> All right, and thank you for sharing

06:19that. I'm thinking um

06:22and I'm going to say this humbly as like

06:23the MLGW chair the last 2 years, I feel

06:26like I'm being redundant

06:27but but I always learn something new

06:29when I, you know, think I might know a

06:31little something. So, Ursula and Doug

06:33have done a great job

06:36as far as I'm concerned, you know,

06:37explaining um and I'm thinking

06:39Memphis-centric now

06:42um

06:43as far as an intake process, right? Like

06:45if someone comes to Memphis and they're

06:48exploring building a data center here.

06:51Um you know, and I'm thinking about

06:52speaking to the public right now as

06:53everybody's learning about this process.

06:55Like I understand the intake process for

06:58you at TVA.

06:59But like Doug, you talk about and

07:01Ursula, you've talked about how it takes

07:02like a year maybe sometimes to

07:05do all the research and make sure I'm

07:06talking about protecting ratepayers,

07:09aquifer, like all the things we've

07:10talked about.

07:12Like y'all working in conjunction

07:14together, could you explain that a

07:15little bit?

07:16>> Yes, I'll start. Um

07:18so,

07:19>> [clears throat]

07:19>> typically folks will start with us

07:22and I want to say before we agree to

07:24serve any new customer, I want to

07:26reiterate that my obligation is to

07:28ensure that I protect the availability,

07:30reliability, and affordability of the

07:33utilities that I provide for all of our

07:35existing customers.

07:36>> And thank you. You say that every time

07:38and I appreciate it every time.

07:39>> That is predicate number one. Yeah. So,

07:41if somebody is a large electric customer

07:43like a data center and and asks

07:46uh for service, they will submit a

07:48request, a load request to MLGW.

07:51If that is larger than 5 MW, we will

07:53contact TVA and say we have a large load

07:56customer, so standby because you will be

07:59required to do a system impact study.

08:02What happens is that large load is

08:04evaluated. As was just mentioned, we

08:06look at the size and the location of the

08:08load.

08:09We then look at what is around it. What

08:12kind of infrastructure do we have in

08:14existence? And then we look at the

08:16impacts of what that load will have on

08:18the system. So,

08:20will it affect the reliability of

08:22existing customers? Will it take away

08:25from the availability of power from

08:26existing customers?

08:28And that is a very formalized process of

08:31studying that engineers go through

08:33multiple iterations of.

08:35Um because we want to make sure that in

08:36the most extreme circumstances, if there

08:38is a substation offline or a a power

08:40line down, that we can still serve

08:42everybody ably even in those diminished

08:45circumstances.

08:46TVA does a very similar study for the

08:49transmission of power to our system and

08:52also for the generation. Do they have

08:54enough generation capacity in order to

08:56meet that new load?

08:58Um once that study is completed, we will

09:01then move to a facility study where we

09:03identify

09:04uh that Okay, TVA, it appears they may

09:07have enough power to generate, they can

09:08transmit it to us, uh but they may have

09:11to make some changes to the system to

09:12make it more reliable.

09:14In our distribution system, we may have

09:16to upsize one of the wires to make sure

09:18we don't overload it. We may have to

09:19build a new substation. We may have to

09:23add some new components to the electric

09:25system to make sure it stays reliable

09:27and that we can distribute power under

09:29almost every circumstance.

09:31We calculate the costs of that and then

09:33we present that to the customer and says

09:36and say, "We can serve you under the

09:38following circumstances and here are the

09:41improvements you will have to pay for in

09:42order for us to do that."

09:44Now that is

09:46the process that we look for. I think

09:48that's a community benefit that we talk

09:50haven't talked about in that way, but

09:51number one, that they have to pay their

09:54own way. 100% of the infrastructure

09:56that's necessary to serve them is paid

09:58by them. Now that is not true if the

10:00Philips Spinoza factory comes to town.

10:03If Philips Spinoza factory comes and

10:05they have a large load of greater than 5

10:06megawatts, we, MLGW and TVA, will bear

10:10the costs of bringing the transmission,

10:12generation, all the distribution to you

10:15because we want you as a new large

10:16customer who's going to provide new jobs

10:19for our community. So, you do not have

10:21to pay your own way. We will sell you

10:23more electricity and that's how we'll

10:24get reimbursed. So, number one, pay

10:26their own way. Number two,

10:28predicates for service, even once they

10:30have decided that they'll pay for

10:31everything that we can ably serve them,

10:33is that they have to be curtailed before

10:36every other customer.

10:38So, if there is a pressure on the grid,

10:40we will curtail them first.

10:44Third,

10:45um that

10:46we have to ensure that um

10:49and TVA just did this,

10:51that they are paying more for their

10:53electricity than other commercial and

10:55industrial customers are.

10:57And that is the rate that they are

10:59paying. I'll let TVA talk about the

11:01capacity payment up front to make sure

11:03that they're paying for the generation,

11:04but all of this is

11:06put on the data centers. None of it is

11:08put on the ratepayer. So, that is a

11:10benefit for us to get significantly new

11:13infrastructure on our system,

11:15significantly upgraded infrastructure on

11:16our system at no cost to our customers,

11:19and they are protected from any impacts

11:22to reliability, affordability, or

11:24availability of power.

11:26That is why I can say, as I've talked to

11:28all of you about the water and gas rate

11:30increases that we're proposing, that

11:32they are completely divorced from the

11:33data centers. In fact, we forecasted

11:35that long before the data centers were

11:37even a topic of conversation back in

11:392023. So,

11:41I want everybody to feel comfortable

11:43that it is our obligation, whether it's

11:45a data center or manufacturing plant or

11:47another large load customer, that we

11:49have got to do this rigorous analysis to

11:52ensure that we protect our ratepayers,

11:54we protect the electric grid,

11:56and all of that happens in coordination

11:58with the Tennessee Valley Authority and

11:59MLGW engineers before we can agree to

12:02serve anyone. And then once we have all

12:05those lined out, then there is a service

12:08agreement that goes into effect that

12:10memorializes everything I just said.

12:12Number one, you'll be served with this

12:14amount of power and no more. Number two,

12:16you will be curtailed at this number of

12:18hours per year at our discretion. Number

12:20three, should you fail to curtail, there

12:22are

12:23monetary penalties. Number four, if you

12:25then further

12:26fail to curtail, we will cut you off.

12:29So, there's lots of protections in here

12:32for our constituents that ensure that

12:35they pay their own way and they are the

12:37first to have to curtail their power

12:39before anybody else does. So, that is

12:42how we have operated. That's the model

12:44that we put into place. I will reiterate

12:46again,

12:47that model that we put into place in

12:49Memphis has been replicated and is now

12:52memorialized as the ratepayer protection

12:55pledge that everybody has signed across

12:57the nation. So,

12:58there's a lot of good work that's done

13:00here.

13:01I guess while I have the floor,

13:02Councilman, the other community benefit

13:04I will say is that we also saw that with

13:07our gas and water. We made them pay for

13:09all that infrastructure.

13:10And further, the partnership with TVA

13:13>> When you say we made them pay, who who

13:15what are you talking about?

13:15>> The the data centers had to pay for any

13:18new water or gas infrastructure.

13:20We often talk about electric, but again,

13:22I'll come back to the water. We have

13:24been discussing with TVA since 2018,

13:27how do we reduce their reliance on water

13:30from the aquifer and we came up with the

13:32recycled water plant idea. And so, that

13:35became a benefit that we put forth in

13:37the very first discussion with XAI was

13:40help us build this and that turned into

13:42they are building it and that is a 250

13:44million to 300 million-dollar project

13:46now.

13:48So, a benefit to us is it reduces demand

13:50on the aquifer, protects our customers

13:53and the future customers hundreds of

13:55years in the future to make sure we have

13:57pristine water here. So, hopefully that

13:59covers the water front of a lot of

14:01things about how we treat this

14:03before we agree to serve anyone.

14:05>> All right. Thanks.

14:07Um

14:08I've got another question. We've had

14:09Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton join us.

14:12Um Councilman Canale snuck in quietly.

14:16Impressive. Um,

14:18and Councilman Warren, you're you are in

14:20the queue.

14:22And we got Alan Wade.

14:25Please.

14:28All right. Go ahead go ahead.

14:32You got your mic on?

14:33>> Sir.

14:36So so you your comments

14:40indicated that the process that you had

14:42been using has been memorialized in the

14:44new

14:45state law that requires you and TVA to

14:49ameliorate any impact on the rate payer.

14:51>> And I think nationally the president has

14:53issued that across the country the rate

14:55payer protection pledge and all the

14:56utility all major utilities have adopted

14:58that model.

14:59>> So part of what you said was that

15:02uh they have to also agree to curtail

15:05their usage when there's a peak demand.

15:08>> That's correct.

15:08>> And so is this embodied in an agreement

15:11with you and the customer?

15:13>> It absolutely is. So if they are if we

15:15have an agreement to serve, it is

15:17embodied in the service agreement with

15:18MLGW and the customer. There is a limit

15:21that MLGW can serve. It's 800 megawatts.

15:23Anything above that TVA has to serve

15:26directly. Now they can also serve

15:27directly lower than that. In the service

15:30agreement that TVA has it's memorialized

15:32and it's not just um that they have to.

15:34It's the actual number of hours and the

15:36duration that they have to curtail. And

15:39I will tell you that early on there was

15:41a shorter number of hours and a shorter

15:43number of times and now it is

15:45significant

15:47um especially as TVA builds out new

15:49generation.

15:49>> And then one final question.

15:51To the extent that that we review all

15:55applications for new data centers

15:59and impose a requirement that they have

16:03tained approval for you to serve them

16:08electricity or water or whatever. Um is

16:11there you know at some point in time

16:13could you certify to us that that has

16:16been done so we can check that off our

16:17box.

16:18>> We absolutely can because before and

16:20that's all memorialized in that service

16:22agreement before it comes through there,

16:24the checklist says all of these

16:26requirements have to be met before it

16:28comes to us for approval and that

16:30service agreement can't be signed until

16:32such time as all of those things are

16:34certified, so we're happy to share that.

16:35>> Okay, and and I'll echo on that.

16:38Our process is going to probably be

16:40doing the same thing. You got to meet

16:42all these checklists and that's just

16:43going to be one of them. We check them

16:45off. They meet meet them, they go

16:47forward. If they don't, they don't.

16:48>> Yes, sir.

16:49>> That's all I have and I got to go to

16:50full power.

16:52>> Thank you, Alan.

16:54Um

16:56Thank you again, Doug and James. I want

16:59to be sure I think I called you Jamie on

17:00the phone yesterday.

17:03Is that right?

17:04>> Yes, sir. Jamie.

17:05>> It threw me for a loop. I was like, I

17:06didn't Yeah, I didn't, you know.

17:08Sorry, I was going to apologize for

17:10calling you Jamie. I should have known

17:11that would That would have been what you

17:12go by. Um

17:14>> No problem.

17:16>> Dr. Warren, you got it. Go ahead.

17:17>> I just might

17:18>> Oh, sorry. Go ahead, Jamie. Yeah.

17:22>> No, I was just going to piggyback on um

17:24Doug's comments. He he absolutely right.

17:27I think

17:28the the the standard approach for for

17:31for for TVA [clears throat] valley wide

17:33is is just that, ensuring reliability

17:35and afford- affordability for all and

17:37that the data centers pay their own way.

17:40That's the transmission, that's the

17:42rate, that's the incremental generation.

17:45So, all of those pieces are embedded uh

17:48in our standard commercial offering and

17:50as Doug said there,

17:52uh memorialized in in power contracts as

17:55these

17:56these projects

17:58>> Thank you.

17:58>> are worked into the system, so.

18:00>> Jamie, real quick before I kick it over

18:01to Dr. Warren, I'm looking and I just

18:03want to announce this again. We created

18:05a website on the city website and Ella B

18:08and the administration helped us with

18:09that.

18:10And Ursula, I'm looking at the

18:11communication piece that you sent us.

18:13It's a public update piece and it's got

18:16a ton of great information.

18:19I think almost everything that Doug just

18:21mentioned is on is on here.

18:24And so just available to the public and

18:26Jamie, if you have anything that you

18:27could send us

18:29um

18:30>> Sure.

18:31>> just a fundamental piece that explains,

18:33you know, the protections and

18:35what I think is the great work that that

18:38y'all do and we and I we appreciate the

18:40partnership that we have, but I would

18:41love to be able to put that on online

18:43for people to see.

18:45Certainly if it um

18:47reaffirms anything we're talking about

18:49today just to keep it documented for

18:51everybody.

18:52All right. I feel like I've spoken a

18:53whole lot, council members. Uh

18:56I think council members are coming in

18:57with more questions, but Dr. Warren,

18:59you're up.

19:00>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh thank you uh

19:02Jamie for being with us.

19:04Yeah, I'm sure it you're aware as we are

19:07that the general public is not very very

19:11enamored uh with multiple data centers

19:14coming online rapidly.

19:16And I think what we're seeing is just

19:19sort of a general uh reputation

19:23uh or uh of this industry in general uh

19:27because of worries about it causing

19:30their power to go up, because of worries

19:33about it using uh gas and and turbines

19:37and causing pollution. Is there any plan

19:40for TVA as you're generating more power

19:43for these uh data centers to make sure

19:47that that power is renewable energy? And

19:50if so, what is it and how soon can we

19:52expect it be online? Where are you with

19:55nuclear coming online

19:58to begin to help us as far as uh global

20:00warming and climate change, etc. Because

20:03as we're looking at this, it's all a big

20:05picture. Uh and the amount of

20:08power these things are using now is a

20:11small percentage, but if you look at the

20:13growth of what's going on with these, it

20:15could be much more. So, renewable

20:18energy, where's that coming into TVA's

20:20picture? What are you doing as far as

20:22these data centers requiring them to do

20:24that? And how are you controlling them

20:27coming online and then doing what we had

20:30in Memphis where they just buy out their

20:32own power plant that's carbon-based

20:34power plant, put it next to a

20:36neighborhood and gear it up. How do we

20:39stop that and what are you doing to make

20:40that not occur?

20:42If anything.

20:45A lot of questions.

20:46>> Yeah, maybe a couple comments.

20:48Uh no [clears throat] problem. Our a

20:49couple comments, so

20:51you know, the mission of TVA and then

20:53we've kind of talked on this is

20:55delivering, you know, reliable,

20:57affordable energy and and we do that

20:59through a least-cost planning mandate.

21:01So, really every planning and commercial

21:04decision we make, including as you

21:06alluded to, the integration of data

21:08centers is evaluated through this

21:09least-cost planning mandate. Um we have

21:12a very diverse

21:14uh

21:14uh

21:15generation portfolio. Um and we'll

21:19continue to evaluate those portfolios,

21:21these load growth through efforts like

21:23our IRP. Again, with that foundational

21:26element of protecting existing

21:29customers, maintaining that dependable

21:32um and reliable service. So, we have

21:35those mechanisms like an IRP to evaluate

21:38those different scenarios as we see this

21:41this load growth coming onto our system.

21:42>> What's the IRP again?

21:46You said a IRP.

21:46>> Integrated resource plan.

21:48>> Okay, right.

21:49>> Yes, sir. Apologies. Integrated resource

21:51plan where we evaluate a number of

21:53different scenarios um and the diversity

21:56of our generation portfolio as we see

21:59load growth.

22:01>> Okay.

22:01>> So, if I can add there, we can give you

22:04the top-level summary. The IRP was just

22:05recently completed and I can tell you

22:07having been familiar with this and Jamie

22:09can fill in, there is at least the last

22:11count, I think, 6,000 MW of solar that's

22:14included in this. Um as one of those

22:16pieces, obviously we're going to have to

22:18double the amount of production that TVA

22:20has over the next you know, couple of

22:22decades here, but I know there's a

22:23significant amount of solar integrated,

22:25a significant amount of battery storage

22:27integrated into that as well.

22:28And I will say on the nuclear side, that

22:30is a a nut that the entire nation's

22:32trying to crack. TVA,

22:34um just from talking with the CEO and

22:36understanding this having been in DC,

22:38we want TVA to be the leader in bringing

22:40new nuclear on, but we do not want the

22:4210 million people in the valley who rely

22:44on that to bear the burden of the cost

22:46of the national model. So,

22:48uh there is a significant effort

22:50underway to ensure that TVA has the

22:52resources and funding that don't come

22:54from the ratepayers of TVA. That's

22:56federal dollars to help build out that.

23:01Uh that's a much longer conversation,

23:03but I do want to let you know that that

23:05is top of mind and a priority. I don't

23:07want to speak for Jamie, but uh knowing

23:09uh Mike Skaggs, the new CEO, that is top

23:11of mind for him and he's been working

23:13very hard in DC to bring that on so that

23:15we can be the leader here in new

23:17nuclear. Uh that's everything from micro

23:20to small to large-scale nuclear

23:22reactors. Now, I want to answer the

23:24second part of your question, and that

23:25is

23:26our job is to bring the connection to

23:29the data center. Uh should that

23:32connection be insufficient and they

23:34decide to generate their own power

23:35behind the meter, that is where the

23:37discussions you all are having because

23:40uh that's part of the entitlement that

23:42comes with the zoning that is there.

23:45What is allowable for behind-the-meter

23:47generation? We could not dictate that.

23:50For us, we only evaluate the electrons.

23:54Where would that interface with our

23:55system and what could it potentially do?

23:56Is it an inverter-based, in other words,

23:58a battery, or is it or or solar-type

24:01thing, or is it a spinning metal kind of

24:03thing? Both of those we have to evaluate

24:05the connection to our system. So,

24:07>> So, really you don't have any way you

24:09can regulate or tell them what to do on

24:11the backside, right?

24:12>> So, I'll give an example. If a data

24:14center needed 200 MW on TVA and we

24:16decided we could give them 100,

24:19that's what we would agree to serve them

24:20with. And then if they decided to bring

24:22something behind the meter

24:24and connect it on their property, and if

24:26they had the zoning entitlement to do

24:27that, then they could connect that right

24:29up. Um and they could use that as a

24:32power source. You're seeing that today

24:34and that's kind of the things you're

24:35alluding to. So, we don't have a

24:38regulatory authority to tell them what

24:39they can't do behind. We can say if what

24:42they're doing behind the meter is

24:43connected to the grid, it's disallowed

24:45because it would cause some kind of

24:47harm. But, as long as that harm is

24:50mitigated, we can't we we have no other

24:52regulatory authority behind the meter.

24:54>> And I think this is for Mr. Raggsdale.

24:56So, as we're looking at what we're going

24:57to be doing with our zoning in the

24:59future, you know, I think uh

25:02putting uh

25:04carbon-based generation next to schools

25:07or next to communities may be something

25:10that we're going to be able to zone in

25:12or out based on the distances and and a

25:15reasonable record Yeah, a reasonable

25:18person would say that we could win the

25:20lawsuit with it. So, I I think it that's

25:23sort of how we're going to try to use

25:24our zoning to make sure that we don't

25:26have uh our neighborhoods in trouble.

25:29>> Control what we can control, councilman.

25:32Yeah, agreed.

25:33>> Okay. Uh and uh I guess with TVA I I I

25:36was wanting to hear about the nuclear.

25:38Thank you for that, Doug.

25:40Uh and uh are we going to be in

25:42Tennessee the lead state in TVA as we

25:45move forward with this based on our

25:47position?

25:49>> Well, yes. I think you know, Tennessee's

25:51by far the largest state in the

25:52Tennessee Valley and so

25:54uh most of the resources are here, but

25:56there will be assets in other the other

25:58six states as well. But, certainly

26:00uh the majority of the action will

26:02happen here because we are a very large

26:04uh but the largest part of the Tennessee

26:06Valley, but uh we all work very closely

26:08together. So, and again, uh the power

26:11that we generate here at the Allen plant

26:12is used in Kentucky and Mississippi and

26:15Alabama and and as far away as Virginia.

26:19So, we wheel that power all across the

26:20valley. So, for us, it's important to

26:22have the source

26:24for TVA to be able to wheel that power

26:26through transmission. So, that's why

26:28when we talk about we're all connected

26:30together. So, we should be advocates for

26:32adding net new generation. Um the clean

26:35generation you talk about

26:37>> Like the solar that you're doing.

26:38>> doesn't have to be here. It can be

26:40somewhere else.

26:40>> But the solar that you're planning on

26:42bringing on bringing online is just

26:44going to be coming from MLGW and uh the

26:46only and we'll have access to that here

26:48in the city.

26:49>> We we can't generate that ourselves yet.

26:51That's a different story. We're

26:52batteries, yes, it's it's going to be in

26:54our distribution system.

26:56>> Uh but I mean I understand we got TVA on

26:58the line now, so maybe we can see what

27:00they can do to help us where we can do

27:02our own solar down here. Is Y'all Y'all

27:05going to help us with that, right,

27:06Jamie?

27:09>> Yeah, happy to partner with MLGW and and

27:12have conversations. And I just want to

27:14echo what uh was being said. I think

27:17Tennessee is uniquely positioned to be a

27:19a leader there in new nuclear

27:22uh as as was mentioned, but TVA has a

27:24kind of a history of nuclear

27:27uh generation and and I think there's a

27:30new nuclear ecosystem developing really

27:33across the state of Tennessee. So, it's

27:35um

27:36it's an opportunity to be a leader in an

27:38exciting time in that space. And just

27:40one other comment there at at to Doug's

27:42point, I think

27:44proponents of adding net new generation

27:46are very diverse

27:49generation portfolio inclusive of um all

27:52kinds of generating assets helps keep

27:54rates low and and reliability high. And

27:57so, that's um that's what we're always

28:00looking to evaluate.

28:02>> Thank you. Thank you, Jamie. We're

28:03definitely very interested in you guys

28:06doing what you can to help MLGW figure

28:09out how to add solar and battery into

28:12our own ability down here just in case

28:15there's a major systems issue or you

28:18know, we have those incredibly hot days

28:20and incredibly cold weeks where we

28:23really need extra extra service. And I

28:27think that's the way we could keep our

28:28cost lower here if we were generating

28:32solar power and cuz once you get it in,

28:34then cost you anything to generate it.

28:37Thanks.

28:38>> All right, thank you, councilman. We've

28:39got a question from Councilwoman Logan

28:43online.

28:44See you. My eyes aren't as what they

28:46used to be.

28:48>> I know.

28:49>> Oh, there you go. Hey, Councilwoman

28:51Logan.

28:52>> Can you hear me?

28:53Hello. Hello. How are you all?

28:56Thanks to TVA and MLGW everyone that's

28:59here. I have a couple of questions. What

29:00The first question

29:02Well, kind of the questions were from

29:04earlier conversate earlier presentation,

29:07but I'll still ask it.

29:09As TVA is preparing to build more power

29:11generation infrastructure, are there any

29:14local infrastructure improvements that

29:17need to be made

29:19or that we need to consider to prepare

29:21for it?

29:22And if so, do you all are you all

29:25working together, MLGW and TVA,

29:28um

29:29so that that is considered when

29:32determining the needs and/or initial

29:34investment for new um companies that are

29:37going to have a scale or any resource

29:39intensive use request uh is made?

29:45>> Logan, I'm happy to take a stab at that,

29:47but would welcome your perspective as

29:48well. So,

29:50um for any new data center loads,

29:53consistent with what our board approved

29:55in August, we are adding incremental

29:57generation to serve those those data

30:00center loads. The new rate plus what we

30:03call a capacity commitment charge

30:06ensures that data centers are funding

30:09the full cost of adding that incremental

30:11generation to the system, so there's no

30:14cost shifting um to other ratepayers. As

30:17far far as the energy delivery or the

30:20transmission infrastructure needed to

30:22serve both at the bulk and and the

30:25distribution level, that is where uh

30:27both the TVA and MLGW transmission

30:30engineers work very closely together to

30:32understand

30:34um

30:35what projects, what infrastructure is

30:37needed to to be built to serve these

30:40loads.

30:41And again, in in that instance, the the

30:43data center is covering the full cost of

30:45any uh

30:47any generation and transmission

30:50infrastructure required, but

30:53uh Doug, am I Do you have any comments

30:55on the the local level?

30:57>> There is a very close coordination, I

30:59would say daily, multiple times daily on

31:01these projects. And And just to be

31:03clear, I just to give an example, since

31:05we are a water and gas utility as well,

31:08um you know, we obviously provide water

31:10to the to to the TVA Allen combined

31:12cycle plant when that was new. So, we

31:14had to coordinate at that level. We also

31:16provide all of the natural gas

31:18connections to that. There is a separate

31:20contract TVA has, but that comes through

31:22the

31:23MLGW gate, so we coordinate that very

31:25closely. TVA is replacing 16 old

31:29combustion turbines that were fuel

31:30oil-fired. This is uh you know, 1960s

31:35style technology or 50s. They're

31:37replacing them with six aero derivative

31:40turbines. These are peaking plants that

31:43will be turned on

31:45uh

31:45infrequently, uh only when the peak is

31:48very high. MLGW and TVA worked, this is

31:51the infrastructure question,

31:52Councilwoman Logan. Councilwoman Logan,

31:54uh we had to make sure we had sufficient

31:56gas pipeline. Uh we had to make sure

31:58that we had the transmission ability to

32:00get the gas there and the capacity. So,

32:02that's one example, but it spans as uh

32:05Jamie was saying, anytime there's new

32:07electric load, one more electron coming

32:10in, their transmission engineers, our

32:11transmission engineers, and our

32:12distribution folks work together to make

32:14sure that it's seamless.

32:17Um and so, we work

32:19incredibly hard to make sure that uh

32:22if you think about it this way, there's

32:23a thousand things that have to go right

32:25for that light to come on when you hit

32:26the switch, and only one thing to go

32:28wrong. And the 10,000 employees at TVA

32:31and 2,700 folks at MLGW are the people

32:33that allow those thousand things to go

32:36right. Uh And you can't let one thing

32:39drop out. So, we are linked together.

32:44>> Absolutely. Well, that's good to hear.

32:46And as we represent the

32:48650,000

32:50constituents, you know, we have to ask

32:52these type of questions. And so, I do

32:53appreciate that. Um if you see the

32:55perspective that we have to ask the

32:57question. But I want to um ask also a

33:00little delve a little deeper.

33:02I hear you say that you all are

33:04coordinating that and to this point um

33:07it seems to be that you all are

33:08coordinating well. Um but is there

33:10anything in writing that um

33:14you know, kind of codified or put that

33:16in writing that there is coordination

33:19prior to

33:21that um

33:22prior to TVA

33:24agreeing to do those things

33:26or agreeing to something that we are

33:29maybe not

33:30um

33:32in position to find at that time.

33:35That

33:37that it is uh in writing that they will

33:40make sure that those things are covered

33:43by the applicant.

33:46So, I know you say you all coordinating,

33:48but is there anything in writing to

33:49ensure that that happens?

33:51>> A couple things. We have a all

33:52requirements contract with TVA that lays

33:54out much of the coordination.

33:57We have uh separate contracts for gas

33:59and for water that are separate from

34:01electricity that are uh memorialized

34:03between MLGW and TVA.

34:06And then

34:07the

34:07the ratepayer protection pledge that was

34:09signed by TVA memorializes

34:12their commitment to ensuring all of

34:14those things are done before any new

34:16connections are made. So, I think

34:18there's a significant amount of uh

34:21oversight

34:22um and commitment in writing that um

34:26the things we just talked about are now

34:28and they were just affirmed by the board

34:29during the recent board meeting that was

34:32held in Memphis, Tennessee. So,

34:34and Jamie can talk about where they're

34:35codified

34:36in MLGW uh or excuse me, in TVA's kind

34:39of

34:40policies.

34:42>> Yeah, I'll just [clears throat] I'll

34:43just echo

34:45Oh.

34:46Sorry. Go ahead.

34:47>> No, go ahead. Go ahead.

34:50>> I was just going to echo this this new

34:52standard process. We do have stage gates

34:55and contractual kind of milestones that

34:59um

35:00outline that full cost recovery and and

35:03commitment for projects that make it

35:05further in the process. So,

35:07whether that's a project agreement or um

35:10other forms of agreement just like uh

35:13was said by MLGW, uh we do have stage

35:15gates in the process to capture that.

35:19>> Okay, sounds great. Last question, MLGW,

35:23um President Strickland,

35:25um how is the city of Memphis or MLGW

35:27monitoring the timeline or going to

35:30monitor and

35:32um can't say enforce, but monitor the

35:35timeline for building the water

35:37treatment facility moving forward. You

35:40mentioned the water treatment facility

35:41earlier

35:42and brought this question to my mind.

35:45So,

35:46has there been any, you know, discussion

35:47on how to best monitor that so it won't

35:50be a year and we find out, okay, that's

35:52going to be a break or a a wait, you

35:56know? So, this last episode kind of

35:58caused pause or caution for a lot of

36:01citizens. So, what are we doing to make

36:04sure we're not if in that position

36:06again?

36:08>> So, I guess I'll say it like this. There

36:10is as we've talked about before, we have

36:13a commitment. Is there a contract? No.

36:16But, you have my commitment that I am

36:18going to be the lead advocate for this.

36:21Uh this started back when I was with the

36:23city and I followed through with it at

36:25MLGW. I am in regular correspondence

36:28with the leadership at SpaceX AI.

36:30Uh recently had the update that they

36:32have committed that they will begin in

36:34January. They have uh done an RFP. They

36:37have selected a pre-construction

36:39contractor. They have selected a

36:41uh primary contractor. I think they'll

36:43be moving forward with subs so they can

36:44get mobilized. Um all I can tell you

36:47since I don't have, you know, there was

36:49no contractual agreement to get it done

36:51that it has my uh direct attention and I

36:54am committed to ensuring that we follow

36:56through with this. So, um

36:59if you're looking for somebody to to

37:01make sure they have the focus on it, I

37:02have a lot of things to see focused on,

37:04but this one is high on my list because

37:06it's a commitment that we had. So, uh

37:08there's actually a letter that came from

37:10SpaceX I was this that came to all

37:12Memphis City Council members and to the

37:14mayor. Uh so, there is a letter of

37:16commitment from them, so you have that.

37:19Um but beyond any contractual

37:21obligation, just know that you have a

37:23strong advocate here in me and I will

37:25stay on top of this thing.

37:29>> Okay, thank you. Thank you, Chair.

37:30You're back for now.

37:31>> All right, thank you, Councilwoman.

37:32We've got Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton and

37:34then Councilman Warren.

37:37Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton.

37:40>> Thank you. Mayor Strickland, I just

37:42heard something to me, as a

37:43businesswoman, prior into business,

37:47that's very disturbing. There's no

37:49contractual agreement out there. You're

37:51very focused in on it,

37:54but and you're a big advocate. Well, we

37:57all are big advocates, but when you're

37:59doing business with someone, and I'm

38:01sending you out to represent,

38:04and anything can happen to you at any

38:06moment, just like it can happen to me,

38:08just like it just happened to my family.

38:09At any moment, things can pop up. But to

38:12hear you say that there is no

38:14contractual agreement, and you are an

38:17advocate, and you're really focused in

38:19and zoomed on it, is very disturbing to

38:22me. The second thing is with how fast

38:25this is moving, and you did say there's

38:28a 1-year process before approval is

38:30going on.

38:33And

38:36we are currently working on zoning and

38:40siting at all of these parcels that are

38:43happening. But if you have a one-year

38:46notification, you know beforehand

38:49why

38:52the council is not included in this. And

38:55moving forward, there needs to be a

38:57partnership moving forward with TBA,

39:00with MLGW, with Edge, with the city,

39:04with the county.

39:05Anybody that's making these deals

39:07because first of all, when I finish with

39:09this council member, seated elected

39:11official, I am still a constituent here.

39:14I am still a very very involved

39:17constituent. And that concerns me when I

39:19hear that, that there is no contract.

39:24SpaceX AI is a huge business. They don't

39:27go I guarantee you they don't go

39:29anywhere without some type of an

39:31agreement or contract saying A B C D E F

39:35G. And just to hear that you're

39:37advocating, hell, we all are advocating.

39:39We all want the same thing. We all want

39:42to see the same prosperity and wealth

39:44and economic growth here in this city.

39:46But nothing in agreement really disturbs

39:49me. So I need to hear something a little

39:51bit more solid than that.

39:54Because at this point, as a constituent

39:57and then as a council member, and seeing

39:59the way that business goes here in

40:01Memphis, I don't trust it.

40:04The attack and everything else, I don't

40:06[clears throat] trust any of it.

40:08And so just hearing you say that alarms

40:11me greatly.

40:13>> Understood.

40:14>> I am.

40:14>> Okay, yeah. Real quick, Doug, real

40:16quick. And I And I definitely want you

40:17to respond to that, but Councilwoman

40:19Cooper-Seton, thank you for saying that.

40:21And I And I

40:24I agree. I mean, that's one of the

40:25things that are that's on here. And

40:26Doug, I definitely want you to reply,

40:28but again, this is meeting number four.

40:30And so I think for all of us

40:33like the meeting that we have in 2

40:34weeks, the Monday before Council

40:36Tuesday, like this is why we have a

40:38pause.

40:40So thank you for those comments,

40:42Councilwoman Cooper-Seton, because I I

40:43agree. And these are the things that

40:46that we need to figure out.

40:48All right. Thank you, President McGowen.

40:49Go ahead.

40:50>> Sure, and certainly I understand that.

40:52Um but I I do want to provide some

40:54context.

40:56First, my obligation is to provide

40:58utilities. I provide between 4 and 7

41:01million gallons of water to the

41:02Tennessee Valley Authority's Allen

41:04plant, and I provide that as a They are

41:06a customer. They requested it. I had the

41:08capacity.

41:09When XAI requested water, they requested

41:111.28 million gallons per day.

41:14Uh I had 2 million gallons of capacity

41:17in the street available for them to use

41:19or Electrolux or any other company that

41:22would have come into that building to

41:23use.

41:24So, uh I cannot

41:27just withhold services if I am able to

41:29provide those services.

41:31Uh

41:32Again, the recycled water facility was

41:35contemplated fully five or six years

41:38before XAI ever came on the scene.

41:41Was studied by city engineers, TVA, and

41:43we negotiated with TVA uh and the city

41:46to see figure out how we were going to

41:48build this. We had a design, but neither

41:51TVA nor MLGW nor the city of Memphis had

41:55uh the necessary 200-plus million

41:57dollars with all of the other things

41:58going on to build the recycled water

42:00plant. We decided as a community it was

42:02a good idea to put that into place so

42:05that we could have another source of

42:06water for the Tennessee Valley Authority

42:08to use.

42:14We began talking about this again with

42:15the Tennessee Valley Authority in 2022

42:18when I arrived at MLGW, and we had

42:20progressed down the line on an updated

42:22design, but still we were left with a

42:25200-million-dollar hole and with this

42:28project that we, long before the arrival

42:30of XAI, decided that we wanted as a

42:32community.

42:34And so, no, I do not have a contract

42:36with XAI because I asked them after

42:39providing the utilities that we uh

42:42committed to provide, if they would join

42:44us in building this, and that turned

42:46into

42:47they offered to build it for us. So, let

42:50me be clear, this isn't something that

42:51they were required to do. Wasn't

42:53something that uh that was new. It was

42:55something we were doing and now they're

42:57stepping in to build it for us.

42:58Something that we had to said we wanted

43:01at least 6 years before.

43:03So, I cannot obligate them to spend that

43:06money to build that. It was a desire we

43:08had as a community and much like a

43:10community benefits agreement, they're

43:12providing that benefit to our community.

43:14If it's not ultimately built, we still

43:17have the desire and we'll have to figure

43:18out how to come up with $200 million to

43:20build a facility.

43:22But, I think that's not going to be the

43:24case.

43:25>> All right, thank you for that

43:26explanation. And real quick, when I

43:28spoke with Jamie yesterday

43:30Uh go ahead, Councilwoman Cooper-Suggs.

43:32Sorry, I thought you were done.

43:33>> I'm Yeah, thank you.

43:34No, I wasn't. I still didn't get my

43:37answer. I'm not saying [clears throat]

43:38anything about that I don't do not want

43:40a water facility. My question is you

43:44said that you are committed, you are the

43:46direct person who they are talking to.

43:49That you're the direct person that

43:51making sure that you are focused zoomed

43:53on making sure that this happen. I could

43:56be that person. I can sit in that seat

43:58and do that what you're doing because

44:00it's affecting me, my community, the

44:03city that I love, the city where my tax

44:05dollars are spent.

44:07That's not what I asked you. How do we

44:10know? So, this is what we're doing.

44:12We're doing old school stuff just by

44:14verbal by verbal commitment. That's how

44:17we're doing business now, verbal

44:19commitment.

44:21That's what I'm asking. And my question

44:23was also moving forward we need to

44:28ensure

44:30we need to ensure that we never end up

44:33back here again because we want to do

44:35business with good people that want to

44:37do good business here with Memphis. And

44:40that's why I said that MLGW, once again,

44:44the city, the county, Edge, TVA, we must

44:49plan together for our future customers

44:52that we plan for our any future data

44:54centers that are here, especially with

44:56now that we're dealing with zoning, any

44:58power heavy industrial corridors. I

45:01mean, I'm just saying to hear you say

45:04that is still you went all you

45:07skateboarded all around everything else

45:10in what I asked. You may be the voice. I

45:12could be the voice as well. I could be

45:14there on them like white on rice, just

45:17like you are.

45:19However, what is in writing that makes

45:22us to make sure that the commitment that

45:26I'm not saying that you're not fully

45:27capable of handling.

45:29That's not what I'm saying.

45:32But what I'm not going to do and be a

45:34part of and sit here

45:37as a citizen, not as your city council,

45:39because I don't as a citizen, as a

45:42resident here in Memphis,

45:45and say, "Just because you're the

45:48advocate and you're the voice right now

45:50and you're committed to that, what do we

45:53have in writing?

45:56What no real legit business would do

45:59anything without anything in writing.

46:03A great example, and not to be picking

46:05on anyone,

46:07Spinoza has a transportation business.

46:10I'm not He's not going to Man and I are

46:11not going to just shake hands and say,

46:13"Okay, I'm going to" No, we're talking

46:15about major dollars here, big money

46:19here, dollars, commitment. You're

46:22advocating for it. Great, love it. Thank

46:25God that you're in the seat to do so.

46:27But where

46:28are

46:29contracts, paperwork? And this is how

46:32Memphis usually ends up in a bad

46:35position because of this is what you're

46:38saying now. I don't care a thing about

46:40that. The water facility, I'm sure it's

46:42going to get done. $200 Of course, we

46:45all would know there's a money problem.

46:46But you're saying that you're just going

46:48to be

46:50laser focused on it, and nobody's made

46:53any type of agreement in writing. That's

46:55all I'm asking, that we follow through

46:58with what we say we're going to do.

47:01I I'm not I'm not I don't care about

47:02that.

47:03>> Thank you, Councilwoman. Well, let me

47:05just say real quick, Doug. Councilwoman,

47:07do you have any other questions?

47:11>> Cuz if you Not in Not in Not No. No, you

47:13can go on and move forward. I just need

47:15that [clears throat] particular thing

47:17answered.

47:18>> I appreciate you and everything you just

47:20said

47:20>> I don't need you going Yeah, I'm just

47:22>> Yeah, yeah, no, that's it. I

47:24Yeah, other council members in the queue

47:25for here. We have Councilwoman

47:26>> That's what I'm saying.

47:26>> Yeah, I Yes, ma'am. Absolutely. Doug, do

47:29you want to make a comment? And look,

47:30we're going to continue to talk about

47:31this, right? I mean

47:32>> I didn't mean to suggest that I'm the

47:35only advocate. I was saying that I will

47:37be laser-focused. The mayor's an

47:39advocate for this, too. There is a

47:41contract between SpaceX AI and the city

47:43of Memphis that if it's not built, the

47:45city can claw back the land. So, there

47:47is some things in writing there, but

47:49again, this is an offer of a gift to the

47:53city. I hate to say the word gift, but

47:55we're not paying anything for this.

47:58There is an agreement that will be made

48:00with the city of Memphis for the

48:01provision of the uh effluent so that

48:05they can use it. There's an agreement

48:07between TVA and SpaceX AI for them to

48:10buy the water uh once it is recycled

48:13instead of buying it from MLGW. So,

48:14there are some contractual things in

48:16place. But, there is not a contract

48:19between MLGW and SpaceX AI to build this

48:21thing, nor was it ever contemplated. Um

48:24nor am I the appropriate one to have the

48:25contract with.

48:27>> Got you. All right, we've got

48:28Councilwoman uh Madam Chair Swearingen

48:30Washington just joined us.

48:32Um it was a magic trick from online and

48:35in person. It's pretty amazing. Uh All

48:37right, we've got Councilman Warren,

48:38Councilwoman Logan, and Councilwoman

48:41Walker in the queue. Um Councilman

48:44Warren.

48:44>> Thank you. Just uh these are questions

48:46for TVA and MLGW from the community. As

48:50part of your IRP

48:52and the need for more diversity in a

48:55generation portfolio,

48:58would you guys consider to update the

49:01residential buyback allowance and move

49:04those rates closer to commercial

49:06production pricing?

49:08Currently, if you're residential and you

49:11have solar panels,

49:13you know, you do get paid some money for

49:15that, but it's nowhere close to the rate

49:18that we'd be charging our commercial

49:20customers. So, if we're putting that

49:23back in the system,

49:25and you're looking at that, is there any

49:26way you can think about that in the

49:28future? The second question is, would

49:30MLGW facilitate implementation of a

49:34virtual power plant to aggregate

49:36residential or small business

49:38production? Is that something MLG can do

49:41currently with its contract with TVA?

49:45And I think the final thing I just want

49:46to comment because I agree with

49:49Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton that I feel

49:52horrible sitting here with no contract

49:54on somebody giving us a

49:57water treatment plant, but it was a

49:59donation. So, normally with donations, I

50:02mean, I don't think we have in the past

50:05gone in and someone says, "I'm going to

50:07donate $50,000 to the city." We say,

50:10"Well, give me a contract." We say,

50:12"Thank you for the money." We and we

50:13take it. So, I think that's sort of how

50:15we got in the position we're in because

50:18it was a donation and we were saying,

50:20"Thank you."

50:21And I think when they pulled the

50:24donation, that's when we said, "Well,

50:26this doesn't smell right." So, what's

50:29going to happen? I think the

50:31production's going to start between now

50:33and January. And once they start

50:35building that thing again, I think it

50:37will make a big difference in how people

50:39feel about XAI.

50:41But, they're going to have to do that to

50:42make people feel any better about them,

50:44though. So, the answer to those

50:45questions one and two,

50:59>> net metering in fact it's prohibited so

51:01we're not since we're not a net metering

51:03state that's a something for the state

51:05legislature to work on.

51:07>> Can you explain what that means cuz I

51:08don't understand it?

51:09>> Net metering it means that if you

51:11generate electricity I pay you for

51:12exactly the retail rate at which you buy

51:14it from us. Tennessee does not have that

51:16provision in law and actually does not

51:18permit that so you get the avoided cost

51:21rate which is significantly less than

51:23the retail rate. That's the as

51:25non-technical as I can get but that is

51:26we'd have to change the state statute.

51:28>> So on that um you know I I know we have

51:30lobbyists.

51:31>> That's right.

51:32>> Okay and I know you guys have lobbyists.

51:35I don't know exactly how to write that

51:37or what you think would be a reasonable

51:38thing to take to the state but I would

51:40think that may be one of the things as

51:42we're looking at all this we may want to

51:44take to the state for

51:45>> Sure.

51:46>> to get someone to sponsor this year

51:48particularly if it's going to increase

51:49our capacity to generate here and keep

51:52rates low

51:54that may be beneficial and in the reason

51:56way we keep rates low is instead of just

51:58paying a nominal amount for that

51:59electricity you pay a little bit more to

52:02get more people to want to do it

52:04but since they're doing it and you're

52:06not paying as much for the electricity

52:07as you do any other way you're

52:08generating it that can help keep costs

52:11low. I think that's the the thought

52:12process on that. Is that correct?

52:14>> We're happy to work with you on

52:16structuring some legislation if you'd

52:18like to push that forward.

52:19>> that sounds great. I'd love to do that

52:21and the other the other question was

52:23>> virtual power plant

52:24>> virtual power plant

52:25>> Absolutely we've talked about that

52:26before in the past. We were actually

52:29we have already

52:30uh begun a residential battery pilot

52:33program. We've started that with our

52:34medically vulnerable folks so we've

52:35installed batteries at some homes of

52:38people who are medically vulnerable. The

52:39idea there is that they will have the

52:41hedge of resilience if they are out and

52:43then we'd have additional aggregable

52:45power should we need it. So we're at the

52:48beginnings of that but it's a technical

52:50solution that we are I've talked about

52:52that publicly that that is a desire that

52:54we have to help aggregate

52:57assets that are otherwise idle into a

52:58virtual power plant.

53:01>> All right thank you Dr. Morgan.

53:02>> Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

53:03>> And and a quick

53:05we're an hour in and Jamie, thank you

53:07again. It means a lot to me personally,

53:09but also to the community and council

53:12members that you're

53:13with us today. Today's focus was going

53:16to be on community benefits, meaning a

53:18community benefits agreement and some of

53:19the legislation that we have brought up

53:22and we're still going to get there.

53:23I mean, I could sit here all night long

53:26and talk about this stuff. But I think

53:29you know, when we originally started

53:30this, it was

53:313 weeks ago today and that was before we

53:33had a moratorium in place.

53:36So

53:37you know, Dr. Warren, you mentioned

53:38maybe we meet every other week. I think

53:41all this stuff's too important for us

53:42not to discuss.

53:44We're not going to solve it all today,

53:46but just get trying to get us to stay on

53:48track and get into the meat of that.

53:51Today over the next hour is what I'd

53:52like to to see us do. So, I'm not trying

53:54to rush anybody with their questions,

53:56but I just wanted to put that out there.

53:59And while TVA's here with us, like let's

54:01definitely take advantage of this. So,

54:03we've got Councilwoman

54:05Logan.

54:06All right, and then Councilwoman Walker

54:08will come to you. Councilwoman Logan.

54:12>> Thank you, Chair, and thank you for

54:14really listening. However, I do think

54:16that

54:17what we've been talking about to some

54:19some ways is related to community

54:21benefit, particularly the um

54:24the water treatment facility. That's a

54:26huge benefit for the community and for

54:29protecting our aquifer. So, I have one

54:31little comment on that. I do I do share

54:34Councilwoman Cooper-Suggs' sentiment and

54:36how we feel about it. I also understand

54:39that

54:40President McAllen is not um responsible

54:43for the um

54:45contracting for the city, but I wonder

54:49if and some even some of I got this from

54:53a question from

54:54a constituent as well.

54:56Is there any recourse we have in maybe

54:59curtailing

55:01um

55:03uh let me say that, curtailing like

55:06water space if water consumption or

55:09water consumption or some type of once

55:11they agree to it,

55:13you know, it became somewhat of a verbal

55:14contract or something,

55:17you know,

55:18them saying, "Okay, we're going to do

55:19that." And everybody was in, you know,

55:21in favor of it at that point or felt

55:24that that was a good compromise or good

55:26gift, but now, you know, taking it back

55:28or "No, I'm not going to do it. I'm

55:30going to do it." And then all of this,

55:31you know, that we can't be in that

55:33position. So, is it possible that we

55:35could consider

55:36putting something in place to maybe

55:38curtail water consumption until it's

55:40done if, in fact, it gets to a point

55:42where say they start and they stop or

55:44whatever. So, you don't have to answer

55:46now, but I I would like to have further

55:48conversation maybe at at committee or

55:51something if we need to move on. I did

55:53hear

55:54um Chairman Espinosa say that. So, if

55:56you need to respond

55:58later, I I don't I don't want to rush

56:00the conversation is what I'm saying. So,

56:02thank you and I'll yield back, Chair.

56:04>> All right. You want to make a a brief

56:05comment on that or we'll just wait hold

56:06up to the next

56:07>> talking to Councilwoman Logan on that

56:08later.

56:08>> All right. Perfect. Um

56:10so, uh President McGowan said I'll talk

56:12to Councilwoman Logan and then we'll

56:14bring it back up just for follow-up

56:17publicly.

56:18Councilwoman Walker.

56:22>> Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you

56:24all for um

56:26coming out today. So, I tuned in a

56:28little late and I was wondering about

56:30the the conversation. I thought it was

56:32community benefits, but um

56:35anyway, my questions, so I have a couple

56:39um

56:41And so, this is where I want to start.

56:43I'm going somewhere with this. It's not

56:44going to take me too long, but um

56:47Mr. um President McGowan, can you

56:50briefly share what a direct line

56:53service agreement is?

56:56>> So, direct serve, that's a TVA agreement

56:59to directly serve uh

57:01typically a large load customer. So,

57:03Jamie can probably talk about what that

57:05is, but there is a decision that is made

57:07between the MLGW engineers and TVA

57:09engineers about who is the most

57:12appropriate service provider based on

57:13the infrastructure that we have

57:14available. And so, if the decision is

57:17that TVA is best positioned to provide

57:20direct service to that customer,

57:22then we defer that over to TVA. So,

57:24Jamie, I don't know if you want to fill

57:25in on that.

57:28>> No, that that that's correct. And um

57:31it's that all same all requirements

57:33contract with the direct serve customer.

57:35So, that's correct.

57:37>> Okay, thank you for that. And then

57:40um

57:42And that's when the customer is over how

57:45many megawatts?

57:47>> Well, it can actually be any level of

57:49megawatts. We're just The limit that

57:52MLGW can serve is about 850 megawatts

57:55based on our system. Anything above

57:57that, TVA has to directly serve.

58:00Anything below that that's a large load,

58:02we will look at the proximity of the TVA

58:05transmission system, the proximity of

58:07the facilities that they have to that

58:09area, and we'll also look at the cost

58:12for us to upgrade the

58:15distribution system versus the cost for

58:16TVA to upgrade, and then a decision will

58:18be made about what the most

58:19cost-effective way is to do that.

58:24>> Okay, thank you for that. And then

58:26um behind the meter, is this the exact

58:29same thing? Is Are these Is this

58:32language used interchangeably or is

58:35behind the meter I just want to be clear

58:37cuz I was going somewhere with this. And

58:39And I'm trying to share this

58:42accurately with constituent constituents

58:44as certain questions come up.

58:47>> So, behind the meter means simply

58:51um

58:51the power comes into your facility and

58:54is metered as you use it. Uh the analogy

58:57I'll give here is um if you were

59:00your house you're running your house

59:01based on MLGW energy that's coming

59:03through the meter, and you decide that

59:05you want to

59:07uh do a backyard barbecue with an

59:09electric grill, and you start up your

59:10portable generator, um you're not using

59:13my electricity, you're using something

59:15uh that is behind my meter. You're still

59:17getting electricity, but not from me.

59:20So, behind the meter means you have

59:22additional source of generation

59:24um that is producing electricity you're

59:26using, but it's not coming from TVA or

59:28MLGW.

59:32>> So,

59:33SpaceX AI, they are behind the meter,

59:36correct?

59:38>> No, ma'am. They have a service agreement

59:41with MLGW to receive a certain amount of

59:43power.

59:44They have a service account a power

59:46contract with TVA to receive a certain

59:48amount of power. And then, they are, in

59:51the case of Colossus one, they're

59:52receiving 150 MW from MLGW, and then

59:56they're generating the other 150 MW

59:58behind the meter.

1:00:00About this December or January, that

1:00:02will cease, and they will begin

1:00:03receiving all of the power from MLGW.

1:00:07Um and they will not be generating

1:00:08behind the meter any longer.

1:00:12>> I just might add to to that just

1:00:14>> [clears throat]

1:00:15>> um

1:00:16looking at kind of data centers more

1:00:17broadly, um to the point that was just

1:00:20made, there's kind of a decision, how

1:00:22much does a um

1:00:24project want to generate on site uh

1:00:27versus how much to to pull from the

1:00:29grid, and that that's the distinction

1:00:31between behind the meter generation to

1:00:34serve

1:00:35uh load of a site versus what is

1:00:37included in a power contract to

1:00:40uh receive power from the grid.

1:00:43>> So,

1:00:45what's in the power contract? Is that

1:00:47public information? Is this the power

1:00:49contract with you all or with MLGW or

1:00:52both?

1:00:55>> Could be could be a power contract with

1:00:57MLGW or could be a power contract with

1:00:59TVA depending on

1:01:01on the size of the installation.

1:01:04the project.

1:01:10>> Okay, thank you. I yield the floor.

1:01:14>> All right. Uh

1:01:16it's a quick question.

1:01:17>> Dr. Warman, super fast question, sir,

1:01:20please.

1:01:20>> Super fast. We talked about the

1:01:23the the

1:01:24preemption, you know, trying to be able

1:01:26to

1:01:27uh get

1:01:29>> [clears throat]

1:01:29>> us to have local power producers, people

1:01:32have

1:01:34you know, their solar panels or whatever

1:01:35paid. MLGW can't do anything about it

1:01:39because it's a Tennessee company. Can

1:01:41TVA do something about it since the

1:01:44federal company that will uh negate the

1:01:47need to go to Nashville and get the law

1:01:49changed? Is there any way TVA could come

1:01:51to our rescue in this case?

1:01:55>> We'll have to look at it.

1:01:56>> Is this referencing

1:01:58>> This is referencing the net metering

1:02:00with residential solar. So,

1:02:02TVA's authority kind of stops at the

1:02:04transmission level where they deliver it

1:02:07to us and then MLGW is the local

1:02:09distributor. So, that's that controls

1:02:11the power that comes back to the local

1:02:13distributor, but

1:02:14your question is a good one and bears

1:02:16further discussion about how we best

1:02:18approach that if that is a desire of the

1:02:20community, then how do we best approach

1:02:22that to to get what we're what we're

1:02:24desiring?

1:02:24>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you. Thank

1:02:26you, gentlemen.

1:02:27>> Thanks. And Jamie, again, thank you for

1:02:29being here and I do want to say as a

1:02:30Memphian, I was excited and I'm thankful

1:02:34that Mitch Graves is the chairman of

1:02:36your your board. They had their first or

1:02:39he had his first board meeting here in

1:02:40Memphis.

1:02:42Um I'll always remember it because I had

1:02:44COVID and watched it from home,

1:02:47but yeah, I'm thankful for that and I

1:02:48just wanted to say that publicly. I want

1:02:50to segue

1:02:51the body

1:02:52um over to and I'm going to say

1:02:55community benefits and Councilwoman

1:02:57Logan said it earlier, those are two

1:02:58words that

1:03:00that have um

1:03:02all of this is about community benefits.

1:03:05Like our jobs are, right? I mean,

1:03:06everything we've talked about is a

1:03:08community benefit. We're trying to

1:03:09protect people and provide community

1:03:11benefits.

1:03:12But I had we had a

1:03:14citizen ask a question today.

1:03:18Um he asked me a question online and I

1:03:19want to answer it and it and I think it

1:03:21provides a real good opportunity to to

1:03:23talk about that word because I think

1:03:26that word gets lost in translation right

1:03:28now as we're talking about all this. So,

1:03:30hopefully

1:03:31you know, that'll help with this

1:03:32conversation. But, the question was,

1:03:33"How will the council hold XAI

1:03:36accountable to actually build the safety

1:03:38infrastructure they have promised, i.e.,

1:03:39gray water facility?

1:03:42It continues to look like lots of

1:03:43suggestions, assurances, and promised

1:03:45action without any real enforcement."

1:03:47So, to the individual that asked this

1:03:49online,

1:03:51we've talked about some of this today

1:03:53and I don't

1:03:54you know, I don't think we have the time

1:03:56to answer that super specifically.

1:03:58Probably not as much as you would like.

1:04:00So, let's continue that conversation,

1:04:02but I do want to point

1:04:05that gentleman and the public to again

1:04:07the website we created. We posted the

1:04:09letter that's been referenced like a

1:04:11dozen times in the past

1:04:134 hours of committee hearings. It is

1:04:15available for everyone to read.

1:04:17Um, my understanding is the gray water

1:04:20facility I I was never informed. I don't

1:04:23think anybody was that it wasn't

1:04:24happening.

1:04:25But, there's a lot more information, um,

1:04:28you know, that you can just read

1:04:29yourself and it's it's a a letter that

1:04:31was sent to us

1:04:32and we just posted it out there for

1:04:34people to read. So, I would direct that

1:04:35gentleman. I want to thank that person

1:04:37for the question. I know all council

1:04:38members are getting all types of

1:04:39questions. We're not going to answer

1:04:41them all today, but we're going to get

1:04:42to them. That's what we're doing.

1:04:44Um,

1:04:46so, there's the the word community

1:04:48benefits real quick. Jamie mentioned

1:04:50that yesterday because he saw community

1:04:51benefits and he's aware of of what the

1:04:55difference is when we say that word. So,

1:04:58three things on community benefits.

1:05:01The question that I got was about the

1:05:0325% of tax revenue going neighborhoods.

1:05:06How is that being spent? You know, is

1:05:08that part of the community benefits

1:05:09agreement? So, here it is. It's really

1:05:10three things, okay?

1:05:1325%

1:05:15of the SpaceX taxes that are being paid

1:05:17into the city of Memphis are required to

1:05:20go to the community within a 5-mile

1:05:21radius of their sites.

1:05:24This is already happening. Like we've

1:05:26already I believe we've already

1:05:28that that was approved and now we're

1:05:30waiting for the mayor

1:05:32I believe to send us I'll tell you what

1:05:34Chief Winton if y'all want to I feel

1:05:35like we're segueing into community

1:05:37benefits and Chamber thank you for being

1:05:39here Bobby if you want to

1:05:40come up with you know I have a feeling

1:05:42you're

1:05:43going to want to say something soon here

1:05:45as we transition into this.

1:05:47So again community benefits three things

1:05:49are happening, okay?

1:05:52And again it's all community benefits

1:05:53but 25% of the of the city of the taxes

1:05:56paid into the city by SpaceX they are

1:05:58required to go into the community within

1:05:59a 5-mile radius of their sites. That is

1:06:02real. That is happening.

1:06:05And we're essentially waiting for I

1:06:07believe the administration to give us

1:06:08their suggested

1:06:10chop up of that for lack of a better

1:06:11term.

1:06:12Independent of that I have I just put

1:06:15this down check out the SpaceX a

1:06:18letter that is online.

1:06:21I know

1:06:23I think the Fairley gymnasium I mean

1:06:25this is another community benefit like I

1:06:27think they paid for a

1:06:28a gym

1:06:30I believe and I'm looking at Winton I'm

1:06:31looking at anybody. I want I think it

1:06:33was three and a half or four or three

1:06:35million dollars those are totally

1:06:36separate community benefits so there's

1:06:39benefits so they're doing stuff outside

1:06:40of

1:06:42of taxes is is one I think that's

1:06:45community benefit.

1:06:47The other stuff that they're doing on

1:06:48standalone basis

1:06:50um

1:06:52uh I think it's on their website.

1:06:54Um

1:06:55you know ask us those questions I need

1:06:57to be better versed in that but you know

1:06:59I'm not

1:07:00I'm not uh you know they're doing things

1:07:02around the community I know that and I I

1:07:04know the Fairley gymnasium thing was

1:07:06something that I saw.

1:07:07And then third the point of today's

1:07:09meeting

1:07:10community benefit is the community

1:07:12benefits agreement which is

1:07:14something that we're trying to pass from

1:07:16a legislation standpoint. I had it in my

1:07:18ordinance. Dr. Warren you know presented

1:07:21one to us and we're working through that

1:07:23and that's where we actually come up

1:07:24with with a legal document and a piece

1:07:27of legislation.

1:07:28And that was really we're an hour and 15

1:07:30minutes into it, but that was the agenda

1:07:32item for today. But [laughter]

1:07:34I think it's great. I hope that made

1:07:36sense. I mean that work community

1:07:37benefits

1:07:38it's sprinkled all throughout this,

1:07:40right? But I mean

1:07:41you know, there are differences there,

1:07:43right?

1:07:43Um so with that, you thank you Chief

1:07:46Wynn for being here. Uh

1:07:48Bobby, thank you for being here. And Dr.

1:07:50Warren, I know you wanted to speak

1:07:52um

1:07:53on the piece of legislation that you

1:07:55presented and I will be quiet and listen

1:07:57to the body work.

1:08:00>> Thank you, Mr. Chair.

1:08:02Um

1:08:04we are hoping that we can put together

1:08:07by the time um

1:08:10end of the year uh

1:08:12legislation

1:08:14that directs our P&Z and planning

1:08:18departments to begin developing

1:08:22regulations that allow us to regulate

1:08:25data centers as they come in based on

1:08:27what our powers are as a city

1:08:30and our powers as a council to be able

1:08:32to do that.

1:08:34Um

1:08:34>> And and again, for the record, we're in

1:08:36planning and zoning because that is like

1:08:38the core thing we we can control.

1:08:39>> And that's why we're here because that's

1:08:41the one way that we're going to actually

1:08:42be able to control data centers. But the

1:08:45other issue is I think there's a uh

1:08:49there's a desire for data centers to

1:08:53come in and try to help the community as

1:08:56they come in and build. And there's no

1:08:59mechanism by which data centers can do

1:09:02any more for us than pay property taxes.

1:09:05That's all we can really collect at this

1:09:07point. Uh the

1:09:09when I first looked at this, I was

1:09:11thinking, "Well, what if we just said,

1:09:13you know, um you go ahead and for all

1:09:15the for this amount of power, you know,

1:09:18we want to tax you for it and we want

1:09:19you to pay extra." We don't have the

1:09:22authority to tax.

1:09:23>> Enter the community benefits agreement.

1:09:26>> Which is why the community benefits

1:09:28agreement or agency

1:09:30>> Just real quick. I'm sorry. When that

1:09:32work community benefits comes up, it

1:09:33means like a myriad of things to

1:09:35different people.

1:09:36And I'm not trying to speak over you or

1:09:38anything. I just I really want us to

1:09:39understand

1:09:40>> a tag team here today.

1:09:41>> community. Like everything's a community

1:09:43benefit, hopefully, right? But like

1:09:45community benefits agreement, okay.

1:09:47>> Okay, and this would be a community

1:09:49benefit agency, which is a little bit

1:09:51different. An agreement is is is where

1:09:54you say

1:09:55we agree that we're going to pay you

1:09:56this. But if we do that, that's taxation

1:10:00based on the current way the laws read

1:10:02in the state according to Allen. So, we

1:10:04can't do that. It's illegal for us to do

1:10:06that.

1:10:07The community benefit agency is a little

1:10:10bit like the airport authority. It's

1:10:12going to be its own independent

1:10:14nonprofit. It will have its own board.

1:10:17How that board is developed and who

1:10:19appoints whom will be part of the

1:10:21legislation that we ask for when we take

1:10:24it into Nashville. So, we're going to

1:10:25need to have a pending legislation that

1:10:29does says what we want it to do, and I'm

1:10:30sure it's going to be changed when it

1:10:31gets to Nashville a little bit. But I

1:10:33mean, we're going to want the council,

1:10:34we're going to want the mayors, we're

1:10:36going to want the commission to appoint

1:10:38people. We're probably going to want to

1:10:39have a couple people appointed by the

1:10:41chambers, some people just uh community

1:10:44members that are appointed. And I

1:10:45imagine the state may want to appoint a

1:10:47couple representatives to this. Uh and

1:10:50what it would do is it would essentially

1:10:52be the clearinghouse

1:10:54for agreements that it would make with

1:10:58people coming in

1:11:00bringing large data centers. And to

1:11:02bring a large data center, part of the

1:11:04agreement coming in would be for every

1:11:0780,000 kilowatts were you know, or

1:11:10megawatts, we're going to give you a

1:11:11$80,000. Some here, whatever it is. You

1:11:13know, we'll come up with uh I think

1:11:15other people have given numbers, and I

1:11:17think you had that in your

1:11:18>> So, in my ordinance, it was an airport

1:11:20authority type creation. And so anyways,

1:11:22the public is watching this, talk about

1:11:24this, and learn all this together. We've

1:11:25got experts. The gentleman that was here

1:11:27last week had

1:11:29awesome recommendations and has seen it

1:11:31work in other parts of the country. So,

1:11:32yes, that's what we're doing right now

1:11:34just for the public to know. We're

1:11:36working through that.

1:11:36>> So, what we're hoping to do with this is

1:11:39to create legislation that will go to

1:11:42the state where we will ask them for

1:11:45permission to set up this agency.

1:11:48And once this agency is in place, then

1:11:51we go to future, and in my mind, current

1:11:56uh data centers and say, "Please come on

1:11:59board. Help us with this." And the money

1:12:01that comes into this can then be used

1:12:03for

1:12:05all sorts of things, but primarily I

1:12:07think we're going to set it up to where

1:12:08it's used for the things that the city

1:12:10does.

1:12:11You know, it's going to be used for

1:12:12paving [clears throat] roads. It's going

1:12:14to be used for helping people get their

1:12:17roofs fixed. It's going to be used for

1:12:18after-school programs for kids, maybe

1:12:21pre-K for all, things that the city has

1:12:24been doing. And as a city body, then we

1:12:27would request from that agency, "We

1:12:30would like this to be spent here."

1:12:33And we can set it up to where A, it

1:12:35could have its own authority to grant,

1:12:37but I think ideally, in order to keep it

1:12:40under control to where citizens feel

1:12:42like they've got a little bit more

1:12:44invested, all of its disbursements

1:12:48should hopefully come through the

1:12:49council once they make it and then get

1:12:51council approval. But that way you've

1:12:53got a checks and balance on them and

1:12:55they have a checks and balance on us for

1:12:57spending it cuz they won't give it to us

1:12:59if they don't want to. And when they do,

1:13:01we have to make sure it's spent the way

1:13:02it's supposed to. And we can ask them.

1:13:05So, I mean, I I think that it's going to

1:13:07be a balancing act as we build it, but

1:13:09other places have done this. I think

1:13:11cities in Virginia now have no property

1:13:14tax. So, you're thinking we're trying to

1:13:16attract people to Memphis and let them

1:13:18know how cool we are and what a great

1:13:20place it is to live. All of a sudden,

1:13:22we're able to use this and lower

1:13:24people's property tax as to where we're

1:13:26no longer the highest tax city. Coming

1:13:29here is going to be cheaper for you. And

1:13:32now we're have ability to help people

1:13:35start to build low-cost housing or new

1:13:37housing in areas that need to be

1:13:39redeveloped. So, this could be a

1:13:41[clears throat] huge potential boom for

1:13:44how we jump-start uh

1:13:47everyone realizing we're cool

1:13:50and we're so and we're rock and roll,

1:13:52you got to come to Memphis.

1:13:54>> All right, thank you uh Councilman

1:13:56Warren. Uh Bobby,

1:13:59the Chamber, thank you for being here.

1:14:02Thoughts? Comments?

1:14:04>> Uh thank you uh Councilman and and thank

1:14:06you all.

1:14:07>> excuse me.

1:14:07>> Uh Bob- Bobby's fine. Mr. White remind

1:14:09me of my late father. God bless. Uh so,

1:14:11uh thank you all so much uh for the

1:14:13opportunity to be here. Um I do want to

1:14:15just generally speak. I did have a

1:14:17presentation, but uh uh regarding um

1:14:19Councilman Warren and his comments, I

1:14:20think the what of it is one thing, but

1:14:22the how of it is the way we get there,

1:14:24which is why the legal advice um

1:14:27ensuring that we are engaging even with

1:14:30um

1:14:31the way we have to think about it as it

1:14:34relates to Nashville and and of course

1:14:36um I'm a lobbyist. Members of my uh team

1:14:39at the Chamber are lobbyists. We have a

1:14:41lobbying team in Nashville. We work with

1:14:43them. I think the thing that we have to

1:14:44consider is that even when we are going

1:14:47and making these acts in Nashville and

1:14:50working through the sausage making of

1:14:52figuring out something that could be

1:14:54beneficial, we have to think about a

1:14:56tool or something that is ultimately not

1:14:59just useful to us in Memphis and Shelby

1:15:00County, but is ultimately useful in

1:15:03other communities around the state if in

1:15:05fact we want the type of buy-in uh that

1:15:07we want to uh be considered. So, again

1:15:10to your point um Councilman Warren, I do

1:15:12think that the what of it all is what we

1:15:15all want, but the how we get there is

1:15:17going to be the thing that requires um

1:15:19the shared uh thought partnership and um

1:15:22members and other people who bring that

1:15:24expertise. I want to also say this. We

1:15:25have investors with the Chamber who

1:15:27bring tremendous expertise that I think

1:15:30um uh could be beneficial to us in this

1:15:32space because they are working in

1:15:33communities like some of the ones you've

1:15:35mentioned.

1:15:35>> So I I if you don't mind, let me um and

1:15:39I think you were done with questions. So

1:15:40Mr. White, also known as Bobby, sorry.

1:15:43Uh I'll call you Bobby.

1:15:45Um

1:15:46I worked there for a for a little while,

1:15:47right? So I feel like if you don't mind,

1:15:50would you

1:15:51explain in 30 seconds the Chamber of

1:15:54Commerce

1:15:56regarding government funding and what I

1:15:58think is your most powerful tool just

1:16:01like a city or a family is the people

1:16:04and their strengths because there are

1:16:07Chamber members that have relationships,

1:16:09I believe, I know in Nashville. And it's

1:16:12going to help us with this.

1:16:13>> Absolutely. If we can show the first

1:16:15slide outside of this opening slide, the

1:16:16first the next slide because that is

1:16:19would help me to frame that conversation

1:16:20to answer your question, Councilman, who

1:16:22we are, what we represent. I was here at

1:16:24the mayor's office some years ago when

1:16:25the Chamber actually came off of

1:16:28receiving funding from the Memphis City

1:16:30Council for

1:16:32its operations. So it is 100% business,

1:16:36not just business lead, it's business

1:16:37funded with no government funds. That

1:16:40allows a certain amount of independence.

1:16:41I do also want to say this that those

1:16:44investors who invest in the Chamber,

1:16:47they we are the tip of the spear when it

1:16:49comes to business recruitment and

1:16:51retention and we are funded by business

1:16:53leaders. I think that's worthy of being

1:16:55mentioned. But I do want to also mention

1:16:57something, it may not even be

1:16:58represented in this slide, but um

1:17:01there's been a thing that has I've heard

1:17:04recently uh and and NDAs and

1:17:08confidentiality. Let me claim that

1:17:10because I keep hearing it being put off

1:17:12on Council members and I know that is

1:17:14not you all's thing. NDAs and

1:17:16confidentiality is critical to our

1:17:18business. There's not a economic

1:17:20development organization in the nation

1:17:22that is serious about what it does that

1:17:25is not signing NDAs. So that is part of

1:17:27what we do, preserving the confidence of

1:17:30those that we attempt to recruit as we

1:17:32try to get them to consider Memphis as

1:17:35choosing to be here. So,

1:17:37I hope that maybe takes a little

1:17:38pressure off of some of you all who have

1:17:40been asked these questions, knowing you

1:17:42are not the ones who sign NDAs. We are

1:17:44the entities and the I can lose my job

1:17:46for sharing things that

1:17:48may reveal because I am under NDA.

1:17:51>> All right, thank you. We've got

1:17:52Councilwoman Walker, Councilwoman Logan

1:17:55and the queue, and Councilwoman

1:17:56Cooper-Sutton.

1:17:57Uh

1:17:59Councilwoman Walker.

1:18:02>> Thank you.

1:18:03Um

1:18:04So,

1:18:06as you started this segment, you had

1:18:08mentioned about the three um the taxes.

1:18:11So, that is a community

1:18:13benefits ordinance, not to be confused

1:18:16with community benefits

1:18:19agreement,

1:18:20and not to be confused with community

1:18:24benefits

1:18:26agency. And I just want to share that,

1:18:29and

1:18:31um you had used the term about

1:18:35it being chopped up or not last week.

1:18:37So, I text you the breakdown of

1:18:41the funding, how the funding will be

1:18:43appropriated with respect to what we

1:18:45approved last week, the community

1:18:48benefits ordinance. And that information

1:18:50was shared

1:18:52with us

1:18:54um

1:18:54last week.

1:18:56>> Thank you.

1:18:56>> And then secondly, you Yeah, and

1:18:59secondly, you said something about um

1:19:02Fairley. So,

1:19:04under Brent Mayo, he identified four

1:19:07schools

1:19:09two each within

1:19:12a 5-mi

1:19:14radius of the two locations, and one was

1:19:18Fairley.

1:19:19Um

1:19:22And God bless him, what he desired to do

1:19:25and intended to do, um

1:19:27that did not happen. And with respect to

1:19:29the funds that were appropriated,

1:19:34the I'm not saying that it was um

1:19:37um

1:19:39um Mr. Richmond and or the board, but

1:19:43these funds that were designated

1:19:46for schools in the 5-mi radius of the

1:19:49two locations,

1:19:51all of these funds did not go

1:19:55to the intended schools in the 5-mi

1:19:58radius. They went to some

1:20:00other schools out of the area

1:20:03and I won't go so far as to say they

1:20:06have misappropriate a misappropriated

1:20:09XAI fundings, but you all can call it

1:20:11and identify however

1:20:14you choose and I do feel,

1:20:17um,

1:20:18that that is unfortunate. And then what

1:20:20was the third one? Did So, let me Well,

1:20:22let me finish number two. So, number

1:20:24two,

1:20:25um, there was a hold up

1:20:28at the board, um, with them signing the

1:20:30MOU and I'm I still don't know what that

1:20:34was about, but in writing it ended up

1:20:38being

1:20:39an in-kind donation as I understand and

1:20:43I know as a council,

1:20:45um, specific specifically to you, um,

1:20:49Councilman Warren, I know that we just

1:20:51can't receive funds directly

1:20:54from them, but they are able to

1:20:57give funds directly

1:21:00to

1:21:01individuals, organizations, and entities

1:21:04as they choose dependent on the nature

1:21:07of that

1:21:09that entity

1:21:11and I think

1:21:14I think that it would benefit

1:21:17everyone concerned,

1:21:20um, SpaceXAI,

1:21:23the chamber, the council,

1:21:26the mayor, everybody involved in this

1:21:29equation, if SpaceXAI

1:21:32was willing to share

1:21:35what all they have done in the community

1:21:37so far,

1:21:38with whom,

1:21:40and the dollar amount cuz that would

1:21:44take some heat off of all of us as we

1:21:47are constantly hearing people barking

1:21:50about

1:21:51what they need to be doing, what they

1:21:53should be doing, and I'm not disagreeing

1:21:55with that, but they're doing things

1:21:57already. So, if we're advocating for

1:21:59them to

1:22:01purchase some oranges and they have

1:22:03already purchased some oranges, maybe we

1:22:05need to pivot that and advocate

1:22:09that they need to be

1:22:11purchasing some apples, and I understand

1:22:14the I

1:22:16my perception of the secrecy around this

1:22:19is that because of the lack and the lack

1:22:21of resources

1:22:23that people are afraid either they don't

1:22:26want to be criticized for taking funds

1:22:28from XA Space XAI and or it's just so

1:22:33much lack

1:22:35and need in the community. People are

1:22:37afraid to share that they got something

1:22:40cuz they might be afraid if they what

1:22:42they have received or could be receiving

1:22:46in the future

1:22:48could be

1:22:49affected.

1:22:51And I just wanted to share that. And

1:22:52then, what was number three, Councilman

1:22:54Espinoza?

1:22:55>> You know, thank you, Councilwoman

1:22:56>> stand-alone.

1:22:58>> Yeah, so I had down and again, this is

1:23:01due to

1:23:02two questions that really just confused

1:23:04and muddled all of this. So, I was

1:23:05saying community benefits one, 25% of

1:23:08the Space XAI taxes are going directly

1:23:10to the community within a 5-mi radius.

1:23:13Number two was to check the letter that

1:23:15we posted online, and I mentioned

1:23:17fairly, but I don't have the details,

1:23:18similar to what you just said.

1:23:21I think it was three I have I wrote down

1:23:223.6 million.

1:23:25But I don't know that that's accurate.

1:23:26And then, the third thing was totally

1:23:28stand-alone from those two was a

1:23:30community benefits agreement, and you

1:23:32just corrected me appropriately because

1:23:35there's the community benefits agency

1:23:37that we need to implement some sort of

1:23:39community benefits agreement. So, that's

1:23:41all I got for you. If I said something

1:23:43else, sorry.

1:23:45>> Okay, and then um and then I just had

1:23:48one more thing on on this. So,

1:23:51with respect to Fairley, they did

1:23:54renovate they they did

1:23:57renovate the gym and

1:24:00the week the Friday of the October 6th

1:24:04meeting, that Friday there was supposed

1:24:07to have been a ribbon cutting

1:24:10that

1:24:11uh for the gym that got canceled and I'm

1:24:15still waiting to

1:24:18hear back. I did I did reach out to um

1:24:22SpaceXAI and they they sent me something

1:24:25about the cancellation, but they didn't

1:24:27know why they didn't know why it had

1:24:30been um

1:24:32canceled. So, with that, I will pause

1:24:35and yield the floor.

1:24:37>> Thanks.

1:24:38And Bobby, thank you for being here

1:24:40today. We asked you to be here because

1:24:41we will appreciate the help from your

1:24:44members as we get in Asheville and then

1:24:46Chief Winton, thank you for being here

1:24:48today. He's watched every minute of all

1:24:50these hearings and we caught up last

1:24:53week again with the website that we

1:24:55created and Penelope and the team helped

1:24:57us with that.

1:24:59Uh

1:24:59and I've said this multiple times, too,

1:25:01right? We started the hearings 3 weeks

1:25:03ago and then the mayor announced his

1:25:0490-day plan and I feel like it's really

1:25:07good timing. This is all before we had

1:25:10passed a moratorium and so, I'm here to

1:25:12support you and the mayor on that 90-day

1:25:14plan and I if you don't mind, will you

1:25:16expound on that a little bit and

1:25:19anything else you want to share?

1:25:20>> Yeah, absolutely. Uh and thank you for

1:25:23that. Obviously, with the announcement

1:25:25of the executive order,

1:25:27uh we just want to get to work hand in

1:25:28hand right with you.

1:25:30Um one of the things that stepping back

1:25:33looked at was looking at all of the

1:25:35presenters and the information that's

1:25:38come before council over the last 2

1:25:41years. Like 27 distinct presenters.

1:25:45Um and so, as we were talking,

1:25:47Councilman Espinosa,

1:25:49we actually have assembled a full data

1:25:51repository of every presenter, every

1:25:54expert, and it coupled with all of the

1:25:58things we're hearing from the community

1:26:00to actually start to correlate those

1:26:02data points.

1:26:04And then get right to work to the things

1:26:06that we're hearing, starting with the

1:26:09two, you know, main impacted communities

1:26:12being Boxtown and Whitehaven. Obviously,

1:26:15you heard about with Whitehaven, the

1:26:17thing we heard the most right out of the

1:26:19gate was the traffic, and what's going

1:26:21on right there with John P. Freeman.

1:26:24Excited to see progress being made.

1:26:26We're not We don't have the victory flag

1:26:29up yet, but I will say that once we

1:26:31reached out to SpaceX AI and said,

1:26:34"Here's the problem. Let's sit down and

1:26:35talk." With our city engineers,

1:26:38one of the things to note for everyone

1:26:40for the record, they rerouted traffic

1:26:43within. So, as trucks come in delivering

1:26:46during this major construction period,

1:26:48those trucks now are rerouted out on

1:26:51Stateline Road, where they used to be

1:26:53able to exit on two lane. So, the

1:26:55reduction in traffic that John P.

1:26:57Freeman school saw right out of the gate

1:27:00was actually that. So, now we're dealing

1:27:01with the the the trucks that are getting

1:27:06the word late. But now we have sky cops

1:27:09out there and cameras. So, we are now

1:27:11following up with those individuals. So,

1:27:14that was kind of first step there. And

1:27:16then in Boxtown, one of the things we

1:27:18heard clearly was,

1:27:20and this goes right back to the

1:27:21community benefit ordinance,

1:27:23"We need our homes fixed." I mean, it

1:27:26was very clear. I actually spent time

1:27:28spent time walking up and down East

1:27:31Boxtown Road because I was actually

1:27:33baptized in Boxtown as a kid. So, it's

1:27:36like, "You know what? Let me go out here

1:27:37and talk with people on the ground and

1:27:39hear what they're saying." And just as

1:27:41the survey said, home fixing our homes

1:27:44was number one on the list. So, the

1:27:46dollars that are allocated there, you

1:27:48know,

1:27:49Deputy Chief Walls on my team is now

1:27:52serving point. She's literally living

1:27:54over there with the HCD team right now

1:27:57cuz we're going too fast, you know,

1:28:00I don't want to say fast track cuz we

1:28:02won't skip any of the administrative

1:28:04processes, but we're going to make them

1:28:06happen swiftly and start getting making

1:28:08that happen for that community. And then

1:28:10when we do our first community

1:28:12stakeholder meeting, it will be there

1:28:15to talk about what's happening, what

1:28:17they need, and address that short list.

1:28:20Also, you know, just to to know,

1:28:23obviously with the executive order

1:28:25coming out, a little bit and not sure if

1:28:28everybody knows my actual background. I

1:28:30mean, my degree field is actually

1:28:32information systems. I spent my time

1:28:35growing up actually building server

1:28:37farms for FedEx and ran data centers

1:28:41globally. So, you know, it's one of

1:28:43those now how do we take this knowledge

1:28:46and everything that we've compiled and

1:28:48start to translate that into, you know,

1:28:50this is fact, this is fiction and

1:28:52helping our communities understand the

1:28:54difference

1:28:56and what's happening. So,

1:28:58working, you know, I've started to call

1:29:00some of my

1:29:02global CIO Fortune 100 colleagues and

1:29:06and also the data centers they sit

1:29:09outside of Memphis and talk about

1:29:12responsible data centers and that model.

1:29:15And what's interesting is you start

1:29:16looking at the data points that are

1:29:18coming out from that. They actually

1:29:20correlate with what we're hearing from

1:29:22our environmental justice teams.

1:29:24>> Hey, and I want to just chime in because

1:29:26Jamie, I don't think he's on the call

1:29:27anymore, but he referenced it

1:29:30TVA has led the country

1:29:33on this stuff and I think that's

1:29:36that's a really good thing for us to

1:29:37have. I mean, you know, we're part of

1:29:38that. Like we're leading on something

1:29:40and that's a good thing.

1:29:41>> Yes.

1:29:42>> Um

1:29:43Go ahead.

1:29:44>> Sorry.

1:29:44>> No, so I just want to say, you know,

1:29:46there's activity activity happen. You'll

1:29:48start to to more about that on next

1:29:51Friday, but it's working right in tandem

1:29:54with the council and this team.

1:29:58>> Uh we've got Thank you, Chief. We've got

1:30:00Councilwoman Logan Cooper Sutton and

1:30:02then Walker again. And I've got a staff

1:30:05for 25 more minutes.

1:30:07And then we'll be back here again in 2

1:30:09weeks. We're going to continue to do

1:30:10this. We'll go ahead, Councilwoman

1:30:11Logan.

1:30:14>> Um one thing that I [clears throat]

1:30:15wanted to note, um I'm not sure which

1:30:18committee it's for which benefit

1:30:20community benefit agreement fund, you

1:30:23know, whatever agency [clears throat]

1:30:25or which whichever one. But I do think

1:30:27it's it's very, very important that we

1:30:29get this part right because we don't

1:30:32know exactly what's coming in the future

1:30:34for, you know, as a result of the data

1:30:37center type of skill centers and or

1:30:39resource-intensive use facilities or

1:30:42centers.

1:30:43So, making certain that even though

1:30:46we're doing roads and all of these other

1:30:48things, that a portion of that is set

1:30:51put aside for

1:30:54any type of um

1:30:56disaster or interruption or disruption

1:31:00of services in any way for the city.

1:31:04So, you know, we we definitely want to

1:31:06approach it and I hope that

1:31:08administration is looking at that part

1:31:10while while land use and and placement

1:31:13and um

1:31:16disclosure and all of that is on our

1:31:19side, our purview. I do hope that

1:31:22administration is looking at how we can

1:31:25have, you know, funds for

1:31:29not only the south part of the city, but

1:31:31the entire city if in fact there is

1:31:33something that happens with the

1:31:35utilities or with the water or with a

1:31:39power outage and, you know, people need

1:31:41food and those types of things. So, um

1:31:44it it, you know, it's it's really

1:31:46important that we drill down and really

1:31:47look at um this this whole entire

1:31:52um development

1:31:54from a holistic and a future standpoint,

1:31:57[clears throat] not just currently what

1:31:59we need. Um, we definitely want to fix

1:32:01things like the traffic jams and, you

1:32:03know, anything that deals with safety

1:32:05and of our people and studying of the

1:32:07air quality and like you said, we have 2

1:32:09years of that so we can pull that data,

1:32:11fix those things, put those things in

1:32:13place, but we also need to, you know,

1:32:16um, prepare or be prepared as a city to

1:32:20protect our citizens and provide for

1:32:22citizens in case there's things that

1:32:24that come up that we don't know about.

1:32:27In other cities, you know, they are

1:32:30having some some of these issues. I'm

1:32:32not certain that if it's from the data

1:32:33centers or what, but we see that there

1:32:36are

1:32:37blackouts and things like that. So, just

1:32:38wanted to put that there. Hopefully,

1:32:40that's in a conversation.

1:32:42>> Thank you, Councilwoman.

1:32:43>> You're welcome.

1:32:45>> Here's what I'd like to do real quick.

1:32:46We're going to meet again on November

1:32:48the 9th. I'm not ending today's meeting.

1:32:50Uh, Bobby, uh, Mr. Bobby White from the

1:32:52Chamber had to duck out. He's going to

1:32:54be back on the 9th. He's been at every

1:32:56meeting we've had so far. A lot of you

1:32:57have and there's some citizens here in

1:33:00the audience today that keep coming and

1:33:01it's great. Um, I'm going to commit us

1:33:04to, you know, we've got one in 2 weeks

1:33:07on the 9th and then we'll send out a

1:33:08schedule. Dr. Warren has suggested it,

1:33:10Councilwoman Logan just did. We'll

1:33:12continue to meet publicly every 2 weeks,

1:33:14but I'm also excited until

1:33:17indefinitely and not every council

1:33:18member has to come. I know it's it's

1:33:20crazy scheduling sometimes, but um,

1:33:23let's commit to that publicly and then

1:33:26um,

1:33:29I know we're going to be out in the

1:33:30community. I know people have have

1:33:31listening sessions scheduled and then

1:33:33the mayor is also going to get into the

1:33:34meet. I mean, Chief Winton's about to

1:33:35get into the media their plan and their

1:33:37road show. I like being outside, man.

1:33:39All these meetings at City Hall, but we

1:33:41got to do them, right? Uh,

1:33:42so yeah, so let's count on that, count

1:33:45on each other for that. Uh, yeah, Bobby

1:33:47will be back on the 9th and

1:33:51Oh my gosh, breaking development. He's

1:33:53coming back upstairs. So, he'll be back

1:33:56up here. All right. Councilwoman Logan,

1:33:57thank you. Councilwoman

1:34:00Walker, you are next.

1:34:05>> Yes, thank you.

1:34:07Um

1:34:08So, my question was for Mr. White. Did

1:34:10you say he would be back on the 9th?

1:34:13>> He's actually coming right back up right

1:34:14now, but yes, ma'am, he'll be back on

1:34:15the 9th.

1:34:18If need

1:34:19>> Well, how long

1:34:21How long are we going We going to still

1:34:23do this until 3:00? If Well, if he comes

1:34:25back before we close today, I will put

1:34:28my question forward that that

1:34:31time.

1:34:34I yield the floor.

1:34:38>> I'm I'm available to answer whatever

1:34:40question. I'm I'm I'm here now. I I

1:34:43think the um

1:34:45If we

1:34:45>> I forgot that she wasn't here and

1:34:47visually saw you. Yeah, Councilwoman

1:34:48Walker, I think you're up, Bobby. Yeah.

1:34:51>> No, I I there's a question I'm happy to

1:34:52answer.

1:34:53>> Um

1:34:58Okay, thank you. I didn't realize you

1:35:00were back. So,

1:35:01um

1:35:03as it relates to

1:35:05whatever

1:35:07the data centers do for

1:35:10the community,

1:35:12um the conversations, the chatter, the

1:35:15questions, the the the acts, the

1:35:18recommendations, the ideas, a lot of

1:35:21what people are wanting

1:35:24to see happen, are wanting

1:35:27to see them do deals with um

1:35:30dressing poverty and the eradication of

1:35:33poverty.

1:35:34So,

1:35:36um as far as the chamber is concerned,

1:35:39um I know that that you all were before

1:35:42us in committee in April of 2024,

1:35:46and the young lady who presented with

1:35:48you

1:35:50there was some data shared about the

1:35:52poverty in Memphis, and

1:35:54in conclusion, she said that it was just

1:35:57not a whole lot that could be done to

1:35:59really

1:36:01um

1:36:02um lower the poverty rate in Memphis and

1:36:05I did find that to be disturbing. And so

1:36:07my question to you

1:36:08>> of that quote Councilwoman, though.

1:36:10>> Although

1:36:12you

1:36:12>> Yeah, so

1:36:14I know that based on

1:36:17what you

1:36:18you had something on the screen, so that

1:36:20that's not y'alls

1:36:23that that's not y'alls primary focus,

1:36:25but in lieu of the current

1:36:27situation in the city, in society,

1:36:31is it possible to have some kind of

1:36:33intersectionality

1:36:35between what Space X AI

1:36:38is going to do moving forward and what

1:36:41the chamber can do to help them

1:36:45address poverty here in the city,

1:36:47although that you all

1:36:50don't claim to be responsible for

1:36:52addressing that and the young lady said

1:36:54that not much is going to happen, but

1:36:57I'm just putting it out there. I think

1:36:58it would be great.

1:37:00>> Yeah. Uh yeah, thank you Councilwoman. I

1:37:02do not recall the comment or the

1:37:04presentation, but I do want to just say

1:37:06this, that with our 35 to 45 members

1:37:10there at the chamber, we are addressing

1:37:12poverty by staying in our lane, which is

1:37:15business recruitment and retention. Our

1:37:17issue is is that we are very much

1:37:19focused on what we call um

1:37:23great paying jobs as much as we can be

1:37:26because we know that the best tool in

1:37:28any community's toolbox,

1:37:31uh it's um it's a poverty eradicator,

1:37:33it's a

1:37:34it pushes back on crime, which is

1:37:36actually business recruitment and it

1:37:39retention. It is essential to the growth

1:37:41of the city. So, while we may not frame

1:37:44it as such, I do want to at least defend

1:37:47the fact that the chamber is fully uh

1:37:49committed in that space based on the

1:37:51work that we do as the tip of the spear

1:37:53when it comes to recruitment of

1:37:55businesses and when it comes to

1:37:57retention of businesses. There is a um a

1:37:59slide you may not see, uh which was

1:38:02essentially showing that in the last

1:38:04several years we've had about and I

1:38:06think we've gotten to a play place we've

1:38:08kind of normalized $1 billion. But over

1:38:11the last couple

1:38:12But over the last couple of years we've

1:38:13seen over a hundred billion dollars of

1:38:15tech technology and AI related

1:38:18investment. That's not just SpaceX AI

1:38:21and 5C. That's also FedEx building a new

1:38:24hub, that's St. Jude expanding in

1:38:26downtown. But I do just want to say

1:38:29Councilwoman that we stay focused on

1:38:32that part because we know

1:38:34that in terms of hunting for recruitment

1:38:37that we are

1:38:38as much as we have partners with MLGW

1:38:40and Edge and the city and the county

1:38:42that we are pretty much the ones in that

1:38:45space of actively hunting for what those

1:38:47opportunities are

1:38:49in other spaces to recruit people to

1:38:51Memphis. So so no disrespect to the

1:38:55premise. I'm just speaking to the idea

1:38:57that we are in fact in that space. We

1:39:00just don't necessarily call it that.

1:39:02>> [snorts]

1:39:04>> Okay, well that's great and of course I

1:39:07along with my colleagues, you know,

1:39:08we're aware of what you all do. I guess

1:39:11what, you know, on the street level, on

1:39:13the community level

1:39:15I think it would be good for the

1:39:17community the average more people in the

1:39:20community to know

1:39:22who you all are and what you do

1:39:26and what your role was in

1:39:31um having SpaceX AI

1:39:35to come here. Just like the

1:39:36clarification and I thank you for the

1:39:38the clar- clarification on the NDA.

1:39:42And the reason why we take so many hits

1:39:44about that is because

1:39:47information has not been shared I judge

1:39:50from the right sources and I don't want

1:39:51to get too far to the left but I thank

1:39:53you for your response and in conclusion

1:39:57moving forward

1:39:59I know you all do marketing and PR and

1:40:01all of that but if it could reach down

1:40:06to everyday Memphians in the community,

1:40:10I think that it would um be a benefit to

1:40:15the grand scheme of things. Thank you,

1:40:17Mr. Chair. I yield the floor.

1:40:19>> All right, thank you, Councilwoman

1:40:21uh Walker. I Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton.

1:40:26>> Thank you, Chair. And thank you um

1:40:30I always want to call you what I call

1:40:32you

1:40:32>> Yes, ma'am.

1:40:33>> in our church arena.

1:40:35Um but thank you

1:40:36um

1:40:37I just I'm still trying to say Elder

1:40:39White, Bobby White, uh for coming and

1:40:42for being very transparent.

1:40:45What I would like for the chairman to

1:40:47request and to ask that Edge show up at

1:40:51these meetings as well.

1:40:53>> It's done. Thank you.

1:40:54>> I second

1:40:55they need to show up. The chamber shows

1:40:58up whenever as many hits as they get

1:41:01even from me sometimes, and as many hits

1:41:04as they get from the community, they

1:41:06always show up with transparency. We may

1:41:08not like what we hear or like who's

1:41:11representing them, but when the City

1:41:13Council ask, they do show up. So, I want

1:41:17to make record of that first of all. And

1:41:19thank you, uh Bobby White. The second

1:41:21thing is that um Councilwoman Walker did

1:41:26clarify ordinance.

1:41:28She did clarify agency, and she did

1:41:30clarify community agreement. And this

1:41:33portion is now community benefit.

1:41:36What has been such a huge ask and part

1:41:41for Space X A I

1:41:44since that was the biggest data center,

1:41:46the hyper-scale data center that you

1:41:48know, has been here, the focus. There is

1:41:5075% that went to the city.

1:41:52And most of the communities where these

1:41:54data centers are now located should have

1:41:58air quality monitor monitors.

1:42:01I want to shout out to Shelby County.

1:42:03Have to

1:42:08>> Uh she's just about to get into the

1:42:09shower.

1:42:10>> air quality.

1:42:12They need air quality monitors in our

1:42:15community. That should be part of the

1:42:17benefits. We got 75%

1:42:20of that revenue went to the city. So, we

1:42:23need to really focus in and zoom in and

1:42:27really focus in on that. The community

1:42:30are asking for those monitors. They want

1:42:33them. I get the quality air monitoring

1:42:37report sent to my phone every day. I

1:42:40would suggest that the council members

1:42:42get it, too. That would be a part of

1:42:45knowledge, us being aware what our air

1:42:47quality looks like and what's going on

1:42:49in our city as well.

1:42:51However,

1:42:53when I think about the chambers and they

1:42:55are recruiters, they recruit and attract

1:42:58businesses here.

1:43:00That is great.

1:43:03We would like to see and know more when

1:43:05you're recruiting the skill set of the

1:43:08people that are here in in Memphis that

1:43:10can possibly qualify for those. What

1:43:13education skill sets are we looking for?

1:43:17Uh more open communication when you're

1:43:19recruiting and these city and these

1:43:21businesses are excited to come here

1:43:23because we want to do business with

1:43:25people that want to do good business

1:43:26with us here in Memphis. So, those

1:43:28things are important and we should also

1:43:32have a committee

1:43:35that we are openly quarterly talking

1:43:38about what's happening, [clears throat]

1:43:40who is potentially coming. If the

1:43:42Chamber of Commerce is our faith, we

1:43:45need to know about it as a city because

1:43:48this will give people encouragement,

1:43:50maybe an opportunity that they will want

1:43:52to change their perspective on how they

1:43:55look at things, how they

1:43:57uh approach their education skills, on

1:44:00what things that they want to do if they

1:44:03knew about what potential business have

1:44:06been recruited, excited about coming

1:44:08here, being a part of the city of

1:44:10Memphis. I think those are the things

1:44:12that we need to look at also as

1:44:13community benefits when this is

1:44:16happening. I'm not saying where I I want

1:44:18to take control cuz I don't know where I

1:44:20am going to be for the next 4 years.

1:44:22But, as a citizen, those would be things

1:44:25that I think would be more probable.

1:44:27There are other things that are

1:44:28happening in other cities like Columbia,

1:44:30Georgia. Uh things are happening.

1:44:33Wouldn't that be such an an amazing

1:44:36thing to happen that we don't have to

1:44:38pay taxes because that's one of the

1:44:40biggest revenues that we have here. And

1:44:43negotiating, who who is negotiating

1:44:46[clears throat]

1:44:47when these businesses come here? Who are

1:44:50the negotiators? How are you

1:44:52negotiating? Are you making sure that

1:44:54our most hardest community in this city,

1:44:58as we know that the assessor, hey Mr. Um

1:45:02Javier, has said that we 5 years down

1:45:05the road what we're looking at. So, we

1:45:07got a lot of things we got to take in

1:45:09consideration and making sure that every

1:45:14player, everybody that's important,

1:45:16plays a part. That someone is sitting at

1:45:18the table. And I I don't have to sit at

1:45:21the table. I'm a citizen here, but I

1:45:24sure want to know that these

1:45:26negotiations that we're making with

1:45:27these businesses that are coming here,

1:45:29that the people that really live here,

1:45:31the backbones of it, the people that I I

1:45:33mean got the really grit and grind of

1:45:35it, is participating and know and see

1:45:39and are really benefiting at all,

1:45:41whether we're wealthy or whether we're

1:45:42poor, we all are benefiting from it some

1:45:46way or another. I yield. [clears throat]

1:45:49>> Thank you Thank you, uh councilwoman. I

1:45:50really appreciate the comments. I do

1:45:52want to say just a couple of things. I

1:45:54agree with you wholeheartedly regarding

1:45:55the workforce aspect of it. Uh one of

1:45:58the things we've really pushed toward

1:45:59even as a chamber, and we have about I

1:46:02have about two, three pieces of

1:46:04legislation that we've passed in

1:46:05Nashville to kind of lean into this

1:46:07space as it relates to industry

1:46:08credentials and the fact you don't have

1:46:10to have a 4-year degree in order to get

1:46:13some of these certifications, industry

1:46:14credentials, and get a good paying job

1:46:16on the other side of that. And we've

1:46:17tried to align that with what the market

1:46:19or where the market is going even as it

1:46:21relates to many of these larger

1:46:23employers who've come into our space.

1:46:25So, we agree with you. I agree with you

1:46:27wholeheartedly

1:46:28relative to that, and that's the work we

1:46:30want to get better at even as it relates

1:46:32to our connection. We want the things

1:46:34that the school districts do to be even

1:46:36better informed by what the market where

1:46:40the market is going and what the needs

1:46:42of businesses are.

1:46:43I do want to say this.

1:46:45I'm from South Memphis.

1:46:47Um

1:46:48Uh

1:46:49we we have an institutional fortitude.

1:46:51I'm working here at the chamber. We're

1:46:52not here to be liked. We're here to be

1:46:54effective. Uh we're not um we're not

1:46:57trying to host a public opinion poll to

1:46:59see how people think about us. And I'll

1:47:01even say this to you, Councilwoman

1:47:04Walker, you mentioned it. Most of our

1:47:06marketing and in PR is not in Memphis.

1:47:08It's outside of Memphis. Uh we're not

1:47:11using our marketing dollars to try to

1:47:13get citizens to feel better about us.

1:47:16This is why we talk to you.

1:47:18This is why we want you to know what

1:47:20we're doing for you all to be able to

1:47:22stand up and make mention of the work

1:47:24that we do because quite frankly, we

1:47:26spend every dime that we have

1:47:29uh that should be spent with site

1:47:31selectors and people outside of the city

1:47:34trying to recruit them in if we were to

1:47:36spend it internally in Memphis trying to

1:47:38get people to better understand. But

1:47:39again, this is why we communicate uh

1:47:41with you all and appreciate your

1:47:42comments.

1:47:43>> why can't you spend it both places?

1:47:45>> We'd love if you guys want to invest in

1:47:46the chamber, we'd love to uh

1:47:48>> Cooper Sudduth was speaking of what

1:47:50Cooper Sudduth was speaking of if you

1:47:52spent it both places

1:47:55to what the point I was making, maybe I

1:47:57was misunderstood and to the point that

1:47:59she was making

1:48:01why can't it be spent

1:48:03both places so people can know about the

1:48:06job creation that you all are doing?

1:48:09>> No, no, no. Yeah, not to interrupt, but

1:48:11on the job creation, the workforce piece

1:48:13is one thing. I'm speaking wholly and

1:48:16specifically to in fact how most of our

1:48:18attention marketing dollars actually go

1:48:21toward promoting Memphis. It goes toward

1:48:24recruiting companies. It goes toward

1:48:26travel budget to go to other cities.

1:48:28>> that's obvious cuz most Memphians don't

1:48:30know about y'all or what y'all do as it

1:48:33relates to making their lives better as

1:48:35it relates to making the city better.

1:48:37And I think as it relates to the overall

1:48:39equation, it would be helpful if more

1:48:42Memphians knew about what you all were

1:48:45doing for the citizens and for the city.

1:48:48>> We welcome any invitation, town hall

1:48:51meetings, any forums you guys are

1:48:52interested in hosting. We're more than

1:48:54welcome as uh Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton

1:48:56mentioned, we we show up and we're more

1:48:58than welcome to answer any questions and

1:48:59speak in those forums that you guys said

1:49:01because again, people look to you all

1:49:03for answers and we're happy to be

1:49:04supportive.

1:49:08>> Quick. Thank you, Councilwoman Walker.

1:49:11>> Well, thank you. I'm looking forward um

1:49:13I'll be looking forward to that.

1:49:15>> Councilwoman Cooper-Sutton.

1:49:17I hear Did you want to say something?

1:49:18>> Um I

1:49:19Well, I was just going to wrap it wrap

1:49:21up my my comment, but um thank you and

1:49:26uh Bobby White, thank you for the

1:49:27Chamber. I'm going to give you all

1:49:28another shout-out for showing up. Um you

1:49:31all get as much heat hit as we do and I

1:49:34do personally. And uh Chairman, I want

1:49:38to not sound redundant, [clears throat]

1:49:40but be very clear.

1:49:42Um

1:49:43they show up every time.

1:49:44>> Yes, ma'am.

1:49:45>> We need the EDGE board to show up every

1:49:48time.

1:49:49>> Yes, ma'am.

1:49:49>> When there's an ask and a request sent

1:49:52to them

1:49:54because there's questions that need to

1:49:55be asked from them on the business side

1:49:58as well. We're trying to One

1:50:01Councilwoman Logan said something during

1:50:03my second year term.

1:50:06And she said she wanted a better

1:50:07relationship with EDGE,

1:50:10Chamber

1:50:11communicating, talking.

1:50:14And the Chamber has fulfilled that

1:50:16wholeheartedly and I'm grateful for

1:50:18that.

1:50:19And I'm thankful for that. And

1:50:23I feel that I can call the chamber at

1:50:25anytime, and you know, let them know

1:50:27they know that I have a tour going on.

1:50:29They're welcome to show up at the tour,

1:50:31but it's really dear to

1:50:33uh parks and community. But they're

1:50:36welcome to show up. He the

1:50:39Mr. White has never never not been

1:50:42um

1:50:43a pushback with me.

1:50:45And answer my question. Uh Councilwoman

1:50:47Walker, there is a sheet that I'm going

1:50:49to send to you that SpaceXAI sent sent

1:50:52to me of their investment

1:50:54of what they have been investing in

1:50:56because that was some things that I

1:50:58wanted to know since the new takeover of

1:51:01SpaceXAI.

1:51:02So, Dominique, my analyst would will

1:51:05will send that over to each council

1:51:07member uh for your in

1:51:08>> and and we'll put that on the website.

1:51:10Sorry, I'm trying to cut you off.

1:51:11>> it should be shared I think it should be

1:51:13shared publicly cuz like I said a little

1:51:16earlier, people think they haven't done

1:51:18anything, and they're not currently

1:51:20doing anything. And so, I think it needs

1:51:23to be shared publicly, but I know that's

1:51:25not their model to just make it known

1:51:27what they're doing. But thank you

1:51:29>> Well, for that. Yeah. Yeah, and that's

1:51:31why I asked so I could get the

1:51:33information out to my constituents when

1:51:36they ask or there won't be any

1:51:37misinformation. And if it is

1:51:39misinformation that, you know, we can

1:51:42research and do, I can only give them

1:51:45what has been given to me.

1:51:47>> Yeah.

1:51:47>> And trust and be very prayerful that

1:51:49that is, but uh

1:51:51Chairman Spenozza, I'm going to yield.

1:51:53Thank you for this forum that you

1:51:56um

1:51:57did, and I appreciate it. And thank you

1:51:59again. I yield.

1:52:00>> Thank you, ladies. Um

1:52:02yeah, these meetings sometimes are

1:52:03probably horribly boring. I'm sitting

1:52:05here thinking, you know, so much good

1:52:07information. We need to get Project Pat

1:52:09to come in here and do like, you know,

1:52:11the new churches

1:52:13thing cuz I can't get that song out of

1:52:14my head.

1:52:15Uh I get like maybe in between committee

1:52:17meetings, Dr. Warren, you think?

1:52:18>> It let me uh thank you.

1:52:20>> Sorry, go ahead. I'm not sorry.

1:52:21>> [clears throat]

1:52:22>> I would like that.

1:52:22>> Last year

1:52:24the chamber lobbied for state bill 1074.

1:52:28You familiar with that bill, Bobby?

1:52:30>> Tell me which one it is.

1:52:31>> It's the one that preempted community

1:52:34benefit agreements.

1:52:37That we could not do community benefit

1:52:39agreements. So, last year

1:52:40>> But those are based on state incentives.

1:52:42Uh if I if I remember correctly.

1:52:44>> I'm not sure what it is. Will you look

1:52:45that up and figure out what it is and

1:52:47bring it back to me cuz I didn't realize

1:52:49we were lobbying against ourselves last

1:52:51year. But um

1:52:53>> I don't think we had a plan in terms of

1:52:55how we're moving forward, but I believe

1:52:56that the particular piece of legislation

1:52:58you're talking about, and I'm going by

1:53:00memory here, was tied to and it was not

1:53:02necessarily us uh as much as there was

1:53:05this whole idea that if you're receiving

1:53:07state incentives, there was some It's

1:53:09It's tied to state incentives, if I

1:53:11remember correctly.

1:53:12>> Okay, so we need to we're probably going

1:53:14to need to unwrap

1:53:15rewind that or unwind it or whatever to

1:53:18get this community benefit agreement

1:53:20through more than likely.

1:53:22Have your guys look at it and see what

1:53:24they think as we move forward with it.

1:53:26Thank you, Bobby.

1:53:27>> Thank you, Councilwoman Warren. Chief

1:53:29Wente, you want to make a comment before

1:53:30we wrap it up?

1:53:31>> Yeah, just a quick comment. Uh one of

1:53:32the things that's part of the work uh

1:53:34we've been talking with both 5C, uh

1:53:37Google who's across the pond, as well as

1:53:39SpaceX AI about now bringing together

1:53:42that story on terms of jobs and career

1:53:45pathing, like what's in it for them as a

1:53:48collective story. So, more to come

1:53:50there.

1:53:50>> All right, thank you. So, Gia just

1:53:53confirmed we're continuing to load

1:53:54documents on that link, so check out the

1:53:56link like you're going to get the most

1:53:57recent Shelby County Health Department,

1:53:59everything that's been presented to us

1:54:00or given

1:54:02to us. Um and I'm excited to see that

1:54:05list that it sounds like Councilwoman

1:54:06Cooper-Sutton just got. So, we'll see a

1:54:08list that we just got from SpaceX that

1:54:09has some of their investments in the

1:54:10community. We'll be back on November the

1:54:139th. Uh

1:54:15we got

1:54:15>> Can I make one comment on what you're

1:54:17maybe sharing regarding the funds that

1:54:20have been shared? I You may want to back

1:54:23and check because I do know that been

1:54:26tens of millions of dollars have been

1:54:27given out where they have had entities

1:54:30actually sign NDAs. So, whatever may

1:54:32have been shared, you may want to clear

1:54:34with the company that they're okay with

1:54:36that being shared publicly. That's the

1:54:38only thing.

1:54:38>> Well, I haven't seen anything yet. I

1:54:41mean, I just heard like we all did in

1:54:42real time. Councilwoman Cooper said and

1:54:44said she got a list of something. So,

1:54:47just for public knowledge

1:54:50I mean, thank you for saying that.

1:54:52If it went to a city email

1:54:54you know, um

1:54:56Yeah, so I mean, it I

1:54:59you know,

1:55:00um you did. You did. You definitely did

1:55:02and I appreciate you saying it. All

1:55:04right, so we'll be back on the 9th and

1:55:06uh appreciate everybody for coming.

1:55:08Thank you.

```*

## Sources

- Agenda: https://memphis.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=10

- Event page: https://memphistn.gov/event/community-benefits-economic-growth-outstanding-questions/