2026-10-06 - Committee on Appointments

Summary

Built from the posted agenda. The City's posted video for this meeting is the combined Tuesday morning committee stream (Fiscal Committee, Community Development Committee and Committee of the Whole), in which no appointments business appears, so what was said or decided here is not known.

  • Appointment: Resolution confirming the Mayor's appointment of Natasha Bledsoe as an alternate to the Housing Appeal Board.
  • Vacancies: Discussion of the current Board and Commission Vacancy List dated October 6, 2026.
  • The stream's contents are summarized on 2026-10-06 - Fiscal Committee and 2026-10-06 - Community Development Committee; this page keeps the full caption transcript.

Agenda

  1. Resolution confirming Mayor LaGrand's appointment of Natasha Bledsoe as an alternate to the Housing Appeal Board
  2. Discussion on the current Board and Commission Vacancy List, October 6, 2026

Sources

Note: The City's YouTube stream "Tuesday Morning Committee Meetings" appears (from its title) to cover the morning committees of this day together; this page carries it so its transcript is processed once.

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:11[music]

00:12Heat. Heat.

00:17[music]

00:42>> [music]

00:45>> Heat. Heat.

00:52[music]

01:00[music]

01:06Heat. Heat.

01:08[music]

01:17[music]

01:23[music]

01:29>> [music]

01:34[music]

01:42[music]

02:02[music]

02:14[music]

02:20[music]

02:31[music]

02:43[music]

02:52>> Heat. Heat.

02:59[music]

03:15[music]

03:26>> [music]

03:59[music]

04:09[music]

04:14[music]

04:20[music]

04:30[music]

04:46[music]

05:25[music]

05:42[music]

05:49[music]

06:16[music]

06:21>> Heat. Heat.

06:25[music]

06:41[music]

06:43Heat. Heat.

06:48[music]

06:54[music]

07:04[music]

07:24Heat. Heat.

07:27[music]

07:34[music]

07:58>> [music]

08:04[music]

08:11>> Heat. Heat.

08:19[music]

08:31[music]

08:34Heat. Heat.

08:36[music]

08:45[music]

08:49[music]

08:56Heat. Heat.

09:19Heat. Heat.

09:41>> [music]

09:46[music]

09:50[music]

09:56[music]

10:27>> Heat. Heat.

10:30[music]

10:48[music] Heat. Heat.

10:56[music]

11:22Heat.

11:26Heat.

11:34>> [music]

11:46>> Heat. Heat.

11:54Heat. Heat. [music]

12:12[music]

12:15Heat.

12:28Heat.

12:34[music]

12:36Heat. Heat.

12:44[music]

12:54[music]

12:57Heat. Heat.

13:29Heat. [music] Heat.

13:44>> [music]

13:52[music]

13:58>> Heat. Heat.

14:59>> [music]

15:04[music]

15:09[music]

15:22[music]

15:39[music]

15:47[music]

15:56[music]

16:41[music]

16:49[music]

16:58>> Heat. Heat.

17:03Heat. Heat.

17:08[music]

17:16[music]

17:24[music]

18:08>> [music]

18:17[music]

18:25[music]

18:37[music]

18:49[music]

18:55[music]

19:00[music]

19:08[music]

19:10>> Heat. Heat.

19:17Heat.

19:26[music]

19:31[music]

19:37[music]

19:44Heat.

19:52>> [music]

19:59[music]

20:00>> Heat. Heat.

20:07[music] Heat. Heat.

20:15[music]

20:44>> [music]

20:49[music]

20:50>> Heat. Heat.

20:56[music]

21:08Heat.

21:09Heat.

21:12[music]

21:18Heat.

21:30Heat. [music]

21:48>> [music]

21:55>> Heat. Heat. [music]

22:07>> [music]

22:12>> Heat. Heat.

22:22[music] Heat. Heat.

22:30[music]

23:11>> [music]

23:29[music]

23:37[music]

23:47[music]

23:50>> Good morning everyone. The time is now

23:518:30 and we can go ahead and call our

23:52fiscal committee meeting to order.

23:55First up is a resolution approving an

23:57agreement with the Michigan Green

23:59Building Collaboration Collaborative to

24:01accept $210,99

24:03in funding for the Office of

24:05Sustainability to hire a full-time staff

24:07member. [snorts]

24:08Do

24:08>> you have a motion?

24:09>> So moved.

24:10>> Support.

24:10>> Moved and supported. Miss Wilkinson.

24:12>> Thank you. Good morning, commissioners.

24:14>> Good morning. It's a resolution

24:15approving agreement with the Michigan

24:16Green Building Collaborative, formerly

24:18known as the US Green Building Council

24:19of West Michigan, to accept funding for

24:21the Office of Sustainability to hire a

24:23staff person. The Michigan Green

24:25Building Collaborative accepted grant

24:27dollars from the WGI Foundation on

24:28behalf of our EH0 initiative, equitable,

24:31healthy, and zero-carbon buildings, uh

24:33joint partnership with the Michigan

24:34Green Building Collaborative, and the

24:36Urban Core Collective to address

24:37decarbonization of both our commercial

24:39and our residential building sector.

24:42This staff person, a commercial

24:43sustainability specialist, will help

24:44support our business community as well

24:46as help us increase capacity to address

24:49our buildings and industry chapter of

24:50our climate action and adaptation plan.

24:53>> Thank you so much for the overview

24:54questions, Commissioner.

24:57>> Well, just a comment. Thank you, Miss

24:59Miss Wilkinson, uh, for your work on

25:00this. I really appreciate it. I think

25:02it's uh an awesome opportunity for the

25:05community to see that this is not a city

25:07investment uh that we are getting uh

25:09outside investments for this work and

25:11working with community partners with no

25:14undue stress on homeowners, business

25:16owners uh versus you know it's uh

25:20funding an outside funding source. So

25:22very happy to see that and further shows

25:24that you know there's no penalties for

25:27the climate action adaptation plan and

25:29our office is finding very innovative

25:31ways to do this work. So thank you for

25:34that.

25:34>> Thank you commissioner.

25:36>> Yes, commissioner.

25:37>> I just want to say thank you for your

25:39hard work. I'm really excited to see

25:40that we're adding to our staff. I agree

25:42with my colleague on the funding

25:44mechanisms and all that, but I think

25:46that your department is incredibly vital

25:48for what we're doing as a city and as a

25:50community and so any time we can be, you

25:53know, supporting the work of our climate

25:55action plan or our sustainability work

25:58or all these things, I really appreciate

25:59it. So, thank you. Thank you,

26:01Commissioner.

26:02>> Thank you so much. And I'll just say I

26:04echo my those comments. All those in

26:06favor?

26:07>> I I

26:07>> Any opposed? Item carries. Thanks so

26:09much. Um, item number two is a

26:11resolution executing a $70,000 agreement

26:14with Seaffort PR and carbon stories to

26:16create a colleges possible PR marketing

26:18and community engagement campaign for um

26:21OC's two college through college

26:23initiative and accepting a dumination by

26:25Matt Richenhal. Do you have a motion?

26:28>> So moved.

26:28>> Support and supported. Miss Harris,

26:30>> good morning. Good morning. So, as you

26:32mentioned, our community's children

26:33manages the two college leadership

26:36council as well as the T2C studio Grand

26:38Rapid Center for College Success. And

26:40we've never had a project quite like

26:41this before. Uh with this project, we

26:44will partner with Seafford PR who will

26:45also subcontract with uh Carbon Stories

26:47to produce a colleges possible PR

26:50marketing and scholar engagement

26:52campaign. And so, our target audience is

26:54GRPS scholars and families. And we want

26:56to drive home the absolute fact that

26:59college degree attainment is still

27:01relevant and achievable with a village

27:03which can include our TOC studio. And so

27:05we'll be leaning on storytelling uh

27:08leaving a digital footprint uh

27:10affordability

27:11uh and really talking about the return

27:13on uh investment and so this is our

27:16project and we're excited to get

27:18started.

27:20>> Great. Congratulations. Thank you for

27:22overview. Colleagues questions

27:23commissioner.

27:24>> Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh thank

27:26you, Miss Harris, uh for your work on

27:27this. Um I agree it is very uh important

27:30in today's times to continue uh

27:33highlighting different avenues of

27:35education. I'm also very thankful to I

27:38believe I don't know if they call them

27:39trustees, but I know Mr. Richenth uh

27:42Hall is a part of the East Grand Rapids

27:44School Board. Uh so I'm really thankful

27:46once again for the community showing

27:48support. I think we are quite

27:50resourcerich in this county and is

27:52wonderful to see such collaboration. So

27:54very happy to support this as well.

27:56>> Thanks.

27:59>> All right. Um hearing no uh no nobody

28:01else. All those in favor?

28:03>> I.

28:03>> Any opposed? Item carries. Thanks so

28:06much. Next is a resolution authorizing a

28:08budget substitution of $115,000 for

28:11Cesar Chavez Hall to 10 half

28:13construction. Uh Miss Irving is uh you

28:16can take this one, Molly.

28:18>> I guess I can. Okay. [laughter]

28:19>> Oh, I'm sorry.

28:21>> Yes.

28:23No, I'm happy to happy to pinch hit. Um,

28:25this is simply just moving. Um, you'll

28:28see you'll see in the I believe it's uh

28:31the second page of the document, you'll

28:33see the movement of the funds. Um,

28:35closing closing down a few capital

28:38projects to shift funding over over to

28:40this one. So, fairly simple budget

28:42substitution.

28:44>> Yes, I would agree with that. Um,

28:47any questions, colleagues? Okay. All

28:49those in favor?

28:50>> I. Any opposed?

28:52>> Thank you. Item carries. Thanks so much.

28:54Um, next is our item number four is our

28:57bid list resolution for October 6, 2026.

28:59Do you have a motion?

29:00>> So moved.

29:01>> Support.

29:02>> Miss Claren.

29:03>> Uh, just seven items today. All fairly

29:05routine. A couple extensions like route

29:08wear and image trend. But if there are

29:10any questions, myself or the departments

29:12here can answer.

29:14>> Thank you so much. Yep. Just a reminder

29:16that typically um this list has always

29:18been one that's larger and and and

29:21sometimes larger, sometimes not. Uh but

29:23that we don't necessarily go through

29:25each one, but certainly can overview

29:27anyone's colleagues that you have in

29:28full and as Miss Clarence said, can uh

29:30do an overview with department heads as

29:32well.

29:34Um sir, I see you're raising your hand,

29:36but right now is not a time for public

29:37comment, but we can connect after the

29:39meeting. Thank you so much. Um all

29:41right, so I'm going to call the

29:42question. All those in favor? I.

29:44>> Any opposed? Item carries. So that takes

29:48care of our business and we're going to

29:49move on to our comprollers warrant

29:51report for the period of September 8th,

29:522026 through September 21st, 2026 in the

29:56amount of 37,60,65757

30:01and our monthly travel report. Miss

30:03Kirkland.

30:04>> Good morning.

30:05>> Good morning.

30:05>> Um, as Oh, I'm sorry.

30:09>> Sorry about that.

30:10>> Hi. Um, as stated, as stated, the cash

30:14payments issued total 37 million

30:16including 6.2 million in payroll, 380

30:20for income tax warrants, [snorts] which

30:22included 42029

30:25income tax refunds and 1,241 accounts

30:28payable checks were issued. It's the

30:30warrant report for the time period.

30:32>> Thank you so much for that report.

30:33>> Thank you,

30:34>> madame deputy comproller. Um, any

30:36questions? That report is received and

30:39filed. And next and our last item for

30:41today is our treasures report for the

30:43period of September 9, 2026 through

30:45September 22nd, 2026. Mr. Treasurer,

30:48>> good morning, commissioners. With our

30:50report today, we did see again the 25

30:53basis point rate hike. Um what's

30:55happened since then though is the jobs

30:57reports come in has been very favorable

30:59to where it's actually pushing um

31:02general thought that we're going to hold

31:03those rates probably in October. We

31:05probably won't see an adjustment until

31:07maybe the last meeting of the year.

31:10The problem is though, every every week

31:12we get more data. Every week we get more

31:15global issues popping up. We get more

31:16local issues popping up. So, you know,

31:18it it's it's like I feel like a flag

31:21blowing in the wind. With each gust it

31:24changes and so that's what's really

31:26happening with the economics going on

31:28right now. Um, we still have a lot of

31:30unstable items. However, Grand Rapids is

31:32stable. We are stable. Our investment

31:35program is stable. We have $714 million

31:38invested at 3.44%.

31:41Um, where we see rates go up, that

31:43benefits our office because we just

31:45invested some of our reserve portfolio

31:47about $90 million. We're getting over 5%

31:50on that money. So, pushing it out um

31:53anywhere from 12 to 36 to 60 months is

31:58giving us a better return on our money.

32:00But then again, those are reserve funds

32:02that we know we don't need right now for

32:04liquid operations that have to be used

32:06right away. So, we're going to continue

32:08to analyze those different opportunities

32:10that happen as we have maturities come

32:12due and place that out on the yield

32:14curve so that we're setting ourselves up

32:16to have continued interest earnings for

32:19a good five years out. That's our policy

32:21as a average weighted return of or

32:23average weighted maturity of around five

32:25years. And so, we're going to actively

32:28look to do that. Um when we look at our

32:30other things that are there, you know,

32:33we have uh federal government is funded

32:35through December 11th. Um that might be

32:38something that becomes more

32:39controversial after we have our

32:40election. So just even though they're

32:43not in power yet or whoever the new

32:45elected officials are, that could come

32:47into play in after the new year. So

32:51really want to make sure that we're

32:53keeping our eyes and ears open for that

32:54because we are an entity that needs

32:58federal and state dollars to fund the

33:00programs that we have that are working.

33:01So we're looking at it just to make sure

33:04that there's no interruption in in any

33:06of those funding sources and then bring

33:08it to executives attention if we're

33:10seeing those things happen.

33:12>> Um we continue to see the fuel prices go

33:14down. This morning it was reported at

33:16$453 on average nationwide. So obviously

33:20it's for it's 46 cents lower than our

33:22high point. So hopefully we're going to

33:25continue to see that come down, but

33:26again it's tied to global issues or

33:29issues beyond our control. Um I did put

33:32a table into our our report today just

33:34to show you some of the things that we

33:36look at. Um for example, we've got a

33:38positive outlook on interest earnings

33:40because we're able to invest higher. the

33:43value of our investments is stable

33:44because we're invested in very um very

33:48secure US treasuries, US agencies,

33:50municipal bonds, things that have very

33:52very high ratings. Um we've got plenty

33:55of cash for daily operations. We're

33:57funding out into 2028 to cover payroll

34:00and debt service right now. So we're

34:02we're going out 18 months to make sure

34:04our normal large payments are funded. We

34:08the concern obviously is going to be

34:09fuel for our vehicles, construction

34:11projects, borrowing for major projects.

34:13Um we just have to really pay attention

34:15to to city revenue in case anything is

34:18impacted especially uh jobs. When we

34:21look at the national average

34:23unemployment is 5% but in West Michigan

34:27we're at 4 4.3

34:30our state is 4.3. We're around 4.1. We

34:33we have people that are employed and

34:35there are plenty of jobs out there right

34:36now. It's just I think what we battle

34:38with is finding people to fill those

34:40jobs and we see it as a as a

34:42municipality and we see it with the

34:44signs up as we're driving down the road.

34:46Um Gil staffing had 60 jobs immediate

34:50hire. I don't know if that's to draw

34:51people in or if that's you really have

34:53people there that you need to have fill

34:55roles, but um we always had that

34:58conversation since co about what's full

35:00employment look like. And we have a lot

35:02more people that are are accepting

35:03part-time employment. Uh and so a lot of

35:07two wagers and family might have one

35:08that's working full-time, one that's

35:10working part. So really focused on what

35:13the dynamic that's really going to

35:15happen in Grand Rapids and and when it's

35:18going to maybe feel like we're on a a

35:21more level secure area. I mean, our city

35:24is growing. It keeps growing. It's it's

35:27fabulous what we're doing. Um, again, I

35:30just think that as a as a region, we do

35:35an outstanding job and we focus on the

35:38issues that impact us and that that's

35:41critical for our operation and what we

35:42do. So, that's my report for today.

35:45>> Thank you so much. Questions for our

35:47treasur commissioner?

35:49>> Yeah, thank you for this. And um

35:51normally we don't have a lot of

35:53questions for you, but I do feel like,

35:56you know, with this overview that you've

35:58given um and we're looking at increased

36:00costs, pressures on our families, even

36:02with people moving here, there's housing

36:04pressure, things like that, and I'm

36:06thinking about the consumer price index

36:08and how that's already been going up. I

36:10wondered if you had any reflections um

36:12as you've been doing your forecasting. I

36:14know I I appreciate that you're thinking

36:15about payroll to 2028. Um but as we're

36:18thinking about costs increasing costs

36:21for city services and the increasing

36:23cost that uh and burdens that our um

36:26constituents are having um what what

36:29kinds of thoughts or process you know

36:31reflections do you have there?

36:32>> When I when I look at just simply the

36:35producer price index and also the

36:37manufacturers they're still growing

36:38right now. Their input costs are going

36:41up. So, their input costs are going to

36:43cascade down to us. Just like the

36:45cascading cost of transporting goods

36:48across the ocean, needing oil and diesel

36:51to move those products, the diesel for

36:53our trucks, you know, you look at the

36:55Myers truck driving down the highway

36:57with the blueberry sign on the side, it

36:59it's costing them much more to get that

37:02to us. And grocerers are extremely

37:05costconscious because their margins are

37:07so small. So, that's where we're going

37:09to see that. So, as as we see the

37:12consumer price index continue to stay

37:14elevated,

37:16obviously the Fed wants to see that

37:18ratchet down to around 2%. Again, you're

37:21you're over a full percentage point

37:23higher. So, the only way that they're

37:25going to try to ratchet that down is

37:27going to be to turn up the federal funds

37:30rate. So, to increase it from 3.75 to

37:324.0 and go beyond that to try to push

37:36that down. The jobs reports aren't

37:38helping them. So the the question is

37:40going to be what they only have they

37:42only have one tool. The Fed only has one

37:44tool in their toolbox to use and that's

37:46the screwdriver to turn up and turn down

37:48interest rates.

37:51>> Thank you. All right. With that, that

37:53report is received and filed and we're

37:55adjourned at 8:44. Thank you.

38:32>> [music]

38:40[music]

38:51[music]

39:02[music]

39:27[music]

39:48[music]

39:55[music]

39:56>> Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,

39:56hey, hey, hey, hey.

39:58Heat. Heat. N.

40:01[music]

40:08[music] Heat. Heat.

40:18Heat. Heat.

40:33>> [music]

40:38[music]

40:45[music]

40:46>> Heat. Heat.

40:51[music]

40:58>> [music]

41:19[music]

41:26[bell]

41:32[music]

41:35>> Heat. Heat.

41:37[music]

42:01>> [music]

42:28[music]

42:41>> Heat. Heat.

42:50Hallelujah.

42:53[music]

43:11[music]

43:14Heat.

43:17Heat.

43:27Heat. Heat.

43:30[music]

43:37[music]

43:43[music]

43:47Hallelujah.

43:54[music]

44:04>> [music]

44:23[music]

45:04[music]

45:23[music]

45:28>> Heat.

45:45[music]

45:46Heat.

46:10Heat. Heat.

46:16Heat. Heat.

46:21[music]

46:37Heat.

46:39[music]

46:54[music] Heat.

47:01Heat.

47:15Heat.

47:24>> [music]

47:39>> Heat. Heat.

47:46Heat. Heat.

48:07Heat. [music]

48:17[music]

48:18Heat.

48:22[music]

48:33>> [music]

48:59[music]

49:34>> Heat. Heat.

49:44Heat. Heat.

49:52[music]

50:04[music]

50:18>> [music]

50:24[music]

50:28[music]

50:37>> Heat. Heat.

50:49[music] Heat.

50:59Heat.

51:14[music]

51:21Heat. [music]

51:41Heat. Heat. [music]

51:48Heat.

52:03[music] Heat.

52:12>> [music]

52:21>> Heat.

52:24Heat.

52:32Heat.

52:45[music]

52:46Heat.

53:10Heat.

53:13Heat.

53:24>> [music]

53:30>> Heat. Heat.

53:55>> [music]

54:06[music]

54:10>> Heat. Heat.

54:13[music]

54:19[music]

54:25[music]

54:30[music]

54:37>> [music]

54:42[music]

54:49[music]

54:56[music]

55:02[music]

55:09[music]

55:13>> Heat. Heat.

55:19[music]

55:21Heat.

55:28[music]

55:35[music]

55:41Hey. Hey. Hey.

55:45[music]

55:52>> [music]

55:59>> Heat. Heat.

56:02[music]

56:07Heat.

56:15[music]

56:22Heat.

56:31>> [music]

56:44[music]

56:59>> Heat.

57:03>> [music]

57:16[music]

57:19>> Heat. Hey, heat. Hey, heat.

57:24[music] Heat.

57:37[music]

57:43Heat. [music]

57:48Heat. Heat.

57:50[music]

58:03[music]

58:11>> [music]

58:17[music]

58:34>> Heat. Heat.

58:49>> [music]

58:51>> Heat. Heat.

58:55[music]

58:59Heat. Heat.

59:01[music]

59:09[music]

59:19[music]

59:21Heat. Heat.

59:31[music]

59:49>> [music]

59:57[music]

1:00:05>> Heat. Heat.

1:00:07[music]

1:00:16>> [music]

1:00:22>> Heat. Heat.

1:00:31[music]

1:00:42>> [music]

1:00:48[music]

1:01:00>> Heat. Heat.

1:01:06[music]

1:01:15[music]

1:01:21Heat. Heat.

1:01:27[music]

1:01:36[music]

1:01:42[music]

1:01:55Heat. Heat.

1:01:59[music]

1:02:04Heat.

1:02:16[music]

1:02:17Heat.

1:02:21[music]

1:02:37>> [music]

1:02:45[music]

1:02:51>> Heat.

1:03:00[music]

1:03:03Heat.

1:03:09[music]

1:03:26Heat. Heat. [music]

1:03:34Hey. Hey. Hey.

1:03:57[music]

1:04:06>> [music]

1:04:12[music]

1:04:42>> Heat.

1:04:46Heat.

1:05:12>> [music]

1:05:33[music]

1:05:47>> Heat. Heat.

1:05:57[music]

1:06:08Heat. Heat. [music]

1:06:16[music]

1:06:27[music]

1:06:29Heat. Heat.

1:06:38[music]

1:06:50Heat. Heat.

1:07:04[music]

1:07:31>> [music]

1:07:42[music]

1:08:40>> Morning everyone. We are going to get

1:08:41the community development committee

1:08:43meeting started.

1:08:46Oh, we're missing one.

1:08:48>> We're not going to get started yet.

1:08:50>> I'll go get her.

1:08:51>> She's here somewhere.

1:09:03>> Apologies. I was one second on the dot.

1:09:07Okay. Hey, item number one this morning

1:09:09is a resolution approving a fireworks

1:09:11discharge permit for er laser products

1:09:13for special effects at Van Andal Arena

1:09:15in connection with the Bring Me the

1:09:17Horizon Tour 2026 on October 8, 2026.

1:09:21Motion

1:09:21>> support.

1:09:22>> Thank you. Good morning.

1:09:24>> Morning.

1:09:25>> Anything [clears throat] to add?

1:09:27>> Uh not really. It's standard. I got some

1:09:29handheld stuff and more flames than

1:09:32normal.

1:09:34>> Right. Seeing no questions. All in

1:09:36favor? I.

1:09:38>> Any oppose? Motion carries.

1:09:40>> Have a good day.

1:09:40>> Thank you. Enjoy the concert.

1:09:43>> Item number two is a resolution setting

1:09:45October 27th, 2026 as the date to

1:09:48consider an ordinance reszoning a

1:09:50portion of 834 Livingston Avenue

1:09:53Northeast from special district open

1:09:55space zone district to the to the

1:09:58traditional neighborhood lowdensity

1:10:00residential zone district.

1:10:02>> Supported.

1:10:04Who is that? Would be me.

1:10:06>> Good morning. Good morning. Um, so this

1:10:09should seem somewhat familiar in that a

1:10:11couple of meetings ago, the city

1:10:13commission was asked to consider the

1:10:15sale of a portion of formal what what is

1:10:18currently 836.

1:10:21Yep. 836 uh Livingston Avenue. Um, and

1:10:24the uh sale included the split of the

1:10:27southern portion of that. Um, the

1:10:30southern portion is now uh addressed as

1:10:32834 Livingston. Hence the memo

1:10:35references 834. Um that southern uh

1:10:38parcel would actually currently be in a

1:10:41what's we call a split zoning meaning it

1:10:42has two different zoning designations.

1:10:44Uh LDR on the southern half of the

1:10:47portion of 834 and NOS excuse me OS um

1:10:52on the northern portion of the 834. Um

1:10:56so this uh request is to reszone that

1:10:59northern half of 834. Um that will then

1:11:03allow for the 834 parcel to be combined

1:11:06with the quite avenue parcels. Um that

1:11:09then would then that then would

1:11:11facilitate a 12-unit multifamily

1:11:13development that would be up for

1:11:15consideration by the uh city planning

1:11:17commission. Uh Greg Mets is here from

1:11:19the development team. If there's any

1:11:21additional questions that um I can't

1:11:23answer um and if there's any questions

1:11:25for me, please let me know. me.

1:11:28Commissioner Belshack,

1:11:29>> I'm just curious and with your planning

1:11:31expertise, um the move from low from

1:11:35open space to low density, why are we

1:11:37not considering a higher density or is

1:11:40that just not needed in this

1:11:41neighborhood?

1:11:41>> Um in this particular case, the LDR is

1:11:44what is immediately surrounding. So,

1:11:46it's consistent with the existing

1:11:48pattern of development for the

1:11:49neighborhood. Uh the proposed zone

1:11:51district does facilitate uh the project

1:11:54as it's currently proposed. And so, um,

1:11:57having a zone district that would be

1:12:00different than what is surrounding it

1:12:02would be a little bit more challenging,

1:12:04um, in terms of, uh, comporting with

1:12:06the, uh, community master plan. So,

1:12:08there was a variety of reasons that went

1:12:10into that recommendation, um, and

1:12:12ultimately the lowdensity residential

1:12:15facilitated the project and made easy

1:12:18sense for what's happening around it.

1:12:20That's helpful because I think for some

1:12:21people in a neighborhood, especially if

1:12:23they're used to single family homes, uh,

1:12:25a 12-unit development doesn't feel like

1:12:27low density. It feels like a higher

1:12:28density. So, it's it's good to know that

1:12:30this project is still fits within that

1:12:32definition for you.

1:12:33>> Yeah, we've we've worked really hard to

1:12:35try to communicate that low density

1:12:37residential is not the same thing as

1:12:39single family residential. So all of our

1:12:41residential zone districts since 2008

1:12:44have facilitated all types of housing,

1:12:47not necessarily uh every density, but

1:12:49all housing types in each neighborhood.

1:12:52And so 12 units um you're right, some I

1:12:55think that that's a uh perspective of

1:12:57whether or not you'd consider 12 units

1:12:59to be low density. Um per the ordinance

1:13:02in the community master plan, it is.

1:13:05>> Thank you.

1:13:07See nothing further. I'll call the

1:13:09question. All in favor? I. Any opposed?

1:13:11Motion carries. Item three is a

1:13:13resolution setting October 27th, 2026 as

1:13:16a date to consider an ordinance

1:13:18reszoning 1951 Fuller Avenue Northeast

1:13:21from the mid 20th century neighborhood

1:13:24commercial and mid 20th century

1:13:25neighborhood lowdensity residential zone

1:13:27districts to the mid 20th century

1:13:29neighborhood mixed density residential

1:13:31zone district.

1:13:32>> So move

1:13:33>> support. Thank you.

1:13:35Thank you. So if it's okay, I will

1:13:37combine my comments and presentation for

1:13:39the next two items as they are uh

1:13:42related. Uh the first item is focused on

1:13:45the uh privately controlled parcel at

1:13:471951 Fuller and as stated it would

1:13:50request uh reszone the property uh from

1:13:53LD uh from mid-century uh commercial uh

1:13:57to the mixed density residential which

1:14:00is a higher residential density. Um,

1:14:03also as part of this request, the second

1:14:06item uh should look familiar. Again,

1:14:08previous uh commission item was to

1:14:10consider the sale of the cityowned

1:14:12property or portion of the city-owned

1:14:14property, which is 1911 Fuller Avenue,

1:14:17uh, which is the, uh, water tower

1:14:19property. Um, and so, uh, city

1:14:22commission agreed to the sale of the

1:14:24northern portion of 1911. So, the

1:14:27proposed items reszone though the city

1:14:31controlled or previously what was city

1:14:32controlled property and the 1951

1:14:36fuller um and allowed for would allow

1:14:39for it to be in a single unified zone

1:14:41district which is mixed density

1:14:43residential ultimately facilitating a

1:14:46multifamily development at that

1:14:47location. Um I will note that I've met

1:14:50with um various development teams over

1:14:53the past few years um and it has been an

1:14:56inherently challenging site um to be

1:14:58able to zone it or excuse me develop it

1:15:00under either the current dimensions or

1:15:02the current zoning designation. And so

1:15:05having that mixed density residential

1:15:07zone district classification gives us a

1:15:09lot more flexibility in terms of uh the

1:15:11density making the development work from

1:15:14a site design perspective. Um, and so

1:15:16this for me has been years in the

1:15:18making. Um, and so it's it's nice to see

1:15:21the developments come to fruition. Uh,

1:15:23Jeff Edwards is here from the

1:15:24development team. Uh, if there's any

1:15:26additional uh, questions from the

1:15:28commission that you'd like to direct uh,

1:15:30towards the development team. Otherwise,

1:15:31I'm happy to answer and I failed to

1:15:33mention that the planning commission did

1:15:35recommend uh, approval of the reszone.

1:15:37Sorry about that.

1:15:38>> Thank you. No questions. Uh,

1:15:40Commissioner Knight,

1:15:42>> it's great to see all this development

1:15:44happening. Huh?

1:15:48It's great to see all of this happening

1:15:50over in the second ward where we're uh

1:15:52creating more opportunities for housing.

1:15:54Um just wondering if if there's because

1:15:58this is just residential, is there any

1:16:00opportunities for there to be um

1:16:03business mixed in there because I know

1:16:05that that's right almost by nap correct

1:16:09if I'm um

1:16:11>> thinking correctly. Yes, it is just um a

1:16:15parcel south of NAP. You're correct.

1:16:18>> Um

1:16:19>> so I know that you have the gas station

1:16:20right there on the corner and then

1:16:22there's a couple of um small businesses

1:16:24in that space right there, but just just

1:16:26thinking about and then right around the

1:16:28corner there's more businesses over

1:16:29there.

1:16:30>> Yeah.

1:16:30>> So just

1:16:31>> so the proposed zoning designation would

1:16:33not facilitate a uh mixeduse development

1:16:36or commercial development. I will note

1:16:38that the majority of 1951

1:16:42uh Fuller, which is that large northern

1:16:45swath, has been in the commercial zone

1:16:47designation since probably 2008. Um, and

1:16:52nothing has come to fruition. What that

1:16:54would suggest to me at least is um it's

1:16:57a little bit challenging with the

1:16:58topography and the size of the parcel.

1:17:00Um, and the market isn't there to

1:17:02support a commercial development at that

1:17:05location. Um certainly I'm sure Jeff

1:17:07Edwards could further comment on that

1:17:10but um I think that they've made an

1:17:12intentional decision to look at mixed

1:17:15dens excuse me multif family residential

1:17:17because of what the market is supporting

1:17:19um and in this particular case not

1:17:22commercial.

1:17:24>> Thank you.

1:17:24>> Thank you.

1:17:25>> Seeing no further questions I will call

1:17:27the question. All in favor?

1:17:29>> I. Any oppose? Motion carries. Item

1:17:32number four is a resolution setting

1:17:35October 27th, 2026 as the date to

1:17:37consider an ordinance reszoning a

1:17:39portion of 1911 Fuller Avenue Northeast

1:17:41from mid-century

1:17:43neighborhood lowdensity residential to

1:17:45the mid-century

1:17:47mid 20th century neighborhood mixed

1:17:50density residential zone district.

1:17:52>> So move

1:17:52>> support.

1:17:53>> And I think we you touched a little bit

1:17:55on this already. Any additional

1:17:57questions, colleagues? Okay, I'll call

1:17:59the question. All in favor?

1:18:00>> I. Any opposed? Motion carries. Item

1:18:04number five is a resolution authorizing

1:18:07execution of a user agreement with fans

1:18:09of Valley Field for use and

1:18:10collaborative stewardship of Sullivan

1:18:12Field.

1:18:14>> So moved to support.

1:18:15>> Thank you. All right. Good morning.

1:18:17Laura Clay with the parks department. So

1:18:19this resolution would authorize a user

1:18:21agreement um between the city and fans

1:18:23valley field. Um this follows a

1:18:26multi-year um considerable investment in

1:18:29the Sullivan space, Sullivan Park space.

1:18:31Um and the agreement just uh outlines

1:18:34the coordination and responsibility for

1:18:36activation operations and long-term

1:18:38maintenance. So under this agreement

1:18:40there would be um a very clear uh

1:18:43delineation of the maintenance and care

1:18:46for the facility responsibility with the

1:18:48city as well as giving the fans of

1:18:50valley field an opportunity to operate

1:18:52the concessions as well as the museum

1:18:55and this will just help us ensure that

1:18:57the long-term um historic nature that

1:18:59has been preserved through this

1:19:01construction pro um project is respected

1:19:04well out into the future. So, uh, it's a

1:19:06three-year term, uh, with a one-year

1:19:09renewal, and we are very excited that

1:19:11this project is coming to completion

1:19:13over the next six months. So,

1:19:15>> this feels like a big milestone.

1:19:16>> It is a very big milestone for all your

1:19:19work and uh, the work of Friends of

1:19:21Valleyfield. Um, Commissioner,

1:19:24>> yes, thank you. This is a big thing over

1:19:26on the west side and in the first ward

1:19:28and has been going on for a long time

1:19:29and I'm very excited. I know that the

1:19:32friends of Valley Field have been uh

1:19:34pretty great to work with and um that

1:19:36three years is a reasonable amount of

1:19:38time, but but I would like to hear if

1:19:40there is um you know any budgetary

1:19:43considerations that we'll need to keep

1:19:45in mind [snorts] as we move forward

1:19:46since the city will be taking some

1:19:49responsibility for the maintenance up

1:19:50until now. It's you know been largely

1:19:53the fundraising and everything that the

1:19:54Valley Field Friends of Valley Field

1:19:56have been doing. So if you could just

1:19:58touch on that that would be great.

1:19:59>> Sure. Sure. Uh so the parks department

1:20:01does already have the internal skill set

1:20:03to be able to maintain a high level of

1:20:05standard for the athletic field. So the

1:20:07maintenance side will just be covered by

1:20:08a regular park operations and then

1:20:10long-term sustainability of the of the

1:20:12space will be built into our um

1:20:14long-term capital plan. So um we do very

1:20:17much recognize uh the the long-term need

1:20:20for the space to be preserved um as it

1:20:23was intended. So

1:20:24>> yes, thank you very much. I'm it's going

1:20:25to be exciting to be there when it

1:20:26finally opens. Opens.

1:20:28>> Yeah. Thank you, Commissioner.

1:20:30>> You want to add?

1:20:30>> Yes.

1:20:31>> For once, I'm gonna add one thing on.

1:20:32>> All right. Yes.

1:20:33>> So, so I'm gonna throw on my Rotary hat

1:20:36a minute. So, as president of the Grand

1:20:38Rapids Rotary Club, we've been um doing

1:20:40some collaborative things with fans of

1:20:41Valleyfield, too. And so, I see a util

1:20:44utilization of this space. So, it's it's

1:20:46kind of not just Fans of Valley Field,

1:20:48but it's these other community

1:20:49organizations that are going to come

1:20:50alongside and um ma basically do lots of

1:20:54different fun things at this at this

1:20:56facility as well. And so, we've This has

1:20:59been a nice collaborative thing of the

1:21:01fans of Valleyfield and in Grand Rapids

1:21:02Rotary doing some things together to um

1:21:05to go um above and beyond to as we see

1:21:08go forth. So, it's I think seeing those

1:21:10collaborations has been great amongst

1:21:12nonprofits that are out there as well.

1:21:14So,

1:21:14>> and I can piggyback on what the clerk

1:21:16said just to recognize that fans of

1:21:18Valley Field through some very generous

1:21:20philanthropic donors, they've raised $2

1:21:22million in private donations to put

1:21:25towards this project. So, um, and they

1:21:27also helped secure an a RAB 2.0 grant.

1:21:30So, they have been incredible partners,

1:21:33not just in, um, thinking through the

1:21:36long-term care and development of the

1:21:38space, but also in coming to the table

1:21:40in a very significant way for capital

1:21:42investment.

1:21:43>> Wonderful. Seeing nothing further, I'll

1:21:46call the question. All in favor?

1:21:47>> I.

1:21:48>> Any opposed? Motion carries. Thank you.

1:21:50>> Thank you.

1:21:51Item six is a resolution awarding a

1:21:53contract with Kentwood Escavating Inc.

1:21:56for storm sewer relocation in Port Lane

1:21:58Southeast 40T west of Portman Drive

1:22:00Southeast Culac in the amount of

1:22:03$138,115

1:22:06with total amount not to exceed

1:22:08$250,000.

1:22:09>> So moved.

1:22:10>> Support.

1:22:12>> Thank you. Good morning, Mr. McCall.

1:22:13Would you like to tell us about this

1:22:14item?

1:22:15>> Sure. Good morning, commissioners. Um

1:22:17filling in for Cindy who wasn't feeling

1:22:18well this morning. Um, we received three

1:22:20bids for this project. The low bid was

1:22:22approximately $8,500 under the

1:22:24engineers's estimate. The project will

1:22:26be replacing the storm water outfall

1:22:29that um failed this spring with some

1:22:31heavy rains. There was a big wash out in

1:22:32the neighborhood. The project will

1:22:34relocate it um to a more stable area

1:22:36which will be easier for us to maintain

1:22:38in the future. Um the the work will take

1:22:41place still this fall. Um so we'll be

1:22:44ready for spring rains next year. Um the

1:22:46project's funded by the capital

1:22:47improvement fund. um for funds allocated

1:22:50to the stormwater group.

1:22:52>> Thank you. All in favor?

1:22:56>> I. Any opposed? Motion carries. The last

1:22:59item this morning is item seven, a

1:23:02resolution awarding a contract with

1:23:03Basin Electric Company for water

1:23:05resource recovery facility North Primary

1:23:08Substation Replacement in the amount of

1:23:111,748,800

1:23:14with total amount not to exceed

1:23:162,141,755.

1:23:19>> So move

1:23:20>> support.

1:23:22>> Uh yes, this project is at the water

1:23:24resource recovery facility. um that will

1:23:26be replace an existing substation um in

1:23:29the north primary control building that

1:23:31um that building was built in the 1970s

1:23:33and a lot of the equipment there in the

1:23:35substation um has kind of reached its

1:23:37useful life. This will modernize um the

1:23:39electrical infrastructure and ensure

1:23:41reliable power um to the north primary

1:23:43treatment operation for years to come.

1:23:45Um we did receive two bids. The low bid

1:23:47was approximately $5,000 under the

1:23:49engineers estimate. Um, this will be

1:23:51funded by the sewer system fund and work

1:23:53will uh be completed by next fall.

1:23:58>> I'll call the question. All in favor?

1:24:00>> I.

1:24:00>> Any opposed? Motion carries. Thank you

1:24:03all. We are adjourned.

1:24:12Heat. Heat.

1:24:33Heat. Heat.

1:24:53Heat.

1:25:07Heat.

1:25:15Heat. Heat. [music]

1:25:28[music]

1:26:06>> [music]

1:26:17[music]

1:26:25[music]

1:26:25>> Heat. Heat.

1:26:31Heat. Heat.

1:26:57Heat up

1:26:59>> [music]

1:27:23>> here.

1:27:25Heat. Heat. [music]

1:27:33[music]

1:27:48>> [music]

1:27:56>> Heat. Heat.

1:27:58[music]

1:28:09>> [music]

1:28:15[music]

1:28:24[music]

1:28:35>> Heat.

1:28:36>> [music]

1:28:45[music]

1:28:52>> Heat

1:28:55up here. [music]

1:29:00Heat.

1:29:10[music]

1:29:15Heat.

1:29:22Heat up

1:29:35here.

1:29:51>> [music]

1:29:59[music]

1:30:16[music]

1:30:24[music]

1:30:29[music]

1:30:32>> Heat. Heat. N.

1:30:37[music]

1:30:43>> [music]

1:30:49[music]

1:30:56[music]

1:31:01[music]

1:31:04>> Heat. Heat.

1:31:07>> [music]

1:31:37[music]

1:31:50[music]

1:32:24>> Heat. Heat.

1:33:12>> [music]

1:33:39[music]

1:33:42>> Heat. Heat.

1:34:00[music]

1:35:58>> [music]

1:36:14>> Heat. Hey, Heat.

1:36:38Heat. Heat.

1:36:59[music]

1:37:02Heat. Heat.

1:37:18[music]

1:37:51behind.

1:37:54Heat. Heat.

1:38:02[music]

1:38:20[music]

1:38:21Heat.

1:38:34Heat. [music]

1:38:53Heat. Heat. [music]

1:39:02[music]

1:39:03Heat.

1:39:14Heat.

1:39:24>> [music]

1:40:12[music]

1:40:50>> Heat.

1:41:03[music]

1:41:05Heat.

1:41:17>> [music]

1:41:25[music]

1:41:30[music]

1:41:31>> Heat. Heat.

1:41:49>> [music]

1:42:14[music]

1:42:14>> Heat.

1:42:21Heat.

1:42:26Heat. Heat. N.

1:42:33[music]

1:43:00Heat. Heat.

1:43:18>> [music]

1:43:19>> Heat. Heat.

1:43:44Heat. Heat.

1:43:47[music]

1:44:01>> [music]

1:44:04>> Heat. Heat.

1:44:24>> [music]

1:44:40[music]

1:44:48>> Heat. Heat. [music]

1:44:54[music]

1:44:59>> [music]

1:45:07[music]

1:45:12>> Heat. Heat.

1:45:16[music]

1:45:20Heat. Heat.

1:45:24[music]

1:45:29[music]

1:45:54>> [music]

1:46:00[music]

1:46:08>> Heat. [music]

1:46:18[music]

1:46:23Heat.

1:46:30[music]

1:46:40>> [music]

1:46:45[music]

1:46:46>> Heat. Heat.

1:47:28>> [music]

1:47:32>> Heat.

1:47:38[music]

1:47:43Hey. Hey. Hey.

1:47:57>> [music]

1:48:15>> Heat.

1:48:39[music] Hey, heat. Hey, heat.

1:48:46>> [music]

1:48:53[music]

1:49:02[music]

1:49:06>> Heat. Heat. [music]

1:49:09Heat. Heat.

1:49:15[music]

1:49:40Heat. Heat.

1:50:00Heat. Heat.

1:50:10Heat. Heat.

1:50:13[music]

1:50:32[music] Heat. Heat.

1:50:42[music]

1:50:53[music]

1:50:58Heat.

1:51:02[music]

1:51:07[music]

1:51:13[music] Heat.

1:51:21Heat. [music]

1:51:30[music]

1:51:32Heat.

1:51:52Heat. Heat.

1:52:29Heat. [music]

1:52:37[music]

1:52:44[music]

1:52:50Heat.

1:52:54Heat.

1:52:58[music]

1:53:06[music]

1:53:11Heat.

1:53:14[music]

1:53:20>> [music]

1:53:27[music]

1:53:37>> Okay. Uh, thank you everyone. I'm going

1:53:39to call this meeting to committee the

1:53:40whole to order. And I have a little, we

1:53:43all have a little flyer on our desk from

1:53:44the ELO network, which in my brain

1:53:47always means electric light orchestra.

1:53:49Um, and appropriately enough, it's uh

1:53:51talking about keeping the lights on. So,

1:53:53I'm going to come up and read a

1:53:55proclamation.

1:54:09So, I should have said that Miss Harris

1:54:10from the um Eolo is going to join me up

1:54:12the podium here. So whereas research

1:54:16shows that children who regularly attend

1:54:18after school programs improve their

1:54:20self-confidence in school attendance and

1:54:22whereas half of the youth participating

1:54:24in local out of school time programs

1:54:26improve their math and reading

1:54:27performance and whereas afterchool

1:54:30programs inspire career and skill skill

1:54:32development programming as well as

1:54:34physical and mental wellness that

1:54:36support learning. And whereas these

1:54:38programs ensure ongoing investment from

1:54:40public and private stakeholders to

1:54:42ensure quality after school for all

1:54:44young people is sustained. Whereas the

1:54:46city of Grand Rapids is committed to

1:54:48supporting quality afterchool programs

1:54:50for young people where they can learn,

1:54:52thrive, and be safe. Therefore, I, David

1:54:54Lrand, mayor of the city of Grand

1:54:56Rapids, declare October 22, 2026 as

1:55:00lights on after school day in Grand

1:55:01Rapids. and celebrate this day and shine

1:55:03the brightest of lights on programs that

1:55:05provide enriching opportunities for

1:55:07young people before school, after

1:55:09school, in the evenings, on weekends,

1:55:10and in the summer. So, um I'm Yeah,

1:55:14right on. So, uh, you know, this is

1:55:18having having been on the school board

1:55:19myself, uh, at GRPS, uh, it's really,

1:55:24uh, urgent that we focus on things that,

1:55:27um, summer learning loss, for example,

1:55:28is an endemic problem that every

1:55:30community has to has to struggle with.

1:55:33And it's also true that um making sure

1:55:36particularly postcoid um that we

1:55:39reinforce the message for um the

1:55:41children and the parents as often as

1:55:43possible in as many ways as possible um

1:55:45that it's really really important to

1:55:47show up at school. Um but these

1:55:49wraparound programs are off are perhaps

1:55:52the most important way that we as a city

1:55:55can lean into doing that uh support for

1:55:57the educational system in in in town. Uh

1:56:00at the end of the day, we don't run the

1:56:01school systems. we don't pay for them.

1:56:03Um, but this is a way that we can

1:56:05meaningfully help uh lean into making

1:56:07sure our kids succeed in school. So,

1:56:09Miss Harris, I don't know if you want to

1:56:10say anything.

1:56:11>> Thank you. Thank you, mayor. Uh, so good

1:56:13morning, mayor and uh, city

1:56:14commissioner, city manager, and other

1:56:16appointed officials and staff. Grand

1:56:18Rapids is one of 8,000 communities

1:56:21around the nation celebrating the impact

1:56:23of OST programs, so out of schooltime

1:56:25programs. and our community's children

1:56:27manages an out of schooltime system

1:56:30building effort called the expanded

1:56:31learning opportunities network. We do

1:56:33have some members in the audience. Uh

1:56:34we've got some members from uh hopefully

1:56:38here Boys and Girls Clubs, GRPS, GR

1:56:41Symphony, Parks and Wreck, STEM

1:56:43Greenhouse, MASP, OCC, Refuge, Refugee

1:56:46Education Center, Granville Avenue Arts

1:56:48and Humanities, First T, Positive Impact

1:56:50for Life, others. If you are part of the

1:56:52ELO network, please stand. Thank you so

1:56:55much for being here.

1:56:57[applause]

1:57:00I also want to shout out our ELO

1:57:02coordinator uh our new coordinator

1:57:04Sattorii Spicer and our partners at the

1:57:05Michigan uh afterchool partnership. Now

1:57:08I want to uh introduce you to uh Tiffany

1:57:10Young who is the vice chair of the ELO

1:57:13network to say a few words.

1:57:16>> Good morning commissioners, mayor, and

1:57:18the city manager. First, thank you for

1:57:20continuing to invest in out of school

1:57:22time and in the young people of Grand

1:57:23Rapids. This annual proclamation is

1:57:25evidence of that support and celebration

1:57:27of our success in the field of OST in

1:57:29Grand Rapids. One thing I hope we

1:57:31continue to remember is that OST is much

1:57:33more than childare. And even more than

1:57:35an antiviolent strategy, it's a portal

1:57:37to opportunity. It's where young people

1:57:39find trusted adults, discover what

1:57:42they're good at, develop skills and

1:57:43confidence, and lay the building blocks

1:57:45for their future. O OST is essential to

1:57:47the fabric of our community and Michigan

1:57:50is recognizing that value in a

1:57:51significant way with a $135 million

1:57:54investment and out of schooltime

1:57:55programming this year. Grand Rapids has

1:57:57an incredible opportunity to build on

1:57:59that momentum and the ELO network is the

1:58:01connective tissue bringing together the

1:58:03city, schools, nonprofits, philanthropy,

1:58:05and community partners so that our

1:58:06investments work together because

1:58:09ultimately our goal is simple easy.

1:58:11Every young person in Grand Rapids

1:58:12should have access to a place where they

1:58:14can belong, discover, and thrive. Thank

1:58:16you for continuing to help make that

1:58:18possible as we invest in in and

1:58:20celebrate Lights On after school.

1:58:24>> Just really quick, we have a a quick

1:58:26video, a one minute video from our

1:58:27partners at Grand Rapids uh public

1:58:29schools. Uh these are uh scholars that

1:58:33are part of the Loop after school

1:58:35program.

1:58:39>> [music]

1:58:41>> Hi, my name is Diego and after school

1:58:44program is important because we get to

1:58:48learn and do some projects.

1:58:54>> My name is Jaden and I is important to

1:58:59me because I can make new friends and

1:59:03learn more.

1:59:07Hi, my name is Shada and Loop is

1:59:09important to me because I get to learn

1:59:12more and um have fun.

1:59:19>> Hi, my name is Ava and Loop is important

1:59:22to me because I get my homework done

1:59:25faster and I when I go home I get to

1:59:28have fun and and chill with my um

1:59:31friends and family.

1:59:34>> All right. And one quick plug, the ELO

1:59:36network is hosting our annual Lights on

1:59:38After School pre-bash at the new MLK

1:59:41community center on Wednesday, October

1:59:4321st from 4:30 to 7:30. There will be

1:59:46free admission, a DJ food, talent show,

1:59:48prizes, and more. So, please spread the

1:59:50word.

1:59:52>> Okay, everyone want to come up for a

1:59:53picture?

1:59:54>> Do we have a photographer?

1:59:56>> Um,

1:59:59we have a photographer.

2:00:00>> Maybe not.

2:00:12How are you doing, sir? Good to see you.

2:00:14>> Thanks for being here.

2:00:18[clears throat]

2:00:20>> Okay,

2:00:23good to see you.

2:00:40There you go.

2:01:01>> [applause]

2:01:02>> Thank you.

2:01:26Okay, this brings us to our next item of

2:01:28business. This is a resolution

2:01:29authorizing publication of and setting a

2:01:31date to consider an ordinance amending

2:01:33section 9.66, chapter 151, the nuisances

2:01:36of the city code to clarify uh

2:01:39application of the sound uh ordinance to

2:01:41the amphitheater. And um um

2:01:44>> support.

2:01:46All right, Miss Barren.

2:01:47>> Thank you. Uh, so, uh, I will introduce

2:01:50the item and then we also have, uh, with

2:01:52us Rich McKean, the executive director

2:01:55of the, uh, Kent County Grand Rapids

2:01:57Convention and Arena Authority to give

2:01:59us a little information about the first

2:02:00season of Acer Amphitheater. Uh but just

2:02:03to introduce the item, the in 2023, the

2:02:07city commission approved an amendment to

2:02:09the city's noise code that exempted

2:02:11sounds coming from uh performance venues

2:02:14operated by the CA

2:02:16uh between certain hours, so between 7

2:02:19a.m. and 11:00 p.m. with an opportunity

2:02:21to extend that 11:00 p.m. uh under

2:02:23certain circumstances. that was placed

2:02:25in a section of the noise code that

2:02:27already included a number of noise

2:02:29generators that were considered exempt

2:02:32from the noise code uh including

2:02:34lawnmowers, snowblowers, etc. Uh at that

2:02:37time I presented the amendment as

2:02:39something that we were supporting and

2:02:41that actually the noise generated by the

2:02:43amphitheater would be governed by the

2:02:45special land use permit that was uh

2:02:48under consideration at the planning

2:02:50commission. Uh we recently had a

2:02:52decision from a court uh based on some

2:02:57litigation that's ongoing about noise uh

2:02:59at the amphitheater and that uh court

2:03:02decision threw the intent of that

2:03:05original amendment into question uh and

2:03:08uh led to a way that the code could

2:03:11potentially be interpreted as needing to

2:03:12be enforced that is really not uh easily

2:03:15administered and impacts a number of

2:03:17those noise generators that I just

2:03:19referenced as well would apply to all of

2:03:21those noise generators in a way that we

2:03:23did not intend. Uh therefore, we are

2:03:25bringing to you an amendment that simply

2:03:28clarifies our intent, modifies that

2:03:30section to ensure that it's understood

2:03:33that all of those noise generators are

2:03:36uh exempt from application of the noise

2:03:38code. Uh for the AC acure amphitheater

2:03:41in particular, it is uh governed by the

2:03:44special land use permit which includes

2:03:46some um considerations of decibel

2:03:49limitations at certain spots on the uh

2:03:52amphitheater property and has a noise

2:03:54monitoring system that the city has

2:03:56access to. Uh so with that, I will

2:03:58invite up uh Mr. McKean to share a few

2:04:01highlights of the season with you.

2:04:06>> Good morning. uh appreciate the

2:04:09opportunity to talk about uh what ended

2:04:11up being a pretty good season for the

2:04:14Akasher Amphitheater.

2:04:17Um ended up having 49 public events. You

2:04:20might recall in the planning stages we

2:04:22were hoping for 30 maybe 35. So to see

2:04:25roughly a 50% plus growth. Uh really

2:04:28pleased about that. Attendance-wise we

2:04:31were hoping for about 300,000. We're

2:04:33probably going to end up over 400,000.

2:04:36Uh we also had a number of private or

2:04:38community events. In fact, have another

2:04:39one November 12th. Uh that'll be our

2:04:42last one before we get everything packed

2:04:43up. Um about 800 new employees. Um

2:04:48experienced Grand Rapids did some work

2:04:50to see what if there is any correlation

2:04:53between events at the amphitheater and

2:04:55hotel occupancy and found that there

2:04:57definitely is. Uh unlike a convention

2:05:00where uh hotel rooms are contracted so

2:05:03it's very very obvious. This is more

2:05:05anecdotal, but I would argue uh that the

2:05:08correlation, the correlatory evidence

2:05:11demonstrates that it's more than

2:05:12anecdotal. Uh it has a positive impact

2:05:14on the uh the businesses including the

2:05:17hotels, restaurants downtown.

2:05:20Um the Lionel Richie concert uh was

2:05:22something I hope the community uh will

2:05:25continue to uh remember fondly for uh

2:05:28decades to come. It was pretty cool. Um

2:05:31we were intentional with the

2:05:32programming. uh had Detroit natives war

2:05:34and treaty open and then Grand Rapids

2:05:37own Brian Vanderarch. Uh so it was very

2:05:39much a connection to the local

2:05:41community. Uh we also had a community

2:05:43openhouse the next day uh about 10,000

2:05:46folks through the building. Um it went

2:05:48so well we're probably looking to do

2:05:49that next year as well. It's a chance

2:05:51for us selfishly to get some of the

2:05:54kinks worked out operationally and to

2:05:56get people back into the building. uh it

2:05:58may not have as many bells and whistles

2:06:00as we had uh on May 16th. Uh but that's

2:06:03going to be our plan uh as an one of our

2:06:06openings for uh the foreseeable future.

2:06:09Um had a number of uh big deal events

2:06:13throughout the year. Um I think many of

2:06:15you may know I'm Canadian, so to have

2:06:16the Guess Who, a Canadian band on Canada

2:06:19Day in Grand Rapids was really cool for

2:06:22me. uh our marketing team put together a

2:06:24little poster uh with me welcoming them.

2:06:28Uh so I had a number of the crew saying,

2:06:30"You're the guy on the big ass poster,

2:06:32aren't you?" I said, "Yeah, yeah, that's

2:06:34me." So it was nice. Uh Dave Matthews

2:06:36Band, we had a lot of people in the

2:06:38music industry. Uh really impressed with

2:06:40the fact we got two DMV shows. Uh and

2:06:44the Midwest was uh throughout the

2:06:47Midwest, we had people coming from all

2:06:48over the place. Um, Symphony, uh, had

2:06:52two picnic pops as well as an event with

2:06:54Josh Groin. Uh, again, very happy to

2:06:56have them as users of the building. Um,

2:07:00we also commissioned a composer to

2:07:02compose a signature song for the

2:07:04amphitheater. So, when you're walking in

2:07:06and you're hearing that uh uh,

2:07:10hearing the verbiage about uh,

2:07:11restricted items, have your tickets out

2:07:13and available, the sound bed underneath

2:07:15that. Um, we had uh that composed uh and

2:07:20we had GVSU students uh actually play

2:07:23the music, record the music. Then the

2:07:26composer and his team took it back to

2:07:28their uh facility in LA uh remixed it

2:07:31because they couldn't get the entire uh

2:07:33orchestra together in one sitting. Uh

2:07:36and that I continue to be very proud of

2:07:39another great connection uh between the

2:07:41venue, the community, GVSU, one of our

2:07:44neighbors obviously. Um and the success

2:07:46there ended up turning into uh we will

2:07:49be having the a similar song uh for the

2:07:53soccer stadium opening up in March. Um

2:07:56we continue to be very very active

2:07:58relative to artist donations and

2:08:00donating tickets for the community. Uh

2:08:02that is something that we'veii that

2:08:04we've uh established at the arena and

2:08:06DVOS performance hall and will continue

2:08:09uh with the amphitheater as well.

2:08:12Um, our marketing team does a really

2:08:14good job of identifying backstage

2:08:16experiences for the touring artists as

2:08:20well as an almost maybe even more

2:08:23importantly the crew that work with

2:08:24them. Uh, cultivating something that

2:08:27makes them feel welcomed but also

2:08:29illustrates uh the sense of place.

2:08:32You're in Grand Rapids. Uh, so a all of

2:08:34these um setups are with local vendors,

2:08:38local providers. Uh we continue to be

2:08:41really active in that space. Again,

2:08:43something that we've been doing at the

2:08:44arena that we've continued on at the

2:08:45amphitheater.

2:08:48Um happy to answer any questions. Um and

2:08:51I guess the only thing I would say is uh

2:08:54greatly appreciate everything you folks

2:08:55do. I think you know I've been here 28

2:08:57years and working very closely uh with

2:09:00city commissions and mayors over uh

2:09:02those over that time. It's not lost on

2:09:05me. Uh the job that you guys have uh and

2:09:08the arrows that you take uh it is

2:09:11appreciated genuinely by me.

2:09:13>> Thanks. Well, a couple things that

2:09:15aren't really in your uh wheelhouse um

2:09:17Rich, but there are certainly things the

2:09:19community were concerned about that are

2:09:20worth pointing out, I guess, for the

2:09:22audience, and that is um the night of

2:09:24the Lannel Richie concert, we had the

2:09:27trifecta. We had a soldout DeVos, we had

2:09:29a soldout Vanandal, uh we had the

2:09:32amphitheater sold out and we and all of

2:09:35the parking happened fine. As a matter

2:09:37of fact, we didn't even have uh

2:09:39completely filled ramps. Um the So that

2:09:43was great. And I will just say speaking

2:09:44personally, the thing I love uh at least

2:09:47equally to the amphitheater activity,

2:09:49the activity inside is the activity

2:09:51outside. Um it is just great fun to see

2:09:55streams of people walking in. uh

2:09:57sherpalike with their with their chairs

2:09:59on their backs. Uh it's a very it's a

2:10:02it's great to have that have that

2:10:03positive energy all around the

2:10:06amphitheater before events. Um and it's

2:10:08it's sort of like sort of feels like a

2:10:10farmers market like you see people

2:10:11meeting each other and bumping into each

2:10:13other and everybody's in a good mood and

2:10:15so um you know at some point you got to

2:10:17be quiet during the you got to listen to

2:10:19the performance but outside there's lots

2:10:21of great community activity going on. So

2:10:23I really that's something that surprised

2:10:25me. I didn't expect to see to have so to

2:10:27have it be so much fun to be near the

2:10:30amphitheater um when events are going

2:10:32on.

2:10:34So, thanks. Um yeah, great. I think we

2:10:37can move on to the ordinance. Oh,

2:10:38Commissioner,

2:10:40thank you. Um I'd echo those sentiments.

2:10:43Uh husband rode his bike and had no

2:10:46problem parking a number on the couple

2:10:48of days that I was able to go to

2:10:49different things. I did want to ask a

2:10:52question about um some of the just

2:10:54because small business and um

2:10:56entrepreneurship is really near and dear

2:10:57to my heart both here at commission but

2:10:59also in my day job. um what is the

2:11:03process for individuals to be able to be

2:11:05considered for um you know these

2:11:08promotions, fan activations, the things

2:11:09that you have listed here and then also

2:11:12so this is something that you all are

2:11:13doing but this is not part of the um

2:11:18um the different sites where people

2:11:19would actually go and like purchase

2:11:21alcohol or food. So this is all

2:11:22something that you're doing separately.

2:11:24So, can you talk to me about the

2:11:26difference in those two processes and

2:11:27how individuals are able to tap into

2:11:30that customer base? Thanks. Thanks,

2:11:32Rich.

2:11:32>> Not at all. Um, the I'll call it the

2:11:35backstage experience and then the

2:11:37concession experience and they are two

2:11:39different things. Um, so with [snorts]

2:11:42the backstage experience, um, we've

2:11:44worked for a long time with the downtown

2:11:45market and their incubator kitchen to

2:11:47identify different potential

2:11:49opportunities and bring them into the

2:11:52fold. uh if that turns into a concession

2:11:55opportunity, we're very open to that. Um

2:11:58but we've got two different groups

2:12:00working on these two different efforts.

2:12:03Um we are always on the lookout for

2:12:07different providers. Uh and again, local

2:12:10especially on that backstage side is

2:12:12important to us. So if there's someone

2:12:14else who has not had an opportunity that

2:12:17feels they could be, we'd be delighted.

2:12:19We're always on the lookout. uh they can

2:12:21get a hold of me directly and then our

2:12:23marketing team primarily does the

2:12:24backstage activations. Um we're looking

2:12:27for and it's not a large scale but we're

2:12:30looking for reliability uh

2:12:32repeatability. Um so for example uh

2:12:36coffee uh activation backstage has been

2:12:39a regular favorite. Uh and we work with

2:12:43a couple of different providers that

2:12:44have that setup. They've got a barista

2:12:47there. So we're looking for turnkey. Uh,

2:12:50so that's the hope.

2:12:51>> Okay. [snorts]

2:12:52>> Um, on the concession side, um, I guess

2:12:55I'd specifically look at Mosby's

2:12:57Popcorn, uh, as well as, uh, Loves Ice

2:13:00Cream. Uh, two local providers, locally

2:13:02owned. Um, they they've been Mosby's has

2:13:06been involved, man. Uh, I bet you five

2:13:10or six years. We do Christmas gifting

2:13:12with him as well as uh we've had them at

2:13:17the arena in a stand for a number of

2:13:20years at the ar excuse me at the

2:13:23amphitheater as well. Uh and they've

2:13:25continued to be a great partner. Uh

2:13:27Loves it was new at the um uh

2:13:31amphitheater and again obvious reasons

2:13:34summer venue ice cream. So, uh, that has

2:13:37done fairly well. Um, [snorts]

2:13:39relative to moving forward, I think the

2:13:41soccer stadium provides us, and I

2:13:43realize that isn't a direct answer to

2:13:45your question. However, I think it gets

2:13:47even more of an answer to your question.

2:13:49Um, the soccer stadium, I think,

2:13:51provides even more connectivity to the

2:13:54community. Um, and we've put out an RFP

2:13:57to the community uh for food and

2:13:59beverage providers to uh to respond to

2:14:04to see if there could be a fit for them

2:14:06to have some type of presence at the

2:14:08soccer stadium. Our food uh we've uh

2:14:10worked closely so far with the Hispanic

2:14:12Chamber of Commerce uh to make sure that

2:14:15some of that word is getting out that

2:14:17perhaps we don't have access to the

2:14:19channel uh of dist information

2:14:22distribution that perhaps they would.

2:14:24Uh, and I know we've got a first tour of

2:14:26potential you uh

2:14:29potential providers to that RFP uh

2:14:32through the soccer stadium tomorrow. So,

2:14:34we'd be more than open willing uh to

2:14:37have all those conversations. Um, I'm

2:14:40betting uh myself and uh our FNB team at

2:14:45a senior level, a management level, have

2:14:47probably had two dozen meetings over the

2:14:49last year or two, not just about the new

2:14:51buildings, but about existing buildings,

2:14:53all with locallyowned uh purveyors. Uh

2:14:56so we we do not shy away from that. Um I

2:15:00do think there is um there are elements

2:15:03of it relative to scale, relative to

2:15:06timeliness, relative to deliveries and

2:15:08relative to health code that need to be

2:15:10kept in mind. Uh so uh provided provided

2:15:15the rules can be maintained primarily

2:15:18from uh health code perspective uh then

2:15:21we're able to we're able to work with

2:15:23about anybody.

2:15:24>> Okay.

2:15:25>> Thank you. That's helpful.

2:15:26>> Thank you, Mayor.

2:15:27>> Thanks. Uh yeah, city measure.

2:15:30>> Thank you, mayor, and [clears throat] uh

2:15:31thank you Rich and Kate for the update.

2:15:34Uh I would like to um acknowledge a

2:15:38couple of things. One, uh how much of a

2:15:40game changer the amphitheater is for our

2:15:43city and not just downtown. The mayor

2:15:45and I uh along with members from the

2:15:47right place went to talk to other

2:15:50potential investors and the opening of

2:15:52the amphitheater signal for them that uh

2:15:56investment in Grand Rapids is a good

2:15:57thing and not just downtown and we

2:16:00specifically talked about the need for

2:16:02more housing and they were very

2:16:04interested in providing housing at

2:16:07various affordability points and so this

2:16:08this is what we anticipated. It would

2:16:10not just be an entertainment venue, but

2:16:12it would be the kickoff of other

2:16:13opportunities to invest in our

2:16:15community. I do want to go back and uh

2:16:18certainly thank this commission. It's

2:16:19hard to believe we're at the end of the

2:16:20first season, but uh prior to getting

2:16:23here, there was a lot of effort from a

2:16:25lot of city staff and other partners uh

2:16:27to include Grand Action and others to

2:16:30really help us think about how to

2:16:31materialize what we had envisioned and

2:16:34move our old public works uh site off of

2:16:372011 market to scrimm. So I want to

2:16:39thank all the city employees who were

2:16:40involved in that. And then once built uh

2:16:43those 49 activations uh take a lot of uh

2:16:47city resources on the public safety and

2:16:49mobility side. So I want to specifically

2:16:51thank uh our public safety departments

2:16:54both police and fire uh mobile GR refues

2:16:58uh special events and specifically out

2:17:00of my executive office Miss Barren for

2:17:03coordinating uh on behalf of the city.

2:17:07>> Great. Thanks.

2:17:08>> And and let me also add one other one

2:17:11other comment. I I do know that early on

2:17:13in the season, we've learned a lot as

2:17:15the mayor said, we learned a lot about

2:17:16mobility. We've learned a bit lot about

2:17:19um ingress and egress into the venue as

2:17:22well as uh we have heard concerns around

2:17:25sound, but I think what we've

2:17:27experienced towards the end of the

2:17:28amphitheater were very uh season was

2:17:31were very few complaints relative to

2:17:34what we experienced early on. And so I

2:17:36want to thank uh Rich and his team for

2:17:38being able to uh take that feedback in

2:17:40consideration and uh make sure that uh

2:17:43they're listening to uh some of the

2:17:45feedback that was provided.

2:17:48>> Thanks. And uh bringing it home then we

2:17:50actually have a resolution not on

2:17:52concession but on uh modifying our noise

2:17:54ordinance. So um seeing no further

2:17:58comments, thank you Mr. McCain.

2:17:59>> Appreciate the opportunity.

2:18:00>> Yep. Yep. Uh so motion's on the table.

2:18:04Um any further discussion on the

2:18:06ordinance uh proposal? Okay. All in

2:18:09favor of the resolution say I.

2:18:11>> I.

2:18:11>> I.

2:18:12>> All opposed. Motion carries.

2:18:20That brings us to item three, which is a

2:18:23class C resort license uh for SMG County

2:18:28uh convention Arena Authority.

2:18:31>> So moved.

2:18:34And who do we have to explain this one

2:18:36to us?

2:18:38>> Yep. So going all So the um the Amway

2:18:42Stadium is inside of the downtown

2:18:44district. So this would be a district um

2:18:46license. Um so just like we've done for

2:18:49any other licenses that have been

2:18:51inside. This is not part of the quota

2:18:53system. It's part of the downtown

2:18:54downtown development district for their

2:18:56liquor license in order to get them

2:18:57ready to go for for March to get through

2:18:59this process. That's why it's coming to

2:19:01us now. Great. Okay. Um, any discussion,

2:19:05colleagues? All in favor say I. I. All

2:19:08opposed. That was easy. Uh, moving us on

2:19:11to our next item, which is an Oprah, the

2:19:13which, uh, when it's at home is the

2:19:16obsolete property rehabilitation

2:19:18district. Uh, for a project at 2130

2:19:22Planefield. Uh and I'll if we'll discuss

2:19:26uh items four and five together since

2:19:27the second is approving a tenure um

2:19:30exemption certificate um for that

2:19:33district support.

2:19:35>> Thank you mayor. Good morning

2:19:36commission. I want to just flag that um

2:19:39as a reminder the OPRA act so the

2:19:41abatement that we're talking about with

2:19:43this uh project is expiring 1231 of

2:19:472026. And so our the economic

2:19:49development office back in June uh did a

2:19:52call for projects that were interested

2:19:54in pursuing this tool uh and took

2:19:56applications at the end of July. Um the

2:19:59three items that you see on the agenda

2:20:01today were a result of that pursuit and

2:20:04subsequent to today's commission

2:20:06meeting, we would make a recommendation

2:20:08to the state tax commission uh for next

2:20:11steps. So I just want to flag the

2:20:12overall process there. Uh this project

2:20:15at 2130 Planefield is activating a 3,000

2:20:18square foot structure uh with four

2:20:20one-bedroom apartments at 100% area

2:20:23median income and um 1,600 square ft uh

2:20:27of commercial space. This is the highest

2:20:30uh aspirational goals that I've seen for

2:20:32our inclusion plan. So, I just want to

2:20:34call attention to 82% uh equating to

2:20:37900,000 of the 1.1 million in

2:20:39construction costs dedicated to

2:20:40microloccal uh minority owned and

2:20:43womenowned enterprises. And this

2:20:45qualifies for the base OPRA uh 10-year

2:20:49uh term. I'm happy to answer any

2:20:51questions,

2:20:53>> colleagues.

2:20:55Seeing no questions, um all in favor say

2:20:57I.

2:20:58>> I. Uh and then the resolution for the uh

2:21:01district itself. All in favor, pardon

2:21:03me. I can have a motion.

2:21:04>> So moved.

2:21:05>> Support.

2:21:06>> All in favor say I.

2:21:07>> I.

2:21:07>> I.

2:21:08>> Motion carries. Uh that brings us to

2:21:10items uh to our next project which is

2:21:131024 MLK. Um same thing uh uh two items

2:21:18that will consolidate. M RO.

2:21:20>> Yes. And I meant to mention

2:21:21>> Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah. Motion in support.

2:21:23>> M.

2:21:24>> Yes. And I meant to mention on the last

2:21:26project they did receive an emerging

2:21:27developer who want a grant. I want to

2:21:29flag that on this one as well. In

2:21:30addition to the corridor improvement

2:21:32authority contributing a facade grant.

2:21:34So this project is activating a 5,300

2:21:37foot structure uh for our child care

2:21:39facility along with flex areas for after

2:21:42school programming and community uses.

2:21:44Um investments a little over a million

2:21:46dollars

2:21:47and again this project qualifies for the

2:21:49base 10-year term.

2:21:51>> Great. Any questions or discussion,

2:21:54colleague? Okay. Seeing none, all in

2:21:56favor say I.

2:21:57>> I. I all opposed. Motion carries. Um I

2:22:01get a request from staff that we um uh

2:22:04remove uh items uh the next two items uh

2:22:09from the uh from this meeting um for

2:22:13discussion at our 2:00 meeting and uh uh

2:22:18following a um discussion and close

2:22:20session of some legal implications. So,

2:22:23if I could have a motion to

2:22:24>> motion to postpone items number eight

2:22:26and nine.

2:22:27>> Yep. Great. All in favor of postponing

2:22:30those items, say I.

2:22:31>> I. I.

2:22:32>> Uh opposed. Motion carries. That brings

2:22:35us to

2:22:37uh resolution on our uh well essentially

2:22:40on our 911 system. Um our dispatch.

2:22:43>> So move support.

2:22:46>> Good morning, mayor, commissioners. Matt

2:22:48Wyel, chief of staff at the police

2:22:49department. Um, this resolution allows

2:22:53the city to enter into a new agreement

2:22:55with the county for public safety

2:22:56answering points. You'll hear PAP. Uh,

2:22:59that's our dispatch operations.

2:23:01Primarily, we're talking about funding.

2:23:04Um, I have Reed Wakeman with me. He's

2:23:06the manager of our dispatch center. He's

2:23:08going to give you a presentation on the

2:23:10current governing structure through the

2:23:12Kent County Dispatch Authority. Uh, he's

2:23:14going to explain why it's not efficient

2:23:15and why we need to go in a new

2:23:17direction. That's what this agreement

2:23:19does. Uh, I want to thank uh the law

2:23:21department, city attorney, and our

2:23:23partners at the county for getting us to

2:23:25this point. A lot of work has gone into

2:23:26it. Um, but the highlight here is

2:23:29efficiency and more funding for the

2:23:30city, both in terms of 911 operations

2:23:33and in uh capital projects. Uh, with

2:23:36that, I'll turn it over to Reed and

2:23:37we'll be happy to take any questions you

2:23:39have afterwards.

2:23:44>> Morning.

2:23:46Uh thanks for the chance to brief you

2:23:48today on this proposed intergovernmental

2:23:49agreement. Uh I've got four slides and

2:23:51with just a few minutes of your time,

2:23:52I'm going to try to summarize the last

2:23:5420 years of 911 services uh and then

2:23:56explain the updated intergovernment

2:23:58agreement uh the GRPD and the 911 center

2:24:00staff have been planning and developing

2:24:02and working on for several years. Um

2:24:06so first off, uh we're going to talk

2:24:07about uh I want you to look at mostly at

2:24:08the right side of this uh this slide

2:24:10kind of shows the current KCDA

2:24:12structure. Uh but before I start that

2:24:14just some brief introductory financial

2:24:15information. Uh by state statute uh 911

2:24:19funds are delivered first to the county.

2:24:22Uh and then in his current state they

2:24:23are passed on from the county to the

2:24:25dispatch authority for management and

2:24:27distribution to the paps. So that's the

2:24:28kind of the current state. Uh discussion

2:24:31began in 2004 but in 2006 the dispatch

2:24:34authority structure was actually

2:24:35created. At that time there were many as

2:24:38six separate dispatch centers in Kent

2:24:39County. each were managed independently

2:24:41by a different entity. This led to, as

2:24:44you can imagine, challenges with

2:24:45misouted calls, lack of interoperable

2:24:47communications between first responders,

2:24:49and a host of other problems. The

2:24:51authority set out to set out to address

2:24:53these challenges by establish

2:24:54establishing shared technology for the

2:24:57big four applications that 911 centers

2:24:59use and utilize increased funding from a

2:25:0120-year search charge that was uh that

2:25:03was approved in 2016 to provide funding

2:25:05for unified CAD computer dispatch um

2:25:09radio systems 911 call handling systems

2:25:11and then recording systems. Those are

2:25:12the big four at the key of what 911

2:25:14does. Those four those objectives have

2:25:16all been accomplished. uh that board

2:25:18that bond is scheduled for payoff this

2:25:20year, 10 years ahead of schedule. Uh but

2:25:22if we fast forward 20 years from the

2:25:24founding of KCDA, uh 911 dispatch

2:25:26services are now provided by two high

2:25:28functioning dispatch centers. One at the

2:25:31city of Grand Rapids Police Department

2:25:32and the second at the Kent County

2:25:33Sheriff's Office. These two centers work

2:25:36smoothly together. We have full

2:25:37interoperability. We provide critical

2:25:39backup and overflow capabilities for

2:25:41each other to make sure that 911 is

2:25:43always there and always on for all city

2:25:45county city and county residents and

2:25:46visitors. and that we are responsive and

2:25:49supportive of the needs of the Grand

2:25:50Rapids Police Department and the Grand

2:25:51Rapids Fire Department.

2:25:54So, while the makeup of the 911

2:25:55environment has been kind of completely

2:25:57rewritten over the last 20 years, the

2:25:59structure of the KCDA has been frozen in

2:26:01time. If you look at the makeup of the

2:26:03admin policy board on the lower right,

2:26:06with the exception of the Grand Rapids

2:26:07Police Chief, uh the Kent County

2:26:09Sheriff, and the Grand Rapids fire

2:26:10chief, it is made up of members who no

2:26:12longer have awareness of or involvement

2:26:14as direct stakeholders in the operation

2:26:15of their own dispatch centers. They are

2:26:18still voting, however, on issues and

2:26:19budgets that impact the city 911 center.

2:26:22I also want to call to your attention

2:26:24the communication flow that you'll see

2:26:25in the arrows on the organization chart.

2:26:27All information currently flows through

2:26:29the KCDA director, which is a position,

2:26:32there's a recurring theme here, held by

2:26:34someone who has no direct stake, no

2:26:35knowledge or involvement in dispatch

2:26:37center operations. This setup has been a

2:26:39pain point, which has slowed progress

2:26:41and created a lot of unnecessary work

2:26:42for both 911 centers over the last

2:26:44several years.

2:26:46A couple of things to point out to you.

2:26:47Um, in the in the 23 years that I've

2:26:49been in 911, the technology landscape,

2:26:51as you can imagine, has changed

2:26:52dramatically. Uh advanced technology is

2:26:54now a critical part of what 911 does. In

2:26:57the current organization, the

2:26:58technological experts from the two 911

2:27:00centers serve on the technical advisory

2:27:02committee. Uh they are severely limited

2:27:04in communications with the majority of

2:27:06the voting board members. Furthermore,

2:27:08you'll notice the technical advisory

2:27:10committee has absolutely no

2:27:11communication or relationship with the

2:27:12finance committee, which again is made

2:27:14up of parties with no direct stake in or

2:27:17experience with 911. In my experience,

2:27:20this isolation from the subject matter

2:27:22experts has led to tech techn

2:27:24technological debt with significant

2:27:26related risks to the stability and

2:27:27sustainability of 911 and dispatch

2:27:29services. KCDA financial planning and

2:27:32resource management has neglected and

2:27:34delayed addressing critical cyber

2:27:35security and technical needs in favor of

2:27:37early payoff of the fire and radio

2:27:39system bond.

2:27:44The next slide. Uh, in light of

2:27:46accomplishing all these objectives,

2:27:47including the bond payoff, KCDA agreed

2:27:48in early 2026 to pursue dissolution

2:27:51pending an alternate intergovernmental

2:27:53agreement between the city and the

2:27:54county, which brings us here today. This

2:27:56slide provides an overview of the

2:27:58proposed intergovernmental agreement.

2:27:59Uh, this agreement was developed by the

2:28:01291 centers and reviewed and updated by

2:28:03legal to remove the roadblocks to

2:28:05strengthening and equipping the dispatch

2:28:06centers. The agreement consists of four

2:28:08parts. the IG body which is the main

2:28:11substance of the contractual agreement

2:28:12between the city and the county but also

2:28:14contains three appendices. One of these

2:28:16establishes an inter inventory of shared

2:28:18technology systems that the parties uh

2:28:20are jointly responsible for.

2:28:22Establishing this is crucial to

2:28:24effective future management of our

2:28:25resources. Uh it also establishes two

2:28:28committees, one related to finance and

2:28:29one related to IT.

2:28:32This revised dispatch, this revised

2:28:33structure you see in front of you

2:28:34includes dispatch center leadership on

2:28:36both committees, which is key to

2:28:38effectively managing existing 911

2:28:39contracts. The finance committee

2:28:42includes a representative from the city

2:28:43and the county as well as dispatch

2:28:45center management. This will promote

2:28:47joint 911 planning.

2:28:49As mentioned previously, the dispatch

2:28:51center's reliance on advanced software

2:28:52and hardware to coordinate emergency

2:28:54services at the level expected by our

2:28:56law enforcement, fire department, and

2:28:58emergency responders

2:29:00and the public are all increasing. The

2:29:03IT committee or the information

2:29:04technology committee established in the

2:29:06IG includes a representative from the

2:29:08city IT department and from county IT.

2:29:11When 911 services rely on connecting two

2:29:14separate municipalities, having city and

2:29:16county IT in the loop on IT decisions

2:29:18will improve cyber security, efficiency,

2:29:20and resilience of the 911 system.

2:29:24In another important improvement, both

2:29:26IT and finance matters will run through

2:29:27the GRPD chief and the Kent County

2:29:29Sheriff. State statute requires that

2:29:32state distribute 911 funding directly to

2:29:33counties. But this IGA contract

2:29:35establishes how state funds for 911 will

2:29:37be allocated between the PAPs and

2:29:39requires that two public safety

2:29:41executives who are most directly

2:29:42responsible for management and delivery

2:29:43of emergency services are directly

2:29:45involved in the development of future

2:29:47budgets for the dispatch center.

2:29:49And finally, the organizational

2:29:51structure established in the IGA

2:29:52contract simplifies communication. This

2:29:55will improve overall coordination and

2:29:57responsiveness to the financial and

2:29:59technology needs of the 911 centers.

2:30:04Want to touch briefly on some budget

2:30:06highlights. Uh this slide compares the

2:30:07current FY27 KCDA budget with a proposed

2:30:10FY27 budget jointly developed for the

2:30:12IGA. The immediate benefits are in terms

2:30:15of the dispersement to the Grand Rapids

2:30:16Dispatch Center. Uh the budget this

2:30:18budget reinstates $400,000 between the

2:30:20two PAPs that was removed by KCDA in the

2:30:22last fiscal year in order to facilitate

2:30:24early bond payoff. It removes KCDA admin

2:30:27costs from having another layer of

2:30:28administration, legal, and finance. And

2:30:31it finally utilizes the additional

2:30:32capital that will be available

2:30:34subsequent to the bond payoff to

2:30:36appropriately fund the capital projects

2:30:37and address the technology debt that

2:30:39I've mentioned before.

2:30:42I will point out the budget for the

2:30:43first year was designed to be

2:30:44conservative uh while KCDA assets are

2:30:47transferred and adjustments are made,

2:30:49but the long-term goal is to further

2:30:50increase 901 center funding and to allow

2:30:53the technology purchases we need to meet

2:30:55the growing needs of the public as well

2:30:56as police and fire first responders.

2:31:01Wrapping things up here, this slide

2:31:03summarizes the key improvements the city

2:31:04will will benefit from with the adoption

2:31:06of this intergovernmental agreement. It

2:31:09has been pointed out in GRPD

2:31:10accreditation studies, the Grand Rapids

2:31:12Fire Department's accreditation studies,

2:31:14KCDA consultant reports, and the Grand

2:31:16Rapids Fire Department's recent ISO

2:31:17study that the system we have is an

2:31:19exemplary model of a system designed for

2:31:22efficiency, interoperability, and backup

2:31:24and failover capabilities between the

2:31:26two 911 centers.

2:31:28This agreement appropriately establishes

2:31:30the city of Grand Rapids as one of the

2:31:31two key players in a wellplanned

2:31:33countywide 901 technology ecosystem.

2:31:37This IGA accurately reflects the city of

2:31:38Grand Rapids as an equal part equal

2:31:40partner with a strong voice in budget

2:31:42development and planning. It redirects

2:31:44KCDA admin costs to where they can

2:31:46directly impact dispatch operations and

2:31:48technology funding and support the

2:31:50service we deliver.

2:31:52The technology committee included in the

2:31:53IGA contract integrates IT and 901

2:31:56experts from both parties into this into

2:31:58the process of planning and budgeting.

2:32:00This should improve cooperation and may

2:32:02result in technology efficiencies. And

2:32:05finally, the J contract promotes

2:32:07prioritization of dispatch center

2:32:08technology planning and maintenance

2:32:10using the funds that will be made

2:32:11available after the KCDA bond is paid

2:32:13off.

2:32:16That is my presentation. Um, glad to

2:32:18answer any questions you have that uh

2:32:20would help help you understand this

2:32:21better.

2:32:23>> Yeah, if you could roll back a slide to

2:32:25the to the budget and and also then

2:32:26explain. I don't see there the when the

2:32:29bonds paid, how much are we currently

2:32:30paying a year for the bond? The current

2:32:32bond pay minimum bond payment is

2:32:34$1,650,000 a year.

2:32:36>> Okay. So that goes away when the bond is

2:32:38paid off. So we're going to get we're

2:32:40going to be 1.6 positive.

2:32:41>> Correct.

2:32:42>> In terms of cash flow after that. Um

2:32:44comparing uh the two budgets there, it

2:32:46looks like the proposed IGA budget net

2:32:49is is a net increase substantial net

2:32:52increase and some of that really it

2:32:53really is two line items. So what is

2:32:56when it says estimated revenue

2:32:58estimated searchcharge revenue is that

2:33:01total budget and then you broke it down

2:33:03underneath that or what does that mean?

2:33:05>> That is the total revenue uh the the

2:33:08items underneath that other than the

2:33:0910.9 million are 10 10.9 million are the

2:33:12dispersements or the expenses in

2:33:13essence.

2:33:14>> Okay.

2:33:14>> So the revenue is what comes to us from

2:33:16the state or comes to the authority from

2:33:18the state.

2:33:20>> Oh I see. I see. Um okay. And and so

2:33:23you're proposing um substantially more

2:33:26for uh capital expenditure. Can you you

2:33:28want to can you elaborate on that a

2:33:30little bit?

2:33:30>> Sure. Uh as I mentioned, there's there's

2:33:32some technology debt has that has

2:33:33occurred. Uh we are currently operating

2:33:35CAT on a CAD system, a computerated

2:33:36dispatch system uh whose service

2:33:38contract ends at the end of 2028.

2:33:41Um and we're in the process of planning

2:33:43for that replacement. Uh we are also in

2:33:45our our current phone system, our call

2:33:47handling equipment is outdated and needs

2:33:49to be updated and replaced and uh that

2:33:51is currently not uh not I would I would

2:33:54say appropriate funds are not allocated

2:33:56for that in the current KCDA budget. And

2:33:58then in addition as I said there is some

2:34:00critical cyber security needs that we

2:34:01have been attempting to address with the

2:34:03KCD attempting to get approval for and

2:34:05they have been very slow to to to uh to

2:34:08grant funding for those and that funding

2:34:09has only been granted in part. So,

2:34:11there's some cyber security issues that

2:34:13we need to address to make sure that our

2:34:14system is secure and stable and that we

2:34:16have appropriate backup systems both

2:34:18on-site, off-site, and at the county

2:34:20center in place. So,

2:34:22>> great.

2:34:22>> That would be the the additional

2:34:23expenses we would plan on in terms of

2:34:25capital.

2:34:25>> Great. Thanks, colleagues. Any other

2:34:28questions?

2:34:29>> City measure.

2:34:30>> Thank Thank you Reed and Matt and um

2:34:33police department for your work on this.

2:34:35We highlighted for you the response uh

2:34:38time for dispatch and even with the

2:34:41amount of technical debt as I said we we

2:34:44still have outstanding performance over

2:34:4699% of our uh calls are dispatched

2:34:50within receiving a dispatch in the

2:34:51appropriate time and that's that's very

2:34:53outstanding. There are very many cities

2:34:55and dispatch centers that are struggling

2:34:57with staffing as well as with technology

2:34:59and uh getting a lot of complaints from

2:35:02the local community. I just want to

2:35:03thank you and pass on my thanks to your

2:35:06employees who work 24/7 365 to ensure

2:35:09that we are there when emergencies

2:35:11happen and people call in. Thank you.

2:35:14>> Thank you, sir.

2:35:16>> Well, thanks for the presentation. Um,

2:35:21>> yep. Did we Did we get a motion already?

2:35:23Yeah, we had a motion. Okay. Uh, so all

2:35:26in favor of the resolution, please say

2:35:29I.

2:35:29>> I.

2:35:30>> I. All opposed. Uh that brings us to a

2:35:34request from our city attorney that we

2:35:36uh move into close session. Uh we have a

2:35:38briefing uh happening, but before we

2:35:40move on to the briefing. Um can I have a

2:35:42motion to move us into closed session to

2:35:44discuss legal opinion?

2:35:45>> So moved. Support.

2:35:46>> Okay. All in favor say I. Oh, sorry.

2:35:48Roll call.

2:35:49>> Commissioner Kilgore,

2:35:50>> yes.

2:35:51>> Commissioner Knight,

2:35:51>> yes.

2:35:52>> Commissioner Sassi,

2:35:52>> yes.

2:35:53>> Commissioner Purdue,

2:35:54>> yes.

2:35:54>> Commissioner Belch,

2:35:55>> yes.

2:35:55>> Mayor Lrand,

2:35:56>> yes. Okay. Okay. And that brings us to

2:35:58our final presentation and that is a

2:36:00briefing on our national community

2:36:02survey results.

2:36:06>> Good morning, commissioners. Um, good

2:36:09morning. Um, you might recall that uh

2:36:11for the fourth uh this is the fourth

2:36:13iteration of the national community

2:36:14survey that we conducted. It was

2:36:16conducted back in the spring and I have

2:36:18here with me uh Nick Mastani Astroni,

2:36:21sorry. Um to uh to go over the results

2:36:24with you. He's with PCON NCS which is

2:36:26the vendor that we hired to conduct the

2:36:27the study for us.

2:36:30>> Thank you.

2:36:33>> City of Grand Rapids. It's uh my

2:36:35pleasure to present to you the results

2:36:36of the 2026 National Community Survey.

2:36:39Before I do, uh I want to give credit

2:36:40where credit is due as a member of my

2:36:42team, Angelica Frato, and she uh did all

2:36:45the heavy lifting through the process

2:36:46with your team uh here. And so um yeah,

2:36:50just a momentous occasion. Excited to

2:36:52share with you the results of the survey

2:36:53today.

2:36:54Uh just a brief introduction again my

2:36:56name is Nick Mashardi uh I work with our

2:36:59team is PCO in 2019 we merged with a

2:37:02firm national research center who had

2:37:04been a survey and consulting company for

2:37:06local governments for 20 years and we

2:37:08helped bring some technology to bear uh

2:37:10with them and then over the surveys that

2:37:12you see here uh the very first one the

2:37:14national community survey is our

2:37:15flagship survey fielded to residents to

2:37:17assess the importance of public services

2:37:19and their satisfaction with those public

2:37:21services which we'll go through today.

2:37:23Um it's very important as we run through

2:37:25these results uh there is no

2:37:27organization that has a Dow Jones

2:37:30Industrial Average of local governments

2:37:31in the United States. We are fortunately

2:37:33or unfortunately the closest thing that

2:37:35there is uh and the communities that are

2:37:38in this national benchmark which

2:37:40contextualizing with with benchmarks is

2:37:42important are very high performing

2:37:43cities. So when I share with you your

2:37:45results relative to benchmarks know that

2:37:47these benchmarks are extremely high

2:37:49performing cities uh throughout the

2:37:51throughout the country. So you're going

2:37:53up against uh many of the best. Uh these

2:37:56surveys have been fielded I think uh

2:37:58over the years with about 2,000 surveys.

2:38:00The benchmarking the national

2:38:01benchmarking comparison group consists

2:38:03of about 400 surveys. And then we you

2:38:05will also see a custom benchmarking

2:38:08comparison group. I think it's about 32

2:38:10cities that have similar demographics

2:38:12and um uh socioeconomics to to Grand

2:38:15Rapids. So just please keep that in mind

2:38:18as we're looking at comparisons. These

2:38:19are extremely high performing local

2:38:21governments. Um and then uh just how all

2:38:24this fits in uh just at a very high

2:38:26level we think of the annual governance

2:38:28cycle as gathering data and strategic

2:38:30planning and then execute a lot of

2:38:32programs. And this kind of the goal of

2:38:33the national community surveys to give

2:38:35you a very high level look that can

2:38:37inform uh strategic priorities and

2:38:39strategic planning processes.

2:38:43Overall not not every local government

2:38:45doing this benchmarking is organized the

2:38:47same. So these generalized

2:38:48organizational structure that I'll go

2:38:50through today breaks down city services

2:38:53according to 10 domains which are kind

2:38:55of like departments and then you you see

2:38:57those 10 here and I'll just run through

2:38:59them basically one slide each. Feel free

2:39:02to interrupt if you have questions as we

2:39:04go along.

2:39:06Uh and then before we dive into those

2:39:08results just uh about methodology. Uh

2:39:10one thing that's unique is we do help

2:39:13field a statistically significant and

2:39:16representative uh voice of the

2:39:18community. uh we do that through

2:39:21sampling uh method A and then at the end

2:39:24of that process we also do make it

2:39:26available to general residents of the

2:39:28community so everybody has the

2:39:30opportunity to have a voice but in such

2:39:32a way that that doesn't bias the

2:39:34representivity of the uh probability

2:39:38based random sample at the outset. The

2:39:40results that you guys achieved um 381

2:39:44completed surveys on the probability

2:39:46based random sample may sound low. does

2:39:48comprise uh a statistically significant

2:39:51set of results at a 95% confidence level

2:39:54and a 5% margin of error. So when you

2:39:56see results such as a 70 78% that means

2:40:01plus and minus five so between 73 and 83

2:40:05you can have confidence that the actual

2:40:06community voice resides in that range

2:40:09with 95% confidence.

2:40:12Um and then in addition on the open

2:40:14participation component there was

2:40:16another 393

2:40:18responses. Um so all right uh so getting

2:40:22into the results and you'll see trends

2:40:24and you'll see benchmarks uh and you'll

2:40:26see custom benchmarks and I'll just help

2:40:28you kind of walk through uh each of

2:40:29those and so this is overall sets of

2:40:32results for those 10 different domains

2:40:34colorcoded. So you'll see most of them

2:40:36are light green. That indicates uh

2:40:39compared to this extremely high

2:40:40performing group of cities. You guys

2:40:42were similar to the national benchmark.

2:40:44Uh not significantly higher, not

2:40:46significantly lower, right? Kind of in

2:40:48on par with the benchmark of this high

2:40:50performing group. There was one area in

2:40:53safety uh where you were uh 10 points um

2:40:56lower uh than the the national average,

2:40:58but again it's a high performing group.

2:41:00And then according to your custom

2:41:02benchmarking group, it's worth pointing

2:41:04out you guys are an extremely high

2:41:05performer in education, arts, and

2:41:07culture. Um, so this is a very high

2:41:10level result. We'll go into a little bit

2:41:11uh more detail as we go on.

2:41:14Um, and sorry that was in quality. Uh

2:41:17but it's also nice to look at these

2:41:18results in comparison to where residents

2:41:21are deeming the importance and the

2:41:23deemed importance from your resident

2:41:26constituents uh are in very very much in

2:41:29alignment with the deemed importance

2:41:31from uh the benchmarking cities that

2:41:33that uh that we survey with. So you can

2:41:36see even your custom benchmarking groups

2:41:38and your others, there's nothing really

2:41:40out of line about what's deemed

2:41:41important from your residents relative

2:41:43to others. So we like to put the two of

2:41:45those together and that's where this

2:41:46slide is just you can kind of take a

2:41:48look at the rated quality versus the

2:41:50rated importance and on this slide

2:41:53you're generally looking for larger gaps

2:41:56um are the areas that might be worth

2:41:58spending some attention towards. And so

2:42:01at the very top uh only a pretty small

2:42:04gap between health and wellness the

2:42:06deemed importance and the deemed quality

2:42:08are pretty close. And then as you move

2:42:10down towards the bottom, the ones in

2:42:12bold there, safety, utility, utilities,

2:42:15community connectivity, and mobility

2:42:18have slightly higher gaps uh where the

2:42:20importance relative to the quality might

2:42:22be something as you're thinking through

2:42:23prioritizing initiatives worthy of some

2:42:26attention.

2:42:28Um so again at a very high level to

2:42:31these national benchmarks, uh there are

2:42:34and the survey has a ton of questions in

2:42:37it. uh you can see about 123 uh

2:42:40questions if you take each question in

2:42:42each subcomponent in two areas uh you

2:42:44were higher than the national

2:42:46benchmarking group 111 were similar and

2:42:48there were 10 that received lower

2:42:50ratings and according to your custom

2:42:52benchmarking group there was 14 with

2:42:54higher ratings three with lower ratings

2:42:57uh and 106 with similar

2:43:00so uh and then this is just one more at

2:43:02a high level that's worth paying some

2:43:04attention to uh there are some areas

2:43:06this is kind of your trends and your

2:43:08changes uh relative to the the trends

2:43:10and the changes nationally. So

2:43:12nationally no real train uh no real

2:43:15change in recreation or residents

2:43:18connectivity uh across the nation but

2:43:22you guys did experience a jump in those

2:43:24two areas. So things recently over the

2:43:26last two years uh impacted an elevation

2:43:30whereas nationally there there really

2:43:31wasn't one. And similarly in in the

2:43:35decrease area there wasn't really

2:43:36national trend but there were some areas

2:43:38where you saw a decline. Some of this is

2:43:40a result of things that are going on

2:43:42coincident with when the survey is in

2:43:44the field. Uh and I think the team will

2:43:46speak to some of the things that were

2:43:47going on coincident. So I do know uh I

2:43:50think it was the spring and there was

2:43:51some storm water. So I think that could

2:43:53be something impacting uh the decrease

2:43:55in the rating and the storm water uh

2:43:57management. But also there there were

2:44:00decreases in utility bill um billing,

2:44:03attracting diverse backgrounds, traffic

2:44:04flow, employment uh and a sense of civic

2:44:07pride. Um there are some areas

2:44:10nationally where there were declines but

2:44:11you guys held steady and uh that is

2:44:14overall transit ease of travel and um uh

2:44:19and buser bus or transit uh services.

2:44:23Okay. So key findings uh one slide here

2:44:26for each of those domains. Those were

2:44:27the results at a very high level. Um so

2:44:30key finding one residents view Grand

2:44:31Rapids is a great place to live uh and

2:44:34committed to community. So again you'll

2:44:36see these results are similar to the

2:44:39national benchmarks and similar to your

2:44:41custom benchmarks. Again that that

2:44:42speaks speaks well. And then one area uh

2:44:45that you are higher than custom is uh

2:44:47residents rating of Grand uh with with a

2:44:50recommend living in Grand Rapids.

2:44:54most measures related to Grand Rapids

2:44:56parks and recreation in line with

2:44:58comparison groups. Um so you see pretty

2:45:00stable trends here for the most part

2:45:02except a nice increase occurred in

2:45:04recreation centers uh and facilities and

2:45:06then relative to your custom

2:45:08benchmarking groups and national these

2:45:09are on par and again interrupt me if

2:45:11there's specific questions on it but uh

2:45:13so education culture and arts this is a

2:45:15strong area for you guys with several

2:45:17results above benchmarks

2:45:20and uh you can see pretty stable trends

2:45:23scored higher specifically in

2:45:24opportunities to attend cultural arts

2:45:26music activities make sense uh with some

2:45:28of the earlier presentation today and

2:45:31community support for the arts is high

2:45:32and then relative to your custom peer

2:45:34benchmarking group uh you guys pretty

2:45:36much dominated them uh in in these

2:45:38areas.

2:45:40Some safety and emergency readiness

2:45:42measures indicate some uh opportunity

2:45:44for growth. Um so again

2:45:47relatively stable trends here relative

2:45:50to the national benchmark the overall

2:45:52feeling of safety uh is is lower which

2:45:54we mentioned on the onset. Everything

2:45:56else is comparable uh to national and

2:45:58custom benchmarks.

2:46:01Safety services in in Grand Rapids uh in

2:46:03the police sheriff services uh national

2:46:06benchmark uh was lower. I think this was

2:46:08also around the time that there was the

2:46:10police chief uh search was going on. Uh

2:46:13crime crime prevention rate relative to

2:46:15national benchmark was a little lower.

2:46:16And then relative to your custom

2:46:18benchmarking group, the police sheriff

2:46:20services was also lower.

2:46:23Key finding five, economic confidence in

2:46:25Grand Rapids, strong but shows uh

2:46:28possible declines

2:46:29and uh you'll see just to jump to the

2:46:32decrease specifically was in the uh

2:46:35feeling around employment opportunities.

2:46:38So again, remember these are perception.

2:46:40I uh I was actually trying to dig up

2:46:42some of the overall employment

2:46:43opportunities uh in Grand Rapids and it

2:46:46strikes me that the overall employment

2:46:48opportunities really aren't that far off

2:46:49base. So just keep in mind this is a a

2:46:51local perception. um and worthy of uh

2:46:54further investigation if you like and

2:46:56happy to jump and share some of the data

2:46:58sources that I saw. And then uh on this

2:47:00on the economy is also worth pointing

2:47:02out is Grand Rapids is a place to visit

2:47:05uh relative to your peers. Uh you scored

2:47:07very high in that area.

2:47:10Residents give lower marks to mobility

2:47:12services compared to the 2023 survey. Uh

2:47:15so a decrease in particular on traffic

2:47:18flow on major streets. Again, maybe that

2:47:20has to do with all the education arts uh

2:47:22activities. I'll I'll leave that to you.

2:47:24This is uh just where the perception

2:47:26came in. And only one area lower than

2:47:29national benchmark that was on ease of

2:47:30public parking. Um and then on your

2:47:33compared to your custom benchmarks,

2:47:35there was the ease of uh public parking

2:47:37was also lower, but your performance was

2:47:39high on ease of travel by public

2:47:42transportation and ease of walking uh in

2:47:44your town.

2:47:46And then on the street and transit

2:47:48services, uh you can see snow removal,

2:47:51street cleaning, and street repair, uh

2:47:53were a little lower. Again, this can be

2:47:55due if there was heavy snow. I don't

2:47:57remember exactly uh what's going on

2:47:59there. And then according to your custom

2:48:02benchmark, street repair was a little

2:48:04lower, but your bus and transit services

2:48:06rated higher.

2:48:08There are there's a little room in the

2:48:10survey for some additional special

2:48:12topics. We like to do the benchmarking,

2:48:14but also if there's uh something going

2:48:16on that you'd like to learn about, we

2:48:18have a little bit of room in that survey

2:48:20uh for these custom questions. And so

2:48:22we'll run through uh some of these

2:48:24custom questions. So remember these for

2:48:26these we don't have benchmarks. These

2:48:27are just questions that pertain um to

2:48:30Grand Rapids. So construction and

2:48:32roadwork communication. So the on the

2:48:34left you're looking at the quality of

2:48:36the information provided to you. I

2:48:39pretty pretty much centered around good

2:48:41nothing excellent, not nothing um you

2:48:44know just pretty even distribution

2:48:46around um good satisfaction with the

2:48:48quality of the information and then

2:48:50higher um deemed effectiveness of that

2:48:53communication um around the construction

2:48:56impacts

2:48:58and then uh the other questions were

2:49:00around preferred ways to hear about

2:49:02construction. So direct mail or flyers

2:49:05achieve the highest that may be one of

2:49:06the highest costs. So just what's the

2:49:08highest ROI? I leave that to you guys.

2:49:10Emails and e- newswsletters uh also

2:49:12received higher scores with texting in

2:49:14in third.

2:49:17And then project interest and

2:49:18invitations uh to participate. So on the

2:49:21right you'll see which types of projects

2:49:22are the most interested in knowing about

2:49:25and on the left is have you received an

2:49:27invitation uh to participate or provide

2:49:29feedback uh on a project in your

2:49:31neighborhood. So 69% said no. 31% said

2:49:34yes.

2:49:36And then this last slide is a uh city

2:49:39communication performance uh and broken

2:49:42down by different events worth notifying

2:49:45on. So snow emergencies and then police

2:49:47updates um received the lower

2:49:50performance. Weather related were also

2:49:52uh the highest.

2:49:54>> Yes.

2:49:55>> Um you're missing a number.

2:49:57>> You're missing a number on the traffic

2:49:59reports for the excellent category on

2:50:02that slide.

2:50:07the one we were just on city

2:50:09communications.

2:50:12>> Um,

2:50:12>> can you get that to us later?

2:50:13>> I can. Uh, but I'm I'm struggling to see

2:50:16it here right now. My

2:50:17>> It's nine.

2:50:19>> Yeah. Traffic reports the blue.

2:50:21>> Excellent. Excellent.

2:50:22>> Oh. Oh, okay. Now,

2:50:24>> I mean, I could do math, but

2:50:25>> Okay. Yes. [laughter] Sorry, it just

2:50:27took me a while to see it. I see it.

2:50:29I'll get back to you for sure. Yeah. And

2:50:31if it's

2:50:31>> The answer is nine. You don't have to

2:50:32get back to

2:50:33>> Quit. Thank you for we'll still

2:50:35corroborate but uh thank you. Okay. And

2:50:39then uh just a quick summary of the

2:50:41findings. Uh place to live uh 81% uh

2:50:45rated but similar to benchmarks uh parks

2:50:48and wrecks uh 67%

2:50:52safety 64% economy mobility and then

2:50:55your highest performing area uh relative

2:50:57to the benchmarks was 71% on education

2:50:59and culture.

2:51:01Uh so again um it was great working with

2:51:05your team helping kind of take these

2:51:06results and then bake them in as you're

2:51:08reviewing strategic priorities and

2:51:10follow-up engagement. One other thing

2:51:12just to keep note of all the digital

2:51:14respondents become part of a digital

2:51:16standing panel. It's able to kind of

2:51:18re-en re-engage them. So uh just know

2:51:21that that's available for follow-up

2:51:23engagement. It's our team is happy to

2:51:24help you uh reconnect with those uh

2:51:27respondents. And then um oh I'll leave

2:51:30that up here. And then just one thing to

2:51:31keep in mind is uh when residents

2:51:34respond to the survey, it's it's a long

2:51:36survey. It's about 20 questions, four or

2:51:37five parts each. Um and so just uh I

2:51:41think you guys are generally pretty good

2:51:42about sharing your survey results, but

2:51:43it's nice to close the loop back to the

2:51:45residents and that helps ensure in the

2:51:47future you you continue to h have good

2:51:50um response rates. But thank you. Again,

2:51:52I want to give credit to Angelica from

2:51:53our team who kind of shephered the

2:51:55process along the way. and it was a

2:51:56pleasure uh of mine to be able to share

2:51:58these uh results uh with you and the

2:52:00team.

2:52:01>> And and so quickly before we move on to

2:52:03any further questions, we thought we'd

2:52:05just go ahead and let you know um before

2:52:07the results even came back, we obviously

2:52:09are already aware of what's happening in

2:52:10our community. We had already identified

2:52:11a few things to work on and they

2:52:13actually this validated in some ways

2:52:15what we knew we needed to to do. Um just

2:52:18to give you an idea, you might remember

2:52:19that slide back a little bit earlier

2:52:20that showed you the double digit decline

2:52:22areas. Um first of all what we're going

2:52:23to do with it closing the loop obviously

2:52:25we're going to you know we're going to

2:52:26close the loop those reports should be

2:52:28live on our website now we're sending

2:52:29out a press release it'll be in our

2:52:30newsletters we RGR u but then addition

2:52:33to that we've also shared it internally

2:52:34with staff so they can start doing

2:52:35analysis on their particular uh subject

2:52:37areas and then there's a few things

2:52:39where we're going to look for what

2:52:40future opportunities do we have to

2:52:41engage and dig in a little deeper

2:52:43because this can only tell us so much.

2:52:46Um to give you just a quick overview

2:52:48though of those double-digit declines

2:52:49and some of the things we've done. As

2:52:50Nick mentioned, we believe the storm

2:52:52water management may be related to the

2:52:53spring flooding that occurred. There was

2:52:54localized flooding. You might even

2:52:56recall that street cleaning was one of

2:52:57the items on there where we ranked

2:52:58pretty low. Um those corresponded from

2:53:01our our research and analysis. And so

2:53:03we're already developing and we're

2:53:04already developing before the results

2:53:05came back a comprehensive sweeping and

2:53:07green infrastructure maintenance basin

2:53:09cleaning program. Um utility building.

2:53:12We're going to be passing this

2:53:12information on to consumers energy and

2:53:14DTE because one thing to note about the

2:53:15survey is it doesn't distinguish between

2:53:17what jurisdiction of government is

2:53:19responsible for something. It just asks

2:53:20how people are feeling about it. And so

2:53:22we'll make sure that that gets to

2:53:23consumer and DTE. And then at your

2:53:25November 17th meeting, you're going to

2:53:26get an update on uh our our utility rate

2:53:29study uh information. Um attracting

2:53:31people from diverse backgrounds. We do

2:53:33believe that this is related in part to

2:53:35ongoing federal actions, but we do

2:53:36continue to support the uh the welcome

2:53:38plan. And then we uh we're going to

2:53:40continue to reinforce, you know, our

2:53:42outreach and engagement activities are

2:53:43inclusive to all communities and all

2:53:44populations. Um the traffic flow on

2:53:46major streets again doesn't distinguish

2:53:48between jurisdictions. So it doesn't

2:53:50distinguish between who's responsible

2:53:51and who's doing the construction. And

2:53:52the state this particular year um had

2:53:55substantially increased activity along

2:53:57131, the belt line, uh I 96. So that in

2:54:01con in conjunction with our planned

2:54:03stuff probably made it seem a little

2:54:05heavier than normal um in the past year

2:54:07or so. Um, but we do have the mobility

2:54:09blueprint underway and we also have the

2:54:11right ofway working group that is

2:54:12addressing some of those uh those

2:54:14construction communication uh uh um uh

2:54:17feedback that we got. [snorts] Um

2:54:19employment opportunities, we'll be

2:54:20sharing that with all the local

2:54:21workforce development entities. We do

2:54:22want to point out that as an employer,

2:54:24uh the city has a turnover rate of less

2:54:26than 8% in FY26. Um and so we'll be

2:54:30probably doing a little bit more

2:54:31conversation around what exactly is

2:54:32going on with that given all the

2:54:34economic trends in other areas being so

2:54:36positive. And then finally, um the one

2:54:38that we're definitely going to have to

2:54:39do some more reach, uh some more

2:54:40research on is a sense of civic and

2:54:43community pride. Given so many people

2:54:45recommend this as a place to live, given

2:54:47so many people are happy to live here,

2:54:48given so many people gave us such high

2:54:50overall ratings, that one will probably

2:54:52require us to do a little more outreach

2:54:54and engagement to to get a better sense

2:54:55of what's caused that. So with that, we

2:54:58had any questions you might have. Nick

2:54:59and myself are available.

2:55:02Um, so I I get that these are all

2:55:05national um comparables and so it's not

2:55:08quite as easy um to explain some of them

2:55:12perhaps. I mean in terms of when I see

2:55:15when I see the question about civic

2:55:16pride um you know I think about what's

2:55:19going on at the federal level. Um, and

2:55:23you know, I I I said from the dis, the

2:55:25fact that we've got a uh US Supreme

2:55:28Court that now says it's okay to detain

2:55:30people based on skin color uh and accent

2:55:33does not make me proud to be an

2:55:34American. Uh, I find that incredibly

2:55:36distressing. Now, maybe that's something

2:55:39maybe that those numbers are byproduct

2:55:41of the fact that our community is

2:55:44reading loud and clear and and and and

2:55:47expressing real dissatisfaction with

2:55:48federal policies. in which case I'm kind

2:55:50of proud of our of our community for not

2:55:52being so civically prideful. Um if if

2:55:55that's what we're reading. Um but I

2:55:57don't know. Um I guess one of the

2:55:59questions I would have is you're

2:56:00comparing us to other people and you

2:56:02presumably don't drop the surveys in

2:56:06synchron in in synchronous uh method,

2:56:08right? Like these are presumably

2:56:10stepped. Um so you know and again I'm

2:56:13thinking about like the Alex Prey

2:56:14killing, right? that happened fairly

2:56:17close to when our prior to our survey

2:56:19going out and maybe uh you know the

2:56:22those act those those national there

2:56:24there's a real I mean and we continue to

2:56:27have an ongoing accounting for uh

2:56:30federal immigration enforcement tactics

2:56:32activities all that kind of thing and

2:56:34that if so if if th if that wasn't

2:56:36forefront in some communities minds are

2:56:38we seeing in a sense some effect of like

2:56:40when the time of your polling was

2:56:43>> yeah that very well may be a byproduct

2:56:45to that you are right. Uh the surveys

2:56:47that we're fielding with cities across

2:56:48the country are rolling throughout the

2:56:50year. So some of them uh could could

2:56:53have been u very well were not at that

2:56:56same time and there may other things

2:56:57that may have been inducing a the

2:56:59variation in the sense of civic pride.

2:57:01Um, with that said, I'm something we're

2:57:03always willing to do and uh willing to

2:57:05kind of follow up as an after item is

2:57:07city maybe cities who were fielding the

2:57:10survey around the same time uh but had

2:57:12higher scores just and if there are best

2:57:14practices to learn uh to maybe even

2:57:16counteract things like that, we're happy

2:57:18to dig in and uh do some connectivity

2:57:20sharing with that.

2:57:21>> Great. And obviously that that national

2:57:24moment of I mean fear among other things

2:57:27would certainly seem to me contribute to

2:57:29questions of overall feeling of safety

2:57:31in the community. Um if that's not you

2:57:34know safety worrying about like can I go

2:57:37for a walk at night but a question of

2:57:38like are my neighbors going to be

2:57:41stuffed into the back of a bus um when I

2:57:44you know some afternoon. Um, I I know

2:57:46we've had a lot of people very very

2:57:48clearly and emphatically coming in and

2:57:50telling us that they do not feel safe in

2:57:52this national federal environment. So, I

2:57:55just wanted to flag that as a

2:57:56hypothesis.

2:57:57>> Sure, Mayor. And it's worth noting that

2:57:59we do there are some things that are

2:58:01easy to explain what what we might think

2:58:03of as recency bias in in the results.

2:58:05So, for instance, the uh public works

2:58:07team would love it if I was only rating

2:58:10uh if we did it in the fall because by

2:58:11then all the streets are clear and all

2:58:12the potholes are full. Um, unfortunately

2:58:14this usually we tend to put it out right

2:58:16after the snow. So something like that

2:58:18we can make a reasonable assumption.

2:58:19That's why we noted that the civic pride

2:58:21thing we probably are going to have to

2:58:22go out and do some deeper have some

2:58:24deeper conversations to really

2:58:25understand it because it it it may

2:58:27correls things. It may be something in

2:58:30the community that we're just even not

2:58:31aware of a sentiment that we need to you

2:58:33know we need to track on. And so we'll

2:58:34be working uh with you know my team

2:58:36engagement um OPA OE and and trying to

2:58:39and trying to feed what the next step of

2:58:40engagement will be for that.

2:58:42>> Yeah. Thank you. Uh, Commissioner Yasi,

2:58:44did I see your hand up?

2:58:45>> Oh, I was gonna say

2:58:47>> and then Commissioner uh

2:58:48>> Yeah, I think Commissioner Knight did

2:58:49too, but I think she walked out. Uh,

2:58:51thank you for this overview. Thanks for

2:58:53highlighting this. Um, I wanted to just

2:58:56add a couple of things on the employment

2:58:59opportunities. I think, you know,

2:59:01appreciate sharing with the local

2:59:02workforce development entities. I also

2:59:04think about, you know, those parties

2:59:06that are receiving CDBG funding through

2:59:09um, you know, our departments, but also

2:59:11just some of the nuances. I think, you

2:59:13know, those that are, uh, returning from

2:59:16incarceration, those that have different

2:59:19physical or cognitive abilities. Um, you

2:59:23know, I think that's what we're also

2:59:24seeing quite a bit as I I think about

2:59:26some of the other bodies I sit on. Um

2:59:30I agree too on the utility piece. You

2:59:33know that's oftentimes is kind of taking

2:59:35it from you know it's coming to the city

2:59:37but who is the the consideration and so

2:59:40I appreciate these items and where the

2:59:42trends are and obviously the ones that

2:59:44are really obvious to us. What's the

2:59:46what's the strategy? So sort of this is

2:59:48like the response, right? But what is

2:59:49the strategy or how do um municipalities

2:59:52say if we see like slight changes or you

2:59:55know, hey, we see some slight changes

2:59:57and also to your point uh Mr. Green, we

3:00:00know some other things that are going

3:00:01on. So a lot of these things are not

3:00:02surprising to us, right? And so how do

3:00:04we have sort of the response and then

3:00:06the proactive PE? I mean, I believe

3:00:08we're always being proactive, but how do

3:00:10we categorize that or how do you how do

3:00:13you sort of rank that and make sure

3:00:15you're not just focusing on, oh my gosh,

3:00:16this number is so much lower and so we

3:00:19want to put our energy and time there.

3:00:20Thanks.

3:00:23>> I would just say so I do several of

3:00:25these presentations uh and our team does

3:00:27around the country. I think um the the

3:00:30first thing they look at is a perception

3:00:31versus reality issue and so other data

3:00:33that can corroborate uh if there

3:00:35actually has been a decline or is it

3:00:36just something that we can do to

3:00:37communicate differently and then similar

3:00:39to what I alluded to of sharing of best

3:00:42practices. So again these are as I

3:00:44mentioned extremely high performing

3:00:45cities and sometimes even a small dip

3:00:47down they really uh really go after it

3:00:49to try to try to get ahead of it. Um I

3:00:52was just in Neapville, same thing. I

3:00:54mean their their scores are you guys are

3:00:56great scores and their scores are really

3:00:57high and but if any dip down they just

3:00:59get up and and I'm happy to kind of

3:01:01share other communities and uh maybe

3:01:03where the declines weren't happening. So

3:01:05yeah, just something we're happy to do.

3:01:07>> Thank you,

3:01:08>> Commissioner. It it's it's also worth

3:01:10noting too that even in some of the

3:01:12areas and and I can I can highlight for

3:01:14you um going back to

3:01:17uh where did it go? Going back to the

3:01:19safety, you might even see, for

3:01:21instance, we are lower in an overall

3:01:23feeling of safety against the national

3:01:24benchmark, but we're still going up. And

3:01:26so this also in some ways validates some

3:01:29of the programs we have in place and and

3:01:30it so it becomes a question of through

3:01:32your strategy, through the budgetary

3:01:34process, what do we change? What do we

3:01:35evaluate? What do we keep doing? So

3:01:37we're also looking for that

3:01:38reinforcement as well. Like some of

3:01:39these numbers, you know, safety in your

3:01:41neighborhood during the day, it's the

3:01:42highest it's been since we've started

3:01:43since we've started tracking it. And so

3:01:45in some cases, this also validates the

3:01:46things we are doing. And and so we can

3:01:48also instead of looking at what we can

3:01:49do to fix certain things, we can say,

3:01:51hey, this is being successful and we can

3:01:52and we can continue to reinforce it.

3:01:55Well, and and again to to keep on that

3:01:57slide for a minute, um if you look at

3:01:59the fire, flood or natural disaster, um

3:02:02if this is a spring thing and people are

3:02:04I mean I know that there was some

3:02:05concern about flooding and it's

3:02:07interesting because you know I'm trying

3:02:09to think back to what event would have

3:02:11caused that but but if that number then

3:02:14that you know

3:02:168% decline is lumped in and the and you

3:02:19ask them at the end of it what's your

3:02:21overall feeling of safety and they've

3:02:22just said I mean this wasn't this was

3:02:25before our our wildfire uh excitement

3:02:29this summer. So it wasn't it's not like

3:02:31we're tracking oh my gosh I can't

3:02:32breathe the air. Um but it is you know

3:02:35if if there were concerns about flooding

3:02:36and that just um filters down into the

3:02:39answer. I'm I'm assuming these question

3:02:41I'm assuming I'm guessing these

3:02:42questions are asked sequentially like at

3:02:44least logically you were going to ask

3:02:46the overall thing after you ask the uh

3:02:48the disagregated questions. So we may be

3:02:52tracking a flood effect there too for

3:02:53some to some extent. Who knows?

3:02:55>> Um just one of the factors we're

3:02:57discussing. I these are all all right

3:02:59factors and uh we we we take a lot of

3:03:02pride in trying to field this process as

3:03:03well as we can and there's just some act

3:03:05uh and then just always keep in mind

3:03:07these are population inferences from a

3:03:10sample. So don't forget there is the the

3:03:11plus and minus range there too.

3:03:13>> Thanks Commissioner Belure.

3:03:15>> Thank you. Um so to contribute to the

3:03:17conversation we were having I also noted

3:03:19in as we were going through this that

3:03:21with the ease of parking public parking

3:03:23on slide 25 um I believe this survey was

3:03:27well as we were approaching the launch

3:03:29for the amphitheater. So there was a lot

3:03:31of discussion in in that and we just had

3:03:33a nice discussion about the amphitheater

3:03:35and and how parking in our most busy day

3:03:38still seemed to be manageable and as

3:03:40noted we have our mobility

3:03:42blueprint going on. Um we also have

3:03:45since the dis distinguishing between

3:03:47which governmental entity or body is um

3:03:50in in charge of something we have a lot

3:03:52of um

3:03:55like just diverse decision-making

3:03:57bodies. So we have like the convention

3:03:59of arena authority. We have the rapid

3:04:01which is not run by the city. So that's

3:04:03a big impact on what transit is. Um you

3:04:06know we do have the dash that we pay the

3:04:08rapid to do. So there were changes there

3:04:10too. Um, so I think, you know, as we

3:04:13think about what's happening in our

3:04:14streets and and what's going on there,

3:04:16that's just a continuing conversation.

3:04:18Um, I do know that snow removal this

3:04:21past year has been a big issue. So, I

3:04:23think we can continue thinking about

3:04:24that. We have a lot of, um, elderly and

3:04:28disabled folks that just need extra

3:04:31help. And there's been a lot of, at

3:04:32least in some of my neighborhoods that I

3:04:34represent, discussion about why can't we

3:04:37have the city services like they do in

3:04:39such and such part of town. And so, um,

3:04:41I think those are paid for by the

3:04:43corridor improvement authorities. So,

3:04:45just additional opportunities that we

3:04:46need to think about. And then overall,

3:04:51I'm curious because I know this is

3:04:52mostly focused on like city services and

3:04:55feeling of the n the what it's like to

3:04:58live here. But I noticed that we no

3:05:00questions about housing were

3:05:02specifically asked or how like a big

3:05:05part of our city services is the

3:05:06planning department and how that works.

3:05:08So, if you could just talk a little bit

3:05:10about that or if there's anything in the

3:05:12future we could be looking at.

3:05:15>> Um,

3:05:16I if it is really a big part of the city

3:05:19operations. Um, I mean, you do have this

3:05:21standing panel you could kind of go back

3:05:22to if you wanted to do something

3:05:24additional. We do have this data set I

3:05:26was sharing that we've been compiling to

3:05:28take a look at non-resident sentiment

3:05:29but overall uh housing data. Um, and so

3:05:33yeah, happy to kind of dig into that

3:05:34data with the with the team as a

3:05:36follow-up. I guess that would be a

3:05:37question for the rest of the commission

3:05:39if that's something we wanted to learn

3:05:40more about as well.

3:05:44>> Yeah. Well, city manager, I think you

3:05:46can keep that in mind for um maybe next

3:05:48year's survey. That's because you do

3:05:50have the ability to focus in, but I

3:05:51think it's a good point. Commissioner uh

3:05:53Commissioner Purdue,

3:05:54>> thank you for the presentation. Thank

3:05:56you for the effort on this. Um two

3:05:59things. So you just mentioned residency

3:06:02and I know that in the survey for

3:06:05demographic drop down there is a length

3:06:07of res residency. So just confirming

3:06:09that everyone who completed the survey

3:06:11is a verified resident or are folks who

3:06:14might who work in Grand Rapids but might

3:06:16not live here. Are they also included in

3:06:18this?

3:06:18>> Um yes. So first I don't know if Doug's

3:06:20track but I'm going to double check just

3:06:22there to see if there were housing

3:06:24questions uh in there. I don't remember.

3:06:27I just want to come back to that. to

3:06:28your question on the uh so remember

3:06:31there was two waves. There's a

3:06:32probability based random sample. Uh all

3:06:35of those respondents absolutely should

3:06:37be uh official city residents. I believe

3:06:41the sampling frame that we used was from

3:06:44the USPS

3:06:46uh property list uh address. So uh yes,

3:06:50those should all be verified residents

3:06:52of the community. We do take some steps

3:06:55also uh to help ensure that in the open

3:06:58participation component they are also

3:07:01verified residents but it's more

3:07:03possible to sock puppet uh those uh

3:07:06results in

3:07:07>> okay I think you know this report

3:07:10obviously focused on averages I think

3:07:13the most value is when you a as you

3:07:16spoke to kind of understand what's

3:07:18behind each of these numbers but also

3:07:20look beyond averages to see how

3:07:21different communities are experiencing

3:07:23each of these domains. So the online

3:07:27report is in kind of table format and

3:07:30allows you to drop down pretty um for

3:07:33for every question drop down and and uh

3:07:35disagregate um in some really

3:07:37interesting ways everything from housing

3:07:39type to length of residency to presence

3:07:41of children. So I'm curious if you found

3:07:44any interesting trends when you broke it

3:07:46down in any particular area. Um that's a

3:07:50great qu that's a that's a great point.

3:07:52I there's already so much data in this

3:07:55survey as is when you look at benchmarks

3:07:58custom benchmarks and trends. Uh and

3:08:00then we do the benchmarks on the trends

3:08:02too. Um so one thing that we are doing

3:08:05right now and I hope to have for you for

3:08:07the next implementation if we want to

3:08:08dive and you you can explore it there.

3:08:10>> Uh the the thing that we're working on

3:08:12right now is we call those our disparity

3:08:14reports. uh is to be able to do

3:08:17benchmarks and trends within the

3:08:19disparity reports as well. So you can

3:08:20see how this uh combination kind of

3:08:23explodes a little bit.

3:08:24>> Um the short answer though was off the

3:08:27cuff through looking at all those

3:08:28combinations there was nothing that

3:08:30really you know struck us but that is a

3:08:33very large space to kind of review and

3:08:36we're working to make that easier to

3:08:38identify those points.

3:08:39>> Okay, great. I think I really appreciate

3:08:42this this point and um would be

3:08:44interested in kind of that sort of

3:08:45reporting and I know a big part of your

3:08:48model is benchmarking against similar

3:08:50cities. Um I think I'm probably more

3:08:52interested in how different parts of the

3:08:54city benchmarks across each other,

3:08:56right? And I think my goal is par

3:08:58throughout the city. um whether that

3:09:00were better or worse in another city is

3:09:02not as much of my priority as saying how

3:09:04is everyone experiencing our city in a

3:09:06positive way and uh where might we need

3:09:09to target efforts um and where are we

3:09:11doing excellent

3:09:13>> thank you

3:09:14>> yeah ju just to follow up very quickly

3:09:16on the on the housing question there

3:09:18were two questions about housing one

3:09:19about variety of housing type and one

3:09:21about affordability um all anything not

3:09:24covered on today's presentation as the

3:09:26commissioners pointed out is available

3:09:28via our website on uh on something

3:09:30called Tableau where you can go and you

3:09:32can cross tab and sort through all of

3:09:33the results.

3:09:35>> Great.

3:09:35>> Yeah. Yeah. We we we'll see and we we

3:09:37will send you the full report. It's

3:09:38it'll be posted on on the website, too.

3:09:40>> Okay. Thanks. Um any additional

3:09:43questions?

3:09:44>> Okay. Well, thanks so much for the

3:09:46presentation and thanks for doing the

3:09:47work. And that will adjourn our meeting,

3:09:49I believe. And we'll move in Well, not

3:09:51adjourn.

3:09:52>> Yes, we're moving to 601 for close

3:09:54session.

```*