Case No. 2026-0046 Madequecham Valley Road House Relocation and Second Dwelling
At a glance
Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard.
- What: a request for front-setback relief to move an eroding house back from the coastal bank and add a new second dwelling on the same lot.
- Where it stands: continued to November 19, 2026; the board supports moving the existing house but not the new dwelling's proposed spot.
- Next: the applicant is to return with an updated plan after talking to the owners, engineer and architect.
The request
- Attorney Arthur Reid presented for the owners, with the project engineer present.
- The existing house is about 61 ft from the top of the bank and erosion continues; it would move back more than 100 ft, with a 204 sq ft addition, and the driveway would be extended inside the lot.
- A new second dwelling is proposed in the north-east corner, about 4 ft from the front line (the relocated house is about 18 ft from it); the front setback is 35 ft.
- The road is a 40 ft paper road that ends at the lot; the land to the north and east is owned by the Land Bank and is not expected to be opened.
- The applicant said a compliant second dwelling could be built today but would likely mean a return for more relief as erosion continues.
Main concerns
- Members were comfortable with relocating the existing house, since the board has long encouraged moving as far from the bank as possible.
- Most objected to a brand-new two-story building so far into the setback beside another two-story building, saying the second dwelling should read as secondary.
- Discussion of the new variance standard (practical difficulty instead of substantial hardship) and whether it covers new construction an owner could place elsewhere.
- Ideas raised: rotate the buildings to follow the lot line, pull the new dwelling behind the parking, swap the two locations, and show the Historic District Commission approved footprint (a T shape) on the site plan.
Decisions
- Continued to November 19, 2026, by unanimous vote, with a request for an updated plan.
Sources
- Video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6p7jYuqnryc
- The posted agenda for this meeting was not available when this page was written.
Discussion time
About 34 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).
| Meeting | Minutes |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 - Zoning Board of Appeals | 34 |
Log
- 2026-10-15 - Zoning Board of Appeals — Heard; no objection to relocating the existing house, but concerns about the new second dwelling in the front setback; continued to November 19 (unanimous).