2026-10-20 - Fire Staffing Presentation to City Council
Summary
Built from auto-captions (no speaker labels; names and figures are often garbled). This recording was posted by a private individual, not the city, and covers the fire staffing presentation at the October 20, 2026 City Council meeting. Councilors are mostly unidentified in the captions; only those addressed by name are linked.
- Fire Chief Fire Chief Brian (surname unclear) and Andrew Oaks, president of Framingham Firefighters Local 1652, presented a union-commissioned staffing and GIS study to the Council, then took questions.
- George P. King Jr chaired and ended the session after a Zoom commenter declined to speak, saying the matter would be referred to the Finance Subcommittee.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Fire Department Staffing | 39 | 76% |
| Western Framingham Fire Station | 7 | 14% |
| Fire Station Facilities | 5 | 10% |
Fire Department Staffing
0:00-31:22, 38:05-44:17, 49:36-51:09
- The chief said he agrees with the study's findings. It covers January 2019 to December 2023: 60,538 incidents and 93,945 responses across the five stations, mapped with GIS.
- Key findings: the three specialty trucks (Ladder 3, Tower 1, Rescue 1) run three firefighters against the NFPA 1710 standard of four; population density in every part of the city is high enough that NFPA calls for five or six on a truck.
- Coverage figures cited (best case, trucks in station): low-hazard buildings reached by 17 firefighters in 8 minutes, 25% of the city now, 37% with a fourth firefighter per truck, then 46% and 57% in later phases; medium-hazard (26 firefighters in 8 minutes), 1% now, 16%, 24% and 30%. High-hazard buildings (39 personnel in 10 minutes) were not mapped because the department cannot meet that standard until phase three.
- Phases recommended: add a fourth person to every frontline apparatus (five engines at four, two ladders and the heavy rescue at three); add a ladder company at Station 2; add an engine company and deputy chief at Station 1.
- Speakers argued four-person crews search 50% faster and complete tasks about 25% faster, citing national fire-ground studies; staffing has been the same since about 1993-94, calls since 1986 are up 170% and staffing down 18%, and comparable cities such as Newton and Waltham staff more per shift. About 30 firefighters are on shift, one of them a dispatcher.
- The ask: let the mayor and chief meet with the union to raise minimum staffing from 30 to 33 per shift (about 12 hires across four groups), covered by overtime for now; develop a multi-year plan for the rest of the study; keep working toward a sixth station in western Framingham.
- A councilor asked about overtime fatigue and cost versus hiring; the presenters agreed hiring is still needed. Another asked how to phase it; the chief said every apparatus is the priority but any increase would be welcome and it can be funded in steps.
- Christine Long voiced strong support and raised concern that unpermitted electrical and other work, mainly on the south side, adds fire risk, and that outdoor furniture burning is being reported by neighbors. John Stefanini spoke of Framingham's early minimum-staffing law and the difference from smaller departments, and asked that the matter go to the Finance Subcommittee. Michael Cannon praised the management-union collaboration and asked that planning stay flexible given ADUs, the possible effect of ballot Question 7, and the new battery storage facility. Brandon Ward (captioned "Mr. Wood") said parts of this were in the ideal budget last cycle but were pared back.
- Funding ideas mentioned: a federal SAFER grant application, and House Bill 620 (credited to a state representative whose name the captions render as Priscilla Souza) to have state colleges with dorms contribute to fire costs.
- Outcome: no vote; to be referred to the Finance Subcommittee.
Western Framingham Fire Station
31:22-38:05
- A councilor whose home is in West Framingham said the study shows the area, including the 990 and tech park area with lab and pharmaceutical buildings (some medium, some high hazard), is poorly covered, and asked about long-term planning.
- Presenters described Mass Pike responses (frequent, with billing to the Turnpike), reliance on Southborough mutual aid with an agreement to send four-person crews, and the strain this puts on smaller neighbors.
- The chief called the presentation perhaps the first formal push of ongoing strategic planning with the administration.
Fire Station Facilities
44:17-49:35
- Station 1 on Route 9 (built in 1968-69) is at end of life: open dorms with little privacy, electrical capacity problems. Station 5 on Concord Street has had a new roof, parking lot, kitchen and geothermal work.
- Councilors described Stations 2 and 7 as in poor condition (roof leaks, worn furnishings) and asked how to get station projects into the capital budget. One councilor said the Council should act and called this a good first step.
Other business
- Presenters pointed to the study being in the agenda backup material and on the union's Facebook page.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:00I got a seat for her right here. All
00:02right. Uh good evening, counselors, and
00:04uh thank you for the opportunity to
00:06discuss the Framingham Fire Department
00:07GIS study. Uh tonight, I'll be
00:10co-presenting with uh Andrew Oaks. He's
00:12the president of Framingham
00:13Firefighters, Local 1652. And we're also
00:16joined by members of Local 1652's
00:19leadership team and my administrative
00:21team in the back. Uh this uh study was
00:24commissioned by local 1652 through the
00:27international association of
00:28firefighters to provide an independent
00:30assessment of our department's current
00:31operations, staffing, and service
00:34demands. I want to emphasize at the
00:37outset that I agree uh with the study's
00:40findings and recommendations.
00:43The report reinforces what we have been
00:44experiencing firsthand. As Frammingham
00:47continues to grow and emergency services
00:50demands increase, we must evaluate
00:52whether our staffing, facilities, and
00:56resources are keeping pace with the
00:57needs of our community. The study
00:59provides valuable independent support
01:01for the investments we need to make to
01:04maintain firefighter safety and deliver
01:06effective, reliable emergency services.
01:09Uh we'll provide a brief presentation uh
01:12highlighting the study's key findings
01:14and recommendations. Uh following the
01:17presentation, uh we'll welcome your
01:19questions and look forward to discussing
01:20how we can use the information to plan
01:22responsibly for the future and continue
01:24providing the highest level of service
01:27to the residents of Framingham.
01:29We have the study up. Could we go to the
01:31next slide, please?
01:35Thank you. Uh just some real quick facts
01:38uh about the study. Um
01:41this study was done uh from January 2019
01:46through December 2023. So we have uh
01:49just about five solid years worth of
01:51data. Um
01:54about 60,000 uh you can see 60,538
01:58incidents were analyzed
02:00uh and that included 93,945
02:04responses. Um the method was using GIS
02:08mapping in our run data. Um again I
02:12talked about five years worth of data
02:14and it was all five of our stations were
02:16mapped out.
02:19Next slide please.
02:23Uh some key findings uh from the study
02:26um Andy want to take over.
02:27>> Absolutely chief. So some of the key
02:29findings that were found when the study
02:31was concluded was that uh one the three
02:33specialty trucks for the Framian fire
02:35department are underst staffed per NFPA
02:371710 standard which is four firefighters
02:39per truck. We run three on those trucks
02:41right now. That is the uh ladder three
02:43tower one and rescue one.
02:45Uh the other things that was found was
02:48that uh the density of Framingham
02:49surprisingly is extremely high. Uh I
02:51know we had that moniker for the longest
02:53time. We're the largest town in
02:55Massachusetts, maybe the United States.
02:57Population per square mile. Uh so the
02:59NFPA looks at that as anything over
03:033,000 people per square mile should have
03:05at least six firefighters on the trucks
03:06in those areas. Anything over from 1,000
03:09to 2,999 people per square mile should
03:12have five.
03:13All sections of Framingham met one of
03:15those markers. That's a a huge issue
03:17obviously for staffing issues for us.
03:22And as far as the final stuff that was
03:24found, like I said earlier, this was
03:27taken from all the different data
03:29points, which is a big thing to point
03:30out is this is all facts. It's not our
03:32opinions here tonight. This is totally
03:34factfound.
03:38>> I think no, that's good. Next slide,
03:41please. Um, we're going to be using some
03:42words here, so we just kind of want to
03:44define them a little bit. Um, kind of
03:45building hazards. Uh, we talk about low
03:48h low hazard buildings. Uh these are
03:50single family uh buildings that we
03:52respond to. Um
03:55our our our guidelines are are uh the
03:58National Fire Protection Agency uh NFPA
04:02uh 1710. They define how we are supposed
04:04to respond. Um and and within their
04:08definitions are some lowhazard
04:10buildings. So a lowhazard building, a
04:12single family home, we're supposed to
04:14respond the standard is to respond with
04:1617 personnel within 8 minutes. a
04:18mediumhazard building. Um these are town
04:21homes, uh garden style apartments, uh
04:24strip malls. Um we're supposed to have
04:2726 personnel in 8 minutes. High hazard.
04:30These are uh high-rise buildings. Um at
04:35the college at uh uh up and down Route
04:389. Um and we're supposed to have uh
04:42these high-hazard buildings were
04:43supposed to have 39 personnel within 10
04:45minutes. Next slide.
04:52So this next slide is just a quick map
04:54of Framingham. It the red dots there
04:56represent the stations here in
04:57Framingham. Uh the orange sections are
05:00like I was saying earlier about the
05:01density. Uh this is why I wanted to show
05:03it is that's the area of anywhere
05:05between a,000 to 2,99 people in it.
05:08Anything that's the dark red is over
05:093,000 people per square mile. Uh, like I
05:12said, all of Framingham now has those
05:15factors where they need at least five or
05:16six firefighters on a truck. We're
05:18asking for four on a truck. So, I think
05:20we're making a bit of a concession
05:22there. Personally,
05:24um, the biggest thing here is we just
05:26want to make sure our department's
05:26prepared to respond to all these
05:28situations that are coming up. Uh, it's
05:30no longer just fires or medicals. We're
05:32seeing electric car vehicles and
05:33everything else coming through here. We
05:35have uh the buses that are coming
05:37through here now. what uh liquid propane
05:40>> hydrogen's coming in a few years, but we
05:42have CNG buses at this point right now.
05:44>> So,
05:45>> I think it is our responsibility to
05:47provide effective emergency responses
05:48regardless of what part of the city
05:50someone lives in though. Uh that's why I
05:52think having four on every truck is one
05:54of the biggest driving points for us
05:55here.
05:57So, one of the components that uh next
05:59slide please. Sorry.
06:02One of the components of the study uh
06:04discussed uh staffing um and uh the
06:08study uh surveyed um a few different
06:11data points. Uh what our current
06:13staffing and our deployment is. That's
06:16>> um our current staffing and deployment
06:18with NFPA standards.
06:21Uh we'll get to this part in in a future
06:23slide. uh phase two and ladder companies
06:25added to uh station two and then phase
06:28three and engine and deputy chief added
06:31to station one. Next slide please.
06:35Uh as I uh kind of just mentioned um the
06:38study had uh uh some recommendations for
06:41us and as you can see uh the slide here
06:44um it uh it goes through the different
06:46phases. Um you know the first phase is
06:48adding one person one more member to
06:51each of the to each truck uh to each
06:54apparatus that responds. We currently
06:56have eight frontline fire apparatus that
07:00respond to calls. Five engine companies
07:02uh two ladder companies and one heavy
07:05rescue. Um currently the five engine
07:09companies have four members on it. Uh
07:12the two ladder companies have three and
07:14the heavy rescue has three as well. Uh
07:16the recommendations from the study uh
07:19are uh just that phase one adding a
07:22fourth person to each uh to each
07:26frontline apparatus. Um and as we go
07:29through uh and again we understand that
07:31there is uh you know uh financial
07:33implications for this and that's why um
07:36you know the study had some
07:38recommendations on you know a phased
07:40approach and not just hey throwing this
07:43all at you at one time. It's a phased
07:45approach. Um, as you can see, phase two
07:48is adding uh firefighters
07:52uh uh to all the to all the pieces um
07:55and a ladder truck at station two. Uh
07:58phase three uh is is um again adding a
08:03deputy chief uh and um an aid to uh to
08:10each uh to station one and and station
08:12five. Station one is Route Nine. Um,
08:16station two is A Street. Um, station
08:19three is headquarters and Luring Drive.
08:22Station five is Conquered Street and
08:23station seven is Winter Street. Uh,
08:26Water Street, excuse me.
08:32>> You want me to keep going on this one
08:33there, Chief?
08:34>> Uh, yeah, next slide, please. I'm sorry.
08:38>> So, uh, this next slide describes, uh,
08:40response metrics through those phases.
08:42Uh, something I think is important for
08:43everyone to understand is there's a big
08:45difference between getting a fire truck
08:46to an emergency and getting enough
08:47firefighters there to effectively handle
08:48that emergency. When someone calls 911
08:51because their house is on fire, they
08:52don't need just a fire truck to pull up
08:54in front of their house. They need
08:55firefighters that can stretch hose
08:56lines, establish a water supply, search
08:58for trapped occupants, ventilate the
09:00building, and begin saniting that fire.
09:04Many of those operations need to happen
09:05at the same time. That's what makes
09:07staffing so important. When we look at
09:09these maps that will be coming up in the
09:11following slides as well, you'll see how
09:14deficient we are in getting firefighters
09:16to places in in the aotted time by NFPA.
09:19So the current slide here, you'll see
09:22our low hazards start at 25% of the city
09:24is covered by our current staffing where
09:26we can get 17 firefighters in 8 minutes
09:28to a houseire. If we add a fourth
09:31firefighter to every truck, that brings
09:33it up to 37%. I know some of you have
09:35seen the study. I've sat down with a few
09:36of you. I've showed you the active
09:38mapping where you can actually punch in
09:39an address through the study and you can
09:41see if your house is covered. So, uh,
09:45phase two, you see that it jumps to 68%
09:47by adding an additional ladder company.
09:49And then phase three or excuse me, 46%
09:53phase three jumps to 57% by adding
09:55additional engine company.
09:57Uh, medium hazards, it's 1% right now.
10:01It It's not good. I'm not trying to be
10:03an alarmist here. I'm not trying to
10:04scare anybody, but 1% of the city, we
10:06can get 26 firefighters there in 8
10:08minutes. That's a problem. Uh, by just
10:10adding that fourth firefighter each
10:12truck, you can get 16%. Which, you know,
10:1616% doesn't sound a lot, but it's a lot
10:17better than 1%.
10:19And as you add the ladder and the extra
10:21engine company in phases two and three,
10:23respectively, you get to 24 and 30%. Uh,
10:26you'll notice we didn't do a high hazard
10:27slide for the mapping. Uh, I thought it
10:29was too depressing personally. That's
10:31why I didn't add it. Uh because until
10:33you hit phase three, we don't even have
10:35enough firefighters to handle high-rise
10:37fire by FBA standards. Not saying we
10:39can't do it because we do it ever almost
10:41every day, but we just don't do it
10:44safely. Uh I was personally at a fire
10:47just a few years ago where we almost
10:48lost multiple firefighters. So it's
10:51something that's near and dear to me and
10:52it was at a high-rise fire.
10:57>> Next slide, please.
10:58>> You want to keep going?
10:59>> Y.
11:01So this is the mapping I was discussing.
11:03Uh you'll see on the left is our current
11:05staffing model. Uh anything in blue we
11:08can reach in eight minutes. You'll
11:10notice it's mostly eastern Framingham.
11:12Uh West Framingham and Knobscot and a
11:15lot of the South Framingham are left out
11:16of this unfortunately just due to the
11:18amount of firefighters we have on shift
11:20and where stations are located. I know
11:22the chief and assistant chief have
11:24mentioned adding a sixth station to
11:26Western Framingham at some point and as
11:27you can tell from the mapping is
11:29desperately needed. It actually comes up
11:31in the study as well. They do mention
11:32trying to find a a station for western
11:35Framingham. By adding that fourth
11:37firefighter, everything that's dark blue
11:39is the additional that you get. So, you
11:41cover a little more of Central
11:41Framingham and South Framingham as well
11:43as northeast Framingham in Saxonville.
11:45But, uh, Knobscot and West Frammium are
11:47still left lacking.
11:53And next slide, please.
11:58Medium hazard. Like I said, 1% it's a
12:01little depressing. It's pretty much
12:04right behind station 5. That's it. Uh
12:07with our current staffing model, uh 26
12:10firefighters in the city, it's pretty
12:11much everybody. We have 30 firefighters
12:13on shift, but one of them is a
12:14dispatcher. So, it's really 29
12:15firefighters that we have responding to
12:17calls. So, 26 is pretty much everybody
12:19going to that fire. Like I said, by
12:21adding that fourth firefighter, though,
12:22you can see the dark blue, it expands it
12:24quite a bit of what we can cover and get
12:25those firefighters there in the time
12:27that's needed.
12:31Next slide, please.
12:35>> So, this slide is why do we need four
12:37firefighters and why is that important
12:39to us? Uh
12:42the I discussed the uh the trucks that
12:44don't have four firefighters. So, the
12:45heavy rescue, why is it important for us
12:47to have four firefighters? The heavy
12:49rescue is responsible for our primary
12:51searching at structure fires. With three
12:54firefighters on the rescue truck, a
12:55primary search must be completed as a
12:57team uh of three firefighters. We have a
13:00rule of two in and two out that we must
13:02maintain integrity with each other. Um
13:06and it's two in two out. So you always
13:08you can't be alone. You must be with a
13:10with a another member. By adding the
13:13fourth member, our search can be
13:14completed 50% faster by breaking up into
13:17two teams of two.
13:21And no priority is more important on the
13:24fire ground than the safety of the
13:25firefighters.
13:26Life safety in period period. Uh why do
13:30we need four firefighters on on the
13:32aerial trucks? Uh tower one and ladder
13:343. They're responsible for forcible
13:36entry. How do we get into the place when
13:39it's locked? When things are are uh
13:41doors are locked and we are closed and
13:44we can't get in. They're responsible for
13:46ventilation of the building, making the
13:47interior more tenable and increasing
13:50victim's survivability.
13:52Ventilation must be coordinated effort
13:55with an engine company to ensure the
13:56fire does not grow. Again, we can break
13:58up into two person or two member teams
14:01and and accomplish things twice as fast.
14:06Just add one more thing to that too is
14:08uh I don't ride the rescue personally,
14:10but I do ride the tower, so I know truck
14:12work and it it's backbreaking work when
14:14you're on a roof cutting a hole,
14:15especially when it's snowy or icy and
14:17cold and windy. Uh my brother rides the
14:19rescue. Uh Janet, I know you did some
14:22training with my brother when we did our
14:23fire ops, and you know how intense it is
14:26to try to search. We searched a small
14:28apartment with you in Noval. Uh
14:30>> we thought we were going to die
14:31>> right now. We weren't going to let that
14:34happen.
14:35Now, think of a triple decker on the
14:37south side, though, where it's the
14:38rescue is doing the search and there's
14:40three of them and they have to search
14:42three different apartments.
14:44That's not fair to the residents of
14:45Fremium. I'm sorry.
14:49Uh, next slide, please.
14:55Uh, we just put this in here because,
14:56uh, these are some pretty, uh, big
14:57studies that were done, uh, kind of
14:59landmark studies for the fire service.
15:01Um these studies were done a few years
15:03ago but uh it still holds true today. Um
15:08the study uh shows that four
15:10firefighters uh uh can have to or
15:13firefighters complete 22 essential fire
15:15ground operations 25% faster than three
15:19firefighters. I'm going to say that
15:21again.
15:22Four fighters complete 22 essential fire
15:26ground tasks 25% faster than three
15:30firefighters.
15:32Time is money. Time is is life in our
15:35business.
15:36The study also found that every single
15:38task was completed faster, but
15:40specifically search was initiated and
15:42executed 30% faster with victims being
15:45removed from uh immediate uh dangers to
15:48life and health environments
15:50uh 27% faster. Ventilation was completed
15:5430% faster.
15:56Uh the the study also uh was it happened
15:59in Washington DC and they they did this
16:01study and it was uh and it concluded
16:03that ladder and rescue uh companies um
16:07they took 12 minutes longer to complete
16:09with a crew of three versus a crew of
16:12four.
16:13Next slide.
16:14>> Can I actually say one more thing on
16:15that, Chief? Once again, not trying to
16:18be alarmist here, but the chief just
16:20said 25% faster, 27% faster. That's
16:24time. When you think about that for
16:25somebody who's trapped in a house fire
16:27or someone who's, you know, having
16:30issues, that's a lot of time. Seconds
16:32feel like hours when you're in those
16:34situations.
16:37And that could be the difference between
16:38life and death for somebody by just
16:40adding one additional firefighter to to
16:42trucks.
16:45>> Next slide, please.
16:49>> Wrap up.
16:50>> Absolutely.
16:53So this final slide or no, excuse me,
16:55not the final slide, but this is just a
16:57conclusion from the study itself. What
16:59they found, uh, basically what they're
17:01saying is that Framm is understaffed for
17:04the fire department for a city of our
17:05size. Um, some of you have heard me say
17:07probably before, Premium is larger than
17:09the Burrow of Manhattan with square
17:11mileage. You know, so we have 30
17:14firefighters covering on paper 78,000
17:17people. Reality, we know it's more.
17:21Their recommendations are, and these
17:22are, like I said, recommendations from
17:23the NFPA, is four firefighters on every
17:25truck, look for that western station
17:28eventually, you know, add those
17:30additional companies so that we can
17:31properly staff our fire department for a
17:33city of our size. If you look at
17:35comparable cities to ours, Newton's and
17:38Walthams, they've got a lot more
17:40firefighters on the shift than we do,
17:42and they're doing a lot less calls than
17:44we do.
17:45That's significant. So, we've been
17:48staffed the same way since, I believe,
17:501993.
17:52>> 94.
17:52>> Yes. Since 93.
17:54>> I was born in 1987. I was six.
17:59>> Thank you for that presentation.
18:00Appreciate you taking the time and
18:01effort to do it.
18:02>> There's actually a couple more slides.
18:04>> Oh, I thought it was the last slide.
18:05>> So, we do we just have one more because
18:07we want people to to check the study out
18:09for themselves.
18:09>> Okay.
18:10>> Um Eddie, why don't you go here and then
18:12I'll I'll finish with the with the
18:14>> So, what are we looking for? It's pretty
18:16simple and straightforward. Uh local
18:181652 is asking the city council to allow
18:20the mayor and chief to sit down with
18:22local 1652 leadership to increase our
18:24minimum staffing from 30 to 33. Uh that
18:27can be done through overtime. Right now,
18:29we have enough firefighters hired that
18:31we don't need to hire someone right now.
18:33We can just do it by increasing our
18:34overtime budget a little bit. Uh this
18:37will allow us to staff all of our
18:39frontline apparatus with four
18:40firefighters. Additionally, we'd like to
18:43have the city council work with the
18:44mayor, Chief Duter, and myself to
18:47formulate a plan to implement the rest
18:48of the study for a reasonable and
18:50responsible timeline. I understand that
18:51the city's in a hard financial crunch
18:53right now. I don't expect things to be
18:54done overnight. It's a big ask, but it
18:57is something we do need to be planning
18:58for because we're already behind the
19:00eightball with this. You know, we should
19:01have been increasing our staffing years
19:03ago. So, and then to complete, you know,
19:07or continue work with the mayor and the
19:08city council to identify a site in
19:10western Framingham, possibly in the 990
19:12area for a sixth fire station. I
19:14understand that's a long-term goal. You
19:16know, that's not something that can be
19:17built overnight. Obviously, it can't be
19:18built in a year.
19:20five, six, 10 years down the road.
19:23But that would help with our response
19:25times in western Premium as well as
19:26northwestern Knobscott, which as you can
19:29see from those maps is a very neglected
19:31area for getting firefighters on scene
19:33in a reasonable time.
19:36>> All right, next slide. And I I I promise
19:39this is the last slide.
19:41>> No, that's okay. Uh I I I think uh uh
19:44both uh Andy and I and I wanted people
19:47to be able to touch and and look at the
19:49study themselves. Um we are always
19:52available for questions um
19:56at any time. I I carry my phone with me
19:58all the time except for right now it's
19:59in the back but Chief Schultz is keeping
20:01an eye on it. Uh we are always available
20:04for questions um and to answer. So, uh,
20:07with that link, uh, the Frammingham Fire
20:09Department, you can click on that link
20:10and and, uh, get the the study yourself
20:13so you can see it with your own eyes.
20:14>> And for anybody who's looking, this is
20:15in our backup material on our agenda
20:18item tonight.
20:18>> Also, you can find it on Local 1652's
20:21Facebook page. Not trying to plug our
20:22Facebook page or anything, but we do
20:24have it posted there as well for people
20:26to see. Um, one thing I will say is it's
20:28not very mobile friendly. It's more web-
20:30based, so you should use it on a
20:32computer to get the full experience. Uh
20:34all those maps are interactive though.
20:36Like I said, you can punch in your
20:37address. You can punch in your mom and
20:39dad's address, your grandparents
20:40address, whoever. See if the fire
20:42department can reach you in the time
20:43frame. And that mapping, the big thing
20:45to understand about that is that's best
20:47case scenario where all the trucks are
20:49in the station. We did 93,000 responses
20:53in 5 years. I think currently we're at
20:5560 something thousand for the last two
20:57years. So we are getting busier. The
20:59trucks are almost never in the stations.
21:02So best case scenario, that's what those
21:04mappings show.
21:06>> Thank you, Brian.
21:08>> Thank you. Um so I do I have some
21:11questions. Thank you for the report as
21:13always, you know, very good. Um but so
21:17you said um so in terms of um you
21:21mentioned indie calls are are you resp
21:24um speaking of responses to fires or all
21:27the calls that you get responding to
21:29like you know when people have have to
21:31go to the hospital respiratory failure
21:33whatever.
21:34>> Yeah. That that's all calls. Okay. That
21:36was all calls. Yes.
21:37>> Okay. Um because like you know with the
21:40fire definitely you need the four. And
21:42then the other thing is um so if you add
21:47um an additional person to what is it
21:51eight different
21:52>> just three counselor
21:53>> okay three okay so so it would be just
21:58what 12 people or just
21:59>> yes you have to hire 12 people but like
22:01I said it could be backfilled currently
22:03with overtime
22:05>> now I that's another thing so but if
22:08overtime is good to a point right but
22:11you still would need to have a like be
22:14looking to hire because service goes
22:16down if you overwork the people.
22:18Correct.
22:18>> Correct.
22:19>> And then um like in terms of money too
22:23over time is great for when you're
22:25making it but at the same time does it
22:26drain some of the money from hiring too
22:30and definitely the time. Okay. But still
22:33good good plan so far. um in terms of um
22:38where you feel um you need um the fire
22:42departments, right? I think the one you
22:44said over at 990 that's probably a good
22:46place too. But now do you have data that
22:49shows like where you guys have to
22:51respond to the most? Like let's say
22:53let's just say District 9 maybe there is
22:56a fire station
22:58>> over by Irving and Western A, right? So
23:01um I What are they staffed at? I mean,
23:04do you do you have a like a list of um
23:08data that shows where which districts
23:10that you go like how how much you're in
23:12each district?
23:13>> Yeah. Uh well, the heat mapping will
23:16show where the call calls come from and
23:18uh so uh district 9 specifically. Um
23:22that is fire headquarters and we have an
23:24engine company there with four people
23:26and a ladder truck with with three. U we
23:29want the fourth person on that. Um and
23:32uh some of a lot of our data has shown
23:35that um calls for service in the western
23:38part of of our of our community uh the
23:41Route 9 towards South Bro where um it's
23:45high density high-rise uh that has
23:48really uh had an uptick uh in in
23:53responses um over the last several
23:55years. Um and and those as we discussed
23:58those are kind of our high hazard
24:00buildings. Um
24:03>> yeah,
24:04>> because of just because of the density
24:05of the people and it takes us longer uh
24:08on Route 9. Um you know, when we have a
24:11fire, uh uh we respond,
24:14we have that station right on Route 9.
24:16They go with an engine company and a
24:18ladder company with the tower, but the
24:21second their backup engine company comes
24:23all the way from Knobscot.
24:25>> Um, it took me 30 minutes today at 8:00
24:30this morning to get from my office at 10
24:33Luring Drive to Water Street.
24:36>> 30 minutes. Now, I hit four trains and
24:38sometimes that happens. Um, but the
24:41train can't pull over for us. We got we
24:43can't get through on the train. Um, on a
24:47good day,
24:49state engine 7 that's in Knobcot takes
24:5113 to 15 minutes to get to Route 9. Uh,
24:55at 1,600, one of the 1600 buildings,
24:571,400.
24:59That's a good day. That's with no
25:00traffic. Um, and and that's kind of what
25:02we're discussing um now that the density
25:05and and and things like traffic are
25:08increasing. Our call volume is
25:10increasing, traffic is increasing, and
25:12it takes us longer to get there. in
25:14construction
25:15>> and and you know and and and I heard
25:17Saraki here um last week or the week
25:20before and I started counting up how
25:22many how many buildings that he was
25:24talking about and and how many
25:26apartments or how many units are in each
25:27building and it was 488 uh that he
25:31talked about that are either coming
25:32online have just come online are coming
25:34online or projected in the future and um
25:39you know that's going to put a
25:40significant demand on our on our
25:42resources. I'll just close with I mean
25:44the four firefighters and the teams. I
25:48mean that's kind of a no-brainer like
25:50the difference that it makes, but I'm
25:51glad that you guys broke it all down.
25:53Anybody can hear it, see it, you know,
25:55or whatever. Um that's that's very
25:58obvious, you know, very easy to
26:00understand the need for that like the
26:02two teams and this and that and how much
26:04more dangerous it would be with just
26:06three. Um and that even the small fire
26:09well I mean small in terms of not a
26:12high-rise fire but that occurred you
26:14know last what December or something in
26:17um in interfaith you know it was it was
26:20small in in comparatively but yet it was
26:24very dangerous
26:25>> very intense. Yes. very intense um
26:27>> and and you know rescuing multiple
26:29people out of there takes takes a lot of
26:32staffing to do that
26:33>> and there was you know loss of life and
26:36different things and fire you know fire
26:38person injured too um so definitely um
26:42you know it's good it's good this is
26:44very good it can't it's coming you're
26:47being proactive but also you guys have
26:50gone so long without it now do we know
26:54um this is the last thing though So you
26:57were saying that the the recommendation
27:01not just for Firmingham but every or the
27:02the requirement is like what 39
27:05firefighters at certain fires and things
27:08like that.
27:09>> Yeah, that's for a high hazard building.
27:11>> Okay. Yeah, that makes sense.
27:12>> We do understand that, you know, that
27:14that certainly isn't going to happen
27:15overnight. Um again, my goal as the fire
27:18chief is is to tell you what we need. Um
27:21and and how we get how do we get there.
27:24Um, and you know, I think that's part of
27:26me coming up here with with Andy is to
27:28discuss. Um, and again, one of the great
27:31things that we have is our collaboration
27:32together. Um, there's very few uh locals
27:36and management that that can talk like
27:39this. Um, we have a great team. Uh, we
27:42have a great group of firefighters. Um,
27:45we understand get that, you know, these
27:47are the recommendations. Some of them,
27:49you know, might not be uh able to
27:52happen. um just because it's you know
27:54it's a s significant ask um so you know
27:57we are conscious about that
27:59>> we may have to add a few more phases
28:01that's
28:01>> yeah yeah and and and again our hope is
28:03at some point that this will be uh you
28:06know a phased approach
28:07>> yeah great thank you
28:09>> miss long
28:10>> thank you Mr. Chairman, so this is uh a
28:13particular interest to me uh because I
28:16have felt that you've been under staff
28:18for a long time as some other
28:20departments have been. Um, and what
28:23really concerns me as a procurement
28:25officer that sent out bids on
28:27construction, when I've done checking in
28:29Framingham on contractors, they're not
28:32pulling permits because owners of
28:35certain properties on Conquer Street and
28:38over don't want anybody in from ISD in
28:41their properties. So, that leads me to
28:44think there's the building codes being
28:46violated. Electrical fires, which we're
28:48getting a lot of on the south side.
28:50That's why because who knows who's
28:52wiring what and if they're illegally
28:54being wired or if they're up to code. So
28:57I'm this is something I'm really
28:58concerned about and I think you need to
29:00be staffed properly because of what's
29:03going on with permanent. I have talked
29:04to the building commissioner on this
29:06because I had to check references on a
29:08couple different contractors. Same
29:10thing. The owners of the property. I
29:12don't want them in my house. They're too
29:14nosy. They want too much stuff. And I'm
29:16like you serious?
29:18>> So if we, you know, we have a lot of
29:21that going on. It's hard to check to
29:23know where if there's permits not being
29:26pulled for electrical work.
29:28>> Yeah, it it is tough to follow up. We do
29:30have
29:30>> work. We have a we have a great
29:32partnership with the building uh
29:34department as well. Um we're in constant
29:36uh contact. You know, one of my staff
29:38members back here, Deputy Chief
29:39Jingress, he's a fire marshal and he's
29:41constantly uh
29:4420 or 30 times a day talking to the
29:46building department. So, I'm I'm not
29:47faulting you or the building department.
29:49I'm just saying that if we have people
29:51that are wiring illegally,
29:53>> yeah,
29:53>> their houses because they don't want to
29:55be under the scrutiny of ISTD, they
29:57don't want to pay for permits. They
29:58don't want to have to build deal with
29:59building code. That's what you have. And
30:01it's primarily, it seems like a lot on
30:03the south side of Framingham that that's
30:05going on. And that concerns me. So, I
30:07think we really need to be funded um
30:10properly and staff properly to prevent
30:14Framingham being on fire. And I will say
30:17I have called the fire department
30:18because the other thing that's going on
30:19is I've had some of my neighbors calling
30:22because people are burning
30:24they're burning furniture in their
30:25backyard on their lawn.
30:29>> Jingress.
30:29>> Who does that? Who does that? Yeah.
30:33>> So I get called because they're afraid
30:36to call their neighbor because they've
30:38gotten into
30:40>> Yeah.
30:40>> altercations. Let's put it that way. So
30:43I'm like, "Okay, I'll call anyway and
30:44I'll get them over there." But I mean
30:46that I'm just horrified. It's not in a
30:48fire pit. This is just on the lawn in a
30:50very treed area. So I think we need more
30:54firefighters. I think 990 is a good
30:56location for another fire station. Um
30:59and I don't see why you can't redevelop
31:01the one on on Water Street, which is
31:03right behind my house basically. So, I
31:08thank you for all you do and I
31:10appreciate the difficulties you have and
31:11I definitely support funding and
31:14supporting the fire department to
31:16increase your staffing.
31:18>> Much appreciated.
31:18>> So, because I know firsthand what goes
31:20on with that,
31:22>> Miss
31:24Thank you, Mr. Chair. Gentlemen, thank
31:26you so much for coming. When I first saw
31:28this report, I was horrified. uh mostly
31:30because you right now cannot get to my
31:32house in uh four minutes and even uh
31:36when you go through stage phase three
31:39you still will not get to my house. So
31:40this I'm being very selfish but um I
31:45have a lot of concerns about West
31:46Framingham which I love this new West
31:48Framingham but um
31:52the area around 990 and the tech park if
31:56we could talk about that for a second
31:58because I think
31:59I don't have a crystal ball, but I would
32:01say that that area is going to see some
32:03changes in the next decade, 20 years.
32:06And uh
32:07>> you have somebody in the back who may
32:08have a crystal ball to that?
32:09>> Yes. Yes.
32:12>> Um
32:14does that area right now count as a
32:17medium hazard with all of the
32:18pharmaceutical and lab work that's going
32:21in on the tech park?
32:22>> So, some of them are medium, some of
32:24them are actually considered high
32:25hazard.
32:27>> 39 firefighters. Okay. Um,
32:31which then further pushes why a station
32:34over there would be important. Um, how
32:38often are you pulled into mass pike
32:40accidents?
32:41>> Frequently.
32:42>> And what happens when that h when that
32:44happens?
32:44>> Uh, if it's a car accident, depending on
32:46where it is on the mass pike, it kind of
32:47depends on which truck goes. Um
32:49everything from the 9 and 90 exit east
32:55would be the tower
32:56>> up until a certain point and they go
32:58west as well. So where we have to go
33:00into Southboro if it's before the exit
33:02but before Southboro we actually have to
33:04go into Southboro come around turn
33:06around. So you drive a mile and a half
33:08two miles up the mass bike westbound to
33:10come down eastbound. Uh then engine
33:14seven covers the rest area east and then
33:17the rescue. any accident that's on the
33:19Mass Pike, the rescue has to respond to
33:20as well, just due to possible
33:22entrapments and other things that might
33:23be needed with the tools they have on
33:24their truck.
33:25>> Right. The big just just one more thing
33:27on that. The big thing about the Mass
33:28Pike is when you go there, you're
33:29committed, right? There's no you got to
33:31go from one exit to another. So when we
33:34when you know, we we get a report of
33:36something, you know, a multi-car
33:38accident. It it it might take, you know,
33:40um two or three fire companies plus uh
33:44you know, a few ambulances as well. And
33:45then those those resources are committed
33:48to the to the mass pike u for for you
33:51know sometimes an extended period
33:52depending how to get on and off and we
33:54can use some different ways to get on
33:56and off but uh we don't have any extra
33:58secret ways to get on and off but uh the
34:00one you know nice thing about Mass Pike
34:02is um there is a billing mechanism. So
34:05when we do go to the Mass Pike we we we
34:07bill the Mass Pike um for services
34:09rendered on on the Mass Pike. one of a
34:11few communities that is able to um to
34:15build the mass pike for that.
34:16>> Okay, that's good to know. Um
34:21>> what happens about mutual aid on the
34:23west side? Do you use Southboro, Malber?
34:26So if if everyone is say there's a big
34:29accident on the Pike, but then there's a
34:31fire in Feeasant Hill and all companies
34:34are busy, how often do we use mutual aid
34:37on that side?
34:38>> As needed. Uh and certainly Salt South
34:40Bro um would would probably be our
34:43primary uh company to get there. It's a
34:45little bit of a long shot for uh for
34:46Malro to get there. Um again we had you
34:49know you know a multi- alarm fire at one
34:51of the highrises Marro would be coming.
34:53Um so Malro I mean uh South Bro comes
34:59and you know
35:01depending on how their staffing looks.
35:04Uh
35:04>> are they still volunteer? No, no, they
35:06have a full-time department, but and and
35:07we have an agreement within our district
35:09that if you go from one community to
35:11another, you staff your you staff your
35:13piece with four with four firefighters.
35:16Um, but depending, they could be on a
35:18call or two and they might, you know,
35:20they're going to give us what they what
35:21they have left, but generally the
35:23agreement is four firefighters to come.
35:25Um, sometimes if they're tied up on
35:27something, you might not get four from
35:29them.
35:29>> Okay, that's good to know. I as a kid, I
35:31remember hearing the bell for their
35:33volunteer. So
35:34>> yeah, I think uh they don't I'm not
35:35sure. They have a little bit of a call
35:36department still. Um so I don't know if
35:39you heard it. They got a new station. So
35:40they got rid of part of that old bell
35:41over there. It's everything's over text
35:43now.
35:43>> Oh well that's that's that's good too.
35:45>> That's ruining traditions.
35:46>> Thing I would like to point out about
35:48mutual aid too is the communities around
35:49us by asking them to send us four
35:51firefighters. We're absolutely draining
35:52their fire protection.
35:54>> We are surrounded by smaller
35:55communities. You know I I told you about
35:58you know comparable communities of
35:59Newton and Waltham. They have the
36:00Bostons, the Camidages around them. They
36:02can afford to send one or two extra
36:04trucks to their communities to help
36:05them. The communities around us can't
36:06afford to do that,
36:08>> right? There's some of them where they
36:09have to send firefighters from one
36:10station in their town to another one to
36:12get on a truck before they can come to
36:14Framm to send four firefighters.
36:17>> Okay. My
36:18>> delay is a response.
36:19>> No, it's it's it's it's a good point.
36:21Um, and my final question is, so we're
36:23talking about West, this potential
36:26station at 990 down the line. What sort
36:28of strategic planning are we doing right
36:30now? uh about
36:34meeting the needs and of what we're
36:37looking at for the fire department for
36:38the next 10 20 years. Is this what is
36:42the conversation we're having with the
36:43administration moving forward? I love
36:46strategic planning. I wish we did it
36:48more, but I this is something that is
36:50not just it's your li it's the lives of
36:54firefighters, it's the lives of
36:55residents and property and this is a big
36:58deal.
36:58>> Yeah. And I think that those
37:00conversations are happening, right? Um
37:02there's, you know, there's a regular
37:03conversation. The poor mayor has to
37:05listen to me. You know, I talk about
37:07this, you know, quite a bit. Um so there
37:09is a lot of discussion with him and and
37:11you know, he um whether it's with him
37:14and then and Sari um talking about where
37:16are we going, where is the city going.
37:18Um so I think that's one of the reasons
37:20that we're here today. This is this is
37:22kind of um you know maybe our first
37:24formal push out of our strategic
37:27planning and where we need to be and
37:29where where we need to be and again we
37:31talk about the phasing where do we need
37:32to be in one year 3 years 5 years 10
37:35years 15 years um so yeah there's a lot
37:38of that discussion going on um and I
37:41think that's why we're here today and
37:43and you know thankfully that you know
37:45the study came out and you saw it and
37:46you and you asked us to come present it
37:48and I think this is a a huge step
37:50forward would um because I think I came
37:52here, you know, last couple of years and
37:54I have discussed, hey, I think I need we
37:56need more firefighters. We might need a
37:57new station. So, I think we're there.
37:59We're getting there.
38:00>> Well, thank you. I really appreciate and
38:01I look forward to hearing more as u we
38:04continue on.
38:05>> Mr. Stephanie,
38:06>> thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um first, thank
38:09you, gentlemen, for this very
38:10collaborative, comprehensive
38:13approach. Um, in another life, seemingly
38:17forever ago, I had I had the pleasure of
38:19authoring the state EMS and first
38:21responder law, which led to Framingham
38:24being on the cutting edge of getting
38:26minimum staffing. And I'll give you a
38:28perspective that's a little bit
38:30different than your safety perspective.
38:31To follow up on what you were saying a
38:32moment ago, at the time I was, in
38:34addition to being a selectman, I was the
38:36state rep for Framingham and Ashley. And
38:39you can imagine the stark differences
38:42between staffing in Framingham versus
38:44staffing in Ashland. What I don't think
38:46people realize is it changes the entire
38:50approach to the way in which we you
38:53gentlemen approach your professional
38:55activity. And in Ashlin at the time
38:57there were some fires and literally they
38:59arrived and they watched the building
39:01burn. They don't do search and res uh
39:04search and rescue. they don't do any
39:06kind of invasive and in Framingham we
39:08stop the fire and we rescue people. It
39:11it's that stark of a difference in terms
39:13of where it is. So I appreciate that
39:15very much and in the staffing. Um
39:19I guess all I would say is I would just
39:21say Mr. Chairman, when this conversation
39:24is done, I would hope that we refer this
39:26to the finance subcommittee or put this
39:28on the agenda so we can dig into this in
39:31a little bit more detail in terms of,
39:34you know, next steps and where we are.
39:36>> Thank you. Anybody else? Mr. Cannon,
39:38>> just briefly, Mr. Chairman, thank you
39:40guys. And and I chief, I I agree with
39:42you. It's unusual in most communities
39:43that the leadership on the management
39:45side and the leadership on the union
39:47side can speak so collaboratively, not
39:49just behind the scenes, but in a in a
39:50formal setting like that. It's very
39:51rare. Uh, and it it speaks loudly and it
39:54says a lot. It's it knowing you and
39:55working with all of you as we all do,
39:57it's not surprising at all, but it's
39:58great to see. Um I'm hopeful that in the
40:01planning that that continues to happen
40:02that um we'll talk about and thank you
40:06for touching on mutual aid, Andrew, and
40:09how other communities have larger
40:11communities around them in in you know
40:14as you move east, but they they look to
40:15Framingham uh to fill those voids uh
40:18when they're in our neck of the woods.
40:21Um, I'm hopeful we'll be nimble in our
40:25planning as ADUs seem to be sweeping
40:28every community in Massachusetts in a
40:30way that uh I don't know that was
40:33forecasted initially. Um, I'm curious
40:37how question seven, if that passes,
40:39which will just lead to a lot more
40:41building and a lot more density in areas
40:44where it wasn't planned or zoned, could
40:46do the same. Uh I was very impressed
40:48with how the department uh and the team
40:50worked with the new battery storage
40:52facility as that project was um under
40:55development. Uh
40:58so as electric cars I just things that
41:01were things that we probably 25 years
41:04ago didn't think were possible are just
41:06so in the foreground now. Um and uh and
41:10I'm hopeful that a new station uh where
41:13it makes sense is is sooner, you know,
41:15sooner rather than later. I know we talk
41:16about it broadly, but um however uh we
41:19can meaningfully put I almost said light
41:23a fire under that which is probably the
41:24worst. I'll leave the comments there.
41:27Thank you team. Thank you for your
41:29collaboration and all you do for our
41:30community. Thanks Mr. Chairman.
41:32>> Thank you Mr. Wood.
41:35>> Uh thank you chair. Thank you guys for
41:37the presentation. Um really appreciate
41:39you guys diving into the details and and
41:42yeah starting this conversation. I know
41:45some of these kind of recommendations at
41:47one point in time I think were part of
41:49the last budget cycle before we or at
41:51least the ideal proposed budget that you
41:54know we would look to have and um had to
41:58be paired back given some of the
41:59financial situations within the city. Um
42:02I would be interested in hearing um uh
42:05two quick questions. you know,
42:09it would be great to bring um you know,
42:11do phase one and bring all the staffing
42:12up to four per per vehicle. Do do you
42:15have an order of priority within um th
42:18those those staffing requests? Because
42:21um I do think, you know, it's when we
42:25say 30 to 33, it's it sounds
42:28a little easier than to say 12 hire 12
42:31firefighters. Um though we can cover it
42:33with overtime. And then my other
42:35question is what does the process look
42:37like in regards to upgrades to our
42:40existing stations? Um, and how is that
42:43dialogue taking place if at all? And how
42:45do we I think do a better how do we do a
42:48better job of getting those kind of
42:49projects on the capital budget?
42:52You mind if I take this one?
42:54>> Okay. Yeah. So, uh, you know, the
42:56priority really would be staffing for on
42:58on each on each apparatus. Um,
43:04But but but do you distinguish between
43:05like when I when I look when I look and
43:07see raising tower one, raising ladder
43:10three, rescue one, do you do you have a
43:12priority list within that or is it it's
43:15just all or none?
43:16>> No, it's you know of of course we
43:18wouldn't uh you know say no to any sort
43:20of increase. Um and I think it would be
43:22preferable to when and we say and and
43:24when andy talks about you know 30 to 33
43:28that's per group. So everything we have
43:29to do is times four.
43:31>> Yeah. No.
43:32>> Yeah. And I just want to make sure that
43:33that's clear.
43:33>> No, 100%. I guess the reason I ask is,
43:38>> you know, if we say we're going to
43:40increase one fiscal this year, like
43:42let's find a way to fund one this year.
43:43Let's find a way to fund one next year
43:45and let's way to find a way to do that's
43:48>> let's break it up in a way we can
43:49actually get there.
43:50>> I would never draw the line in the sand
43:52and say no, I I don't want one. I don't
43:54want two. you know I you know giving you
43:56my recommendation but I think at the end
43:58of the day it's you know it it's you
44:00know we'd be very thankful and grateful
44:02for you know any any sort of increase
44:04>> I think if with viscus referred to the
44:06finance subcommittee I think at least
44:08for I'm not on that committee but it
44:10would be helpful for me to have that
44:11kind of laid out so that and I think
44:14maybe hopefully for others maybe gives
44:16them something a little bit more to act
44:17on but then yeah I guess the other
44:18question is around the the
44:22um the physical buildings within which
44:24you operate which as anyone who's been
44:26been into knows
44:28need work. They they need serious uh
44:30work. Um in some ways it's kind of
44:33embarrassing uh the living quarters.
44:35Well, not some ways it is embarrassing
44:36the the quarters we're asking our
44:38firefighters to work in and how do we
44:39make improvements there? Yeah, the real,
44:41you know, we've had a lot of discussions
44:42with the mayor. Um, in particular, you
44:45know, station one on Route 9 seems to be
44:48um, you know, it's a built in the 60s,
44:50even though some of the other buildings
44:51got built in the 60s, but they've had
44:53we've had some rehab going on. Um, and
44:55you know, Conquered Street's had some
44:56some real significant upgrades. We got a
44:59new roof in the building. We got a new
45:00parking lot. Um we we were part of the
45:02geothermal project over there and that's
45:05you know really made a huge difference
45:07um in that building and and the upgrades
45:09have really been appreciated. Uh morale
45:11is through the roof at that station
45:14literally uh in a great way. New
45:16kitchen, we got new kitchen, right? Um
45:19uh but yeah, I think you know the next
45:20one uh and Ann Andy can really talk um
45:23to this. I spent seven years at station
45:25one. um he is currently at station one
45:29and he knows the conditions at that
45:31station and and again our workforce is
45:33changing. Um you know uh when in 1968-69
45:38when station one was built um there were
45:40no female firefighters. Uh now we have
45:42three female firefighters and one is
45:44stationed there and it's big open dorms.
45:47um there's very little privacy there and
45:50uh so um there's you know there's no
45:52real complaints about it but there's
45:53there's a recognition that upgrades um
45:56to today's standards need to happen. um
45:59not on top of some of the electrical
46:00components in the building just weren't
46:03designed to handle um you know
46:05somebody's charging a cell phone uh you
46:07know and this you can see the lights dim
46:10you know um you know again it's it's you
46:13know the the firefighters do a great job
46:16um you know they'll they'll say things
46:17to me but they do a great job of
46:19maintaining the buildings um Jim Palini
46:21with facilities helps us out a
46:23significant amount um you know they they
46:25they clean the building every day um
46:28they live there. Um they clean it, they
46:30maintain it. So they do a fantastic job
46:32of that. But some of the building and
46:35that one specifically is really um at at
46:38end of life uh for for what it was
46:41designed for.
46:44>> Thank you.
46:46So, I basically Brandon brought up what
46:48I was going to bring up because I have
46:50been in pretty much all of the stations
46:52just because either take my kids there
46:54or now my grandkids and um I remember
46:57station two did with the roof you used
47:00to leave buckets under each section. So,
47:03that was sort of like your new roof that
47:04you got when you got new buckets. And I
47:06I just couldn't even like fathom how
47:09that that station stayed open. And you
47:12know, you look at seven and I mean I the
47:15the recliners are like the original like
47:18I I don't know how those guys do it
47:20there because it you know and they never
47:22complain you know they never you know
47:25and then you go to you know Andy your
47:27your station is um I mean is it like the
47:31wallpaper it's like the cigarette smoke
47:33like the it just it's like that shade of
47:35but you guys never complain. you you you
47:38know you walk us around when we come in
47:39to visit to the kids come in um and
47:43these are an issue and I mean you're
47:45you're talking you know um two fire
47:49stations that are you know I see them
47:52both really at end of life in in the
47:54sense um and I think that you know to
47:57sit up here and for us to all listen and
47:59anybody that's you know watching and
48:01everybody here is you know of course we
48:03want to keep you guys staff that you can
48:08do your jobs and not only keep us safe
48:10but keep yourselves safe and I think
48:13that this is a good first step. Um I
48:16know that that you guys put a lot into
48:19this report and I know Andy will you
48:21know I he every time you see him he will
48:25tell you about it and in case you miss
48:27something he'll you know he'll tell you
48:29something else that you didn't hear the
48:30last time. But I think that these
48:33numbers are, you know, they are
48:35staggering and I I I think that just by
48:38the sheer growth and, you know, to
48:40Mike's point about question seven, that
48:42could really change. Um, and you see the
48:44ADUs now, that is part of our topic
48:47tonight. Um, they are going up
48:49everywhere and you are adding um onto
48:53lots that weren't zoned that way. And so
48:56now we're finding ways and we even heard
48:58the governor. I do believe she said she
49:00wants 200,000 new homes across the the
49:03state and that's you know density is
49:05what they want. So these are all
49:08long-term things that I think that you
49:09know I think it's good that we're
49:10hearing this now and then um I think
49:14that I'd be in support of you know you
49:17know our our team up here to you know do
49:20what we can do to uh work with the mayor
49:22and yourselves. Um but I I think I speak
49:24for everyone too. I don't usually say
49:27that, but I, you know, in this
49:28situation, I think that, you know, we
49:31have to, you know, act on this and, you
49:33know, it's a good first step. So, thank
49:35you.
49:35>> Thank you.
49:36>> So, thank you. Uh, I'm going to take one
49:38comment from Zoom and then I'm going to
49:40end this session because we have other
49:41things we have to talk about, but I
49:42appreciate
49:42>> make one more point there, Mr. Chairman.
49:45>> Uh, two quick facts. Number one, calls
49:49since 1986 have increased 170%. Our
49:51staffing has decreased by 18%.
49:54Number two, I know everyone's kind of
49:55squirmish about hiring firefighters.
49:58There's a couple things that we've been
49:59working on to help with that. Uh, one,
50:02the chief has been applying for a safer
50:03grant through the federal government,
50:04which helps pay for hiring firefighters
50:06for last five years. But also, I've been
50:09working with Representative Priscilla
50:11Souza on House Bill 620, which would
50:14have state colleges that have dorms in
50:17cities help pay for the fire department
50:19because they pay for their own police
50:20departments, no problem, but they use
50:21the municipal fire departments for all
50:23their calls. And that's the place we've
50:24been going to a lot over the last 5
50:26years. So, uh, that's something that's
50:29also in the works.
50:30>> Okay. Thank you for that. That's a good
50:31point about the colleges. All right. I'm
50:33gonna take one one comment from Zoom and
50:35then we will refer this to finance
50:38subcommittee. Sarah Lever, you can talk
50:40for two minutes. Can you please state
50:41your name and address?
50:48You there?
50:54>> Last chance.
50:58>> Apologies. It was a technical error.
51:00>> Okay.
51:02So would you like to speak?
51:04>> No, I would not.
51:05>> Oh, okay. Thank you very much. Okay.
51:08Thank you both very much for coming in
51:09and presenting.
51:09>> Thank you very much.
