2026-10-20 - Fire Staffing Presentation to City Council

Summary

Built from auto-captions (no speaker labels; names and figures are often garbled). This recording was posted by a private individual, not the city, and covers the fire staffing presentation at the October 20, 2026 City Council meeting. Councilors are mostly unidentified in the captions; only those addressed by name are linked.

  • Fire Chief Fire Chief Brian (surname unclear) and Andrew Oaks, president of Framingham Firefighters Local 1652, presented a union-commissioned staffing and GIS study to the Council, then took questions.
  • George P. King Jr chaired and ended the session after a Zoom commenter declined to speak, saying the matter would be referred to the Finance Subcommittee.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk):

Topic Minutes Share
Fire Department Staffing 39 76%
Western Framingham Fire Station 7 14%
Fire Station Facilities 5 10%

Fire Department Staffing

0:00-31:22, 38:05-44:17, 49:36-51:09

  • The chief said he agrees with the study's findings. It covers January 2019 to December 2023: 60,538 incidents and 93,945 responses across the five stations, mapped with GIS.
  • Key findings: the three specialty trucks (Ladder 3, Tower 1, Rescue 1) run three firefighters against the NFPA 1710 standard of four; population density in every part of the city is high enough that NFPA calls for five or six on a truck.
  • Coverage figures cited (best case, trucks in station): low-hazard buildings reached by 17 firefighters in 8 minutes, 25% of the city now, 37% with a fourth firefighter per truck, then 46% and 57% in later phases; medium-hazard (26 firefighters in 8 minutes), 1% now, 16%, 24% and 30%. High-hazard buildings (39 personnel in 10 minutes) were not mapped because the department cannot meet that standard until phase three.
  • Phases recommended: add a fourth person to every frontline apparatus (five engines at four, two ladders and the heavy rescue at three); add a ladder company at Station 2; add an engine company and deputy chief at Station 1.
  • Speakers argued four-person crews search 50% faster and complete tasks about 25% faster, citing national fire-ground studies; staffing has been the same since about 1993-94, calls since 1986 are up 170% and staffing down 18%, and comparable cities such as Newton and Waltham staff more per shift. About 30 firefighters are on shift, one of them a dispatcher.
  • The ask: let the mayor and chief meet with the union to raise minimum staffing from 30 to 33 per shift (about 12 hires across four groups), covered by overtime for now; develop a multi-year plan for the rest of the study; keep working toward a sixth station in western Framingham.
  • A councilor asked about overtime fatigue and cost versus hiring; the presenters agreed hiring is still needed. Another asked how to phase it; the chief said every apparatus is the priority but any increase would be welcome and it can be funded in steps.
  • Christine Long voiced strong support and raised concern that unpermitted electrical and other work, mainly on the south side, adds fire risk, and that outdoor furniture burning is being reported by neighbors. John Stefanini spoke of Framingham's early minimum-staffing law and the difference from smaller departments, and asked that the matter go to the Finance Subcommittee. Michael Cannon praised the management-union collaboration and asked that planning stay flexible given ADUs, the possible effect of ballot Question 7, and the new battery storage facility. Brandon Ward (captioned "Mr. Wood") said parts of this were in the ideal budget last cycle but were pared back.
  • Funding ideas mentioned: a federal SAFER grant application, and House Bill 620 (credited to a state representative whose name the captions render as Priscilla Souza) to have state colleges with dorms contribute to fire costs.
  • Outcome: no vote; to be referred to the Finance Subcommittee.

Western Framingham Fire Station

31:22-38:05

  • A councilor whose home is in West Framingham said the study shows the area, including the 990 and tech park area with lab and pharmaceutical buildings (some medium, some high hazard), is poorly covered, and asked about long-term planning.
  • Presenters described Mass Pike responses (frequent, with billing to the Turnpike), reliance on Southborough mutual aid with an agreement to send four-person crews, and the strain this puts on smaller neighbors.
  • The chief called the presentation perhaps the first formal push of ongoing strategic planning with the administration.

Fire Station Facilities

44:17-49:35

  • Station 1 on Route 9 (built in 1968-69) is at end of life: open dorms with little privacy, electrical capacity problems. Station 5 on Concord Street has had a new roof, parking lot, kitchen and geothermal work.
  • Councilors described Stations 2 and 7 as in poor condition (roof leaks, worn furnishings) and asked how to get station projects into the capital budget. One councilor said the Council should act and called this a good first step.

Other business

  • Presenters pointed to the study being in the agenda backup material and on the union's Facebook page.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00I got a seat for her right here. All

00:02right. Uh good evening, counselors, and

00:04uh thank you for the opportunity to

00:06discuss the Framingham Fire Department

00:07GIS study. Uh tonight, I'll be

00:10co-presenting with uh Andrew Oaks. He's

00:12the president of Framingham

00:13Firefighters, Local 1652. And we're also

00:16joined by members of Local 1652's

00:19leadership team and my administrative

00:21team in the back. Uh this uh study was

00:24commissioned by local 1652 through the

00:27international association of

00:28firefighters to provide an independent

00:30assessment of our department's current

00:31operations, staffing, and service

00:34demands. I want to emphasize at the

00:37outset that I agree uh with the study's

00:40findings and recommendations.

00:43The report reinforces what we have been

00:44experiencing firsthand. As Frammingham

00:47continues to grow and emergency services

00:50demands increase, we must evaluate

00:52whether our staffing, facilities, and

00:56resources are keeping pace with the

00:57needs of our community. The study

00:59provides valuable independent support

01:01for the investments we need to make to

01:04maintain firefighter safety and deliver

01:06effective, reliable emergency services.

01:09Uh we'll provide a brief presentation uh

01:12highlighting the study's key findings

01:14and recommendations. Uh following the

01:17presentation, uh we'll welcome your

01:19questions and look forward to discussing

01:20how we can use the information to plan

01:22responsibly for the future and continue

01:24providing the highest level of service

01:27to the residents of Framingham.

01:29We have the study up. Could we go to the

01:31next slide, please?

01:35Thank you. Uh just some real quick facts

01:38uh about the study. Um

01:41this study was done uh from January 2019

01:46through December 2023. So we have uh

01:49just about five solid years worth of

01:51data. Um

01:54about 60,000 uh you can see 60,538

01:58incidents were analyzed

02:00uh and that included 93,945

02:04responses. Um the method was using GIS

02:08mapping in our run data. Um again I

02:12talked about five years worth of data

02:14and it was all five of our stations were

02:16mapped out.

02:19Next slide please.

02:23Uh some key findings uh from the study

02:26um Andy want to take over.

02:27>> Absolutely chief. So some of the key

02:29findings that were found when the study

02:31was concluded was that uh one the three

02:33specialty trucks for the Framian fire

02:35department are underst staffed per NFPA

02:371710 standard which is four firefighters

02:39per truck. We run three on those trucks

02:41right now. That is the uh ladder three

02:43tower one and rescue one.

02:45Uh the other things that was found was

02:48that uh the density of Framingham

02:49surprisingly is extremely high. Uh I

02:51know we had that moniker for the longest

02:53time. We're the largest town in

02:55Massachusetts, maybe the United States.

02:57Population per square mile. Uh so the

02:59NFPA looks at that as anything over

03:033,000 people per square mile should have

03:05at least six firefighters on the trucks

03:06in those areas. Anything over from 1,000

03:09to 2,999 people per square mile should

03:12have five.

03:13All sections of Framingham met one of

03:15those markers. That's a a huge issue

03:17obviously for staffing issues for us.

03:22And as far as the final stuff that was

03:24found, like I said earlier, this was

03:27taken from all the different data

03:29points, which is a big thing to point

03:30out is this is all facts. It's not our

03:32opinions here tonight. This is totally

03:34factfound.

03:38>> I think no, that's good. Next slide,

03:41please. Um, we're going to be using some

03:42words here, so we just kind of want to

03:44define them a little bit. Um, kind of

03:45building hazards. Uh, we talk about low

03:48h low hazard buildings. Uh these are

03:50single family uh buildings that we

03:52respond to. Um

03:55our our our guidelines are are uh the

03:58National Fire Protection Agency uh NFPA

04:02uh 1710. They define how we are supposed

04:04to respond. Um and and within their

04:08definitions are some lowhazard

04:10buildings. So a lowhazard building, a

04:12single family home, we're supposed to

04:14respond the standard is to respond with

04:1617 personnel within 8 minutes. a

04:18mediumhazard building. Um these are town

04:21homes, uh garden style apartments, uh

04:24strip malls. Um we're supposed to have

04:2726 personnel in 8 minutes. High hazard.

04:30These are uh high-rise buildings. Um at

04:35the college at uh uh up and down Route

04:389. Um and we're supposed to have uh

04:42these high-hazard buildings were

04:43supposed to have 39 personnel within 10

04:45minutes. Next slide.

04:52So this next slide is just a quick map

04:54of Framingham. It the red dots there

04:56represent the stations here in

04:57Framingham. Uh the orange sections are

05:00like I was saying earlier about the

05:01density. Uh this is why I wanted to show

05:03it is that's the area of anywhere

05:05between a,000 to 2,99 people in it.

05:08Anything that's the dark red is over

05:093,000 people per square mile. Uh, like I

05:12said, all of Framingham now has those

05:15factors where they need at least five or

05:16six firefighters on a truck. We're

05:18asking for four on a truck. So, I think

05:20we're making a bit of a concession

05:22there. Personally,

05:24um, the biggest thing here is we just

05:26want to make sure our department's

05:26prepared to respond to all these

05:28situations that are coming up. Uh, it's

05:30no longer just fires or medicals. We're

05:32seeing electric car vehicles and

05:33everything else coming through here. We

05:35have uh the buses that are coming

05:37through here now. what uh liquid propane

05:40>> hydrogen's coming in a few years, but we

05:42have CNG buses at this point right now.

05:44>> So,

05:45>> I think it is our responsibility to

05:47provide effective emergency responses

05:48regardless of what part of the city

05:50someone lives in though. Uh that's why I

05:52think having four on every truck is one

05:54of the biggest driving points for us

05:55here.

05:57So, one of the components that uh next

05:59slide please. Sorry.

06:02One of the components of the study uh

06:04discussed uh staffing um and uh the

06:08study uh surveyed um a few different

06:11data points. Uh what our current

06:13staffing and our deployment is. That's

06:16>> um our current staffing and deployment

06:18with NFPA standards.

06:21Uh we'll get to this part in in a future

06:23slide. uh phase two and ladder companies

06:25added to uh station two and then phase

06:28three and engine and deputy chief added

06:31to station one. Next slide please.

06:35Uh as I uh kind of just mentioned um the

06:38study had uh uh some recommendations for

06:41us and as you can see uh the slide here

06:44um it uh it goes through the different

06:46phases. Um you know the first phase is

06:48adding one person one more member to

06:51each of the to each truck uh to each

06:54apparatus that responds. We currently

06:56have eight frontline fire apparatus that

07:00respond to calls. Five engine companies

07:02uh two ladder companies and one heavy

07:05rescue. Um currently the five engine

07:09companies have four members on it. Uh

07:12the two ladder companies have three and

07:14the heavy rescue has three as well. Uh

07:16the recommendations from the study uh

07:19are uh just that phase one adding a

07:22fourth person to each uh to each

07:26frontline apparatus. Um and as we go

07:29through uh and again we understand that

07:31there is uh you know uh financial

07:33implications for this and that's why um

07:36you know the study had some

07:38recommendations on you know a phased

07:40approach and not just hey throwing this

07:43all at you at one time. It's a phased

07:45approach. Um, as you can see, phase two

07:48is adding uh firefighters

07:52uh uh to all the to all the pieces um

07:55and a ladder truck at station two. Uh

07:58phase three uh is is um again adding a

08:03deputy chief uh and um an aid to uh to

08:10each uh to station one and and station

08:12five. Station one is Route Nine. Um,

08:16station two is A Street. Um, station

08:19three is headquarters and Luring Drive.

08:22Station five is Conquered Street and

08:23station seven is Winter Street. Uh,

08:26Water Street, excuse me.

08:32>> You want me to keep going on this one

08:33there, Chief?

08:34>> Uh, yeah, next slide, please. I'm sorry.

08:38>> So, uh, this next slide describes, uh,

08:40response metrics through those phases.

08:42Uh, something I think is important for

08:43everyone to understand is there's a big

08:45difference between getting a fire truck

08:46to an emergency and getting enough

08:47firefighters there to effectively handle

08:48that emergency. When someone calls 911

08:51because their house is on fire, they

08:52don't need just a fire truck to pull up

08:54in front of their house. They need

08:55firefighters that can stretch hose

08:56lines, establish a water supply, search

08:58for trapped occupants, ventilate the

09:00building, and begin saniting that fire.

09:04Many of those operations need to happen

09:05at the same time. That's what makes

09:07staffing so important. When we look at

09:09these maps that will be coming up in the

09:11following slides as well, you'll see how

09:14deficient we are in getting firefighters

09:16to places in in the aotted time by NFPA.

09:19So the current slide here, you'll see

09:22our low hazards start at 25% of the city

09:24is covered by our current staffing where

09:26we can get 17 firefighters in 8 minutes

09:28to a houseire. If we add a fourth

09:31firefighter to every truck, that brings

09:33it up to 37%. I know some of you have

09:35seen the study. I've sat down with a few

09:36of you. I've showed you the active

09:38mapping where you can actually punch in

09:39an address through the study and you can

09:41see if your house is covered. So, uh,

09:45phase two, you see that it jumps to 68%

09:47by adding an additional ladder company.

09:49And then phase three or excuse me, 46%

09:53phase three jumps to 57% by adding

09:55additional engine company.

09:57Uh, medium hazards, it's 1% right now.

10:01It It's not good. I'm not trying to be

10:03an alarmist here. I'm not trying to

10:04scare anybody, but 1% of the city, we

10:06can get 26 firefighters there in 8

10:08minutes. That's a problem. Uh, by just

10:10adding that fourth firefighter each

10:12truck, you can get 16%. Which, you know,

10:1616% doesn't sound a lot, but it's a lot

10:17better than 1%.

10:19And as you add the ladder and the extra

10:21engine company in phases two and three,

10:23respectively, you get to 24 and 30%. Uh,

10:26you'll notice we didn't do a high hazard

10:27slide for the mapping. Uh, I thought it

10:29was too depressing personally. That's

10:31why I didn't add it. Uh because until

10:33you hit phase three, we don't even have

10:35enough firefighters to handle high-rise

10:37fire by FBA standards. Not saying we

10:39can't do it because we do it ever almost

10:41every day, but we just don't do it

10:44safely. Uh I was personally at a fire

10:47just a few years ago where we almost

10:48lost multiple firefighters. So it's

10:51something that's near and dear to me and

10:52it was at a high-rise fire.

10:57>> Next slide, please.

10:58>> You want to keep going?

10:59>> Y.

11:01So this is the mapping I was discussing.

11:03Uh you'll see on the left is our current

11:05staffing model. Uh anything in blue we

11:08can reach in eight minutes. You'll

11:10notice it's mostly eastern Framingham.

11:12Uh West Framingham and Knobscot and a

11:15lot of the South Framingham are left out

11:16of this unfortunately just due to the

11:18amount of firefighters we have on shift

11:20and where stations are located. I know

11:22the chief and assistant chief have

11:24mentioned adding a sixth station to

11:26Western Framingham at some point and as

11:27you can tell from the mapping is

11:29desperately needed. It actually comes up

11:31in the study as well. They do mention

11:32trying to find a a station for western

11:35Framingham. By adding that fourth

11:37firefighter, everything that's dark blue

11:39is the additional that you get. So, you

11:41cover a little more of Central

11:41Framingham and South Framingham as well

11:43as northeast Framingham in Saxonville.

11:45But, uh, Knobscot and West Frammium are

11:47still left lacking.

11:53And next slide, please.

11:58Medium hazard. Like I said, 1% it's a

12:01little depressing. It's pretty much

12:04right behind station 5. That's it. Uh

12:07with our current staffing model, uh 26

12:10firefighters in the city, it's pretty

12:11much everybody. We have 30 firefighters

12:13on shift, but one of them is a

12:14dispatcher. So, it's really 29

12:15firefighters that we have responding to

12:17calls. So, 26 is pretty much everybody

12:19going to that fire. Like I said, by

12:21adding that fourth firefighter, though,

12:22you can see the dark blue, it expands it

12:24quite a bit of what we can cover and get

12:25those firefighters there in the time

12:27that's needed.

12:31Next slide, please.

12:35>> So, this slide is why do we need four

12:37firefighters and why is that important

12:39to us? Uh

12:42the I discussed the uh the trucks that

12:44don't have four firefighters. So, the

12:45heavy rescue, why is it important for us

12:47to have four firefighters? The heavy

12:49rescue is responsible for our primary

12:51searching at structure fires. With three

12:54firefighters on the rescue truck, a

12:55primary search must be completed as a

12:57team uh of three firefighters. We have a

13:00rule of two in and two out that we must

13:02maintain integrity with each other. Um

13:06and it's two in two out. So you always

13:08you can't be alone. You must be with a

13:10with a another member. By adding the

13:13fourth member, our search can be

13:14completed 50% faster by breaking up into

13:17two teams of two.

13:21And no priority is more important on the

13:24fire ground than the safety of the

13:25firefighters.

13:26Life safety in period period. Uh why do

13:30we need four firefighters on on the

13:32aerial trucks? Uh tower one and ladder

13:343. They're responsible for forcible

13:36entry. How do we get into the place when

13:39it's locked? When things are are uh

13:41doors are locked and we are closed and

13:44we can't get in. They're responsible for

13:46ventilation of the building, making the

13:47interior more tenable and increasing

13:50victim's survivability.

13:52Ventilation must be coordinated effort

13:55with an engine company to ensure the

13:56fire does not grow. Again, we can break

13:58up into two person or two member teams

14:01and and accomplish things twice as fast.

14:06Just add one more thing to that too is

14:08uh I don't ride the rescue personally,

14:10but I do ride the tower, so I know truck

14:12work and it it's backbreaking work when

14:14you're on a roof cutting a hole,

14:15especially when it's snowy or icy and

14:17cold and windy. Uh my brother rides the

14:19rescue. Uh Janet, I know you did some

14:22training with my brother when we did our

14:23fire ops, and you know how intense it is

14:26to try to search. We searched a small

14:28apartment with you in Noval. Uh

14:30>> we thought we were going to die

14:31>> right now. We weren't going to let that

14:34happen.

14:35Now, think of a triple decker on the

14:37south side, though, where it's the

14:38rescue is doing the search and there's

14:40three of them and they have to search

14:42three different apartments.

14:44That's not fair to the residents of

14:45Fremium. I'm sorry.

14:49Uh, next slide, please.

14:55Uh, we just put this in here because,

14:56uh, these are some pretty, uh, big

14:57studies that were done, uh, kind of

14:59landmark studies for the fire service.

15:01Um these studies were done a few years

15:03ago but uh it still holds true today. Um

15:08the study uh shows that four

15:10firefighters uh uh can have to or

15:13firefighters complete 22 essential fire

15:15ground operations 25% faster than three

15:19firefighters. I'm going to say that

15:21again.

15:22Four fighters complete 22 essential fire

15:26ground tasks 25% faster than three

15:30firefighters.

15:32Time is money. Time is is life in our

15:35business.

15:36The study also found that every single

15:38task was completed faster, but

15:40specifically search was initiated and

15:42executed 30% faster with victims being

15:45removed from uh immediate uh dangers to

15:48life and health environments

15:50uh 27% faster. Ventilation was completed

15:5430% faster.

15:56Uh the the study also uh was it happened

15:59in Washington DC and they they did this

16:01study and it was uh and it concluded

16:03that ladder and rescue uh companies um

16:07they took 12 minutes longer to complete

16:09with a crew of three versus a crew of

16:12four.

16:13Next slide.

16:14>> Can I actually say one more thing on

16:15that, Chief? Once again, not trying to

16:18be alarmist here, but the chief just

16:20said 25% faster, 27% faster. That's

16:24time. When you think about that for

16:25somebody who's trapped in a house fire

16:27or someone who's, you know, having

16:30issues, that's a lot of time. Seconds

16:32feel like hours when you're in those

16:34situations.

16:37And that could be the difference between

16:38life and death for somebody by just

16:40adding one additional firefighter to to

16:42trucks.

16:45>> Next slide, please.

16:49>> Wrap up.

16:50>> Absolutely.

16:53So this final slide or no, excuse me,

16:55not the final slide, but this is just a

16:57conclusion from the study itself. What

16:59they found, uh, basically what they're

17:01saying is that Framm is understaffed for

17:04the fire department for a city of our

17:05size. Um, some of you have heard me say

17:07probably before, Premium is larger than

17:09the Burrow of Manhattan with square

17:11mileage. You know, so we have 30

17:14firefighters covering on paper 78,000

17:17people. Reality, we know it's more.

17:21Their recommendations are, and these

17:22are, like I said, recommendations from

17:23the NFPA, is four firefighters on every

17:25truck, look for that western station

17:28eventually, you know, add those

17:30additional companies so that we can

17:31properly staff our fire department for a

17:33city of our size. If you look at

17:35comparable cities to ours, Newton's and

17:38Walthams, they've got a lot more

17:40firefighters on the shift than we do,

17:42and they're doing a lot less calls than

17:44we do.

17:45That's significant. So, we've been

17:48staffed the same way since, I believe,

17:501993.

17:52>> 94.

17:52>> Yes. Since 93.

17:54>> I was born in 1987. I was six.

17:59>> Thank you for that presentation.

18:00Appreciate you taking the time and

18:01effort to do it.

18:02>> There's actually a couple more slides.

18:04>> Oh, I thought it was the last slide.

18:05>> So, we do we just have one more because

18:07we want people to to check the study out

18:09for themselves.

18:09>> Okay.

18:10>> Um Eddie, why don't you go here and then

18:12I'll I'll finish with the with the

18:14>> So, what are we looking for? It's pretty

18:16simple and straightforward. Uh local

18:181652 is asking the city council to allow

18:20the mayor and chief to sit down with

18:22local 1652 leadership to increase our

18:24minimum staffing from 30 to 33. Uh that

18:27can be done through overtime. Right now,

18:29we have enough firefighters hired that

18:31we don't need to hire someone right now.

18:33We can just do it by increasing our

18:34overtime budget a little bit. Uh this

18:37will allow us to staff all of our

18:39frontline apparatus with four

18:40firefighters. Additionally, we'd like to

18:43have the city council work with the

18:44mayor, Chief Duter, and myself to

18:47formulate a plan to implement the rest

18:48of the study for a reasonable and

18:50responsible timeline. I understand that

18:51the city's in a hard financial crunch

18:53right now. I don't expect things to be

18:54done overnight. It's a big ask, but it

18:57is something we do need to be planning

18:58for because we're already behind the

19:00eightball with this. You know, we should

19:01have been increasing our staffing years

19:03ago. So, and then to complete, you know,

19:07or continue work with the mayor and the

19:08city council to identify a site in

19:10western Framingham, possibly in the 990

19:12area for a sixth fire station. I

19:14understand that's a long-term goal. You

19:16know, that's not something that can be

19:17built overnight. Obviously, it can't be

19:18built in a year.

19:20five, six, 10 years down the road.

19:23But that would help with our response

19:25times in western Premium as well as

19:26northwestern Knobscott, which as you can

19:29see from those maps is a very neglected

19:31area for getting firefighters on scene

19:33in a reasonable time.

19:36>> All right, next slide. And I I I promise

19:39this is the last slide.

19:41>> No, that's okay. Uh I I I think uh uh

19:44both uh Andy and I and I wanted people

19:47to be able to touch and and look at the

19:49study themselves. Um we are always

19:52available for questions um

19:56at any time. I I carry my phone with me

19:58all the time except for right now it's

19:59in the back but Chief Schultz is keeping

20:01an eye on it. Uh we are always available

20:04for questions um and to answer. So, uh,

20:07with that link, uh, the Frammingham Fire

20:09Department, you can click on that link

20:10and and, uh, get the the study yourself

20:13so you can see it with your own eyes.

20:14>> And for anybody who's looking, this is

20:15in our backup material on our agenda

20:18item tonight.

20:18>> Also, you can find it on Local 1652's

20:21Facebook page. Not trying to plug our

20:22Facebook page or anything, but we do

20:24have it posted there as well for people

20:26to see. Um, one thing I will say is it's

20:28not very mobile friendly. It's more web-

20:30based, so you should use it on a

20:32computer to get the full experience. Uh

20:34all those maps are interactive though.

20:36Like I said, you can punch in your

20:37address. You can punch in your mom and

20:39dad's address, your grandparents

20:40address, whoever. See if the fire

20:42department can reach you in the time

20:43frame. And that mapping, the big thing

20:45to understand about that is that's best

20:47case scenario where all the trucks are

20:49in the station. We did 93,000 responses

20:53in 5 years. I think currently we're at

20:5560 something thousand for the last two

20:57years. So we are getting busier. The

20:59trucks are almost never in the stations.

21:02So best case scenario, that's what those

21:04mappings show.

21:06>> Thank you, Brian.

21:08>> Thank you. Um so I do I have some

21:11questions. Thank you for the report as

21:13always, you know, very good. Um but so

21:17you said um so in terms of um you

21:21mentioned indie calls are are you resp

21:24um speaking of responses to fires or all

21:27the calls that you get responding to

21:29like you know when people have have to

21:31go to the hospital respiratory failure

21:33whatever.

21:34>> Yeah. That that's all calls. Okay. That

21:36was all calls. Yes.

21:37>> Okay. Um because like you know with the

21:40fire definitely you need the four. And

21:42then the other thing is um so if you add

21:47um an additional person to what is it

21:51eight different

21:52>> just three counselor

21:53>> okay three okay so so it would be just

21:58what 12 people or just

21:59>> yes you have to hire 12 people but like

22:01I said it could be backfilled currently

22:03with overtime

22:05>> now I that's another thing so but if

22:08overtime is good to a point right but

22:11you still would need to have a like be

22:14looking to hire because service goes

22:16down if you overwork the people.

22:18Correct.

22:18>> Correct.

22:19>> And then um like in terms of money too

22:23over time is great for when you're

22:25making it but at the same time does it

22:26drain some of the money from hiring too

22:30and definitely the time. Okay. But still

22:33good good plan so far. um in terms of um

22:38where you feel um you need um the fire

22:42departments, right? I think the one you

22:44said over at 990 that's probably a good

22:46place too. But now do you have data that

22:49shows like where you guys have to

22:51respond to the most? Like let's say

22:53let's just say District 9 maybe there is

22:56a fire station

22:58>> over by Irving and Western A, right? So

23:01um I What are they staffed at? I mean,

23:04do you do you have a like a list of um

23:08data that shows where which districts

23:10that you go like how how much you're in

23:12each district?

23:13>> Yeah. Uh well, the heat mapping will

23:16show where the call calls come from and

23:18uh so uh district 9 specifically. Um

23:22that is fire headquarters and we have an

23:24engine company there with four people

23:26and a ladder truck with with three. U we

23:29want the fourth person on that. Um and

23:32uh some of a lot of our data has shown

23:35that um calls for service in the western

23:38part of of our of our community uh the

23:41Route 9 towards South Bro where um it's

23:45high density high-rise uh that has

23:48really uh had an uptick uh in in

23:53responses um over the last several

23:55years. Um and and those as we discussed

23:58those are kind of our high hazard

24:00buildings. Um

24:03>> yeah,

24:04>> because of just because of the density

24:05of the people and it takes us longer uh

24:08on Route 9. Um you know, when we have a

24:11fire, uh uh we respond,

24:14we have that station right on Route 9.

24:16They go with an engine company and a

24:18ladder company with the tower, but the

24:21second their backup engine company comes

24:23all the way from Knobscot.

24:25>> Um, it took me 30 minutes today at 8:00

24:30this morning to get from my office at 10

24:33Luring Drive to Water Street.

24:36>> 30 minutes. Now, I hit four trains and

24:38sometimes that happens. Um, but the

24:41train can't pull over for us. We got we

24:43can't get through on the train. Um, on a

24:47good day,

24:49state engine 7 that's in Knobcot takes

24:5113 to 15 minutes to get to Route 9. Uh,

24:55at 1,600, one of the 1600 buildings,

24:571,400.

24:59That's a good day. That's with no

25:00traffic. Um, and and that's kind of what

25:02we're discussing um now that the density

25:05and and and things like traffic are

25:08increasing. Our call volume is

25:10increasing, traffic is increasing, and

25:12it takes us longer to get there. in

25:14construction

25:15>> and and you know and and and I heard

25:17Saraki here um last week or the week

25:20before and I started counting up how

25:22many how many buildings that he was

25:24talking about and and how many

25:26apartments or how many units are in each

25:27building and it was 488 uh that he

25:31talked about that are either coming

25:32online have just come online are coming

25:34online or projected in the future and um

25:39you know that's going to put a

25:40significant demand on our on our

25:42resources. I'll just close with I mean

25:44the four firefighters and the teams. I

25:48mean that's kind of a no-brainer like

25:50the difference that it makes, but I'm

25:51glad that you guys broke it all down.

25:53Anybody can hear it, see it, you know,

25:55or whatever. Um that's that's very

25:58obvious, you know, very easy to

26:00understand the need for that like the

26:02two teams and this and that and how much

26:04more dangerous it would be with just

26:06three. Um and that even the small fire

26:09well I mean small in terms of not a

26:12high-rise fire but that occurred you

26:14know last what December or something in

26:17um in interfaith you know it was it was

26:20small in in comparatively but yet it was

26:24very dangerous

26:25>> very intense. Yes. very intense um

26:27>> and and you know rescuing multiple

26:29people out of there takes takes a lot of

26:32staffing to do that

26:33>> and there was you know loss of life and

26:36different things and fire you know fire

26:38person injured too um so definitely um

26:42you know it's good it's good this is

26:44very good it can't it's coming you're

26:47being proactive but also you guys have

26:50gone so long without it now do we know

26:54um this is the last thing though So you

26:57were saying that the the recommendation

27:01not just for Firmingham but every or the

27:02the requirement is like what 39

27:05firefighters at certain fires and things

27:08like that.

27:09>> Yeah, that's for a high hazard building.

27:11>> Okay. Yeah, that makes sense.

27:12>> We do understand that, you know, that

27:14that certainly isn't going to happen

27:15overnight. Um again, my goal as the fire

27:18chief is is to tell you what we need. Um

27:21and and how we get how do we get there.

27:24Um, and you know, I think that's part of

27:26me coming up here with with Andy is to

27:28discuss. Um, and again, one of the great

27:31things that we have is our collaboration

27:32together. Um, there's very few uh locals

27:36and management that that can talk like

27:39this. Um, we have a great team. Uh, we

27:42have a great group of firefighters. Um,

27:45we understand get that, you know, these

27:47are the recommendations. Some of them,

27:49you know, might not be uh able to

27:52happen. um just because it's you know

27:54it's a s significant ask um so you know

27:57we are conscious about that

27:59>> we may have to add a few more phases

28:01that's

28:01>> yeah yeah and and and again our hope is

28:03at some point that this will be uh you

28:06know a phased approach

28:07>> yeah great thank you

28:09>> miss long

28:10>> thank you Mr. Chairman, so this is uh a

28:13particular interest to me uh because I

28:16have felt that you've been under staff

28:18for a long time as some other

28:20departments have been. Um, and what

28:23really concerns me as a procurement

28:25officer that sent out bids on

28:27construction, when I've done checking in

28:29Framingham on contractors, they're not

28:32pulling permits because owners of

28:35certain properties on Conquer Street and

28:38over don't want anybody in from ISD in

28:41their properties. So, that leads me to

28:44think there's the building codes being

28:46violated. Electrical fires, which we're

28:48getting a lot of on the south side.

28:50That's why because who knows who's

28:52wiring what and if they're illegally

28:54being wired or if they're up to code. So

28:57I'm this is something I'm really

28:58concerned about and I think you need to

29:00be staffed properly because of what's

29:03going on with permanent. I have talked

29:04to the building commissioner on this

29:06because I had to check references on a

29:08couple different contractors. Same

29:10thing. The owners of the property. I

29:12don't want them in my house. They're too

29:14nosy. They want too much stuff. And I'm

29:16like you serious?

29:18>> So if we, you know, we have a lot of

29:21that going on. It's hard to check to

29:23know where if there's permits not being

29:26pulled for electrical work.

29:28>> Yeah, it it is tough to follow up. We do

29:30have

29:30>> work. We have a we have a great

29:32partnership with the building uh

29:34department as well. Um we're in constant

29:36uh contact. You know, one of my staff

29:38members back here, Deputy Chief

29:39Jingress, he's a fire marshal and he's

29:41constantly uh

29:4420 or 30 times a day talking to the

29:46building department. So, I'm I'm not

29:47faulting you or the building department.

29:49I'm just saying that if we have people

29:51that are wiring illegally,

29:53>> yeah,

29:53>> their houses because they don't want to

29:55be under the scrutiny of ISTD, they

29:57don't want to pay for permits. They

29:58don't want to have to build deal with

29:59building code. That's what you have. And

30:01it's primarily, it seems like a lot on

30:03the south side of Framingham that that's

30:05going on. And that concerns me. So, I

30:07think we really need to be funded um

30:10properly and staff properly to prevent

30:14Framingham being on fire. And I will say

30:17I have called the fire department

30:18because the other thing that's going on

30:19is I've had some of my neighbors calling

30:22because people are burning

30:24they're burning furniture in their

30:25backyard on their lawn.

30:29>> Jingress.

30:29>> Who does that? Who does that? Yeah.

30:33>> So I get called because they're afraid

30:36to call their neighbor because they've

30:38gotten into

30:40>> Yeah.

30:40>> altercations. Let's put it that way. So

30:43I'm like, "Okay, I'll call anyway and

30:44I'll get them over there." But I mean

30:46that I'm just horrified. It's not in a

30:48fire pit. This is just on the lawn in a

30:50very treed area. So I think we need more

30:54firefighters. I think 990 is a good

30:56location for another fire station. Um

30:59and I don't see why you can't redevelop

31:01the one on on Water Street, which is

31:03right behind my house basically. So, I

31:08thank you for all you do and I

31:10appreciate the difficulties you have and

31:11I definitely support funding and

31:14supporting the fire department to

31:16increase your staffing.

31:18>> Much appreciated.

31:18>> So, because I know firsthand what goes

31:20on with that,

31:22>> Miss

31:24Thank you, Mr. Chair. Gentlemen, thank

31:26you so much for coming. When I first saw

31:28this report, I was horrified. uh mostly

31:30because you right now cannot get to my

31:32house in uh four minutes and even uh

31:36when you go through stage phase three

31:39you still will not get to my house. So

31:40this I'm being very selfish but um I

31:45have a lot of concerns about West

31:46Framingham which I love this new West

31:48Framingham but um

31:52the area around 990 and the tech park if

31:56we could talk about that for a second

31:58because I think

31:59I don't have a crystal ball, but I would

32:01say that that area is going to see some

32:03changes in the next decade, 20 years.

32:06And uh

32:07>> you have somebody in the back who may

32:08have a crystal ball to that?

32:09>> Yes. Yes.

32:12>> Um

32:14does that area right now count as a

32:17medium hazard with all of the

32:18pharmaceutical and lab work that's going

32:21in on the tech park?

32:22>> So, some of them are medium, some of

32:24them are actually considered high

32:25hazard.

32:27>> 39 firefighters. Okay. Um,

32:31which then further pushes why a station

32:34over there would be important. Um, how

32:38often are you pulled into mass pike

32:40accidents?

32:41>> Frequently.

32:42>> And what happens when that h when that

32:44happens?

32:44>> Uh, if it's a car accident, depending on

32:46where it is on the mass pike, it kind of

32:47depends on which truck goes. Um

32:49everything from the 9 and 90 exit east

32:55would be the tower

32:56>> up until a certain point and they go

32:58west as well. So where we have to go

33:00into Southboro if it's before the exit

33:02but before Southboro we actually have to

33:04go into Southboro come around turn

33:06around. So you drive a mile and a half

33:08two miles up the mass bike westbound to

33:10come down eastbound. Uh then engine

33:14seven covers the rest area east and then

33:17the rescue. any accident that's on the

33:19Mass Pike, the rescue has to respond to

33:20as well, just due to possible

33:22entrapments and other things that might

33:23be needed with the tools they have on

33:24their truck.

33:25>> Right. The big just just one more thing

33:27on that. The big thing about the Mass

33:28Pike is when you go there, you're

33:29committed, right? There's no you got to

33:31go from one exit to another. So when we

33:34when you know, we we get a report of

33:36something, you know, a multi-car

33:38accident. It it it might take, you know,

33:40um two or three fire companies plus uh

33:44you know, a few ambulances as well. And

33:45then those those resources are committed

33:48to the to the mass pike u for for you

33:51know sometimes an extended period

33:52depending how to get on and off and we

33:54can use some different ways to get on

33:56and off but uh we don't have any extra

33:58secret ways to get on and off but uh the

34:00one you know nice thing about Mass Pike

34:02is um there is a billing mechanism. So

34:05when we do go to the Mass Pike we we we

34:07bill the Mass Pike um for services

34:09rendered on on the Mass Pike. one of a

34:11few communities that is able to um to

34:15build the mass pike for that.

34:16>> Okay, that's good to know. Um

34:21>> what happens about mutual aid on the

34:23west side? Do you use Southboro, Malber?

34:26So if if everyone is say there's a big

34:29accident on the Pike, but then there's a

34:31fire in Feeasant Hill and all companies

34:34are busy, how often do we use mutual aid

34:37on that side?

34:38>> As needed. Uh and certainly Salt South

34:40Bro um would would probably be our

34:43primary uh company to get there. It's a

34:45little bit of a long shot for uh for

34:46Malro to get there. Um again we had you

34:49know you know a multi- alarm fire at one

34:51of the highrises Marro would be coming.

34:53Um so Malro I mean uh South Bro comes

34:59and you know

35:01depending on how their staffing looks.

35:04Uh

35:04>> are they still volunteer? No, no, they

35:06have a full-time department, but and and

35:07we have an agreement within our district

35:09that if you go from one community to

35:11another, you staff your you staff your

35:13piece with four with four firefighters.

35:16Um, but depending, they could be on a

35:18call or two and they might, you know,

35:20they're going to give us what they what

35:21they have left, but generally the

35:23agreement is four firefighters to come.

35:25Um, sometimes if they're tied up on

35:27something, you might not get four from

35:29them.

35:29>> Okay, that's good to know. I as a kid, I

35:31remember hearing the bell for their

35:33volunteer. So

35:34>> yeah, I think uh they don't I'm not

35:35sure. They have a little bit of a call

35:36department still. Um so I don't know if

35:39you heard it. They got a new station. So

35:40they got rid of part of that old bell

35:41over there. It's everything's over text

35:43now.

35:43>> Oh well that's that's that's good too.

35:45>> That's ruining traditions.

35:46>> Thing I would like to point out about

35:48mutual aid too is the communities around

35:49us by asking them to send us four

35:51firefighters. We're absolutely draining

35:52their fire protection.

35:54>> We are surrounded by smaller

35:55communities. You know I I told you about

35:58you know comparable communities of

35:59Newton and Waltham. They have the

36:00Bostons, the Camidages around them. They

36:02can afford to send one or two extra

36:04trucks to their communities to help

36:05them. The communities around us can't

36:06afford to do that,

36:08>> right? There's some of them where they

36:09have to send firefighters from one

36:10station in their town to another one to

36:12get on a truck before they can come to

36:14Framm to send four firefighters.

36:17>> Okay. My

36:18>> delay is a response.

36:19>> No, it's it's it's it's a good point.

36:21Um, and my final question is, so we're

36:23talking about West, this potential

36:26station at 990 down the line. What sort

36:28of strategic planning are we doing right

36:30now? uh about

36:34meeting the needs and of what we're

36:37looking at for the fire department for

36:38the next 10 20 years. Is this what is

36:42the conversation we're having with the

36:43administration moving forward? I love

36:46strategic planning. I wish we did it

36:48more, but I this is something that is

36:50not just it's your li it's the lives of

36:54firefighters, it's the lives of

36:55residents and property and this is a big

36:58deal.

36:58>> Yeah. And I think that those

37:00conversations are happening, right? Um

37:02there's, you know, there's a regular

37:03conversation. The poor mayor has to

37:05listen to me. You know, I talk about

37:07this, you know, quite a bit. Um so there

37:09is a lot of discussion with him and and

37:11you know, he um whether it's with him

37:14and then and Sari um talking about where

37:16are we going, where is the city going.

37:18Um so I think that's one of the reasons

37:20that we're here today. This is this is

37:22kind of um you know maybe our first

37:24formal push out of our strategic

37:27planning and where we need to be and

37:29where where we need to be and again we

37:31talk about the phasing where do we need

37:32to be in one year 3 years 5 years 10

37:35years 15 years um so yeah there's a lot

37:38of that discussion going on um and I

37:41think that's why we're here today and

37:43and you know thankfully that you know

37:45the study came out and you saw it and

37:46you and you asked us to come present it

37:48and I think this is a a huge step

37:50forward would um because I think I came

37:52here, you know, last couple of years and

37:54I have discussed, hey, I think I need we

37:56need more firefighters. We might need a

37:57new station. So, I think we're there.

37:59We're getting there.

38:00>> Well, thank you. I really appreciate and

38:01I look forward to hearing more as u we

38:04continue on.

38:05>> Mr. Stephanie,

38:06>> thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um first, thank

38:09you, gentlemen, for this very

38:10collaborative, comprehensive

38:13approach. Um, in another life, seemingly

38:17forever ago, I had I had the pleasure of

38:19authoring the state EMS and first

38:21responder law, which led to Framingham

38:24being on the cutting edge of getting

38:26minimum staffing. And I'll give you a

38:28perspective that's a little bit

38:30different than your safety perspective.

38:31To follow up on what you were saying a

38:32moment ago, at the time I was, in

38:34addition to being a selectman, I was the

38:36state rep for Framingham and Ashley. And

38:39you can imagine the stark differences

38:42between staffing in Framingham versus

38:44staffing in Ashland. What I don't think

38:46people realize is it changes the entire

38:50approach to the way in which we you

38:53gentlemen approach your professional

38:55activity. And in Ashlin at the time

38:57there were some fires and literally they

38:59arrived and they watched the building

39:01burn. They don't do search and res uh

39:04search and rescue. they don't do any

39:06kind of invasive and in Framingham we

39:08stop the fire and we rescue people. It

39:11it's that stark of a difference in terms

39:13of where it is. So I appreciate that

39:15very much and in the staffing. Um

39:19I guess all I would say is I would just

39:21say Mr. Chairman, when this conversation

39:24is done, I would hope that we refer this

39:26to the finance subcommittee or put this

39:28on the agenda so we can dig into this in

39:31a little bit more detail in terms of,

39:34you know, next steps and where we are.

39:36>> Thank you. Anybody else? Mr. Cannon,

39:38>> just briefly, Mr. Chairman, thank you

39:40guys. And and I chief, I I agree with

39:42you. It's unusual in most communities

39:43that the leadership on the management

39:45side and the leadership on the union

39:47side can speak so collaboratively, not

39:49just behind the scenes, but in a in a

39:50formal setting like that. It's very

39:51rare. Uh, and it it speaks loudly and it

39:54says a lot. It's it knowing you and

39:55working with all of you as we all do,

39:57it's not surprising at all, but it's

39:58great to see. Um I'm hopeful that in the

40:01planning that that continues to happen

40:02that um we'll talk about and thank you

40:06for touching on mutual aid, Andrew, and

40:09how other communities have larger

40:11communities around them in in you know

40:14as you move east, but they they look to

40:15Framingham uh to fill those voids uh

40:18when they're in our neck of the woods.

40:21Um, I'm hopeful we'll be nimble in our

40:25planning as ADUs seem to be sweeping

40:28every community in Massachusetts in a

40:30way that uh I don't know that was

40:33forecasted initially. Um, I'm curious

40:37how question seven, if that passes,

40:39which will just lead to a lot more

40:41building and a lot more density in areas

40:44where it wasn't planned or zoned, could

40:46do the same. Uh I was very impressed

40:48with how the department uh and the team

40:50worked with the new battery storage

40:52facility as that project was um under

40:55development. Uh

40:58so as electric cars I just things that

41:01were things that we probably 25 years

41:04ago didn't think were possible are just

41:06so in the foreground now. Um and uh and

41:10I'm hopeful that a new station uh where

41:13it makes sense is is sooner, you know,

41:15sooner rather than later. I know we talk

41:16about it broadly, but um however uh we

41:19can meaningfully put I almost said light

41:23a fire under that which is probably the

41:24worst. I'll leave the comments there.

41:27Thank you team. Thank you for your

41:29collaboration and all you do for our

41:30community. Thanks Mr. Chairman.

41:32>> Thank you Mr. Wood.

41:35>> Uh thank you chair. Thank you guys for

41:37the presentation. Um really appreciate

41:39you guys diving into the details and and

41:42yeah starting this conversation. I know

41:45some of these kind of recommendations at

41:47one point in time I think were part of

41:49the last budget cycle before we or at

41:51least the ideal proposed budget that you

41:54know we would look to have and um had to

41:58be paired back given some of the

41:59financial situations within the city. Um

42:02I would be interested in hearing um uh

42:05two quick questions. you know,

42:09it would be great to bring um you know,

42:11do phase one and bring all the staffing

42:12up to four per per vehicle. Do do you

42:15have an order of priority within um th

42:18those those staffing requests? Because

42:21um I do think, you know, it's when we

42:25say 30 to 33, it's it sounds

42:28a little easier than to say 12 hire 12

42:31firefighters. Um though we can cover it

42:33with overtime. And then my other

42:35question is what does the process look

42:37like in regards to upgrades to our

42:40existing stations? Um, and how is that

42:43dialogue taking place if at all? And how

42:45do we I think do a better how do we do a

42:48better job of getting those kind of

42:49projects on the capital budget?

42:52You mind if I take this one?

42:54>> Okay. Yeah. So, uh, you know, the

42:56priority really would be staffing for on

42:58on each on each apparatus. Um,

43:04But but but do you distinguish between

43:05like when I when I look when I look and

43:07see raising tower one, raising ladder

43:10three, rescue one, do you do you have a

43:12priority list within that or is it it's

43:15just all or none?

43:16>> No, it's you know of of course we

43:18wouldn't uh you know say no to any sort

43:20of increase. Um and I think it would be

43:22preferable to when and we say and and

43:24when andy talks about you know 30 to 33

43:28that's per group. So everything we have

43:29to do is times four.

43:31>> Yeah. No.

43:32>> Yeah. And I just want to make sure that

43:33that's clear.

43:33>> No, 100%. I guess the reason I ask is,

43:38>> you know, if we say we're going to

43:40increase one fiscal this year, like

43:42let's find a way to fund one this year.

43:43Let's find a way to fund one next year

43:45and let's way to find a way to do that's

43:48>> let's break it up in a way we can

43:49actually get there.

43:50>> I would never draw the line in the sand

43:52and say no, I I don't want one. I don't

43:54want two. you know I you know giving you

43:56my recommendation but I think at the end

43:58of the day it's you know it it's you

44:00know we'd be very thankful and grateful

44:02for you know any any sort of increase

44:04>> I think if with viscus referred to the

44:06finance subcommittee I think at least

44:08for I'm not on that committee but it

44:10would be helpful for me to have that

44:11kind of laid out so that and I think

44:14maybe hopefully for others maybe gives

44:16them something a little bit more to act

44:17on but then yeah I guess the other

44:18question is around the the

44:22um the physical buildings within which

44:24you operate which as anyone who's been

44:26been into knows

44:28need work. They they need serious uh

44:30work. Um in some ways it's kind of

44:33embarrassing uh the living quarters.

44:35Well, not some ways it is embarrassing

44:36the the quarters we're asking our

44:38firefighters to work in and how do we

44:39make improvements there? Yeah, the real,

44:41you know, we've had a lot of discussions

44:42with the mayor. Um, in particular, you

44:45know, station one on Route 9 seems to be

44:48um, you know, it's a built in the 60s,

44:50even though some of the other buildings

44:51got built in the 60s, but they've had

44:53we've had some rehab going on. Um, and

44:55you know, Conquered Street's had some

44:56some real significant upgrades. We got a

44:59new roof in the building. We got a new

45:00parking lot. Um we we were part of the

45:02geothermal project over there and that's

45:05you know really made a huge difference

45:07um in that building and and the upgrades

45:09have really been appreciated. Uh morale

45:11is through the roof at that station

45:14literally uh in a great way. New

45:16kitchen, we got new kitchen, right? Um

45:19uh but yeah, I think you know the next

45:20one uh and Ann Andy can really talk um

45:23to this. I spent seven years at station

45:25one. um he is currently at station one

45:29and he knows the conditions at that

45:31station and and again our workforce is

45:33changing. Um you know uh when in 1968-69

45:38when station one was built um there were

45:40no female firefighters. Uh now we have

45:42three female firefighters and one is

45:44stationed there and it's big open dorms.

45:47um there's very little privacy there and

45:50uh so um there's you know there's no

45:52real complaints about it but there's

45:53there's a recognition that upgrades um

45:56to today's standards need to happen. um

45:59not on top of some of the electrical

46:00components in the building just weren't

46:03designed to handle um you know

46:05somebody's charging a cell phone uh you

46:07know and this you can see the lights dim

46:10you know um you know again it's it's you

46:13know the the firefighters do a great job

46:16um you know they'll they'll say things

46:17to me but they do a great job of

46:19maintaining the buildings um Jim Palini

46:21with facilities helps us out a

46:23significant amount um you know they they

46:25they clean the building every day um

46:28they live there. Um they clean it, they

46:30maintain it. So they do a fantastic job

46:32of that. But some of the building and

46:35that one specifically is really um at at

46:38end of life uh for for what it was

46:41designed for.

46:44>> Thank you.

46:46So, I basically Brandon brought up what

46:48I was going to bring up because I have

46:50been in pretty much all of the stations

46:52just because either take my kids there

46:54or now my grandkids and um I remember

46:57station two did with the roof you used

47:00to leave buckets under each section. So,

47:03that was sort of like your new roof that

47:04you got when you got new buckets. And I

47:06I just couldn't even like fathom how

47:09that that station stayed open. And you

47:12know, you look at seven and I mean I the

47:15the recliners are like the original like

47:18I I don't know how those guys do it

47:20there because it you know and they never

47:22complain you know they never you know

47:25and then you go to you know Andy your

47:27your station is um I mean is it like the

47:31wallpaper it's like the cigarette smoke

47:33like the it just it's like that shade of

47:35but you guys never complain. you you you

47:38know you walk us around when we come in

47:39to visit to the kids come in um and

47:43these are an issue and I mean you're

47:45you're talking you know um two fire

47:49stations that are you know I see them

47:52both really at end of life in in the

47:54sense um and I think that you know to

47:57sit up here and for us to all listen and

47:59anybody that's you know watching and

48:01everybody here is you know of course we

48:03want to keep you guys staff that you can

48:08do your jobs and not only keep us safe

48:10but keep yourselves safe and I think

48:13that this is a good first step. Um I

48:16know that that you guys put a lot into

48:19this report and I know Andy will you

48:21know I he every time you see him he will

48:25tell you about it and in case you miss

48:27something he'll you know he'll tell you

48:29something else that you didn't hear the

48:30last time. But I think that these

48:33numbers are, you know, they are

48:35staggering and I I I think that just by

48:38the sheer growth and, you know, to

48:40Mike's point about question seven, that

48:42could really change. Um, and you see the

48:44ADUs now, that is part of our topic

48:47tonight. Um, they are going up

48:49everywhere and you are adding um onto

48:53lots that weren't zoned that way. And so

48:56now we're finding ways and we even heard

48:58the governor. I do believe she said she

49:00wants 200,000 new homes across the the

49:03state and that's you know density is

49:05what they want. So these are all

49:08long-term things that I think that you

49:09know I think it's good that we're

49:10hearing this now and then um I think

49:14that I'd be in support of you know you

49:17know our our team up here to you know do

49:20what we can do to uh work with the mayor

49:22and yourselves. Um but I I think I speak

49:24for everyone too. I don't usually say

49:27that, but I, you know, in this

49:28situation, I think that, you know, we

49:31have to, you know, act on this and, you

49:33know, it's a good first step. So, thank

49:35you.

49:35>> Thank you.

49:36>> So, thank you. Uh, I'm going to take one

49:38comment from Zoom and then I'm going to

49:40end this session because we have other

49:41things we have to talk about, but I

49:42appreciate

49:42>> make one more point there, Mr. Chairman.

49:45>> Uh, two quick facts. Number one, calls

49:49since 1986 have increased 170%. Our

49:51staffing has decreased by 18%.

49:54Number two, I know everyone's kind of

49:55squirmish about hiring firefighters.

49:58There's a couple things that we've been

49:59working on to help with that. Uh, one,

50:02the chief has been applying for a safer

50:03grant through the federal government,

50:04which helps pay for hiring firefighters

50:06for last five years. But also, I've been

50:09working with Representative Priscilla

50:11Souza on House Bill 620, which would

50:14have state colleges that have dorms in

50:17cities help pay for the fire department

50:19because they pay for their own police

50:20departments, no problem, but they use

50:21the municipal fire departments for all

50:23their calls. And that's the place we've

50:24been going to a lot over the last 5

50:26years. So, uh, that's something that's

50:29also in the works.

50:30>> Okay. Thank you for that. That's a good

50:31point about the colleges. All right. I'm

50:33gonna take one one comment from Zoom and

50:35then we will refer this to finance

50:38subcommittee. Sarah Lever, you can talk

50:40for two minutes. Can you please state

50:41your name and address?

50:48You there?

50:54>> Last chance.

50:58>> Apologies. It was a technical error.

51:00>> Okay.

51:02So would you like to speak?

51:04>> No, I would not.

51:05>> Oh, okay. Thank you very much. Okay.

51:08Thank you both very much for coming in

51:09and presenting.

51:09>> Thank you very much.