2026-07-29 - Board of Finance

Summary

Written from the auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

  • The chair opened by remembering a longtime board member who had died since the June meeting, and the board observed a moment of silence. Four members were present and two absent; the chair noted that the Town Council's appointment of a replacement is being contested on whether the council or the board has the authority under the charter, and said the board would treat the appointee as a full member until that is resolved.
  • Approval of the June 17 minutes was tabled because there was not a majority of members who had attended.
  • The board voted 4-0 by roll call to appropriate the $833,994 state education grant from the general fund to the Board of Education for 2026-27. The chair explained that the Town Council had both booked the grant as revenue and cut the same amount from the school request, which lowered the mill rate twice (about 0.12 mill each time). One member objected that the double effect was known to some people before the mill rate vote and was not brought to the full board; the chair called it an oddity rather than an error and proposed that every future mill rate meeting include a line-by-line comparison of the board's recommended budget with the council-adopted one.
  • The auditors presented the fiscal year 2025 audit: unmodified (clean) opinions on the financial statements and the federal and state single audits, with no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. General fund balance was about $39.7 million, with unassigned fund balance of about $35.4 million (17.7 percent of revenue). The town's share of the state municipal employees retirement liability was $67.6 million, and other post-employment benefits liability was $29.3 million. The audit was late because of finance office turnover but finished within the state extension; one management letter comment urged a stronger year-end close so reports can be filed by December 31.
  • The finance director reported that the closeout of the DePaolo school project audit cut disputed costs from about $1.66 million to about $314,000, so roughly $2.6 million will come back to the town. About $1 million is already booked as a receivable, and where the rest will go is still being researched. Together with an estimated $2.4 million surplus from fiscal year 2025, this will be used to meet the policy of holding 11 percent of revenue in the rainy day fund.
  • Self-insurance (health) claims ended the year about $3.3 million under budget, below the prior year, with about $2.9 million in cash. Short-term investments were about $65.6 million at roughly 3.3 to 3.57 percent, with about $20.7 million long term. Fiscal-year-to-date revenue and expense reports and the contingency line were skipped because the new year was only two weeks old; an updated unassigned fund balance schedule will come next month.
  • Sewer bills are moving from quarterly to twice a year, which saves tens of thousands of dollars in postage and lets the town always collect interest.
  • Committee assignments: a member will take the public works liaison role and another stays on open space. The chair asked that a fire commission liaison role be restored given the SAFER grant, a fire company building in a flood zone and other items with financial impact.
  • Administrative items, all approved 4-0: three appropriations (youth outside programming, pre-K and special education tuition fees, and a Calendar House dial-a-ride grant), then the year-end list of department transfers and carry-forwards into 2026-27, voted in groups. There was no public comment, and the meeting adjourned at about 8:20.

Issues discussed

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:007:01, we'll call our meeting uh to

00:03order.

00:04It's the town of Southington Board of

00:05Finance meeting

00:07and today is uh July 29th, 2026.

00:11This particular meeting, we're at the

00:12John Weichsel Municipal Center and not

00:14the Town Hall because of a scheduling

00:16um overlap.

00:18And we'll stand for the Pledge of

00:20Allegiance.

00:23>> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the

00:25United States of America and to the

00:28republic for which it stands, one nation

00:31under God, indivisible, with liberty and

00:33justice for all.

00:37>> [clears throat]

00:39>> It's been a month since our last meeting

00:41and um

00:42very sad to report that one of our

00:44active seated members passed away.

00:49Uh Edward Pocock Jr., who we

00:52affectionately called E2 because he has

00:54a whole family involved in community

00:56services

00:58uh has passed away.

01:00Uh with a after a very brief illness and

01:04uh very much a shock to us who have

01:06worked with him for a long time. He was

01:08um appointed to the Board of Ed and to

01:11Board of of Finance in 2010

01:14and served alongside of us for a very,

01:16very long time. Um

01:18he did his work. He was our a lot of

01:20times our ears on the ground. He drove

01:22the Calendar House senior shuttle. Uh he

01:25would bring us like the voice of the

01:26people and he had some time on his hands

01:29in town, so he would tell us a lot of

01:31things that were going on and it was

01:33just uh in insightful, but I I guess

01:36I'll make Joe smile, too. He was also

01:38funny.

01:39There were times when dealing with him

01:40was very humorous and he'd make us laugh

01:43and he would laugh. He was happy to have

01:45made us laugh. So, we we miss him and

01:48we'll go into a moment of silence in

01:50just a moment, but he was also a police

01:52officer

01:53uh and rose to the level of lieutenant

01:56in Southington. And then he also used to

01:59mow the high school. He used to have a

02:01job, a lawn mowing business. He would

02:03mow all those big fields at the high

02:04school. So,

02:06he was served on building committees. I

02:08can't go on and on. Everybody who knows

02:09him knows that he was everywhere and the

02:12Pocock name has a long history of

02:15service in town from him starting it and

02:18leading the family to his son who served

02:20as town council member and chair for a

02:22while who was also a police lieutenant

02:25and retired at captain and uh did a lot

02:28of things in town, a lot of good things.

02:30Um and then

02:32uh his granddaughter, we called her E4,

02:36Erica, who had served the town also in

02:39different capacities. But Ed has

02:40inspired not only his own family, but a

02:43lot of people to serve and to try to do

02:45their best for someone else or as I

02:47always say, the common good. But try to

02:49do their best and uh and have a and and

02:51as honor, have a little fun doing it.

02:53So, I'll just ask everybody for a little

02:55moment of silence for Ed, his family,

03:11Thank you.

03:13It still is very much a shock to

03:15uh that it happened so quickly and he

03:17was an active member. He was a seated

03:19member. Uh

03:22going on a little We'll do the roll

03:23call. Well, let's do the roll call and

03:25then we'll move on.

03:28>> Mr. Labieniec

03:29>> Here.

03:31>> Mr. Britain

03:32>> Here.

03:33>> Mr. Budnick

03:36Absent. Mr. Salerno

03:38Absent. Ms. Wade

03:40>> Present.

03:41>> Chair Larry

03:42>> Here.

03:43So, we we have a quorum, but uh the

03:46public should know we we do have a

03:49contested issue. So, I just want to put

03:53it out there so it's not um

03:55a secret. So,

03:57Mr. Pocock passed away. Town Council

04:01uh in consultation with the town

04:03attorney made an appointment and they

04:06appointed Mr. Rob Britton to fill the

04:10vacancy left by Edward Pocock.

04:13Uh there are some challenges currently

04:16in play

04:17on whether it was the Town Council's

04:20appointment to make.

04:22Uh there was a ruling by the town

04:24attorney.

04:25There was a lot of discussion held at

04:28the council level on it.

04:31And Council believes based upon all that

04:33that they were proper in making the

04:36appointment. Mr. Britton resigned from

04:39the um

04:41Planning and Zoning Commission. He was

04:44elected unanimously. All nine members of

04:46the Town Council uh elected him to this

04:49position or appointed him to this

04:51position and then he was sworn in by the

04:53town clerk.

04:55Uh and so he's a seated member, but it

04:57just should be known that there is a

05:00a a contest a contention against that uh

05:03being raised. So,

05:06letting you know that that is out there

05:07and that that'll get resolved. That'll

05:09have to sort itself.

05:11Uh Town Council made the appointment so

05:12it will sort itself at Town Council and

05:14I believe Town Council once again take

05:17up the issue. The issue has

05:19as far as I'm aware, the issue has

05:21nothing to do with Mr. Britton himself.

05:24It has to do with the process and the

05:26charter and where the authority for the

05:28appointment lies. I believe that's the

05:31crux of it. Who had the authority if

05:34Mr. Wade, do you want to add anything to

05:36that?

05:38But it's about where the authority lies.

05:40So, just put that out there that that is

05:42um

05:43occurring now as we sit. But since the

05:46the appointment has been made, I'm going

05:48to proceed as if

05:51Rob Britton is a full-fledged

05:54appointed member of the board as as the

05:56rest of us until if and until anything

06:00were to change on that. But um

06:03all internal Alex, all internal

06:06uh

06:08town council uh town attorney are all

06:11saying everything was done proper. Is

06:14that your understanding?

06:16>> And as well as the town clerk.

06:17>> As well as the town clerk.

06:19So

06:21um

06:23something being sorted. Want to just

06:24make it clear.

06:25Okay. Um

06:28old business uh the approval of the

06:30minutes of June 17th.

06:33We we may not have the majority to do

06:36that to approve those minutes. We'll

06:38have to table that one. So I'll ask for

06:40the tabling of the approval of the

06:41minutes.

06:44I'll make a

06:45>> Motion to table.

06:46>> Second.

06:46>> A motion and a second to table. All in

06:48favor?

06:48>> I. I.

06:49>> All right. We have to table the

06:50approval. That just makes the minutes

06:52official and it [clears throat] and it

06:53searches for any errors or corrections

06:55in it. But we'll we'll table that. There

06:58was also some discussion around the

07:01funding of

07:03the the state grant that came up. So

07:06what had happened was Board of Finance

07:08finished their work in in April on the

07:11budget and passed the recommended budget

07:14to Town Council. And then after that

07:17point, the state of Connecticut came

07:19through with a with a grant of 833994.

07:24Just happened to be our number when the

07:26state um allocated money for education.

07:29And

07:31they alerted the town of Southington

07:34that the town of Southington would

07:35receive that grant.

07:38And

07:40Town Council

07:42looked at it and I believe and I was

07:45didn't read it

07:47get too too involved at all because our

07:49work was finished. But the grant said

07:52something to the effect of if your

07:54budget is completed and your work is

07:57done, you will take that money and

07:59appropriate and tell me if I'm wrong

08:01here. You will take that money and you

08:02will appropriate it to your Board of Ed

08:04in addition to whatever you agreed the

08:06budget to be.

08:08But if your budget is still open and

08:10hadn't been decided

08:12you can do with the grant as your

08:14governing body decides. Something to

08:16that nature.

08:18So Town Council

08:21wanted to do something

08:23and their action was

08:26to

08:28withhold the town funding in that same

08:31amount. I'll call it 833, but it's

08:33really 833994.

08:36But to withhold the 833

08:39from the Board of Ed

08:42and then when the grant was received in

08:44the new fiscal year which started July 1

08:47this year we would um

08:51receive

08:52the money and then appropriate that

08:55money to the Board of Ed so that we take

08:57away the town's money and we give the

08:59Board of Ed the state's money. Does it

09:01make a difference? No.

09:04But it just showed a direct connection

09:08or a direct chain of custody of the

09:10funds from the state

09:14to the Board of Ed and then they

09:16withheld the town funds in the budget.

09:19Two actions that occurred

09:22and they brought attention to

09:26um the fact that the mill rate

09:29was went down favorably to the numbers

09:31833994.

09:33So they went ahead and credited revenue

09:35and they debited accounts receivable

09:37which was the proper accounting. There's

09:39no other way to do it. And when they did

09:41that, when they credited revenue, which

09:43is an increase to revenue, there was a

09:45decrease to taxes needed, and they got a

09:47favorable um

09:50.12 to the mill rate cuz taxes needed

09:52went down cuz they got the state money.

09:54Okay.

09:56Town Council, in trying to do to make it

10:01to trying to do this this like chain of

10:03custody with the money, instead of doing

10:05nothing at all, Town Council said, "Let

10:08us

10:09reduce the Board of Ed budget by 833,

10:14and then when the money comes in or in

10:17the new fiscal year, Board of Finance

10:19will give them the 833 from the state."

10:21So, in other words, replace the town's

10:23833 with the state's 833.

10:27Well, when they did that, guess what?

10:30It was a reduction to expense, another

10:33good guy to the mill rate.

10:36Um

10:39Uh

10:41we then the budget was then turned

10:43around, given back to the Board of

10:46Finance cuz only the Board of Finance

10:47can set the mill rate. So, Town Council

10:49comes with the Town Council adopted

10:51budget and says, "Here's your budget."

10:54We sat down, checked the math, and with

10:57a unanimous uh there were only five of

10:59us here at the time. Mr. Levenick was

11:00not here.

11:02Uh

11:02there with a 5-0 vote, we voted for the

11:06mill rate that

11:08we went forward with, the mill rate we

11:10approved.

11:12During that meeting, there was no We

11:15didn't have this discussion.

11:17Nor did we have a discussion on other

11:19bridged items

11:21from what the Town Council did after

11:24they took our budget. So, they had a

11:25book look like this called the Board of

11:27Finance budget. They did their thing,

11:29and then they handed us back the town

11:31council budget.

11:34Lesson learned for me or for this board

11:36going forward is probably we should

11:40really get into having a bridge and

11:42saying we gave you a budget of X, you

11:46gave us back a budget of Y.

11:48What were the differences? Can we walk

11:51through them from what we gave you to

11:53what you gave us back? Because in that

11:55budget there was some self-insurance

11:56stuff. There was um a reduction to a an

12:00administrative assistant in the fire

12:02department. There was a delay of the

12:04assistant fire chief to hiring to save a

12:06little bit of money and some other

12:08stuff.

12:09But we did not take the time in our

12:12m- meeting and and maybe that was my

12:15fault as the chair, but we didn't take

12:17the time in that meeting to really shake

12:20out all of those items, but we did get

12:22it we did get them. We got the book. We

12:25got the numbers, but we just didn't

12:27bring it to the point of a discussion.

12:28We weren't blind to it. It was all

12:30handed to us. It was given to us on a

12:32sheet. We all had the sheet.

12:34Um but we didn't bring up the the

12:38uh issues and kind of walk through them.

12:40So therefore we we didn't walk through

12:42this thing.

12:43So the piece that's missing now

12:46is we're in the new fiscal year. July

12:491st started it and now uh tonight or or

12:52now we should take action to give the

12:55Board of Ed the 833 that we got from the

12:59state. So in a moment I'll I'll ask for

13:02a motion to appropriate 833994

13:05from the general fund to the Board of

13:08Ed.

13:09But another thing I didn't know.

13:11Sometimes you if things are going

13:13smooth, everything's fine, but sometimes

13:15when you drain the water in the in the

13:16pond, all the stumps and rocks start to

13:19stick out. So one thing I didn't know

13:22was that the Board of Ed in their

13:24internal workings, they have their own

13:26finance committee, and they could only

13:29work off of the number

13:32I don't know if that's policy choice

13:34state law. They could only work off the

13:37number that was approved for them for

13:39the year. So, right now the budget that

13:41was approved for them is the budget that

13:44we gave them plus a few other

13:45adjustments, but the 833 was pulled out.

13:49So, they're working with a starting

13:51point of a budget that's 833 lower than

13:54where it should be. Now, very simply I

13:56said if if I was over there, I would

13:57just put a receivable in from the town,

13:59bump the number back up, and that's my

14:01budget. But, they don't work that way.

14:02They have to work from the number that

14:04the the authority of the town gave them,

14:07which is 833 short.

14:10So, but we do realize that the third

14:12action that was not done is this board

14:15has to take the 833 from the state. I

14:17don't know if we got it yet or it's

14:18still a receivable.

14:20Still a receivable. We don't even have

14:21the money, but that's fine. We'll get

14:23it.

14:25We have to take the 833 from our general

14:28fund when it gets there

14:30and and appropriate it to the Board of

14:33Ed. Then, Mr. Roshana, Mr. Medancy, Miss

14:36Malette, the Board of Ed will then be

14:38happy and say, "Okay, good. Now our

14:40starting point is where

14:43it is." They're not thrilled about it

14:44cuz that we reduced the request. But,

14:47they'll say, "Okay, we're where we're

14:48where we think we should be." And then

14:49they can go off and plan the year. If we

14:52fail to give them the 833,

14:55they're 833 short, and all of their

14:57plans have to include a balanced budget.

15:00So, they will have to take some action

15:03in the

15:04work papers that may not take in

15:06reality, but they have to make the work

15:08papers agree to the to the budget Town

15:10Council gave them, which does not

15:11include the 833. Um

15:15I hope I clarified that right, but I

15:17will take it as criticism personally

15:21that

15:22in the future anybody who sits in the

15:24chair role should

15:27get a roll forward

15:29and which we had you know in the in

15:31those stuff but should take that roll

15:33forward put it on the agenda make sure

15:35that everybody

15:37got comfortable with what were the

15:39movements after we gave the town council

15:43the board of finance's recommended

15:45budget. What did they do with it? And

15:47and we did not do that and I'll take

15:49responsibility for for not engaging in

15:52that discussion to the point where it

15:54was clear because we left it unclear. In

15:58fact, I wasn't even you know at that

16:00moment aware of it. I'd been traveling a

16:01lot of excuses but if we put it in the

16:03agenda going forward

16:05we get it right. Um

16:09and that's so we have to we have to

16:11entertain a motion

16:13to give the board of ed the money from

16:16the state and we can do that now even

16:17though it's a receivable on the town

16:19side we can make the motion to

16:20appropriate it and then

16:23we'll get it eventually.

16:26I don't think there's any doubt we're

16:27going to get it, right? Jackie smiled

16:29it's coming. It's in the mail. We're

16:30going to check the mail tomorrow it'll

16:32big check will be in the mail.

16:34Um

16:36So I will ask for that motion and during

16:38that motion of course we'll have

16:39discussions and further discussion if

16:41anybody like to discuss further.

16:43So I just ask for the motion to

16:45appropriate eight eight 33 nine

16:4934

16:50to the board of ed for fiscal year

16:522026-27

16:55from the general fund.

16:56>> I'll make the motion.

16:58>> Second.

16:59>> Motion is second. Now discussion. Any

17:04>> I guess um

17:06I'm all for moving the money over to

17:08board of ed. But this doesn't resolve

17:11our mill rate issue, correct? Because

17:14>> It you know you look at the mill rate

17:16it's rightly so

17:18that when you look at the mill rate,

17:20there are two good guys in it or two

17:22negative or two reductions of .12. They

17:25are in there and

17:28when you look at it, you shake your

17:29head. You say, "Why twice? Why two?"

17:33It's valid.

17:35Uh because even in the emails, um you

17:39know, my emails were forwarded in all of

17:41this and everybody's emails on the issue

17:42cuz people were trying to say, "Who knew

17:44what? What was this?" In my emails, I

17:46said, "Nah, it should be once. It

17:47doesn't make sense. You got 1.833, not

17:49two."

17:50But when you go through the actions,

17:53um we received the revenue

17:56credited revenue that reduces taxes

17:59needed and made the mill rate favorable.

18:02Then when town council said, "Let me

18:04reduce the money the town money to the

18:06Board of Ed," that also made the mill

18:09rate another notch .12 favorable. The

18:13piece that's not in the mill rate now is

18:16us taking the money from the state and

18:19giving it to the Board of Ed, which we

18:21have to do. It's part of the trifecta

18:23here, the three pieces, three legs of

18:25the stool. But the third leg doesn't

18:28affect the mill rate. So, we shake our

18:29head and say, "Hmm,

18:32why two favorables in the mill rate?"

18:34>> I I guess I'm more curious about the the

18:36breakdown on it. So,

18:38my understanding from the emails is that

18:41you were aware,

18:43um the

18:44town council was aware, I think Alex was

18:48made aware, um

18:50that this that we knew this before we

18:52took the vote. Correct? I mean, my

18:56it was I mean, my my just from the

18:58reading of the emails

18:59>> little fuzzy. I mean, I know I made the

19:01statement the mill rate should go down

19:03once. That's the statement I made and I

19:06I own that statement.

19:07>> Well, I mean, for me, I

19:09that the that you recognized that the

19:11error had been made is how I would put

19:12it.

19:13>> know that it's an error,

19:15but and I also don't know sitting here

19:18if at that moment

19:20a lot of conversation was occurring, but

19:24at the moment of the mill rate setting,

19:26I did not believe we had any error. I

19:28still don't. I think we have

19:29[clears throat] a a weird situation, but

19:31I I don't sit here and say we have an

19:34error, cuz when I break it down, I I

19:36could explain it. Um

19:39I don't call it an error, I call it an

19:41oddity.

19:42>> Right, but we were aware of it before

19:44the vote was taken.

19:46>> I We We all had the same information.

19:49>> Well,

19:49>> I

19:51>> We didn't have the same We had the same

19:54like aggregate information, but you you

19:56had someone had pointed out to you,

19:59right? That My understanding is our

20:01finance director was aware like found

20:03the error that um another a finance

20:06director from another town was contacted

20:09uh to make sure that

20:12>> And they were asked to shake it out. I

20:13think town council asked finance to kind

20:15of shake it out and ask questions and So

20:18I'm asking that [clears throat] all

20:19happened I mean Alex,

20:20>> maybe you would know. That all happened

20:22before we took the vote on the mill

20:24rate.

20:26>> Yeah.

20:26>> Yeah, there was discussion um regarding

20:29that. But the one thing that I will say

20:31is

20:32um

20:34and our auditor's here, so and I'm not a

20:36I'm not

20:37a finance guru. Um

20:40the bigger issue was this money wasn't

20:42budgeted for in the budget. So, finance

20:45had to had to bring it as a revenue.

20:48I don't know legally if they could have

20:50brought it in as revenue and not

20:51recognized it.

20:53Um so, I think more is in a way you're

20:55forced to recognize it in accounting. Um

20:59But again, our auditor's here. I'm not

21:01going to go behind but

21:02>> yeah, but we were all and there was

21:04some of us were aware that this was

21:06happening before the vote.

21:08>> At the vote, I would say that I There

21:11may have been emails, but I had been

21:13traveling. I was not aware at the time

21:17we voted.

21:18If I had known, I would have said, "We

21:20got to have a discussion on this." Even

21:22if I came to the same conclusion. And

21:23and now I looked at this 45 times since

21:25then.

21:26>> Right.

21:26>> But at that moment, I was not aware that

21:28I said, "Is everybody okay? Is everybody

21:30good?" It's all on video. And we all

21:32kind of nodded. I did not at that moment

21:36wasn't aware because I had just come

21:37home from Switzerland from a business

21:39trip. Prior to that, I was in the

21:40Philippines.

21:41I was not dwelling on this.

21:44And when I looked when Chrissy brought

21:46her laptop over to where I was sitting,

21:48we looked at the number just to make

21:49sure the math was right. And I said,

21:51"Yeah, the math that that that you take

21:53the total taxes needed divided by the

21:55grand list." We had the right grand

21:56list, the right taxes needed. I looked

21:58at it and said, "Yeah, it's good."

21:59Everybody kind of looked at me. I

22:00nodded. Um

22:04I I I still don't call it an error. I

22:07call it like an oddity and an odd thing

22:10because of the way it played out. But um

22:14That's all.

22:15>> Dirk, can I just interject quickly, Mr.

22:17>> Yeah.

22:17>> Uh the only thing that I think could

22:20have been done differently

22:22is to over artificially

22:25exaggerate the mill rate

22:27to make up for it. So, we would overtax

22:30the residents over and above the budget

22:33and then it would have possibly been

22:35like a artificial wash out at the end.

22:37Um

22:38>> I guess my issue is that we weren't

22:39given the opportunity to discuss that.

22:41That we you you know, and I it's not

22:44about how we could have resolved it.

22:46It's that there was information out

22:48there that wasn't

22:49>> that as a

22:50I'll take that as a lesson learned

22:52because I think the whole bridge

22:54had we brought forth the whole bridge of

22:57we gave you a budget of X, you gave us

23:00back a budget of Y. What were the

23:02differences? And if we looked at that

23:04closely and was on the agenda as an

23:06item, not something somebody may have

23:08been aware of, somebody not, we all had

23:10the same book, yes. But if it was

23:12something that was

23:14on the agenda and we took our our rulers

23:17out, we went down, "Ooh, look at this.

23:18Look at this. Look at this." It probably

23:20would have been better for all of us.

23:21So, I'll take it as a lesson learned

23:24um after 16 years of doing it and always

23:26need a lesson learned that we should

23:28demand a bridge and have a bridge as

23:30part of our mill rate setting meeting. A

23:32whole bridge discussion. How do we get

23:34from what we gave them to what they gave

23:36us back? I

23:37I'll take it as a my fault.

23:40>> I

23:40And in the future, I think that's great.

23:42I just my issue is honestly it it

23:44doesn't feel transparent when you look

23:46at the emails and that there was an

23:48agreement among people that there was an

23:51error, an oddity, whatever you want to

23:52call it, and then it wasn't brought

23:56forth before we voted.

23:58>> Yeah, and I didn't agree there was an

23:59error, but um certainly

24:03certainly when we go around and say, "Is

24:05there anything? Everybody good?

24:07Everybody good?" If somebody wasn't

24:10ding ding, they should raise their hand,

24:12but I I didn't even raise my hand cuz at

24:14the moment I wasn't

24:15like tuned into it.

24:18But I had been in I'll admit that yes, I

24:20was in conversations during the process.

24:22The day I was flying out to the

24:24Philippines, I was on a call where

24:27somebody said that like when Chrissy was

24:29asked to call different people and ask

24:30them, "Does this make sense?" I was one

24:32of the people that got called and I

24:34said, "No, it should only be one

24:35reduction. It's only 1833. It should

24:37only be one reduction." That was kind of

24:39my contribution to it and we had

24:41discussions and it was everybody's All

24:44those discussions in the emails were

24:45people just shaking the tree saying,

24:47"Have we got it right?" Um but then it

24:50all happened after that. It happened at

24:52a town council meeting. This was all

24:54ahead of it saying,

24:56"Does this make sense?"

25:01>> I I just want to say I'm sorry and I

25:03don't want to beat a dead horse. I don't

25:04believe it was on the record or

25:07transparent for everyone that the the

25:10error was We all had access to the

25:12information, but the error was spotted

25:16by our finance director or

25:19>> Well, if there's an error, there has to

25:20be a correction. That's why I call it an

25:22oddity because if it's an error Yeah, an

25:24oddity. Yes, and it should have been

25:27It's The only

25:29when you do remediation, right? You

25:31could remediate and you could do root

25:32cause corrective action. The true

25:34corrective action should be that in the

25:36future, we should come forward,

25:38whoever's here, whoever is in this role,

25:41mill rate setting meeting should have

25:42two pieces to it. Review the bridge of

25:45the budget given to town council and the

25:47one received back, what changed, and

25:50then set the mill rate. That piece

25:52didn't happen. I'll take responsibility

25:54for that. But, I do believe that if we

25:56were to go back and wave a magic wand

25:59and raise the mill rate 0.12, we would

26:02then be taxing the people for an

26:04additional 833. So, we have the state's

26:06833 and the people's 833.

26:09That's why I don't consider it an error.

26:11So, we'll leave it at that. Um thank

26:13you, Katie, though.

26:15And it it is right to point out it's an

26:17oddity and it's a very It's a second

26:19oddity that we had an oddity and we

26:21didn't sit here as a group and discuss

26:23it. So, putting So, the remediation for

26:25me, the the corrective action would be

26:27Let's make sure we have a bridge at mill

26:30rate setting time next year, every year.

26:33We we we go through the bridge by

26:35detail, by line item detail, what

26:36changed, and then move to set the mill

26:39rate. And in setting the mill rate, we

26:41simply check the math, too, make sure

26:43that you know, the fundamental of our

26:45job is done. We got the right grand

26:46list, the right tax is needed. So. Okay,

26:49well, thank Thank for the discussion.

26:52Um

26:53Now we're going to have the CLA 2025

26:56>> We have to vote. [snorts]

26:58>> Oh. Oh, I'm sorry. We have a motion.

26:59Yes, I thank you.

27:00Uh motion and a second by We'll do roll

27:02call vote cuz of all the discussion. Uh

27:05motion and a second to This is back I

27:07got to rewind rewind a little bit to

27:09give the 833 934 from general fund to

27:14Board of Ed an appropriation for the

27:162020 6 2027 fiscal year.

27:20>> Mr. Lebanik?

27:21>> Yes.

27:22>> Mr. Britain?

27:23>> Yes.

27:24>> Mrs. Wade?

27:25>> Yes.

27:25>> Chair Larry?

27:26>> Yes.

27:28Okay. It passes 4-0.

27:31Guess you guys are now and now focused a

27:34little bit. They're smiling. That's

27:35think That's good to see.

27:37Um

27:38All right. CliftonLarsonAllen

27:39presentation on the 2025. This will be

27:42the 2024 20 No.

27:442024 2025 year closeout. Leslie,

27:48welcome.

27:50Yeah, down there. Yeah, I'm This is a

27:51new a new home for us for this meeting.

27:55And I hope the microphone's working.

27:58And you could just tell everybody who

27:59you are, the partner and

28:00>> Hi, I'm Leslie Zall. Can you hear me?

28:02Wow, it's loud. Okay.

28:04>> How'd you like our presentation?

28:06You're You're the finance person on the

28:08other side.

28:10Go ahead. Please.

28:13>> Thank you. I'm Leslie Zall, the

28:14principal on the town of Southington

28:16audit. Um and I'm presenting um the

28:20audit results for fiscal year 6/30/2025.

28:25Um I'm first going to start my agenda by

28:28just explaining

28:30um

28:31the scope of our audit, what we do, what

28:33we don't do,

28:35a high-level result of the audit, um

28:38some financial statement numbers. I know

28:40the

28:41the ACFR can be voluminous, so um I did

28:44give you a snapshot of some of the

28:45financial statements within the act for

28:49Um, I'm going to go through the federal

28:51and state single audit. Um, we do have

28:53one management letter comment, some

28:55required communication, and then some

28:57updated GASBs that are coming down for

29:00fiscal year 26.

29:02>> Thank you. Can I ask that you just

29:03elaborate a little bit when you get to

29:05the point on what is the audit, what

29:07does it include and not include? You

29:09said you would, but we've been getting a

29:11lot of chatter

29:12because of other communities, and people

29:15are saying you should do an audit. Well,

29:16we do do an audit. But, um, if you just

29:18elaborate a little bit when you get to

29:20that spot of what is included in the in

29:22the financial audit and what is not,

29:24like you said you do, but just maybe

29:25spend another minute or two on that.

29:27>> Sure, so let me go through my

29:28presentation, and then if it doesn't

29:30answer your question, I can certainly

29:32elaborate.

29:33>> Okay. Thank you, Leslie.

29:34>> Um, so the main focus of our audit is to

29:37audit the financial statements of the

29:39town of Southington as they are

29:40presented by the finance office and

29:42management of the town.

29:44So, we're looking at these specific

29:46numbers at this specific point in time.

29:48>> [snorts]

29:49>> Um, we express an opinion on whether

29:51those numbers that are in in the finance

29:54finance office

29:56general ledger are in accordance with

29:58generally accepted accounting

29:59principles. So, our focus is primarily

30:01on the numbers within those statements.

30:05We also express an in relation to

30:07opinion on the schedule of federal and

30:09state financial assistance

30:12as it relates to the financial

30:13statements as a whole.

30:16Our yellow book requirements, um, also

30:18require us to express an opinion on

30:21compliance with anything related to

30:24those major state and federal programs

30:26that we test based on a prescribed, um,

30:30risk assessment.

30:33We do provide a report on internal

30:35control, and if we do find something as

30:37we're auditing these numbers, we are

30:40required to tell you if there's any

30:42significant deficiencies or material

30:44weaknesses in the control structure as

30:46it relates to these numbers, but we

30:48don't opine on internal control.

30:51Um, so

30:53other areas outside the purview of these

30:55financial statements might not be in the

30:57scope of our audit.

31:00Um, but we do get an understanding of

31:03the internal controls and will report to

31:05you any significant deficiencies or

31:07material weaknesses as it relates to the

31:10financial statements, but also the major

31:12state and federal programs that we test.

31:15We don't look at every transaction, so

31:17our main goal is not to

31:20find fraud, but if we're required to

31:23tell you if there's any material

31:25misstatements that we find during our

31:27audit, right?

31:28Um

31:30but because we don't look at every

31:31transaction

31:33throughout the fiscal year, there was

31:35there's always things that will come up

31:38that we did not know about during the

31:40course of looking at these numbers.

31:42>> [sighs]

31:43>> Did that answer your question?

31:45>> Yeah, [clears throat] I just if you want

31:46me to just ask a little deeper. So, on

31:48internal controls, you're not looking at

31:51design and design deficiencies, nor are

31:53you looking at effectiveness testing.

31:55You're just looking if you find

31:57something and say, "Boy, this looks

31:59odd." You would then go back and say,

32:01"What are the controls around this?" But

32:02you're not You're not coming in with the

32:04goal of saying, "Do we have design

32:06deficiencies or do we have control

32:08effectiveness testing deficiencies?" Cuz

32:11you're not testing internal controls.

32:13>> Correct. Those are separate audits. We

32:14do

32:15do those consulting engagements, but

32:17they are not part of the scope of an

32:18audit.

32:19>> And fraud risk assessment, how much of

32:21that do you do or not do?

32:24Like

32:24>> Again, we we do a fraud risk assessment

32:27very globally as it relates to the

32:29numbers in the financial statements.

32:31>> Okay.

32:32>> So, it's a it's a very narrow scope

32:35>> But we could engage you separately for a

32:39for a um

32:41you know, an internal control assessment

32:42from right from the fraud risk down to

32:44the designed effectiveness down to the

32:47execution effectiveness or the internal

32:50control effectiveness.

32:51>> There is

32:51>> We could hire you for that.

32:53>> There is a myriad of services that we

32:54could provide the town of Southington if

32:56you wish to have those services done.

32:59>> Okay. Forensic audits, we do internal

33:01control efficiencies, all that stuff,

33:04but they're out of the scope of this.

33:05>> Okay, maybe the board would you know, at

33:07some point we

33:08look into that a little maybe see what

33:10the board's appetite is. Thank you.

33:12Yeah, please.

33:13>> Um, slide five, just give you high-level

33:16results of the audit. So on the

33:18financial statement piece you received

33:20an unmodified opinion, that's what you'd

33:22want to receive each year. That means

33:24your financial statements are in

33:25accordance with GAAP.

33:27Um, the federal single audit and the

33:29state single audit were both clean,

33:31their opinions were unmodified.

33:34Um, there's no in material weaknesses or

33:37significant deficiencies to report to

33:39you either on the financial statements

33:41or the state and federal single audits.

33:44Um, essentially a clean audit overall,

33:47something that you have achieved in

33:49years past as well.

33:54Um, moving on to slide seven.

33:57This is a snapshot of the management's

34:00discussion and analysis within the ACFR.

34:03I like to show this

34:05table because it shows um

34:08comparatives between 2025 and 2024.

34:12This table is on a full accrual basis of

34:15accounting, so it includes all of your

34:17long-term assets and liabilities. So

34:19everything within the town is is totaled

34:23in this number on a full accrual basis

34:25of accounting.

34:26Um, the results of the

34:29the numbers as of 6:30 2025, you have a

34:32net position in the governmental

34:34activities. So, that's everything except

34:37for your one um enterprise fund. So, um

34:42that net position is 146

34:44million. That's up from 11 up 11 million

34:48from the previous fiscal year.

34:50And then that business-type activity

34:52column is is your one enterprise fund.

34:55You had a net total net position of 92.4

34:58million, and that's down 2.3 million

35:01from the previous fiscal year.

35:05I want to next go to um

35:08the government fund statements. This is

35:10usually the fund [clears throat]

35:11statements that you would typically work

35:13with on a day-to-day um basis. These are

35:17on a modified accrual basis of

35:18accounting. What does that mean? That

35:21means that um your long-term assets and

35:23liabilities are not there, um and your

35:26revenue recognition is slightly

35:28different.

35:29Um

35:30>> Was the other books kept in on a cash

35:33basis?

35:34>> No.

35:34>> Okay. I I thought fund balance

35:36accounting. So, it isn't a it is all

35:38accrual basis.

35:40>> Uh so, these funds we call modified

35:42accrual versus full accrual, but it's

35:45not cash basis, if that helps.

35:49Um each bucket, if you will, each column

35:52on this slide eight um is

35:56is a fund that we opine on separately.

35:58So, we opine on each major fund um

36:02together, and then we opine on the

36:04remaining aggregate fund groups.

36:07Um the general fund is always a major

36:09fund, so we will always opine on that

36:11one general fund.

36:13Um as of 6:30, 2025, you'll see total

36:16fund balance of 39.7 million. That's

36:19down about 480,000

36:22from last year.

36:25Um and I'll go through some of um, the

36:27metrics um, in a few slides

36:30um,

36:31coming up. Capital Projects Fund has a

36:34fund balance of 5.8 million, increased

36:383.4 million from last year cuz you had

36:41that issuance of bonds during the year.

36:44That third column, Emergency Management,

36:47is your ARPA fund.

36:49You have You'll see there in the middle

36:51of that column unearned revenue from the

36:54grants. It's 712,000.

36:57That's what you haven't yet spent

37:00in ARPA as of 6/30. You have till the

37:02end of the year to spend those funds.

37:08Um, Debt Service Fund, you have a fund

37:11balance available. It's at 7.8 million.

37:15That's down 76,000 from last year.

37:18We have the Ed Grants Fund, a negative

37:2137. That's down 14,000 from last year

37:24and that just has [clears throat] to do

37:26with timing of when things are expended

37:28and

37:29when things come in. And then that

37:31Non-governmental Funds column is

37:33accumulation of all your other funds.

37:36Um, that went up 352,000

37:39from last year um, and you landed fund

37:42balance at 9.2.

37:44>> And is the rainy day is the unassigned

37:46to 35,4

37:4993?

37:50>> Correct.

37:50>> Okay.

37:53>> Moving on to the Sewer Enterprise Fund,

37:55that

37:57again, um, that's the same numbers as

38:00the business-type activities cuz you

38:02only have one fund in that group. Um,

38:06your net position decreased 2.3 million

38:08as I had mentioned. And then your

38:10Internal Service Fund, which is your

38:12health benefits, that decreased 1.4

38:15million from last year and you are now

38:17have net position of 5.3.

38:25>> Just some quick metrics for you in terms

38:27of the um financial statement results,

38:30property taxes remain high at 99.39%.

38:35Um your general fund unassigned fund

38:37balance, as we just mentioned, at 35.4

38:40million, that's 17.

38:437% of your actual year-end general fund

38:46revenues.

38:48Um your unassigned balance from the

38:50previous year was 32.9, so

38:53um

38:55that was increased from from the prior

38:57year. In terms of budgetary results,

39:00revenue came in lower than expected by

39:022.4, but your expenditures came in much

39:05lower at 4.9.

39:09And then I just want to mention um on

39:11the liability side,

39:14you guys participate at the MERF

39:16program.

39:17Um that your share of the MERF liability

39:20is 67.6 million, um and currently the

39:24MERF is funded at 72.85%.

39:28Um this is up from

39:30>> the MERF for everybody in the state?

39:32Like isn't the state manage that in

39:34totality?

39:35>> that, so the

39:37the town of Southington doesn't have

39:38control over that.

39:39>> Okay, so they give us a bill and

39:41whatever we pay brings us to the 72.85.

39:45>> The 72.85 is the the

39:48the percentage funded as a whole for

39:50everyone.

39:51>> Okay.

39:52>> Um your total OPEB liability is 29.3

39:56million.

39:57Um then that's just

40:00and if you don't understand what OPEB

40:01is, that's other post-employment

40:03benefits.

40:04Um

40:05that liability is

40:07is calculated based on an implicit rate

40:10subsidy, which means your retirees are

40:12in the plan. If they weren't in the

40:14plan, your cost would be a little

40:16different, and so there's a liability

40:17attached to that.

40:18>> retirement is not here because that's

40:20held with the state. This is only our

40:23municipal employees. Some in the Board

40:25of Ed, some in the town, but not the

40:27teachers or administrators.

40:29>> Correct.

40:29>> Okay.

40:31>> Any other questions on the financial

40:33statements before I move on to the

40:35single audits?

40:36Okay.

40:38>> Everybody?

40:39>> So, we issued two separate um

40:43reports. One is on the federal awards,

40:46and then one is on the state financial

40:48assistance. So,

40:49um the town of Southington spent 6.3

40:52million on federal awards during the

40:54fiscal year. The programs that we tested

40:57were the education stabilization fund

41:00and your ARPA grant.

41:02Um what we're required to test with

41:04those grants, um we were you the town of

41:08Southington was in compliance. So, you

41:10have an unmodified opinion, which is a

41:12clean opinion, and no no findings to

41:14report to you.

41:18Then on the state single audit side, um

41:20state assistance came in at 35.7

41:23million. We tested three grants on the

41:26state side. Um the LOCIP grant, town aid

41:29road, and urban action grant. Again, all

41:32those three programs um were clean

41:35opinions and no no findings to report to

41:38you on the internal controls.

41:43I did put in one management letter

41:45recommendation um that I want to briefly

41:49touch on um just because the audit was

41:52late this year, and I think I would be

41:54remiss if I didn't say something about

41:56the lateness of the audit.

41:58However, you had the finance office had

42:01gone through a tremendous amount of

42:03turnover during that time. In my

42:05experience in the 30 years I've been

42:07auditing, usually this takes a lot

42:09longer for people to catch up.

42:12I feel that um the finance office knew

42:14they needed help, they sought the help,

42:16they got it done within the require you

42:19know, the 6-month extension period from

42:22OPM. Um so I think that's a testament to

42:26Chrissy and her team for being able to

42:28do that. Um so now that she's not, you

42:31know, drinking from a fire hose, now

42:34it's time to to, you know, plan ahead.

42:38Um we recommend that the town continue

42:40her efforts and the finance office's

42:42efforts to strengthen that fiscal

42:45year-end close process so that they can,

42:47in fact, issue on time by December 31st.

42:51>> Can I just make a comment on that? You

42:53know, given that I I work around the

42:54state, I saw last year that only maybe

42:5670-plus towns actually met the December

42:5931st deadline. And there was a lot of

43:01towns that were outside the scope,

43:03right? Would you agree?

43:05>> Since COVID?

43:06>> Yeah.

43:06>> There's so many. And there's so many who

43:09don't have finance [clears throat]

43:09directors right now that there's

43:11turnover.

43:12Um

43:13it There's there's quite a bit that

43:15don't make the deadline now.

43:17>> Yeah, I just wanted to point that out.

43:18It's just it's not a Southington thing.

43:19It's it's statewide.

43:21>> Yes.

43:25Okay.

43:26Um as far as required communications, I

43:28did want to mention that there was two

43:29new standards for 2025, GASB 101, which

43:33was quite a lift for um

43:36Board of Ed and town in terms of getting

43:38that information together.

43:40Um

43:41that was related to compensated absences

43:44and then GASB 102 on certain risk

43:47disclosures um did not apply to the

43:49town.

43:50Um there was no difficulties encountered

43:53during the audit. We work very well with

43:55with both parties and their finance

43:57office is very helpful.

43:59Um within [snorts] the financial

44:01statements, there are significant

44:02estimates that I am required to share

44:04with you.

44:06Two of those significant estimates, one

44:09is on total OPEB liability and one is on

44:11incurred but reported claims within the

44:13internal service fund on health

44:15benefits.

44:16Um

44:18the OPEB liability is based off

44:20actuarial values, right? So, if those

44:22assumptions change, so does the number.

44:24That's why it's a significant estimate.

44:26And then incurred but not reported

44:27claims, we don't know necessarily what

44:30those claims will be, but there's an

44:32assessment that's done.

44:34Um

44:36by your consultants to to estimate that

44:38liability.

44:39>> Leslie, was GASB 101 part of the fiscal

44:43year 2025?

44:44>> Yes.

44:46>> And what did that call upon us to do?

44:49>> So, that called upon make um

44:53accumulating data, historical data on

44:57how

44:59people are using their time. So,

45:01we had to go back at least 3 years to

45:04look at who's using their time while

45:06they're still employed, who's using

45:08their time, or who's saving their time

45:10>> like vacation, sick, and other?

45:12>> Yes, all types of pay.

45:14Um is incorporated into that standard.

45:17But, um the change was we used to record

45:20them only if they got paid out if they

45:22left on June 30th, and now there's the

45:24belief that well, you're going to use

45:26that time while you're employed, so

45:28maybe we should add that liability as

45:30well.

45:31>> Okay.

45:33>> Um no As I said, there was no

45:35disagreement with management.

45:38Um there was two uncorrected

45:40misstatements. Um

45:42both us and the town decided these were

45:45immaterial instances, and therefore not

45:48required to be booked. Um there was a

45:51beginning balance effect on the new GASB

45:54101 standard. We flowed that through the

45:56fiscal year.

45:58Um and then

46:00there is um or could be an allocation of

46:04that implicit rate subsidy liability

46:06that could go into the sewer fund. Um,

46:10but the town mostly pays for that, so

46:12there was an agreement that that was not

46:14a material aspect of the of an

46:16allocation to make.

46:20Um, and there was no independence

46:22issues, um, between the town and CLA.

46:29I have We have two Government Accounting

46:31Standards Board standards that are

46:34coming down the pipe for fiscal year 26.

46:37One is on GASB 103.

46:40That will affect your enterprise fund.

46:42Um,

46:44it really just shifts some things on the

46:46P&L

46:47on the operating revenues versus

46:49non-operating revenues.

46:51Um, there's also some changes in the

46:53management's discussion and analysis,

46:56um, that the finance department prepares

46:58and we will give them a list to make

47:00sure that they incorporate those into

47:01the ACFR.

47:04Um, there's also some changes with

47:06component units, but that doesn't apply

47:08to Southington.

47:10Um, the next standard is 104 on

47:13disclosures of certain capital assets.

47:15Because we as auditors do prepare the

47:18financial statements,

47:20um, or assist the town in preparing the

47:22financial statements, we will do this

47:24GASB for you, um, as long as we have the

47:28information, we're just going to be

47:29segregating that footnote out a little

47:31bit more than we usually have, so

47:32there's not a big lift there on that

47:34one.

47:37I've also given you the QR code. We have

47:39webinars that we do, um, updating you

47:42guys on any trends. We also have

47:44articles that are, um, very helpful to

47:47you on any new and upcoming things that

47:50are going on in the industry, so take a

47:52look at those when you have time.

47:54Um, and I'm open for any questions.

47:57>> at two or is that just the finance

47:59department?

48:00>> No, everyone can see.

48:01>> Okay. Okay.

48:03>> Please do.

48:07>> Any questions?

48:09>> So Leslie, if you had to rate the town

48:11of Southington out of four-point scale,

48:13how they do?

48:14>> Well, that's a really tough question to

48:16ask.

48:17I think town of Southington is doing

48:19very well financially.

48:21>> Thank you.

48:22>> Thank you.

48:23>> And thank you for the guidance you

48:24provided. I know you know, in part of

48:26the independence, there's a there's a

48:28line there, but also reaching over and

48:30giving a little guidance, helping our

48:32our staff, even even the past staff, the

48:35past group of finance directors, you've

48:37always your firm has always been

48:39helpful, not only doing the audit and

48:41remaining independent and objective, but

48:43also sometimes offering a little bit of

48:45help, guidance, and advice that makes

48:47the relationship a comfortable

48:49relationship.

48:50>> Thank you very much.

48:55>> Thank you.

48:56>> Thank you.

49:02>> Okay. Um

49:03the close out of the DePaolo school

49:06audit.

49:07Is that you, Chrissy?

49:08>> Yes.

49:10So recently the finance department was

49:13in contact with our state auditors and

49:16we wrapped up the final audit for

49:19DePaolo.

49:20This has been going on, I believe it's

49:22since

49:242017.

49:26Um when we received the draft final

49:29audit report, it came in that we had

49:331,663,000

49:36dollars in ineligible costs.

49:39Um so our department worked very

49:42diligently going through all of the

49:45hundreds of boxes that we have in our

49:47office and going back through meeting

49:49minutes.

49:50So we got that $1.6 million number down

49:54to 314,000.

49:57Um, so with our final audit um, report

50:01back we will be receiving about $2.6

50:05million

50:07back to the town. So, um, in looking

50:11through our um, books, um, we have about

50:151 million booked in AR. So, I have to do

50:19a little bit more researching and

50:21figuring out um, how we had this project

50:25originally budgeted, whether it was um,

50:27from grant money or bonding. So, I'm not

50:30really sure where the additional 1.6

50:33will go, if it will go back to general

50:34fund or what, but I will keep you

50:36updated on

50:36>> But that should have been closed years

50:38ago, right?

50:39>> Yes, so this is one of four um, school

50:42projects that I walked into when I came

50:44>> And what, yeah.

50:46And you had the other one got solved

50:47too, to the favorable.

50:48>> Yes, so

50:49>> Uh, it went from being unfavorable to

50:50the favorable because

50:53I guess I

50:54Josh, right? Josh

50:55>> Yes.

50:55>> rolled up his sleeves for in the

50:57basement.

50:58>> Yes.

50:58>> I mean, that that's really something. I

51:00people need to know, you know, people

51:02offer an awful lot of criticism of

51:04sometimes town government and you know,

51:06but it but sometimes, a lot of times,

51:10things are done really hard, really

51:11well, and a lot of effort, a lot of

51:14smarts go into things and things come

51:15out excellent. So, I mean, I think we're

51:17closing two audits that came to us

51:20almost in a position of a liability

51:22where we would have expenses that were

51:24not approved by the state and we get

51:26stuck with them from the allocation that

51:29we thought we'd get

51:30to actually them saying, "Uh-oh, it's

51:33the other way around." I mean, that

51:35takes a lot of work, a lot of effort,

51:36and I think we're we're every one of us

51:38appreciative.

51:39>> Yes, I am too. Very tedious work and I'm

51:42proud

51:42>> And the staff, right? It's always staff.

51:46>> So, thank you to my team.

51:50>> Um that's excellent.

51:53And what was our surplus I didn't even

51:55look at the surplus in 2025 when Leslie

51:57was

51:58talking. Do you remember?

52:01Cuz now that's committed, right? Now

52:02that this audit's over that that surplus

52:05is

52:05>> I believe it was around 2.4.

52:07>> 2.4 million.

52:12So, 2.6 from the closeout of the

52:16the Palo and 2.4 from the closeout of

52:18the 2025 year. Um

52:21but I think people have to realize, too,

52:23that when we close with a surplus, in a

52:27way, it's by design because we have to

52:29bump up our rainy day fund because our

52:31rainy day fund says that every we have

52:35to keep 11% of revenue in the rainy day

52:38fund. So, every time our budget goes up,

52:41say our budget goes up What was it going

52:43to go up? It was going to go up by $10

52:45million this year. We would have had to

52:47put 1.1 million right to our rainy day

52:50fund. So, we don't budget to build the

52:53rainy day fund. We design it where we

52:55get a surplus and the surplus gets us

52:57there. So, it's a little bit by design,

52:59not happenstance, that we get a surplus.

53:02So, but we do need it because as the

53:04budget goes up, the 11% goes up and the

53:07rainy day fund has to grow. And again,

53:09not a budgeted item, so we we grow it by

53:12counting on a surplus.

53:17Good.

53:20Okay, self-insurance update.

53:24Joe, anything's Oh, is your

53:26self-insurance in here?

53:27>> So, including included in your packets,

53:30I provided the expenditures and claims

53:33through June 30th.

53:35We ended the year on a really good note.

53:38We have about 3. almost 3.3 million

53:43under what was budgeted for claims. Um

53:46so we ended the year really strong.

53:48>> And we were below prior year.

53:51>> I'm sorry.

53:51>> For claims. We We were below prior year

53:53for claims, correct?

53:54>> Yes, that's correct.

53:56>> Well.

53:59>> Um so we're still working on finalizing

54:01everything. It's been busy the last few

54:03months, I mean few weeks trying to um

54:06you know, pay all of our final invoices

54:08and everything. But right now our ending

54:10cash balance is um about 2.9 million.

54:21>> It's great.

54:23Okay. No uh

54:25Any questions?

54:27All right. I I know our fiscal year just

54:29began. Um

54:31I Can I ask for unanimous consent that

54:33we don't I don't think we have any

54:35issues with revenue and expenditures cuz

54:37we're only a couple weeks in. Can I ask

54:39anybody you know, we can just skip

54:41these um first two items of the fiscal

54:44assessment because the fiscal year just

54:46began.

54:47>> So moved.

54:48>> No.

54:49>> Second.

54:49>> Okay.

54:50All in favor, I.

54:51>> I.

54:51>> Um okay. We just don't need to go there.

54:54It's too soon. That's the point where we

54:55say, "Hey, how are revenues going versus

54:57budget? How are expenses?" We haven't

54:59even closed a month.

55:01Through 2 weeks. Okay. Um

55:04the contingency line item.

55:07>> [clears throat]

55:08>> Same as one and two, Mr. Jared.

55:09>> All right. Just We'll We'll square that

55:12up soon. Okay. Same Same as We've got

55:14that goes with one and two. All right.

55:15Investments.

55:18Let me slide down in my notes here.

55:23>> Um so the interest rates are still um

55:26holding steady for short term. We're at

55:293.3%

55:30to 3.57.

55:32Um right now we have about 65.6

55:37million in short-term and 20.7 in

55:41long-term. Um long-term interest rate um

55:44continues to be at 3.34%.

55:51>> So, we're hopefully revenue holds up

55:54budget

55:55as we squeeze it a bit.

55:58>> It's tax season, so revenue will be

56:00coming in shortly. However, our tax

56:02collector is very busy.

56:04>> Our January July thing, right?

56:07>> Yep.

56:07>> But yeah, 65 million short-term and 25

56:11million long-term. We've got a lot of a

56:13lot of money

56:14floating and thanks to the treasurer too

56:16for doing

56:17what 100 years ago was called sources

56:19and uses, right? How much when it when

56:21when do we need the money? And and if we

56:23don't need the money, can we invest the

56:25money? I know what there's new names for

56:27it, cash flow forecasting, but sources

56:30and uses was a nice name they

56:31discontinued,

56:33but

56:34I guess it tells us what we could

56:35invest, so that's great.

56:37Um

56:39Okay. Any questions there?

56:44Unassigned fund balance.

56:49>> So, for the next board meeting, I will

56:51be updating it now that I have the final

56:53um

56:54audit report for FY25, so I will be

56:57updating this with all of the um

57:00expenditures that we have used from in

57:03FY26. Um so, I I'll have a new one for

57:06the next

57:07>> tag any single thing

57:09that

57:10somebody forecasts to use, even if it's

57:13not

57:15realized yet. And I think we I think we

57:17all kind of wanted that where if there's

57:19something somebody's thinking about or

57:21we're looking at something, we should

57:23put a notation in here because this

57:25undesignated

57:27this rain this excess rainy day,

57:29sometimes we don't really have what we

57:32say we have because we've we've

57:34committed it to one thing or another and

57:35we don't want to

57:37overcommit the same dollars to different

57:39things, nor do we want to

57:41have things in the budget in the future

57:44year in the capital plan that require

57:46this money that isn't tagged. So, it

57:48really goes from unassigned to assigned.

57:50So, yeah, we can sharpen our pencil next

57:52month. We could all sit down and maybe

57:54this another thing we we really hash out

57:56so we're clear on it. So, when somebody

57:58says you got money in your undesignated

57:59reserve fund, there's no ambiguity among

58:02these members here, our members, that

58:05we're we're comfortable with what the

58:07number we have in there, what it is,

58:09what we're planning for it, if we're not

58:11planning anything, what that unassigned

58:13balance

58:14is. So,

58:16um it's a nice schedule, but

58:19we'll see it more fully next time. Okay.

58:22Got it.

58:25Um any other funds to discuss?

58:32>> Our sewer funds already you changed the

58:34collection,

58:35um Alex, the way in which sewer bills

58:37are collected, the timing of them.

58:39Everybody has their own timing or

58:41>> So, in the past they were billed

58:43quarterly

58:45to coincide with the the water rates,

58:47the water bills coming out. Um it was

58:49very difficult for when the water

58:52department, which is not a town of

58:53Ellington entity, would get the bills

58:55over to the the sewer department for

58:57billing.

58:59A lot of times we would get it after the

59:01the sewer bills had to go out. And in

59:04that case, we're not allowed to collect

59:05interest. So, that's actually our

59:07interest because you've got to publish

59:09the sewer bill notice in the in the

59:10local paper, and you also have to have

59:12them postmarked

59:13um by the 1st of the month.

59:16>> So, you could never collect interest or

59:17just for that month?

59:18>> You can never collect interest on those

59:19bills.

59:20>> Ever?

59:21>> Ever.

59:22>> Ever?

59:24>> So, now we're going to a twice a year.

59:28And we did collect interest most of the

59:30time. There's very It was just when if

59:31It was a water department got it out

59:32very, you know,

59:33>> Yep.

59:34>> the day before it was due,

59:36we we can't get it to the mailer

59:37that day, the same day.

59:39So, now we're doing it twice a year.

59:43It's saving tens of thousands of dollars

59:45in postage, which will directly um

59:48benefit the ratepayers who pay those

59:50those bills and the the sewer charges.

59:53Uh and it'll make it much simpler and

59:57easier for the billing of the that so

59:59that the interest will always be

1:00:00accrued. It'll be simple. It'll be It'll

1:00:02be cleaner.

1:00:03Um there was a lot of discussion at the

1:00:05town council level regarding the

1:00:07implementation of this

1:00:09and um the publication to the the

1:00:12public.

1:00:13So, uh in the in everybody's mailer bill

1:00:16that's the last quarterly bill that went

1:00:18out, there was a very nice cardstock

1:00:21colored um printed piece of paper that

1:00:24explained, "Hey, you are not getting a

1:00:26bill for 6 months.

1:00:29You're on a new billing cycle." There

1:00:30was also a lot of social media posting

1:00:32regarding the issue. There was a lot of

1:00:34town posting on the issue. So, um

1:00:39some folks have been calling saying,

1:00:41"Where's our bill?" And we said, "You'll

1:00:43get it in

1:00:443 months." Um but we are so far most of

1:00:48the feedback we've gotten from the

1:00:48public is thankful that they're no

1:00:51longer paying for all those stamps and

1:00:54in the postage and their sewer bills.

1:00:58>> Okay.

1:01:01>> Anything else?

1:01:05All right, we have our subcommittees and

1:01:07I guess um

1:01:10haven't talked about Mr. Pocock used to

1:01:12serve on public works and open space.

1:01:15So, we have to fill his void on those.

1:01:20And usually I think public works is one

1:01:22Democrat, one Republican.

1:01:25And um

1:01:26I think we only have one member on open

1:01:28space, right? Doesn't matter.

1:01:31>> Mr. Chair, I was on open space and

1:01:32depending on zoning, so I could just

1:01:34>> You'll carry on with open space? Okay,

1:01:35thank you for that, Rob.

1:01:37Um

1:01:38public works, you want public works?

1:01:40>> Sure.

1:01:41>> Okay. That's a good That's a good one. I

1:01:43started with that one years ago. It was

1:01:44very insightful.

1:01:46Um

1:01:48so public works.

1:01:50Who Who

1:01:51When we see the uh chair of the town

1:01:53council, we'll tell him

1:01:55public works and open space.

1:01:58Okay. Um economic strike.

1:02:02Who's on that? Kevin on that one?

1:02:04>> I think that's Scott.

1:02:04>> Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Um not sure. Usually

1:02:07sometimes we don't have anything. Oh, we

1:02:08got a million of these year-end close

1:02:11out administrative business, but let's

1:02:13keep going here.

1:02:16Um

1:02:18I do think we need our fire commissioner

1:02:21liaison role

1:02:23put back in place because there's a lot

1:02:25going on. There's that um permission to

1:02:27apply for the safer grant going on.

1:02:30There's um

1:02:31company five building in a flood zone.

1:02:34Like there's stuff that could have

1:02:35financial implications. I don't expect

1:02:37us to go figure out how to put out a

1:02:38fire, fire prevention or suppression,

1:02:40but certainly things that come with

1:02:42money we should be a little closer to.

1:02:45So,

1:02:46if anybody, you know, has that strong

1:02:48desire to go to

1:02:51You don't have to go to every meeting.

1:02:52It's not an assignment per se. It's more

1:02:54of a liaison, so you you just be that

1:02:57person who represents the fire

1:02:58department to this board cuz even as we

1:03:01went through the budget, that linkage

1:03:04wasn't strong and

1:03:06we sometimes here didn't really know

1:03:09clearly what was going on in the fire

1:03:11department. We had to call the chief a

1:03:12lot or or um Mitch on the computer

1:03:16systems and other things. So, I think we

1:03:18do have to strengthen that. So, I'll

1:03:19leave it there. We'll talk about it

1:03:20maybe next time. We got a lot of stuff

1:03:22on our agenda.

1:03:24Any more um

1:03:26board communicate I'm sorry. We'll go to

1:03:28public communications. Anybody from the

1:03:30public like to speak?

1:03:35Okay.

1:03:36Hearing having a lot of public, but

1:03:37nobody wants to speak. That's okay.

1:03:39Uh board communications member to

1:03:42member?

1:03:45>> Um if I could I I just wanted to note

1:03:47that Steve Salerno is not here this

1:03:49evening because his mother-in-law passed

1:03:52away. So, I just wanted to extend our

1:03:54condolences to Steve's family.

1:03:56>> Yeah, thoughts to Steve, his

1:03:57mother-in-law.

1:03:59Um always difficult and

1:04:02you know, we should really just take a

1:04:03moment not just just in maybe in honor

1:04:06of Steve and his mother-in-law, but for

1:04:08everybody. There's a lot of people in

1:04:09our community that

1:04:11are suffering with different things,

1:04:13whether it's illness in the family,

1:04:15death in the family, illness with

1:04:17children, which is I think the worst.

1:04:20Um

1:04:21we should just take a moment to

1:04:22recognize as we're sitting up here doing

1:04:23our business in a very business-like

1:04:25mode that there are a lot of people

1:04:27suffering. So, let's just take a minute

1:04:29and just think of that and

1:04:31never forget the folks.

1:04:41Thank you.

1:04:43Okay. Um

1:04:45any other member to member board

1:04:46communications?

1:04:48Town department comments, anything from

1:04:51department?

1:04:53Okay, that was a section we put in if if

1:04:55there was a department, any department

1:04:57that wanted to come forward and say,

1:04:59"Hey, let me tell you what we're doing

1:05:01or let me tell you where we might be

1:05:03short on money or let me tell you where

1:05:04we appreciate having some money."

1:05:06It just gave them a little voice of the

1:05:09departments, whether it be community

1:05:11services, IT, highway, parks, whoever.

1:05:14And so everybody should know that

1:05:15they're welcome to come. Uh there are no

1:05:17presentations tonight. So we have some

1:05:19administrative items and Rob, for you,

1:05:22the administrative business is stuff

1:05:25where the money's been received and we

1:05:27just have to appropriate it back to the

1:05:29right line item. There there's nothing

1:05:31really to think about there. It it's

1:05:34it's akin to a um somebody made a

1:05:36donation and it sits in the general fund

1:05:39and we have to give it to the the cause

1:05:41that they donated to, that department,

1:05:43that cost center, and that line item. Or

1:05:46um one of our vehicles gets in an

1:05:47accident, we get the insurance claim,

1:05:49sits in our general fund, and we have to

1:05:51appropriate it back to um let's say the

1:05:54police department to vehicle

1:05:56maintenance. You know, that's the kind

1:05:57of thing you'd find at administrative

1:05:59business, those consent agendas, as we

1:06:01say. So I'd like to take all three

1:06:03together. I'll read them and then we'll

1:06:05take them up as one. So appropriation of

1:06:07the 25-26 year for $670,

1:06:11um

1:06:12for special revenue youth outside

1:06:14programming. Number two is an

1:06:16appropriation of the 25-26 year for

1:06:18682,277.74

1:06:22for um the general fund to board of head

1:06:24pre-K and special ed tuition fees. And

1:06:27then we have an appropriation 2026-27

1:06:30for 54,699

1:06:33for the calendar house to dial-a-ride

1:06:35grant.

1:06:36>> I'll make a motion to approve.

1:06:37>> Second.

1:06:38>> Motion approved, second, any discussion?

1:06:41All those in favor signify by saying I.

1:06:42>> I.

1:06:43>> I opposed. That carries 4-0. Now there

1:06:46are a load.

1:06:48This is our typical year-end

1:06:50list. That's why I'm really glad

1:06:52everybody's here, and Christie probably

1:06:53is, too, right? You can close out the

1:06:55year. So

1:06:57>> [laughter]

1:06:58>> I'll Oh.

1:06:59I'll try and go quickly through them. Um

1:07:03and we'll just see if we can do them

1:07:05quickly. They're all in our packet.

1:07:07Let's see if we can get it done. Okay.

1:07:10Um

1:07:12Let me just start by saying they're all

1:07:1520

1:07:17Well,

1:07:18a bunch of them are 25, 26. So, here we

1:07:20go. 2025, 2026 year of transfer general

1:07:23fund highway parks contracted services

1:07:2614,350.

1:07:30>> I'll make a motion to approve.

1:07:32>> Second.

1:07:32>> Motion second any discussion? All in

1:07:34favor signify by saying I.

1:07:36>> I.

1:07:36>> I.

1:07:37>> Uh next number two, transfer 2025, 2026

1:07:41this fiscal year $1,050

1:07:43general fund highway parks on call

1:07:46meals.

1:07:47>> So moved.

1:07:48>> Second.

1:07:50>> Motion is second any discussion? All

1:07:52those in favor signify by saying I.

1:07:53>> I.

1:07:54>> Number three, department transfer $300

1:07:56highway parks uniform cleaning to meal

1:07:59allowance.

1:08:00>> So moved.

1:08:02>> Second.

1:08:03>> Uh any discussion?

1:08:05All those in favor signify by saying I.

1:08:07>> I.

1:08:07>> I.

1:08:08>> The number four, department transfer

1:08:102025, 2026 15,895

1:08:13highway parks ground maintenance to

1:08:15gasoline.

1:08:17>> So moved.

1:08:18>> Second.

1:08:19>> Any discussion?

1:08:21All those in favor signify by saying I.

1:08:23>> I.

1:08:24>> Department transfer 2025, 2026 7,680

1:08:28highway parks contracted services to

1:08:30utilities.

1:08:31>> So moved.

1:08:32>> Second.

1:08:34>> All in favor?

1:08:35>> I.

1:08:35>> I.

1:08:36>> Next one, department transfer 2025, 2026

1:08:394,000 even um

1:08:42general fund highway parks building

1:08:43maintenance to um refuse.

1:08:46>> So moved.

1:08:47>> Second.

1:08:49>> Um all in favor?

1:08:50>> I.

1:08:50>> I.

1:08:51>> Uh department transfer 2025, 2026 $600

1:08:55building maintenance to contracted

1:08:57services.

1:08:59>> So moved.

1:09:00>> Second.

1:09:00>> All in favor?

1:09:01>> I.

1:09:02>> I.

1:09:03>> I'll save you, Joe.

1:09:04>> I'll skip discussion. If you want to If

1:09:05you want to discuss, just just

1:09:06interrupt.

1:09:07>> Can we group them or not?

1:09:08>> What?

1:09:09>> Can we group them?

1:09:10>> Um

1:09:10>> You said to read them, right?

1:09:11>> I still have to read them. So,

1:09:13well, you're Let's Let's Let's group

1:09:15them.

1:09:16How about we group them all um

1:09:19I will group them down to 16 and we'll

1:09:21turn the page. How's that? Okay, I'll

1:09:24read them. 20 They're all from 2025-26.

1:09:26$775

1:09:28ground maintenance to program supplies,

1:09:30$333 uniform cleaning to overtime,

1:09:33$3,500

1:09:35contracted services to overtime,

1:09:38uh $16,696

1:09:41ground maintenance to overtime,

1:09:44$2,185

1:09:47uh highway parks equipment maintenance

1:09:48to overtime, $2,880

1:09:52highway parks building maintenance to

1:09:54overtime, $3,043

1:09:56highway parks vehicle maintenance to

1:09:58overtime, $1,305

1:10:02highway parks office supplies to

1:10:04overtime, $3,469

1:10:06highway parks tools and equipment to

1:10:08overtime. We have a motion on 8 to 16.

1:10:11>> So moved.

1:10:12>> Second.

1:10:13>> Motion is second. Any discussion? All

1:10:15those in favor signify by saying aye.

1:10:17>> Aye.

1:10:17>> Aye.

1:10:18>> Thank you.

1:10:21>> Oof.

1:10:22>> Down to 32?

1:10:25>> Yeah, we'll take them

1:10:27down to 32. That'll be the end of the

1:10:292025-26.

1:10:30So, these are all 2025-26 fiscal year.

1:10:33We'll go 17 to 32. Highway parks

1:10:36downtown renovations to overtime 3,149,

1:10:40$205 animal control regular wages to

1:10:43overtime, um $800 animal control

1:10:46building maintenance to office supplies,

1:10:482,500

1:10:50animal control to regular wages to

1:10:53animal control utilities,

1:10:55$200 police regular wages to dispatch

1:10:59longevity.

1:11:01$3,100, regular wages to police

1:11:03utilities. $20,118.49,

1:11:07regular wages to police utilities.

1:11:09$8,500,

1:11:11engineering contracted services uh town

1:11:14line sewer.

1:11:16$2,969.05,

1:11:19finance office supplies to regular

1:11:22wages. $500

1:11:24um

1:11:25general fund overtime to regular wages.

1:11:28$200

1:11:29uh finance department longevity to

1:11:32regular wages. $331.47

1:11:37uh finance department dues and

1:11:38conferences to regular wages.

1:11:41Depart- another transfer. $4,119.42,

1:11:45town clerk microbinding to regular

1:11:48wages.

1:11:49Uh $509.57,

1:11:52general fund town clerk dues and

1:11:54conferences to regular wages. $7,732.84,

1:11:58general fund IT mobile communications to

1:12:01regular wages. And a department

1:12:03transfer, $495.57,

1:12:06general fund community services

1:12:07temporary seasonal. Those were all de-

1:12:10partment transfers.

1:12:11>> So moved.

1:12:13>> Second.

1:12:13>> Motion is second. Any discussion? All

1:12:15those in favor signify by saying aye.

1:12:17>> Aye.

1:12:19>> Okay, next group.

1:12:22>> Maybe 33 through 35.

1:12:23>> Look at that. All right, we'll do the

1:12:24ones on that we could see on the page.

1:12:2633 to 46. Now we're into the 2026-27

1:12:32I'll do them separately.

1:12:33>> Or I think 33-35.

1:12:34>> Yeah.

1:12:35>> And then it will take the next group.

1:12:37>> Cuz cuz it the department transfers are

1:12:38going to carry over. So we'll do 33 to

1:12:4035.

1:12:41>> Okay. All right, yeah, yeah, yeah. Cuz

1:12:43the rest are carried forwards. Got it.

1:12:45Department transfer 2026-27, $6,000,

1:12:49finance office supplies to postage,

1:12:52department transfers $5,000.

1:12:54Assessor office supplies to

1:12:56subscriptions and a department transfers

1:12:58$1,600.

1:13:00Assessor office supplies to postage.

1:13:03>> So moved.

1:13:04>> Second.

1:13:05>> Motion is second. Any discussion? All

1:13:07those in favor signify by saying aye.

1:13:08>> Aye.

1:13:09>> Aye.

1:13:10>> Now we have the carry forwards. These

1:13:12are funds not spent that we're carrying

1:13:14forward to the new year. So um we'll

1:13:18take them from 36 to 46 and then turn

1:13:20the page where we have a a slew more.

1:13:24Uh

1:13:25carry forward into fiscal year 26-27.

1:13:285,183

1:13:30general fund

1:13:32Board of Ed phase three building.

1:13:344,029

1:13:37general fund Board of Ed Southington

1:13:39High School athletic facility.

1:13:4187,978.25

1:13:44general fund Board of Ed non-lapsing.

1:13:4792,015

1:13:50general fund Board of Ed non-lapsing.

1:13:536,600

1:13:55general fund Board of Ed non-lapsing.

1:13:59Uh 88,190

1:14:02>> [clears throat]

1:14:02>> 53 cents general fund Board of Ed

1:14:05non-lapsing.

1:14:07121,657.76

1:14:11general fund Board of Ed non-lapsing.

1:14:14And uh

1:14:1565,910

1:14:1730 cents general fund assessors

1:14:20revaluation services. 4,051.91

1:14:25uh assessors office supplies.

1:14:2813,918.69

1:14:31economic development contracted

1:14:33services.

1:14:34And 24,500

1:14:36even

1:14:37uh economic development promotions.

1:14:40>> So moved.

1:14:41>> Second.

1:14:42>> Any discussion on any of those?

1:14:47Okay. All in favor?

1:14:49>> Aye.

1:14:49>> Aye.

1:14:50Okay, now we're on to the final page of

1:14:53them.

1:14:53>> 79

1:14:55>> What?

1:14:55>> Take it to 79.

1:14:57>> We'll take it all.

1:14:58Okay, they're all carry forwards into

1:15:00fiscal year 2026-27.

1:15:03That means from the current last year to

1:15:05this year, the 2025-26 to 2026-27.

1:15:09And I'll I'll read them.

1:15:1020,300

1:15:12general fund economic development to

1:15:14promotions. 21,050

1:15:18town council program services for the

1:15:20America 250 celebration.

1:15:22Uh

1:15:2333,033.27

1:15:27town hall building maintenance.

1:15:30$3,355

1:15:32calendar house building maintenance.

1:15:34$514.35

1:15:37calendar house equipment maintenance.

1:15:39$78.65

1:15:42calendar house program services. $3,080

1:15:46calendar house building maintenance.

1:15:48$17,370

1:15:51um

1:15:52fire department training services.

1:15:54$16,294.58

1:15:57fire department contracted services.

1:15:59$18,000 even fire department building

1:16:02maintenance.

1:16:03$8,405.53

1:16:05fire department vehicle maintenance.

1:16:07$4,508 fire department uniforms and

1:16:10shoes.

1:16:11$50,000 even fire department fire

1:16:14equipment. $12,000 even fire department

1:16:17air packs. $700

1:16:20even uh fire department equipment and

1:16:23furniture. $14,000 even uh engineering

1:16:26department contracted services.

1:16:29$11,276.87

1:16:31engineering equipment maintenance.

1:16:33$19,914.58

1:16:36engineering contracted services.

1:16:39$43,197.12

1:16:42engineering contracted services 14,000

1:16:45even general fund library professional

1:16:47services $1,200

1:16:50library books and multimedia

1:16:53$510 library other professional services

1:16:5711,000 even general fund town manager

1:16:59professional services 10,000 general

1:17:02fund town attorney other professional

1:17:04services 10,000 general fund police

1:17:07vehicle maintenance 6,500 general fund

1:17:10police command vehicle connectivity

1:17:145,000

1:17:16general fund police school and education

1:17:18175,000

1:17:20sewer fund water pollution control plant

1:17:22maintenance 70,000 even sewer fund water

1:17:26pollution control sewer maintenance

1:17:28147,937

1:17:31water pollution control sewer major

1:17:33maintenance

1:17:34352,536.50

1:17:37water pollution control environmental

1:17:40assessment

1:17:41319,279.70

1:17:45water pollution control

1:17:47manganite feed system

1:17:50carry forward 3,464.20

1:17:53sewer fund legal fees

1:17:55>> So moved.

1:17:56>> Okay, so moved.

1:17:57Second. We have a second?

1:17:59>> Second.

1:17:59>> Second. All any discussion on any

1:18:01particular item?

1:18:03All in favor signify by saying I.

1:18:05>> I.

1:18:06>> Opposed, abstain. Okay, turning the

1:18:08page.

1:18:10No vote.

1:18:11Any other business? It's your half

1:18:13favorite motion.

1:18:15>> I'll make a motion to return.

1:18:17>> So, second.

1:18:19>> Motion a second.

1:18:20>> [laughter]

1:18:21>> All in favor?

1:18:23>> I.

1:18:23>> I.

1:18:23>> Meeting adjourned at 8:20. Thank you all

1:18:26for being here.

1:18:27Really appreciate it and I think the

1:18:29town staff really appreciates it because

1:18:31all this stuff you could close out the

1:18:32year.

1:18:33>> John, that was impressive.