2026-10-20 - City Council Formal Meeting
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard. The presiding chair is not named in the captions and is identified from the council roster.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes public comment and side talk):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Other business | 29 | 36% |
| HF Sinclair Westline Connect pipeline expansion | 17 | 21% |
| HUD Community Development Needs Public Hearing | 13 | 16% |
| Wasatch Assembly housing demands | 8 | 10% |
| Sugar House Business District special assessment area | 5 | 6% |
| Hardage upzone at Linden Avenue and 800 East | 4 | 5% |
| Ballpark rezoning follow-up | 2 | 3% |
| Tree preservation legislative action | 1 | 1% |
| Right-of-way construction signage requirement | 1 | 1% |
- Tuesday, October 20, 2026.
- The recording is music until about 6:35, the meeting opens at about 6:49 and was adjourned at about 1:28:30; the video ends with music at about 1:29.
- The captions have no gaps in the meeting itself.
- Every vote was unanimous.
Ballpark rezoning follow-up
40:36-42:16
- Item C2: ordinances for the Ballpark zoning map and text amendments, moved by Council Member Carlsen and seconded by Dugan.
- Carlsen thanked colleagues for adding open space, naming green space as a priority with a 5-acre minimum, and for tree protections.
- Adopted unanimously.
Sugar House Business District special assessment area
42:16-47:39
- Items D1 and D2 (designating the area and appointing a Board of Equalization) were both postponed on motions by Council Member Young.
- Young said property-owner buy-in is not there given business costs and recent construction, but it is "not a never".
- Both votes were unanimous; Dugan and Napier-Pearce seconded.
HUD Community Development Needs Public Hearing
27:33-40:07
- Item B6: annual hearing on 2027-2028 HUD needs (CDBG, ESG, HOME, HOPWA), introduced by policy analyst Allison Rowland.
- Speakers: Jennifer Madrigal, MJ Powell, Abby Feinstein (captioned Feenstra), a resident describing a neighbor's housing struggle, and Bernie Hart.
- Themes: deeply affordable housing, case management funding, land trusts, and provider accountability for outcomes.
- Napier-Pearce moved to close and Carlsen seconded; unanimous. The chair urged residents to contact federal representatives to protect CDBG.
Tree preservation legislative action
48:37-49:55
- Item E2: Carlsen moved to ask the administration to review tree code with emphasis on preservation during development.
- Seconded by Dugan; unanimous.
Right-of-way construction signage requirement
49:55-51:14
- Item E3: Council Member Petro moved a request for informational signage at right-of-way construction projects.
- The chair said constituents had asked who owns road projects; unanimous.
HF Sinclair Westline Connect pipeline expansion
54:04-55:54, 58:12-59:56, 1:04:23-1:12:25, 1:23:10-1:28:25
- Not on the agenda; raised in general comment by Nicholas Glenn, Kate Groesinger, Lexi Tuddenham, Brooke Smith, Jack Strauss, Brian Minch, Olivia Juarez and others, all opposed.
- Concerns: leaks, fire and earthquake risk, drinking water in the watershed, and construction disruption. Strauss said his group collected almost 1,300 signatures.
- Speakers referred to the council's briefing with HF Sinclair at the October 13 work session. The captions render Emigration as "immigration".
- The chair asked staff to invite Sinclair back for the November 10 work session; a council member said Sinclair had not yet confirmed.
Wasatch Assembly housing demands
1:12:25-1:20:44
- Four speakers, including Kylie Akina, asked for no homelessness sweeps, adoption of the expanding housing options plan, property tax for affordable housing, deposit and junk fee rules and a ban on RealPage.
- They asked for eviction protections and thanked Chris Wharton for completing the group's survey.
Hardage upzone at Linden Avenue and 800 East
1:00:08-1:04:10
- Cindy Cromer and Deborah Rothol opposed the up-zone request; Rothol said the Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 against the general plan amendment (speaker claim, unverified).
Other business
- Opening and meeting rules (6:49-11:00); minutes for September 8 and October 6 approved, moved by Council Member Wharton and seconded by Dugan.
- Joint resolution with Mayor Mendenhall declaring November 2026 Native American Heritage Month (11:00-18:10): moved by Dugan, seconded by Petro, unanimous. Carlsen shared her own Native heritage, and Samantha Eldridge accepted the resolution.
- Grant application hearings for items B1 to B5 (18:10-27:33), introduced by Sylvia Richards: older adults home modification, Allen Park all-abilities recreation and creek rehabilitation, a financial empowerment blueprint (START), a BLM fuels management water source, and a youth outdoor recreation grant. Jennifer Madrigal and MJ Powell spoke in support. Closed and referred to a future consent agenda, unanimous.
- Item C1, community correction facilities and jail tax ordinance (40:07-40:38): adopted unanimously.
- Item E1, a request that the administration review risk management coverage levels (47:41-48:37): moved by Young, unanimous.
- Consent agenda approved (51:14-51:43; the mover is captioned "Warren", apparently Wharton). The mayor had no questions from the council.
- General comment (from 52:02, about 17 registered): also included a tribute by MJ Powell to a late firefighter union leader (55:56-58:04) and a request from Bernie Hart for outcome data on homeless services (1:20:46-1:23:02).
Agenda
Native American Heritage Month resolution and public hearings on three grant applications (Older Adults Home Modification, Allen Park recreation, CityStart).
Related issues
- Ballpark rezoning follow-up (item C2, ordinances adopted)
- Sugar House Business District special assessment area (items D1 and D2, postponed)
- HUD Community Development Needs Public Hearing (item B6)
- Tree preservation legislative action (item E2)
- Right-of-way construction signage requirement (item E3)
- HF Sinclair Westline Connect pipeline expansion, Hardage upzone at Linden Avenue and 800 East and Wasatch Assembly housing demands (general comment)
Video summary: 2026-10-20 - City Council Formal Meeting
Sources
- Video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XVZumAJisNI
- Agenda: https://slc.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=4258
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:00[music]
00:14[music]
00:22[music]
00:28[music]
00:34[music]
00:40[music]
00:47[music]
00:51[music]
00:58[music]
01:14[music]
01:23[music]
01:40[music]
01:46[music]
01:59>> Mhm.
02:01>> [music]
02:14[music]
02:24[music]
02:30[music]
02:38[music]
02:58[music]
03:16[music]
03:22[music]
03:28[music]
03:36[music]
03:44[music]
04:16[music]
04:23[music]
04:28[music]
04:35[music]
04:46[music]
04:52[music]
05:18[music]
05:23[music]
05:35[music]
05:41[music]
05:45[music]
05:58[music]
06:15[music]
06:30[music]
06:35[music]
06:49>> 1 2 today's meeting
06:52we are happy to have you
06:54whether you are joining us in person or
06:56online.
06:57Um
06:58we hope you continue to participate in
07:00whichever manner you feel the most
07:01comfortable. Uh
07:04let's do the pledge of allegiance now.
07:06Join me.
07:09>> I pledge allegiance to the flag
07:12of the United States of America and to
07:15the republic for which it stands, one
07:17nation under God, indivisible, with
07:20liberty and justice for all.
07:26>> Before we move through the agenda, I
07:27want to quickly go through the
07:29registration information and share some
07:31the reasoning
07:33on how and why we chair these meetings
07:35the way we do.
07:37We welcome everyone regardless of your
07:39opinion or for side of an issue because
07:41we will have a people with varying
07:43opinions on important issues, the
07:45council's goal is to make the meeting a
07:47place where there where people feel safe
07:50and comfortable participating.
07:52This is the most local level of
07:54government and it is a key value of ours
07:56to ensure that we have created a created
07:58a respectful
08:00and safe environment so no one is
08:02intimidated out of free participation.
08:06This also allows us to ensure that the
08:08meeting can continue and that we can
08:10conduct the scheduled city business.
08:12We invite each of you to contribute to
08:14this space, to speak your mind and to
08:17welcome others to do the same.
08:19In order to create this welcoming and
08:21safe space, we will pause the meeting at
08:24any action that causes a disruption to
08:26our ability to conduct the meeting.
08:29Or any safety concern involving threats
08:31or unprotected speech.
08:34Either a repeated actions or comments,
08:36it may result in removal from the
08:38meeting.
08:39To avoid intimidating others, please
08:41avoid the use of threatening and
08:43discriminatory language.
08:45Do not insult others based on religion,
08:48ethnicity, race, color, gender, sexual
08:52orientation, or physical ability.
08:55Whether you agree or disagree with
08:56someone's comment, clapping, cheering,
08:59showering, booing, snapping, gesturing,
09:03obstructing, or discouraging others from
09:05commenting is not allowed.
09:08As a reminder, as council members, we
09:10refrain from reaching
09:12from reacting or responding to allow
09:15everyone to share their opinions freely.
09:18This is to keep our reactions from
09:20affecting your ability to share your
09:22opinion freely.
09:24If you would like to follow up with any
09:26of us, please see council staff
09:29uh or in the room here or you can
09:32message uh Zoom uh and start a chat with
09:35our council staff uh for information or
09:37contact information.
09:39When making your comments, please
09:41address the body and not the individual
09:43elected official.
09:45If you have a handout for the council,
09:47please you raise your hand and council
09:48staff will assist you.
09:50Council staff are also available during
09:53and after the meeting to help you with
09:54any questions or information sharing.
09:57The full meeting rules are listed at the
09:58door
09:59and our staff will post the link in
10:01Zoom.
10:03As a reminder of our public comment
10:05registration process, individuals may
10:08register to comment on scheduled public
10:10hearing items until the hearing is
10:12closed.
10:14For the general comment section, we will
10:16accept sign-ups until 7:30 p.m. The
10:19general comment section is limited to a
10:21maximum of 1 hour and will only include
10:24commentors who register before 7:30.
10:27So, if you're here to give general
10:29comment, please sign up and remember
10:32that it is possible not everyone who
10:33signed up may be able to speak.
10:36This brings us to item A4, which is
10:39approval of the minutes for September
10:428th and October 6th, 2026. I need a
10:45motion.
10:46>> Second.
10:47>> Motion by Council Member Wharton and
10:48seconded by Council Member Dugan. Any
10:50discussion?
10:51All of those in favor say I.
10:53>> I.
10:53>> I.
10:54>> Any opposed or abstentions?
10:56This motion carries unanimously. Our
10:58next item is A5.
11:00The council will consider adopting a
11:02joint ceremonial resolution
11:05with Mayor Mendenhall declaring November
11:07as Native American Heritage Month in
11:10Salt Lake City. I will now read the
11:11resolution.
11:14Joint resolution declaring November 2026
11:17as Native American Heritage Month in
11:19Salt Lake City.
11:21Whereas Salt Lake City stands on the
11:22ancestral homelands of many indigenous
11:25nations, including including the Utes,
11:28Paiute,
11:29Goshute, Diné, Navajo, Shoshone,
11:32Arapaho,
11:33Agala, Sioux, Cheyenne, River Sioux,
11:36Wind River Shoshone, Cherokee, uh
11:39Rosebud Sioux Sioux tribes, uh or other
11:43respected bands, and whereas
11:46Native American Heritage Month is an
11:48opportunity not only to celebrate the
11:50histories, cultures, and contributions
11:52of indigenous people, but also to
11:55reflect in our shared responsibilities
11:57to to ensure native voices are heard,
12:00respected, and represented through the
12:02year, and whereas
12:05meaningful recognition of Native
12:07American Heritage requires an honest
12:09understanding of our shared history,
12:12including the displacement,
12:14discrimination, and injustices
12:16experienced by indigenous people, as
12:19well as the commitment to learning from
12:21that history and building a more
12:24inclusive future,
12:26and
12:27whereas Native American residents,
12:30artists, educators, leaders, and
12:33families continue to shape Salt Lake
12:34City's economic, cultural, and social
12:37development, and their voices and
12:39contributions are essential to our
12:41city's future,
12:42and whereas recognizing Native American
12:45Heritage also means making space for
12:48indigenous voices in conversations about
12:51our shared future,
12:52as demonstrated by Salt Lake City's
12:54recent support of
12:57diverted indigenous stewardship and
13:00Saving the Great Salt Lake, a
13:02documentary exploring the role of
13:04indigenous knowledge and leadership in
13:06addressing the lake's decline,
13:09and whereas Salt Lake City remains
13:12committed to strengthening relationships
13:13with Native American residents and
13:15tribal nations through meaningful
13:17dialogue, improved services, and
13:20partnerships built on justice, equity,
13:23mutual respect, and shared prosperity,
13:26and now, therefore, be it resolved that
13:29the Salt Lake City Council and the mayor
13:30of Salt Lake City hereby declare the the
13:33month of November of 2026 as Native
13:36American Heritage Month
13:38in recognition of the enduring presence,
13:41contributions, and legacy of Native
13:43American communities.
13:46I will look for a motion.
13:48>> Mr. Chair, I move that the council adopt
13:50a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
13:52Mendenhall
13:53November as Native American Heritage
13:55Month in Salt Lake City.
13:57>> Second.
14:00>> I have a motion by Council Member Dugan
14:01and seconded by Council Member Petro. Is
14:03there any discussion?
14:07Council Member Carlson.
14:08>> Uh
14:09I uh I wanted to like mention something
14:11that I mentioned a few years back
14:14on the heels of this resolution. Um
14:17it's um
14:19as a person that grew up uh being
14:22ashamed of um
14:24you know, my my roots, and it took me a
14:27lifetime to get to a place where I was
14:29acceptance of myself and my own heritage
14:31and my own native roots. It's been a
14:34process uh of loving myself and loving
14:36my my uh my background. Um my community
14:41growing up tried to squash and squish
14:43that um out of me. Um and it is uh
14:48it happens a lot even today
14:50uh where we uh try to melt in uh and
14:55hide uh ourselves
14:57uh to not shine in our differences. Um
15:01it took took a lot of work uh to be able
15:04to accept my native heritage.
15:07Um and uh I I can say now that I'm very
15:10proud of that. Um so, thank you.
15:12I have a question on the table. I'm
15:14going to call that.
15:15Um all those in favor say I.
15:17>> I.
15:18>> I.
15:20>> That carries unanimously. Um I would
15:23like to welcome Samantha Eldridge,
15:26tribal liaison at the University of
15:28Utah,
15:29and director of the Center for Native
15:31Excellence and Tribal Engagement here
15:33with us today to receive the resolution.
15:35Uh, thank you for being here. You have
15:37the time.
15:38>> Thank you. Uh, thank you, Salt Lake City
15:40Council, Mayor Mendenhall, for the
15:41public proclamation to recognize
15:44November as Native American Heritage
15:46Month. I have been in community with
15:48many of you, and many of you know I'm a
15:50product of Salt Lake City. My family's
15:52from Rose Park. I graduated from East
15:54High School.
15:55And as a first-generation college
15:57student, I'm excited to share with you
15:58today that I will be graduating next
16:00semester with my doctorate in education.
16:09My journey is just one of many stories
16:11of Native Excellence within our
16:13community. Too often, conversations
16:15around indigenous and native communities
16:18come from a deficit lens. While those
16:20conversations are important, Native
16:21American Heritage Month gives us an
16:23opportunity to shift that narrative and
16:26celebrate our strengths,
16:28accomplishments, and contributions.
16:31Native Excellence is not the exception.
16:33It is all around us, and it deserves to
16:35be seen, recognized, and celebrated. I
16:38hope this month reminds us not only of
16:40the importance of preserving our
16:42cultures, our histories,
16:44and the legacy of our people, but also
16:47of celebrating who we are today and the
16:49futures we are creating for the next
16:51generation. Thank you for this
16:53recognition and for celebrating Native
16:55American Heritage Month with with us.
16:57Okay, hat and it's all good.
16:59>> Thank you. Will you come here with us
17:01and receive the resolution photo?
18:10>> Thank you. Um thank you
18:13uh
18:17Samantha for receiving that resolution.
18:19I uh this brings us uh to the public
18:22hearing section of our agenda.
18:24These are specific proposals before the
18:26council that require a public uh
18:27hearing. Your comments should pertain to
18:30the public hearing, and if you go off
18:32topic, we'll ask you to stop your
18:34comment. In order to create this
18:36welcoming and safe space, we'll pause
18:38the meeting at any disruption to our
18:40ability to conduct the meeting, or any
18:42safety concern involving threats or
18:44unprotected speech.
18:46If you have there are repeated actions
18:47or comments, it may result in removal
18:49from the meeting.
18:50Um if
18:52you are on Zoom, please unmute your
18:55microphone uh when your name is called.
18:58Each person will have 2 minutes. If you
19:00reach the 2-minute mark, the host will
19:02announce time, and your microphone will
19:05be muted.
19:06We'll be calling the names in order of
19:08sign-ups. If you need staff assistance
19:11in the room, please raise your hand and
19:12someone will be with you.
19:14>> [snorts]
19:15>> If you have technical issues in Zoom or
19:17you need assistance here in the room,
19:19you can message staff support or reach
19:21out to staff here in the room. Uh if
19:24you're unable to finish your comment,
19:26you can uh send the rest of your comment
19:29via email, mail, or calling our office.
19:33Contact information is at
19:34slc.gov/council.
19:38If you do have a handout, please reach
19:40out to staff to make the handout
19:43available to us.
19:44Um the public hearing that we're going
19:46to hear first
19:48uh is a group of public hearings and
19:50it's B uh 1 through B5 and these are
19:54grant applications and will be heard as
19:56one. Uh before we begin taking comments,
19:59I will turn the time over to Sylvia
20:01Richards, Council Policy Analyst, to
20:04give us a short introduction. Sylvia.
20:07>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Periodically, the
20:10city receives applies for and receives
20:13grants which fund some city programs.
20:16Each grant receives a public hearing to
20:19provide additional information for the
20:21council and the public.
20:24The first grant tonight is the Older
20:26Adults Home Modification Program Grant
20:29which would fund home assessments by
20:31licensed occupational
20:33therapists and licensed contractors to
20:35install low-cost home modifications
20:39which would increase the safety and
20:41accessibility allowing older adults to
20:44stay in their homes rather than moving
20:47to nursing homes or assisted care
20:49facilities. Second is the fiscal year 27
20:53Outdoor Recreation Initiative for Allen
20:56Park All Abilities Recreation Access and
21:00Creek Rehabilitation Project. The grant
21:03would fund the construction of several
21:06ADA project projects as well as a
21:08riparian viewing platform, the
21:11restoration of the front meadow
21:13development of a nature play area and
21:16exploration area,
21:18gazebo and pavilion rehabilitation.
21:21Also included is the construction of the
21:24Emigration Creek stormwater
21:26infrastructure, flood plain
21:29reconnection, riparian habitat and
21:31restoration and phase one design and
21:35construction documents.
21:37Third is the 2026 Salt Lake City START
21:41program grant. A portion of the funding
21:44would be used to hire a student intern
21:46at the University of Utah Department of
21:48City and Metropolitan Planning to assist
21:51with the project. Deliverables include a
21:53municipal financial empowerment
21:56blueprint focusing on neighborhoods in
21:59the city's high poverty census tracts.
22:02The blueprint will outline former
22:04residents strategies strategies such as
22:08financial education, counseling, and
22:11access to banking.
22:13Fourth is the fiscal year 2026 Bureau of
22:16Land Management Fuels Management and
22:18Community Fire Assistance Grant. It
22:21would fund the purchase and placement of
22:23Utah Street and I Street Hallowell, a
22:263,775
22:29gallon capacity portable water dip
22:32source
22:34for larger helicopters used by the US
22:36Forest Service and as a field station
22:39for tankers during prescribed burns,
22:42firebreaks, and reducing fuel sources in
22:45interagency aerial wildfire suppression.
22:49And last fifth is the Utah's
22:52Children's Outdoor Recreation Education
22:55Grant. It would fund the promising youth
22:57summer opportunity outdoor recreation
23:00activities.
23:0110 school resource officers and four
23:03youth advocates would provide outdoor
23:06programming and activities to help youth
23:09ages 12 to 18 to build skills,
23:12competence, and healthy relationships.
23:14Funds will also cover recreation entry
23:17fees, food, and recreation equipment.
23:20Thank you.
23:21>> Thank you, Silvia. Taylor,
23:23you begin with our first public comment.
23:26>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. We have two people
23:28registered to speak to these items. The
23:30first will be Jennifer Madrigal,
23:32followed by MJ Powell. Jennifer, you may
23:34now unmute.
23:36Hi. Um this is Jennifer Madrigal. I am
23:39the Glendale Neighborhood Council Chair,
23:41and I just wanted to speak to the older
23:43adults home modification program.
23:45Um I really support this initiative. Um
23:49and I would also love if it would be
23:51possible to do things like including
23:53chair lifts for multi-story units.
23:56Um we've got a lot of three-floor
23:57townhomes coming up in our um in our
24:00neighborhood, and and this is not
24:02necessarily low-cost, um but it would be
24:05a boon for
24:07um
24:08people to be able to age in place in
24:09these units. Um I would also love if we
24:12could potentially use a portion of the
24:14grant funds or maybe some additional
24:16city funds to advertise this opportunity
24:19specifically to low-income and
24:22historically marginalized communities.
24:25Um and this um I would especially
24:27appreciate if this could include some of
24:29these relevant communities, such as
24:31those on the west side, um but also all
24:34immigrant and minority populations that
24:36may not necessarily have English as a
24:39first language. Um so I I really
24:42appreciate this effort, and I greatly
24:44support it.
24:49>> And next is MJ Powell. MJ, you may now
24:51unmute.
24:57>> Good evening, city council members,
24:59mayor, and Salt Lake City residents. I
25:02want to express my strong support for
25:05item B5 in the Salt Lake City Police
25:08Department's application for fiscal year
25:112026 Utah Children's Outdoor Recreation
25:14and Education Grant.
25:16Too often when we talk about public
25:18safety, we focus only on responding to
25:21problems
25:22after they occur. Problems like the
25:25Promising Youth Project represents
25:27something different. They all focus on
25:29prevention, restoration, mentorship, and
25:32opportunity. They invest in young people
25:34before they become involved in the
25:37justice system and help those who may
25:39already be struggling to find a better
25:41path forward.
25:43What I especially appreciate about this
25:45initiative is it restorative justice
25:47approach. Restorative justice recognizes
25:50that young people are more than their
25:52mistakes.
25:53It creates opportunities for
25:55accountability, healing, growth, and
25:58reconnection with their communities.
26:01Those values are not only good for
26:02individual youth, they are good for
26:05public safety as a whole.
26:07Outdoor education and recreation can
26:09also be transformative.
26:11For many young people, access to
26:13positive experiences
26:15leadership development and healthy
26:17activities can be life-changing.
26:20These opportunities can help build
26:22confidence, strengthen relationships,
26:26and provide a sense of belonging that
26:28every young person deserves.
26:30I commend the police department for
26:31pursuing innovative partnerships and
26:34community-based solutions.
26:36Whether or not every grant application
26:38is ultimately funded, I believe this
26:40proposal reflects the kind of investment
26:42we should be making in our youth and the
26:44future of our city.
26:46I respectfully encourage the council to
26:48support this grant application and
26:50continue prioritizing prioritizing
26:52programs that lift up young people and
26:55help them thrive. Thank you.
26:58>> That was the final registered commenter
27:00for this item.
27:02>> Thank you, Jennifer and and MJ for your
27:05comments. I will look for a motion.
27:07>> Mr. Chair, I move the council close the
27:09public hearing and refer items B1
27:10through B5 for a future consent agenda
27:12for action.
27:13>> Second.
27:15>> I have a motion by council member Dugan
27:17and and seconded by council member
27:19Carlson.
27:20Any discussion?
27:23I'm going to call the question. All
27:24those in favor say I.
27:25>> I.
27:26>> I.
27:26>> Any opposed or abstentions?
27:30This was a unanimous vote.
27:33We're moving on on the agenda to item
27:36B6, which is the 2027-2028
27:41US Housing and Urban Development General
27:44Community Development Needs Annual
27:47Public Hearing.
27:49I'm going to turn the time to Allison
27:51Rowland to give us a brief Council
27:53Policy Analyst to give us a brief update
27:55on this.
27:55>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. This hearing is
27:57designed to receive public comment for
27:59the 2027-2028
28:01US Housing Urban Housing and Urban
28:04Development Department or HUD General
28:06Community Development Needs. Each year
28:09Salt Lake City receives several million
28:10dollars in grants from HUD through four
28:12programs: Community Development Block
28:15Grants or CDBG, Emergency Solutions
28:18Grant or ESG, the Home Investment
28:21Partnership, and Housing Opportunities
28:24for Persons with HIV/AIDS or HOPWA. This
28:27public feedback helps the city
28:29prioritize grant funds among the many
28:31competing needs.
28:33>> Thank you, Allison.
28:35I will need
28:38I will open the time for public comment,
28:41Taylor.
28:44>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. We have four
28:45people registered to speak to this item.
28:47The first will be a Jennifer Madrigal,
28:49followed by MJ Powell, and then Abby
28:51Feenstra. Jennifer, you may now unmute.
28:55>> Thanks. Again, sorry. This is Jennifer
28:57Madrigal. Um happen to be the chair of
28:59the Glendale Neighborhood Council. Um I
29:01was going to list the programs for the
29:05CDBG Community Development Block Grant
29:07that I know have personally um touched
29:10the Glendale community, but I quickly
29:12realized this would be probably over 30
29:15of the 38 applicants listed. Um so I
29:18just want to give thanks
29:20um for for funding for these
29:22organizations that are they're active in
29:25the community in so many different ways,
29:27um not just with housing, but in other
29:29ways that really benefit um the Glendale
29:31community.
29:33Um and then I would also I I I don't
29:36know if this is possible, but I would
29:37love to shout out to um the Salt Lake
29:40City Community Land Trust Project. I
29:43don't know if there's any way in the
29:44future to try to expand this um
29:47this pathway to home ownership, um but
29:50this would be an excellent way to allow
29:53families to afford
29:55homes that they couldn't necessarily
29:57afford having to pay for the home and
29:59the land. Um that's all I have to say
30:02for now.
30:03>> [laughter]
30:03>> Thanks.
30:06>> Next is MJ Powell, followed by Abby
30:08Feenstra, and then Royal Arred. MJ, you
30:11may now unmute.
30:13>> Hello again.
30:14Thank you for the opportunity to provide
30:16public input regarding the city's use of
30:18federal housing and community
30:20development funding.
30:22Each year Salt Lake City receives
30:24millions of dollars through programs
30:26like Community Development Block Grants,
30:29acronyms HOME, ESG, HOPWA.
30:34These are significant investments, and I
30:36believe they should be focused on
30:37helping the residents who are
30:38increasingly being left behind
30:41by our housing market.
30:43One concern I continue to hear across
30:45our community is that what government
30:47and developers often define as {quote}
30:50affordable housing is still completely
30:53out of reach for many people who already
30:55live and work here.
30:57Too many renters are struggling to save
30:59for a home and too many first-time home
31:01buyers find that dream of ownership
31:03grows further
31:05away from them every year.
31:07Housing built for people earning $40 per
31:10hour is not affordable to many existing
31:12residents like people such as myself.
31:17At full-time hours, $40 per hour is
31:20approximately
31:2183,200
31:2383,200
31:25per year before taxes and I'm not even
31:27making half of that.
31:29That benchmark excludes many hospitality
31:32workers, service workers, seniors, young
31:35adults, and families whose wages have
31:37not kept pace with housing costs.
31:40Affordability should not exist only on
31:42paper. It should reflect whether the
31:44people who already live and work in Salt
31:46Lake City can realistically afford to
31:48remain here.
31:50So, with that being said, I please
31:52encourage the council and the mayor's
31:54administration to prioritize investments
31:56that actually expand deeply affordable
31:59housing, rentals, and create attainable
32:02sustainable pathways to first home
32:05ownership.
32:06Home ownership. Thank you for your time
32:08and have a good evening.
32:11>> And next is Abby Feinstein followed by
32:14Sarah Jolly.
32:16Abby is here in person.
32:23>> Can everybody hear me? Okay.
32:25Good evening, council members. My name
32:27is Abby Feinstein. I'm a resident of
32:28District 5 and I'm the grants manager at
32:31First Step House, which is a housing and
32:33homelessness services nonprofit in
32:35Districts 1, 2, and 4.
32:38I want to thank you for your time
32:39tonight and for your commitment to
32:40stable housing for our most vulnerable
32:42neighbors.
32:43I'm here to urge you to increase funding
32:46for case management. The best way to
32:48show why is a story about one of our
32:49clients who I'll call Mark.
32:51Mark had experienced homelessness and
32:53instability for quite some time before
32:54coming to First Step House.
32:56He had been through treatment He had
32:58been through treatment before and used
32:59up his county sober living voucher, but
33:01then unfortunately he relapsed as about
33:0340 to 60% of people experiencing an
33:05addiction do.
33:06So when he graduated from First Step
33:07House this time, sober and ready to
33:09rebuild his life, he had nowhere to go
33:11except straight back onto the street.
33:13That's where case management made the
33:14difference. Case management staff got
33:16Mark connected to tenant-based rental
33:18assistance or TBRA funding. That got him
33:20into one of our recovery residences.
33:22They worked with him to connect him to
33:24our employment program. That got him a
33:25job at a national pharmacy chain. He
33:27started making so much money that he
33:29actually was no longer eligible for his
33:30subsidized housing voucher, and even
33:32though at this point it had been months
33:34since he had graduated from First Step
33:35House, his case manager stepped up again
33:37and got him last-minute market-rate
33:39housing through relationships she built
33:41with local landlords.
33:43Today Mark is sober, employed, and
33:44paying his own rent. He doesn't require
33:46any assistance from us or from the city.
33:48His treatment bed and housing placement
33:50are now open for the next person who
33:51needs them.
33:53Mark's story is not unique to First Step
33:54House. Case managers in shelters and
33:56housing programs all over the city do
33:58this work every day.
33:59The rental assistance that the city
34:00funds is a big part of what got Mark
34:02housed, but it didn't work all on its
34:04own. Someone had to find it, help him
34:06apply, manage it, and then step in when
34:08his situation changed. The city has
34:10invested in that work before. Mark is
34:12proof that it pays off, and we would
34:13love to see that investment grow.
34:16As you're considering how to use this
34:17funding, I hope you'll keep case
34:18management among your top priorities,
34:20not just at First Step House, but across
34:22the whole system. It's what makes the
34:23rest of this funding work.
34:25>> Hi.
34:28Next is Sarah Jolly, followed by Bernie
34:30Hart. Sarah's here in person.
34:50>> Hi council. My name is Sarah Jolly and
34:52I'm here with my neighbor and friend. Do
34:54you say your name?
34:56Royal Allred.
34:58Um
34:59Royal was recently on the news on
35:01October 9th by
35:03uh Jordan Tracy talking about his
35:05struggle to
35:06uh
35:07secure safe, stable housing and the
35:10report highlights the barriers that
35:12people like Royal um
35:15are facing in accessing housing and the
35:18urgent need for support while navigating
35:20an overwhelmed system.
35:22Um
35:23we had taken to a GoFundMe which we're
35:26not here to highlight but I'm going to
35:27read you part because it talks about our
35:29my experience supporting Royal in this.
35:32So, Royal's 66 years old, a double
35:35amputee who uses an electric wheelchair.
35:37Additional medical diagnoses include
35:39diabetes, progressive loss of vision in
35:41both eyes, and a serious blood clotting
35:42disorder that has already taken both of
35:45his legs.
35:46Um Royal's also a friend and a
35:48consistent presence in our community.
35:50He's reliable, approachable, and widely
35:52known and respected.
35:54After experiencing homelessness off and
35:56on for the last 5 years, he's worked to
35:57stay in a motel for the past year but it
36:00costs continue to rise. He's no longer
36:03able to manage the cost of his room.
36:06Um motel management has been working
36:07with him but his funds are depleted and
36:09so we went to the community for support.
36:12Um so he uh has completed his intake and
36:16assessment through the Salt Lake Valley
36:18Coalition to End Homelessness
36:19Coordinated Entry and CT
36:22He was assessed as having high housing
36:24needs. He receives SSDI and has all the
36:27documentation needed to move into
36:29housing. We made sure that we did
36:31everything. We got birth certificates,
36:33their social security card. Um and he
36:37has Medicare, Medicaid. What he does not
36:39have and is an available housing
36:41placement, access to case management um
36:45to assist him in the process or any
36:47clear timeline of when that will become
36:49available. So, over the past several
36:51weeks, we pursued one
36:53>> Time.
36:55>> Thank you.
36:56>> Will you be able to
36:57provide the rest of it?
36:58>> Yes. No, but we'll we'll take the rest
37:00of you know, staff can help you with
37:02that. So, thank you. Thank you so much.
37:04>> All right. Thank you.
37:07>> And next is Bernie Hart who is here in
37:09person.
37:24>> I'd feel much more comfortable if was
37:27people that were actually home with
37:29dealing with mental health and addiction
37:30issues that were up here advocating for
37:33more money for current programs.
37:37The city and the county and the state
37:40are involved in programs and they don't
37:43have a clue as to how well the programs
37:45work.
37:47SAMHSA who provides a lot of money to
37:49the state of Utah for mental health and
37:51addiction issues does not hold agencies
37:55that spend their money accountable for
37:57outcomes. They do not know if those the
38:00money spent is actually helping people.
38:04If you want to save money and help more
38:06people
38:08achieve success in our community, I
38:11would think it might be a good time for
38:13the homeless homeless services board and
38:16the people that are behind the homeless
38:19services board start holding service by
38:21providers.
38:23Every service provider accountable for
38:26outcome
38:27managing outcomes and reporting
38:29outcomes. Help the homeless by holding
38:32people accountable. Thank you.
38:38>> That was the final registered commenter
38:39for this item.
38:42>> Thank you,
38:43Jennifer, MJ, Abby, we all Roy and
38:45Bernie. I will look for a motion.
38:48>> Mr. Chair.
38:50>> Mr. Chair, I move that the council close
38:51the public hearing.
38:52>> Second.
38:54>> Motion by Jennifer and Napier Pierce and
38:56Council member Carlson. Any discussion?
39:01I would like to quickly mention that
39:03CDBG as
39:05uh
39:06as
39:07in the last few years has been on the
39:08chopping block from the federal
39:10government. Um this is uh
39:14there's been threats to cities about
39:16cutting this funding.
39:18Uh very legitimate threats and every
39:20time that we as a city raise the flag
39:22about how important these funds are
39:25uh
39:25many times the answer is like, "Yeah,
39:27but we're on the hole on on the federal
39:29budget."
39:31Um
39:31I just want to highlight that these
39:33funds are key to the success of our city
39:37um and I would like to invite all of you
39:39to contact your
39:42federal representative to make sure that
39:43they know the value of these funds uh
39:46for our city. Um it's very important uh
39:50that we don't lose these funds um that
39:52go directly to to service providers. So,
39:56I have a motion by Council member
39:58Jennifer Napier Pierce seconded by
40:00Council member Carlson.
40:02Uh all of those in favor say I.
40:03>> I.
40:04>> I.
40:05>> Any opposed or abstentions?
40:07This motion carries unanimously. We're
40:09moving on to item uh C1, which is an
40:13ordinance for a community correction
40:15facilities and jail tax amendments and I
40:18need a motion.
40:20>> I move that council adopt the ordinance.
40:23>> Second.
40:24>> Council member Pietro made the motion
40:26and Council member Dugan made the
40:28second. All of those in favor
40:30say I.
40:31>> I.
40:32>> Any opposed, abstentions, or comments?
40:36No? We're moving on. That motion was
40:38unanimous.
40:40Item C2 is an ordinance for the ballpark
40:42zoning map amendment map and text
40:44amendments.
40:46I need a motion.
40:47>> Mr. Chair, I move that the council adopt
40:49the ballpark zoning map and text
40:51amendment ordinances.
40:53>> Second.
40:54>> Council member Carlson and Council
40:56member made the motion and Council
40:58member Dugan seconded it. Any
41:00discussion? Council member Carlson.
41:02>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just want to
41:04express my gratitude to
41:07my fellow colleagues up here who when
41:09had the opportunity to incorporate
41:11community feedback into this proposal
41:15took that opportunity to increase in
41:18the amount of open space and explicitly
41:22name green space as a priority in that
41:24open space plan establishing a minimum
41:27of 5 acres. Also appreciative of the
41:29ways in which this ordinance helps to
41:31protect mature trees and mitigate their
41:34loss during the redevelopment of this
41:36property and also grateful that um
41:39throughout the process I feel that you
41:41all have colleagues and other city
41:43departments have really heard voices
41:46about the redevelopment of this site and
41:49I'm grateful for that
41:50willingness to give and take in that
41:52process and I'm looking forward to
41:55continuing to implement the ballpark
41:57next plan that was adopted in 2025.
41:59Thank you.
42:01>> Thank you, Council member Carlson. Any
42:03other comments, thoughts? I have a
42:05motion on the table by Council member
42:07Carlson seconded by Council member
42:09Dugan. All of those in favor say I.
42:11>> I.
42:12>> Any opposed? Abstentions? This motion
42:15carries unanimously.
42:16This brings us to item D1,
42:19a resolution designating the Sugar House
42:22special assessment area, and I need a
42:23motion.
42:25>> Mr. Chair, I move that the Council
42:26postpone action on the resolution to
42:29designate the Sugar House Business
42:30District 2027 Special Assessment Area
42:34and proceed to the next agenda item.
42:37>> Second.
42:39>> All right.
42:41Council Member Young made the motion and
42:42Council Member Petro, sorry, Council
42:44Member Dugan
42:45uh seconded.
42:46Um any discussion?
42:49Um I'm going to call the question. All
42:51those in favor say I.
42:53>> I.
42:54>> Any opposed? Any abstentions?
42:57Okay. Any comments on this?
43:00Okay.
43:01Um moving on to item D2. This is a
43:04resolution appointing the Board of
43:06Equalization for the Sugar House Special
43:08Assessment Area, and I need a motion.
43:10>> Mr. Chair, I move that the Council
43:12postpone action on the resolution to
43:14appoint a Board of Equalization for the
43:16Sugar House Business District 2027
43:19Special Assessment Area and proceed to
43:21the next agenda item.
43:24>> Second.
43:26>> I have a motion by Council Member Young
43:28seconded by Council Member Jennifer
43:30Nipper-Pearce.
43:32Any discussion? Council Member Young.
43:33>> Yeah, thank you. So, these two items
43:36obviously go together for the community,
43:38and I think it's important to make sure
43:40that we're clear on the background
43:42related to today's conversation. So, the
43:46Sugar House Special Assessment Area is
43:49unique in the fact that it is a tool
43:52that the community is the sponsor for in
43:55terms of creating a Special Assessment
43:57Area or SAA. Um different than many of
44:01our tools here in the city, this tool is
44:04actually sponsored by the community in
44:07terms of bringing it forward to create
44:09an additional tax specific to an area to
44:12create revenue for specific needs that
44:15are identified by that community. So, to
44:18be clear, it was originally the
44:19community's request that we began this
44:22process to be able to measure the amount
44:24of buy-in we had from local property
44:27owners, which is required before the
44:29city or council would take action to be
44:31able to bring this to reality.
44:34In the case today, it's clear the buy-in
44:36just isn't there. It's understandable
44:39given the current economic challenges
44:41that are being faced by small businesses
44:43from increasing costs across labor,
44:46supplies, and rent. Additionally, we
44:48know that Sugar House has survived
44:50several large-scale road and utility
44:52improvement projects, and that it's
44:54still something that many of our
44:56business owners are still recovering
44:58from. Now, just because it's not moving
45:01forward today, doesn't mean it's a never
45:04for Sugar House. Um as a representative
45:07for the area, I believe that there will
45:09be a future date where this action may
45:11have more community support um for
45:14services and solutions that we see
45:17already happening in our downtown
45:19business district uh specifically
45:21calling out the downtown ambassadors
45:23that help with cleaning, safety, and
45:25hospitality.
45:27I want to quickly express my gratitude
45:28to the local business owners and
45:30operators who have reached out to share
45:33their input related to the current
45:35conversation about the proposed SAA.
45:38Your voices have been heard, and we hope
45:40that you continue to be involved in the
45:42discussions about the business district
45:44through our Sugar House Chamber and
45:46Community Council. I also want to thank
45:48the mayor and her team, especially uh
45:51including our economic development
45:53leaders. Your time and expertise to help
45:56scope and support the Sugar House
45:58leaders who brought this initiative
46:00forward is much appreciated. If you are
46:03operating in a business here in Salt
46:06Lake City, you should know our economic
46:08development team. They have enthusiasm
46:11for building the city's economy
46:13stretching from major employers to
46:15aspiring new business owners, and they
46:17have always impressed me with their
46:19attitudes and their professionalism.
46:21Sugar House appreciates all of the staff
46:24and team members who gave to this
46:25project. Finally, I want to give my
46:28appreciation to the Sugar House
46:30Community Council and Chamber leaders
46:32that brought this idea forward to the
46:34city. I know it's been a decade of
46:37discussion amongst our community and
46:39really appreciate the leadership of
46:41Landon, Judy, James, and Scott among
46:43many others who have helped translate
46:45that discussion into the action for
46:47consideration. These volunteers have
46:50given from their traditional day jobs to
46:52help create a more connected community
46:54across Sugar House businesses, and that
46:57connected community extends well beyond
47:00this SAA discussion. The Sugar House
47:02Chamber is an important organization if
47:04our for our community, and I encourage
47:07all of our Sugar House businesses, both
47:09renters and landowners alike, to get
47:11involved. We can do really great things
47:14together as a community, and that is the
47:17future that I look forward to for
47:19District 7. So, thank you for the
47:21opportunity to share those comments
47:23ahead of the final vote.
47:26>> Thank you, Council member Young. The
47:27motion was yours and seconded by Council
47:29member Jennifer and Peer Peers.
47:32Uh I'm going to call the question. All
47:34those in favor say I.
47:36Any opposed? Abstentions? This motion
47:39carries unanimously.
47:41Um the unfinished business section of
47:45the agenda is uh item E1, which is a
47:49legislative action requesting review of
47:52risk management policies.
47:54I uh will look for a motion.
47:56>> Mr. Chair, I move that the council adopt
47:58a legislative action requesting the
48:00administration to evaluate the current
48:02levels of coverage administered by risk
48:05management and assess whether those
48:07levels should be updated to reflect
48:09current costs and economic conditions.
48:13>> Second.
48:17>> I couldn't second that one, but I would
48:19have loved to.
48:20Uh, thank you.
48:21Um, is there any discussion?
48:23Council member Young made the motion.
48:25Council member Carlson seconded. Um,
48:28I I'm going to call the question. All of
48:30those in favor say I.
48:31>> I.
48:32>> I.
48:33>> Any opposed or abstentions? This motion
48:36carries unanimously.
48:37Uh, there is
48:39item E2, which is a legislative action,
48:42tree preservation amendment. I will look
48:44for a motion.
48:46>> Mr. Chair, I move that the council adopt
48:48a legislative action requesting that the
48:50administration review and eval-
48:53city code regarding tree policies with
48:55an emphasis on preservation during new
48:57development throughout Salt Lake City
48:59and return to the council with
49:01recommendations for potential amendments
49:03that support the community's
49:04environmental health.
49:06>> Second.
49:06>> Second.
49:09>> Motion by Council member Carlson,
49:11seconded by Council member Dugan.
49:14Uh, any discussion?
49:16Council member Carlson.
49:17>> Um,
49:19this uh, legislative action really is
49:22um, in response to thinking about as we
49:25continue to grow as a city, how can we
49:27continue to care for and protect and
49:30preserve our um, urban forestry,
49:33recognizing the tremendous benefit that
49:35mature trees bring to our communities.
49:37And so I'm looking forward to hearing
49:39from the administration ideas about how
49:41to strengthen those protections.
49:44>> Thank you. I'm going to call the
49:46question. All of those in favor say I.
49:48>> I.
49:49>> I.
49:50>> Any opposed or abstentions? This motion
49:53carries unanimously.
49:55Our final item is E3. It's a legislative
49:58action for construction in the
49:59right-of-way project signage
50:02requirement. I need a motion.
50:04>> Mr. Chair, I move that the council adopt
50:06a legislative action requesting that the
50:08administration review and prepare
50:09recommendations that would require
50:11informational signage to be posted at
50:13construction progress projects affecting
50:16the public right-of-way throughout Salt
50:18Lake City.
50:19>> Second.
50:19>> Second.
50:21>> I uh have a motion by Council member
50:23Petro and seconded by Council member
50:25Warren. It's not against anybody here. I
50:27just heard it first. I uh Is there any
50:30discussion?
50:32>> Uh
50:33just say I appreciate uh Mr. Chair, you
50:36I think you were the originator of this
50:39um request and
50:41um I think this makes a lot of sense and
50:43um I hope it's something that we can
50:45add.
50:47>> Thank you. I I even today I got a few
50:49messages from constituents about some
50:51road projects that they didn't know who
50:53was owning it and we're still trying to
50:55find out who is doing what. I think this
50:58will be a big uh improvement for
51:00transparency with our constituents. So,
51:03thank you for supporting that. Soon,
51:05well, I I'm going to call the question.
51:06All those in favor say I.
51:08>> I.
51:09>> Any opposed?
51:11Any abstentions? So, thank you for
51:13supporting that. This motion was
51:14unanimous. Um
51:16Uh now I have the portion of consent. Um
51:20I need a motion to approve.
51:22>> Move for approval.
51:25>> Second.
51:27>> I
51:28uh
51:28uh
51:29Council member Warren made the motion.
51:31Council member Jennifer Napier Pierce
51:33made the second. All of those in favor
51:35say I.
51:36>> I.
51:36>> I.
51:37>> Any opposed?
51:39Any abstentions?
51:40Uh motion carries unanimously.
51:43Um
51:46um
51:46Now we are in the section G of the
51:50agenda.
51:51Are there any questions for the mayor?
51:56Thank you, mayor, for being here today.
51:58Um,
51:59I there are no questions. So, now we are
52:02going to the section G2, which is
52:06the
52:08the general comment section of the
52:09agenda.
52:11This section is for public comment of
52:14any city business not scheduled for a
52:16public hearing.
52:17It's limited to a maximum of 1 hour and
52:20only those individuals who register to
52:22speak before 7:30. Our meeting rules
52:25apply to these general comments. Just
52:27avoid disruptions, threats, or we will
52:30ask a staff member to assist you out of
52:32the meeting. Also, as a reminder,
52:34comments that include profanity,
52:36personal attacks, intimidation, or
52:38discriminatory language are not
52:40persuasive or compelling to this
52:41council.
52:43They are not helpful to create a
52:44respectful or safe environment.
52:47We'll be calling the names in the order
52:49of sign-ups. If you are on Zoom, please
52:52unmute your microphone when your name is
52:54called. Each person will have 2 minutes.
52:57And to make sure that as many of you as
53:01many of people
53:03can speak as possible
53:06in that hour,
53:08feel free to come up and stand in line
53:10or close to to the podium.
53:13Please avoid disruptions so you can we
53:16can use the time
53:18as for as many people as possible.
53:20If you reach the 2-minute mark,
53:23we're going to hear the
53:24time being called out and the microphone
53:27will be muted. It doesn't mean that we
53:29don't want to hear the rest of your
53:31comments, so please send that to us. You
53:33can help staff members here will assist
53:37you on getting the rest of your comments
53:39to us.
53:40If you have issues on Zoom, you can
53:43contact staff support. Or if you have uh
53:45needs here, you can reach out to staff
53:48member.
53:49Um,
53:50Taylor, let's begin with our first
53:52general comment.
53:56>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. We have about 17
53:58people registered to speak. The first
53:59will be Nicholas Glenn, followed by MJ
54:01Powell, and then Kate Groesinger.
54:04Nicholas, you may now unmute.
54:08>> Hello. My name is Nicholas Glenn. Can
54:10you all hear me?
54:12>> Yes, we can hear you.
54:13>> Okay. Awesome. I'm a resident of
54:15District 6 living on the East Bench. And
54:18I am extremely concerned about the
54:21Sinclair pipeline that is being proposed
54:24by HF Sinclair. I am worried about the
54:26risk that it presents to me and my
54:29neighbors over on the eastern side of
54:31the city near where
54:33Emigration Canyon is, about the concerns
54:36of a leak in the pipeline, and also
54:37about the construction, the disruptions
54:39to the community, to our neighbors, to
54:42our ability to drive down our roads, and
54:45our quality of life living in the area.
54:47I would love to hear from the council. I
54:50know I appreciate you guys taking the
54:52meeting
54:53last week to meet with Sinclair to get
54:55facts and information about the
54:57pipeline. I would love to hear from the
54:59council about what your thoughts are on
55:03future steps regarding the pipeline as
55:06far as like what the city can do to
55:07potentially prevent the pipeline, or
55:11if the city is speaking with the state
55:14about the state's thoughts on the
55:15pipeline, where they are at for
55:17transparency for the residents on what's
55:19happening here. I am, you know,
55:21concerned about the health risks and the
55:23safety risks long-term to our
55:25communities, and I want to know what the
55:28city is doing beyond the fact-finding
55:30missions, what the next steps are, what
55:33are your guys' goals and plans as far as
55:35potentially stopping the pipeline. I am
55:37encouraged that many of our city council
55:39members appear to at least be
55:40tentatively against the pipeline and are
55:43interested in
55:46finding alternative routes or preventing
55:48the pipeline from being in our
55:49community. So, I appreciate that and
55:51thank you.
55:52Thank you for the time to speak to you
55:54today.
55:56>> And next will be MJ Powell followed by
55:59Kate Groesinger and then Cindy Cromer.
56:02MJ, you may now unmute.
56:06>> Good evening, city council, Mayor
56:08Mendenhall,
56:10Chief Leeb and Salt Lake City Fire
56:12Department.
56:14I would like to take a moment to honor
56:16the life and service
56:18Johnny Stevens.
56:21Many people knew Johnny as a
56:22firefighter, a union leader,
56:27and the president of Local 81.
56:30I was fortunate enough to know him in
56:32another way as well.
56:34I had the opportunity to knock doors
56:36with Johnny on the west side of Salt
56:38Lake City.
56:39What always stood out to me was how
56:41genuinely interested he was in hearing
56:43from people.
56:45He was not simply going through the
56:47motions of having conversations.
56:50He listened.
56:51Whether someone had concerns about their
56:53neighborhood,
56:55questions about city services, or simply
56:57wanted to share their perspective,
57:00Johnny made them feel heard.
57:03Just as importantly, he was always
57:04prepared to connect with people with
57:06useful information,
57:08the resources and possible solutions
57:10they might have been looking for.
57:13He understood that public service was
57:14not just about showing up. It was about
57:17making a meaningful difference in
57:19people's lives.
57:21Johnny led by example. He demonstrated
57:23what servant leadership looks like
57:26through his humility, compassion, and
57:28commitment to both his profession and
57:30his community, as well as those he
57:32loved.
57:35Through that leadership and example, he
57:37influenced an entire generation of
57:39firefighters, public servants, labor
57:41leaders, and community members.
57:43His impact extends far beyond the fire
57:46stations where he served.
57:49May he rest in peace, and my condolences
57:52to all of fire,
57:54as well as local 81,
57:57and his wife and family.
57:59See you on the other side, brother.
58:04>> Next will be Kate Grotsinger, followed
58:07by Cindy Cromer, and then Deborah
58:09Worthen. Kate, you may now unmute.
58:12>> Hi there, can you hear me?
58:15>> Yes, we can.
58:15>> Great. Hi. So, um I'm here, and I don't
58:19know how to turn on my video, um but I
58:21am here to comment on the Sinclair
58:23pipeline.
58:24Um I work for a group called the Center
58:27for Western Priorities. We're public
58:29lands conservation group, and every
58:31year, for work, I study oil and gas
58:33leaks that are um reported to states,
58:36including Colorado, Wyoming, and New
58:38Mexico.
58:39Um these are the top oil and gas
58:40producing states in the West, and um
58:43basically what my report finds every
58:45year is that there is no safe way to
58:47build oil and gas infrastructure. There
58:49are always leaks. It is not a matter of
58:52if, it's a matter of when. In fact,
58:54Colorado um is finding that when
58:56operators go to close in oil and gas
58:59wells, um a lot of the
59:01related infrastructure has actually been
59:03leaking for for years.
59:05Um my concern with this pipeline is that
59:07I live in the Avenues. Um I recreate in
59:09the Wasatch. I drink water that comes
59:11from this watershed.
59:13Um and I am really concerned that that
59:15about the impact pipeline
59:17Um the Dakota Access Pipeline, which
59:19many of you may remember, built on the
59:21um
59:22the reservation up in North Dakota. Um
59:24when they constructed that pipeline, it
59:26spilled over a million gallons of waste
59:28and it there have been at least four
59:30leaks
59:32since that pipeline was finished. So, in
59:34closing, I I oppose this pipeline. I
59:37really I know that you guys are on our
59:38side, but I really want you to fight for
59:40it. Um
59:41I'm vital linking my report in the chat
59:43so you can see it. Um there's no safe
59:45way to build this pipeline and it
59:47absolutely threatens our clean water and
59:50um our watershed and you know, the
59:52wildlife and everything that relies on
59:54this watershed. So, please oppose the
59:56pipeline. Thank you so much.
1:00:00>> And next is Cindy
1:00:02Albatross
1:00:03Wasatch
1:00:04Lexington
1:00:06Cindy is here on Zoom.
1:00:08>> Hi, my name is Cindy Cromer. I avoid
1:00:10repeating my comments to this council.
1:00:13The one tonight is admittedly a re-tread
1:00:15of a comment that I made about the
1:00:16Silverado proposal next to St. Mark's
1:00:19Cathedral.
1:00:20The Silverado proposal was one of three
1:00:23up-zonings that the East Downtown
1:00:24community had to deal with at the same
1:00:26time.
1:00:27Now there are two proposed up-zones in
1:00:30East Central, Hardage and Trolley.
1:00:33I'm speaking with 50 years of experience
1:00:35in investment real estate. Nothing is
1:00:38more important than location. It is
1:00:40location, location, location.
1:00:43If you rezone properties east of State
1:00:45Street, developers will continue to
1:00:47petition for up-zonings there. And the
1:00:50city will see less or no development
1:00:53occur on State Street, downtown, and the
1:00:56west side.
1:00:57State Street is currently the city's
1:00:59armpit with a few bright spots like
1:01:02Astra and Sky.
1:01:04Our downtown has a smile marred by
1:01:06missing teeth where there are surface
1:01:08parking lots.
1:01:09Property owners will hold on to those
1:01:11parking lots for another generation
1:01:14unless you provide a reason for them to
1:01:15change.
1:01:17You are in charge of where development
1:01:19occurs. The seven of you move um more
1:01:22than anybody else, other any other
1:01:25group, other than perhaps the LDS Church
1:01:27and State, you're in charge of where
1:01:29things happen.
1:01:31You can upzone east of State Street.
1:01:33That will occur at the expense of plans
1:01:36you have approved for life on State,
1:01:38Ballpark next, and the Power District.
1:01:41And I want to digress, if I have a few
1:01:43more seconds, to give Soren Simonsen
1:01:45credit, because it was many, many years
1:01:47ago, across the hall, when he was on the
1:01:49council, that he said, when things were
1:01:51quite slow in the city,
1:01:53"If you build a building this big here,
1:01:55it will drain all the development
1:01:57potential out of the surrounding area."
1:02:00And that's when I got it. It's a
1:02:02hydraulic model.
1:02:04Thanks.
1:02:06>> Next will be Deborah Rothol, followed by
1:02:09Lexi Tuodenham, and then Brooke Smith.
1:02:12Deborah's here in person.
1:02:14>> My name is Deborah Rothol. I've
1:02:16lived in District 4 for 28 years. I'm
1:02:20here about the upcoming vote on the
1:02:22Hardage upzone request for three plots
1:02:25at the corner of Linden Avenue and 800
1:02:28East, between 3rd and 4th South.
1:02:31It's unfortunate that the Hardage Hotel
1:02:34Development Company has let
1:02:36medium-density properties, which provide
1:02:38naturally affordable housing,
1:02:40deteriorate
1:02:42over the 20 years that they've owned
1:02:43them.
1:02:46The buildings hold wonderful historic
1:02:49value. One is on the National Historic
1:02:51Registry, and they house valued
1:02:53neighbors.
1:02:57Hardage will make plenty with the
1:02:58existing zoning on the adjoining lots
1:03:01toward 400 South, and by building even
1:03:04at the proper scale, plenty.
1:03:07Three things from the city's record.
1:03:09First, our Planning Commission voted 6
1:03:11to 1 to deny the general plan amendment.
1:03:15They found no evidence that it meets
1:03:17consideration three, consistency with
1:03:20adopted plans. That's not a close call.
1:03:23Six commission commissioners said no.
1:03:26Second, the only reason staff gave for
1:03:29amending the plan is that tracks has
1:03:31expanded since 2005.
1:03:34The line on 400 South opened in 2001,
1:03:38four years before the plan was adopted.
1:03:40The plan was written with rail already
1:03:43in place. Nothing has changed, so the
1:03:45basis to amend the plan
1:03:48isn't there.
1:03:50Third, in 2012, this council adopted the
1:03:53400 South Livable Communities project
1:03:55and deliberately left these three
1:03:57parcels out of the transit station area.
1:04:01The council drew that line on purpose.
1:04:04Please deny the general plan amendment.
1:04:07Hold the line the council drew in 2012.
1:04:10Thanks.
1:04:13>> Next is Lexi Tuddenham, followed by
1:04:16Brooke Smith, and then Cindy McDonald.
1:04:18Lexi, you may now unmute.
1:04:23>> Hi there. Lexi Tuddenham. I am the
1:04:26executive director of the Healthy
1:04:27Environment Alliance of Utah.
1:04:29Thank you for the opportunity to speak
1:04:31tonight. I speak on behalf of our 22,000
1:04:34or more members and supporters of the
1:04:36cause of the state, but most especially
1:04:38the ones who live in the pathway and
1:04:40along
1:04:41the watershed that will be affected if
1:04:44the S- H- of Sinclair pipeline is
1:04:46constructed. We have a lot of members
1:04:48and I've been hearing stories for years
1:04:50about
1:04:51folks who were affected by the Red Butte
1:04:54oil spill
1:04:55back in the day. I think it the Chevron
1:04:57spill really speaks to
1:05:01the health effects that we can see out
1:05:03of the polluted gasoline. So, there are
1:05:04a lot of differences that we've have
1:05:06already been discussed. I won't
1:05:08replicate any of what's already been
1:05:09said, and I know that the council is
1:05:11taking a good hard look at this, but I
1:05:12want to emphasize that from the
1:05:15perspective of an organization that
1:05:16speaks for a healthier future for the
1:05:18state,
1:05:19we vigorously oppose this and and hope
1:05:22that the council will do the same. Thank
1:05:24you.
1:05:26>> Next is Brooke Smith, followed by Sandy
1:05:29McDonald, and then Jack Strauss. Brooke,
1:05:33you may now unmute.
1:05:37>> Thank you. I appreciate the time.
1:05:39Again, not to be redundant, but
1:05:41further comments on the immigration
1:05:43pipeline as others have
1:05:45stated
1:05:47earlier this evening.
1:05:49So, allow me to pose a few, you know,
1:05:51hypothetical questions to ask ourselves.
1:05:54And some of these
1:05:56questions we, you know, we may or may
1:05:58not know the answer to, but again, given
1:06:00the massive negative impact impact on
1:06:02citizens that are both upfront, right? I
1:06:06e.
1:06:07You know,
1:06:08moving through our community, but
1:06:10potentially downstream as others have
1:06:12have indicated. Is it truly necessary as
1:06:15a as a municipality to accept these type
1:06:18of things? So, again, a few hypothetical
1:06:20questions. Number one, what do we get
1:06:22out of this deal?
1:06:24Is it quantifiable? In business
1:06:26terminology, one might ask, what is our
1:06:28return on investment?
1:06:30What does Sinclair get out of the deal?
1:06:32I think we know the answer to that is
1:06:34profits. They, you know, they want to
1:06:36make money, naturally. What do city
1:06:37leaders, the council, and administrators
1:06:40get?
1:06:41Is it really worth it?
1:06:44What does the risk-reward equation look
1:06:46like?
1:06:49You know, and again, if if we think in
1:06:52in more general terms, you know, we
1:06:54we've seen this issue recently with the
1:06:55Parleys Canyon
1:06:57gravel
1:06:59pit issue.
1:07:00You know, again, I ask I ask, you know,
1:07:03a hypothetical question, why Why it seem
1:07:05like corporate interests continue to be
1:07:07a priority?
1:07:08Is it
1:07:10you know, does
1:07:11does enough of the tax revenue that is
1:07:12generated from these projects really
1:07:14trickle down as we saw back in
1:07:17in the Reagan era to the benefit of of
1:07:19our fellow constituents?
1:07:20Right? You know, so benefits being fire,
1:07:22police, libraries, park services, you
1:07:25know, that type of thing. Is that really
1:07:26enough to offset the negative effects
1:07:29um on on health and well-being of
1:07:31everyone on these type of projects?
1:07:35Thank you.
1:07:39>> And next is Cindy McDonald followed by
1:07:42Jack Strauss and then Brian Mutch. Cindy
1:07:46Mutch is here in person.
1:07:48>> Mayor, Council, thank you so much for
1:07:50this evening. We appreciate all of your
1:07:53efforts.
1:07:55Sinclair already has a pipeline that
1:07:58runs through a rural area. So, if there
1:08:01is a calamity, it would be much easier
1:08:05to clean up
1:08:07rather than a highly populated area.
1:08:11Thank you.
1:08:15>> And next is Jack Strauss followed by
1:08:18Brian Mutch and then Ed Canada. Jack is
1:08:20here in person.
1:08:22>> Hello Council, uh Mayor. Thank you so
1:08:23much for taking comments tonight. My
1:08:24name is Jack Strauss and I'm the
1:08:26Executive Director of Save Our Canyons,
1:08:28a local nonprofit here in Salt Lake
1:08:30that represents 15,000 people across the
1:08:32valley and Wasatch Front. Uh the mission
1:08:35of our organization is to protect the
1:08:36beauty and wildness of the mountain
1:08:38range. So, you can imagine when I
1:08:39learned about a
1:08:41refined fuel pipeline crossing the
1:08:43Summit County, Parleys Watershed,
1:08:45Emigration Canyon, the foothills, and
1:08:46wrapping around the bench into our city,
1:08:48I was quite concerned. And the more
1:08:50information we gathered, the more
1:08:51concerned I got. I'm I'm very worried
1:08:54about public and environmental health
1:08:55that could come out of this pipeline if
1:08:57we had a spill,
1:08:59if we had [clears throat] a earthquake,
1:09:00and God forbid a fire. Um even a leak
1:09:03would pollute
1:09:05the headwaters of the
1:09:06headwaters of our drinking water for um
1:09:08thousands of people downstream.
1:09:10So, I came to the meeting last week, and
1:09:13I listened to your questions of HF
1:09:16Sinclair, and I want to say thank you
1:09:18very much for your
1:09:20uh strong opinions on this issue, and I
1:09:22want you to know that we have your
1:09:23support, and we'll help you if we can
1:09:25work on this. Um
1:09:28I think there's a lot of levers that we
1:09:29can pull, and I hope we can see this
1:09:31through to help um fight this really bad
1:09:34project that's I think really dangerous
1:09:35for our for our city and for our
1:09:37mountains. Um one of the things that our
1:09:39organization is really good at is
1:09:41organizing people um from across the
1:09:43valley, uh and people that love and rely
1:09:45on these mountains. So, we've been doing
1:09:47that since we learned about this
1:09:48pipeline as we continue to educate
1:09:49people. Um we've had probably the
1:09:51biggest outpouring of support uh in
1:09:54opposition to an to an issue that we've
1:09:55had since the gondola. In about 2 weeks,
1:09:57we've compiled almost 1,300 signatures
1:10:01that I will leave for you here tonight.
1:10:02So, know that people from across the
1:10:04valley have your back as you work to
1:10:05find tools to fight this bad project.
1:10:07Thank you.
1:10:11>> And next is Brian Minch, followed by Ann
1:10:13Canada, and then Don L.
1:10:15Brian's here in person.
1:10:18>> At last week's Sinclair presentation, I
1:10:20was very impressed with questions the
1:10:22council asked and your preparation.
1:10:25You did your homework.
1:10:26But there is still more important
1:10:28information.
1:10:29Time and again, Sinclair made vague
1:10:32claims about commitments to highest
1:10:34standards, industry's tightly regulated,
1:10:36they don't want a catastrophic leak,
1:10:37they live here, too, blah blah blah.
1:10:40Chevron would have said the same thing
1:10:42before their pipeline ruptured twice in
1:10:442010.
1:10:46In fact, they did say the same thing in
1:10:48multiple meetings we had with them when
1:10:50I was
1:10:51part of a community working group formed
1:10:52to design a longitudinal health
1:10:54surveillance on behalf of the harmed
1:10:56residents.
1:10:58But according to the US Pipeline and
1:11:00Hazardous Material Safety
1:11:01Administration, there were at least
1:11:039,329
1:11:06fossil fuel pipeline leaks nationwide
1:11:08from 2010 to 2024.
1:11:11That's an average of 1.7 a day. But the
1:11:14real number is even much higher than
1:11:15that because Texas alone reports on
1:11:18average 30 pipeline leaks per day.
1:11:23No doubt every one of them involves a
1:11:25company that makes the same promises
1:11:27Sinclair does.
1:11:29I was an expert witness for a Red Butte
1:11:30Creek plaintiff.
1:11:32His teenage son woke up early that
1:11:34morning blind.
1:11:36And that lasted for several hours.
1:11:39The father was a healthy middle-aged
1:11:40male who died of pulmonary fibrosis 5
1:11:43years later.
1:11:44Likely caused by hazardous VOCs. Lung,
1:11:48bone marrow, brain, and chromosomal
1:11:50toxicity are known consequences of
1:11:52benzene exposure.
1:11:5413 months after the spill, we measured
1:11:57carcinogenic chemicals in the creek 400
1:12:01times higher than what the EPA
1:12:04considered safe.
1:12:06Many residents continue to have various
1:12:08symptoms years later.
1:12:10So, in many ways a gasoline spill is
1:12:12even more hazardous hazardous than crude
1:12:14oil.
1:12:15Salt Lake's future does not depend on
1:12:18more gasoline. It
1:12:23Thank you.
1:12:25>> Next is N. Canada followed by Don L. and
1:12:28then Kai Barrera. N. is here in person.
1:12:33>> Hello, Salt Lake City Council and Mayor.
1:12:35My name is N. Canada, District 2, and I
1:12:37am a housing lobby leader for the
1:12:38Wasatch Assembly. We are joining public
1:12:40comment today to advocate for our
1:12:42housing policies in the Wasatch
1:12:43Assembly's 2026 policy agenda.
1:12:45Based on KUTV Based on a KUTV article,
1:12:48only 16% of homes in in the Salt Lake
1:12:51City market are considered affordable.
1:12:53This is a crisis and we need bold
1:12:55solutions to meet our community's needs.
1:12:58More money needs to go towards building
1:12:59housing and less money needs to go to a
1:13:02a bloated police budget.
1:13:04The city is making strides with thriving
1:13:05in place and housing SLC. The only
1:13:08housing SLC goal that has been completed
1:13:10is the 30 to 80% AMI units with 6,080
1:13:13either completed, under construction, or
1:13:15planned.
1:13:17The goal for deeply affordable
1:13:19um deeply wealth building units is not
1:13:21even close to the goal.
1:13:23We do not discount these accomplishments
1:13:25towards affordability, but it's not
1:13:26enough nor bold enough.
1:13:28We need to build community land trust
1:13:30apartments where rents will not be
1:13:31significantly raised over time by
1:13:33landlords. We need at cost condos that
1:13:36can build community ownership within the
1:13:37city.
1:13:38Below are our policies to help our
1:13:40community with both homelessness and
1:13:41chronic renting.
1:13:43No homelessness sweeps, passing
1:13:44expanding housing option plan, we
1:13:47endorse Walks approach.
1:13:49Property tax for at costs and CLT
1:13:51affordable housing and expanding housing
1:13:53homelessness services.
1:13:55You can see the other policies on our
1:13:56pamphlets which you've gotten in the
1:13:57past or on our website
1:13:59wasatchassembly.org. We thank Chris
1:14:01Wharton for filling out the survey. We
1:14:02hope to hear from the rest of city
1:14:04council so we can find alignment to
1:14:06solve this housing crisis. You can
1:14:08always reach out to us at
1:14:09[email protected] for questions.
1:14:11And additionally, we of course are
1:14:13against the pipeline and thankful for
1:14:15community members
1:14:16that community members are commenting on
1:14:17this important topic. I assume the
1:14:20council is aligned and thank you Chris
1:14:21Wharton for getting ahead of this by
1:14:24stating his opposition. No more fossil
1:14:26fuel infrastructure, more green energy.
1:14:28Thank you.
1:14:31>> Next will be Don L followed by Kai
1:14:34Barrera and then Kylie and Kena. Don,
1:14:36you may now unmute.
1:14:39>> I thank you council for giving us a
1:14:41chance to speak. I want to actually
1:14:43start off with the pipeline and thank
1:14:46you
1:14:47to my district council member Chris for
1:14:50being against this. This is actually the
1:14:52first thing I've heard of this
1:14:55and so that in itself is concerning.
1:14:58The one thing that I just want to
1:15:01quickly state that is so ironic to me.
1:15:03You guys started the meeting out
1:15:06acknowledging and recognizing the need
1:15:09to
1:15:10recognize Native Americans for the month
1:15:13of November
1:15:14and then now we're talking about a
1:15:16pipeline and somebody's already
1:15:18acknowledged Dakota Access. Like I just
1:15:21wonder how those two actions or thoughts
1:15:24can actually take place
1:15:26without it being so obvious. The
1:15:28pipeline should be like a hell no. But
1:15:30my original comments are to say that my
1:15:33name is Don. I'm the community organizer
1:15:35of powerful moms who care. We're a
1:15:37project of Crossroads Urban Center. We
1:15:41look forward to meeting with council
1:15:42members, talking about the ineffective
1:15:45housing systems in Salt Lake City.
1:15:48We know as mothers that even if we work,
1:15:52even if we have disabilities,
1:15:55the current housing
1:15:57often times leaves us in inadequate
1:15:59shelters or even without shelter access
1:16:01because they're full. So we urge the
1:16:04council to have a mindset of housing
1:16:06first. That is not a dirty concept. It's
1:16:10not a dirty word. Housing first and
1:16:13family supported of housing really has
1:16:17to come in place in your budget before
1:16:19you're allowing four unit properties
1:16:22here and there. Those are important as
1:16:23well, but there's been a lot of
1:16:26negligence in making sure that there's
1:16:28accessibility to the most vulnerable.
1:16:31Thank you.
1:16:37>> Next is Cabrera followed by Kylie Aquino
1:16:40and then Bernie Hart. Kai is here in
1:16:42person.
1:16:44>> Hello, long time no see you.
1:16:46My name is Kai and I am now a resident
1:16:49of Taylorsville.
1:16:51And I'm here today because I have been
1:16:53forced out of the city where I work and
1:16:55spend most of my time
1:16:57due to a lack of readily available and
1:16:59affordable housing.
1:17:02The Wasatch Assembly has brought you a
1:17:03clear set of demands developed by people
1:17:06in our community and these are one, no
1:17:09homelessness sweeps.
1:17:12Two,
1:17:13adopting WALC's expanding housing
1:17:16options plan.
1:17:17Three, property tax used for affordable
1:17:20housing and homelessness services.
1:17:25While affordable housing is a focal
1:17:27point in development in our city,
1:17:30I don't believe the interests of those
1:17:31of us who need affordable housing are
1:17:34being prioritized.
1:17:35However, the interests of real estate
1:17:37and development agencies and their
1:17:39priorities need to be more consistently
1:17:41heard.
1:17:42My top priority policies of Wasatch
1:17:44Agenda's
1:17:45Wasatch Assembly's agenda are one,
1:17:48security deposit regulation
1:17:50to make it easier for people to move
1:17:52into housing because like people who
1:17:56previously commented, we can't save for
1:17:59actually owning a home.
1:18:01People can hardly save for the deposit
1:18:03on their next place
1:18:05because we know that deposits are not
1:18:06being returned.
1:18:08No junk fees for apartment complexes.
1:18:10Lots of complexes now
1:18:13have you pay for parking, have you pay
1:18:14for garbage, have you pay for internet
1:18:16that is mandatory because the developers
1:18:18also include that in packages when they
1:18:20are constructing these housing options.
1:18:24And third would be banning RealPage.
1:18:27AI market pricing for housing should
1:18:32never be allowed.
1:18:34You were elected to represent the people
1:18:36who live here. Um unfortunately, I do
1:18:38not live here anymore, and so I'm asking
1:18:41that you listen and hear us and use
1:18:43these comments in
1:18:45>> Thank you.
1:18:48Next is Kylie Akina, followed by Bernie
1:18:51Hart, and then John Arias.
1:18:54Kylie, you may now unmute.
1:18:56>> Good evening, council members. My name
1:18:58is Kylie Akina, District 5 resident and
1:19:00member of Wasatch Assembly.
1:19:02In light of rapid rent increases from
1:19:042020 to 2026, and um evictions included
1:19:08in that increase, I'm commenting to
1:19:10advocate to add agenda items concerning
1:19:12tenant protections against evictions for
1:19:14vulnerable community members, including
1:19:16immigrants, asylum seekers, and disabled
1:19:18individuals. A- um agenda items can
1:19:20include appropriation towards universal
1:19:22rights to counsel, multilingual tenants'
1:19:25rights education and advocacy, eviction
1:19:27diversion programs, accessibility grants
1:19:29to landlords, medical crisis diversion,
1:19:32a stop to abatements throughout Salt
1:19:33Lake City, and long-term housing
1:19:36solutions with on-site health care
1:19:38and social services. Living near uh
1:19:41Liberty Park, I'm quite tired of seeing
1:19:43unhoused neighbors berated by SLCPD
1:19:45almost daily or nightly. So, any of
1:19:47these agenda items um put on the um
1:19:50um proposed by the council would help
1:19:52prevent sudden homelessness to already
1:19:54at-risk communities facing hardships due
1:19:56to removal of federal funding of
1:19:58life-saving programs. I would also like
1:20:00to echo the need for transparency on
1:20:02next steps for preventing the proposed
1:20:04immigration pipeline, and what residents
1:20:06can expect following your decisions as
1:20:08any potential leaks could lead to severe
1:20:09fire risk or displacement.
1:20:12Um in light of Indigenous Heritage
1:20:13Month, a large portion of Indigenous
1:20:15peoples are often made up of immigrants
1:20:17and asylum seekers who continue to face
1:20:20extreme ongoing cruelty at this time in
1:20:22our country. So, I encourage all council
1:20:24members not to just acknowledge
1:20:25Indigenous lands and peoples locally and
1:20:27globally, but to move toward policy that
1:20:29shapes our well-being by way of legal
1:20:31protections, as well as a distri-
1:20:33redistribution of wealth and power. That
1:20:35would include disavowing any current or
1:20:37potential partnerships with genocide
1:20:39supporting super PACs as we approach
1:20:41elections. Thank you.
1:20:46>> And next is Bernie Hart followed by John
1:20:49Arias and then Olivia Harris. Bernie is
1:20:52here in person.
1:20:59>> It's time
1:21:03for the a different dance. Time for a
1:21:05little different dance, a little form of
1:21:07different music.
1:21:09Cuz the old dance steps just
1:21:11didn't get me anywhere.
1:21:13The homeless and people that are at risk
1:21:16in the and mentally ill and addicted in
1:21:18the community are not being helped by
1:21:20current services and there's no proof
1:21:23that the services actually work. But the
1:21:26homeless services board and the governor
1:21:28and uh the UDA partnership and whoever
1:21:31else is in Mr. Shumway involved in this
1:21:34new plan
1:21:35uh is going to put more and more of them
1:21:37in jail without having provided me or
1:21:40anybody with information that the system
1:21:42worked or helped people. Nobody, no
1:21:45information. The mental health courts
1:21:47and the district attorney's office when
1:21:49I asked said the information did not
1:21:52exist.
1:21:54I'm going to start pretending
1:21:57that this is not intentional
1:21:59institutional ignorance.
1:22:02I'm just getting to going to start
1:22:04believing that there is a few people out
1:22:06there that will have a reasonable
1:22:09data-driven conversation about what is
1:22:12or is not working. I can't believe our
1:22:15entire government structure
1:22:17doesn't have some information on for a
1:22:19basis to make informed decisions on how
1:22:22they deal with the mental health and
1:22:24addiction
1:22:25in the community. I will be formal
1:22:28filing formal grammar requests with any
1:22:31organization I can think of
1:22:33and I'll be returning the results to the
1:22:35mayor's office because she is a member
1:22:37of the Homeless Services Board and I
1:22:40will be sitting back, not dancing, just
1:22:43quietly waiting for her to respond.
1:22:46And if she doesn't respond and I get no
1:22:48response, I will come back here and let
1:22:50you know that nobody that I've asked is
1:22:53providing me with information that I
1:22:55think is required to make informed
1:22:57decisions. So, thank you.
1:23:02>> Next is John Arias followed by Olivia
1:23:05Horas. John is here in person.
1:23:10>> Can you all hear me?
1:23:11Can you [clears throat] hear me?
1:23:13Good evening. Thank you guys. Um
1:23:15I uh
1:23:16I never speak it. I never
1:23:19come here, so so this is a first, so I
1:23:21feel very strongly. Um I'm
1:23:24here talking about the Sinclair oil
1:23:26project. I'm very happy to hear
1:23:28uh a lot of people against it and I I
1:23:32would urge y'all to pull no stops in
1:23:35opposing this pipeline. Uh it is
1:23:39uh first of all, let's cut to the chase
1:23:42and see it for what it actually is. This
1:23:44is a private for-profit pipeline
1:23:47that benefits
1:23:49uh Sinclair. It benefits their
1:23:51shareholders.
1:23:53Presumably it benefits some state
1:23:55legislators along the way.
1:23:57Um the legislature may be giving it a
1:23:59veneer of
1:24:01of of of
1:24:03of doing some good for the community,
1:24:07but someone asked a really good question
1:24:09about what benefit does it bring
1:24:13the communities uh up up in Summit
1:24:15County, down here in the valley. I don't
1:24:18think it brings anything any benefit.
1:24:20It's a purely for-private venture with
1:24:22all the profits going to Sinclair. All
1:24:26Sinclair is doing with this is
1:24:28socializing the risk. So, the risk is
1:24:31going to fall on the on Salt Lake
1:24:33community, on Parleys, on immigration,
1:24:35on Summit County.
1:24:37And
1:24:38so, I mean, this is a form of corporate
1:24:40welfare as presented, just plain and
1:24:43simple.
1:24:44Uh
1:24:45people have commented on the the
1:24:47environmental hazards.
1:24:49Uh I I'm on a well
1:24:52and and and little anecdote, seen them
1:24:55come through. If you see the Sinclair
1:24:59SWAT team of surveyors,
1:25:02they're Oklahoma tags, Louisiana tags,
1:25:05Texas tags, Colorado tags. There are no
1:25:07locals involved. So, my time's up.
1:25:15>> Next is Olivia Juarez, who is here in
1:25:18person.
1:25:21>> Hello council. Hello mayor. My name is
1:25:22Olivia Juarez. I am a Salt Lake City
1:25:25resident in Council District 6, and I'm
1:25:28here to speak on behalf of Green
1:25:30Latinos, a 501c3 nonprofit climate
1:25:33conservation and environmental justice
1:25:35organization with 132 members in Salt
1:25:38Lake City. And like many today in
1:25:40response to your October 13 work
1:25:42session, I've come to ask each of you
1:25:44respectfully to reject HF Sinclair's
1:25:47proposed Westline Connect project. It
1:25:50was encouraging to hear so many of you
1:25:52on the Zoom recording. Thank you for
1:25:53providing that, uh raising concern about
1:25:56the consequences of a leak, of a spill,
1:25:58or fire ignition, any other catastrophe
1:26:01that could be caused in association with
1:26:03the construction, maintenance, and
1:26:05straight-up existence of the um
1:26:08gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel pipeline.
1:26:11It's a concern shared by Green Latinos
1:26:13for two main reasons that I want to
1:26:14highlight. Uh first, many of us have
1:26:18recalled the Red Butte Creek crude oil
1:26:21spill that contaminated our wild water,
1:26:24soil, and wildlife. And as a reminder,
1:26:26it drove people literally outside of
1:26:28their homes because of their fumes.
1:26:31History tells us that pipelines owned by
1:26:34major fossil fuel companies are
1:26:36vulnerable to risk. They do not get an
1:26:38exception, and no risk is acceptable,
1:26:41especially as this presidential
1:26:43administration continues to eviscerate
1:26:45every bedrock environmental law and
1:26:47program that would protect us after a
1:26:50catastrophe. Second, I want to highlight
1:26:53that Rose Park, Federal Heights, and the
1:26:54University of Utah, areas nearby the
1:26:56pipeline,
1:26:58are really high in the EPA's
1:27:01environmental justice score EJ screen
1:27:03mapping tool for burdens to exposure to
1:27:07toxic air releases and burden with
1:27:10drinking water non-compliance.
1:27:12I will be submitting more information on
1:27:15that to you all for the record
1:27:17electronically. It's in the best
1:27:19interest of our community to reject it,
1:27:21so please
1:27:22>> Time.
1:27:26And that was the final registered
1:27:27commenter.
1:27:28>> Thank you all of you that shared your
1:27:30comment
1:27:32to today.
1:27:35Just a quick update
1:27:37to everybody here, but also to to our
1:27:39council colleagues, they I I uh
1:27:43I I'm asking
1:27:45uh the the our council staff to uh ask
1:27:48Sinclair to come back on November 10th
1:27:51uh to our work session to answer the
1:27:54questions that we
1:27:55uh we brought up in the meeting. So, uh
1:27:58we are going to be waiting for a
1:28:00response on that.
1:28:02>> Yeah, thanks, Mr. Chair. Just for anyone
1:28:04who might be listening, we have not um
1:28:05heard confirmation from Sinclair yet
1:28:07that they can make that day work, but we
1:28:09will make sure to put that out on all
1:28:11our social media channels as soon as we
1:28:13confirm that.
1:28:14>> Yeah, I I I I appreciate that and I
1:28:16think that's
1:28:17that's something important to us is to
1:28:19get answers to the questions that we
1:28:21propose.
1:28:22So,
1:28:24thank you all of you.
1:28:25Thank you everybody for your comments.
1:28:27This concludes our Salt City Council
1:28:29meeting.
1:28:30This meeting stands adjourned.
1:28:36>> Yes, excellent.
1:28:37>> Hope you feel better.
1:28:39>> Yes.
1:28:41Uh
1:28:42yes.
1:28:45>> [music]
1:28:53[music]
1:29:04[music]
1:29:14[music]