Data center zoning amendments (Ordinances 5987 and 5988)
At a glance
Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard.
- What: two ordinances amending the Unified Development Code for data centers and other resource-intensive uses, up for second reading on 10/20/2026.
- Where it stands: both passed second reading on the consent agenda with no opposing votes.
- Next: third and final reading; the council also passed a related substitute, Data center development standards ordinance (Ordinance 5986), on the same night.
Council action
- First reading, 10/8/2026: added to the consent agenda; Ordinance 5987 sponsors were Warren, Canale, Spinosa and Carlisle, and 5988 sponsors were Logan, Cooper-Sutton, Swearengen-Washington, Easter-Thomas and Warren. Easter-Thomas asked to be removed from 5988; Carlisle moved, Green seconded, and the roll call had no opposing votes.
- Items 9 and 10 on the consent agenda. Ordinance 5987 lists Councilmembers Warren, Canale, Spinosa, Carlisle and White as sponsors; Ordinance 5988 lists Logan, Cooper-Sutton, Swearengen-Washington, Walker and Warren.
- Vice Chair Carlisle moved the consent agenda, Warren seconded; the roll call had no opposing votes. During the later debate members said the substitute for Ordinance 5986 combined earlier data center ordinances.
Planning & Zoning discussion (10/8/2026)
- At the first committee hearing, Alan Wade described Ordinance 5987 as the combined zoning ordinance he drafted from the held proposals; it takes effect on adoption and is later codified in the Unified Development Code. Logan's became Ordinance 5988. Both went to first reading on the consent agenda that afternoon.
- Themes: siting away from homes, schools, churches and protected areas; objective, checkable criteria (feasibility, sound and buffer studies, no outside power sources without approval) so the city is not sued; light versus heavy industrial categories with large data centers directed to 12 to 15 heavy industrial areas; special use permits as the fastest route to public hearing; recovery of incremental public costs allowed under state law, but no tax.
- Carlisle urged moving to a vote; Cooper-Sutton asked how fast data centers can be moved out of industrial neighborhoods near schools (Wade: not without condemnation; rules apply to new projects).
Sources
- 2026-10-06 - City Council Committees
- 2026-10-08 - Planning & Zoning (2) (hearing video, 10/8/2026)
- 2026-10-08 - Planning & Zoning (earlier upload of the same 10/8/2026 session; no additional discussion)
- 2026-10-08 - Memphis City Council (council meeting video, 10/8/2026)
- 2026-10-20 - Memphis City Council (council meeting video, 10/20/2026)
- https://memphistn.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Regular-Agenda-10.20.26.pdf
Discussion time
About 40 minutes across 3 meetings (from transcript timestamps; approximate).
| Meeting | Minutes |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 - Memphis City Council | 2 |
| 2026-10-08 - Planning & Zoning (2) | 35 |
| 2026-10-08 - Memphis City Council | 3 |
Log
- 2026-10-08 - Planning & Zoning (2) — Committee hearing No. 1: Wade's combined zoning ordinance, siting and objective criteria, numbers assigned; no vote.
- 2026-10-20 - Memphis City Council — Passed second reading on the consent agenda, no opposing votes.
- 2026-10-08 - Memphis City Council — First reading on the consent agenda; Easter-Thomas was removed as co-sponsor of 5988; no opposing votes.
- 2026-10-22 - Page created from a posted agenda; no meeting transcript processed yet.
- 2026-10-06 - City Council Committees - Council attorney's framework advanced to the full council with same-night minutes.
- 2026-11-07 - 2026-11-10 - City Council Full Meeting - Third readings on the agenda; the data center zoning update is also before 2026-11-10 - City Council Committees (Planning & Zoning).