Data center zoning amendments (Ordinances 5987 and 5988)

At a glance

Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard.

  • What: two ordinances amending the Unified Development Code for data centers and other resource-intensive uses, up for second reading on 10/20/2026.
  • Where it stands: both passed second reading on the consent agenda with no opposing votes.
  • Next: third and final reading; the council also passed a related substitute, Data center development standards ordinance (Ordinance 5986), on the same night.

Council action

  • First reading, 10/8/2026: added to the consent agenda; Ordinance 5987 sponsors were Warren, Canale, Spinosa and Carlisle, and 5988 sponsors were Logan, Cooper-Sutton, Swearengen-Washington, Easter-Thomas and Warren. Easter-Thomas asked to be removed from 5988; Carlisle moved, Green seconded, and the roll call had no opposing votes.
  • Items 9 and 10 on the consent agenda. Ordinance 5987 lists Councilmembers Warren, Canale, Spinosa, Carlisle and White as sponsors; Ordinance 5988 lists Logan, Cooper-Sutton, Swearengen-Washington, Walker and Warren.
  • Vice Chair Carlisle moved the consent agenda, Warren seconded; the roll call had no opposing votes. During the later debate members said the substitute for Ordinance 5986 combined earlier data center ordinances.

Planning & Zoning discussion (10/8/2026)

  • At the first committee hearing, Alan Wade described Ordinance 5987 as the combined zoning ordinance he drafted from the held proposals; it takes effect on adoption and is later codified in the Unified Development Code. Logan's became Ordinance 5988. Both went to first reading on the consent agenda that afternoon.
  • Themes: siting away from homes, schools, churches and protected areas; objective, checkable criteria (feasibility, sound and buffer studies, no outside power sources without approval) so the city is not sued; light versus heavy industrial categories with large data centers directed to 12 to 15 heavy industrial areas; special use permits as the fastest route to public hearing; recovery of incremental public costs allowed under state law, but no tax.
  • Carlisle urged moving to a vote; Cooper-Sutton asked how fast data centers can be moved out of industrial neighborhoods near schools (Wade: not without condemnation; rules apply to new projects).

Sources

Discussion time

About 40 minutes across 3 meetings (from transcript timestamps; approximate).

Meeting Minutes
2026-10-20 - Memphis City Council 2
2026-10-08 - Planning & Zoning (2) 35
2026-10-08 - Memphis City Council 3

Log