2026-10-14 - Public Safety Committee
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions of the video; names and numbers may be misheard.
- The Public Safety and Emergency Management Committee met October 14, 2026 with Chair Vivian Marmol, Vice Chair Ana Levy and Councilors Rosaly Gonzalez and Selena Reyes (Reyes joined remotely). Minutes from August 25 and September 10, 2025, January 15 and March 2, 2026 were approved.
- Item 412-26: Lawrence police briefed the committee on the city's 35 Flock license plate reader cameras and their safeguards, addressed a Methuen councilor's claim that a plate was searched 359 times (police say once), and said a 90-day trial of another vendor would be introduced the next night. The item was tabled so councilors can read the packet. See Surveillance Technology and Flock License Plate Readers.
- Item 413-26: police shooting statistics and public safety technology were tabled until police return with numbers and maps. See Police Shooting Statistics and Public Safety Technology.
- Item 414-26: contractor and developer compliance with city ordinances and permits was tabled pending a visit from Inspectional Services. See Contractor and Developer Compliance with City Ordinances and Permits.
- Police also said about 10 percent or fewer of roughly 441 city cameras are down at any time and that city camera footage is kept 30 days.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
01:33Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and
01:35welcome to the public safety and
01:36emergency management committee. Um,
01:39madame clerk, could you please uh make
01:42notice that the name of the committee
01:44needs to be adjusted?
01:46>> Okay.
01:46>> It has to say public safety and
01:47emergency management committee.
01:50Um,
01:52okay. Today is Wednesday, October 14,
01:56and it is approximately 6:08 p.m. Voting
01:59members present today. Uh, to my left is
02:03our vice chair and councelor at large,
02:07um, Anna Levy and, uh, city councelor
02:10Rosalie Gonzalez. Uh, noted as absent is
02:14uh, councelor Selena Reyes. Pursuant to
02:17chapter 20 of the acts of 2022, the
02:19meeting of public safety and emergency
02:21management committee is being conducted
02:23both in person and via remote
02:25participation. A reminder that persons
02:27who would like to listen to and or view
02:29this meeting while in progress may
02:30either attend in person um at the 200
02:33Common Street City Council Chambers
02:35Lawrence Mass uh location or uh use any
02:39any of the following access locations
02:41such as our Facebook Lawrence City
02:43Council page and our YouTube Lawrence
02:45City Council page. Uh Madame Clerk, if
02:48you could please call the role.
02:53>> Councelor Rosel Gonzalez
02:54>> present.
02:56Vice Chair and Councelor Anna Levy
02:59>> present.
03:00>> Councelor Selena Reyes is noted absent.
03:03And Madame Chair [snorts] Vivian Marl
03:07>> present.
03:08>> Thank you.
03:09>> Okay. If we could please stand for the
03:11pledge of allegiance before commencing
03:12today's meeting.
03:14>> I aliance to the flag of the United
03:17States of America and to the republic
03:19for which it stands. One nation under
03:22God, indivisible, with liberty and
03:24justice for all.
03:27>> Oh,
03:28>> yes.
03:29>> Could we confirm? Oh,
03:32>> councelor Reyes.
03:33>> Councelor Reyes, I just wanted to make
03:35sure. Could you hear me? Could you hear
03:36us?
03:38>> Yes. I want to double check. Did you
03:39hear me?
03:41>> We could. Um, if you could please
03:43>> noted. Um, console, I'm doing a roll
03:46call. Console Selena Reyes
03:48>> present.
03:49>> Thank you.
03:52So, I'm looking for a motion to approve
03:55u minutes of August 25th of 2025,
04:00September 10th of 2025,
04:03January 15, 2026, and March 2nd of 2026.
04:08>> So, move second.
04:11>> Oh, let me repeat that. I'm so sorry.
04:13I'm looking for a motion to approve
04:15minutes for council approval of August
04:1725th, 2025, September 10th of 2025,
04:20January 15 of 2026, and March 2nd of
04:232026.
04:24>> So move.
04:25>> Second. Um, all those in favor? Oh,
04:27Madame Clerk, could you please call the
04:29RO?
04:31>> Councelor Rosel Gonzalez,
04:33>> yes.
04:34>> Councelor Anna Levy,
04:36>> yes.
04:38Councelor
04:39Selena Reyes.
04:44>> Thank you. And Madame Chair, Vivian
04:46Marmal,
04:47>> uh, present.
04:48>> Thank you. I mean, yes. I don't know why
04:51I'm I'm thinking of um I'm so sorry. I'm
04:53thinking of [laughter]
04:57um the attendance. Yes. Please uh ensure
05:00that you have that.
05:01>> Yes. Um, councilors, we have uh under
05:04new business um item 41226. Councelor
05:09Reyes, I I do want to make sure that
05:11you're aware that we did receive a
05:13package of information. Um I'll have to
05:17make sure that it's emailed to you. We
05:20just I just received this and we made
05:22copies for all counselors. So, I'll make
05:24sure to that you have your own copy on
05:27your desk and I'll have to have a
05:29conversation with our city clerk to
05:31ensure that she could email this to you
05:33as well. I I haven't received it by
05:35email and none of the other counselors
05:37as well.
05:40>> Uh, thank you for letting me know.
05:42>> Okay, so item 41226,
05:45uh, Lawrence Police Department. We we do
05:47have Sergeant Dart that's going to speak
05:49on um the flock safety cameras. Um are
05:55you guys joining forces?
05:58[laughter]
05:58Okay. Um
06:01by all means um please present uh what
06:06you have the overview for this
06:08presentation. And I know that you are
06:10already speaking um somewhat on this
06:13item under the ordinance committee, but
06:16um due to the fact that there's been
06:18many growing concerns on this item, it
06:21was recommended by the chief to have the
06:24uh have this discussion um under public
06:27safety committee um and therefore allow
06:30other counselors to chime in and ask
06:32questions um based on this item. So you
06:35have the floor.
06:37>> Good evening. Uh Salman Dar Sergeant
06:41Lawrence Pey 55 L Street UT division.
06:46[snorts]
06:47We uh received the agenda uh regarding
06:50questions regarding flock safety cameras
06:52and obviously uh shooting statistics and
06:55public safety technology. A packet was
06:58submitted today uh that's going to be
07:00introduced on the uh for the 20th uh
07:04that entails exactly this and that's
07:06under the 9.25
07:10um city ordinance that's required for
07:13the department to submit. Um so we were
07:16just making sure that we are a part to
07:18that and you had the documentation to
07:20review prior to that meeting. Uh that
07:23entails exactly what you may have a as
07:26far as questions for flock safeties and
07:29um we just needed some clarification
07:31[snorts]
07:31uh regarding the shooting statistics.
07:34>> So if you don't mind the shooting
07:36statistics that's the next item. Okay.
07:38>> So for this item we're just going to
07:40focus on the FL
07:43>> um and anything surrounding the flat
07:46cameras. How many how does it work?
07:50Okay.
07:50>> Um and
07:53we'll figure out what are other pending
07:55questions that counselors have.
07:56>> So basics would be uh the the technology
08:00itself is to read uh license plates.
08:03Correct. So what when there's an
08:05investigation there is a list that goes
08:08by if the uh in the item is on that
08:11particular list it will be triggered by
08:13that technology which alerts the
08:15officers. That's the premise of it. uh
08:18they're in various locations of the
08:19city. Uh there's 35 of them and uh
08:23that's how we the only time that's only
08:26initialized is if there is investigation
08:27or there's a 911 call that comes in and
08:30requires us to review any of that
08:32information. There's some recent more
08:34safeguards that been put into place
08:36because we want to show transparency
08:38towards that. Now it requires also uh an
08:42incident number to be associated every
08:44time an officer goes and and uh uses
08:46that this technology. So
08:49>> um
08:52so I'm going to speak for me. I like to
08:54have things be dumbed down in a way
08:56where it's like very intro 101. When you
08:59say the
09:02these license plate readers are
09:05triggered to to be effective upon
09:10>> something serious happening. What do you
09:12mean by that? Whether it's an Amber
09:14Alert like
09:15>> example would be basic would be a stolen
09:18car, right? Okay.
09:19>> So there's a hot sheet for those stolen
09:21cars. If the if the device picks up on
09:25that plate, it will alert us which then
09:27we dispatch the officer.
09:29>> Okay. Is there a certain criteria as to
09:32what like what are labeled as serious
09:35crimes? It's just not it it does it
09:38doesn't get turned on for any specific
09:40um
09:40>> No, it's it's specific. It's specific to
09:43the the case itself. I'll let the
09:45captain elaborate a little more.
09:47>> Sure. I can um I like to use the word
09:49the term layman's terms, not dumb down.
09:51if you're okay with that.
09:52>> Of course.
09:53>> So, um, in layman's terms, the there are
09:5635 cameras out there. The 35 cameras are
09:58taking still photos. Okay. This is not
10:02video. They're still photos. Still
10:04photos of the rear of cars when they
10:07pass these cameras. Okay. Those photos
10:11are then searchable by the program by an
10:13officer. Okay. Um, that is all that it
10:17is um doing. It is taking a picture of
10:19the back of a car. Now the back of the
10:21car includes the license plate and also
10:25logo um you know emblem um make model uh
10:30shape of uh rear rear plates uh I'm
10:34sorry brake lights and um and also uh
10:37luggage racks bumper stickers stuff like
10:39that. Um there are two different
10:41functions with the flock cameras. There
10:43is a hut list which Sergeant Dar was
10:45talking about. If there is um an alert
10:49to a um stolen car, an Amber alert, a
10:55silver alert,
10:57anybody who has dispatch and anyone who
10:59has the Flock app active on their phone
11:01will be alerted to that and then they
11:03can be dispatched or go to that
11:05location. So if we if we have an Amber
11:07alert out there and we get an alert
11:10southbound on Broadway at the Mthuan
11:12line, we would then dispatch officers
11:15cars out there for a certain plate and
11:17model. Now when there is a that's the
11:19hutless function. Now there is the
11:21investigative function. The
11:23investigative function is when an
11:25officer decides they want to they're
11:28dispatched to a call, they're doing an
11:29investigation, they can search these
11:31pictures that Flock has been taking of
11:34the rear of cars for specific things and
11:37it can be for a specific license plate
11:39or we can search for a specific make,
11:41model, type of a of a car. Okay? It's
11:44not limited to license plate reading.
11:46The software allows us to search for
11:48that. So, if you if you'd like, I could
11:51give you an example. We have a hit and
11:53run, okay? And the person doesn't get a
11:56license plate. The person simply gets um
12:00a make, model, and color, a red Honda
12:03CRV, okay? Traveling south on Broadway.
12:06The officer could then go to that camera
12:09that's located on Broadway and look for
12:12a specific time period and look for a
12:15red Honda CRV that goes through and
12:17maybe finds the license plate because
12:20again it's taking the picture. So now
12:22that would be a suspect motor vehicle.
12:25Not automatically our our our our
12:29person we're going to charge, but that
12:30would allow us to do some more
12:32investigating and rule that vehicle in
12:35or out of our investigation.
12:37Does that kind of help?
12:39>> No, of course. Um
12:42I I know I have several questions, but I
12:45want to make sure that um
12:47>> and due to the fact that there's three
12:49different packages, I want to make sure
12:51that um I'm allowing during [snorts]
12:54these segments if there is any
12:56counselors that have any questions
12:59>> u that they would like to bring up
13:00during what's been said so far.
13:04>> Councelor Le, you have a question so So
13:07share this is what I'm looking in here
13:09because not too long ago I just hear
13:11about the problems uh with that with the
13:15that kind of camera that one of the
13:18council on meth have I don't know so you
13:21haven't hear about the complain and all
13:23the problems
13:24>> I'm very familiar with that counselor um
13:26I don't know how much we want to go into
13:28that but I can say that it was a um I
13:31think what I can say openly is it was a
13:33misunderstanding
13:34>> in the original comments ments by that
13:36other counselor from another city. Um
13:39that that was properly investigated and
13:42her initial thought there was no problem
13:44and that um the officer was cleared and
13:47it was uh used very appropriately in
13:49that setting.
13:51>> So the amount of time that she said that
13:54was searched is not
13:56>> it that was not accurate. It was a
13:58misunderstanding. It was only searched
14:00one time.
14:01>> Okay. And um the um larger number, the
14:05359 time number that was thrown out
14:07there was the actual history that the
14:11officer, it was the number of searches
14:13that officer had conducted in a 2-year
14:15period, not the number of times that
14:17that license plate was searched. The
14:20license plate was only searched one
14:22time. It was a misunderstanding by the
14:24third party website that the um the
14:27person went to and it was investigated
14:30by internal affairs and by um by the
14:34Lawrence Police Department and we were
14:36able to 100% confirm her license plate
14:39was searched one time related to a hit
14:42and run on Broadway.
14:45No, that's uh through you madam chair
14:48that brought the attention because I say
14:50you know if you did not committing any
14:52any crime or you did not committing
14:55anything or your play is clean uh
14:58something happened at one time so why
15:02you it's practically 300 something time
15:05it is practically almost every day that
15:07she was uh getting anywhere that's the
15:10person was coming. Yes. And that brings
15:14some concern. That's us as well.
15:15>> And we were very concerned when we heard
15:17359* 2. When the initial report was made
15:20to us, I honestly I was very upset. Um
15:23but once we were able to look at it and
15:25look at the information and understand
15:28why somebody would arise to that number
15:29and I understand why somebody came up
15:31with that number initially. Um, and very
15:34quickly we were able to see that a
15:36mistake was made and then we further
15:39went on and did our investigation and
15:41realized it was only flocked one time.
15:44Um, searched in flock one time and
15:46searched appropriately. It was searched
15:48as a result of a hit-and- run
15:49investigation with a making model of a
15:52vehicle given. He then went to a
15:54specific camera and looked for that make
15:56and model vehicle in that area at that
15:58general time. found a plate, ran that
16:03plate in flock, and quickly realized
16:05that it was not the suspect vehicle,
16:07found a different I'm sorry, different
16:09suspect motor vehicle, and solved the
16:12case. The the the the vehicle was was a
16:16um vehicle of interest for a short
16:18period of time. We're talking about a
16:1945minute period of time.
16:21>> And that it was um it was not searched
16:24in flock 359 times. I can't be more
16:26clear about that. It was searched one
16:28time. ruled out as the vehicle of
16:31interest and the proper vehicle the
16:34suspect motor vehicle was identified.
16:36>> Okay. So I wanted this like for
16:38clarification and for the record what
16:40you are telling right now that was just
16:42only one time because I said well I'm
16:46scared that's my life is completely
16:50[laughter]
16:51it's
16:52>> something I mean I'm going to be
16:55watching every single day or you know
16:58for that is a camera. How many camera do
17:00we have in in the
17:02>> flock cameras or or
17:04>> the flock?
17:04>> The flock 35.
17:06>> 35. Yeah.
17:06>> Right now.
17:07>> 35 right now.
17:08>> Yeah. So, no when with the other camera
17:10we started with about 70 when we
17:14installed the other one.
17:16>> So,
17:16>> this you're talking about the city video
17:18cameras.
17:18>> The city video cameras. I think so that
17:20we started with about 70 uh camera at
17:23the time. So and now beside we have
17:26beside all those camera we have a 35
17:29>> we have 35 flock LPR cameras
17:31>> they they obviously this serves a
17:34different purpose altogether city
17:36cameras or city cameras um
17:38>> but this has a specific tool this is a
17:41tool that we use for investigation
17:43purposes only so
17:45>> if there is something that's uh you know
17:48alerted we will follow through by using
17:50this tool this is why it was um asked of
17:53this council to approve that, the demo
17:56of that, the process that was taken in
17:58place when it was first initiated. Uh I
18:00know there's a lot of other public talk
18:03out there. Uh that's a a subjective
18:05matter. I think uh when it concerns to
18:09Lawrence PD and the citizens of
18:11Lawrence, uh everybody should be at ease
18:14that we're not in any nefarious
18:17business. We're here to help people. You
18:19know, we're here to help the public. So
18:21if we can solve a crime quicker with
18:24efficiency with no we try to make that
18:28there is no errors you know for the due
18:30process um I think this is where it's
18:34it's it's key to have something like
18:35this so um and it's fine it's it's it's
18:39absolutely in the right of anybody to
18:41question hey uh as you are doing today
18:43and we can bring some clarity to that
18:46>> are we thinking to increase the amount
18:49of camera the floor camera.
18:52>> We are uh um we do have something
18:55scheduled for tomorrow night where we
18:57have a vendor that's going to be showing
18:59showcasing their version of it. Um
19:02hopefully that's something that um
19:04intrigues uh the council to the point
19:08that we can start a demo phase. We would
19:10like to explore other options. Um, not
19:14to say anything negative about our
19:15current vendor, but it's always good to
19:17see how technology evolves throughout
19:19different vendors and what they can
19:21produce. So,
19:22>> if it's a better better alternative,
19:24then we will uh, you know, we'll
19:25definitely bring that to you
19:27>> through you, Maranchia. Paul, how long
19:29right now are being using the camera?
19:32>> We've ex uh, we just renewed the
19:34contract with vlog for those LPRs for
19:36this fiscal year. So
19:38>> yeah, for for how long have been
19:41>> how long have we've had uh since
19:43>> it's uh 2021, March of 2021.
19:48>> So we started using the
19:50>> we started using
19:51>> we started with a smaller amount and
19:53have rolled them out in phases.
19:55>> So both camera are being watching at the
19:58same time for the same group or or there
20:01are different people who take care and
20:04watch those camera. So
20:08cameras themselves are not being
20:10monitored by a single individual all day
20:13long. It doesn't operate that way. They
20:16are displayed for use. So just like
20:20anything else, you have a TV that's on
20:22right now. It's more beneficial that
20:24it's on versus you looking for that
20:26power button. So the display that we
20:28have in dispatch now in our new facility
20:30allows us a widescreen where everything
20:33is displayed. when a call does come in,
20:35any hot call, we can actually hover over
20:38that screen, expand it and see what's
20:41going on in real time. That's what that
20:43does. So the there there is there's got
20:46to be um again a cause for for us to
20:50view there where we we don't I don't
20:53think any well I shouldn't say uh that
20:56because I'll be speculating, but I would
20:57say that for the Lawrence Police
20:59Department, we don't have a single
21:01person watching cameras. We're
21:03reactionary in the sense and and and I
21:05sorry I didn't introduce myself for
21:07those that you know me. My name is Hal
21:08Rogers. I'm a captain at the Lawrence
21:09Police Department. I'm in charge of
21:11detectives. So from the primarily
21:15we're not proactive on the cameras,
21:16they're reactive. We get a report of a
21:18crime and then we look and see if there
21:19are any cameras in that area that may
21:20have captured the crime or something
21:23before or after. So we're not monitoring
21:25it. We're not zooming into cars. We're
21:28not zooming into homes. where simply
21:30they're out there when and if we need
21:32them. And we do need them. You know, we
21:34use them a lot because we're a very busy
21:36department. So, we're very reactionary
21:38with the cameras. We're not proactive.
21:40We're not we're not using them to track
21:43people, track cars, nothing. It's it's
21:46after the report of a crime, after the
21:48report of an incident. It's a very very
21:50useful tool for our follow-up
21:52investigation.
21:54>> And it's the evolution of uh how do you
21:56investigate, right? you're you go from a
21:59time where you were knocking on doors
22:00asking which we still do but to a
22:03capacity where it it accelerates the the
22:06search process. The more time that
22:08passes on a particular event uh the
22:10harder it gets. So and if we can bridge
22:13that gap this is where this technology
22:15uh comes in in hand
22:18>> through you manager floor
22:22>> all the camera are working right now
22:25>> we uh we h most I would have to say
22:28there's there are cameras out there due
22:30to uh maintenance that's going on in the
22:33city when it comes to uh polls and
22:36whatnot some cameras are down but for
22:38the most po part I can say almost 90%
22:40are up and and functional
22:42>> because I I know that there are so many
22:45city camera that are are not working.
22:48>> Yeah. If we're talking about city
22:49cameras, the ones that are uh the
22:51department is uh aware of because ISD
22:54has uh theirs um which it's all in the
22:58one but I can say 441 out of the 441
23:01that we currently are displaying there's
23:04probably less than 10% I would even say
23:0710%
23:09much less than that. Uh and again it's
23:11because there's our wear and tear on the
23:13cameras. They have to be replaced. We do
23:15have uh an amount budgeted for that. But
23:18then we're limited too because there's
23:19certain areas that require more
23:21maintenance than others. So we have to
23:23take all that into consideration. And I
23:26I will say I think um there there was a
23:29concern previously about the cameras
23:30being down for an extended period of
23:32time or the officers having issues
23:34accessing those cameras because um I
23:36know the the previous chief uh got a
23:40request for an update on on the status
23:42of them. And I can say that with the mo
23:45us with us moving to our new PD, we were
23:48able to um install new computer servers
23:51which was a huge issue with the cameras
23:53were not down. We just had difficulty
23:55accessing them in a useful manner at
23:57times and we were constantly working
23:59with the vendor. They were essentially
24:01hitting control altdelete all the time
24:03in order for the cameras to to work
24:05easily for us. But that's something that
24:07has been rectified. That's something
24:08that has been fixed with our move to the
24:11new PD. We have a new server, a new
24:13operating system that has made um
24:15reviewing the cameras um much more
24:17easier for everybody involved. and we
24:20just deal with the occasional camera
24:22that goes down as a result of an outage
24:24or whatnot in which we reach out to the
24:26vendor and they come right out and fix
24:28it. They're they're very very
24:30responsive.
24:32>> For how long do you keep like the
24:35recording of the camera?
24:37>> The cameras are the city cameras are
24:40accessible for 30 days. They are 30-day
24:42retention period. They have been our
24:44entire time. if we are investigating a
24:47crime and there is evidence on that
24:49camera that is preserved for trial. So
24:52there's two parts to your your question.
24:53So 30 days searchable after that we have
24:58no access to them. There is a small
25:00portion within the PD in evidence and in
25:03booking and and I'm just referring to
25:05that because it's I think it's important
25:08that those are retained for much longer
25:10for obvious reasons. There are things
25:12that may be reported to us that we need
25:14to investigate that is um uh they may be
25:17reported outside of the 30-day window,
25:19but anything public is 30 days.
25:22>> I just want to clarify that part alone
25:24is the inside of the the this is
25:26internal security for internal security.
25:28>> This is not external right here.
25:32[laughter]
25:34>> Right.
25:34>> And and and flock wondering about flock.
25:37Flock the the images that are retained
25:39by Flock are only retained for 30 days.
25:43They're only searchable for 30 days.
25:44Again, anything that we specifically
25:47save as a result of investigation would
25:49be saved through at least the
25:51prosecution through at least the case in
25:53court. And um our access into Flock is
25:57permanently retained. So that's why we
25:59were able to go back and do an audit on
26:01that complaint or that that that issue
26:03that was uh um brought up that was
26:06several years old. We were able to go
26:08back and we were able to vet that out
26:11and prove that was not the case. So we
26:14can't do a search more than 30 days, but
26:16we can look at our own access and see
26:19what we did, which is very important for
26:21the entire time we've had flock.
26:24>> Thank you.
26:25>> You're welcome.
26:25>> Through you, Madam Chair,
26:27>> councelor Gonzalez. Okay. So, um what I
26:30am understanding is that these are
26:32crimebased cameras that take still
26:36photos of license plates only.
26:39>> Flock. Yes. It's only the rear of the
26:41car. And I'll be specific about the rear
26:42of the car. LPR technology has evolved.
26:46Originally, it was only for the license
26:48plate, but the program has improved
26:50where now we can do make, model, color.
26:52You know, I can say I'm looking for a
26:54red Honda CRV with a bumper sticker, and
26:56it could help me. So it's only capturing
26:59a picture of the rear of the car.
27:01>> It definitely has evolved. I mean uh the
27:04the department did have a technology
27:06where it was mounted on top of the
27:07cruisers. We have gone away with that a
27:10long time ago. I think there's some
27:12confusion on that too. This is why we
27:14also re revisited our internal policy
27:16that reflects that as well.
27:18>> Uh they they are LPRs. Uh so gone are
27:22the days where they're mounted on cars.
27:25>> Okay. So there's no possible way that
27:27these uh flock cameras can capture um a
27:30driver's face or a pedestrian for any
27:34crime.
27:34>> So I would say no with a couple of
27:37exceptions. They are specifically angled
27:39on that side of the road. We have to
27:41have two cameras on each road to get
27:42north and south egress, let's say. Okay?
27:45If a car drives on the wrong side of the
27:47road, it's going to capture a picture of
27:49that driver. Okay? So it's not intended
27:51to do that, but I can't tell you what
27:53would never happen. And then I would
27:55also say it's not supposed to get
27:57pedestrians. However, I can talk about
27:59this. We just had a recent case where um
28:03it was taking the picture of the rear of
28:05the car, the license plate, while it was
28:07stopped and there was a pedestrian with
28:09a firearm in his hand crossing the back
28:11of the car and the city camera in the
28:14area didn't capture the person holding
28:16the gun. It just had the wrong angle.
28:18But because Flock was taking a picture
28:20of the plate at the exact moment he
28:22walked by it, it was able to p picture
28:25the gun. Now, we did not get his face,
28:27it was not good enough for an ID, but
28:29because of the other video and because
28:31of the investigation,
28:33>> that's just one piece of the puzzle that
28:35helped us, you know, properly charge the
28:37guy. So, not the intended purpose,
28:40>> but but a c certainly a uh positive
28:43result of a picture of a license plate.
28:46though.
28:46>> Um, still three.
28:48>> Are these cameras distributed equally
28:50throughout districts?
28:53>> Equally throughout districts. I think
28:54the best way I would say no.
28:56>> They're more targeted towards hotspots.
28:59>> Hotspots in major thorough ways. And
29:01without getting into locations, I'd
29:03rather not so that the public doesn't
29:05know where they are.
29:06>> Um, we are trying to capture the most
29:09amount of vehicular traffic as possible.
29:12>> Okay.
29:13>> And that's the best way to put it. major
29:15choke points, thorough thoroughways. Um,
29:18city cameras themselves, when we're
29:19talking about the actual video cameras,
29:21I think are pretty equally distributed
29:23throughout districts, but the flock,
29:25which is designed to catch traffic, it's
29:28on major thorough thorough affairs.
29:30>> Okay.
29:31>> Okay. Thank you.
29:32>> Okay. Councelor Reyes, do you have any
29:35questions
29:39>> through you, Madame Chair? I don't have
29:41question. Thank you so much.
29:43>> Okay. Um,
29:45so yeah, as I'm listening to you guys, I
29:48am reading and um I'm answering a lot of
29:51my own questions by reading this. Um, if
29:54you don't mind, however, cuz we did uh
29:57one of my questions was um the funding
30:00of these cameras and I do see that you
30:02guys touched on that and there was a
30:04conversation or question asked regarding
30:07potentially getting more cameras. So,
30:08I'm assuming that that um the budgeting
30:11for this is and I'm not sure if you have
30:13the answer for that. Um yes,
30:16>> and if any questions that we don't have
30:18for today, by all means, this is
30:19something that um I could see myself
30:22tableabling just so we could be properly
30:24informed by reading this and then bring
30:26this up at a later point in time. Um as
30:29far as uh new technology uh like the one
30:33we will be introduced with tomorrow uh
30:36is something that I don't think we can
30:39clearly say or give it an amount even
30:41because it's still has to go through the
30:43approval and also the demo phase and
30:46then negotiation starts after that. Um
30:49and whatever dollar amount may be
30:52associated with that we can we will be
30:54presenting that and we'll be asking
30:56obviously funding
30:57>> from wherever it may be suitable.
31:00>> Okay. If you don't mind me, I'm going to
31:02touch on because I know you you
31:04mentioned that 90% are functioning, but
31:07those that aren't like to me uh also as
31:11a counselor that's part of the budget
31:12committee, but primarily with public
31:14safety, I want to make sure that if
31:16we're spending money for 35 cameras to
31:19function, I'm expecting for all of them
31:21to be functioning. So, uh, how long have
31:26the the 10% that you
31:28>> I I think
31:29>> that are down, how long are they down
31:31for? And
31:31>> I'll touch base on that. It's it's more
31:34of a revolving total that I'm giving
31:36you. Not that they're constantly 10%
31:38down.
31:39>> No. And I know, but when when a camera
31:41is down,
31:42>> what is the process to for maintenance
31:44to come out and fix like for how long
31:46are they down for?
31:47>> And we do need to separate city cameras
31:49from FL if that's okay. So specifically
31:52Flock, I would say they are down a lot
31:55less often than than city cameras. I
31:57would say way less than 10%. I would say
31:59occasionally we have one or two down
32:01>> out of So we're talking maybe 3 to 5%.
32:05When that happens, they are they are
32:07monitoring. I don't have to discover it
32:09accidentally. I don't I don't have to
32:11have someone come to me and say, "Hey, I
32:13was trying to do a search. I had an
32:14investigation and it was down. I'm an
32:16admin. I'm getting alerts. I'm getting
32:18emails. Go check the power source on
32:20this. There are things that I I go out
32:22immediately. So, I'm getting an email
32:24whenever there's an issue. I'm going out
32:25there to see based on the trouble light
32:28whether or not it's a power issue,
32:30whether or not it's another issue. And
32:31if it's not a power issue, I'm reaching
32:33out to Flock and they are responsive.
32:35They are very responsive. They're
32:36getting out to me. I mean, I want to say
32:39a week, 10 days at the most one camera
32:41would be down. Um, and Lantel is out the
32:44next day in most cases.
32:46>> So, Flock Flock obviously is on a lease
32:48program. Yes. And because it's on a
32:50lease program, obviously service is
32:52rendered a lot quicker, okay?
32:54>> And they want, you know, their system to
32:56be back up and operational. And we make
32:58sure of that, too. Like the captain
32:59says, we do get the alerts. They let us
33:01know when they're coming in. But just
33:03like everything else, you there's an
33:04approval. It's not like they'll just
33:06[snorts] wall to the city and start
33:08working on it. They'll let us know that
33:09this is the issue going on with the
33:11particular location. They'll be coming
33:13out on this particular date. So, it may
33:15take a few days, but their turnaround is
33:17fairly quick. when we're talking about
33:19city cams, city cams is a little more uh
33:23particular because there's a process
33:25there too depending on what the issue
33:28is, the cost could be a little more and
33:30we have to also factor in now that we
33:32have a an agreement with Lantel. Uh it
33:35it benefits us. So we do have that
33:37service we did not have before where we
33:39were solely reliant on the budgetary
33:42amount that was given to us for that
33:43fiscal year. Now, we're stuck behind
33:45that amount unless we go in front and
33:47and get some more funding. But, uh, in
33:50the from the time that I've spent uh, in
33:52this uh, in this unit, it's been u, I
33:56would have to say there's a lot of
33:58moving parts when it comes to utilities
34:00also in this city which causes the delay
34:03most of the time
34:05>> and a lot of the issues that happen is
34:06because of that. uh just the um I would
34:10say um the communication in between jobs
34:14that are happening with utilities versus
34:16the technology that are there kind of
34:18conflict. So uh it it costs a little
34:21more too but I don't want to go down
34:23that path as far as it's it's a it's a
34:26hit or miss when we talk about that.
34:28>> No no it's giving me an idea that maybe
34:30we should we should be adding that as an
34:32item and under public safety which is
34:34the city cameras. So, it's like a whole
34:37it's a completely different item. So,
34:39we'll try not to intermingle what the uh
34:42what they are.
34:44>> Um I want to segue real quick. Um
34:47access. I'm reading it. Um however, I
34:51feel like the language could be vague as
34:54to who has access and this is the part
34:57where I mean it could be vague. Um
35:03so, can it says who may access Number
35:0513, it's like the officer in charge.
35:08It's like, well, how many officers are
35:10usually in char? Is this p is this uh on
35:13a given shift? And and it says and
35:16designates. So what does that mean and
35:18designates like
35:19>> so
35:20>> how many the officer in charge is
35:22obviously during the course of any shift
35:24there is one officer in charge which is
35:27the
35:29uh and design are anybody that's a user
35:32designated for that platform that have
35:34access right so you have a username and
35:36a password that'll give you access to
35:37the system so no outsider would have
35:40access to that other than those
35:41designates these are issued by number of
35:45personnel so there's not uh there's a
35:48set amount that can only access it to
35:50begin with. Um and then the overview
35:53from the OIC is the one that decides uh
35:56certain mitigating factors that would
35:58allow that information to flow outside.
36:01But if we stick to the your question as
36:04far as access goes, if I have 90
36:07licenses, they're associated with a
36:10specific user and a password. And those
36:12individuals that work because we have a
36:14rotation in dispatch, they could be
36:16working dispatch so they have access to
36:18that system. Um,
36:22>> okay.
36:23Cuz I'm I'm
36:26I'm a fan of you guys having the
36:29resources and tools. I think having
36:30cameras are great, especially when we're
36:33as a counselor and I'm getting
36:34complaints of like illegal dumping. It's
36:36like I love cameras that could capture
36:38who are the perpetrators. Um uh I think
36:41when it comes to flock though uh the
36:44biggest and not even flock it's many
36:45things like technology
36:48if it's not used for how it's supposed
36:50to be intended for is where it's driving
36:54the conversation to a place where we
36:56don't want to have. Um so that's why my
37:00concern is who has access and is there a
37:04tracking some sort of tracking mechanism
37:08as to
37:09>> whoever has uh the access
37:14>> okay let me see how I'm wording this
37:16>> like a log
37:17>> is there a log or some sort of tracking
37:18mechanisms as to what has been
37:22>> searched
37:22>> and and and I can talk about that so so
37:24[laughter] basically the people that
37:26have access are the officers in the
37:27police department. Okay, they they all
37:29have access and and again we're trying
37:31to focus on Flock. All right now, all
37:32officers have access to Flock. They have
37:35an individual a specific username and
37:38password. They are not shared. It is
37:40ultim multiffactor authentication. So
37:42they get the text on their phone when
37:44they [snorts] log in and they have to
37:45enter the code. So people aren't sharing
37:48loginins and and whatnot. So you have
37:50one person logging in. There is user
37:52logs. Okay. And that's what I was
37:55touched on earlier. The actual
37:57searchable pictures are only there for
37:5830 days, but these user logs never go
38:00away. We have permanent retention. So,
38:02if we get a complaint about somebody um
38:05inappropriately using Flock 5 years ago,
38:07we have the ability to go back 5 years
38:09and see if they conducted that search.
38:11>> The the type of information that's
38:13retained in the in these search logs are
38:16the person that's that's and I just went
38:18through this so I know pretty well. It's
38:20the person that's logged in. Okay, it's
38:23what they're entering for information.
38:24Are they entering in a plate? Are they
38:26entering in a make or a model or a color
38:30or a type of vehicle? What are they
38:32specifically looking for? What's the
38:34time frame they're looking for? What
38:35cameras are they looking at? Everything
38:38is tracked and everything is searchable
38:40by admins to see what they are doing.
38:42So, if we get a complaint, we can go
38:45back and look and see if it was used
38:46appropriately. In addition to that, I do
38:49monthly audits. We do an organizational
38:51audit where I look at it. Basically, all
38:54the searches that were conducted for the
38:55entire month go into a spreadsheet. It's
38:58a lot of information. I'm able to go
38:59through it. I'm able to um and it's a
39:02lot and I'm able to see whether or not
39:06there's anything that's jumping out at
39:08me. Okay. In addition to that, I find
39:09that very difficult and Flock found that
39:11was very difficult. Flock has issued um
39:14created a new thing called audit assist
39:17and they have something that immediately
39:20flags
39:22questionable searches. Okay. And what
39:26they do is I'm notified as the as the
39:28admin notified to look into this a
39:31little more. And a questionable search
39:33may be something like hey they um
39:36conducted they call narrow plate time
39:39frame. Okay. So they conducted a search
39:42for one plate or one vehicle type
39:44multiple times in a very very narrow
39:46period of time. Okay? Or the other thing
39:50is they're looking at one plate over a
39:52long period of time because most
39:54investigations, not all, but most
39:55investigations take place in a very
39:57short period of time, you know, days,
39:59maybe weeks. So they're like, why is an
40:00officer looking at this particular plate
40:02over a period of one or two months?
40:04Okay. So I'm alerted to it. I look into
40:07it. I inquire. I'm I'm there are other
40:09safeguards in place and I'm like, "Oh,
40:11this is part of this this type of
40:12investigation. This is a long-term drug
40:15investigation." So, where So, we're
40:17looking at this for this vehicle
40:19multiple times over a period of time or
40:21unrelated investigations. Believe it or
40:23not, the same vehicle could be used,
40:24could be a suspect motor vehicle in
40:26different crimes.
40:28So, one officer does a plate search for
40:31a vehicle this month and then a
40:33different officer does a plate search.
40:34I'm alerted to that and I look at that
40:36and I see that there's nothing wrong
40:38that there was no reason that there were
40:39two unrelated incidents. There are other
40:41safeguards in place that the officers
40:43have to put in. There are three things
40:45in minimum that they have to put in. One
40:47is a log number, a CAD number. That is a
40:49reports been assigned and they're
40:51putting that report number in the
40:52system. So it's an easy reference. Two
40:54is they're selecting a permissible
40:56reason. Okay, the permissible reason
40:58specula it breaks it down and says it's
41:01for a law enforcement reason. It's for
41:02this. It's based on reasonable
41:03suspicion. It's based on an Amber Alert.
41:05It's based on probable cause. It's based
41:07on these. They're they're scrolling
41:09through a drop down and they're clicking
41:10there. The other thing is offense type.
41:13So, our offense types, there's there's
41:14approximately there's 40ome offense
41:17types that we can um that they can click
41:20and there's no others. There's no
41:22generics and then there's obvious things
41:24that we don't allow for legal reasons.
41:25We don't allow them to collect um click
41:28offense type um for certain things. So,
41:32um, there are safeguards in place. The
41:34user logs are there forever. Um, we're
41:38able to look up and see what anybody is
41:40searching at any time for the entire
41:42time that we've had flock. So, the
41:43safeguards in place and we can also look
41:45backwards and it's right now everybody
41:49every sworn officer in the PD is a user.
41:52>> Okay.
41:53>> With specific
41:55>> user. Um, yeah,
41:56>> I promise to almost be done and this is
41:58like me not even reading all of it.
42:00>> [laughter]
42:00>> I can I can answer any questions you
42:02have.
42:03>> Um, have you So, how long have we been
42:07having the flocks for?
42:08>> So, we have had flocks since March of
42:102021.
42:11>> March of 20. And as of March of 2021
42:14till now, have you had to reprimand
42:17anybody? Has there been anything that
42:20based on some of your audits that
42:22something did jump out to you? Anything
42:25that needed to be addressed?
42:26>> Nothing. We the only thing we've had was
42:29this one incident.
42:30>> Yeah.
42:31>> From like Mthun
42:32>> from last month.
42:33>> Oh, that's it. Okay. All right.
42:35>> And that that's also been um mentioned
42:38in the report.
42:39>> Okay.
42:39>> It's our first one.
42:41>> Okay. And then my last question for now,
42:45I don't I don't make promises.
42:49Sharing information. And I'm I I saw
42:52briefly um sharing with the
42:56Massachusetts State Police. Is there any
42:58other agencies that you guys work with?
43:00Um and what exactly is being shared for
43:03what reason?
43:04>> Yes.
43:04>> Um
43:07specifically,
43:10I want to touch on are we helping other
43:13state agencies when it comes to
43:15immigration related cases?
43:18>> And that's what I wanted to touch on as
43:19well. So absolutely not, we will not and
43:23have not um cooperated with any sort of
43:25immigration investigation. That is a
43:27hard stop.
43:28>> It's also uh written in our policy.
43:31That's a hard no. We we also as far as
43:35uh the sharing goes, it's usually
43:38something that's more fluent, right? If
43:40you have
43:42a a neighboring agency that has, let's
43:45just say, a domestic, a rolling
43:47domestic, it's on its way to Lawrence.
43:49They're calling us. Hey, it's fleeing.
43:51It's coming down your way. Do you mind?
43:53That's when that would trigger the
43:55sharing of information, an active call.
43:59You know, it wouldn't be outside of
44:00that. We we sometimes get calls from
44:03agencies outside um that say, "Hey, we
44:06you know are we had an incident in our
44:08town and it drove south, we think into
44:10your town afterwards. We didn't get a
44:12plate, but this is a description or we
44:14got a partial plate. Can you can you
44:16look into this?"
44:18>> And again, if we do get that, we are
44:20sharing the image of the back of the
44:22vehicle and the time period. We're not
44:24giving any personal information. We're
44:26not then running that plate and then
44:27giving that other agency. I mean, they
44:28they they have the ability to run that
44:30on their own, but but we're not sharing
44:32personal information. There is no
44:33personal information in Flock. It's a
44:35picture of the back of the car. That's
44:36that's all that's being uh retained and
44:38all that's that's um that we're
44:40searching.
44:42>> Um as you're mentioning that, how does
44:44that help a case? So, it's like it just
44:47says yes, they they drove by Lawrence.
44:50So, so there's I I I could again I could
44:53go on forever and talk about how we use
44:55Flock, but I'll give you just that hit
44:57and run example. Let's say Mthuan, who
44:59which is a next door community,
45:02>> um no longer has Flock, has a hit and
45:04run and that vehicle was a good
45:06description, but they didn't get the
45:08license plate. They said it drove south
45:10on Lawrence. So now we are looking at a
45:12camera on Broadway in that time period
45:15for a vehicle with that description. And
45:16let's say I'll use my example of a
45:18bumper sticker, okay? very specific
45:20bumper sticker. Okay. We now get a still
45:22image of that. We now have the license
45:23plate. So, we give that license plate to
45:26them. They're able to run it and now
45:27that's their suspect motor vehicle and
45:28they're able to continue their
45:30investigation now that they have that
45:31information.
45:32>> Um, so it's not fair that we pay funding
45:35so other cities and towns that be taking
45:37away their flat cameras using our
45:39resources. Now, [laughter]
45:41>> and and and I understand that and that's
45:43may may or may not be a sensitive issue.
45:45I think cooperation um with law
45:47enforcement is very very important. I
45:49know
45:50>> and [laughter] and and I think that you
45:51know it was it benefits all of us um if
45:55we share appropriate information with
45:58other police departments when
45:59appropriate.
46:00>> Okay.
46:01>> Yeah. I mean I agree it's there's
46:02obviously a saying in in law enforcement
46:04a knowledge of one is a knowledge of
46:06all. Right. So we we are here uh when we
46:08come across this information it'll
46:10benefit. Granted
46:12>> I know.
46:12>> Yeah.
46:13>> But you know what I mean right? I I do.
46:15>> I But if there's a victim involved, it's
46:17about protecting all victims regardless
46:19of where they live. And and I'm I we
46:22believe strongly in the sharing of
46:24appropriate information with the
46:25appropriate people.
46:26>> No, I understand. And I appreciate the
46:29the information. Um I know I'm going to
46:33have to like sit with this and read up
46:35on it. Counselors, do you have any uh
46:38further questions considering the new
46:40information we just received? Thank
46:43you. Yeah, through you. I think that is
46:45a lot of question bar because we've got
46:47those paper you know practically at the
46:50moment that we getting here is uh still
46:54we have to read a little bit more.
46:56>> So I want to make a motion if and before
47:00you make your motion I want to make
47:02sure. So I you had three packets s um
47:06>> we I put it as one package. One is for
47:09city surveillance cameras.
47:12The second part is technology use and
47:16implementation.
47:21And the last one is license plate
47:24readers. So it's three separate packets,
47:27but I I decided to put it as one to be
47:30organized. And then this second package
47:32which is kind of like I would say what
47:35theou
47:36>> So those are responses to what was asked
47:38of us under the
47:40>> oh this was counselor
47:43>> L plants had questions
47:45>> um and this was the the response to
47:48those questions. So um and this is in
47:51regards to that ordinance item that's
47:53>> 9.25
47:55>> 9
47:56>> 9.25 5. Yes.
47:58>> And that's going to be heard on the 20th
48:00um of this month.
48:02>> It was just this is to give you a
48:04content of tonight. You know, as far as
48:07it's it's good that you have it now.
48:10>> No, no, I appreciate it. Council Rees,
48:12do you have any fur Do you have any
48:14questions before um we move on?
48:24Okay. Okay, I'll just wait for her to if
48:26she if she does decide I'm sure she'll
48:30un unmute herself. So,
48:33are you all set with questions? Okay.
48:35So, we can move on to like make a motion
48:37to table this item. That way we we have
48:40the ability to to read up on it.
48:43>> Motion to table item 412-26,
48:48Lawrence Police Department Flock Safety
48:50Cameras.
48:51>> Can I get a second? Second. Uh, madame
48:55clerk, could you please call the role?
48:58>> Councelor Roselie Gonzalez,
49:00>> yes.
49:01>> Councelor Selena Reyes,
49:04>> yes.
49:05>> Thank you. Councelor Anna Levy,
49:08>> yes.
49:08>> And Madame Chair, Vivian Marl,
49:10>> yes.
49:11>> Thank you. Motion carries. Motion
49:13carries. Uh the second item um it is
49:19item 41326
49:22with the Lawrence Police Department
49:23shooting statistics and public safety
49:25technology. Um was one of the packages
49:28that I mentioned part of the this item
49:31or all three was regarding the flock?
49:34>> It was it was regarding uh the
49:35surveillance and
49:38this was something that we weren't
49:39familiar with.
49:41>> Oh, you weren't? No, we we wanted to
49:43have a little content behind what uh
49:46>> uh what was being looked for.
49:50>> So, in the me um when the item was sent
49:54to to our city clerk to have it added on
49:57the agenda and then once it's on the
49:59agenda, it gets assigned to uh a
50:02committee for that item to be addressed.
50:05It was specifically to talk on um so it
50:08says specifically on the email
50:10requesting the Lawrence Police
50:12Department provide the public safety
50:14committee with updated shooting
50:16statistics and trends including the
50:18number and locations of incidents and
50:21discuss current and potential
50:22technologies being utilized to identify,
50:24deter, investigate and respond to
50:27gunrelated incidents. Um if you can if
50:31you're not ready for this prepared no
50:33that's fine. I would rather table and
50:36have you guys provide us with the data.
50:38>> Um
50:39>> I will say Flock and the city cameras
50:42are absolutely technology that we use to
50:44solve those those crimes. But um but
50:47that's all I'd be prepared to say
50:48tonight.
50:49>> No. And and that's that's great. So when
50:51we discuss this once again specifically
50:54with the city cameras, we're defin I I'm
50:57very data driven. Uh, I can't speak for
51:00everybody else, but when it comes to
51:01like the number, I'm going to be very I
51:04want to hear the numbers. Um, not 90% of
51:08them are functioning. I want to know how
51:09many we have and how many are down. And
51:12so, if we could get
51:13>> sure updated number when we go in front
51:16of you. Yes.
51:17>> And when it comes to incidents, um, are
51:20we able to
51:22have it uh, divided by district if
51:26possible? cuz I know each counselor is
51:28very like it takes takes it very
51:30personal and wanting to ensure what's
51:32happening in their district.
51:33>> I can talk to our crime analyst. Um I
51:36think that request has been made before
51:38and I forget what the answer was. We
51:40break it down by sector which is very
51:42similar to district but not exactly
51:45district lines but we absolutely could
51:47do we could do a
51:48>> when you say sector are you saying north
51:51south the Mount Vernon area like
51:53>> there's so the the mapping behind the
51:56technology is broken down by how we
51:59patrol. So
52:01>> when our when we so when that's set
52:04that's why it's not broken down in
52:05districts.
52:06That's fine. If it could be broken down,
52:08however, [laughter]
52:10>> and we'll figure it out.
52:11>> We can actually do a pin map.
52:13>> We'll figure it out.
52:14>> We absolutely I know we our analyst has
52:16technology to do a pin map
52:18>> and that would allow you it would be a
52:19map of the city of Lawrence with all the
52:21incidents and you guys would be able to,
52:23you know, look at it and say, well, this
52:25is my district. I just don't know that
52:26we would be able to give you a list by
52:28district line.
52:29>> And that's fine. I think that's fine.
52:31>> But we can give you the geographic
52:32location. That's that's easy. Yeah,
52:34that's easy.
52:34>> Yeah, we we definitely the whole point
52:36is understanding the hot spots of course
52:39of where these trends are happening and
52:41we'll we'll dive in a little bit deeper
52:45um for the next rodeo. I'll touch base
52:47with you guys. I'm not sure if you guys
52:48are going to be the design for LPD to
52:53continue to speak on this when we're
52:55ready to untab it.
52:56>> I don't know.
52:57>> I would have no problem being Yeah.
52:59being the person for flock and for
53:02>> So, I'll touch base with you guys to see
53:04whenever we're ready cuz I don't want to
53:06have this scheduled for a week or two
53:08and we're still not ready.
53:10>> Sure.
53:10>> Okay.
53:11>> All right. I'm looking for a motion to
53:13table.
53:13>> Motion to table.
53:15>> Can I get a second? Second. Uh, madame
53:17clerk, please call the role.
53:19>> Sure. Councelor Selena Reyes.
53:23>> Yes.
53:25>> Councelor Rosa Gonzalez.
53:27>> Yes.
53:27>> Councelor Anna Levy.
53:29>> Yes.
53:29>> Madame Chair V Maro.
53:31>> I vote yes.
53:31>> Thank you. Motion
53:32>> car. Carries. Um, so I'll see you guys
53:35next time.
53:36>> Thank you.
53:37>> Um, counselors, I'm look Madame Clerk.
53:40As a matter of fact, let me read this.
53:41It's item 41426,
53:43contractor and developer compliance with
53:45city ordinances and permit requirements.
53:48if we are able to send communication to
53:52ISD
53:53um specifically um Pat Ruiz and um I
54:00definitely want communication to be sent
54:02out to the building inspector Peter
54:04Blanchett to be here um for the next
54:08public safety meeting to speak uh in
54:11regards to this item.
54:14Um,
54:17counselors, can I get them? Well,
54:20>> yeah. Motion to table.
54:22>> Motion second.
54:23>> Okay. Madame clerk, please call the
54:25role.
54:27>> Councelor Rosio Gonzalez,
54:29>> yes.
54:30>> Councelor Selena Reyes,
54:32>> yes.
54:33>> Councelor Anna Levy,
54:35>> yes.
54:35>> And Madame Chair, Vivian Marmo,
54:37>> I vote yes.
54:39>> Thank you.
54:39>> Motion carries. Um, if there is no other
54:43items to be untou [laughter]
54:49and I got it. Okay, Madame Clair, please
54:51call the role.
54:52>> Councelor Selena Reyes.
54:54>> Yes.
54:55>> Councelor Rosal Gonzalez.
54:57>> Yes.
54:57>> Councelor Anna Levy.
54:59>> Yes.
54:59>> And Madame Chair and Vivian Mar.
55:01>> Yes. Thank you. [laughter]
55:07[laughter]
55:07>> Have a great day.
55:08>> No, I'm gonna take this with me that
