2026-10-14 - Public Safety Committee

Summary

Based on auto-generated captions of the video; names and numbers may be misheard.

  • The Public Safety and Emergency Management Committee met October 14, 2026 with Chair Vivian Marmol, Vice Chair Ana Levy and Councilors Rosaly Gonzalez and Selena Reyes (Reyes joined remotely). Minutes from August 25 and September 10, 2025, January 15 and March 2, 2026 were approved.
  • Item 412-26: Lawrence police briefed the committee on the city's 35 Flock license plate reader cameras and their safeguards, addressed a Methuen councilor's claim that a plate was searched 359 times (police say once), and said a 90-day trial of another vendor would be introduced the next night. The item was tabled so councilors can read the packet. See Surveillance Technology and Flock License Plate Readers.
  • Item 413-26: police shooting statistics and public safety technology were tabled until police return with numbers and maps. See Police Shooting Statistics and Public Safety Technology.
  • Item 414-26: contractor and developer compliance with city ordinances and permits was tabled pending a visit from Inspectional Services. See Contractor and Developer Compliance with City Ordinances and Permits.
  • Police also said about 10 percent or fewer of roughly 441 city cameras are down at any time and that city camera footage is kept 30 days.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

01:33Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and

01:35welcome to the public safety and

01:36emergency management committee. Um,

01:39madame clerk, could you please uh make

01:42notice that the name of the committee

01:44needs to be adjusted?

01:46>> Okay.

01:46>> It has to say public safety and

01:47emergency management committee.

01:50Um,

01:52okay. Today is Wednesday, October 14,

01:56and it is approximately 6:08 p.m. Voting

01:59members present today. Uh, to my left is

02:03our vice chair and councelor at large,

02:07um, Anna Levy and, uh, city councelor

02:10Rosalie Gonzalez. Uh, noted as absent is

02:14uh, councelor Selena Reyes. Pursuant to

02:17chapter 20 of the acts of 2022, the

02:19meeting of public safety and emergency

02:21management committee is being conducted

02:23both in person and via remote

02:25participation. A reminder that persons

02:27who would like to listen to and or view

02:29this meeting while in progress may

02:30either attend in person um at the 200

02:33Common Street City Council Chambers

02:35Lawrence Mass uh location or uh use any

02:39any of the following access locations

02:41such as our Facebook Lawrence City

02:43Council page and our YouTube Lawrence

02:45City Council page. Uh Madame Clerk, if

02:48you could please call the role.

02:53>> Councelor Rosel Gonzalez

02:54>> present.

02:56Vice Chair and Councelor Anna Levy

02:59>> present.

03:00>> Councelor Selena Reyes is noted absent.

03:03And Madame Chair [snorts] Vivian Marl

03:07>> present.

03:08>> Thank you.

03:09>> Okay. If we could please stand for the

03:11pledge of allegiance before commencing

03:12today's meeting.

03:14>> I aliance to the flag of the United

03:17States of America and to the republic

03:19for which it stands. One nation under

03:22God, indivisible, with liberty and

03:24justice for all.

03:27>> Oh,

03:28>> yes.

03:29>> Could we confirm? Oh,

03:32>> councelor Reyes.

03:33>> Councelor Reyes, I just wanted to make

03:35sure. Could you hear me? Could you hear

03:36us?

03:38>> Yes. I want to double check. Did you

03:39hear me?

03:41>> We could. Um, if you could please

03:43>> noted. Um, console, I'm doing a roll

03:46call. Console Selena Reyes

03:48>> present.

03:49>> Thank you.

03:52So, I'm looking for a motion to approve

03:55u minutes of August 25th of 2025,

04:00September 10th of 2025,

04:03January 15, 2026, and March 2nd of 2026.

04:08>> So, move second.

04:11>> Oh, let me repeat that. I'm so sorry.

04:13I'm looking for a motion to approve

04:15minutes for council approval of August

04:1725th, 2025, September 10th of 2025,

04:20January 15 of 2026, and March 2nd of

04:232026.

04:24>> So move.

04:25>> Second. Um, all those in favor? Oh,

04:27Madame Clerk, could you please call the

04:29RO?

04:31>> Councelor Rosel Gonzalez,

04:33>> yes.

04:34>> Councelor Anna Levy,

04:36>> yes.

04:38Councelor

04:39Selena Reyes.

04:44>> Thank you. And Madame Chair, Vivian

04:46Marmal,

04:47>> uh, present.

04:48>> Thank you. I mean, yes. I don't know why

04:51I'm I'm thinking of um I'm so sorry. I'm

04:53thinking of [laughter]

04:57um the attendance. Yes. Please uh ensure

05:00that you have that.

05:01>> Yes. Um, councilors, we have uh under

05:04new business um item 41226. Councelor

05:09Reyes, I I do want to make sure that

05:11you're aware that we did receive a

05:13package of information. Um I'll have to

05:17make sure that it's emailed to you. We

05:20just I just received this and we made

05:22copies for all counselors. So, I'll make

05:24sure to that you have your own copy on

05:27your desk and I'll have to have a

05:29conversation with our city clerk to

05:31ensure that she could email this to you

05:33as well. I I haven't received it by

05:35email and none of the other counselors

05:37as well.

05:40>> Uh, thank you for letting me know.

05:42>> Okay, so item 41226,

05:45uh, Lawrence Police Department. We we do

05:47have Sergeant Dart that's going to speak

05:49on um the flock safety cameras. Um are

05:55you guys joining forces?

05:58[laughter]

05:58Okay. Um

06:01by all means um please present uh what

06:06you have the overview for this

06:08presentation. And I know that you are

06:10already speaking um somewhat on this

06:13item under the ordinance committee, but

06:16um due to the fact that there's been

06:18many growing concerns on this item, it

06:21was recommended by the chief to have the

06:24uh have this discussion um under public

06:27safety committee um and therefore allow

06:30other counselors to chime in and ask

06:32questions um based on this item. So you

06:35have the floor.

06:37>> Good evening. Uh Salman Dar Sergeant

06:41Lawrence Pey 55 L Street UT division.

06:46[snorts]

06:47We uh received the agenda uh regarding

06:50questions regarding flock safety cameras

06:52and obviously uh shooting statistics and

06:55public safety technology. A packet was

06:58submitted today uh that's going to be

07:00introduced on the uh for the 20th uh

07:04that entails exactly this and that's

07:06under the 9.25

07:10um city ordinance that's required for

07:13the department to submit. Um so we were

07:16just making sure that we are a part to

07:18that and you had the documentation to

07:20review prior to that meeting. Uh that

07:23entails exactly what you may have a as

07:26far as questions for flock safeties and

07:29um we just needed some clarification

07:31[snorts]

07:31uh regarding the shooting statistics.

07:34>> So if you don't mind the shooting

07:36statistics that's the next item. Okay.

07:38>> So for this item we're just going to

07:40focus on the FL

07:43>> um and anything surrounding the flat

07:46cameras. How many how does it work?

07:50Okay.

07:50>> Um and

07:53we'll figure out what are other pending

07:55questions that counselors have.

07:56>> So basics would be uh the the technology

08:00itself is to read uh license plates.

08:03Correct. So what when there's an

08:05investigation there is a list that goes

08:08by if the uh in the item is on that

08:11particular list it will be triggered by

08:13that technology which alerts the

08:15officers. That's the premise of it. uh

08:18they're in various locations of the

08:19city. Uh there's 35 of them and uh

08:23that's how we the only time that's only

08:26initialized is if there is investigation

08:27or there's a 911 call that comes in and

08:30requires us to review any of that

08:32information. There's some recent more

08:34safeguards that been put into place

08:36because we want to show transparency

08:38towards that. Now it requires also uh an

08:42incident number to be associated every

08:44time an officer goes and and uh uses

08:46that this technology. So

08:49>> um

08:52so I'm going to speak for me. I like to

08:54have things be dumbed down in a way

08:56where it's like very intro 101. When you

08:59say the

09:02these license plate readers are

09:05triggered to to be effective upon

09:10>> something serious happening. What do you

09:12mean by that? Whether it's an Amber

09:14Alert like

09:15>> example would be basic would be a stolen

09:18car, right? Okay.

09:19>> So there's a hot sheet for those stolen

09:21cars. If the if the device picks up on

09:25that plate, it will alert us which then

09:27we dispatch the officer.

09:29>> Okay. Is there a certain criteria as to

09:32what like what are labeled as serious

09:35crimes? It's just not it it does it

09:38doesn't get turned on for any specific

09:40um

09:40>> No, it's it's specific. It's specific to

09:43the the case itself. I'll let the

09:45captain elaborate a little more.

09:47>> Sure. I can um I like to use the word

09:49the term layman's terms, not dumb down.

09:51if you're okay with that.

09:52>> Of course.

09:53>> So, um, in layman's terms, the there are

09:5635 cameras out there. The 35 cameras are

09:58taking still photos. Okay. This is not

10:02video. They're still photos. Still

10:04photos of the rear of cars when they

10:07pass these cameras. Okay. Those photos

10:11are then searchable by the program by an

10:13officer. Okay. Um, that is all that it

10:17is um doing. It is taking a picture of

10:19the back of a car. Now the back of the

10:21car includes the license plate and also

10:25logo um you know emblem um make model uh

10:30shape of uh rear rear plates uh I'm

10:34sorry brake lights and um and also uh

10:37luggage racks bumper stickers stuff like

10:39that. Um there are two different

10:41functions with the flock cameras. There

10:43is a hut list which Sergeant Dar was

10:45talking about. If there is um an alert

10:49to a um stolen car, an Amber alert, a

10:55silver alert,

10:57anybody who has dispatch and anyone who

10:59has the Flock app active on their phone

11:01will be alerted to that and then they

11:03can be dispatched or go to that

11:05location. So if we if we have an Amber

11:07alert out there and we get an alert

11:10southbound on Broadway at the Mthuan

11:12line, we would then dispatch officers

11:15cars out there for a certain plate and

11:17model. Now when there is a that's the

11:19hutless function. Now there is the

11:21investigative function. The

11:23investigative function is when an

11:25officer decides they want to they're

11:28dispatched to a call, they're doing an

11:29investigation, they can search these

11:31pictures that Flock has been taking of

11:34the rear of cars for specific things and

11:37it can be for a specific license plate

11:39or we can search for a specific make,

11:41model, type of a of a car. Okay? It's

11:44not limited to license plate reading.

11:46The software allows us to search for

11:48that. So, if you if you'd like, I could

11:51give you an example. We have a hit and

11:53run, okay? And the person doesn't get a

11:56license plate. The person simply gets um

12:00a make, model, and color, a red Honda

12:03CRV, okay? Traveling south on Broadway.

12:06The officer could then go to that camera

12:09that's located on Broadway and look for

12:12a specific time period and look for a

12:15red Honda CRV that goes through and

12:17maybe finds the license plate because

12:20again it's taking the picture. So now

12:22that would be a suspect motor vehicle.

12:25Not automatically our our our our

12:29person we're going to charge, but that

12:30would allow us to do some more

12:32investigating and rule that vehicle in

12:35or out of our investigation.

12:37Does that kind of help?

12:39>> No, of course. Um

12:42I I know I have several questions, but I

12:45want to make sure that um

12:47>> and due to the fact that there's three

12:49different packages, I want to make sure

12:51that um I'm allowing during [snorts]

12:54these segments if there is any

12:56counselors that have any questions

12:59>> u that they would like to bring up

13:00during what's been said so far.

13:04>> Councelor Le, you have a question so So

13:07share this is what I'm looking in here

13:09because not too long ago I just hear

13:11about the problems uh with that with the

13:15that kind of camera that one of the

13:18council on meth have I don't know so you

13:21haven't hear about the complain and all

13:23the problems

13:24>> I'm very familiar with that counselor um

13:26I don't know how much we want to go into

13:28that but I can say that it was a um I

13:31think what I can say openly is it was a

13:33misunderstanding

13:34>> in the original comments ments by that

13:36other counselor from another city. Um

13:39that that was properly investigated and

13:42her initial thought there was no problem

13:44and that um the officer was cleared and

13:47it was uh used very appropriately in

13:49that setting.

13:51>> So the amount of time that she said that

13:54was searched is not

13:56>> it that was not accurate. It was a

13:58misunderstanding. It was only searched

14:00one time.

14:01>> Okay. And um the um larger number, the

14:05359 time number that was thrown out

14:07there was the actual history that the

14:11officer, it was the number of searches

14:13that officer had conducted in a 2-year

14:15period, not the number of times that

14:17that license plate was searched. The

14:20license plate was only searched one

14:22time. It was a misunderstanding by the

14:24third party website that the um the

14:27person went to and it was investigated

14:30by internal affairs and by um by the

14:34Lawrence Police Department and we were

14:36able to 100% confirm her license plate

14:39was searched one time related to a hit

14:42and run on Broadway.

14:45No, that's uh through you madam chair

14:48that brought the attention because I say

14:50you know if you did not committing any

14:52any crime or you did not committing

14:55anything or your play is clean uh

14:58something happened at one time so why

15:02you it's practically 300 something time

15:05it is practically almost every day that

15:07she was uh getting anywhere that's the

15:10person was coming. Yes. And that brings

15:14some concern. That's us as well.

15:15>> And we were very concerned when we heard

15:17359* 2. When the initial report was made

15:20to us, I honestly I was very upset. Um

15:23but once we were able to look at it and

15:25look at the information and understand

15:28why somebody would arise to that number

15:29and I understand why somebody came up

15:31with that number initially. Um, and very

15:34quickly we were able to see that a

15:36mistake was made and then we further

15:39went on and did our investigation and

15:41realized it was only flocked one time.

15:44Um, searched in flock one time and

15:46searched appropriately. It was searched

15:48as a result of a hit-and- run

15:49investigation with a making model of a

15:52vehicle given. He then went to a

15:54specific camera and looked for that make

15:56and model vehicle in that area at that

15:58general time. found a plate, ran that

16:03plate in flock, and quickly realized

16:05that it was not the suspect vehicle,

16:07found a different I'm sorry, different

16:09suspect motor vehicle, and solved the

16:12case. The the the the vehicle was was a

16:16um vehicle of interest for a short

16:18period of time. We're talking about a

16:1945minute period of time.

16:21>> And that it was um it was not searched

16:24in flock 359 times. I can't be more

16:26clear about that. It was searched one

16:28time. ruled out as the vehicle of

16:31interest and the proper vehicle the

16:34suspect motor vehicle was identified.

16:36>> Okay. So I wanted this like for

16:38clarification and for the record what

16:40you are telling right now that was just

16:42only one time because I said well I'm

16:46scared that's my life is completely

16:50[laughter]

16:51it's

16:52>> something I mean I'm going to be

16:55watching every single day or you know

16:58for that is a camera. How many camera do

17:00we have in in the

17:02>> flock cameras or or

17:04>> the flock?

17:04>> The flock 35.

17:06>> 35. Yeah.

17:06>> Right now.

17:07>> 35 right now.

17:08>> Yeah. So, no when with the other camera

17:10we started with about 70 when we

17:14installed the other one.

17:16>> So,

17:16>> this you're talking about the city video

17:18cameras.

17:18>> The city video cameras. I think so that

17:20we started with about 70 uh camera at

17:23the time. So and now beside we have

17:26beside all those camera we have a 35

17:29>> we have 35 flock LPR cameras

17:31>> they they obviously this serves a

17:34different purpose altogether city

17:36cameras or city cameras um

17:38>> but this has a specific tool this is a

17:41tool that we use for investigation

17:43purposes only so

17:45>> if there is something that's uh you know

17:48alerted we will follow through by using

17:50this tool this is why it was um asked of

17:53this council to approve that, the demo

17:56of that, the process that was taken in

17:58place when it was first initiated. Uh I

18:00know there's a lot of other public talk

18:03out there. Uh that's a a subjective

18:05matter. I think uh when it concerns to

18:09Lawrence PD and the citizens of

18:11Lawrence, uh everybody should be at ease

18:14that we're not in any nefarious

18:17business. We're here to help people. You

18:19know, we're here to help the public. So

18:21if we can solve a crime quicker with

18:24efficiency with no we try to make that

18:28there is no errors you know for the due

18:30process um I think this is where it's

18:34it's it's key to have something like

18:35this so um and it's fine it's it's it's

18:39absolutely in the right of anybody to

18:41question hey uh as you are doing today

18:43and we can bring some clarity to that

18:46>> are we thinking to increase the amount

18:49of camera the floor camera.

18:52>> We are uh um we do have something

18:55scheduled for tomorrow night where we

18:57have a vendor that's going to be showing

18:59showcasing their version of it. Um

19:02hopefully that's something that um

19:04intrigues uh the council to the point

19:08that we can start a demo phase. We would

19:10like to explore other options. Um, not

19:14to say anything negative about our

19:15current vendor, but it's always good to

19:17see how technology evolves throughout

19:19different vendors and what they can

19:21produce. So,

19:22>> if it's a better better alternative,

19:24then we will uh, you know, we'll

19:25definitely bring that to you

19:27>> through you, Maranchia. Paul, how long

19:29right now are being using the camera?

19:32>> We've ex uh, we just renewed the

19:34contract with vlog for those LPRs for

19:36this fiscal year. So

19:38>> yeah, for for how long have been

19:41>> how long have we've had uh since

19:43>> it's uh 2021, March of 2021.

19:48>> So we started using the

19:50>> we started using

19:51>> we started with a smaller amount and

19:53have rolled them out in phases.

19:55>> So both camera are being watching at the

19:58same time for the same group or or there

20:01are different people who take care and

20:04watch those camera. So

20:08cameras themselves are not being

20:10monitored by a single individual all day

20:13long. It doesn't operate that way. They

20:16are displayed for use. So just like

20:20anything else, you have a TV that's on

20:22right now. It's more beneficial that

20:24it's on versus you looking for that

20:26power button. So the display that we

20:28have in dispatch now in our new facility

20:30allows us a widescreen where everything

20:33is displayed. when a call does come in,

20:35any hot call, we can actually hover over

20:38that screen, expand it and see what's

20:41going on in real time. That's what that

20:43does. So the there there is there's got

20:46to be um again a cause for for us to

20:50view there where we we don't I don't

20:53think any well I shouldn't say uh that

20:56because I'll be speculating, but I would

20:57say that for the Lawrence Police

20:59Department, we don't have a single

21:01person watching cameras. We're

21:03reactionary in the sense and and and I

21:05sorry I didn't introduce myself for

21:07those that you know me. My name is Hal

21:08Rogers. I'm a captain at the Lawrence

21:09Police Department. I'm in charge of

21:11detectives. So from the primarily

21:15we're not proactive on the cameras,

21:16they're reactive. We get a report of a

21:18crime and then we look and see if there

21:19are any cameras in that area that may

21:20have captured the crime or something

21:23before or after. So we're not monitoring

21:25it. We're not zooming into cars. We're

21:28not zooming into homes. where simply

21:30they're out there when and if we need

21:32them. And we do need them. You know, we

21:34use them a lot because we're a very busy

21:36department. So, we're very reactionary

21:38with the cameras. We're not proactive.

21:40We're not we're not using them to track

21:43people, track cars, nothing. It's it's

21:46after the report of a crime, after the

21:48report of an incident. It's a very very

21:50useful tool for our follow-up

21:52investigation.

21:54>> And it's the evolution of uh how do you

21:56investigate, right? you're you go from a

21:59time where you were knocking on doors

22:00asking which we still do but to a

22:03capacity where it it accelerates the the

22:06search process. The more time that

22:08passes on a particular event uh the

22:10harder it gets. So and if we can bridge

22:13that gap this is where this technology

22:15uh comes in in hand

22:18>> through you manager floor

22:22>> all the camera are working right now

22:25>> we uh we h most I would have to say

22:28there's there are cameras out there due

22:30to uh maintenance that's going on in the

22:33city when it comes to uh polls and

22:36whatnot some cameras are down but for

22:38the most po part I can say almost 90%

22:40are up and and functional

22:42>> because I I know that there are so many

22:45city camera that are are not working.

22:48>> Yeah. If we're talking about city

22:49cameras, the ones that are uh the

22:51department is uh aware of because ISD

22:54has uh theirs um which it's all in the

22:58one but I can say 441 out of the 441

23:01that we currently are displaying there's

23:04probably less than 10% I would even say

23:0710%

23:09much less than that. Uh and again it's

23:11because there's our wear and tear on the

23:13cameras. They have to be replaced. We do

23:15have uh an amount budgeted for that. But

23:18then we're limited too because there's

23:19certain areas that require more

23:21maintenance than others. So we have to

23:23take all that into consideration. And I

23:26I will say I think um there there was a

23:29concern previously about the cameras

23:30being down for an extended period of

23:32time or the officers having issues

23:34accessing those cameras because um I

23:36know the the previous chief uh got a

23:40request for an update on on the status

23:42of them. And I can say that with the mo

23:45us with us moving to our new PD, we were

23:48able to um install new computer servers

23:51which was a huge issue with the cameras

23:53were not down. We just had difficulty

23:55accessing them in a useful manner at

23:57times and we were constantly working

23:59with the vendor. They were essentially

24:01hitting control altdelete all the time

24:03in order for the cameras to to work

24:05easily for us. But that's something that

24:07has been rectified. That's something

24:08that has been fixed with our move to the

24:11new PD. We have a new server, a new

24:13operating system that has made um

24:15reviewing the cameras um much more

24:17easier for everybody involved. and we

24:20just deal with the occasional camera

24:22that goes down as a result of an outage

24:24or whatnot in which we reach out to the

24:26vendor and they come right out and fix

24:28it. They're they're very very

24:30responsive.

24:32>> For how long do you keep like the

24:35recording of the camera?

24:37>> The cameras are the city cameras are

24:40accessible for 30 days. They are 30-day

24:42retention period. They have been our

24:44entire time. if we are investigating a

24:47crime and there is evidence on that

24:49camera that is preserved for trial. So

24:52there's two parts to your your question.

24:53So 30 days searchable after that we have

24:58no access to them. There is a small

25:00portion within the PD in evidence and in

25:03booking and and I'm just referring to

25:05that because it's I think it's important

25:08that those are retained for much longer

25:10for obvious reasons. There are things

25:12that may be reported to us that we need

25:14to investigate that is um uh they may be

25:17reported outside of the 30-day window,

25:19but anything public is 30 days.

25:22>> I just want to clarify that part alone

25:24is the inside of the the this is

25:26internal security for internal security.

25:28>> This is not external right here.

25:32[laughter]

25:34>> Right.

25:34>> And and and flock wondering about flock.

25:37Flock the the images that are retained

25:39by Flock are only retained for 30 days.

25:43They're only searchable for 30 days.

25:44Again, anything that we specifically

25:47save as a result of investigation would

25:49be saved through at least the

25:51prosecution through at least the case in

25:53court. And um our access into Flock is

25:57permanently retained. So that's why we

25:59were able to go back and do an audit on

26:01that complaint or that that that issue

26:03that was uh um brought up that was

26:06several years old. We were able to go

26:08back and we were able to vet that out

26:11and prove that was not the case. So we

26:14can't do a search more than 30 days, but

26:16we can look at our own access and see

26:19what we did, which is very important for

26:21the entire time we've had flock.

26:24>> Thank you.

26:25>> You're welcome.

26:25>> Through you, Madam Chair,

26:27>> councelor Gonzalez. Okay. So, um what I

26:30am understanding is that these are

26:32crimebased cameras that take still

26:36photos of license plates only.

26:39>> Flock. Yes. It's only the rear of the

26:41car. And I'll be specific about the rear

26:42of the car. LPR technology has evolved.

26:46Originally, it was only for the license

26:48plate, but the program has improved

26:50where now we can do make, model, color.

26:52You know, I can say I'm looking for a

26:54red Honda CRV with a bumper sticker, and

26:56it could help me. So it's only capturing

26:59a picture of the rear of the car.

27:01>> It definitely has evolved. I mean uh the

27:04the department did have a technology

27:06where it was mounted on top of the

27:07cruisers. We have gone away with that a

27:10long time ago. I think there's some

27:12confusion on that too. This is why we

27:14also re revisited our internal policy

27:16that reflects that as well.

27:18>> Uh they they are LPRs. Uh so gone are

27:22the days where they're mounted on cars.

27:25>> Okay. So there's no possible way that

27:27these uh flock cameras can capture um a

27:30driver's face or a pedestrian for any

27:34crime.

27:34>> So I would say no with a couple of

27:37exceptions. They are specifically angled

27:39on that side of the road. We have to

27:41have two cameras on each road to get

27:42north and south egress, let's say. Okay?

27:45If a car drives on the wrong side of the

27:47road, it's going to capture a picture of

27:49that driver. Okay? So it's not intended

27:51to do that, but I can't tell you what

27:53would never happen. And then I would

27:55also say it's not supposed to get

27:57pedestrians. However, I can talk about

27:59this. We just had a recent case where um

28:03it was taking the picture of the rear of

28:05the car, the license plate, while it was

28:07stopped and there was a pedestrian with

28:09a firearm in his hand crossing the back

28:11of the car and the city camera in the

28:14area didn't capture the person holding

28:16the gun. It just had the wrong angle.

28:18But because Flock was taking a picture

28:20of the plate at the exact moment he

28:22walked by it, it was able to p picture

28:25the gun. Now, we did not get his face,

28:27it was not good enough for an ID, but

28:29because of the other video and because

28:31of the investigation,

28:33>> that's just one piece of the puzzle that

28:35helped us, you know, properly charge the

28:37guy. So, not the intended purpose,

28:40>> but but a c certainly a uh positive

28:43result of a picture of a license plate.

28:46though.

28:46>> Um, still three.

28:48>> Are these cameras distributed equally

28:50throughout districts?

28:53>> Equally throughout districts. I think

28:54the best way I would say no.

28:56>> They're more targeted towards hotspots.

28:59>> Hotspots in major thorough ways. And

29:01without getting into locations, I'd

29:03rather not so that the public doesn't

29:05know where they are.

29:06>> Um, we are trying to capture the most

29:09amount of vehicular traffic as possible.

29:12>> Okay.

29:13>> And that's the best way to put it. major

29:15choke points, thorough thoroughways. Um,

29:18city cameras themselves, when we're

29:19talking about the actual video cameras,

29:21I think are pretty equally distributed

29:23throughout districts, but the flock,

29:25which is designed to catch traffic, it's

29:28on major thorough thorough affairs.

29:30>> Okay.

29:31>> Okay. Thank you.

29:32>> Okay. Councelor Reyes, do you have any

29:35questions

29:39>> through you, Madame Chair? I don't have

29:41question. Thank you so much.

29:43>> Okay. Um,

29:45so yeah, as I'm listening to you guys, I

29:48am reading and um I'm answering a lot of

29:51my own questions by reading this. Um, if

29:54you don't mind, however, cuz we did uh

29:57one of my questions was um the funding

30:00of these cameras and I do see that you

30:02guys touched on that and there was a

30:04conversation or question asked regarding

30:07potentially getting more cameras. So,

30:08I'm assuming that that um the budgeting

30:11for this is and I'm not sure if you have

30:13the answer for that. Um yes,

30:16>> and if any questions that we don't have

30:18for today, by all means, this is

30:19something that um I could see myself

30:22tableabling just so we could be properly

30:24informed by reading this and then bring

30:26this up at a later point in time. Um as

30:29far as uh new technology uh like the one

30:33we will be introduced with tomorrow uh

30:36is something that I don't think we can

30:39clearly say or give it an amount even

30:41because it's still has to go through the

30:43approval and also the demo phase and

30:46then negotiation starts after that. Um

30:49and whatever dollar amount may be

30:52associated with that we can we will be

30:54presenting that and we'll be asking

30:56obviously funding

30:57>> from wherever it may be suitable.

31:00>> Okay. If you don't mind me, I'm going to

31:02touch on because I know you you

31:04mentioned that 90% are functioning, but

31:07those that aren't like to me uh also as

31:11a counselor that's part of the budget

31:12committee, but primarily with public

31:14safety, I want to make sure that if

31:16we're spending money for 35 cameras to

31:19function, I'm expecting for all of them

31:21to be functioning. So, uh, how long have

31:26the the 10% that you

31:28>> I I think

31:29>> that are down, how long are they down

31:31for? And

31:31>> I'll touch base on that. It's it's more

31:34of a revolving total that I'm giving

31:36you. Not that they're constantly 10%

31:38down.

31:39>> No. And I know, but when when a camera

31:41is down,

31:42>> what is the process to for maintenance

31:44to come out and fix like for how long

31:46are they down for?

31:47>> And we do need to separate city cameras

31:49from FL if that's okay. So specifically

31:52Flock, I would say they are down a lot

31:55less often than than city cameras. I

31:57would say way less than 10%. I would say

31:59occasionally we have one or two down

32:01>> out of So we're talking maybe 3 to 5%.

32:05When that happens, they are they are

32:07monitoring. I don't have to discover it

32:09accidentally. I don't I don't have to

32:11have someone come to me and say, "Hey, I

32:13was trying to do a search. I had an

32:14investigation and it was down. I'm an

32:16admin. I'm getting alerts. I'm getting

32:18emails. Go check the power source on

32:20this. There are things that I I go out

32:22immediately. So, I'm getting an email

32:24whenever there's an issue. I'm going out

32:25there to see based on the trouble light

32:28whether or not it's a power issue,

32:30whether or not it's another issue. And

32:31if it's not a power issue, I'm reaching

32:33out to Flock and they are responsive.

32:35They are very responsive. They're

32:36getting out to me. I mean, I want to say

32:39a week, 10 days at the most one camera

32:41would be down. Um, and Lantel is out the

32:44next day in most cases.

32:46>> So, Flock Flock obviously is on a lease

32:48program. Yes. And because it's on a

32:50lease program, obviously service is

32:52rendered a lot quicker, okay?

32:54>> And they want, you know, their system to

32:56be back up and operational. And we make

32:58sure of that, too. Like the captain

32:59says, we do get the alerts. They let us

33:01know when they're coming in. But just

33:03like everything else, you there's an

33:04approval. It's not like they'll just

33:06[snorts] wall to the city and start

33:08working on it. They'll let us know that

33:09this is the issue going on with the

33:11particular location. They'll be coming

33:13out on this particular date. So, it may

33:15take a few days, but their turnaround is

33:17fairly quick. when we're talking about

33:19city cams, city cams is a little more uh

33:23particular because there's a process

33:25there too depending on what the issue

33:28is, the cost could be a little more and

33:30we have to also factor in now that we

33:32have a an agreement with Lantel. Uh it

33:35it benefits us. So we do have that

33:37service we did not have before where we

33:39were solely reliant on the budgetary

33:42amount that was given to us for that

33:43fiscal year. Now, we're stuck behind

33:45that amount unless we go in front and

33:47and get some more funding. But, uh, in

33:50the from the time that I've spent uh, in

33:52this uh, in this unit, it's been u, I

33:56would have to say there's a lot of

33:58moving parts when it comes to utilities

34:00also in this city which causes the delay

34:03most of the time

34:05>> and a lot of the issues that happen is

34:06because of that. uh just the um I would

34:10say um the communication in between jobs

34:14that are happening with utilities versus

34:16the technology that are there kind of

34:18conflict. So uh it it costs a little

34:21more too but I don't want to go down

34:23that path as far as it's it's a it's a

34:26hit or miss when we talk about that.

34:28>> No no it's giving me an idea that maybe

34:30we should we should be adding that as an

34:32item and under public safety which is

34:34the city cameras. So, it's like a whole

34:37it's a completely different item. So,

34:39we'll try not to intermingle what the uh

34:42what they are.

34:44>> Um I want to segue real quick. Um

34:47access. I'm reading it. Um however, I

34:51feel like the language could be vague as

34:54to who has access and this is the part

34:57where I mean it could be vague. Um

35:03so, can it says who may access Number

35:0513, it's like the officer in charge.

35:08It's like, well, how many officers are

35:10usually in char? Is this p is this uh on

35:13a given shift? And and it says and

35:16designates. So what does that mean and

35:18designates like

35:19>> so

35:20>> how many the officer in charge is

35:22obviously during the course of any shift

35:24there is one officer in charge which is

35:27the

35:29uh and design are anybody that's a user

35:32designated for that platform that have

35:34access right so you have a username and

35:36a password that'll give you access to

35:37the system so no outsider would have

35:40access to that other than those

35:41designates these are issued by number of

35:45personnel so there's not uh there's a

35:48set amount that can only access it to

35:50begin with. Um and then the overview

35:53from the OIC is the one that decides uh

35:56certain mitigating factors that would

35:58allow that information to flow outside.

36:01But if we stick to the your question as

36:04far as access goes, if I have 90

36:07licenses, they're associated with a

36:10specific user and a password. And those

36:12individuals that work because we have a

36:14rotation in dispatch, they could be

36:16working dispatch so they have access to

36:18that system. Um,

36:22>> okay.

36:23Cuz I'm I'm

36:26I'm a fan of you guys having the

36:29resources and tools. I think having

36:30cameras are great, especially when we're

36:33as a counselor and I'm getting

36:34complaints of like illegal dumping. It's

36:36like I love cameras that could capture

36:38who are the perpetrators. Um uh I think

36:41when it comes to flock though uh the

36:44biggest and not even flock it's many

36:45things like technology

36:48if it's not used for how it's supposed

36:50to be intended for is where it's driving

36:54the conversation to a place where we

36:56don't want to have. Um so that's why my

37:00concern is who has access and is there a

37:04tracking some sort of tracking mechanism

37:08as to

37:09>> whoever has uh the access

37:14>> okay let me see how I'm wording this

37:16>> like a log

37:17>> is there a log or some sort of tracking

37:18mechanisms as to what has been

37:22>> searched

37:22>> and and and I can talk about that so so

37:24[laughter] basically the people that

37:26have access are the officers in the

37:27police department. Okay, they they all

37:29have access and and again we're trying

37:31to focus on Flock. All right now, all

37:32officers have access to Flock. They have

37:35an individual a specific username and

37:38password. They are not shared. It is

37:40ultim multiffactor authentication. So

37:42they get the text on their phone when

37:44they [snorts] log in and they have to

37:45enter the code. So people aren't sharing

37:48loginins and and whatnot. So you have

37:50one person logging in. There is user

37:52logs. Okay. And that's what I was

37:55touched on earlier. The actual

37:57searchable pictures are only there for

37:5830 days, but these user logs never go

38:00away. We have permanent retention. So,

38:02if we get a complaint about somebody um

38:05inappropriately using Flock 5 years ago,

38:07we have the ability to go back 5 years

38:09and see if they conducted that search.

38:11>> The the type of information that's

38:13retained in the in these search logs are

38:16the person that's that's and I just went

38:18through this so I know pretty well. It's

38:20the person that's logged in. Okay, it's

38:23what they're entering for information.

38:24Are they entering in a plate? Are they

38:26entering in a make or a model or a color

38:30or a type of vehicle? What are they

38:32specifically looking for? What's the

38:34time frame they're looking for? What

38:35cameras are they looking at? Everything

38:38is tracked and everything is searchable

38:40by admins to see what they are doing.

38:42So, if we get a complaint, we can go

38:45back and look and see if it was used

38:46appropriately. In addition to that, I do

38:49monthly audits. We do an organizational

38:51audit where I look at it. Basically, all

38:54the searches that were conducted for the

38:55entire month go into a spreadsheet. It's

38:58a lot of information. I'm able to go

38:59through it. I'm able to um and it's a

39:02lot and I'm able to see whether or not

39:06there's anything that's jumping out at

39:08me. Okay. In addition to that, I find

39:09that very difficult and Flock found that

39:11was very difficult. Flock has issued um

39:14created a new thing called audit assist

39:17and they have something that immediately

39:20flags

39:22questionable searches. Okay. And what

39:26they do is I'm notified as the as the

39:28admin notified to look into this a

39:31little more. And a questionable search

39:33may be something like hey they um

39:36conducted they call narrow plate time

39:39frame. Okay. So they conducted a search

39:42for one plate or one vehicle type

39:44multiple times in a very very narrow

39:46period of time. Okay? Or the other thing

39:50is they're looking at one plate over a

39:52long period of time because most

39:54investigations, not all, but most

39:55investigations take place in a very

39:57short period of time, you know, days,

39:59maybe weeks. So they're like, why is an

40:00officer looking at this particular plate

40:02over a period of one or two months?

40:04Okay. So I'm alerted to it. I look into

40:07it. I inquire. I'm I'm there are other

40:09safeguards in place and I'm like, "Oh,

40:11this is part of this this type of

40:12investigation. This is a long-term drug

40:15investigation." So, where So, we're

40:17looking at this for this vehicle

40:19multiple times over a period of time or

40:21unrelated investigations. Believe it or

40:23not, the same vehicle could be used,

40:24could be a suspect motor vehicle in

40:26different crimes.

40:28So, one officer does a plate search for

40:31a vehicle this month and then a

40:33different officer does a plate search.

40:34I'm alerted to that and I look at that

40:36and I see that there's nothing wrong

40:38that there was no reason that there were

40:39two unrelated incidents. There are other

40:41safeguards in place that the officers

40:43have to put in. There are three things

40:45in minimum that they have to put in. One

40:47is a log number, a CAD number. That is a

40:49reports been assigned and they're

40:51putting that report number in the

40:52system. So it's an easy reference. Two

40:54is they're selecting a permissible

40:56reason. Okay, the permissible reason

40:58specula it breaks it down and says it's

41:01for a law enforcement reason. It's for

41:02this. It's based on reasonable

41:03suspicion. It's based on an Amber Alert.

41:05It's based on probable cause. It's based

41:07on these. They're they're scrolling

41:09through a drop down and they're clicking

41:10there. The other thing is offense type.

41:13So, our offense types, there's there's

41:14approximately there's 40ome offense

41:17types that we can um that they can click

41:20and there's no others. There's no

41:22generics and then there's obvious things

41:24that we don't allow for legal reasons.

41:25We don't allow them to collect um click

41:28offense type um for certain things. So,

41:32um, there are safeguards in place. The

41:34user logs are there forever. Um, we're

41:38able to look up and see what anybody is

41:40searching at any time for the entire

41:42time that we've had flock. So, the

41:43safeguards in place and we can also look

41:45backwards and it's right now everybody

41:49every sworn officer in the PD is a user.

41:52>> Okay.

41:53>> With specific

41:55>> user. Um, yeah,

41:56>> I promise to almost be done and this is

41:58like me not even reading all of it.

42:00>> [laughter]

42:00>> I can I can answer any questions you

42:02have.

42:03>> Um, have you So, how long have we been

42:07having the flocks for?

42:08>> So, we have had flocks since March of

42:102021.

42:11>> March of 20. And as of March of 2021

42:14till now, have you had to reprimand

42:17anybody? Has there been anything that

42:20based on some of your audits that

42:22something did jump out to you? Anything

42:25that needed to be addressed?

42:26>> Nothing. We the only thing we've had was

42:29this one incident.

42:30>> Yeah.

42:31>> From like Mthun

42:32>> from last month.

42:33>> Oh, that's it. Okay. All right.

42:35>> And that that's also been um mentioned

42:38in the report.

42:39>> Okay.

42:39>> It's our first one.

42:41>> Okay. And then my last question for now,

42:45I don't I don't make promises.

42:49Sharing information. And I'm I I saw

42:52briefly um sharing with the

42:56Massachusetts State Police. Is there any

42:58other agencies that you guys work with?

43:00Um and what exactly is being shared for

43:03what reason?

43:04>> Yes.

43:04>> Um

43:07specifically,

43:10I want to touch on are we helping other

43:13state agencies when it comes to

43:15immigration related cases?

43:18>> And that's what I wanted to touch on as

43:19well. So absolutely not, we will not and

43:23have not um cooperated with any sort of

43:25immigration investigation. That is a

43:27hard stop.

43:28>> It's also uh written in our policy.

43:31That's a hard no. We we also as far as

43:35uh the sharing goes, it's usually

43:38something that's more fluent, right? If

43:40you have

43:42a a neighboring agency that has, let's

43:45just say, a domestic, a rolling

43:47domestic, it's on its way to Lawrence.

43:49They're calling us. Hey, it's fleeing.

43:51It's coming down your way. Do you mind?

43:53That's when that would trigger the

43:55sharing of information, an active call.

43:59You know, it wouldn't be outside of

44:00that. We we sometimes get calls from

44:03agencies outside um that say, "Hey, we

44:06you know are we had an incident in our

44:08town and it drove south, we think into

44:10your town afterwards. We didn't get a

44:12plate, but this is a description or we

44:14got a partial plate. Can you can you

44:16look into this?"

44:18>> And again, if we do get that, we are

44:20sharing the image of the back of the

44:22vehicle and the time period. We're not

44:24giving any personal information. We're

44:26not then running that plate and then

44:27giving that other agency. I mean, they

44:28they they have the ability to run that

44:30on their own, but but we're not sharing

44:32personal information. There is no

44:33personal information in Flock. It's a

44:35picture of the back of the car. That's

44:36that's all that's being uh retained and

44:38all that's that's um that we're

44:40searching.

44:42>> Um as you're mentioning that, how does

44:44that help a case? So, it's like it just

44:47says yes, they they drove by Lawrence.

44:50So, so there's I I I could again I could

44:53go on forever and talk about how we use

44:55Flock, but I'll give you just that hit

44:57and run example. Let's say Mthuan, who

44:59which is a next door community,

45:02>> um no longer has Flock, has a hit and

45:04run and that vehicle was a good

45:06description, but they didn't get the

45:08license plate. They said it drove south

45:10on Lawrence. So now we are looking at a

45:12camera on Broadway in that time period

45:15for a vehicle with that description. And

45:16let's say I'll use my example of a

45:18bumper sticker, okay? very specific

45:20bumper sticker. Okay. We now get a still

45:22image of that. We now have the license

45:23plate. So, we give that license plate to

45:26them. They're able to run it and now

45:27that's their suspect motor vehicle and

45:28they're able to continue their

45:30investigation now that they have that

45:31information.

45:32>> Um, so it's not fair that we pay funding

45:35so other cities and towns that be taking

45:37away their flat cameras using our

45:39resources. Now, [laughter]

45:41>> and and and I understand that and that's

45:43may may or may not be a sensitive issue.

45:45I think cooperation um with law

45:47enforcement is very very important. I

45:49know

45:50>> and [laughter] and and I think that you

45:51know it was it benefits all of us um if

45:55we share appropriate information with

45:58other police departments when

45:59appropriate.

46:00>> Okay.

46:01>> Yeah. I mean I agree it's there's

46:02obviously a saying in in law enforcement

46:04a knowledge of one is a knowledge of

46:06all. Right. So we we are here uh when we

46:08come across this information it'll

46:10benefit. Granted

46:12>> I know.

46:12>> Yeah.

46:13>> But you know what I mean right? I I do.

46:15>> I But if there's a victim involved, it's

46:17about protecting all victims regardless

46:19of where they live. And and I'm I we

46:22believe strongly in the sharing of

46:24appropriate information with the

46:25appropriate people.

46:26>> No, I understand. And I appreciate the

46:29the information. Um I know I'm going to

46:33have to like sit with this and read up

46:35on it. Counselors, do you have any uh

46:38further questions considering the new

46:40information we just received? Thank

46:43you. Yeah, through you. I think that is

46:45a lot of question bar because we've got

46:47those paper you know practically at the

46:50moment that we getting here is uh still

46:54we have to read a little bit more.

46:56>> So I want to make a motion if and before

47:00you make your motion I want to make

47:02sure. So I you had three packets s um

47:06>> we I put it as one package. One is for

47:09city surveillance cameras.

47:12The second part is technology use and

47:16implementation.

47:21And the last one is license plate

47:24readers. So it's three separate packets,

47:27but I I decided to put it as one to be

47:30organized. And then this second package

47:32which is kind of like I would say what

47:35theou

47:36>> So those are responses to what was asked

47:38of us under the

47:40>> oh this was counselor

47:43>> L plants had questions

47:45>> um and this was the the response to

47:48those questions. So um and this is in

47:51regards to that ordinance item that's

47:53>> 9.25

47:55>> 9

47:56>> 9.25 5. Yes.

47:58>> And that's going to be heard on the 20th

48:00um of this month.

48:02>> It was just this is to give you a

48:04content of tonight. You know, as far as

48:07it's it's good that you have it now.

48:10>> No, no, I appreciate it. Council Rees,

48:12do you have any fur Do you have any

48:14questions before um we move on?

48:24Okay. Okay, I'll just wait for her to if

48:26she if she does decide I'm sure she'll

48:30un unmute herself. So,

48:33are you all set with questions? Okay.

48:35So, we can move on to like make a motion

48:37to table this item. That way we we have

48:40the ability to to read up on it.

48:43>> Motion to table item 412-26,

48:48Lawrence Police Department Flock Safety

48:50Cameras.

48:51>> Can I get a second? Second. Uh, madame

48:55clerk, could you please call the role?

48:58>> Councelor Roselie Gonzalez,

49:00>> yes.

49:01>> Councelor Selena Reyes,

49:04>> yes.

49:05>> Thank you. Councelor Anna Levy,

49:08>> yes.

49:08>> And Madame Chair, Vivian Marl,

49:10>> yes.

49:11>> Thank you. Motion carries. Motion

49:13carries. Uh the second item um it is

49:19item 41326

49:22with the Lawrence Police Department

49:23shooting statistics and public safety

49:25technology. Um was one of the packages

49:28that I mentioned part of the this item

49:31or all three was regarding the flock?

49:34>> It was it was regarding uh the

49:35surveillance and

49:38this was something that we weren't

49:39familiar with.

49:41>> Oh, you weren't? No, we we wanted to

49:43have a little content behind what uh

49:46>> uh what was being looked for.

49:50>> So, in the me um when the item was sent

49:54to to our city clerk to have it added on

49:57the agenda and then once it's on the

49:59agenda, it gets assigned to uh a

50:02committee for that item to be addressed.

50:05It was specifically to talk on um so it

50:08says specifically on the email

50:10requesting the Lawrence Police

50:12Department provide the public safety

50:14committee with updated shooting

50:16statistics and trends including the

50:18number and locations of incidents and

50:21discuss current and potential

50:22technologies being utilized to identify,

50:24deter, investigate and respond to

50:27gunrelated incidents. Um if you can if

50:31you're not ready for this prepared no

50:33that's fine. I would rather table and

50:36have you guys provide us with the data.

50:38>> Um

50:39>> I will say Flock and the city cameras

50:42are absolutely technology that we use to

50:44solve those those crimes. But um but

50:47that's all I'd be prepared to say

50:48tonight.

50:49>> No. And and that's that's great. So when

50:51we discuss this once again specifically

50:54with the city cameras, we're defin I I'm

50:57very data driven. Uh, I can't speak for

51:00everybody else, but when it comes to

51:01like the number, I'm going to be very I

51:04want to hear the numbers. Um, not 90% of

51:08them are functioning. I want to know how

51:09many we have and how many are down. And

51:12so, if we could get

51:13>> sure updated number when we go in front

51:16of you. Yes.

51:17>> And when it comes to incidents, um, are

51:20we able to

51:22have it uh, divided by district if

51:26possible? cuz I know each counselor is

51:28very like it takes takes it very

51:30personal and wanting to ensure what's

51:32happening in their district.

51:33>> I can talk to our crime analyst. Um I

51:36think that request has been made before

51:38and I forget what the answer was. We

51:40break it down by sector which is very

51:42similar to district but not exactly

51:45district lines but we absolutely could

51:47do we could do a

51:48>> when you say sector are you saying north

51:51south the Mount Vernon area like

51:53>> there's so the the mapping behind the

51:56technology is broken down by how we

51:59patrol. So

52:01>> when our when we so when that's set

52:04that's why it's not broken down in

52:05districts.

52:06That's fine. If it could be broken down,

52:08however, [laughter]

52:10>> and we'll figure it out.

52:11>> We can actually do a pin map.

52:13>> We'll figure it out.

52:14>> We absolutely I know we our analyst has

52:16technology to do a pin map

52:18>> and that would allow you it would be a

52:19map of the city of Lawrence with all the

52:21incidents and you guys would be able to,

52:23you know, look at it and say, well, this

52:25is my district. I just don't know that

52:26we would be able to give you a list by

52:28district line.

52:29>> And that's fine. I think that's fine.

52:31>> But we can give you the geographic

52:32location. That's that's easy. Yeah,

52:34that's easy.

52:34>> Yeah, we we definitely the whole point

52:36is understanding the hot spots of course

52:39of where these trends are happening and

52:41we'll we'll dive in a little bit deeper

52:45um for the next rodeo. I'll touch base

52:47with you guys. I'm not sure if you guys

52:48are going to be the design for LPD to

52:53continue to speak on this when we're

52:55ready to untab it.

52:56>> I don't know.

52:57>> I would have no problem being Yeah.

52:59being the person for flock and for

53:02>> So, I'll touch base with you guys to see

53:04whenever we're ready cuz I don't want to

53:06have this scheduled for a week or two

53:08and we're still not ready.

53:10>> Sure.

53:10>> Okay.

53:11>> All right. I'm looking for a motion to

53:13table.

53:13>> Motion to table.

53:15>> Can I get a second? Second. Uh, madame

53:17clerk, please call the role.

53:19>> Sure. Councelor Selena Reyes.

53:23>> Yes.

53:25>> Councelor Rosa Gonzalez.

53:27>> Yes.

53:27>> Councelor Anna Levy.

53:29>> Yes.

53:29>> Madame Chair V Maro.

53:31>> I vote yes.

53:31>> Thank you. Motion

53:32>> car. Carries. Um, so I'll see you guys

53:35next time.

53:36>> Thank you.

53:37>> Um, counselors, I'm look Madame Clerk.

53:40As a matter of fact, let me read this.

53:41It's item 41426,

53:43contractor and developer compliance with

53:45city ordinances and permit requirements.

53:48if we are able to send communication to

53:52ISD

53:53um specifically um Pat Ruiz and um I

54:00definitely want communication to be sent

54:02out to the building inspector Peter

54:04Blanchett to be here um for the next

54:08public safety meeting to speak uh in

54:11regards to this item.

54:14Um,

54:17counselors, can I get them? Well,

54:20>> yeah. Motion to table.

54:22>> Motion second.

54:23>> Okay. Madame clerk, please call the

54:25role.

54:27>> Councelor Rosio Gonzalez,

54:29>> yes.

54:30>> Councelor Selena Reyes,

54:32>> yes.

54:33>> Councelor Anna Levy,

54:35>> yes.

54:35>> And Madame Chair, Vivian Marmo,

54:37>> I vote yes.

54:39>> Thank you.

54:39>> Motion carries. Um, if there is no other

54:43items to be untou [laughter]

54:49and I got it. Okay, Madame Clair, please

54:51call the role.

54:52>> Councelor Selena Reyes.

54:54>> Yes.

54:55>> Councelor Rosal Gonzalez.

54:57>> Yes.

54:57>> Councelor Anna Levy.

54:59>> Yes.

54:59>> And Madame Chair and Vivian Mar.

55:01>> Yes. Thank you. [laughter]

55:07[laughter]

55:07>> Have a great day.

55:08>> No, I'm gonna take this with me that