2026-10-13 - Ordinance and Committee of the Whole
Summary
- The meeting combined the Ordinance and Government Relations Committee (6:30 p.m.) and the Committee of the Whole (7:22 p.m.); the chair is Ana Levy. Minutes of August 24 and September 29 approved.
- Parking and Traffic Ordinance Changes October 2026: a long list of parking, handicap-space and pole items was referred to the engineer, DPW and police, ordered to hearings or withdrawn; older tabled Fairmont Street resident-parking items were taken off the table.
- Orchard Street One-Way Conversion Request: sent to the engineering department for evaluation.
- Mayor No-Confidence Resolution and Pending Cases: the no-confidence resolution on Mayor Brian DePeña was sent to the full council with a favorable recommendation, 5 to 2; the council votes October 20. The mayor was arraigned in Salem the same day and pleaded not guilty.
- The Committee of the Whole takes no public comment and its votes are recommendations only; a moment of silence was held for a local bilingual newspaper figure.
Built from auto-generated video captions (names and numbers may be misheard); no agenda or minutes found.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
05:28Good evening and welcome to the
05:30ordinance in the government relation
05:31committee. Uh the meeting is scheduled
05:34for Tuesday, October the 13, 2026 uh
05:386:30 p.m. So this meeting is also uh
05:43being conducted as a hybrid meeting and
05:45you also can remotally access the
05:48meeting through the digital platform to
05:51do uh the rules. Uh we have council
05:55president uh Joanni Rodriguez who is to
05:58my right uh because we didn't have a
06:01quum so to be part of the meeting today.
06:04Uh and to my left uh we have uh
06:08councelor Frankly Miguel the vice chair
06:11of the committee and myself
06:15person to chapter 20 of the of 2022.
06:19This meeting of ordinary committee is
06:21being conducted both in person and via
06:23remote participation. And as a reminder,
06:26the person who would like to listen or
06:28to view this meeting while in progress
06:31may either attend in person at the
06:34location above or use any of the
06:36following asset um Facebook or YouTube.
06:41Please stand now for the flag of
06:43>> the
06:47flag of the United States of America and
06:50to the republic for it stands one nation
06:53under God indivisible with liberty and
06:56justice for all
07:02>> council. We have a minute uh to approve
07:05for um August 24
07:08and September 29, 2026. Can I have a
07:12motion?
07:14>> Uh madame chair, I won't be able to vote
07:16on this minute. So,
07:18but I'll make the motion to approve.
07:21>> Second.
07:22>> Motion is already made in second. All
07:26those in favor?
07:28>> I. So,
07:32Miss Claire,
07:34roll call, please.
07:36>> Roll call.
07:38>> Councelor Vice Chair Franklin Miguel.
07:40>> Yes,
07:43>> Madame Chair. Anna Levy.
07:44>> Yes.
07:45>> Council President Javanni Rodriguez.
07:47>> Abs.
07:48>> Thank you. Motion carries.
07:50>> So, motion carries.
07:53Thank you. So, the first item on the
07:56agenda is item 417. Uh 26 is the inst
08:03on Mars Street at Brook line street Paul
08:06number 463050 and referend number
08:1031358963.
08:15We had a somebody from the national
08:19please state your name and address for
08:22the record.
08:25Vasna Ang 11:01 Turnpike Street here on
08:28behalf of National Grid.
08:31Uh National Grid is seeking the town's
08:33uh petition approval to install um pole
08:3740
08:394630-50
08:41uh in between existing poles 4630 and
08:454631
08:46for system reliability upgrades.
08:50Uh the pole will be installed in the
08:51public way.
08:53Council
08:58any question or concern
09:05>> through your manager
09:07>> president?
09:08>> Usually these items get referred to that
09:11uh to the DPW or
09:16>> the this item is no no it's not sended
09:19to DPW. is sended after uh directly to
09:23the silicons
09:24>> to the fans.
09:25>> Yes.
09:26>> All right. I will ask the question here.
09:28So um this is to um this is to serve any
09:33business or to improve
09:34>> No, this is any specific area.
09:36>> Uh this is to improve the old uh the
09:39overhead infrastructure around the area.
09:40there's if there's a let's say there's
09:42an outage the um the upgrades that we're
09:45putting in it would detect the outage
09:47and if
09:49that section is out we can actually um
09:52power it from another section. So this
09:55automatically detects an outage and
09:57possibly
09:59fix that outage from powering from
10:01another area. So
10:02>> so the infrastructure is to improve the
10:05overall services on the Marson Street
10:08area.
10:08>> Uh yes. Okay.
10:12to
10:13council vice chair.
10:14>> So this new pole that you're proposing
10:17um is that going to be between the two
10:19assisting poles already?
10:20>> Yes.
10:21>> What's the distance between the two
10:22poles and if
10:24>> uh I don't know off my head. This is a
10:28design from another person. I'm just
10:30here for the um for the uh
10:34ordinance meeting I I guess.
10:36>> Okay. So, so uh we do have concerns with
10:40this um I mean not necessarily the
10:43improvement but uh the poles when we are
10:46placing double poles or triple poles in
10:49in some cases.
10:50>> Yeah. Uh, are you looking to remove any
10:53of this or
10:54>> um, from what I understand, I don't
10:57think any poles are going to be removed,
10:58but if you if the city finds that having
11:01the three poles in the uh, in the same
11:04proximity, they can possibly figure out
11:07a different uh, scheme for this if uh,
11:10the city doesn't approve it. So,
11:13>> so this is a joint poll for Verizon and
11:17also for
11:18>> um,
11:19>> national agree. Yeah. From from from
11:21what I see here, uh, yes. Jointly owned
11:24poll.
11:25>> Join the own.
11:26>> Yeah.
11:26>> Join the old poll
11:29>> or a new pole?
11:31>> Yes.
11:31>> A new one?
11:32>> Yes.
11:33>> Okay.
11:39>> So, do we have to order a public hearing
11:41or we send it directly to
11:43>> to order a public hearing?
11:44>> Yeah, I'll make a motion that uh we send
11:45it to the full council or a federal
11:47recommendation to order a public
11:48hearing. Second.
11:50>> So motion is already made to send it to
11:52the full council to order a public
11:54hearing. Already second. Um
11:58any other discussion?
12:00If no, all those in favor?
12:03>> I I
12:03>> there I have it.
12:05>> Thank you.
12:05>> Thank you too.
12:10Item 41826
12:14uh is one way orion is three. So we have
12:19in Kia
12:21councelor Rosali
12:28may address.
12:30Good evening uh Rosalie Gonzalez
12:33counselor uh 200 Common Street. I am
12:36here today in support of my um
12:40constituents on Orchestra. They are
12:43requesting to set orchestra as a
12:46one-way. Um, I actually invited them
12:49today so they can speak on behalf of
12:50their request.
12:52>> Okay.
13:02>> Sandra Mazan, 14 Orchard Street,
13:05Lawrence.
13:06>> Good evening.
13:08>> Okay. [laughter]
13:09state your concern
13:11>> and your request.
13:12>> Yeah, I'm a long-term resident of
13:14Orchard Street. I'm a home owner there.
13:17I have been since I've lived there. And
13:20uh we need additional parking on Orchard
13:24Street. As you know, those are historic
13:26homes. When they were built, they were
13:28not built with parking.
13:31And as the density of the street has
13:34grown, there is need for more parking.
13:38Currently, there's parallel parking on
13:41both sides. It is two-way street. So,
13:44we're looking to make it one way so that
13:46we can make space for additional
13:49parking, which would be angled parking
13:52on the street. and the one way from
13:56Newberry to South Union or the opposite
13:59um could be determined at a later point.
14:02But from what we have seen with some um
14:07drawings from AI, pictures, etc., it is
14:10possible to get additional parking if we
14:13make angled parking, but it would need
14:16to be one way to and of course there are
14:19advantages for one-way parking. um
14:22safety. It decreases the number of cars
14:26on the street cut through. It's safer
14:29for pedestrians and again it will make
14:32the needed space for angled parking.
14:40Um I saw that
14:43thinking.
14:45So the ocean is three. I saw that was
14:47only one way. No,
14:50>> no. It's two-way parking.
14:52>> Well, two-way parking and one thing is
14:55two-way people uh uh way for the car is
14:59another is another thing. So, you're
15:02looking for parking on one side of the
15:06S3, one one side of the street or you
15:09are looking just only one way car
15:13getting from Newberry or from Union
15:17Street. What is what you're looking for?
15:19>> So, parking would still be available on
15:22both sides of the street.
15:24>> Okay.
15:24>> Okay. But with that, we are looking to
15:28make it one way because
15:29>> or just make it one way.
15:31>> To make it one way to accommodate. Yes.
15:34Mhm.
15:35>> All right. Because I was a little
15:37confused. You were looking for one way
15:40uh parking just only one side parking or
15:43so you were looking for just only one
15:46way to make a history uh for the car
15:49coming from Union or coming from the
15:52Newberry.
15:53>> No. Well, with the one way, the
15:55direction of it, that could be
15:57determined whether it's one way from
16:00Newberry to South Union or South Union
16:02to Newberry, that could be determined,
16:04but there would still be parking on both
16:07sides of the street. Yes. One would be
16:09angled parking and the other side would
16:11be parallel parking.
16:13>> Okay.
16:14>> Councelor, any other question?
16:17>> Yes,
16:19>> President.
16:21So currently uh Orchard Street is that
16:24it resident parking only? [snorts]
16:26>> There is resident parking only for 12
16:28hours that's in the evening not 20.
16:31>> So that's was Orchard was one of the
16:33original
16:34uh uh if I if I remember correctly
16:39one of the original street that actually
16:41become uh resident parking, right?
16:44>> Yeah. I don't know. It's been uh there's
16:47been 12-hour resident parking for some
16:49time. I think one of the former
16:50counselors did that for us. But um when
16:54I first moved there back in
16:58um 1993
17:00um there was not I don't think there was
17:03>> after that maybe like
17:05>> but it's been over 20 years right that
17:08it's been a resident parking
17:09>> I think it's been yeah it's been a long
17:11time but it wasn't originally
17:13>> that's what I that's what I thought
17:15street garden street and um in Orchard
17:17Street has been one of the original
17:20places that we start the program.
17:24So essentially uh this this is an unique
17:28very unique uh street because you have
17:32the garden in between
17:34>> I'm sorry say that again
17:36>> like you have the like the garden in
17:38between the cut between uh uh Orchard
17:42Street and Jackson Court. So So uh
17:46Orchard Street is a very unique street.
17:49>> Yes. It's it's only a block um long.
17:52Yes. And it there are one ways all
17:54around it except for South Union. So
17:57Garden is one way, Summer's one way,
18:00Newberry's one way.
18:02>> The reason that I'm asking is because um
18:05so that's one of the thing that it get
18:07analyzed when uh when you have a one-way
18:10street.
18:11>> So what other street around can serve
18:14the other direction on the opposite
18:16side? So if one is going down, the one
18:18the other one is going up.
18:20>> So and you have to have a combination of
18:22both otherwise you're sending people
18:23over two three blocks if they want to go
18:27uh around the around the street. So
18:29that's one of the thing that need to be
18:30figured it out to see. Yes, it's doable.
18:34>> Yes. Um some of the part some of the
18:38traffic there we want to cut down on for
18:41safety reasons. Um they're because
18:44people use um Orchard Street because it
18:48is two-way and so you know instead of
18:50going down a one way to get where they
18:53want to go. Yes, we want to cut down on
18:55some of the traffic
18:57>> coming on the street.
18:58>> Like like I said, it was in potentially
19:00I wasn't here when when that was
19:02designed.
19:03>> It was intent the intent is to have it
19:06uh a one way and then another way and
19:09potentially have another street.
19:11>> Mhm. that goes both ways uh to serve
19:15>> the traffic from around the area. That's
19:17how you design it.
19:18>> Uh but having the concerns that you guys
19:20have, it is worth to have
19:23>> a a a a potential look into it by that
19:27uh by that engineering department
19:30>> or potentially a a an organization a
19:34company that actually provide traffic
19:36stories
19:37>> to the to the city. Another thing that
19:39I'm that I'm seeing is that on the
19:41petition I think that working with
19:43councelor counselor uh Gonzalez uh you
19:47need to have you need to add another
19:48item of the angle parking because that's
19:52also need to be approved separately but
19:54while we doing the while the they doing
19:58the study you can add that as well
20:00because I mean if the intent is to park
20:03in an angle way uh that need to be
20:05changed as well.
20:07>> Yes. Sorry,
20:08>> excuse me.
20:09>> It's okay. Um, originally that's why I
20:11added the one way first uh just to see
20:14where it would go and then um if it went
20:17the right way then I would add her other
20:19request.
20:20>> Yeah,
20:20>> that was the idea.
20:21>> So that's the that's that u and that
20:23also can be looked up u unofficially by
20:27the uh in case that they hire an outside
20:32company. So they can look at that as
20:34well to see it uh at the same time that
20:37they designed the one way uh that they
20:39can actually look into what is the best
20:43way of fitting more cars on an angle way
20:46because it should it could be different
20:49based on the angle. It could be 30° 45°
20:52or uh 90° which is not a good thing
20:57because you need a lot more space to
20:58back up. So each configuration you need
21:02a backup area to that you're not
21:05interfering with traffic uh and the
21:08angle of 30 degrees you require less
21:11distance in the back and then they need
21:14to also look into that to see if it is
21:18doable.
21:19So just just have that conversation with
21:22with their um engineering department so
21:24they can look into that as well.
21:31That should be good.
21:32>> So, I would like to make a motion to
21:34send the to send this um item to the
21:39engineering department
21:41uh to evaluate uh the new design.
21:43>> Second.
21:45>> Can you Did you hear the motion? Okay.
21:47So, the motion is already approved. All
21:49those in favor?
21:51>> I
21:51>> there I have it. Uh I
21:54>> So,
21:55>> okay. So
21:56>> this item is going to be sended to the
21:59full council for next
22:01>> the engineering department.
22:03>> Okay.
22:06>> Yes. Okay.
22:07>> So at the next when when we got back the
22:11the story so we going to let you know
22:14and you know that
22:15>> and then she can come and send
22:18>> Oh
22:19>> and we send it to to the full counsel.
22:21Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
22:28Item 41926
22:30is one hour parking
22:33nuno de Mara park and also
22:37to add a sign that said that uh it's
22:41going to be two uh owner expensive that
22:45was that item was submitted by me and
22:50also um many of you know that we We have
22:54like uh we have five parking spay. Um
22:59>> I think three of three of three to five
23:01>> three to five parking spay. Uh the nuno
23:04the park the America park those part is
23:06being those parking is being used by um
23:11practically the resident and when
23:13somebody try to get into the park it
23:16doesn't find any any space. So we are
23:19asking to this item to be sended to DPW
23:25um and add the
23:30uh the one hour and also to add a sign
23:35that say that it's going to be two as
23:37owner expensive.
23:39>> I'll make a motion to send this item to
23:41the uh to the engineering department.
23:45>> Second
23:45>> uh for evaluation. So a motion is
23:48already made in second.
23:51No more discussion. All those in favor I
23:54>> they I have it. Item 420 26 is the
23:58resident parking on Four Street Bai
24:05from Albor Street to County Road
24:09Council. Motion to send to um DPW for
24:14and Lawrence police department for
24:16evaluation.
24:17>> I'll second that.
24:18>> So a motion already made it and second
24:21or in favor I
24:23>> the I have it. Item 42126.
24:28Uh can I make it uh
24:30>> as a block? as a blow item 42126,
24:344226
24:36and 42326
24:39is a
24:40>> no and also 426 and 27
24:43>> 4
24:442326
24:46>> 426 26 and 42726
24:49>> 426 26 42726
24:54>> I'll make that motion that we take it as
24:56a block
24:58>> the motion already made it and second
25:00All those in favor?
25:01>> I.
25:02>> Item 42126
25:05is remove parking handicap parking on
25:08157 fairway street. 422 is a removal of
25:12the handicap parking 159 Fair Street.
25:16Uh 423 is to remove handicap parking 18
25:21Orion Street. Uh 42626
25:25is to remove park handicap parking on 23
25:29Arding Street. 42726
25:32to remove handicap parking on 2021
25:36Welding Street.
25:38>> I'll make a motion to send it to the
25:39police department and TPW.
25:41>> Second.
25:42>> Motion already made and second or in
25:45favor?
25:45>> I I have it. So item 42526
25:51is a char a parking of 16 oranges three.
25:55>> Do you have an item?
25:56>> Um I hate to interrupt you but there was
26:00an item that you just um you just sent I
26:04believe to the city engineer. It was
26:07item 420
26:0926 resident parking at Fairmont both
26:12sides from Auburn Street to county road.
26:1542626
26:16is remove how parking 420-26.
26:22>> Um I want to make sure that we're not
26:24being repetitive. This is an item that I
26:27and it's you know it just so happens
26:28that I'm here for another item and I'm
26:31just reviewing your agenda. And in
26:34reviewing your agenda, if you were to
26:35refer to,
26:38okay, this is one, two, three, it's on
26:42the fourth page under tabled new
26:45business February 3rd of 2026.
26:48I had requested for resident parking of
26:51Fairmont Street um east side from Auburn
26:54Street to County Road, which is so I'm
26:57just trying to make sure that we're
26:58being efficient and we're not being
26:59repetitive adding similar items that
27:02it's addressing the same streets. Um,
27:05and I do remember that there was a young
27:06lady during our city council meeting,
27:08during public participation that was
27:11addressing wanting resident parking um,
27:15for this street and working with the
27:18city clerk. However, again, February
27:203rd, 2026, that's something that's been
27:23tabled. Um, so I would I would look
27:25forward to, you know, uh, meeting with
27:29you guys to address maybe tabled
27:31matters, um, when it relates to resident
27:34parking, um, and to see what's holding
27:38it up, whether it's, um, continuously
27:40trying to receive information from the
27:42city engineer or the Lawrence Police
27:44Department. Uh, because I'm not aware,
27:46you know, uh, items that we request as
27:48counselors, it gets tabled for various
27:51reasons. Um, so I just want to make sure
27:54that you guys were aware that item
27:57already exists.
27:58>> Okay. So, uh,
27:59>> can you repeat what is the old item?
28:02>> Uh,
28:02>> so I think it's it's various items that
28:05relates to that street.
28:07>> Okay.
28:07>> Um, there's item 3126,
28:11which is res resident parking.
28:13>> Okay.
28:14>> Fairmont Street West Side from Auburn
28:16Street to County Road.
28:18>> Okay. I got it. which is the same two
28:19streets that you just mentioned on that
28:22new business item.
28:24>> Mhm.
28:24>> Then we have item 3226, which is
28:27resident parking
28:28>> Fairmont Street East Side from Auburn
28:31Street to County Road.
28:34>> And then item 3326
28:37um relates to uh
28:40>> changing it to a one-way Fairmont Street
28:42from Auburn Street to Holly Street. Um
28:46and that concludes those three items
28:50regarding that specific street.
28:52>> Okay.
28:53>> So,
28:54>> thank you councelor Mu.
28:55>> All right.
28:55>> I would like to uh make a motion to on
28:58table item 3126, 3226 and 3326 and send
29:02correspondence to the DPW and as well as
29:05that uh police department uh to send us
29:08an update uh when it comes to those
29:10three items.
29:11>> Second.
29:12So motion is already made it to on table
29:15item 3126
29:1732 26 and 3326
29:20to send it to the PW and the police
29:22department to send uh information on
29:25those three item already second
29:28um
29:30in favor
29:31>> I
29:31>> I
29:31>> so they I have it okay thank you
29:36>> so u it is important make a note on the
29:39so they they're correlated
29:42Yes, that's related to the Yeah.
29:47>> All right. Madame chair, I would like to
29:48make a 425. You're you're on 425 right
29:51now.
29:52>> Uh 42526 is the child care parking on 16
29:56or street. That was also for councelor
30:00Rosali Gonzalez. May I hear motion?
30:03>> I will make a motion to send it to uh
30:05DPW and the police department for
30:07review.
30:08>> Second. Motion already made and already
30:11second. All those in favor I have an
30:14item 42826
30:18>> 429
30:19>> handicap I already done
30:20>> 429
30:22>> 428 429
30:23>> 428 and 429 as a blocks
30:26>> I'll make a motion to uh take it as a
30:29block. All those in favor I.
30:32>> So item 428
30:3542826 is a handicap parking on 195
30:39fairway street and 42926
30:42is a handicap parking on 45 m street.
30:46>> I'll make a motion to send it to the DPW
30:48and to uh the the police department for
30:52review.
30:53>> Second.
30:54>> All those in favor?
30:55>> I have it. So 43 and 43126.
31:01Can I make as a block?
31:03>> So move. Second. Second.
31:05>> All right. Second. All those in favor?
31:08>> I I
31:09>> Okay. Item 43026 is a 15minute parking
31:12on 375 SS3 and 43126
31:17is a 50minute parking on 3T to S3. Can I
31:21hear a motion?
31:22>> Have a motion to send it to the uh to
31:24the DPW for review. Second
31:27>> motion already made in second. All in
31:29favor?
31:30>> I have.
31:32>> All right.
31:33>> So, council, we have a couple of items
31:36in here to take our table.
31:43item.
31:44So, can we take in item 37826?
31:49Uh, out of table 363 26, 364 26, 366 26,
31:56335 26 and 336 26 and 33726.
32:03>> I'll make a motion to take it as a block
32:05out of the table matters.
32:07>> All right. Second. All in favor?
32:10they so item 2726
32:17um
32:20it's a handicap parking on 37 Bennington
32:24Street after review at the Lawrence Poly
32:27Department had on favor recommendation
32:30uh approving the handicap parking. So
32:34what is the motion? Motion to withdraw.
32:43>> So motion um motion to fordraw. Second
32:47>> motion to withdraw is already second.
32:50All those in favor.
32:52>> They have it. Item 33526
32:56is um
32:59a request for a handicap parking to be
33:02placed in front of 56 Green War Street
33:06and the police department has a favor
33:08recommendation for this handicap
33:10parking. May I hear a motion?
33:12>> Motion to uh send the full council to
33:14order public hearing.
33:15>> Second.
33:16>> There is a motion to send it to the full
33:18council. Already second. Um all those in
33:23favor
33:24>> I have it. Item 33626
33:28is
33:31handicap parking in uh 145 Union Street.
33:36Uh the Lawrence police department has an
33:38in favor recommendation for this
33:40handicap parking at this location. May a
33:43motion motion to withdraw.
33:44>> I'll make a motion to withdraw but also
33:46send correspondence to the applicants as
33:48as with the denial letter. Yeah. Second.
33:51All in favor? I.
33:53>> They have it.
33:55>> Same thing with it 277.
33:58>> Okay.
33:58>> Maria.
33:59>> Maria.
34:00>> Okay. Thank you.
34:06So, um,
34:08document 33726 is a traffic story around
34:12255 East Hong E3 part
34:17for the pedestrian safety.
34:20This item was sended to the full council
34:23but according to uh the Lawrence police
34:26department this item need to be sended
34:28to DPW and the city engineer for an
34:32assessment. So the DPW and the city
34:35engineer must conduct
34:38assessment. It is the for view to
34:41determine the physical rowway can safely
34:44board the proposed traffic control
34:47modification and if the municipal in
34:51Frio can support the necessary
34:53transition sign on the row. Can I hear a
34:56motion?
34:56>> Motion to send it to the
34:58>> second.
34:59>> Motion already made in second or in
35:02favor.
35:02>> I
35:04have it. So document 36326
35:08is a no parking on nor street and one
35:13side of the street. So the Lawrence Podi
35:17department also send this item to DPW
35:20and to the city engineer and the city
35:23engineer must conduct an infrastructure
35:26and a special assessment.
35:29It is the perview to determine if the
35:33physical what
35:36of the street necess necessary the
35:39removal of the parking to allow the safe
35:42passage of the two-way traffic. Can I
35:45hear a motion?
35:47>> So move
35:47>> second
35:49>> to send it. The motion is to send it to
35:51the engineering department
35:53>> DPW in the engineer department. So it's
35:56already second. All those in favor.
36:00>> They I have it. Order. Uh item 36426.
36:07Um it's a request for a handicap parking
36:10to be placed in front of four furong
36:13street. The Lauren Police Department has
36:16a favor recommendation for this handicap
36:18parking at this address. Can I hear
36:21motion?
36:21>> Motion to order here.
36:23>> Second.
36:24>> All those in favor? Hi,
36:25>> there I have it. Item 36626
36:30is
36:33a a request for a handicap parking space
36:35in front of 393 lower street. The Lauren
36:39Police Department has in favor
36:41recommendation for this handicap parking
36:44space at this location. May I hear a
36:46motion? Um motion to forward with jaw
36:49and send correspondence with the uh to
36:52the petitioner with the um with the
36:54letter with the police department
36:56recommendation.
36:57>> So motion already made and second or in
37:00favor I
37:02>> I have it. So, ordinate 3 item 37826
37:09uh is a request for a handicap parking
37:11to be placed on front of 192 Union
37:16Street. The Lauren Police Department has
37:18a favor recommendation for this handicap
37:21parking at this address. Can I hear a
37:24motion?
37:25>> Motion to report hearing.
37:27Let's
37:27>> switch
37:2937
37:3137826.
37:38So uh so move
37:40>> there is there is a motion already
37:43second in favor I
37:46>> they have
37:48council any other item from the agenda
37:51>> uh by item 37426
37:56>> no that was on the previous one
37:59>> item 374
38:05Yes.
38:10>> All of those that you haven't
38:12>> those item were already approved.
38:14>> Yeah.
38:16>> Yeah. There is no more item
38:18>> right now.
38:22>> Are you here for
38:26>> you have anything on ordinance?
38:28>> No.
38:28>> No.
38:32All right. Um, motion to adjourn.
38:35>> There is a motion to adjourn. Already
38:38second or in favor?
38:40>> May I have it?
38:46>> Yes.
44:09Stand
44:12>> space.
44:41Give you a phone camera.
48:07spread out.
48:10>> [snorts]
48:40>> Good evening and
48:46good evening and welcome to committee of
48:48the hall. This is a subcommittee of the
48:50Lawren City Council. Today, Tuesday,
48:54October the 13, 2027.
48:57It is
49:007:22
49:02p.m. So this meeting is also being
49:05conducted as a hybrid meeting in UB and
49:09you may remotely access the meeting
49:11through the digital platform before
49:14uh fabu and YouTube the
49:20person to charter of the act of 2022.
49:23This meeting of the committee of the
49:25is being conducted both in person
49:29and via remote participation.
49:31A reminder, the person who would like to
49:34listen or view this meeting while in
49:36progress may either attend in person at
49:40the location above or use any of the
49:42following access location
49:45and you
49:49please roll.
49:51>> Yes. Conor Rosali Gonzalez,
49:54>> present.
49:55>> Conor Frank Miguel,
49:56>> present.
49:57>> Councelor Vivian Marl,
49:59>> present. Councelor Mark Llan
50:01>> present.
50:02>> Councelor Gregor de Rosario is noted
50:04absent. Councelor Selena Reyes is noted
50:07absent. Councelor Stephanie Infante
50:10>> present.
50:11>> Council president Javanni Rodriguez
50:13>> present.
50:14>> And Madame Chair Anna Levy
50:16>> present.
50:16>> Thank you. Please stand for the police
50:19to the flag.
50:22>> Oh, I'm sorry. Before let's do um moment
50:25of silence in the name of Mr. Alberto
50:28Sores who was a a community person who
50:32also was part of the Roombo newspaper
50:36the only uh bilingual newspaper uh in
50:39the city. So let's take a moment
51:00>> [snorts]
51:02>> So let's do the pledge of the flag
51:06to our flag of the United States of
51:08America and to the stand one nation
51:11under God indivisible with liberty and
51:14justice for all.
51:25I think this is
51:28so counselor there is no minute to
51:30approve but before I would before to
51:34start I would like to ask the city cler
51:36to talk about a little bit about the
51:39committee of the whole.
51:42>> Thank you councel. I know for several
51:44counselors this is their first meeting
51:46at a committee of the whole meeting. So
51:48um unlike other council committees uh
51:51where you elect your chair, the
51:53committee of the whole is always chaired
51:55by the vice chair of the council. Um the
51:57committee of the whole is comprised by
51:59the full city council but it serves as a
52:01committee. So like any other committee,
52:03your vote is not a binding final um
52:07decision of the council is treated as a
52:09recommendation to the full council. So
52:11whatever is voted on tonight would be
52:14recommendations to the full council to
52:15be voted on at your next meeting which
52:16is scheduled for the 20th next Tuesday.
52:19So just to keep that in mind. Um but it
52:21is a deliberative body comprised of the
52:24entire council but it's treated as a
52:26committee.
52:28>> Thank you.
52:31>> Um also there is no public
52:34participation.
52:35Uh it's like any regular uh subcommittee
52:39that we have in
52:41>> That's true.
52:42>> Uh
52:44and the is it is like any other
52:48subcommittee. So there is that's the
52:50reason why we do not have a public
52:52participation. So we have item we don't
52:56have a minutes to approve and item the
52:59new the item in the agenda is item 40326
53:04adoption of a vote or no confidence
53:06resolution regarding major Brian a de
53:09pena uh subitted by council president
53:12Rodriguez council vice president Levy
53:15and councelor uh Infante
53:21>> thank you madame chair I was asked by
53:24the chairperson to read the resolution
53:26that you are considering into the record
53:28this evening. It's a resolution um reads
53:31vote of no confidence and it reads
53:32whereas the city of Lawrence remains
53:35dedicated to fostering an environment of
53:36trust and mutual respect between the
53:38city government and the community and
53:40whereas the mayor of the city of
53:42Lawrence is responsible for leading the
53:43city and instilling trust in the
53:45government of the people of Lawrence.
53:47And whereas Mayor Brian Apena has been
53:49charged with both federal and state
53:51crimes. And whereas these charges send a
53:53message of distrust in the local
53:55government to people of Lawrence and
53:56distract the mayor in his function as
53:58the mayor. And whereas the city council
54:01hereby takes a vote of no confidence in
54:03the ability of mayor Brian Aena to
54:04continue to govern the city of Lawrence.
54:06Now therefore be it resolved that the
54:08city of Lawrence city council does vote
54:11in the majority of no confidence in the
54:12leadership of Mayor Brian A. Dea and
54:14witness whereof we hereby set our hands
54:16and cause the seal of the city of
54:17Lawrence to be fixed. It would be this
54:1920th day if you adopt this resolution.
54:22This 20th day of October in the year of
54:23our Lord 2026 and then all um all
54:28parties voting in the affirmity would
54:30would in the affirmative would sign off
54:32on that resolution.
54:38>> Council, any discussion on this item on
54:40this resolution? Council Stephanie Fant.
54:44>> Thank you. Just a quick note for the um
54:46city clerk. My first name is misspelled
54:48on the resolution.
54:49>> Okay.
54:50>> With the IE instead of the Y, so just
54:53sure that it's fixed. Thank you.
54:55>> We'll get that fixed. Yeah.
54:59>> What is it?
55:01>> Um there is no public participation at
55:04this meeting, but you did receive two
55:05letters in support of the resolution. Um
55:10one is from former city councelor Wendy
55:13Luzon and one is from a neighborhood
55:15activist. um Lewis Roblace and those are
55:18both on your table this evening. Um also
55:22I had been asked to um
55:26maybe I wasn't asked to [laughter]
55:28um but I understood that there was some
55:30disappointment that the only items
55:32backing up the materials were some
55:33newspaper articles. So, I did get the
55:35official AG's announcement um and with
55:39the indictments from her September 24th
55:41press release that's in your package as
55:43well as the actual criminal complaint
55:45filed with the United States District
55:47Court. All those items are on your
55:48package and on the table this evening
55:50for you.
55:57>> Any discussion
55:59on any other item?
56:01>> Council plan.
56:02>> Cons plan.
56:03>> Thank you.
56:04Um, thank you, Madam Vice Chair. I've
56:06got a comment that I wish to read into
56:08the record for this evening. Uh, tonight
56:10we are being asked to vote on a
56:12resolution expressing no confidence in
56:14Mayor Brian to paint his ability to
56:16govern the city of Lawrence. I do not
56:19intend to support this resolution.
56:22In my view, it has no practical effect,
56:25carries no meaningful consequence, and
56:28does not change the authority or
56:30responsibility of the mayor or this
56:32council. Whatever its stated purpose, I
56:35believe this resolution is primarily
56:38symbolic and risk turning the council
56:40into a participant in a controversy that
56:43is already being addressed through the
56:46appropriate legal channels. I am not
56:49interested in supporting an agenda item
56:51that in practical terms does little more
56:53than generate headlines and social media
56:56attention. Our responsibility as a
56:59council is to take meaningful action on
57:02behalf of the residents we represent.
57:05That said,
57:07I believe it is important for the public
57:09to understand where I stand regarding
57:13the legal matters involving meia. I
57:16would make three points. First,
57:20due process matters.
57:23Our constitution provides important
57:25protections against government
57:27overreach, including the right to due
57:30process and the presumption of
57:32innocence. Those protections apply to
57:35everyone, including the mayor. The
57:38allegations against them must be
57:40addressed through the legal process, and
57:42he is entitled to defend himself and
57:45have the government prove its case.
57:48Several members of this council have
57:50appropriately recognized the importance
57:51of those constitutional protections and
57:54I agree with them. Second,
57:58if this council lacks confidence in a
58:00particular policy or action of the
58:02mayor, we already have meaningful tools
58:05at our disposal. We can vote on matters
58:08the mayor proposes or supports. We can
58:11approve them, reject them, amend them,
58:14or otherwise exercise our authority as a
58:17legislative body. We can also place
58:20specific matters on the agenda, request
58:23information, ask questions, and conduct
58:26the oversight that is part of our
58:28responsibility to Lawrence residents.
58:31Those actions have real consequences.
58:34The symbolic vote of no confidence does
58:37not. And third,
58:42the city charter provides a mechanism
58:45that directly addresses the questions of
58:48competence in the mayor. The recall
58:51process.
58:53A recall gives the voters the
58:55opportunity to decide whether the mayor
58:58should remain in office.
59:00That is a meaningful process with a
59:03meaningful consequence.
59:06I support allowing the recall petition
59:10to proceed to the voters.
59:12To repeat, I support allowing the recall
59:17petition to proceed to the voters. The
59:21allegations facing Mayor Deena are
59:23serious and they have resulted in legal
59:26action by both federal and state
59:28authorities.
59:29The Federal Department of Justice, led
59:32by a Republican, and the Massachusetts
59:34Attorney General's Office, led by a
59:36Democrat, are separate institutions
59:39operating under different political
59:41leadership and with different
59:42responsibilities.
59:45These organizations are often at odds
59:47with each other, but regarding Mayor
59:49Dea, they both agree that he has
59:52violated the law. The legal proceedings
59:55should be allowed to follow their course
59:57and Mayor Deia remains entitled to due
1:00:01process.
1:00:03At the same time,
1:00:05given the seriousness of the
1:00:06allegations,
1:00:08I believe the residents of Lawrence
1:00:10should have the opportunity to make
1:00:13their own judgment about whether they
1:00:15have confidence in the mayor's
1:00:17leadership. If the residents want Mayor
1:00:19Deena to remain in office, they should
1:00:22have the opportunity to affirm the
1:00:24choice. If they want him removed, they
1:00:27should have the opportunity to make that
1:00:29choice as well. This is a consequential
1:00:33process. It gives voters a direct voice
1:00:37in determining the future of our city.
1:00:41For those reasons, I will not support
1:00:44this resolution tonight. I believe we
1:00:46should focus our attention on actions
1:00:48that have real impact on the people we
1:00:50were elected to serve and allow the
1:00:53appropriate legal and electoral
1:00:56processes to work as they are intended.
1:01:00Thank you, Madam Vice Chair.
1:01:03>> Any other councils that would like to
1:01:05speak?
1:01:09>> Councelor President.
1:01:10>> Uh thank you, Madame Chair. Thank you
1:01:12for the opportunity to speak.
1:01:15Uh
1:01:17I was one of the uh three counselors
1:01:19that uh uh put this forward for the
1:01:22council to discuss this matter and as a
1:01:26president of the Lawrence city council I
1:01:27support the board of no confidence to
1:01:29the mayor leadership
1:01:32uh to govern the city. Lawrence
1:01:34residents deserve a city that uh a
1:01:37city's government that focus on their
1:01:39needs with transparency, accountability,
1:01:43and public trust.
1:01:46Mayor Dea is definitely entire to a due
1:01:48process
1:01:50and the presumption of innocence is
1:01:52there. The council the council
1:01:55responsibility is to evaluate his
1:01:57leadership and the impact to the city.
1:02:01The board of no The board of no
1:02:03confidence expressed our judgment about
1:02:06his ability to lead
1:02:09and do not expressed or determined guilt
1:02:14or criminal guilt.
1:02:16Public trust matters.
1:02:20When serious when serious concerns about
1:02:22leadership
1:02:24uh is brought up to our attention, we
1:02:29need to take action and a board of no
1:02:32confidence
1:02:34does that.
1:02:35My responsibility
1:02:37is to the resident of the city. I will
1:02:41continue to advocate
1:02:43for accountable leadership, reliable
1:02:46city services, and government that put
1:02:50the city of Lawrence first.
1:02:53With that said, I'm definitely going to
1:02:56support the board of no confident to the
1:02:59leadership of the of Brian.
1:03:04councelor any other counselor that would
1:03:07like to make a comment or any discussion
1:03:14if there is no more comment or
1:03:16discussion on this matter can I hear a
1:03:19motion
1:03:20>> I'll make a motion to send this item to
1:03:22the full council with a f recommendation
1:03:25>> second so motion already made it and
1:03:28second all those in favor
1:03:30>> I I'll request a roll call
1:03:33>> you Okay. Roll call. Maria, please.
1:03:38>> Councelor Mark Plan.
1:03:39>> No.
1:03:40>> You said no.
1:03:41>> I said no.
1:03:41>> Okay. Thank you.
1:03:44>> Sorry. Councelor Stephanie Fante.
1:03:47>> Yes.
1:03:48>> Councelor Rosal Gonzalez.
1:03:50>> No.
1:03:52>> Councelor Franklin Miguel.
1:03:54>> Yes.
1:03:55>> Councelor Vivian Marmal.
1:03:57>> Yes.
1:04:00>> Council President Javanni Rodriguez.
1:04:02>> Yes.
1:04:04And madame chair Anna Levy.
1:04:06>> Yes.
1:04:07>> Thank you. Motion carries. And we have
1:04:09councelor Selena Reyes and councelor
1:04:12Gador Rosario absent.
1:04:14>> It is important to do madame chair. Um
1:04:16yes just continue.
1:04:17>> Okay.
1:04:18>> Motion carries.
1:04:20>> All right. Uh it is important to
1:04:22recognize the councelor Rees. She have
1:04:24sent uh had she have communicate uh with
1:04:28me as a council president regarding his
1:04:31her uh not being here today. She have a
1:04:35little bit of an issue at the aper and
1:04:38she wasn't able to attend as per her
1:04:41last text message.
1:04:43>> Thank you counc president uh for the
1:04:46information. The next item on the agenda
1:04:48is item 40426.
1:04:51Just uh before we continue with that so
1:04:54cler do you mind giving us an update as
1:04:56of what that means what we did and uh
1:04:58when it's going to be take care of the
1:05:00council.
1:05:01>> Sure. So um that last item was sent up
1:05:04to the full council with a favorable
1:05:06recommendation. And that means at your
1:05:07next meeting, which is Tuesday, October
1:05:0920th, there'll be a final vote on that
1:05:12item um or there should be a final vote
1:05:14on that item unless it's tabled for some
1:05:16reason. Um where that resolution will
1:05:19either be adopted or um denied that
1:05:23meeting.
1:05:25>> Uh just
1:05:28to ask a question to uh Tenny Hilton
1:05:31that is here today in case anything
1:05:33missing.
1:05:35Sergey Jenny Hilton, there is anything
1:05:37that procedure wise we we missed or
1:05:39everything is all set?
1:05:42>> Everything is fine. You you voted to
1:05:43bring it up to the full council. It will
1:05:44be heard at the full council.
1:05:46>> Just want to make sure.
1:05:47>> No problem.
1:05:53>> Can we get to the next item?
1:05:58So the next item on the agenda is item
1:06:0040426.
1:06:02is a discussion regarding complaints or
1:06:06charge issued by the Massachusetts
1:06:08Attorney General concerning a public
1:06:11office council by councelor President
1:06:13Yari Rodriguez.
1:06:15>> Yeah. Thank you madam chair madam chair
1:06:18of the committee. Uh the reason that I
1:06:19put this up is because we wanted to get
1:06:22an update uh from the city attorney or
1:06:24anything that we don't know uh and that
1:06:26can be discussed in public when it when
1:06:28it comes uh to the complaint or the
1:06:30charges against the mayor of the city of
1:06:33Lance. So I just want to ask for a quick
1:06:35update from the city attorney.
1:06:38Um the only thing that's changed is
1:06:41today the mayor was arraigned in
1:06:43superior court in Salem. He pled not
1:06:45guilty and was released. So he got
1:06:47further dates on his criminal case. So
1:06:50that's the only thing since the last
1:06:51time we met that has changed.
1:06:52>> And that is uh through mane that's in
1:06:54regard to the state charges.
1:06:56>> That is regarding the state charges.
1:06:57Yeah.
1:06:57>> Okay.
1:06:58>> And they g they gave a continuence date
1:07:00on that when the for the procedure
1:07:03discovery etc.
1:07:03>> Do you have the specific dates?
1:07:06>> I believe both dates are in December.
1:07:07Both the federal and the state. Uh I
1:07:09would be giving you them off the top of
1:07:11my head. I don't have them written down
1:07:12but something like the sixth and the
1:07:14eth. But don't hold me to that.
1:07:15>> Yeah. can if you can uh find out and
1:07:17send it to us that will be great.
1:07:18>> I'd be more than happy to.
1:07:20>> Uh thank you
1:07:26>> council. Any
1:07:28more discussion on the item
1:07:3240426
1:07:34question?
1:07:37So what is the motion?
1:07:39>> Motion to table
1:07:42up there
1:07:44>> table up there. That way we can discuss
1:07:46it down there.
1:07:50>> In case we need we need another update.
1:07:56>> All right. I would like to uh make a
1:07:58motion to send this item to the full
1:08:01council
1:08:02uh with the intent of tableabling at the
1:08:04full council and that way if it is any
1:08:08update we just do it at the full
1:08:09council.
1:08:09>> So send it to the committee report.
1:08:10>> Send it as a committee report.
1:08:12>> Second.
1:08:14>> So already made it seconal.
1:08:26No.
1:08:28>> Councelor Franklin Miguel.
1:08:29>> Yes.
1:08:31>> Councelor Vivia Marl.
1:08:32>> Yes.
1:08:34>> Councelor Mark Llan.
1:08:35>> Yes.
1:08:38>> Councelor Gregor Rosario is noted
1:08:40absent. Councelor Selena Ray is noted
1:08:43absent. Councelor Stephanie Infante.
1:08:45>> Yes.
1:08:47>> Council President Javanni Rodriguez.
1:08:49>> Yes.
1:08:50>> And Madame Chair Anna Levy.
1:08:52>> Yes.
1:08:53>> Thank you. Carries.
1:08:56Council, there is no more items on the
1:08:59agenda for today.
1:09:01So what is the motion?
1:09:04>> Motion to adjourn.
1:09:06>> So motion to adjourn. Already all in
1:09:09favor
1:09:11Maria please.
1:09:14>> Any name?
1:09:15>> No on that one.
1:09:17[laughter]
1:09:18>> Okay.
1:09:22>> Yes.
1:09:23>> Okay. Thank you so much. Cons Rosar is
1:09:27noted absent. Cons absent cons
1:09:32Gonzalez.
1:09:34>> Council Franklin Miguel Con Marl Council
1:09:37President Rodriguez and Madame Chana
1:09:39Levy.
1:09:40>> Yes.
1:09:41>> Thank you. Motion carries.
1:10:10There we go.
