Half-Cent General Purpose Sales Tax
At a glance
Based on auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
- What: a proposed citywide half-cent general-purpose sales tax (about $20 million a year) to close projected general fund deficits and cash-fund at least three fire stations; a renewal of the half-cent infrastructure sales tax was previewed alongside it.
- Where it stands: discussed on 2026-10-13 with no vote. A majority of speakers favored August 2027 over March 2, 2027, and several wanted the ballot language tightened. The 0.1% housing and homeless tax and the auditor question were treated separately and went to the March ballot a week later.
- Next: any version would need ballot language, a call for election and, for August, a citizen sales tax committee.
The case
- Forecast deficits of $13.3 million in 2028 and $17.4 million in 2029. The current rate is 9.35%; adding the half-cent and 0.1% would make it 9.95%.
- A property tax alternative of about 8.35 mills in 2028 (about $96 a year on a $100,000 home) and a further 2.567 mills in 2029 was compared.
- August 2027 model: first collections January 1, 2028, reserves above 20% through 2031 with $2 million a year of budget reductions or adjustments, and $30 million for three fire stations between 2029 and 2031. A 0.4 cent version would raise about $16 million a year and not fund fire stations.
- Draft ballot language: up to $30 million for at least three fire stations, up to $15 million a year for public safety and up to $5 million a year for public works and infrastructure.
- The current infrastructure half-cent tax expires October 1, 2029; renewal language was also shown.
Debate
- Options laid out by Mayor Duncan: everything in March, everything in August, or the auditor and housing questions in March with the rest in August.
- Kell and Ortiz would support only an August election; Kell also asked for a food-versus-general spending breakdown and a chart of past cuts, and Ortiz objected to vague wording on vehicles and equipment.
- Hiller called the draft a possible "slush fund" and proposed a 0.4 cent operating-only version without fire stations; McGee and Miller said the language was not specific enough and McGee wanted community input; Miller supported renewing the infrastructure tax.
- Valdivia-Alcala wanted a bar on using the money for pay raises.
- Public: Joseph Ledbetter disputed the projections and the size of reserves; Danielle Twemlow raised stacked community improvement district rates and unclear use of the two infrastructure taxes.
- City Manager Perez said the existing sales tax is not allocated by department and that reports would show how it is spent. Staff: Dalton Bittel.
- Related: 0.1% sales tax for affordable housing trust fund and homeless initiatives, City Auditor charter ordinance amendment.
Sources
- 2026-10-06 - City Council (video)
- 2026-10-13 - City Council
- Governing Body (City Council) Meeting - October 13, 2026
Discussion time
About 41 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).
| Meeting | Minutes |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 - City Council | 41 |
Log
- 2026-10-13 - City Council - non-action discussion of the half-cent tax, August versus March timing and ballot language; most councilmembers leaned to August; no vote.
- 2026-10-06 - 2026-10-06 - City Council: non-action discussion of a half-cent general sales tax (about $20 million a year); consensus favored slowing the timeline for community input.