0.1% sales tax for affordable housing trust fund and homeless initiatives

At a glance

  • What: Resolution calling a March 2, 2027 special election on a citywide 0.1% special purpose sales tax; requires six votes.

  • Update 2026-10-20: the Governing Body voted 8-1 (Ortiz no) to send the question to a March 2, 2027 mail-ballot election. Motion by Hiller, second by Miller. Based on auto-generated captions.

The proposal

  • A new 0.1% citywide special purpose sales tax, about $4 million a year; first collections July 1, 2027 (about $2 million in the first half-year).
  • At least 50% to the affordable housing trust fund; the rest to evidence-based homeless initiatives (programs, operating and construction costs, outreach, transportation, rental assistance, affordable housing).
  • A homeless services committee, created by ordinance and modeled on the housing trust fund review committee, would recommend spending to the council; structure to be set within about 60 days.
  • Special election cost estimated at $155,000, revised up from about $118,000. The sales tax rate is now 9.35%.

Debate

  • For: Bradberry (prevention costs less than crisis response; the public decides), Banks, Mayor Duncan (targeted purpose; the council can later repeal). Steve Henry spoke for Topeka JUMP.
  • Kell first preferred August, then changed his mind after Bradberry. His cleanup amendment was not adopted because counsel said the language already covers it.
  • Hoferer asked that city administrative costs be recovered.
  • Against: Ortiz (cost, pace, "transportation services" too broad). Joseph Ledbetter and Henry McClure opposed a special election.

Earlier discussion (2026-10-13)

  • First non-action discussion of revised ballot language: at least 50% to the housing trust fund, the rest to homeless initiatives, 10-year term. About 28 minutes of the larger sales tax debate.
  • Valdivia-Alcala wanted Built for Zero named and was wary of putting it on a March ballot without more public explanation; City Manager Perez preferred general wording so funding is not tied to one program. Bradberry proposed requiring evidence-based practice, a plan and measurable outcomes, which several members backed.
  • Hoferer asked about unspent balances, early repeal and spending guidelines; Ortiz asked to add transportation services (including helping people return to family elsewhere), which the Mayor and Perez were open to.
  • Hiller, McGee and Miller were comfortable moving this question to March; Kell and Ortiz preferred August. Mayor Duncan said he would rewrite the language for a decision the next week. A caller supported the tighter language. No vote.

Sources

Discussion time

About 70 minutes across 2 meetings (from transcript timestamps; approximate).

Meeting Minutes
2026-10-20 - City Council 42
2026-10-13 - City Council 28

Log

  • 2026-10-20 - City Council - action item A passed 8-1 (Ortiz no): question goes to a March 2, 2027 mail ballot; 42 minutes with three public speakers.
  • 2026-10-13 - City Council - first discussion of the revised ballot language alongside the half-cent tax; leaned toward tightening wording (evidence-based programs, transportation services); no vote.
  • 2026-10-22 - Page created from a posted agenda; no meeting transcript processed yet.
  • 2026-10-06 - 2026-10-06 - City Council: first non-action discussion of a 0.1 percent sales tax for affordable housing and homeless services (about $4 million a year); the council leaned toward an August 2027 ballot.