2026-09-29 - City Council Budget Hearings
Summary
Day 1 of the proposed 2027 budget hearings. The captions begin about six minutes in and end shortly before the close. No votes were taken.
- Property tax millages: Chief Administrative Officer Giarrusso presented scenarios for rolling forward city millages, which have not been fully rolled forward since 2015; he said the Board of Liquidation and school board millages are not being rolled forward. For a $200,000 home with the homestead exemption, rolling every city millage forward would add $103.94 a year. Members asked about cut scenarios, the administration's position and public outreach, and the administration committed to publishing information and a calculator. Public commenters alleged that taxes are driving residents out and that fines and code enforcement fall hardest on poor residents. See 2027 Property Tax Millage Ordinances.
- Department of Finance: proposed general fund of about $38.7 million against $19.3 million adopted for 2026, driven mainly by debt service newly shown in the general fund; excluding it the budget is about $1 million lower. Staffing falls in accounting, purchasing and treasury, while the revenue bureau doubles its sales-tax audit team (staff cited a 4.6 to 1 return on audits). The new tax-sale vendor, GovEase, is being onboarded while tax sales are paused. Members asked about the timeline and about funding for a responsible-contracting hearing officer. See Department of Finance 2027 Budget.
- Office of Budget Management: proposed general fund of $2.8 million against $1.5 million adopted, an increase of $1.25 million, mostly personnel from transferring existing staff into a new Contracts Management Office. Brandy DeLarge presented. See Office of Budget Management 2027 Budget.
- Information Technology Innovation: proposed budget about $3 million above 2026 adopted but $1 million below 2025; restores maintenance for core systems including 311 and asset management, with a new 311 system and a permitting-system solicitation planned. See Information Technology Innovation 2027 Budget.
- Service Innovation Performance Accountability: proposed general fund of $1.2 million against $563,000 in 2026, mostly to budget for existing staff at full cost. See Service Innovation Performance Accountability 2027 Budget.
- Employee Labor Relations: health plan changes projected to save about $11.95 million rather than the $14.8 million option shown on the slide; open enrollment runs October 1 to 31. Members asked whether costs are shifting to employees. See Employee Labor Relations 2027 Budget.
- Resilience Sustainability: general fund of only about $177,000, with most work grant-funded; reductions include recycling and Christmas tree recycling funding, and members asked about alternative funding. See Resilience Sustainability 2027 Budget.
- Early Childhood Education: presenters said the program serves 1,800 infants and toddlers, and that rolling the early childhood millage forward could serve roughly 100 to 200 more children against demand of about 5,000. See Early Childhood Education 2027 Budget.
- Civil Service: a standstill budget with other operating funding unchanged at $59,364, two vacant positions eliminated and no funding for public safety promotional testing. See Civil Service 2027 Budget.
Council members present included JP Morrell, Matthew Willard, Aimee McCarron, Lesli D. Harris, Freddie King III, Eugene J. Green Jr. and Jason Hughes.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
05:45All right, guys. It's 9:30
05:49and I know that we have some folks
05:51coming in late. So, why don't we go
05:53ahead and get started because I know we
05:54have a long day today, tomorrow, and for
05:57the next 10 days.
06:07I don't see it.
06:09>> That's it. It's fine. I can
06:13>> right there.
06:14>> All right. And as a housekeeping
06:15announcement, I know we have folks uh
06:17who are interested in the budget and the
06:19presentations to save on paper because
06:22we're facing a budget crisis. There is a
06:24QR code at the front desk and at the
06:27bulletin board where you can scan and
06:29that'll take you to the presentations as
06:31well as information about what we're
06:32going to talk about today. So go ahead
06:34and scan that QR code and we can get
06:36started.
06:45>> Good morning. You ready, Madam Chair?
06:47>> I'm ready. Thank you.
06:48>> All right. Good morning everybody. It's
06:49good to see you again. Um I the reason
06:52why we begin with this is because there
06:54are ordinances that have to be uh
06:57considered and one that certainly has to
06:59just be passed confirming what the
07:01millage rate will be for this budget. Uh
07:04I I'm going to say to you though in this
07:06presentation there is nothing new to
07:08report. So you're not going to get
07:10really any new information other than
07:13what we've already discussed at length
07:15last week. And and again, I will I will
07:18though cuz council member Harris asked
07:20last time give some more data on
07:22households, but other than that,
07:24everything the council is going to see
07:25today is both something we have
07:28discussed and is quite publicly
07:29available. So, um again, these are the
07:33millages that we'll start with that are
07:35potentially subject to the roll forward
07:37proposition. They are broken down here
07:40essentially as to the ones that would go
07:43directly to the general fund or
07:46supporting something that is a direct
07:48city service. And so in the first uh
07:52trunch you see general alimony and
07:54unrestricted general fund. If those are
07:57rolled forward all the way um for 1.82
08:01mills that could potentially generate up
08:04to $10 million in additional revenue.
08:07And then um for city dedicated use that
08:12would then go to these departments
08:14specifically and then the goal would
08:16obviously be then that takes money
08:18pressure off of the general fund as a
08:20result of this money being infused.
08:23There is police protection, fire
08:26protection, park and parkways and and
08:30nor it says a recreation department.
08:32Again, it's about um 1.911 mills and a
08:36potential increase of 11.388 million. Um
08:41also, there's fire, police, platoon that
08:45goes directly to potential pay for the
08:48police and fire based on um what the
08:52millillage was originally set up for.
08:54And if that is rolled forward is
08:56potentially $4.3 million. And then the
09:00other potential millages as discussed
09:03are library, early childhood education,
09:07oughten and city park. And collectively
09:10those are almost three mills 2.93
09:14that would generate close to $16.35
09:17million. So the bottom line number, the
09:20grand total is if you take the 10
09:22million from general fund, the 11
09:25million for city dedicated use, the 4
09:28million and the 16 million, you get to
09:3042 million. Now, Council Member Harris,
09:33you asked the last meeting, and I know
09:35some media outlets have already reported
09:37on this and and obviously we want to put
09:39the information out there, is if you
09:42have a $200,000 home
09:46um that is homestead exempt and all
09:49these millages were rolled forward, the
09:52annual increase would be $103.94.
09:56So that is a monthly increase of only
09:59$866.
10:01Similarly, for $250,000 home, um a full
10:06roll forward would be an annual increase
10:08of $141.13
10:11for a monthly increase of $11.76.
10:15And then just for purposes of brevity,
10:17I'll stop at $300,000,
10:20which is $178.33
10:23annually and a monthly increase of of
10:26only $14.86.
10:29So, um that those are the all-in
10:31numbers. Um, obviously if any council
10:35member wants, we can talk about what
10:37does it look like if you only do general
10:39alimony, what does it look like if you
10:40do general alimony and the city
10:43dedicated ones, what does it look like
10:45if you do the city dedicated ones and
10:48part of the other ones? Like we can we
10:50can provide all that to you. I mean, the
10:53the bottom line is obviously the number
10:55decreases because I'm giving you the
10:58all-in number right now for these
11:00millages that haven't been rolled
11:01forward uh since 2015. And then um here
11:05are the rest of the parts of the levy.
11:08These are millages that are not being
11:10rolled forward. The board of liquidation
11:13has confirmed, I think I said this last
11:16week, that they are not going to roll
11:17their millillage forward. So, it's 14.5
11:20mills will stay the same. Um, and I
11:23think that's a real credit to them,
11:25particularly considering the fact that
11:27the bonds were issued this year and will
11:30be in subsequent years. If you see,
11:32there's three different SUN water board
11:34drainage millages. All of those remain
11:37static. The school board already rolled
11:40their millages forward a couple of years
11:42ago, so they are not going to obviously
11:45do that again. And the Orleans Law
11:47Enforcement District is the sheriff. And
11:50you can see um how many of the mills
11:54overall are are for um these outside
11:57agencies. And then just for the sake of
11:59completeness, these next couple slides
12:01talk about um special millages.
12:03Actually, just this one. I thought there
12:05may be one more on the levy. Uh but
12:07downtown development district remains
12:09the same for now. The garden district
12:11remains the same. Turo Bouani and then
12:14the levy boards on both the east and the
12:17west bank stop um uh at the same level
12:21as well. So um
12:25that's what we have. We just wanted to
12:26make sure that obviously we know that
12:28these are ordinances. This is the way we
12:30always begin the presentations and
12:33particularly since the council members
12:34have asked what are potential impacts on
12:37households. We just wanted to make sure
12:38we were providing more detail
12:40particularly after you asked Councilman
12:42Ramirez last week.
12:43>> Yeah, I I appreciate that. Um, CEO
12:45Jeruso, I I do want uh would like some
12:49discussion about the various scenarios
12:50as you uh predicted because clearly
12:54there there are options that the city
12:56council can take. We can roll forward
12:58the general alimony. We could do general
13:00alimony plus the city services side, all
13:03of it. Um, do you have from the
13:07administration side what that would look
13:09like as far as cuts? So, if we only roll
13:12forward the general alimony, what would
13:14be off of the chopping block if we did?
13:17>> Yeah, I mean, it's it's it's a basic
13:19math proposition. So again, if you have
13:23the let's just take the one that you
13:24said first, council member, if you took
13:26the general alimony plus you did the
13:29city dedicated services, that's, you
13:31know, roughly $21.5 million. Then that
13:36subtracts from the 77 million that is
13:39there. So you take the 77 million minus
13:42essentially 21.5,
13:44you get to what like 56 12 at that
13:47point. Um, so you know, it is this is
13:51this is part of what we're we're trying
13:54to explain overall is that it's a series
13:57of choices. And I keep on saying this
13:59cuz it's it's how we feel. It's a menu
14:01of options,
14:01>> right?
14:02>> The option is number one, we need to
14:04make $77 million of cuts. Here are the
14:07proposed ones. And obviously, all of
14:10these meetings will be leading towards
14:12which ones um are more potentially
14:16acceptable than others. And then next,
14:18if in the realm of $77 million of cuts,
14:22if there's additional revenue that's
14:24raised, then which of those cuts come
14:26off of the board as a result of that?
14:29And and and again, these are the ones
14:32that you could say would do it. I mean
14:34and and just to completely answer your
14:37question, council member, um you know,
14:40the the the outside ones, I think you
14:43have to ask those agencies how it
14:46enerurs to the benefit of the city. And
14:48obviously, they're going to have their
14:50own answers about the benefits of the
14:53library and early childhood education,
14:55but that is not money that would
14:57directly come to the general fund
14:59itself.
15:00>> Yeah. I I guess my question is uh a
15:02little more pointed. Are there is there
15:05a revision of the proposed cuts that we
15:07saw in the budget that the
15:10administration would present to us if we
15:12decide on one scenario versus another?
15:15>> I think it would be it would be council
15:17member it would be a conversation
15:19between everybody about what it ought to
15:21be. I mean I I well I'm just I say that
15:24because look this is this is a dialogue.
15:27We present the budget as the
15:28administration. the council approves, I
15:31think it would be a mistake for us to
15:32say, well, these are the ones that we
15:34think and who cares what the council has
15:35to say. Um, and so we want that to be a
15:38very active conversation, right? And we
15:40know that you and your colleagues um are
15:42not only listening to your constituents
15:44and getting feedback in real time, uh,
15:47both in public and social media and the
15:49media and other venues. So, it would
15:52definitely be a continued dialogue and
15:54trying to make sure that we get broad
15:56consensus. I understand. Um, on the
16:00millage sheet, we did get a revised um,
16:03what the scenarios would be as far as
16:05individual homeowners, I think on
16:07Monday. Is this posted anywhere for the
16:10public to see?
16:11>> I don't know. I'm Look at Abby. Where is
16:13she? I don't know that it's posted yet,
16:15but we I mean, we provided it to the
16:17press, so obviously have zero problems
16:20posting it online where the other
16:22information is posted as well.
16:24>> Okay. It would be great if we could get
16:25that posted. Council members, uh, do
16:28Council Member King.
16:30>> Uh, good morning, Council CEO Drew. So,
16:32you you you mentioned that this is a
16:34dialogue and
16:36I've heard um it's kind of frightening
16:39the amount of misinformation I've I've
16:42been hearing surrounding the villages. I
16:44get it. No one wants tax to go up $1,
16:47one penny. But the amount of just false
16:51information. Um I think even sometimes
16:55purposely that's been sent out
16:57surrounding these millages is is
16:58alarming. And I asked asked actually
17:01last time we spoke what is the
17:04consequences if we don't have millages
17:07rolling forward. We're talking about the
17:09neutral ground grass not being cut.
17:11we're talking about possibly
17:13um just overall quality of life issues
17:17getting worse and I don't think that is
17:20being explained um as clear as it can
17:24be. So my question is, does the
17:27administration in your office have any
17:29plans like we did the budget
17:32the budget previews the past few weeks?
17:34Are there any plans to do the same thing
17:36to go to different communities and say
17:39this is the truth about this? Um it was
17:42just said your property tax isn't going
17:44to go up $100 a month. It may go up $5 a
17:48month. It may go up $8 a month. Are we
17:50going to try to educate the public as
17:52much as possible so they can know all
17:55the facts and have as much
17:59real factual information as possible
18:01opposed to the sky is falling, social
18:05media,
18:07print media,
18:09every other media that's you know the
18:10information that's being put out.
18:12>> Yeah. I mean a I would say that process
18:15started at the budget community meetings
18:17because it was certainly being reported
18:20as we're in the middle of those
18:21meetings. So the information continue to
18:23come up and um even at those meetings we
18:26knew that there was consternation and
18:28address those questions. I think the
18:31this the part that we can discuss very
18:34clearly with people is these are the
18:36things that we know as of right now are
18:39part of our proposed cuts and what that
18:42potentially looks like. But at the same
18:44time I think we would have to say hey
18:47this may not be the landing spot. It is
18:50the starting spot. That is the phrase
18:51the council used repeatedly. And then
18:54also it depends on what obviously
18:56happens with the rule four. Um, if there
18:59is interal board, then we know that
19:01there has to be $77 million in
19:04correspondent cuts. If there aren't,
19:06then these are the type of things that
19:08need to be saved. U and then we talk to
19:11people and particularly I would think
19:13the council members because it's going
19:15to be I think just candidly council
19:17members slightly different from
19:18community to community and council
19:21members are going to have different
19:22requests within those cuts than other
19:24ones. And so how do we work together?
19:26But I I know that certain council
19:28members um are having their own
19:30community meetings coming up on those.
19:32Uh I know that they've also ask the
19:34administration to participate or at
19:36least be available at those and
19:38obviously we're happy to do that too.
19:41>> Thank you,
19:45>> Council Member Willer.
19:46>> Thank you, Chairwoman. Just a couple of
19:48questions. Joe, can [clears throat]
19:50homeowners in New Orleans pay their
19:52property tax bill monthly?
19:55Not that I'm aware of.
19:57>> Same. So the the only reason I flag that
19:59is because when we talk about how much
20:01the increase will be when we break it
20:03down per month, I don't think that's
20:06totally fair because they have to pay it
20:08at the time it's due. And if they don't
20:10pay it at the time it's due, they start
20:11to um incur interest penalties. So I I
20:15don't think we should we should talk
20:16about it like that. Um, also I mean I I
20:19agree with some of what Council Member
20:21King was talking about, but when we talk
20:23about, you know, the the the potential
20:26roll forward, um, I think we also need
20:29to talk about, and I brought it up last
20:30week, people with, uh, special
20:33assessment levels right now, uh, with
20:36freezes, they still will pay more with
20:38the roll forward, regardless of how much
20:40that roll forward is. um because the
20:43millage rate when the millage rate goes
20:45up their expense their property tax bill
20:48will go up. So um I would just urge you
20:51to to keep communicating and um
20:53something else that you that you
20:55mentioned when you first started
20:56speaking was that um you know this is
20:59kind of a starting point. This is the
21:01budget that was presented to the
21:02council. But um we can make those
21:05changes. Um we can make changes with the
21:08uh given revenue that we have right now
21:10without increasing revenue and decide
21:13and prioritize what should be preserved,
21:15what should be cut, move things around.
21:18Um and so I just want to urge the public
21:20to to keep chiming in and reaching out
21:22to us based on, you know, what you think
21:25uh is the most important in this budget.
21:27But thank you for being transparent and
21:29upfront with us, Joe. Yeah, you got it.
21:30Um, and and and to that point, uh, to
21:33segue, Abby just let me know that her
21:36office is putting up a web page, so it
21:38should be available this week. So, we
21:40want to provide people information to be
21:42able to see for themselves.
21:44>> Thank you.
21:44>> And and I guess can I just add one
21:45thing? I mean, I I'm making a promise um
21:48with Abby with my back to me, but you
21:50know, the goal to me would be also for
21:52people to be able to I want to use the
21:55right words here, to be able to toggle
21:57through what the options look like. So
21:59if it's the full roll forward, this is
22:01what the impact would be either on a
22:03yearly or a monthly basis if this is
22:05what happens and this is what it looks
22:07like. So that way people can see the
22:09effect based on what portion or portions
22:12of the proposition were there.
22:14>> It would be it would be great to have an
22:16interactive as you're talking about
22:18where you can put your home value say
22:21$352,000
22:23and you can toggle through. So I don't
22:24know if we have the capacity to do that.
22:26Abby shaking her head. Yes.
22:28>> If we could do that, that would be
22:29great. Council member Green, do you have
22:30any questions on millages?
22:32>> The challenge we're coming in a little
22:34bit late is that I couldn't hear
22:35everything. So, I just want to say,
22:37could you just um state how long it's
22:40been since the city rolled forward a
22:42millillage that benefited the city of
22:43New Orleans because voters have voted on
22:45millages that have gone to early
22:47childhood education, Ottoman Institute,
22:50and other parks. But in terms of the
22:52roll forward that covers the inc
22:54potential increases in city government,
22:56how long has it been?
22:57>> Yeah. So, council member, if my if my
22:59memory is correct, the council did not
23:02roll the millages forward in 2023 in
23:05light of the fact that we were still
23:07coming off of CO and all the money that
23:09the city had and as somebody from the
23:11public point out, IDA as well, right?
23:13There was still the impacts of IDA being
23:15so there was zero rolled forward in
23:172023. In 2019,
23:20the council led an effort to roll
23:23forward generally um the public safety
23:27and general alimony mill um and I think
23:30maybe even sew and water board, but they
23:32didn't roll forward other ones. So, it
23:34wound up being revenue neutral. So, it
23:36was the effect was of a no roll forward
23:38as a practical matter even though there
23:41was an elegance of rolling some forward
23:43and and rolling some back. So the last
23:45time, council member, my understanding
23:47they've been ruled forward all the way
23:49is 2015.
23:50>> 2015. So you're 11 years ago.
23:52>> 11 years ago and by the start of the
23:54year 12 years ago.
23:55>> Okay. It's important to recognize no
23:57matter what your position is that some
23:59things have changed relative to city
24:00budget. For example, we as a city pay
24:04persons who work for us $15 an hour and
24:07up. And it it does increase the cost of
24:09our contracts versus others who can pay
24:12minimum wage or just get wages pay pay
24:14people whatever they want to pay them.
24:16But we've also had some sort of some
24:18other increases in city budget in the
24:20last
24:2211 how many years was it?
24:24>> 11 years.
24:25>> 11 years we've had some sort of
24:26increases. Are we impacted by increases
24:29for example in insurance anywhere?
24:31>> Sure. I mean look council member I think
24:34you know you know where I'm going with
24:35the question. Just feel free Joe. I know
24:37you've been on the council 8 years and
24:39you recognize that there have been some
24:40changes in the last 11 years.
24:43>> Well, I I again I'd point to two things.
24:45One is you're right, things have gotten
24:47more expensive. I mean, that's just the
24:48nature of usually how how how the world
24:51works. And again, um city government is
24:54no different than that. Uh, number two
24:57is I also think it's important because
25:00the council has demanded this that we
25:02also put a budget forward that has
25:05things that we know are are items that
25:08need to be included, right? So, for
25:10example, the increased healthc care cost
25:12of of nearly $30 million being included
25:15in this budget. The debt service that
25:17was not included in the last budget uh
25:20is being included. That's $18 million.
25:22We're including the retention pay and
25:25the uh terminal leave pay which are
25:27about $5 million. So again that council
25:30member creeps up the expenditure side
25:33because we're saying collectively we
25:35want to make sure that we are both being
25:38transparent and ensuring that our city
25:40employees are getting um the benefits
25:43that that they that they have. But at
25:46the same time you have to have revenue
25:49that meets those expenses. So you have
25:51both things happening simultaneously.
25:53And I I think sometimes that second part
25:56of the conversation getting lost. You're
25:57100% right. Things have gotten more
25:59expensive. Yes. And we also now are
26:03budgeting for significant line items
26:05that were not accounted for before. And
26:08as a result of that, the expenses at
26:11this moment until the budget is passed,
26:12we need to make sure the expenses
26:14revenues match. Crime is down
26:16significantly in our city and we stemmed
26:18the tide of the loss of police officers.
26:21But one way we did so was as a city
26:23council to make additional revenues
26:25available that would pay police better
26:27and also provide bonuses. Could you talk
26:29about the impact that that had on the
26:31city's budget and in terms of public
26:33safety?
26:34>> Yeah, I mean there's a couple of things
26:36there. I mean, number one, uh, I can
26:38give an overall number that I think, uh,
26:40again, I want to give credit to my
26:42office of performance accountability
26:44folks. They estimated that the across
26:46the board pay increases for city
26:49employees, including police, fire, and
26:52others, is roughly $26 million for just
26:54this year. So again, you're not talking
26:57about an insignificant amount of money.
27:00It's part of the whole piece that goes
27:02into where we are. And obviously um that
27:06will carry forward into the next year as
27:08well. And then you know you had the the
27:10largest retention bonuses this year for
27:13NOPD. Remember the council at the
27:17request of the last administration had
27:19those retention the higher retention
27:20bonuses for 23 24 25 and for 2020 uh for
27:26and I guess partially this year too. And
27:28we were close to uh several million
27:31dollars. And of course, remember part of
27:33that was the $6 million that was
27:35budgeted for wasn't available. So then
27:37the administration had to go find it. So
27:39it all those things all add up, council
27:42member. And so you talk about again
27:44people who are leaving the city who have
27:46time that terminal leave is a number.
27:47Your retention payments, you're
27:49budgeting around $5 million, $5.5
27:52million for next year. You have the
27:54salary increases which are $26 million
27:57for this year. So all of those things
27:59are just part of the pie that gets part
28:02of the expense side. And then of course
28:05um I I I will get to your hobby horse
28:07before you do which is you know there
28:09are there are other obligations that
28:12that the city is incurring and again
28:15from my presentation last week um
28:18roughly $98 million is being spent on
28:21outside agencies. you know, if we didn't
28:23have to spend that money on the outside
28:25agencies, that makes up the entire gap.
28:28So, those are the type of things when
28:30you combine them of what you're in.
28:33Could you be more specific with the
28:35larger agencies that we spend money on
28:37on the outside? So people understand
28:38that there is an institution that houses
28:41persons who are all charged with state
28:44charges who are held until they go into
28:46the state department of corrections, but
28:48the city incurs the expenses for
28:50insurance and general operations. Could
28:53you talk about that um expenditure?
28:55>> Yeah. Um and again, I I want to be
28:58careful.
28:58>> I know we have a consent decree. I
29:00understand. I'm not asking you to make
29:02an opinion. I'm just asking you to state
29:04the facts relative so that the public
29:06will know how much we spend on the
29:08Orleans Justice Center, which is a
29:10basically a state facility in terms of
29:14the charges that people are held on.
29:16>> There's essentially two different
29:17components to that, council member. One
29:19is roughly the the 50 so million dollars
29:24um that that OJC the the jail gets um to
29:28run its ongoing operations. And then
29:30there's also the 20 roughly $25 million
29:33or so that the city pays for for health
29:36care at the jail. So if you look at that
29:3898 million75 of it is is for that. And
29:42then of course that includes criminal
29:45court and the DA and the public
29:46defenders all the other ones going down
29:49the list as part of that group. So it's
29:52it's a lot of our um public just public
29:55safety providers and of course part of
29:57the pension system is part of that as
30:00well. So it's it's all of those things
30:02that in addition but um you know that
30:06that expense for for the for the jail
30:08and for the healthcare contract are both
30:11significant independently and then
30:13together um significant as well.
30:16>> Could you also talk about loss of
30:17federal revenues? Well, I'm look, um,
30:20you know, obviously, uh, the the fact
30:23that the ARPA dollars have dried up are
30:25are significant. Those were, you know,
30:28one-time funds that were used to replace
30:30revenue at the beginning and then used
30:32for significant other programming and to
30:35see how things were going to go. Um, you
30:38know, I think the hard part is when you
30:40have one-time revenue, uh, it's good for
30:42either piloting something to see if it
30:44can go forward or to test, but when the
30:47money dries up, then it becomes much
30:49harder. And, and you know, I'll cite
30:51council member Morell um, who frequently
30:54has had lived through this when he was
30:56in the state legislature. And the bottom
30:58line is you can't consistently use money
31:02that you only get once or expenses that
31:06repeat over and over again. And and as a
31:09result of, you know, all of that money
31:11going away, there are fewer options that
31:13we have. And then the last piece to that
31:15too, council member, is um I think we
31:19all want to make sure that we have a
31:22robust surplus as well, right? like we
31:25are not and I think maybe council member
31:27Willard asked this last time. We are not
31:29tapping in to our surplus dollars in
31:33order to fund this budget. So we are
31:35sequestering that roughly $138 million
31:39to make sure that we actually have our
31:41own cash in the bank as necessary.
31:44>> Why do we need $138 million or any
31:46monies um in reserve?
31:49>> There's there's a couple reasons. Um,
31:51first reason is in case something bad
31:54happens, particularly uh an act of God,
31:58really a hurricane for the city, uh,
32:00that you need to be able to tap into
32:01your own dollars. And if if all city
32:04services shut down, you couldn't collect
32:06property taxes and sales taxes and
32:08things were shuttered, then you need to
32:10have your own money. That's that's
32:11that's number one. Um, number two is,
32:15um, if the funds were robust enough, and
32:17this is what the LLA talks about, you
32:20could use some of those excess dollars
32:23as prepayments for your federal and for
32:26other state programs, and then they pay
32:28you back, and that money goes back into
32:30there. Um and then and then the third
32:33point which is an A and a B is under
32:36GFOA principles you want to roughly have
32:39about 16% of your general fund in that
32:43surplus. Um we are depending on which
32:46number you use whether it's the 748
32:49million or the 763 million at 18.1 or
32:5318.4%.
32:55So, we are now higher. And again, um B,
32:58I didn't go into this detail the other
33:00day, but when the ratings agencies look
33:03at the city of New Orleans, they are
33:06looking at a number of factors. And they
33:08are looking at, among other things, is
33:11your budget balanced?
33:13Do you have enough money in the bank?
33:15Are you at that 16% threshold or
33:17thereabout? And have you raised revenue
33:20or expenses to meet? Those are the
33:22things they're looking at. So as a city
33:24is um both trying to improve its credit
33:28rating and I think also trying to raise
33:32its esteem to build more capital. It is
33:35important to show those things are
33:36happening in order to make sure we
33:38change. Look, I I will tell you this.
33:40I've told this to the rating agencies
33:42after this budget is passed. I'm going
33:44to be like a cat scratching at their
33:45back door about this is where we started
33:48at the beginning of the year and we got
33:49dinged by two of the reading agencies
33:52held held static by one of them um
33:55because none of those things were in
33:57place and all three have now changed and
34:00therefore I'm going to actively pursue
34:02on behalf of the city trying to get that
34:04credit rating back up high. During the
34:06last 11 years, we incurred an expense
34:08that was somewhat unexpected. That was
34:10to build the third phase of the um
34:12Arlean Justice Center. What was the
34:14amount um that was involved with that?
34:17And um from where did that money come?
34:19>> Um council member, I have to get back to
34:21you in the total. Um the the issue there
34:24was it was delayed and so as a result of
34:28the delay, the project increased
34:30exponentially over time. I know a
34:32significant portion came from FEMA
34:35funds. I think some came from capital,
34:38but I don't want to spit out a wrong
34:40number to you, but it is it is a sizable
34:42number.
34:43>> There were cuts that have to take place
34:44in certain areas relative to what our
34:47city council expenditures allow.
34:49>> Anytime you have to pay for one thing,
34:51other projects get delayed as a result.
34:54>> Thank you. I know that you have a
34:55difficult job at this time. Um there's
34:57so many pressures on whether it be the
34:58loss of federal government revenues,
35:00whether it be, you know, issues
35:02involving what we assume as a city in
35:04terms of responsibilities for the state
35:06and the general pressures on us all
35:09because we understand that people are
35:11incurring higher insurance costs and the
35:13like. But it's just important to
35:15recognize that [clears throat] in the
35:16last 11 years, we have not raised a
35:17millillage that benefits the city of New
35:20Orleans general fund, but we've incurred
35:22hundreds of millions of dollars in
35:25additional costs. Thank you, sir.
35:27>> Thank you.
35:28>> Thank you. If are there any questions
35:31any more questions from the dis? If not,
35:34I do have one comment card
35:37from Mahairi Morgan. Mr. Morgan.
35:41>> Larry Morris.
35:42>> Yes, Mr. Larry Morgan. I couldn't read
35:45your handwriting.
35:51And just a reminder, everybody gets two
35:53minutes to speak. Just say your name and
35:55address and whether or not you are a
35:56paid actor.
36:05>> Good morning to the council. My name is
36:07Larry J. Morgan. Now from the residents
36:10of the 8312 OENA in the Cton district,
36:14thank you for giving me the opportunity
36:16to speak upon the subject of the budget.
36:20The budget
36:22is making many people leave our city. I
36:26went to slide for a week. I went to
36:31some of the places
36:33and many other places.
36:36Look like all the people I met. They was
36:39from New Orleans.
36:41You're driving the people out of the
36:44city.
36:46Taxes must have its limitation.
36:51We must
36:53consider
36:55that the economy and the salary that the
36:59people get here today, we don't make
37:02that kind of money. And the saddest part
37:05about it is this.
37:08Joe,
37:10you gave yourself a six figure raise and
37:14you was the one that was talking after
37:17election for lowering people and how bad
37:21the crisis was in city government.
37:25Joe, you're a joke.
37:29And what I like you to know
37:33all the time when y'all raise us the
37:37taxes and all that the service get less
37:41and less and less.
37:45Please consider
37:48we cannot afford any more taxes because
37:53many people the salary don't accommodate
37:57it and the service is not rendered for
38:02the prices that we pay. Please
38:08consider not
38:10>> Thank you, Mr. Morgan. Council member
38:12Morurell,
38:15>> thank you. Um, pardon my tiredness. I
38:17have two really quick questions. The
38:19first is I think it's important for all
38:20of us to acknowledge that when you're
38:22looking at millage increases, um, there
38:25are certain considerations that are
38:27beneficial to the city but don't
38:28directly impact the general fund. Uh, an
38:31example, Joe, I know that we have had
38:33conversations, uh, currently is the
38:35city's responsibility to fund the
38:37maintenance and upkeep of Crescent Park,
38:39correct?
38:41And one of the considerations I know
38:43that we were in conversations with
38:44Ottoan Park that maintains Walderberg
38:47Park and the rest of the riverfront. Um
38:50they are one of the groups that receive
38:53millage dollars. And one of the
38:55considerations that's under
38:56consideration is that in exchange for
38:59rolling forward their millillage, which
39:01is one of the smallest millages we have,
39:03that they would take over the
39:05maintenance of uh Crescent Park, which
39:08would mean that it would relieve the
39:10city of the obligation of doing so and
39:13also they would do it cheaper and also
39:15because of the fact they maintain the
39:17rest of the riverfront, it would have an
39:19economy of scale effect. Correct.
39:21>> That that's right. And you know, council
39:22member, I think as a broader oughten is
39:25in almost every council district except
39:27for one. Um, and they [clears throat] do
39:29a lot of work across the city. But to
39:31your direct point, what they have
39:33committed now is with this millillage
39:35rule board for to take over um the
39:38operation and the security at Crescent
39:40Park, which has been something that has
39:42been an unfunded mandate the city did
39:45not budget for, did not expect to take
39:47on this year. And again, because their
39:49property is closer to this, they are
39:51better able to manage it with additional
39:54funds than the city ultimately.
39:56>> The other thing I I want to put out
39:58there, I think there has been a lot of
40:01conversation about progressive versus
40:03regressive taxes. And uh I think it's
40:07important to define terminology. Um, a
40:11regressive tax is a tax that is um
40:16by being regressive in nature. It is a
40:18tax that's determined by tax authorities
40:20to fall disproportionately on the poor.
40:23And I can tell you as a former
40:25legislator um serving with several
40:27former legislators working with
40:29Louisiana Budget Project, the most
40:32regressive tax in the city of New
40:34Orleans and the state of Louisiana is in
40:36fact sales tax. Correct.
40:37>> Yes, it is. And though that is something
40:40that everyone um has asked the city to
40:43consider, looking at ways we can
40:45manipulate or increase the sales tax, we
40:48have consistently taken that off the
40:49table because it is a regressive tax
40:52that would create additional tax burdens
40:55for very basic goods and services.
40:57Correct.
40:57>> That's right. I mean to your point,
40:59council member, sales tax hits everybody
41:01evenly, right? So it doesn't matter if
41:04you make a million dollars or you're
41:05making at the poverty level 17,000,
41:07every increment it goes up, it affects
41:09everybody the same. Which means if
41:11you're poorer and you're trying to buy
41:13basic household goods, all of those
41:16increase as a result,
41:17>> right? And similarly uh with groups like
41:20the Louisiana Budget Project, they treat
41:23property tax as a non-regressive
41:25progressive tax because the amount of
41:27property tax you paid is directly tied
41:29to the valuation of your property. So by
41:32definition, property tax increases along
41:35with the valuation. So therefore, the
41:38people paying the highest property tax,
41:40the people with the most expensive
41:41houses. Correct?
41:42>> Yeah. I mean, council member, just to
41:43that point, if your house is valued at
41:47$750,000,
41:49then your annual increase, again, if all
41:52the millages were to be rolled forward,
41:54is $513 on an annual basis. By contrast,
41:59if your house is valued at 700, I'm
42:01sorry, 250,000. Say that one more time.
42:04By contrast, $250,000, then it's $141.
42:08So, it's a huge difference of nearly
42:11$375
42:13per year depending on what kind of house
42:16you can afford.
42:17>> Okay. Thank you for that clarification.
42:18I appreciate it.
42:19>> Thank you.
42:20>> Uh, Council Member King has a question.
42:22>> Yes. I want to make sure my point is is
42:26we the council is being asked will be
42:28asked in the future to um about this
42:31millillage to roll it forward. Correct.
42:33So my my question is I want to make it
42:35very clear. My first question is and if
42:39you may not as CEO I see members of
42:41administration in the audience what is
42:43the administration's position with the
42:45millillage
42:47>> on the millages? Yeah. at the position
42:49has routinely been there's a series of
42:52choices and either we can decide do we
42:55want to roll forward and these are the
42:57things that have happened or we don't
42:59roll forward and this is where we are.
43:00So that has been routinely our position.
43:03>> What is what would the administration
43:05prefer to see happen?
43:07>> I council member I think we're going to
43:09listen to everybody and decide as we
43:12move forward what happens with that.
43:14Again, what we're saying is this is the
43:17cut that has happened and as a result,
43:19people have to decide what do they feel
43:21more comfortable with. If we propose all
43:23the cuts, then people complain you're
43:25cutting too much and you're not raising
43:26revenue. If we propose you're raising
43:28revenue, then people complain about the
43:30cuts. So, it's about trying to find out
43:32where we want to land.
43:34>> Okay. So, am I clear in hearing that the
43:36administration doesn't have a yes or no
43:41answer when it comes to rolling? As I've
43:43said repeatedly, we have a menu of
43:45options that we are presenting. We're
43:46going to let people decide.
43:48>> Is is there someone in the audience who
43:49can answer that from the administration
43:51who can say yes or no? Because my
43:53question is if we're going to be asked
43:54to vote on this as a council,
43:57what help or what information will be
43:59armed are we going to be armed with or
44:01what help we will we get from the
44:02administration if they want to see it
44:04move forward?
44:05>> I mean, council member, I think we've
44:07laid that forward pretty clearly
44:09already.
44:09>> I don't think it was laid forward
44:11because Mr. Morgan is one of the people
44:13saying don't vote for it. I'm hearing
44:14all kind of people saying don't vote for
44:16it. I think the information isn't isn't
44:18being plainly given to the people the
44:22all the facts. So I I don't think matter
44:25of fact I know it hasn't been laid out
44:27pretty plainly. I was in a barber shop
44:28last week and I would say I gave the
44:30information to the people. They had no
44:32idea of the actual numbers being
44:36presented. All they are hearing is my
44:38taxes are going to be raised after the
44:43um sanitation fees have been raised. I'm
44:46not trying to sandbag anybody, but
44:48information is key. The more information
44:51we get out there to the people in the
44:53community, the better they can tell us
44:57as a council what their choices, what
45:00they want to see. But if we're if we're
45:03doing a a lackluster job as a whole
45:05administration and the council of
45:07getting information out, yeah, the
45:08people going to say no because they
45:09don't have all the information. So my my
45:13question is
45:15my comment is if the administration
45:18wants to see this roll forward, I
45:20strongly urge that they get with every
45:22council member and figure out which is
45:27the best way for that councilman for
45:28that district to educate the
45:31constituents as much as possible.
45:33>> Yeah. Well, council member again um a at
45:36your everybody's request, we're going to
45:38post the information online about what
45:41the consequences would be of partial uh
45:44incomplete, non roll forward or complete
45:46roll forward as has been requested. Uh
45:49the information is very much available
45:52about the starting point is of course we
45:54we this this conversation didn't start
45:57before now and we've been actively
46:00involved. I've I've met with the council
46:02members pretty much every Tuesday uh for
46:05the year except for the last month and
46:07we'll continue to make sure we do that
46:08as well. So that way we hear your
46:11feedback and all of your colleagues
46:13feedback and making sure that we
46:15understand what you're hearing when
46:17you're at your community meetings, when
46:19you're at your barber shop, when you're
46:20at the grocery store. So that way we can
46:23work together and if there's information
46:25that isn't being provided or needs to be
46:27provided differently, how do we work
46:29together to make that happen? That's
46:30what I'm saying. I don't want this to be
46:31a back and forth conversation of
46:34adversarial. I'm just letting you know.
46:36What I'm hearing right now is no. And I
46:39think we can help that if we say, "Okay,
46:41we're going to at
46:45we're going to get with our council
46:47members and say, "Here is all the
46:50information, the good, the bad, the
46:52ugly, the ugly." So the community will
46:55understand exactly what's being
46:58presented. they can say yes or no to the
47:00council members and we can have a more
47:03or we can have a a better idea of what
47:05our constituents want. You may say the
47:07information is out there because it's
47:08online. I guarantee you a lot of people
47:10have no idea where that is, how to
47:12access that information online. So I
47:15don't know if just putting online is the
47:16best. I think the best way get the
47:18bumps, get the bruises is to go to
47:21directly to the to the to the voters say
47:24this is what it is and and this is what
47:27isn't. So that's that's my comments on
47:30that. Thank you.
47:30>> Yeah. And again, um I would just
47:32reiterate that that was part of the
47:34purpose of having the community
47:35meetings. So we heard routinely from
47:37people about that. And
47:39>> well, we can go back and forth, but the
47:40community meetings didn't work. All
47:42right. And I and I feel a bit
47:44disrespected. Every time I say
47:45something, it's met with, "Yeah, I hear
47:48your butt." I was at a barber shop last
47:51week and the people had no idea the
47:53numbers being presented. All right? So
47:56I'm not trying to have this back and
47:57forth. My point is people don't know.
48:00There is a ton of misinformation out
48:02there that is making people very
48:05concerned and they're they're letting me
48:07know I'm like, "Hey, that's that's
48:08nowhere near what the information is."
48:10So the community meetings at that that I
48:13had at Burman, that I had at that you
48:15all had at Phyllis Wheatley that was all
48:17over the city clearly didn't work. So we
48:20need to find a better way.
48:22>> I'm happy to work with you any way to
48:23make that happen. Council
48:25>> Council Member Willard. Thank you, Madam
48:27Chair. Uh Joe, just you know to to
48:30piggyback on Freddy's point, um I don't
48:33think we can overcommunicate something
48:36like this. So any additional
48:39communications, direct outreach, you
48:42know, get in in front of church
48:44communities, stuff like that, um I think
48:48goes a long way. But you know, I think
48:51the the main takeaway is um and you know
48:55where I stand on this right now on the
48:57roll forward. Um but the main takeaway
49:00is if we don't create any additional
49:04revenue um the cost is 77 million in
49:08cuts. Right.
49:09>> Correct.
49:09>> And I think that's the main takeaway
49:11that that we walk away with today. Um
49:15you know
49:17there's 77 million in cuts. There's
49:19actually a h 100red million um 21.5 was,
49:23you know, um boosted with one-time
49:26spending, which is not ideal, but we're
49:28trying to get through this year and next
49:30year. Um and so when you remove that,
49:33when you add in that 21.5 million, it's
49:36about 77 million in cuts. So, um I just
49:39wanted to put that out there.
49:40>> Yeah. And it look I I let me let me make
49:43sure I answer Council Member King's
49:44question a better way. A conversation
49:48has begun and that doesn't mean that is
49:51the ending point or doesn't need to be
49:53repeated, shouted from rooftops.
49:56Um big meetings, small meetings of which
50:00administration will be a part of, the
50:02council members will be a part of. And
50:04obviously we want to help that
50:06communication because to everybody's
50:08point this is something that will be in
50:11the ether for the next 5 to 6 weeks. And
50:13so obviously there has been a beginning
50:16point of communication and there needs
50:18to be continued communication and and
50:21along the way if the council feels like
50:23there's ways for us to refine the
50:25communication as well we want to do
50:28that. If you're if you're saying this
50:30point is not seeping through or this is
50:32something you can explain better or did
50:34you think about running the map, we want
50:36to be your partner in making sure that
50:38we can do that. So um we provide what
50:41happens. The administration is a part of
50:43this but obviously the council
50:45particularly with with no disrespect to
50:47the at large is the district council
50:49members because they're the ones who are
50:51meeting regularly like council member
50:53King Harris um Green Hughes and McCarron
50:56their constituents. So we want to be a
50:58part of refining that information and
51:00getting it to you and and repeating it
51:02as necessary.
51:03>> And I think you know the the last thing
51:05I would say to put it a different way if
51:07we had an additional hundred million in
51:10recurring revenues we would be okay. We
51:13would be kumbaya. Uh we would have $21.5
51:16million to spend on one-time purposes
51:18for next year. Uh but that's not where
51:21we are. um there's really nothing we can
51:23do to come up with a 100 million in
51:25recurrent revenues right now. Um and so
51:29regardless of what revenue producing
51:31measures we take, we're still going to
51:33be in a situation where we have to cut.
51:35So, um again, you know, I really
51:37appreciate you and Mayor Mareno for
51:39being transparent through this entire
51:41process. And I agree, the conversation
51:43about a roll forward uh has begun.
51:46>> Yeah. I mean, look, and I I'll say it
51:48one last time, it has begun. And if
51:50people don't feel like they're getting
51:52the information, then let's all work
51:54collectively on trying to get as much
51:56out there as humanly possible and
51:58continuing because I think council
52:00member made another point about
52:01misinformation. How do we combat that as
52:03well and let people make decision why do
52:06that's what we're all
52:10>> Thank you. Um
52:11>> wait one more last
52:14>> Hold on one second. Hold on one second.
52:16I I do want to just get my question in.
52:19We are uh ripping off of what uh council
52:22member Willard said, we are at a $77
52:24million deficit. If we rolled forward
52:26the millages, we would gain $42 million.
52:30We're still looking at a deficit of $35
52:32million, right?
52:34>> Well, but you I wouldn't say that,
52:35council member, because if you're
52:37looking at it, let's just take the
52:39number right here. So again, if you say
52:42to council member uh Willard's point,
52:44the starting point was 99 million. we
52:47roughly have found um 21 million that
52:50gets you to 77 million. I have my
52:53calculator in front of me so that way I
52:55don't make a basic math mistake here.
52:57And if just the millages on this page
52:59are rolled forward, it's roughly then
53:02you've reduced it to 55 or 56 million.
53:05Um, as I said before and repeat again, I
53:08would be shocked if the council did not
53:11accept all the CAO proposed cuts, which
53:14is roughly about 16 million. So that
53:17gets you to 40. So, you know, those
53:20those moves if done would potentially
53:24half or more than half actually,
53:26>> right? But the bottom line is we're even
53:28if we roll forward the millages, we're
53:30still looking at significant cuts from
53:32this budget, from your proposal. Um, and
53:34again, I think that it's great that you
53:36all propose this, but I would like a
53:38scenario where the administration says,
53:41"Okay, well, the millages are rolled
53:43forward. This is what we would take off
53:44the table because right now everything's
53:47on the table."
53:48>> Right.
53:48>> Right. And so the proposal, the proposed
53:51cuts that we have here that were
53:54presented, if you could refine that if
53:56the millages were rolled forward, I
53:59think that would be helpful for all of
54:01us, especially as we're communicating to
54:03our constituents.
54:04>> Understood.
54:05>> Council member Morell,
54:07>> I think I have a bit of a different
54:09perspective. I think that if the council
54:12at this point rolls millages forward, I
54:14think that we would be in the position
54:16to dictate to you which cuts come off
54:17the table. Uh, I do think it's a a
54:20cooperative relationship, but at the end
54:21of the day, um, I don't expect the
54:25administration and council to agree
54:28necessarily on which of those items are
54:30the priorities to restore. Um, I think
54:32that we'll come to an agreement, but I
54:35think that already when I talk to my
54:37colleagues, there is uh there's
54:41consensus on some issues that need to be
54:43restored and not consensus on others,
54:45and it's going to be a cooperative
54:47public conversation. And so I mean
54:49though I certainly would love to see
54:51what is your priority as an
54:52administration as far as those
54:54restorations, I would tell the public
54:56that whatever you think that you want to
54:58restore, the council's ultimately going
55:01to have the final say because the
55:02council ultimately passes the budget,
55:04which you know from our last
55:05administration,
55:07there was multiple times that the budget
55:09committee and you did not agree with
55:11what the Canrell administration wanted
55:12to restore and that was part of the
55:15process. And even though our
55:18relationship with this administration is
55:19certainly a bit more respective, I don't
55:21expect there to be a one forone
55:24agreement on any of that. Um, what I
55:26would also add is that general comment
55:28to the public, and I my 10-year-old
55:31corrected me, uh, money does come from
55:33paper, which does come from trees, but
55:35we can't print it. So, um, something
55:38that I I said at a, uh, function, uh,
55:42last week regarding the budget is that
55:45for multiple years when we've had these
55:48conversations, there's kind of been a
55:51general conversation between the public
55:54and the council as don't cut my thing,
55:57fund my thing. And though we certainly
56:01want to hear that and that was part of
56:02the conversation at the mayor's town
56:04hall meetings, what I would put to the
56:07public is also what do you want cut?
56:12Because at the end of the day, there is
56:14a fixed amount of money that we have
56:16available to us. And if we are going to
56:18fund something that is uncut without
56:21raising millages, we have to cut
56:23something else. Um, I know for example,
56:26tomorrow we're going to receive a
56:28tremendous amount of information from
56:30the NOPD that they want a heck of a lot
56:32more money. And I will tell you what I
56:35intend to tell them tomorrow, which is,
56:37okay, NOPD, what do you want to cut?
56:41Because as any department, as any
56:43individual in the public wants to
56:45restore these cuts without a millage
56:47roll forward, it is going to require a
56:50cut somewhere else. There is no printed
56:53money that we have available to us. And
56:55so as we go into also the other budget
56:58presentations for today, as we hear
57:00advocates advocating for which
57:02departments to spare, part of the
57:05benefit of having a very significant
57:08and large briefing book available to the
57:11public is that you see how much things
57:13cost. You see how much we're spending on
57:15positions, on programs. There is nothing
57:18that prevents anyone from coming up
57:20here. And there will be plenty of people
57:22that come here tomorrow advocating for
57:24cutting NOPD.
57:26Go read the briefing book. Tell me what
57:28you want to cut and tell me how much
57:29money that generates and what your
57:31position as a lay person, the public,
57:34what cut you want to restore. Because
57:36that is the budget process. It's not
57:38just about coming to the kitchen table
57:40and saying, "Mom and dad, I want to
57:42restore the streaming services." Mom and
57:44dad are going to say, "Okay, who's
57:45paying for that?" And that's kind of
57:47where we're at. And I would hope this
57:49year versus previous years because there
57:52is a level of transparency as far as
57:55what things cost do not just come
57:58advocating for restoration and against
58:01millages if you don't have a proposed
58:03cut that you also going to advocate for
58:06because that is not helpful.
58:08>> And council member if I could complete
58:10that thought too. Um and this is a
58:12little bit I think what council member
58:13King was getting at as well. There's
58:15also we are talking all about general
58:18fund money too. And part of I feel like
58:20some of the inaccurate information I've
58:22seen is there is still non-general fund
58:25money that's going to many programs as
58:27well. And so when people talk about the
58:29cuts, they're focused on the general
58:31fund side, but there's still almost an
58:33equal amount on non-general fund funding
58:35as well that also everybody needs to
58:38keep their eye on as a complete picture.
58:42>> All right, I have one speaker card from
58:43Mr. Adun.
58:53Good morning. Um, also Wednesday,
58:57uh, Apple Street. Uh, I just wanted to
58:59add to the record, uh, for you, Mr.
59:01Morell, uh, in regards to the regressive
59:03tax. Um when the austerity crisis was
59:07announced in the beginning of the year,
59:09uh superintendent uh Anne Kirkpatrick
59:11said that uh there wouldn't be an
59:13incentive to um penalize the citizens
59:18with civil penalties. Um and I just want
59:21to
59:22emphasize the [sighs]
59:27emphasize that we don't like miss the
59:29forest for the trees.
59:31Um because while poor people are being
59:35regressively taxed, also what happens,
59:38especially on uh in black communities,
59:41especially in New Orleans East, people
59:43get fines, parking tickets, um code
59:46enforcement, all of that ramps up and it
59:48hits poor people as well. Uh so just
59:52wanted to make sure that was on your
59:53radar and add completion to your
59:56statement. Thank you.
59:58>> Thank you. The board is clear. Uh
1:00:01Ashley, you want to get to the next
1:00:02item?
1:00:04>> Yes, ma'am. The next item is the
1:00:06Department of Finance presented by First
1:00:08Deputy Mayor CEO. Accounting is up
1:00:10first.
1:00:20>> Then after accounting, we'll have
1:00:21purchasing.
1:00:26That all do it together. Wonderful.
1:00:27accounting, purchasing, revenue,
1:00:28treasury and retirement all together.
1:00:42>> I don't
1:00:53bring it up.
1:01:01What I I just
1:01:28stop.
1:01:32How you doing? How you doing?
1:01:41>> There's a lot of talent and experience
1:01:43at that table.
1:01:45>> There it is.
1:01:55>> Ready to go.
1:01:56>> Y'all ready?
1:01:56>> We're ready.
1:01:57>> Okay.
1:01:58>> Ready? All right. All right. Good
1:02:00morning, council members. Today, I'm
1:02:03pleased to present the Department of
1:02:04Finance proposed 2027 budget. Before I
1:02:08get started, I'd like to introduce the
1:02:10finance leadership team who will be
1:02:12presenting with me today. To my right,
1:02:15I've got Freda Richardson, deputy
1:02:17director and controller.
1:02:19Next to her is Kai Wells, interim chief
1:02:23procurement officer.
1:02:25Then I've got Romy Samuel, collector of
1:02:27revenue.
1:02:29We have Mr. Jesse Evans, director of the
1:02:32city of New Orleans employee retirement
1:02:34system. And then finally, Miss Courtney
1:02:37Wilson Renthrow, treasurer.
1:02:45Each of our bureau chiefs play a
1:02:47critical role in the city's overall
1:02:48financial management. And today, they'll
1:02:50each have an opportunity to walk you
1:02:52through their respective areas,
1:02:54including their proposed 2027 budget,
1:02:57the efficiencies they've implemented,
1:02:59and the pri priorities for the coming
1:03:01year.
1:03:03I'll begin with the agency level
1:03:04overview, and then I'll turn it over to
1:03:06each of them to provide the details for
1:03:08their bureaus.
1:03:14The overarching theme for 2027 is
1:03:17continuing to strengthen the city's
1:03:19financial management while being
1:03:21disciplined about how we use our
1:03:23resources.
1:03:25We have worked throughout 2026 to
1:03:27improve processes, leverage technology,
1:03:30and focus our staffing and expenditures
1:03:33on activities that directly support the
1:03:35city's financial operations.
1:03:39for you. We have the agency level
1:03:41proposed 2027 budget for the general
1:03:44fund,
1:03:47approximately 38.7 million
1:03:51compared to the 19.3 million in the 2026
1:03:54adopted budget. The primary driver of
1:03:57that increase CAO mentioned CEO Jesuso
1:04:01mentioned earlier is the debt service
1:04:04that was not budgeted in our general
1:04:05fund last year. It also it includes 18.2
1:04:09million in principal payments and 2.3 in
1:04:13interest expense that's reflected in our
1:04:15current operating 2027 operating budget.
1:04:19When we remove the debt service and
1:04:21compare the operating components on an
1:04:23applesto apples basis, the agency is
1:04:26proposing a budget of approximately $1
1:04:28million less than 2026.
1:04:32As you hear from each bureau today,
1:04:34you'll see that the underlying approach
1:04:35has been one of careful resource
1:04:38management and targeted investment.
1:04:41Several bureaus will actually be
1:04:43operating with fewer positions in 2027
1:04:46than in 2026,
1:04:48while others are holding at capacity
1:04:50because we believe there is a direct
1:04:51opportunity in revenue generation and
1:04:54compliance.
1:04:56Now, we'll turn it over and um address
1:04:59the key components of each department.
1:05:03And I'll start with the director's
1:05:05office. In the general fund for the
1:05:07director's office, we have currently
1:05:09five full-time equivalents.
1:05:12And we also are um responsible for our
1:05:16financial and supply management software
1:05:18of about 650 million $650,000,
1:05:22sorry, our brass software.
1:05:25And new for this year, we will be
1:05:27responsible for the budget for the board
1:05:29of review tax appeals consultant of
1:05:31about 800,000
1:05:33and also the audits for the city and the
1:05:36retirement systems of about 850,000.
1:05:43Next up, we have accounting.
1:05:46>> Good morning.
1:05:48for 2027 for personnel, we will reduce
1:05:53from 2022 FTEES that we have currently
1:05:57to um 20 in 2027, which is a 9%
1:06:03reduction. We are removing the assistant
1:06:06payroll supervisor vacancy and also an
1:06:09accounts payable office worker vacancy
1:06:12is being removed.
1:06:15Also for other operating for ADP we are
1:06:19coming in for $3 million for our ADP
1:06:22which is payroll and timekeeping
1:06:24software. This includes a proposed
1:06:27reduction that we've already received
1:06:29from ADP of $250,000
1:06:32for 2027
1:06:34for maintenance and an additional 50k of
1:06:37investments.
1:06:43>> Good morning. uh from purchasing. As it
1:06:46relates to personnel, we're at 6.5 FTEES
1:06:49in 2027, which is a reduction of three
1:06:52FTEEs from 2026 where when we were at
1:06:559.5.
1:06:57Um, with regards to our other operating,
1:06:59we have our brass commodity code
1:07:01maintenance as well as our uh hearing
1:07:04officer for our administrative hearing
1:07:05officer uh for disqualification
1:07:08hearings.
1:07:14Good morning. For retirement, um, our
1:07:17budget made primarily a personnel.
1:07:19That's that's primarily what what what
1:07:21drives our budget. Uh, 7 and a half
1:07:24full-time equivalents is what we are
1:07:26requiring for 2027. Those 7 and 1 half
1:07:29employees uh, play a vital role in
1:07:31safeguarding the the financial
1:07:33well-being of over 3,000 active
1:07:34employees and over 2,000 retirees. We're
1:07:37also the accountant and the custodian
1:07:38for the $621 million investment
1:07:40portfolio for the fund. From that fund,
1:07:43we pay roughly $4.3 million each month
1:07:46in retirement benefits. This underscores
1:07:48our commitment to timely, reliable
1:07:50financial support for those who serve
1:07:52the city.
1:07:53We do have one planned retirement uh in
1:07:56our personnel area for the year. It'll
1:07:58be roughly immediate retirement. And
1:08:00then as relates to our other operating,
1:08:02we basically go going to go with the
1:08:04basic operating needs of an office. We
1:08:06did have a planned construction with
1:08:07some enhancements for the actual office.
1:08:09We're going to push those back to our
1:08:11future uh future budget
1:08:14revenue.
1:08:15>> Good morning.
1:08:16>> The Bureau of Revenue is uh going into
1:08:192027 with 46 employees. We were able to
1:08:23double the audit staff, the sales tax
1:08:25audit team, which is definitely revenue
1:08:29generating. We will have more reach in
1:08:31the audit areas. So we'll be able to
1:08:34conduct more audits there. A project
1:08:37manager position which was a contractor
1:08:41has been cut and we have brought that
1:08:43task in house. One of our internal staff
1:08:46will handle that. Our other operating
1:08:49expenditures, we do have upkeep and
1:08:52maintenance for our sales tax revenue
1:08:54system, the collection system of 1.1
1:08:57million. We do have some cuts. Some
1:09:01printing costs have been reduced. Uh
1:09:04more people are filing online, so we
1:09:06don't require printing sales tax forms
1:09:09for those, which is a plus. Uh we have
1:09:12some outside consultants,
1:09:14storage of legacy data from the prior
1:09:17sales tax system. We're able to cut and
1:09:21a one-time expenditure with the clerk of
1:09:24court for filing of leans.
1:09:28Good morning. For Treasury, we have a
1:09:31reduction uh consist of 20 FTEES, a
1:09:35reduction of three FTEES from 2026,
1:09:38which includes positions in our cash
1:09:40sharing, AVT and brake tag uh units
1:09:43within the department. We also have
1:09:46other operating costs uh INOVA cash
1:09:48sharing system, which is a city-wide
1:09:50system of 215,000.
1:09:53We have our IS world tax administration
1:09:56platform SAS and maintenance fees that
1:10:00is 350,000
1:10:02printing costs which we have reduced uh
1:10:05but it is at 210 we have banking and
1:10:08analysis fees of 190,000 and we also
1:10:11have a reduction in our contract labor.
1:10:17That concludes our general fund uh
1:10:20budget uh key points. Uh here on this
1:10:23slide shows our non-general fund uh
1:10:26budget and as you can see for 2027 we
1:10:29are proposing zero non-general fund that
1:10:33is a difference of the moving the debt
1:10:35service in this non-general fund over to
1:10:38general fund for 2027.
1:10:43In the next few slides, we're going to
1:10:44talk about our efficiencies and goals
1:10:47for each bureau. So, I'll let them have
1:10:49an opportunity to discuss that.
1:10:53Thank you. for accounting. Um, for 2026,
1:10:57we did complete our 2025 audit on time.
1:11:01And this was the first year ever that
1:11:04the LLA approved and issued our audit in
1:11:07one business day after submittal, which
1:11:09was on July 1st, 2026.
1:11:12We have increased the efficient monthly
1:11:15production of our financial statements
1:11:17that are inclusive of enhanced analysis
1:11:19for the city council, mayor, and CEO. We
1:11:23have weekly reconciliations of bank
1:11:25accounts to move general fund dollars
1:11:28for weekly expenses of payroll fringes
1:11:30and vendor payments. And we want to
1:11:33thank the uh departments internal who
1:11:36are helping us in this effort because we
1:11:39could not do it without them. um
1:11:41ensuring that they have this information
1:11:44and brass timely so that we can
1:11:46reconcile
1:11:48efficient fund balance reconciliations
1:11:50by creating lamp investment bank
1:11:52accounts for about 60% of our special
1:11:55revenue funds and also creating the due
1:11:58to dou from journal entries between
1:12:00general fund and special revenue funds
1:12:03to ensure accuracy of [clears throat]
1:12:05reporting. So that's ensuring that those
1:12:07special revenue funds do have the
1:12:10representative of the cash that's for
1:12:12the fund balance for those special
1:12:13revenues within their segregated bank
1:12:16accounts act.
1:12:18We also have a object cleanup um that we
1:12:21are completing by the end of the year
1:12:23and that's also to ensure that duplicate
1:12:25objects are deactivated and creating a
1:12:28glossery of terms of active objects to
1:12:31increase our universal efficiencies
1:12:33across all departments.
1:12:36And also we have grass updates to assist
1:12:38vendors and departments in conducting
1:12:40business with CL in a more efficient
1:12:43manner. We've already done this year the
1:12:45account categories established for
1:12:47expenditures ties to special events.
1:12:51Vendor notification of canceled and
1:12:53rejected invoices. Before the
1:12:56departments nor the vendors knew that we
1:12:58canled or rejected invoices. They now
1:13:01can see that on a platform. they get an
1:13:03email, it they know exactly what it is,
1:13:06why it was cancelled, and what they need
1:13:08to do to get that invoice resubmitted so
1:13:10it can be paid. And lastly, initiating a
1:13:13monthly closing of our cash payables,
1:13:17purchasing, requisitions, source
1:13:19management, assets, and global ledger
1:13:22modules and bricks.
1:13:26Um for purchasing we were able to
1:13:28successfully host our annual procurement
1:13:30fair while spending a third of our live
1:13:32budget and we also assisted with
1:13:34analysis on contract consolidation to
1:13:37find areas for citywide savings
1:13:41>> for retirement. Uh we heard a lot about
1:13:43communication I think in the prior uh
1:13:45session. Uh we think communication is
1:13:47very very important as it relates to
1:13:48retirees. One of the things that we
1:13:50launched was a text messaging system
1:13:52called normers. Now, it allows us to
1:13:55communicate with our retirees via text
1:13:56message, give important announcements
1:13:58about things that are happening with
1:13:59with retirement. So, that's been very
1:14:00very successful. Uh, we allow members to
1:14:03actually sign up for that. It's actually
1:14:04a wet signature is required. We don't
1:14:06just do that over line online. They have
1:14:08to actually physically sign up for that.
1:14:09Again, another way to effectively
1:14:10communicate with our retirey community.
1:14:13We also uh are utilizing our monthly
1:14:15direct deposit statement. So, retirees
1:14:16get their benefit payments each month
1:14:18and there's a statement that goes out
1:14:19that indicates that a direct deposit has
1:14:22actually been made. We're now including
1:14:23notices within those direct deposits as
1:14:25opposed to doing separate mailing. So
1:14:26that again cuts down the cost of doing
1:14:28separate mailing. We include those
1:14:30direct those notices within the direct
1:14:31deposit uh statements. Uh we are
1:14:34managing our budget just for the basic
1:14:35basic office needs and again as I
1:14:38mentioned before we postponed a office
1:14:40construction enhancement. We're going to
1:14:41push that back to a future budget. Next
1:14:44we have revenue.
1:14:45>> Thank you.
1:14:46uh revenue is leveraging technology to
1:14:48maximize collections by streamlining
1:14:51compliance processes. What that means
1:14:53the new tax system enables
1:14:56the revenue department to communicate
1:14:59within uh the unit the bureau the
1:15:03delinquent tax unit can get audit leads
1:15:05to audit sooner. they are generating
1:15:09leads on their dashboards daily so they
1:15:12can actually make those recommendations
1:15:14a lot sooner. We've identified over
1:15:17$250,000
1:15:19in printing cost reductions. As
1:15:21mentioned before, we do not and will not
1:15:23have to print paper forms because people
1:15:26are using the online platforms more
1:15:29often to file sales taxes. We did not
1:15:31backfill the project manager position uh
1:15:35as support for the sales tax system or
1:15:38nor did we fill the net developer
1:15:41contract position.
1:15:43We've increased the number of audits
1:15:45with the addition of internal sales tax
1:15:49audit staff. To date, we're on pace to
1:15:52complete approximately 200 by year's
1:15:54end. uh collections so far have been
1:15:57$3.3 million in sales tax as of August
1:16:022026 and the current return on
1:16:04investment for our audit team is 4.6 to1
1:16:09for the Bureau of Treasury. We've
1:16:12established a process to refer
1:16:14delinquent accounts, particularly
1:16:16delinquent business personal property
1:16:18accounts to the office of debt recovery,
1:16:21uh increase in accountability and
1:16:23pursuing additional revenue
1:16:24opportunities.
1:16:26Uh we've also launched a comprehensive
1:16:29cash management initiative to improve
1:16:32the monitoring, collection, recordation,
1:16:34and forecast of available cash in
1:16:37working in lock step with the Bureau of
1:16:39Accounting and other departments within
1:16:42the city. We've uh implemented routine
1:16:45transfers to appropriate bank accounts
1:16:48to ensure cash is aligned with the
1:16:50individual fund needs. We've also
1:16:53strengthened the coordination between
1:16:55revenue collections, our cash
1:16:57availability, and expenditure
1:16:59requirements,
1:17:00improving the city's ability to forecast
1:17:03and strategically manage available cash
1:17:05to meet our operational needs.
1:17:11We will now move to our 2027 goals for
1:17:15accounting.
1:17:16will complete the fiscal year 2026
1:17:19annual financial audit and issue the act
1:17:22for by June 30th with timely resolution
1:17:24of audit findings and required
1:17:26management responses.
1:17:29Provide timely, accurate and analytical
1:17:31financial reporting to the mayor, city
1:17:33council and CEO to support effective
1:17:37financial management and decision
1:17:38making. maintain our weekly bank
1:17:41reconciliations and cash transfers to
1:17:44ensure [clears throat] that the general
1:17:45fund cash is accurately positioned to
1:17:48meet weekly payroll, franch and vendor
1:17:51payment obligations.
1:17:53strengthen our special revenue
1:17:55accounting and reporting by establishing
1:17:57dedicated LAMP investment accounts for
1:18:00at least 90% of special revenue funds
1:18:03and implementing standardized due to due
1:18:05firm accounting procedures to ensure
1:18:07accurate interf fund balances and timely
1:18:11fund balance reconciliations.
1:18:13And finally, our monthly closing of our
1:18:16cash payables, purchasing requisitions,
1:18:19source management, assets, and global
1:18:21ledger modules and brands.
1:18:24Uh, for purchasing, our 2027 goals are
1:18:27to participate in the monthly closing of
1:18:29Brass to aid in the finalizing of
1:18:31transactions monthly and the production
1:18:33of reliable financial records. continue
1:18:36to participate in vendor outreach events
1:18:38such as those hosted by Propeller in an
1:18:40effort to educate external stakeholders
1:18:42on how to do business with the city,
1:18:44specifically how to find and respond to
1:18:46opportunities and facilitate procurement
1:18:49training for internal stakeholders on
1:18:51the procurement policy manual and
1:18:52standard operating procedures through
1:18:54quarterly virtual trainings and
1:18:56workshops.
1:18:59The 2027 goals for retirements are these
1:19:02are pretty standard. the first two
1:19:04anyway. Uh we want to obtain an
1:19:05unqualified audit opinion for the 2026
1:19:07audit year. We submit our audit of
1:19:10course to the through the city but we
1:19:11also submit our audit directly to the
1:19:12legislative auditor as well. So again
1:19:14our goal is to have an unqualified audit
1:19:16opinion for 2026 audit uh for the audit
1:19:18year. Secondly, we want to attain the
1:19:20certificate of excellence for public
1:19:22pension plan reporting and transparency
1:19:24as so granted by the national conference
1:19:26on public employee retirement systems.
1:19:28This indicates our ability to or our
1:19:31fourthness to be transparent with how we
1:19:33operate and how we handle our financial
1:19:35obligations. We want to continue member
1:19:38education up to and including a 3-hour
1:19:40quarterly uh retirement class is offered
1:19:42via civil service. Remember, my staff
1:19:44actually teaches that class and we offer
1:19:45it quarterly and it's a three-hour
1:19:47class. Lastly, we want to continue the
1:19:49formal formalizing our plans for future
1:19:51operation stamping. As I look across the
1:19:53landscape of the retirement office,
1:19:55roughly 70% of the office will be
1:19:57eligible to retire in January of next
1:19:58year. That being said, we need really
1:20:00need to focus on a formalized plan on
1:20:02how we're going to operate in the
1:20:04future. Next, we have revenue.
1:20:06>> Thanks, Jesse. Uh revenue's 2027 goals.
1:20:09Uh we want to continue development in
1:20:11our current sales tax system. There are
1:20:13things we're learning every day, uh
1:20:16functionality that we can use. We want
1:20:18to grow our audit program and we will
1:20:22use the system to do that to identify
1:20:25those leads that we can pursue and
1:20:27recover those revenues. Uh in addition
1:20:30we want to broaden our re our resources
1:20:33leveraging relationships with banking
1:20:35institutions through ODR through office
1:20:37of debt recovery. Uh we also want to
1:20:41maximize recovery utilizing the existing
1:20:44city code. We currently have tools where
1:20:46we can recover uh outstanding
1:20:50liabilities, sales tax li liabilities
1:20:52utilizing warrants for restraint,
1:20:54levies, things like that, as well as
1:20:56leans. Uh I'll take this time to do a
1:20:59public service announcement. Uh we are
1:21:01having an amnesty program that is
1:21:03beginning October 1st going through the
1:21:06end of the year December 31st where
1:21:08taxpayers who have not filed can get a
1:21:11waiver of 100% of penalties and 50% of
1:21:15interest on sales taxes that are unpaid.
1:21:19So we will have opportunities to pay
1:21:22over time an abbreviated installment
1:21:24agreement and we urge taxpayers b
1:21:27business owners to come out and
1:21:29participate. Okay.
1:21:34Our 2027 goals for the bureau of
1:21:37treasury to successfully onboard our new
1:21:41uh tax sale vendor gov ease as the
1:21:43city's new tax lean auction vendor to
1:21:46strengthen tax collection. uh leverage
1:21:49some of our technologies such as is
1:21:51world billing and receivable system to
1:21:53maximize the staff's capacity especially
1:21:56where there is area of limited staffing
1:21:59strengthen cross functional
1:22:00communication and data sharing between
1:22:03city departments and the parish
1:22:05assessor's office to improve the
1:22:07accuracy and data uh validation of the
1:22:10business personal property tax bills in
1:22:12particular uh and improve our
1:22:15coordination between um between
1:22:17departments for projected revenue, cash
1:22:19availability, and the city's upcoming
1:22:21funding requirements.
1:22:25>> And that completes our presentation. Let
1:22:27us know if you have any questions.
1:22:29>> We do. Um I'll go first and then I know
1:22:31uh council member King and Willard uh
1:22:34have some questions really quickly. Um
1:22:36the director's office personnel notes
1:22:39five full-time employees in 2027, but
1:22:42the budget book says six. What is
1:22:45accurate?
1:22:50I only know of five.
1:22:52>> Okay. So, the budget book is not
1:22:54accurate in this
1:22:55>> unless do we include Freda in um the
1:22:58director's office? Okay. So, Freda and
1:23:01then two of our IT staff and then the
1:23:05assistant and then chief of staff.
1:23:07>> Okay.
1:23:08>> Equals six.
1:23:09>> Okay. So, six is the accurate number.
1:23:11>> Yes. And and just just generally for the
1:23:14public and my colleagues, there are some
1:23:16variances between the presentations and
1:23:19the budget books. So just look out for
1:23:21that as we go. Um sales tax, Romy, we
1:23:24can pay online now, right? We always
1:23:26Absolutely.
1:23:26>> Okay, good.
1:23:27>> Um and then on the audit staff
1:23:29positions, you said you have a 4.6 to1
1:23:32return on investment, correct?
1:23:34>> What can we anticipate going forward in
1:23:362027 with the additional staffers? Well,
1:23:39we we have five now. Um there are no
1:23:44additional
1:23:45>> Uhhuh.
1:23:46>> team members, but there is an
1:23:47opportunity there because it is proven
1:23:49that we can bring in revenues
1:23:52>> and we can generate revenues using these
1:23:54staff members.
1:23:54>> Absolutely.
1:23:55>> Great. Um and then on the gov ease, is
1:23:58that the replacement for civic source?
1:24:01>> Yes.
1:24:01>> And when what's the implementation
1:24:03schedule?
1:24:04>> Uh within the next 6 months. In the
1:24:07meantime, are we doing tax sales? What
1:24:09are we doing?
1:24:09>> No, currently no.
1:24:10>> So, we're just holding on tax sales
1:24:12until we can get this implemented.
1:24:14>> That's a larger conversation that we
1:24:16need to have because I think we can get
1:24:18some revenue there that is unrecognized.
1:24:20Is there a timeline on getting this
1:24:23implemented quicker than 6 months?
1:24:26>> We would like to. We're currently
1:24:28working on the 27 property tax bill. So,
1:24:31that's somewhat of the reason why there
1:24:33is a delay with the onboarding. Okay.
1:24:36Again, I'd like to have a larger
1:24:38conversation about that because it seems
1:24:39like that horizon is um not as quick as
1:24:44it should be. Uh Council Member Willard.
1:24:47>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Um on the uh
1:24:50Romeo, on the sales tax audits, um have
1:24:53y'all done any modeling on when you get
1:24:55to a point of diminishing returns? Like
1:24:58if you add two more team members, you
1:24:59bring in more money, but then you know
1:25:02if you get up to 10, you're duplicating
1:25:04efforts and no additional money comes
1:25:06in.
1:25:07>> Well, the the reach I mean I'll be
1:25:11honest, when I started it was 25
1:25:12auditors. So, and we still were not able
1:25:15to reach all the registered businesses.
1:25:19We may audit
1:25:22maybe 2 to 5% of registered businesses.
1:25:25So the more staff we have, the more
1:25:27reach we have. Now we do have contract
1:25:29auditors. We have two firms right now uh
1:25:32that help assist. But we've seen that
1:25:35the return is higher with internal
1:25:37staff. So we're at 10 now. I think you
1:25:42know that's an opportunity for revenue
1:25:44growth if we add more team members.
1:25:47>> Have have you guys had any conversations
1:25:49with the department of revenue because
1:25:51they do sales tax audits in the city as
1:25:53well? Absolutely. We do joint audits.
1:25:56We've done Yes.
1:25:57>> Okay. Cool. All right. I'm going to
1:25:59start over because I kind of went
1:26:00through my question slide by slide. Uh
1:26:03Alyssa, you know, one of the big things
1:26:05for one of the big reasons for the
1:26:07increases because of the debt service
1:26:09that we're now budgeting for. Can you
1:26:11just kind of overview all of the types
1:26:13of debt service that we're including in
1:26:15this portion? Is that all of the city's
1:26:17debt service?
1:26:19>> That's the debt service that we are
1:26:21directly responsible for. So that's
1:26:23includes um the I think there's about
1:26:28five
1:26:28>> yes bonds
1:26:30>> five bonds that are that are our
1:26:32responsibility not the board of
1:26:34liquidation's responsibility.
1:26:35>> Okay. Um on the personnel side I was
1:26:40confused as well five versus six. So,
1:26:43I'd have to recalculate the number, but
1:26:45was basically trying to do an analysis
1:26:48of um you know, salary plus benefits for
1:26:52employees in finance versus accounting.
1:26:54And it seemed like finance
1:26:57was a little bit heavier than
1:26:59accounting, but I don't know how it
1:27:01reconstitute when when you put the six
1:27:03in. So, it may may level out altogether.
1:27:07Um,
1:27:09moving on to purchasing.
1:27:11Um, we have 6.5 FTEES for next year
1:27:16budgeted. I wanted to know if that
1:27:17includes the chief procurement officer
1:27:20position.
1:27:22>> Yes, it does.
1:27:23>> It does. Okay. And any can we get any
1:27:26type of update right now as to how that
1:27:28search is going?
1:27:29>> So, the search is is basically started I
1:27:32think about a week or so ago, two weeks
1:27:35ago. It got posted online. And I've also
1:27:37started doing some of my own recruiting.
1:27:38I put it on LinkedIn um in hopes of
1:27:41generating some more. I'm waiting to
1:27:43hear back. I've I've heard about a few
1:27:45people have already um we've got a few
1:27:48people who have already applied um but I
1:27:50haven't seen the list yet of how many
1:27:52applicants we've got thus far.
1:27:54>> Okay. Um,
1:27:56one of the reasons I'm asking about that
1:27:58is because, uh, you know, we recently
1:28:00updated the responsible responsible
1:28:02contracting ordinance, um, authorizing
1:28:05the Bureau of Purchasing to conduct
1:28:07those responsibility hearings um, to
1:28:10determine whether contracts are, you
1:28:13know, doing responsible work or
1:28:15nonresponsible work. And if they're
1:28:17doing nonresponsible work to hold them
1:28:19accountable, make sure they're not
1:28:21getting awarded with contract after
1:28:23contract. I think my team connected with
1:28:26you this morning, Alyssa, about that
1:28:2710,000 that was removed.
1:28:30>> Yes. Yes. So, we um had it in our
1:28:33original budget. Um but [snorts] as uh
1:28:35as you might have heard from CEO Jula,
1:28:37we're we're planning to have a menu of
1:28:40options and um whether or not that um
1:28:44that fits in or that was taken out,
1:28:47maybe we'll find something else to
1:28:48remove to add that in because I do see
1:28:50the importance of that um that line
1:28:52item.
1:28:53>> Yeah. for that hearing officer and you
1:28:55know again could be a a potential
1:28:57revenue producing measure um at least
1:29:00until we get all responsible you know
1:29:02contractors working on uh city of New
1:29:05Orleans uh construction sites. Um the
1:29:08next thing I'll go on to is um under
1:29:12revenue
1:29:15I wanted to know about
1:29:20the i3 verticals
1:29:23and the chase handheld device purchase
1:29:26maintenance. Yes.
1:29:27>> Can somebody touch on that?
1:29:29>> Yes. So I3 verticals is a vendor who is
1:29:33storing our legacy data, sales tax
1:29:35information from the prior system. When
1:29:38we do audits, we audit three years uh
1:29:41plus the current year. So we need to be
1:29:43able to research older data that we had
1:29:47not brought over into the new system. So
1:29:50we had to have that system stood up for
1:29:52a couple years while we, you know, keep
1:29:55adding going forward.
1:29:56>> The I3
1:29:57>> I3 vertical. Correct. The handhelds are
1:30:00for when we go collect from special
1:30:02events. That is a payment uh mechanism
1:30:05like toast, you know, similar to a toast
1:30:07or a square where we can go
1:30:10>> and collect on site at those um special
1:30:13events.
1:30:15>> So, um is I3 vertical going to be phased
1:30:18out?
1:30:18>> Yes.
1:30:19>> At what point?
1:30:19>> Uh 27.
1:30:21>> Okay. Yes. Okay. Good. Um 385,000 for
1:30:25outside consultants. Can you touch on
1:30:28that?
1:30:28>> So we do in with our current system it
1:30:31is a requirement that [clears throat] we
1:30:32maintain onsite their developers because
1:30:36the core product cannot be
1:30:41accessed through outside developers. So
1:30:44we have to maintain their staff but it
1:30:47was cheaper to add our team as well. So
1:30:50we we kept the minimum number of their
1:30:54team which is the fast enterprises team
1:30:56but we were able to hirenet developers
1:30:59at a much lower cost as contractors to
1:31:01the city to do some of the work.
1:31:04>> So it's cheaper to do it that way.
1:31:06>> Correct.
1:31:07>> Um what about 22nd Century? What what
1:31:10services are they providing?
1:31:11>> Well that was through that was the city
1:31:14developers were hired through 22nd.
1:31:16>> Got it.
1:31:17um other operating 32,000 onetime
1:31:21expense to the clerk of court.
1:31:22>> Correct. So when we escalate enforcement
1:31:27after
1:31:28sales tax audits, if we do installment
1:31:30agreements, we have to file leans with
1:31:32the courts. So there's a cost to filing
1:31:36those [clears throat] leans. And as we
1:31:38ramp up enforcement, the cost goes up.
1:31:40So we want to make sure we're paying the
1:31:44courts so that we're able to still do
1:31:45that. That's expected to be enough to
1:31:48cover it for next year.
1:31:49>> Yes.
1:31:50>> Okay. Um, moving on to Treasury, uh,
1:31:54548,000
1:31:56for Tyler Technology and INOVA annual
1:32:00fees. Courtney, what what are those?
1:32:02>> Yes. So, [clears throat] the INOVA
1:32:03cashing system, that's basically a cash
1:32:06sharing system throughout different
1:32:08departments uh within the city for uh
1:32:11taxpayers to come in and make payments
1:32:13in house. uh INOVA is based I mean I
1:32:17world is basically our billing and
1:32:18receivable system. So the tax bills that
1:32:20you receive are generated through that
1:32:23uh through that system. Uh we have taxes
1:32:26as well as code enforcement and other
1:32:28departments utilize that I world system
1:32:32uh to put leans and taxes on the bills.
1:32:35>> Okay. uh echo uh council member Harris's
1:32:39point on um tax sales for adjudicated
1:32:42properties in the city. I mean obviously
1:32:45we're in a cash crunch. Anything we can
1:32:47do to come up with money is a good step
1:32:49in the right direction but I understand
1:32:52we're onboarding a new vendor. So um but
1:32:54as soon as we can do that that would
1:32:56help all of us. Um I wanted to touch on
1:33:00business personal property because you
1:33:01had some information on that. Uh, is
1:33:04that reported directly from the
1:33:06businesses themselves? Is that
1:33:08self-reported?
1:33:09>> Businesses are supposed to submit a LAP
1:33:115 to the Orleans Parish Assessor's
1:33:13Office and from there we receive that
1:33:16data to generate the bills.
1:33:18>> Is there is there anything to make sure
1:33:19that information is being reported
1:33:21accurately?
1:33:25I think
1:33:25>> or do you know of of
1:33:27>> well as far as treasury if they come
1:33:31into our office we would direct them to
1:33:33the assessor's office but it's
1:33:35imperative that uh businesses are
1:33:38communicating to the city and the
1:33:39assessor open and close dates as well as
1:33:42ensuring that they're submitting those
1:33:44LA fives annually.
1:33:46>> Okay. And then I saw in the slides um
1:33:48increased communication improve
1:33:50communication with the assessor's
1:33:52office. So, I think that's a another
1:33:54good step in the right direction. But
1:33:56thank all of you for your time today.
1:33:59>> Council member Morurell,
1:34:02>> thank you. Um, couple of quick
1:34:05questions. I don't think I have that
1:34:06many. Um,
1:34:10Mr. Willard already uh touched on the
1:34:12fact that we are now budgeting for debt
1:34:15service in the general fund. did think
1:34:16that it might be worth explaining the
1:34:20the
1:34:22it might be worth explaining side slide
1:34:25one and slide six slide yeah slide eight
1:34:30where it is we are budgeting now from
1:34:34the general fund for debt service but we
1:34:38are removing from the non-general fund
1:34:43debt service previously so explain why
1:34:46we are doing that procedurally cuz I
1:34:47think that if someone is watching this
1:34:49at home they're like well are we robbing
1:34:51Peter to pay Paul or what is the economy
1:34:53of doing this? Yeah, I think the overall
1:34:56approach there is that this is truly
1:34:58owed by the general fund and using the
1:35:00general fund sources of cash. And so by
1:35:03putting it in a non-general fund, to me,
1:35:06it's kind of like we're it wasn't
1:35:08presented accurately because we didn't
1:35:11have another source of cash to pay for
1:35:14that um that service.
1:35:16>> Right. I I I think that's an important
1:35:18important distinction to make because
1:35:20the reality is that when you have debt
1:35:22service, it's a reoccurring cost that
1:35:25requires reoccurring revenue to to be
1:35:28identified to pay it. And by putting it
1:35:30in non-general fund, it is kind of a
1:35:34budget gimmick to try and present that
1:35:37it is not a reoccurring cost and
1:35:38therefore is eligible for other sources
1:35:40of funding. So, I I am heartened and I
1:35:44appreciate y'all doing it that way
1:35:46because though it is certainly makes our
1:35:48life a bit more difficult in that we
1:35:50have to have it compete with other
1:35:53reoccurring [snorts] expenses, it is the
1:35:56honest way to do it because at the end
1:35:57of the day, if we don't account for it
1:35:59properly, then we run the risk of
1:36:02pretending that that money is eligible
1:36:04in the general fund when it is actually
1:36:06accounted for. So, I appreciate y'all
1:36:08doing that. um with ADP uh the ADP uh
1:36:13the ADP I think it's on page two. Um
1:36:17just so everyone's aware you guys the
1:36:19the payroll system that you guys
1:36:21implement is used by all departments.
1:36:23Correct. Yes.
1:36:24>> So ADP what you're paying for the same
1:36:26ADP that NOPD uses every single
1:36:29department in the city uses. Correct.
1:36:30>> That's correct.
1:36:31>> Okay. I just it's I think it's important
1:36:34because we're going to see throughout
1:36:35these budget presentations there are
1:36:38costs that are allocated to one
1:36:40department that are actually a cost of
1:36:42all departments.
1:36:43>> Yes.
1:36:44>> Just like the audits for example uh uh
1:36:47previously the audits were housed in the
1:36:48New Orleans City Council in our budget.
1:36:50>> Correct.
1:36:51>> Though there are costs that the whole
1:36:53city bears and so part of the reason why
1:36:55that's now in your budget is because
1:36:57it's an audit issue. It just made sense
1:37:00procedurally to put it with the group
1:37:02that does the audit. So, I wanted to
1:37:04account for that. Uh, budgeting for
1:37:06retirement. I see that on page three,
1:37:08you guys are budgeting for I believe it
1:37:11is
1:37:12one person that's leaving midyear.
1:37:15>> Yes, we have one person who's retiring
1:37:17uh mid year.
1:37:18>> Yeah. So just for those of you who are
1:37:20watching uh the thousands or the
1:37:22millions or watching at home um part of
1:37:24that process we're trying to do in all
1:37:26departments is we have to budget for
1:37:28terminal leave for those people who are
1:37:30leaving at some point. Previously we did
1:37:33not budget for it though it occurs.
1:37:36Correct.
1:37:36>> So as a department you guys are talking
1:37:38to the people who are eligible for
1:37:40retirement and trying to figure out when
1:37:42they're going to retire so that you can
1:37:44budget for it. Correct.
1:37:45>> Correct. I mean that's what we're doing
1:37:46spec specifically within our office. But
1:37:48I think that should be something that
1:37:49department should do across the board,
1:37:51>> right? Because if that per if a person
1:37:53in any department decides to leave and
1:37:56they separate from the city and they
1:37:58have obligations the city has to pay
1:38:01that comes out the budget regardless.
1:38:03Correct.
1:38:03>> It does. Yes.
1:38:04>> So when you don't budget for terminal
1:38:06leave, it just creates a mid-year budget
1:38:08deficit if you have multiple people
1:38:10leaving.
1:38:10>> Correct. And just to be clear, they do
1:38:12have the option to get the actual cash
1:38:13payout, but they can also apply to
1:38:14additional credible service, which will
1:38:16give them a higher pension. So they it's
1:38:17just their choice. I can apply it for
1:38:19pension for additional credible service,
1:38:21higher pension, or I can take the cash.
1:38:23>> Well, we know from a lot of reporting
1:38:25that we have many people who chose the
1:38:26cash.
1:38:27>> So So I think that if
1:38:29>> I applaud y'all for using that as a
1:38:32practice, I hope other departments are
1:38:34paying attention because uh as I said,
1:38:37there's no money tree. So, if you are a
1:38:38department and you go and you do not
1:38:41account for terminal leave, I think
1:38:43something that's incumbent upon the
1:38:44council is that as we're looking at
1:38:45mid-year cuts, the idea is that if you
1:38:48are a department that did not account
1:38:50for terminal leave and many people
1:38:52leave, there's this idea we're going to
1:38:54find that money somewhere, I would
1:38:56encourage all departments to hear me
1:38:58now. That comes from your budget. So if
1:39:01you have people that leave and you don't
1:39:03account for it, we're not going to go to
1:39:05the money tree out back to get the
1:39:07money. We're going to have to relook at
1:39:09your own budget and you're going to have
1:39:11to live within your means. So if their
1:39:13department's not accounting for terminal
1:39:14leave right now, I would encourage you
1:39:16to do it because it's much more awkward
1:39:18when you have many people leave and then
1:39:20suddenly you don't have print paper, you
1:39:23don't have water, you don't have
1:39:24whatever the things you thought you had
1:39:26in your budget previously. So I
1:39:27appreciate y'all doing that. um
1:39:31retirement. So, um I think there's two
1:39:34slides. There's one on 11, one on 16. Uh
1:39:36I appreciate that y'all are doing some
1:39:38efficiencies like text messages and
1:39:40reducing overhead. Um who is responsible
1:39:44for the termination of colas for
1:39:45retirees. Is that also within your
1:39:47department?
1:39:47>> It's within the the board's uh
1:39:50discretion. Correct.
1:39:51>> Okay. Cuz I know that we did some
1:39:52changes a couple of years ago that make
1:39:54colas feasible. Um, is there any effort
1:39:58to budget for a potential cola for 2027?
1:40:03>> We not for There will be a onetime cola.
1:40:05There's uh
1:40:06>> we will do we do a onetime cola like
1:40:08every year, but I I it's only a flat
1:40:10500. We're actually have our actual
1:40:12we're looking at what a 1% increase and
1:40:14when I when we say cola an increase in
1:40:16the actual monthly benefit, right?
1:40:18>> We're looking at both a one time and a
1:40:205%. It's not in this year's budget.
1:40:22>> Okay. Uh but we will be look the board
1:40:24will actually be looking at it at its
1:40:25October meeting. We'll have those
1:40:26numbers put forth. The last time we
1:40:28looked at it, it was north of $20
1:40:29million to do%. They're very expensive
1:40:32because it is the gift that keeps on
1:40:34giving once you promise that 1%
1:40:35increase. There's no taking it back
1:40:37again. It's the gift that continues to
1:40:39give. Uh so to answer your question more
1:40:41directly, we are looking at it, but it
1:40:42will not be in the 2027 budget. At the
1:40:44earliest, it will be in the 2028.
1:40:46>> Right. So right now uh what so you're
1:40:49accounting for a one time not for a
1:40:52permanent co-inking
1:40:52>> that's correct.
1:40:53>> Okay. [clears throat]
1:40:55>> And for the retirees who are watching
1:40:56the one time I think we started that two
1:40:58years ago maybe two years ago. So um the
1:41:01one time that we have given retirees
1:41:03that we do it every December. We try to
1:41:05do it around Christmas. Right.
1:41:07>> It's uh we look at what the end of the
1:41:08year we've now since the council has
1:41:10been gracious enough to move it forward.
1:41:11It's every February now.
1:41:12>> Okay.
1:41:13So, so the the one we're budgeting for
1:41:16the one time that will continue and
1:41:18we're looking at feasibility in 2028 of
1:41:21doing an actual real cola.
1:41:22>> Correct. 1% and the 5%.
1:41:24>> Okay. Yes.
1:41:25>> Um, let's see what else I had.
1:41:28>> Oh, I think Oh, uh, also page 12, we
1:41:32talked about the audits. I want to also
1:41:35give kudos to the fact that audits are
1:41:37continuing to go up. I know that at one
1:41:38point uh as we're coming out of the
1:41:41pandemic and the like audits were down
1:41:44significantly. We're up now to 200. Um
1:41:47as council member Harris said and as you
1:41:49said Romy, I think that anything we can
1:41:51do to hire more auditors we should be
1:41:53doing because the ROI is 4.6 to1. So I
1:41:57will readily support any effort to hire
1:42:00as many auditors as possible because as
1:42:02you said, no matter how many auditors we
1:42:03hire, they're not enough. And there are
1:42:06plenty of individuals I know that we
1:42:08have even [snorts] begun to hear from
1:42:09people with the amnesty. They're going,
1:42:11"Whoa, wait a second. I've looked back
1:42:12on my books. I really need to figure get
1:42:14straight with my sales tax audits." I
1:42:16think anything that we can do as a
1:42:18council, if you identify any mechanism
1:42:21to hire more auditors, we will work with
1:42:23you diligently to hire as many as you
1:42:26can fill in those seats because that is
1:42:27a direct revenue increase to the city.
1:42:29And that's all I have. Thank you.
1:42:32>> Thank you, Council Member McCarron.
1:42:34Thank you. Um, thank you all for your
1:42:36presentation. I want to ask um this for
1:42:38every department. Can you guys provide
1:42:40us with a a org chart of your
1:42:44department? And and I'm going to ask the
1:42:46CEO from here on out if other
1:42:48departments can also present us with a
1:42:50org chart so we can kind of see. You
1:42:52don't have to put names of people that
1:42:54are on there. Just like, you know,
1:42:56filled, vacant, whatever would be
1:42:58helpful for us to kind of understand
1:43:00how, you know, each department runs. Um
1:43:04I just have a couple additional
1:43:05questions. Um could some of these
1:43:08positions So the FTEES [clears throat]
1:43:10the reduction are these positions being
1:43:13reduced? Are they currently vacant?
1:43:17Okay, they're vacant cuz to council
1:43:20member Morell's point about sales tax
1:43:23audits, you know, I think if there's
1:43:25people that are already in your
1:43:27department that could maybe be
1:43:28cross-trained as well. I don't know if
1:43:31that's something that y'all have thought
1:43:32about, but just a suggestion of of you
1:43:35know
1:43:36>> how you can have and you know if we're
1:43:39having trouble hiring that anybody can
1:43:41be crossrained on that. I don't know.
1:43:43>> Well, there is a cross trainining
1:43:44between accountants and auditors. You
1:43:46have to have so many hours in accounting
1:43:49um in order to qualify for the position.
1:43:52So I don't think there's anyone one free
1:43:55that's going to give up in accounting
1:43:57but um
1:43:59[laughter]
1:43:59>> not hardly
1:44:00>> I would say we have a shortage of
1:44:02accountants um the staff that are not
1:44:05the vacancies that you're seeing um that
1:44:08are not being filled are more of our
1:44:11management development series or um or
1:44:14assistant office workers.
1:44:16>> Okay. And what is the role of the the
1:44:18project manager? I know you said that
1:44:20was something you you guys originally
1:44:21were doing uh out of the house, but now
1:44:24you brought it in-house. What is that
1:44:25person what is their role?
1:44:26>> Well, they manage uh the development,
1:44:29the additional development we're doing
1:44:30with the system, the expansion of the uh
1:44:33sales tax collection system. We're
1:44:34learning as we go. Uh we have uh monthly
1:44:38meetings with municipalities across the
1:44:39country who are using this application
1:44:42and we see what is available there that
1:44:45we can use here. So as those different
1:44:49modules grow, we need a point person to
1:44:51kind of make sure those are moving in in
1:44:54the right direction.
1:44:55>> Okay.
1:44:55>> So we we brought that in house.
1:44:57>> Okay. Perfect. Um that I saw in revenue
1:45:00there's one person that is funded by a
1:45:03short-term rental fund. Is that what
1:45:06does that person do? And then are there
1:45:08other people that are working on
1:45:10short-term rentals, whether it's payment
1:45:12or enforcement, whatever? I know that
1:45:14mostly lives in in in short in um safety
1:45:17and permits, but you guys do process
1:45:19things. Is there anybody else that you
1:45:21can get on that cuz that's a that's a
1:45:23revenue stream and we're about to
1:45:24increase those nightly fees to create
1:45:26more revenue there.
1:45:26>> Absolutely. Uh because we have
1:45:30short-term rentals that report on
1:45:32platforms and individually, we make sure
1:45:35that the individuals who are reporting
1:45:38report timely. So we have an analyst, a
1:45:42revenue field agent who monitors those
1:45:44to make sure that that those filings are
1:45:47timely and if not they go out and make
1:45:49contact with those taxpayers. Uh we do
1:45:51have several support staff as well as I
1:45:54thought an auditor that does the same
1:45:56thing that is funded but I I defer to
1:45:59Mr. Delarge on that but we monitor the
1:46:02program outside of the platform filings.
1:46:05There are individuals who do their own
1:46:07filings.
1:46:07>> Okay. Yeah. I mean, if there's
1:46:09additional people that are working on
1:46:10the short-term rental stuff, then, you
1:46:12know, I would encourage all to kind of
1:46:14just take a look at that and make sure
1:46:15that we are capturing using that funding
1:46:18stream. Um, that's what it's for. Um,
1:46:21and that can kind of alleviate some
1:46:23general fund money um for other
1:46:26employees or whatever, you know,
1:46:28whatever y'all need. But let's I think,
1:46:30you know, during this process of of
1:46:32after hearings and going for the
1:46:34amendment, let's make sure that we're
1:46:36capturing that. Um cuz that is what it's
1:46:38supposed to be used for, too. So, um I
1:46:40think that was everything for me. Thank
1:46:42you, Council Member Green.
1:46:46>> Good morning, and thank you for your
1:46:47presentation. It's good to see you all
1:46:49there. I have a simple question that was
1:46:51the result of a statement that was made
1:46:53um that 2 to 5% of the businesses get um
1:46:57audited. I want to make sure that
1:46:59businesses out there don't think that
1:47:00they have a 95% chance of not being
1:47:03audited.
1:47:04>> Correct.
1:47:04>> Could you explain that statistic because
1:47:06we don't audit every business in Could
1:47:09you explain that so that
1:47:11>> so folks understand?
1:47:13>> So every year we develop an audit plan.
1:47:15We make sure that we have a healthy mix
1:47:18of all industries included. But we may
1:47:20focus on a particular industry. It may
1:47:22be one year it may be construction. Uh
1:47:25the others may be retail, restaurants,
1:47:27bars, hotels, the like. So what we do
1:47:32though uh each auditor has in their
1:47:35inventory a mix of audits because each
1:47:38audit is different. You learn different
1:47:41industries by performing those reviews.
1:47:44Now when we're in audit assignments, we
1:47:48do generate leads. So if we find that
1:47:52taxpayers are doing business with
1:47:54unregistered businesses, we will pursue
1:47:56those and those uh we we follow through
1:48:00on those because we have firsthand
1:48:02information to perform a review. So
1:48:08what we say is we also conduct many
1:48:11audits or desk audits. Our normal audit
1:48:14review is 3 years plus the current year
1:48:17which it which can take some time. We
1:48:19have scaled back on auditing that longer
1:48:23period of time so that we can do more
1:48:25audits and make sure that businesses are
1:48:27in compliance. What we want to make sure
1:48:30is that businesses are applying the tax
1:48:33law properly. It's not necessarily, you
1:48:36know, it's the gotcha moment. We want to
1:48:38make sure especially for the newer
1:48:39businesses because we try to get to new
1:48:42businesses within the first 6 months so
1:48:44that they understand what the city's
1:48:46expectations are as it relates to sales
1:48:49tax regulations so that we
1:48:51[clears throat] put them on the proper
1:48:52path. We don't want to wait 2 3 years
1:48:55down the line and they've been reporting
1:48:57incorrectly and then penalize them. So
1:49:00we try to reach you know with the many
1:49:02audits because it's a condensed period
1:49:03because they haven't been operating so
1:49:06for a longer period of time. So we try
1:49:08to reach out to newer businesses uh more
1:49:13seasoned businesses. Those take longer
1:49:15[snorts] because they've been in
1:49:16business longer. The longer the larger
1:49:19operations like hotels, major restaurant
1:49:22chains, those will take a longer period
1:49:25of time. But we try to do a healthy mix
1:49:27of all. It's important to understand for
1:49:29businesses that when you don't do the
1:49:32sales taxes correctly, you can run a
1:49:33file not only of the city but also of
1:49:35the state.
1:49:36>> But the state, correct?
1:49:36>> And the state has its auditors. In other
1:49:40words, I guess what I'm trying to
1:49:41emphasize to business is to utilize the
1:49:43services even to call in
1:49:45>> and ask if they need some help relative
1:49:48to how to do correct
1:49:51>> those applications. We and we have uh
1:49:54you know customer service
1:49:55representatives on the first floor of
1:49:57city hall. We are open Monday through
1:49:59Friday 9 to5. Taxpayers walk in all the
1:50:02time. We do not complete the returns for
1:50:04you but we will walk you through it and
1:50:07explain to you exactly what numbers need
1:50:10to go where. So you know we we welcome
1:50:13taxpayers. I think last year a year
1:50:15before it was 14,000 walk-ins for the
1:50:18year. So taxpayers do come in and sit
1:50:21with us and we we urge taxpayers who do
1:50:24not understand to come in and we'll
1:50:26explain it to you.
1:50:27>> Thank you. What are the repercussions
1:50:29for collecting sales taxes and not
1:50:32submitting them to the government agency
1:50:34which is the city?
1:50:35>> So we do levy penalties and interest as
1:50:38well as negligence fees if you don't
1:50:40file within 60 days of the due date. The
1:50:42penalties are 5% per month, which is
1:50:46capped at 25% per month after that fifth
1:50:49month, and 1.25% in interest. That does
1:50:53not cap. So, for as long as you keep the
1:50:56city's revenue, we will charge you for
1:50:59that. Now, in the amnesty period, we are
1:51:03waving the penalty. We do expect 100% of
1:51:07the tax dollars to come in um and 50% of
1:51:11the interest just like any bank if you
1:51:14borrow money you have to pay the
1:51:15interest on it but we're discounting the
1:51:18interest by 50% and waving the penalty
1:51:21and negligence fees 100%.
1:51:23>> I want to encourage our business owners
1:51:24that who collect sales taxes or which
1:51:26collect sales taxes to stop into city
1:51:29hall and find out the facts relative to
1:51:32what you have to do. Um, too many times
1:51:34we have businesses that go out of
1:51:37business and they say, "I'm owe the city
1:51:38thousands of dollars in taxes." Well, it
1:51:41could have been resolved earlier if you
1:51:43just walked into city hall. We're a
1:51:45small city. From wherever you are in the
1:51:47city of New Orleans, it takes you less
1:51:48than a half hour to get into city hall.
1:51:50We welcome you to come in and speak to
1:51:53someone in our various offices, the
1:51:55Bureau of Revenue, the the um Department
1:51:59of Finance, and others. And if there's
1:52:01no one who can give you that help, no,
1:52:03I'm not going to say that cuz you all
1:52:04can always give them the help. So, no
1:52:07excuses. You walk in, you're going to
1:52:08get information that's going to help
1:52:10your business out.
1:52:11>> Great.
1:52:11>> Thank you very much.
1:52:12>> And we do have it online. We we have uh
1:52:14the frequently asked questions. We have
1:52:16a brochure uh that we emailed all our
1:52:19taxpayers. So, there is information out
1:52:21there. Go to the city's website and
1:52:23you'll find it.
1:52:24>> Yeah. I'm trying to incorporate um into
1:52:26people reaching out that fact that some
1:52:28people say, "Oh, I can't understand it
1:52:30online. I don't have anybody to help me
1:52:31online. I've been in business 45
1:52:33[clears throat] years. I never had to do
1:52:34it this way."
1:52:35>> Right. Right.
1:52:36>> We're a friendly to the population city
1:52:39hall. Just walk in and ask.
1:52:41>> Yes, absolutely.
1:52:42>> Okay. Thank you.
1:52:45>> With no more questions and no comment
1:52:47cards, you are free to go. Thank you.
1:52:49Thanks to each of you.
1:52:51Up next we have the CEO's office and
1:52:53we're starting with the office of budget
1:52:55and management.
1:52:59I'm counting the other way. How many
1:53:00left?
1:53:09Sorry.
1:53:40change. You changing
1:53:54Heat. Heat.
1:54:05Heat.
1:54:20Heat.
1:54:53Good morning, council members.
1:54:54>> Good morning. I'm Bri Delarge, assistant
1:54:57CEO. Before I discuss our budget, I want
1:55:00to recognize the budget office and our
1:55:02CEO administrative staff. Their work on
1:55:06this proposal began well before the
1:55:08September introduction.
1:55:10Starting in May, the budget office
1:55:12worked directly with departments and
1:55:14agencies to help them prepare their
1:55:17requests. staff held workshops to walk
1:55:20departments through the budget portal
1:55:22quica and to discuss strategies for
1:55:25building their budgets. They also set
1:55:28aside dedicated times for departments to
1:55:30come to the budget office, ask
1:55:32questions, and get individual assistance
1:55:35leading up to the July 24th submission
1:55:37deadline. That support takes patience
1:55:40and a great deal of coordination.
1:55:43My staff help departments work through
1:55:45their submissions while continuing the
1:55:47office's regular responsibilities.
1:55:50I also want to thank our administrative
1:55:52staff whose work kept the office
1:55:54organized and supported the many
1:55:56meetings and deadlines involved in this
1:55:58process.
1:55:59The revenue estimating conference
1:56:01adopted the 2027 general fund forecast
1:56:04on September the 10th and the mayor
1:56:07introduced the proposed budget on
1:56:08September 22nd.
1:56:10In that short period, the team finalized
1:56:13the numbers, prepared the appropriate
1:56:16legislative documents, and completed the
1:56:18budget book. They put in long hours at
1:56:21the end of a process they had been
1:56:23supporting for months, and I'm proud of
1:56:24what they accomplished. The budget book
1:56:27was an especially important part of that
1:56:30work. We wanted it to do more than
1:56:32present tables and numbers. Our goal was
1:56:34to make the proposal easier for
1:56:36residents and council to understand and
1:56:38to ensure the book reflects Mayor
1:56:41Moreno's priorities and the direction of
1:56:43her administration.
1:56:45As the mayor and CEO said on September
1:56:4722nd, this is a leaner budget. There
1:56:51were no easy or good choices among the
1:56:53items reduced or eliminated to balance
1:56:55the 2027 proposal. Those decisions
1:56:58affect departments and the people they
1:57:00serve, and we'll hear more about that in
1:57:02the coming hearings.
1:57:04My presentation today will now focus on
1:57:06my office's proposed budget, the changes
1:57:09behind it, and the work we plan to carry
1:57:11forward in 2027.
1:57:14Our proposed general fund budget is $2.8
1:57:17million compared compared with 1.5
1:57:20million adopted for 2026, an increase of
1:57:23$1.25 million.
1:57:25Most of that change is in personnel. The
1:57:28proposed personnel budget is 1.7
1:57:31million, an increase of 1.1 million.
1:57:35This primarily reflects the transfer of
1:57:37existing staff from other agencies to
1:57:40establish and support the contracts
1:57:42management office. The increase in the
1:57:45office's budget should be understood in
1:57:46the context of that transfer of
1:57:48responsibil responsibilities and
1:57:50personnel.
1:57:52of the operating increases by $103,000
1:57:56from 936,000
1:57:58to just a little over one million. In
1:58:012026, nine general fund resources
1:58:04supported a portion of citywide postage
1:58:07cost and for 2027, we have placed a full
1:58:10citywide postage cost in general fund.
1:58:15The non the proposed non-general fund
1:58:17budget is 121,000 compared to 350,000
1:58:21adopted for 2026, a decrease of
1:58:24$228,000.
1:58:26This composition also changes. The
1:58:29proposal includes 121,000 in personnel
1:58:32and no other operating funding compared
1:58:35with no personnel and 350,000 in other
1:58:38operating for 2026.
1:58:41The removal of that other operating
1:58:43amount is tied to the citywide postage
1:58:46funding shift I just described. The
1:58:48personnel amount reflects staffing
1:58:50associated with the office's current
1:58:52responsibilities.
1:58:57Our office has also made changes to
1:59:00control costs. We have reviewed vacant
1:59:02positions and left them unfilled where
1:59:05we can maintain essential functions. We
1:59:08cross trainin staff so they can cover
1:59:11work across multiple areas and we have
1:59:13realigned existing personnel as
1:59:16responsibilities have changed including
1:59:18the creation of the contracts management
1:59:20office. We have minimized discretionary
1:59:23spending and centralized certain
1:59:25expenses across the CEO's office that
1:59:27gives us greater visibility into
1:59:29purchases, helps avoid duplication and
1:59:32makes better use of the resources we
1:59:34have. These efforts build on the spend
1:59:37the spending controls the city put in
1:59:39place during 2026.
1:59:42Our goals for 2027.
1:59:44In 2027, the budget office will review
1:59:47department's quarterly expenditure plans
1:59:49against actual spending each month. We
1:59:52will work with departments as conditions
1:59:54change so that their plans remain
1:59:56aligned with the adopted budget. We will
1:59:59also continue evaluating hiring and
2:00:01spending requests against available
2:00:03funding. city priorities and the CEO's
2:00:06controls on other operating
2:00:08expenditures.
2:00:09The contracts management office will
2:00:11move into his first full year. Our focus
2:00:14will be on setting clear expectation
2:00:16with departments, improving consistency
2:00:19in the contracting process, monitoring
2:00:22compliance with contract terms, and
2:00:24supporting timely invoicing and
2:00:26payments. We also want to help ensure
2:00:28agreements are executed before services
2:00:31begin. Our administrative staff will
2:00:33continue supporting the CEO executive
2:00:35office and other CEO divisions as well
2:00:38as well as the mayor's office when
2:00:40needed. They also manage the city's mail
2:00:42room and the timely distribution of
2:00:44mail. The two project managers assigned
2:00:47to the office will coordinate the city's
2:00:49state cooperative endeavor agreements
2:00:51and assist with contracts, budget work,
2:00:53and other special projects as designated
2:00:55by the CAO. The proposed budget asked
2:00:59every office to be careful with the
2:01:01resources available while continuing to
2:01:03meet its responsibilities.
2:01:05My team understands that obligation. We
2:01:07will continue to provide council and
2:01:09departments with the budget information
2:01:11and support they need throughout this
2:01:13process and as the 2026 budget is
2:01:15implemented.
2:01:20>> Thank you. Any questions? Council member
2:01:22Willard.
2:01:23>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh Brandy, thank
2:01:25you for the information and everything
2:01:27that you've been doing uh to help us get
2:01:29out of this financial crisis. A couple
2:01:32of questions. So on the general fund
2:01:34slide, um personnel is increasing
2:01:37attributable to um a agency transfers
2:01:41for positions in the contracts
2:01:43management office. On the agency and
2:01:46office transfers, were those positions
2:01:49backfilled
2:01:50like when they left one office? it will
2:01:52not be backfilled. So it's like like for
2:01:54example that's the one decrease we see
2:01:56in Nord that one position moved to our
2:01:58office the funding also shifted with the
2:02:00person.
2:02:01>> Okay. And um
2:02:04the non-general fund side that is just
2:02:07taking out the postage. Was that what
2:02:10that was?
2:02:10>> So the yes the postage but the the
2:02:12increases on personnel. So, two of the
2:02:14staff that are moving to contracts
2:02:16office primarily will service CDPG grant
2:02:20funding and so there they will retain
2:02:22their grant funding for the majority of
2:02:23their position. They'll have a little
2:02:25bit general fund, but the majority will
2:02:26be grant funded because that's the
2:02:27primary grants they'll be servicing.
2:02:29>> Okay. The the contracts management
2:02:32office, can you touch on that? Is that
2:02:34uh was that created this year?
2:02:36>> Yes. So, it's not fully operational just
2:02:38yet, right? So, we're in the final
2:02:40stages and uh Cameron McAfee, the
2:02:42project manager on Aby's team, is
2:02:45helping us oversee getting that
2:02:46established. And so, that will service
2:02:48the executive um
2:02:51branches, departments for contracts. So,
2:02:55the routing, the management of fiscal
2:02:58from start to finish will be managed by
2:03:00that office. It'll also help us to keep
2:03:02an eye on items of duplicate nature,
2:03:06right? So, why do we have three security
2:03:07contracts? Why are we not combining
2:03:09those costs? Why is this one less? Why
2:03:10is this one more? So, that'll also be
2:03:12more streamlined as well.
2:03:13>> So, historically, that was kind of
2:03:15handled per office, per agency.
2:03:17>> Yes.
2:03:18>> And so, we're putting it all under one
2:03:19roof.
2:03:20>> Yes. All executive branch offices. Yes.
2:03:22>> And how many people are slated to be
2:03:24there for next year's budget?
2:03:26>> We have um an administrator who will
2:03:28oversee that office. There's two
2:03:30supervisors and then each supervisor has
2:03:33three staff. And then the project
2:03:34managers that we have, we're we're
2:03:36tasking part of their work. They will
2:03:38also facilitate contracts as well. Some
2:03:40of the larger heavy lift like our
2:03:42central adjudication hearing officers
2:03:44contracts require a little bit more
2:03:46work. So they'll be assigned to those
2:03:48like they're assigned to the state CAS
2:03:50as well.
2:03:51>> Okay. Thank you.
2:03:53>> You're welcome.
2:03:54>> Anyone else? Council member McCar,
2:03:56>> I just had one. How many staff did did
2:03:59you say were transferred um to to the
2:04:02contract management office?
2:04:03>> I have to get you the exact number cuz
2:04:05we've reduced some. So some of the
2:04:07vacancies that we had, we're using that
2:04:09funding for the project managers who can
2:04:11be multitaskked in more than just one
2:04:13area who can manage multiple things, but
2:04:15we lost about three or four already. The
2:04:17number is around 10 or so, but I can get
2:04:18the number from um the exact number from
2:04:20you.
2:04:21>> And how many of those are are vacant
2:04:23versus
2:04:23>> So none are vacant now. All the
2:04:25vacancies were removed as part of our
2:04:26CAO savings and that work will be
2:04:28shifted in house. So that's what I spoke
2:04:30about earlier, the cross trainining. We
2:04:32have multiple staff, even our
2:04:34administrative staff are trained on
2:04:35contract work, so we don't plan on
2:04:37filling those vacancies for 2027 at all.
2:04:40>> Okay, perfect. Thank you.
2:04:42>> You're welcome.
2:04:42>> I just have a couple questions and
2:04:44Brandy, these may be for you, but maybe
2:04:46they're for CEO Jeruso about specific
2:04:49funds. Um, on page 131, there's M fund
2:04:547015,
2:04:57there's miscellaneous office
2:04:58administration. Do you know what that
2:05:01accounts for?
2:05:02>> What page is that again?
2:05:04>> 131.
2:05:05>> So, um 7015 is not a fund. It's a
2:05:08department code. Okay.
2:05:09>> And so that is a miscellaneous
2:05:11department code for CAO which covers
2:05:13citywide expenditures that don't
2:05:15attribute specifically to the CEO's
2:05:17office. Examples include outside
2:05:19security contract for Martyra, the
2:05:23hotels associated with that in OPSE.
2:05:26That also includes the expenditure for
2:05:28like the LLA. That's not a specific CEO
2:05:30expenditure, but it covers citywide and
2:05:32the CEO manages it, not in 7015, but in
2:05:36that 7,000 bracket. We also have like
2:05:38the retirey healthcare. That's not a CEO
2:05:40expenditure. So, we place it there. We
2:05:42also have a new code 7040 for city
2:05:44advertising that covers citywide
2:05:46advertising. So, that 7,000 why it's
2:05:48called miscellaneous. We trying to that
2:05:50that 7015 is like a catch-all, right?
2:05:52So, we may have different things that
2:05:54come up. Maybe it's a council initiative
2:05:56with the mayor, but it needs it's
2:05:58citywide. It's not for CEO, it falls
2:06:00into that bucket. So, what we did a
2:06:02couple of years ago, instead of having
2:06:03it all in the CEO executive budget, we
2:06:05tried to distinguish those so that 7015
2:06:08will cover those things that will cover
2:06:10more than one area of the city. And it
2:06:11also includes I was just thinking the
2:06:13docuign which goes to our contracts that
2:06:15the mayor, the law department, and
2:06:16others will be using to expedite signing
2:06:19of our contracts.
2:06:19>> Thank goodness for Docuine and and
2:06:21coming into the modern era. Um the
2:06:24details for uh 7015 we can get in
2:06:27Questica.
2:06:28>> Yeah, we can get it to you as well.
2:06:29Yeah.
2:06:30>> Okay, perfect. I think we'd all want to
2:06:31take a look at that. And then um
2:06:33municipal participation grant 7701
2:06:38uh also on that page
2:06:41>> is for arts council. Looks like
2:06:42>> arts council.
2:06:43>> Yeah. So arts council this is where SPCA
2:06:46lives. O2 appears to be council on
2:06:49aging. Um, public defender is 05, SPCA
2:06:53is 7706
2:06:56and 07. I can't recognize that one
2:06:58offhand, but those are for our partners
2:07:00>> and they live they live in that
2:07:01municipal participation grant. Yes.
2:07:03>> And they will come before us later in
2:07:05these next 10 days. All right. Thank
2:07:07you.
2:07:08>> Thank you.
2:07:11Up next we have ITI.
2:07:35Hi council members. My name is Jonathan
2:07:37Whisby and I'm the chief innovation
2:07:39officer for the city and oversee the
2:07:41office of information technology and
2:07:43innovation as part of that role. Um what
2:07:45I wanted to concentrate on on this first
2:07:47slide is some really important context
2:07:49for understanding this which is to say
2:07:52that the 2025 budget and the 2026 budget
2:07:56the transition between those cut about
2:07:574.1 million from ITI from 25 adopted to
2:08:0226 adopted. And really one of the first
2:08:04tasks that the mayor and the CEO gave me
2:08:07um when I was hired in January was to
2:08:10take a look at those cuts and see how to
2:08:12best implement them within the
2:08:14department. Um in about the spring of
2:08:16that year, I determined that we really
2:08:19couldn't implement all of those cuts
2:08:20without some really significant service
2:08:22impacts. And so working with uh the CEO
2:08:25[clears throat] as well as with our
2:08:27partner departments and I think in
2:08:28particular I want to give credit to DPW
2:08:31and to Steve Nelson for their assistance
2:08:33in this. We were able to find other
2:08:35departments that had associations with
2:08:37the programs we delivered. For instance,
2:08:39the payment for our asset management
2:08:42system, the payment for our geographical
2:08:43information systems. Uh and they were
2:08:46able to absorb those payments so that we
2:08:47could continue those services. What the
2:08:502027 budget does is it puts that right.
2:08:53It allows us to continue paying for IT
2:08:56products and enterprisewide IT services
2:08:58that we've always historically paid for.
2:09:00Um, and I also want to note importantly
2:09:02it is still a million dollars less than
2:09:04the 2025 budget. And on the next slide,
2:09:06I'll give you some insight into how
2:09:08those savings were achieved. So from our
2:09:1025 baseline, we're down a million even
2:09:12though from our 26 adopted baseline
2:09:14we're up to 3 million. Um
2:09:18just to kind of ground you in terms of
2:09:21how this impacts both our personnel and
2:09:23other operating budget, the personnel
2:09:25budget increases um from 40 to 42 FTEES,
2:09:30but that is the result of a transfer of
2:09:32four contracted staff to uh full-time
2:09:36civil servant staff. Uh in reality, we
2:09:39actually lost two uh budgeted positions
2:09:41in this 27 budget. So, you know, we uh
2:09:45are seeing a decline in overall staffing
2:09:47even though it appears to be uh an
2:09:49increase. Um on the other operating
2:09:52side, what's this what this does is it
2:09:53does a couple of things. First is it
2:09:55restores some of the funding for core
2:09:57services that was cut with the 26
2:09:59budget. And secondly, it really starts
2:10:01to solve a problem, you know, and I
2:10:02think you've you've heard and you will
2:10:04hear from other departments about sort
2:10:06of hidden costs in the 26 budget. One
2:10:08thing the city has always struggled to
2:10:10do is to fund the ongoing maintenance of
2:10:12IT systems. We can use capital funding
2:10:15to implement them, but then once they
2:10:17are running, we need to pay to maintain
2:10:18them and continue to have that service.
2:10:20And that is an operating cost. And the
2:10:22city historically has not budgeted well
2:10:24for the general fund cost of maintaining
2:10:26those systems after budgeting for the
2:10:28capital cost of implementing them. We
2:10:30see that this year with our asset
2:10:31management system and our 311 system and
2:10:33we're making a commitment to budget for
2:10:35those properly in 2027 so that we don't
2:10:38have an issue with trying to make those
2:10:39payments next year. Um and then you know
2:10:43sort of the final thing to talk about
2:10:44here is to be clear this also includes
2:10:48uh the elimination of furls for my
2:10:50department. So my department was under
2:10:52furls for 2026 it is not for 2027. So
2:10:55part of the increase you see in
2:10:56personnel is also the restoration of
2:10:59that funding to allow uh the employees
2:11:01to come off of furlow. Uh and then
2:11:03finally this allocation for other
2:11:05operating is still 700k less and then as
2:11:07I said before the whole allocation is a
2:11:09million less.
2:11:12Uh so you know I mentioned earlier one
2:11:14of my first mandates was take a look at
2:11:15what we could find in terms of budget
2:11:17efficiencies in the IT budget and we
2:11:19really tackled this a number of
2:11:20different ways and I want to give really
2:11:22a lot of credit to uh the senior staff
2:11:24in my department especially uh my deputy
2:11:27CIO Dennis Kakunga who has really led up
2:11:29a lot of these initiatives uh and our
2:11:31director of operations Kim Lru as well.
2:11:33Uh what we were able to do is eliminate
2:11:36some costs that we didn't necessarily
2:11:38and I want to focus in on this first
2:11:39one. Uh, ITI had a lease on some office
2:11:42space in the DXC building for our cyber
2:11:45command. What we did instead was we
2:11:47transferred that technology to a city
2:11:49hall conference room and we transition
2:11:51to a strategy of more virtual
2:11:52activations and inerson activations.
2:11:54Eliminated that lease. We did a lot of
2:11:56auditing of our licensing. We're able to
2:11:58cut down significantly on our costs for
2:12:00WebEx, for Zoom, uh, cell phone and
2:12:02Wi-Fi service within our department to
2:12:05try to rightsize some of those
2:12:06expenditures. And then we had to we had
2:12:08to decide on some eliminations of of
2:12:10software products and other things as
2:12:12well. In that process, we really tried
2:12:14to look at who's using this, how how
2:12:16often is it being used, what is the
2:12:17purpose it's fulfilling. You know,
2:12:19certainly there were many software
2:12:20products that once we went through that
2:12:21valuation, we decided this would have
2:12:23too severe an impact to the city to cut.
2:12:25But what you see on this list is really
2:12:27uh some that we decided we could live
2:12:28with. And then I want to also spend a
2:12:31second talking about this last item,
2:12:33public Wi-Fi service. Um, I think in
2:12:36general we would want uh a robust public
2:12:38Wi-Fi strategy within the city of New
2:12:40Orleans. The issue we have here is that
2:12:43the public Wi-Fi as it was installed uh
2:12:46under the prior administration was a
2:12:48little bit offset with other priorities.
2:12:49So for instance, we installed public
2:12:51Wi-Fi at Duncan Plaza. Within a couple
2:12:53of months, there was a fence put up
2:12:54around Duncan Plaza and the public Wi-Fi
2:12:57service there was hardly ever used. We
2:12:59looked at utilization rat rates for
2:13:01Lafayette Square for the public Wi-Fi.
2:13:04There was a little bit more use of that,
2:13:05you know, just shy of about a thousand
2:13:07users a month um with a little bit
2:13:09higher maybe during the Martyra period.
2:13:11Um we talked with the DEDD and a couple
2:13:13of other entities and decided we could
2:13:15remove this without significant uh
2:13:17service impacts as well. So that was
2:13:19sort of the process we went through to
2:13:21try to determine what we could find
2:13:23savings for uh in some of the decisions
2:13:25that we had to make.
2:13:28So I want to talk a little bit about
2:13:302027 goals. Uh in this first one I think
2:13:33it risks being a bit of a buzzword
2:13:35efficiency culture if I don't go into
2:13:36some detail on what I mean by that. So I
2:13:38want to give you a couple of examples.
2:13:40Um you know the first example I would
2:13:42say is we've done a lot of auditing of
2:13:45licensing this year and really our next
2:13:47step is to institutionalize some of that
2:13:49auditing to make sure that there are
2:13:50regular points at which it is constantly
2:13:52reviewing these licenses making sure
2:13:54that they're right sized and that we
2:13:56don't end up in a situation where usage
2:13:58of a particular program is dropped off
2:13:59but we're still paying for it as if it
2:14:01was being heavily utilized. Uh I also
2:14:03think it's about being
2:14:04solutionorientated and trying to find
2:14:06ways to solve problems without uh having
2:14:09to contract a vendor necessarily. Uh
2:14:11there was a 2024 letter the OIG wrote uh
2:14:15to the police department and to the CEO
2:14:17saying basically there's an existing
2:14:19issue here with uh detail scheduling in
2:14:22the city where the systems where police
2:14:24officers get scheduled in ADP don't talk
2:14:26to the systems that uh OPSC uses to
2:14:29schedule those details. uh and they had
2:14:31suggested you should go out and buy a
2:14:32vendor or software product to solve
2:14:34this. So, we're actually put able to put
2:14:36together a really important team. Uh,
2:14:38and you know, I do want to give a lot of
2:14:39credit here to that team. Aqua Gordon,
2:14:42JB Rash, Fabian, Barbara, Matt CG,
2:14:44MenopD. Uh, and what this team did is
2:14:47they worked over about a 3-month period
2:14:49to develop a way to integrate those
2:14:51systems so that now four times a day,
2:14:53ADP police officer schedules are being
2:14:55pushed to the OPSC system and no OPSC
2:14:58coordinator can schedule a detail during
2:15:00that time. So if there is a detail
2:15:02someone wants to work and they say
2:15:03actually something's just wrong with my
2:15:05my schedule in the system, they have to
2:15:06call up the supervisor and get them to
2:15:08change that schedule if that is indeed
2:15:10true. Uh and then the last thing I want
2:15:12to talk about on this is really uh
2:15:13integrating artificial intelligence into
2:15:16the way that we do things as well. Um I
2:15:18will say because of the way the city is
2:15:20resourced, we have really had a strong
2:15:22preference for vendor AI solutions. And
2:15:26some of the ways that we are looking to
2:15:27improve that is uh you'll see in a
2:15:29future slide I talk a little bit about
2:15:31um or that later in this slide replacing
2:15:33the permitting system for the city uh
2:15:35which was acquired well over 15 years
2:15:37ago. Um one of the core requirements
2:15:41that we're planning on putting into that
2:15:43RFP is the requirement that there be an
2:15:46initial AI review of documents uploaded
2:15:48by individuals who are looking to apply
2:15:50for permits. The current process as our
2:15:53understanding is from safety and permits
2:15:55is that there is sometimes a lot of
2:15:56delay from when the person uploads a
2:15:58document then a safety and permits
2:16:00person has to review it and determine if
2:16:02it's the appropriate document and then
2:16:04they communicate with the customer and
2:16:06that back and forth can last for days or
2:16:08sometimes weeks. So what we want to be
2:16:10able to do is at the point of upload say
2:16:12hey wait a second that document you
2:16:14uploaded actually isn't what we're
2:16:15looking for for this particular need.
2:16:17you need a document that has X or Y on
2:16:20it or a document you can find here and
2:16:21help to assist the customer at the point
2:16:24of application. So, we're looking for a
2:16:26lot of those vendor solutions. There are
2:16:28ways that we're looking to try to
2:16:29demonstrate and pilot uh more local AI
2:16:32uses, but I would say that for the most
2:16:34part, the way the city will really
2:16:36utilize AI in the coming year or two is
2:16:38going to be through vendor supported
2:16:39solutions because that really expands
2:16:41our capacity to be able to utilize these
2:16:43tools to their full um benefit.
2:16:47Next sort of uh on this list is cyber
2:16:49security. Obviously, there are going to
2:16:51be limits to how much I can talk about
2:16:53this in a public forum, but I do want to
2:16:55just make the council and the public
2:16:56aware. We have partnered really closely
2:16:59with uh SESA, that's a cyber security
2:17:01infrastructure security agency at the
2:17:03federal level. Um they have helped us
2:17:05organize a tabletop cyber security
2:17:07exercise earlier this year that we had
2:17:09really robust participation in from our
2:17:11local and regional homeland security
2:17:13entities. Um they also helped really
2:17:15conduct an intensive two-eek review of
2:17:17our cyber security defenses and were
2:17:19able to decrease our risk score by about
2:17:2285% in uh 3 months after that review. So
2:17:26they've given us a lot of really
2:17:27actionable items that we've been able to
2:17:29implement that have made the city more
2:17:30secure and I think our plan for the next
2:17:33year is to continue to build on that and
2:17:34implement some of the larger and large
2:17:37larger and more time-sensitive uh items.
2:17:40Um the next item we see on here 311
2:17:43system. You know last month the city
2:17:44council was gracious enough to approve
2:17:47uh a contract that allowed us to move
2:17:49forward with the uh acquisition of the
2:17:51311 module which will be fully
2:17:53integrated with our asset management
2:17:55system currently. One of the big holes
2:17:57that we have in 31 run right now is that
2:17:58there is no connection there uh in the
2:18:01current systems address based. So it's
2:18:03really difficult to line up to
2:18:05particular assets. Someone might say the
2:18:07corner of, you know, two streets, but
2:18:10you may it may actually mean, you know,
2:18:12the traffic light that's facing this way
2:18:14or that way, and it's hard for them to
2:18:15indicate it. The new system will allow
2:18:17them to indicate what specific asset
2:18:19they're calling about and also allow
2:18:21them to keep track of the updates that
2:18:22are made as that work item goes through
2:18:25the asset management system. So, we're
2:18:27excited about that. We anticipate a
2:18:29launch date of about Q2 of 2027. Uh, so
2:18:32we'll look forward to that. certainly
2:18:34will come to present to the council as
2:18:35we move towards that launch date. Um the
2:18:38next item on here uh the justice
2:18:40technology modernization project. I I
2:18:42don't know how much the visibility of
2:18:44this is in the community but for about
2:18:46the last 3 years the city spent about 30
2:18:48million in ARPA dollars really becoming
2:18:51a model in the country for how to
2:18:53integrate criminal justice IT systems.
2:18:55Uh and they've put in place really and
2:18:57this is due to really the the hard work
2:18:59of Nathaniel Weaver who's been on this
2:19:01project leading it. It's a really
2:19:02monumental accomplishment and our job is
2:19:04to continue to make sure that that
2:19:06continues to function. Uh in full
2:19:08disclosure, we didn't get additional
2:19:10dollars to do this in 27 in the proposed
2:19:13budget. So there is, you know, some
2:19:15additional funding needs that are
2:19:17required. Uh it to the degree that we
2:19:19don't receive them in any amended
2:19:21budget, we'll just have to we'll have to
2:19:22make additional cuts to our our core IT
2:19:24services. So that is an item that you
2:19:26know exists out there. Um, but this is
2:19:29something that's very very important to
2:19:31maintain uh for the overall health of
2:19:33the criminal justice system. Uh, I
2:19:36talked a little bit about the llama
2:19:37replacement already. This is a really
2:19:39important thing. I've assigned my deputy
2:19:40CIO to lead this requirements gathering
2:19:43process. We're hoping to release a
2:19:45solicitation sometime in the November
2:19:47time frame. Uh, and we're spending the
2:19:49time in between now and then talking
2:19:50with the dozens of different departments
2:19:52that interact with permitting to ensure
2:19:54that we understand the requirements. And
2:19:56then the last one on there, uh, I just
2:19:58want to make sure people understand we
2:20:00do have an April 2027 deadline we're
2:20:03working towards on accessibility for our
2:20:06website. Um, because we have a
2:20:08decentralized uh, website model, a lot
2:20:11of our content editors at departments
2:20:13rather than centrally located within
2:20:15ITI. And so what our web team's been
2:20:17doing has been uh, really going out and
2:20:20training a lot of these people on how to
2:20:21make documents accessible. Uh, and this
2:20:24is particularly for people with visual
2:20:25or audio disabilities, but it can be for
2:20:27a lot of different uh, potential
2:20:29disabilities. And so we're training them
2:20:31so that the objects that they upload to
2:20:33our website in the future are created in
2:20:35a way that they're accessible to people
2:20:37with those disabilities. And so that's
2:20:39something we're very focused on with
2:20:40that April deadline uh, looming as well.
2:20:43And that is the conclusion of my
2:20:44prepared presentation. I'm happy to take
2:20:46any questions you have.
2:20:47>> Thank you. Are we looking at other
2:20:48cities for the replacement of llama and
2:20:50what they use or how are you identifying
2:20:53the new system that would replace it?
2:20:55>> Yeah, I I think we wanted to start with
2:20:57initial process of requirements
2:20:58gathering internally. uh our system is
2:21:01very complex and I think permitting
2:21:03systems in general uh the regulatory
2:21:06frameworks very heavily between cities
2:21:08and so we wanted to first start with a
2:21:10really a review of um what we needed
2:21:13from it which each of our individual
2:21:14departments and their individual review
2:21:16processes required right things like the
2:21:18VCC HDLC they don't always have analoges
2:21:21in other in other communities that being
2:21:23said I think before the release of the
2:21:25RFP part of that process is particularly
2:21:28looking at how other entities these have
2:21:30structured their RFPs that you know
2:21:32resulted in systems that you know we
2:21:34believe are are you know among the
2:21:36leaders in the industry uh and just
2:21:39learning from that as well but we have
2:21:41not done exhaustive search of other
2:21:42cities at this point.
2:21:43>> So your uh November timeline is to issue
2:21:45the RFP
2:21:47>> Yeah. to issue the solicitation. Yeah.
2:21:48>> Solicitation. Um and then there would be
2:21:50of course an implementation.
2:21:52>> Yeah. The implementation timeline is
2:21:54hard to talk to because we haven't
2:21:55gotten responses back. you know, I would
2:21:57ballpark it at about a year, but it
2:21:59could be a little bit longer, a little
2:22:00bit shorter than that. Um, but I I don't
2:22:03expect it to be a quick process.
2:22:05>> Okay. And then just on 311 system,
2:22:07you're saying Q2 of 2027. Is that right?
2:22:11Full implementation.
2:22:12>> That's correct.
2:22:13>> Okay. All right. Uh, Council Member
2:22:15Willard.
2:22:17>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Jonathan, you
2:22:20said the personnel increase is largely
2:22:23attributable to your uh team coming off
2:22:26of furloss.
2:22:27>> The the well, I say there's two factors.
2:22:29It's coming off of furlows and then it's
2:22:31the addition of the two positions that
2:22:34result from the four contractor
2:22:36conversions. So, in that case, it's not
2:22:38actually diminishing the overall budget.
2:22:40It's shifting from operational to uh
2:22:42personnel.
2:22:43>> Were those contract positions coming out
2:22:45of your budget before?
2:22:46>> Yes, out of the operating budget. So but
2:22:49now you have benefits associated and
2:22:51everything like that. Um is it is it
2:22:54cheaper to have them inhouse or
2:22:56>> in the aggregate we will save several
2:22:59tens of thousands of dollars by doing it
2:23:01but on a per position basis it varies
2:23:03significantly.
2:23:04>> Okay. All right. Um, on the other
2:23:08operating side,
2:23:11I see where you have 750,000
2:23:14for those maintenance payments and the
2:23:17new 311 system and then you're restoring
2:23:20the budget. Um, if you take out that
2:23:23750,000, you're still looking at, you
2:23:26know, about a million and a half uh in
2:23:28other operating costs going up. Is that
2:23:31just restoring some of the things that
2:23:33you scaled back this year? Yeah, that's
2:23:35so you know we normally pay the contract
2:23:38for EZRI which provides our geographical
2:23:40information systems allow us to do our
2:23:41maps. If you've seen the ICC map that's
2:23:44you know required through that and
2:23:45there's a lot of systems that rely on
2:23:47that mapping technology. We have always
2:23:49paid for that. This year I had to go to
2:23:51DPW and say Steve you are a main
2:23:54consumer of this and I cannot fund it in
2:23:56my budget. Would you be able to pay for
2:23:58that this year? It's not an ideal way
2:24:00to, you know, structure this type of
2:24:02budgeting, but it was unavoidable
2:24:04because of the cuts that we received.
2:24:06Uh, and so what this does is next year
2:24:08allows me to continue to fund it as we
2:24:10have in prior years.
2:24:11>> Okay. Are there other examples of of
2:24:14stuff like that where maybe other
2:24:15agencies, departments share the cost,
2:24:18but in best practice, it should be
2:24:20funded under your department.
2:24:23So I I think there's a there's a mixture
2:24:25and some of these are historical you
2:24:27know reasons rather than necessarily
2:24:29best practice reasons. I think what we
2:24:31have tried to do is say if you have what
2:24:33we would define as enterprisewide system
2:24:35which would be generally two or more
2:24:37departments that are frequent users that
2:24:39it probably should be a thing in the IT
2:24:40budget. There are exceptions to that.
2:24:42You heard finance has brass in their
2:24:44budget. They have ADP in their budget.
2:24:46Those were implemented primarily as
2:24:48financial systems and so historically
2:24:50that's how they've been budgeted. uh and
2:24:51they have considerable staff to support
2:24:53those systems. For most other systems
2:24:56that would be more than one department,
2:24:58we would be the preferred uh way of of
2:25:01budgeting for those and certainly for
2:25:02your you know licensing for things like
2:25:04Microsoft and and other things.
2:25:06>> Okay. um
2:25:09the slide where you lay out the um 1.1
2:25:14million in cost savings in 2026
2:25:17um was that exclusive for ITI's budget
2:25:22or did there were there savings in other
2:25:24departments?
2:25:25>> Uh certainly other departments achieve
2:25:27savings that we helped them with but the
2:25:29all of these items are items that
2:25:31specifically were in the uh ITI budget.
2:25:34>> Okay. Um, so that 1.1 million, um, was
2:25:39that does that mean you spent 1.1
2:25:42million less than you were budgeted or
2:25:44that was your that was your way to
2:25:46>> less of historical spend?
2:25:48>> Gotcha.
2:25:48>> Yeah. Right. Because again, we received
2:25:49about a $4 million cut and I couldn't
2:25:51find a way to fully absorb that without
2:25:54really serious impacts to our cyber
2:25:56security or our our regular services.
2:25:59>> So that was the way you rightsize the
2:26:00shift this year. Right? We we tried to
2:26:02stick to where do we find efficiencies?
2:26:04Where do we get rid of programs that
2:26:06aren't being utilized sufficiently and
2:26:08not let's cut down to the bone and get
2:26:11rid of really core capabilities that you
2:26:14know residents and departments depend
2:26:16upon.
2:26:16>> Okay. Thank you,
2:26:19>> Council Member McCarron. Um okay so h
2:26:22how many this is why I've asked for a
2:26:25you know org chart going forward if you
2:26:28guys can submit it to me um or to us uh
2:26:32how many FTEEs do you have currently
2:26:34total
2:26:35>> currently I believe we have 39 uh three
2:26:39of the contractors are still uh on
2:26:41contract
2:26:42>> okay 39 and you're you're budgeted for
2:26:4540 so you'll have one additional hire
2:26:47this year
2:26:47>> I believe we're budgeted for 42
2:26:5041. Am I reading that wrong?
2:26:53>> Um, and in the budget book it says 40.
2:26:56>> Gotcha.
2:26:59>> So, is it 40 or
2:27:01>> I thought I thought I saw 41 or 42
2:27:04somewhere. So,
2:27:11yep. I
2:27:13see the 40. I think one of these
2:27:17positions has an allocation of I'll see
2:27:19here two
2:27:24I did review it this morning and I
2:27:26thought I counted an additional one. Uh
2:27:29I may have made an error in that but I
2:27:31can get back to you with the clarifying
2:27:32information.
2:27:33>> Okay. Yeah. I mean unless you know it
2:27:35just says general fund 40 positions
2:27:37proposed 2027
2:27:39adopted in 2020.
2:27:41>> So I think maybe I'm off by one then. I
2:27:43think we probably have 38 now um or 37
2:27:47now that have an inclusion of three
2:27:49additional contractor allocations.
2:27:51>> Okay. Um my other question I know you
2:27:55you talked about the 311 system. What
2:27:58are the do you know the overall cost of
2:28:00the system
2:28:02>> of the new system
2:28:03>> and what what's like the difference?
2:28:05What will it enable us to do?
2:28:07>> Yeah. So the current system is funded
2:28:09through OPCD and I don't know the cost
2:28:12of it currently but it's relatively
2:28:14minimal because it was developed in
2:28:16house effectively and they're just
2:28:17paying for quickbased licensing. Um the
2:28:20incremental cost of maintenance for the
2:28:2331 system which is in my budget is
2:28:25approximately $100,000. Okay.
2:28:27>> Um the implementation cost uh I'm going
2:28:32to forget it. It was it was in the 500
2:28:33to 600,000 range somewhere around there.
2:28:36But that is being funded through capital
2:28:37rather than through operating.
2:28:39>> Okay. And so going forward, your budget
2:28:41will have the ongoing maintenance. And
2:28:43are we receiving anything from OPCD on
2:28:46that or like are they helping out with
2:28:48the cost?
2:28:48>> I I have not had that conversation with
2:28:50Carl.
2:28:51>> Okay. But they will still be the one
2:28:53>> for certainly for 2027. I believe
2:28:55they'll have to maintain that cost
2:28:57because we're not implementing until
2:28:58partway through the year. But I would
2:29:00imagine that they will see some savings
2:29:02in 2027 and then certainly in 2028 there
2:29:05will be a savings. But again, I think
2:29:07their overall costs are relatively
2:29:09minimal because they designed the
2:29:11program themselves and so it's not
2:29:13really vendor supported. It's just some
2:29:15licensing.
2:29:16>> Okay. And when you guys have a full roll
2:29:19out of that, h will you have a a public
2:29:22meeting to kind of talk about so
2:29:24constituents are aware, you know,
2:29:26whether there's going to be any gaps of
2:29:27service and changes that they can
2:29:30anticipate. Um, obviously for district
2:29:33council members, that's where everything
2:29:34goes to get out to every department. So,
2:29:39um, as much as information that you can
2:29:41give us ahead of time is helpful.
2:29:43>> I I think we'll need to do that. Uh just
2:29:45as full disclosure from what we know now
2:29:47and again we're very early in the
2:29:49process of implementation. So there may
2:29:50be other things that arise. Um we're
2:29:53learning that the importation of past
2:29:56tickets is really problematic into the
2:29:58new system because of the way that the
2:30:00past tickets were characterized. Um so
2:30:03we may need to make a decision about how
2:30:05many of the past tickets we import if we
2:30:07import them at all. And that would be
2:30:09something we would have to do, I think,
2:30:10in collaboration with the council and
2:30:12with the community to really say here's
2:30:14the limits that we have and here's what
2:30:17the potential consequences are. We want
2:30:18to hear from you about how to best l
2:30:20limit or mitigate those consequences. So
2:30:22I think it will there will have to be a
2:30:24public input pro input process along
2:30:26with it. But I would like to get a
2:30:28little deeper in implementation because
2:30:29there's still things I'm sure I don't
2:30:30yet know that will be problematic that
2:30:33will come up as there usually are in
2:30:34these types of projects. Will we lose
2:30:37all that data?
2:30:38>> No. No. Uh the data will exist period.
2:30:42It's stored locally and there's not not
2:30:44going to be a loss of data. The question
2:30:46is basically how the new system intakes
2:30:48that data and associates it with assets
2:30:51and it's a complicated thing because the
2:30:54previous system was address based. And
2:30:56so a lot of times a resident was given
2:30:58no choice but to choose a specific
2:31:00address for the the problem they were
2:31:02reporting. in that address
2:31:06street. Yeah.
2:31:07>> Right.
2:31:08>> Okay. Um
2:31:11Yeah. Okay. Definitely let us know about
2:31:14that. Um cuz Yeah. My concern is that
2:31:17we're going to miss some service
2:31:19requests that we don't know about and
2:31:21then we'll have no record and then it
2:31:23kind of, you know, everything goes back
2:31:25into a new queue. Um which can be
2:31:28complicated. So
2:31:30>> yeah, I think there's a solution we can
2:31:31work out. I think it it would be best
2:31:33developed in partnership with the
2:31:34council and the community. Uh but I
2:31:36wouldn't worry about the data being
2:31:37lost. It's just a matter of how the data
2:31:39uh is treated within the new framework.
2:31:42>> Okay. Thank you.
2:31:45>> Council member, can I just make a
2:31:46comment? So I noticed what came up with
2:31:48John. It's going to come up with Abby
2:31:49when she presents in Christina. We're
2:31:51looking at the personnel total. So in
2:31:53some of these cases, the we didn't add
2:31:55add extra people, right? So I'm looking
2:31:57at how the budget was completed for 2026
2:32:00with our transition team and in certain
2:32:02cases as we had the right size parts of
2:32:04the budget there were random selected
2:32:06codes in CEO. So while CAO has reduced
2:32:08some of their personnel across the board
2:32:10they may have selected one of these cost
2:32:12centers. So Abby didn't add new people.
2:32:14Christina didn't add new people neither
2:32:16did John except for the contractors. And
2:32:18so that is going to be a case for some
2:32:19of these offices that is pulled in
2:32:20Questica that 2026 amendment update for
2:32:23the budget. That's how some of the
2:32:24budget was completed. Right now Abby and
2:32:27I are completing the 2026 amended
2:32:29budget. So there are some personnel
2:32:31shift changes for actuals but none of
2:32:33these areas are included because we're
2:32:35not over budget in the CO agency are in
2:32:37the 7,700s right now. So that is
2:32:40something for Christina and Abby. So
2:32:42when we get to those slides to give you
2:32:44some preface on that.
2:32:45>> Okay. Yeah. I did notice there's some
2:32:47some in CIO miscellaneous there's a
2:32:50couple of um 7,000 funds that have 7015
2:32:55has has a FTE and some other things.
2:32:59>> Yeah. So some of those are accurate. We
2:33:00can go over in detail with you, but
2:33:02specifically Aby's going to be
2:33:03presenting on 7030 and 7016 and it shows
2:33:06an increase in her personnel dollar
2:33:07total. But what happened is when some of
2:33:09the actuals were done, instead of saying
2:33:12maybe it came out of these cost centers
2:33:13based upon actuals, they chose just
2:33:15those cost centers and a lump sum amount
2:33:17which wasn't even enough to fund one
2:33:19person in some cases. So what they're
2:33:21presenting now is budgeting for actuals.
2:33:23There were no new hires in those areas
2:33:25to exceed what we had at the start of
2:33:272026.
2:33:28>> Okay. Thank you.
2:33:28>> You're welcome. Thank you,
2:33:30>> Council Member Moro.
2:33:32>> Thank you. Um couple of quick questions.
2:33:36Uh well maybe not so quick. Uh I
2:33:39appreciate you all budgeting for
2:33:40maintenance cost. I think that's
2:33:41important that uh we differentiate
2:33:43between the installation cost which is
2:33:45capital versus the maintenance cost
2:33:47because as we know even in this chamber
2:33:50as we speak maintenance costs are not
2:33:52insubstantial. So I appreciate that's
2:33:54being accounted for. Um when it comes to
2:33:57the IT part of ITI have you guys
2:34:00identified any duplicative services? say
2:34:03that because the council for example, we
2:34:05have a we have an IT person,
2:34:09but if you have a functioning city hall
2:34:12situated IT office, it is not necessary
2:34:15for departments themselves to have IT
2:34:18persons if they're centralized IT. Have
2:34:20you all gone through the various
2:34:22departments at city hall to see how many
2:34:23have individually assigned IT workers
2:34:26outside of your office? I haven't done a
2:34:28comprehensive study, but I've certainly
2:34:30looked at some specific departments,
2:34:32council included. Um, you know, I think
2:34:34our issue becomes when you consolidate
2:34:37them, it now takes away some level of
2:34:39service from that department where
2:34:41they're used to having someone sort of
2:34:43available to them at all times. And
2:34:45we've had some friction there in terms
2:34:46of meeting the needs of all of our
2:34:48client departments. Uh, that being said,
2:34:50I think that there are certainly some
2:34:52institutional benefits to such a
2:34:53strategy. uh and I'm definitely happy to
2:34:56work with any department that's
2:34:57interested.
2:34:58>> I think it's something that I think it's
2:35:00something that we kind of have to go
2:35:01beyond the uh talking to the
2:35:04departments. I think it's something we
2:35:05to look at very closely because when
2:35:07you're talking about for example the
2:35:09availability of replacement equipment
2:35:11and the like having all of that
2:35:12centralized with you like for example if
2:35:14you got a council member who has a
2:35:16deficient laptop the person who's our IT
2:35:19person is going to go to your department
2:35:21hopefully to see what is available to
2:35:23replace it without this think it's
2:35:26duplicative when the person who needs to
2:35:29provide the replacement of the service
2:35:31is going to just be interfacing with you
2:35:33as the master IT department to provide
2:35:36the service to the council as a whole.
2:35:38So, I know for us, I would appreciate
2:35:41you looking at all the departments that
2:35:42are centrally located in one building
2:35:44and seeing if we could centralize the
2:35:46services cuz it could save a lot of
2:35:47money. Um, I want to dig into the ops
2:35:51conversation and Mr. Duso was nodding
2:35:53when he said this. I I will be very
2:35:55candid and I'm going to say this to
2:35:57Chief Kpatrick when he comes in
2:35:58tomorrow. I do not know why OPSC exists.
2:36:03I understand the idea behind it which uh
2:36:06was by prior mayor Mitch Landrew that
2:36:09decentralizing detail management was
2:36:12somehow going to prevent the aorta of
2:36:13corruption. Obviously that's not the
2:36:16case because we've seen plenty of cases
2:36:18pop up since then. Um what concerns me
2:36:22is so for those of you the three people
2:36:26watching right now on the internet or
2:36:27the thousands Mr.
2:36:29Um,
2:36:31when it comes to details, when an
2:36:33officer is hired to do a detail, they
2:36:35tag on a $5 to $8 fee that is collected
2:36:39by OPSE to manage said detail. And that
2:36:45is a cost for the most part that OPSE
2:36:48keeps to have OPSE exist. Now, there's
2:36:52problems with that. one, as you said,
2:36:54we, and I'm going to be candid, not your
2:36:56fault, Jonathan, but I think we wasted
2:36:59money trying to put OPSC to work with
2:37:02ADP because many of the conflicts you've
2:37:05seen over the years are that OPSC
2:37:08separately as a department did not
2:37:10communicate with ADP. So the reason why
2:37:12you see all these instances in which
2:37:13officers are double dipping or accused
2:37:16of double dipping is because because
2:37:18those two systems did not communicate
2:37:20you could have duplicative entries.
2:37:23Whereas in a centralized ADP system that
2:37:27physically cannot happen if you try to
2:37:28put in time where ADP is identified
2:37:32time's already been assigned you
2:37:33literally cannot have duplicate hours.
2:37:35So
2:37:37the fact that we in my opinion not your
2:37:40fault but opinion wasted money trying to
2:37:42make these systems talk I think that the
2:37:46second eye and ITI the innovation part
2:37:49as I told Mr. Daruso, if you have a
2:37:52functioning centralized system that
2:37:54covers overtime and details centralized
2:37:58in NOPD or in the city through ITI, you
2:38:02just don't need OPSE and that $5 to 8
2:38:06that is captured for management that
2:38:08becomes money that rather than paying a
2:38:11third party to exist is now part of the
2:38:14city budget. Uh I think the other excuse
2:38:17that was used for the creation of OPSC
2:38:19was that at the time the administration
2:38:21did not believe they wanted to generate
2:38:24an additional retirement benefit. That
2:38:26was a silly argument to begin with
2:38:28because overtime and details do not go
2:38:30towards base retirement at all. They
2:38:33never have and they still don't. So what
2:38:36I want to encourage you and I've told
2:38:37Mr. Jerusalem this repeatedly is that
2:38:40almost every other law enforcement in
2:38:43the greater New Orleans area operates
2:38:44under a quarterm system where the
2:38:47department itself assigns details. They
2:38:50collect the money from the details for
2:38:52the overhead. And part of the benefit of
2:38:54that is that they create a quarter
2:38:56master where for example bulletproof
2:38:59vests, uniforms, part of the benefit of
2:39:02having the department manage it is that
2:39:05they provide those items. As you know,
2:39:07right now, uh, NOPD officers are provide
2:39:09a kind of useless stipen for equipment.
2:39:12But if you look at the cost of equipment
2:39:14versus the stipen, the two do not
2:39:16remotely carry each other. I would
2:39:18encourage I know this is probably get me
2:39:20some hate but the uniforms for example
2:39:23and I'll talk to Chief Krypach about
2:39:25this tomorrow. We are the only
2:39:28department utilizing this baby blue
2:39:31uniform and we are paying a premium
2:39:34because every other department in the
2:39:36country has shifted away from it. So, we
2:39:40are paying a vendor to produce a
2:39:43specific color for a specific shirt that
2:39:46we are paying an exclusive premium on
2:39:48for it to exist.
2:39:51Now, think about that for a second.
2:39:54Why are we paying more money to have a
2:39:57specific color of a specific uniform
2:39:59when there's an economy of scale just
2:40:01looking what is the cheapest color for a
2:40:03uniform? Because right now, because
2:40:05officers are paid a stipen to replace
2:40:07their own uniforms, if the cost of that
2:40:10uniform exceeds the stipen, they're
2:40:12paying for replacement uniforms. In
2:40:15Jefferson Parish, for example, because
2:40:17they manage their details, when an
2:40:19officer rips a shirt, they give him a
2:40:22new shirt. When officer's bulletproof
2:40:24vests get beyond their expiration date,
2:40:26they give them a new bulletproof vest.
2:40:28there's no interruption in the use of
2:40:30equipment because the details themselves
2:40:34pay for that equipment. So, I would
2:40:37encourage you to go to the second eye
2:40:39and look at the innovation piece because
2:40:41as we're going to have Chief Kurpatre
2:40:43come down here tomorrow and complain
2:40:44about all the money she doesn't have,
2:40:46there are opportunities through
2:40:49innovation to have the department
2:40:52generate money that it can utilize for
2:40:54its needs that do not require us to
2:40:57raise taxes at all. It just requires us
2:41:01to consolidate existing services in a
2:41:04way that a by having a centralized
2:41:07system whether it's ADP or something
2:41:08else you eliminate the opportunities for
2:41:12double billing completely two by not
2:41:15paying for this vestigial tale that is
2:41:18OPSE to exist we're not paying these
2:41:21people to kind of exist to oversee a
2:41:24program that [snorts] through very
2:41:26simple I mean you probably already have
2:41:28three ideas in your head on how we could
2:41:29do this like
2:41:31just having a centralized logging system
2:41:34where we assign officers based upon
2:41:37request. We can do this ourselves
2:41:39cheaper and have the city actually use
2:41:42the money rather than paying for a
2:41:44department we don't need. So I would
2:41:45[snorts] encourage you while we're doing
2:41:47this budget process, we're looking at
2:41:49ways to generate money that doesn't
2:41:51require tax increases. That is something
2:41:54we can do right now that I think we
2:41:56should really work at trying to
2:41:58accomplish.
2:41:59>> Thank you.
2:41:59>> I need you to innovate, Jonathan.
2:42:01>> No, no, thank you. I will say some of
2:42:02that information I wasn't previously
2:42:04aware of and so I appreciate it and
2:42:06we'll certainly take a look at it. I I
2:42:07do want to clarify one thing, which is
2:42:09to say certainly we used resources on
2:42:11this project, but we didn't actually
2:42:13incur additional costs. So, I just want
2:42:15to clarify that one. Okay. But I think
2:42:17>> well I appreciate we didn't throw good
2:42:18money after bad wasting money try and
2:42:20make those two things talk when really
2:42:21the simplest thing to do would be
2:42:22eliminate one of them and have a
2:42:24centralized system. So I I'll work with
2:42:26you offline on that but I think it's
2:42:27something we can accomplish in the short
2:42:29term that could really have a boon to
2:42:31officers in the city. Thank you.
2:42:33>> Thank you council member Green.
2:42:36>> Good morning and thank you Jonathan for
2:42:37the presentation. Um I want to make this
2:42:42as unpolitical as I can. I'm going to
2:42:44look to my CEO.
2:42:46Talk to me and the public about the
2:42:48Orleans Parish Communications District.
2:42:52Is that a city agency? And why are we
2:42:54incurring cost to upgrade the technology
2:42:58and the [clears throat] work that is
2:42:59being done by an agency that is not a
2:43:02city agency? So, the first question that
2:43:04I'll ask is my coun is my um CEO. Under
2:43:08whose jurisdiction does the OPCD fall?
2:43:12OPCD is a state agency.
2:43:14>> OPCD is a what? A state agency.
2:43:16[clears throat]
2:43:17Yet, the city of New Orleans is
2:43:19obligated to invest significant
2:43:22taxpayers dollars in an institution that
2:43:26provides services on a regional level.
2:43:28Am I correct with that?
2:43:31>> Yes, I believe so.
2:43:32>> Yes. You know, you know what I'm doing.
2:43:33[clears throat] At the end of the day,
2:43:34it's yet another obligation of the city
2:43:36of New Orleans relative to something
2:43:39that I'm not blasting the state because
2:43:42some of this is just etched into
2:43:45policies that haven't been analyzed for
2:43:47a while. But I think that um Councilman
2:43:51CEO, I'm going to say that for a while
2:43:52cuz we served for 4 years. CEO Jeruso, I
2:43:55appreciate your work. I appreciate the
2:43:57fact that you are accomplished um
2:44:00long-term member of the council who is a
2:44:03law a member of the bar who's a lawyer
2:44:05who has a lot of options and you've
2:44:07chosen to be here with the city of New
2:44:08Orleans. So I thank Mayor Moreno for
2:44:11what it took to have you here. You also
2:44:13are able to answer questions based on
2:44:15your experience. So my general question
2:44:18to you is that a is that an issue that
2:44:20we should be exploring the city spending
2:44:24local taxpayer dollars to invest in
2:44:27enhancements to 311, which is a good
2:44:29idea, but that fall under the under the
2:44:32cost jurisdiction of just the citizens
2:44:34of New Orleans.
2:44:36>> I guess if if I could just address the
2:44:38311 part, I think there's a broader
2:44:40policy issue here you're bringing up
2:44:41that that is very pertinent and deserves
2:44:43to be discussed. But on the 311
2:44:46specifically, I just want to say
2:44:47historically it was a city cost and the
2:44:50city incurred that expense to host. ITI
2:44:53actually was the host of 311 for a
2:44:55number of years. Um, and when you look
2:44:57at other cities budget, often it is
2:44:58considered a local service because the
2:45:00people responding to those 311 incidents
2:45:02are city departments. Uh, and so I think
2:45:05in that particular case, OPCD took it
2:45:08over for a reason not I'm not entirely
2:45:10aware of. Uh but I do think it is
2:45:12inherently and should be primarily a
2:45:14city responsibility and so that
2:45:16particular part I think is reasonable
2:45:19but I I get your point more broadly
2:45:21about the use of city resources. I'll
2:45:23let Joe address
2:45:24>> John I mean I think John pretty much
2:45:25answered the way I would have which is
2:45:28this one's a little bit trickier because
2:45:30there is obviously state management in
2:45:32the district itself as I answered as a
2:45:34state agency. At the same time, I think
2:45:37it's fair to say that 311 calls and
2:45:39certainly 911 calls generally are
2:45:42related to city quality of life issues,
2:45:44safety. So again, this is this is one
2:45:47that is a balancing act and I know that
2:45:49you're trying to achieve that as are
2:45:51other members of the council and then
2:45:53certainly um you've been very clear
2:45:55about other state obligations and how do
2:45:57we just work collectively to try to
2:45:59resolve those going forward and
2:46:00>> not everything that I bring up is just
2:46:02for the sake of controversy. It's a good
2:46:04statement that we work well with the
2:46:06state of Louisiana, but we work well
2:46:08with the state of Louisiana in many
2:46:10other areas and OPCD is a good is a good
2:46:13example. We help keep the citizens of
2:46:15our city and in some respects our region
2:46:18unless you tell me that if someone calls
2:46:20311 they can't report on something in
2:46:23Jefferson Parish. Can they report on
2:46:24something in Jefferson Parish? And I
2:46:26don't know. So I'm asking you something
2:46:28that I will ask you that I will tell you
2:46:30that I just don't know the answer. I've
2:46:31never had anybody say, "I called in to
2:46:33311 and reported something in St.
2:46:36Tammy." Is that something that they can
2:46:38do?
2:46:39>> Uh my understanding is that it's
2:46:40geoenced in the same way that 911 is. Uh
2:46:44and so depending upon the jurisdiction
2:46:45that you're starting that call from,
2:46:47you'll be referred to that
2:46:48jurisdiction's uh hotline effect.
2:46:51>> So for example, if you call 311 from
2:46:53Jefferson Parish, it connects to whom?
2:46:57Jefferson Parish OPCD. Okay, that's
2:46:59fine. Just wanted to clarify that, but
2:47:01that was just also for the public. But
2:47:03the bottom line is that we work well
2:47:05together on a lot of issues and we're
2:47:06going to be bringing enhancements to 311
2:47:09that are going to be involving our IT
2:47:11service here. And it's a good thing
2:47:13we're doing it within a state agency.
2:47:15That's all. Thank you very much.
2:47:19>> Any other questions?
2:47:21And no public cards. We can move on to
2:47:23the next. Great. Up next is the Office
2:47:25of Service and Innovation/performance
2:47:27and Accountability.
2:47:44Hi everybody. My name is Abby Via and
2:47:46I'm the chief performance officer and I
2:47:49lead the Office of Service and
2:47:50Innovation and the Office of Performance
2:47:52and Accountability.
2:47:54Um, so on this slide, as Brandy said,
2:47:56thank you Brandy for uh prefacing this
2:47:58in the 2026 budget, we were not budgeted
2:48:01for the cost of our actual FTEES that
2:48:03existed in both offices as of January
2:48:052026. So that has been corrected for
2:48:082027. So the increase here from 563,000
2:48:13to 1.2 million is primarily attributable
2:48:16to adjusting for our actual personnel.
2:48:19Uh we have seven FTEEs across the office
2:48:22of innovation and OPA. We also accounted
2:48:25for uh as every other department did the
2:48:28true cost of health insurance, workers
2:48:30compensation um to make sure that we're
2:48:32fully budgeting for all of those
2:48:33positions. And on the other operating
2:48:36side, you'll see a reduction of the
2:48:38$17,500
2:48:40uh which is essentially the elimination
2:48:43of any um other operating funding we'll
2:48:45have in lie of having our own budget. we
2:48:49will consolidate with other CIO units um
2:48:52on any office [clears throat] supplies
2:48:53or purchases throughout the year to
2:48:55hopefully decrease that overhead cost.
2:48:58Um so as I said, those are the two
2:49:00factors here that you see on the slide.
2:49:02Overall, we're not a super expensive
2:49:04office, so the numbers that I'm
2:49:05presenting on today are relatively
2:49:07small, but I'm happy to answer any
2:49:08questions about them.
2:49:12>> On the not
2:49:13>> Can I just I just want to interrupt one
2:49:14second. Um, there are many fine
2:49:17departments in the city of New Orleans.
2:49:19Poundfor-pound, you get the most value
2:49:21out of the Office of Performance and
2:49:23Accountability, Service Innovation. And
2:49:25I'm not saying that that there aren't
2:49:26other ones, but when you talk about,
2:49:28let's just take the overtime issue that
2:49:30Council Member Moral raised. They're the
2:49:33ones who build the dashboard. They're
2:49:34the ones who create the information.
2:49:36They're the ones who follow up with all
2:49:37the departments. They're the ones who
2:49:39follow up on an objective basis for
2:49:41everything. So, um, there's a lot of
2:49:44really important things the city of New
2:49:46Orleans does that provides
2:49:48services to the city, but also so many
2:49:51of the questions today council members
2:49:52have asked have been geared towards
2:49:54measuring and management and so much of
2:49:56that is really housed inside OPA and SMI
2:49:59and sort of make sure they're getting
2:50:01the proper information. Thank you.
2:50:03>> Yeah. No, thank you. Um, on this slide
2:50:06here, this is the non-general fund
2:50:07appropriation to the department. Um,
2:50:10this reflects a handful of grant funed,
2:50:13excuse me, grant funded positions that
2:50:15are assigned to the grants management
2:50:16office within the chief administrative
2:50:18office. I believe those are three FTEEs
2:50:21and there's no other operating
2:50:23appropriation in non-general fund.
2:50:27And on the budget efficiency slide, uh
2:50:30primarily we just didn't spend any money
2:50:32that we didn't essentially have to spend
2:50:34on payroll. Um, so we forewent all other
2:50:37operating expenditures in 2026. We buy
2:50:40our own water. We buy our own coffee. We
2:50:42did not attend any of the conferences we
2:50:44were invited to attend this year. Um,
2:50:46we've also consolidated several senior
2:50:48positions under the office. Um, also
2:50:51responsibilities are shared across the
2:50:53CEO leadership team, many of who are at
2:50:55the table today. Um, but we previously
2:50:57had a full-time chief of staff position,
2:50:59a director of innovation position, and a
2:51:01director of administration and planning.
2:51:04uh we no longer have any of those
2:51:05positions. Uh we have consolidated those
2:51:07functions across the senior team.
2:51:11Uh what I do also want to mention which
2:51:12isn't outlined on this slide is the team
2:51:15both the innovation and OPA staff's uh
2:51:18to Joe's point connection to
2:51:20[clears throat] a lot of the budget
2:51:21efficiencies that you'll be hearing from
2:51:23the departments over the next few weeks
2:51:25and in particular last year as we uh saw
2:51:28spending trends headed toward a notable
2:51:31spending deficit in 2025. a lot of the
2:51:34work that was done to reduce spending in
2:51:352025. Um, instituting a spending freeze,
2:51:39reducing overtime spending, uh, working
2:51:42with departments to minimize any
2:51:43non-essential purchases. Um, as well as
2:51:48responding to the both state
2:51:49requirements and, uh, local requirements
2:51:52on reporting, which were contingencies
2:51:55for the city's revenue anticipation
2:51:57note. Uh, a lot of that effort came out
2:52:00of the innovation and OPA offices. Um,
2:52:02we have a small team. We worked closely
2:52:05with budget and finance to accomplish a
2:52:07lot of that. But I do just because I
2:52:10literally have the microphone um want to
2:52:12shout out the work from those teams just
2:52:14to make it through the end of the year
2:52:15last year to ensure that we could
2:52:17continue to make payroll for city
2:52:18employees citywide and meet
2:52:20[clears throat] our obligations. And
2:52:22then of course this year um working with
2:52:24departments on creating budget
2:52:26efficiencies, uh instituting quarterly
2:52:28spending reviews with departments,
2:52:31continuing to see reductions on overtime
2:52:33spending, uh developing revenue
2:52:35enhancement measures. Um and I think a
2:52:38lot of that work is part of why we're
2:52:39sitting here in a much different
2:52:40position than we were a year ago today.
2:52:46And as for next year, um a couple of the
2:52:48goals that we have are outlined on this
2:52:50slide. I won't go line for line, but a
2:52:52couple of the ones I really want to
2:52:53highlight are the stat programming. So,
2:52:56this is really an effort that um I
2:52:59believe under Mayor Landrew and under
2:53:01John Wisby really took legs, but this is
2:53:03around using data to inform policy
2:53:06decisions. you know, monitoring uh
2:53:10performance indicators and metrics
2:53:11across departments and across functions
2:53:13to understand where resources should be
2:53:16allocated and where departments can
2:53:18potentially adjust how they're operating
2:53:21um to improve their service delivery and
2:53:23their efficiencies internally. And so
2:53:26we've seen a lot of that focus on the
2:53:28Department of Safety and Permits this
2:53:30year. Um I want to give a shout out to
2:53:31Cameron Mcy who's the associate director
2:53:33of OPA. Um he's meeting with the mayor
2:53:36this afternoon to discuss a public
2:53:37facing dashboard on permitting. Um and
2:53:40he's worked closely with Susanna Kirby
2:53:42to stand that up. We're very excited
2:53:43about it and I think it's a model that
2:53:45can be replicated for other departments
2:53:47um in 2027 and beyond.
2:53:51Uh as has been discussed here before,
2:53:52we're working on the reprocurement of
2:53:54our parking and traffic photo
2:53:56enforcement and collections vendors. Um
2:53:58that's going to be a large undertaking
2:54:00and that solicitation is in its final
2:54:02phases now.
2:54:04uh before it hits the streets and is
2:54:06open for bid. We're working to
2:54:08understand with the department of
2:54:10finance our cash level transactions and
2:54:12our grant reimbursement mechanisms and
2:54:14building uh tools like PowerBI to
2:54:17extract that data from brass to be able
2:54:19to give decision makers and the
2:54:21departments a better understanding of
2:54:23exactly how all of our bank accounts and
2:54:25different transactions are occurring. Um
2:54:27that has been instrumental in
2:54:29understanding our cash flow this year.
2:54:31Um, and obviously that is something the
2:54:33Department of Finance has led, um, and
2:54:35we've continued to support is just
2:54:37understanding how much cash do we have,
2:54:39where is the cash, um, and what that's
2:54:41going to look like going forward. Um and
2:54:43then generally working on transparency,
2:54:46continued collaboration with
2:54:48departments, understanding where we can
2:54:50both improve service delivery for
2:54:51communities and residents, but then also
2:54:54uh find internal efficiencies to keep
2:54:56overhead costs low and increase revenue
2:54:58opportunities wherever possible
2:55:00[clears throat] and appropriate. Um as
2:55:02Brandy mentioned, the the new contracts
2:55:04management office is opening next month.
2:55:06We're excited to continue to support
2:55:08that effort and ensure that um
2:55:10coordination is happening across the
2:55:12contracts management uh citywide and um
2:55:18we also do a lot of work around the uh
2:55:21Orleans Parish Prison and their jail
2:55:23healthcare contract. And so continuing
2:55:25to work alongside the sheriff's office
2:55:27and the health department and the office
2:55:29of criminal justice on those efforts,
2:55:31especially headed toward uh the phase 3
2:55:33extension. And lastly, uh just continued
2:55:37use of data across city departments um
2:55:40to give departments the tools that they
2:55:42need to be able to understand the impact
2:55:44they're having, how can they improve
2:55:46their service delivery or also how can
2:55:48they just promote their service
2:55:50delivery. A lot of departments are doing
2:55:51wonderful things and have made huge
2:55:53strides and so we want to be able to
2:55:54give them the opportunity to share that
2:55:56publicly or um monitor it internally.
2:56:01Um, with that, that is my presentation
2:56:04and I'm open for any questions.
2:56:06>> Thank you, Abby. I just want to um thank
2:56:08you for working closely with Dominique
2:56:10in my office to get that data dashboard
2:56:12up on the mayor's office uh side and the
2:56:15city council side showing real time uh
2:56:18budget to actuals and spending. I think
2:56:21that was a good step in the right
2:56:23direction. I do look forward to seeing
2:56:25the millillage uh calculator up and
2:56:28running and I I think that's very
2:56:30important. How many FTEEs do you have
2:56:32that are general fund funded?
2:56:36>> We have seven FTEEs.
2:56:37>> And then the the grant funded that would
2:56:41be three FTEEs.
2:56:42>> Three. And what happens when those
2:56:44grants are out?
2:56:45>> So those grants I believe are grants we
2:56:48expect to continue through 2027.
2:56:50Just to give I know that this a little
2:56:52bit uh strange that we have those
2:56:54positions in the office budget here. Um
2:56:57I think this predates back to when we
2:56:59initially received ARPA funding and the
2:57:01first uh sort of ARPA project manager is
2:57:05to Wisby's point, Jonathan's point. Um
2:57:08Nathaniel Weaver really led up the
2:57:09Justice Tech modernization program that
2:57:12predated the ARPA project management
2:57:14office. And so Nathaniel was placed in
2:57:16the innovation office and he functions
2:57:18as um my one of my director ports even
2:57:21though of course he's uh super
2:57:23autonomous but he is budgeted out he has
2:57:25historically been budgeted out of
2:57:26innovation and now that we shift out of
2:57:29having this large ARPA funded ARPA PMO
2:57:32we now have and we've reduced that
2:57:34significantly. We are now using the best
2:57:36and brightest of that team and deploying
2:57:38them on the grants management side. um
2:57:40they are funded with long-term grants in
2:57:43uh the absence of the ARPA funding that
2:57:44expires this year and that's why you see
2:57:46them in our office.
2:57:47>> I would also say that they were
2:57:48traditionally funded with general funds
2:57:50but because we're able to shift some of
2:57:52the funding to grant to offset the
2:57:53general fund, we will do that in any
2:57:55situation where we can. So they were
2:57:57already on general fund. So this
2:57:58actually helps the budget for this year
2:58:00and going forward as long as we have
2:58:01those grants.
2:58:02>> Okay, great. And I I love the use of
2:58:04data to inform policy. Uh Council Member
2:58:06Willer, did you have your button pushed?
2:58:08Okay. Council member McCarron,
2:58:12>> I think actually you asked my question
2:58:14about the FTEES. Um
2:58:17you said that 2026 though you were under
2:58:19budgeted.
2:58:21>> Yes, we um we were budgeted at an amount
2:58:24to Bry's point that did not accommodate
2:58:27the existing seven FTEES and their cost.
2:58:30Um I think it was a decision made during
2:58:31the transition around reducing personnel
2:58:33costs uh with not a corresponding
2:58:36reduction in the actual staff. So none
2:58:38of us were laid off during the
2:58:40transition. Uh we had no new hires in
2:58:432026. So it's the same people who were
2:58:45here in January. Uh we're just making
2:58:47sure that that funding is appropriately
2:58:48accounted for.
2:58:49>> Okay. And then and so you're just
2:58:51budgeted for seven FTEES general fund
2:58:55this year and then three grant funded
2:58:59for next year.
2:59:00>> That's correct.
2:59:01>> Okay.
2:59:02>> Okay. Thank you.
2:59:03>> And we'll get you an org chart.
2:59:05>> Yes, please. One just one follow-up
2:59:07question to council member McCarron.
2:59:09Does this take are you guys furoughed?
2:59:11>> Um yes, partially furled. I'm furoughed.
2:59:14Certain people have been exempted based
2:59:15on the nature of their duties and I
2:59:17believe that the people who are fully
2:59:19grant funded are also exempted.
2:59:21>> So part of this amount the 712 accounts
2:59:24for the non-furl in 2027.
2:59:26>> Correct. No furlows are incorporated
2:59:28into our 2027.
2:59:29>> And just going forward for any of these
2:59:31presentations are we taking into account
2:59:33for personnel the furlow versus
2:59:35non-furl?
2:59:36>> There are no furlows included in the
2:59:382027 budget. So every personnel increase
2:59:41that you will see will assume no
2:59:42furlows. um most departments have at
2:59:46least a couple employees who are furled.
2:59:49So even the police department or others
2:59:51uh you know you'll see a little bit of
2:59:53an uptick in that. There are only a
2:59:54couple of departments that I can think
2:59:55of that are fully exempt as of now. So
2:59:58you won't see any impact on the furlow
2:59:59being eliminated in 2027.
3:00:01>> Thank you.
3:00:02>> The health care cost should be
3:00:04>> included too as well. That went up over
3:00:06$2,000 per employee and the workers comp
3:00:09increased as well. So that you may see
3:00:10an a department I think we have civil
3:00:13service coming up. They didn't have any
3:00:14new employees but they show a slight
3:00:16increase in because of those fringe
3:00:17benefits as well.
3:00:18>> Okay. Got it. Thank you. Any other
3:00:20questions? All right. Let's move on.
3:00:24>> All right. I think next up is uh is
3:00:28office of labor and employee relations.
3:00:30And kind of much like Brandy Christina
3:00:33and her team do things behind the scenes
3:00:36that are unsung. So, um, most of the
3:00:39things are that affect us on a
3:00:40day-to-day basis, but not everybody sees
3:00:41it. So, Christina,
3:00:44>> good morning, council members. I'm
3:00:46Christina Hamilton, assistant CEO for
3:00:48human resources. Thank you for the
3:00:50opportunity to present the Office of
3:00:52Employee and Labor Relations proposed
3:00:532027 budget and priorities. Our office
3:00:56includes employer relations, personnel
3:00:58and training, benefits administration,
3:01:00and recruitment. I'll briefly review our
3:01:03proposed budget, highlight our 2027
3:01:06health plan cost containment strategy,
3:01:08and discuss our key workforce
3:01:10priorities. Our proposed 2027 general
3:01:13fund budget is approximately 3.9 million
3:01:16compared with approximately 3.74 million
3:01:18in the 2026 adopted budget for an
3:01:21overall increase of approximately
3:01:23$159,000.
3:01:25personnel increases by approximately
3:01:27$364,000
3:01:29due to budgeting for actuals which
3:01:31assistant CEO Delarge just explained due
3:01:33to the budgeting process that took place
3:01:35during the transition [clears throat]
3:01:37and our other operating decreases by
3:01:39approximately $25,000 or 37.2%.
3:01:44We will continue to coordinate across
3:01:45CAOHR and other CAO divisions to reduce
3:01:48duplicative spending, streamline the use
3:01:50of available resources and operate as
3:01:53efficiently as possible.
3:01:56One of our most significant areas of
3:01:58focus for 2027 is managing the cost of
3:02:00the city's self-funded health care plan.
3:02:03The city's recent claims experience
3:02:05demonstrates the need for action. In
3:02:072025, gross medical claims were
3:02:09approximately $53.5 million compared
3:02:12with approximately $44 million in 2024.
3:02:15Gross pharmacy claims were approximately
3:02:17$26.3 million compared with
3:02:19approximately $16.8 million in 2024.
3:02:23Overall plan costs were approximately
3:02:25$80.7 million and net employer cost was
3:02:28approximately $62.3 million. As a
3:02:31self-funded plan, the city bears the
3:02:33financial impact of claims experience.
3:02:36These trends reinforce the importance of
3:02:38managing cost while balancing the impact
3:02:40on employees, retirees, and their
3:02:43families.
3:02:45Hub International is the city's healthc
3:02:47care consultant and they have identified
3:02:49more than $31 million in potential
3:02:51savings associated with a range of
3:02:53health plan changes. After evaluating
3:02:56the available options and their
3:02:58potential impact on both employees and
3:03:00plan participants, the city elected to
3:03:02pursue a more measured approach with a
3:03:04combination of initiatives representing
3:03:06approximately 11.95 million in savings
3:03:10versus the 14.8 million you see on your
3:03:12slide. I'm going to make that update
3:03:14shortly. The strategy is diversified
3:03:17across the plan design, pharmacy,
3:03:19eligibility, and coordination of
3:03:21benefits, site of care, and employee
3:03:23contributions rather than relying on a
3:03:26single cost reduction measure. Please
3:03:28note that the narrow network option
3:03:30listed on the presentation is not being
3:03:32implemented at this time.
3:03:34The projected components are
3:03:36approximately $3.9 million from plan
3:03:38design, $2.7 million from pharmacy
3:03:41initiatives, $3.08 million from
3:03:44eligibility and coordination
3:03:45initiatives, $1.64 million from site of
3:03:48care strategies, and $647,000
3:03:52from employee contributions.
3:03:55For active employees, 2027 introduces
3:03:57two medical plan options. The active PO
3:04:01has a $1,000 individual deductible.
3:04:03Employees will also have a new
3:04:05highdeductible health plan with a $3,000
3:04:08deductible using the choice network.
3:04:11Compared with 2026, the PO has a higher
3:04:13cost sharing in several areas, including
3:04:16the individual deductible, individual
3:04:18out-of- pocket maximum, office and
3:04:19specialist co-pays, emergency room
3:04:22co-pay, and certain pharmacy co-pays.
3:04:24However, the family out-of-pocket
3:04:25maximum decreases from $13,500
3:04:28to $12,000 and employees gain a second
3:04:31medical plan choice. The highdeductible
3:04:33health plan provides lower employee
3:04:35payroll deductions than the PO, but
3:04:37carries a higher deductible. Of course,
3:04:39it is an HSA compatible plan under the
3:04:41current design. There are no employer
3:04:44HSA contributions assumed at this time.
3:04:46For the active PO, the base dental, the
3:04:49employee and spouse and employee and
3:04:51family contribution tiers have increased
3:04:53by $20 per month. However, the employee
3:04:56only and employee and children rates
3:04:57remain unchanged.
3:05:00For pre65 retirees, the city is
3:05:02establishing a separately self-funded
3:05:04retirey PO plan with its own plan design
3:05:07and stop-loss arrangement. Hub's updated
3:05:10January through June 2026 experience
3:05:13also shows why this is necessary.
3:05:16The retirees no Medicare population
3:05:18averages 555 subscribers, down from 600
3:05:22for the same period in 2025. Despite
3:05:25that enrollment decline, gross plan
3:05:27costs increased from approximately 5.83
3:05:30million to 7.17 million and per employee
3:05:34per member increased from $1,620
3:05:37to $2,154
3:05:40or approximately 33%.
3:05:42Retirees represented approximately 10.5%
3:05:46of average enrollment but 15.6% of gross
3:05:49plan cost with per employee per member
3:05:52approximately 57% higher than the active
3:05:55employee population. These figures refer
3:05:57to retirees no Medicare and subscriber
3:05:59counts and do not include covered
3:06:01dependent. The individual deductible
3:06:04increases from $750 in 2026 to $1,250
3:06:08in 2027 for retirees, and certain
3:06:11co-pays and out-of- pocket limits also
3:06:13changed. The separate design allows the
3:06:15city to address the retirey population
3:06:17distinctly rather than placing pre65
3:06:20retirees in the active select choice
3:06:22structure.
3:06:24Beyond the health plan cause
3:06:25containment, our priorities are to
3:06:27strengthen employee health, wellness,
3:06:28and productivity. Streamline HR
3:06:31operations and strengthen professional
3:06:33development, support employee
3:06:35recognition, engagement, and retention.
3:06:37Maintain constructive labor management
3:06:39relationships, focus recruitment on
3:06:41critical and hard to fill vacancies, and
3:06:43expand educational, professional
3:06:46development, and financial resource
3:06:47partnerships. We will continue with the
3:06:49mayor's outstanding employee award
3:06:51program, preventive health and wellness
3:06:53initiatives, health and wellness
3:06:54clinics, and the annual health and
3:06:56wellness fair, which will be this Friday
3:06:58from 10 to 2. Please come out. HR
3:07:00training and professional development,
3:07:02targeted recruitment strategies, and
3:07:04partnerships that connect employees with
3:07:06educational and financial resources.
3:07:08Overall, our 2027 priorities reflect a
3:07:11balance between fiscal responsibility
3:07:14and workforce support. We are focused on
3:07:16managing healthcare costs, operating HR
3:07:18efficiently, supporting our employees,
3:07:21maintaining constructive labor
3:07:22relationships, and recruiting and
3:07:24retaining the workforce necessary to
3:07:26provide services to the city of New
3:07:28Orleans. Thank you. And I'm happy to
3:07:30answer any questions.
3:07:31>> Thank you. Um, that was informative.
3:07:33October 1st is open enrollment. Is that
3:07:36ma'am? And when does it end?
3:07:37>> October 31st.
3:07:38>> Okay. And during that time, are are you
3:07:40all communicating these changes to city
3:07:43employees?
3:07:43>> Absolutely. We have it all queued up and
3:07:45ready to go. Yes, ma'am.
3:07:46>> Okay. And when does that start rolling
3:07:47out?
3:07:48>> It's going to start rolling out right
3:07:50today.
3:07:50>> I think it just rolled out.
3:07:52>> Yes, ma'am. [laughter]
3:07:53>> Okay. Council member Willard.
3:07:56>> Thank you. Um, thank you, Kristen. That
3:07:58was a lot of information. Um, so I I
3:08:02just have a I guess a few questions
3:08:04mainly on the healthc care side.
3:08:06>> Absolutely. Um, but on the personnel
3:08:09budget, an increase of 364,000,
3:08:12does that account for any of your staff
3:08:15coming off of furlow next year?
3:08:17>> Yes, that accounts for that as well.
3:08:19Yes.
3:08:19>> Okay. All right. Um
3:08:24I guess overall with the health
3:08:26insurance changes my concern it it may
3:08:30be you know not not properly based but
3:08:35are we basically transferring just more
3:08:37of the cost on to city employees?
3:08:40>> No, the city is definitely bearing the
3:08:42brunt of the cost of the healthcare
3:08:44insurance
3:08:45>> with the with the changes in this.
3:08:46>> Yes, we're still carrying most of the
3:08:48cost. Absolutely. Okay. Um, and I'm
3:08:52sorry. I'm sorry. Just to complete this
3:08:54also, we provide the health care costs
3:08:56for a lot the healthcare for a lot of
3:08:57the outside agencies too. So, just make
3:09:00sure that as we're doing all this, it's
3:09:01not just the city, it's also many of the
3:09:03outside agencies as well.
3:09:05>> Okay. Um,
3:09:08the select asher network savings, it
3:09:12said they were modeled for 6% reduction
3:09:15in medical claims. Can you
3:09:17>> We're scrapping that.
3:09:18>> Okay. It's no longer being proposed for
3:09:20this plan year.
3:09:22>> Yeah. I wanted to know how how do you do
3:09:24that? Like in in actuality.
3:09:26>> So
3:09:27>> I mean you can model to reduce but in
3:09:29actuality how do you reduce the claims?
3:09:31>> I I it it's a matter of also looking
3:09:34council member at the the number the
3:09:36sheer volume of claims and and just for
3:09:39again the totality of employees. So not
3:09:42just the city more dollar amount claims
3:09:45were with one healthcare provider as
3:09:47opposed to the other. So as a result of
3:09:49what was being proposed then then having
3:09:52that be the leader of that not sole
3:09:55provider but a select provider was going
3:09:58to induce the proposed savings but I I
3:10:01think in retrospect given that there's
3:10:04already these other changes um we will
3:10:06wait to roll it out in 2028 instead.
3:10:09>> Okay. um public watching this. Um you
3:10:14know, my my question just overall would
3:10:16be um are the employees paying paying
3:10:20more to get less?
3:10:22>> Absolutely not. We have the HSA
3:10:25available now that we didn't have that
3:10:27option available before. Yeah,
3:10:28absolutely.
3:10:29>> Okay. All right. Thank you, Kristen.
3:10:30>> You're welcome,
3:10:31>> Council Member McCarron.
3:10:33Okay. Sorry, I'm still not clear. So, so
3:10:37the select Ashner network is not being
3:10:40implemented for next year. Okay. Okay.
3:10:43Um,
3:10:45and then what is the new cost per if if
3:10:48an employee is just paying for
3:10:50themselves?
3:10:52You said there's no
3:10:53>> employee only has no change and employee
3:10:55and child or children has no change.
3:10:57It's only going to be the only changes
3:10:59to employee and spouse and employee and
3:11:00family.
3:11:01>> Okay. And it's going to be an additional
3:11:03$20 per month for each of those tiers.
3:11:05>> Okay, great. Um I saw on in the CAO
3:11:09miscellaneous budget there's this new
3:11:10section Brandy 7112
3:11:13says hospitalization hospitalization
3:11:16section is that is that for this cost or
3:11:19what what is that
3:11:20>> partial? So that is when we work with
3:11:23finance a lot right to get the fringe
3:11:25right. So that's where some of the bulk
3:11:26of the costs have come that the debt
3:11:29service right so that is specifically
3:11:31for the retirees who are under who are
3:11:33not eligible for Medicare. So that has
3:11:36not previously been appropriately um
3:11:38placed in the budget. So that cost is
3:11:40specifically for retirees.
3:11:42>> Okay. Okay. Thank you for clarifying
3:11:44that. Um, one other question on on
3:11:46enhanced recruitment for critical
3:11:48vacancies and just, you know, what are
3:11:52you guys going to be doing sort of next
3:11:53year to have workforce development
3:11:56incorporated into how you are
3:11:58recruiting, for example, with
3:12:00electricians? Something we talked about
3:12:02with with um, Director Nelson and our
3:12:05unions. you know, what what kind of
3:12:06partnerships is the city working towards
3:12:09to help strengthen, you know, if they
3:12:11have apprenticeship programs for
3:12:13electricians, how are we going to work
3:12:15with those our local labor unions to
3:12:18have a pipeline into um city government
3:12:21positions that we know that we are
3:12:23actively hiring for electricians, that
3:12:25sort of thing.
3:12:25>> Absolutely. Our recruitment team is very
3:12:28active. I don't know if you see them on
3:12:29social media, they're always making
3:12:30videos and everything, always announcing
3:12:33the critical positions that we have
3:12:34available. We meet with departments. If
3:12:36you let us know that you have a critical
3:12:38position you're trying to fill, we'll
3:12:39immediately come over and meet with you
3:12:40and see what your priorities are. We go
3:12:42to universities, all the local
3:12:43universities. We go to Tuland, we go to
3:12:45Lyola, we go to Xavier, anywhere. We go
3:12:47to many different job fairs. We are
3:12:49constantly working working to make sure
3:12:51we keep the city staffed up for any
3:12:53critical vacancies that we have.
3:12:55>> Okay. And I and I would encourage you to
3:12:57work with our our local union too
3:12:59because they do have an apprenticeship
3:13:01program and I think they're trying to
3:13:02you know especially with some of the
3:13:04stuff that we've been working on um with
3:13:06our virtual power plant our community
3:13:08solar those are all jobs that the
3:13:11electrician the electrical union are
3:13:13working to build towards too and I think
3:13:14they could be you know also good for the
3:13:17city. So definitely reach out with them
3:13:20and work with them on how you can create
3:13:21that sort of pipeline into those
3:13:23positions.
3:13:23>> Absolutely. Yes ma'am. Thank you.
3:13:26>> Just a couple more questions that
3:13:28sparked. Um I do think the uh one-time
3:13:31audit of the eligibility is critical. I
3:13:34know that sometimes kids are become 26
3:13:38and they're still on their parents plan.
3:13:39So I think that's really important that
3:13:41we do. It's a one-time audit
3:13:43>> once a year. Are you planning to do that
3:13:45going forward?
3:13:46>> One time audit for now, but we'll keep,
3:13:48you know, looking at things and seeing
3:13:49if we need to do it again. Absolutely.
3:13:51>> And on on audit, um I know Council
3:13:54CEO Jerusa and I, sorry, or Joe um
3:13:58[clears throat] talked uh separately
3:14:00about a staff audit. Is that something
3:14:02that your department would conduct?
3:14:05>> We can help with that. Absolutely. Yeah,
3:14:06we all work together. So, we you know,
3:14:08we work with everybody. We work with
3:14:09civil service. We work with whoever we
3:14:11have to work with. We can absolutely
3:14:13work together to conduct whatever type
3:14:14of staff audit we need to conduct.
3:14:16Absolutely.
3:14:16>> Yeah. We just want to make sure that um
3:14:18there aren't people on our staff roles
3:14:20that aren't actually staffed that aren't
3:14:23actually here anymore. And I I think we
3:14:25found an instance of that when um when
3:14:29uh traffic enforcement went over to
3:14:30NOPD.
3:14:32>> Yep. Yes, ma'am. Absolutely.
3:14:34>> Thank you. Any other questions?
3:14:36>> Let's keep rolling.
3:14:37>> All right. Thank you. Thank you all to
3:14:39the team who who again I think so much
3:14:41of this work you see up here is behind
3:14:43the scenes and so critical to the city.
3:14:45I think next up we have Megan Williams.
3:14:47Resilience.
3:15:09Nothing.
3:15:36>> All right. Uh, good afternoon. Uh I'm
3:15:39Megan Williams. I'm the chief
3:15:40sustainability officer uh for the city
3:15:42of New Orleans. Uh thank you guys for
3:15:44allowing us to present today and present
3:15:46our budget. For those of you who do not
3:15:48know, we are the climate action arm of
3:15:50the city. We create all of the climate
3:15:52policy uh and do a lot of the
3:15:54implementation as well. Uh historically
3:15:56our office has managed the Gentile
3:15:58Resilience District, the EPA climate
3:16:01pollution reduction act grant, hazard
3:16:03mitigation grants, um and a host of
3:16:05other climate mitigation grants. Um
3:16:08however some some of these grants are
3:16:09also managed by other departments. Uh we
3:16:12also do the large majority of storm
3:16:14water management planning and
3:16:15implementation of these projects.
3:16:19Um we are we are very slim in our
3:16:22budget. Uh as you can see there was
3:16:25nothing adopted for 2026 and even for
3:16:282027 uh there's a a very small
3:16:31percentage of uh personnel funding. The
3:16:34majority of it is operating which
3:16:35results in about $177,000
3:16:38budget for our office. Uh the proposal
3:16:42for uh the 22,000 in personnel is to
3:16:45move two of my staff members to split
3:16:47funding to help with some of the
3:16:49administrative purposes of our office.
3:16:51Um the majority of that falls all on me
3:16:53right now. Uh there's a lot of logistics
3:16:55and planning that needs to be done
3:16:57through our office that uh we could just
3:16:59use some assistance with, but all of our
3:17:01office otherwise is grant funded.
3:17:06Uh there were no general fund hires in
3:17:082026. The only hiring that we did was
3:17:11for our energy program manager which was
3:17:13funded through the EPA CPRG grant. Uh
3:17:17the reduction in costs for uh the
3:17:20operating budget is reflective of
3:17:23reducing funding for recycle debt and
3:17:25Christmas tree recycling. Unfortunately,
3:17:28uh given the majority of our other
3:17:29expenses are for personnel and consent
3:17:32decree efforts, which is the the bottom
3:17:35uh bullet there. Uh it was a tough
3:17:38decision between other programs, but
3:17:41there is also a funding line for the
3:17:43climate action plan for 2027. Because we
3:17:45are a C40 city, we are required to
3:17:47update the climate action plan uh to
3:17:50maintain our status. So our intention is
3:17:53to update that plan, but also we've been
3:17:56exploring other opportunities to help
3:17:57fund it. If we can find other
3:17:59opportunities to fund it, I can help I
3:18:01can repurpose that funding to hopefully
3:18:03back to recycled at and the Christmas
3:18:06tree recycling. But we are under consent
3:18:08decree by EPA and uh LDEQ for certain
3:18:12environmental sites like Gordon Plaza
3:18:15and Recovery 1 to maintain the grass
3:18:18around them and also to do some uh water
3:18:21quality testing. The water quality
3:18:23testing for this year has been moved to
3:18:25sanitation. Uh while we are going to
3:18:28maintain the funding for the maintenance
3:18:30at these sites, particularly recovery
3:18:32one, Gordon Plaza will be turned into a
3:18:34solar farm. We are anticipating issuing
3:18:36that RFQ any day now uh for
3:18:39advertisement, but we as a city are
3:18:41required to maintain access to the site
3:18:44for recovery one so that we can submit
3:18:46our water quality reports to DEQ uh in a
3:18:49timely fa fashion.
3:18:55Uh in our 2026 budget, uh the you can
3:18:58see the bulk of it is on other
3:19:00operating. There's a significant portion
3:19:02uh of the 31 million in other operating
3:19:04that was proposed for 2026 has been
3:19:07reduced by about $5 million and that's
3:19:10reflected through a couple of different
3:19:11measures. Uh one of those being grant
3:19:13writing services. We did have a uh a
3:19:16contract at one point for an outside uh
3:19:18consultant [clears throat] to do grant
3:19:20writing for us. We have eliminated that.
3:19:22Uh and a portion of that is also
3:19:24included in the Swiffer grant which was
3:19:26the recycling and solid waste master
3:19:28plan uh was on other operating as well
3:19:30because it was EPA funded. It was not
3:19:32general funded. Uh the 250 that you see
3:19:35proposed for the personnel is for uh
3:19:39pretty much myself and the proposed uh
3:19:42two employees to be split funded uh
3:19:44which results in about 25 million in
3:19:46other operating. Um included in this is
3:19:48also uh the 5135 fund which is green
3:19:52infrastructure maintenance. It is the
3:19:53only eligible fund in the city for green
3:19:56infrastructure maintenance that is not
3:19:58directly in fund 1000 for the general
3:20:01fund.
3:20:02Um
3:20:04again we have uh not utilized the entire
3:20:07amount of the 5135 for the green
3:20:11infrastructure fund but this will allow
3:20:12us to maintain the existing sites for
3:20:15green infrastructure that the city has
3:20:17implemented through grant funding. Um
3:20:19unfortunately none of those grants
3:20:21include maintenance funds. So we have
3:20:23had to get creative in how we maintain
3:20:25them. Uh and we've been working very
3:20:27closely with uh a couple different
3:20:28agencies to try to to utilize some of
3:20:31these funds and make this work a little
3:20:32bit better than it has in the past. Um
3:20:34on the other operating, you can see that
3:20:36there's also the Gentile resilience
3:20:38district grant which is managed through
3:20:40our office, but the majority of the
3:20:42other operating is the climate pollution
3:20:44reduction grant with all of the u the
3:20:47different measures including energy
3:20:49efficiency, municipal decarb, ebikes,
3:20:52and uh protected bike lanes.
3:20:56Some of the budget efficiencies that
3:20:58we've implemented this year is uh sort
3:21:00of right sizing some of the
3:21:02responsibilities in our office. Uh we
3:21:04were downsized pretty significantly
3:21:06um
3:21:08coming into the transition and we've
3:21:10been able to sort of repurpose some of
3:21:12our our positions in our office that
3:21:14currently exist to distribute the
3:21:16responsibilities. Uh we've again been
3:21:19hosting and collaborating with a lot of
3:21:20community groups uh in our current
3:21:22project areas to address some of the
3:21:24maintenance. Uh this is community
3:21:26groups. This is some of our consultants
3:21:28that have done work with us. Uh we have
3:21:30been trying to get really creative and
3:21:31getting more boots on the ground to uh
3:21:34address some of this work in the most
3:21:35creative fashion. Uh and one of the big
3:21:37things that we've done is we've
3:21:38consistently organized uh service days
3:21:40in our communities to address these
3:21:42things very directly. Our goal for 2027,
3:21:46uh I won't read all of these, but uh
3:21:49going back to the A Street Solar Farm,
3:21:51which is also considered Gordon Plaza,
3:21:54our intention is to turn this into a
3:21:55solar farm. Uh because this is a
3:21:58landfill site, uh or a super site, we
3:22:00are not able to disturb a lot of the
3:22:02ground. So, we have to be very mindful
3:22:04of the work that we can do. But the
3:22:05intent is to turn into a solar farm. And
3:22:08again, that RFP is uh planning to be
3:22:10issued here in the next couple of weeks
3:22:12and is currently with purchasing. Um
3:22:15through the CPRG grant, we're also
3:22:18intending on identifying some energy
3:22:19efficiency recommendations throughout 41
3:22:22city identified buildings. That project
3:22:24is kicking off next week with the first
3:22:26round of assessments. Uh we're also
3:22:28looking at [clears throat]
3:22:2914 buildings for uh solar photovalttaic
3:22:33installations which should help with
3:22:34some of the lighting in our buildings as
3:22:36well and also create some energy
3:22:37efficiency. Uh there were 14 that were
3:22:40originally identified. We're currently
3:22:42going back through the list to see if
3:22:43those sites still make sense. Uh and
3:22:45we're working very closely with property
3:22:47management and capital projects on that
3:22:50as well. [clears throat] Um and then the
3:22:52construction of Lincoln Beach phase one.
3:22:54uh that it is is a capital project but
3:22:56it is being managed through our office
3:22:58and through me directly. So our
3:23:00intention is to complete the
3:23:01construction of phase one. Uh and the
3:23:04big goal for for 2027 is to um implement
3:23:08and uh update the climate action plan
3:23:11again going back to it as a requirement
3:23:12for C40 uh membership. So we are
3:23:15exploring some options with our our
3:23:17climate mitigation partners like
3:23:19Gennoth, the water institute and trying
3:23:21to find some options on how we can
3:23:23create a very robust plan uh that
3:23:25creates some equitable equitable
3:23:27distribution of climate actions
3:23:29throughout the city. That's it.
3:23:31>> Thanks Megan. Uh I have a couple
3:23:33questions before I turn to Council
3:23:35Member McCarron and Green. Uh Saratoga
3:23:37law is that included in the non-general
3:23:40fund money?
3:23:41>> It is. It's currently included in the
3:23:44hazard mitigation grant for uh DPS1 for
3:23:48Broadmore. We are still waiting to hear
3:23:49back from FEMA on that extension to do
3:23:52the work. We have submitted the request
3:23:54already, but we have not gotten anything
3:23:55certain back from them yet. So, we're
3:23:57following up, I think, almost weekly to
3:23:59bi-weekly with them right now.
3:24:01>> Does that live in your budget or does it
3:24:02live in uh DPW's budget? uh it would
3:24:05likely live in ours under bond funds if
3:24:07we were able to do it uh or if we just
3:24:09if we are not able to do it with HMGP
3:24:11funds we would have to do it with bond
3:24:13funds. So we would have to get creative
3:24:15in in how we move some of that funding
3:24:17towards that project
3:24:18>> and the maintenance of that lot. Sorry
3:24:20you guys to get uh detailed but this is
3:24:22important um for district B. The
3:24:24maintenance parks and parkways cut it.
3:24:27It doesn't maintenance doesn't live with
3:24:28you.
3:24:29>> It does not. Not for that site at all.
3:24:31>> So we're trying to figure out who what
3:24:32department. Yeah, it would uh it has
3:24:35never really lived with us uh as a
3:24:38budget item because we've never taken
3:24:40over the site to do the project itself.
3:24:42So, in in future endeavors, once it is
3:24:44completed, it would fall under us, but
3:24:46not currently. That does not live in our
3:24:47budget.
3:24:48>> This just goes to the efficiency that
3:24:49can be had when departments actually
3:24:51figure out who's cutting what and who's
3:24:53doing what. I, you know, I know
3:24:54[clears throat] there was some confusion
3:24:55over the maintenance of this lot and who
3:24:57was cutting it and who wasn't. So, um,
3:25:00looking forward to getting that
3:25:02straight. On your
3:25:05other operating, it says reduction of
3:25:07funding for recycled debt and Christmas
3:25:09uh, tree recycling. It's actually
3:25:10elimination, isn't it?
3:25:12>> It is elimination, but I put it as
3:25:13reduction because if we're able to find
3:25:15other funding for the climate action, I
3:25:17could repurpose it back to those. It
3:25:19would just be at a lesser amount than in
3:25:21previous years.
3:25:21>> So, Christmas tree recycling, I just
3:25:23looked at um, the budget proposal that
3:25:25was given to us last week. It's about
3:25:27$20,000. Mhm.
3:25:29>> That's it.
3:25:30>> That's it. Yeah. In in previous years
3:25:33and what we're going to try to explore
3:25:35uh for the next year is partnering with
3:25:37more of our our part our our partners. I
3:25:39think Glass Half full did some of that
3:25:41work last year. So, we're going to still
3:25:43try to find as many opportunities to
3:25:44utilize the work. Uh there's sort of a
3:25:46two-step process with the Christmas tree
3:25:48recycling. The first step is collecting
3:25:50that, which I think some of that has
3:25:52previously been shared with sanitation.
3:25:54And then the second part is being able
3:25:56to bundle that. And that's where we
3:25:57really found the gap this year because
3:25:58that can be relatively expensive to add
3:26:01that to it. So I'm I'm putting that with
3:26:03a little bit of an asterisk next to it
3:26:04because I would like to be able to
3:26:05repurpose those funds.
3:26:07>> Recycled app for the public's knowledge.
3:26:09Uh they recycle during Migra events.
3:26:12They pick up cans, beads, etc. Um, have
3:26:15we ever done an analysis of the impact,
3:26:18their economic impact of them recycling
3:26:21and what we pay them to recycle versus
3:26:24tonnage and just hauling it and putting
3:26:27it in a landfill somewhere?
3:26:29>> I think there's there's some data from
3:26:31both our side as well as from recycled
3:26:33debt side. So, we would need to get them
3:26:35both in front of us and and compare them
3:26:37to see what the benefit and the cost is.
3:26:39>> Can you get that to us before the end of
3:26:41budget season? because it's important to
3:26:43know that if we actually fund recycled
3:26:46at then we could save money on uh
3:26:49proposed cuts to migra.
3:26:50>> Sure. I'll get with sanitation um and
3:26:53look at their numbers and see if they
3:26:54have it divvied out that way and then
3:26:55I'll get some numbers from recycle as
3:26:57well.
3:26:57>> Yeah, send it to all of us.
3:26:59>> All right. I think that's all I have.
3:27:00Thanks, Megan.
3:27:02>> Council member Mer.
3:27:03>> Thank you. Um and and thank you council
3:27:05member Harris for bringing up the
3:27:06Christmas trees. Um because you know I
3:27:09think it's important. I know it's only
3:27:10$20,000, but it has a a huge effect on
3:27:15restoring our coastline. So, my question
3:27:17about that is, are there other cities in
3:27:19the state that are doing this? If so,
3:27:22how are they funding these programs? And
3:27:24is there state or federal funding that
3:27:28we could figure out how to get to use? I
3:27:31mean, we're restoring the coast, so
3:27:33essentially helping the state in
3:27:35general. Do you know about other
3:27:36>> Yeah, Jefferson Parish has done it. Um,
3:27:39and they've funded it a couple of
3:27:40different ways. I believe they've had
3:27:41grants in the past to do it, but they've
3:27:43also used some of their own funding. Uh,
3:27:45one thing that I have been doing is
3:27:46talking to some of our coastal
3:27:47restoration groups to see if there is a
3:27:49way that they could assist us with that.
3:27:51Um, in the past, the coalition to
3:27:54restore coastal Louisiana has done
3:27:56volunteer days, but it it's been very
3:27:58specific the type of work that they've
3:28:00done on the volunteer days, which is
3:28:02just a small departure from what we
3:28:04need. So, I am having those
3:28:05conversations with our coastal groups.
3:28:07Um, I need to have the conversation with
3:28:09like Ponch Train Restoration uh or Pon
3:28:11Train Conservancy to see if there's some
3:28:13ways that we could get volunteer days to
3:28:15do this type of work.
3:28:17>> Yeah, if you need help with that, in
3:28:18fact, I'm going to say like, let's have
3:28:20a another conversation about this. If
3:28:22you need to come to a climate committee
3:28:24and we need to talk about this and get
3:28:25our coastal partners and figure out how
3:28:27we can make this happen, I think it's
3:28:28just incredibly incredibly important
3:28:31that, you know, spending $20,000 to help
3:28:34restore our coastline is vitally
3:28:36important. um as part of the bigger
3:28:38picture. So, so let's definitely plan on
3:28:40talking about that more.
3:28:42>> Sure. We've had great success with that
3:28:43program in the past, so it's it's not a
3:28:45desire to have to cut it by any means,
3:28:47but if we have to trim down, um
3:28:49unfortunately, it was one of the ones
3:28:51that seemed like it could be on the
3:28:53chopping block, but I would love to do
3:28:54it. And again, I've had some preliminary
3:28:56conversations with our coastal groups to
3:28:58see what that might look like to get uh
3:29:00probably several days of organizing. I
3:29:03think where we could probably use a lot
3:29:04of the help is on the pickup um and
3:29:07finding some more unique ways to cut the
3:29:09cost on the pickup side of things to
3:29:11actually get the trees to uh the
3:29:13location to get the drop off done.
3:29:14>> Okay, great. Let's talk I look forward
3:29:16to talking more about that. Um the only
3:29:18other question I had, you know, I know
3:29:20you talked about the CPRG grant, but how
3:29:23many employees do you have in your
3:29:24office?
3:29:25>> We currently have um eight employees in
3:29:28our office. All are grant funded right
3:29:30now. And you just hired a new one to
3:29:32help with the the climate grant.
3:29:34>> Yes.
3:29:35>> Okay. Um I guess we won't talk about
3:29:38benchmarking because you guys are going
3:29:39to have that next year, but additional
3:29:42reporting on that would be great um as
3:29:44you guys move forward on that. Um
3:29:49>> that's basically all I have.
3:29:50>> Yeah, I can add on the benchmarking
3:29:52piece. We are intending to hire someone
3:29:54full-time through the CPRG grant
3:29:56specifically to manage the benchmarking
3:29:58portion. What we are doing right now is
3:30:01reviewing the job description that's
3:30:02going to go out. We intend to post it in
3:30:04the next month so that we can start the
3:30:06hiring process or the interview process,
3:30:08I should say, to get someone on board
3:30:10cuz that is a a fairly full-time job
3:30:12just to do benchmarking. So, as we've
3:30:14onboarded our energy program manager,
3:30:16she's been reviewing the process and the
3:30:18ordinances and all the documentation
3:30:20about benchmarking to get herself
3:30:22familiar with it and then our next step
3:30:23is to hire someone to do it um under her
3:30:26guidance as well.
3:30:27>> Okay, perfect. Thank you. Council member
3:30:29Green,
3:30:30>> good morning and thank you for your
3:30:32presentation. I want to start off with
3:30:33the good by thanking you for your
3:30:36willingness to meet with community
3:30:38members at their neighborhood
3:30:39association meetings. That's important
3:30:41that they know that you're available. Um
3:30:43sometimes the questions get answered
3:30:45before them, but when you're there, they
3:30:47appreciate that. I also want to thank
3:30:49you for working with the businesses
3:30:52along Allegian Fields Avenue and
3:30:54residents who you might have seen to
3:30:56prepare them for what's going on at the
3:30:57Blue Green Corridor project and also for
3:31:00emphasizing the value to that entire
3:31:03community because those bio swells and
3:31:05those areas do work. Hunter Train Park
3:31:08in Gentilly Woods for example experience
3:31:11less flooding in part because hundreds
3:31:14of thousands of gallons of water can be
3:31:16stored before it hits the drainage
3:31:17system. But with that I'll ask you I
3:31:19didn't hear the answer that I wanted to
3:31:20hear relative to maintenance monies. So
3:31:23tell me about maintenance of those bios
3:31:26um what we can do moving forward within
3:31:28the budget or with either a private
3:31:31assistance or public assistance to get
3:31:33those maintained better for the
3:31:36neighbors.
3:31:36>> Sure. So, that's the 5135
3:31:39uh storm water fee and loo fund that is
3:31:41intended to be used for green
3:31:43infrastructure maintenance. That's what
3:31:44we're using right now. Uh we've been
3:31:46able to attribute about $300,000 towards
3:31:49that funding. It has taken a long time
3:31:51to get them back in working order and
3:31:53we're still parsing through the list
3:31:55right now. Um we are looking at
3:31:57different uh workforce development
3:31:59opportunities as well to help fund some
3:32:02of the maintenance that needs to happen
3:32:04out there. Uh and then in addition, one
3:32:07of the things that we are looking to do
3:32:09is something called adopt a storm water
3:32:11lot, which is very similar what the
3:32:12state does for adopt a highway and see
3:32:14if we can partner either with residents
3:32:16or community groups or consultants to
3:32:19help do some of that work to keep those
3:32:21lots in working order. So, our current
3:32:24contractor, uh, Groundwork New Orleans,
3:32:26has been, uh, charging through the list
3:32:29that we were given by your office of the
3:32:31priority lots, and we're going through
3:32:32every week and updating the priorities
3:32:34with them to make sure that we're
3:32:35knocking them down consistently and then
3:32:37getting them back in working order in a
3:32:39routine uh, fashion. So, if we can
3:32:42continue to utilize that fund, that will
3:32:44help us keep all of those things in
3:32:46working order in the way that they were
3:32:47intended to operate. The bottom line for
3:32:49the communities, Gentily Woods and
3:32:51Punter Train Park, is that we are
3:32:53working every day to maintain those lots
3:32:56and that you would see by maybe the end
3:32:58of November they could all be remediated
3:33:01or what do you feel?
3:33:02>> Yeah, I believe we'll be uh close to
3:33:04probably the beginning of November uh
3:33:06because we'll have a a much more robust
3:33:08staff out there um that we've been able
3:33:10to subcontract some of the work for the
3:33:12bigger lots that need some work done on
3:33:14them. So they are starting to move
3:33:16through them a lot faster and then
3:33:17they're also starting to loop back on
3:33:19the ones that have been cut to keep them
3:33:21at a manageable rate. So we are
3:33:23intending to have all of them done.
3:33:24There are a handful of them that are
3:33:26holding water and I've reached out to
3:33:28sewage and water board to assist with
3:33:29some of those things. Uh we've
3:33:30identified some of the problems with
3:33:32those. So uh pretty much every day we
3:33:34have some sort of conversation
3:33:35internally about what to do with each of
3:33:37those lots. How can the private sector
3:33:39um those who are interested in
3:33:41environment and sustainability and
3:33:43resilience, how can they assist your
3:33:45office? Um you mentioned the project
3:33:47potentially adopting a storm water lot,
3:33:50but are there other um means that people
3:33:53can use to work with your office and how
3:33:55would they contact your office?
3:33:57>> Yeah, we're always open to opportunities
3:33:59to figure out what that looks like in
3:34:00different neighborhoods. Uh each
3:34:02neighborhood has a different need. So we
3:34:04would love to take them on uh and any
3:34:07consultant or private business that
3:34:08wants to work with us. They can reach
3:34:10out to myself or our uh communications
3:34:13director Lauren Muse to figure out
3:34:14different opportunities to maybe hand
3:34:16over some of that work to them and they
3:34:18can assist in in moving that needle
3:34:20forward.
3:34:20>> It's important to recognize that there
3:34:22are some folks from the private sector
3:34:24who want to help might even be willing
3:34:26to help with some of those bio swells.
3:34:28To be very honest with you, I know that
3:34:29it's a little bit of a challenge because
3:34:30of the hill that goes into the area that
3:34:33collects the water, but maybe on the
3:34:35peripheries there are some organizations
3:34:37that have talked about helping because
3:34:39it is a it is a challenge as we move
3:34:41forward.
3:34:41>> Yeah, we're open to to any opportunity
3:34:44and help we can get. Can you talk about
3:34:46um briefly for the public the challenges
3:34:49that have been created by cuts in
3:34:50federal funding and also some of the
3:34:52opportunities that might exist
3:34:55in the future because these are such
3:34:57important areas in which you work.
3:35:00>> Sure. Uh in general there has been a big
3:35:02shift in funding towards any sort of
3:35:04climate solutions. Um and historically
3:35:06we have been all of the work that I've
3:35:08mentioned today is disaster recovery
3:35:11money. So, it is a direct result,
3:35:13especially on the storm water side, it's
3:35:15a direct result of Hurricane Katrina for
3:35:16the majority of them. Um, the the
3:35:20climate of federal funding has shifted
3:35:22away from a lot of that work. Um, across
3:35:24the board, we've seen grants canled or
3:35:27programs canceled like the brick funding
3:35:30program under FEMA that has since been
3:35:32restored. But without those pots of
3:35:34money to do these large scale capital
3:35:36projects, it is going to be very hard
3:35:38for us to consistently do the scale of
3:35:41projects that are really meaningful to
3:35:43address specifically storm water
3:35:44management. But for all of our climate
3:35:46vulnerabilities, it's going to be very
3:35:48hard for us to do this work without
3:35:51federal funding. In the long term, we
3:35:53would love to become a city that can
3:35:55self-fund a lot of this work, but it is
3:35:57going to take us some time to do that.
3:35:59But we also have to keep in mind that
3:36:01with these projects comes maintenance
3:36:03and none of the federal grants consider
3:36:05maintenance in their funding
3:36:06opportunities. So [clears throat] we
3:36:08have to be very mindful of how quickly
3:36:09we put projects out but also ensure that
3:36:11we're bringing maintenance to the
3:36:13forefront throughout the design process
3:36:15so that we can have opportunities to
3:36:18maintain that's not so costly and
3:36:19burdensome on us as well. So, uh, we're
3:36:22going to continue to be a climate
3:36:23vulnerable city from coastal flooding,
3:36:26um, like climate, uh, council member
3:36:27McCarron was mentioning with the coastal
3:36:30the tree, uh, recycling program. Um, so
3:36:33if we don't have funding and we fully
3:36:35rely on the the federal pot, it it's
3:36:38going to be difficult for us to to do
3:36:40these projects in the future.
3:36:41>> And I like to emphasize the positive.
3:36:43We're moving forward on very important
3:36:44projects. It's not just a blue green
3:36:46card. Talk to us for a second about
3:36:47what's going on at the Willie Hall site.
3:36:50>> Sure. So the Willie Hall site is one of
3:36:52the Gentilly Resilience District
3:36:53projects. Uh there's about $141 million
3:36:57in funding from uh HUD to do the work in
3:37:00Gentilly to mitigate storm water uh some
3:37:03storm water flooding. So the Willie Hall
3:37:05site is a site that was uh operated by
3:37:08Nord but a part of the Mcdana 35
3:37:10[clears throat] school. We have
3:37:12transformed that site into a storm water
3:37:14management site by installing tanks
3:37:15under the the playground. Uh you cannot
3:37:18see it today. It looks like it's just
3:37:20been restored with uh with soil and to
3:37:23and grass on top of it. But there's a
3:37:26system of about 5 million gallons of of
3:37:29storage underneath that park in
3:37:31particular. And it allows water to come
3:37:33in from the drainage system, fill up the
3:37:35tanks, and then exit slowly uh back to
3:37:38the drainage system. And that allows us
3:37:39to just take a little bit of pressure
3:37:41off of the immediate needs of the the
3:37:42pump stations in the area. Um when the
3:37:45the plans are finished, there will be uh
3:37:48a a track on a field track on top of it
3:37:52as well as a baseball field and um a
3:37:55building for Nord to operate their
3:37:57equipment out of uh or store their
3:37:59equipment out of. So it's one of about
3:38:01nine projects in the Gentilly Resilience
3:38:03District suite.
3:38:04>> Thank you very much for that
3:38:06information. Um my last question refers
3:38:08to um Councilman King's district, but on
3:38:11yesterday the green infrastructure for
3:38:13TMA project was dedicated. Councilman
3:38:16King, if I'm not trying to take any of
3:38:18your thunder, but it's another example
3:38:19of the state and the city working
3:38:21together to get something done. Could
3:38:24you talk about that particular project
3:38:26for a second? Were you there yesterday?
3:38:27>> I was. Yes. So that that site as well as
3:38:30the vision to reality site on Claybornne
3:38:32are examples of community-led green
3:38:34infrastructure projects. Um, and these
3:38:36are really meaningful projects that uh,
3:38:40community groups like Waterwise and
3:38:42Healthy Community Services have been
3:38:44able to implement through partnerships
3:38:46with the city and the state. Um, there's
3:38:48opportunity for other sites like this
3:38:50that are DOTD owned but city operated
3:38:54that we can utilize for these uh,
3:38:56community-led green infrastructure
3:38:58sites. and it's really transforming a
3:39:00space that we as the city often have not
3:39:02had as a priority or have had funding to
3:39:04do in previous years. These community
3:39:06groups have really led the charge in
3:39:08advocating for this scale within their
3:39:10neighborhoods. So, people not just for
3:39:12the the storm water side of it, but it
3:39:15also addresses the extreme heat issue
3:39:17that we have by installing trees and
3:39:19some shaded areas. Um, and it allows
3:39:21people to it brings people into a site
3:39:23very meaningfully to exist within their
3:39:25own environment. I know that it's a
3:39:27challenging time, but I'm emphasizing
3:39:29those projects to just let the public
3:39:30know that work is still going on in
3:39:32important areas in our city that is
3:39:35making our city more resilience
3:39:37resilient for the future. And I want to
3:39:39thank you for your office. There's a
3:39:40number of projects that you're working
3:39:41on that are making a great difference.
3:39:44The um release of requests for proposals
3:39:46relative to the agricultural state solar
3:39:48farm is such a significant change from
3:39:51where we were 4 years ago. M and that is
3:39:54why government sometimes has to spend
3:39:55money to get certain things done to
3:39:58relocate the residents of the Gordon
3:40:00Plaza subdivision. I I don't know the
3:40:01exact dollar amount, but it was millions
3:40:03of dollars. And now it's going to result
3:40:05in a solar farm that just like the solar
3:40:08farm that the Sisters of the Holy Family
3:40:10are sponsoring can provide potential
3:40:12relief to residents nearby. So, it's
3:40:15just good news stories that we need to
3:40:17emphasize in the midst of these
3:40:18challenging times that many of those
3:40:20projects continue to happen. and I thank
3:40:22you for your work in making some of
3:40:24those happen.
3:40:25>> Thank you.
3:40:26>> Thank you, Council Member Green. I that
3:40:28uh sparked a thought. Al Davis Park, the
3:40:30grass is dying. That is a water
3:40:32retention uh project. Do we have money
3:40:35in the budget to
3:40:37>> They place the grass uh Saturday, I
3:40:40believe, either Friday or Saturday at Al
3:40:41Davis. So, they'll be watering it in
3:40:43over the next couple weeks to ensure
3:40:44that it establishes. We did shift to a
3:40:47different method of installing the grass
3:40:49that has a much higher percentage of of
3:40:52establishing itself. So we should not
3:40:53have that same issue that we had with
3:40:55the previous iterations of it. So over
3:40:57the next 2 to 3 weeks, you should see a
3:40:59distinct difference in A Davis's
3:41:02quality. The same you'll see the same at
3:41:04Taylor Playground as well where
3:41:05[clears throat] the entire park will be
3:41:07redone with sod rather than seating. So,
3:41:10we we had a lot of conversations with
3:41:11our landscape architect and with our
3:41:13contractors on getting that grass
3:41:15restored to uh a proper working order
3:41:17where we can actually turn it back over
3:41:19to the community cuz it was not in that
3:41:20condition for a while.
3:41:21>> Yeah, the community is actually outraged
3:41:23about it and um very upset. But is that
3:41:26being grant funded or how are we paying
3:41:28for that?
3:41:28>> It was funded through uh some additional
3:41:30funds in the grant already. So, we've
3:41:32already paid for it. We've already got
3:41:33it installed. Uh we're we're at the
3:41:35point where we're just monitoring it
3:41:36over the next couple weeks to ensure
3:41:37that it will take the moment that we god
3:41:40forbid see something go wrong, our
3:41:42contractor is responsible to going for
3:41:44going to fix it within several hours,
3:41:46honestly. Uh so I've I've already
3:41:48instructed them that I don't want to see
3:41:49another blade of grass die in that area.
3:41:52So we have taken the steps we need to
3:41:54and have have installed the proper
3:41:57material at this point that I feel very
3:41:59confident on.
3:41:59>> Okay. Thank you, Megan. Council member
3:42:01King, anything? Thank you uh Megan for
3:42:05your presentation. Council Green, thank
3:42:07you for letting the people know the the
3:42:09great work happening in District C. But
3:42:11I also want to just uh give Miss Sheree
3:42:13Austin a shout out for leading that
3:42:15initiative over on Clebon at that area
3:42:19although owned by the state and operated
3:42:20by the city was a place of illegal
3:42:24dumping um trash
3:42:27animals vagrants. It it was a it was a
3:42:29sight for sore eyes and Miss Sher led
3:42:32the charge to uh making sure it becomes
3:42:34a positive for our city where it's nice
3:42:36park um border retention area. So thank
3:42:40you for um making that happen Miss
3:42:42Austin you and the other residents of uh
3:42:45thank you for that shout out council
3:42:47green.
3:42:49>> Good work.
3:42:50>> All right thank you. Thank you. Up next,
3:42:54up next is the Miller presentation,
3:42:57the early childhood.
3:42:59>> So with that, um, you have early
3:43:01childhood and have civil service. So we
3:43:04will be done and we look forward to
3:43:05seeing council in the next seven.
3:43:07>> Everybody do their stretches for
3:43:08tomorrow. It's public safety day.
3:43:10>> That's right.
3:43:11>> And bring your lunch
3:43:12>> and and also obviously we'll try to
3:43:13follow up on individual questions as we
3:43:15get.
3:43:15>> Thank you.
3:43:16>> Thank you all.
3:43:33Yeah, I need three more like this.
3:43:42Heat. Heat.
3:43:59Perfect.
3:44:10Hi everyone. Good to see everyone. Um,
3:44:14as we begin, we're really excited to be
3:44:16able to tell the story yet again of the
3:44:18success that we have seen as part of the
3:44:20uh early care and education millage that
3:44:22was passed in 2022. Um we are especially
3:44:25appreciative to the voters who made this
3:44:27happen as well as the council and the
3:44:29administration multiple administrations
3:44:32who have continued to invest in this
3:44:34work and given us such great support. Um
3:44:37we also want to just note that this has
3:44:39been something that we have uh worked
3:44:41with throughout multiple administrations
3:44:43and so we're incredibly indebted to uh
3:44:45Dr. Agno and her team for helping us
3:44:48maintain some of the success that we saw
3:44:50um over the past couple of years. So,
3:44:53this is a story that, as you all know,
3:44:56begins actually in 2017 when the city
3:44:59made the first municipal investment in
3:45:01parent education for $750,000,
3:45:04which then many of you as part of this
3:45:06council then doubled and doubled and
3:45:09doubled. So much in fact that we then
3:45:11were able to in 2022 put this on the
3:45:14ballot. We are now in the fourth full
3:45:17year of execution of that millillage.
3:45:19And each year we have seen a major
3:45:21initiative kind of launch as part of the
3:45:24suite of services and programs that are
3:45:26provided by it.
3:45:30This is a very large set of partners
3:45:33that work on this project. Um this is it
3:45:36includes 40 child care centers across
3:45:38the city. It includes nonprofit
3:45:40partners. It includes vendors that um
3:45:43have have launched as the result of this
3:45:45work. And it includes a number of folks
3:45:48who um have now started to expand their
3:45:51services to include young children. They
3:45:53may have traditionally focused on youth
3:45:55development or K12, but now are starting
3:45:57to focus in early care and education.
3:46:00As of today, we are serving 1,800 young
3:46:03people, uh, infants and toddlers as part
3:46:05of this work. 1,000 of them are
3:46:08supported by the early care and
3:46:10education millillage, but we have
3:46:12successfully for the fourth year in a
3:46:14row been able to get those funds matched
3:46:16by the state of Louisiana one to one.
3:46:19And that additional $21.5 million has
3:46:22ensured that an additional 800 children
3:46:24are receiving care uh full day full day
3:46:27full day full year care.
3:46:30With those numbers, that actually means
3:46:32that now the millillage and its matching
3:46:34funds are responsible for over 60% of
3:46:37the publicly funded seats in our
3:46:39network.
3:46:41With this data, um I showed this last
3:46:44year and I'll continue to show it. Uh
3:46:46New Orleans leads the state in the
3:46:48amount of young people who are being
3:46:50served by this work. Um we have 31% of
3:46:53our low-income toddlers and infants that
3:46:55are served by these publicly funded uh
3:46:57seats. Uh the average in the state is
3:47:0012%. Now it's 31%, there's 69% of
3:47:03children who aren't being served. And so
3:47:05we'll continue to to focus on getting as
3:47:08much access as we can.
3:47:11As many of you know, we have continued
3:47:13to evaluate this program and its success
3:47:16both internally as well as externally
3:47:18and independently. And one thing that we
3:47:21are most excited to show is that we are
3:47:24seeing major improvements in early care
3:47:26and education in kindergarten readiness.
3:47:29Um what we have seen here is that our
3:47:32children are showing up in kindergarten
3:47:35performing better than the statewide
3:47:37average. And that really tracks
3:47:39alongside the major investments that
3:47:41this city has made.
3:47:43Not only are we performing higher, we
3:47:45are performing higher in every single
3:47:48demographic regardless of race, uh,
3:47:50socioeconomic status, disability status
3:47:53or English language learner status. And
3:47:55that is true and due to the work of our
3:47:59partners, um, of our child care centers
3:48:01who get up every day and the tireless
3:48:03efforts of our team and our partners,
3:48:05many of which are here today.
3:48:10The 4H child care partnerships that we
3:48:12have are located across all five
3:48:15districts. That is intentional because
3:48:16there is need across all five of our
3:48:19districts.
3:48:20And of that, you also know that a big
3:48:23portion of those funds not just covers
3:48:25seats and care during the day, but also
3:48:28uh restricts funding for wraparound
3:48:30supports or comprehensive services for
3:48:33the children who are participating. What
3:48:35that means is that we've been able to
3:48:37launch two major partnerships with
3:48:40partners including Manning Family
3:48:42Children's Thrive Kids as well as
3:48:44two-lane tikes to provide in-classroom
3:48:47supports for our children, families, and
3:48:49educators. As a result, nearly every
3:48:53child in our program received a vision
3:48:55screening, a developmental screening,
3:48:57and a hearing screening, which means
3:48:59they are getting these screenings
3:49:00earlier, which means we can then
3:49:02intervene much faster. Of those children
3:49:05that were screened, over a quarter of
3:49:07them were immediately enrolled in care
3:49:09coordination. Some of them received
3:49:11intervention services and some of them
3:49:14were actually referred to and then saw
3:49:16developmental pediatricians.
3:49:18We also saw almost a thousand uh visits
3:49:23to from our two-lane partners um around
3:49:25two-lane uh mental health consultations.
3:49:28So really working with the educators,
3:49:30the families and the children themselves
3:49:32to help regulate emotions and manage um
3:49:34trauma and stress.
3:49:38We have seen in the past four years an
3:49:40increase in the acuity of our children
3:49:43with exceptionalities and special needs
3:49:45who are enrolling in our program. And so
3:49:47this year we launched uh a major
3:49:50initiative called the high- five
3:49:51initiative. The high- five initiative
3:49:53worked with six of the 40 child care
3:49:55centers where we saw high incidents of
3:49:58children with exceptionalities who
3:50:00needed additional support. And grants
3:50:02allowed them to hire full-time
3:50:04developmental support educators who
3:50:06could work alongside teachers in the
3:50:08classroom and work alongside children in
3:50:11their families to help ensure that those
3:50:13sort the services that they were already
3:50:15receiving in classrooms and the care
3:50:17that they were receiving was the most
3:50:18impactful. And the thing that was
3:50:21amazing about this is that uh one of the
3:50:23directors said, and I'll I'll just read
3:50:25partial partially part of the quote.
3:50:27This is the first year that everybody on
3:50:29my team came back. Um, so we're seeing
3:50:32byproducts of these types of
3:50:34interventions on educator retention.
3:50:38We are also in the third year of a
3:50:40partnership with the New Orleans
3:50:41Redevelopment Authority related to our
3:50:43child care facilities. Um, since 2022,
3:50:46we have partnered and provided $4.6
3:50:49million to Nora to support not just new
3:50:52construction, but improvements to
3:50:54facilities, signage, uh, enhancements,
3:50:57um, just a variety of things. and and
3:51:00we'll talk a little bit about how that
3:51:01funding is going to change going in the
3:51:03future. We have also at Agenda provided
3:51:06nearly 2,000 hours of direct technical
3:51:08assistance to almost 130 childcare
3:51:11centers, meaning we are helping them
3:51:13through the permitting process, the
3:51:14zoning issues, the licensing
3:51:16requirements.
3:51:18Three centers uh have launched since the
3:51:21start of this funding. So you note uh
3:51:23many of you have been at their openings.
3:51:25two in district B, uh, the Firehouse and
3:51:28Will Cox Academy, as well as Shiloh
3:51:30Gardens and Council District E, uh, in
3:51:32Holy Cross's neighborhood. And what's
3:51:34remarkable is two of those three are al
3:51:37also integrating housing support as part
3:51:39of their work. And so we're integrating
3:51:41child care with affordable housing,
3:51:43which we know is continues to be a
3:51:45priority for the city.
3:51:49As I mentioned, we continue to do
3:51:52independent evaluations as required by
3:51:54the cooperative endeavor agreement. I'm
3:51:56not going to read through um everything,
3:51:58but I will say a couple of important
3:52:00statistics uh based on our findings for
3:52:03this year's program. 94% of our families
3:52:06reported that the city seats program
3:52:08improved their ability to work or go to
3:52:10school. 89% of our families would
3:52:13recommend their site to a a friend or a
3:52:16family member. 77% of our children are
3:52:19remaining from year to year from year 1
3:52:22uh and 67% have retained going forward
3:52:26and 97% of our directors participating
3:52:30said that their city seats program
3:52:32experience has been very positive.
3:52:36We have continued to invest uh in child
3:52:39care educators which includes
3:52:40professional development, coaching,
3:52:43training. We provided over 2,000 hours
3:52:46of in-classroom support to help uh you
3:52:49know assist teachers in really
3:52:52developing their practice and getting
3:52:53really good at what they do. Um and we
3:52:56know that that's showing up in the
3:52:57progress that we're seeing with young
3:52:58kids. 77% of our city seats directors
3:53:02said that of all of our supports, the
3:53:05inclassroom coaching was by far had the
3:53:07greatest impact on their teacher and
3:53:09their teachers practices.
3:53:13We also launched a couple years ago now
3:53:15a wage enhancement program. As you know,
3:53:18childc care owner uh educators are some
3:53:21of the lowest paid professions in the
3:53:22city um and across the country. The
3:53:25average wage is $11 an hour. Now, as
3:53:28part of this work, we partner with our
3:53:30child care centers to ensure that they
3:53:31adopt the wage ordinance and so we do
3:53:34have some progress there with respect to
3:53:36that, but we also provide retention
3:53:38bonuses for individuals to stay in the
3:53:40classroom. It is not uncommon uh prior
3:53:43to initiatives like this that we would
3:53:44lose about 60% of our workforce from
3:53:47year to year. I'm happy to say that now
3:53:49we are seeing major retention work um as
3:53:53part of this and they are receiving
3:53:55these you know quarterly enhancements to
3:53:58essentially stay in the classroom. 90%
3:54:01of the teachers who were surveyed said
3:54:03that it reduced their stress levels and
3:54:0583% said that they would stay in the
3:54:07field as part of this. And just again a
3:54:11couple of quotes. I often struggle with
3:54:13the idea of staying in child care
3:54:15because it's so hard to make ends meet.
3:54:17This last year they helped me make me
3:54:19feel like I could stay in early
3:54:20education doing a job that I love.
3:54:24So going into this year our priorities
3:54:27are first and foremost this is a program
3:54:29that is effectively working. We have
3:54:31both independent data to suggest that as
3:54:33well as our internal data to suggest
3:54:35that. We would love to continue to serve
3:54:37as many children as possible. We have uh
3:54:40over 5,000 kids that could be eligible
3:54:42for these types of programs but cannot
3:54:44participate because we do not have
3:54:46funding for those seats. We also have
3:54:48over 50 child care centers that could
3:54:51also participate as part of this work um
3:54:53but cannot because we do not despite as
3:54:56much funding as we do have um it is very
3:54:58expensive to be able to provide full day
3:55:00full day full day full year care. We
3:55:03will continue to focus on early literacy
3:55:06um which is really aligned with many of
3:55:08our state priorities around that. We
3:55:10will continue to work with Nora on
3:55:12facility improvements but many uh to to
3:55:15the last presentation. We are focusing
3:55:17very much on green infrastructure as
3:55:19well as lead abatement. Those are two
3:55:22areas that we know the administration
3:55:23has already been focused on where we
3:55:25feel like we can leverage our funding
3:55:27appropriately. Also, we're seeing that
3:55:29many of our child care centers are
3:55:30spending an astronomical amount of money
3:55:32each year on repairs related to not
3:55:35having permeable pavements or not having
3:55:37drainage in their uh childcare centers.
3:55:40We will continue to have high
3:55:41accountability and maintain
3:55:43communication with the public, increase
3:55:45our uh ability to to uh improve our data
3:55:49systems,
3:55:50increase family support. We'll be
3:55:52launching our parent cohort this year
3:55:54and most importantly try to maintain as
3:55:57much funding as we can at the state
3:55:59level. Um as New Orleans has gone the
3:56:01rest of the state has gone and so with
3:56:04that we are now seeing 17 communities
3:56:06across the country uh excuse me across
3:56:08the state who are now leveraging funding
3:56:10for that state matching fund. And so
3:56:12that does mean that our competition for
3:56:14those funds is now much higher than it
3:56:17was in the past. And so we'll need to
3:56:19work not just with the administration
3:56:21and our council and our legislature, but
3:56:23to ensure that our representatives know
3:56:25that we should be pushing to see that
3:56:27that state matching fund has as much
3:56:29funding as possible so that all parishes
3:56:31across the state who have done the same
3:56:33things we have to to raise local funds
3:56:35will be able to participate.
3:56:37I'm going to turn it over to Janica
3:56:39Julian, uh my partner at Nola Public
3:56:41Schools. Good afternoon.
3:56:54Can you come help me with the slides?
3:56:56I'm sorry. Excuse me. Can you come help
3:56:58me with the slides? I don't know why.
3:57:11>> While we're waiting uh for the technical
3:57:13info, does anybody have any questions
3:57:14for Jen?
3:57:17Jen, I do have a I just have an
3:57:19observation. Currently, you're at 4.39
3:57:22mills,
3:57:23>> correct?
3:57:24>> And that gains you about $24 million a
3:57:27year. It's about 21 and a half. I
3:57:29believe that number reflects the Yeah,
3:57:31it's about 21 and a half that we
3:57:33currently use.
3:57:34>> Okay. All right. Um and then if your
3:57:37millage rolled forward to five,
3:57:40>> correct?
3:57:40>> You'd get about $3.4 million in
3:57:44additional funding. Correct.
3:57:45>> How many more children could you um
3:57:47help?
3:57:48>> So, there's two things that that
3:57:49conditions on. The first is the amount
3:57:50of state matching funds. So, right now,
3:57:53these are programs that operate
3:57:54together. And so if the state matching
3:57:56fund were reduced, we would not be a we
3:57:59would have to take any increases to
3:58:01absorb the killed children who are
3:58:02already enrolled in our state matching
3:58:04funds program. But we would need to do
3:58:07another thing which is also increase and
3:58:09augment the rate at which we are uh
3:58:12currently compensating our childare
3:58:13centers for these funds. Right now um it
3:58:16is not at market rate and so we would
3:58:18need to consider both of those things.
3:58:19Based on our modeling, we feel
3:58:21optimistic we could serve anywhere from
3:58:23100 to 200 more children. It would come
3:58:26at the expense and the cost of reducing
3:58:28some other things within the budget, but
3:58:30we feel um we could serve and we would
3:58:33serve more children as a result of a
3:58:34roll forward.
3:58:35>> So you could serve about 100 to 200 more
3:58:37children, but the demand is really like
3:58:395,000.
3:58:40>> Correct. Still
3:58:41>> okay. Thank you.
3:58:44>> Right. Sorry for the technical
3:58:46difficulty. At Nola Public Schools, we
3:58:49have the pleasure of making sure that
3:58:51these kiddos get into seats through our
3:58:53coordinated enrollment process. And so
3:58:56here there are five strategies that we
3:58:58want to share about um our enrollment
3:59:00and access that we provide for families
3:59:03through the coordinated enrollment
3:59:04process um through our avail system.
3:59:07Sorry. So, one, family access and
3:59:09enrollment support is connecting those
3:59:11families to these opportunities through
3:59:13some of our events, our family resource
3:59:16centers, which includes application
3:59:18assistance, ver verification support,
3:59:20and direct family navigation. And so we
3:59:23connect with a lot of our community
3:59:26partners around the city and bring the
3:59:28application process, you know, in those
3:59:31sites because we do realize that
3:59:33although our family resource centers are
3:59:35centrally located, in some cases
3:59:38families still experience barriers to
3:59:40being able to access those resource
3:59:42centers. But there we can start a new
3:59:45application. we can provide assistance
3:59:47with the verification
3:59:49um and do direct outreach to priority
3:59:51priority neighborhoods and families. The
3:59:55second strategy is around enrollment
3:59:57operations and accountability. We want
3:59:59to make sure that we are strengthening
4:00:01our enrollment applica operations
4:00:03through application verification,
4:00:06quality control of those applications,
4:00:08monitoring of our eligibility, staff
4:00:11development and data informed
4:00:12performance management. And so how we do
4:00:15those is that we make sure that the
4:00:17documents that are we're verifying we're
4:00:19doing that with quality as well as
4:00:22accuracy daily quality control and error
4:00:25correction staff coaching training and
4:00:27professional development
4:00:30compliance monitoring to protect public
4:00:32investment. So, not only are we
4:00:34providing that access, we want to make
4:00:35sure that we're doing it in a great way
4:00:38and being accountable to make sure that
4:00:40we are actually um passing the audits
4:00:42that come alongside [clears throat]
4:00:44the funding. The next thing is our
4:00:46technology and process improvement.
4:00:48Although our database system which is
4:00:50called Availab is helping to streamline
4:00:53applications and improve verification
4:00:55and enrollment workflows, we
4:00:57continuously monitor um the application
4:01:00including the questions um and the
4:01:03things that we're asking for. We do
4:01:05things like talk to our families as well
4:01:07as our stakeholders to find out if it's
4:01:09readable. um do they understand what it
4:01:12is we're asking for and what are the
4:01:14things that are, you know, preventing
4:01:16them from getting in the application in
4:01:17a timely manner. And so that's why we
4:01:20again went out into the community to
4:01:22provide that support because we want
4:01:24every family to be able to access the
4:01:26application and, you know, get across
4:01:28the finish line to submitting the
4:01:30application for enrollment.
4:01:32Next, we make sure that we're supporting
4:01:34our providers through training,
4:01:36onboarding, and enrollment technical
4:01:38assistance, coordinating that outreach,
4:01:40and ongoing engagement with early
4:01:42childhood and community partners. We
4:01:44know that often times families trust
4:01:47community partners because they're going
4:01:49into that space and have not maybe came
4:01:50into our space yet. So, we make sure
4:01:53that we're providing this information to
4:01:55the sites that provide services for
4:01:57families as well as community partners
4:01:59just to eliminate another barrier for
4:02:01families. And lastly, seat utilization
4:02:04and equitable access using our
4:02:06enrollment and demand data. We maximize
4:02:09publicly funded seats by doing targeted
4:02:12outreach, connecting with families to
4:02:14available opportunities, and
4:02:15strengthening the equitable access
4:02:17across our city. And so we're constantly
4:02:19monitoring our application cycle. Um we
4:02:23have a main round application cycle as
4:02:25well as open enrollment cycle. And we we
4:02:26like to call it always open enrolling
4:02:28because if a seat becomes available, we
4:02:31are going to fill that seat. And so our
4:02:33application process is ongoing
4:02:35throughout the year to ensure that if
4:02:37any vacancies um exist that we're able
4:02:40to fill those seats in a timely manner.
4:02:43And our goal is that every publicly
4:02:45funded early childhood seat is
4:02:46accessible to any eligible family
4:02:49through this process and that it's
4:02:51equitable and family centered um
4:02:53throughout the system.
4:02:56Get this slide
4:03:00here.
4:03:07All right. And so how we do these,
4:03:09again, I just wanted to give a little
4:03:11bit of data about some of the things
4:03:12that I talked about for our community
4:03:14based enrollment events. As I've stated,
4:03:17we go out in this community, but this
4:03:19year we did about um sorry, we started
4:03:22off with our at the beginning of our
4:03:23application cycle, we start off with our
4:03:25fair. It's a coordinated enrollment
4:03:27system fair where families are able to
4:03:29come out and they meet providers um and
4:03:32community resources. Unlike with our
4:03:35application process, you you you're not
4:03:37able to connect with a school or
4:03:39provider at that particular time. So, we
4:03:40thought that that it would be important
4:03:42that they can come on site. We're
4:03:44normally um at McDonald 35 every year.
4:03:47This year would be January 9th and
4:03:49they're able to walk up to a provider or
4:03:52school and ask them questions based upon
4:03:54the needs of their families. We this
4:03:57year had 21 total verification events
4:04:00and supported over 600 families. Whether
4:04:03that was with application assistance or
4:04:06verification as I talked about
4:04:07previously.
4:04:14We want to make sure that throughout
4:04:15this process we are also building family
4:04:17trust. And so in our high satisfaction
4:04:20rating surveys that we've done 83% of
4:04:23those families explained that their
4:04:25process was was either good to
4:04:27excellence and 92.5%
4:04:30were very satisfied. So even though
4:04:33we're getting a high rating, we still
4:04:35contact families who do rate their
4:04:37experience at a two or below to talk to
4:04:40them about their concerns and then that
4:04:42also aids in improving our overall
4:04:44satisfaction and our application
4:04:46process.
4:04:48We've expanded our family support by
4:04:50making sure that we have available live
4:04:52phone assistance and virtual support
4:04:54options um so that if families can't
4:04:56come in for whatever reason, they have
4:04:58another avenue to reach out to us. 91%
4:05:02of our applicants who initiated
4:05:03initiated an application either placed
4:05:06or successfully weight listed and then
4:05:08of those 90% did receive their first
4:05:10first choice placement.
4:05:15The next thing I want to talk about is
4:05:17within our system we implemented um two
4:05:21compliance managers on last year but
4:05:24right now that is helping to strengthen
4:05:25our quality assurance and reduce our
4:05:27audit findings. We have successfully um
4:05:30in the 2526 school year had all of our
4:05:33funding sources without any uh audit
4:05:36findings which then is going to be
4:05:39something that we're trying to make sure
4:05:40that we're doing moving forward. And
4:05:42what that means is not only are we
4:05:43filling the seats again, we are making
4:05:45sure that we are following all of the
4:05:47eligibility requirements for the various
4:05:49funding sources that we do offer. And we
4:05:52also make sure that we're pouring into
4:05:54our staff with a professional
4:05:55development and skill building as well
4:05:57as making sure that we're reinforcing
4:06:00our rigorous appliance framework to
4:06:02uphold all of those policy adherence
4:06:04that I spoke about earlier.
4:06:08We also have an engagement and
4:06:10enrollment campaign. You may see some of
4:06:13our billboards around the city, but we
4:06:15are thinking about ways that we can
4:06:17reach uh families who we are not already
4:06:19reaching. So be on the lookout for our
4:06:21before you know it campaign. We are
4:06:23going to highlight some of the journey
4:06:26of the kids who started in about 3 years
4:06:28ago in our campaigns from infasy through
4:06:32kindergarten. So we're excited that
4:06:34we're going to show a little bit of
4:06:35their journey and how they're being
4:06:36successful in their educational journey.
4:06:38Now
4:06:41lastly, this is the fiscal year budget
4:06:43for 2027. Um we have five categories of
4:06:47family enrollment and support
4:06:49information and media campaign, family
4:06:51access, our data systems and support and
4:06:54then fiscal administration and program
4:06:56support which totals 1.5 million um with
4:07:00100%
4:07:02uh indicated right here.
4:07:07>> Okay, any questions?
4:07:09All right, thank you so much for your
4:07:10presentation.
4:07:11>> Civil service is up next. Thank you,
4:07:14Ashley.
4:07:39I'm sorry.
4:08:13He's going to drive.
4:08:26Good afternoon, council members. Um I'm
4:08:28Amy Trapany, civil service director, and
4:08:29I have with me today Tia Harrison and
4:08:31Robert Hagman for my staff. Um for our
4:08:342027 proposed budget, um it's
4:08:37essentially a standstill budget from
4:08:382026. Our personnel costs are about $2.4
4:08:42million. Um as Brandy spoke about
4:08:44earlier, that's a $26,000 increase from
4:08:482026, but that's due to an increase in
4:08:50the fringes, the cost of fringes. Um it
4:08:53maintains our current staffing level of
4:08:55filled positions. Other operating is
4:08:58also fixed at 59,364
4:09:01and that is the same amount as we had in
4:09:022026.
4:09:06Okay. And the key components of our
4:09:07budget um as I said it maintains our
4:09:09current filled staffing and uh it
4:09:12eliminates two uh positions that are
4:09:14currently vacant. Uh one of the
4:09:16positions actually has sort of been
4:09:17replaced by technology when we went to
4:09:19our new learning management system. uh
4:09:21it eliminated the need for us to refill
4:09:23that position. So for our other
4:09:26operating again it's the same as 2026.
4:09:29Um just to note 92% of our other
4:09:31operating funds are essentially
4:09:33dedicated to two areas either software
4:09:36or or our disciplinary appeals process.
4:09:38About 63% of our budget goes to the
4:09:41different softwares programs that we use
4:09:43and 29% uh goes to the disciplinary
4:09:46appeals process and that's mostly for
4:09:48hearing examiners and court reporters.
4:09:50Um as you know we use uh Neo gov for
4:09:53most of our uh human resource uh
4:09:56tracking. So we use different uh modules
4:09:58of that system for applicant tracking.
4:10:00It's our job portal. It's our learning
4:10:02management system performance
4:10:04evaluations. It's online onboarding,
4:10:07electronic requisition routing. So we
4:10:09use that for a number of HR processes in
4:10:12city government across departments.
4:10:16Um for our budgeting efficiencies from
4:10:182026 to 20 uh from 2025 to 2026 uh
4:10:22essentially the biggest cut to our
4:10:24budget uh was that we did not get funded
4:10:26last year or this year for public safety
4:10:28promotional testing. Um so that was a
4:10:31significant uh difference in our budget
4:10:33from 2025 to 2026. And again that's not
4:10:36funded for 2027.
4:10:38uh our rules do allow for those
4:10:39promotional eligible lists to stay in
4:10:41effect for up to five years with
4:10:44commission extension and that is
4:10:46essentially what the commission has done
4:10:47for the existing eligible list. Uh the
4:10:49commission's extended them into 2027
4:10:55for our 2027 goals. Uh our our first
4:10:58goal is to continue to work with the
4:11:00administration and the civil service
4:11:01commission to revise civil service rules
4:11:03and processes to enhance efficiency,
4:11:06transparency, and fairness in the
4:11:08administration of the merit system.
4:11:10Every year we bring forward a number of
4:11:11rule changes uh to move things forward
4:11:13in our system. Uh we also want to
4:11:16sustain and monitor the efficiencies
4:11:18resulting from the mayor's hiring
4:11:20process improvement task force that we
4:11:22served on earlier this year. Um some of
4:11:24those changes that we've made uh we've
4:11:26gone for to a per vacancy per job
4:11:29posting system. Uh previously we would
4:11:32post positions collect applications put
4:11:35people on eligible list and then when
4:11:36the departments had a need we would give
4:11:38them the list. Um what that resulted in
4:11:40while it gave an instant list of people
4:11:43there were often people on the list who
4:11:45had applied months earlier and were no
4:11:47longer interested in the position. So
4:11:49we've shifted to where the department
4:11:51files a requisition. It goes through the
4:11:54approval process. It's an actual
4:11:56budgeted vacancy. Then we do the posting
4:11:58and create the eligible list for that
4:12:00particular vacancy. So uh much better in
4:12:03terms of the public knowing that it is
4:12:06for an actual seat in city government.
4:12:09Um one of the other efficiencies is we
4:12:12reertify the list of eligibles on a
4:12:14weekly basis. So, we're constantly
4:12:15sending more qualified candidates to the
4:12:18departments. Um, increased visibility
4:12:20for managers on those requisitions. Uh,
4:12:23we moved the hiring freeze form at to
4:12:25part of the requisitioning process. So,
4:12:27that's electronic now. And then there's
4:12:29a mandate for departments to use our
4:12:31online electronic onboarding system as
4:12:34well for new employees. Uh, another goal
4:12:37is to work with the departments to
4:12:38address critical vacancies through
4:12:40hiring rate increases, new
4:12:41classifications, or minimum
4:12:43qualification changes. Uh, we want to
4:12:45partner, Robin Tia's team will work with
4:12:47the departments to update job
4:12:49specifications to ensure they're
4:12:50accurately reflecting involving work
4:12:52requirements and organ organizational
4:12:54needs across city government and the
4:12:56sewage and water board. Again, those job
4:12:58titles and the job specs are living
4:13:00documents. We want to make sure that
4:13:01that those accurately reflect changes to
4:13:04the workforce, especially when you have
4:13:06uh increased incorporation of technology
4:13:08into jobs. Um, another thing that we've
4:13:11worked on this year and will continue to
4:13:13work on when you don't have money to put
4:13:14forward uh to initiatives, you can still
4:13:17do enhanced training for the
4:13:18departments. So, this year uh we did uh
4:13:21a workshop for departmental leaderships
4:13:23on disciplinary training. We partnered
4:13:25with the law department and the business
4:13:27council gave us some assistance. Really
4:13:29worked uh to train those departmental
4:13:32leaders on how to effectively enact
4:13:34discipline for employees in a way that's
4:13:36fair and stands up uh to any challenges.
4:13:39Uh we also created a reference guide to
4:13:42all things civil service for directors
4:13:44and new directors so that they would
4:13:46have um sort of a bible on how to work
4:13:48within our system effectively. It gives
4:13:50them a reference to say okay well how do
4:13:52I do this in the system? How does this
4:13:54work? developed that earlier this year.
4:13:56Um next year uh early in the year with
4:13:59the assistance of the business council,
4:14:00we hope to do a train the trainer
4:14:02session where uh right now we have about
4:14:0525 individuals uh who serve as uh
4:14:07trainers in our employee growth and
4:14:09development program. They're employee
4:14:11trainers and we're going to uh bring in
4:14:13someone to assist uh with training the
4:14:15trainer for them on uh techniques for
4:14:18adult learners. So to make that program
4:14:20better to effectively train our existing
4:14:22workforce. It's one of the things that
4:14:24we'll be working on earlier next early
4:14:26next year. So
4:14:27>> great. Any questions?
4:14:30>> Hearing none.
4:14:30>> No news is good news. Thank you.
4:14:32>> Yeah. Thank you. And with that, we will
4:14:33adjourn. As I noted, public safety is
4:14:35tomorrow. Do your stretches. Bring your
4:14:38lunch. We will be here for a long time
4:14:39tomorrow.
4:14:40>> Bye.