2026-10-01 - Stormwater Management Advisory Commission

Summary

  • Routine business: Two absences were excused and the September 3 minutes were approved. No one signed up for public comment.
  • Planning Commission liaison: Staff noted one upcoming rezoning case near the Dixie Forest and Spring Forest area (R-4 to R-6 with conditions, including controlling the 25-year storm at each discharge point) with a public hearing the following Tuesday. Staff said neighbors raised many questions about traffic and stormwater, there is no documented flooding near the site, and erosion complaints nearby are in a different drainage basin. A new Planning Commission liaison has been appointed and will attend future meetings.
  • Staff updates: Staff won awards at the North Carolina stormwater conference in Winston-Salem, and two staff presentations were well received. A flood risk awareness survey for people in floodprone areas, especially renters, drew about 40 responses after roughly 1,800 mailed cards; staff noted no federal or state rule requires landlords to disclose flood risk to tenants. A public meeting on the East Lane Street Drainage Improvements Project was set for October 8, and a stream cleanup at Worthdale Park for October 24 at 10 a.m. Drainage assistance projects at Wellington Place, Cable Court and Midlands Town Homes are moving toward construction.
  • Rainwater Rewards Projects Approval: The commission approved three rain garden and cistern projects on the modified consent agenda. Staff reported more contractors joining the program and a recent jump in residential and commercial inquiries, which they tied to the citywide increase in reimbursement to 90%.
  • Glenwood Crest Drainage Improvements Project: A project manager presented the completed rehabilitation of an 80-to-100-year-old private storm pipe network. About 3,700 feet of pipe was studied by camera; 1,150 feet needed work, with 800 feet lined using ultraviolet-cured liners and 350 feet excavated and replaced, and grout injected to fill voids. The contract with the lower of two bids was $2.8 million against an engineer's estimate of $2.4 million, and the project had a 50% contingency. Construction finished in August 2026. He cited challenges with easements from about 30 private properties, tree preservation, a subcontractor's liners that had to be replaced at the contractor's cost, and a state DOT pipe rehabilitation done ahead of the city's work. The liner has a 50-year design life.
  • Stormwater Commission FY26 Annual Report: The commission approved the draft final fiscal year 2027 work plan and the fiscal year 2026 annual report for presentation to City Council on Wednesday, November 4 (moved from Tuesday because of Election Day).
  • Stormwater Regulations Review Request: Staff said Jones asked at the September 15 council meeting that the commission suggest stormwater regulations for possible review. Members discussed erosion control, floodplain, watershed and detention rules and the 25-year storm conditions offered in rezoning cases, and staff proposed a November or December agenda item. Upcoming topics also include industrial stormwater discharges under the new permit effective July 1 and optional field tours.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:12to the Walnut Creek uh wetland center

00:15for hosting this to rec

00:19um

00:21notice that uh in this call to order the

00:23meeting is being recorded by video and

00:25audio means the recordings will be

00:26posted on the city's website for public

00:28viewing and listening.

00:30In-person attendees of this meeting will

00:32be included in the recording. By

00:34remaining in this meeting, inerson

00:35attendees agreed with both images and/or

00:37voices may be included in this request.

00:40We have a two requests for excused

00:43absences

00:44and

00:47hoping that Colin and Barrett will join

00:50us soon.

00:53We excuse all four or should we

00:56>> I would suggest excuse the two that we

00:58know of now. If we need to come back the

01:01other two, we can check.

01:07>> Okay. So we'll look for a motion to

01:10excuse uh and Nichol

01:17second. All in favor of excusing.

01:20>> Okay. Yeah.

01:25>> Yeah. Thanks to Scott,

01:30>> right?

01:32>> Yeah. Maybe that's where Barrett talking

01:34about right now. [laughter] I have made

01:37that mistake because

01:40um Scott distributed the meeting minutes

01:43from September 3rd

01:45and would like to open the floor for

01:48motions to approve andor conversations.

01:59>> Second. Thank you. Any discussion? All

02:03in favor of approving the minutes?

02:05Thank you, Scott, for taking good care

02:07of us on votes and minutes.

02:11Um, public comments. This is an

02:13in-person meeting. Comments may be made

02:15by attendees uh upon registering. This

02:18person meetings indicating they'd like

02:19to speak. The meeting also publicly

02:22livereamed. Comments cannot be accepted

02:24during the meeting using those virtual

02:26methods. Um comments communications from

02:30residents should be sent via email

02:31address to rale scopec.gov.

02:34>> I don't think we had a anybody signed up

02:37to speak.

02:39>> Not yet. Okay. Thank you.

02:41>> All right. Now we're on the planning

02:42commission and leaison.

02:48Have you had a chance? Uh Ben and I

02:51spoke yesterday morning and there's one

02:54case that has a little bit of storm

02:56water mentioned in it. Um that is going

02:58to go over in North.

03:00>> Okay. Thank you.

03:02>> And the other thing is we're seeking

03:04we're still looking for is planning

03:06commission have they appointed the

03:07liison yet?

03:07>> They did. They did. Okay.

03:10>> Yes. And he'll be joining us for future

03:12meetings which will always take place

03:13the same week.

03:19Yes. And he was he was the leazison for

03:23like a week for a month and they changed

03:26change the chairship and so they had to

03:29turn out to be ahead. So

03:31>> it's fine. Yeah.

03:33>> Anyway, um like uh like uh Commissioner

03:40C said, we have a case Z4325609

03:44road. If you guys have driven in this

03:46area, you still sign for but [snorts] um

03:49uh this has already been planned and

03:52it's scheduled a public hearing uh

03:54Tuesday night. There were uh

03:59uh sort of where Atlanta becomes liter

04:01if you know that area near near Dixie

04:03forest spring forest area.

04:06uh currently zones R4 uh requesting R

04:10six conditional use weather conditions

04:12that they're offering right now is the

04:13rate of storm water be controlled to

04:1525ear storm and as I said the public

04:17hearing is set for Tuesday this case has

04:19seen a lot of questions about all all

04:22sorts of things traffic storm water

04:26height um

04:28uh fit for lack of a better term and so

04:32there's been a lot of neighborhood uh up

04:36up up up up up up up up up up up up up

04:36up up up up up up up upswell about this

04:37one but but I do think they've uh got

04:40some storm water uh complaints around

04:44this property and some are actually in a

04:46different drainage basin which this this

04:48big blue line is the drain bas line.

04:51Everything um north is Perry and

04:54everything south is uh Marsh I believe

04:57Marsh and um so any complaints on this

05:00side of the island obviously wouldn't

05:02wouldn't have anything to do with this

05:03case because doesn't get get there but

05:06there are a few

05:09channel erosion cases and things like

05:11that. So that's what the applicant added

05:15in the 25-year storm detention. Uh

05:18stormwater staff has gotten a laundry

05:19list of questions from neighbors about

05:21this project and we just kind of got the

05:23standard answers. This is what we're

05:24looking for

05:26site plan things like that. But they

05:28have a whole bunch of issues with

05:31traffic as well because this area if you

05:33know it is still looks a little rural

05:36for lack of better term. It's like

05:37two-lane

05:39uh in the shoulder section.

05:42Um any development would have to improve

05:45the roadway in front of their property

05:49the entire road. So um a lot of issues

05:53on that. I did want to give you a sense

05:55because once we met yesterday, this is

05:56actually a zoom in on on the tobo. So

06:00they're kind of the existing res house

06:02is kind of the top of the hill now. So

06:05So they're not really

06:07um draining in one specified manner and

06:10they have options to drain to public

06:12right away public rideway. So there are

06:14options and the one staff comment that

06:17we did make the change in their

06:18condition was to control 25 storm at

06:21each point of discharge since there's

06:22not one point of discharge. So but this

06:26is what the carpet looks like currently.

06:29which says four residential house with a

06:30decent size

06:32uh driveway apartment that area and um I

06:39do believe the residents are a little

06:40bit nervous because if you go back to

06:42this picture there's a couple other

06:45bigles around that could potentially

06:47subdivide later. So I think that's what

06:49and all these other residential

06:50properties are are forward as well. So

06:56from our perspective fits the condition

06:59they're offering.

07:00>> Correct.

07:00>> And most stream there's no flood plane.

07:03>> Yeah.

07:04>> There's no flooding on the chase of

07:07neighbors that we that you have correct.

07:09No

07:12there's not any document flooding

07:15near this site to automatically trigger

07:18any UDO storm requirements or anything

07:20like that. And there's no real cases,

07:22but I mean it definitely would have an

07:24impact on this pocket being arc. So I do

07:26understand why neighbors are concerned

07:28and and I don't want to speak for

07:30commission. We mentioned that storm

07:32water is mentioned in a lot of these

07:33cases. It's like a nice thing to kind of

07:36add add to the list of things that are

07:39wrong with the site.

07:41And you mentioned that there have been

07:44reports about erosion that were in some

07:46of the comments, but those were in the

07:48Marsh Creek water shed and this property

07:50drains completely anticipated.

07:52>> Yeah, there was more in the Marsh Creek.

07:54There's one or two in this drain basin,

07:56but it's far under way, but there's

07:59there's um

08:01erosion and street flooding in this

08:03area, but the city just finished a Dix

08:05road project in this area, too, that was

08:06supposed to handle some of that as well.

08:08And also this is an open I mean just to

08:10location that's about to where we are

08:17and with the R six they could go to town

08:19homes but not apartments that

08:26>> yeah I think it's good to be aware of

08:28these that is a storm water condition

08:30added and storm water issues mentioned

08:33but I would agree that you know I don't

08:35think I don't see a lot

08:37on what our concern on this case.

08:41>> So far in the past couple meetings,

08:43we've been a lot we haven't had hardly

08:46any cases that have any storm water or

08:47human conditions attached to them.

08:49That's why the schedule.

08:52How many times do people offer up 25

08:55years? Is it like 110 cases kind of

08:58thing or is it I wouldn't say it's a

09:01it's a every case or anything like that

09:04but I think it it was it was something

09:07the neighbors were talking about that

09:08they were concerned about storm water

09:10because all their public right away is a

09:12ditch and shoulder section. So they're

09:13worried about what's what's it going to

09:15do to ditches downstream and things like

09:17that.

09:24Yeah, there's multiple sides around

09:25town. Like if you driven through this

09:26area

09:31and just like I say, we have got laundry

09:33list of questions concerned citizens.

09:36That's us in planning and transation.

09:39We've all kind of had long list of stuff

09:41to answer today.

09:46Thanks. So that's information

09:50that

10:03so um we do have on our agenda later

10:06today um hopefully a final review of the

10:10fiscal year 27 work plan and fiscical

10:13year 26 annual report. Um uh we would

10:18ideally like to approve it today so that

10:20we can take it to city council on the

10:22November 4th council. I'm going to just

10:25note for everyone um that that first

10:28council meeting in November is on

10:30Wednesday because Tuesday is an election

10:32is election day. So they move that

10:34council meeting be Wednesday. And so I

10:37think uh chair you're planning to be

10:39there to present it that everyone's

10:41welcome to attend or stream if you'd

10:44like to to see. It'll be a short

10:45presentation of the work annual report

10:48as we do annually.

10:52>> Um is it whatever that Wednesday is

10:55meeting?

10:57The meeting will be the fourth. Yeah.

10:58Yeah. Tuesday is the third which would

11:00normally be the first Tuesday the

11:02council meeting but because that's

11:04election day it will be on the fourth

11:07and our meeting is on the 5th. our

11:09meetings on the correct correct

11:14no staff updates. Uh quick overview of

11:18we did have the North Carolina uh ABWA

11:22Stormwater Conference in Winston Salem a

11:24couple weeks ago. Uh the team was lucky

11:27enough to have a couple of awards. Um,

11:30the Gibson Play Plaza was recognized.

11:32This is Storm Alert award and Scott

11:34Bryant was nice enough to nominate me

11:36for an award which I which I received

11:38which was very exciting

11:45and then stormwater staff delivered two

11:47presentations at the conference. one of

11:49which you will see today. Eric Mayor is

11:53presenting the same presentation on the

11:55Glenwood Crest project that he presented

11:58at at the conference and then um our

12:01asset management team uh Sherry, Claudia

12:04and Kinley also presented on some pure

12:07pipe lining uh projects that that they

12:09did. So both both were very

12:11wellreceived. We were well represented

12:13at the conf. There is a um a survey that

12:18our flood plane team has been um u

12:22putting out to the to the public.

12:23They've made a number of mailings. Uh

12:26there's a link here if you're interested

12:28in uh filling it out, but we're just

12:30looking at what the survey is related to

12:32flood risk awareness. And this is part

12:35of a strategic initiative that um our

12:38team is is working on to assist

12:40residents who live in floodprone areas

12:43uh become more aware and and understand

12:45better what resources are available for

12:47them in terms of potential flood

12:50insurance or or so forth and especially

12:53focus on um renters who may not be as

12:56aware that the um that the home they

12:58live in is is

13:01how many people about that are not

13:04directly city or

13:08>> so far we have done direct mailings um I

13:12believe I'm not sure if someone's here I

13:14think it was 1,800 um direct mail cards

13:18were sent out area you remember how many

13:20we sent out from the tele

13:26>> okay there but yeah it was a direct mail

13:29but they're exploring other methods as

13:32well this is is part of strategic

13:34initiative is trying different ways of

13:36of reaching folks who sometimes may be

13:38hard to reach. See what um success rate

13:41we we have. Um because you know, and

13:44we've talked about this before. Um

13:47people who own their homes are usually

13:50more aware that they're in a flood plane

13:52or a flood run area because their

13:54mortgage company makes them buy flood

13:56insurance. Whereas there is not a um a

13:59similar disclosure

14:02method for rent to know or understand

14:05and there's no legal requirement at the

14:08federal or state level to require

14:10disclosure by landlords that um to their

14:13to their tenants. Um there has been

14:15discussion of of um whether that could

14:18be a a potential federal policy in the

14:21in the future. U but so far it's it's

14:24it's not got um got a lot of traction at

14:27the federal or state level.

14:34>> Thank you. So 1800 direct direct mail I

14:37think we got maybe in the 40ish range of

14:40responses so far. So, um, yeah, and pass

14:43along or if if you would know anyone who

14:46would, you know, be interested in

14:48filling up the survey, please continue

14:50to promote that. Um, there are some

14:52links um and a couple public meetings we

14:55have coming up on October 8th. So, just

14:58next week, is the East Lane uh East Lane

15:02Street public meeting that's in the

15:03Oakwood neighborhood. That's a project,

15:06a capital improvements project that's

15:08nearing the end of u uh design. Uh and

15:12public meeting will review the the

15:15alignment of of that project which is

15:17aimed at um

15:20uh structural um integrity improvement.

15:23You might recall that was the location

15:25that there was a private storm sewer

15:28under a house that failed and um caused

15:31a large sinkhole and the house had to be

15:33demolished. So the city project um will

15:37replace that private system which was in

15:39backyards with a public system that

15:41follows the street rights of way to um

15:44to relocate storm water through through

15:46the streets primarily. Yes sir.

15:48question. I think it was last week city

15:50of Rings out there at the intersection

15:51of L and Oakwood

15:54uh would have been the north west

15:57quadrant and they they dug up there used

16:00to be it was like constant flooding and

16:02the neighbor said there's just a spring

16:04that feeds that corner and I think they

16:07addressed that. Do you know what they do

16:08you have any idea what they were doing?

16:10>> Not familiar with that intersection. I

16:12do know that there was a catch basin at

16:14the corner of Lane Street in Bloodworth

16:17>> that was um that was also a floodprone

16:21area that work was done not to

16:24completely correct it but to to make it

16:27easier for to get drainage but this east

16:29lane project will go through that area

16:31and provide more capacity as well. I'm

16:33not familiar with the intersection that

16:35you're mentioning.

16:36>> It might not been storm water. may have

16:37something else there could have been and

16:40I don't know if we are maint

16:46>> um and then there is on October 24th is

16:49street cleanup at Worthdale Park and um

16:52if anyone to go to that we are finishing

16:55up a construction project it's a stream

16:58restoration project at Worthdale Park as

17:00as well so you can get a a glimpse of

17:02the ongoing work that's uh being done at

17:05at Worthdale Park also

17:08We click on the links and sign up

17:10volunteers.

17:11>> Yes. Yes, that would be the easiest way

17:13to do that. Or um yeah, it be I don't

17:17know the time in the area. Do you know

17:19that the time in the street or dor time

17:22that clean up?

17:24>> Well, it's 10 a.m.

17:26>> 10 10 a.m. So, registration would be

17:29preferable, but you could also just come

17:31at 10 a.m. to work on October 24th. I'm

17:35sure somebody will give you a vest and a

17:37and a bag to to help collect some

17:40litter.

17:42And then lastly, a few uh drainage

17:45assistance projects. Wellington um place

17:48cable court Midlands Town Homes moving

17:51to construction here in the very near

17:52future. So excited about seeing more DA

17:56projects moving moving forward.

17:59And that's all that I have, Mr.

18:02Thank you for that. Um I saw we all

18:06maybe got an email about a bio blitz

18:08starting this week today. I think we're

18:11on the storm water list now. Thank you

18:13for that. Um that's across the city park

18:16sites or something. So that's exciting.

18:19Um and notice they were fixing on six

18:22road that a new building

18:25drainage issue pushing out six foot road

18:28and they were fixing that last week. I

18:30appreciate that. You want to talk about

18:32that?

18:33>> Yes. Yes.

18:35Um, all right.

18:37Any questions for Wayne or staff?

18:43>> Uh, let's see. We now have the modified

18:45consent agenda for the Valley Rainwater

18:47Rewards Projects and Justin and Stephen

18:50are here to talk

18:58like we have three projects on the

19:01>> Yes. Agenda here.

19:03>> Yeah. Thanks.

19:06So, I believe you all received the memo

19:08prior. Um so happy to answer any

19:11questions related to the three projects

19:13I'm proposing today um

19:16for the budget that's on top of that.

19:21>> You can just spin them through a little

19:24project after this.

19:25>> Yeah. Just so we can see our

19:28>> Sure. Yeah. Do you mind driving or

19:34crashing?

19:36>> Nothing unusual about any of the three.

19:38>> No, nothing unusual. Um, nothing, you

19:40know, particularly to point out and say

19:42that's that's atypical.

19:45So once again, three projects. Uh, one

19:49is integrated as you can see on top.

19:52Basically means there's two different

19:53project types, Ringard and Sistn. You

19:56can see them kind of delineated here

19:58with their typical or they're not the

20:00typical their drainage areas for each

20:04and then below those metrics are a sum

20:06of the total project.

20:09>> Is that right piped all the way?

20:13>> Yeah, it's a pipe.

20:15>> Yeah, we typically recommend piping just

20:16because swailes are um especially like

20:19river rock swailes or something like

20:21that can get very expensive very quick.

20:23um actually dissuade people from moving.

20:30All right. Uh next one, another rain

20:32garden kind of in the corner uh of their

20:34lot downstream capturing majority of

20:37their roof in this case. Uh same ide sp

20:41mostly roof runoff. Um prior one did

20:44have some pvious treatment as well as

20:48well as mainly impervious. This is the

20:50next two are all impervious treatment

20:57and see a similar design uh for this

20:59property too. A little more w little

21:01more open in this case. Um but you know

21:04roughly speaking that's where the rain

21:06garden has been located and they're

21:07capturing majority of their home and

21:09some driveway.

21:12So good projects overall. Um,

21:16you know, like I said, no no issues as

21:19far as far as uh initial review or

21:21scrutiny went after we we you know,

21:26cross-cheed every every item in their

21:28application.

21:29>> Have you seen more interest by

21:31contractors or more availability from

21:33contractors in these projects or

21:36>> Yeah, better depth of contractor.

21:38>> Yes. So I would say that is actually

21:40very observable recently. Um you know

21:43because normally we'd have some key

21:46players. I'd say about three key players

21:48now I've been getting a lot of calls

21:51from additional ones as well. Um one of

21:54which or both of which are promoting a

21:56lot of their clients. So um so yeah you

22:00know key players and I say key players

22:02just just frequent flyers right? Um,

22:05I've I've probably been seeing five, six

22:07plus additions to our contractor list

22:09recently. Um, so it's been it's been

22:12good in that regard. I think that's only

22:13a helpful thing.

22:16Yeah, adds more competition, gives

22:19diverse kind of approach to things,

22:21challenges us in many ways too, just to

22:23to scrutinize and see what they're

22:25doing, what they're not doing. So, yeah,

22:27very good. Uh and and I would say also

22:30at least this last couple weeks like a

22:32huge uptick in interest as well. So

22:36you've been responding to a lot of

22:38consultations

22:39>> on the residential side or commercial

22:41side or not?

22:42>> Both.

22:42>> Yeah, both. You know, residential I

22:44think I don't know if it's ever going to

22:46change. It's definitely our backbone. Uh

22:48that's the majority of our

22:49consultations. But yeah, for me speaking

22:51for myself, I've had two uh commercial

22:55consultations recently. you know, some

22:57large scale plus one of these guys like,

22:59hey, I own 20 properties. I'm trying to

23:01explore this. So,

23:04we'll see. We'll see see what happens. I

23:06never

23:09>> Yeah.

23:13Do you think the change to the 90% um

23:19citywide is driving any of that

23:21potentially or?

23:22>> Yeah. Oh, yeah. I mean, it's I get a lot

23:25of feedback on the generosity of the

23:28program. So, uh, and people who just

23:31hear about it or they're like, "Hey, my

23:34landscaper told me about this. This

23:37doesn't, you know, it almost seems

23:39unreal. Why aren't more people doing

23:40it?"

23:41>> Um, so, so that is absolute feedback

23:45I've been getting. I think that's I

23:47think that is is huge. Now, you know,

23:49obviously every project is unique. We

23:51have to evaluate it. sometimes have to

23:53say, "Hey, you're not eligible for 90%,

23:55you're eligible for 73% or whatever."

23:58But, um, but still it's it's good

24:01feedback, you know, pretty much across

24:03the board.

24:18Second

24:21discussion

24:23all in favor of approvement for the

24:25motion. Okay.

24:27>> All right.

24:28>> Yeah. I appreciate it. Thank you guys

24:31for doing this work.

24:33>> Yeah. Yeah.

24:37Um, now we're going to pass

24:42about what we

24:45crested and drainage improvements

24:46project. Just Eric. All right. Just

24:48Eric. All right. Got the better half

24:50today, right? I hope so.

24:53Thank you for being here after doing

24:55this before. So, you better drive run

24:56with a, you know, a lesser crowd. Hope

25:00not.

25:01>> Again, Eric Mayer. I'm a CIP project

25:03manager for Raleigh stormwater and I did

25:06present this to the American Public

25:07Works Association meeting we had last

25:09month at Winston Salem. I'll be offering

25:12the same presentation to the American

25:13Society of Civil Engineers next month in

25:16Raleigh at the McKinnon Center and here

25:18to talk about the Glenma Crested Drain

25:20Improvements Project on the urban

25:22rehabilitation retrospective.

25:27My agenda will consist of five points. A

25:29brief background on the project, the

25:31engineering study and decision for the

25:34alternative was chosen, the design

25:36permitting stages for this project,

25:39construction phase, and then overall

25:41outcomes.

25:45Historically with Raleigh storm water,

25:47with any capital improvement project,

25:49the methods that's been going forward is

25:51to identify a failing stormwater system

25:54and to upgrade it by digging and

25:56replacing it with a larger pipe.

25:59But now as we come to different

26:00neighborhoods, there are different

26:01concerns and different uh opportunities

26:03to rehabilitate situ

26:11being an older historical neighborhood.

26:14So Raleigh storm water going forward is

26:16going to use more CIP as needed for

26:18different projects as development comes

26:20about.

26:23The first task was to assess the the

26:25given area within the five points as

26:26part of the engineering study. So, a

26:29network of about 3,700 linear feet of

26:31private stormware pipe was identified

26:33and studied using close caption TV

26:36techniques and full camera to identify

26:38and grade each of the different uh

26:40conditions for those pipes.

26:42Within that network, about 2550 or

26:45roughly 70% of that pipe was screened

26:48out and set aside for no work or no

26:51attention needed to be done at the time.

26:53Minor defects here or there, no saving

26:55holes. There was no need to re-lotate

26:57that section of piping.

26:591,150 ft remaining 30% of the alignment

27:03was chosen for further upgrades for

27:05rebilt or excavation replacement.

27:08It should be noted for this project that

27:10it was governed by the presence of sink

27:12holes and overall structural integrity

27:14of piping and not the capacity. Flooding

27:17was not a concern and had not been

27:19reported too much among the uh the

27:21neighborhood.

27:23This project was challenging with the

27:25all the private property efforts because

27:27it was so interrolling with public

27:28alleys specifically Woodland and

27:30Crescent Alley. The five points you had

27:33to be mindful of homes driveways and

27:35other structural considerations and an

27:37overall city system implications for

27:39public runoff.

27:43Again the global crest area within here

27:45is uh as shown star the five points area

27:49again four quarters around here and

27:52avenue a major artery that's working its

27:54way over here.

27:56This area is on the order of 80 to 100

27:58years old and is governed by the

28:00backyard trunk line running from this is

28:02about uh Copper Street through Woodland

28:05Avenue up through Crescent Woodland

28:07Alley crossing DT road at Glow Avenue

28:11working its way down to Alexand. So

28:13these pipes are on the order of 30 to 54

28:15in in diameter.

28:18At the time this work was done and the

28:19city studia there were no public ements

28:22anywhere on it. So system and process

28:24need to be put in place to achieve

28:26public easements for this alignment.

28:28Again, this was documented through about

28:30two decades of calls about sinkholes and

28:32GIS application work. The prime

28:36contractor was solutions with a contract

28:38price of $2.8 million.

28:43Now in this agent system, how do we go

28:45about customizing the solution to bring

28:48about improvements for the overall well

28:49crescent system?

28:54The choices between rehabilitation or

28:56replacement are governed by condition

28:58pipe set study structural integrity

29:02identifying if it's flooding or not

29:03flooding where it is in relation to

29:05homes, garages, walls, fences, other

29:08structures,

29:10being able to achieve and identify

29:12easement widths. Again, tracking those

29:14sink poles

29:16within that 1,150 linear feet I had

29:19spoken about that required some work to

29:21be done on it. 800 linear feet was

29:23identified to be rehabilitated with

29:25cured in place pipelining. The remaining

29:27350 linear feet will be dedicated for

29:31new excavation or equation of pipe.

29:34As I discuss this project, it'll become

29:36apparent that the wire itself will still

29:38the pipe. There needs to be a grounding

29:40program or backbone program, some way to

29:42address the same holes that had been

29:44recorded and identified by the

29:45residents.

29:50This section here I'll discuss is again

29:51the uh section that's on the west side

29:53of Glow Avenue. So it doesn't show the

29:56side east side where Alexander is. This

29:58section here Alexander was lining and

30:01joint replacement joint repair but I

30:03wanted to just highlight for you

30:06the solution need to be customized. So

30:07there's a lot of alternation between

30:09yellow lining

30:11and red excavation. So it was very uh

30:13peace build in the way the contractor

30:15had to plan and work to meet the design

30:18requirements.

30:20This section here on Preston Road along

30:22Woodland Avenue who sectioned down did

30:25not require any additional work. So that

30:26was left alone during project.

30:35The preferred method that storm water

30:36will look to going forward is to use

30:38ultraviolet cured uh glass reinforced

30:41polymer as the methodical lining. This

30:44is chosen primarily because of its

30:45environmental qualities. It has

30:47diminished odor and does not affect the

30:50air quality the same way felt or steam

30:52curing does. There's also less chance of

30:54intrusion into surface waters that may

30:57come about by this application.

31:00Now I get to show you some of my toys

31:02I've collected along the way. Part of

31:05the project in order to evaluate this

31:06was a visit to the Santex plant in

31:08Huntersville, North Carolina, which has

31:10a a large market share of providing

31:12these UV cured liners in North Carolina.

31:15So I want to share with you some of

31:16their typical fiberglass strands that

31:18they have.

31:20You're able to kind of see the whole

31:22process of fabrication. So this uh this

31:24particular piece of fiberglass has

31:26aspirations of becoming either a 12 to

31:2872 in liner along the way

31:35when cured becomes a hard structural

31:37member in place. This is about quarter

31:39inch in thickness.

31:45share with you some pictures not only

31:46from the GL Crescent project, some other

31:48recent projects I've worked on that had

31:50lining elements in. This is a project on

31:53Tomington Drive that we completed last

31:55year as part of the system repair

31:56program. You can just see some of the uh

31:58storage containers. This is where the

32:00liner is stored

32:04and it's brought and delivered to the

32:05site.

32:11This is a section of the liner. Once it

32:13becomes once it goes from that

32:14fiberglass single strand, it becomes a

32:16liner. And you get the varying

32:18thicknesses by just making multiple

32:20layers of that fiberglass element along

32:23the way to get the desired design

32:24thickness

32:32within that system repair package I just

32:34mentioned. This was a uh project on Pine

32:36Street that was completed last year. And

32:38this is an example of the UV light

32:40train. And this is a element that once

32:42the contractor has installed the liner,

32:44he runs this train through. It's got a

32:46series of lights that emit ultraviolet

32:50with the uh hours of the resin and lots

32:52of curing process. So generally the

32:55contractor will run this about a foot a

32:57minute. So about 60 ft an hour in order

33:01to cure in place.

33:05photo of the dentist [clears throat]

33:08on there. It's very similar product.

33:16[laughter]

33:22>> The public engagement program for this

33:23pro process. This project had multiple

33:25processes along the way. The initial

33:27stage involved traditional public

33:29meetings with large gatherings of

33:31interested neighborhood. Again, we got

33:33this large polygon founded by Kalper, by

33:36Fairview, Glenwood and Alexander

33:39invited these households to discuss the

33:41project and let them know the

33:42alternatives that we had put in place.

33:44As the project continued to develop in

33:46terms of easement reporting and

33:48construction sequencing and other way of

33:51the construction meetings became more

33:53customized and more one-on-one means

33:55were necessary to continue to inform the

33:58residents about what they could expect

33:59to see and what would be asked of them

34:01during the construction process

34:07the engineering study. Now we can get

34:09forward and start putting together

34:10design plans to get this project

34:11permitted and built.

34:15Some of the challenges involved because

34:16it was a unique project to storm water

34:18was navigating how the permitting

34:20process would work or would be involved

34:22in terms of doing engineering analyses

34:24for hydraulics and hydrarology

34:27coordination involved with the DUT as

34:29the Glowwood Avenue section where this

34:31project will bisect as a DOT corridor.

34:34they need to be involved with the

34:35project to make sure that there were no

34:37adverse effects to their existing

34:38infrastructure in Glwood Avenue.

34:41We also had to navigate what the

34:43disturbed areas would be and how much uh

34:45permitting that would involve. So during

34:47that permitting process and discussions,

34:50it was determined that since over an

34:51acre of areas be disturbed for aligning,

34:54we still need to go through with the

34:56DEEQ to obtain the appropriate

34:58permission to keep the project moving

35:00forward.

35:03This is the 42-in corrugated metal pipe

35:06underneath Lwood Avenue. And you can see

35:07it's in in rough shape and has uh severe

35:11rusting where the water would be and

35:12just a very irregular cross-section that

35:15would inhibit storm water flow. So

35:18during the coordination process, this

35:19was discussed with the DOT and

35:22discussions were back and forth as to

35:24whether the city would do it ahead of

35:26the project and further coordinate with

35:27D or the best way to sequence it going

35:30forward. So it had been determined that

35:32the DOT would ahead of the city's

35:34project rehabilitate this pipe prior to

35:37the city breaking ground on their own

35:38preferred

35:43as discussed before there about 30

35:46private properties were involved and

35:47there were no easements hand at the

35:48time. So we had to work with according

35:51with the each individual neighbor to

35:54achieve and record the ement in order to

35:55do the work in a single cohesive system.

35:59This also involves again customizing the

36:01solution to accommodate existing fences,

36:04driveway repairs, access, making sure

36:06the landscaping and tree removal was

36:08accounted for and documented.

36:131909 Glenwood Avenue is the property

36:15that the city had bought. It was the

36:16focus or part of the project. The

36:19homeowner had wanted to sell it due to

36:20some sink holes and just some drainage

36:23repairs that had been long overdue. It's

36:25determined by the city that based on its

36:28location, it'll be serve it well to be

36:30able to customize and determine the

36:32final layout for storm water as well as

36:34to have a staging area to store

36:36equipment during construction.

36:41Twists and turns during construction.

36:46This is a new kind of work. So, it took

36:47a challenge some challenges to advertise

36:51to skate from contractors what be

36:52looking at. So the engineer acorn

36:55determined an estimate of $2.4 million.

36:58We ended up having two bids after two

37:01sets of uh bidding iterations and the

37:03lower bid was $2.8 million to get into

37:05fluial solutions.

37:08Contraers are still learning about the

37:10large scale rehabilitation and what's

37:11involved that market. So now I think at

37:13this point we get a little bit more

37:14momentum and be better suited to have

37:17more competitive pricing in the future

37:19as contractors get more familiar with

37:21what the city's been expecting and what

37:23that work will look like along the way.

37:26We found some challenge along the way

37:28working with the subs that we had a

37:29given general contractor who applied for

37:31and won the bid. They hired a sub who

37:33had experience in lining but not enough

37:36experience sufficient enough for the

37:38curing place pipeline that we had

37:39specified. So we ended up having a

37:42subcontractor to a subcontractor which

37:44we had some challenges along the way

37:46getting the project done but it was a

37:48little challenging and different because

37:50of the out ofstate nature of this

37:52contractor. There had to be some

37:53additional coordination efforts involved

37:55just to make sure that we stayed within

37:57the project schedule.

38:02Working in backyards, we had to be

38:03mindful of different access issues,

38:05where fences and gates were, being

38:07mindful of privacy for each of the

38:09homeowners, and being aware of their

38:11concerns for tree removal and for

38:13driveways.

38:17I'll share a uh a pair of

38:20pictures here. And this was for the

38:22frame that needed to be removed. This is

38:24for a 42inch pine tree along the

38:26alignment that was needed to be removed

38:28in order to facilate access along

38:30Woodland Alley. So it was a challenge

38:32getting such a large piece of women into

38:34a narrow narrow space as will ali.

38:44This is the driveway along the project

38:46alignment. They have reported just voids

38:48and sink holes underneath their

38:50driveway. The driveway in this case here

38:52was not paved but there was a ground

38:54stabilization program put in place. That

38:57graph was installed by injecting through

38:59pilot holes before that moment.

39:02[clears throat]

39:22Given the nature of the uh approach area

39:25in terms of this historical nature and

39:26some of the over structures, it was

39:28determined that it would be appropriate

39:30to ask task our materials testing agent

39:32to put together a program of three post

39:35construction inspection assessments as

39:37well as monitoring the various uh site

39:40structures with some crack ages, some

39:42seismic monitoring for sensitive areas

39:44where excavation and replacement was

39:47occurring. So we went through this

39:49program and working with the residents

39:50to gauge their interest in participating

39:52and it gave them a little more comfort

39:54that the city had their best interest at

39:56heart in protecting their homes and

39:58other structures during construction.

40:04Part of that again is the tree removal

40:05and you'll see the picture of the uh

40:07pine tree I'm take I'm sitting around

40:09that was removed. This is a property

40:11here where there were two trees. This is

40:13a 33 inch maple, a 77 inch popppler. So,

40:17we worked with the homeowner and did the

40:20best we could to this popper tree still

40:22in place. The structures that were

40:24rehabilitated were rehabilitated around

40:26to avoid damaging the tree roots.

40:28There's a vertical root zone for each

40:31tree that was dedicated during the

40:32construction.

40:34At the home west, we did remove this

40:37maple tree, so the hammock is no longer

40:39there.

40:42But along the way, as part of the

40:43consultation, we worked in house with

40:45our urban forestry folks just to

40:47identify limiting areas and how we would

40:49be judicious about tree removal and tree

40:51lim

40:55with an aging system like this where a

40:57lot of the construction solutions years

40:59ago were sort of ad hoc. We had to

41:01determine identify the conditions and

41:03see what remediation could be done along

41:05the way. So this is kind of a typical

41:07condition where you have a lot of stone

41:09or brick constructed drain structures in

41:11place again here because a lot of the

41:14corrugated metal piping really

41:16collapsed. So we had to be mindful of

41:18that. In this case here, this was the

41:201909 Gladwood Avenue box that was

41:22particularly challenging for the

41:24contractor. We end up developing a

41:26solution where this structure was kept

41:28because the contractor's fear about it

41:31collapsing during demolition. So we're

41:32able to redesign to accommodate uh

41:35additional lining, creating a new

41:37manhole to facilitate additional

41:39excavation and replacement.

41:41[clears throat]

41:42At one of the residents, we found there

41:44was a concern about rats that have been

41:46invest infesting there at their home. So

41:48we had to determine if the structure the

41:50drain structure could be changed or

41:52modified to discourage rats from

41:55constant in and out. So that in that

41:57case that modification was switched from

41:59an open throat catch basin to a standard

42:01uh draining but

42:04every once in a great while you may also

42:05see some sewer laterals some conflicts

42:07that you're unaware of. So likewise

42:09we're able to work with the homeowner to

42:11modify our design to avoid damaging

42:14their sewer lateral.

42:18During the course of construction, we

42:19found that there was a case where we had

42:22a 42inch corrugated metal pipe and

42:24during construction, we found that there

42:26were some wrinkles that formed. And

42:28these wrinkles are as a result of just

42:30the corrugated metal pipe crushing like

42:31a soda can. So your cross-section of

42:33your pipe is irregular. It doesn't quite

42:35match a nominal diameter that was

42:38anticipated. And as you can see with the

42:40sand that are around, this condition

42:42right here is is hard. There's no it's

42:44already cured in the place. that water

42:46is just going to sit and it may cool but

42:48it may be may have a hard time getting

42:51around there will not flow as per the

42:53design. So when it was identified the

42:56project team came together and

42:57determined the best course of action was

42:59to grind out those wrinkles and realign

43:02the pipe in order to meet the proper uh

43:05design section.

43:09I'll share with you a uh a recent

43:10project we just finished at Cranon Lane

43:12where the contractor did uh didn't line

43:15up properly and although there's a

43:16wrinkle here because of where the

43:17wrinkle is located uh the wrinkle itself

43:20in this case could not be uh over

43:23couldn't have been avoided because of

43:25the bend in the pipe. So because the

43:27wrinkle was right above the spring line,

43:29it did not inhibit maintenance or flow

43:31was deemed acceptable by that project

43:32team and left in place.

43:40Along the way, we also found that some

43:41of the other liners, the 54in liners

43:43that were planned for Alexander Road had

43:46been uh improperly stored by the

43:47contractor and started curing in place

43:49before they were installed. So we had to

43:51work with the contractor and then they

43:53reorder the liners at their cost and

43:55install them correctly

43:57as the project progress.

44:00When the engineer and the owner work

44:02together, we look for just again close

44:03caption TV review, make sure the line

44:05segments are correct and accounted for

44:07and the line looks good and formed

44:10properly.

44:11identifying any service laterals or any

44:13other uh pipes that flow in there as

44:16well as deting a sampling and testing

44:18program to look at the structural

44:20qualities of the liner making sure it

44:22meets ADM requirements and has the

44:24appropriate thickness based upon the

44:26expected loading involved.

44:32>> I mentioned before earlier about how in

44:34addition to having the aligning

44:35programs, it's appropriate to have a

44:36routing program that helps fill the

44:38voids.

44:39the project I sent before with that

44:41driveway. I'll share I'll share with you

44:44my props. This was the uh this was the

44:46grout was injected in place and this is

44:48a a poly

44:50hydrophilic grout. So only small amount

44:53of grout was injected but just because

44:55of the nature of the water in the soil

44:56it's able to expand significantly fill

44:58in any voids that may come about. So

45:01share that with I call the phone.

45:07Here's a photo of the 1909 Glad Avenue

45:10uh the site that was demolished prior to

45:12construction. And so the sink holes that

45:14were observed there were filled in place

45:16with that same yellow phone.

45:26One of the challenges we have the

45:27contractor was being able to determine

45:29in the bid form a grout. So in the bid

45:33form there was clearly stated that that

45:34grout that you see right there was to be

45:36recorded and docu documented as a liquid

45:38because it's a liquid that's injected in

45:40place and only after it's exposed to

45:41water does it fill up that volume. In

45:44that case, the uh the contractor had to

45:47start billing for the project based upon

45:49that uh that quantity right there, that

45:51volume. We had to have go back to

45:53Webster's dictionary and show that this

45:56is in gallons because gallons is a

45:57liquid measurement and not not that it's

46:00like you can't really quantify what that

46:01would look like. And by doing that we're

46:04able to have some cost control of the

46:06project because that would slow up to

46:08factor 10 15 16 times what the actual

46:10bid might be and be a real costly

46:13problem

46:16satisfaction team. So we were able to

46:18avoid a lot of challenges. We stopped

46:20working by being collaborative with

46:22design team.

46:27>> As we went along the way, we developed a

46:29close out and property restoration

46:31matrix for each property just based upon

46:33landscaping issues, how the structures

46:35were doing and being able just to take

46:37care of walk through the contractor to

46:39identify for punchless purposes what

46:41work was still remaining as the project

46:43continued on.

46:45That's that 77 inch poll I mentioned to

46:47you that was off Avenue just got hit by

46:50lightning in the last few months and

46:52kind of left a nasty scar right along

46:54here. So we're in touch with the

46:56homeowner who was blocking that just to

46:58see if there are any long-term effects

46:59if the popler is going to survive and so

47:02far so good. will be a

47:05night

47:20out.

47:24We finished construction in August of

47:262026. So, contractors left the site at

47:29this time. Now, right now, we're working

47:30through our remaining permanent

47:31compliance. including uh urban forestry.

47:35So now with a storm water conveyance

47:37involved, we're just collecting asphalt

47:38survey data identifying where the new

47:41structures are and close caption TV

47:43inspections

47:45inspections together to the city site

47:46permanent review for the final steps.

47:51Our program outcomes are that trenches

47:53rehab. Having this customized lining

47:55solution will be a workable option going

47:58forward which will help more projects in

48:00more timely more cost effective manner.

48:04The polyurethane grabbing that talking

48:07about with its the foam and its exposure

48:10to water will be another option help

48:12supplement this drive program in

48:14addition to aligning work going forward.

48:17We hope by continue to develop the

48:18relationships with contractors to make

48:20more of a market that more uh good

48:22competition going forward and we get

48:24better bid prices in the future.

48:28Having individualized resident

48:30communication especially during

48:31easements and construction help the city

48:33by developing those good relationships

48:35and helping to keep the communication

48:37going be responsive to the citizens

48:39needs.

48:41It's good for us to be proactive and

48:42identify new technology and be able to

48:44embrace it and work into our toolkit

48:47going forward.

48:49Having regular field meetings bi-weekly

48:51with the design team and the contractor

48:52helped just as a touch point and being

48:54able to respond to issues and pivot

48:56quickly.

48:58The generous owners contingency also

49:00helped with being able to avoid any

49:02costly delays or change orders that may

49:04be problematic with the project and also

49:07keeping the design firm well involved

49:09during construction. For this particular

49:11case, since we're still working and

49:13learning about the curricul pipelining,

49:15we also use the design firm as self

49:17consultant to help with field

49:19construction administration efforts.

49:24Before I uh turn over for questions, I

49:26did want to share sort of before and

49:27after the crime project I mentioned that

49:29I just finished this past month. This is

49:32a before picture and it consists of

49:34three 36-in reinforced concrete pipes

49:36that are emptying into an outfall into a

49:38wetland. You'll see by this first one

49:40that these pots are 50 years old.

49:43They're showing their age. Their wire

49:45fabric is starting to be exposed for

49:47reinforcement. There's moss growing. The

49:48edges are chipped.

49:53And now after uh lining in a fresh

49:56coating using a a spray spray drainage

50:00coating solution, now it's sealed up

50:02there. The edges are kind of are

50:04protected from prer decay. And u this

50:07product turned out well. which was

50:08another asset to our drainage systems

50:10program.

50:14So this is a project we're excited

50:16about. It's got good improvements and

50:17ramifications for our capital

50:19improvements, our system repair, our

50:21drainage systems programs.

50:24Take any questions you might have.

50:27>> Did you rewrite your polyureth?

50:33>> We may do like underlying molding. maybe

50:35limit some noise or [clears throat] and

50:37it was in there and the contractor

50:38understood that. But it's always good

50:41construction side to repeat ourselves to

50:44analyze if need be just to make sure

50:46that everybody understands.

50:48>> Yeah, we'll get to

50:51us

50:55right

51:00in their eyes. They just stay

51:05Yes sir.

51:06>> You may have mentioned if uh what is the

51:08life expectancy of this material?

51:11>> The line is a 50-year

51:13>> design extension for existing piping.

51:16>> Okay.

51:17>> And I would say I would expect

51:22that CMT which lasted 100 years which

51:26that's well beyond what that would be

51:28expected to lo.

51:30>> Yeah. I should reiterate that most of

51:32those pipes that we spoke about that

51:33needed that line or corrugated metal

51:35couple were polyropylene but again that

51:37culprit is a rustling out of the metal

51:39pipes at the spring line.

51:42>> I guess I have another question. Um

51:45is this is the application best when the

51:48pipe is is on the larger side that I am

51:51because several years ago I was over

51:53Chapel Hill and they were doing a pipe

51:54bursting thing and I never seen happy.

51:57>> [clears throat]

51:57>> this be a better option than pipe

51:59bursting

52:01situations?

52:03>> It may depend on the technique and the

52:05engineer's preference what the city

52:06would be uh equal to. Again, I think I

52:09mentioned the general for liner size be

52:11about 12 to 72 in

52:13small diameter.

52:15>> I wouldn't pay to do that. I'm sure be a

52:17certain length that'll be agonomical to

52:20shops.

52:22>> I know you presented at the conference.

52:24Are there other cities and towns in

52:25North Carolina that are interested in

52:27this or have tried it already?

52:29>> Durham and Charlotte have ling programs

52:31as well. They also have inspectors who

52:33are getting more familiar with the

52:34NASCAR requirements.

52:36This also applications with sanitary

52:38sewer and with drinking water. So level

52:40of water utilities in general will be

52:43using this across the nation.

52:47two-part question um less technical but

52:50just as you have conversations with land

52:52owners who are impacted by construction

52:56what are the what is the typical kind of

52:58response that you get in those

53:01conversations

53:03um and then geez my tiredness is showing

53:06I forgot the second question

53:08[clears throat]

53:09answer that and then circle back to the

53:11city

53:13>> I came to city about three years ago so

53:14a lot of this effort I spoke about

53:16within signing and the the initial

53:18public engagement was before my time. A

53:20lot of it was working with the

53:21homeowners to tell what they can expect

53:23in terms of just trees were a big driver

53:26of it, their landscaping, being able to

53:28preserve what they could expect in terms

53:30of what it look like after the fact that

53:31back in terms of uh restoration.

53:35They've been very concerned about having

53:36the old streets back there, but that

53:38alley was very impassible. was very slow

53:41going wet and dark and all that darkness

53:43was great in the summer and of course

53:44the shading but since that time now the

53:47area's dried out a lot it's open and

53:49it's a little bit more eventually grow

53:50in there and be an asset going over.

53:54>> Thank you. And I remember the second

53:56part um you mentioned that the city

53:58bought a lot in order to accommodate I

54:00guess there there's a structural issue

54:02then meant to accommodate staging area.

54:04Um is that common with projects like

54:07this? And then what happens to the lot

54:08after the project's finished?

54:10>> So we're the warranty stage after this

54:12project for 199 Avenue. So the

54:15contractor handed off to us. just doing

54:17strong maintenance in terms of mowing

54:18the grass and keeping an eye on it, but

54:20the weather to offer it publicly for

54:23sale in the future.

54:26It does have a a pipe that's bicting

54:28itself

54:30with a long-term stat.

54:33We do consider that fairly regularly.

54:36Um, you might recall, and I don't know,

54:37Matt, if we can, go back to that plan

54:39view that had the the 1909 house on it.

54:43Um, if we were going to keep the pipe in

54:46its previous location, it was a very

54:50tight easement between two houses. We

54:52would have had to, in order to excavate

54:54a new pipe through there, put a lot of

54:57shoring to protect the foundations of

55:00both of those houses, which would have

55:02been very expensive, maybe approaching

55:04the cost of the house itself, and then

55:06you've got a very tight corridor to try

55:08to maintain that and get access. So, um,

55:12that was one consideration. Um, the

55:15pipe, the owner of this house had

55:17recently purchased, but she was

55:19completely unaware of a private

55:21stormwater pipe right next to her house,

55:24which when family was actually having

55:26some foundation impacts to her to her

55:28house. So, she was unable to get

55:30contractors to even go in there and help

55:33her shore up her house foundation. So,

55:35she was a very willing seller. said

55:38these [clears throat] types of um buys

55:40are always voluntary when we're when

55:43we're going in and talking to

55:44homeowners. And then the last the last

55:47point mentioned that we could relocate

55:49that the new pipe through through where

55:51the house used to be, put an easement on

55:53there. Um in addition to the impacts

55:56during construction that allowed us to

55:58stage and have better access, we'll have

56:01longer term access for maintaining that

56:03whole corridor which is all now

56:06public easement. So we'll we'll take

56:08over mitigating that from uh from this

56:11point forward. So there are a lot of

56:12advantages. Um we don't make those

56:15decisions lightly and it's all all

56:17voluntary but there are a lot of reasons

56:18that that really helped facilitate this

56:21project and we did that we were able to

56:22do that very early. So the design

56:24engineer

56:26designed the project knowing that that

56:29decision had been made. you could

56:31realign the pipe and make the design

56:33decisions knowing that that is

56:40um for the bidding like contractors

56:45there's a pretty big disparity between

56:47those two between those two and you

56:49still see the case of like for future

56:51ones like that's not becoming the case

56:54anymore where people understanding what

56:56it's going to be so there's not that

56:59disparity anymore

57:01who did that bit were general

57:02contractors who more in the excavation

57:06>> ling some of a niche field so ling

57:09contractors don't generally take on the

57:10general contractor role in the case of

57:12the smaller products I showed you since

57:14those were smaller smaller dollar

57:16they're a little more to that but the

57:18nature is kind of required overall the

57:20GC to oversee all the site issues that

57:22go with that so

57:25there'll need to be some relationship

57:26building on their side in order to get

57:27to line

57:29area,

57:30>> right? So, we hope to have now we have

57:31data actually to look at

57:37bring that bid in to more like a actual

57:39cost.

57:40>> Was there was there any that bid that

57:43was chosen? Did that cost change at all

57:46dramatically the porcelain project? Were

57:48there changing orders or anything beyond

57:50that% conditions or were they relatively

57:53on budget

57:54>> due the contingencies that we had in

57:56place 50% contingency in the project

57:59where would be on budget?

58:02>> That answers my question. Did you have

58:04to spend more than the 2.8 if you

58:06thought you were going to? So that that

58:08built in is great. Um, and then is there

58:11I guess is there another lining system

58:13[snorts] that doesn't UV? Is there an

58:17older technique or something like that?

58:19And so this UV thing is very unique. Is

58:22that [laughter]

58:25well you mentioned that because I spoke

58:27before again this the plan was to align

58:30to do a new line here from this existing

58:32box all the way to this box. There was a

58:35picture I showed you of some of the

58:38brick channel that brick chamber that

58:40was very kind of there was no water in

58:41there. It was ancient falling apart.

58:43Since the contractor was afraid to

58:45actually go in there and do direct

58:47connection, but they did a point of

58:48entry here by digging that structure may

58:51have had some possibility of failure. So

58:54the decision was made by

58:57the pipe that was here lining this

58:58section and then connecting from here to

59:01here. So the pipe actually moves from

59:03here to here.

59:05Because of the the short pipe distance

59:08and because of the need to be expedition

59:09about it in this particular case, we did

59:12authorize the contract produce belt

59:14length about 20 ft or so. That was a

59:16little different technique compared to

59:18the cure in place, but it was a little

59:20more able schedule was a little easier

59:23to fabricate.

59:29So the curative place linings idea has

59:33been around for

59:35became more popular in the late 80s and

59:3890s and had been applied a lot for

59:41wastewater um pipes and the earlier

59:44technologies. The first one was um hot

59:46water. So they could impregnate the the

59:49liners that you felt with air with a

59:52with an epoxy. There was a heat

59:54activating curing system. So they would

59:56put hot water in there, heat it up. That

59:59would that would cure the wire until it

1:00:01was hard. But then you'd have a pipe

1:00:04full of hot water that had these curing

1:00:07byproducts like styrene, which have

1:00:10toxicity

1:00:12um to to them. um in a in a wastewater

1:00:15pipe that's not really a problem. You

1:00:17can release it and becomes diluted and

1:00:19goes down in the wastewater plant and

1:00:21it's a micro amount of water compared to

1:00:24what the the system flows. In a storm

1:00:27water system though, you don't want to

1:00:29have that amount of water as biological

1:00:31toxicity. You know, you can't release it

1:00:34to the stream. Um you either have to

1:00:36pull it suck it up into a a vacuum truck

1:00:39or something like that. There are even

1:00:41newer methods that have steam, but

1:00:43you're still um creating that styrene

1:00:46that can that can off gas and and have

1:00:49odors. And again, that has some toxicity

1:00:51to it as as well. So, the UV cure has

1:00:54lots of advantages. You don't have that

1:00:56steam off or or the water that you have

1:00:58to try to get rid of. Um it is

1:01:01relatively new but there are multiple

1:01:03manufacturers now so there's plenty of

1:01:05competition um with but we have gone

1:01:08exclusively to ultraviolet light cured

1:01:12cured in place liner now just just for

1:01:14those reasons there it used to be more

1:01:16expensive it's not really important

1:01:18because of the number of manufacturers

1:01:20that have adopted this we we still get

1:01:23good bid

1:01:24>> it should be that that DOT crossing I

1:01:26mentioned that we start that the DOT did

1:01:28prior to our

1:01:30That was right over here. This was Steve

1:01:32Jer.

1:01:34No, I thought that was really

1:01:40did that one.

1:01:40>> Yes,

1:01:44>> no, no, no. I'm sorry. And I want to go

1:01:46back to Commissioner McMillan's question

1:01:48about pipe. So the cured in place lining

1:01:51system, as you can see, it it does

1:01:53decrease the diameter of the of the pipe

1:01:56just a little bit, but because it's

1:01:57smoother, the actual capacity stays

1:02:00about the same really. And as Eric said,

1:02:03capacity wasn't an issue in this in this

1:02:05project. It was really a structural

1:02:07integrity issue. But pipe bursting um it

1:02:11actually brings you can pull a coupling

1:02:13through there with a a new pipe behind

1:02:16it and you can actually expand and and

1:02:19insert a larger pipe that it literally

1:02:22breaks it pushes it out into the soil.

1:02:25You pull a larger size pipe maybe a pipe

1:02:28size sometimes two pipe size depending

1:02:30on soil and depth and all of that. So

1:02:32pipe bursting is actually we have not

1:02:35used that here in storm water. Rolling

1:02:37waterers use that for wastewater

1:02:39projects. But that is another technique

1:02:40where you actually if you do need more

1:02:43capacity and you want a trenchless

1:02:46technique because digging is expensive

1:02:48or there's a surface impacts or so forth

1:02:51that you're trying to minimize. That is

1:02:53another good technique that we'll keep

1:02:56in mind having storm water but could be

1:02:58applicable.

1:02:59>> Yeah. So I have a question just because

1:03:00we get these questions in the work I'm

1:03:02doing right now. But um I assume when

1:03:05you bought the house from the 1909 give

1:03:09market value, right?

1:03:12>> If you sell it

1:03:14in at least the stuff we're working on

1:03:16now, you can't make a profit. You can

1:03:18sell it back and you can go in with

1:03:20market value. So maybe it went up in

1:03:22value in a couple of years or something.

1:03:24But are there there some?

1:03:27>> Well, in this case, the house is gone.

1:03:29Yeah. An easements through there. So, it

1:03:31can never be redeveloped. Um, what we're

1:03:34considering is so we're considering

1:03:37selling it to an adjacent property owner

1:03:40if they just wanted to have more

1:03:41property. They

1:03:42>> Okay.

1:03:42>> Very restricted what they could ever do

1:03:44on this property in the in the future

1:03:46because of the easement that would be

1:03:49through there. But, you know, they could

1:03:51um, you know, have a bigger lawn and

1:03:53play broke. You know, there's a lot of

1:03:55things, especially in that area, having

1:03:57a larger lot would quite some property

1:04:00value increase to an addition. You

1:04:02>> have the same case for the one on East

1:04:03Lane.

1:04:05>> Um, that would that one um, we bought

1:04:08did not buy the house. We bought an

1:04:10extended easement

1:04:12>> for the entire property, but because we

1:04:15were relocating, we're going to be

1:04:17relocating the new s storm sewer outside

1:04:21of that property. There will not be a

1:04:23storm sewer through that property in the

1:04:25future.

1:04:26>> So, we're able to use it for um

1:04:28construction staging similarly, but we

1:04:31we wanted the property owner to keep

1:04:33that walk for the future because that

1:04:36one can be redeveloped.

1:04:37>> Okay? because it will not have a storm.

1:04:39So they still fight through it. They

1:04:41still

1:04:43very little different situ.

1:04:44>> Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely.

1:04:49>> Challenging projects in sure was. Thank

1:04:53you very much. Thank you.

1:05:03Walk us through

1:05:06fiscal year

1:05:10annual report

1:05:1326

1:05:14fiscal year 26.

1:05:17Thank you again Ariel for everything you

1:05:20have done to help.

1:05:22>> Yes.

1:05:23>> Good afternoon commission. We're back

1:05:24with your thanks to Ariel your draft

1:05:27final FY27 work plan and your draft

1:05:30final FY26 annual just really a

1:05:33highlight all the conditions work as you

1:05:36I'm going to let Ariel kick us off as we

1:05:38look at the report first Matt again and

1:05:42then we get to by

1:05:48any questions.

1:06:00Um, thank you [clears throat] everyone

1:06:01for everybody comments and um your

1:06:03suggestions. I looked through everything

1:06:06that Wayne sent to me um and adopted

1:06:09them in the new uh draft. Um yeah, you

1:06:13can yeah, scroll down if there's

1:06:15anything that you know pops up. Um right

1:06:19now I can certainly go back and um add

1:06:22them in. But from here we would just

1:06:25adopt the annual report and then it'll

1:06:28be presented to the council.

1:06:31>> You're suggesting we did move this right

1:06:36comments.

1:06:39>> Yeah, I think it was Yeah. going through

1:06:41and just making some formatting, then

1:06:43moving that summary up to the front. Um,

1:06:46and then at the end, I also um added the

1:06:49photos for these track members. Um, if

1:06:52you want to take a shot today, you

1:06:54certainly can.

1:07:19Yeah.

1:07:21>> Oh, yeah.

1:07:22>> Yeah. No, I was just going to say feel

1:07:24free to stop scrolling through. There

1:07:26weren't a lot of

1:07:30folks. I think moving moving that

1:07:32summary to the front

1:07:34>> was one of them. Do you remember the the

1:07:36other area? Yeah, it was I think there

1:07:40was just some content that that shifted

1:07:42around uh from some sections

1:07:44>> formatting issues. Yeah. Location

1:07:48issues.

1:07:49>> Yep. Yep. And then I think I may have

1:07:51swapped out some photos that I may have

1:07:53got just some better ones to include in

1:07:56but for the most part um most of it

1:07:58stayed the stay about the same.

1:08:04We go to the last page. Let's see. The

1:08:08last

1:08:11Yes.

1:08:13Yeah, I think Wayne took a group photo

1:08:15the last meeting, so I kind of pulled

1:08:17extracted from that, but you know, I can

1:08:18certainly update any head shots if

1:08:20anyone wants an updated one or, you

1:08:23know,

1:08:24but I think yeah, I think that was all

1:08:27the changes.

1:08:32Thanks.

1:08:37back up to the top.

1:08:40They see it in there.

1:08:43That not

1:08:45just heard about near the top of this

1:08:48area. Keep building all this area.

1:08:58Okay.

1:08:59Drive and DC

1:09:01money, things our CIP. We're going to

1:09:04give us a tour of this project right

1:09:06after this. This is a another

1:09:08neighborhood drainage improvement

1:09:09project. It involves channel

1:09:11improvements as well as piping

1:09:13improvements, cover improvements. So,

1:09:14we'll we'll go see that in just a little

1:09:16bit. So, this must be completed through

1:09:18this year. So, that in your hand

1:09:26work

1:09:29both of these. So all improvements

1:09:32thanks to Eric

1:09:36and um we're a little bit biased but we

1:09:38think this is your best work yet.

1:09:41You know it keeps getting better every

1:09:43year since your draft 27

1:09:46um your comments on the annual report.

1:09:49We took your comments on this one as

1:09:51well. So again right up front we've got

1:09:54your charge from city council items.

1:09:56These are actually per ordinance

1:09:57verbatim right here.

1:10:00Uh there's your connection to the city

1:10:02strategic plan right up there. And we

1:10:04didn't look up

1:10:06the city strategic plan and um there are

1:10:10no identifier references to the verb. So

1:10:13we just enter his text as it is here. So

1:10:17ordinance strategic plan. There's the

1:10:20photograph from last time with the

1:10:22commission. uh your mission statement,

1:10:25your vision statement,

1:10:28some updated photographs as well as you

1:10:30go through here thanks to Ariel.

1:10:34You'll see those

1:10:36smacks involved with engagement and

1:10:39outrage

1:10:41updated

1:10:46your guiding themes. This forward these

1:10:49are your identifiers for the guiding

1:10:50themes here just for your work plan

1:10:52items as we go through the through the

1:10:54agenda.

1:10:56And then I think you get into one thing

1:10:58with add really like this year's

1:11:01acknowledgement of the items and we

1:11:02cover all in the first 25% or so of each

1:11:05meeting are these items public comments.

1:11:08So important the plan commission smack

1:11:10the comments right here staff updates

1:11:15emerging matters which is engagement

1:11:18reviewing the budget

1:11:20and the rainwater awards projects and

1:11:23other projects as well as the capture

1:11:25and as of just last year the silver

1:11:28smart so that's part of our agenda so

1:11:30that's roughly 25% of your work is is

1:11:32those labs and then the rest of your

1:11:34priority shows up here is high priority

1:11:37items all the high.

1:11:42We put in the note that the identifiers

1:11:44here are just that just for identifiers.

1:11:46They're not meant to reflect order of

1:11:49high priority. They're all important

1:11:51identifiers. Here's your connections

1:11:53with the guiding above. So all this

1:11:57should be well connected.

1:12:01Got 10 items in there. the opportunity

1:12:07and likely multiple presentations on

1:12:09some of those throughout the years as

1:12:12well. And this is your just more

1:12:14comprehensive items. You can always pull

1:12:17those as we go throughout the year. your

1:12:18your comments, your thoughts on it and

1:12:21coming together as as you had hoped for

1:12:24really help us be

1:12:27old guided by the commission with our

1:12:29staff to help

1:12:40both of these as approved

1:12:46you

1:12:49not too far out.

1:12:53So very thank you again for great work

1:12:57and he's a really public this is I think

1:13:00closing state public engagement

1:13:03and some really high value

1:13:14we're interested in feel like it's

1:13:16comprehensive

1:13:20>> as always you may test

1:13:27There's always a team member condition

1:13:35when we presented Wayne and I presented

1:13:37it's 5 10 minutes. It's not much of a

1:13:40recap but I don't I don't remember it

1:13:43being very extensive. kind of hit the

1:13:45highlights because these are these

1:13:46documents are given to city council

1:13:50comment before extending.

1:13:53>> That's right. So the city council

1:13:55through your action officially agree

1:13:56with your annual

1:13:58work

1:14:07to

1:14:08>> Yes. If you do make a motion to adopt,

1:14:10then we will officially that would

1:14:13officially send at the city council for

1:14:15reviewing

1:14:18for the November 4th city council

1:14:20meeting.

1:14:37Second discussion

1:14:40favor of that motion.

1:14:43Thank you, Scott. Thank you. Appreciate

1:14:45it.

1:14:48Um, let's see. We are wrapping up in

1:14:52record time. I'll just wait because we

1:14:54got some late breaking news for you that

1:14:56we've got.

1:14:57>> Yes, that's my fault for this. Um I will

1:15:02go through some well let us do the late

1:15:04breaking news because we um

1:15:07then we'll talk about that topics kind

1:15:09of ties to that. So be talking about

1:15:11topics for November this summer.

1:15:14>> Wayne, take it away.

1:15:15>> Yes. So, at the um September 15th city

1:15:19council meeting, council member Jones uh

1:15:22brought up an item during her individual

1:15:25inspection

1:15:26um requesting that the Stormwater

1:15:29Management Advisory Commission um review

1:15:32stormwater regulations

1:15:35and um through facilitation with staff,

1:15:39bring back ideas for um any potential

1:15:43review of specific regulations that um

1:15:47the commission would like to um take

1:15:49forward for potential further evaluation

1:15:52by city council. So um I I wasn't able

1:15:56to go back and get the video of the

1:15:57council. I actually missed that meeting

1:15:59because I was in Mrs. S the APWA um

1:16:01conference. Um but I will review that.

1:16:04But my understanding of request is that

1:16:07um they would like the ideas of some

1:16:09more specifics of what which regulations

1:16:12um there may be some interest in in um

1:16:14looking at more closely and then um and

1:16:18then they will help guide the process

1:16:20that we would want to use to review

1:16:24those whether that will be a stakeholder

1:16:26process or something more specific. And

1:16:29and it may depend on the depth of the

1:16:31regular regulation evaluation and the

1:16:34number of um regulations that you all

1:16:37would like to um to consider for for

1:16:40changes. So what we would like to

1:16:42propose at the staff level is we'll look

1:16:44at a future agenda item maybe November

1:16:47December to get the discussion going um

1:16:50to facilitate if there are any specific

1:16:53regulations that you'd like to look at.

1:16:55Are those erosion sediment control? Are

1:16:57they are they flood plan? Are they water

1:17:00by waterershed regulations? Are they

1:17:02storm water the size of storm water

1:17:04detention? The numbers the types of

1:17:07storm you know if there's anything

1:17:09specific that may have come up in um

1:17:12resoning cases for example I know that

1:17:14kind of stirred some of the discussion

1:17:16of well if there's

1:17:19water conditions that are being

1:17:20requested does that mean perhaps our

1:17:23regulations might need revisiting in

1:17:25some of those same areas? so that we're

1:17:27getting more than just resoning cases

1:17:29because resoning cases are only a very

1:17:31small percentage of the overall

1:17:33development that's occurring in the

1:17:35city. So if there's concerns about

1:17:36regulation um so be thinking about that.

1:17:40We'll certainly bring back and and we

1:17:41can even bring back some some ideas and

1:17:44talk a little just to facilitate the the

1:17:47discussion for you. But we'll bring that

1:17:49back at a at a future meeting that that

1:17:52we can then provide council some

1:17:54additional feedback from that work. I

1:17:57would say if staff can um

1:18:01it's a little bit maybe but just go back

1:18:04to find some of the discussions over the

1:18:06last year cases because I think you hit

1:18:08on the key points sensitive lands

1:18:12for flood planes set control concerns

1:18:16possibly the different storm event that

1:18:18we're being you know tracked for or you

1:18:22know

1:18:26um things like It sounds like we started

1:18:28but just you could see some of those

1:18:29things and then eliminate the bats that

1:18:33we were talking about. Maybe there were

1:18:34other things that you had to talk about.

1:18:36I appreciate councelor Jennis bringing

1:18:38this appreciate that she's been an

1:18:40advocate for attending these meetings. I

1:18:42don't know if she's here today but um

1:18:45but um appreciate her bringing it back

1:18:48to us as an opportunity to discuss. And

1:18:51as Wayne noted, we'll see whether it

1:18:54stays with us or it goes to kind of more

1:18:56technical staff thing. We make

1:18:58suggestions, they come up with

1:18:59suggestions, we review the suggestions

1:19:01or we dive off into a subcommittee. I

1:19:04don't know how much

1:19:08these are things that we've talked about

1:19:09that matter and I think development in

1:19:11Raleigh is a really good thing that's

1:19:13happening.

1:19:14We have to figure out what we'll take

1:19:16out.

1:19:20And just to tack on, I think if people

1:19:22are willing to do a little bit of like

1:19:25homework before the next meeting and

1:19:27we're talking about it, I think it might

1:19:28be useful to us for us to review the um

1:19:32kind of video or not the um conditions

1:19:36that the storm water staff put together

1:19:39as like these would be, you know,

1:19:40potential options that developers would

1:19:43choose that would be above and beyond

1:19:44storm water. That document I think is

1:19:46really helpful. Um and then maybe just

1:19:48some of our cases that we've talked

1:19:50about in the past where we've gotten the

1:19:51conditions out of now and what those

1:19:53conditions look like so that we can

1:19:55probably start with that

1:20:00>> and and it has been good and somewhat

1:20:02intentionally that uh Bennett has

1:20:05appreciated the last year that they've

1:20:06come in and kind of given us a download

1:20:08of the

1:20:09uh direct construction regulations the

1:20:12coast development structure challenges

1:20:14the you know large water wersheds

1:20:18So um but there might be some spots

1:20:19where each of us want to dive into

1:20:21regulations and if we have special as

1:20:24well

1:20:28see where that goes. I appreciate the

1:20:29opportunity or council has offered to us

1:20:32to dig into that.

1:20:37And with that, the other items um

1:20:42we looking at obviously more rain

1:20:45rainwater rewards programs which is

1:20:46great or projects which are great.

1:20:49There's that interest that Steve noted

1:20:51the increased interest. Um we're going

1:20:53to talk about industrial stormwater

1:20:55discharges uh to systems. I believe

1:20:58that's a permit issue that we have to

1:21:01discuss right related to our MS portal

1:21:03permit and there have been some changes

1:21:04to that in our new permit which went

1:21:07into effect July 1. we talk about

1:21:10alarming more education for us. Correct.

1:21:16>> Um begin review like say the council

1:21:19request the storm water development sto

1:21:21development requirements and then it

1:21:22looks like we're going to try to do a

1:21:24field tour park

1:21:30trying to line up a few field visits at

1:21:32the end of meetings like we're doing

1:21:33today. So, visits are optional, but a

1:21:36great opportunity to see things

1:21:38happening.

1:21:41And if you have other business, email me

1:21:43and Scott and Wayne, you can copy

1:21:46Nicola. She's going to be out there for

1:21:48her said till early December, I think is

1:21:51what her office said. But, um, you know,

1:21:54Samantha as well, she just kind of, you

1:21:57know, Samantha Nichol and I meet with

1:21:59Wayne and Scott to pick up the agenda.

1:22:03You see something?

1:22:13>> Leave it as followation

1:22:26capital improvement project. Um think

1:22:29we're 10 minutes early.

1:22:32But somebody has to do their special job

1:22:34before we get out of here.

1:22:40>> Josh

1:22:44that sorry didn't mean to get anybody

1:22:46outbody

1:22:53second.

1:22:56All right. All in favor of

1:23:00Okay.

1:23:02>> [music]

1:23:11[music]