2026-10-14 - Planning Board
Summary
Based on manual captions of the video; the captions are sparse and names may be misspelled.
- The Planning Board met October 14, 2026 with members including Shaughnessy, Glenn, Winberg and Foley, and approved the September 9 minutes.
- The board granted two-year permit extensions for 80 Clay Street and 61-71 Hancock Street, and a six-month extension for 45-50 Winter Street, using new state authority. See Planning Board Permit Extensions Under New State Law.
- The continued hearing on the 520-unit development at 100 and 150 Newport Avenue Extension drew a revised site plan, flood, parking and traffic questions, and testimony from Walter Hubley and State Rep. Bruce Ayers; the developer agreed to a supplemental Neponset Bridge traffic study and the hearing was continued to November 18. See 100 and 150 Newport Avenue Extension 520-Unit Residential Development.
- A new hearing on a seven-unit building at 7-11 Burns Avenue, with a letter from Richard C. Ash, was continued to December 9. See 7-11 Burns Avenue Seven-Unit Residential Building.
- Staff presented three approval-not-required plans for signature (125 Liberty Street lot assemblage, 117 Town Hill Street subdivision, and a split of 1600 Crown Colony Drive into two parcels) and a draft 2027 meeting schedule, with a vote expected in November (one summer meeting, likely July 28, and no August meeting).
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:21Good evening.
00:26Yes. Good evening.
00:34Roll call.
00:36Member Shaughnessy present. Member Glenn present.
00:44Member Foley present. Good for you guys. Pursuant
00:50audio or video recording of this public meeting
00:55Attendees are therefore therefore advised that
01:00whether perceived or unperceived by those present
01:06The board requests that you please be courteous
01:10cell phones. Applicants and project teams are
01:15presenting before the planning board. [snorts]
01:21minutes from September 9th of 2026. Do I hear a
01:29approve the the uh All in favor. All in favor.
01:39business business items first on the schedule
01:48Start starting with uh first business item, new
01:53timeline on permanent approval for 80 Clay
02:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman members of the board.
02:05a request for an extension, a 2-year extension for
02:11I wanted to just to take a moment just to talk
02:17that allow the the Planning Board to extend as
02:22this board has entertained in numerous occasions
02:27plan review for a period of 6 months. However,
02:34budget approved legislation that actually made
02:40And that included a number of regulations that
02:4640A. One of those changes that were was enacted
02:55extension, but an extension up to 2 years.
03:03my client is actually proposing an
03:09That development proposal not only
03:15but it also requires a number of state
03:22as well as the financing associated with that. And
03:28delayed in their ability to move this matter
03:33we are requesting a 2-year extension of the
03:41my client the additional time in in order to
03:46My client is here, Dan Angelo is here. If there's
03:51can answer that, but that is our request, Mr.
03:59Um Mr. Stevens, what's the position of the
04:05to the board. I would acknowledge Attorney
04:10through the Chapter 137 of the Acts of 2026 had
04:19It was some time ago I did some research
04:24and there really wasn't any explicit language,
04:29rules of 6 months for the Zoning Board of Appeals.
04:35acknowledge again Attorney Fleming, and I'll
04:41the permanent granting authority in its discretion
04:46may extend the time for exercise of the
04:52and provided further that the application for
04:56granting authority prior to the expiration of the
05:02to the end of the original 2-year period of the
05:07which is now allowable under law. The department
05:14you very much, Mr. Stevens. Is there a motion
05:20I'll make that motion to approve the 2-year
05:27Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.
05:34a request for an extension of the 2-year time
05:39through 69 and 71 Hancock Street,
05:45Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Attorney David
05:50Uh it's the exact same issue that Mr. Fleming
05:56have commodity pricing has uh caused a lot
06:04and his family are are no exception to it. The
06:09automatically would extend the variance out. This
06:15range. So, we're asking for the same thing, a
06:20Thank you. Um and Mr. Stevens, the position of uh
06:26it would be favorable for the 2-year extension
06:31on the case prior that it's now allowable.
06:38I'll make a motion. I'll second that. All those in
06:47Uh the as far as we'll move on to the uh uh the
06:54of the 6-month timeline on permit approval for
07:00number 2023-02. [laughter] Uh good evening, Mr.
07:07Rob Corley, I'm the CEO of NeighborWorks Housing
07:13partnership with Caritas Communities to develop
07:17well. As was referenced before, this isn't related
07:22our funding from the state. We've been putting
07:28over a year and a half now. And we've been awarded
07:32for the last 3 and a half months. So, we're
07:37latest January. So, we're seeking an extension of
07:43hope to close and start construction in the early
07:50um, on in Minot Street. Thank you. Uh, Mr.
07:56on this? Yeah, um, through you to the board,
08:01extended this permit twice already for 6-month
08:07right now is for a third 6-month extension. So,
08:14uh, which is shy of the 24 months extension. The
08:20of NeighborWorks with the affordable housing
08:24the financing of affordable housing um,
08:29support the 6-month extension and and hopefully
08:35Okay, thank you. Well, to God's ears,
08:38request? Motion to approve. Second. All those
08:49Now, moving on to the uh, uh, agenda agenda.
08:56for 100 and 150 Newport Avenue extension,
09:05This public hearing shall be conducted to
09:11Land East Coast LP, 40 Washington Street,
09:19for certificate of consistency under sections
09:28Zoning Ordinance. The applicant proposes the
09:35four residential buildings along with structured
09:42540 spaces. The proposal will also include
09:48designed drainage controls and landscaping.
09:58that 163 plus or minus square feet of land
10:05150 Newport Avenue Extension, uh 17 Oak Avenue,
10:13located within the Residence B, Residence C,
10:20and are shown on Assessor's Map 61-62, Lots 40,
10:35Good evening, Mr. Chairman. For the
10:38and I represent uh Trammell Crow. Just to
10:43the board uh during the summer at the first uh
10:49we had a lot of comments from the board. Um
10:53concerns that neighbors had with working with
10:59and we've come up with this brief presentation,
11:06the points that were raised. Uh and
11:11uh one of the directors of Trammell Crow, and
11:21Good evening, Mr. Chairman, members
11:25last time we were here was towards the end
11:31uh I s- think some really positive updates that
11:36Um so to start there were a few follow-ups um
11:43that came up at the July planning board hearing.
11:50the uh overlay was supposed to be transparent, but
11:58which is now currently owned by the MBTA and
12:03parking garage, where the overpass is, they have
12:10that provides access and kind of their
12:18to allow people to get into this into the overpass
12:25of the concerns of okay, how is there going
12:31title documents, there is that easement. So there
12:39office building that they own, they will have the
12:46the MBTA's parcel, there's the city land and then
12:53some clarity. And then along with the access into
13:01up was where are you guys on the zone of influence
13:08giving some more detail on which departments have
13:14Friday and shortly after um we will have the
13:22Um moving forward, so another question that came
13:32and I thought it'd be useful to just provide
13:37Their proximity to MBTA MBTA stations and
13:45both per unit which we look at but we look
13:52As you can see we're pretty much towards the
13:58in Quincy just across the street here. And on
14:06do not feel comfortable going below that. We feel
14:12would also want to note that the zoning does
14:19the lowest we could go is losing 20
14:22the 540 that we're providing is necessary
14:30So we talked through the
14:35a few other comments that came in from
14:40Indoor bike storage that is
14:45One comment that came up was in
14:51That is something that we can investigate
14:57There needs to be a capacity study that
15:00financials that go into that and then if
15:06do some upgrades on our end that
15:12are comfortable saying that we can do solar ready
15:17the bearing capacity to eventually take on solar
15:25just can't say that we're going to be able to plop
15:30the utility company to confirm capacity and then
15:37um accretive to us. Uh dedicated pickup for trash
15:48we did a tree survey, so we went out, surveyed
15:53later when I walk through some of the changes
15:59at the site that we provided. I think we
16:04really bring the site together um and provide
16:11our residents and to the public. Um and then three
16:19on Friday. We sent everything in, so DPW comment
16:26and I know another one just came in, so we do
16:32um comments back as expeditiously as possible.
16:39And the beta peer review um we worked with um all
16:48everything was all of our responses
16:52but we'll welcome any other additional
16:58So, that leads into some of the site plan updates
17:06quick overview, up top is what we initially
17:12and I'll walk through kind of each one in
17:19most excited about is what we're calling this
17:26So, essentially So, as it is today, the
17:32We are proposing bringing that sidewalk interior
17:39a row of trees kind of striping Newport
17:45some nice beauty for not only our residents,
17:52to the office park out across the street from us.
17:59Newport Avenue extension towards the T station.
18:06showing what we're looking to do. As you can
18:11and we're just bumping that in, planning some nice
18:18space from cars and then also some additional
18:26This is, you know, looking up towards the 150
18:32is today. And then, this is what we are proposing,
18:39like. So, before {slash} current. And then,
18:49And then, kind of a front-facing shot, you
18:55which is closest to the MBTA's MBTA station, and
19:04This is what it would look like, you know, as
19:09So, a lot a more greenery, especially front
19:18Next up is the kind of National Grid land that
19:25two sites. So, very pleased to say we've reached
19:31was able to get through all their I think it was
19:38we were proposing. So, we are under agreement to
19:45see it used to be just a strip that we had to cut
19:50to actually connect the sites. Um so, I know that
19:56was how are these sites connected on the interior?
20:04that allowed us to shuffle some parking spaces
20:10some landscape islands. We chose to bunch all
20:17Avenue extension. So, that can be a seating
20:23trees for anyone who just wants to plop down as
20:29Um and then we were able to get rid of we
20:35backwards L-shaped building to A and as you can
20:44that came down into that courtyard. We're able
20:50we haven't lost any parking spaces and open that
20:58um larger courtyard that also connects
21:03everything just kind of works better um site
21:11that land and uh we think it's a great great win
21:18Uh another comment that came up was what's
21:24So, we provided even more of a buffer with some
21:30property line and then we're proposing doing some
21:39of the site will be a little bit more depressed
21:44um as you can see in the bottom left picture um
21:50go back there and plant whatever they do. I'm not
21:58about gardening. Um and then we have our dog park
22:05so, it's just more thought put into the
22:12And then as I alluded to earlier, Copley
22:18of all the existing trees and kind of the
22:24Um those are trees that we all think
22:29verifying their health once we
22:33And so, that's almost 40 trees that we'll be able
22:39uh including that one kind of in the bottom right
22:47Um on the 100 parcel um we didn't elect to do
22:57did do that and provided, you know, another tree
23:02of those existing trees that you see we're able
23:08it on the 100 side. And then in addition to
23:14adding over 300 new trees. So a lot more green has
23:26And those are that's those are all the updates
23:33anyone has. Any members of the board have any
23:40I have to ask some questions. Please excuse me,
23:46I don't mean to. Uh on the MBTA comment, you said
23:52Mhm. An encouraging email. Yep. Are you going
23:56they have it? Is it here? Uh I shared it with
24:01can pass it along as well. Okay. And then um and
24:08anything like that, but have you guys filed
24:13So with these updated plans that we just submitted
24:18with with the Conservation Commission. I applaud
24:22think that looks nice. The elevated plantings,
24:27it floods back there, the water can go underneath
24:32We know that, right? So when I was a younger man,
24:37South and I remember winters down there going
24:43off of Newport Avenue. And then when you got about
24:47that the bump was there because that's where the
24:53so that didn't sink, but the road sank. And
24:57they're all kind of like getting squished down.
25:02all your buildings, not just one building, up on a
25:08Cuz I'm a little nervous that like 10 years
25:13I'm thinking about building settling. Uh cuz this
25:19on a pedestal and you're driving piles down to
25:25going to take the load of the building, and plus
25:30count that load, at least it won't sink if it's on
25:36open up more of the area, so it won't And I And I
25:43I don't like to see a lot of parking and black
25:48auto factory parking lot, you know what
25:52elevated up, just like I mentioned before, put it
25:58and give the people in the other buildings a
26:02apartment flooded, cuz it's going to flood. I
26:07of climate change. So, you didn't mention
26:11I was kind of hoping you'd say that. I like I
26:16that's good, they won't wash away, but I
26:21any discussion? I know you were talking to the
26:27Right, so that's down the the south end of the
26:32right side here. Now, is there any discussion
26:38down to the north end of the property as well, so
26:44get over to without going to the T. If they didn't
26:50they have a pedestrian flyover further down
26:54it doesn't go over the track I don't believe that
26:59put some type of a connector so it could
27:03people in the northern part of the property and
27:08over so they could go over to the Hancock Street
27:13on the other side of the street and try and bring
27:17I'm not trying to pick on you at all, but it's
27:22these buildings sink in 10 years. Mhm. And
27:27you know, some type of a an underground
27:32So to that point about the building sinking, well,
27:39elevation 12 or higher and the flood zone AE is
27:48the first floor is at 2 ft higher and we
27:54the flooding concern. So we feel very comfortable
27:59units in our property. Um and then to [clears
28:08the building on the right is the one that's
28:13and I don't want to sound like a broken record,
28:19very significant cost implications to those and
28:25one level and then things have changed a lot in
28:30make these deals work. So um while it would
28:37you know, with a podium floor, it we
28:43Um but I will say that our entire design team
28:49soils that we are putting these buildings on has
28:55don't sink and we have a great construction team
28:59they won't. So, are you going to do slab on grade
29:04underneath the slab? Cuz obviously, you're not
29:08pedestals cuz you're going to tell me it cost too
29:12you. All right? So, you're going to at least put
29:19though they say it won't sink, but if you have
29:23There there will be ground improvements that
29:29Um so, the ground will be heavily tested to make
29:36without tested? How? Compression test? Mhm. You're
29:41type of a standard tonnage test on top of piles
29:47but they go through a lot of modeling to make sure
29:55you know, negative impacts as you're saying 10,
30:01our buildings are built to last. So, um I won't
30:08But I like to think that my children will be
30:12right? Yep. So, I'm not trying to pick on you,
30:15right? And you know, I I love the idea
30:20You know, we need housing. I'm I'm all for it
30:24actually so much parking if we're this close to a
30:30encouraging people to walk to the T? Wasn't
30:35Just threw it out there. That's all. Again, you
30:41Appreciate it. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Do
30:48the last time you presented, I was had a question
30:54you're basing your data on. Mhm. Is that still
31:03That is we have and Nick, you can come up and
31:11with our survey of the existing site, we have
31:17which is a little bit more accurate than what FEMA
31:22you know, real-time data. Um and as
31:28filing with conservation, so I'm sure that will
31:35Any further questions?
31:39No more questions? Can I I I just thought
31:44Um so talking to the MBTA and you received an
31:50Did they also give you because I know it's pretty
31:55That's the zone of influence. That's the
31:58those are together. Thank you. Yep. So no
32:05but it's a public hearing. Do any
32:19[cough]
32:20All right. Good evening, Mr. Chairman, members
32:263 resident and city councilor. I'm here on behalf
32:32Uh much of what I have to say was covered in
32:39of questions. So, I'm going to try to go through
32:44for to be on record. Uh but I'll try not to be
32:50Um so just as a as a form of context back in
32:57March, April. We I hosted a community
33:03offered up their professionals, the city offered
33:08Uh we had a really good turnout and I had
33:12residents, many of which I shared with
33:16Um and then after that meeting, this
33:22the project that was presented in July didn't
33:28of resident feedback and my feedback, which is
33:34So, that's the context for why we are
33:46Okay, covered all that. [cough] So, in the
33:49in the email that I had sent in to the board
33:53were carried over from my previous email, which
33:59So, all I'm going to do is go through and I'm
34:01it was already covered and then I'm going
34:06he and I have been collaborating since I would say
34:14facilitate the conversation about this project as
34:20that with traffic that all of us I don't think
34:25doesn't have to contend with that whether it's
34:30for that reason um representative Ayers and I have
34:37one of the main things is the size of the project.
34:41a lot of uh diff- cars and traffic to increase
34:47I'll acknowledge that this
34:53probably does have a lower impact than fully fully
34:59which I think took over 1,000 spaces and everyone
35:04much more contention, but it does offer challenges
35:11that was done in March did reflect that. And
35:20I reached out to Tremont Crossing and asked it to
35:27on their traffic study. And uh as Representative
35:39Mr. Chairman, may I? Good afternoon, everyone. Uh
35:44opportunity to speak uh tonight. Uh I also want
35:49advocacy on this project. Um our offices have been
35:56and state will share jurisdiction. Although this
36:02um the potential traffic impacts on the
36:07jurisdiction. Tonight, um I'm asking uh Mr.
36:15requiring the applicant to conduct a supplement uh
36:22the project's approval. Um Mr. Chairman, in the
36:29uh seven it addresses seven intersections that
36:35analyze developments in the impact on the traffic
36:43I believe an additional analysis would
36:47and the state work together to address these
36:53um a supplemental study could evaluate vehicle
37:00congested along the surrounding corridor, the
37:05intersections, including Route 3A, Hancock Street,
37:12I think all of us have um including myself been
37:18I hear from my constituents all the time uh in
37:23about the delays that they have to uh go
37:29about 2 weeks ago it was a rainy day. I took
37:34Uh the the commuters experience significant
37:41is uh a regional a regional uh gateway, but it
37:48public transportation. And this would only help
37:54the congestion in and around 3D 3A, Hancock Street
38:01and the state has also been advancing
38:06and the Neponset Circle on the Boston side. A
38:11could provide important information and additional
38:15the city and the state understand the area's
38:21opportunities to improve the public safety, reduce
38:28options, and determine the appropriate traffic
38:35Mr. Chairman and members of the board you
38:44Thank you representative Ayers for for
38:50So, I'll continue my remarks. It was the
38:55and I want to acknowledge the applicant's efforts
39:05particularly the acquisition of the
39:10when when it was when we were in discussions
39:14something [snorts] that I'd like to see them
39:20because I think it could give them the opportunity
39:26a lot easier, but number two it enables them to
39:32of the green spaces in the center of the campus
39:38With respect to parking, I've heard a lot
39:43two exactly opposing schools of thoughts.
39:50some feel that parking needs to be increased. I do
39:57when it comes to comparing similar sites
40:03and looking at the ratio of bedroom to
40:09in a in a layperson's perspective when it comes to
40:15sense and I want a successful development if we're
40:21The other thing that came up in our community
40:27condenser units. And the response from
40:32cuz that equipment on the buildings right now are
40:38left on the illustration on the screen is very
40:4320 ft high, and so they have direct sort of line
40:48can hear them coming on and turning off and so
40:53that the newer units are are much more quiet than
40:59make sure we had on record. [clears throat] Let's
41:04ones we've already covered. The applicant has
41:09affordable housing units. Um the green space I've
41:17acquiring that additional 5,000 sq ft of
41:23The one thing that I'll amend to the green space,
41:29a neighbor of mine, and that is how does this
41:34tree ordinance, which requires 50% of the parking
41:40um 3311-4C within our tree ordinance.
41:47the planning board on that. Uh it was our
41:53uh mentioned earlier and and pedestrian walkways.
41:58towards I would say the southern section of this
42:07the streets. I can imagine that to be a much
42:11and people who work nearby getting to the T
42:17uh the the major roadway and and the
42:22passing cars. So, that's very much appreciated.
42:28uh that include that not only includes a
42:34but also the vertical pathways. I hope they
42:39And let's see. I think that covers most of I
42:47sorry. Board members remarks, that covers every
42:53um this project is very important to a lot
42:58project specifically, but it impacts us mainly
43:05you know, the MBTA station. So, um that's with
43:13Any Any additional members of the
43:17[cough and clears throat]
43:25All right. Uh thank you for the
43:29Ryan Fassett. I live in Ward 3. Um thanks for
43:35opening up the public comment.
43:40board member your your comments earlier were
43:44these podium buildings, why can't we do more
43:50Yeah. Just kidding, Kev. Just kidding. No, and and
43:54to make anybody angry. It's just this is a huge
44:01done here is going to be pretty permanent. Uh you
44:07going to flood. We know sea level rise is coming.
44:13um right, they're talking about like a 100-year
44:17know 100-year floods are getting more and
44:21you know, we we probably need to go above and
44:26future flooding, climate change risk,
44:33Councilor brought up that there was a few people
44:38I couldn't agree with that or disagree with that
44:43spaces to actually hit the minimum, um which
44:48this development is right next to a T stop.
44:56parking. Um residents in that neighborhood in the
45:02about privacy, concerned about lights. Um it seems
45:07parking spaces, create some green space for those
45:12nice and uh cozy for them. Should be great. Um I
45:19to lease these properties, lease the property,
45:25metropolitan area planning council, they've done
45:33uh that the vacancy rate for apartments in
45:40you know, these are going not going to
45:44They're not going to have any issue leasing these
45:47selling these to a leasing agency or whatever kind
45:52Uh even if there is 20 less parking spaces,
45:59Uh ultimately, I think it's great
46:02Uh I'm an arborist, certified arborist, certified
46:10maybe we'll see board certified master arborist
46:15Quincy's good stuff going on here. I
46:20what species we're having planted. Um I know we're
46:26Quincy city code or something like that.
46:31going in in some of these islands. If it's
46:36they're not great trees. They're not
46:41so the vagueness of the landscaping plan needs to
46:46information and then I would feel comfortable
46:49pass the tree ordinance. Um ultimately, like I
46:54going to be huge for Quincy businesses. It's
46:58community that we can develop in these buildings
47:01still excited about them and I just hope we
47:07[cough and clears throat] Great.
47:18Favor and oppose sheets and pens. Oh, and and
47:23sill if you would like to favor or oppose, you
47:36Uh just Mr. Chairman, if I might uh
47:41Counselor Hubley have a reasonable request for a
47:48River Bridge and my client has agreed to do that.
47:53weeks, I would imagine. And the team is here if
48:00Are there any dis- if I could Yes. If I may, thank
48:04a on just a great process here. Thank you uh
48:10the last meeting a a citizen engineer, and I
48:16for the Neponset River Bridge. Any
48:21It was pretty impressive. And it did just came
48:26Came from a resident. And uh it was really clever.
48:36representative Ayers is looking to do this study.
48:42involved in I think are great. I I like the I
48:49access to the uh power grid behind you. That's a
48:58to remember Shawn Siza's idea about a flyover.
49:04the hook for that because of everything that be
49:08yards. But as we look at the study, as as we move
49:15and traffic in general, you've done everything
49:20And that's that's a bear of a process. I know what
49:26now might be the time to just look at that
49:32in this area? The answer might just be no. And
49:38you've got we've got these 520 odd units that
49:43and all the restaurants and businesses are on
49:47would it be something the MBTA had you
49:53and it just never happened. You know, so I just
49:57further traffic studies and so forth with the
50:03taking a look at what Mr. Shanahan recommended
50:10if if everything came back and said it would make
50:15again, I'm not putting you guys on the hook
50:18we can build a little act I mean, we can we
50:24maybe it's something for the MBTA to look
50:28to to to bridge that divide literally, you know,
50:34be necessary, but now would be the time certainly
50:41Any further comment or questions from the board?
50:51as far as the department have any recommendation
50:56at this time. Um as I believe the board has
51:01and responses have more or less come in in the
51:06enough time to fully comprehend those comments,
51:13some additional time to work through that. Uh we
51:17office uh to reach out and work directly with
51:24the flooding concerns and issues that have been
51:29as next week and the recommendation would be one
51:37and would be back here before the board at that
51:43meeting. I'll make a motion. Second that.
51:52Can you change to November 18th, correct?
51:57than we normally meet because of the Veterans
52:02there'll be a 5-week spread hopefully to
52:12Okay. The uh next matter, actually
52:18uh the public hearing is 7-11 Burns Burns
52:29Uh this public hearing shall be conducted to
52:36of 606 Washington Street, Second Floor, Quincy,
52:43Quincy Zoning Ordinance Title 17, Section
52:53parking waiver. The applicant proposes to demolish
53:00residential building consisting of seven units
53:07will also include professional design drainage
53:158,739 plus or minus square feet of land and
53:23The subject property is located within a business
53:30uh 2085D, Lots 64, Lots B. And then before
53:41uh relative to the uh Planning Board General
53:46to administer oaths with the chair, summons
53:52cross-examine person giving testimony during
53:57inspect the subject site or buildings uh, during
54:04cause. The order of business will be announced by
54:09chair. Any person wishing to speak, please raise
54:14When recognized, please stand, state your name
54:19and special credentials, if any,
54:23Please speak slowly and within the context
54:27stenographed and taped for public record.
54:32exclude any unnecessary, irrelevant,
54:39Thank you.
54:40[clears throat] [laughter]
54:44Good evening, Mr. Chairman, members
54:48Um, me and Minh Van is the business partner. We
54:54about a year and a half ago. I'm also the project
55:02um, from Hardy Man Design Group. Uh, he's a
55:07the site and drainage designs. And we also
55:13for the traffic engineer portion, uh, who did the
55:207 through 11 Burns Ave, it's an existing five-unit
55:27uh, wood frame structure, uh, with a basement.
55:34uh, total of 8,739 sq ft. And to the left
55:43sewer easement. I'm not sure if it's still
55:49the property at the back, the laundromat building.
55:55has two bedrooms and one bath. There's one
56:01two units in the on the first floor,
56:07So, this property is located in the Business B
56:14um Business B and Res B on zone. Uh we're abutting
56:25And then, there's other um residential building
56:31Um Burns Ave is actually a one-way street. So,
56:39Chuck Charles Mom and enter into um Burns
56:45what we're proposing tonight here is to demolish
56:52and then propose to construct a three-story wood
56:59apartment building uh with 14 um on-grade parking
57:08Uh the ground floor will contain 14 parking space
57:16plus one bath unit. And then, on the second floor,
57:25And then, also on the third floor, uh we'll have
57:31These unit range approximately
57:39the
57:42the proposal itself on the outside calls for
57:51portion of the structure will have a basement for
57:58rooms such as sprinkler rooms, fire alarms, and um
58:07Um the the front yard actually um for the zone
58:1415 ft, which is sort of a a modest setback um in
58:23on the houses that's currently on that street. So
58:31um neighborhood community meeting back in
58:36And the comments were quite positive.
58:43this proposal will require some um dimensional
58:49which will submit through the department in the
58:56traffic characteristics, um adding additional two
59:03uh the vehicle trip projection is very de minimis
59:11in vehicle um is 12 during the weekdays and
59:20the two additional units for this project
59:27And I I also have um Chi Man here to explain
59:42Good evening. For the record, my name is Chi.
59:47From Hady Man Design Group. Professional
59:53the site currently site has no drainage control.
1:00:02hit the ground, it's going to be pretty much
1:00:09All the runoff will be either from
1:00:13ground and drain out to the street and then
1:00:21conditions, we are going to be proposing
1:00:30and the driveway is going to be
1:00:34the porous pavements, they are open grade
1:00:41drain through the pavement and we have a reservoir
1:00:48of crushed stone layer that will actually store
1:00:57On top of that, the roof runoff will be collected
1:01:10the little rectangle area under the building.
1:01:18overall building footprint. So, the the roof
1:01:25directly into the infiltration system. This
1:01:33a depth of about 1.8 ft. Um we did have um test
1:01:42water elevations and also the soil characteristic
1:01:50Um so, the run off is
1:01:57into the drainage infiltration system
1:02:06control manhole um outlet control manhole which
1:02:13orifice. So, it's controlled the the run off going
1:02:22majority of the water on site for infiltration
1:02:31through a 4-in pipe that go into um the street
1:02:37run off leaving our site um to mitigate the storm
1:02:48because with the infiltrations, we actually also
1:02:55we can um provide the TSS and phosphor removal.
1:03:04water they can do direct infiltrations. The
1:03:10be drained towards the the trench drain
1:03:18you know, on the rainy day, you don't really get
1:03:23those are more like, you know, um you [snorts]
1:03:32the the liquid collect under the building
1:03:40run off per se. And those are going to be
1:03:45oil and gas separator, a gas trap, uh be treated,
1:03:54Um again, G mentioned there's a sewer easement on
1:04:03site into the burn Burns Ave. So, our building
1:04:11sewer. We intend to uh keep that sewer in place.
1:04:18um the owner is going to work out the ease-
1:04:27fire protection connection will be connecting into
1:04:34anticipate um you know, very high demand. And the
1:04:46to need a pad mount transformer. In this case, you
1:04:52require They usually have a pole mount
1:04:57a pole mount transformer. It probably go
1:05:03Um so, based on our calculations, the peak rate of
1:05:13achieving about 30 to 40% reductions on on
1:05:20the volume wise is 45 to 50%. So, it's going to be
1:05:28runoff control. And I'm happy with any questions.
1:05:39Where is the property line? I thought the the
1:05:45Uh just just off the parking lot. The parking
1:05:54Are they Are they in favor of this? Have you
1:06:00with our neighbor and he's in favor. There's
1:06:12Any other questions? Um for seven
1:06:17Do you think So, you're not going
1:06:21just individual residential trash units?
1:06:26private So, so that that that room alone is uh
1:06:35probably about five of them. Okay. Um those are
1:06:42and those seems to work. Okay. Tho- tho- those
1:06:48need more, then we'll just add the frequency.
1:06:55in the front house. Is that going to be preserved?
1:07:02to to for this proposal. Okay. And then will
1:07:08And you'll be providing that to
1:07:20So, this currently there's a big tree
1:07:27And this this is the proposed um rendering of the
1:07:37and additional trees in the back um based on the
1:07:43will add those uh additional trees. There's
1:07:50Uh unfortunately, that that
1:07:56you know, in position that we we cannot be able
1:08:08And we'll we'll need some distance away
1:08:21Is there any other questions?
1:08:25No, thank you.
1:08:28Uh no further questions of the board. It's uh
1:08:33wish to speak, questions, or comments?
1:08:42Just state your full recognized
1:08:44my name is Jennifer Ryan. I live on Safford Street
1:08:51that I would have a vested interest. Um I'm
1:08:57next to a business district. And so, I'm very
1:09:04very close to my property, [clears throat] and
1:09:08curious about the um property owners on the other
1:09:14and I am curious about um I the tree ordinance
1:09:23Um and the little trees on the landscape
1:09:27Um and so um just considering the the neighbors on
1:09:34um near Quincy that are just paved over um
1:09:39Quincy doesn't become um um continuously more
1:09:46more opportunity to be able to preserve green
1:09:50become a denser and denser place to live. That's
1:09:58Are there any other members of
1:10:04Um and uh Mr. Stevens, have we received
1:10:09uh receive a communication from Councilor
1:10:15uh for the 7 to 11 Burns Ave project. Good
1:10:22uh Vice Chair Kelly, and members of the Planning
1:10:307 to 11 Burns Ave. I apologize, I have a
1:10:36held a community meeting on this proposal on March
1:10:41generally positive. The neighbors are in large
1:10:45to the neighborhood over the building currently
1:10:50city departments as well, and understand the board
1:10:56uh will likely be continued to another meeting.
1:11:00up tonight by constituents, I'll look forward to
1:11:07Richard Ash, Quincy Councillor, Ward 2. Uh so,
1:11:13Um as far as the project, the department
1:11:19to December 9th uh to allow for that review to
1:11:25recommendation. Is there a motion to continue
1:11:312 months. Second. All those in favor? Aye.
1:11:44Back to the business. Uh yes.
1:11:48Can I jump in on that? Yes, you may. Okay.
1:11:56member Meade to the board, uh there are three
1:12:03One is for 125 Liberty Street, which is a lot
1:12:10The other is uh for property at 117 Town Hill
1:12:17uh that has received Zoning Board of Appeal uh
1:12:24is for 1600 Crown Colony Drive, uh and that's
1:12:31uh site into two uh parcels. Uh so, all
1:12:39The final business item is everybody should have
1:12:45schedule. Uh so, we'll look to take up a vote
1:12:51second Wednesdays of the month after the COVID
1:12:59The summer meetings we laid out either July 14th
1:13:07depending on the workflow, but we usually try
1:13:14the one summer meeting and we push that towards
1:13:20that could be July 28th or one possibility
1:13:26And then no August meeting. So that again is
1:13:33Take a look, put some thought into it, feel free
1:13:37you know we'll look to get into a little
1:13:40a vote on that schedule at next
1:13:45the department. [snorts and clears throat]
1:13:50So a motion to adjourn? Motion to
