2026-11-03 - City Council

Summary

  • 10 members present, Erik Gitschier presiding; adjourned 7:39 PM.
  • Release of the October 6 executive session minutes on Flock cameras adopted 10-0 on roll call; the released section is posted with the agenda (see Flock Safety System Suspension).
  • Amendment to the Acre Urban Renewal Plan for 276 Broadway St adopted 10-0 on second reading (see Senior Center Purchase at 276 Broadway).
  • Purchase of the Senior Center at 276 Broadway St adopted 10-0 on second reading; the purchase price in the attached vote is $3,000,000.
  • Confirmation of the Draper Laboratory executive session votes put over to November 10 after Sean McDonough objected to the second reading under Council Rule 27 (see Draper Laboratory Executive Session Votes).
  • Utility hearings (Boston Gas on Westford, Lane and Fernald; National Grid on Robeson St; Zayo at 174 South St) each referred to the Wire Inspector.
  • Reappointments adopted 10-0: Maria Sheehy to the Lowell Memorial Auditorium Board of Trustees; Richard Cote and James Gaffney III to the Veterans Commission. One out-of-state travel request (police) adopted 10-0.
  • Motion responses accepted and placed on file; Council motions 5.1 to 5.9 were all referred (City Manager, Public Safety, Finance, City Clerk).
  • Petitions: David Trainor's Flock cameras petition referred to the City Manager; handicap-parking signs at 57 Ware St and 105 Jewett St referred to the Transportation Engineer.

Built from the posted agenda and the draft minutes attached to the November 10 agenda (acceptance pending); discussion highlights are from the video captions.

Discussion highlights (from the video)

  • Sean McDonough objected under Council Rule 27 to taking up the Draper Laboratory confirmation vote the same night, noting it was election night, and asked that it come back the following week; the item was put over.
  • On a motion for a briefing on the summer youth program outlook, a councilor called it an investment in young people, and the city's posted request for information on expanding summer opportunities for youth was raised as related.
  • On a motion for an update on sustainability council feedback about the specialized building code, the City Manager said the city has the stretch code and the specialized code and would balance builder input against environmental input.
  • A councilor pressed for enforcement of conditions on a subdivision where work continues, asking who is responsible for enforcing them and for issuing a stop-work order until conditions are met.
  • A motion to explore a residential tax exemption together with the good landlord abatement was discussed as a way to protect working families.
  • A motion asked the finance subcommittee and city finance team to meet as needed to prepare for the FY28 budget, to improve coordination between council and administration.
  • On traffic motions, the City Manager said flashing stop signs cost about $1,500 each and take the sign shop three to four hours to assemble; another councilor said new double-yellow line markings had stopped cars zigzagging and hoped for an effective low-cost control.
  • A discussion of alcohol licensing weighed how to distinguish bars from restaurants through a food-service requirement; the CFO said the state reports meals-tax receipts only in aggregate, not per business.

Names in the auto-captions are often garbled, so some remarks are not attributed to individual councilors.

Agenda

Agenda posted at the link in Sources; outcomes are summarized above from the minutes.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:00Heat. Heat.

00:01[music]

00:15>> [music]

00:26>> Heat. Heat.

00:30[music]

00:41>> [music]

00:45>> Heat. Heat.

00:54Heat. [music]

01:02[music]

01:08Heat.

01:10[music]

01:16Heat. Heat. N.

01:28[music]

01:39[music]

01:46>> [music]

01:57>> Heat. Heat.

02:00[music]

02:03Heat. Heat.

02:07[music]

02:21[music]

02:39>> [music]

02:51>> November 3rd, 2026, LOL City Council

02:54meeting come to order. City prayer. Dear

02:58God, today as this session opens, we

02:59pray that your presence will be before

03:01us and everyone who serves in the

03:03decision-making process of our city. We

03:05pray for the direction which will lead

03:07our city to be strong and unified. May

03:10we continue the legacy of our founders.

03:12May we be granted this day the wisdom to

03:14make decisions which will be for the

03:16good of our city. We also pray for your

03:18special blessing on all those who are

03:20working to transform our city and make

03:22it a better place to live and work.

03:24Amen.

03:26Pledge Allegiance. I pledge allegiance

03:28to the flag of the United States of

03:30America and to the republic for which it

03:32stands, one nation under God,

03:35indivisible, with liberty and justice

03:37for all.

03:45>> Roll call. Mr. Clerk.

03:48>> Council Dakota

03:49>> here.

03:50>> Mayor Gia here.

03:51>> Council Geran

03:52>> here.

03:52>> Council Leang here. Council Mcdana

03:55>> here.

03:56>> Council Mercier

03:57>> here.

03:57>> Council Non

03:58>> here.

03:59>> Council Robinson

04:00>> here.

04:01>> Council Scott

04:02>> here.

04:03>> Council Chow

04:04>> here.

04:05>> 10 present.

04:06>> Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Are there any

04:08moment of silences?

04:12Seeing none, we'll move on to mayor's

04:14business. Number two, mayor's business

04:162.1, communication, remote zoom

04:18participation. Motion will accept and

04:20place on file by councelor Direan

04:22seconded by councelor Mercier. All in

04:24favor signify by saying I. Any opposed?

04:28So ordered. 2.2 proclamation

04:32lung cancer awareness.

04:36Whereas lung cancer is one of the

04:38leading causes of cancer related deaths

04:40in the United States, affecting

04:42thousands of individuals and families

04:44each year. And raising awareness is

04:46essential to promoting early detection,

04:48prevention, and access to life-saving

04:51screening and treatment. Whereas lung

04:53cancer awareness month provides an

04:55opportunity to honor those who have lost

04:57their lives to lung cancer, recognize

05:00survivors and individuals battling the

05:03disease and encourage our community to

05:05support research, prevention, early

05:07detection and improved treatment

05:10options. Now therefore, I, Mayor Eric R.

05:12Gia, do hereby proclaim November as lung

05:15cancer awareness month in the city of

05:17LOL and encourage all residents to

05:19increase their awareness, learn about

05:21the importance of early detection, and

05:24support individuals and families

05:25affected by lung cancer. Motion to

05:28accept and place on file by council

05:30Robinson, seconded by councel Mercier.

05:32All in favor signify by saying I. Any

05:35opposed? So ordered. Three city clerk

05:383.1 minutes of the city clerk regular

05:40meeting October 27th for acceptance

05:43motion to accept by council Yang

05:44seconded by councelor Dakota all in

05:47favor signify by saying I any opposed so

05:50ordered 3.2 to release executive session

05:54minutes October 6th, 2026. Flock cameras

05:58motion to adopt.

05:59>> There is a register speaker. Excuse me,

06:01sir.

06:04Emily Girtinbach.

06:10>> Yes, thank you. My name is Emily

06:11Girtton. I live at 124 Park Avenue East.

06:14I just wanted to make a comment

06:15regarding this current motion. Before I

06:18make that comment, I do need to provide

06:19a little additional context so that my

06:21comment makes sense to everyone here.

06:23So, I was one of the people who spoke at

06:24the September 22nd meeting where the

06:26council did vote to suspend use of the

06:29flock cameras. Now, since then, I was

06:31reading the Lel Sun article that

06:33recently published about the cameras

06:34turning back on. Had a few different

06:36quotes from the counselors, including

06:38why are we not talking about ALPRs in

06:40general, which I think is a good point,

06:41conversation for another time, and also

06:43why are we talking about flock

06:44specifically? For context, there are

06:46over 50 ALPRs in Lel. 98% of them are

06:49from Flock. That is why we, the

06:51constituents, have been talking about

06:53Flock. It's very relevant to us

06:54statistically here in the city. Also,

06:56there's the matter of data sharing,

06:58which is the point that is particularly

06:59relevant to the statement I want to make

07:01about what's on the docket tonight. Um,

07:03so you can stop sharing Flock data with

07:05other police departments, but you can't

07:07stop sharing it with Flock safety. Uh,

07:09Flock's own contract says, and I quote,

07:11"Customer hereby grants to Flock a

07:13non-exclusive, royalty-free,

07:15irrevocable, perpetual worldwide license

07:18to use and disclose customer data to

07:20provide the Flock services and use the

07:22customer data to improve Flock's

07:24products and services." Their data

07:26policy says in item two, data ownership

07:29is because Flock needs access to your

07:31data to operate the service, the terms

07:33and conditions include a limited license

07:35from you back to Flock. There's no way

07:37to avoid it. Now the point I wanted to

07:38make regarding the release of the

07:40minutes is inside l reported that

07:42cameras were turned back on with the

07:44caveat that data isn't shared with other

07:46LPDS or flock as we can see from the

07:49flock contract that is not pos the

07:51ladder there is not possible it's always

07:52shared with flock the LPD transparency

07:55portal is the web page on the flock

07:57website not a city site I know that

07:59transparency portals were referenced

08:00previously and in the sun article if you

08:02go to that portal it shows that data

08:04that has been shared with flock as it

08:06has to be providing approving the policy

08:08that Flock does have the data because

08:09the portal is on their website. So, my

08:12point is this. I really hope that the

08:14council votes to release those minutes

08:16so we can see what the decisions and the

08:18discussions were regarding turning the

08:19cameras back on. If you talk if you did

08:22indeed make that caveat, again, I don't

08:25know because I haven't seen the minutes.

08:26If you did make that caveat, it

08:27indicates to me that there is some

08:28disconnect between how flock actually

08:30works and how you've been told it works

08:32or how you infer it to work. And if you

08:34didn't make that caveat and you think,

08:36"Well, she doesn't know what she's

08:36talking about." Well, show me the

08:38minutes. Thank you.

08:40>> Thank you, [clears throat] Matt Lucas.

08:46>> Uh, good evening. My name is Matthew

08:47Lucas. I live at 331 Akenhab in

08:50Centralville. Uh, Mayor Mayor Ger, and

08:53members of the council, I filed the open

08:56meeting law complaint regarding the uh,

08:58October 6th session. Thank you for

09:00putting the release of the October 6th

09:02minutes on tonight's agenda. Re the

09:04residents have asked for this and it

09:05matters. I ask for three things. One,

09:08release it. Release the minutes in their

09:10entirety. If any part is withheld, name

09:13the exemption for each part. Two, open

09:16it. Your October 27 minutes say another

09:19executive session on flock is coming.

09:21Whether and how flock runs in LOL is a

09:23policy decision. Please debate it and

09:25vote on it in an open session. Three,

09:28write it. Whatever was decided, put it

09:30in police policy 330.08 and the flock

09:33contract. Today, that policy still

09:35allows sharing with any verified police

09:37agency. Name who approves exceptions and

09:40send the council the monthly audits.

09:44Release it, open it, and write it. Thank

09:46you very much.

09:48>> Thank you.

09:49>> That's it, Mr.

09:51>> Motion to adopt by councelor.

09:54>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. There's a person

09:57on the agenda this evening who wants to

10:00speak about it and I'm wondering if that

10:03person is here and we can get this issue

10:06behind us for some reason. We I don't

10:09want to come back again at the end of

10:11the meeting. Maybe the man is here. I

10:13don't know.

10:14>> Can we finish this portion and then if

10:16you want to suspend the rules to bring

10:17that up we can.

10:18>> All right. because without releasing the

10:20minutes.

10:21Motion to release the minutes. Adopt by

10:24council Mcdana, seconded by councel

10:27Leang. Roll call.

10:32>> Councilor Dakota.

10:34>> Yes.

10:35>> Mayor Gia.

10:36>> Yes.

10:37>> Councilor Jirean.

10:38>> Yes.

10:38>> Council Leang.

10:40>> Yes.

10:40>> Councilor Mcdana.

10:41>> Yes.

10:42>> Council Mia.

10:43>> Yes.

10:43>> Council Non.

10:45>> Yes.

10:45>> Council Robinson.

10:46>> Yes.

10:47>> Councilor Scott. Yes.

10:49>> Council Chow.

10:50>> Yes.

10:50>> 10 years.

10:52>> Thank you, Mr. Clerk.

10:55Motion to suspend the rules by councelor

10:57Mercier, seconded by councelor Mcdana to

11:01take petition

11:049.2 miscellaneous out of order.

11:09All in favor?

11:11>> If the man isn't here yet, then I

11:13wouldn't

11:14>> I don't know if he is or not. I'm going

11:15to call his name. His name is David

11:18Trainer.

11:20>> David Trainer.

11:22I

11:22>> mean, it's a public hearing. Council

11:24Mercy, you suspend the rules. They

11:25should be here on time to speak about

11:27it. And it's a motion that just got

11:30>> Maybe he's knowing that he's on the end

11:32of the meeting and he's probably going

11:33to come at 10:00 at night. I don't

11:35>> You want to withdraw your motion?

11:38>> Withdraw it then. I don't.

11:39>> Council Leang, do you want to withdraw a

11:40second?

11:42>> Yeah.

11:43>> All right.

11:45Motion to suspend the rules and take 7.3

11:47out of order by councelor Dakota,

11:49seconded by councelor Chow. All in favor

11:52signify by saying I. Any opposed? So

11:55ordered.

11:567.3 vote. Conf confirm executive session

12:01votes for Draper Laboratory.

12:04Wave full reading and second reading by

12:07title.

12:11Vote confirm votes taken in executive

12:15session to enter into and ex execute a

12:18parking agreement tax increment

12:20financing agreement parcel 15 in right

12:24of first refusal partial 16 with Charles

12:27Stark Draper Laboratories Inc. for

12:30property located in the Hamilton Canal

12:32Innovation District.

12:34Motion to adopt by councelor Robinson,

12:38seconded by councelor Scott. Mr.

12:41registered speakers. Mr. Mayor,

12:42>> Mr. Mayor, just uh I want to just note

12:46that

12:47without stopping any speakers from

12:49speaking, I I do object uh just under

12:52council rule 27 and and like this to

12:54come back before the council next week,

12:55it it's election. I can give a whole

12:57justification as to why, but there's a

12:58whole slew of speakers. Councelor, we're

13:00not letting people speak if you object

13:02to it. It's off the table and it's off

13:06the agenda and we will proceed to the

13:08regular agenda. If you'd like, I can I

13:11can wait and object after the speakers.

13:14Well,

13:14>> you already objected. So, we're not

13:17withdrawing an objection that was just

13:19objected to after you find.

13:20>> All right. Well, then in that then in

13:21that case, Mr. Mayor, and I and I I

13:23would appreciate you to address me as a

13:25colleague on the city council. You don't

13:26you don't I don't know if you can hear

13:28or not, but it was said.

13:30>> So, Mr. Mayor, I am objecting under rule

13:3327 uh and asserting that right. Um it's

13:36election night. It's in a neighborhood

13:38that has been told there was going to be

13:39a whole slew of community engagement

13:40that as far as I am aware has not

13:42happened and I believe that those

13:44residents in addition to everything else

13:46deserve the chance to be heard and to

13:47understand what is being built in their

13:49literal backyard. So thank you.

13:50>> I believe we had meetings down at the

13:53downtown neighborhood meeting where

13:55people were there including yourself and

13:57there weren't any questions in that

13:58neighborhood but you was st you were

14:01sitting there but we can move back on to

14:03the regular agenda since your objection

14:04is taken over.

14:06This item will be on the next agenda

14:08item. What's that?

14:09>> This item would be on the next agenda.

14:11>> Yeah, it we'll decide if it'll be on the

14:13next agenda.

14:15>> It was already seconded though, right?

14:16>> You don't need to.

14:17>> He objected after the second.

14:23>> So now we'll move back to the regular

14:25portion of the meeting. Five city

14:27council motions. 5.1 council noon.

14:30request the city manager collaborate

14:32with the parks and recreation to brief

14:34the city council on the future outlook

14:37of the summer youth program. Seconded by

14:39councelor Mercia. Councelor Noon,

14:47>> I guess.

14:51>> Council,

14:52>> thank you.

15:15is an investment

15:17uh for the future of law our young

15:20people. um now keep them engaged

15:24in

15:26the productive activity that provide

15:29through the summer use program that park

15:32and recre is doing. Uh so if Mr. Manager

15:37would you know uh work with the park and

15:41wreck uh to give council an update on

15:45you know what is the future of that park

15:47and wreck. Thank you. Thank you, Council

15:49New Council Robinson.

15:51>> Thank you. Um I thank my colleague for

15:53bringing this forward. If if it's okay

15:55with the maker of the motion, would you

15:57mind including if this comes back sooner

15:59rather than later, just also an update

16:01on what winter programming is being

16:03offered, if any, by by the same

16:05department. Thank you.

16:06>> Absolutely. And thank you.

16:08>> Thank you.

16:08>> Thank you, Council Robinson. Councelor

16:10Jan.

16:10>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um I I know I've

16:13spoken with um assistant city manager

16:15Shawn Mishado about um a recent our uh

16:19request for information that the city

16:20has posted about expanding the summer

16:22opportunities for LOL youth. And I'm

16:24assuming some of that might play into

16:27this report, but I wanted to just check

16:29whether that does relate or not.

16:35>> Yeah, this is city manager Golden.

16:37>> Uh thank you very much, Mr. Mayor to the

16:39council. Uh yes, council. We could we

16:41would include that as well. Um

16:43opportunities I suppose.

16:44>> Okay. No, thank you.

16:48>> All in favor of the motion signify by

16:49saying I. Any opposed? So ordered. 5.2

16:53Council Newman request the city measure

16:55direct the appropriate department to

16:57update the city council on the status of

16:59the public and sustainability council

17:01feedback regarding the specialized

17:03building code. Seconded by councelor

17:06Scott. Councelor Non.

17:08>> Thank you Mr. Mayor. Um so I I

17:10understood or I've heard that the

17:13sustainability council had met a while

17:17back you know there's some public

17:19comment on regarding the specialized

17:22building code. I know that we talk about

17:25you know in our uh 2030 you know um uh

17:29green energy greenhouse and whatnot.

17:32This is a good idea. Uh renewable

17:35energy, you know, it's uh certainly

17:37going to cut the long-term carbon

17:40footprint, you know, that we plan for

17:432030. It's also, you know, if we were to

17:46do this or we get the uh developer or

17:50builder to do this, it still needs going

17:52to reduce the utility bill, you know, uh

17:57for building owner and residences over

18:00time. So I I I I like I just like to

18:03know uh where are we at on it? What's

18:05what's the feedback so that um so that

18:08as a council we can you know uh uh think

18:10about what's next.

18:12>> Thank you.

18:14>> Thank you Council New and Council

18:15Robinson.

18:16>> Thank you. um on this motion.

18:21I agree in theory with with what we're

18:25trying to accomplish with this, but

18:28is there a way to also provide

18:31[clears throat]

18:32would this be a costly measure,

18:34additional cost to either us or projects

18:39that are going on in the community as a

18:40result of adoption of this? I think

18:43that's if if we're gonna if we're

18:44looking for information to to be able to

18:47make an informed decision, I think all

18:48those factors need to be put in there.

18:51>> Manager Golden.

18:52>> Uh thank you, Mr. May. I try not to

18:54answer these beforehand, but I know a

18:55little bit on it, but we can um we have

18:57the best the base code, the stretch

18:59code, and then the opt-in code. And I

19:02think that we could probably um put put

19:04together things that might help the

19:07council with all of that. Um, we do have

19:09the stretch code currently right now

19:11here in the city of LOL and the

19:13specialized code. So, I'll get all that

19:15information and probably balance it with

19:18whatever um the builders are saying

19:20versus the environmental and try to put

19:22it all together for you for the council

19:24to make a decision.

19:28All set council represent. All in favor

19:31of the motion signify by saying I. Any

19:33opposed? So ordered. 5.3 Council Noon

19:37request the city manager coordinate with

19:39the relevant department to present a

19:40fire station repair update to the public

19:43safety subcommittee seconded by

19:45councelor Mcdana. Council new.

19:48>> Thank you Mr. Mayor. So I know that um

19:51you know the uh fire department or the

19:55uh people involved in this um you know

19:58renovation of the firehouse has been

20:01working hard on this. I know that

20:03they'll come up with a report sometime

20:05soon. I just want to see as I want to

20:07see sooner if they can update the

20:10council so that we can maybe update the

20:12council, bring the report to the

20:13subcommittee, the public safety

20:15subcommittee to have a more discussion

20:17on it as to where

20:20where's the the worst firehouse that

20:22need to be repaired first or renovate

20:24first and then second just the timeline

20:26of it. That that that'd be good. Thank

20:28you.

20:30All in favor of the motion signify by

20:32saying I. Any opposed? So ordered. 5.4.

20:36Council request the city clerk prepare

20:38the executive session minutes regarding

20:40the LHA tiff for the city council in the

20:43solicitor's review ahead of their

20:44release. Seconded by councelor Leang.

20:48Council no.

20:49>> The mayor motion speak for itself.

20:52>> Thank you. All in favor of the motion

20:54signify by saying I. Any opposed? So

20:57ordered. 5.5 Councelor Robinson request

21:01the city manager provide an update

21:02replanting plan complete with locations

21:05and tree types in Senville Woodward and

21:08current original plan seconded by

21:11councelor Scott councelor Robinson.

21:13>> Thank you. Um we had an original plan

21:15that was proposed and and presented

21:17through I believe it was the planning

21:19board and um I I just want to I want to

21:21premise this that I've gotten quite a

21:24bit of calls and and all positive.

21:26People are thrilled to see that we're

21:28currently replanting. I saw some new

21:30trees going into McFersonson. I mean,

21:32all throughout putting some back based

21:34on the number that was taken out of the

21:36reservoir, so and it's helping, I think,

21:39to try to long-term break up some of

21:41those hotter areas in the the district.

21:43Um,

21:45I don't know what the total anticipated

21:48number is going in over in Centerville

21:49or or locations. And I think it'd be

21:51helpful just to get maybe it's something

21:53that the city puts up, DBD puts out for

21:55the public to be aware because I've even

21:57been asked what type of trees and last I

21:59was unaware. I think a lot of red maples

22:02is what initially the plan was to put

22:05in. So any information is greatly

22:07appreciated. Thank you.

22:09>> All in favor of the motion signify by

22:11saying I. Any opposed? So ordered.

22:165.6 6. Council Robertson request the

22:18city manager have the property

22:19department provide a report on what is

22:21being done to enforce the approved

22:24conditions of the apple orchard project

22:26as well as how occupy permits and all

22:29other permitting continues without being

22:31in compliance. Seconded by councelon

22:33councelor Robinson.

22:35>> Thank you Mr. Mayor. Um again this

22:38project has been a nightmare since day

22:40one. It's it's they went in and clearcut

22:42the entire parcel. There was serious

22:44concerns about storm water mitigation.

22:47Now the part I find troubling is when

22:51they went for the subdivision because it

22:52was approval not required. When they

22:54proposed to subdivide more than three

22:57units on one lot, it triggered site plan

23:00review. During the process of site plan

23:03review, they went in front of the

23:05planning board and and they also had

23:08serious concerns about storm water

23:10mitigation amongst many other things. I

23:13have seen firsthand in heavy rains the

23:16the deposits, the silt, the sediment

23:18left behind that runs right off of that

23:20parcel as we knew it would happen down

23:23to First Street.

23:25I have a copy of the approval conditions

23:28that one of our boards put on and it's

23:31been filed.

23:33It's not being followed. I'm seeing

23:36people moving into a unit. I'm seeing a

23:38foundation being dug. I'm seeing a bunch

23:40of work continuing to progress, but yet

23:45the subdivision

23:47requirements

23:49still apply. It doesn't matter if it's

23:5115 different owners, that subdivision

23:54process has approval conditions applied

23:57to it. And we're not following up. I

23:59don't know whose responsibility it is. I

24:02mean, something as simple as the

24:03curbing.

24:05The applicant shall conduct test pit and

24:07soil analysis on each lot prior to any

24:10storm water infrastructure installation

24:12subject to approval from the low

24:14regional wastewater utility. The

24:17applicant shall submit a retaining wall

24:19design from a qualified engineer prior

24:21to the issuance of any permits. The

24:24applicant shall install vertical granite

24:26curbon VA4 with a 6-in reveal along the

24:30frontage of each property subject to

24:32engineering department approval. and the

24:35applicant shall work with low regional

24:36wastewater utility and engineering

24:38department to address any issues that

24:40may arise with the conditions outlined

24:42in the correspondence.

24:44I'm not seeing follow-up on any of this,

24:46but I am seeing forward movement,

24:48forward progress on this sub

24:50subdivision.

24:52What is the point of of putting all

24:55these codes and and ordinances and

24:58everything on the books that we have if

25:00we're not going to enforce it? I I mean

25:03this we knew that project was

25:05challenging.

25:07It was made very clear to the owner and

25:10the developer and the subdivider. It's a

25:12challenging project. Uh our boards have

25:17explained their concerns and and spelled

25:19out requirements. Whose responsibility

25:22is it to enforce this and put a stop

25:24work order until these conditions are

25:26met? Because nothing's being met but the

25:28work continues. And I think it's it's a

25:31slap in the face to the residents for

25:33one and it slap in the face to the

25:35council because here we are looking to

25:37make ordinance and policy that govern

25:39the way business is conducted in the

25:41city. But for what it's words on paper

25:44at this point, I hope we can really put

25:47some eyes on this and and and figure out

25:49why this is allowed to go and and I

25:52don't see how this justification to

25:54allow people to move into a project like

25:57this currently when they have not met

25:59any of these requirements. Thank you.

26:02>> Thank you, Council Robinson. All in

26:05favor of the motion signify by saying I.

26:07Any opposed? So ordered. 5.7 Council

26:11Mcdana request the city manager work

26:13with the appropriate department to

26:15explore the implications of adopting the

26:17residential tax exemption mass general

26:19law chapter 59 section 5C and the good

26:23landlord tax abatement Massachusetts

26:25general law chapter 59 section 50

26:28simultaneously

26:30to ensure that working families are

26:32taxed fairly while maintaining civ city

26:34revenues and protecting naturally

26:36occurring affordable housing. Seconded

26:38by Council Leang, Council Mcdana.

26:41>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um,

26:45there's no way around the the difficult

26:48financial times that we're in and in and

26:49the the period of tax increases. I know

26:52at the last meeting there was a

26:53discussion about trying to figure out

26:55tax exemptions for senior citizens who

26:56had lived in the city for 30 years.

26:59There there have been plenty of times

27:00the council has discussed a whole host

27:02of of attempts at at uh mitigating the

27:05impact on on longtime law residents. Um,

27:08in 2023, the Commonwealth adopted this

27:11good landlord tax abatement, the the

27:13chapter 59, uh, section 50 as a local

27:17option. Um

27:20my hope would be that that combined with

27:22a residential tax exemption would help

27:24to ensure that uh those paying ju just

27:26like we do a commercial residential

27:28split um where commercial and industrial

27:31properties are paying at a higher rate.

27:33um that this could maybe help further

27:36split so that those paying uh the higher

27:39percentage of uh city taxes are are

27:43those that own a whole host of rental

27:45properties and who are not renting them

27:46out at any sort of affordable rate. Uh

27:48it's just explore motion and see what it

27:50would look like. So, thank you.

27:53>> Thank you, Council Mcdana. Councelor

27:55Durant.

27:55>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I just wanted to

27:57thank councelor Mcdana for framing this

28:00motion as he did which is an ex sorry um

28:05which is to explore the implications of

28:08this because I think rather than sort of

28:11insisting that we move forward I think

28:13that's exactly the right way we should

28:16be exploring if we're exploring anything

28:18um so I appreciate that thank you

28:21>> thank you councel all in favor of the

28:23motion signify by saying I any opposed

28:26So ordered 5.8 Council Direan requests

28:29the finance subcommittee and city

28:31finance team meet as needed to prepare

28:33for FY28 budget process to ensure

28:36coordination and communication between

28:38city council and city administration.

28:40Seconded by council Dakota council

28:43>> thank you very much. Um, last year, last

28:46sorry, last week, we had several

28:48requests come before us for additional

28:50funding, which while they're not going

28:52to increase taxes to the residents, they

28:55will still reduce our uh the city's

28:57financial flexibility during the next

28:59year and potentially coming years. And

29:02to me, a big part of the concern about

29:05things like the appropriation for the

29:07police department last week was the lack

29:09of awareness um that the city council

29:11had that that spending, which was not in

29:14the budget, was a priority for the city

29:16administration if the funding could be

29:18found. Um, you know, we've had and I

29:22appreciate the presentations that the

29:24CFO has provided to uh the council and

29:27to the finance committee about the

29:28budget stressors that have affected us

29:31this year and will do in the future. Um,

29:34and we should continue that discussion.

29:36Um, but I think it's also important that

29:39as the budget is put together, the

29:42council understand the administration's

29:44priorities for items that aren't already

29:47budgeted or that aren't, you know, end

29:49up not included in the budget, but

29:52[clears throat] for which um, you know,

29:55there is an intent if the money can be

29:57found to um, you know, to fund it. so

30:01that we can go into the requests that

30:04might be made later on with an

30:05understanding of how everything fits

30:08together in terms of the

30:09administration's goals and then ideally

30:11the council has some input in in that

30:14process. Um, and I'm assuming the

30:16finance comm uh committee is the right

30:19place to have that discussion although

30:21it certainly could be done in the

30:23council as a whole if that is the will

30:26of the body. Thank you.

30:28>> Thank you councelor Duran. All in favor

30:30of the motion signify by saying I. Any

30:32opposed? So ordered. 5.9 Council Direan

30:36request the city council to go into

30:38executive session to A review unreleased

30:41executive session minutes. B approve

30:43final minutes. C. Determine which

30:45portions, if any, of such approved

30:47minutes are ready for release. And D,

30:50agree on a timeline for ongoing review

30:52of minutes in determination of portions

30:55which if any minutes should be released.

30:59Seconded by councelor Chow, Councelor

31:01Tran.

31:02>> Thank you very much. Um, as my husband

31:05well knows, my eight years or really

31:07nine, including kindergarten, at

31:08Catholic school, um, made me a lifelong

31:11rule follower. And, um, you know, I know

31:15that my colleagues, whether or not they

31:16went to Catholic school, we all and the

31:19city clerk and the city solicitor are

31:21all conscious of our obligations under

31:23the open meeting laws. Um, including

31:25with respect to executive session

31:27minutes. Um, and I think we comply with

31:29them. But I think [clears throat] you

31:32know bal having sorry I don't know what

31:34my why I'm horse today. Um you know

31:36being we have an obligation to balance

31:39you know our need to protect the city's

31:41interests with the interests of all our

31:44residents to be informed. So I think

31:46coming up with a standard process and

31:48time frame for reviewing approving and

31:51considering the release of minutes. I'm

31:53not suggesting that, you know, we

31:55immediately release them because, as you

31:57know, I've been a proponent of ensuring

31:59we find that right balance. But I do

32:01think if we just come up with a time

32:03frame, that will probably be a, you

32:05know, and a procedure that we follow. I

32:08think that would be a good thing for us

32:10to be doing um more regularly. Thank

32:13you.

32:14>> Thank you, Council Dan.

32:16All in favor of the motion signify by

32:18saying I. Any opposed? So ordered

32:22being 7 o'clock, we'll go to the utility

32:24public hearings. 4.1 Boston Gas. Request

32:27replacement of existing gas main at 217

32:30to 250 Westford Street in portion of

32:33Lane and Fenade Street. Give second

32:36reading. We're going to open the

32:37hearing. Anyone wishing to speak in

32:39favor,

32:42please state your name and address the

32:43record.

32:43>> Good evening. Diana Cuddy, National

32:44Grid, 170 Data Drive, Waltham,

32:46Massachusetts. I'm here today to request

32:48a grant a location for um for this uh

32:52for this location on Westford and uh

32:54Lane Street. The city uh sewer

32:57separation project has resulted in

32:59encroachment approximately 350 ft of our

33:01gas main that we need to relocate.

33:04>> Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak

33:07in favor? In favor. In favor. That

33:11portion of the hearing is closed. Anyone

33:13wishing to speak in opposition?

33:14Opposition. opposition. That portion of

33:18the hearing is closed.

33:20Motion to refer to the wire inspector

33:22for report and recommendation by

33:23councelor Mcdana. Seconded by council

33:26mercia.

33:28All in favor signify by saying I. Any

33:31opposed? So ordered. 4.2 National Grid

33:34request installation of underground

33:36electrical conduit along Robson Street

33:39for service at 225 Middle Sex Street.

33:43We're going to open the hearing. Anyone

33:44wishing to speak in favor?

33:46>> Uh yes. Hello. My name is Alec BSong.

33:48I'm here to speak in favor of the

33:50petition. Uh we're looking to install uh

33:54conduit across Robinson to the property

33:56for service.

33:58>> Thank you. Anyone else wishing to speak

34:00in favor? In favor.

34:03In favor. That portion of the hearing is

34:05now closed. Anyone wishing to speak in

34:07opposition? Opposition.

34:10Opposition. That portion of the hearing

34:12is now closed.

34:14Motion refer the wire inspector for

34:16report and recommendation by councelor

34:17Scott seconded by councelor Robinson.

34:20All in favor signify by saying I. Any

34:22opposed? So ordered. 4.3 zo enterprise

34:26networks request installation of

34:28underground fiber optic conduit at 174

34:31South Street. We're going to open the

34:33hearing. Anyone wishing to speak in

34:35favor?

34:37In favor.

34:39In favor. That portion of the hearing is

34:41now closed. Anyone wishing to speak in

34:44opposition?

34:45Opposition. Opposition. That portion of

34:48the hearing is now closed. Motion to

34:50refer to the wire inspector for report

34:52and recommendation by councelor Dakota.

34:54Seconded by councelor Chow. All in favor

34:57signify by saying I. Any opposed? So

35:00ordered.

35:03We go back to the regular agenda. Six,

35:05communications from the city manager.

35:076.1 motion response.

35:10A Western Street and Steman Street.

35:13Thank you, Mr. Manager, for the

35:14response. Anyone wishing to

35:17motion to accept in place on file by

35:20council Dakota, seconded by Council

35:22Mcdana. All in favor signify by saying

35:25I. Any opposed? So ordered. 6.1B.

35:29South Ling and Shaw. Council Noon.

35:33Council Noon. South Laring and Shaw.

35:39Mr. Mayor,

35:42sorry.

35:54Control.

35:56I do appreciate it.

35:59I carry that recommendation.

36:02>> I thank you. Uh, assistant city manager

36:04Jovan by Roses. Although like I said uh

36:08the traffic engineer and her team uh

36:12recommend against any change in the

36:14traffic control.

36:19I appreciate their report. Really I do

36:21and and I I take her recommendation. Um

36:25you know uh I will relay the message to

36:27those who call me on this um because

36:31they know best and I don't. So meaning

36:34that the traffic uh engineer. So

36:36appreciate the report. Thank you.

36:37>> Thank you, Council No. Councelor Jirean.

36:40>> Yes. I just had a question. Um in the

36:42report it mentioned that the flashing

36:44stop signs are of questionable

36:46durability and I was just curious like

36:49why or what that

36:51>> manager Golden.

36:52>> Uh thank you very much, Mr. Mayor

36:53through to the council. Uh we had

36:55installed flashing stop signs.

36:57>> Oh, and actually I think I'm on the

36:58wrong item. I'm sorry.

37:00>> Okay.

37:01>> All right. We can come back to it.

37:01>> We can come back to it.

37:03Motion to accept and place on file by

37:05councel noon, seconded by councelor

37:07Dakota. All in favor signify by saying

37:10I. Any oppose? So ordered 6.1 C

37:12Princeton Boulevard in Baldwin Street.

37:14Council Dakota.

37:16>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um I do appreciate

37:18Miss Alman's

37:20reply, but I the city has continued to

37:24pave paint pavement markings through

37:26November and we'll address the crosswalk

37:27and stop bars of Princeton Boulevard and

37:29Foster. I I think Council Dan just

37:32brought up um the flashing stop signs.

37:34If there was ever an intersection that

37:36needs those, city manager, it's

37:38Princeton at Foster and Westfed Foster

37:40to be quite frank. There's accidents

37:41going on all

37:45I'm sorry,

37:46>> manager.

37:47>> Uh thank you, Mr. Mayor to the council.

37:49Uh council, that is under state control.

37:51However, that doesn't mean we can't try

37:53to get it accomplished. Um, and to

37:54answer the question, previously we've

37:56had some issues over on West Sixth

37:58Street in Bunker with this um

38:01with with with uh these working

38:03appropriately. So, there has been a

38:05little bit of a challenge on it, but it

38:07is a state state road. So, we can talk

38:08to Mass Dot and see if they they did

38:11they were so generous to uh bring us

38:14West Six and Bunker at the time and we

38:16are definitely interested in them, but

38:18the um it it appears that our our sign

38:21folks have to go out and readjust them

38:23often to make sure they're flashing and

38:25working.

38:26>> I mean, they're expensive. I mean,

38:28solar. Are we looking at solar plated?

38:30Uh I'm sorry, I didn't see Miss Alman

38:32there. I apologize

38:35cuz I understand it's state highway but

38:38what um I think I also want to include

38:39Westford at Foster as well where there's

38:41been accidents as well.

38:42>> We did file [clears throat] this motion

38:44about three years ago. Yeah, it's

38:45ultimate and we told the state did this.

38:48>> So the flashing stop signs cost about

38:51$1,500 a piece and then they have to be

38:53assembled. So it takes the sign shop

38:56between three and four hours to assemble

38:58them and install them. Um each one um

39:01the ones at West 6th and um Bunker Hill,

39:05couple of them work great. One of them

39:07kind of works when it feels like it. Um

39:10so that's just we're keeping an eye on

39:12them. The state is more in favor of

39:14them. I can I've asked them if they

39:16would consider putting them at Princeton

39:18and Foster, but that's their that's

39:20their

39:21>> Is this uh the faulty equipment with one

39:24vendor or is this something that we can

39:26>> We don't know. We received them from the

39:28the ones at Bunker Hill and Wessix from

39:31the state. Um they just delivered them

39:34to us. So I'm looking into it a little

39:36bit because the the ones now on Broadway

39:39at Mount Vernon seem to be working

39:41pretty well and they also came from the

39:43state. So I'm just looking I'm have a

39:47request for information in from them if

39:49they use two different vendors or what's

39:50going on.

39:51>> Okay. And if we could put Westford and

39:53Foster as well because I know we've had

39:55accidents there as well.

39:56>> Correct. There's a number of

39:57intersections that I'm looking at that

39:59are always stops that um might need that

40:02those kind of treatments to help.

40:05>> Thank you very much.

40:07>> Thank you, Councelor Dakota. I'm sorry.

40:09>> Councelor Leang,

40:10>> just want to mention one of the four on

40:13the Broadway is not working today just

40:15in case. [laughter]

40:18Uh just want to give you a heads up on

40:20that one. the one that's uh coming

40:21toward the city hall. Thank you.

40:25>> Motion to accept and place on file by

40:28councelor Dakota, seconded by councelor

40:30Chow. All in favor signify by saying I.

40:33Any opposed? So ordered. 6.1D motion

40:37response. Mount Pleasant and First

40:39Street. Councelor Robinson.

40:41>> Thank you. Thank you very much. Um I

40:43think from what I've heard the West

40:45Sixth ones

40:47great improvements. I haven't I haven't

40:49heard really any negatives on that. I'm

40:52glad to see that First Street in uh M

40:54Pleasant do meet the criteria. In the

40:57community I work in um they also

41:00received some from the state.

41:02I think there's there's a lot of

41:04variables with them um because I believe

41:07they are solar powered the ones that we

41:10have in the community working as well as

41:13the installation. If if whoever does the

41:15installation of them nicks a wire or or

41:18doesn't completely tighten down the

41:20wire, then you're going to see a

41:22lackluster uh operational lifespan. So,

41:27there's a bunch of things that go

41:28through, but I'm glad to see that we can

41:30um get these now through you to the

41:34manager. Is this something we have to

41:36purchase or is there grants available

41:39again for these type of devices?

41:42>> Mr. manager.

41:43>> Uh, thank you, Mr. Mayor. Through to the

41:45council. Counselor, we do try to get

41:46them for free from Mass DOT, but this is

41:49probably one of those purchases piece. I

41:50know the West Sixth Street um and bunker

41:53were free. They were they were kind of

41:56trying them out. So, we will continue to

41:58try to get them on a grant, I suppose,

42:00if that's the case. Um, but

42:02probabilities will be we will be

42:04purchasing them in the future.

42:05>> Okay. Thank you very much.

42:07>> Is it district four we deal with?

42:13So, I'll give everybody someone's phone

42:14number call them tomorrow.

42:17Uh, motion would adopt and place on

42:19accept and place on file by councelor

42:21Scott, seconded by councelor Mercier.

42:24All in favor signify by saying I. Any

42:26oppose? So ordered. 6.1 motion response

42:29E. Lawrence and Burka Street. Council

42:31Dan and Council Scott.

42:34>> Council Scott, just thank you for the

42:36response. Um, it doesn't surprise me. I

42:38guess there was seven crashes between

42:40between 25 and 26 is such a blind spot

42:42to pull out of. I'm so I'm glad to see

42:44that this will be under consideration a

42:46good candidate for intervention in 2027.

42:49Thank you.

42:50>> Thank you, Council Scott. Council Dan.

42:52>> Yeah, thank you very much, Miss Ultman.

42:53Um I [clears throat] uh I always get

42:56nervous when I come through that

42:57intersection traveling I think south um

43:00because I always worry about the

43:02northbound Laurens Street folks sort of

43:04move going to Bill Rico Street without

43:06realizing that there are people who are

43:08like have the right away to go you know

43:10in effect left there. So, I get um so

43:14I'm really hopeful that um improving the

43:17sidewalk and doing the realignment is

43:20going to help, but uh yeah, it's it's

43:22always I always pause. My husband never

43:25does and he says, "No, we have the

43:26rightway. We should go, but I always get

43:28worried." So, [laughter]

43:29hopefully he will not be one of those

43:31accident numbers. Thank you.

43:34>> Thank you, Councelor Jiren. Motion to

43:35accept and place on file by council

43:37Yang, seconded by Council Mcdana. All in

43:40favor signify by saying I. Okay. Any

43:42opposed? So ordered. Motion response

43:456.1. Motion response F. Gorm Street in

43:47Manchester Street. Mr. Vice Mayor, if

43:50you would come up for a minute.

43:51>> Absolutely.

43:52>> Thank you.

44:08>> Mr. Mayor.

44:10>> Thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor. um through

44:13you to Yavani Bayz Rose.

44:16We want to thank you for the report or

44:18Miss Alman, whoever wants to take this.

44:20Um Miss Alman, thank you for the report.

44:23I think that this one needs to be done

44:25yesterday. When you drive up Garm Street

44:28and you got two schools there and all

44:29those kids that cross those roads and

44:31every I'm hoping that this can be done

44:33before the winter, but I'm I don't know

44:34that that's the case. But it's really

44:37important to watch those kids cross that

44:39street. And I I wish Miss Alman, and she

44:41probably has, just goes up there and

44:42watches it in the morning and then watch

44:44it in the afternoon and watch how tough

44:46it is to navigate that area when

44:48someone's coming up the hill or coming

44:49across and going down. Um, even with the

44:52crossing people, I think we need the

44:54signage put up yesterday and this stuff

44:56really needs to be done. But I I thank

44:58you for all the recommendations. I think

45:00that um right now it is imperative that

45:02we get up there quick because they're

45:04really young students walking across

45:06those streets and sometimes they don't

45:08always adhere to to crossing pieces. So,

45:11um thank you again,

45:12>> Mr. Mayor. You want Miss Alman to come

45:14to the podium?

45:17>> I'm sure

45:20>> tomorrow, Mr. Alman

45:34I second with Vice Mayor Nun said.

45:38>> Motion to accept and place on file by

45:40councelor Mcdana, seconded by councelor

45:42Dakota. All in favor signify by saying

45:44I. Any opposed? So ordered. 6.1g

45:48Elm in Chapel. Council Mcdana.

45:51>> Uh I Mr. Mayor, thank you. Um, it threw

45:54you to the manager and Miss Alman and

45:56the guy with the line marking equipment.

45:58Uh, thank you to everybody. Um, this is

46:03this was uh one of the most complained

46:06about sections of street in all of

46:09district 4, never mind in that section

46:11of back central. Um, since the lines

46:15have gone in, I I don't mean to jinx us

46:17now if if we all get a bunch of

46:19complaints tomorrow, but I know I'm

46:20going to say it. I'm going to say it.

46:21I'm going to say it. I I need good news

46:23right now. Um since the lines have gone

46:25in, okay, it's been several weeks and

46:27and the complaints that I have received,

46:29I don't know if 311 is also reflective,

46:31have have plummeted. Um you know, watch

46:34I was watching some of the cars this

46:36morning and uh it looks so much better.

46:39You know, the double yellow with the

46:40white line on the side, cars are not

46:42zigzagging all over the place. It it I'm

46:44really hoping that this is an effective

46:46and lowcost uh control on some dangerous

46:49driving going forward. So, thank you.

46:51Motion to accept and place on file by

46:53council Mcdana seconded by councel

46:55juran. All in favor signified by saying

46:58I. Any opposed? So ordered. 6.1 motion

47:01response H. Pine and Georgia council

47:04child.

47:05>> Thank you Mr. Mayor. I want to thank the

47:07traffic engineer and the assistant city

47:08manager for the report and for going to

47:12look at uh the area um on the motion. Uh

47:16this motion was brought out by uh

47:18residents uh families with uh school age

47:20children who uh take the bus uh to

47:23school. Um I know that um the traffic

47:26engineer went to look at the area during

47:29um the day uh when the school's in

47:31session. Um I was wondering that the

47:33real concern from the family is really

47:35when the the school bus uh pick up and

47:37drop off. um with an area like that um

47:40it's a it's a beautiful area but I can

47:42see that when the children get off the

47:44bus um they might be running around uh

47:47what have you and I know that they will

47:50be continuing study of that corridor. I

47:52was wondering if you could go look at

47:54that area again um during when the

47:56school buses are there when they pick up

47:58or drop off um just to see how safe it

48:01is uh for the for the school children.

48:03Um but overall a thank you report.

48:07Thank you, councelor Cow.

48:09Motion to accept and place on file by

48:12councelor Scott, seconded by councelor

48:15Mercier. All in favor signify by saying

48:17I. Any opposed? So ordered. 6.1. Motion

48:21response I. Alcohol bar licenses.

48:25Councelor [clears throat] Mercia,

48:26Council Dakota, Council Robinson,

48:28Council Mcdana. We'll go with Council

48:29Mercia first.

48:31>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. um as it indicated

48:34and it was a very lengthy uh response

48:38and it was a very good response uh that

48:41councelor Mcdana and myself did attend

48:44the August 13th uh 2026

48:48license commission meeting and I just

48:51want to say thank you for the report and

48:53also to state that there will be another

48:58meeting uh to propose for the proposed

49:02those regulations during the November

49:055th meeting and that'll be this

49:07Thursday. That'll be uh at 6:00 in the

49:12uh city council chambers right here. So,

49:15just in case anybody would like to come

49:17and still discuss this, very

49:20informative, very important, and I think

49:22that the rule should revert back to um

49:27getting rid of that no bar license.

49:32I think it there are bars, there are uh

49:36restaurants, there is a big difference

49:38and I think when we spoke the police

49:42seemed to be happy with what we were

49:44saying because they kind of agreed. So I

49:47think we want to make this city safe and

49:50I don't feel as well that we should

49:52punish the good uh owners of restaurants

49:56and things. That's not what we're trying

49:59to do. But we're trying to protect the

50:02people that are still 14, 15 years old

50:06from going in and calling it a

50:08restaurant and being served without

50:10being ced. It's about public safety and

50:13we're that's our responsibility. Thank

50:15you.

50:16>> Thank you, Council Mia. Council Dakota.

50:18>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. through you to the

50:20city solicitor. Um, understanding that

50:23the license commission is getting

50:25together this Thursday, is it going to

50:27be put forth that there will be a bar

50:29license and there will be a restaurant

50:31license? And if so, what are are there

50:34any different provisions for each of the

50:36licenses as well?

50:38>> Sister Williams.

50:40>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. So, the license

50:42commission actually already voted in

50:44favor of um moving forward with these on

50:47premise licenses and being able to

50:49differentiate between a restaurant and

50:52uh you know a pub license or a bar and a

50:55pub license. So, they just they simply

50:57ran out of time at their last meeting.

50:58So, this meeting will be a continuation

51:00of that and they're going to talk about

51:02the different requirements that will be

51:04attached to these different licenses.

51:06So, you know, if it's this particular

51:08license where it's not a restaurant,

51:10where it's more of a bar or a pub, you

51:12have to be 21 to go in. You um there's

51:14going to be a further sort of subset of

51:17requirements for serving food. You're

51:19going to have to prove, show equipment,

51:21show a menu, actually show the different

51:23foods that are being served. Um, and

51:27there was one other one that I can't

51:29think. There's a few others that's just

51:32like off the top of my head. All of this

51:34is going to be fleshed out on Thursday

51:36at the license commission meeting. So,

51:37we're as close as we've ever been on

51:40something like this. So, it's a good

51:41thing.

51:42>> The cost of each license will be the

51:43same.

51:44>> I'm sorry.

51:45>> The cost of each license will be same on

51:47a yearly basis.

51:48>> I I don't know where the commission's I

51:50don't even know if they've spoken about

51:51that yet. Um, so maybe Thursday is a

51:54good time for that discussion to come

51:55up.

51:56>> I'll resign tonight and I'll get on the

51:57commission for Thursday. How's that?

51:59[laughter]

52:02>> [snorts]

52:02>> Thank you.

52:04>> That really wasn't funny,

52:07Council Mcdana.

52:08>> Yes.

52:09>> Thank you, uh, Mr. Mayor, and thank you

52:11to, uh, to the administration for this

52:14incredibly detailed report and a whole

52:15host of motion responses. Um, one of

52:17which was, uh, the the motion about

52:20acknowledging that there are, in fact,

52:22bars and law. Uh, councelor Mercier, I

52:24think, already said everything there is

52:25to say on that. I look forward to the

52:26license commission's meeting and

52:28hopefully we get some common sense

52:29regulation moving forward. I do want to

52:31note uh just as the person who

52:33represents the area of the city with a

52:35whole lot of bars who were have been

52:37upset since the motion to

52:42uh study early closing. Um I I need to

52:45say on TV right now uh thank you in case

52:48nobody reads this report uh thank you to

52:51DPD for acknowledging what a

52:52horrifically bad idea that would be. Um,

52:54I would not support that either. Um, I

52:58am I am glad I I think going forward

53:00that we have a we have a common sense

53:02solution here to establish that there

53:03are bars and and make sure that the good

53:05actors are not being punished for uh

53:07other people failing to to run their

53:09business appropriately. So, thank you.

53:11>> Thank you, Council Mcdana. Council

53:12Robinson.

53:13>> Thank you. Um, again, I I'd like to echo

53:16thank you for the report. Um, I

53:20wholeheartedly agree. No blanket uh

53:23blanket policy regarding this is is only

53:26harmful.

53:28I have a question though uh one of the

53:29words well one of the phrases they use.

53:32Um suitable food

53:36just find that awkward u through you

53:37maybe to the solicitor. Do you know what

53:39what that seems kind of tricky to to

53:42define. We're going to look for

53:45establishments that serve suitable food.

53:48>> Senator Williams.

53:49>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. So again, these

53:52are more detailed conversations we'll

53:54have in the license commission. I think

53:56um it's trying to find a way to quantify

54:01things and how to actually put pen to

54:03paper when it comes to these

54:04requirements. um you know, it's not a

54:07candy bar and a couple bags of chips

54:08that are on the end of the bar as

54:10opposed to, you know, hot meals are

54:12actually cooked and served that could

54:14potentially, you know, I know in the

54:16past establishments have said, "Well,

54:18yeah, we got some cool range Doritos

54:20right there. Um some Cheeits, so that's

54:23fine." Well, that's not I don't think

54:25the spirit of why we're doing this. So,

54:27um I suspect the license commission will

54:28also get into that in more detail.

54:30>> Okay. Thank you. So it's it's more or

54:32less an attempt to kind of close that

54:34loophole,

54:35>> right? and and and ensure that they are

54:37in fact serving food like um

54:40and again maybe this is a question for

54:42Thursday but but would would we have the

54:46ability to to request well obviously ask

54:50the um board

54:52continued verification through maybe

54:56their receipts Males tax receipts or

54:59something along those lines to to verify

55:01you know maybe it's annual that they are

55:03in fact still selling food and and and

55:06they still are functioning once that

55:08license is given out. Because we've seen

55:10an establishment in the city that had a

55:12full kitchen, got fully licensed, were

55:15operational, and out of the blue yanked

55:18the code on the kitchen and still kept

55:20the name and operated as if it was a

55:22restaurant, but they didn't even have a

55:24kitchen, let alone food at that point.

55:27>> Manager Gold, uh, CFO Baldin.

55:32>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And I think there

55:34is a way for us to try to identify this

55:37information you're looking for. The

55:39comment I wanted to make is that we

55:41we've attempted to get this kind of

55:42information from the department of

55:43revenue before and it as some of the

55:45counselors may recall there was a

55:47question about the Popeye's uh that's on

55:50the border of of lol and and chumpsford

55:52and the question was as to uh their

55:54receipts and how much was being sold

55:56through the drive-thru window which is

55:58right on the border and it is as a

56:00matter of policy they don't give out

56:01individual tax uh information so they

56:04report they can report to us in the

56:06aggregate how much which they do when we

56:08get our quarterly dispersement of the

56:10meals tax receipt, but we can't ask them

56:13and they won't give us uh how much an

56:16individual business is is making or what

56:19they're reporting as receipts. That's

56:20all private. So, we we can try to come

56:22up with some other creative ways to try

56:24to address your question though,

56:25counselor. Thank you. And I wouldn't

56:27even be looking to to kind of pry into

56:30what that that business is making so

56:32much. If if we're getting any kind of

56:36refund back for that meals tax, then I'd

56:40imagine that would kind of substantiate

56:42that they are in fact still serving

56:45food. Correct. Cuz it wouldn't would it

56:47apply to beverage as well though?

56:51>> CFO B.

56:53>> Thank you. I I guess what I mean is when

56:54we get our dispersement from the state,

56:56there's no we have no way of knowing how

56:59much comes from any individual business.

57:01It just comes in an aggregate total. So

57:03if it's a million dollars over a year,

57:05we get $250,000 a quarter, but we don't

57:08know how much is from business X

57:10business Y. And I I'm only mentioning

57:14this because we've asked before. They

57:15have refused to give us that

57:16information.

57:17>> Okay.

57:18>> Privacy reasons.

57:19>> Thank you for that clarification.

57:20>> Cele.

57:22>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council

57:24Robinson, I want to just mention

57:25something quick. You alluded to, you

57:27know, perhaps some of these um points

57:30that you've raised being discussed on

57:32Thursday and and to your point, it it

57:34may be worthy of a conversation.

57:38Do we want to find a way to tie this to

57:39the license itself? Do we want the

57:41license commission to establish a policy

57:43that there needs to be there will be an

57:44annual requirement and figure again it's

57:47it's hard to say exactly what would go

57:50into that but hey once a year you have

57:52to show us x y and z to prove to us that

57:55you are you know serving suitable food

57:57and that the kitchen's still operation

57:59employees stuff like that the license

58:01commission does have the authority to

58:03you know put almost like conditions on

58:06the license or to add these things to

58:08help ensure um you know that that

58:11businesses are are um following the

58:13rules.

58:14>> Thank you very much. So it looks like

58:16Thursday is the meeting for the

58:18conversation. Greatly appreciate it.

58:20>> Thank you, Council Robinson. Council

58:21Dakota.

58:22>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I I think it

58:24actually could be quant quite quantit

58:27quantitative is that once inspectional

58:30services give out the permits

58:33then there would be something that would

58:34trigger at city hall that something

58:37would be a monthly receipts would be

58:39sent to the state at that point. So I

58:41don't think it's a big obstacle. I

58:43remember when I owned an establishment

58:45that said when special services came in,

58:47they checked every six months. I was I

58:50was still in compliance, but that state

58:52reports were were sent on a monthly

58:54basis. So, I don't think it's a a heavy

58:57lift. Thank you.

59:00>> Thank you, Council Dakota.

59:02Motion to accept and place on file by

59:04Council Robinson, seconded by Council

59:06Dakota. All in favor signified by saying

59:08I. Any opposed? So ordered. 6.2 to

59:11communications. Reappoint of Maria

59:14Shehy, Memorial Auditorium Board.

59:16Richard Cody, Veterans Commission, James

59:18Gaffne, Veterans Commission. Motion to

59:21adopt by Councelor Nune, seconded by

59:23Councelor Mercier. Roll call.

59:27>> Councelor Dakota,

59:28>> yes.

59:29>> Mayor Gia,

59:30>> yes.

59:30>> Council Durant,

59:31>> yes.

59:31>> Council Leang,

59:32>> yes.

59:33>> Council Mcdana,

59:34>> yes.

59:34>> Councelor Mercia,

59:35>> yes.

59:35>> Council Noon,

59:36>> yes.

59:37>> Council Robinson,

59:38>> yes.

59:38>> Council Scott,

59:39>> yes. Council Chiao.

59:40>> Yes.

59:41>> Nes.

59:43>> Thank you, Mr. Kirk. 6.3. Communication.

59:45City major request one out ofstate

59:47travel DPD. Motion to adopt by council

59:49juran. Seconded by councelor Chow.

59:52>> Any discussion? Seeing none, roll call.

59:55>> Council Dakota.

59:57>> Yes.

59:58>> Mayor Gia.

59:58>> Yes.

59:59>> Council Durant.

1:00:00>> Yes.

1:00:00>> Council Leang,

1:00:01>> yes.

1:00:01>> Council Mcdana,

1:00:02>> yes.

1:00:03>> Council Mercia,

1:00:04>> yes.

1:00:04>> Council N.

1:00:05>> Yes.

1:00:05>> Council Robinson,

1:00:06>> yes.

1:00:07>> Council Scott,

1:00:08>> yes. Council Chow.

1:00:09>> Yes. 10 years.

1:00:11>> Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Seven votes from

1:00:12the city manager. 7.1 vote authorizing

1:00:15amendment to the AKA urban renewal plan

1:00:18276 Broadway Street. Wave full reading

1:00:21and second reading by title.

1:00:26Vote authorizing the city manager on

1:00:28behalf of the city of l to request

1:00:29approval for the following plan change

1:00:32to the acre urban renewal revitalization

1:00:35and development plan from the

1:00:37commonwealth of Massachusetts department

1:00:39of housing and community development.

1:00:42Motion to adopt by councelor Scott,

1:00:46seconded by councelor noon.

1:00:49>> Roll call.

1:00:50>> Councelor Dakota.

1:00:51>> Yes.

1:00:51>> Mayor Gia.

1:00:52>> Yes.

1:00:53>> Council Jirean.

1:00:54>> Yes.

1:00:54>> Council Leang.

1:00:55>> Yes. Yes. Council Mcdana,

1:00:56>> yes.

1:00:56>> Council Mia,

1:00:57>> yes.

1:00:58>> Council Non,

1:00:59>> yes.

1:00:59>> Council Robbins,

1:01:00>> yes.

1:01:00>> Council Scott,

1:01:01>> yes.

1:01:02>> Council Chow,

1:01:02>> yes.

1:01:03>> That's 10 years.

1:01:04>> Thank you, Mr. Clerk. 7.2 vote

1:01:06authorizing purchase of the senior

1:01:08center 276 Broadway Street. Wave full

1:01:10reading is second reading by title. Vote

1:01:12authorizing the city of LOL buyer

1:01:15through its city council to enter into a

1:01:17purchase and sales agreement with

1:01:19Nicholas C. Saris, trustee of the city

1:01:22barns condominium trust seller for the

1:01:25purchase of property located at 276

1:01:28Broadway Street in the city of l. Motion

1:01:30to adopt by councelor

1:01:33Leang, seconded by councelor Mercia. Any

1:01:36questions? Councelor Dan.

1:01:37>> Uh thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um I this might

1:01:40be for the city solicitor or his team.

1:01:42Um, I assume there'll also uh be a

1:01:44settlement agreement at some point that

1:01:46or at some point as part of this that

1:01:48resolves any outstanding issues about

1:01:51this property.

1:01:54>> Manager Goldman,

1:01:56>> city solic.

1:01:58>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Yes, that's

1:01:59correct.

1:02:00>> Great. Thank you. And then are is the

1:02:03city comfortable that once the purchase

1:02:04and sale and the deeds are, you know,

1:02:07signed and filed and the settlement

1:02:09agreement is signed that the city will

1:02:11own the entire parcel and all the

1:02:13condominiums, the common areas and the

1:02:15leases and the parking spaces. Just

1:02:17wanted to make sure it's sort of all

1:02:19wrapped into a

1:02:20>> a hole. Right.

1:02:24>> Celestia Williams.

1:02:25>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Uh yes. Uh as you

1:02:27know, this is um this has been around

1:02:29for a while. So, um, a lot of a lot of

1:02:32work's gone into this and and I think

1:02:34the end product, um, everything looks

1:02:36good.

1:02:37>> Great. Thank you very much.

1:02:39>> Thank you, Council Dian, Council Dakota.

1:02:41>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I'd like to take

1:02:42this opportunity to thank City Celissa

1:02:45Williams, and Councelor Theodoris, who's

1:02:47sitting here as well for the for the

1:02:49jobs they've done on this. Well done.

1:02:52>> Thank you, Council Dakota. Any other

1:02:54questions? Roll call.

1:02:59Council Dakota.

1:03:01>> Yes.

1:03:02>> Mayor Gia,

1:03:03>> yes.

1:03:03>> Council Dire,

1:03:04>> yes.

1:03:04>> Council Leang,

1:03:05>> yes.

1:03:06>> Council Mcdana,

1:03:07>> yes.

1:03:07>> Council Meria,

1:03:08>> yes.

1:03:09>> Council Non,

1:03:10>> yes.

1:03:10>> Council Robbins,

1:03:11>> yes.

1:03:12>> Council Scott,

1:03:13>> yes.

1:03:13>> Council Chow,

1:03:14>> yes.

1:03:14>> It's 10 years.

1:03:15>> Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Eight reports of

1:03:17subcommittee. There are none. So, we

1:03:18move on to nine. Petition 9.1 claims

1:03:21three property damage. Motion to refer

1:03:22to law department for report and

1:03:24recommendation by councelor Mercier,

1:03:26seconded by councel Mcdana. All in favor

1:03:28signify by saying I. Any opposed? So

1:03:31ordered. 9.2. Miscellaneous. David

1:03:34Trainer. Request to address the city

1:03:36council regarding flock cameras.

1:03:40>> David Trainer.

1:03:44Please state your name and address for

1:03:46the record. And there's three minutes.

1:03:48>> All right.

1:03:53All right. So, I'm David Trainer, uh, 38

1:03:55Meredith Street in LOL.

1:03:58All right. So, there's been a lot of

1:04:00talk about the low police misusing the

1:04:03technology and of the flock cameras. And

1:04:06while I think this is a concern, I don't

1:04:08think it's the main issue here. My main

1:04:10concern is about a billion-dollar

1:04:12surveillance company having eyes on us

1:04:14and tracking us and stalking us wherever

1:04:16we go. Yes, Chief Hudon has proven

1:04:19himself to be a liar multiple times. He

1:04:21said that there was only 25 cameras when

1:04:23there actually 37. says we only share

1:04:26with a few communities around us. We

1:04:27share with 11 as far as New York. We

1:04:30also share with the postal service who

1:04:32works with ICE. So that's how ICE gets

1:04:34into our system. But I feel like those

1:04:36are smaller issues uh that we can work

1:04:39out and get under control. What we can't

1:04:42control is the big brother corporation

1:04:44looming over us with its equipment. Uh,

1:04:47right after the cameras got suspended,

1:04:49Chief Hudon admitted in the Inside Lol

1:04:51podcast that he didn't know how to shut

1:04:53off the cameras. You'd have to go find

1:04:55out. Not that it really matters. Flock

1:04:57has been uh caught turning on the

1:05:00cameras in Boston after they've been

1:05:02suspended.

1:05:03Um, you know, technology this day is

1:05:05very sneaky and it's very easy to cover

1:05:07things up and it's very hard to prove

1:05:10allegations of misuse. Chief Hudon also

1:05:13assures us that after 7 days it's the

1:05:16footage is deleted.

1:05:18Sure, maybe on his screen it's deleted,

1:05:20but they're not building all these data

1:05:21centers around here to delete

1:05:23information.

1:05:25An example of this type of u violation

1:05:27became apparent in the Nancy Guthrie

1:05:29kidnapping case. uh she had a doorbell

1:05:32camera uh when the masked intruders

1:05:34approach, you know, came into the

1:05:36building, but she didn't have a

1:05:37subscription service, so the camera

1:05:39wasn't on, except a week later, Cash

1:05:42Patel of the FBI pulled up footage

1:05:44pulled from back channels of the mass

1:05:46men at her front door. So there you go.

1:05:50Uh Chief Hudon also assured us that

1:05:52Flock has no way of tracking us, you

1:05:54know, because they don't have access to

1:05:55our license plate database. Well, these

1:05:58cameras have AI and they can understand

1:06:00and analyze what they're looking at.

1:06:02That's the whole pitch of Flock. So,

1:06:04they can just take a picture of me in my

1:06:06car, look me up on the internet, cuz we

1:06:08all have at least a LinkedIn, so my face

1:06:10is on the internet. And then boom, they

1:06:12know it's me in my car and where I'm

1:06:14going. I personally did this test

1:06:16myself. I took a screenshot of Chief

1:06:18Hudon talking at the LOL Council. I put

1:06:20it into a few I put him into a few chat

1:06:22bots and said, "Hey, I'm in LOL. Who is

1:06:24this man?"

1:06:25Um, it it told me, "Hey, that looks like

1:06:27Chief Hudon of LOL." I asked him, "How

1:06:30can I reach him? I got his office number

1:06:32and his cell phone number." I asked him

1:06:34where he lived. I got his address. I can

1:06:38pull it up on the Google Street View and

1:06:39find out where he lives. 2 minutes, not

1:06:42even. Flock also has, you know,

1:06:44contracts with the government, so they

1:06:46probably have access to databases that

1:06:48supersede any of ours. This is really

1:06:50dangerous stuff we're talking about

1:06:51here. AI has been doing bad things all

1:06:54sorts all around the world. In France,

1:06:57for instance, a group of hackers used AI

1:06:59to shut off every single refrigerator in

1:07:01a chain of grocery stores. Can you

1:07:04imagine that? In Market Basket, they

1:07:05have no electricity and all our food

1:07:07goes bad. North Korea last week stole $6

1:07:10billion of crypto, the biggest heist in

1:07:13human history using AI. And we want to

1:07:16put this on the streets of LOL. you

1:07:18know, we could have North Koreans

1:07:20looking at us right now, you know,

1:07:21through the breaches.

1:07:24So, and I also asked a detective in LOL,

1:07:27you know, what he thinks of the

1:07:28technology. He he said he would love to

1:07:29have it on every stringle every single

1:07:31street corner if he could. Is that the

1:07:34future we want to live in?

1:07:37Uh, so I'm just saying it doesn't sound

1:07:40like freedom to me. I'd ask you guys to

1:07:42please reconsider. A lot of people

1:07:44online would like to as well, all the

1:07:46young people at least. Uh this this is

1:07:49dangerous stuff. I'm not really

1:07:50concerned as much with the low police.

1:07:52It's it's more of big brother watching

1:07:55over us. Thank you.

1:07:58>> Thank you, David. [clears throat]

1:07:59>> Thank you.

1:08:01Motion to refer to the city manager for

1:08:03report and recommendation by council

1:08:06Mcdana, seconded by councelor Leang. All

1:08:09in favor signify by saying I. Any

1:08:12opposed?

1:08:13>> So ordered.

1:08:14>> Excuse me.

1:08:16No council me.

1:08:18>> I don't know. I thought this gentleman

1:08:20wanted to speak, but

1:08:21>> did he register to speak?

1:08:23>> I did. It was voted to 7.3.

1:08:25>> 7.3.

1:08:26>> Yeah.

1:08:28>> All right.

1:08:29>> Yes. 7.3.

1:08:30>> Anybody

1:08:31>> withdrawn?

1:08:32>> Yep.

1:08:34>> It's all right.

1:08:35>> If you want to suspend the rules and

1:08:37have him speak, you can.

1:08:38>> No, he he I he's signed up to speak.

1:08:42>> Thank you.

1:08:43>> Nobody wants to speak. 9.3 miscellaneous

1:08:46ernak request installation of a handicap

1:08:49parking sign at 57 wear street motion to

1:08:51refer to transportation engineer for

1:08:53report and recommendation by councelor

1:08:55Scott seconded by councelor Dakota all

1:08:57in favor signify by saying I any opposed

1:09:00so ordered 9.4 24 miscellaneous William

1:09:03J. Mallister request installation of a

1:09:06handicap parking sign located at 105 JW

1:09:09Street. Motion to refer to

1:09:10transportation engineer for report and

1:09:12recommendation by councel Robinson

1:09:14seconded by councelor Juran. All in

1:09:17favor signified by saying I. Any

1:09:19announcements

1:09:21council Dakota.

1:09:22>> Thank you Mr. Mayor. Uh this Thursday um

1:09:24the little community charter school is

1:09:26having a

1:09:28um a night uh with Mickey Ward and

1:09:31showing the fighter movie. Um all the

1:09:33proceeds will go to the team Mickey Wood

1:09:35charities. Uh if any of the counselors

1:09:37are interested, please let me know.

1:09:39>> Thank you.

1:09:40>> Thank you, Council Dakota. Councelor

1:09:41Mercia.

1:09:42>> Uh thank you, Mr. Mayor. Uh this

1:09:44Thursday,

1:09:46November 5th, in the morning, the

1:09:49Salvation Army will be holding their

1:09:5134th Christmas Castle breakfast from

1:09:547:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. at Lindsy's. The

1:09:58honore is Chris Dick. Uh, he will be

1:10:01roasted like a Thanksgiving turkey by

1:10:04his friends by his friends John Chemley,

1:10:08Danielle McFaden, school committee

1:10:11woman, and um, his brother Brian. So,

1:10:15just if anybody wants to know about that

1:10:19because I'm the MC and I'm going to do

1:10:21the roasting. [laughter]

1:10:22They're in trouble.

1:10:24>> Thank you, Council Me. Council Jiren.

1:10:26>> Well, thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um, next

1:10:28Tuesday at 10:00 a.m. there will be a

1:10:30Veterans Day um, remembrance at LOL

1:10:33Memorial Auditorium. So, I would like to

1:10:36just make sure folks remember our

1:10:38veterans. Thank you.

1:10:39>> Thank you, Councelor Durant. Coun, no

1:10:42more counselors. Assistant City Manager

1:10:44Shadow.

1:10:46>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um, this Sunday

1:10:47there is a ribbon cutting for the Steve

1:10:49BTO concession stand, long overdue at

1:10:52Shed Park. It'll be Sunday from 11 to 1.

1:10:55um again at shed park for the Steve Bto

1:10:57concession stand.

1:10:59>> Thank you, Mr. Mishado.

1:11:02With that, I just want to thank all the

1:11:04people who put their name on a ballot

1:11:05and wish them all luck tonight in the uh

1:11:07voting. So, good luck to all the

1:11:09candidates. Motion to adjourn by

1:11:11councelor Charles, seconded by

1:11:13councilto. All in favor signify by

1:11:15saying I. Any opposed? So ordered.

```*