Closed Session Litigation Matters

At a glance

  • What: Council's closed sessions in September and October 2026 listed pending lawsuits and anticipated litigation; no reportable actions were announced.
  • Where it stands: On October 6, City Attorney Alcala Wood reported a federal case on that day's closed-session agenda was taken off the calendar.
  • Next: None.

Matters listed

  • September 22: two workers' compensation appeals matters; City of San José v. San José Police Officers Association (Santa Clara County Superior Court, 26cv497694); two matters of anticipated litigation; and a City Clerk performance evaluation.
  • September 29: one workers' compensation appeals matter and three civil suits (two in Santa Clara County Superior Court, one in federal court) naming the City.
  • October 6: a federal civil case (taken off calendar) and a City Manager performance evaluation.

The minutes name private parties in some cases; they are omitted here.

Sources

Log

2026-11-03 - City Council

Item 2.8 (26-1138): settlement of Kao et al v. City of San Jose (case 25CV465773) for $400,000. The November 17 agenda adds a settlement in Lopez et al v. City of San Jose (26-1205), see 2026-11-17 - City Council.

2026-10-06 - City Council

One litigation item removed from the closed session agenda.

2026-09-29 - City Council

Four litigation matters listed.

2026-09-22 - City Council

Three litigation matters, anticipated litigation and an employee evaluation listed.

2026-11-03 - City Council

Kao v. City of San Jose settlement of $400,000 scheduled on the consent calendar (item 2.8).