Cubberley Property Appraisal Release

At a glance

Based on auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

  • What: whether the City should publicly release the two appraisal reports behind its agreement to buy about 7 of the 35.5 acres of the Cubberley (captioned "Coverly") site from the Palo Alto Unified School District.
  • Where it stands: on October 13, 2026 the Council voted 7-0 to release both appraisals (dated August 29, 2024 and September 5, 2024).
  • Next: staff publish the appraisals with a cover memo, wording to be finalized by the mayor and staff. The funding question goes to voters on Measure J Cubberley Renovation Ballot Measure.

Background

  • On October 5 the City and the school district released a joint statement with appraisal figures, third-party interest in the property and the difficulty of valuing it, but not the appraisal documents themselves.
  • The agreed price was about $60.65 million (2024 dollars). The district's position was about $90 million, based on potential long-term leases to private schools.
  • Councilmembers said negotiations with the district are concluded, so the earlier reason for confidentiality no longer applies.
  • Two appraisals exist from the same appraiser; the second followed staff questions on comparable sales.

Council discussion

  • All speakers supported release, citing transparency and the public vote on the measure in under 30 days; Vice Mayor Stone said the appraisal question had distracted from the merits of the measure.
  • Councilmember Burt and Councilmember Lythcott-Haims expected opponents to pick at selected comparables.
  • Councilmember Reckdahl said the appraisals were better than expected, but the comparables range widely, and they exclude building value and demolition costs.
  • Lythcott-Haims said the appraisals value 8 acres, so the per-acre figure must be scaled to 7 acres; readers will see higher headline numbers than those released to the media.
  • The motion was made by Councilmember Lu and seconded by Mayor Veenker; it was clarified to cover only the two appraisal reports.
  • A draft cover memo by Reckdahl and Burt, explaining why the price was a negotiated result rather than either side's position, was shown on screen. It was not voted on; the mayor and staff will finalize wording.

Public comment

  • Two residents spoke: one urged evidence-based debate over a cartoon in a local paper, one supported the purchase and the sales tax and urged the Council to release the documents.

Sources

Discussion time

About 37 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).

Meeting Minutes
2026-10-13 - City Council Special Meeting 37

Log