Planning Commission Absence Rules (Ordinance 3270)

At a glance

Based on auto-generated captions; names, numbers and details may be misheard.

  • What: Resolution No. 1633 (updated Planning Commission rules of procedure) and Ordinance No. 3270 (amending Redmond Municipal Code chapter 4.43) change how commissioner absences are handled.
  • Where it stands: moved off consent. An amendment failed, then the council voted to refer the package to the next Committee of the Whole on 2026-10-20.
  • Next: committee review to clarify who decides removals and fix cross-references.

The proposal

  • The Planning Commission wrote its own absence rules instead of using the general commission standard, and asked that its version control.
  • As described by Councilmember Parsi: three consecutive missed meetings (excused or not) lets the mayor flag the commissioner for a council vote on removal. Four consecutive misses or more than 25% of meetings in a year lets a majority of the commission request removal, with the mayor deciding.
  • Interim Co-Director Allen said the commission did not want to be the decision maker on removing a colleague, so cases go to the mayor and then to council.

The confusion

  • Councilmember Parsi said the text is unclear about whether a seat becomes vacant immediately when the mayor finds inefficiency or neglect, or only after council acts. She said not all paths lead to council.
  • Allen recommended changing a cross-reference on page 9 of the redline from RMC 4.10.030 (general commission rules) to RMC 4.43.080 (Planning Commission rules). She and other staff acknowledged the documents are confusing.
  • Parsi moved that change; a technical add-on about the 080 section was suggested during the discussion. Councilmember Forsythe and Councilmember Kritzer asked clarifying questions.

Votes

  • Amendment to change the reference failed on a roll call, about 3-4 (roll order is hard to follow in the captions). Council President Stewart and Councilmember Soni said they would not support it or approval that night.
  • Councilmember Kritzer then moved to refer the item to the next available Committee of the Whole; it was seconded and carried by voice vote.

Sources

Discussion time

About 16 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).

Meeting Minutes
2026-10-20 - City Council Business Meeting 16

Log