2026-10-08 - Development Commission

03:20America

03:32for it stands one nation under God,

03:35indivisible with liberty and justice for

03:38all

03:4326

03:45307

03:487 South Sports.

03:56>> The 0.46 acre site consists of 10

03:59parcels developed with a truck parking

04:01area in association with an adjacent

04:04truck repair business. The site is

04:06subject to zoning code violation

04:0924470-10332

04:13for lack of zoning clearance. The

04:15requested LM limited manufacturing

04:18district will allow less objectionable

04:20manufacturing uses and specifically a

04:22truck parking lot.

04:23>> Yeah,

04:24>> North of the site is a commercial garage

04:25in the C4 commercial district. South of

04:28the site is the associated truck repair

04:31facility in the M manufacturing

04:33district. East of the site is a

04:35large-scale manufacturing plant in the M

04:37manufacturing and LM limited

04:39manufacturing districts. West of the

04:41site is a single unit dwelling in the R3

04:43residential district. Concurrent council

04:46variance CV26-076

04:49includes variances to building and

04:51parking setbacks and required parking.

04:54That request will be heard by city

04:55council and will not be considered at

04:57this development commission meeting. The

04:59Columbus growth strategy recommends

05:01industrial and warehouse uses for this

05:03location. The site is located within the

05:06boundaries of the Columbus Southside

05:07Area Commission whose recommendation is

05:09for approval.

05:11The limitation text includes use

05:13restrictions allowing only less

05:15objectionable manufacturing uses and

05:17supplemental development standards

05:19addressing traffic access to the site

05:21fencing and includes a site plan showing

05:24fencing, landscaping, and screening

05:25commitments. The requested LM limited

05:28manufacturing district will address an

05:30active zoning code violation by allowing

05:32less objectionable manufacturing uses,

05:34including truck parking on the subject

05:36site. The limitation text includes a

05:38commitment to a site plan that

05:39demonstrates fencing, landscaping, and

05:41screening commitments from an adjacent

05:43residential use and public rights right

05:46ofway. Additionally, the proposed uses

05:48are consistent with the Columbus Growth

05:50Strategies future land use

05:51recommendation of industrial and

05:54warehouse at this location and therefore

05:57city department's recommendation is for

05:59approval.

06:01>> Okay. Uh Dan, any traffic?

06:05>> No traffic issues. and honor

06:08>> planning has no additional comments.

06:10>> Okay. Is it

06:12step forward?

06:14>> That's me.

06:15>> Give us your name for the record because

06:18we're not sure who you are.

06:22>> Good afternoon. My name's Jack Reynolds.

06:24I'm an attorney with Smith and Hale at

06:26172 East State Street, Columbus, Ohio.

06:30And I'm here on behalf of the property

06:32owner and the applicants.

06:35>> Okay. Uh you have anything to add?

06:38>> No, it's we're we're this will go

06:40towards solving the code enforcement

06:43issues which is currently in court and

06:46by getting it zoned and the council

06:48variance will solve the problem. Uh and

06:52uh my client can can com repair as many

06:56trucks as he wants to.

06:58>> Well, if you compare the uh aerial photo

07:02>> Oh, yeah. page 105.

07:04>> Oh, yeah.

07:05>> It's a no-brainer.

07:06>> It's It He needs some help.

07:08>> He needs Yeah. Yeah. This And this

07:10layout looks

07:12>> We're helping a lot.

07:13>> All right. Any questions or comments? I

07:16need someone to recommend we vote.

07:22>> Okay. All those in favor?

07:24>> I Okay. Please call the role.

07:28>> Amanda Golden.

07:31John Ingerson,

07:32>> stay.

07:35>> Kayun,

07:36>> yes.

07:37>> Dan Fertleman,

07:38>> yes.

07:39>> Joshua Cox,

07:40>> yes.

07:41>> Chair Fitzpatrick,

07:42>> yes. You are approved.

07:44>> Thank you folks very much.

07:50>> Okay, going on to case number two.

07:56Z26-031

07:595480 Winchester Pike.

08:06>> Please see your sub

08:08is Is the applicant here?

08:10>> Yes.

08:10>> Okay.

08:12>> Please see your supplemental packets for

08:14an updated site plan dated October 6,

08:162026.

08:20The 96.47 47 acre site consists of one

08:24undeveloped parcel in the R rural

08:27district. The requested PUD4 planned

08:30unit development district will allow a

08:32subdivision consisting of up to 352

08:36single unit dwellings on individually

08:38platted lots with a gross density of 3.7

08:41dwelling units per acre. North of the

08:43site is a singleunit dwelling

08:46subdivision in the PUD8 planned unit

08:48development district. South and east of

08:50the site is undeveloped land in the R

08:54rural and LLD limited apartment

08:57residential districts and single unit

08:59dwellings in the R rural district in

09:02Madison Township. West of the site is a

09:04light manufacturing facility and storage

09:06yard in the LM limited manufacturing

09:09district. The site is within the

09:11planning area of the southeast land use

09:13plan which recommends private open

09:15space, lowdensity residential and low

09:19medium density residential land uses for

09:21this location.

09:23The site is located within the

09:24boundaries of the Greater Southeast Area

09:26Commission whose recommendation is for

09:28approval. The PUD development text

09:31includes use restrictions and

09:32supplemental development standards that

09:34address the maximum dwelling count,

09:36building and parking setbacks, lot

09:38width, lot size, street trees, and

09:41building materials. Additionally, the

09:43commitments to develop the site in

09:45accordance with the submitted site plan

09:47and landscape plan are included in the

09:49text. Code modifications to lot width

09:52and lot size are included in the text.

09:54The Columbus multimodal thoroughfare

09:56plan identifies Winchester Pike as a

09:58suburban commuter corridor requiring 120

10:02ft of rightway from the center line. The

10:05requested PUD planned unit development

10:07district will allow up to 352 single

10:10unit dwellings on individually platted

10:12lots developed in accordance with the

10:14submitted PUD text site plan and

10:16landscaping plan. The proposed density

10:19of 3.7 units is consistent with the

10:22recommended land uses of the southeast

10:24land use plan and with the city's

10:26objective of providing more housing in

10:29all areas of the city. While the

10:31proposed use is supported, the following

10:34comments from the Department of Public

10:36Service have yet to be addressed. A

10:38traffic impact study is required and has

10:40not yet been received by the Department

10:42of Public Service. Right ofway

10:44dedication along Winchester Pike, access

10:47point to the site along Winchester Pike

10:49and review by Franklin County Engineers

10:51Office. City department's recommendation

10:54can be for approval upon the completion

10:57of the pending traffic impact study and

10:59the resolution of any outstanding

11:01comments including any necessary

11:03revisions or commitments to the PUB text

11:06to the satisfaction of the Department of

11:08Public Service. Therefore, city

11:10department's recommendation is for

11:11disapproval.

11:14Okay,

11:16Dan.

11:20>> Access to this site is under the

11:21jurisdiction of the Franklin County

11:23Engineers Office. Um so the the primary

11:26concern leading to the disapproval is

11:28the location of the Northwesterly

11:31um proposed access point to Winchester.

11:34Um there's an outstanding comment about

11:36uh where that location is in alignment

11:40with the access to the park that's on

11:42the opposite side of Winchester Pike. Um

11:45so that still needs to be resolved. Um

11:48traffic, we've been working with the um

11:50traffic consultant on the study. We do

11:52not have a submittal yet. Um I know this

11:55one might be a little more um

11:57complicated than most studies. We've had

12:00to work with the U. Mid Ohio Regional

12:02Planning Commission to update the

12:04regional travel demand model um because

12:06of all the development in this part of

12:08town um to make sure the land use

12:10assumptions are consistent with what's

12:12been happening and what's been proposed

12:14in recent years. Um and then um so that

12:17study is going to be looking at um the

12:21uh two Winchester intersections with

12:23Shannon Road, Ebrite Road, Bryce Road,

12:26Bixby Road and then also the

12:28intersection of Bryce Road and Shannon

12:30Road.

12:31Okay. Uh,

12:35>> uh, planning is broadly supportive of

12:37the application. Uh, we don't have any

12:39issues in terms of use. Uh, we've been

12:42working with the applicant to fine-tune

12:44the site plan. Um, which they have been

12:47um, receptive to, you know, making

12:49iterative improvements. I think we still

12:52have a couple um, things to work on

12:55there. So if the commission is looking

12:59to move forward with it, planning were

13:00to request uh a condition be that they

13:03continue to work with us on improving uh

13:06you know primarily some of their open

13:08space um reserves having units not back

13:11up to those.

13:13>> Okay. U I I I totally agree with that.

13:18Will the applicant come up and give your

13:20name for the record?

13:21>> Yes.

13:23Hi, I'm Drew Miller with Arbor Homes,

13:266797 North High Street, Worthington,

13:28Ohio.

13:29>> All right. U just first impression when

13:32I saw this site plan, I thought, man,

13:34this is every inch is counted for here.

13:38Every inch

13:39and uh it's not all green space. There's

13:44ponds, but there's hardly any room for

13:48grass to grow around them because

13:50they're so so tight. We are sitting at

13:53this table to cast a vote on whether we

13:56think this is a appropriate use or a not

14:00appropriate use.

14:02>> And these details, often traffic details

14:06are tagging along behind the land use

14:10considerations.

14:12So

14:13setting aside the the fact that every

14:18square inch is committed to a lot rather

14:20than green space throughout common

14:24space.

14:25Uh

14:27we can render a decision

14:30when you get this

14:32this is the uh blank check statement.

14:37If if we uh vote on your land use and

14:42you encounter difficulties

14:44that you just can't work with, you you

14:48pretty much have to give right away.

14:49That's a given.

14:50>> Sure.

14:51>> But if if other things come up and you

14:53have to move that northwest access and

14:56knock out a few lots, you're going to

14:58have to live with it. If you have to

15:00chip in thousand, hundreds of thousands

15:03of dollars for traffic lights,

15:06take it or leave it. Because if you

15:08don't take it, this

15:11body's work is done. Tear that up and

15:15start over.

15:16>> Sure.

15:16>> Long as you understand that, we'll go

15:19forward and and uh

15:21and hear the

15:24the offerings. It's it is important to

15:27note that the area commission

15:31that voted on the land use in this area

15:34voted in approval of you

15:36>> and of your use. So, does anybody else

15:39have any comments?

15:42because I I got no problem voting on the

15:44use, but

15:45>> yeah,

15:45>> but it's easy to say, "Oh, yeah, we'll

15:48work with the city and we'll work with

15:50the Frank County engineer."

15:52But there may be some uh

15:56some pain with that and some money to

15:58spend,

15:59>> right?

15:59>> And if you don't agree to it, this never

16:02happened,

16:02>> right? Yes. And so we fully understand,

16:06you know, kind of what the challenges

16:07are of this site. Actually just uh spoke

16:10to Drew Lurant with Carpenter Marty.

16:11He's our traffic engineer. They're

16:13wrapping up the traffic study today. So,

16:15I know we'll have that tomorrow. He did

16:17give me an indication of what

16:18improvements are going to be

16:19recommendate recommended. It was really

16:21no surprise to us. We we went into this

16:24kind of eyes wide open understanding

16:25that the traffic situation down there is

16:28complex and there will be, you know, a

16:30give on our part. So, we're comfortable

16:32with the recommendations that I've seen

16:35um which uh do include turn lanes and

16:37contributions to other intersections.

16:39So, we were prepared for that. Um, as

16:42far as the northwestern access aligning

16:44that with park, um, I've my engineers

16:47here with me, we have looked at that and

16:49I think that's something that we can

16:50accommodate. So,

16:52>> all right. Well, when when you do, uh,

16:55continue to work with these two

16:57gentlemen here.

16:58>> Yeah.

16:58>> And all their people that that help

17:01because you need to have a record of

17:03that.

17:04>> Yeah.

17:04>> Before you advance to city council.

17:07>> We understand. Um and and then in

17:09addition to the open space, I think

17:11we're at roughly 40% but a lot of that

17:14um you know when we look at it compared

17:16to the Columbus growth strategy um which

17:19which I understand is um asking for more

17:21amenized open space um we're comfortable

17:24with that as well. So we're looking

17:25forward to the opportunity to you know

17:27make that more accessible to everybody

17:30um including you know some additional

17:31walking paths, landscaping and just

17:33easier access for people in the

17:35neighborhood to enjoy that. I know that

17:36was one of the the main issues with the

17:38area commission is they wanted to make

17:40sure that they had access to that open

17:42space and and

17:43>> well unless you have a boat three or

17:45four of those green spaces are blue

17:49>> right

17:49>> ponds.

17:50>> Yeah. I I think uh

17:55I I for one have no problem with this

17:58and and the fact that you achieved 3.7

18:02units per acre density is amazing when

18:05you look at the fact of so many lots,

18:09>> right? It's it's a unique site and

18:11really our our mission as a company is

18:13to provide uh more affordable attainable

18:15houses. So we are we are committing to

18:18being the price leader in this area and

18:19that was another attractive feature from

18:21the area commission. So um that's that's

18:24the challenge. It's a balance you know

18:25for us to find

18:26>> well and everybody likes that word

18:28affordable now.

18:29>> Right.

18:30>> Okay. Is anybody else having a comment?

18:33>> Yes.

18:33>> So uh to the north I see how you're

18:37you're tying into existing rideaways. Uh

18:41might you consider uh leaving those

18:44opportunities more to the south also

18:48because it it you have these two uh

18:50culde-sacs and

18:52>> Oh to the east

18:54>> to the east south.

18:56>> Yeah. Yeah. Um yeah that's something we

19:00can definitely look at. You know I know

19:02codachs aren't ideal. They're not ideal

19:03for us as a builder either.

19:05>> Um so yeah I think there's absolutely

19:07opportunity to tie that into the east. I

19:09don't know. I I think there might that

19:11might be under contract and there might

19:13be somebody developing that. So I think

19:16we can probably find out who that is and

19:18see if we can get those aligned.

19:20>> I mean that's always my you know we see

19:24too many of these where

19:27just focused in on the land that they

19:29have instead of the broader context.

19:31>> Right. And uh

19:33>> yeah, I know we did look at

19:35>> opportunities they should take.

19:37>> Absolutely. I think it's Coppell Square

19:39is the eastern tiein. Um

19:44that came up looking to extend that

19:46street to the west as well. There's a

19:48new um manufacturing plant right there.

19:50And so that western stub didn't make a

19:52lot of sense, but I I agree with you on

19:54the eastern stubs, the southeastern. So

19:57that's something we can look at.

19:59>> Yeah.

20:04Um, hello. My name is Garrett Baker. I'm

20:06with American Trucker Point, the design

20:07engineer at uh 2550 corporate exchange

20:10drive. The only thing I wanted to add

20:11about the the tie-ins to the east. Um,

20:14definitely doable that the only one that

20:16would be difficult to achieve is that

20:18southeast southeastern culde-sac because

20:21that's um entirely that's all wetlands

20:24right there that that we're staying out

20:26of. there there were not any identified

20:28wetlands in the northeast one. So that I

20:31think that would be the

20:32>> okay

20:32>> the spot to to look at.

20:34>> Right.

20:36>> Okay. Well, the these things are are

20:38primarily triggered by the fact that

20:40Franklin County Engineer and State

20:43Highway and all these other people

20:46having ore in the water slow things

20:49down, right?

20:50>> But

20:51Mr.

20:52>> Yes. Yes.

20:53>> Just a question. the proposed detention

20:56pawn on the northwest corner. Is it

21:00possible to make it a public amenity

21:02instead of isolated the way it is?

21:05>> Yeah, we we've been kind of exploring

21:08that and part of what we changed with

21:10the supplemental plan that you have in

21:12your packet is creating like a boulevard

21:14style street that is hopefully going to

21:16kind of terminate into that open area.

21:18So, um, yeah, you know, and that was a

21:21comment from planning, too, is how do we

21:23make that more accessible and open to

21:25everybody? So, um, I I think it's as we

21:28continue to work with planning, we

21:29hopefully we'll revise this plan a

21:31little bit and refine it to to achieve

21:34that.

21:37>> Okay. Uh,

21:40>> chair, I just wanted to um for our newer

21:42DC members. So, right now our position

21:46is disapproval, but if this does get to

21:49a point where the comments have all been

21:52addressed, we will revise the staff

21:54report for city council to be an

21:56approval. So, that's kind of how that

21:57works, just so you're aware.

21:59>> And it it will be written in stone that

22:03the applicant has agreed to.

22:04>> Yeah. No, that's like all in their

22:06development text. That's all they're on

22:08their end. I'm just saying the actual

22:09staff report you're seeing will be kind

22:11of amended for the ordinance should they

22:14meet the requirements we need and then

22:16we're at an approval

22:17>> having having agreed to do all those

22:19things. We not sure of the details

22:22>> to the satisfaction of the

22:25departments.

22:26>> That guy right there,

22:28>> these two guys over here

22:30>> especially.

22:31>> Yes, sir.

22:32>> Would be nice to them. the uh if you

22:35make that then then this thing shifts

22:37automatically

22:39but you may be delayed

22:41in working that out and you may have to

22:43open up your checkbook and chip in on

22:46traffic lights or those kinds of things.

22:48>> That's we're prepared for that.

22:51>> I just I've got a comment that

22:54piggybacks on Mike's earlier comment

22:57regarding the open space.

23:01You've got a lot of rooftops here.

23:03>> Yes.

23:04>> And it's affordable housing and it's

23:06going to have kids

23:10I don't see

23:12these streets and the street pattern. I

23:14don't see that you know kids are going

23:16to be playing football in the street but

23:19you haven't got any playing fields kind

23:21of you know this middle oval is a

23:23detention basin

23:25>> right?

23:26You know, I I at least the amenity the

23:29idea that there should be an amenity

23:35for, you know,

23:37>> yeah,

23:38>> that many of the population and that

23:41much youth to have to go offsite

23:43somewhere.

23:45>> We don't we don't want them to have to

23:46go offsite. And so we and we've

23:49communicated to planning staff that we

23:51are committed to making sure that our

23:52open space is amenitized uh including

23:55walking trails, which we do have a

23:56little bit right now, but we plan on

23:57adding more. We've we've budgeted in

24:00this in this project for at least two

24:02playgrounds. Uh we haven't determined

24:04where we're going to put those yet. Um

24:06so yeah, we we want to make sure that

24:08you know the kids and the residents who

24:10live in this area can enjoy the area and

24:12not have to go off site. So All right.

24:14Yeah. And this gentleman over here named

24:17Hunter, he's got all kinds of hunting

24:20devices to collect. [laughter]

24:23So he he he's a very agreeable guy as

24:26long as you're agreeable.

24:27>> We're agreeable and we're we're

24:28flexible, too. We want to make sure it's

24:29a it's a nice comm for everybody. So,

24:31>> all right, let's let's get you started

24:34and hope you stay with it.

24:36>> Thanks.

24:37>> You got at least one pelt to put up on

24:40the wall. Need a motion to vote.

24:44Motion for the updated site plans first

24:47dated

24:47>> which are probably going to change but

24:49we'll just

24:49>> yeah get them

24:50>> for the sake of discussion. 106

24:54>> 26 is the date of the revised site plan.

24:57>> Motion to approve that.

24:58>> So moved.

24:59>> All those in favor? I

25:01>> Okay. Now I need a motion to vote.

25:08>> So move.

25:09>> Okay. All those in favor? I Okay. Please

25:11call the role.

25:14John Ingerson.

25:18>> Yes.

25:19>> Dan Fertlman.

25:25Uh Joshua Cox

25:27>> say I would have liked to seen this plan

25:30a little more developed before we got

25:32it, but I'm voting yes.

25:38Honor,

25:38>> are you voting on this one? Are you

25:41voting on this one?

25:42Uh, Anna Tasango,

25:47Amanda Golden, Cher Fitzpatrick.

25:50>> Yes, you are approved.

25:52>> Thank you. I'm going to stay here

25:54because uh we're we've got the next

25:56project.

25:57>> Okay. You you've racked up a seven to

25:59zero vote, which is very rare in this

26:01group.

26:04>> So, you you may have to do an interview

26:06before you leave the building.

26:09Okay. Case number three.

26:13Z26-028

26:163701 Bryce Road.

26:19>> The 43.13 acre site consists of one

26:22undeveloped parcel in the R rural

26:24district. The requested R2 residential

26:27district will allow a subdivision

26:29consisting of 146 single unit dwellings

26:31on individually platted lots resulting

26:34in a gross density of 3.4 units per

26:36acre. North of this site is a metro park

26:39in the Rural District. West and south of

26:41the site is undeveloped land in the

26:43Rural District. And east of the site is

26:45undeveloped land in the PUD4 land unit

26:48development district. The site is within

26:50the planning boundaries of the Southeast

26:52Land Use Plan, which recommends

26:53lowdensity residential 4 to six dwelling

26:55units per acre at this location. The

26:58site is located within the boundaries of

27:00the Greater Southeast Area Commission,

27:01whose recommendation is for approval.

27:04A traffic impact study is in progress.

27:06In conjunction with this application,

27:08additional commitments may be necessary

27:09upon review and approval of that traffic

27:11impact study by the Department of Public

27:13Service.

27:15The requested R2 residential district

27:16will allow a subdivision containing up

27:18to 146 single unit dwellings on

27:21individually platted lots. The proposed

27:23density of 3.4 units per acre is

27:25consistent with the recommended land

27:27use. Additionally, the proposal is

27:29consistent with the city's objective of

27:30providing more housing in all areas of

27:32the city.

27:33City department's recommendation can be

27:35for full full approval upon the

27:38completion of the pending traffic impact

27:39study and the resolution of any comments

27:41including any necessary commitments

27:43based on those results to the

27:44satisfaction of department of public

27:46service. So right now city department's

27:48recommendation is conditional approval.

27:53>> Okay, any questions or comments? Dan,

27:56traffic.

27:57>> This uh traffic stud is very similar to

27:59the one um for the previous application.

28:02same traffic consultant. Um biggest

28:04difference is this one will be looking

28:06at the uh Bryce Road intersections with

28:09Shannon Road and Gender Road and

28:12Chattton Road. No, Bryce Road and

28:15Chatterton Refugee the second

28:17intersection.

28:19>> Okay. U so you and how Honor, how about

28:24you? for you.

28:26>> Uh again, uh planning is okay with this

28:29one in terms of use, but we have a

28:31couple outstanding site design comments

28:33that we're working with the applicant.

28:35>> Same story goes. He is some consulting

28:37to do.

28:38>> Correct.

28:39>> Okay.

28:42However, on this one, you have posted an

28:44even more impressive

28:46low density number of 3.4 units per

28:51acre.

28:53>> That's right. So, you know, and the

28:55density is really what helps us achieve

28:56those attainable price points for this

28:58area. Um, I think we have a little bit

29:01more flexibility on this site in terms

29:02of making sure we're aligning with the

29:04Columbus growth strategy. Um, we did put

29:07together uh a plan um that I think

29:10achieves some more of that by um

29:12extending some of those north south

29:14streets and removing lot the lots that

29:17you see across the top there so that

29:19there's going to be more homes fronting

29:20that open space. Uh so that's where

29:23we've got a retention pond and a uh

29:25flood plane storage and that kind of

29:27opens up into uh Metro Parks uh property

29:30to the north of us too. So that's one

29:33one change I know we can make that's

29:35really getting more in line with

29:36planning's comments. Um and then just in

29:39terms of making sure that those ponds u

29:41are more amenitized, activated um so

29:44that you know pe people can enjoy that

29:46and getting some more walking paths

29:48around. There's everything we're we're

29:50open to committing to. I would uh I

29:52would

29:55echo John's statements that as a good

29:59business decision. If you don't provide

30:01a place for the kids to play, they'll be

30:04taking the tires off your car. So, they

30:07got to go somewhere and be able to do

30:10some some playing.

30:12>> That's right.

30:12>> At any age.

30:13>> Yeah. And we'll be putting a playground

30:15in here, too. Um and just making sure

30:17that that active that open space is more

30:19activated for for people to enjoy. So,

30:22um, and then that traffic study that was

30:24included with the, uh, the previous

30:26project. So, that'll be, uh, submitted

30:29tomorrow. So, we already understand kind

30:31of what improvements are going to be

30:32required there. So, we're prepared to

30:34commit to those.

30:35>> Okay. And we the counseling by Hunter

30:37will be important because

30:40this has to work financially. It has to

30:43work structurally but it also has to

30:46result in something that caters to

30:50toddlers,

30:52young people, school age

30:56[snorts] and and old folks that want to

30:57take a walk too.

30:58>> Absolutely. So

31:02again, if you don't if you don't make

31:04everybody happy, all we're doing here

31:06tonight gets

31:08>> right

31:08>> thrown away. This is for

31:10>> we're confident we can achieve that. I

31:13think we're heading in the right

31:14direction already.

31:14>> It's very rare when somebody comes in

31:16with this this type of use and there's

31:21not a hundred people sitting there

31:23raising.

31:23>> I think we did a good job building

31:25goodwill with the uh area commission

31:26down there. We we started talking to

31:28them in January of this year. Um just

31:30letting introducing ourselves and then

31:32letting them know our intentions and uh

31:34you know all the feedback we got we

31:36tried to incorporate to the site. I know

31:38there's some things we still need to get

31:40right but um yeah I think I think

31:42generally you know everybody was pretty

31:44happy about this.

31:45>> We may have to put you up as a lecturer

31:47for [laughter]

31:50>> I appreciate that. Thank you.

31:51>> This is not a usual situation.

31:54>> Okay. again based on land use

31:57appropriateness.

31:59Uh do we need to take a motion for any

32:02new documents here? Is everything

32:06>> there's no supplemental material for

32:07this application?

32:08>> Okay, just a motion to take a vote.

32:12>> All moved.

32:14Second.

32:15>> Second.

32:17>> Okay, please call the role.

32:21can unqu

32:23>> I'll say yes but I will probably suggest

32:27if you can soften the street layout a

32:29little bit is too rigid

32:32very very very uh a lot of 90 degrees if

32:36you can just soften the street street

32:38layout a little bit that would be great

32:40my vote is yes

32:43>> Dan Fleman

32:46Joshua Cox

32:47>> yes

32:49>> Anna Tasango

32:52surprised that we don't have a firing

32:54squad behind you. So, I think that is a

32:56good sign.

32:57>> It is a good sign. Thank you.

32:59>> Amanda Golden,

33:00>> John Ingerson,

33:03>> Sheriff Fitzpatrick.

33:04>> Undefeated. Yes.

33:06>> 70. Good for you.

33:07>> Thank you everybody for your time. Thank

33:09you very much.

33:09>> Okay. I This is unprecedented for the

33:13staff too to organize these things.

33:15They're so on the money. off.

33:17Compliments to the staff because yeah,

33:18Columbus has been really great to work

33:20with. So,

33:22>> well, that's it's three hard a lot of

33:25acres, three separate cases, and in a

33:28half hour we're finished. You're lucky

33:30the shot family is on your side.