2026-10-14 - Land Use & Transportation Committee

Summary

Built from the official minutes (draft) and the auto-generated captions of the video; where they differ, the minutes' record is used for attendance and votes.

  • Official minutes (draft): five members present (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter); Gray and Blanchard excused.
  • Motion by Dorsey that Bill 26-0220 be Recommended Favorably with Amendment carried 5 to 0 (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter).
  • Wednesday, October 14, 2026, Land Use & Transportation Committee, Du Burns Council Chamber (3:30 PM agenda).
  • Recording runs 0:04 to about 20:29 and ends as the chair adjourns; no recesses, closed sessions or gaps.
  • One bill was on the docket.

Grocery store zoning (26-0220)

0:04-20:29

  • Opening (0:04-1:24): Chair Dorsey opened with Vice Chair Middleton, Bullock and Porter present; Parker joined during the sponsors' presentation. Blanchard and Gray were absent. Dorsey and Torrence are co-lead sponsors; Middleton took the chair while they presented.
  • Sponsors (1:24-14:35): the bill makes retail grocery store its own zoning use, exempts it from off-street parking maximums and defines the term. Torrence framed it as equity for historically redlined neighborhoods, citing the income and unemployment thresholds chains look for. Dorsey said grocery stores have no definition in the zoning code, so they cannot be treated differently from other retail, and that parking maximums have repeatedly blocked grocery stores in neighborhoods that need them.
  • Amendments: one from the Board of Municipal & Zoning Appeals strikes a footnote limiting retail (and so grocery stores) to 5,000 square feet in transit-oriented areas. One from the Planning Commission adds a 5,000 square foot minimum floor area to the definition, so a corner store cannot qualify and escape the parking limits (corner stores run roughly 1,000 to 2,000 square feet; small chain grocers 10,000 to 12,000).
  • Smoke shops (9:50-12:20): Middleton said a grocery store in her district is half smoke shop and is tied to crime near Park Heights. Torrence said the definition's sales and perishables test should help, that chains may sublease space to smoke shops through separate LLCs, and that this needs a separate bill.
  • Agency reports (14:55-16:45): Law approved form and legal sufficiency and both amendments; Finance expects no financial impact; Transportation, Housing and Community Development, the Mayor's office for BDC, and the Parking Authority all supported the bill; the Board of Municipal & Zoning Appeals was favorable with its amendment and had no objection to the other. The Planning Commission voted Oct 8 to approve with both amendments.
  • Vote (16:50-20:29): no public testimony. Both amendments passed by voice vote. The bill was moved favorable with amendments on a roll call: five in favor (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter), two absent. It goes to the full council Monday, where Dorsey intends a double reading to move it quickly.

Based on auto-generated captions; names, figures and spellings may be misheard.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate):

Topic Minutes Share
Grocery store zoning (26-0220) 20 100%

Issues discussed: Grocery store zoning (26-0220)

Agenda

Bill 26-0220 on zoning for grocery stores.

Official Minutes

Draft minutes of the Land Use & Transportation Committee, Wednesday, October 14, 2026, 3:30 PM (Du Burns Council Chamber and Webex).

  • Attendance: present 5 (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter); excused 2 (Gray, Blanchard).
  • One item: Grocery store zoning (26-0220), Zoning - Grocery Stores. Sponsors listed: Dorsey, Torrence, Middleton, Gray, Bullock, Porter, Blanchard, Jones, Glover, Ramos, Cohen.
  • Motion by Dorsey: Recommended Favorably with Amendment. Carried, Yes 5 (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter). No absences are listed in the vote block, although two members were excused.
  • Minutes and captions: the minutes do not list the two amendments or the voice votes on them, which the video shows; the minutes also record Parker as present, while the captions show him joining during the sponsors' presentation.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:04Hey everybody,

00:07it is October 14th, believe it or not,

00:102026, 3:30ish

00:13p.m. Um,

00:16this is the land use and transportation

00:18committee of the Baltimore City Council.

00:19My name is Ryan Dorsy. I'm the chair of

00:21this committee. Uh, I am joined here

00:23today by vice chair of the committee,

00:26vice president of the city council,

00:27Sharon Green Middleton.

00:28>> Thank you, Mr. Chair

00:30>> to my far right, Councilman John

00:31Bullock.

00:32>> Thank you, Mr. Chair.

00:32>> To his left, Councilwoman Felicia

00:34Porter.

00:35>> Thank you, Mr. Chair.

00:36>> And we are joined here by committee

00:38staffer, Julianne Jamont today. Hello.

00:39How are you doing?

00:40>> Good. How are you?

00:41>> She's well, good. I love it. Um, we have

00:43representatives from the mayor's office

00:45and a whole bunch of city agencies. We

00:47only have one bill uh on our docket here

00:50today, zoning grocery stores, council

00:52bill 260220.

00:55Uh I am a co-lead sponsor of this bill

00:57with Councilman James Torrance who is

00:59here with us. Um he and I will uh take a

01:02few minutes to just present the bill to

01:03the committee. Um I am going to uh hand

01:06it over to Councilwoman Middleton uh to

01:10take the chair as uh I step up to the

01:13podium and uh have Councilman Torrance

01:16kick us off here.

01:24Oh, now you spin up here.

01:26>> Hello there. Before we uh proceed, just

01:29want to uh repeat this is bill number

01:322622,

01:34zoning grocery stores.

01:37Um sponsor, council member Ryan Dorsy,

01:40District 3, and Council Member James

01:43Torrance, District 7. And the purpose is

01:48for establishing retail grocery store as

01:51a zoning use, exempting a grocery store

01:55from certain parking maximums, and

01:58defining a certain [clears throat] term

02:00and making conforming changes.

02:04And we're going to start off by the

02:07introduction with uh Council Member

02:11Torrance of the seventh district.

02:14Thank you, Madam Chair. I'll be very

02:16brief and to the point. This is about

02:18creating equity within our city. Um, one

02:20of the hardest parts about serving red

02:22line communities in West Baltimore,

02:24North Baltimore, Southwest Baltimore,

02:26Central Baltimore is realizing that um,

02:29redlinining has gone beyond just the

02:31government sector. It's gone down to

02:32banking as well. One of the things that

02:34is in the way of attracting grocery

02:37stores when we think about the math is

02:38not only the unemployment rate within

02:40the mile radius, the average income. In

02:42addition to that, whether or not the

02:43zoning is right for the neighborhood as

02:45well. In addition to that, also looking

02:47at what is the easiest way to get a

02:49truck route. Um, these are all things

02:51that both can and can't be controlled.

02:54One of the things that we can control as

02:56government is zoning to make sure that

02:57we are creating an opportunity for them

02:59to easily get into a neighborhood. But

03:02to give you an idea, even in my own

03:03district, we had to do a lot of economic

03:06development on North Avenue just to

03:08attract a grocery store. At one time

03:10when I first started in office just in

03:12Pen North, the unemployment rate for

03:13black men was 13%. That unemployment

03:16rate had to be lowered to around 5% just

03:18to attract a grocery store. Just to give

03:20you an idea, that is what we're dealing

03:21with. We proved the point with working

03:23with Live Baltimore in terms of

03:25attracting black residents to West

03:26Baltimore directly, marketing to them.

03:29They took us up on it and they pro

03:30proved positive that we can attract

03:32middle-ass black incomes to the

03:33neighborhoods and that raised the

03:34average income. They give you ideas for

03:36some neighborhoods in order to attract

03:38just a simple Aldi, you need $50,000 as

03:41the average income in the neighborhood

03:43or to attract another grocery store like

03:45a give you an idea of a Trader Joe's

03:47$80,000 or Whole Foods around $100,000

03:50along with Wegman's. These are the

03:52things that we have to think about even

03:53just in quality, but also making sure

03:55that our communities can get what they

03:57need. Um, happy to partner with

03:59Councilman Dorsy to remove the minimums.

04:01we're addressing through an amendment,

04:03the 5,000 foot um that planning

04:05commission has alerted us to, but also

04:07realizing that this is about doing

04:09something that is right, but also

04:11getting out the way and defining in the

04:12zoning code what a grocery store is. So,

04:14I'll yield to my colleague.

04:22>> Hi, thank you. Um it's

04:25um I'm like a technical nerd on land use

04:28stuff and formbbased code stuff. So it's

04:31good to have a partner in Councilman

04:32Torrance who uh has sort of the boots on

04:35the ground experience of the actual

04:38impact of uh legislative need and

04:41legislative intent and change. Um

04:44uh I represent a district that doesn't

04:47have 13% unemployment, right? We have

04:50like 80% owner occupied households that

04:53and we have above average income uh per

04:56household. We have very high rates of co

04:59car ownership and all these things uh

05:01equate to something that grocery stores

05:03go. That's a good place for us to be.

05:05Let's be there. And as a result, I have

05:07a district where at the south end of my

05:09district, I have a Safeway and at the

05:11north end of my district, I have a

05:12Giant. And at the uh the northwest

05:16corner of my district, just outside of

05:18the city line, is uh is a a stop uh what

05:22do you call it? A save a lot um or

05:24shoppers rather. Um and and then in

05:27between we have an independent grocery

05:28store, Harvest Fair, and we have uh two

05:31African grocery stores and an Italian

05:33import

05:35um a fish market and and the LLE um you

05:39know, also on the west side of my

05:41district. So just like we have this like

05:43abundance of grocery stores and um

05:47despite this you know every you know

05:49half of my colleagues on the council for

05:51the last decade that I've been on the

05:53council have had uh difficulty with the

05:55lack of grocery stores in their

05:57districts and uh one thing that has been

06:00a common uh issue in how we are able to

06:05approach

06:07the need for grocery stores is the total

06:09absence of even a basic definition of a

06:12grocery store as a land use type in the

06:15zoning code. And so uh you know it just

06:18seems

06:20uh so obvious that you can't address the

06:24zoning related matters uh associated

06:26with a particular type of land use if

06:29you don't even define that land use in

06:31your zoning code. And so this bill takes

06:34the most basic step forward here of just

06:37defining grocery store and then by

06:41defining it separating it from all other

06:45generically enrolled forms of

06:50retail goods establishment. By

06:52separating grocery store, we can have

06:53different land use parameters around it,

06:57separate and different from um from all

07:00other retail good establishments. And so

07:02that's all this that this bill

07:04essentially does is defines grocery

07:06store and then does not strap it with

07:08the same off- streetet parking maximum

07:12requirement or limitation rather that

07:14other retail goods establishments have.

07:17Um that's it. It defines the use and

07:20then deliberately omits it from one

07:24particular table. There are two

07:26amendments in the committee's packet

07:28today. Uh one was noted by uh the BMZA

07:34and one was noted by planning commission

07:37uh members. The one removes a footnote.

07:40The one noted by BMJ removes a footnote

07:44um because retail goods establishments

07:47in transit oriented development areas

07:50are generally limited to not being more

07:52than 5,000 square feet. And I think the

07:54idea behind that is generally in to you

07:57want to pack in as many small uses as

07:59you can and have a lot of reasons for

08:01people to come to that area. And so you

08:03don't want big sprawling kind of big box

08:05kind of stores and things like that

08:06taking up your TOD zones. Um but we

08:10don't want that 5,000 square foot

08:12maximum applied to grocery stores.

08:16Um the other amendment noted by planning

08:19commission is we don't want people

08:22shoehorning in the idea of a grocery

08:25store uh that's some extremely small

08:28thing that's more like a corner store um

08:31just so that they can have a sprawling

08:34parking lot um without any limitations

08:37on the parking lot. So it's actually

08:39more important that we have a minimum

08:41square footage in this. So the one

08:43definition removes the 5,000 ft maximum

08:46and the other uh the other amendment

08:48rather uh creates a 5,000 ft minimum. Um

08:52for reference um corner stores if

08:55they're like an individual like a single

08:58um row home width they're generally

09:01about a th00and square ft for the store.

09:03If it's a double row home with uh corner

09:07store, it's about 2,000 square feet

09:09versus uh a Lidle or an Aldi or a Mom's

09:14or in Charles Village uh the Eddy's.

09:17These smaller scale uh grocery stores

09:21that are not your Safeway Giant or these

09:24really big supermarkets. These smaller

09:26grocery stores tend to be about 10 to 12

09:28to 12,000 square ft. And so 5,000 square

09:32feet as a minimum uh square footage uh a

09:35minimum floor area uh for the use uh

09:39seems reasonable in making sure that

09:41we're uh defining grocery store

09:43appropriately. And so that's what this

09:45bill does.

09:48>> Just

09:48>> any questions for me or Councilman

09:50Torrance?

09:50>> Um I have a I guess an interesting

09:54question. I I wish this bill had came

09:57along a little bit earlier. I um I have

10:01a grocery store in my district that half

10:04basically half the grocery store is uh

10:08smoke shop, tobacco smoke shop

10:11and um sprung up there unexpectedly, you

10:17know, approved without my knowledge or

10:20the community knowledge and um has just

10:24been causing havoc because, you know,

10:27here we had

10:29It took the time to get a healthy food

10:31store and then um I guess the money

10:35wasn't coming in fast enough and they

10:38figured out that they could make money

10:40by adding a smoke shop and this is like

10:43in the heart of Park Heights on Cole

10:46Spring and um of course it's created

10:51even more um illegal activity in that

10:55entire perimeter. I don't know how this

10:59I know the definition is probably going

11:02to help but any comments on that.

11:05>> Yeah. So, Madam Vice President, I think

11:07the definition will help. The reason why

11:09the definition is intentional. It looks

11:11at industry standards. Um uh I make it

11:14easier. It's easier to be visual. So, if

11:16we're walking into a grocery store, you

11:18see two things. Normally, you see the

11:20perishable like fresh fruits and

11:22vegetables in one section. And then you

11:24count the multiple aisles to the right

11:26of you normally, which is probably the

11:28dry goods as well as the potato chips,

11:31the soda, and everything else. The money

11:33is there. Everything else is small

11:35margins, less than literally if I sell

11:38you an orange, I'm only making probably

11:3910 cents off the orange.

11:41>> Um, that is where the math for grocery

11:44stores come in handy. It's both a small

11:47margin portion. I have two actual I know

11:50actually the chain that is allowing

11:52this. Um hopefully this will address it

11:55in a way because it requires a certain

11:57amount of sales. Um but the other thing

12:00is they're probably leasing a small

12:02portion of their property to that person

12:04>> um to be a smoke shop. I think that's

12:06something that we should address in

12:08another bill because I'm now noticing

12:09the same issue and it's the same chain

12:12because those chains are as separate

12:13LLC's.

12:14>> Mhm. and I have two of them where they

12:16both have a smoke shop in there and

12:17they're making up the margins that way.

12:20>> Thank you for that added information.

12:22Any other members on the council have

12:25any questions for the sponsors?

12:28>> I'll just if I can just put a fine point

12:30on this. I think um Councilman Torrance

12:32and I both touched on this, but to put a

12:34real clear point on this uh as the

12:36essential purpose of this bill for

12:38anybody who watches this hearing video

12:42in the future, um

12:45grocery stores are just different from

12:49other business uses. Um I think I said

12:53this in the lunchon when uh the bill was

12:56introduced. It's like nobody there there

12:58there there's sort of an endless list of

13:02things that could exist in a

13:04neighborhood that nobody would ever say

13:06this neighborhood is really incomplete

13:09because it doesn't have

13:11a shoe repair place. Nobody ever says

13:14this neighborhood is incomplete because

13:16we don't have a tax repairer in it.

13:18Right? But for decades, we've gone like,

13:21what do we need to do to bring a grocery

13:24store to this neighborhood? Because we

13:25consider that an essential part of a

13:27neighborhood. And so, while parking

13:30maximums in general are a reasonable

13:33policy to have in place and we've had it

13:36in place for um a long time without any

13:40real problems associated with it.

13:43Grocery stores are the unique use for

13:46which a parking maximum presents a a

13:50repeated impediment to being able to

13:52land that use in a neighborhood that

13:55needs it in order to thrive and be

13:58attractive and be complete and healthy.

14:01And so we would just want to get out of,

14:03you know, restricting this because we

14:05just know that the economics associated

14:07with grocery stores and what uh

14:09particularly chain grocery stores look

14:12for when looking to site a grocery store

14:14anywhere. It includes uh sort of an

14:17exceptional volume of parking

14:20>> and it's one of the hardest businesses

14:22of all the businesses to maintain and

14:25keep and that's probably part of the

14:27shortage. Thank you both for uh

14:30introducing this

14:32and with no further questions to you.

14:34>> Cool. Thank you.

14:35>> We'll move to the next phase.

14:45>> I don't know if you want to comment on

14:48on that piece I said.

14:52>> Um okay. So, thank you, Madam Chair. Um,

14:55we will go to the agency bill reports.

14:58Law department.

15:00>> The law department approves the bill for

15:02form and legal sufficiency as well as

15:04both amendments that were

15:06[clears throat] proposed.

15:07>> Thank you. Um, Department of Finance,

15:10>> Gabriel Stewart here for the Department

15:13of Finance. Uh, we've re reviewed the

15:15report as well as the amendments. Uh, we

15:17do not anticipate a financial impact

15:18from this legislation.

15:20>> Great. Thank you. Uh, do

15:24Barzectic for DOT. Uh we stand by our

15:27report, Mr. Chair.

15:28>> Thank you. Um DHCD.

15:32>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Jason Wright

15:34representing DHCD. We respectfully stand

15:36behind our favorable bill report.

15:39>> Thank you. Uh BDC.

15:43>> Good afternoon, Mr. Chair. Trey Hayes

15:44here from the mayor's office. Uh BDC

15:46stands by their uh favorable bill

15:48report. Thank you.

15:50>> Thank you. We did not refer the bill to

15:53parking authority, but I take it parking

15:55authority has a something to say.

15:57>> Fran Bernzinski with the parking

15:59authority. We have favorable

16:01recommendation for this bill.

16:02>> Thank you, Fran. Um

16:06and and then I'll go to BMCA and then

16:08we'll do planning commission. BMCA.

16:11>> Hey, good afternoon chair. Um Sunny

16:14Boyce for BMZA. Uh we stand by our

16:16favorable with amendment as you

16:19described and uh we also have no

16:21objection to the um other amendment

16:23proposed. Thank you.

16:25>> Great. Thank you. And planning

16:26commission.

16:28>> Uh good afternoon. Emily Mosbball with

16:30the planning commission. Um on October

16:348th following the presentation of staff

16:35report, the planning commission voted

16:37for it to be approved um with both of

16:39the amendments described by Councilman

16:40Dorsy included.

16:42>> Great. Thank you. Um,

16:46committee members, uh, have you all seen

16:49the, uh, sorry, um, Councilman Parker,

16:51thank you for joining us.

16:53>> Councilman Parker, uh, came in while

16:55Councilman Torrance and I were standing

16:57up at the podium. Um,

17:00uh,

17:02committee members, have you seen the

17:04amendments in the packet? They are

17:06immediately following the bill in the

17:09packet. Um the first one is labeled

17:12Dorsy 114 oct 26

17:16and uh it is the one that uh we

17:21mentioned um that adds to the

17:24definition. So the definition centers

17:26generally around uh the grocery store

17:29dedicating at least a certain portion of

17:31its space to um seafood, meats, produce

17:36and other food goods. and that uh the a

17:41substantial portion of the receipts um

17:44uh sales are from those things. This

17:47just adds one other parameter to the

17:49definition saying that the a grocery

17:51store by definition has a floor area

17:54size of 5,000 square ft or greater. Uh

17:58the second one from BMZA on page five

18:00and line 16 on columns two and four in

18:02each instance strike the um the footnote

18:07two which is that uh the opposite

18:11limiting grocery stores to only 5,000

18:14square ft in to areas. So getting rid of

18:17that limitation. Um

18:20I don't see anybody here to testify from

18:24the public. Are there any

18:26just there's nobody here to testify on

18:29this bill. Um and I don't think that we

18:31have anybody online to testify either.

18:34Um

18:37any questions for any agencies uh from

18:40the committee.

18:45Okay. Uh, with that I will

18:50move the Dorsy amendment.

18:54Um, all in favorable in favor of this

18:58amendment say I.

19:00>> I.

19:00>> Oppose say nay.

19:02>> Abstain. Great. This amendment will uh

19:06is voted favorable. Uh, I will now move

19:08the BMZA amendment. Uh, all in favor of

19:12this amendment say I. I. Opposed say

19:15nay. abstain. Okay, this amendment also

19:19is voted favorable. Um I will move the

19:23bill favorable with amendments.

19:27Um and we'll just do a roll call. How

19:29about that? Um the chair votes I. Vice

19:34Chair Middleton

19:35>> I.

19:35>> Councilman Parker

19:37>> I.

19:37>> Councilman Bullock

19:38>> I.

19:39>> Councilwoman Porter

19:40>> I.

19:41>> This bill is voted favorable. Uh we have

19:44five in the affirmative and two absent.

19:47Um and I will note Councilman Blanchard

19:50has a sick three-year-old at home with

19:52104 temperature and Councilman Gray is

19:55at the local progress uh annual con no a

19:59conference with local progress. Um so

20:01out

20:03doing their respective duties. Uh thank

20:05you for um the committee members here

20:08today. Thank you to all the agency staff

20:11for being here. Uh this will bill will

20:13be recommended favorable with amendments

20:15to the council uh at its next meeting on

20:18Monday where I believe we will intend to

20:21double read the bill so that we can move

20:23this along uh as quickly as possible.

20:27We are finished here today. Thank you

20:29everybody.