2026-10-14 - Land Use & Transportation Committee
Summary
Built from the official minutes (draft) and the auto-generated captions of the video; where they differ, the minutes' record is used for attendance and votes.
- Official minutes (draft): five members present (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter); Gray and Blanchard excused.
- Motion by Dorsey that Bill 26-0220 be Recommended Favorably with Amendment carried 5 to 0 (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter).
- Wednesday, October 14, 2026, Land Use & Transportation Committee, Du Burns Council Chamber (3:30 PM agenda).
- Recording runs 0:04 to about 20:29 and ends as the chair adjourns; no recesses, closed sessions or gaps.
- One bill was on the docket.
Grocery store zoning (26-0220)
0:04-20:29
- Opening (0:04-1:24): Chair Dorsey opened with Vice Chair Middleton, Bullock and Porter present; Parker joined during the sponsors' presentation. Blanchard and Gray were absent. Dorsey and Torrence are co-lead sponsors; Middleton took the chair while they presented.
- Sponsors (1:24-14:35): the bill makes retail grocery store its own zoning use, exempts it from off-street parking maximums and defines the term. Torrence framed it as equity for historically redlined neighborhoods, citing the income and unemployment thresholds chains look for. Dorsey said grocery stores have no definition in the zoning code, so they cannot be treated differently from other retail, and that parking maximums have repeatedly blocked grocery stores in neighborhoods that need them.
- Amendments: one from the Board of Municipal & Zoning Appeals strikes a footnote limiting retail (and so grocery stores) to 5,000 square feet in transit-oriented areas. One from the Planning Commission adds a 5,000 square foot minimum floor area to the definition, so a corner store cannot qualify and escape the parking limits (corner stores run roughly 1,000 to 2,000 square feet; small chain grocers 10,000 to 12,000).
- Smoke shops (9:50-12:20): Middleton said a grocery store in her district is half smoke shop and is tied to crime near Park Heights. Torrence said the definition's sales and perishables test should help, that chains may sublease space to smoke shops through separate LLCs, and that this needs a separate bill.
- Agency reports (14:55-16:45): Law approved form and legal sufficiency and both amendments; Finance expects no financial impact; Transportation, Housing and Community Development, the Mayor's office for BDC, and the Parking Authority all supported the bill; the Board of Municipal & Zoning Appeals was favorable with its amendment and had no objection to the other. The Planning Commission voted Oct 8 to approve with both amendments.
- Vote (16:50-20:29): no public testimony. Both amendments passed by voice vote. The bill was moved favorable with amendments on a roll call: five in favor (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter), two absent. It goes to the full council Monday, where Dorsey intends a double reading to move it quickly.
Based on auto-generated captions; names, figures and spellings may be misheard.
Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate):
| Topic | Minutes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Grocery store zoning (26-0220) | 20 | 100% |
Issues discussed: Grocery store zoning (26-0220)
Agenda
Bill 26-0220 on zoning for grocery stores.
Official Minutes
Draft minutes of the Land Use & Transportation Committee, Wednesday, October 14, 2026, 3:30 PM (Du Burns Council Chamber and Webex).
- Attendance: present 5 (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter); excused 2 (Gray, Blanchard).
- One item: Grocery store zoning (26-0220), Zoning - Grocery Stores. Sponsors listed: Dorsey, Torrence, Middleton, Gray, Bullock, Porter, Blanchard, Jones, Glover, Ramos, Cohen.
- Motion by Dorsey: Recommended Favorably with Amendment. Carried, Yes 5 (Dorsey, Middleton, Parker, Bullock, Porter). No absences are listed in the vote block, although two members were excused.
- Minutes and captions: the minutes do not list the two amendments or the voice votes on them, which the video shows; the minutes also record Parker as present, while the captions show him joining during the sponsors' presentation.
Sources
- Minutes (draft): https://baltimore.legistar1.com/baltimore/meetings/2026/10/5394_M_Land_Use___Transportation_Committee_26-10-14_Meeting_Minutes.pdf
- Video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8ivDG3qQfEM
- Agenda: https://baltimore.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=1443751&GUID=5E62B5A0-4AA8-453F-907D-37567AECEECE&Options=info|&Search=
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:04Hey everybody,
00:07it is October 14th, believe it or not,
00:102026, 3:30ish
00:13p.m. Um,
00:16this is the land use and transportation
00:18committee of the Baltimore City Council.
00:19My name is Ryan Dorsy. I'm the chair of
00:21this committee. Uh, I am joined here
00:23today by vice chair of the committee,
00:26vice president of the city council,
00:27Sharon Green Middleton.
00:28>> Thank you, Mr. Chair
00:30>> to my far right, Councilman John
00:31Bullock.
00:32>> Thank you, Mr. Chair.
00:32>> To his left, Councilwoman Felicia
00:34Porter.
00:35>> Thank you, Mr. Chair.
00:36>> And we are joined here by committee
00:38staffer, Julianne Jamont today. Hello.
00:39How are you doing?
00:40>> Good. How are you?
00:41>> She's well, good. I love it. Um, we have
00:43representatives from the mayor's office
00:45and a whole bunch of city agencies. We
00:47only have one bill uh on our docket here
00:50today, zoning grocery stores, council
00:52bill 260220.
00:55Uh I am a co-lead sponsor of this bill
00:57with Councilman James Torrance who is
00:59here with us. Um he and I will uh take a
01:02few minutes to just present the bill to
01:03the committee. Um I am going to uh hand
01:06it over to Councilwoman Middleton uh to
01:10take the chair as uh I step up to the
01:13podium and uh have Councilman Torrance
01:16kick us off here.
01:24Oh, now you spin up here.
01:26>> Hello there. Before we uh proceed, just
01:29want to uh repeat this is bill number
01:322622,
01:34zoning grocery stores.
01:37Um sponsor, council member Ryan Dorsy,
01:40District 3, and Council Member James
01:43Torrance, District 7. And the purpose is
01:48for establishing retail grocery store as
01:51a zoning use, exempting a grocery store
01:55from certain parking maximums, and
01:58defining a certain [clears throat] term
02:00and making conforming changes.
02:04And we're going to start off by the
02:07introduction with uh Council Member
02:11Torrance of the seventh district.
02:14Thank you, Madam Chair. I'll be very
02:16brief and to the point. This is about
02:18creating equity within our city. Um, one
02:20of the hardest parts about serving red
02:22line communities in West Baltimore,
02:24North Baltimore, Southwest Baltimore,
02:26Central Baltimore is realizing that um,
02:29redlinining has gone beyond just the
02:31government sector. It's gone down to
02:32banking as well. One of the things that
02:34is in the way of attracting grocery
02:37stores when we think about the math is
02:38not only the unemployment rate within
02:40the mile radius, the average income. In
02:42addition to that, whether or not the
02:43zoning is right for the neighborhood as
02:45well. In addition to that, also looking
02:47at what is the easiest way to get a
02:49truck route. Um, these are all things
02:51that both can and can't be controlled.
02:54One of the things that we can control as
02:56government is zoning to make sure that
02:57we are creating an opportunity for them
02:59to easily get into a neighborhood. But
03:02to give you an idea, even in my own
03:03district, we had to do a lot of economic
03:06development on North Avenue just to
03:08attract a grocery store. At one time
03:10when I first started in office just in
03:12Pen North, the unemployment rate for
03:13black men was 13%. That unemployment
03:16rate had to be lowered to around 5% just
03:18to attract a grocery store. Just to give
03:20you an idea, that is what we're dealing
03:21with. We proved the point with working
03:23with Live Baltimore in terms of
03:25attracting black residents to West
03:26Baltimore directly, marketing to them.
03:29They took us up on it and they pro
03:30proved positive that we can attract
03:32middle-ass black incomes to the
03:33neighborhoods and that raised the
03:34average income. They give you ideas for
03:36some neighborhoods in order to attract
03:38just a simple Aldi, you need $50,000 as
03:41the average income in the neighborhood
03:43or to attract another grocery store like
03:45a give you an idea of a Trader Joe's
03:47$80,000 or Whole Foods around $100,000
03:50along with Wegman's. These are the
03:52things that we have to think about even
03:53just in quality, but also making sure
03:55that our communities can get what they
03:57need. Um, happy to partner with
03:59Councilman Dorsy to remove the minimums.
04:01we're addressing through an amendment,
04:03the 5,000 foot um that planning
04:05commission has alerted us to, but also
04:07realizing that this is about doing
04:09something that is right, but also
04:11getting out the way and defining in the
04:12zoning code what a grocery store is. So,
04:14I'll yield to my colleague.
04:22>> Hi, thank you. Um it's
04:25um I'm like a technical nerd on land use
04:28stuff and formbbased code stuff. So it's
04:31good to have a partner in Councilman
04:32Torrance who uh has sort of the boots on
04:35the ground experience of the actual
04:38impact of uh legislative need and
04:41legislative intent and change. Um
04:44uh I represent a district that doesn't
04:47have 13% unemployment, right? We have
04:50like 80% owner occupied households that
04:53and we have above average income uh per
04:56household. We have very high rates of co
04:59car ownership and all these things uh
05:01equate to something that grocery stores
05:03go. That's a good place for us to be.
05:05Let's be there. And as a result, I have
05:07a district where at the south end of my
05:09district, I have a Safeway and at the
05:11north end of my district, I have a
05:12Giant. And at the uh the northwest
05:16corner of my district, just outside of
05:18the city line, is uh is a a stop uh what
05:22do you call it? A save a lot um or
05:24shoppers rather. Um and and then in
05:27between we have an independent grocery
05:28store, Harvest Fair, and we have uh two
05:31African grocery stores and an Italian
05:33import
05:35um a fish market and and the LLE um you
05:39know, also on the west side of my
05:41district. So just like we have this like
05:43abundance of grocery stores and um
05:47despite this you know every you know
05:49half of my colleagues on the council for
05:51the last decade that I've been on the
05:53council have had uh difficulty with the
05:55lack of grocery stores in their
05:57districts and uh one thing that has been
06:00a common uh issue in how we are able to
06:05approach
06:07the need for grocery stores is the total
06:09absence of even a basic definition of a
06:12grocery store as a land use type in the
06:15zoning code. And so uh you know it just
06:18seems
06:20uh so obvious that you can't address the
06:24zoning related matters uh associated
06:26with a particular type of land use if
06:29you don't even define that land use in
06:31your zoning code. And so this bill takes
06:34the most basic step forward here of just
06:37defining grocery store and then by
06:41defining it separating it from all other
06:45generically enrolled forms of
06:50retail goods establishment. By
06:52separating grocery store, we can have
06:53different land use parameters around it,
06:57separate and different from um from all
07:00other retail good establishments. And so
07:02that's all this that this bill
07:04essentially does is defines grocery
07:06store and then does not strap it with
07:08the same off- streetet parking maximum
07:12requirement or limitation rather that
07:14other retail goods establishments have.
07:17Um that's it. It defines the use and
07:20then deliberately omits it from one
07:24particular table. There are two
07:26amendments in the committee's packet
07:28today. Uh one was noted by uh the BMZA
07:34and one was noted by planning commission
07:37uh members. The one removes a footnote.
07:40The one noted by BMJ removes a footnote
07:44um because retail goods establishments
07:47in transit oriented development areas
07:50are generally limited to not being more
07:52than 5,000 square feet. And I think the
07:54idea behind that is generally in to you
07:57want to pack in as many small uses as
07:59you can and have a lot of reasons for
08:01people to come to that area. And so you
08:03don't want big sprawling kind of big box
08:05kind of stores and things like that
08:06taking up your TOD zones. Um but we
08:10don't want that 5,000 square foot
08:12maximum applied to grocery stores.
08:16Um the other amendment noted by planning
08:19commission is we don't want people
08:22shoehorning in the idea of a grocery
08:25store uh that's some extremely small
08:28thing that's more like a corner store um
08:31just so that they can have a sprawling
08:34parking lot um without any limitations
08:37on the parking lot. So it's actually
08:39more important that we have a minimum
08:41square footage in this. So the one
08:43definition removes the 5,000 ft maximum
08:46and the other uh the other amendment
08:48rather uh creates a 5,000 ft minimum. Um
08:52for reference um corner stores if
08:55they're like an individual like a single
08:58um row home width they're generally
09:01about a th00and square ft for the store.
09:03If it's a double row home with uh corner
09:07store, it's about 2,000 square feet
09:09versus uh a Lidle or an Aldi or a Mom's
09:14or in Charles Village uh the Eddy's.
09:17These smaller scale uh grocery stores
09:21that are not your Safeway Giant or these
09:24really big supermarkets. These smaller
09:26grocery stores tend to be about 10 to 12
09:28to 12,000 square ft. And so 5,000 square
09:32feet as a minimum uh square footage uh a
09:35minimum floor area uh for the use uh
09:39seems reasonable in making sure that
09:41we're uh defining grocery store
09:43appropriately. And so that's what this
09:45bill does.
09:48>> Just
09:48>> any questions for me or Councilman
09:50Torrance?
09:50>> Um I have a I guess an interesting
09:54question. I I wish this bill had came
09:57along a little bit earlier. I um I have
10:01a grocery store in my district that half
10:04basically half the grocery store is uh
10:08smoke shop, tobacco smoke shop
10:11and um sprung up there unexpectedly, you
10:17know, approved without my knowledge or
10:20the community knowledge and um has just
10:24been causing havoc because, you know,
10:27here we had
10:29It took the time to get a healthy food
10:31store and then um I guess the money
10:35wasn't coming in fast enough and they
10:38figured out that they could make money
10:40by adding a smoke shop and this is like
10:43in the heart of Park Heights on Cole
10:46Spring and um of course it's created
10:51even more um illegal activity in that
10:55entire perimeter. I don't know how this
10:59I know the definition is probably going
11:02to help but any comments on that.
11:05>> Yeah. So, Madam Vice President, I think
11:07the definition will help. The reason why
11:09the definition is intentional. It looks
11:11at industry standards. Um uh I make it
11:14easier. It's easier to be visual. So, if
11:16we're walking into a grocery store, you
11:18see two things. Normally, you see the
11:20perishable like fresh fruits and
11:22vegetables in one section. And then you
11:24count the multiple aisles to the right
11:26of you normally, which is probably the
11:28dry goods as well as the potato chips,
11:31the soda, and everything else. The money
11:33is there. Everything else is small
11:35margins, less than literally if I sell
11:38you an orange, I'm only making probably
11:3910 cents off the orange.
11:41>> Um, that is where the math for grocery
11:44stores come in handy. It's both a small
11:47margin portion. I have two actual I know
11:50actually the chain that is allowing
11:52this. Um hopefully this will address it
11:55in a way because it requires a certain
11:57amount of sales. Um but the other thing
12:00is they're probably leasing a small
12:02portion of their property to that person
12:04>> um to be a smoke shop. I think that's
12:06something that we should address in
12:08another bill because I'm now noticing
12:09the same issue and it's the same chain
12:12because those chains are as separate
12:13LLC's.
12:14>> Mhm. and I have two of them where they
12:16both have a smoke shop in there and
12:17they're making up the margins that way.
12:20>> Thank you for that added information.
12:22Any other members on the council have
12:25any questions for the sponsors?
12:28>> I'll just if I can just put a fine point
12:30on this. I think um Councilman Torrance
12:32and I both touched on this, but to put a
12:34real clear point on this uh as the
12:36essential purpose of this bill for
12:38anybody who watches this hearing video
12:42in the future, um
12:45grocery stores are just different from
12:49other business uses. Um I think I said
12:53this in the lunchon when uh the bill was
12:56introduced. It's like nobody there there
12:58there there's sort of an endless list of
13:02things that could exist in a
13:04neighborhood that nobody would ever say
13:06this neighborhood is really incomplete
13:09because it doesn't have
13:11a shoe repair place. Nobody ever says
13:14this neighborhood is incomplete because
13:16we don't have a tax repairer in it.
13:18Right? But for decades, we've gone like,
13:21what do we need to do to bring a grocery
13:24store to this neighborhood? Because we
13:25consider that an essential part of a
13:27neighborhood. And so, while parking
13:30maximums in general are a reasonable
13:33policy to have in place and we've had it
13:36in place for um a long time without any
13:40real problems associated with it.
13:43Grocery stores are the unique use for
13:46which a parking maximum presents a a
13:50repeated impediment to being able to
13:52land that use in a neighborhood that
13:55needs it in order to thrive and be
13:58attractive and be complete and healthy.
14:01And so we would just want to get out of,
14:03you know, restricting this because we
14:05just know that the economics associated
14:07with grocery stores and what uh
14:09particularly chain grocery stores look
14:12for when looking to site a grocery store
14:14anywhere. It includes uh sort of an
14:17exceptional volume of parking
14:20>> and it's one of the hardest businesses
14:22of all the businesses to maintain and
14:25keep and that's probably part of the
14:27shortage. Thank you both for uh
14:30introducing this
14:32and with no further questions to you.
14:34>> Cool. Thank you.
14:35>> We'll move to the next phase.
14:45>> I don't know if you want to comment on
14:48on that piece I said.
14:52>> Um okay. So, thank you, Madam Chair. Um,
14:55we will go to the agency bill reports.
14:58Law department.
15:00>> The law department approves the bill for
15:02form and legal sufficiency as well as
15:04both amendments that were
15:06[clears throat] proposed.
15:07>> Thank you. Um, Department of Finance,
15:10>> Gabriel Stewart here for the Department
15:13of Finance. Uh, we've re reviewed the
15:15report as well as the amendments. Uh, we
15:17do not anticipate a financial impact
15:18from this legislation.
15:20>> Great. Thank you. Uh, do
15:24Barzectic for DOT. Uh we stand by our
15:27report, Mr. Chair.
15:28>> Thank you. Um DHCD.
15:32>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Jason Wright
15:34representing DHCD. We respectfully stand
15:36behind our favorable bill report.
15:39>> Thank you. Uh BDC.
15:43>> Good afternoon, Mr. Chair. Trey Hayes
15:44here from the mayor's office. Uh BDC
15:46stands by their uh favorable bill
15:48report. Thank you.
15:50>> Thank you. We did not refer the bill to
15:53parking authority, but I take it parking
15:55authority has a something to say.
15:57>> Fran Bernzinski with the parking
15:59authority. We have favorable
16:01recommendation for this bill.
16:02>> Thank you, Fran. Um
16:06and and then I'll go to BMCA and then
16:08we'll do planning commission. BMCA.
16:11>> Hey, good afternoon chair. Um Sunny
16:14Boyce for BMZA. Uh we stand by our
16:16favorable with amendment as you
16:19described and uh we also have no
16:21objection to the um other amendment
16:23proposed. Thank you.
16:25>> Great. Thank you. And planning
16:26commission.
16:28>> Uh good afternoon. Emily Mosbball with
16:30the planning commission. Um on October
16:348th following the presentation of staff
16:35report, the planning commission voted
16:37for it to be approved um with both of
16:39the amendments described by Councilman
16:40Dorsy included.
16:42>> Great. Thank you. Um,
16:46committee members, uh, have you all seen
16:49the, uh, sorry, um, Councilman Parker,
16:51thank you for joining us.
16:53>> Councilman Parker, uh, came in while
16:55Councilman Torrance and I were standing
16:57up at the podium. Um,
17:00uh,
17:02committee members, have you seen the
17:04amendments in the packet? They are
17:06immediately following the bill in the
17:09packet. Um the first one is labeled
17:12Dorsy 114 oct 26
17:16and uh it is the one that uh we
17:21mentioned um that adds to the
17:24definition. So the definition centers
17:26generally around uh the grocery store
17:29dedicating at least a certain portion of
17:31its space to um seafood, meats, produce
17:36and other food goods. and that uh the a
17:41substantial portion of the receipts um
17:44uh sales are from those things. This
17:47just adds one other parameter to the
17:49definition saying that the a grocery
17:51store by definition has a floor area
17:54size of 5,000 square ft or greater. Uh
17:58the second one from BMZA on page five
18:00and line 16 on columns two and four in
18:02each instance strike the um the footnote
18:07two which is that uh the opposite
18:11limiting grocery stores to only 5,000
18:14square ft in to areas. So getting rid of
18:17that limitation. Um
18:20I don't see anybody here to testify from
18:24the public. Are there any
18:26just there's nobody here to testify on
18:29this bill. Um and I don't think that we
18:31have anybody online to testify either.
18:34Um
18:37any questions for any agencies uh from
18:40the committee.
18:45Okay. Uh, with that I will
18:50move the Dorsy amendment.
18:54Um, all in favorable in favor of this
18:58amendment say I.
19:00>> I.
19:00>> Oppose say nay.
19:02>> Abstain. Great. This amendment will uh
19:06is voted favorable. Uh, I will now move
19:08the BMZA amendment. Uh, all in favor of
19:12this amendment say I. I. Opposed say
19:15nay. abstain. Okay, this amendment also
19:19is voted favorable. Um I will move the
19:23bill favorable with amendments.
19:27Um and we'll just do a roll call. How
19:29about that? Um the chair votes I. Vice
19:34Chair Middleton
19:35>> I.
19:35>> Councilman Parker
19:37>> I.
19:37>> Councilman Bullock
19:38>> I.
19:39>> Councilwoman Porter
19:40>> I.
19:41>> This bill is voted favorable. Uh we have
19:44five in the affirmative and two absent.
19:47Um and I will note Councilman Blanchard
19:50has a sick three-year-old at home with
19:52104 temperature and Councilman Gray is
19:55at the local progress uh annual con no a
19:59conference with local progress. Um so
20:01out
20:03doing their respective duties. Uh thank
20:05you for um the committee members here
20:08today. Thank you to all the agency staff
20:11for being here. Uh this will bill will
20:13be recommended favorable with amendments
20:15to the council uh at its next meeting on
20:18Monday where I believe we will intend to
20:21double read the bill so that we can move
20:23this along uh as quickly as possible.
20:27We are finished here today. Thank you
20:29everybody.