2026-10-21 - Board of Zoning Appeals

Summary

Built from the City's posted agenda and the YouTube auto-generated captions of the meeting video. No minutes are posted.

  • Roll call: three members present (one remotely), a quorum. The minutes of the October 5 special meeting were approved by voice vote. No old business.
  • One case, VAR26-086, at 124 Sheldon Avenue (R1A single-family district): a variance of 3 feet from the minimum front setback to replace an existing concrete front patio with a wider wooden patio. The house is vacant and being rehabilitated. Staff had no objection and recommended the standard condition that other changes comply with the zoning code or return for relief. The owner said the new patio would extend no farther from the house than the existing stoop and would be wider only to the sides, onto vacant ground.
  • The board amended the second finding of fact, replacing "dwelling" with "the patio structure immediately adjacent to the dwelling," because the patio, not the house, was the pre-existing nonconforming element. No correspondence was received and no one spoke at the public hearing; the owner said neighbors who asked about it were fine with it.
  • The findings of fact were accepted as amended, and the variance was granted with the standard condition, by voice vote. Appeals go to the Circuit Court of Monongalia County within 30 days, and work in that window is at the owner's risk.
  • Staff announced the regular November meeting will include the requests tabled at the October 5 special meeting. The meeting adjourned by voice vote.

See Board of Zoning Appeals Variance Cases Fall 2026.

Agenda

Agenda PDF posted; see Sources.

Sources

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:20and welcome to the regular meeting of

00:22the City of Morgantown Board of Zoning

00:24Appeals. Please turn off all cell phones

00:26or other devices that may disrupt these

00:28proceedings. It is the duty of this

00:31board

00:32to consider

00:35requests for relief from the

00:36requirements of the city's zoning

00:38regulations, to consider

00:40conditional use permits, and to hear

00:42administrative appeals. The board

00:44conducts business in the following

00:46order:

00:47review, amend, and approve minutes of a

00:50previous meeting.

00:52We will then move to unfinished

00:53business,

00:55take up new business, and then conclude

00:57with announcements from staff.

01:00Each request is heard in the order that

01:02it appears on the agenda. For each

01:03conditional use and variance request,

01:05the following is done.

01:07We will introduce the agenda item, and

01:09the planning division will present a

01:10staff report, which may or may not offer

01:13a recommendation.

01:14The applicant agent will be asked to

01:16present their justification for the

01:18request, which may include questions by

01:20members of the board.

01:22I will then open a public hearing to

01:24hear testimony in support of or in

01:27opposition to the request. Rules

01:29regarding public testimony are as

01:31follows.

01:32Anyone wishing to testify during the

01:34public hearing may do so. Once

01:37recognized by me, or may, in lieu of

01:40oral testimony, submit written testimony

01:43to the chair.

01:45All recognized speakers must approach

01:47the podium,

01:49state their name and address for the

01:51record, and speak clearly into the

01:53microphone.

01:54All comments must be addressed to the

01:56board, should be relevant to the

01:58application, and may not be of a

02:00personal nature or personal attacks.

02:03All speakers will be limited to 5

02:05minutes.

02:07If members of the board have any

02:08questions of the speaker, that time will

02:10not be counted toward his or her 5

02:12minutes.

02:13If there's a large number of speakers,

02:15including many who are part of groups or

02:17organizations,

02:19we may, to avoid repetitive comments,

02:22elect to ask for a representative to

02:24speak on behalf of the group or

02:25organization.

02:27Speakers are notified that irrelevant

02:30comments or comments of a personal

02:32nature or personal attacks may result

02:35in the speaker forfeiting his or her

02:37opportunity to participate in the public

02:39hearing.

02:40I may elect to recognize the applicant

02:42agent at the end of the public hearing

02:44to provide rebuttal or additional

02:46comments, which will be limited to 5

02:50minutes, an additional 5 minutes.

02:52If members of the board have any

02:53questions of the applicant agent, that

02:55time will not be counted toward his or

02:58her 5 minutes. After all testimony and

03:01is heard, including possible rebuttal by

03:03the applicant,

03:05I will declare the public hearing

03:07closed, and no further public comment

03:10will be permitted.

03:11Uncivil, unruly, and or disruptive

03:14behavior at any time during this meeting

03:16is prohibited and will result in removal

03:18from this public meeting.

03:20State law requires the board to consider

03:22findings of fact for each conditional

03:24use and variance request case.

03:28The request cannot be granted unless a

03:30majority of the quorum present finds in

03:33the positive of all the findings of

03:34fact. The board may elect to continue

03:37the hearing

03:38to another date if it needs additional

03:40information.

03:41Applicants and requesting parties will

03:43be notified in writing by the planning

03:45division

03:47of the board's findings and conclusions,

03:49regardless of whether a request is

03:51approved or denied.

03:54Decisions of the board can be appealed

03:56to the Circuit Court of Monongalia

03:57County within 30 days

04:00upon receipt of the written notification

04:03from planning.

04:04Any work done relating to decisions

04:06rendered by this board during this

04:0830-day appeals period is at the sole

04:11financial

04:12risk of the applicant.

04:14Thank [snorts] you for your

04:15consideration and respect for these

04:17proceedings and the opinions of all

04:18meeting participants.

04:21Uh we are going to we are calling to

04:24order and we are going to do a roll

04:26call. Ms. Cook.

04:28>> Here.

04:29>> Mr. Martin.

04:31>> Here.

04:32>> Mr. Martin is here

04:33>> Mhm.

04:34>> remotely.

04:36Mr. Bennington is present. We do have a

04:38quorum so we can can can

04:41can continue with the cases.

04:43Uh before we proceed to our we don't

04:46have new old any old business. We do

04:49have one

04:50case under new business but before we

04:52proceed with that we do have meeting

04:55minutes to consider and possibly amend.

04:58Um

05:00anything to

05:02change, modify

05:04amend, revise?

05:05>> No.

05:06>> Uh Mr. Martin.

05:09>> I I have changes on my end.

05:11>> Now you So you had an opportunity to

05:13look and review?

05:16Yeah.

05:18Okay.

05:19Um so I move to accept the

05:22um

05:22meeting minutes from our previous

05:24meeting for

05:28uh September.

05:29Um and do we have a

05:32for October, I'm sorry.

05:34The special meeting October 5th same

05:37time 6:30 p.m.

05:39>> Yep.

05:40>> So these meeting minutes are for um

05:43Tuesday, October 5th at 6:30 p.m.

05:46>> I second.

05:47>> Um so we have a second to accept the

05:50meeting minutes. All those in favor?

05:52>> I.

05:53>> I.

05:54>> Okay. I. So, we have accepted the

05:58meeting minutes from the Tuesday,

05:59October 5th,

06:012026 meeting, special meeting at 6:30

06:04p.m.

06:05Um, no old business. We do have one case

06:09under new business. This is referenced

06:11as

06:12VAR 26-

06:15086, James Fisher, 124 Sheldon Avenue.

06:20This is a request by James Fisher for

06:22variance relief from section 1335.04

06:26of the city's planning and zoning code

06:28regarding property setback, city tax

06:31district 9 in the first ward, tax map

06:3441, parcel 281 in the R1A single-family

06:39residential district.

06:42>> As referenced, VAR 26086,

06:45uh, found in the packet as well as on

06:47screen. We'll be a mapping view showing

06:49the property in question as well as the

06:52radius for,

06:53uh, notices that were sent out. Uh,

06:56additionally, found in the packet and on

06:58screen is just a closer zoom in,

07:00um,

07:01uh, view of the parcel showing its

07:03location, its uh, proximity to the front

07:06property line and other topographical

07:08features.

07:10Um, the third, uh, view is showing the,

07:14uh,

07:15submitted site plans for this by the

07:17applicant. The one on top is the

07:19existing uh, is the project as it exists

07:22currently. And then the one on the

07:25bottom half is the intended project, um,

07:29that they plan to do if, uh, variance is

07:31approved. So, showing where, uh, it

07:33exists as today and what they would like

07:36to change going forward.

07:38So, the applicant is seeking a variance

07:40regarding expanding an unenclosed porch

07:43in a residential district. The applicant

07:45wishes to remove the existing

07:46encroaching front patio and replace it

07:48with a larger wooden patio at the

07:50reference address. A residential

07:52structure exists at this address that is

07:54already encroaching on minimum front

07:55setback requirements and its conditions

07:57as it is currently. A site plan has been

08:00submitted as I referenced showing

08:01difference in the existing patio and

08:03proposed project area.

08:04I'm referred to the sections of code

08:05below in the staff report as well as

08:07submitted designs.

08:09Um in summary, the applicant wishes to

08:10get a variance regarding 3 ft of minimum

08:12front setback allowance for an

08:14unenclosed landing/porch

08:17at the property address at 124 Sheldon

08:19Ave.

08:22Um please see the attached application

08:24to review the findings of fact listed.

08:26Staff have had no comments or

08:27modifications to the to these. This

08:29attachment can be found below the

08:30conditions. Um planning staff uh

08:33additionally do not have any objection

08:35um to the applicant's request for a

08:37variance. If the BZA grants the

08:39applicant variance relief in accordance

08:41to the city's planning and zoning code,

08:43the use shall be subject to the

08:44following condition being our standard

08:46condition. Any other modifications or

08:48changes to the site plan shall be

08:50compliant with the city's planning and

08:51zoning code or the applicant shall

08:52either seek additional variance relief

08:55or make it compliant. And that will

08:57conclude staff report.

09:00>> All right, thank you.

09:02Do we have a representative

09:04for this application?

09:11>> Thank you.

09:12James Fisher.

09:14Um address 150 Birds Eye View Drive,

09:17Morgantown, West Virginia 26501.

09:20Uh requesting this

09:22just to

09:24improve the quality of the home, improve

09:26the quality of you know beautification

09:27of the area. Um

09:30>> Just just to clarify since you

09:31referenced a different

09:34address.

09:35Are you

09:37are you the Are you representing

09:39>> I'm the owner.

09:40>> You're You are the owner. Okay, so it's

09:42not as if you're speaking on behalf of

09:44>> Correct.

09:44>> Okay. All right, thank you. Just to

09:45clarify.

09:46>> Yep, I'm the owner. It's

09:48uh

09:49a rehabilitation.

09:51It's a vacant structure right now.

09:53So

09:55um

09:57Just to make it nicer.

09:58>> Right. So So you're proposing So it's a

10:01con- it's a concrete slab and you're

10:04proposing to remove that.

10:06>> Yes.

10:06>> For the new for the rehab

10:08new construction, are you pouring a new

10:12>> The wooden patio.

10:14>> Okay.

10:14>> A wooden patio. Yeah.

10:16>> So with just wooden supports then, no

10:20>> Correct, yes. It will not be attached to

10:22the house,

10:23but it'll be

10:24right up against it.

10:25>> Flush.

10:26>> Flush to it.

10:27>> Yeah.

10:27>> The entire length.

10:29>> Okay.

10:30Um

10:31so in terms of

10:35Just to be clear.

10:37For the new patio

10:40just to state clearly, the new patio the

10:42footprint is going to be larger than

10:46what's currently

10:48present. Is that correct?

10:50>> Yes. It will not extend any further

10:53away from the house into the offset, but

10:55it will be

10:56wider.

10:58>> Oh, wider.

10:59>> Yeah, wider.

11:01Yeah.

11:02>> Okay.

11:03So in terms of the wider

11:07for the wider

11:08the width dimension

11:10can you just state clearly

11:13does that have implications for

11:16what you're asking in terms of the

11:18setbacks?

11:21Or no, it's just the front.

11:23>> Just the front of the house. The wooden

11:25patio will be the

11:26>> Okay.

11:26>> the same width

11:28as the front of the house,

11:29but it won't extend any

11:31further than the existing stoop.

11:33>> You just want to be in compliance with

11:36current

11:38zoning regs

11:40as far as setbacks are front setbacks

11:43are concerned.

11:44>> Um, I see the So this is a front porch

11:48or something and so nothing is in these

11:50little rectangles to the right or left.

11:54>> I think they're little

11:55>> They're vacant There's a

11:56vacant lots on on both sides.

11:58>> vacant

11:59pieces of ground or something and you're

12:01just going to cover that up. The same

12:02area basically

12:04>> It was like a little flower garden or

12:06It was at one point now it's

12:09>> But so in other words, you're what

12:11you're proposing, you will be extending

12:14laterally into those

12:17into those white rectangular areas,

12:20correct?

12:21>> the right. To the left and the right,

12:22yes.

12:23>> Okay.

12:23>> Okay. Okay.

12:25>> Um

12:26>> I just wondered what was there cuz it it

12:28looks like there's something there not

12:30just ground or

12:31>> No, it's just it's dirt.

12:33>> Okay.

12:33>> That's all it is is dirt.

12:34>> Dirt and grass or whatever. Okay, that's

12:35fine.

12:37>> That That clarifies things for me.

12:40>> Yeah.

12:41>> Because I was under the impression that

12:43you were

12:45in terms of the front setback

12:48I was under the impression that the

12:50degree of non-conformity with regard to

12:52the setbacks, you were proposing

12:55increasing the degree of non-conformity,

12:57but that's not really the case.

12:59>> Mhm.

12:59>> No.

13:00It's already an existing stoop.

13:02Uh will not go past

13:04>> Right.

13:05>> where it is right now. I just want to

13:07laterally

13:07>> laterally

13:08>> Yeah.

13:10>> That's

13:10>> To the right. To the left.

13:11>> reasonable to me.

13:13The only other issue that I have is Do

13:15you have any other questions?

13:16>> Nope, go ahead.

13:17>> Well, I was just going to say

13:19we may want to modify

13:22the second finding of fact. The dwell I

13:25I it is a statement of fact. The

13:26dwelling was built

13:28or the

13:30>> Before the current setbacks were in

13:31>> Which is that is factually

13:33>> Mhm.

13:33>> accurate. However,

13:36I don't with regard to whether we're

13:38going to grant the variance, it's kind

13:39of an irrelevant statement of fact, if

13:42you follow me.

13:43>> You know what I mean?

13:45We're just

13:46with regard to

13:48um

13:50granting

13:51relief with regard to making sure that

13:56um the applicant is all set with regard

13:58to that what's required for the front

14:00setbacks.

14:01>> You know what I'm saying? It's a fact

14:04factually accurate statement. However,

14:06with regard to it doesn't really have a

14:08bearing on whether we're going to grant

14:10the variance or not.

14:13>> Is there

14:13>> You know what I'm saying?

14:14>> Yes, I do. So, how would you like to

14:16word it?

14:18>> Should we allow that that that state

14:20that second finding of fact to stand?

14:23>> As far as

14:24>> It is actually accurate, but in my mind,

14:27it's not relevant to

14:29>> I mean, the the wording could be changed

14:31instead of dwelling, it could just

14:32reference the previous patio

14:34because that was pre-existing

14:36non-conforming and even if he wanted to

14:37repair or replace the same footprint,

14:40but remove the the concrete and replace

14:42it with wood, he would still be here.

14:44>> Right.

14:45>> For that.

14:46>> Cuz the

14:47let's go with the with the accessory or

14:49the adjacent patio

14:51>> Yeah.

14:51>> construction.

14:53>> Yeah.

14:53>> Are you comfortable with that?

14:55Just because if you if we use dwelling,

14:57then that opens the whole well, are we

14:59dealing with an accessory structure

15:01versus something else versus something

15:03else.

15:03>> board would want to replace the word

15:05dwelling in finding of fact two with

15:08uncovered patio

15:10>> adjacent to the dwelling.

15:11>> Okay. That the board will have to we'll

15:14have to vote on it, but

15:16yeah, you you can amend it to say that

15:17if you would like.

15:19>> I like it.

15:20>> The

15:21patio

15:23>> It's more specific

15:24>> structure

15:25>> what they're requesting.

15:26>> immediately

15:34Can we go with patio structure

15:36immediately adjacent to dwelling?

15:39>> If that was what the board want to to

15:41change it to

15:42No, after a vote, yeah.

15:44>> Yes, that's good.

15:48>> Let's go with that.

15:49>> Okay.

15:50>> Would you like to add anything further?

15:52>> No, sir.

15:53>> Okay. We're kind of jumping the gun

15:56there, but

15:56>> Yeah, we were.

15:57>> in terms of not opening.

15:59Yeah, we may have other questions for

16:00you, but thank you very much.

16:04Okay. Um

16:06So, at this point we're going to proceed

16:09with the public hearing. Anyone wishing

16:12to speak in support of or in opposition

16:14to this case, now is your opportunity to

16:17do so.

16:20And since the the you sent the packet,

16:25um no correspondence at all or

16:27>> No, I've not

16:28>> telephone inquiries or

16:30>> No, for this one I've not received any

16:31correspondence.

16:33>> Okay.

16:34>> Yeah.

16:36>> Um just out of curiosity, sir, did you

16:38maybe run this by

16:41neighbors?

16:42Just out of curiosity.

16:43>> the number of neighbors and they have um

16:46>> Yeah, please approach.

16:47>> They

16:48They question me because they were just

16:49curious what it was.

16:51>> Right.

16:51>> didn't look up the number on the website

16:53or wherever the notice was. They just

16:54asked me what it was and I

16:56you know, I would explain to them it's

16:58for a patio, it's like an extension that

16:59I I showed them where the existing stoop

17:01was.

17:02>> Mhm.

17:03>> And and what the

17:04the end result was planned to be.

17:06>> Right.

17:06>> And everyone okay, sounds nice.

17:08>> Mhm. Mhm.

17:10>> So.

17:11>> Because it does sound like an

17:12improvement which has positive impacts

17:15on

17:15>> on the neighborhood.

17:16>> on the neighborhood, so

17:18Okay.

17:19>> Thank you.

17:19>> Thank you very much.

17:20>> Thank you.

17:21>> Um

17:24Anyone wishing to speak?

17:25No?

17:27Okay, we're going to go ahead and close

17:28the public hearing.

17:31All right, so I'm going to make a motion

17:33to accept the findings of fact.

17:35>> As amended.

17:36>> As amended.

17:37>> I I second.

17:37>> Um the and again, this is to reference

17:39the case. It's for VAR 26-086.

17:44>> Mr. Askew. Excuse me, I'm

17:46>> yes.

17:46>> Because he's on the

17:47>> Yeah, I'm sorry. Mr. Martin

17:50I'm we're sorry.

17:52>> [snorts]

17:52>> Hello.

17:52>> Are you still there?

17:54Did

17:55Okay.

17:56So So, if you're follow if you're

17:59following along, um it's the second

18:01finding of fact, Mr. Martin, so we're

18:03going to change

18:05amend

18:07dwelling to the patio structure

18:09immediately adjacent to dwelling

18:13was built before the current setbacks

18:16were established.

18:18>> Yes, sir.

18:19Understood.

18:20>> Okay.

18:20>> Okay.

18:21>> And we do have a motion

18:23>> and seconded.

18:24>> We and Ms. Cook has seconded it.

18:28Okay. How do we vote?

18:30>> I.

18:31>> I.

18:31>> I.

18:32>> Okay. So, we've accepted the findings of

18:35>> So, I move we grant the variance with um

18:37the ti

18:38>> Yes, subject to the conventional or the

18:40stock

18:41>> conventional yes, stock condition

18:44um of VAR 26-086.

18:47>> All right, so we have a motion to grant

18:50the requested variance for VAR 26-086.

18:55We have

18:57>> I'll second.

18:58>> Okay, and we have a second by Mr.

19:00Martin. Thank you, Mr. Martin.

19:02So, we have a motion to grant the

19:04variance

19:05for VAR 26

19:07-086

19:09by Ms. Cook and that has been seconded

19:12by Mr. Barton. How do we vote?

19:15>> I.

19:15>> I.

19:17Okay.

19:18So, sir, we have granted your variance

19:22request for your case.

19:24Um you will receive written notification

19:27for planning.

19:29Typically 7 to 10 business days.

19:31But do keep in mind as we stated at the

19:34top of the meeting,

19:35the determination that we just rendered

19:38can be appealed to the circuit court of

19:40Monongalia County. It's a 30-day appeals

19:43window, and any work that you do in that

19:4630-day appeals window, you do at your

19:48sole financial risk.

19:50But thank you very much for coming down

19:52this evening.

19:53Good luck with your upgrade.

19:55>> Mhm.

19:57>> All right. So, do we have [snorts]

20:00an

20:02No other cases, just to state for the

20:04record, correct?

20:05>> Yep.

20:05>> Okay.

20:06Do we have announcements?

20:09>> Uh no um specific staff announcements at

20:12this time, other than that we will uh we

20:15do have items on the agenda for the

20:17regularly scheduled November meeting. Um

20:20uh but otherwise, there is no other uh

20:23special announcements. Um the uh

20:26uh requests that were tabled at the

20:28previous special hearing uh will be

20:30heard during that standard uh November

20:32meeting. Uh but otherwise, no other

20:34announcements from staff.

20:36>> All right. Thank you. Um

20:39Mr. Barton, did you want to add

20:40anything? I'm going to move to adjourn

20:42if not.

20:44>> I'm good here.

20:45>> You're good? All right. So, I make I

20:47move to adjourn

20:48>> I second.

20:49>> the regular meeting October 1st

20:53October 21st, 2026. And we have a

20:55second? How do we vote?

20:56>> I.

20:57>> I.

20:59We are so adjourned.

21:00>> All right.

21:01>> Thank you very much.