2026-10-21 - Board of Zoning Appeals
Summary
Built from the City's posted agenda and the YouTube auto-generated captions of the meeting video. No minutes are posted.
- Roll call: three members present (one remotely), a quorum. The minutes of the October 5 special meeting were approved by voice vote. No old business.
- One case, VAR26-086, at 124 Sheldon Avenue (R1A single-family district): a variance of 3 feet from the minimum front setback to replace an existing concrete front patio with a wider wooden patio. The house is vacant and being rehabilitated. Staff had no objection and recommended the standard condition that other changes comply with the zoning code or return for relief. The owner said the new patio would extend no farther from the house than the existing stoop and would be wider only to the sides, onto vacant ground.
- The board amended the second finding of fact, replacing "dwelling" with "the patio structure immediately adjacent to the dwelling," because the patio, not the house, was the pre-existing nonconforming element. No correspondence was received and no one spoke at the public hearing; the owner said neighbors who asked about it were fine with it.
- The findings of fact were accepted as amended, and the variance was granted with the standard condition, by voice vote. Appeals go to the Circuit Court of Monongalia County within 30 days, and work in that window is at the owner's risk.
- Staff announced the regular November meeting will include the requests tabled at the October 5 special meeting. The meeting adjourned by voice vote.
See Board of Zoning Appeals Variance Cases Fall 2026.
Agenda
Agenda PDF posted; see Sources.
Sources
- Agenda Center: https://www.morgantownwv.gov/AgendaCenter
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trYeH0xg_2U (City of Morgantown YouTube channel)
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:20and welcome to the regular meeting of
00:22the City of Morgantown Board of Zoning
00:24Appeals. Please turn off all cell phones
00:26or other devices that may disrupt these
00:28proceedings. It is the duty of this
00:31board
00:32to consider
00:35requests for relief from the
00:36requirements of the city's zoning
00:38regulations, to consider
00:40conditional use permits, and to hear
00:42administrative appeals. The board
00:44conducts business in the following
00:46order:
00:47review, amend, and approve minutes of a
00:50previous meeting.
00:52We will then move to unfinished
00:53business,
00:55take up new business, and then conclude
00:57with announcements from staff.
01:00Each request is heard in the order that
01:02it appears on the agenda. For each
01:03conditional use and variance request,
01:05the following is done.
01:07We will introduce the agenda item, and
01:09the planning division will present a
01:10staff report, which may or may not offer
01:13a recommendation.
01:14The applicant agent will be asked to
01:16present their justification for the
01:18request, which may include questions by
01:20members of the board.
01:22I will then open a public hearing to
01:24hear testimony in support of or in
01:27opposition to the request. Rules
01:29regarding public testimony are as
01:31follows.
01:32Anyone wishing to testify during the
01:34public hearing may do so. Once
01:37recognized by me, or may, in lieu of
01:40oral testimony, submit written testimony
01:43to the chair.
01:45All recognized speakers must approach
01:47the podium,
01:49state their name and address for the
01:51record, and speak clearly into the
01:53microphone.
01:54All comments must be addressed to the
01:56board, should be relevant to the
01:58application, and may not be of a
02:00personal nature or personal attacks.
02:03All speakers will be limited to 5
02:05minutes.
02:07If members of the board have any
02:08questions of the speaker, that time will
02:10not be counted toward his or her 5
02:12minutes.
02:13If there's a large number of speakers,
02:15including many who are part of groups or
02:17organizations,
02:19we may, to avoid repetitive comments,
02:22elect to ask for a representative to
02:24speak on behalf of the group or
02:25organization.
02:27Speakers are notified that irrelevant
02:30comments or comments of a personal
02:32nature or personal attacks may result
02:35in the speaker forfeiting his or her
02:37opportunity to participate in the public
02:39hearing.
02:40I may elect to recognize the applicant
02:42agent at the end of the public hearing
02:44to provide rebuttal or additional
02:46comments, which will be limited to 5
02:50minutes, an additional 5 minutes.
02:52If members of the board have any
02:53questions of the applicant agent, that
02:55time will not be counted toward his or
02:58her 5 minutes. After all testimony and
03:01is heard, including possible rebuttal by
03:03the applicant,
03:05I will declare the public hearing
03:07closed, and no further public comment
03:10will be permitted.
03:11Uncivil, unruly, and or disruptive
03:14behavior at any time during this meeting
03:16is prohibited and will result in removal
03:18from this public meeting.
03:20State law requires the board to consider
03:22findings of fact for each conditional
03:24use and variance request case.
03:28The request cannot be granted unless a
03:30majority of the quorum present finds in
03:33the positive of all the findings of
03:34fact. The board may elect to continue
03:37the hearing
03:38to another date if it needs additional
03:40information.
03:41Applicants and requesting parties will
03:43be notified in writing by the planning
03:45division
03:47of the board's findings and conclusions,
03:49regardless of whether a request is
03:51approved or denied.
03:54Decisions of the board can be appealed
03:56to the Circuit Court of Monongalia
03:57County within 30 days
04:00upon receipt of the written notification
04:03from planning.
04:04Any work done relating to decisions
04:06rendered by this board during this
04:0830-day appeals period is at the sole
04:11financial
04:12risk of the applicant.
04:14Thank [snorts] you for your
04:15consideration and respect for these
04:17proceedings and the opinions of all
04:18meeting participants.
04:21Uh we are going to we are calling to
04:24order and we are going to do a roll
04:26call. Ms. Cook.
04:28>> Here.
04:29>> Mr. Martin.
04:31>> Here.
04:32>> Mr. Martin is here
04:33>> Mhm.
04:34>> remotely.
04:36Mr. Bennington is present. We do have a
04:38quorum so we can can can
04:41can continue with the cases.
04:43Uh before we proceed to our we don't
04:46have new old any old business. We do
04:49have one
04:50case under new business but before we
04:52proceed with that we do have meeting
04:55minutes to consider and possibly amend.
04:58Um
05:00anything to
05:02change, modify
05:04amend, revise?
05:05>> No.
05:06>> Uh Mr. Martin.
05:09>> I I have changes on my end.
05:11>> Now you So you had an opportunity to
05:13look and review?
05:16Yeah.
05:18Okay.
05:19Um so I move to accept the
05:22um
05:22meeting minutes from our previous
05:24meeting for
05:28uh September.
05:29Um and do we have a
05:32for October, I'm sorry.
05:34The special meeting October 5th same
05:37time 6:30 p.m.
05:39>> Yep.
05:40>> So these meeting minutes are for um
05:43Tuesday, October 5th at 6:30 p.m.
05:46>> I second.
05:47>> Um so we have a second to accept the
05:50meeting minutes. All those in favor?
05:52>> I.
05:53>> I.
05:54>> Okay. I. So, we have accepted the
05:58meeting minutes from the Tuesday,
05:59October 5th,
06:012026 meeting, special meeting at 6:30
06:04p.m.
06:05Um, no old business. We do have one case
06:09under new business. This is referenced
06:11as
06:12VAR 26-
06:15086, James Fisher, 124 Sheldon Avenue.
06:20This is a request by James Fisher for
06:22variance relief from section 1335.04
06:26of the city's planning and zoning code
06:28regarding property setback, city tax
06:31district 9 in the first ward, tax map
06:3441, parcel 281 in the R1A single-family
06:39residential district.
06:42>> As referenced, VAR 26086,
06:45uh, found in the packet as well as on
06:47screen. We'll be a mapping view showing
06:49the property in question as well as the
06:52radius for,
06:53uh, notices that were sent out. Uh,
06:56additionally, found in the packet and on
06:58screen is just a closer zoom in,
07:00um,
07:01uh, view of the parcel showing its
07:03location, its uh, proximity to the front
07:06property line and other topographical
07:08features.
07:10Um, the third, uh, view is showing the,
07:14uh,
07:15submitted site plans for this by the
07:17applicant. The one on top is the
07:19existing uh, is the project as it exists
07:22currently. And then the one on the
07:25bottom half is the intended project, um,
07:29that they plan to do if, uh, variance is
07:31approved. So, showing where, uh, it
07:33exists as today and what they would like
07:36to change going forward.
07:38So, the applicant is seeking a variance
07:40regarding expanding an unenclosed porch
07:43in a residential district. The applicant
07:45wishes to remove the existing
07:46encroaching front patio and replace it
07:48with a larger wooden patio at the
07:50reference address. A residential
07:52structure exists at this address that is
07:54already encroaching on minimum front
07:55setback requirements and its conditions
07:57as it is currently. A site plan has been
08:00submitted as I referenced showing
08:01difference in the existing patio and
08:03proposed project area.
08:04I'm referred to the sections of code
08:05below in the staff report as well as
08:07submitted designs.
08:09Um in summary, the applicant wishes to
08:10get a variance regarding 3 ft of minimum
08:12front setback allowance for an
08:14unenclosed landing/porch
08:17at the property address at 124 Sheldon
08:19Ave.
08:22Um please see the attached application
08:24to review the findings of fact listed.
08:26Staff have had no comments or
08:27modifications to the to these. This
08:29attachment can be found below the
08:30conditions. Um planning staff uh
08:33additionally do not have any objection
08:35um to the applicant's request for a
08:37variance. If the BZA grants the
08:39applicant variance relief in accordance
08:41to the city's planning and zoning code,
08:43the use shall be subject to the
08:44following condition being our standard
08:46condition. Any other modifications or
08:48changes to the site plan shall be
08:50compliant with the city's planning and
08:51zoning code or the applicant shall
08:52either seek additional variance relief
08:55or make it compliant. And that will
08:57conclude staff report.
09:00>> All right, thank you.
09:02Do we have a representative
09:04for this application?
09:11>> Thank you.
09:12James Fisher.
09:14Um address 150 Birds Eye View Drive,
09:17Morgantown, West Virginia 26501.
09:20Uh requesting this
09:22just to
09:24improve the quality of the home, improve
09:26the quality of you know beautification
09:27of the area. Um
09:30>> Just just to clarify since you
09:31referenced a different
09:34address.
09:35Are you
09:37are you the Are you representing
09:39>> I'm the owner.
09:40>> You're You are the owner. Okay, so it's
09:42not as if you're speaking on behalf of
09:44>> Correct.
09:44>> Okay. All right, thank you. Just to
09:45clarify.
09:46>> Yep, I'm the owner. It's
09:48uh
09:49a rehabilitation.
09:51It's a vacant structure right now.
09:53So
09:55um
09:57Just to make it nicer.
09:58>> Right. So So you're proposing So it's a
10:01con- it's a concrete slab and you're
10:04proposing to remove that.
10:06>> Yes.
10:06>> For the new for the rehab
10:08new construction, are you pouring a new
10:12>> The wooden patio.
10:14>> Okay.
10:14>> A wooden patio. Yeah.
10:16>> So with just wooden supports then, no
10:20>> Correct, yes. It will not be attached to
10:22the house,
10:23but it'll be
10:24right up against it.
10:25>> Flush.
10:26>> Flush to it.
10:27>> Yeah.
10:27>> The entire length.
10:29>> Okay.
10:30Um
10:31so in terms of
10:35Just to be clear.
10:37For the new patio
10:40just to state clearly, the new patio the
10:42footprint is going to be larger than
10:46what's currently
10:48present. Is that correct?
10:50>> Yes. It will not extend any further
10:53away from the house into the offset, but
10:55it will be
10:56wider.
10:58>> Oh, wider.
10:59>> Yeah, wider.
11:01Yeah.
11:02>> Okay.
11:03So in terms of the wider
11:07for the wider
11:08the width dimension
11:10can you just state clearly
11:13does that have implications for
11:16what you're asking in terms of the
11:18setbacks?
11:21Or no, it's just the front.
11:23>> Just the front of the house. The wooden
11:25patio will be the
11:26>> Okay.
11:26>> the same width
11:28as the front of the house,
11:29but it won't extend any
11:31further than the existing stoop.
11:33>> You just want to be in compliance with
11:36current
11:38zoning regs
11:40as far as setbacks are front setbacks
11:43are concerned.
11:44>> Um, I see the So this is a front porch
11:48or something and so nothing is in these
11:50little rectangles to the right or left.
11:54>> I think they're little
11:55>> They're vacant There's a
11:56vacant lots on on both sides.
11:58>> vacant
11:59pieces of ground or something and you're
12:01just going to cover that up. The same
12:02area basically
12:04>> It was like a little flower garden or
12:06It was at one point now it's
12:09>> But so in other words, you're what
12:11you're proposing, you will be extending
12:14laterally into those
12:17into those white rectangular areas,
12:20correct?
12:21>> the right. To the left and the right,
12:22yes.
12:23>> Okay.
12:23>> Okay. Okay.
12:25>> Um
12:26>> I just wondered what was there cuz it it
12:28looks like there's something there not
12:30just ground or
12:31>> No, it's just it's dirt.
12:33>> Okay.
12:33>> That's all it is is dirt.
12:34>> Dirt and grass or whatever. Okay, that's
12:35fine.
12:37>> That That clarifies things for me.
12:40>> Yeah.
12:41>> Because I was under the impression that
12:43you were
12:45in terms of the front setback
12:48I was under the impression that the
12:50degree of non-conformity with regard to
12:52the setbacks, you were proposing
12:55increasing the degree of non-conformity,
12:57but that's not really the case.
12:59>> Mhm.
12:59>> No.
13:00It's already an existing stoop.
13:02Uh will not go past
13:04>> Right.
13:05>> where it is right now. I just want to
13:07laterally
13:07>> laterally
13:08>> Yeah.
13:10>> That's
13:10>> To the right. To the left.
13:11>> reasonable to me.
13:13The only other issue that I have is Do
13:15you have any other questions?
13:16>> Nope, go ahead.
13:17>> Well, I was just going to say
13:19we may want to modify
13:22the second finding of fact. The dwell I
13:25I it is a statement of fact. The
13:26dwelling was built
13:28or the
13:30>> Before the current setbacks were in
13:31>> Which is that is factually
13:33>> Mhm.
13:33>> accurate. However,
13:36I don't with regard to whether we're
13:38going to grant the variance, it's kind
13:39of an irrelevant statement of fact, if
13:42you follow me.
13:43>> You know what I mean?
13:45We're just
13:46with regard to
13:48um
13:50granting
13:51relief with regard to making sure that
13:56um the applicant is all set with regard
13:58to that what's required for the front
14:00setbacks.
14:01>> You know what I'm saying? It's a fact
14:04factually accurate statement. However,
14:06with regard to it doesn't really have a
14:08bearing on whether we're going to grant
14:10the variance or not.
14:13>> Is there
14:13>> You know what I'm saying?
14:14>> Yes, I do. So, how would you like to
14:16word it?
14:18>> Should we allow that that that state
14:20that second finding of fact to stand?
14:23>> As far as
14:24>> It is actually accurate, but in my mind,
14:27it's not relevant to
14:29>> I mean, the the wording could be changed
14:31instead of dwelling, it could just
14:32reference the previous patio
14:34because that was pre-existing
14:36non-conforming and even if he wanted to
14:37repair or replace the same footprint,
14:40but remove the the concrete and replace
14:42it with wood, he would still be here.
14:44>> Right.
14:45>> For that.
14:46>> Cuz the
14:47let's go with the with the accessory or
14:49the adjacent patio
14:51>> Yeah.
14:51>> construction.
14:53>> Yeah.
14:53>> Are you comfortable with that?
14:55Just because if you if we use dwelling,
14:57then that opens the whole well, are we
14:59dealing with an accessory structure
15:01versus something else versus something
15:03else.
15:03>> board would want to replace the word
15:05dwelling in finding of fact two with
15:08uncovered patio
15:10>> adjacent to the dwelling.
15:11>> Okay. That the board will have to we'll
15:14have to vote on it, but
15:16yeah, you you can amend it to say that
15:17if you would like.
15:19>> I like it.
15:20>> The
15:21patio
15:23>> It's more specific
15:24>> structure
15:25>> what they're requesting.
15:26>> immediately
15:34Can we go with patio structure
15:36immediately adjacent to dwelling?
15:39>> If that was what the board want to to
15:41change it to
15:42No, after a vote, yeah.
15:44>> Yes, that's good.
15:48>> Let's go with that.
15:49>> Okay.
15:50>> Would you like to add anything further?
15:52>> No, sir.
15:53>> Okay. We're kind of jumping the gun
15:56there, but
15:56>> Yeah, we were.
15:57>> in terms of not opening.
15:59Yeah, we may have other questions for
16:00you, but thank you very much.
16:04Okay. Um
16:06So, at this point we're going to proceed
16:09with the public hearing. Anyone wishing
16:12to speak in support of or in opposition
16:14to this case, now is your opportunity to
16:17do so.
16:20And since the the you sent the packet,
16:25um no correspondence at all or
16:27>> No, I've not
16:28>> telephone inquiries or
16:30>> No, for this one I've not received any
16:31correspondence.
16:33>> Okay.
16:34>> Yeah.
16:36>> Um just out of curiosity, sir, did you
16:38maybe run this by
16:41neighbors?
16:42Just out of curiosity.
16:43>> the number of neighbors and they have um
16:46>> Yeah, please approach.
16:47>> They
16:48They question me because they were just
16:49curious what it was.
16:51>> Right.
16:51>> didn't look up the number on the website
16:53or wherever the notice was. They just
16:54asked me what it was and I
16:56you know, I would explain to them it's
16:58for a patio, it's like an extension that
16:59I I showed them where the existing stoop
17:01was.
17:02>> Mhm.
17:03>> And and what the
17:04the end result was planned to be.
17:06>> Right.
17:06>> And everyone okay, sounds nice.
17:08>> Mhm. Mhm.
17:10>> So.
17:11>> Because it does sound like an
17:12improvement which has positive impacts
17:15on
17:15>> on the neighborhood.
17:16>> on the neighborhood, so
17:18Okay.
17:19>> Thank you.
17:19>> Thank you very much.
17:20>> Thank you.
17:21>> Um
17:24Anyone wishing to speak?
17:25No?
17:27Okay, we're going to go ahead and close
17:28the public hearing.
17:31All right, so I'm going to make a motion
17:33to accept the findings of fact.
17:35>> As amended.
17:36>> As amended.
17:37>> I I second.
17:37>> Um the and again, this is to reference
17:39the case. It's for VAR 26-086.
17:44>> Mr. Askew. Excuse me, I'm
17:46>> yes.
17:46>> Because he's on the
17:47>> Yeah, I'm sorry. Mr. Martin
17:50I'm we're sorry.
17:52>> [snorts]
17:52>> Hello.
17:52>> Are you still there?
17:54Did
17:55Okay.
17:56So So, if you're follow if you're
17:59following along, um it's the second
18:01finding of fact, Mr. Martin, so we're
18:03going to change
18:05amend
18:07dwelling to the patio structure
18:09immediately adjacent to dwelling
18:13was built before the current setbacks
18:16were established.
18:18>> Yes, sir.
18:19Understood.
18:20>> Okay.
18:20>> Okay.
18:21>> And we do have a motion
18:23>> and seconded.
18:24>> We and Ms. Cook has seconded it.
18:28Okay. How do we vote?
18:30>> I.
18:31>> I.
18:31>> I.
18:32>> Okay. So, we've accepted the findings of
18:35>> So, I move we grant the variance with um
18:37the ti
18:38>> Yes, subject to the conventional or the
18:40stock
18:41>> conventional yes, stock condition
18:44um of VAR 26-086.
18:47>> All right, so we have a motion to grant
18:50the requested variance for VAR 26-086.
18:55We have
18:57>> I'll second.
18:58>> Okay, and we have a second by Mr.
19:00Martin. Thank you, Mr. Martin.
19:02So, we have a motion to grant the
19:04variance
19:05for VAR 26
19:07-086
19:09by Ms. Cook and that has been seconded
19:12by Mr. Barton. How do we vote?
19:15>> I.
19:15>> I.
19:17Okay.
19:18So, sir, we have granted your variance
19:22request for your case.
19:24Um you will receive written notification
19:27for planning.
19:29Typically 7 to 10 business days.
19:31But do keep in mind as we stated at the
19:34top of the meeting,
19:35the determination that we just rendered
19:38can be appealed to the circuit court of
19:40Monongalia County. It's a 30-day appeals
19:43window, and any work that you do in that
19:4630-day appeals window, you do at your
19:48sole financial risk.
19:50But thank you very much for coming down
19:52this evening.
19:53Good luck with your upgrade.
19:55>> Mhm.
19:57>> All right. So, do we have [snorts]
20:00an
20:02No other cases, just to state for the
20:04record, correct?
20:05>> Yep.
20:05>> Okay.
20:06Do we have announcements?
20:09>> Uh no um specific staff announcements at
20:12this time, other than that we will uh we
20:15do have items on the agenda for the
20:17regularly scheduled November meeting. Um
20:20uh but otherwise, there is no other uh
20:23special announcements. Um the uh
20:26uh requests that were tabled at the
20:28previous special hearing uh will be
20:30heard during that standard uh November
20:32meeting. Uh but otherwise, no other
20:34announcements from staff.
20:36>> All right. Thank you. Um
20:39Mr. Barton, did you want to add
20:40anything? I'm going to move to adjourn
20:42if not.
20:44>> I'm good here.
20:45>> You're good? All right. So, I make I
20:47move to adjourn
20:48>> I second.
20:49>> the regular meeting October 1st
20:53October 21st, 2026. And we have a
20:55second? How do we vote?
20:56>> I.
20:57>> I.
20:59We are so adjourned.
21:00>> All right.
21:01>> Thank you very much.